Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.3 - EXHIBIT 31.3 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis	ex313september302018.htm
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis	ex32section1350certificati.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis	ex312september302018.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis	ex311september302018.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-51404

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Federally chartered corporation (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		35-6001443 (I.R.S. employer identification number)
8250 Woodfield Crossing Boulevard Indianapolis, IN (Address of principal executive offices)		46240 (Zip code)

(317) 465-0200

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



o Large accelerated filer	o Accelerated filer
x Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	o Smaller reporting company
	o Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



	Shares outstanding as of October 31, 2018
Class B Stock, par value $100	20,787,708



Table of Contents		Page
		Number
	Glossary of Terms	3
	Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	5
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

	Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017	6

	Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	7

	Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	8

	Statements of Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2018	9

	Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017	10

	Notes to Financial Statements:
	Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12
	Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance	12
	Note 3 - Available-for-Sale Securities	15
	Note 4 - Held-to-Maturity Securities	16
	Note 5 - Other-Than-Temporary Impairment	18
	Note 6 - Advances	19
	Note 7 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio	20
	Note 8 - Allowance for Credit Losses	20
	Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities	23
	Note 10 - Consolidated Obligations	26
	Note 11 - Affordable Housing Program	27
	Note 12 - Capital	28
	Note 13 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	29
	Note 14 - Segment Information	31
	Note 15 - Estimated Fair Values	32
	Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies	36
	Note 17 - Related Party and Other Transactions	36

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
	Presentation	38
	Executive Summary	38
	Selected Financial Data	41
	Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition	42
	Operating Segments	48
	Analysis of Financial Condition	49
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	54
	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	56
	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	56
	Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments	57
	Risk Management	59
Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	63
Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	64

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	64
Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS	64
Item 6.	EXHIBITS	65

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ABS: Asset-Backed Securities

Advance: Secured loan to members, former members or Housing Associates

AFS: Available-for-Sale

AHP: Affordable Housing Program

AMA: Acquired Member Assets

AOCI: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Bank Act: Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended

bps: basis points

CBSA: Core Based Statistical Areas, refer collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget

CDFI: Community Development Financial Institution

CE: Credit Enhancement

CFI: Community Financial Institution, an FDIC-insured depository institution with average total assets below an annually-adjusted limit established by the Director based on the Consumer Price Index

CFPB: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

CFTC: United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Clearinghouse: A United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission-registered derivatives clearing organization

CME: CME Clearing

CMO: Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

CO bond: Consolidated Obligation bond

DB plan: Pentegra Defined Benefit Pension Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended

DC plan: Pentegra Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended

DDCP: Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan

Director: Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency

Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended

Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association

FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board

FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

FHA: Federal Housing Administration

FHLBank: A Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLBanks: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks or a subset thereof

FHLBank System: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks and the Office of Finance

FICO®: Fair Isaac Corporation, the creators of the FICO credit score

Final Membership Rule: Final Rule on FHLBank Membership issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency effective February 19, 2016

Finance Agency: Federal Housing Finance Agency, successor to Finance Board

Finance Board: Federal Housing Finance Board, predecessor to Finance Agency

FLA: First Loss Account

FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee

Form 8-K: Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act

Form 10-K: Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act

Form 10-Q: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act

FRB: Federal Reserve Board

Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America

Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association

GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended

GSE: United States Government-Sponsored Enterprise

HERA: Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, as amended

Housing Associate: Approved lender under Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934 that is either a government agency or is chartered under federal or state law with rights and powers similar to those of a corporation

HTM: Held-to-Maturity

HUD: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

JCE Agreement: Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended, among the 11 FHLBanks

LCH: LCH.Clearnet LLC

LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate

Table of Contents

LRA: Lender Risk Account

LTV: Loan-to-Value

MAP-21: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, enacted on July 6, 2012

MBS: Mortgage-Backed Securities

MCC: Master Commitment Contract

MDC: Mandatory Delivery Commitment

Moody's: Moody's Investor Services

MPF: Mortgage Partnership Finance®

MPP: Mortgage Purchase Program, including Original and Advantage unless indicated otherwise

MRCS: Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock

MVE: Market Value of Equity

NRSRO: Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization

OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

OCI: Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

OIS: Overnight-Indexed Swap

ORERC: Other Real Estate-Related Collateral

OTTI: Other-Than-Temporary Impairment or -Temporarily Impaired (as the context indicates)

PFI: Participating Financial Institution

PMI: Primary Mortgage Insurance

REMIC: Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit

REO: Real Estate Owned

RMBS: Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities

S&P: Standard & Poor's Rating Service

Safety and Soundness Act: Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended

SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities Act: Securities Act of 1933, as amended

SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and/or a similar frozen plan

SETP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2016 Supplemental Executive Thrift Plan, as amended

SMI: Supplemental Mortgage Insurance

TBA: To Be Announced, a forward contract for the purchase or sale of MBS at a future agreed-upon date for an established price

TDR: Troubled Debt Restructuring

TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority

UPB: Unpaid Principal Balance

VaR: Value at Risk

VIE: Variable Interest Entity

WAIR: Weighted-Average Interest Rate

Table of Contents

As used in this Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us," "our," and the "Bank" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management. We use acronyms and terms throughout that are defined herein or in the Glossary of Terms.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Form 10-Q, including statements describing our objectives, projections, estimates or predictions, may be considered to be "forward-looking statements." These statements may use forward-looking terminology, such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "may," "should," "expects," "will," or their negatives or other variations on these terms. We caution that, by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk or uncertainty and that actual results either could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a particular objective, projection, estimate, or prediction is realized. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following:


•	economic and market conditions, including the timing and volume of market activity, inflation or deflation, changes in the value of global currencies, and changes in the financial condition of market participants;

•

volatility of market prices, interest rates, and indices or other factors, resulting from the effects of, and changes in, various monetary or fiscal policies and regulations, including those determined by the FRB and the FDIC, or a decline in liquidity in the financial markets, that could affect the value of investments or collateral we hold as security for the obligations of our members and counterparties;


•	changes in demand for our advances and purchases of mortgage loans resulting from:


◦	changes in our members' deposit flows and credit demands;


◦	federal or state regulatory developments impacting suitability or eligibility of membership classes;


◦	membership changes, including, but not limited to, mergers, acquisitions and consolidations of charters;


◦	changes in the general level of housing activity in the United States and particularly our district states of Michigan and Indiana, the level of refinancing activity and consumer product preferences; and


◦	competitive forces, including, without limitation, other sources of funding available to our members;


•	changes in mortgage asset prepayment patterns, delinquency rates and housing values or improper or inadequate mortgage originations and mortgage servicing;


•	ability to introduce and successfully manage new products and services, including new types of collateral securing advances;


•	political events, including administrative, legislative, regulatory, or other developments, and judicial rulings that affect us, our status as a secured creditor, our members (or certain classes of members), prospective members, counterparties, GSEs generally, one or more of the FHLBanks and/or investors in the consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks;


•	ability to access the capital markets and raise capital market funding on acceptable terms;


•	changes in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of the other FHLBanks and the FHLBank System;


•	changes in the level of government guarantees provided to other United States and international financial institutions;


•	dealer commitment to supporting the issuance of our consolidated obligations;


•	ability of one or more of the FHLBanks to repay its portion of the consolidated obligations, or otherwise meet its financial obligations;


•	ability to attract and retain skilled personnel;


•	ability to develop, implement and support technology and information systems sufficient to manage our business effectively;


•	nonperformance of counterparties to uncleared and cleared derivative transactions;


•	changes in terms of derivative agreements and similar agreements;


•	loss arising from natural disasters, acts of war or acts of terrorism;


•	changes in or differing interpretations of accounting guidance; and


•	other risk factors identified in our filings with the SEC.

Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, additional disclosures may be made through reports filed with the SEC in the future, including our Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Condition

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands, except par value)



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	115,619	$	55,269
Interest-bearing deposits	1,370,790		660,342
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	3,171,348		2,605,460
Federal funds sold	3,398,000		1,280,000
Available-for-sale securities (Notes 3 and 5)	7,430,027		7,128,758
Held-to-maturity securities (estimated fair values of $5,808,391 and $5,919,299, respectively)(Notes 4 and 5)	5,810,492		5,897,668
Advances (Note 6)	33,566,891		34,055,064
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for loan losses of $(600) and $(850), respectively (Notes 7 and 8)	11,294,203		10,356,341
Accrued interest receivable	115,638		105,314
Premises, software, and equipment, net	36,132		36,795
Derivative assets, net (Note 9)	124,155		128,206
Other assets	38,462		39,689

Total assets	$	66,471,757	$	62,348,906

Liabilities:
Deposits	$	484,167	$	564,799
Consolidated obligations (Note 10):
Discount notes	22,649,814		20,358,157
Bonds	39,563,644		37,895,653
Total consolidated obligations, net	62,213,458		58,253,810
Accrued interest payable	166,942		135,691
Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 11)	37,475		32,166
Derivative liabilities, net (Note 9)	2,451		2,718
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 12)	164,434		164,322
Other liabilities	345,859		249,894
Total liabilities	63,414,786		59,403,400

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

Capital (Note 12):
Capital stock (putable at par value of $100 per share):
Class B-1 issued and outstanding shares: 19,000,804 and 18,566,388, respectively	1,900,080		1,856,639
Class B-2 issued and outstanding shares: 6,169 and 11,271, respectively	617		1,127
Total capital stock	1,900,697		1,857,766
Retained earnings:
Unrestricted	845,922		792,783
Restricted	214,782		183,551
Total retained earnings	1,060,704		976,334
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 13)	95,570		111,406
Total capital	3,056,971		2,945,506

Total liabilities and capital	$	66,471,757	$	62,348,906

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Income

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands)



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2018			2017			2018			2017
Interest Income:
Advances	$	197,145		$	111,513		$	518,682		$	280,412
Prepayment fees on advances, net	118			1,077			120			1,179
Interest-bearing deposits	5,801			924			12,880			1,895
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	19,868			1,329			40,680			5,034
Federal funds sold	15,239			13,844			35,160			30,874
Available-for-sale securities	52,071			32,590			140,561			86,309
Held-to-maturity securities	39,258			32,932			111,298			86,810
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	90,561			79,295			259,690			233,575
Other interest income, net	—			534			17			1,385
Total interest income	420,061			274,038			1,119,088			727,473

Interest Expense:
Consolidated obligation discount notes	113,705			54,701			274,162			121,955
Consolidated obligation bonds	228,610			147,521			617,906			404,294
Deposits	2,932			1,324			7,542			3,155
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	1,927			1,768			6,557			5,277
Total interest expense	347,174			205,314			906,167			534,681

Net interest income	72,887			68,724			212,921			192,792
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	102			(90		)	(359		)	191

Net interest income after provision for credit losses	72,785			68,814			213,280			192,601

Other Income (Loss):
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	—			—			—			—
Non-credit portion reclassified to (from) other comprehensive income, net	—			(14		)	—			(207		)
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses, credit portion	—			(14		)	—			(207		)
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities	—			—			32,407			—
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities	—			—			(45		)	—
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	(8,160		)	(3,745		)	(5,216		)	(12,830		)
Service fees	278			232			783			694
Standby letters of credit fees	123			130			414			535
Other, net (Note 16)	931			409			1,324			1,322
Total other income (loss)	(6,828		)	(2,988		)	29,667			(10,486		)

Other Expenses:
Compensation and benefits	12,306			11,226			38,164			33,012
Other operating expenses	7,216			6,813			20,566			18,833
Federal Housing Finance Agency	853			785			2,616			2,388
Office of Finance	1,078			804			3,509			2,813
Other	975			727			3,859			2,206
Total other expenses	22,428			20,355			68,714			59,252

Income before assessments	43,529			45,471			174,233			122,863

Affordable Housing Program assessments	4,546			4,724			18,079			12,814

Net income	$	38,983		$	40,747		$	156,154		$	110,049

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands)



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2018		2017		2018			2017

Net income	$	38,983	$	40,747	$	156,154		$	110,049

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities	9,043		5,007		19,015			42,617

Net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale securities	—		1,623		(29,322		)	3,362

Net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities	—		4		51			54

Pension benefits, net	636		340		(5,580		)	993

Total other comprehensive income (loss)	9,679		6,974		(15,836		)	47,026

Total comprehensive income	$	48,662	$	47,721	$	140,318		$	157,075

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Capital

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2018

(Unaudited, $ amounts and shares in thousands)



	Capital Stock Class B Putable					Retained Earnings								Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Capital
	Shares		Par Value			Unrestricted			Restricted		Total			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Capital

Balance, December 31, 2016	14,926		$	1,492,581		$	734,982		$	152,265	$	887,247		$	56,368		$	2,436,196

Total comprehensive income						88,039			22,010		110,049			47,026			157,075

Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	2,866		286,585														286,585

Cash dividends on capital stock (4.25% annualized)						(48,769		)			(48,769		)				(48,769		)

Balance, September 30, 2017	17,792		$	1,779,166		$	774,252		$	174,275	$	948,527		$	103,394		$	2,831,087

Balance, December 31, 2017	18,578		$	1,857,766		$	792,783		$	183,551	$	976,334		$	111,406		$	2,945,506

Total comprehensive income						124,923			31,231		156,154			(15,836		)	140,318

Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	696		69,686														69,686
Repurchase/redemption of capital stock	—		(32		)												(32		)
Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net	(267	)	(26,723		)												(26,723		)

Distributions on mandatorily redeemable capital stock						(38		)			(38		)				(38		)

Cash dividends on capital stock (5.16% annualized)						(71,746		)			(71,746		)				(71,746		)

Balance, September 30, 2018	19,007		$	1,900,697		$	845,922		$	214,782	$	1,060,704		$	95,570		$	3,056,971

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	156,154		$	110,049
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation	50,484			57,454
Changes in net derivative and hedging activities	188,223			376
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses, credit portion	—			207
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	(359		)	191
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities	(32,407		)	—
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities	45			—
Changes in:
Accrued interest receivable	(17,242		)	(3,327		)
Other assets	1,290			232
Accrued interest payable	31,439			17,557
Other liabilities	49,796			19,193
Total adjustments, net	271,269			91,883

Net cash provided by operating activities	427,423			201,932

Investing Activities:
Net change in:
Interest-bearing deposits	(704,317		)	(166,306		)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	(565,888		)	(939,389		)
Federal funds sold	(2,118,000		)	(1,185,000		)
Available-for-sale securities:
Proceeds from maturities	80,172			942,491
Proceeds from sales	203,841			—
Purchases	(773,346		)	(1,910,989		)
Held-to-maturity securities:
Proceeds from maturities	755,770			920,737
Proceeds from sales	41,226			—
Purchases	(712,272		)	(911,505		)
Advances:
Principal repayments	250,517,838			192,773,340
Disbursements to members	(250,185,035		)	(197,645,975		)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:
Principal collections	910,622			911,928
Purchases from members	(1,874,800		)	(1,637,664		)
Purchases of premises, software, and equipment	(3,989		)	(3,173		)
Loans to other Federal Home Loan Banks:
Principal repayments	400,000			—
Disbursements	(400,000		)	—

Net cash used in investing activities	(4,428,178		)	(8,851,505		)

(continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Statements of Cash Flows, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
Financing Activities:
Changes in deposits	38,839			(40,952		)
Net payments on derivative contracts with financing elements	(2,242		)	(17,358		)
Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	254,190,275			161,660,654
Bonds	13,074,648			17,978,166
Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	(251,909,384		)	(156,102,609		)
Bonds	(11,302,290		)	(15,538,310		)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	69,686			286,585
Payments for redemption/repurchase of capital stock	(32		)	—
Payments for redemption/repurchase of mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(26,649		)	(4,882		)
Dividend payments on capital stock	(71,746		)	(48,769		)

Net cash provided by financing activities	4,061,105			8,172,525

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks	60,350			(477,048		)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period	55,269			546,612

Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	115,619		$	69,564

Supplemental Disclosures:
Interest payments	$	841,065		$	497,055
Purchases of securities, traded but not yet settled	44,583			17,034
Affordable Housing Program payments	12,770			11,604
Capitalized interest on certain held-to-maturity securities	3,480			1,669
Par value of shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net	26,723			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

We use acronyms and terms throughout these notes to financial statements that are defined herein or in the Glossary of Terms. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "Bank," "we," "us," and "our" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC requirements for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Certain disclosures that would have substantially duplicated the disclosures in the financial statements, and notes thereto, included in our 2017 Form 10-K have been omitted unless the information contained in those disclosures materially changed. Therefore, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements, and notes thereto, included in our 2017 Form 10-K.

The financial statements contain all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full calendar year or any other interim period.

Our significant accounting policies and certain other disclosures are set forth in our 2017 Form 10-K in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. There have been no significant changes to these policies through September 30, 2018. However, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

Use of Estimates. When preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, we are required to make subjective assumptions and estimates that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expense. The most significant estimates pertain to derivatives and hedging activities, fair value, the provision for credit losses, and OTTI. Although the reported amounts and disclosures reflect our best estimates, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Reclassifications. We have reclassified certain amounts from the prior period to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on total assets, total liabilities, total capital, net income, total comprehensive income, or net cash flows.

Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09). On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. This guidance outlines a comprehensive model for recognizing revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance. In addition, this guidance amends the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer. This guidance applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of certain other standards, such as financial instruments, certain guarantees, insurance contracts, or lease contracts.

The guidance, which included subsequent amendments, was effective for our interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01). On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance on certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments.

The guidance was effective for our interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (ASU 2016-15). On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued amendments intended to reduce diversity in practice in how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the statement of cash flows for certain transactions.

These amendments were adopted on a retrospective basis effective beginning on January 1, 2018. As a result, the amount of interest payments as reported in the supplemental disclosures increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 by $101,253. The adoption of these amendments had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued amendments to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The amendments require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net pension and benefit cost. The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement.

These amendments were effective for our interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of these amendments had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the amendments were applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost on the income statement, which resulted in a reclassification from compensation and benefits to other expenses for the non-service components for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 of $526 and $1,500, respectively.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance.

Leases (ASU 2016-02). On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance which requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the statement of condition and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. In particular, this guidance requires a lessee, in an operating or finance lease, to recognize on the statement of condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for a lease with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize a lease asset and lease liability. Under previous guidance, a lessee was not required to recognize a lease asset and lease liability arising from an operating lease on the statement of condition. While this guidance does not fundamentally change lessor accounting, some changes have been made to align that guidance with the lessee guidance and other areas within GAAP.

This guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019. As amended, the guidance allows lessors and lessees to recognize and measure leases at the adoption date by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings. Upon adoption, we will report higher assets and liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the statement of condition, but its effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows would not currently be material.

Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12). On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements. This guidance requires that, for fair value hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness must be recorded in OCI. In addition, the amendments include certain targeted improvements to the assessment of hedge effectiveness and permit, among other things, the following:


•	Measurement of the change in fair value of the hedged item on the basis of the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows determined at hedge inception.


•	Measurement of the hedged item in a partial-term fair value hedge of interest-rate risk by assuming the hedged item has a term that reflects only the designated cash flows being hedged.


•	Consideration only of how changes in the benchmark interest rate affect a decision to settle a prepayable instrument before its scheduled maturity in calculating the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to interest-rate risk.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

This guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019. Its adoption would currently have no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the amended presentation and disclosure guidance will result in a prospective reclassification on the income statement of the change in fair value of hedging instruments and related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships from other income to interest income.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2018-13). On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued guidance to update the disclosure requirements for fair value measurement. These amendments were issued as part of the FASB's disclosure framework project and are intended to improve disclosure effectiveness.

The guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020, and early adoption is permitted; however, we currently plan to adopt this guidance on the effective date. The adoption may have an effect on our disclosures, but will not have any effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14). On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued guidance to modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. These amendments were issued as part of the FASB's disclosure framework project and are intended to improve disclosure effectiveness.

The guidance is effective for the annual period ended December 31, 2020, and early adoption is permitted; however, we currently plan to adopt this guidance on the effective date. The adoption may have an effect on our disclosures, but will not have any effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract (ASU 2018-15). On August 29, 2018, the FASB issued guidance on implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement as a service contract. The amendments align the requirements for capitalizing such costs with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license.

This guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020, and early adoption is permitted; however, we currently plan to adopt this guidance on the effective date. We are in the process of evaluating this guidance, but we currently do not expect its effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows to be material.

Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) OIS Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes (ASU 2018-16). On October 25, 2018, to facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition, the FASB issued guidance permitting the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes.

This guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, concurrent with the adoption of ASU 2017-12. We are in the process of evaluating the impact that this guidance may have on our hedging strategies, but we currently do not expect its effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows to be material.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 3 - Available-for-Sale Securities

Major Security Types. The following table presents our AFS securities by type of security.



						Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Non-Credit			Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
September 30, 2018	Cost ⁽¹⁾		OTTI			Gains		Losses			Fair Value
GSE and TVA debentures	$	4,173,432	$	—		$	58,136	$	—		$	4,231,568
GSE MBS	3,145,061		—			53,607		(209		)	3,198,459
Total AFS securities	$	7,318,493	$	—		$	111,743	$	(209	)	$	7,430,027

December 31, 2017
GSE and TVA debentures	$	4,357,250	$	—		$	46,679	$	—		$	4,403,929
GSE MBS	2,460,455		—			45,840		—			2,506,295
Private-label RMBS	189,212		(68		)	29,390		—			218,534
Total AFS securities	$	7,006,917	$	(68	)	$	121,909	$	—		$	7,128,758


⁽¹⁾	Includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion, amortization, collection of principal, and, if applicable, OTTI recognized in earnings (credit losses) and fair-value hedge accounting adjustments.

Unrealized Loss Positions. The following table presents impaired AFS securities (i.e., in an unrealized loss position), aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.



	Less than 12 months					12 months or More					Total
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
September 30, 2018	Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses
GSE MBS	$	131,681	$	(209	)	$	—	$	—		$	131,681	$	(209	)
Total impaired AFS securities	$	131,681	$	(209	)	$	—	$	—		$	131,681	$	(209	)

December 31, 2017
Private-label RMBS	$	—	$	—		$	2,494	$	(68	)	$	2,494	$	(68	)
Total impaired AFS securities	$	—	$	—		$	2,494	$	(68	)	$	2,494	$	(68	)

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Contractual Maturity. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of non-MBS AFS securities are presented below by contractual maturity. MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their actual maturities will likely differ from their contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
Year of Contractual Maturity	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
Due in 1 year or less	$	528,101	$	528,885	$	83,666	$	83,754
Due after 1 year through 5 years	1,905,256		1,923,714		2,317,516		2,336,699
Due after 5 years through 10 years	1,562,013		1,596,517		1,766,440		1,791,829
Due after 10 years	178,062		182,452		189,628		191,647
Total non-MBS	4,173,432		4,231,568		4,357,250		4,403,929
Total MBS	3,145,061		3,198,459		2,649,667		2,724,829
Total AFS securities	$	7,318,493	$	7,430,027	$	7,006,917	$	7,128,758

Realized Gains and Losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS and HTM investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. Of the OTTI AFS securities sold in 2018, none were in an unrealized loss position. Proceeds from the AFS sales totaled $203,841, resulting in realized gains of $32,407 determined by the specific identification method. There were no sales during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017.

As of September 30, 2018, we had no intention of selling any AFS securities in an unrealized loss position nor did we consider it more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities before our anticipated recovery of each security's remaining amortized cost basis.

Note 4 - Held-to-Maturity Securities

Major Security Types. The following table presents our HTM securities by type of security.



								Gross		Gross
								Unrecognized		Unrecognized
	Amortized		Non-Credit			Carrying		Holding		Holding			Estimated
September 30, 2018	Cost ⁽¹⁾		OTTI			Value		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
MBS and ABS:
Other U.S. obligations -guaranteed MBS	$	3,542,561	$	—		$	3,542,561	$	12,032	$	(681	)	$	3,553,912
GSE MBS	2,267,931		—			2,267,931		8,989		(22,441		)	2,254,479
Total HTM securities	$	5,810,492	$	—		$	5,810,492	$	21,021	$	(23,122	)	$	5,808,391

December 31, 2017
MBS and ABS:
Other U.S. obligations -guaranteed MBS	$	3,299,157	$	—		$	3,299,157	$	6,555	$	(6,690	)	$	3,299,022
GSE MBS	2,553,193		—			2,553,193		26,727		(4,529		)	2,575,391
Private-label RMBS	37,889		—			37,889		240		(307		)	37,822
Private-label ABS	7,480		(51		)	7,429		40		(405		)	7,064
Total HTM securities	$	5,897,719	$	(51	)	$	5,897,668	$	33,562	$	(11,931	)	$	5,919,299


⁽¹⁾	Includes adjustments made to the cost basis of an investment for accretion, amortization, collection of principal, and, if applicable, OTTI recognized in earnings (credit losses).

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Unrealized Loss Positions. The following table presents impaired HTM securities (i.e., in an unrealized loss position), aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.



	Less than 12 months					12 months or More					Total
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
September 30, 2018	Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses
MBS and ABS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS	$	518,514	$	(288	)	$	426,118	$	(393	)	$	944,632	$	(681	)
GSE MBS	778,546		(10,055		)	328,379		(12,386		)	1,106,925		(22,441		)
Total impaired HTM securities	$	1,297,060	$	(10,343	)	$	754,497	$	(12,779	)	$	2,051,557	$	(23,122	)

December 31, 2017
MBS and ABS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS	$	1,140,624	$	(3,274	)	$	886,359	$	(3,416	)	$	2,026,983	$	(6,690	)
GSE MBS	513,244		(2,191		)	203,401		(2,338		)	716,645		(4,529		)
Private-label RMBS	14,712		(26		)	11,369		(281		)	26,081		(307		)
Private-label ABS ⁽¹⁾	—		—			7,064		(416		)	7,064		(416		)
Total impaired HTM securities	$	1,668,580	$	(5,491	)	$	1,108,193	$	(6,451	)	$	2,776,773	$	(11,942	)


⁽¹⁾	For private-label ABS, at December 31, 2017, the total of unrealized losses does not agree to total gross unrecognized holding losses of $405. Total unrealized losses include non-credit-related OTTI losses recorded in AOCI of $51 and gross unrecognized holding gains on previously OTTI securities of $40.

Realized Gains and Losses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS and HTM investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. The amortized cost of the HTM securities sold totaled $41,271. Proceeds from the HTM sales totaled $41,226, resulting in realized losses of $45 determined by the specific identification method. For each of these HTM securities, we had previously collected at least 85% of the principal outstanding at the time of acquisition due to prepayments or scheduled payments over the term. As such, the sales were considered maturities for purposes of security classification. There were no sales of HTM securities during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017.

As of September 30, 2018, we had no intention of selling any HTM securities in an unrealized loss position nor did we consider it more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities before our anticipated recovery of each security's remaining amortized cost basis.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 5 - Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

OTTI Evaluation Process and Results - Private-label RMBS and ABS.

Results of OTTI Evaluation Process - Private-label RMBS and ABS. As part of our evaluation for the three months ended March 31, 2018, we did not have any change in intent to sell, nor were we required to sell, any OTTI security. Therefore, we performed a cash flow analysis at that time to determine whether we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each security. As a result of that cash flow analysis, no OTTI credit losses were recognized. At that time, we determined that the unrealized losses on the remaining private-label RMBS and ABS were temporary as we expected to recover the entire amortized cost.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. The following table presents a rollforward of the amounts related to credit losses recognized in earnings.



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Credit Loss Rollforward	2018		2017			2018			2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	—	$	48,049		$	44,936		$	51,514
Additions:
Additional credit losses for which OTTI was previously recognized⁽¹⁾	—		14			—			207
Reductions:
Credit losses on securities sold, matured, paid down or prepaid	—		—			(43,049		)	—
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected (accreted as interest income over the remaining lives of the applicable securities)	—		(1,647		)	(1,887		)	(5,305		)
Balance at end of period	$	—	$	46,416		$	—		$	46,416


⁽¹⁾	Relates to all securities impaired prior to January 1, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Evaluation Process and Results - All Other AFS and HTM Securities.

Other U.S. and GSE Obligations and TVA Debentures. For other U.S. obligations, GSE obligations, and TVA debentures, we determined that, based on current expectations, the strength of the issuers' guarantees through direct obligations of or support from the United States government is sufficient to protect us from any losses. As a result, all of the gross unrealized losses as of September 30, 2018 are considered temporary.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 6 - Advances

The following table presents advances outstanding by year of contractual maturity.



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Year of Contractual Maturity	Amount			WAIR %	Amount			WAIR %
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts	$	5,682		4.54	$	—		—
Due in 1 year or less	16,245,713			2.15	16,935,411			1.46
Due after 1 year through 2 years	2,836,746			2.17	2,701,784			1.96
Due after 2 years through 3 years	1,998,543			2.08	2,682,073			1.69
Due after 3 years through 4 years	2,239,182			2.27	2,172,549			1.78
Due after 4 years through 5 years	2,246,585			2.60	2,213,319			1.93
Thereafter	8,264,215			2.27	7,464,333			1.66
Total advances, par value	33,836,666			2.22	34,169,469			1.61
Fair-value hedging adjustments	(276,325		)		(126,137		)
Unamortized swap termination fees associated with modified advances, net of deferred prepayment fees	6,550				11,732
Total advances	$	33,566,891			$	34,055,064

The following table presents advances outstanding by the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or the next call date and next put date.



	Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date				Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Put Date
	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts	$	5,682	$	—	$	5,682	$	—
Due in 1 year or less	24,109,124		25,067,272		16,277,713		17,032,411
Due after 1 year through 2 years	2,002,596		2,412,184		3,416,346		2,701,784
Due after 2 years through 3 years	1,540,743		1,716,873		2,972,043		3,406,673
Due after 3 years through 4 years	1,303,582		928,649		2,884,982		2,718,049
Due after 4 years through 5 years	1,294,395		1,494,529		2,669,690		2,524,619
Thereafter	3,580,544		2,549,962		5,610,210		5,785,933
Total advances, par value	$	33,836,666	$	34,169,469	$	33,836,666	$	34,169,469

Credit Risk Exposure and Security Terms. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our top five borrowers held 43% and 45%, respectively, of total advances outstanding, at par. As security for the advances to these and our other borrowers, we held, or had access to, collateral with an estimated fair value at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 that was well in excess of the advances outstanding on those dates, respectively. For information related to our credit risk on advances and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 9 - Allowance for Credit Losses in our 2017 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 7 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

The following tables present information on mortgage loans held for portfolio by term and type.



Term	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Fixed-rate long-term mortgages	$	10,020,297		$	8,989,545
Fixed-rate medium-term ⁽¹⁾ mortgages	1,025,119			1,134,303
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB	11,045,416			10,123,848
Unamortized premiums	252,814			234,519
Unamortized discounts	(2,419		)	(2,426		)
Fair-value hedging adjustments	(1,008		)	1,250
Allowance for loan losses	(600		)	(850		)
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	$	11,294,203		$	10,356,341


⁽¹⁾	Defined as a term of 15 years or less at origination.



Type	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Conventional	$	10,666,464	$	9,701,600
Government-guaranteed or -insured	378,952		422,248
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB	$	11,045,416	$	10,123,848

For information related to our credit risk on mortgage loans and allowance methodology for loan losses, see Note 8 - Allowance for Credit Losses.

Note 8 - Allowance for Credit Losses

A description of the allowance methodologies for our portfolio segments as well as our policy for impairing financing receivables and charging them off when necessary is disclosed in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9 - Allowance for Credit Losses in our 2017 Form 10-K.

Conventional Mortgage Loans.

Conventional MPP. The following table presents the activity in the LRA, which is reported in other liabilities.



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
LRA Activity	2018			2017			2018			2017
Liability, beginning of period	$	161,339		$	136,841		$	148,715		$	125,683
Additions	8,667			7,616			22,138			19,383
Claims paid	(61		)	(87		)	(310		)	(335		)
Distributions to PFIs	(98		)	(317		)	(696		)	(678		)
Liability, end of period	$	169,847		$	144,053		$	169,847		$	144,053

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Credit Quality Indicators. The tables below present the key credit quality indicators for our mortgage loans held for portfolio.



Delinquency Status as of September 30, 2018	Conventional		Government		Total
Past due:
30-59 days	$	42,004	$	9,015	$	51,019
60-89 days	5,417		1,953		7,370
90 days or more	14,260		1,539		15,799
Total past due	61,681		12,507		74,188
Total current	10,895,690		372,773		11,268,463
Total mortgage loans, recorded investment ⁽¹⁾	$	10,957,371	$	385,280	$	11,342,651

Delinquency Status as of December 31, 2017
Past due:
30-59 days	$	63,670	$	11,848	$	75,518
60-89 days	9,944		2,121		12,065
90 days or more	19,576		2,555		22,131
Total past due	93,190		16,524		109,714
Total current	9,878,030		412,869		10,290,899
Total mortgage loans, recorded investment ⁽¹⁾	$	9,971,220	$	429,393	$	10,400,613



Other Delinquency Statistics as of September 30, 2018	Conventional			Government			Total
In process of foreclosure⁽²⁾	$	6,939		$	—		$	6,939
Serious delinquency rate ⁽³⁾	0.13		%	0.40		%	0.14		%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest ⁽⁴⁾	$	13,261		$	1,539		$	14,800
On non-accrual status	$	1,785		$	—		$	1,785

Other Delinquency Statistics as of December 31, 2017
In process of foreclosure⁽²⁾	$	11,081		$	—		$	11,081
Serious delinquency rate ⁽³⁾	0.20		%	0.59		%	0.21		%
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest ⁽⁴⁾	$	16,603		$	2,555		$	19,158
On non-accrual status	$	3,464		$	—		$	3,464


⁽¹⁾	The recorded investment in a loan is the UPB of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net of any deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts (which may include the basis adjustment related to any gain or loss on a delivery commitment prior to being funded) and direct charge-offs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.


⁽²⁾	Includes loans for which the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative, such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due categories depending on their delinquency status, but are not necessarily considered to be on non-accrual status.

⁽³⁾

Represents loans 90 days or more past due (including loans in process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total recorded investment in mortgage loans. The percentage excludes principal and interest amounts previously paid in full by the servicers on conventional loans that are pending resolution of potential loss claims. Our servicers repurchase seriously delinquent government loans, including FHA loans, when certain criteria are met.


⁽⁴⁾	Although our past due scheduled/scheduled MPP loans are classified as loans past due 90 days or more based on the loan's delinquency status, we do not consider these loans to be on non-accrual status.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Allowance for Loan Losses on Mortgage Loans. The following table presents the components of the allowance for loan losses, including the credit enhancement waterfall for MPP.



Components of Allowance	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
MPP estimated incurred losses remaining after borrower's equity, before credit enhancements ⁽¹⁾	$	3,693		$	5,360
Portion of estimated incurred losses recoverable from credit enhancements:
PMI	(790		)	(995		)
LRA ⁽²⁾	(1,124		)	(1,262		)
SMI	(1,309		)	(2,383		)
Total portion recoverable from credit enhancements	(3,223		)	(4,640		)
Allowance for unrecoverable PMI/SMI	30			30
Allowance for MPP loan losses	500			750
Allowance for MPF Program loan losses	100			100
Allowance for loan losses	$	600		$	850


⁽¹⁾	Based on a loss emergence period of 24 months.


⁽²⁾	Amounts recoverable are limited to (i) the estimated losses remaining after borrower's equity and PMI and (ii) the remaining balance in each pool's portion of the LRA. The remainder of the total LRA balance is available to cover any losses not yet incurred and to distribute any excess funds to the PFIs.

The tables below present a rollforward of our allowance for loan losses, the allowance for loan losses by impairment methodology, and the recorded investment in mortgage loans by impairment methodology.



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Rollforward of Allowance for Loan Losses	2018			2017			2018			2017
Balance, beginning of period	$	600		$	850		$	850		$	850
Charge-offs	(117		)	(80		)	(300		)	(601		)
Recoveries	15			170			409			410
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses	102			(90		)	(359		)	191
Balance, end of period	$	600		$	850		$	600		$	850



Allowance for Loan Losses by Impairment Methodology	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	489	$	652
Conventional loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽¹⁾	111		198
Total allowance for loan losses	$	600	$	850


Recorded Investment by Impairment Methodology	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	10,942,404	$	9,956,689
Conventional loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽¹⁾	14,967		14,531
Total recorded investment in conventional loans	$	10,957,371	$	9,971,220

⁽¹⁾

The recorded investment in our MPP conventional loans individually evaluated for impairment excludes principal previously paid in full by the servicers as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 of $2,072 and $2,498, respectively, that remains subject to potential claims by those servicers for any losses resulting from past or future liquidations of the underlying properties. However, the MPP allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 includes $35 and $144, respectively, for these potential claims.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Managing Credit Risk on Derivatives. We are subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by the counterparties to our derivative transactions.

Uncleared Derivatives. For certain of our uncleared derivatives, we have credit support agreements that contain provisions requiring us to post additional collateral with our counterparties if there is deterioration in our credit rating. If our credit rating is lowered by an NRSRO, we could be required to deliver additional collateral on uncleared derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate estimated fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest on cash collateral) at September 30, 2018 was $599, for which we were not required to post collateral. If our credit rating had been lowered by an NRSRO (from an S&P equivalent of AA+ to AA), we would not have been required to deliver additional collateral to our uncleared derivative counterparties at September 30, 2018.

Cleared Derivatives. The clearinghouse determines margin requirements, which are generally not based on credit ratings. However, clearing agents may require additional margin to be posted by us based on credit considerations, including but not limited to any credit rating downgrades. At September 30, 2018, we were not required by our clearing agents to post any additional margin.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Financial Statement Effect and Additional Financial Information.

Derivative Notional Amounts. We record derivative instruments, related cash collateral received or pledged/posted and associated accrued interest on a net basis, by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. The following table presents the notional amount and estimated fair value of derivative assets and liabilities.



	Notional		Estimated Fair Value			Estimated Fair Value
	Amount of		of Derivative			of Derivative
September 30, 2018	Derivatives		Assets ⁽¹⁾			Liabilities ⁽¹⁾
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps	$	34,569,790	$	307,799		$	104,711
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	34,569,790		307,799			104,711
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps	1,776,430		899			179
Swaptions	625,000		165			—
Interest-rate caps/floors	679,500		1,102			—
Interest-rate forwards	86,600		500			14
MDCs	86,377		39			214
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	3,253,907		2,705			407
Total derivatives before adjustments	$	37,823,697	310,504			105,118
Netting adjustments and cash collateral ⁽²⁾			(186,349		)	(102,667		)
Total derivatives, net			$	124,155		$	2,451

December 31, 2017
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps	$	31,084,068	$	247,924		$	50,445
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	31,084,068		247,924			50,445
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps	1,026,778		1,174			734
Interest-rate caps/floors	245,500		92			—
Interest-rate forwards	72,800		37			1
MDCs	70,831		73			48
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	1,415,909		1,376			783
Total derivatives before adjustments	$	32,499,977	249,300			51,228
Netting adjustments and cash collateral ⁽²⁾			(121,094		)	(48,510		)
Total derivatives, net			$	128,206		$	2,718


⁽¹⁾	To conform with the current presentation, variation margin of $24,954 has been allocated to the individual derivative instruments as of December 31, 2017. Previously, this amount was included with netting adjustments and cash collateral.

⁽²⁾

Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow us to settle (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed, with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. Cash collateral pledged to counterparties at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 totaled $124,997 and $16,437, respectively. Cash collateral received from counterparties at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 totaled $208,679 and $89,021, respectively.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents separately the estimated fair value of derivative instruments meeting and not meeting netting requirements, including the effect of the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties.



	September 30, 2018						December 31, 2017
	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities			Derivative Assets ⁽¹⁾			Derivative Liabilities ⁽¹⁾
Derivative instruments meeting netting requirements:
Gross recognized amount
Uncleared	$	308,633		$	100,169		$	118,932		$	27,491
Cleared	1,332			4,721			130,258			23,688
Total gross recognized amount	309,965			104,890			249,190			51,179
Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared	(298,415		)	(97,946		)	(113,842		)	(24,822		)
Cleared	112,066			(4,721		)	(7,252		)	(23,688		)
Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral	(186,349		)	(102,667		)	(121,094		)	(48,510		)
Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared	10,218			2,223			5,090			2,669
Cleared	113,398			—			123,006			—
Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral	123,616			2,223			128,096			2,669
Derivative instruments not meeting netting requirements ⁽²⁾	539			228			110			49
Total derivatives, at estimated fair value	$	124,155		$	2,451		$	128,206		$	2,718


⁽¹⁾	To conform with the current presentation, variation margin of $24,954 has been allocated to the individual derivative instruments within the gross recognized amount as of December 31, 2017. Previously, this amount was included with the gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral.


⁽²⁾	Includes MDCs and certain interest-rate forwards.

The following table presents the components of net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities reported in other income (loss).



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Type of Hedge	2018			2017			2018			2017
Net gain (loss) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness:
Interest-rate swaps	$	(6,096	)	$	(3,319	)	$	513		$	(11,152	)
Total net gain (loss) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness	(6,096		)	(3,319		)	513			(11,152		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest-rate swaps	2,518			(28		)	4,103			(116		)
Swaptions	(170		)	(23		)	(405		)	(200		)
Interest-rate caps/floors	(122		)	(30		)	43			(161		)
Interest-rate forwards	560			(1,145		)	1,521			(2,086		)
Net interest settlements	(2,695		)	(16		)	(5,099		)	(307		)
MDCs	(669		)	870			(2,339		)	1,346
Total net gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	(578		)	(372		)	(2,176		)	(1,524		)
Other ⁽¹⁾	(1,486		)	(54		)	(3,553		)	(154		)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	$	(8,160	)	$	(3,745	)	$	(5,216	)	$	(12,830	)


⁽¹⁾	Consists of price alignment amounts on derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents, by type of hedged item, the gains (losses) on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair-value hedging relationships and the effect of those derivatives on net interest income.



	Gain (Loss)			Gain (Loss)			Net Fair-			Effect on
	on			on Hedged			Value Hedge			Net Interest
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018	Derivative			Item			Ineffectiveness			Income ⁽¹⁾
Advances	$	22,873		$	(25,144	)	$	(2,271	)	$	16,512
AFS securities	52,810			(59,236		)	(6,426		)	7,398
CO bonds	(4,798		)	7,399			2,601			(14,650		)
Total	$	70,885		$	(76,981	)	$	(6,096	)	$	9,260

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Advances	$	13,244		$	(12,245	)	$	999		$	(6,248	)
AFS securities	1,139			(5,750		)	(4,611		)	(9,697		)
CO bonds	(8,490		)	8,783			293			3,529
Total	$	5,893		$	(9,212	)	$	(3,319	)	$	(12,416	)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Advances	$	148,815		$	(147,659	)	$	1,156		$	31,416
AFS securities	251,901			(255,067		)	(3,166		)	8,575
CO bonds	(103,714		)	106,237			2,523			(25,896		)
Total	$	297,002		$	(296,489	)	$	513		$	14,095

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Advances	$	4,419		$	(3,004	)	$	1,415		$	(26,639	)
AFS securities	(24,193		)	14,314			(9,879		)	(40,490		)
CO bonds	(3,662		)	974			(2,688		)	11,294
Total	$	(23,436	)	$	12,284		$	(11,152	)	$	(55,835	)

⁽¹⁾

Includes the effect of derivatives in fair-value hedging relationships on net interest income that is recorded in the interest income/expense line item of the respective hedged items. Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items, which fully offset the interest income/expense of the derivatives, except to the extent of any hedge ineffectiveness. Net interest settlements on derivatives that are not in fair-value hedging relationships are reported in other income (loss). These amounts do not include the effect of amortization/accretion related to fair value hedging activities.

Note 10 - Consolidated Obligations

In addition to being the primary obligor for all consolidated obligations issued on our behalf, we are jointly and severally liable with each of the other FHLBanks for the payment of the principal and interest on all FHLBank outstanding consolidated obligations. The par values of the FHLBanks' outstanding consolidated obligations was $1.0 trillion at both September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. As provided by the Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations, consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of all FHLBanks.

Discount Notes. The following table presents our discount notes outstanding, all of which are due within one year of issuance.



Discount Notes	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Book value	$	22,649,814		$	20,358,157
Par value	$	22,699,988		$	20,394,192

Weighted average effective interest rate	2.06		%	1.22		%

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

CO Bonds. The following table presents our CO bonds outstanding by contractual maturity.



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Year of Contractual Maturity	Amount			WAIR%	Amount			WAIR%
Due in 1 year or less	$	17,490,155		1.87	$	14,021,190		1.27
Due after 1 year through 2 years	8,669,320			2.16	9,392,470			1.46
Due after 2 years through 3 years	3,059,300			2.31	4,849,960			2.23
Due after 3 years through 4 years	1,580,000			2.31	1,294,470			2.17
Due after 4 years through 5 years	2,678,025			2.37	2,798,000			2.29
Thereafter	6,279,450			3.17	5,626,500			3.02
Total CO bonds, par value	39,756,250			2.22	37,982,590			1.80
Unamortized premiums	25,281				27,333
Unamortized discounts	(15,407		)		(13,782		)
Unamortized concessions	(14,562		)		(14,188		)
Fair-value hedging adjustments	(187,918		)		(86,300		)
Total CO bonds	$	39,563,644			$	37,895,653

The following tables present our CO bonds outstanding by redemption feature and the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next call date.



Redemption Feature	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Non-callable / non-putable	$	26,894,250	$	26,277,590
Callable	12,862,000		11,705,000
Total CO bonds, par value	$	39,756,250	$	37,982,590



Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Due in 1 year or less	$	29,554,155	$	24,449,190
Due after 1 year through 2 years	6,374,320		9,098,470
Due after 2 years through 3 years	1,119,300		2,125,960
Due after 3 years through 4 years	430,000		584,470
Due after 4 years through 5 years	759,025		579,000
Thereafter	1,519,450		1,145,500
Total CO bonds, par value	$	39,756,250	$	37,982,590

Note 11 - Affordable Housing Program

The following table summarizes the activity in our AHP funding obligation.



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
AHP Activity	2018			2017			2018			2017
Liability at beginning of period	$	35,634		$	24,629		$	32,166		$	26,598
Assessment (expense)	4,546			4,724			18,079			12,814
Subsidy usage, net ⁽¹⁾	(2,705		)	(1,545		)	(12,770		)	(11,604		)
Liability at end of period	$	37,475		$	27,808		$	37,475		$	27,808


⁽¹⁾	Subsidies disbursed are reported net of returns/recaptures of previously disbursed subsidies.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 12 - Capital

Stock Redemption and Repurchase. Through September 30, 2018, certain members had requested redemptions of their Class B stock, but the related stock outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 totaling $5,426 and $5,144, respectively, was not considered mandatorily redeemable and reclassified to MRCS because the requesting members may revoke their requests, without substantial penalty, throughout the five-year waiting period. Therefore, these requests are not considered sufficiently substantive in nature. However, we consider redemption requests related to mergers, acquisitions or charter terminations, as well as involuntary terminations from membership, to be sufficiently substantive when made and, therefore, the related stock is considered mandatorily redeemable and reclassified to MRCS.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The following table presents the activity in our MRCS.



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
MRCS Activity	2018			2017			2018			2017
Liability at beginning of period	$	180,913		$	166,835		$	164,322		$	170,043
Reclassification from capital stock	3,560			—			26,723			—
Redemptions/repurchases	(20,072		)	(1,674		)	(26,649		)	(4,882		)
Accrued distributions	33			—			38			—
Liability at end of period	$	164,434		$	165,161		$	164,434		$	165,161

In accordance with the Final Membership Rule, captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLBank members on or after September 12, 2014 had their memberships terminated by February 19, 2017. All of their outstanding Class B stock, totaling $3,021 at December 31, 2016, was repurchased on or before February 19, 2017.

The following table presents MRCS by contractual year of redemption. The year of redemption is the later of (i) the final year of the five-year redemption period, or (ii) the first year in which a non-member no longer has an activity-based stock requirement.



MRCS Contractual Year of Redemption	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Year 1 ⁽¹⁾	$	1,365	$	7,963
Year 2	—		13
Year 3	4,158		—
Year 4	—		4,158
Year 5	26,723		—
Thereafter ⁽²⁾	132,188		152,188
Total MRCS	$	164,434	$	164,322


⁽¹⁾	Balances at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 include $1,319 and $2,909, respectively, of Class B stock that had reached the end of the five-year redemption period but will not be redeemed until the associated credit products and other obligations are no longer outstanding.


⁽²⁾	Represents the five-year redemption period of Class B stock held by certain captive insurance companies which begins immediately upon their respective terminations of membership no later than February 19, 2021, in accordance with the Final Membership Rule.

The following table presents the distributions related to MRCS.



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
MRCS Distributions	2018		2017		2018		2017
Recorded as interest expense	$	1,927	$	1,768	$	6,557	$	5,277
Recorded as distributions from retained earnings	33		—		38		—
Total	$	1,960	$	1,768	$	6,595	$	5,277

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Capital Requirements. We are subject to three capital requirements under our capital plan and Finance Agency regulations as disclosed in Note 15 - Capital in our 2017 Form 10-K. As presented in the following table, we were in compliance with those requirements at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.



	September 30, 2018						December 31, 2017
Regulatory Capital Requirements	Required			Actual			Required			Actual
Risk-based capital	$	837,406		$	3,125,835		$	903,806		$	2,998,422

Total regulatory capital-to-asset ratio	4.00		%	4.70		%	4.00		%	4.81		%
Total regulatory capital	$	2,658,870		$	3,125,835		$	2,493,956		$	2,998,422

Leverage ratio	5.00		%	7.05		%	5.00		%	7.21		%
Leverage capital	$	3,323,588		$	4,688,753		$	3,117,445		$	4,497,633

Note 13 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents a summary of the changes in the components of AOCI.



AOCI Rollforward	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities		Non-Credit OTTI on AFS Securities			Non-Credit OTTI on HTM Securities			Pension Benefits			Total AOCI
Balance, June 30, 2017	$	77,078	$	28,677		$	(53	)	$	(9,282	)	$	96,420

OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)	5,007		1,617			—			—			6,624
Net change in fair value	—		(5		)	—			—			(5		)
Accretion of non-credit losses	—		—			—			—			—
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities	—		—			—			—			—
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses	—		11			4			—			15
Pension benefits, net	—		—			—			340			340
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	5,007		1,623			4			340			6,974

Balance, September 30, 2017	$	82,085	$	30,300		$	(49	)	$	(8,942	)	$	103,394

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	102,491	$	—		$	—		$	(16,600	)	$	85,891

OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)	9,043		—			—			—			9,043
Net change in fair value	—		—			—			—			—
Accretion of non-credit losses	—		—			—			—			—
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities	—		—			—			—			—
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses	—		—			—			—			—
Pension benefits, net	—		—			—			636			636
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	9,043		—			—			636			9,679

Balance, September 30, 2018	$	111,534	$	—		$	—		$	(15,964	)	$	95,570

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)



AOCI Rollforward	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities		Non-Credit OTTI on AFS Securities			Non-Credit OTTI on HTM Securities			Pension Benefits			Total AOCI
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	39,468	$	26,938		$	(103	)	$	(9,935	)	$	56,368

OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)	42,617		3,199			—			—			45,816
Net change in fair value	—		(3		)	—			—			(3		)
Accretion of non-credit losses	—		—			12			—			12
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities	—		—			—			—			—
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses	—		166			42			—			208
Pension benefits, net	—		—			—			993			993
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	42,617		3,362			54			993			47,026

Balance, September 30, 2017	$	82,085	$	30,300		$	(49	)	$	(8,942	)	$	103,394

Balance, December 31, 2017	$	92,519	$	29,322		$	(51	)	$	(10,384	)	$	111,406

OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)	19,015		392			—			—			19,407
Net change in fair value	—		2,693			—			—			2,693
Accretion of non-credit losses	—		—			51			—			51
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities	—		(32,407		)	—			—			(32,407		)
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses	—		—			—			—			—
Pension benefits, net	—		—			—			(5,580		)	(5,580		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	19,015		(29,322		)	51			(5,580		)	(15,836		)

Balance, September 30, 2018	$	111,534	$	—		$	—		$	(15,964	)	$	95,570

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 14 - Segment Information

The following table presents our financial performance by operating segment.



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018									Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	Traditional			Mortgage Loans			Total			Traditional			Mortgage Loans			Total
Net interest income	$	56,700		$	16,187		$	72,887		$	51,584		$	17,140		$	68,724
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	—			102			102			—			(90		)	(90		)
Other income (loss)	(6,571		)	(257		)	(6,828		)	(2,738		)	(250		)	(2,988		)
Other expenses	18,979			3,449			22,428			17,163			3,192			20,355
Income before assessments	31,150			12,379			43,529			31,683			13,788			45,471
Affordable Housing Program assessments	3,308			1,238			4,546			3,345			1,379			4,724
Net income	$	27,842		$	11,141		$	38,983		$	28,338		$	12,409		$	40,747

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	Traditional			Mortgage Loans			Total			Traditional			Mortgage Loans			Total
Net interest income	$	162,696		$	50,225		$	212,921		$	140,375		$	52,417		$	192,792
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	—			(359		)	(359		)	—			191			191
Other income (loss)	30,829			(1,162		)	29,667			(9,741		)	(745		)	(10,486		)
Other expenses	58,228			10,486			68,714			49,989			9,263			59,252
Income before assessments	135,297			38,936			174,233			80,645			42,218			122,863
Affordable Housing Program assessments	14,185			3,894			18,079			8,592			4,222			12,814
Net income	$	121,112		$	35,042		$	156,154		$	72,053		$	37,996		$	110,049

The following table presents asset balances by operating segment.



By Date	Traditional		Mortgage Loans		Total
September 30, 2018	$	55,177,554	$	11,294,203	$	66,471,757
December 31, 2017	51,992,565		10,356,341		62,348,906

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 15 - Estimated Fair Values

The following tables present the carrying value and estimated fair value of each of our financial instruments. The total of the estimated fair values does not represent an estimate of our overall market value as a going concern, which would take into account, among other considerations, future business opportunities and the net profitability of assets and liabilities.



	September 30, 2018
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying										Netting
Financial Instruments	Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Adjustments ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	115,619	$	115,619	$	115,619	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	1,370,790		1,370,790		1,370,086		704		—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	3,171,348		3,171,350		—		3,171,350		—		—
Federal funds sold	3,398,000		3,398,000		—		3,398,000		—		—
AFS securities	7,430,027		7,430,027		—		7,430,027		—		—
HTM securities	5,810,492		5,808,391		—		5,808,391		—		—
Advances	33,566,891		33,505,496		—		33,505,496		—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	11,294,203		11,000,691		—		10,990,758		9,933		—
Accrued interest receivable	115,638		115,638		—		115,638		—		—
Derivative assets, net	124,155		124,155		—		310,504		—		(186,349		)
Grantor trust assets ⁽²⁾	22,689		22,689		22,689		—		—		—

Liabilities:
Deposits	484,167		484,167		—		484,167		—		—
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	22,649,814		22,699,988		—		22,699,988		—		—
Bonds	39,563,644		39,260,424		—		39,260,424		—		—
Accrued interest payable	166,942		166,942		—		166,942		—		—
Derivative liabilities, net	2,451		2,451		—		105,118		—		(102,667		)
MRCS	164,434		164,434		164,434		—		—		—

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)



	December 31, 2017
			Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying										Netting
Financial Instruments	Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Adjustments ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	55,269	$	55,269	$	55,269	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	660,342		660,342		659,926		416		—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,605,460		2,605,461		—		2,605,461		—		—
Federal funds sold	1,280,000		1,280,000		—		1,280,000		—		—
AFS securities	7,128,758		7,128,758		—		6,910,224		218,534		—
HTM securities	5,897,668		5,919,299		—		5,874,413		44,886		—
Advances	34,055,064		34,001,397		—		34,001,397		—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	10,356,341		10,426,213		—		10,413,134		13,079		—
Accrued interest receivable	105,314		105,314		—		105,314		—		—
Derivative assets, net	128,206		128,206		—		249,300		—		(121,094		)
Grantor trust assets ⁽²⁾	21,698		21,698		21,698		—		—		—

Liabilities:
Deposits	564,799		564,799		—		564,799		—		—
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	20,358,157		20,394,192		—		20,394,192		—		—
Bonds	37,895,653		37,998,928		—		37,998,928		—		—
Accrued interest payable	135,691		135,691		—		135,691		—		—
Derivative liabilities, net	2,718		2,718		—		51,228		—		(48,510		)
MRCS	164,322		164,322		164,322		—		—		—

⁽¹⁾

Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow the settlement of (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed, with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. To conform with the current presentation, variation margin of $24,954 has been allocated to individual derivative instruments as of December 31, 2017. Previously, this amount was included with netting adjustments.


⁽²⁾	Included in other assets on the statement of condition.

Summary of Valuation Techniques and Significant Inputs. A description of the valuation techniques, significant inputs, and levels of fair value hierarchy is disclosed in Note 19 - Estimated Fair Values in our 2017 Form 10-K. No changes have been made in the current year.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Estimated Fair Value Measurements. The following tables present, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the estimated fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at estimated fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis on our statement of condition.



									Netting
September 30, 2018	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Adjustments ⁽¹⁾
AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debentures	$	4,231,568	$	—	$	4,231,568	$	—	$	—
GSE MBS	3,198,459		—		3,198,459		—		—
Total AFS securities	7,430,027		—		7,430,027		—		—
Derivative assets:
Interest-rate related	123,616		—		309,965		—		(186,349		)
Interest-rate forwards	500		—		500		—		—
MDCs	39		—		39		—		—
Total derivative assets, net	124,155		—		310,504		—		(186,349		)
Grantor trust assets ⁽²⁾	22,689		22,689		—		—		—
Total assets at recurring estimated fair value	$	7,576,871	$	22,689	$	7,740,531	$	—	$	(186,349	)

Derivative liabilities:
Interest-rate related	$	2,223	$	—	$	104,890	$	—	$	(102,667	)
Interest-rate forwards	14		—		14		—		—
MDCs	214		—		214		—		—
Total derivative liabilities, net	2,451		—		105,118		—		(102,667		)
Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair value	$	2,451	$	—	$	105,118	$	—	$	(102,667	)

Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽³⁾	$	1,848	$	—	$	—	$	1,848	$	—
Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair value	$	1,848	$	—	$	—	$	1,848	$	—


December 31, 2017
AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debentures	$	4,403,929	$	—	$	4,403,929	$	—	$	—
GSE MBS	2,506,295		—		2,506,295		—		—
Private-label RMBS	218,534		—		—		218,534		—
Total AFS securities	7,128,758		—		6,910,224		218,534		—
Derivative assets:
Interest-rate related	128,096		—		249,190		—		(121,094		)
Interest-rate forwards	37		—		37		—		—
MDCs	73		—		73		—		—
Total derivative assets, net	128,206		—		249,300		—		(121,094		)
Grantor trust assets ⁽²⁾	21,698		21,698		—		—		—
Total assets at recurring estimated fair value	$	7,278,662	$	21,698	$	7,159,524	$	218,534	$	(121,094	)

Derivative liabilities:
Interest-rate related	$	2,669	$	—	$	51,179	$	—	$	(48,510	)
Interest-rate forwards	1		—		1		—		—
MDCs	48		—		48		—		—
Total derivative liabilities, net	2,718		—		51,228		—		(48,510		)
Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair value	$	2,718	$	—	$	51,228	$	—	$	(48,510	)

Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽⁴⁾	$	2,637	$	—	$	—	$	2,637	$	—
Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair value	$	2,637	$	—	$	—	$	2,637	$	—

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

⁽¹⁾

Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow us to settle (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed, with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. To conform with the current presentation, variation margin of $24,954 has been allocated to the individual derivative instruments as of December 31, 2017. Previously, this amount was included with netting adjustments.


⁽²⁾	Included in other assets.


⁽³⁾	Amounts are as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.


⁽⁴⁾	Amounts are as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Level 3 Disclosures for All Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. The table below presents a rollforward of our AFS private-label RMBS measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using level 3 significant inputs. The estimated fair values were determined using a pricing source, such as a dealer quote or comparable security price, for which the significant inputs used to determine the price were not readily observable.



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
AFS private-label RMBS Level 3 Rollforward	2018		2017			2018			2017
Balance, beginning of period	$	—	$	244,263		$	218,534		$	269,119
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities	—		—			32,407			—
Accretion of credit losses in interest income	—		1,644			1,884			5,300
Net losses on changes in fair value in other income (loss)	—		(11		)	—			(166		)
Net change in fair value not in excess of cumulative non-credit losses in OCI	—		(5		)	2,693			(3		)
Unrealized gains (losses) in OCI	—		1,617			392			3,199
Reclassification of non-credit portion in OCI to other income (loss)	—		11			—			166
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
Sales	—		—			(236,248		)	—
Settlements	—		(15,750		)	(19,662		)	(45,846		)
Balance, end of period	$	—	$	231,769		$	—		$	231,769

Net gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to changes in fair value relating to assets still held at end of period	$	—	$	1,633		$	—		$	5,134

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies

The following table presents our off-balance-sheet commitments at their notional amounts.



	September 30, 2018
Type of Commitment	Expire within one year		Expire after one year		Total
Letters of credit outstanding	$	329,892	$	85,929	$	415,821
Unused lines of credit ⁽¹⁾	1,003,252		—		1,003,252
Commitments to fund additional advances⁽²⁾	22,090		—		22,090
Commitments to fund or purchase mortgage loans, net ⁽³⁾	86,377		—		86,377
Unsettled CO bonds, at par	6,650		—		6,650
Unsettled discount notes, at par	1,425		—		1,425


⁽¹⁾	Maximum line of credit amount per member is $50,000.


⁽²⁾	Generally for periods up to six months.


⁽³⁾	Generally for periods up to 91 days.

Pledged Collateral. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had pledged cash collateral, at par, of $124,987 and $16,437, respectively, to counterparties and clearing agents. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had not pledged any securities as collateral.

Legal Proceedings. We are subject to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We record an accrual for a loss contingency when it is probable that a loss for which we could be liable has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these proceedings could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In 2010, we filed a complaint asserting claims against several entities for negligent misrepresentation and violations of state and federal securities law occurring in connection with the sale of private-label RMBS to us. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, we executed confidential settlement agreements with certain defendants in this litigation, pursuant to which we have dismissed all pending claims against, and provided legal releases to, certain entities with respect to all applicable securities at issue in the litigation, in consideration of our receipt of cash payments from or on behalf of those defendants. We had previously dismissed the complaint as to the other named defendants. As a result, all proceedings in the RMBS litigation we filed have been concluded. Cash settlement payments, net of legal fees and litigation expenses, totaled $317 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $134 and $312 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and were recorded in other income.

Additional discussion of other commitments and contingencies is provided in Note 6 - Advances; Note 7 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio; Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities; Note 10 - Consolidated Obligations; Note 12 - Capital; and Note 15 - Estimated Fair Values.

Note 17 - Related Party and Other Transactions

Transactions with Related Parties. The following table presents the aggregate outstanding balances with directors' financial institutions and their balance as a percent of the total balance on our statement of condition.



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Balances with Directors' Financial Institutions	Par value		% of Total		Par value		% of Total
Capital stock	$	38,365	2	%	$	40,564	2	%
Advances	513,550		2	%	588,108		2	%

The par values at September 30, 2018 reflect changes in the composition of directors' financial institutions effective January 1, 2018, due to changes in board membership resulting from the 2017 director election.

Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

(Unaudited, $ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents transactions with directors' financial institutions, taking into account the beginning and ending dates of the directors' terms, merger activity and other changes in the composition of directors' financial institutions.



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions	2018		2017			2018			2017
Net capital stock issuances (redemptions and repurchases)	$	532	$	90		$	1,378		$	3,664
Net advances (repayments)	46,150		(17,700		)	(46,750		)	47,151
Mortgage loan purchases	11,289		11,187			28,078			25,234

Transactions with Other FHLBanks. Occasionally, we loan or borrow short-term funds to/from other FHLBanks. The following table presents the loans to other FHLBanks.



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
Loans to other FHLBanks	2018		2017		2018			2017
Disbursements	$	—	$	—	$	(400,000	)	$	—
Principal repayments	—		—		400,000			—

There were no borrowings from other FHLBanks during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 or 2017. There were no loans to or borrowings from other FHLBanks outstanding at September 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

In December 2016, we agreed to sell a 90% participating interest in a $100 million MCC of certain newly acquired MPP loans to the FHLBank of Atlanta. Principal amounts settled in December 2016 totaled $72 million, and the remaining $18 million settled in January 2017.

Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Presentation

This discussion and analysis by management of the Bank's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our 2017 Form 10-K and the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in Item 1. Financial Statements.

Unless otherwise stated, amounts disclosed in this Item are rounded to the nearest million; therefore, dollar amounts of less than one million may not be reflected and, due to rounding, may not appear to agree to the amounts presented in thousands in the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements. Amounts used to calculate dollar and percentage changes are based on numbers in the thousands. Accordingly, calculations based upon the disclosed amounts (millions) may not produce the same results.

Executive Summary

Overview. We are a regional wholesale bank that serves as a financial intermediary between the capital markets and our members. We primarily make secured loans in the form of advances to our members and purchase whole mortgage loans from our members. Additionally, we purchase other investments and provide other financial services to our members. As an FHLBank, we are generally designed to expand and contract in asset size as the needs of our members and their communities change over time.

Our principal source of funding is the proceeds from the sale to the public of FHLBank debt instruments, called consolidated obligations, which are the joint and several obligation of all FHLBanks. We obtain additional funds from deposits, other borrowings, and the sale of capital stock to our members.

Our primary source of revenue is interest earned on advances, mortgage loans, and long- and short-term investments.

Our net interest income is primarily determined by the spread between the interest rate earned on our assets and the interest rate paid on our share of consolidated obligations. We use funding and hedging strategies to manage the related interest-rate risk.

Due to our cooperative structure and wholesale nature, we typically earn a narrow interest spread. Accordingly, our net income is relatively low compared to our total assets and capital.

We group our products and services within two operating segments: traditional and mortgage loans.

Economic Environment. The Bank’s financial performance is influenced by a number of regional and national economic and market factors, including the level and volatility of market interest rates, inflation or deflation, monetary policies, and the strength of housing markets.

The U.S. economy continued to grow through the third quarter of 2018. The current economic expansion has run 111 months through the third quarter, compared to the average post-war economic expansion length of 47 months. In the third quarter of 2018, real U.S. Gross Domestic Product posted an annualized increase of 3.5 percent. Strong business, government, and consumer spending boosted such growth. While quite solid, it is a small decline from the 4.2 percent annualized increase in the second quarter 2018.

Table of Contents

Other indications of robust economic growth in the third quarter of 2018 included capital market returns, labor market conditions, and corporate activity. Through the end of the quarter, equity markets remained solid, though markets in the U.S. fared far better than other global markets. Bond market returns, on the other hand, primarily posted negative total returns in the U.S. since the beginning of the year, as a result of a rising interest-rate environment. However, certain floating rate bonds, high yield bonds, and convertible securities sectors posted large cash inflows and positive returns, more in line with equity markets, as investors searched for returns outside of traditional stock and bond markets. In addition to rising interest rates, global central banks, including the Federal Reserve, began in concert to shrink their balance sheet holdings of bonds. Central bank bond purchases as part of a quantitative easing operation helped boost demand and liquidity while reducing borrowing costs for bond issuers since the financial crisis. Global central bank holdings peaked in early 2017 and are expected to steadily decline over the next five years, in accordance with published plans of global central banks. Continued balance sheet shrinkage will, all else equal, put additional pressure on rising interest rates. If economic conditions significantly deteriorate during this timeframe, this unwinding of quantitative easing can certainly be adjusted accordingly.

Labor markets remained very strong, with unemployment rates near record lows. The long-time lack of wage growth accompanying low unemployment levels appears to be dissipating, as wage inflation begins to take root. Regardless of the causes, low unemployment and wage growth characteristically lead to higher consumer confidence and spending, helping to perpetuate economic growth. In September 2018, the national unemployment rate declined to 3.7 percent, down from 4.0 percent in June 2018 and 4.2 percent in September 2017. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the total number of unemployed persons at the end of September 2018 was 6.0 million, while the total number of involuntary part-time employees (those who would prefer full-time employment but can only get part-time jobs) increased to 4.6 million.

Both Indiana and Michigan have continued to show improvement in labor markets over the past five years, in line with national trends. As of September 30, 2018, the unemployment rate in Michigan remained slightly above the national average at 4.0 percent, an improvement from 4.7 percent and 4.4 percent as of the end of the first and second quarters of 2018, respectively. The unemployment rate in Michigan has improved in each of the past five months. Indiana’s employment picture was mixed. Though the unemployment rate ticked up from 3.3 percent at the end of June 2018 to 3.5 percent at the end of September, the total number of jobs increased over the period. The Indiana labor force over the third quarter and over the prior 12 months increased at a rate greater than the rate of job growth. Despite the uptick, the unemployment rate remained below the national average.

Tempering the strong economic reports of prior months is the potential of a continued and expanded global trade war, tight labor markets and other supply costs and constraints, higher interest rates, and the repricing of assets and debt. The higher debt service costs associated with higher interest rates and higher risk premiums have the potential for significant credit events as lower-quality borrowers default or have difficulty obtaining new funding. Government and corporate borrowers, as well as the domestic economy, have been beneficiaries of low interest rates and aggressive monetary stimulus. The Federal Reserve has continued to indicate that the economy is strong enough for it to continue to unwind quantitative easing activity and to continue to increase the overnight federal funds rate. Though this is not universally popular, most market participants realize the necessity of unwinding the relatively loose monetary policy and still near-zero real interest rates, particularly when combined with the massive fiscal stimulus enacted with the personal and corporate tax cuts that went into effect this year. Since the beginning of the year, the Federal Reserve has raised the overnight federal funds rate by 75 basis points (0.75 percent) with the upper target rate now at 2.25 percent. Since the beginning of the tightening cycle in December of 2015, the Federal Reserve has raised the target rate eight times in 25 basis point increments. The ten-year Treasury rate has increased along with short-term rates, and has been at or near the 3% level. Though higher interest rates have the ability to take a toll on markets, businesses, and consumers, the yield curve has remained upward sloping instead of inverted. An inverted yield curve, or one where longer-term rates are below shorter-term rates, is often a leading indicator of a decline in economic growth.

Table of Contents

The housing market remains positive, but has begun to lose momentum despite the strength in the overall economy. A shortage of existing home inventory, increased builder costs, and higher mortgage rates are beginning to impact the availability and affordability of the housing market. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage originations continued to climb modestly in each of the first three quarters of 2018 after a slow start to the year, driven primarily by first-lien 1-4 family purchase mortgages. Total single family mortgage originations were $457 billion in the third quarter of 2018, resulting in production for the first nine months of 2018 to $1,251 billion, down from $1,309 billion for the same period in 2017. Mortgages for refinancing as a share of total originations dropped as mortgage rates have risen along with overall interest rates. New housing starts posted a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.21 million units in September 2018, down 5.3 percent from August 2018. After climbing in each of the first three months of 2018, the volume of existing home sales has declined in each of the past six months, ending in September 2018 at a level of 5.3 million units.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), which has regulated LIBOR since April 2013, announced it would exit from LIBOR after 2021. In response, the FRB convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") to identify a set of alternative reference interest rates for possible use as market benchmarks. The ARRC has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as an alternative rate and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in the second quarter of 2018. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight U.S. Treasury securities repurchase agreement market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by Treasury securities. During the third quarter of 2018, certain market participants began moving towards the utilization of SOFR as a possible LIBOR replacement through the issuance of debt securities indexed to SOFR. On October 25, 2018, the FASB issued guidance permitting the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes.

Impact on Operating Results. Market interest rates and trends affect yields and margins on earning assets, including advances, purchased mortgage loans, and our investment portfolio, all of which contribute to our overall profitability. Additionally, market interest rates drive mortgage origination and prepayment activity, which can lead to both favorable and unfavorable net interest margin volatility in our MPP and MBS portfolios. A flat or inverted yield curve, in which the difference between short-term interest rates and long-term interest rates is low or negative, respectively, can have an unfavorable impact on our net interest margins.

Lending and investing activity by our member institutions is a key driver for our balance sheet and income growth. Such activity is a function of both prevailing interest rates and economic activity, including local economic factors, particularly relating to the housing and mortgage markets. Positive economic trends could drive interest rates higher, which could impair growth of the mortgage market. A less active mortgage market could affect demand for advances and activity levels in our MPP Advantage. However, borrowing patterns between our insurance company and depository members tend to differ during various economic and market conditions, thereby easing the potential magnitude of core business fluctuations during business cycles. Member demand for liquidity during stressed market conditions can lead to advances growth.

Table of Contents

Selected Financial Data

The following table presents a summary of selected financial information ($ amounts in millions).



	As of and for the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2018			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017			September 30, 2017
Statement of Condition:
Advances	$	33,567		$	33,888		$	32,965		$	34,055		$	32,953
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	11,294			10,888			10,496			10,356			10,196
Cash and investments⁽¹⁾	21,296			19,348			17,608			17,628			18,718

Total assets	66,472			64,452			61,392			62,349			62,178

Discount notes	22,650			21,987			19,556			20,358			22,381
CO bonds	39,564			38,123			37,779			37,896			35,902
Total consolidated obligations	62,214			60,110			57,335			58,254			58,283

MRCS	164			181			164			164			165

Capital stock	1,901			1,892			1,881			1,858			1,779
Retained earnings ⁽²⁾	1,061			1,043			993			976			949
AOCI	95			86			135			112			103
Total capital	3,057			3,021			3,009			2,946			2,831

Statement of Income:
Net interest income	$	73		$	70		$	70		$	70		$	69
Provision for credit losses	—			—			—			—			—
Other income (loss)	(7		)	31			6			4			(3		)
Other expenses	23			24			22			23			20
AHP assessments	4			8			6			5			5
Net income	$	39		$	69		$	48		$	46		$	41

Selected Financial Ratios:
Net interest margin⁽³⁾	0.44		%	0.45		%	0.46		%	0.45		%	0.45		%
Return on average equity ⁽⁴⁾	5.05		%	6.20		%	6.57		%	6.46		%	5.95		%
Return on average assets ⁽⁴⁾	0.23		%	0.30		%	0.31		%	0.30		%	0.26		%
Weighted average dividend rate ⁽⁵⁾	4.50		%	4.25		%	6.75		%	4.25		%	4.25		%
Dividend payout ratio ⁽⁶⁾	54.18		%	28.50		%	64.15		%	40.05		%	42.67		%
Total capital ratio ⁽⁷⁾	4.60		%	4.69		%	4.90		%	4.72		%	4.55		%
Total regulatory capital ratio ⁽⁸⁾	4.70		%	4.83		%	4.95		%	4.81		%	4.65		%
Average equity to average assets	4.62		%	4.83		%	4.75		%	4.57		%	4.44		%


⁽¹⁾	Consists of cash, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold, AFS securities, and HTM securities.


⁽²⁾	Includes restricted and unrestricted retained earnings.


⁽³⁾	Annualized net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.


⁽⁴⁾	Annualized, as appropriate.


⁽⁵⁾	Annualized dividends paid in cash during the period divided by the average amount of Class B capital stock eligible for dividends under our capital plan, excluding MRCS.


⁽⁶⁾	Dividends paid in cash during the period divided by net income for the period. By dividing dividends paid in cash during the period by the net income for the prior period, the dividend payout ratios for each of the three months ended September 30, 2018, June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, would be 31%, 41%, 67%, 46% and 46%, respectively.


⁽⁷⁾	Capital stock plus retained earnings and AOCI expressed as a percentage of total assets.


⁽⁸⁾	Capital stock plus retained earnings and MRCS expressed as a percentage of total assets.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. The following table presents the comparative highlights of our results of operations ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
Comparative Highlights	2018			2017			$ Change			% Change		2018			2017			$ Change			% Change
Net interest income	$	73		$	69		$	4		6	%	$	213		$	192		$	21		11	%
Provision for credit losses	—			—			—					—			—			—
Net interest income after provision for credit losses	73			69			4			6	%	213			192			21			11	%
Other income (loss)	(7		)	(3		)	(4		)			30			(10		)	40
Other expenses	23			20			3					69			59			10
Income before assessments	43			46			(3		)	(4	%)	174			123			51			42	%
AHP assessments	4			5			(1		)			18			13			5
Net income	39			41			(2		)	(4	%)	156			110			46			42	%
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	10			7			3					(16		)	47			(63		)
Total comprehensive income	$	49		$	48		$	1		2	%	$	140		$	157		$	(17	)	(11	%)

The decrease in net income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in the prior year was primarily due to higher net losses on derivatives and hedging activities and, to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher net interest income.

The increase in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in the prior year was primarily due to a net realized gain on the sale of all of the Bank's private-label RMBS and ABS, higher net interest income and lower net losses on derivatives and hedging activities, partially offset by higher operating expenses.

Changes in Financial Condition for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018. The following table presents the comparative highlights of our changes in financial condition ($ amounts in millions).



Condensed Statements of Condition	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		$ Change			% Change
Advances	$	33,567	$	34,055	$	(488	)	(1	%)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	11,294		10,356		938			9	%
Cash and investments ⁽¹⁾	21,296		17,628		3,668			21	%
Other assets	315		310		5			1	%
Total assets	$	66,472	$	62,349	$	4,123		7	%

Consolidated obligations	$	62,214	$	58,254	$	3,960		7	%
MRCS	164		164		—			—	%
Other liabilities	1,037		985		52			5	%
Total liabilities	63,415		59,403		4,012			7	%
Capital stock	1,901		1,858		43			2	%
Retained earnings ⁽²⁾	1,061		976		85			9	%
AOCI	95		112		(17		)	(14	%)
Total capital	3,057		2,946		111			4	%
Total liabilities and capital	$	66,472	$	62,349	$	4,123		7	%

Total regulatory capital ⁽³⁾	$	3,126	$	2,998	$	128		4	%


⁽¹⁾	Includes cash, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold, AFS securities, and HTM securities.


⁽²⁾	Includes restricted retained earnings at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 of $215 million and $183 million, respectively.


⁽³⁾	Total capital less AOCI plus MRCS.

Table of Contents

The increase in total assets at September 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 was primarily driven by an increase in short-term investments outstanding to enhance the Bank's liquidity position in light of the issuance of new regulatory guidance from the Finance Agency. See Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments - Legislative and Regulatory Developments for additional information. The increase in total liabilities at September 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 was attributable to a net increase in consolidated obligations to support the increase in the Bank's assets.

The increase in total capital at September 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 was primarily a result of the growth of retained earnings and additional capital stock issued to members. These increases were partially offset by the reduction in AOCI as a result of the recognition of the gain on the sale of our private-label RMBS and ABS.

Analysis of Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Net Interest Income. The following tables present average daily balances, interest income/expense, and average yields of our major categories of interest-earning assets and their funding sources ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018						2017
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield⁽¹⁾		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell	$	7,119	$	35	1.96	%	$	5,126	$	15	1.17	%
Investment securities ⁽²⁾	13,079		91		2.77	%	12,790		66		2.03	%
Advances ⁽³⁾	32,943		198		2.38	%	32,183		113		1.39	%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽³⁾	11,143		90		3.22	%	10,066		79		3.13	%
Other assets (interest-earning) ⁽⁴⁾	1,238		6		1.86	%	424		1		1.36	%
Total interest-earning assets	65,522		420		2.54	%	60,589		274		1.79	%
Other assets ⁽⁵⁾	458						397
Total assets	$	65,980					$	60,986

Liabilities and Capital:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	650	3		1.79	%	$	546	1		0.96	%
Discount notes	22,916		114		1.97	%	21,014		55		1.03	%
CO bonds ⁽³⁾	38,574		229		2.35	%	35,840		147		1.63	%
MRCS	163		1		4.70	%	166		2		4.22	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	62,303		347		2.21	%	57,566		205		1.41	%
Other liabilities	632						710
Total capital	3,045						2,710
Total liabilities and capital	$	65,980					$	60,986

Net interest income			$	73					$	69

Net spread on interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities					0.33	%					0.38	%

Net interest margin⁽⁶⁾					0.44	%					0.45	%

Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities	1.05						1.05

Table of Contents




	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018						2017
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield ⁽¹⁾		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield ⁽¹⁾
Assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell	$	5,708	$	76	1.78	%	$	5,013	$	36	0.96	%
Investment securities ⁽²⁾	12,985		252		2.59	%	12,560		173		1.84	%
Advances ⁽³⁾	32,962		519		2.10	%	30,439		282		1.24	%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio ⁽³⁾	10,745		259		3.23	%	9,793		233		3.19	%
Other assets (interest-earning) ⁽⁴⁾	1,044		13		1.65	%	357		3		1.23	%
Total interest-earning assets	63,444		1,119		2.36	%	58,162		727		1.67	%
Other assets ⁽⁵⁾	460						445
Total assets	$	63,904					$	58,607

Liabilities and Capital:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	640	8		1.58	%	$	555	3		0.76	%
Discount notes	21,425		274		1.71	%	19,743		122		0.83	%
CO bonds ⁽³⁾	38,113		618		2.17	%	34,835		405		1.55	%
MRCS	169		6		5.18	%	167		5		4.22	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	60,347		906		2.01	%	55,300		535		1.29	%
Other liabilities	535						708
Total capital	3,022						2,599
Total liabilities and capital	$	63,904					$	58,607

Net interest income			$	213					$	192

Net spread on interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities					0.35	%					0.38	%

Net interest margin ⁽⁶⁾					0.45	%					0.44	%

Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities	1.05						1.05


⁽¹⁾	Annualized.


⁽²⁾	Consists of AFS and HTM securities. The average balances of investment securities are based on amortized cost; therefore, the resulting yields do not reflect changes in the estimated fair value of AFS securities that are a component of OCI, nor do they reflect OTTI-related non-credit losses. Interest income/expense includes the effects of associated derivative transactions.


⁽³⁾	Interest income/expense and average yield include all other components of interest, including the impact of net interest payments or receipts on derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships, amortization of hedge accounting adjustments, and prepayment fees on advances.


⁽⁴⁾	Consists of interest-bearing deposits and loans to other FHLBanks (if applicable). Includes the rights or obligations to cash collateral, except for variation margin payments characterized as daily settled contracts. The 2017 amounts also include grantor trust assets that are included in other assets in 2018.


⁽⁵⁾	Includes changes in the estimated fair value of AFS securities and the effect of OTTI-related non-credit losses on AFS and HTM securities.


⁽⁶⁾	Annualized net interest income expressed as a percentage of the average balance of interest-earning assets.

The increase in net interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in 2017 was primarily due to asset growth.

Table of Contents

Yields. The average yield on total interest-earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was 2.54%, an increase of 75 bps compared to the corresponding period in 2017, resulting primarily from increases in market interest rates that led to higher yields on advances and investment securities. The average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities was 2.21%, an increase of 80 bps due to higher funding costs on consolidated obligations. The net effect was a decrease in the net interest spread to 0.33% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 0.38% for the corresponding period in 2017.

The average yield on total interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was 2.36%, an increase of 69 bps compared to the corresponding period in 2017, resulting primarily from increases in market interest rates that led to higher yields on advances and investment securities. The average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities was 2.01%, an increase of 72 bps due to higher funding costs on consolidated obligations. The net effect was a decrease in the net interest spread to 0.35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from 0.38% for the corresponding period in 2017.

Average Balances. The average balances of all interest-earning assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. The average balance of short-term investments outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by 39% and 14%, respectively, in light of the issuance of new regulatory guidance from the Finance Agency. The average balance of advances outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by 2% and 8%, respectively, generally driven by member funding needs. The average balance outstanding of mortgage loans held for portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by 11% and 10%, respectively, due to strong demand by our members for MPP Advantage. The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities was due to an increase in consolidated obligations to fund the increases in the average balances of all interest-earning assets.

Provision for Credit Losses. The changes in the provision for credit losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 were insignificant.

Other Income (Loss). The following table presents a comparison of the components of other income ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Components	2018			2017			2018			2017
Net OTTI credit losses	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities	—			—			32			—
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities	—			—			—			—
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	(8		)	(4		)	(5		)	(13		)
Other	1			1			3			3
Total other income (loss)	$	(7	)	$	(3	)	$	30		$	(10	)

The increase in total other loss for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in 2017 was primarily due to higher net losses on derivatives and hedging activities. The increase in total other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in 2017 was primarily due to the gain on the sale of all of our private-label RMBS and ABS. See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 4 - Available-for-Sale Securities and Note 5 - Held-to-Maturity Securities for additional information.

Net Gains (Losses) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities. For the hedging relationships that qualified for hedge accounting, the differences between the change in the estimated fair value of the hedged items and the change in the estimated fair value of the associated interest-rate swaps, i.e., hedge ineffectiveness, resulted in a net loss of $6 million and a net gain $1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to a net loss of $3 million and $11 million for the corresponding periods in 2017. Nearly all of these gains and losses will generally reverse over the remaining contractual terms of the hedged items. See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 11 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities in our 2017 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

To the extent those hedges did not qualify for hedge accounting, or ceased to qualify because they were determined to be ineffective, only the change in the fair value of the derivative was recorded in earnings with no offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item. For the derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (economic hedges), the net interest settlements and the changes in the estimated fair value of the derivatives were recorded in net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities. For economic hedges, the Bank recorded a net loss of less than $1 million and $2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to a net loss of $1 million and $2 million for the corresponding periods in 2017.

The tables below present the net effect of derivatives on net interest income and other income (loss), within the net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, by type of hedge and hedged item ($ amounts in millions).



Three Months Ended September 30, 2018	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans		CO Bonds			Discount Notes		Other			Total
Net interest income:
Amortization/accretion of hedging activities ⁽¹⁾	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	(2	)	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)
Net interest settlements⁽²⁾	16			8			—		(15		)	—		—			9
Total net interest income	16			8			—		(17		)	—		—			7

Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Gains (losses) on fair-value hedges	(3		)	(6		)	—		3			—		—			(6		)
Gains (losses) on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting ⁽³⁾	—			—			—		—			—		—			—
Other ⁽⁴⁾	—			—			—		—			—		(2		)	(2		)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	(3		)	(6		)	—		3			—		(2		)	(8		)

Total net effect of derivatives and hedging activities	$	13		$	2		$	—	$	(14	)	$	—	$	(2	)	$	(1	)



Three Months Ended September 30, 2017	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans		CO Bonds		Discount Notes			Other		Total
Net interest income:
Amortization/accretion of hedging activities ⁽¹⁾	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Net interest settlements⁽²⁾	(7		)	(9		)	—		3		—			—		(13		)
Total net interest income	(7		)	(9		)	—		3		—			—		(13		)

Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Gains (losses) on fair-value hedges	1			(5		)	—		1		—			—		(3		)
Gains (losses) on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting⁽³⁾	—			—			—		—		(1		)	—		(1		)
Other⁽⁴⁾	—			—			—		—		—			—		—
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	1			(5		)	—		1		(1		)	—		(4		)

Total net effect of derivatives and hedging activities	$	(6	)	$	(14	)	$	—	$	4	$	(1	)	$	—	$	(17	)

Table of Contents



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018	Advances		Investments			Mortgage Loans			CO Bonds			Discount Notes		Other			Total
Net interest income:
Amortization/accretion of hedging activities ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)
Net interest settlements ⁽²⁾	31		9			—			(26		)	—		—			14
Total net interest income	31		9			—			(30		)	—		—			10

Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Gains (losses) on fair-value hedges	1		(3		)	—			3			—		—			1
Gains (losses) on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting ⁽³⁾	—		—			(1		)	(1		)	—		—			(2		)
Other ⁽⁴⁾	—		—			—			—			—		(4		)	(4		)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	1		(3		)	(1		)	2			—		(4		)	(5		)

Total net effect of derivatives and hedging activities	$	32	$	6		$	(1	)	$	(28	)	$	—	$	(4	)	$	5



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans			CO Bonds			Discount Notes			Other		Total
Net interest income:
Amortization/accretion of hedging activities ⁽¹⁾	$	—		$	1		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	1
Net interest settlements ⁽²⁾	(27		)	(40		)	—			11			—			—		(56		)
Total net interest income	(27		)	(39		)	—			11			—			—		(55		)

Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Gains (losses) on fair-value hedges	1			(10		)	—			(2		)	—			—		(11		)
Gains (losses) on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting ⁽³⁾	—			—			(1		)	—			(1		)	—		(2		)
Other ⁽⁴⁾	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities	1			(10		)	(1		)	(2		)	(1		)	—		(13		)

Total net effect of derivatives and hedging activities	$	(26	)	$	(49	)	$	(1	)	$	9		$	(1	)	$	—	$	(68	)


⁽¹⁾	Represents the amortization/accretion of fair value hedge accounting adjustments for both current and terminated hedge positions.


⁽²⁾	Represents interest income/expense on derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships. Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items, which fully offset the interest income/expense of the derivatives, except to the extent of any hedge ineffectiveness.


⁽³⁾	Includes net interest settlements on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting. See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information.


⁽⁴⁾	Consists of price alignment amounts on derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts.

Table of Contents

Other Expenses. The following table presents a comparison of the components of other expenses ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
Components	2018		2017		2018		2017
Compensation and benefits	$	12	$	11	$	38	$	33
Other operating expenses	8		7		21		19
Finance Agency and Office of Finance expenses	2		1		6		5
Other	1		1		4		2
Total other expenses	$	23	$	20	$	69	$	59

The increase in total other expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 was primarily due to increases in compensation, primarily driven by salary increases and higher head count. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was also due to an increase in benefits expense.

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total OCI for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted substantially of unrealized gains on non-OTTI AFS securities. Total OCI for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 consisted substantially of the reduction in AOCI as a result of the recognition of the gain on the sale of our private-label RMBS and ABS.

Operating Segments

Our products and services are grouped within two operating segments: traditional and mortgage loans.

Traditional. The traditional segment consists of (i) credit products (including advances, letters of credit, and lines of credit), (ii) investments (including federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, AFS securities and HTM securities), and (iii) correspondent services and deposits. The following table presents the financial performance of our traditional segment ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Traditional	2018			2017			2018		2017
Net interest income	$	57		$	52		$	163	$	140
Provision for credit losses	—			—			—		—
Other income (loss)	(6		)	(2		)	31		(9		)
Other expenses	20			17			59		50
Income before assessments	31			33			135		81
AHP assessments	3			4			14		9
Net income	$	28		$	29		$	121	$	72

The decrease in net income for the traditional segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in 2017 was primarily due to higher net losses on derivatives and hedging activities and, to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher net interest income.

The increase in net income for the traditional segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding period in 2017 was primarily due to the net realized gain on the sale of all of the Bank's private-label RMBS and ABS, higher net interest income, primarily due to an increase in the average balances of advances outstanding, and lower net losses on derivatives and hedging activities, partially offset by higher operating expenses.

Table of Contents

Mortgage Loans. The mortgage loans segment includes (i) mortgage loans purchased from our members through our MPP and (ii) participating interests purchased in 2012 - 2014 from the FHLBank of Topeka in mortgage loans originated by certain of its PFIs under the MPF Program. The following table presents the financial performance of our mortgage loans segment ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Mortgage Loans	2018			2017			2018			2017
Net interest income	$	16		$	17		$	50		$	52
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	—			—			—			—
Other income (loss)	(1		)	(1		)	(1		)	(1		)
Other expenses	3			3			10			9
Income before assessments	12			13			39			42
AHP assessments	1			1			4			4
Net income	$	11		$	12		$	35		$	38

The decrease in net income for the mortgage loans segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the corresponding periods in 2017 was due to lower net interest income, due primarily to lower interest spreads.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Total Assets. The table below presents the comparative highlights of our major asset categories ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Major Asset Categories	Carrying Value		% of Total		Carrying Value		% of Total
Advances	$	33,567	51	%	$	34,055	55	%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	11,294		17	%	10,356		17	%
Cash and short-term investments	8,056		12	%	4,601		7	%
Investment securities	13,240		20	%	13,027		21	%
Other assets ⁽¹⁾	315		—	%	310		—	%
Total assets	$	66,472	100	%	$	62,349	100	%


⁽¹⁾	Includes accrued interest receivable, premises, software and equipment, derivative assets and other miscellaneous assets.

Total assets were $66.5 billion as of September 30, 2018, a net increase of $4.1 billion or 7% compared to December 31, 2017, driven primarily by a significant increase in short-term investments to enhance the Bank's liquidity position in light of the issuance of new regulatory guidance from the Finance Agency. Such increase resulted in a change to the mix of our total assets.

Advances. Advances at carrying value totaled $33.6 billion at September 30, 2018, a net decrease of $488 million or 1% compared to December 31, 2017. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in short-term advances outstanding.

Advances to depository members - comprising commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions - decreased by 5%. Advances to insurance company members increased by 3%. As a result, advances to depository institutions, as a percent of total advances outstanding, decreased from 55% at December 31, 2017 to 53% at September 30, 2018, while advances to insurance companies increased from 45% to 47% at those dates.

Table of Contents

The table below presents advances outstanding by type of financial institution ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Borrower Type	Par Value		% of Total		Par Value		% of Total
Depository institutions:
Commercial banks and savings institutions	$	14,531	43	%	$	15,818	46	%
Credit unions	3,193		9	%	2,901		9	%
Total depository institutions	17,724		52	%	18,719		55	%

Insurance companies:
Captive insurance companies ⁽¹⁾	2,862		9	%	3,020		9	%
Other insurance companies	12,967		38	%	12,389		36	%
Total insurance companies	15,829		47	%	15,409		45	%

Total members	33,553		99	%	34,128		100	%

Former members	284		1	%	41		—	%

Total advances	$	33,837	100	%	$	34,169	100	%


⁽¹⁾	Memberships must terminate no later than February 19, 2021. See certain restrictions on and maturities of advances in Notes to Financial Statements - Note 7 - Advances in the 2017 Form 10-K.

The table below presents advances outstanding by interest-rate payment terms ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Interest-Rate Payment Terms	Par Value		% of Total		Par Value		% of Total
Fixed-rate	$	24,976	74	%	$	25,133	73	%
Variable-rate	8,861		26	%	9,036		27	%
Total advances	$	33,837	100	%	$	34,169	100	%

Our advance portfolio includes callable or prepayable and putable advances. For prepayable advances, the advance can be prepaid on specified dates without incurring repayment or termination fees. All other advances may only be prepaid by the borrower paying a fee that is sufficient to make us financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance. Ignoring lockout dates, callable or prepayable advances totaled $8.8 billion, or 26%, and $8.9 billion, or 26%, of advances outstanding, at par, at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Advances due in one year or less decreased from 50% of the total outstanding, at par, at December 31, 2017 to 48% of the total outstanding, at par, at September 30, 2018, reflecting members' decreased demand for short-term funding. See Note 6 - Advances for additional information.

Table of Contents

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. A breakdown of mortgage loans held for portfolio by primary product type is presented below ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Product Type	UPB		% of Total		UPB		% of Total
MPP:
Conventional Advantage	$	9,731	88	%	$	8,608	85	%
Conventional Original	720		6	%	850		8	%
FHA	323		3	%	361		4	%
Total MPP	10,774		97	%	9,819		97	%

MPF Program:
Conventional	215		2	%	243		2	%
Government	56		1	%	62		1	%
Total MPF Program	271		3	%	305		3	%

Total mortgage loans held for portfolio	$	11,045	100	%	$	10,124	100	%

The increase in the UPB of mortgage loans held for portfolio was due to purchases under MPP Advantage exceeding repayments of outstanding MPP and MPF Program loans. Over time, the outstanding balance of mortgage loans purchased under our original MPP and the MPF Program will continue to decrease as all purchases are now under MPP Advantage.

We have established and maintain an allowance for loan losses based on our best estimate of probable losses over the loss emergence period, which we have estimated to be 24 months. Our estimate of MPP losses remaining after borrower's equity, but before credit enhancements, was $4 million at September 30, 2018 and $5 million at December 31, 2017. After consideration of the portion recoverable under the associated credit enhancements, the resulting allowance for MPP loan losses was less than $1 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 9 - Allowance for Credit Losses in our 2017 Form 10-K.

During the third quarters of 2017 and 2018, major hurricanes caused substantial damage to property in several states on the southeastern coasts of the United States. We analyzed the potential impact of the hurricanes on the Bank’s mortgage loans held for portfolio, including the allowance for loan losses. Because all or a portion of any incurred losses would be covered by the credit enhancements in place and because there is no concentration of the Bank's loans in the affected states, we did not record any additional allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2018, and we do not expect that any net losses resulting from the hurricanes will have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Cash and Investments. The following table presents a comparison of the components of our cash and investments at carrying value ($ amounts in millions).



Components of Cash and Investments	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		Change
Cash and short-term investments:
Cash and due from banks	$	116	$	55	$	61
Interest-bearing deposits	1,371		660		711
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	3,171		2,606		565
Federal funds sold	3,398		1,280		2,118
Total cash and short-term investments	8,056		4,601		3,455

Investment securities:
AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debentures	4,231		4,404		(173		)
GSE MBS	3,198		2,507		691
Private-label RMBS	—		218		(218		)
Total AFS securities	7,429		7,129		300

HTM securities:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS	3,543		3,299		244
GSE MBS	2,268		2,553		(285		)
Private-label RMBS and ABS	—		46		(46		)
Total HTM securities	5,811		5,898		(87		)

Total investment securities	13,240		13,027		213

Total cash and investments, carrying value	$	21,296	$	17,628	$	3,668

Cash and Short-Term Investments. Cash and short-term investments totaled $8.1 billion at September 30, 2018, an increase of 75% compared to December 31, 2017, due to the Bank's enhancement of its liquidity position in light of the issuance of new regulatory guidance from the Finance Agency. Cash and short-term investments as a percent of total assets were 12% at September 30, 2018 compared to 7% at December 31, 2017.

Investment Securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our private-label RMBS and ABS.

AFS securities totaled $7.4 billion at September 30, 2018, a net increase of 4% compared to $7.1 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase resulted from purchases of GSE MBS to maintain a ratio of MBS and ABS to total regulatory capital of up to 300%.

Net unrealized gains on AFS securities totaled $112 million at September 30, 2018, a decrease of $10 million compared to December 31, 2017, primarily due to changes in interest rates, credit spreads and volatility.

HTM securities totaled $5.8 billion at September 30, 2018, relatively unchanged from a total of $5.9 billion at December 31, 2017. At September 30, 2018, the estimated fair value of our HTM securities totaled $5.8 billion, of which $2.1 billion was in an unrealized loss position, a decrease of 26% from $2.8 billion at December 31, 2017, primarily due to changes in interest rates, credit spreads and volatility. The associated unrealized losses increased from $12 million at December 31, 2017 to $23 million at September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

Interest-Rate Payment Terms. Our AFS and HTM securities are presented below at amortized cost by interest-rate payment terms ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
Interest-Rate Payment Terms	Amortized Cost		% of Total		Amortized Cost		% of Total
AFS Securities:
Total non-MBS fixed-rate	$	4,173	57	%	$	4,357	62	%
MBS:
Fixed-rate	3,145		43	%	2,463		35	%
Variable-rate	—		—	%	187		3	%
Total MBS	3,145		43	%	2,650		38	%

Total AFS securities	$	7,318	100	%	$	7,007	100	%

HTM Securities:
MBS and ABS:
Fixed-rate	$	994	17	%	$	1,141	19	%
Variable-rate	4,817		83	%	4,757		81	%
Total MBS and ABS	5,811		100	%	5,898		100	%

Total HTM securities	$	5,811	100	%	$	5,898	100	%

The mix of fixed- vs. variable-rate securities at September 30, 2018 was slightly different compared to December 31, 2017, primarily due to the sale of our private-label RMBS. In addition, substantially all of the fixed-rate AFS securities are swapped to effectively create variable-rate securities, consistent with our balance sheet strategies to manage interest-rate risk.

Total Liabilities. Total liabilities were $63.4 billion at September 30, 2018, a net increase of 7% compared to December 31, 2017, substantially due to an increase in consolidated obligations.

Deposits (Liabilities). Total deposits were $484 million at September 30, 2018, a net decrease of 14% compared to December 31, 2017. These deposits represent a relatively small portion of our funding. The balances of these accounts can fluctuate from period to period and vary depending upon such factors as the attractiveness of our deposit pricing relative to the rates available on alternative money market instruments, members' preferences with respect to the maturity of their investments, and members' liquidity.

Consolidated Obligations. The carrying value of consolidated obligations outstanding at September 30, 2018 totaled $62.2 billion, a net increase of $4.0 billion or 7% from December 31, 2017. This increase supported the increase in the Bank's assets.

The following table presents a breakdown by term of our consolidated obligations outstanding ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
By Term	Par Value		% of Total		Par Value		% of Total
Consolidated obligations due in 1 year or less:
Discount notes	$	22,700	36	%	$	20,394	35	%
CO bonds	17,490		28	%	14,021		24	%
Total due in 1 year or less	40,190		64	%	34,415		59	%
Long-term CO bonds	22,266		36	%	23,962		41	%
Total consolidated obligations	$	62,456	100	%	$	58,377	100	%

We maintain a liquidity and funding balance between our financial assets and financial liabilities. Additionally, the FHLBanks work collectively to manage FHLB System-wide liquidity and funding and jointly monitor System-wide refinancing risk. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, the FHLBanks may consider contractual maturities of the financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e., estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations). See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 3 - Available-for-Sale Securities, Note 6 - Advances, and Note 10 - Consolidated Obligations for more detailed information regarding contractual maturities of certain of our financial assets and liabilities.

Table of Contents

Derivatives. The volume of derivative hedges is often expressed in terms of notional amounts, which is the amount upon which interest payments are calculated. The following table presents the notional amounts by type of hedged item whether or not it is in a qualifying hedge relationship ($ amounts in millions).



Hedged Item	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Advances	$	13,613	$	11,296
Investments	8,429		7,238
Mortgage loans	798		144
CO bonds	14,984		13,524
Discount notes	—		298
Total notional	$	37,824	$	32,500

Total Capital. Total capital at September 30, 2018 was $3.1 billion, a net increase of $111 million or 4% compared to December 31, 2017. This increase was primarily a result of the growth of retained earnings and additional capital stock issued to members. These increases were partially offset by the reduction in AOCI as a result of the recognition of the gain on the sale of our private-label RMBS and ABS.

The following table presents a percentage breakdown of the components of GAAP capital.



Components	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Capital stock	62	%	63	%
Retained earnings	35	%	33	%
AOCI	3	%	4	%
Total GAAP capital	100	%	100	%

The components of GAAP capital were relatively unchanged at September 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017.

The following table presents a reconciliation of GAAP capital to regulatory capital ($ amounts in millions).



Reconciliation	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Total GAAP capital	$	3,057		$	2,946
Exclude: AOCI	(95		)	(112		)
Add: MRCS	164			164
Total regulatory capital	$	3,126		$	2,998

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity. Our primary sources of liquidity are holdings of cash and short-term investments and the issuance of consolidated obligations. Our cash and short-term investments portfolio totaled $8.1 billion at September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we maintained sufficient access to funding; our net proceeds from the issuance of consolidated obligations totaled $267.3 billion.

The recent issuance of new regulatory guidance by the Finance Agency could continue to significantly increase the amount and change the characteristics of liquidity that we are required to maintain. We have not identified any other trends, demands, commitments, or events that are likely to materially increase or decrease our liquidity.

Changes in Cash Flow. Net cash provided by operating activities was $427 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $202 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to the impact of the change in the legal characterization of variation margin payments to be daily settled contracts.

Table of Contents

Capital Resources.

Total Regulatory Capital. A breakdown of our outstanding capital stock, categorized by type of member institution, and MRCS is provided in the following table ($ amounts in millions).



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
By Type of Member Institution	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Depository institutions:
Commercial banks and savings institutions	$	960	46	%	$	945	47	%
Credit unions	260		13	%	240		12	%
Total depository institutions	1,220		59	%	1,185		59	%
Insurance companies	681		33	%	673		33	%
CDFIs	—		—	%	—		—	%
Total capital stock, putable at par value	1,901		92	%	1,858		92	%

MRCS:
Captive insurance companies ⁽¹⁾	132		6	%	152		7	%
Former members ⁽²⁾	32		2	%	12		1	%
Total MRCS	164		8	%	164		8	%

Total regulatory capital stock	$	2,065	100	%	$	2,022	100	%


⁽¹⁾	Memberships must terminate no later than February 19, 2021.


⁽²⁾	Balances at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 include $1 million and $3 million, respectively, of MRCS that had reached the end of the five-year redemption period but will not be redeemed until the associated credit products and other obligations are no longer outstanding.

Excess Capital Stock. The following table presents the composition of our excess capital stock ($ amounts in millions).



Components	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Member capital stock not subject to outstanding redemption requests	$	371		$	302
Member capital stock subject to outstanding redemption requests	5			4
MRCS	27			31
Total excess capital stock	$	403		$	337

Excess stock as a percentage of regulatory capital stock	20		%	17		%

The increase in excess stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 resulted primarily from the fluctuations in advances outstanding.

Finance Agency rules limit the ability of an FHLBank to issue excess stock under certain circumstances, including when its total excess stock exceeds 1% of total assets or if the issuance of excess stock would cause total excess stock to exceed 1% of total assets. Our excess stock at September 30, 2018 was 0.6% of our total assets. Therefore, subject to these regulatory limitations, we are currently permitted to issue new excess stock to members and distribute stock dividends, should we choose to do so.

Capital Distributions. On October 25, 2018, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of 4.50% (annualized) on our Class B-1 capital stock and 3.60% (annualized) on our Class B-2 capital stock.

Table of Contents

Adequacy of Capital. We must maintain sufficient permanent capital to meet the combined credit risk, market risk and operations risk components of the risk-based capital requirement. As presented in the following table, we were in compliance with the risk-based capital requirement at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 ($ amounts in millions).




Risk-Based Capital Components	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Credit risk	$	314	$	360
Market risk	330		336
Operations risk	193		208
Total risk-based capital requirement	$	837	$	904

Permanent capital	$	3,126	$	2,998

The decrease in the total risk-based capital requirement was primarily caused by a decrease in the credit risk component as a result of the sale of our private-label RMBS portfolio. Our permanent capital at September 30, 2018 remained well in excess of our total risk-based capital requirement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2018, principal previously paid in full by our MPP servicers totaling $2 million remains subject to potential claims by those servicers for any losses resulting from past or future liquidations of the underlying properties. An estimate of the losses is included in the MPP allowance for loan losses. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 9 - Allowance for Credit Losses in our 2017 Form 10-K. For information on additional commitments and contingencies, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We determined that four of our accounting policies and estimates are critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These accounting policies pertain to:


•	Derivatives and hedging activities (see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities for more detail);


•	Fair value estimates (see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 15 - Estimated Fair Values for more detail);


•	Provision for credit losses (see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 8 - Allowance for Credit Losses for more detail); and


•	OTTI (see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 5 - Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for more detail).

A full discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in our 2017 Form 10-K. See below for additional information regarding certain of these policies.

Provision for Credit Losses.

Mortgage Loans Acquired under the MPP. Our allowance for loan losses incorporates our analysis of delinquent conventional MPP loans, using the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, further reduced by estimated liquidation costs.

As part of our loan loss analysis at December 31, 2017, we considered an adverse scenario whereby we used a haircut on our underlying collateral values of 20% for delinquent conventional loans, including individually evaluated loans. We consider such a haircut to represent the most distressed scenario that is reasonably possible to occur over the loss emergence period of 24 months. In this distressed scenario, while holding all other assumptions constant, our estimated incurred losses remaining after borrowers' equity, but before credit enhancements, would increase by approximately $3.1 million. However, such increase would be substantially offset by credit enhancements. Based upon subsequent changes in underlying collateral values, we would not expect this amount to have significantly changed at September 30, 2018. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses continues to be based upon our best estimate of the probable losses over the loss emergence period that would not be recovered from the credit enhancements.

Table of Contents

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we sold all of our investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. Therefore, we did not have any OTTI-related credit losses recognized in earnings and did not run a more stressful scenario at September 30, 2018.

Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments

Accounting Developments. See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance for a description of how recent accounting developments may impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments.

Finance Agency Proposed Rule on Housing Goals Amendments. On November 2, 2018, the Finance Agency published proposed amendments to the FHLBank Housing Goals regulation. The proposed amendments would substantially revise the current regulation in several respects. Among other things, the proposed amendments would:


•	Remove the current process by which the Finance Agency establishes each FHLBank’s housing goals retrospectively based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act ("HMDA") data;


◦	Instead, the amendments would, within the regulation itself, prospectively establish annual housing goals for all FHLBanks.


•	Eliminate the current regulation’s $2.5 billion annual AMA purchase volume threshold that triggers application of housing goals for each FHLBank;


•	Eliminate the current regulation’s separate housing goals for home-purchase mortgages for low-income families, low-income areas, very-low income families and refinancing mortgages for low-income families;

◦

These four goals would be replaced by a single, overall measurement of performance. The new housing goal would include each of the four categories, but would not include a separate target level for each category. However, the proposed amendments would place a cap on the amount of purchased loans made to high-income borrowers in low-income areas by requiring that at least 75% of the mortgage loans counted toward the housing goal be made to low-income or very low-income families.


•	Establish the prospective mortgage purchase housing goal target level at 20% of an FHLBank’s annual AMA mortgage purchases;


•	Permit the FHLBanks to request Finance Agency approval of an alternative goal level;


•	Establish a separate annual housing goal target level for AMA program participation (generally 50% of all PFIs) by smaller members (those with average asset sizes below the community financial institution cap established annually by the Finance Agency);


•	Enable the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank that fails to meet any housing goal to perform a feasibility analysis on the FHLBank’s ability to meet that goal and, if the Finance Agency determines the goal was feasible, require the FHLBank to submit a housing plan detailing how it intends to achieve the goal during the next calendar year; and


•	Establish a three-year phase-in for enforcement of the new housing goals.

We are studying the proposed amendments, but at this time we have not fully determined how the amendments, if adopted as proposed, will affect our Advantage MPP or impact our PFIs’ use of the program. Comments on the proposed amendments are due by January 31, 2019.

Table of Contents

Liquidity Guidance Advisory Bulletin. On August 23, 2018, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2018-07 on FHLBank liquidity ("Liquidity Guidance AB"). The Liquidity Guidance AB communicates the Finance Agency’s expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity to enable the FHLBanks to provide advances and letters of credit for members for a specified time without access to the capital markets or other unsecured funding sources. Contemporaneously with the issuance of the Liquidity Guidance AB, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter that identifies initial thresholds for liquidity measures. The Liquidity Guidance AB rescinds the liquidity guidance issued by the Finance Agency in 2009.

The Liquidity Guidance AB provides guidance on the level of on-balance sheet liquid assets related to base case liquidity. As part of the base case liquidity measure, the guidance also includes a separate provision covering off-balance sheet commitments from standby letters of credit ("SLOCs"). In addition, the guidance addresses asset/liability maturity funding gap limits.

With respect to base case liquidity, the Finance Agency revised previous guidance that required the FHLBanks to assume a 5-day period without access to capital markets due to a change in certain assumptions underlying that guidance. Under the Liquidity Guidance AB, FHLBanks will be required to hold positive cash flow assuming no access to capital markets for an increased period of between ten and thirty calendar days, with a specific measurement period set forth in the supervisory letter. The guidance also sets forth the initial cash flow assumptions and formula to calculate base case liquidity. With respect to SLOCs, the guidance indicates that FHLBanks should maintain a liquidity reserve of between 1% and 20% of its outstanding SLOC commitments, as specified in the supervisory letter.

With respect to funding gaps and possible asset and liability mismatches, the Liquidity Guidance AB provides guidance on maintaining appropriate funding gaps for three-month (-10 to -20%) and one-year (-25 to -35%) maturity horizons. The guidance indicates that, depending on financial market conditions, maintaining gap limits within these ranges should provide reasonable assurance that an FHLBank will have adequate liquidity to address the risks associated with possible asset and liability maturity mismatches, including an undue reliance on short-term debt funding, which may increase debt rollover risk.

The Liquidity Guidance AB also addresses liquidity stress testing, contingency funding plans and an adjustment to each FHLBank’s core mission achievement calculation. Portions of the guidance will be implemented beginning on December 31, 2018, with further implementation on March 31, 2019, and full implementation on December 31, 2019. The Liquidity Guidance AB may require us to hold an additional amount of liquid assets, which may increase the cost of funding required to achieve the appropriate funding gap with longer-term funding. Moreover, this could reduce our ability to invest in higher-yielding assets. We do not believe these changes would materially impact our financial condition or results of operations.

Finance Agency Proposed Amendment to Rule Regarding Golden Parachute and Indemnification Payments. On August 28, 2018, the Finance Agency published proposed amendments to its rule on golden parachute payments ("Golden Parachute Rule") to better align the rule with areas of the Finance Agency’s supervisory concern and to reduce administrative and compliance burdens. The Golden Parachute Rule sets forth the standards that the Finance Agency would take into consideration when limiting or prohibiting golden parachute and indemnification payments by an FHLBank or the Office of Finance to an affiliated party (which includes any director, officer or employee) when such FHLBank or the Office of Finance is in troubled condition, in conservatorship or receivership, or insolvent. The proposed amendments would:


•	Focus these standards on payments and agreements with executive officers, broad-based plans covering large numbers of employees and payments made to non-executive-officer employees who may have engaged in certain types of wrongdoings;


•	Revise and clarify definitions, exemptions and procedures to implement the Finance Agency’s supervisory approach; and


•	Align procedures and outcomes of review with requirements of the Finance Agency’s rule on executive compensation.

Comments on the proposed rule were due by October 12, 2018. Ten of the FHLBanks and the Office of Finance submitted a joint comment letter. We continue to assess the effect of the proposed amendments, but we do not anticipate that, if adopted, they would materially impact our financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Final Rule on Indemnification Payments. On October 4, 2018, the Finance Agency published a final rule establishing standards for identifying when an indemnification payment by an FHLBank or the Office of Finance to an officer, director, employee, or other affiliated party in connection with an administrative proceeding or civil action instituted by the Finance Agency is prohibited or permissible. The rule generally prohibits these payments except in the following circumstances:


•	Premiums for commercial insurance coverage or fidelity bonds for directors and officers, to the extent that the insurance or fidelity bond covers expenses and restitution, but not in connection with a judgment in favor of the Finance Agency or a civil money penalty imposed by the Finance Agency on the affiliated party;

•

Expenses of defending an action, subject to (i) the board of directors conducting a due investigation and making a written determination that: (a) the affiliated party acted in good faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be in the best interest of the FHLBank or the Office of Finance (as the case may be) and (b) such payments will not materially adversely affect the safety and soundness of the FHLBank or the Office of Finance; and (ii) an agreement to repay those expenses in certain instances; and


•	Amounts payable under an indemnification agreement entered into on or prior to September 20, 2016 (the date the rule was proposed).

The rule also outlines the process the board of directors must undertake prior to making a permitted payment. The rule became effective November 5, 2018. We do not expect the rule will materially impact our financial condition or results of operations or ability to recruit or retain directors.

Risk Management

We have exposure to a number of risks in pursuing our business objectives. These risks may be broadly classified as market, credit, liquidity, operational, and business. Market risk is discussed in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management in our 2017 Form 10-K for more information.

Credit Risk Management. We face credit risk on advances and other credit products, investments, mortgage loans, derivative financial instruments, and AHP grants.

Advances and Other Credit Products. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, advances to our insurance company members represented 47% and 45%, respectively, of our total advances, at par. The initial borrowing limit for our insurance company members (excluding captive insurance companies) is 25% of their total general account assets less money borrowed. As of September 30, 2018, no insurance company member had total credit products outstanding in excess of this threshold.

Effective February 19, 2016, new or renewed credit extensions to captive insurance companies that became members prior to September 12, 2014 are subject to certain regulatory restrictions relating to maturity dates and cannot exceed 40% of the member's total assets. As of September 30, 2018, one such captive insurance company member's total credit products previously outstanding exceeded the percentage limit. Therefore, no new or renewed credit extensions have been made to this member. We may impose additional restrictions on extensions of credit to our members, including captive insurance companies, at our discretion.

Concentration. Our credit risk is magnified due to the concentration of advances in a few borrowers. As of September 30, 2018, our top borrower held 13% of total advances outstanding, at par, and our top five borrowers held 43% of total advances outstanding, at par. As a result of this concentration, we perform frequent credit and collateral reviews on our largest borrowers. In addition, we analyze the implications to our financial management and profitability if we were to lose the business of one or more of these borrowers.

Table of Contents

Investments. We are also exposed to credit risk through our investment portfolios. Our policies restrict the acquisition of investments to high-quality, short-term money market instruments and high-quality long-term securities.

The following table presents the unsecured investment credit exposure to private counterparties, categorized by the domicile of the counterparty's ultimate parent, based on the lowest of the counterparty's NRSRO long-term credit ratings, stated in terms of the S&P equivalent. The table does not reflect the foreign sovereign government's credit rating ($ amounts in millions).




September 30, 2018	AA		A		Total
Domestic	$	—	$	3,665	$	3,665
Australia	500		—		500
Canada	—		290		290
Singapore	200		—		200
Sweden	113		—		113
Total unsecured credit exposure	$	813	$	3,955	$	4,768

A Finance Agency regulation provides that the total amount of our investments in MBS and ABS, calculated using amortized historical cost, must not exceed 300% of our total regulatory capital, as of the day we purchase the securities, based on the capital amount most recently reported to the Finance Agency. These investments totaled 293% of total regulatory capital at September 30, 2018. Generally, our goal is to maintain these investments near the 300% limit in order to enhance earnings and capital for our members and diversify our revenue stream.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the carrying values of our investments, excluding accrued interest, grouped by credit rating and investment category. Applicable rating levels are determined using the lowest relevant long-term rating from S&P, Moody's and Fitch Ratings, Inc., each stated in terms of the S&P equivalent. Rating modifiers are ignored when determining the applicable rating level for a given counterparty or investment. Amounts reported do not reflect any subsequent changes in ratings, outlook, or watch status ($ amounts in millions).



													Below
													Investment
September 30, 2018	AAA			AA			A			BBB			Grade			Total
Short-term investments:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	—		$	1		$	1,370		$	—		$	—		$	1,371
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	—			3,171			—			—			—			3,171
Federal funds sold	—			813			2,585			—			—			3,398
Total short-term investments	—			3,985			3,955			—			—			7,940
Long-term investments:
GSE and TVA debentures	—			4,231			—			—			—			4,231
GSE MBS	—			5,466			—			—			—			5,466
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS	—			3,543			—			—			—			3,543
Total long-term investments	—			13,240			—			—			—			13,240

Total investments, carrying value	$	—		$	17,225		$	3,955		$	—		$	—		$	21,180

Percentage of total	—		%	81		%	19		%	—		%	—		%	100		%

December 31, 2017
Short-term investments:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	—		$	—		$	660		$	—		$	—		$	660
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	—			2,606			—			—			—			2,606
Federal funds sold	—			780			500			—			—			1,280
Total short-term investments	—			3,386			1,160			—			—			4,546
Long-term investments:
GSE and TVA debentures	—			4,404			—			—			—			4,404
GSE MBS	—			5,060			—			—			—			5,060
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS	—			3,299			—			—			—			3,299
Private-label RMBS and ABS	—			4			16			2			242			264
Total long-term investments	—			12,767			16			2			242			13,027

Total investments, carrying value	$	—		$	16,153		$	1,176		$	2		$	242		$	17,573

Percentage of total	—		%	92		%	7		%	—		%	1		%	100		%

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our private-label RMBS and ABS, substantially all of which were rated below investment grade.

Table of Contents

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. The following table presents a breakdown of the activity in the LRA for original MPP and MPP Advantage ($ amounts in millions).



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018						Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
LRA Activity	Original		Advantage		Total		Original		Advantage		Total
Liability, beginning of period	$	7	$	154	$	161	$	8	$	129	$	137
Additions	—		9		9		—		7		7
Claims paid	—		—		—		—		—		—
Distributions to PFIs	—		—		—		—		—		—
Liability, end of period	$	7	$	163	$	170	$	8	$	136	$	144



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
LRA Activity	Original		Advantage			Total			Original		Advantage		Total
Liability, beginning of period	$	7	$	142		$	149		$	8	$	118	$	126
Additions	—		22			22			—		18		18
Claims paid	—		—			—			—		—		—
Distributions to PFIs	—		(1		)	(1		)	—		—		—
Liability, end of period	$	7	$	163		$	170		$	8	$	136	$	144

Derivatives. The following table presents key information on derivative positions with counterparties on a settlement date basis using the lowest credit ratings from S&P or Moody's, stated in terms of the S&P equivalent ($ amounts in millions).



September 30, 2018	Notional Amount		Net Estimated Fair Value Before Collateral			Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparties		Net Credit Exposure
Non-member counterparties:
Asset positions with credit exposure
Uncleared derivatives - AA	$	297	$	8		$	—	$	8
Uncleared derivatives - A	173		2			—		2
Liability positions with credit exposure
Uncleared derivatives - A	2,077		(8		)	8		—
Cleared derivatives ⁽¹⁾	22,222		(3		)	117		114
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to non-member counterparties	24,769		(1		)	125		124
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to member institutions ⁽²⁾	35		—			—		—
Subtotal - derivative positions with credit exposure	24,804		$	(1	)	$	125	$	124
Derivative positions without credit exposure	13,020
Total derivative positions	$	37,824


⁽¹⁾	Represents derivative transactions cleared with a clearinghouse, which is not rated.


⁽²⁾	Includes MDCs from member institutions (MPP).

Table of Contents

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Measuring Market Risks

To evaluate market risk, we utilize multiple risk measurements, including duration of equity, duration gap, convexity, VaR, earnings at risk, and changes in MVE. Periodically, we conduct stress tests to measure and analyze the effects that extreme movements in the level of interest rates and the shape of the yield curve would have on our risk position.

Market Risk-Based Capital Requirement. When calculating the risk-based capital requirement, the VaR comprising the first factor of the market risk component is defined as the potential dollar loss from adverse market movements, for a holding period of 120 business days, with a 99% confidence interval, based on those historical prices and market rates. The table below presents the VaR ($ amounts in millions).



Date	VaR
September 30, 2018	$	330
December 31, 2017	336

Certain Market and Interest-Rate Risk Metrics under Potential Interest-Rate Scenarios. We also monitor the sensitivities of MVE and duration of equity to potential interest-rate scenarios. We measure potential changes in the market value to book value of equity based on the current month-end level of rates versus large parallel rate shifts. The following table presents certain market and interest-rate metrics under different interest-rate scenarios ($ amounts in millions).



September 30, 2018	Down 200 ⁽¹⁾			Down 100 ⁽¹⁾			Base			Up 100			Up 200
MVE	$	3,430		$	3,374		$	3,309		$	3,217		$	3,189
Percent change in MVE from base	3.7		%	2.0		%	0		%	(2.8		)%	(3.6		)%
MVE/Book value of equity ⁽²⁾	106.5		%	104.7		%	102.7		%	99.9		%	99.0		%
Duration of equity ⁽³⁾	2.1			1.4			2.6			1.9			0.8



December 31, 2017
MVE	$	3,302		$	3,200		$	3,096		$	3,001		$	2,895
Percent change in MVE from base	6.7		%	3.4		%	0		%	(3.1		)%	(6.5		)%
MVE/Book value of equity ⁽²⁾	106.2		%	102.9		%	99.5		%	96.5		%	93.1		%
Duration of equity ⁽³⁾	2.3			3.7			2.9			3.4			3.7


⁽¹⁾	Given the low interest rates in the short-to-medium term points of the yield curves, downward rate shocks are constrained to prevent rates from becoming negative.


⁽²⁾	The change in the base MVE/book value of equity from December 31, 2017 resulted primarily from the change in market value of the assets and liabilities in response to changes in the market environment and changes in portfolio composition.


⁽³⁾	We use interest-rate shocks in 50 bps increments to determine duration of equity.

Duration Gap. The base case duration gap was 0.08% and 0.10% at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Use of Derivative Hedges in our 2017 Form 10-K for information about our use of derivative hedges.

Table of Contents

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act") is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. As of September 30, 2018, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer), and Chief Accounting Officer (the principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2018.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act, that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and other internal controls will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can only be reasonable assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Additionally, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we may from time to time become a party to lawsuits involving various business matters. We are unaware of any lawsuits presently pending which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our 2017 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Item 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number		Description

10.1*+		Directors' Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy, effective January 1, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 000-51404 filed on September 19, 2018

31.1		Certification of the President - Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.3		Certification of the Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certification of the President - Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer, and Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

* These documents are incorporated by reference.

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS

November 8, 2018	By:	/s/ CINDY L. KONICH
	Name:	Cindy L. Konich
	Title:	President - Chief Executive Officer

November 8, 2018	By:	/s/ GREGORY L. TEARE
	Name:	Gregory L. Teare
	Title:	Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer

November 8, 2018	By:	/s/ K. LOWELL SHORT, JR.
	Name:	K. Lowell Short, Jr.
	Title:	Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer

Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis - FORM 10-Q - November 8, 2018

Attached files

Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Reports