Attached files

file filename
EX-10.5 - EXHIBIT 10.5 - FingerMotion, Inc.ex_132108.htm
EX-10.4 - EXHIBIT 10.4 - FingerMotion, Inc.ex_132107.htm
EX-10.3 - EXHIBIT 10.3 - FingerMotion, Inc.ex_132106.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - FingerMotion, Inc.ex_132105.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - FingerMotion, Inc.ex_132104.htm

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 21, 2018

 

FingerMotion, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

333-196503

 

46-4600326

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

 

(Commission File Number)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

Unit 912, 9/F.,

Two Harbourfront, 22 Tak Fung Street, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

 
 

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 


-

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
  

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Emerging growth company     ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☐

 

 

 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

 

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and, in particular, the description of our Business set forth in Item 1 and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Item 7, contain or incorporate forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements regarding, among other things, our:

 

(a)  ability to pay our outstanding debt;

 

(b)  projected revenues and profitability;

 

(b)  future financing plans;

 

(c)  ability to implement our business and growth strategies;

 

(d)  ability to effectively compete with our competitors;

 

(d)  anticipated needs for working capital; and

 

(e)  liquidity.

 

Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations are generally identifiable by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as: “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. Various important risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, performance or achievements, expressed or implied, indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, the forward-looking statements contained herein represent our estimate only as of the date of this filing and should not be relied upon as representing our estimate as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

 

Use of Certain Defined Terms

 

Except where the context otherwise requires and for the purposes of this report only:

 

 

the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the combined business of (i) FingerMotion, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (ii) Finger Motion (CN) Global Limited, a Samoa limited company and wholly-owned subsidiary of FingerMotion, Inc., (iii) Finger Motion (CN) Limited (Hong Kong), a Hong Kong limited company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Finger Motion (CN) Global Limited. (iv) Shanghai JiuGe Management Co., Ltd., or “JiuGe Management,” a Chinese limited company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Finger Motion (CN) Limited (v) Shanghai JiuGe Technology Co., Ltd., or “JiuGe Technology,” a Chinese limited company which is effectively and substantially controlled by Shanghai Management through a series of captive agreements, as the case may be;

 

 

“Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

 

 

“Hong Kong” refers to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China;

 

 

 

 

 

“PRC,” “China,” and “Chinese,” refer to the People’s Republic of China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan);

 

 

“Renminbi” and “RMB” refer to the legal currency of China;

 

 

“Securities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; and

 

 

“U.S. dollars,” “dollars” and “$” refer to the legal currency of the United States.

 

In this current report we are relying on and we refer to information and statistics regarding the mobile data industry and economy in China and that we have obtained from various cited government and institute research publications. Much of this information is publicly available for free and has not been specifically prepared for us for use or incorporation in this current report on Form 8-K or otherwise. We have not independently verified such information, and you should not unduly rely upon it.   

 

Item 1.01 Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement

 

VIE Agreements

 

On 16 October, 2018, we entered into a series of agreements known as variable interest agreements (the “VIE Agreements”) pursuant to which JiuGe Technology became JiuGe Management’s contractually controlled affiliate. The use of VIE agreements is a common structure used to acquire PRC corporations, particularly in certain industries in which foreign investment is restricted or forbidden by the PRC government. The VIE Agreements included:

 

 

(1)

A Consulting Services Agreement through which JiuGe Management is mainly engaged in data marketing, technical services, technical consulting and business consultancy to JiuGe Technology;

 

 

(2)

a Loan Agreement through which JiuGe Management grants a loan to JiuGe Technology for the purpose of capital contribution;

 

 

(3)

a Power of Attorney Agreement under which the owners of JiuGe Technology have vested their collective voting control over JiuGe Technology to JiuGe Management and will only transfer their equity interests in JiuGe Technology to JiuGe Management or its designee(s);

 

 

(4)

a Call Option Agreement under which the owners of JiuGe Technology have granted to JiuGe Management the irrevocable and unconditional right and option to acquire all of their equity interests in JiuGe Technology or transfer these rights to a third party; and

 

 

(5)

an Share Pledge Agreement under which the owners of JiuGe Technology have pledged all of their rights, titles and interests in JiuGe Technology to JiuGe Management to guarantee JiuGe Technology’s performance of its obligations under the Consulting Services Agreement.

 

The foregoing description of the terms of the Consulting Services Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Power of Attorney Agreement, the Call Option Agreement and the Share Pledge Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of the agreements filed as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 to this report, respectively, which are incorporated by reference herein.

 

We note that the VIE Agreements were originally executed and delivered on 16 Oct, 2018, by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer as an agent of the Company, in order to secure the contractual commitments of the other parties. Upon Mr. Wong’s determination that the VIE structure and agreements were final, and not likely to be further amended, he assigned such agreement to the Company for a nominal fee.

 

 

 

 

Our New Corporate Structure

 

All of our business operations are conducted through our Hong Kong and Chinese subsidiaries and controlled affiliate. The chart below presents our corporate structure:

 

 

 

 

 

Mobile Data Agreements

 

JiuGe Technology has also secured contracts with China Unicom and China Mobile to distribute mobile data for businesses and corporations in 9 provinces/municipalities, namely Chengdu, Jiangxi, Jiangsu, Chongqing, Shanghai, Zhuhai, Zhejiang, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia.

 

JiuGe Technology secured an agreement with China Unicom to offer mobile payment and recharge services to all its subscribers in China.

 

Additionally, in October, China Unicom and China Mobile awarded JiuGe Technology with contracts that established partnerships for data analysis, that could unlock potential value-added services.

 

 

Mobile Payment and Recharge Agreement

Party A

联通在线信息科技有限公司 

(“Unicom Online Information Technology Co., Ltd.”)

Party B

上海九鸽信息科技有限公司

(“Shanghai JiuGe Information Technology Co., Ltd.”)

Dated

June 2018

Expiry

31 May 2019.

Contract No.

KD22-0101-2018-000592

     

Where

-

Party A provides China Unicom direct mobile payment and recharge APIs and SDK for Party B to integrate.

  - Party B provides Mobile payment and Recharge system platform that integrate with China Unicom APIs, to enable seamless direct payment and recharge services for subscribers and businesses nationwide.
  - Party B will be collecting all payments on behalf of Party A, and perform reconciliation and settlement with Party A monthly.
     
     

Terms

-

Party A will be settling or paying commission of 0.5% on total payment and recharge face value (listing price) to Party B.

 

    Party B shall not give any discounts more than 0.4% on face value (listing price).
  - Party A ensures payment and recharge process to be completed within 10 minutes and success rates of 98% and above.
  - Party B shall ensure the system to deliver subscribers’ data in secured and completeness during the payment and recharge process.
  - Party B shall provide consumer call center to attend any complaints and inquiries.
  - Party A will be making payment on commission within 15 working days upon receiving invoice document from Party B. For extraordinary cases, it may be extended to 30 working days.
     

 

 

 

 

OUR BUSINESS

 

With the entry into the material agreements described herein, we have expanded our business model and plans.

 

Overview

 

Property Management Corporation of America (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “PMCA”) was incorporated in Delaware on January 23, 2014. Our principal executive office is located at Unit A, 19/F, Times Media Centre, 133 Wan Chai Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong. Our main telephone number is (+852 2780 0607). .

 

On June 21, 2017, the Company filed Articles of Amendment to its Amended Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effecting a 1 for 4 reverse stock split of the Company's common stock and increase in the authorized shares of common stock to 200,000,000 and a name change of the Company from Property Management Corporation of America to Finger Motion, Inc. (the "Corporate Actions"). The Corporate Actions and the Amended Articles became effective on June 21, 2017.

 

Effective July 13, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into that certain Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) by and among the Company, Finger Motion Company Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“FMCL”) and certain shareholders of FMCL (the “FMCL Shareholders”). Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding equity stock of FMCL held by the FMCL Shareholders for shares of common stock of the Company. At the Closing Date, the Company issued approximately 12,000,000 shares of common stock to the FMCL shareholders. In addition, the Company issued 600,000 shares to consultants in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, and up to 2,562,500 additional shares to accredited investors. 

 

As a result of the Share Exchange Agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereunder, FMCL became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. FMCL, a Hong Kong corporation, was formed in April 6, 2016. The Company is an information technology company which specialize in operating and publishing mobile games.

 

Our Video Game Division

 

The Video Game industry covers multiple sectors and is currently experiencing a move away from physical games towards digital software. Advances in technology and streaming now allow users to download games rather than visiting retailers. Video game publishers are expanding their direct to consumer channels with mobile gaming the current growth leader, and eSports and virtual reality gaining momentum as the next big sectors.

 

FMCL had secured a strategic alliance with Games Development Studio in China to design and develop games for the Company. To date, we have 3 games licenses and more to be ready within the year. Our licenses cover worldwide distribution rights (except China). The two current game genres are Action Role Playing Games ("ARPG") and the other is Simulated Life Game (SLG).

 

In June 2018, FMCL temporarily paused its publishing and operating plans for existing games other projects. The Board decided to re-focus the company’s resources in to the new business opportunities in China, particularly the mobile data business.

 

Our Mobile Data Business

 

In first half of 2018, JiuGe Technology secured contracts with China Unicom and China Mobile to distribute mobile data for businesses and corporations in 9 provinces/municipalities, namely Chengdu, Jiangxi, Jiangsu, Chongqing, Shanghai, Zhuhai, Zhejiang, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia.

 

 

 

 

In September, JiuGe Technology launched commercialized mobile payment and recharge services to businesses for China Unicom. The JiuGe Technology mobile payment and recharge platform enables the seamless delivery of real-time payment and recharge services to third-party channels and businesses.

 

In October, China Unicom and China Mobile awarded JiuGe Technology with contracts that established partnerships for data analysis, that could unlock potential value-added services.

 

Government Regulation 

 

Our business activities currently are not currently subject to specific government regulations other than those that are also routinely imposed on corporate businesses. Further, we do not anticipate any detrimental regulations specific to our business activities in the future.

 

Intellectual Property 

 

We do not hold any patents, trademarks or other registered intellectual property on services or processes relating to our business. We do not consider the grant of patents, trademarks or other registered intellectual property essential to the success of our business.

 

Seasonality 

 

We do not have a seasonal business cycle.

 

Environmental Matters 

 

In our operations, we do not store, handle, emit, transport or discharge hazardous materials or waste products. Accordingly, we do not anticipate current or future environment matters will affect our business.

 

Employees 

 

As of December 1st, 2018, we have employed 2 executive officers and 5 employees on a full-time basis. We currently use independent contract labor to deliver services to our clients. No employees or contractors are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We consider relations with our employees and contractors to be good.

 

 

 

 

RISK FACTORS

 

In addition to the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2018, our new business model involves additional risks, including risks related to our VIE structure and risks of doing business in China

 

RISKS RELATING TO THE VIE AGREEMENTS

 

The PRC government may determine that the VIE Agreements are not in compliance with applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations

 

JiuGe Management manages and operates the mobile data business through JiuGe Technology pursuant to the rights its holds under the VIE Agreements. Almost all economic benefits and risks arising from JiuGe Technology’s operations are transferred to JiuGe Management under these agreements. Details of the VIE Agreements are set out in “Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement – VIE Agreements” above.

 

There are risks involved with the operation of our business in reliance on the VIE Agreements, including the risk that the VIE Agreements may be determined by PRC regulators or courts to be unenforceable. Our PRC counsel has provided a legal opinion that the VIE Agreements are binding and enforceable under PRC law, but has further advised that if the VIE Agreements were for any reason determined to be in breach of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such breach, including:

 

  imposing economic penalties;
     
  ●  discontinuing or restricting the operations of JiuGe Technology or JiuGe Management;
     
 

imposing conditions or requirements in respect of the VIE Agreements with which JiuGe Technology or JiuGe Management may not be able to comply;

 

 

requiring our company to restructure the relevant ownership structure or operations;

 

 

taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could adversely affect our company’s business; and

 

 

revoking the business licenses and/or the licenses or certificates of JiuGe Management, and/or voiding the VIE Agreements.

 

Any of these actions could adversely affect our ability to manage, operate and gain the financial benefits of JiuGe Technology, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our ability to manage and operate JiuGe Technology under the VIE Agreements may not be as effective as direct ownership

 

We conduct mobile data business in the PRC and generate virtually all of our revenues through the VIE Agreements. Our plans for future growth are based substantially on growing the operations of JiuGe Technology. However, the VIE Agreements may not be as effective in providing us with control over JiuGe Technology as direct ownership. Under the current VIE arrangements, as a legal matter, if JiuGe Technology fails to perform its obligations under these contractual arrangements, we may have to (i) incur substantial costs and resources to enforce such arrangements, and (ii) rely on legal remedies under PRC law, which we cannot be sure would be effective. Therefore, if we are unable to effectively control JiuGe Technology, it may have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business objectives and grow our revenues.

 

As the VIE Agreements are governed by PRC law, we would be required to rely on PRC law to enforce our rights and remedies under them; PRC law may not provide us with the same rights and remedies as are available in contractual disputes governed by the law of other jurisdictions.

 

The VIE Agreements are governed by the PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitral proceedings pursuant to PRC law. If JiuGe Technology or its shareholders fail to perform the obligations under the VIE Agreements, we would be required to resort to legal remedies available under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, or claiming damages. We cannot be sure that such remedies would provide us with effective means of causing JiuGe Technology to meet its obligations, or recovering any losses or damages as a result of non-performance. Further, the legal environment in China is not as developed as in other jurisdictions. Uncertainties in the application of various laws, rules, regulations or policies in PRC legal system could limit our liability to enforce the VIE Agreements and protect our interests.

 

 

 

 

The payment arrangement under the VIE Agreements may be challenged by the PRC tax authorities

 

We generate our revenues through the payments we receive pursuant to the VIE Agreements. We could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the VIE Agreements were not entered into based on arm’s length negotiations. For example, PRC tax authorities may adjust our income and expenses for PRC tax purposes which could result in our being subject to higher tax liability, or cause other adverse financial consequences.

 

Our Shareholders have potential conflicts of interest with our company which may adversely affect our business

 

Li Li is our senior vice president, and is also the shareholder of JiuGe Technology. There could be conflicts that arise from time to time between our interests and the interests of Ms. Li. There could also be conflicts that arise between us and JiuGe Technology that would require our shareholders and JiuGe Technology’s shareholders to vote on corporate actions necessary to resolve the conflict. There can be no assurance in any such circumstances that Ms. Li will vote her shares in our best interest or otherwise act in the best interests of our company. If Ms. Li fails to act in our best interests, our operating performance and future growth could be adversely affected.

 

We rely on the approval certificates and business license held by JiuGe Management and any deterioration of the relationship between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology could materially and adversely affect our business operations

 

We operate our mobile data business in China on the basis of the approval certificates, business license and other requisite licenses held by JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology. There is no assurance that JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology will be able to renew their licenses or certificates when their terms expire with substantially similar terms as the ones they currently hold.

 

Further, our relationship with JiuGe Technology is governed by the VIE Agreements that are intended to provide us with effective control over the business operations of JiuGe Technology. However, the VIE Agreements may not be effective in providing control over the application for and maintenance of the licenses required for our business operations. JiuGe Technology could violate the VIE Agreements, go bankrupt, suffer from difficulties in its business or otherwise become unable to perform its obligations under the VIE Agreements and, as a result, our operations, reputations and business could be severely harmed.

 

If JiuGe Management exercises the purchase option it holds over JiuGe Technology’s share capital pursuant to the VIE Agreements, the payment of the purchase price could materially and adversely affect our financial position

 

Under the VIE Agreements, JiuGe Technology’s shareholders have granted JiuGe Management an option for the maximum period of time permitted by law to purchase all of the equity interest in JiuGe Technology at a price equal to RMB one dollar or the lowest applicable price allowable by PRC laws and regulations. As JiuGe Technology is already our contractually controlled affiliate, JiuGe Management’s exercising of the option would not bring immediate benefits to our company, and payment of the purchase prices could adversely affect our financial position.

 

 

 

 

RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA

 

Changes in China's political or economic situation could harm us and our operating results. 

 

Economic reforms adopted by the Chinese government have had a positive effect on the economic development of the country, but the government could change these economic reforms or any of the legal systems at any time. This could either benefit or damage our operations and profitability. Some of the things that could have this effect are:

 

 

Level of government involvement in the economy;

 

 

Control of foreign exchange;

 

 

Methods of allocating resources;

 

 

Balance of payments position;

 

 

International trade restrictions; and

 

 

International conflict.

 

The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD, in many ways. For example, state-owned enterprises still constitute a large portion of the Chinese economy and weak corporate governance and a lack of flexible currency exchange policy still prevail in China. As a result of these differences, we may not develop in the same way or at the same rate as might be expected if the Chinese economy was similar to those of the OECD member countries.

 

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could limit the legal protections available to you and us. 

 

We conduct substantially all of our business through our operating subsidiary and affiliate in the PRC. Our principal operating subsidiary and affiliate, JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology, are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investments in China and, in particular, laws applicable to foreign-invested enterprises. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes, and prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, a series of new PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, since the PRC legal system continues to evolve rapidly, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to you and us. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. In addition, most of our executive officers and all of our directors are not residents of the United States, and substantially all the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it could be difficult for investors to effect service of process in the United States or to enforce a judgment obtained in the United States against our Chinese operations, subsidiary and affiliate.

 

You may have difficulty enforcing judgments against us. 

 

We are a Delaware holding company, but Finger Motion (CN) Limited is a Hong Kong company, and our principal operating affiliate and subsidiary, JiuGe Technology and JiuGe Management, are located in the PRC. Most of our assets are located outside the United States and most of our current operations are conducted in the PRC. In addition, most of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons is located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts judgments predicated on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors, most of whom are not residents in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside the United States. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts. The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. Courts in China may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other arrangements that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments with the United States. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, courts in the PRC will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates basic principles of PRC law or national sovereignty, security or the public interest. So it is uncertain whether a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States.

 

 

 

 

The PRC government exerts substantial influence over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities. 

 

The PRC government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. Our ability to operate in China may be harmed by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use rights, property and other matters. We believe that our operations in China are in material compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, the central or local governments of the jurisdictions in which we operate may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations.

 

Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision not to continue to support recent economic reforms and to return to a more centrally planned economy or regional or local variations in the implementation of economic policies, could have a significant effect on economic conditions in China or particular regions thereof and could require us to divest ourselves of any interest we then hold in Chinese properties or joint ventures.

 

Future inflation in China may inhibit our ability to conduct business in China. 

 

In recent years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid expansion and highly fluctuating rates of inflation. During the past ten years, the rate of inflation in China has been as high as 20.7% and as low as -2.2%. These factors have led to the adoption by the Chinese government, from time to time, of various corrective measures designed to restrict the availability of credit or regulate growth and contain inflation. High inflation may in the future cause the Chinese government to impose controls on credit and/or prices, or to take other action, which could inhibit economic activity in China, and thereby harm the market for our products and our company.

 

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenues effectively.

 

The majority of our revenues will be settled in RMB, and any future restrictions on currency exchanges may limit our ability to use revenue generated in RMB to fund any future business activities outside China or to make dividend or other payments in U.S. dollars. Although the Chinese government introduced regulations in 1996 to allow greater convertibility of the RMB for current account transactions, significant restrictions still remain, including primarily the restriction that foreign-invested enterprises may only buy, sell or remit foreign currencies after providing valid commercial documents, at those banks in China authorized to conduct foreign exchange business. In addition, conversion of RMB for capital account items, including direct investment and loans, is subject to governmental approval in China, and companies are required to open and maintain separate foreign exchange accounts for capital account items. We cannot be certain that the Chinese regulatory authorities will not impose more stringent restrictions on the convertibility of the RMB.

 

 

 

 

Fluctuations in exchange rates could adversely affect our business and the value of our securities. 

 

The value of our common stock will be indirectly affected by the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollars and RMB and between those currencies and other currencies in which our sales may be denominated. Appreciation or depreciation in the value of the RMB relative to the U.S. dollar would affect our financial results reported in U.S. dollar terms without giving effect to any underlying change in our business or results of operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rate will also affect the relative value of any dividend we issue that will be exchanged into U.S. dollars as well as earnings from, and the value of, any U.S. dollar-denominated investments we make in the future.

 

Since July 2005, the RMB is no longer pegged to the U.S. dollar. Although the People’s Bank of China regularly intervenes in the foreign exchange market to prevent significant short-term fluctuations in the exchange rate, the RMB may appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the medium to long term. Moreover, it is possible that in the future PRC authorities may lift restrictions on fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate and lessen intervention in the foreign exchange market.

 

Very limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions. While we may enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these transactions may be limited, and we may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure at all. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert RMB into foreign currencies.

 

Restrictions under PRC law on our PRC subsidiary’s ability to make dividends and other distributions could materially and adversely affect our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could benefit our business, pay dividends to you, and otherwise fund and conduct our businesses.

 

Substantially all of our revenues are earned by JiuGe Management, our PRC subsidiary. PRC regulations restrict the ability of our PRC subsidiary to make dividends and other payments to its offshore parent company. PRC legal restrictions permit payments of dividend by our PRC subsidiary only out of its accumulated after-tax profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Our PRC subsidiary is also required under PRC laws and regulations to allocate at least 10% of our annual after-tax profits determined in accordance with PRC GAAP to a statutory general reserve fund until the amounts in said fund reaches 50% of our registered capital. Allocations to these statutory reserve funds can only be used for specific purposes and are not transferable to us in the form of loans, advances or cash dividends. Any limitations on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to transfer funds to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends and otherwise fund and conduct our business.

 

Failure to comply with PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident shareholders to personal liability, limit our ability to acquire PRC companies or to inject capital into our PRC subsidiary or affiliate, limit our PRC subsidiary’s and affiliate’s ability to distribute profits to us or otherwise materially adversely affect us.

 

In October 2005, SAFE, issued the Notice on Relevant Issues in the Foreign Exchange Control over Financing and Return Investment Through Special Purpose Companies by Residents Inside China, generally referred to as Circular 75, which required PRC residents to register with the competent local SAFE branch before establishing or acquiring control over an offshore special purpose company, or SPV, for the purpose of engaging in an equity financing outside of China on the strength of domestic PRC assets originally held by those residents. Internal implementing guidelines issued by SAFE, which became public in June 2007 (known as Notice 106), expanded the reach of Circular 75 by (1) purporting to cover the establishment or acquisition of control by PRC residents of offshore entities which merely acquire “control” over domestic companies or assets, even in the absence of legal ownership; (2) adding requirements relating to the source of the PRC resident’s funds used to establish or acquire the offshore entity; covering the use of existing offshore entities for offshore financings; (3) purporting to cover situations in which an offshore SPV establishes a new subsidiary in China or acquires an unrelated company or unrelated assets in China; and (4) making the domestic affiliate of the SPV responsible for the accuracy of certain documents which must be filed in connection with any such registration, notably, the business plan which describes the overseas financing and the use of proceeds. Amendments to registrations made under Circular 75 are required in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, mergers and acquisitions, equity investment or creation of any security interest in any assets located in China to guarantee offshore obligations, and Notice 106 makes the offshore SPV jointly responsible for these filings. In the case of an SPV which was established, and which acquired a related domestic company or assets, before the implementation date of Circular 75, a retroactive SAFE registration was required to have been completed before March 31, 2006; this date was subsequently extended indefinitely by Notice 106, which also required that the registrant establish that all foreign exchange transactions undertaken by the SPV and its affiliates were in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Failure to comply with the requirements of Circular 75, as applied by SAFE in accordance with Notice 106, may result in fines and other penalties under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions. Any such failure could also result in the SPV’s affiliates being impeded or prevented from distributing their profits and the proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the SPV, or from engaging in other transfers of funds into or out of China.

 

 

 

 

Although our majority shareholder are not PRC residents and therefore Circular 75 & Notice 106 are not applicable to it, we have advised our shareholders who are PRC residents, as defined in Circular 75, to register with the relevant branch of SAFE, as currently required, in connection with their equity interests in us and our acquisitions of equity interests in our PRC subsidiary and affiliate. However, we cannot provide any assurances that their existing registrations have fully complied with, and they have made all necessary amendments to their registration to fully comply with, all applicable registrations or approvals required by Circular 75. Moreover, because of uncertainty over how Circular 75 will be interpreted and implemented, and how or whether SAFE will apply it to us, we cannot predict how it will affect our business operations or future strategies. For example, our present and prospective PRC subsidiary’s and affiliate’s ability to conduct foreign exchange activities, such as the remittance of dividends and foreign currency-denominated borrowings, may be subject to compliance with Circular 75 by our PRC resident beneficial holders. In addition, such PRC residents may not always be able to complete the necessary registration procedures required by Circular 75. We also have little control over either our present or prospective direct or indirect shareholders or the outcome of such registration procedures. A failure by our PRC resident beneficial holders or future PRC resident shareholders to comply with Circular 75, if SAFE requires it, could subject these PRC resident beneficial holders to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our subsidiary’s and affiliate’s ability to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.

 

Under the New EIT Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification will likely result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders. 

 

Under the New EIT Law effective on January 1, 2008, an enterprise established outside China with “de facto management bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the New EIT Law define de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the enterprise.

 

On April 22, 2009, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Notice Concerning Relevant Issues Regarding Cognizance of Chinese Investment Controlled Enterprises Incorporated Offshore as Resident Enterprises pursuant to Criteria of de facto Management Bodies, or the Notice, further interpreting the application of the New EIT Law and its implementation non-Chinese enterprise or group controlled offshore entities. Pursuant to the Notice, an enterprise incorporated in an offshore jurisdiction and controlled by a Chinese enterprise or group will be classified as a “non-domestically incorporated resident enterprise” if (i) its senior management in charge of daily operations reside or perform their duties mainly in China; (ii) its financial or personnel decisions are made or approved by bodies or persons in China; (iii) its substantial assets and properties, accounting books, corporate chops, board and shareholder minutes are kept in China; and (iv) at least half of its directors with voting rights or senior management often resident in China. A resident enterprise would be subject to an enterprise income tax rate of 25% on its worldwide income and must pay a withholding tax at a rate of 10% when paying dividends to its non-PRC shareholders. However, it remains unclear as to whether the Notice is applicable to an offshore enterprise incorporated by a Chinese natural person. Nor are detailed measures on imposition of tax from non-domestically incorporated resident enterprises are available. Therefore, it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each case.

 

 

 

 

Given the above conditions, although unlikely, we may be deemed to be a resident enterprise by Chinese tax authorities. If the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to the enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In our case, this would mean that income such as interest on financing proceeds and non-China source income would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%. Second, although under the New EIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiary would qualify as “tax-exempt income,” we cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to a 10% withholding tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the withholding tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect to the processing of outbound remittances to entities that are treated as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Finally, it is possible that future guidance issued with respect to the new “resident enterprise” classification could result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax is imposed on dividends we pay to our non-PRC shareholders and with respect to gains derived by our non-PRC shareholders from transferring our shares. We are actively monitoring the possibility of “resident enterprise” treatment for the 2010 tax year.

 

If we were treated as a “resident enterprise” by PRC tax authorities, we would be subject to taxation in both the U.S. and China, and our PRC tax may not be creditable against our U.S. tax.

 

We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Chinese anti-corruption laws, and any determination that we violated these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business. 

 

We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act, or FCPA, and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by U.S. persons and issuers as defined by the statute, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have operations, agreements with third parties and we make the majority of our sales in China. PRC also strictly prohibits bribery of government officials. Our activities in China create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by the employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors of our Company, even though they may not always be subject to our control. It is our policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and the employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors of our Company may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA or Chinese anti-corruption laws may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the U.S. government may seek to hold our Company liable for successor liability FCPA violations committed by companies in which we invest or that we acquire.

 

Because our business is located in the PRC, we may have difficulty establishing adequate management, legal and financial controls, which we are required to do in order to comply with U.S. securities laws.

 

PRC companies have historically not adopted a Western style of management and financial reporting concepts and practices, which includes strong corporate governance, internal controls and, computer, financial and other control systems. Some of our middle management staff are not educated and trained in the Western system, and we may have difficulty hiring new employees in the PRC with such training. As a result of these factors, we may experience difficulty in establishing management, legal and financial controls, collecting financial data and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting business practices that meet Western standards. Therefore, we may, in turn, experience difficulties in implementing and maintaining adequate internal controls as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This may result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls, which could impact the reliability of our financial statements and prevent us from complying with Commission rules and regulations and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any such deficiencies, weaknesses or lack of compliance could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

 

 

 

 

Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.

 

On November 30th, 2018, Hsien Loong Wong resigned as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

On December 1st, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Martin J. Shen to serve as a Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

 

On December 1st, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Mr. Leong Yew Poh and Mr. Michael Chan as directors of the Company.

 

Martin J. Shen

 

Martin has nearly 15 years of experience in senior management roles in entrepreneurial startups as well as large multinational corporations. In those roles he has acquired wide-ranging expertise in corporate management, financial oversight and operational administration.

 

Most recently, Martin founded Imperial Distributors (formerly AP Martin Pharmaceutical Supplies Ltd.), establishing the company as the preferred choice for providing distributional support to regional pharmacies throughout Western Canada. His leadership duties included overseeing all aspects of operations, including managing legal and regulatory compliance issues. They covered ensuring compliance with Health Canada requirements as well as all relevant federal, provincial and municipal legislation. He also led the finance department, building a sound foundation for the accounting function and leveraging his extensive experience in public accounting to guide the acquisition of two companies in Alberta.

 

Prior to Imperial, Martin served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at Wales and Son Industrial (later re-named Weir Minerals). The firm specializes in the global delivery of, and support for mining slurry equipment solutions including pumps, hydrocyclones, rubber and wear resistant linings. Sectors served include mining and mineral processing, energy and general industry.

 

As COO and CFO, Martin directed all financial and internal operational activities. This included financial statement preparation and tax filings, banking arrangements, executive compensation and share purchase agreements. He was also responsible for the analysis of monthly results and financial statements and reconciliations to Group head office.

 

Martin began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers in the tax department in Singapore and the audit and advisory group in Hong Kong. As a Tax Manager, he consulted with tax departments of multinational corporations, including Raytheon and Exxon, to provide tax saving mechanisms and future tax planning strategies. Martin also conducted tax conferences and seminars for current and potential clients to provide overview of tax planning scenarios.

 

Martin also spent several years in PwC Vancouver, auditing major Canadian companies and in the process building his expertise in financial management, compliance and financial statement reporting. A US Certified Public Accountant, he holds a BSc from the University of British Columbia.

 

Leong Yew Poh, M.A.

 

Leong Yew Poh has more than 30 years of management experience in growing companies in the technology and hospitality sectors. In that time, Leong established an extensive network of business relationships in the software, banking and telecommunications sectors throughout the Asia Pacific.

 

In his current position, Group CEO at Radiance Hospitality Group, Yew Poh leads the expansion of the company’s hotel management services from offices in Singapore, Shanghai and Malaysia. The Group currently serves hotel chains in Malaysia, Singapore, China, Indonesia, Cambodia, Russia and Vietnam. Its services support service delivery, sales, and increased profit and asset value.

 

 

 

 

Before joining Radiance, Leong served as Director of Strategic Projects for Keppel T&T, a public company that provides transportation, telecommunications and IT services. He was responsible for its e-businesses, which included establishing credit bureaus in Thailand and Malaysia, establishing and operating data centers in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines, operating call centers in Singapore and Malaysia, and providing application solutions for local governments, IT infrastructure, and transportation and education organizations.

 

Prior to Kepple T&T, Leong was first a Regional Director and then Managing Director of Dun and Bradstreet Softwere (later acquired by Geac Computers). In those roles, he led company growth from 15 to more than 250 employees in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai. The firm provided business solutions and managed services for 350 customers in the region, including Telekom Malaysia, Hong Kong Telecom, Philippines Long Distance Telephone, Piltel, Communications Authority of Thailand, Shell, Prudential, AIG, Starwood Hotels, Pacific Dunlop, Minolta, National Panasonic, Sony, Aiwa, Standard Chartered Bank, Malayan Banking, Bank of China, China Trust Bank, Bank Central Asia, Bank Danamon, and Jardines. Leong received a Masters Degree in Accounting and Finance from the University of Auckland.

 

Michael Chan, CPA, CMA, EMBA

 

Michael’s nine years at Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) culminated in his role as Managing Director of Asia Pacific, Asset Servicing. He was a member of BNY Mellon’s Global Corporate Operating Committee (< 1% of 50K+ employees), Asia Pacific Executive Committee and the Corporate Sovereign Institutions Council.

 

Michael represented the firm on the Board of Directors of ASIFMA (Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association) and BNYMellon's Eagle Investment Systems' Asia Singapore entity. He has also served on the OMGEO APAC Advisory Board, and as a member of various industry and banking associations in Hong Kong and Korea.

 

Michael currently serves on the National University of Singapore Society (NUSS) finance sub-committee and a member of the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID). He has been a speaker at industry conferences, a panelist on regulatory/industry roundtables and a media contributor to financial publications. Michael has also chaired employee engagement committees, including mentorship of high performers, and served on the WIN advisory team as well as at community outreach events.

 

Prior to BNYMellon, he relocated to Hong Kong from Canada in 2000 with State Street. Michael was also general manager for a South Korea bank branch and the regional integration manager of a key European acquisition. His career also includes work at Ernst & Young, Canada.

 

A Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) and Certified Management Accountant (CMA) in Ontario, Canada, he holds an EMBA from the Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, and a BComm degree from McGill University.

 

 

 

 

ITEM 9.01

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

 

(d)

 

Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

*3.1

 

Certificate of Incorporation, as amended

*3.2

 

Bylaws

**3.3

 

Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

10.1

 

Exclusive Consulting Agreement between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology

10.2

 

Loan Agreement between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology

10.3

 

Power of Attorney Agreement between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology

10.4

 

Exclusive Call Option Agreement between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology

10.5

 

Share Pledge Agreement between JiuGe Management and JiuGe Technology

 

* Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-196503), effective June 26, 2014.

 

** Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017.

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

              

 

  Finger Motion, Inc.  
       

Date: December 21, 2018

By:

/s/ Martin Shen

 

 

 

Name: Martin Shen

 

 

 

Title: Chief Executive Officer