HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/ - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/	ex-32110q033118.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/	ex-31210q033118.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/	ex-31110q033118.htm

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018 or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 000-29480

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Washington		91-1857900
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

201 Fifth Avenue SW, Olympia, WA		98501
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(360) 943-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



	Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filer ¨
	Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨
			Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

As of April 26, 2018 there were 34,018,280 shares of the registrant's common stock, no par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

March 31, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS



				Page
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION			4
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			4
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF MARCH 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017		4
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017		5
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017		6
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017		7
		CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017		8
		NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		10
		NOTE 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION, SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	10
		NOTE 2.	BUSINESS COMBINATION	14
		NOTE 3.	INVESTMENT SECURITIES	16
		NOTE 4.	LOANS RECEIVABLE	19
		NOTE 5.	ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	30
		NOTE 6.	OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED	33
		NOTE 7.	GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS	33
		NOTE 8.	JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES	34
		NOTE 9.	REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS	35
		NOTE 10.	OTHER BORROWINGS	35
		NOTE 11.	DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS	36
		NOTE 12.	STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	37
		NOTE 13.	ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME	38
		NOTE 14.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS	38
		NOTE 15.	STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION	43
		NOTE 16.	CASH REQUIREMENT	46
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			46
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			64
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			64
Part II.	OTHER INFORMATION			64
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			64
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS			64
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS			65
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES			65
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES			65
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION			65
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS			66
	SIGNATURES			66

Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Form 10-Q") may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated, including: our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel from our recent merger with Puget Sound Bancorp, Inc., or our pending merger with Premier Commercial Bancorp, ("Premier Merger"), into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames or at all, and any goodwill charges related thereto and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not limited to customer and employee retention, which might be greater than expected; the proposed Premier Merger may not close when expected or at all because required regulatory, shareholder or other approvals and conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all or adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with governmental approvals of the merger; the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be effected by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets, which may lead to increased losses and nonperforming assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses no longer being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to increase our allowance for loan losses; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; risks related to acquiring assets in or entering markets in which we have not previously operated and may not be familiar; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; results of examinations of us by the bank regulators, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, initiate an enforcement action against the Company or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position, affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements on us, any of which could affect our ability to continue our growth through mergers, acquisitions or similar transactions and adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including but not limited to, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and implementing regulations, changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules as a result of Basel III; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated charges; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our growth strategies; increased competitive pressures among financial service companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually known to the Company. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements. These risks could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us, and could negatively affect the Company’s operating results and stock price performance.

As used throughout this report, the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company” refer to Heritage Financial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except shares)



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
ASSETS
Cash on hand and in banks	$	86,608		$	78,293
Interest earning deposits	43,701			24,722
Cash and cash equivalents	130,309			103,015
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value	821,567			810,530
Loans held for sale	2,669			2,288
Loans receivable, net	3,281,915			2,849,071
Allowance for loan losses	(33,261		)	(32,086		)
Total loans receivable, net	3,248,654			2,816,985
Other real estate owned	—			—
Premises and equipment, net	62,147			60,325
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost	6,824			8,347
Bank owned life insurance	81,700			75,091
Accrued interest receivable	13,602			12,244
Prepaid expenses and other assets	104,666			99,328
Other intangible assets, net	16,563			6,088
Goodwill	187,549			119,029
Total assets	$	4,676,250		$	4,113,270
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits	$	3,904,741		$	3,393,060
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	30,700			92,500
Junior subordinated debentures	20,083			20,009
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	26,100			31,821
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	59,918			67,575
Total liabilities	4,041,542			3,604,965
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017	—			—
Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 34,018,280 and 29,927,746 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively	490,566			360,590
Retained earnings	153,101			149,013
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net	(8,959		)	(1,298		)
Total stockholders’ equity	634,708			508,305
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,676,250		$	4,113,270

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans	$	38,159	$	30,485
Taxable interest on investment securities	3,529		3,049
Nontaxable interest on investment securities	1,341		1,268
Interest and dividends on other interest earning assets	299		61
Total interest income	43,328		34,863
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	1,960		1,266
Junior subordinated debentures	283		238
Other borrowings	167		213
Total interest expense	2,410		1,717
Net interest income	40,918		33,146
Provision for loan losses	1,152		867
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	39,766		32,279
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges and other fees	4,543		4,213
Gain on sale of investment securities, net	35		—
Gain on sale of loans, net	874		1,195
Interest rate swap fees	51		133
Other income	1,964		1,808
Total noninterest income	7,467		7,349
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and employee benefits	21,367		16,024
Occupancy and equipment	4,627		3,810
Data processing	2,605		1,915
Marketing	808		807
Professional services	2,837		1,009
State and local taxes	688		549
Federal deposit insurance premium	355		300
Other real estate owned, net	—		31
Amortization of intangible assets	795		324
Other expense	2,665		2,454
Total noninterest expense	36,747		27,223
Income before income taxes	10,486		12,405
Income tax expense	1,399		3,089
Net income	$	9,087	$	9,316
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.31
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.31
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.15	$	0.12

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)

(In thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
Net income	$	9,087		$	9,316
Change in fair value of investment securities available for sale, net of tax of $(2,008) and $794, respectively	(7,516		)	1,473
Reclassification adjustment for net gain from sale of investment securities available for sale included in income, net of tax of $(8) and $0, respectively	(27		)	—
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(7,543		)	1,473
Comprehensive income	$	1,544		$	10,789

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)



	Number of common shares		Common stock			Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net			Total stock- holders’ equity
Balance at December 31, 2016	29,955		$	359,060		$	125,309		$	(2,606	)	$	481,763
Restricted stock awards forfeited	(5	)	—			—			—			—
Exercise of stock options	8		109			—			—			109
Stock-based compensation expense	—		510			—			—			510
Common stock repurchased	(16	)	(381		)	—			—			(381		)
Net income	—		—			9,316			—			9,316
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—		—			—			1,473			1,473
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.12 per share)	—		—			(3,594		)	—			(3,594		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	29,942		$	359,298		$	131,031		$	(1,133	)	$	489,196

Balance at December 31, 2017	29,928		$	360,590		$	149,013		$	(1,298	)	$	508,305
Restricted stock units vested	22		—			—			—			—
Exercise of stock options	1		21			—			—			21
Stock-based compensation expense	—		623			—			—			623
Common stock repurchased	(45	)	(1,438		)	—			—			(1,438		)
Net income	—		—			9,087			—			9,087
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—			—			(7,543		)	(7,543		)
Common stock issued in business combination	4,112		130,770			—			—			130,770
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.15 per share)	—		—			(5,117		)	—			(5,117		)
ASU 2016-01 implementation	—		—			118			(118		)	—
Balance at March 31, 2018	34,018		$	490,566		$	153,101		$	(8,959	)	$	634,708

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(In thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,087		$	9,316
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	2,631			2,808
Changes in net deferred loan costs, net of amortization	9			(338		)
Provision for loan losses	1,152			867
Net change in accrued interest receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accrued expenses and other liabilities	(4,191		)	802
Stock-based compensation expense	623			510
Amortization of intangible assets	795			324
Origination of loans held for sale	(20,380		)	(27,209		)
Proceeds from sale of loans	20,651			35,956
Earnings on bank owned life insurance	(335		)	(375		)
Gain on sale of loans, net	(874		)	(1,195		)
Gain on sale of investment securities, net	(35		)	—
Loss on sale or write-off of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements	6			3
Net cash provided by operating activities	9,139			21,469
Cash flows from investing activities:
Loans originated, net of principal payments	(46,959		)	(33,249		)
Maturities, calls and payments of investment securities available for sale	24,443			20,094
Purchase of investment securities available for sale	(69,352		)	(7,932		)
Purchase of premises and equipment	(2,146		)	(847		)
Proceeds from sales of other loans	2,813			4,465
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale	103,032			—
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	10,130			7,682
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	(7,984		)	(7,435		)
Capital contribution to low-income housing tax credit partnership	(7,696		)	(7		)
Net cash received from acquisitions	80,133			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	86,414			(17,229		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	5,796			13,767
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	191,450			184,600
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(253,250		)	(197,450		)
Common stock cash dividends paid	(5,117		)	(3,594		)
Net decrease in securities sold under agreement to repurchase	(5,721		)	(664		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	21			109
Repurchase of common stock	(1,438		)	(381		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(68,259		)	(3,613		)

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	27,294			627
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	103,015			103,745
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	130,309		$	104,372

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	2,398		$	1,775
Cash paid for income taxes	—			—

Supplemental non-cash disclosures of cash flow information:
Transfers of loans receivable to other real estate owned	$	—		$	32
Transfers of loans receivable to loans held for sale	—			5,779
Transfers of premises and equipment, net to prepaid expenses and other assets for properties held for sale	—			2,687
Business Combination:
Common stock issued for business combinations	130,770			—
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed) in acquisitions:
Investment securities available for sale	80,353			—
Loans receivable	388,462			—
Premises and equipment	732			—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	623			—
Accrued interest receivable	1,448			—
Bank owned life insurance	6,264			—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,354			—
Other intangible assets	11,270			—
Deposits	(505,885		)	—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(2,504		)	—

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)


(1)	Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Significant Accounting Policies and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

(a) Description of Business

Heritage Financial Corporation ("Heritage" or the “Company”) is a bank holding company that was incorporated in the State of Washington in August 1997. The Company is primarily engaged in the business of planning, directing and coordinating the business activities of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Heritage Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is a Washington-chartered commercial bank and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The Bank is headquartered in Olympia, Washington and conducts business from its 60 branch offices located throughout Washington State and the greater Portland, Oregon area. The Bank’s business consists primarily of commercial lending and deposit relationships with small businesses and their owners in its market areas and attracting deposits from the general public. The Bank also makes real estate construction and land development loans, consumer loans and originates first mortgage loans on residential properties primarily located in its market areas.

On January 16, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Puget Sound Bancorp, Inc. (“Puget Sound”), the holding company for Puget Sound Bank, both of Bellevue, Washington (“Puget Sound Merger”). See Note (2), Business Combination for additional information on the merger.

On March 8, 2018, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (the "Agreement") with Premier Commercial Bancorp, of Hillsboro, Oregon ("Premier Commercial"), pursuant to which Premier Commercial will be merged with and into Heritage, and immediately thereafter Premier Commercial's bank subsidiary, Premier Community Bank, will be merged with and into Heritage Bank (the "Premier Merger"). Premier Commercial Bank has six branch locations. Under the terms of the Agreement, Premier Commercial shareholders will receive 0.4863 shares of Heritage common stock for each share of Premier Commercial common stock. Based on the closing price of Heritage common stock of $31.10 on March 8, 2018, the consideration value per share of Premier Commercial was $15.12, or approximately $88.6 million in aggregate, including the value of the outstanding shares of Premier Commercial restricted stock. The value of the merger consideration will fluctuate until closing based on the value of Heritage's stock price. At December 31, 2017, Premier Commercial had total assets of $400.5 million, total loans of $339.3 million and total deposits of $330.6 million.

The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and approval of the Agreement by the shareholders of Premier Commercial, and is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2018. In the event the Agreement is terminated under certain specified circumstances in connection with a competing transaction, Premier Commercial will be required to pay Heritage a termination fee of $3.45 million in cash. All of the directors and executive officers of Premier Commercial have agreed to vote their shares of Premier Commercial common stock in favor of approval of the Agreement.

(b) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. It is recommended that these unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes be read with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (“2017 Annual Form 10-K”). In management's opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. In preparing the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Management believes that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate based on the facts and circumstances at the time. Actual results, however, could differ significantly from those estimates.

Table of Contents

The significant accounting policies used in preparation of the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are disclosed in the 2017 Annual Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Company's significant accounting policies from those contained in the 2017 Annual Form 10-K, except for the accounting policy relating to revenue from contracts with customers adopted January 1, 2018 as discussed below.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (“ASC 606”) as amended was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2018. ASC 606 applies to all contracts with customers to provide goods or services in the ordinary course of business, except for contracts that are specifically excluded from its scope. The Company's revenues are primarily composed of interest income on financial instruments, such as loans and investment securities, which are excluded from the scope of ASC 606. Descriptions of our revenue-generating activities that are within the scope ASC 606, which are presented in Service Charges and Other Fees and Other Income on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, are as follows:

•

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts: The Company earns fees from its deposit customers from a variety of deposit products and services. Non-transaction based fees such as account maintenance fees and monthly statement fees are considered to be provided to the customer under a day-to-day contract with ongoing renewals. Revenues for these non-transaction fees are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Transaction-based fees such as non-sufficient fund charges, stop payment charges and wire fees are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as the contract duration does not extend beyond the service performed.


•	Wealth Management and Trust Services. The Company earns fees from contracts with customers for fiduciary and brokerage activities. Revenues are generally recognized on a monthly basis and are generally based on a percentage of the customer’s assets under management or based on investment or insurance solutions that are implemented for the customer.

•

Merchant Processing Services and Debit and Credit Card Fees: The Company earns fees from cardholder transactions conducted through third party payment network providers which consist of (i) interchange fees earned from the payment network as a debit card issuer, (ii) referral fee income, and (iii) ongoing merchant fees earned for referring customers to the payment processing provider. These fees are recognized when the transaction occurs, but may settle on a daily or monthly basis.

(d) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, was issued in May 2014. Under this Accounting Standard Update ("ASU" or "Update"), the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") created a new Topic 606 which is in response to a joint initiative of FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and international financial reporting standards that would:


•	Remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements.


•	Provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues.


•	Improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets.


•	Provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements.


•	Simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer.

The original effective date for this Update was deferred in FASB ASU 2015-14, and the Update was adopted on January 1, 2018 as described below.

FASB ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), was issued in August 2015 and defers the effective date of the above-mentioned FASB ASU 2014-09 for certain entities. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in Update 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted, but only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted the revenue recognition guidance on

Table of Contents

January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. A significant amount of the Company’s revenues are derived from interest income on financial assets, which are excluded from the scope of the amended guidance. With respect to noninterest income and related disclosures, the Company has identified and evaluated the revenue streams and underlying revenue contracts within the scope of the guidance. The Company did not identify any significant changes in the timing of revenue recognition when considering the amended accounting guidance. The adoption of the Update did not have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but the adoption did change certain disclosure requirements included in Significant Accounting Policies above.

FASB ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10), was issued in January 2016, to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This Update contains several provisions, including but not limited to (1) requiring equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplifying the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) eliminating the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value; and (4) requiring separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The Update also changes certain financial statement disclosure requirements, including requiring disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments be made on the basis of exit price. The Update was effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this Update effective January 1, 2018 using the cumulative catch-up transition method. This change resulted in a cumulative adjustment from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net to retained earnings for the unrealized gain related to the Company's equity security. The Company's processes and procedures utilized to estimate the fair value of loans receivable and certificate of deposit accounts for disclosure requirements were additionally changed due to adoption of this Update. Previously, the Company valued these items using an entry price notion. This ASU emphasized that these instruments be measured using the exit price notion; accordingly, the Company refined its calculation as part of adopting this standard. Prior period information has not been updated to conform with the new guidance. See the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Note (14) Fair Value Measurements.

FASB ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) was originally issued in February 2016, to increase transparency and comparability of leases among organizations and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The Update sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The Update requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either a finance or operating lease. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. All cash payments will be classified within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Update is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company anticipates adopting the Update on January 1, 2019. Upon adoption of the guidance, the Company expects to report increased assets and increased liabilities on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a result of recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to certain banking offices and certain equipment under noncancelable operating lease agreements, which currently are not reflected in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. During 2017, management developed its methodology to estimate the right-of use assets and lease liabilities. The Company anticipates electing an exclusion accounting policy for lease assets and lease liabilities for leases with a term of twelve months or less. The Company was committed to $13.9 million of minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating lease agreements at March 31, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of this amendment will have a significant impact to its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

FASB ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, was issued in March 2016 and it clarifies the implementation guidance of the above-mentioned FASB ASU 2014-09 as it relates to principal versus agent considerations. The Update addresses identifying the unit of account and nature of the goods or services as well as applying the control principle and interactions with the control principle. The amendments to the Update do not change the core principle of the guidance. The effective date, transition requirements and impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for this Update are the same as those described in FASB ASU 2015-14 above.

FASB ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, was issued in April 2016 which clarifies the implementation guidance of the above-mentioned FASB ASU 2014-09 as it relates to identifying performance obligations and licensing. The effective date, transition

Table of Contents

requirements and impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for this Update are the same as those described in FASB ASU 2015-14 above.

FASB ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, was issued in May 2016. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this Update affect only the narrow aspects of Topic 606. The effective date, transition requirements and impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for this Update are the same as those described in FASB ASU 2015-14 above.

FASB ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments: Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, was issued in June 2016. Commonly referred to as the current expected credit loss model ("CECL"), this Update requires financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The amendment affects loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables and any other financial asset not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The Update replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology, which generally only considered past events and current conditions, with a methodology that reflects the expected credit losses and required consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to estimate all expected credit losses. The Update additionally addresses purchased assets and introduces the purchased financial asset with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination ("PCD"). The accounting for these PCD assets is similar to the existing accounting guidance of FASB ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, for PCI assets, except the subsequent improvements in estimated cash flows will be immediately recognized into income, similar to the immediate recognition of subsequent deteriorations in cash flows. Current guidance only allows for the prospective recognition of these cash flow improvements. Because the terminology has been changed to a "more-than-insignificant" amount of credit deterioration, the presumption is that more assets might qualify for this accounting under the Update than those under current guidance. For public business entities, the Update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted for fiscal years after December 15, 2018. An entity will apply the Update through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities. An entity that has previously applied the guidance of FASB ASC 310-30 will prospectively apply the guidance in this Update for PCD assets. A prospective transition approach should be used for PCD assets where upon adoption, the amortized cost basis should be adjusted to reflect the addition of the allowance for credit losses. The Company is anticipating adopting the Update on January 1, 2020. Upon adoption, the Company expects a change in the processes, internal controls and procedures to calculate the allowance for loan losses, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. The new guidance may result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses which will also reflect the new requirement to include the nonaccretable principal differences on PCI loans; however, the Company is still in the process of determining the magnitude of the increase and its impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, the current accounting policy and procedures for other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities available for sale will be replaced with an allowance approach. During 2017, the Company's management created a CECL steering committee which has begun developing and implementing processes and procedures to ensure it is fully compliant with the amendments at the adoption date. To date, the CECL steering committee has selected a vendor to assist the Company in the adoption and has begun the implementation discovery sessions.

FASB ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, was issued in August 2016. The Update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. For public business entities, the guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and must be applied using a retrospective transitional method to each period presented. The Company adopted this Update on January 1, 2018. The adoption did not have a significant impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as cash proceeds received from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies and cash payment for premiums on bank-owned life insurance policies were previously classified as cash inflows and outflows, respectively, from investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

FASB ASU 2017-04, Goodwill (Topic 350), was issued in January 2017 and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments, an entity should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by

Table of Contents

which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized, however, should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The Update is effective for annual periods or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019 using a prospective transition method and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the Update will have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

FASB ASU 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities was issued in March 2017 and changes the accounting for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium to shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date rather than to the maturity date. Accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount does not change. The discount would continue to amortize to the maturity date. The Update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this Update in January 2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company had been accounting for premiums as prescribed under this guidance.

FASB ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting was issued in May 2017 to provide clarity as to when to apply modification accounting when there is a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. According to this Update, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions and balance sheet classification of the award is the same after the modification as compared to the original award prior to the modification. The Update was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the Update on January 1, 2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements because we did not modify any share-based payment award during the first quarter ended March 31, 2018. We will apply this Update prospectively for any subsequent modifications of share-based payment awards.

FASB ASU 2018-02, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income was issued to address the income tax accounting treatment of the stranded tax effects within other comprehensive income due to the prohibition of backward tracing due to an income tax rate change that was initially recorded in other comprehensive income. This issue came about from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017 ("Tax Cuts and Jobs Act") that changed the Company’s income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Update changed current accounting whereby an entity may elect to reclassify the stranded tax effect from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The Update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 although early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-02 effective December 31, 2017 and elected a portfolio policy to reclassify the stranded tax effects of the change in the federal corporate tax rate of the net unrealized gains on our available-for-sale investment securities from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net to retained earnings.

FASB ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 was issued to provide guidance on the income tax accounting implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and allows for entities to report provisional amounts for specific income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for which the accounting under ASC Topic 740 was not yet complete but a reasonable estimate could be determined. A measurement period of one-year is allowed to complete the accounting effects under ASC Topic 740 and revise any previous estimates reported. Any provisional amounts or subsequent adjustments included in an entity’s financial statements during the measurement period should be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to tax expense in the reporting period the amounts are determined. The Company adopted this Update with the provisional adjustments as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, the Company did not incur any adjustments to the provisional recognition.


(2)	Business Combination

On July 26, 2017, the Company, along with the Bank, and Puget Sound Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary bank, Puget Sound Bank, jointly announced the signing of a definitive agreement. The Puget Sound Merger was effective on January 16, 2018. As of the acquisition date, Puget Sound merged into Heritage and Puget Sound Bank merged into Heritage Bank. The primary reason for the merger was to create depth in the Company's geographic footprint consistent with its ongoing growth strategy, focused heavily on metro markets, and to achieve operational scale and realize efficiencies of a larger combined organization.

Pursuant to the terms to the Puget Sound Merger, all outstanding Puget Sound restricted stock awards became immediately vested prior to the merger. Puget Sound shareholders received 1.1688 shares of Heritage common stock per share of Puget Sound stock. Heritage issued an aggregate of 4,112,258 shares of its common stock at the closing date price of $31.80 for total fair value of common shares issued of $130.8 million and paid cash of $3,000 for fractional

Table of Contents

shares in the transaction for total consideration paid of $130.8 million. Fair value includes 26,741 shares which were forfeited by the Puget Sound stockholders to pay applicable taxes, totaling fair value of $851,000.

The Puget Sound Merger resulted in $68.5 million of goodwill. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Puget Sound Merger constitutes a business acquisition as defined by FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. FASB ASC 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Heritage was considered the acquirer in this transaction. Accordingly, the preliminary estimates of fair values of the Puget Sound assets, including the identifiable intangible assets, and the assumed liabilities in the Puget Sound Merger were measured and recorded as of January 16, 2018. Fair values on the acquisition date are preliminary and represent management’s best estimates based on available information and facts and circumstances in existence on the acquisition date. Fair values are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair values becomes available. The Company expects to finalize the purchase price allocation by the second quarter of 2018 when the valuation of tax-related matters is complete.

The preliminary fair value estimates of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Puget Sound Merger were as follows:



	Puget Sound Merger
	(In thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,889
Interest earning deposits	54,247
Investment securities available for sale	80,353
Loans receivable	388,462
Premises and equipment, net	732
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost	623
Bank owned life insurance	6,264
Accrued interest receivable	1,448
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,354
Other intangible assets	11,270
Total assets acquired	$	570,642
Liabilities
Deposits	$	505,885
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	2,504
Total liabilities acquired	$	508,389

Fair value of net assets acquired	$	62,253

Table of Contents

A summary of the net assets purchased and the preliminary estimated fair value adjustments and resulting goodwill recognized from the Puget Sound Merger are presented in the following tables. Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed.



	Puget Sound Merger
	(In thousands)
Cost basis of net assets on merger date	$	54,405
Consideration transferred	(130,773		)
Fair value adjustments:
Investment securities	(348		)
Total loans receivable, net	1,400
Premises and equipment	(121		)
Other intangible assets	9,207
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(2,282		)
Deposits	(62		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	54
Goodwill recognized from the Puget Sound Merger	$	(68,520	)

The operating results of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2018 include the operating results produced by the net assets acquired in the Puget Sound Merger since the January 16, 2018 merger date. The Company has considered the requirement of FASB ASC 805 related to the contribution of the Puget Sound Merger to the Company’s results of operations. The table below presents only the significant results for the acquired business since the January 16, 2018 merger date:



	Three Months Ended⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)
Interest income: Interest and fees on loans⁽²⁾	$	4,518
Interest income: Interest and fees on investments ⁽³⁾	59
Interest income: Other interest earning assets	88
Interest expense	(144		)
Provision for loan losses for loans	(200		)
Noninterest income	148
Noninterest expense ⁽⁴⁾	(5,580		)
Net effect, pre-tax	$	(1,111	)

⁽¹⁾ The Puget Sound Merger was completed on January 16, 2018.

⁽²⁾ Includes the accretion of the discount on the purchased loans of $479,000.

⁽³⁾ All securities were sold with trade date of January 16, 2018 and settlement dates on or before February 14, 2018.

⁽⁴⁾ Excludes certain compensation and employee benefits for management as it is impracticable to determine due to the integration of the operations for this merger. Also includes certain merger-related costs incurred by the Company.

The Company also considered the pro forma requirements of FASB ASC 805 and deemed it not necessary to provide pro forma financial statements as required under the standard as the Puget Sound Merger is not material to the Company. The Company believes that the historical Puget Sound operating results are not considered of enough significance to be meaningful to the Company’s results of operations.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company incurred acquisition-related costs (including costs associated with the Premier Merger) of approximately $4.7 million.


(3)	Investment Securities

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018, equity investments (except for investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting) are now measured at fair value, with changes in fair value

Table of Contents

recognized in earnings. These investments were previously measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in AOCI. Accordingly, these securities are no longer classified as available-for-sale and their presentation is not comparable to the presentation as of December 31, 2017. See Note (1) Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Issued Accounting Policies, as well as Equity Securities section discussed below.

Available for sale investment securities

(a) Securities by Type and Maturity

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values of investment securities available for sale at the dates indicated were as follows:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
March 31, 2018
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	23,448	$	43	$	(102	)	$	23,389
Municipal securities	203,771		1,747		(1,226		)	204,292
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations⁽¹⁾:
Residential	307,655		365		(6,743		)	301,277
Commercial	250,489		222		(6,351		)	244,360
Collateralized loan obligations	3,266		5		—			3,271
Corporate obligations	16,589		131		(91		)	16,629
Other asset-backed securities	27,670		679		—			28,349
Total	$	832,888	$	3,192	$	(14,513	)	$	821,567

December 31, 2017
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	13,460	$	6	$	(24	)	$	13,442
Municipal securities	247,358		3,720		(1,063		)	250,015
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations⁽¹⁾:
Residential	282,724		422		(2,935		)	280,211
Commercial	219,696		444		(3,061		)	217,079
Collateralized loan obligations	4,561		19		—			4,580
Corporate obligations	16,594		220		(44		)	16,770
Other securities ⁽²⁾	27,781		652		—			28,433
Total	$	812,174	$	5,483	$	(7,127	)	$	810,530


⁽¹⁾	Issued and guaranteed by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies.


⁽²⁾	Primarily asset-backed securities.

There were no securities classified as trading or held to maturity at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2018, by contractual maturity, are set forth below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Table of Contents



	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	8,166	$	8,205
Due after one year through five years	129,062		128,330
Due after five years through ten years	240,584		235,726
Due after ten years	455,076		449,306
Total	$	832,888	$	821,567

(b) Unrealized Losses and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company's investment securities available for sale that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss positions as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(In thousands)
March 31, 2018
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	7,353	$	(102	)	$	—	$	—		$	7,353	$	(102	)
Municipal securities	63,636		(607		)	16,842		(619		)	80,478		(1,226		)
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations⁽¹⁾:
Residential	181,058		(3,509		)	70,098		(3,234		)	251,156		(6,743		)
Commercial	127,395		(2,698		)	87,284		(3,653		)	214,679		(6,351		)
Corporate obligations	9,483		(91		)	—		—			9,483		(91		)
Total	$	388,925	$	(7,007	)	$	174,224	$	(7,506	)	$	563,149	$	(14,513	)

December 31, 2017
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	11,436	$	(24	)	$	—	$	—		$	11,436	$	(24	)
Municipal securities	$	39,298	$	(384	)	$	26,509	$	(679	)	$	65,807	$	(1,063	)
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations⁽¹⁾:
Residential	175,847		(1,296		)	66,380		(1,639		)	242,227		(2,935		)
Commercial	75,121		(700		)	90,822		(2,361		)	165,943		(3,061		)
Corporate obligations	3,472		(44		)	—		—			3,472		(44		)
Total	$	305,174	$	(2,448	)	$	183,711	$	(4,679	)	$	488,885	$	(7,127	)

⁽¹⁾ Issued and guaranteed by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies.

The Company has evaluated these investment securities available for sale as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and has determined that the decline in their value is not other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in market interest rates. The fair value of these securities is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date. None of the underlying issuers of the municipal securities and corporate obligations had credit ratings that were below investment grade levels at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017. The Company has the ability and intent to hold the investments until recovery of the securities' amortized cost, which may be the maturity date of the securities.

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no other-than-temporary charges recorded to net income.

The following table presents the gross realized gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Gross realized gains	$	104		$	—
Gross realized losses	(69		)	—
Net realized gains	$	35		$	—

(d) Pledged Securities

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale that are pledged as collateral for the following obligations at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Washington and Oregon state to secure public deposits	$	202,048	$	199,605	$	206,377	$	206,425
Repurchase agreements	46,979		45,864		48,750		48,237
Other securities pledged	17,300		17,096		12,484		12,498
Total	$	266,327	$	262,565	$	267,611	$	267,160

Equity Securities

The Company holds an equity security with a readily determinable fair value of $162,000 and $146,000 as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01, this security is no longer classified as available for sale and has been reclassified to prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2018. As such, its presentation is not comparable to the presentation as of December 31, 2017. The Company recorded the unrealized gain on the equity security through an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss,net and retained earnings in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity during the three months ended March 31, 2018.


(4)	Loans Receivable

The Company originates loans in the ordinary course of business and has also acquired loans through FDIC-assisted and open bank transactions. Disclosures related to the Company's recorded investment in loans receivable generally exclude accrued interest receivable and net deferred fees or costs because they are insignificant.

Loans acquired in a business combination are further classified as “purchased” loans. Loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. These loans are identified as "PCI" loans. Loans purchased that are not accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30 are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-20, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, and are referred to as "non-PCI" loans.

Table of Contents

(a) Loan Origination/Risk Management

The Company categorizes loans in one of the four segments of the total loan portfolio: commercial business, one-to-four family residential, real estate construction and land development and consumer. Within these segments are classes of loans for which management monitors and assesses credit risk in the loan portfolios. The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming and criticized loans. The Company also conducts internal loan reviews and validates the credit risk assessment on a periodic basis and presents the results of these reviews to management. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by loan officers and credit personnel, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.

A discussion of the risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment is as follows:

Commercial Business:

There are three significant classes of loans in the commercial business portfolio segment: commercial and industrial, owner-occupied commercial real estate and non-owner occupied commercial real estate. The owner and non-owner occupied commercial real estate classes are both considered commercial real estate loans. As the commercial and industrial loans carry different risk characteristics than the commercial real estate loans, they are discussed separately below.

Commercial and industrial. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may include a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Commercial and industrial loans carry more risk than other loans because the borrowers’ cash flow is less predictable, and in the event of a default, the amount of loss is potentially greater and more difficult to quantify because the value of the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate, may be uncollectible, or may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things.

Commercial real estate. The Company originates commercial real estate loans primarily within its primary market areas. These loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans in that these loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate properties. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and payments on loans, and repayment is dependent on successful operation and management of the properties. The value of the real estate securing these loans can be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate market or the economy. There is little difference in risk between owner-occupied commercial real estate loans and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans.

One-to-Four Family Residential:

The majority of the Company’s one-to-four family residential loans are secured by single-family residences located in its primary market areas. The Company’s underwriting standards require that single-family portfolio loans generally are owner-occupied and do not exceed 80% of the lower of appraised value at origination or cost of the underlying collateral. Terms of maturity typically range from 15 to 30 years. The Company sells most of its single-family loans in the secondary market and retains a smaller portion in its loan portfolio.

Real Estate Construction and Land Development:

The Company originates construction loans for one-to-four family residential and for five or more family residential and commercial properties. The one-to-four family residential construction loans generally include construction of custom homes whereby the home buyer is the borrower. The Company also provides financing to builders for the construction of pre-sold homes and, in selected cases, to builders for the construction of speculative residential property. Substantially all construction loans are short-term in nature and priced with variable rates of interest. Construction lending can involve a higher level of risk than other types of lending because funds are advanced partially based upon the value of the project, which is uncertain prior to the project’s completion. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs as well as the market value of a completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, the Company’s estimates with regard to the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio may vary from actual results. As a result, construction loans often

Table of Contents

involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property or refinance the indebtedness. If the Company’s estimate of the value of a project at completion proves to be overstated, it may have inadequate security for repayment of the loan and may incur a loss if the borrower does not repay the loan. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being dependent upon successful completion of the construction project, interest rate changes, government regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

Consumer:

The Company originates consumer loans and lines of credit that are both secured and unsecured. The underwriting process for these loans ensures a qualifying primary and secondary source of repayment. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are significantly influenced by statutory requirements, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, collection remedies, the number of such loans a borrower can have at one time and documentation requirements. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed. The majority of consumer loans are for relatively small amounts disbursed among many individual borrowers which reduces the credit risk for this type of loan. To further reduce the risk, trend reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis.

The Company also originates indirect consumer loans. These loans are for new and used automobile and recreational vehicles that are originated indirectly by selected dealers located in the Company's market areas. The Company has limited its purchase of indirect loans primarily to dealerships that are established and well-known in their market areas and to applicants that are not classified as sub-prime.

Loans receivable at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following portfolio segments and classes:



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	811,678		$	645,396
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	702,356			622,150
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1,133,394			986,594
Total commercial business	2,647,428			2,254,140
One-to-four family residential	89,180			86,997
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	73,295			51,985
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	98,387			97,499
Total real estate construction and land development	171,682			149,484
Consumer	370,275			355,091
Gross loans receivable	3,278,565			2,845,712
Net deferred loan costs	3,350			3,359
Loans receivable, net	3,281,915			2,849,071
Allowance for loan losses	(33,261		)	(32,086		)
Total loans receivable, net	$	3,248,654		$	2,816,985

(b) Concentrations of Credit

Most of the Company’s lending activity occurs within its primary market areas which are concentrated along the I-5 corridor from Whatcom County to Clark County in Washington State and Multnomah County in Oregon, as well as other contiguous markets. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of (in order of balances at March 31, 2018) non-owner occupied commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and owner-occupied commercial real estate. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no concentrations of loans related to any single industry in excess of 10% of the Company’s total loans.

Table of Contents

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the risk grade of the loans, (ii) the level of classified loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) nonperforming loans and (v) the general economic conditions of the United States of America, and specifically the states of Washington and Oregon. The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 10. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:

•

Grades 1 to 5: These grades are considered “pass grade” and include loans with negligible to above average but acceptable risk. These borrowers generally have strong to acceptable capital levels and consistent earnings and debt service capacity. Loans with the higher grades within the “pass” category may include borrowers who are experiencing unusual operating difficulties, but have acceptable payment performance to date. Increased monitoring of financial information and/or collateral may be appropriate. Loans with this grade show no immediate loss exposure.


•	Grade 6: This grade includes "Watch" loans and is considered a “pass grade”. The grade is intended to be utilized on a temporary basis for pass grade borrowers where a potentially significant risk-modifying action is anticipated in the near term.

•

Grade 7: This grade includes “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” (“OAEM”) loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines, and is intended to highlight loans with elevated risks. Loans with this grade show signs of deteriorating profits and capital, and the borrower might not be strong enough to sustain a major setback. The borrower is typically higher than normally leveraged, and outside support might be modest and likely illiquid. The loan is at risk of further decline unless active measures are taken to correct the situation.

•

Grade 8: This grade includes “Substandard” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines, which the Company has determined have a high credit risk. These loans also have well-defined weaknesses which make payment default or principal exposure likely, but not yet certain. The borrower may have shown serious negative trends in financial ratios and performance. Such loans may be dependent upon collateral liquidation, a secondary source of repayment or an event outside of the normal course of business. Loans with this grade can be placed on accrual or nonaccrual status based on the Company’s accrual policy.

•

Grade 9: This grade includes “Doubtful” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines, and the Company has determined these loans to have excessive credit risk. Such loans are placed on nonaccrual status and may be dependent upon collateral having a value that is difficult to determine or upon some near-term event which lacks certainty. Additionally, these loans generally have a specific valuation allowance or have been partially charged-off for the amount considered uncollectible.

•

Grade 10: This grade includes “Loss” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines, and the Company has determined these loans have the highest risk of loss. Such loans are charged-off or charged-down when payment is acknowledged to be uncertain or when the timing or value of payments cannot be determined. “Loss” is not intended to imply that the loan or some portion of it will never be paid, nor does it in any way imply that there has been a forgiveness of debt.

Numerical loan grades for loans are established at the origination of the loan. Loan grades are reviewed on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if necessary, by the credit department. The Bank follows the FDIC’s Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy for subsequent classification in the event of payment delinquencies or default. Typically, an individual loan grade will not be changed from the prior period unless there is a specific indication of credit deterioration or improvement. Credit deterioration is evidenced by delinquency, direct communications with the borrower, or other borrower information that becomes known to management. Credit improvements are evidenced by known facts regarding the borrower or the collateral property.

The loan grades relate to the likelihood of losses in that the higher the grade, the greater the loss potential. Loans with a pass grade may have some estimated inherent losses, but to a lesser extent than the other loan grades. The OAEM loan grade is transitory in that the Company is waiting on additional information to determine the likelihood and extent of the potential loss. The likelihood of loss for OAEM graded loans, however, is greater than Watch graded loans because there has been measurable credit deterioration. Loans with a Substandard grade are generally loans for which the Company has individually analyzed for potential impairment. For Doubtful and Loss graded loans, the Company is almost certain of the losses, and the outstanding principal balances are generally charged-off to the realizable value.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the balance of the loans receivable by credit quality indicator as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.



	March 31, 2018
	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful/Loss		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	754,720	$	25,050	$	31,908	$	—	$	811,678
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	663,770		19,988		18,598		—		702,356
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1,106,904		10,415		16,075		—		1,133,394
Total commercial business	2,525,394		55,453		66,581		—		2,647,428
One-to-four family residential	87,962		—		1,218		—		89,180
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	71,735		275		1,285		—		73,295
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	98,328		59		—		—		98,387
Total real estate construction and land development	170,063		334		1,285		—		171,682
Consumer	365,577		—		4,172		526		370,275
Gross loans receivable	$	3,148,996	$	55,787	$	73,256	$	526	$	3,278,565



	December 31, 2017
	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful/Loss		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	597,697	$	19,536	$	28,163	$	—	$	645,396
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	595,455		12,668		14,027		—		622,150
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	955,450		10,494		20,650		—		986,594
Total commercial business	2,148,602		42,698		62,840		—		2,254,140
One-to-four family residential	85,762		—		1,235		—		86,997
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	49,925		537		1,523		—		51,985
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	96,404		707		388		—		97,499
Total real estate construction and land development	146,329		1,244		1,911		—		149,484
Consumer	349,590		—		4,976		525		355,091
Gross loans receivable	$	2,730,283	$	43,942	$	70,962	$	525	$	2,845,712

Potential problem loans are loans classified as OAEM or worse that are currently accruing interest and are not considered impaired, but which management is monitoring because the financial information of the borrower causes concern as to their ability to meet their loan repayment terms. Potential problem loans may include PCI loans as these loans continue to accrete loan discounts established at acquisition based on the guidance of FASB ASC 310-30. Potential problem loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $93.3 million and $83.5 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

(d) Nonaccrual Loans

Nonaccrual loans, segregated by segments and classes of loans, were as follows as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	7,627	$	3,110
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	4,544		4,090
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	2,185		1,898
Total commercial business	14,356		9,098
One-to-four family residential	80		81
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	1,147		1,247
Consumer	145		277
Nonaccrual loans	$	15,728	$	10,703

PCI loans are not included in the nonaccrual loan table above because these loans are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30, which provides that accretable yield is calculated based on a loan's expected cash flow even if the loan is not performing under its contractual terms.

(e) Past due loans

The Company performs an aging analysis of past due loans using the categories of 30-89 days past due and 90 or more days past due. This policy is consistent with regulatory reporting requirements.

The balances of past due loans, segregated by segments and classes of loans, as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:



	March 31, 2018
	30-89 Days		90 Days or Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	16,944	$	1,449	$	18,393	$	793,285	$	811,678
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	1,310		989		2,299		700,057		702,356
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	931		3,282		4,213		1,129,181		1,133,394
Total commercial business	19,185		5,720		24,905		2,622,523		2,647,428
One-to-four family residential	535		—		535		88,645		89,180
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	—		1,147		1,147		72,148		73,295
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	408		—		408		97,979		98,387
Total real estate construction and land development	408		1,147		1,555		170,127		171,682
Consumer	1,896		—		1,896		368,379		370,275
Gross loans receivable	$	22,024	$	6,867	$	28,891	$	3,249,674	$	3,278,565

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2017
	30-89 Days		90 Days or Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	2,993	$	1,172	$	4,165	$	641,231	$	645,396
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	1,277		1,225		2,502		619,648		622,150
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	870		3,314		4,184		982,410		986,594
Total commercial business	5,140		5,711		10,851		2,243,289		2,254,140
One-to-four family residential	513		—		513		86,484		86,997
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	84		1,331		1,415		50,570		51,985
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	40		—		40		97,459		97,499
Total real estate construction and land development	124		1,331		1,455		148,029		149,484
Consumer	1,939		687		2,626		352,465		355,091
Gross loans receivable	$	7,716	$	7,729	$	15,445	$	2,830,267	$	2,845,712

There were no loans 90 days or more past due that were still accruing interest as of March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017, excluding PCI loans.

(f) Impaired loans

Impaired loans include nonaccrual loans and performing troubled debt restructured ("TDR") loans. The balances of impaired loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are set forth in the following tables.



	March 31, 2018
	Recorded Investment With No Specific Valuation Allowance		Recorded Investment With Specific Valuation Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Related Specific Valuation Allowance
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	5,135	$	11,390	$	16,525	$	17,191	$	1,769
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	936		12,165		13,101		13,386		1,727
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,692		5,776		10,468		10,630		811
Total commercial business	10,763		29,331		40,094		41,207		4,307
One-to-four family residential	—		295		295		305		93
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	838		309		1,147		1,892		2
Total real estate construction and land development	838		309		1,147		1,892		2
Consumer	—		379		379		450		73
Total	$	11,601	$	30,314	$	41,915	$	43,854	$	4,475

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2017
	Recorded Investment With No Specific Valuation Allowance		Recorded Investment With Specific Valuation Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Related Specific Valuation Allowance
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	2,127	$	9,872	$	11,999	$	12,489	$	1,326
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	2,452		4,356		6,808		7,054		621
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,722		11,297		16,019		16,172		1,222
Total commercial business	9,301		25,525		34,826		35,715		3,169
One-to-four family residential	—		299		299		308		93
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	938		309		1,247		2,200		2
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	—		645		645		645		37
Total real estate construction and land development	938		954		1,892		2,845		39
Consumer	160		282		442		466		54
Total	$	10,399	$	27,060	$	37,459	$	39,334	$	3,355

The average recorded investment of impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are set forth in the following table.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	14,261	$	9,834
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	12,841		4,017
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	10,358		11,265
Total commercial business	37,460		25,116
One-to-four family residential	297		317
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	1,197		2,904
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	322		1,075
Total real estate construction and land development	1,519		3,979
Consumer	411		289
Total	$	39,687	$	29,701

For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, no interest income was recognized subsequent to a loan’s classification as nonaccrual. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Bank recorded $326,000 and $365,000, respectively, of interest income related to performing TDR loans.

Table of Contents

(g) Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

A TDR loan is a restructuring in which the Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. TDR loans are considered impaired and are separately measured for impairment under FASB ASC 310-10-35, whether on accrual ("performing") or nonaccrual ("nonperforming") status. The Company has more stringent definitions of concessions and impairment measures for PCI loans as these loans have known credit deterioration and are generally accreting income at a lower discounted rate as compared to the contractual note rate based on the guidance of FASB ASC 310-30.

The majority of the Bank’s TDR loans are a result of granting extensions of maturity on troubled credits which have already been adversely classified. The Bank grants such extensions to reassess the borrower’s financial status and to develop a plan for repayment. The second most prevalent concessions are certain modifications with extensions that also include interest rate reductions. Certain TDR loans were additionally re-amortized over a longer period of time. These modifications would all be considered a concession for a borrower that could not obtain similar financing terms from another source other than from the Bank.

The financial effects of each modification will vary based on the specific restructure. For the majority of the Bank’s TDR loans, the loans were interest-only with a balloon payment at maturity. If the interest rate is not adjusted and the modified terms are consistent with other similar credits being offered, the Bank may not experience any loss associated with the restructure. If, however, the restructure involves forbearance agreements or interest rate modifications, the Bank may not collect all the principal and interest based on the original contractual terms. The Bank estimates the necessary allowance for loan losses on TDR loans using the same guidance as used for other impaired loans.

The recorded investment balance and related allowance for loan losses of performing and nonaccrual TDR loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Performing TDRs		Nonaccrual TDRs		Performing TDRs		Nonaccrual TDRs
	(In thousands)
TDR loans	$	26,187	$	8,214	$	26,757	$	5,193
Allowance for loan losses on TDR loans	2,613		336		2,635		379

The unfunded commitment to borrowers related to TDR loans was $517,000 and $1.2 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Table of Contents

Loans that were modified as TDR loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are set forth in the following table:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	Number of Contracts (1)	Outstanding Principal Balance (1)(2)		Number of Contracts (1)	Outstanding Principal Balance (1)(2)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	9	$	4,323	8	$	3,245
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	—	—		1	56
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1	2,201		1	184
Total commercial business	10	6,524		10	3,485
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	—	—		2	1,143
Total real estate construction and land development	—	—		2	1,143
Consumer	3	78		1	9
Total loans modified as TDR loans	13	$	6,602	13	$	4,637


⁽¹⁾	Number of contracts and outstanding principal balance represent loans which have balances as of period end as certain loans may have been paid-down or charged-off during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

⁽²⁾

Includes subsequent payments after modifications and reflects the balance as of period end. As the Bank did not forgive any principal or interest balance as part of the loan modification, the Bank’s recorded investment in each loan at the date of modification (pre-modification) did not change as a result of the modification (post-modification), except when the modification was the initial advance on a one-to-four family residential real estate construction and land development loan under a master guidance line. There were no advances on these types of loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Certain loans included in the table above may have been previously reported as TDR loans. The Bank typically grants shorter extension periods to continually monitor these TDR loans despite the fact that the extended date might not be the date the Bank expects sufficient cash flow from these borrowers. The Bank does not consider these modifications a subsequent default of a TDR as new loan terms, specifically new maturity dates, were granted. The potential losses related to these loans would have been considered in the period the loan was first reported as a TDR loan and are adjusted, as necessary, in the current period based on more recent information. The related specific valuation allowance at March 31, 2018 was $195,000 for loans that were modified as TDR loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

Loans that were modified during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are set forth in the following table:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	Number of Contracts	Outstanding Principal Balance		Number of Contracts	Outstanding Principal Balance
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	1	$	283	1	$	234
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1	75		—	—
Total commercial business	2	358		1	234
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	2	838		—	—
Total	4	$	1,196	1	$	234

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the four loans defaulted because they were past their modified maturity dates, and the borrowers have not subsequently repaid the credits. The Bank has chosen not to extend the maturities on these loans. The Bank had no specific valuation allowance at March 31, 2018 related to the credits which defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

The one commercial and industrial loan that was modified during the previous twelve months subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2017 because the borrower was more than 90 days delinquent on his scheduled loan payments.

(h) Purchased Credit Impaired Loans

The Company acquired certain loans and designated them, as appropriate, as PCI loans, which are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30. No loans acquired in the Puget Sound Merger effective January 16, 2018 were considered PCI.

The following table reflects the outstanding principal balance and recorded investment of the PCI loans at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Outstanding Principal		Recorded Investment		Outstanding Principal		Recorded Investment
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	8,269	$	2,091	$	8,818	$	2,912
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	10,392		9,840		12,230		11,515
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	11,855		11,088		14,295		13,342
Total commercial business	30,516		23,019		35,343		27,769
One-to-four family residential	3,891		5,039		4,120		5,255
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	275		—		841		89
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	1,820		1,552		2,361		2,035
Total real estate construction and land development	2,095		1,552		3,202		2,124
Consumer	3,324		4,861		3,974		5,455
Gross PCI loans	$	39,826	$	34,471	$	46,639	$	40,603

Table of Contents

On the acquisition dates, the amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows of the PCI loans exceeded the estimated fair value of the loan is the “accretable yield.” The accretable yield is then measured at each financial reporting date and represents the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the PCI loans.

The following table summarizes the accretable yield on the PCI loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	11,224		$	13,860
Accretion	(781		)	(994		)
Disposal and other	(1,698		)	(490		)
Change in accretable yield	2,524			756
Balance at the end of the period	$	11,269		$	13,132


(5)	Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio. The following tables detail the activity in the allowance for loan losses disaggregated by segment and class for the three months ended March 31, 2018:



	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision for Loan Losses			Balance at End of Period
	(In thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	9,910	$	(81	)	$	499	$	(385	)	$	9,943
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	3,992		—			2		1,046			5,040
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	8,097		—			—		(508		)	7,589
Total commercial business	21,999		(81		)	501		153			22,572
One-to-four family residential	1,056		—			—		27			1,083
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	862		—			—		79			941
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	1,190		—			—		(75		)	1,115
Total real estate construction and land development	2,052		—			—		4			2,056
Consumer	6,081		(485		)	88		370			6,054
Unallocated	898		—			—		598			1,496
Total	$	32,086	$	(566	)	$	589	$	1,152		$	33,261

Table of Contents

The following table details the allowance for loan losses disaggregated on the basis of the Company's impairment method as of March 31, 2018.



	Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		PCI Loans		Total Allowance for Loan Losses
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,769	$	7,251	$	923	$	9,943
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	1,727		2,513		800		5,040
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	811		5,837		941		7,589
Total commercial business	4,307		15,601		2,664		22,572
One-to-four family residential	93		832		158		1,083
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	2		714		225		941
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	—		1,028		87		1,115
Total real estate construction and land development	2		1,742		312		2,056
Consumer	73		5,304		677		6,054
Unallocated	—		1,496		—		1,496
Total	$	4,475	$	24,975	$	3,811	$	33,261

The following table details the recorded investment balance of the loan receivables disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment method as of March 31, 2018:



	Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		PCI Loans		Total Gross Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	16,525	$	793,062	$	2,091	$	811,678
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	13,101		679,415		9,840		702,356
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	10,468		1,111,838		11,088		1,133,394
Total commercial business	40,094		2,584,315		23,019		2,647,428
One-to-four family residential	295		83,846		5,039		89,180
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	1,147		72,148		—		73,295
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	—		96,835		1,552		98,387
Total real estate construction and land development	1,147		168,983		1,552		171,682
Consumer	379		365,035		4,861		370,275
Total	$	41,915	$	3,202,179	$	34,471	$	3,278,565

Table of Contents

The following tables detail activity in the allowance for loan losses disaggregated by segment and class for the three months ended March 31, 2017.



	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision for Loan Losses			Balance at End of Period
	(In thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	10,968	$	(295	)	$	223	$	(805	)	$	10,091
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	3,661		(7		)	149		413			4,216
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	7,753		—			—		(152		)	7,601
Total commercial business	22,382		(302		)	372		(544		)	21,908
One-to-four family residential	1,015		—			—		37			1,052
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	797		—			10		(16		)	791
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	1,359		—			—		187			1,546
Total real estate construction and land development	2,156		—			10		171			2,337
Consumer	5,024		(543		)	107		607			5,195
Unallocated	506		—			—		596			1,102
Total	$	31,083	$	(845	)	$	489	$	867		$	31,594

The following table details the allowance for loan losses disaggregated on the basis of the Company's impairment method as of December 31, 2017.



	Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		PCI Loans		Total Allowance for Loan Losses
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,326	$	7,558	$	1,026	$	9,910
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	621		2,557		814		3,992
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1,222		5,919		956		8,097
Total commercial business	3,169		16,034		2,796		21,999
One-to-four family residential	93		798		165		1,056
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	2		635		225		862
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	37		1,064		89		1,190
Total real estate construction and land development	39		1,699		314		2,052
Consumer	54		5,303		724		6,081
Unallocated	—		898		—		898
Total	$	3,355	$	24,732	$	3,999	$	32,086

Table of Contents

The following table details the recorded investment balance of the loan receivables disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment method as of December 31, 2017:



	Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		PCI Loans		Total Gross Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	11,999	$	630,485	$	2,912	$	645,396
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	6,808		603,827		11,515		622,150
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	16,019		957,233		13,342		986,594
Total commercial business	34,826		2,191,545		27,769		2,254,140
One-to-four family residential	299		81,443		5,255		86,997
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	1,247		50,649		89		51,985
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	645		94,819		2,035		97,499
Total real estate construction and land development	1,892		145,468		2,124		149,484
Consumer	442		349,194		5,455		355,091
Total	$	37,459	$	2,767,650	$	40,603	$	2,845,712


(6)	Other Real Estate Owned

There was no other real estate owned at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017 and no activity during the three months ended March 31, 2018. Changes in other real estate owned during the three months ended March 31, 2017 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	754
Additions	32
Balance at the end of the period	$	786

At March 31, 2018, the recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties (included in the one-to-four family residential loans in Note (4) Loans Receivable) for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process was $80,000.

(7)Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

(a) Goodwill

The Company’s goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in the recent Puget Sound Merger on January 16, 2018 and the historical acquisitions of Washington Banking Company on May 1, 2014; Valley Community Bancshares on July 15, 2013; Western Washington Bancorp in 2006 and North Pacific Bank in 1998. The Company’s goodwill is assigned to the Bank and is evaluated for impairment at the Bank level (reporting unit).

Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in goodwill for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	119,029	$	119,029
Additions as a result of acquisitions⁽¹⁾	68,520		—
Impairment	—		—
Balance at the end of the period	$	187,549	$	119,029

⁽¹⁾ See Note (2) Business Combination

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2017 and determined based on its Step 1 analysis that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value, such that the Company's goodwill was not considered impaired. Changes in the economic environment, operations of the reporting unit or other adverse events could result in future impairment charges which could have a material impact on the Company’s operating results.

(b) Other Intangible Assets

The other intangible assets represent the core deposit intangible ("CDI") acquired in business combinations. The useful life of the CDI related to the acquisitions of Puget Sound Bancorp, Washington Banking Company, Valley Community Bancshares, and Northwest Commercial Bank were estimated to be ten, ten, ten, and five years, respectively.

The following table presents the change in other intangible assets for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	6,088		$	7,374
Additions as a result of acquisitions	11,270			—
Amortization	(795		)	(324		)
Balance at the end of the period	$	16,563		$	7,050


(8)	Junior Subordinated Debentures

As part of the acquisition of Washington Banking Company on May 1, 2014, the Company assumed trust preferred securities and junior subordinated debentures with a total fair value of $18.9 million at the merger date.

Washington Banking Master Trust, a Delaware statutory business trust, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Washington Banking Company created for the exclusive purposes of issuing and selling capital securities and utilizing sale proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures issued by the Washington Banking Company. During 2007, the Trust issued $25.0 million of trust preferred securities with a 30-year maturity, callable after the fifth year by the Washington Banking. The trust preferred securities have a quarterly adjustable rate based upon the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.56%. On the merger date, the Company acquired the Trust, which retained the Washington Banking Master Trust name, and assumed the performance and observance of the covenants under the indenture related to the trust preferred securities.

The adjustable rate of the trust preferred securities at March 31, 2018 was 3.88%. The weighted average rate of the junior subordinated debentures were as follows for the indicated periods:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Weighted average rate ⁽¹⁾	5.73	%	4.89	%

⁽¹⁾The weighted average rate includes the accretion of the discount established at the merger date which is amortized over the life of the trust preferred securities.

Table of Contents

The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of the Trust and payments under the junior subordinated debentures are the sole revenues of the Trust. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the balance of the junior subordinated debentures, net of unaccreted discount, was $20.1 million and $20.0 million, respectively. All of the common securities of the Trust are owned by the Company. Heritage has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the capital securities along with all obligations of the Trust under the trust agreements. For financial reporting purposes, the Company's investment in the Master Trust is accounted for under the equity method and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The junior subordinated debentures issued and guaranteed by the Company and held by the Master Trust are reflected as liabilities on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.


(9)	Repurchase Agreements

The Company utilizes repurchase agreements with one-day maturities as a supplement to funding sources. Repurchase agreements are secured by pledged investment securities available for sale. Under the repurchase agreements, the Company is required to maintain an aggregate market value of securities pledged greater than the balance of the repurchase agreements. The Company is required to pledge additional securities to cover any declines below the balance of the repurchase agreements. For additional information on the total value of investment securities pledged for repurchase agreements see Note (3) Investment Securities.

The following table presents the Company's repurchase agreement obligations by class of collateral pledged:



	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations⁽¹⁾:
Residential	$	11,424	$	11,239
Commercial	14,676		20,582
Total repurchase agreements	$	26,100	$	31,821

⁽¹⁾ Issued and guaranteed by U.S. Government-sponsored agencies.


(10)	Other Borrowings

(a) FHLB

The Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Des Moines functions as a member-owned cooperative providing credit for member financial institutions. Advances are made pursuant to several different programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Limitations on the amount of advances are based on a percentage of the Bank's assets or on the FHLB’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. At March 31, 2018, the Bank maintained a credit facility with the FHLB of Des Moines for $913.0 million and had short-term FHLB advances outstanding of $30.7 million with maturity dates within 30 days. At December 31, 2017 there were FHLB advances outstanding of $92.5 million.

The following table sets forth the details of FHLB advances during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
FHLB Advances:
Average balance during the period	$	35,733		$	101,130
Maximum month-end balance during the period	$	37,200		$	126,300
Weighted average rate during the period	1.70		%	0.81		%

Advances from the FHLB are collateralized by a blanket pledge on FHLB stock owned by the Bank, deposits at the FHLB, certain one-to-four single family residential loans or other assets, investment securities which are obligations of or guaranteed by the United States or other assets. In accordance with the pledge agreement, the Company must maintain unencumbered collateral in an amount equal to varying percentages ranging from 100% to 160% of outstanding advances depending on the type of collateral.

Table of Contents

(b) Federal Funds Purchased

The Bank maintains advance lines with Wells Fargo Bank, US Bank, The Independent Bankers Bank ("TIB") and Pacific Coast Bankers’ Bank to purchase federal funds of up to $90.0 million as of March 31, 2018. The lines generally mature annually or are reviewed annually. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no federal funds purchased.

The Bank maintains a credit facility with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("Federal Reserve Bank") for $81.4 million as of March 31, 2018, of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017. Any advances on the credit facility would have to be first secured by the Bank's investment securities or loans receivable.


(11)	Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has entered into certain interest rate swap contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments. The purpose of these derivative contracts is primarily to provide commercial business loan customers the ability to convert their loans from variable to fixed interest rates. Upon the origination of a derivative contract with a customer, the Company simultaneously enters into an offsetting derivative contract with a third party in order to offset its exposure on the variable and fixed rate components of the customer agreement. The Company recognizes immediate income based upon the difference in the bid/ask spread of the underlying transactions with its customers and the third party, which is recorded in interest rate swap fees on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Because the Company acts only as an intermediary for its customer, subsequent changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations.

The notional amounts and estimated fair values of interest rate derivative contracts outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are presented in the following table.



	March 31, 2018					December 31, 2017
	Notional Amounts		Estimated Fair Value			Notional Amounts		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Non-hedging interest rate derivatives
Interest rate swaps with customer ⁽¹⁾	$	148,238	$	(4,553	)	$	146,537	$	(882	)
Interest rate swap with third party ⁽¹⁾	148,238		4,553			146,537		882

⁽¹⁾The estimated fair value of the derivative included in prepaid and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition was $4.8 million and $3.4 million as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The estimated fair value of the derivative included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition was $4.8 million and $3.4 million as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Table of Contents


(12)	Stockholders’ Equity

(a) Earnings Per Common Share

The following table illustrates the reconciliation of weighted average shares used for earnings per common share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net income:
Net income	$	9,087		$	9,316
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities	(51		)	(78		)
Net income allocated to common shareholders	$	9,036		$	9,238
Basic:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	33,332,645			29,952,074
Less: Restricted stock awards	(127,099		)	(248,170		)
Total basic weighted average common shares outstanding	33,205,546			29,703,904
Diluted:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	33,205,546			29,703,904
Effect of potentially dilutive common shares ⁽¹⁾	142,556			49,085
Total diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	33,348,102			29,752,989


⁽¹⁾	Represents the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units.

Potential dilutive shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no anti-dilutive shares outstanding related to options to acquire common stock. Anti-dilution occurs when the exercise price of a stock option or the unrecognized compensation cost per share of a restricted stock award exceeds the market price of the Company’s stock.

(b) Dividends

The timing and amount of cash dividends paid on the Company's common stock depends on the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. Dividends on common stock from the Company depend substantially upon receipt of dividends from the Bank, which is the Company’s predominant source of income.

The following table summarizes the dividend activity for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and calendar year 2017.



Declared	Cash Dividend per Share	Record Date	Paid Date
January 25, 2017	$0.12	February 9, 2017	February 23, 2017
April 25, 2017	$0.13	May 10, 2017	May 24, 2017
July 25, 2017	$0.13	August 10, 2017	August 24, 2017
October 25, 2017	$0.13	November 8, 2017	November 22, 2017
October 25, 2017	$0.10	November 8, 2017	November 22, 2017	*
January 24, 2018	$0.15	February 7, 2018	February 21, 2018

* Denotes a special dividend.

The FDIC and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks have the authority under their supervisory powers to prohibit the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Company. Additionally, current guidance from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve") provides, among other things, that dividends per share on the Company’s common stock generally should not exceed earnings per share, measured over the previous four fiscal quarters. Current regulations allow the Company and the Bank to pay dividends on their common stock if the Company’s or the Bank’s regulatory capital would not be reduced below the statutory capital requirements set by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC.

Table of Contents

The Company has had various stock repurchase programs since March 1999. On October 23, 2014, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 5% of the Company's outstanding common shares, or approximately 1,513,000 shares, under the eleventh stock repurchase plan. The number, timing and price of shares repurchased will depend on business and market conditions and other factors, including opportunities to deploy the Company's capital.

Since the inception of the eleventh plan, the Company has repurchased 579,996 shares at an average share prices of $16.67. No shares were repurchased under this plan during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

In addition to the stock repurchases under a plan, the Company repurchases shares to pay withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock awards and units. The following table provides total repurchased shares for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Repurchased shares to pay withholding taxes ⁽¹⁾	45,426		15,891
Stock repurchase to pay withholding taxes average share price	$	31.66	$	23.95

⁽¹⁾During the three months ended March 31, 2018, 26,741 of the shares repurchased related to the withholding taxes due on the accelerated vesting of the restricted stock units of Puget Sound which were converted to Heritage common stock shares with an average share price of $31.80 under the terms of the merger. See Note (2) Business Combination.

(d) Issuance of Common Stock

The Puget Sound Merger was effective on January 16, 2018. In conjunction with the merger was the issuance of 4,112,258 shares of the Company's common stock at the merger date share price of $31.80 for a fair value of $130.8 million.


(13)	Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (“AOCI”), all of which are due to changes in the fair value of available for sale securities and are net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:



	Three Months Ended
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Balance of AOCI at the beginning of period	$	(1,298	)	$	(2,606	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification	(7,516		)	1,473
Amounts reclassified from AOCI for gain on sale of investment securities included in net income	(27		)	—
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income	(7,543		)	1,473
ASU 2016-01 implementation	(118		)	—
Balance of AOCI at the end of period	$	(8,959	)	$	(1,133	)


(14)	Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, or interest in open-end mutual funds that allow the Company to sell its ownership interest back to the fund at net asset value on a daily basis. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets, liabilities, or funds.

Table of Contents

Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or valuations using methodologies with observable inputs.

Level 3: Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, such as option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques using unobservable inputs, and not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.

(a) Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to measure the fair value of certain assets on a recurring and nonrecurring basis:

Investment Securities Available for Sale:

The fair values of all investment securities are based upon the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the security. If available, fair values of investment securities are determined by quoted market prices (Level 1). For investment securities where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices on similar securities (Level 2). For investment securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated by using observable and unobservable inputs such as discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Security valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for comparable assets or liabilities.

Impaired Loans:

At the time a loan is considered impaired, its impairment is measured based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the observable market price, or the fair market value of the collateral (less costs to sell) if the loan is collateral-dependent. Impaired loans for which impairment is measured using the discounted cash flow approach are not considered to be measured at fair value because the loan’s effective interest rate is generally not a fair value input, and for the purposes of fair value disclosures, the fair value of these loans are measured commensurate with non-impaired loans. If the Company utilizes the fair market value of the collateral method, the fair value used to measure impairment is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value based on the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business (Level 3). Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis and impairment and is adjusted accordingly.

Other Real Estate Owned:

Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers for commercial properties or certified residential appraisers for residential properties whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once received, the Company reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. On a quarterly basis, the Company compares the actual selling price of collateral that has been liquidated to the most recent appraised value to determine what additional adjustment should be made to the appraisal value to arrive at fair value.

Table of Contents

Derivative Financial Instruments:

The Company obtains broker or dealer quotes to value its interest rate derivative contracts, which use valuation models using observable market data as of the measurement date (Level 2).

The following tables summarize the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.



	March 31, 2018
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	23,389	$	—	$	23,389	$	—
Municipal securities	204,292		—		204,292		—
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations:
Residential	301,277		—		301,277		—
Commercial	244,360		—		244,360		—
Collateralized loan obligations	3,271		—		3,271		—
Corporate obligations	16,629		—		16,629		—
Other asset-backed securities	28,349		—		28,349		—
Total investment securities available for sale	821,567		—		821,567		—
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps	4,793		—		4,793		—
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps	$	4,793	$	—	$	4,793	$	—



	December 31, 2017
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Assets
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$	13,442	$	—	$	13,442	$	—
Municipal securities	250,015		—		250,015		—
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations:
Residential	280,211		—		280,211		—
Commercial	217,079		—		217,079		—
Collateralized loan obligations	4,580		—		4,580		—
Corporate obligations	16,770		—		16,770		—
Other securities	28,433		146		28,287		—
Total investment securities available for sale	810,530		146		810,384		—
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps	3,418		—		3,418		—
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps	$	3,418	$	—	$	3,418	$	—

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

The Company may be required to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Table of Contents

The tables below represent assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and the net losses recorded in earnings during three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.



	Basis⁽¹⁾		Fair Value at March 31, 2018
	Basis⁽¹⁾		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Losses (Gains) Recorded in Earnings During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans:
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	$	976	$	307	$	—	$	—	$	307	$	—
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	976	$	307	$	—	$	—	$	307	$	—


⁽¹⁾	Basis represents the unpaid principal balance of impaired loans.



	Basis⁽¹⁾		Fair Value at December 31, 2017
	Basis⁽¹⁾		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Net Losses Recorded in Earnings During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans:
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	$	976	$	307	$	—	$	—	$	307	$	—
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	976	$	307	$	—	$	—	$	307	$	—


⁽¹⁾	Basis represents the unpaid principal balance of impaired loans.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.



	March 31, 2018
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input(s)	Range of Inputs; Weighted Average
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	307	Market approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	(91.5%) - (14.4)%; (44.0%)



	December 31, 2017
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input(s)	Range of Inputs; Weighted Average
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	307	Market approach	Adjustment for differences between the comparable sales	(91.5%) - (14.4%); (44.0%)

(b) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Because broadly traded markets do not exist for most of the Company’s financial instruments, the fair value calculations attempt to incorporate the effect of current market conditions at a specific time. These determinations are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and do not include tax ramifications;

Table of Contents

therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision, substantiated by comparison to independent markets and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the instruments. There may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results. For all of these reasons, the aggregation of the fair value calculations presented herein do not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.

The tables below present the carrying value amount of the Company’s financial instruments and their corresponding estimated fair values at the dates indicated.



	March 31, 2018
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Fair Value Measurements Using:
					Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	130,309	$	130,309	$	130,309	$	—	$	—
Investment securities available for sale	821,567		821,567		—		821,567		—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	6,824		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Loans held for sale	2,669		2,763		—		2,763		—
Total loans receivable, net	3,248,654		3,240,722		—		—		3,240,722
Accrued interest receivable	13,602		13,602		3		3,698		9,901
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps	4,793		4,793		—		4,793		—
Equity security	162		162		162		—		—
Financial Liabilities:
Noninterest deposits, interest bearing demand deposits, money market accounts and savings accounts	3,482,365		3,482,365		3,482,365		—		—
Certificate of deposit accounts	422,376		425,324		—		425,324		—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	30,700		30,700		—		30,700		—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	26,100		26,100		26,100		—		—
Junior subordinated debentures	20,083		19,500		—		—		19,500
Accrued interest payable	174		174		42		87		45
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps	4,793		4,793		—		4,793		—

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2017
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	103,015	$	103,015	$	103,015	$	—	$	—
Investment securities available for sale	810,530		810,530		146		810,384		—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	8,347		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Loans held for sale	2,288		2,364		—		2,364		—
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses	2,816,985		2,810,401		—		—		2,810,401
Accrued interest receivable	12,244		12,244		23		3,772		8,449
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps	3,418		3,418		—		3,418		—
Financial Liabilities:
Noninterest deposits, interest bearing demand deposits, money market accounts and savings accounts	$	2,994,662	$	2,994,662	$	2,994,662	$	—	$	—
Certificate of deposit accounts	398,398		397,039		—		397,039		—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	92,500		92,500		—		92,500		—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	31,821		31,821		31,821		—		—
Junior subordinated debentures	20,009		18,500		—		—		18,500
Accrued interest payable	162		162		45		79		38
Derivative liabilities - interest rate swaps	3,418		3,418		—		3,418		—


(15)	Stock-Based Compensation

On July 24, 2014, the Company's shareholders approved the Heritage Financial Corporation 2014 Omnibus Equity Plan (the "Plan") that provides for the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards (which includes restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance units, performance shares or bonus shares) and cash incentive awards. The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy share option exercises and restricted stock awards. As of March 31, 2018, shares that remain available for future issuance under the Company's stock-based compensation plans was 970,132.

(a) Stock Option Awards

Stock options generally vest ratably over three years and expire five years after they become exercisable or vest ratably over four years and expire ten years from date of grant. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not recognize any compensation expense or related tax benefit related to stock options as all of the compensation expense related to the outstanding stock options had been previously recognized. The intrinsic value and cash proceeds from options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $24,000 and $21,000, respectively. The intrinsic value and cash proceeds from options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $98,000 and $109,000, respectively.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the three ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (In years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	37,495		$	13.77
Exercised	(8,372	)	13.03
Forfeited or expired	(550	)	11.35
Outstanding, vested and expected to vest and exercisable at March 31, 2017	28,573		$	14.03	2.81	$	306

Outstanding at December 31, 2017	23,231		$	14.21
Exercised	(1,428	)	14.77
Forfeited or expired	(831	)	14.77
Outstanding, vested and expected to vest and exercisable at March 31, 2018	20,972		$	14.15	1.96	$	345

(b) Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards granted generally have a four-year cliff vesting or four-year ratable vesting schedule. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards of $283,000 and a related tax benefit of $60,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards of $445,000 and a related tax benefit of $156,000. As of March 31, 2018, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards was $1.2 million and the related weighted average period over which the compensation expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 1.31 years. The vesting date fair value of the restricted stock awards that vested during the three ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $1.3 million for both periods.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award activity for the three ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016	261,296		$	16.80
Granted	—		—
Vested	(52,201	)	16.60
Forfeited	(5,270	)	16.78
Nonvested at March 31, 2017	203,825		$	16.85

Nonvested at December 31, 2017	137,399		$	17.00
Granted	—		—
Vested	(42,137	)	16.92
Forfeited	—		—
Nonvested at March 31, 2018	95,262		$	17.04

During 2017, the Company began issuing performance-based stock-settled restricted stock unit awards ("PRSU") and stock-settled restricted stock unit awards ("RSU"), collectively called "units". Restricted stock units granted vest ratably over three years. Performance restricted stock units granted generally have a three-year cliff vesting schedule. Additionally, performance restricted stock unit grants may be subject to performance-based vesting as well as other approved vesting conditions. The number of shares of actually delivered pursuant to the PRSUs depends on the performance of the Company's Total Shareholder Return and Return on Average Assets over the performance period in relation to the performance of the common stock of a predetermined peer group. The conditions

Table of Contents

of the grants allow for an actual payout ranging between no payout and 150% of target. The payout level is calculated based on actual performance achieved during the performance period compared to a defined peer group. The fair value of such PRSUs was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation and will be recognized over the subsequent three years. The Monte-Carlo simulation model uses the same input assumptions as the Black-Scholes model; however, it also further incorporates into the fair value determination the possibility that the market condition may not be satisfied. Compensation costs related to these awards are recognized regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied, provided that the requisite service has been provided.

Expected volatilities in the model were estimated using a historical period consistent with the performance period of approximately three years. The risk-free interest rate was based on the United States Treasury rate for a term commensurate with the expected life of the grant. The Company used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of PRSUs granted during the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Shares issued	5,550		6,089
Expected Term in Years	2.84		2.85
Weighted-Average Risk Free Interest Rate	2.39	%	1.40	%
Expected Dividend Yield	—	%	—	%
Weighted-Average Fair Value	27.69		24.39
Correlation coefficient	ABA NASDAQ Community Bank Index		ABA NASDAQ Community Bank Index
Range of peer company volatilities	18.99% - 51.42%		17.8% - 63.1%
Range of peer company correlation coefficients	28.16% - 94.29%		8.24% - 89.79%
Heritage volatility	22.3	%	21.8	%
Heritage correlation coefficient	76.44	%	75.93	%

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recognized compensation expense related to the units of $340,000, and a related tax benefit of $72,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized compensation expense related the units of $65,000. As of March 31, 2018, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested units was $4.3 million and the related weighted average period over which the compensation expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 2.83 years. The vesting date fair value of the units that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $711,000. There were no units that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

The following table summarizes the unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2018:



	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016	—		$	—
Granted	80,735		25.23
Vested	—		—
Forfeited	—		—
Nonvested at March 31, 2017	80,735		$	25.23

Nonvested at December 31, 2017	90,544		$	25.31
Granted	102,939		29.79
Vested	(22,274	)	25.30
Forfeited	(262	)	25.35
Nonvested at March 31, 2018	170,947		$	28.01

Table of Contents


(16)	Cash Requirement

Beginning on January 16, 2018, the Company was required to maintain an average reserve balance with the Federal Reserve Bank or maintain such reserve balance in the form of cash. The required reserve balance at March 31, 2018 was $25.0 million, and was met by holding cash and maintained an average balance with the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company did not have a cash requirement reserve at December 31, 2017.


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The information contained in this section should be read with the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included herein, and the December 31, 2017 audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Overview

Heritage Financial Corporation is a bank holding company which primarily engages in the business activities of our wholly-owned financial institution subsidiary, Heritage Bank. We provide financial services to our local communities with an ongoing strategic focus on our commercial banking relationships, market expansion and asset quality. At March 31, 2018, we had total assets of $4.68 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $634.7 million. The Company’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report relates primarily to the Bank’s operations.

Our business consists primarily of commercial lending and deposit relationships with small businesses and their owners in our market areas and attracting deposits from the general public. We also make real estate construction and land development loans and consumer loans. We additionally originate for sale or for investment purposes one-to-four family residential loans on residential properties located primarily in our markets.

Our core profitability depends primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on interest earning assets, comprised primarily of loans and investment securities, and interest expense, which is the amount we pay on our interest bearing liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. Management strives to match the repricing characteristics of the interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities to protect net interest income from changes in market interest rates and changes in the shape of the yield curve. Like most financial institutions, our net interest income is affected significantly by general and local economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by governmental policies and actions of regulatory agencies. Net interest income is additionally affected by changes on the volume and mix of interest earning assets, interest earned on these assets, the volume and mix of interest bearing liabilities and interest paid on these liabilities.

Our net income is affected by many factors, including the provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is dependent on changes in the loan portfolio and management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan portfolio as well as prevailing economic and market conditions. The allowance for loan losses reflects the amount that we believe is appropriate to provide for probable incurred credit losses in our loan portfolio.

Net income is also affected by noninterest income and noninterest expense. Noninterest income primarily consists of service charges and other fees, gain on sale of loans (net) and other income. Noninterest expense consists primarily of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, and data processing. Compensation and employee benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, expenses for retirement and other employee benefits. Occupancy and equipment expenses are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, and consist primarily of lease payments, depreciation charges, maintenance, and costs of utilities. Data processing consists primarily of processing and network services related to the Bank’s core operating system, including account processing systems, electronic payments processing of products and services, and internet and mobile banking channels.

Results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Other income and other expenses are also impacted by growth of operations and growth in the number of loan and deposit accounts through acquisitions and core banking business growth.

Table of Contents

Earnings Summary

Net income was $9.1 million, or $0.27 per diluted common share, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $9.3 million, or $0.31 per diluted common share, for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Net income decreased $229,000, or 2.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to an increase in noninterest expense of $9.5 million, or 35.0%, partially offset by an increase in net interest income of $7.8 million, or 23.4%.

Net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets (net interest margin) increased 23 basis points to 4.12% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 3.89% for the same period in 2017. The increase in net interest margin was primarily due to an increase in average total loan receivable, net balances, and increases in loan yields and investment yields.

The efficiency ratio consists of noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before provision for loan losses plus noninterest income. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 75.95% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 67.23% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The change in the efficiency ratio was primarily attributable to the increase in noninterest expense as a result of the Puget Sound Merger and certain acquisition costs.

Net Interest Income

One of the Company's key sources of earnings is net interest income. There are several factors that affect net interest income including, but not limited to, the volume, pricing, mix and maturity of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities; the volume of noninterest bearing deposits and other liabilities and stockholders' equity; the volume of noninterest earning assets; market interest rate fluctuations; and asset quality.

Net interest income increased $7.8 million, or 23.4%, to $40.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $33.1 million for the same period in 2017. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to increases in average interest earning assets primarily as a result of the Puget Sound Merger and, to a lesser extent, organic growth. Net interest income also increased due to increases in yields on interest earning assets as a result of a higher yield curve in the current market. The following table provides relevant net interest income information for the dates indicated.

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018						2017
	Average Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾		Average Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Earning Assets:
Total loans receivable, net ^{(2) (3)}	$	3,150,869	$	38,159	4.91	%	$	2,631,816	$	30,485	4.70	%
Taxable securities	599,015		3,529		2.39		567,318		3,049		2.18
Nontaxable securities ⁽³⁾	223,631		1,341		2.43		222,266		1,268		2.31
Other interest earning assets	52,123		299		2.33		31,721		61		0.78
Total interest earning assets	4,025,638		43,328		4.37	%	3,453,121		34,863		4.09	%
Noninterest earning assets	527,947						426,777
Total assets	$	4,553,585					$	3,879,898
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Certificates of deposit	$	423,569	$	760	0.73	%	$	351,300	$	416	0.48	%
Savings accounts	506,158		416		0.33		506,159		264		0.21
Interest bearing demand and money market accounts	1,745,795		784		0.18		1,483,168		586		0.16
Total interest bearing deposits	2,675,522		1,960		0.30		2,340,627		1,266		0.22
FHLB advances and other borrowings	35,733		150		1.70		101,130		203		0.81
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	30,265		17		0.23		19,019		10		0.21
Junior subordinated debentures	20,035		283		5.73		19,750		238		4.89
Total interest bearing liabilities	2,761,555		2,410		0.35	%	2,480,526		1,717		0.28	%
Demand and other noninterest bearing deposits	1,113,286						866,469
Other noninterest bearing liabilities	63,770						47,213
Stockholders’ equity	614,974						485,690
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,553,585					$	3,879,898
Net interest income			$	40,918					$	33,146
Net interest spread					4.02	%					3.81	%
Net interest margin					4.12	%					3.89	%
Average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities					145.77	%					139.21	%


⁽¹⁾	Annualized


⁽²⁾	The average loan balances presented in the table are net of allowances for loan losses. Nonaccrual loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.


⁽³⁾	Yields on tax-exempt securities and loans have not been stated on a tax-equivalent basis.

Interest Income

Total interest income increased $8.5 million, or 24.3%, to $43.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $34.9 million for the same period in 2017. The balance of average interest earning assets increased $572.5 million, or 16.6%, to $4.03 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $3.45 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the yield on total interest earning assets increased 28 basis points to 4.37% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 4.09% for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Interest income from interest and fees on loans increased $7.7 million, or 25.2%, to $38.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $30.5 million for the same period in 2017 primarily due to an increase in average loans receivable of $519.1 million, or 19.7%, as a result of loan growth which was substantially due to the Puget Sound Merger. The loan yield increased 21 basis points to 4.91% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 4.70% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in loan yield was due to a combination of higher contractual note rates as a result of the increasing interest rate environment, higher loan yields from the loans acquired in the Puget Sound Merger as compared to legacy Heritage loans, and an increase in incremental accretion on purchased loans substantially due from loans acquired in the Puget Sound Merger.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the loan yield and effects of the incremental accretion on purchased loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loan yield, excluding incremental accretion on purchased loans ⁽¹⁾	4.70		%	4.52		%
Impact on loan yield from incremental accretion on purchased loans ⁽¹⁾	0.21		%	0.18		%
Loan yield	4.91		%	4.70		%

Incremental accretion on purchased loans ⁽¹⁾	$	1,632		$	1,170

⁽¹⁾

As of the dates of the completion of each of the merger and acquisition transactions, purchased loans were recorded at their estimated fair value, including our estimate of future expected cash flows until the ultimate resolution of these credits. The difference between the contractual loan balance and the fair value represents the purchased discount. The purchased discount is modified quarterly as a result of cash flow re-estimation. The incremental accretion income represents the amount of income recorded on the purchased loans in excess of the contractual stated interest rate in the individual loan notes.

Incremental accretion income was $1.6 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase in the incremental accretion was primarily due to the accretion of the loans acquired in the Puget Sound Merger totaling approximately $479,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company does not anticipate this same accretion yield for Puget Sound Merger in future periods as nearly $316,000 of the accretion was a result of unanticipated pay-offs of three significant loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The incremental accretion and the impact to loan yield will change during any quarter based on the volume of prepayments, but is expected to decrease over time as the balance of the purchased loans continues to decrease.

Total interest income increased primarily due to the increase in interest and fees on loans discussed above and secondarily due to a $553,000, or 12.8%, increase in interest income on investment securities to $4.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in income on investment securities was a result of an increase in investment yields, primarily reflecting the effect of the rise in interest rates on our adjustable rate investment securities, and an increase in the average balance of investment securities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. Yields on taxable securities increased 21 basis points to 2.39% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 2.18% for the same period in 2017. Yields on nontaxable securities increased 12 basis points to 2.43% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 2.31% for the same period in 2017. The average balance of investment securities increased $33.1 million, or 4.2%, to $822.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $789.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The Company has actively managed its investment securities portfolio to improve performance in an increasing rate environment.

Average other interest earning assets increased $20.4 million, or 64.3%, to $52.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $31.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase was due to a combination of an increase in interest earning deposits, as the Bank held more funds in interest earning accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank compared to the same period in 2017, substantially due to the Puget Sound Merger, and an increase in the yields reflecting the risk in interest rates.

Interest Expense

Total interest expense increased $693,000, or 40.4%, to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2017. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities increased seven basis points to 0.35% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 0.28% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as a result of the rise in market rates. Total average interest bearing liabilities increased $281.0 million, or 11.3%, to $2.76 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $2.48 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017 substantially due to the Puget Sound Merger.

The average cost of interest bearing deposits increased eight basis points to 0.30% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 0.22% for the same period in 2017 primarily as a result of the increase in market rates. The average balance of interest bearing demand and money market deposits increased $262.6 million, or 17.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $1.75 billion at March 31, 2018 from $1.48 billion at December 31, 2017 primarily as a result of the Puget Sound Merger. The cost of certificates of deposits increased 25 basis points to 0.73%

Table of Contents

for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from 0.48% for the same period in 2017 primarily as a result of the rise in interest rates.

Interest expense on FHLB advances and other borrowings decreased $53,000, or 26.1%, to $150,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $203,000 for the same period in 2017 due to a decrease in the average balance, partially offset by an increase in rates. The average balance for FHLB advances and other borrowings decreased $65.4 million, or 64.7%, to $35.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $101.1 million for the same period in 2017, as a result of pay downs from using cash and cash proceeds from the sale of investment securities acquired in the Puget Sound Merger.

The average rate of the junior subordinated debentures, including the effects of accretion of the discount established as of the date of the merger with Washington Banking Company, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was 5.73%, an increase of 84 basis points from 4.89% for the same period in 2017. The rate increase on the junior subordinated debentures was due to an increase in the three-month LIBOR rate to 2.32% at March 31, 2018 from 1.15% on March 31, 2017.

Net Interest Margin

Net interest margin increased 23 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2018 to 4.12% from 3.89% for the same period in 2017 primarily due to the above mentioned increase in net interest income. The net interest spread increased 21 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2018 to 4.02% from 3.81% for the same period in 2017 primarily due to the increase in yields on total interest earning assets.

Net interest margin is impacted by the incremental accretion on purchased loans. The following table presents the net interest margin and effects of the incremental accretion on purchased loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Net interest margin, excluding incremental accretion on purchased loans ⁽¹⁾	3.96	%	3.75	%
Impact on net interest margin from incremental accretion on purchased loans ⁽¹⁾	0.16		0.14
Net interest margin	4.12	%	3.89	%

⁽¹⁾

Provision for Loan Losses

The Bank has established a comprehensive methodology for determining its allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses charged to expense, and is reduced by loans charged-off, net of loan recoveries or a recovery of previous provision. The amount of the provision expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was calculated in accordance with the Bank's methodology. For additional information, see the section entitled "Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses" below.

The provision for loan losses is dependent on the Bank’s ability to manage asset quality and control the level of net charge-offs through prudent underwriting standards. In addition, a decline in general economic conditions could increase future provisions for loan losses and have a material effect on the Company’s net income.

The provision for loan losses increased $285,000, or 32.9%, to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $867,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from the same period in 2017 was primarily the result of changes in our asset quality, volume and mix of loans, certain environmental and historical loss factors and as a result of the impact of loan growth. Based on a thorough review of the loan portfolio, the Bank determined that the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was appropriate as it was calculated in accordance with the Bank's methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income increased $118,000, or 1.6%, to $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $7.3 million for the same period in 2017. The following table presents the change in the key components of noninterest income for the periods noted.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017		Change			Percentage Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Service charges and other fees	$	4,543	$	4,213	$	330		7.8	%
Gain on sale of investment securities, net	35		—		35			100.0
Gain on sale of loans, net	874		1,195		(321		)	(26.9	)
Interest rate swap fees	51		133		(82		)	(61.7	)
Other income	1,964		1,808		156			8.6
Total noninterest income	$	7,467	$	7,349	$	118		1.6	%

Service charges and other fees increased $330,000, or 7.8% to $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $4.2 million for the same period in 2017, due primarily to an increase in deposit balances and changes in fee structures on deposit accounts, including a consumer deposit account consolidation process completed at the end of 2016 and a business deposit consolidation process completed during second quarter 2017. Secondarily, service charges and other fees increased as a result of the Puget Sound Merger.

The increase in noninterest income was offset by a decrease in gain on the sale of loans, net of $321,000, or 26.9%, to $874,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $1.2 million the same period in 2017, due primarily to a decrease in mortgage banking activities. Proceeds from sale of loans decreased $15.3 million, or 42.6% to $20.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $35.7 million for the same period in 2017. The detail of gain on sale of loans, net is included in the following schedule.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017		Change			Percentage Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans, net	$	652	$	909	$	(257	)	(28.3	)%
Gain on sale of guaranteed portion of SBA loans, net	222		286		(64		)	(22.4	)
Gain on sale of loans, net	$	874	$	1,195	$	(321	)	(26.9	)%

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased $9.5 million, or 35.0%, to $36.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $27.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The following table presents changes in the key components of noninterest expense for the periods noted.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017		Change			Percentage Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Compensation and employee benefits	$	21,367	$	16,024	$	5,343		33.3	%
Occupancy and equipment	4,627		3,810		817			21.4
Data processing	2,605		1,915		690			36.0
Marketing	808		807		1			0.1
Professional services	2,837		1,009		1,828			181.2
State and local taxes	688		549		139			25.3
Federal deposit insurance premium	355		300		55			18.3
Other real estate owned, net	—		31		(31		)	(100.0	)
Amortization of intangible assets	795		324		471			145.4
Other expense	2,665		2,454		211			8.6
Total noninterest expense	$	36,747	$	27,223	$	9,524		35.0	%

Compensation and employee benefits increased $5.3 million, or 33.3%, to $21.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $16.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily as a result of additional employees and acquisition-related payments from Puget Sound Merger of approximately $2.7 million. The average full time equivalent increased to 796 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 761 for the same period in 2017.

Professional services increased $1.8 million, or 181.2%, to $2.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $1.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to costs of approximately $1.6 million incurred for the Puget Sound Merger and the proposed Premier Merger during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Occupancy and equipment increased $817,000, or 21.4%, to $4.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $3.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was substantially related to on-going costs associated with the Puget Sound Merger.

Data processing increased $690,000, or 36.0%, to $2.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $1.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was substantially due to acquisition related expenses of $352,000 recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2018 as well as additional operations associated with the Puget Sound Merger.

Amortization of intangible assets increased $471,000, or 145.4%, to $795,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $324,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was a result of the amortization of the core deposit intangible recorded in the Puget Sound Merger of $513,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

The ratio of noninterest expense to average assets (annualized) was 3.27% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 2.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily a result of acquisition costs totaling $4.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense decreased $1.7 million, or 54.7%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 from $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease in the income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was primarily due to the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017, which lowered the corporate income tax rate to 21% from 35%.

Table of Contents

The effective tax rate was 13.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to 24.9% for the same period in 2017. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 was due primarily to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Financial Condition Overview

The table below provides a comparison of the changes in the Company's financial condition from December 31, 2017 to March 31, 2018, and the results of the Puget Sound Merger effective January 16, 2018:



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017			Change			Percentage Change		Fair Value of Puget Sound at Merger Date
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	130,309		$	103,015		$	27,294		26.5	%	$	80,136
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value	821,567			810,530			11,037			1.4		80,353
Loans held for sale	2,669			2,288			381			16.7		—
Total loans receivable, net	3,248,654			2,816,985			431,669			15.3		388,462
Other real estate owned	—			—			—			—		—
Premises and equipment, net	62,147			60,325			1,822			3.0		732
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost	6,824			8,347			(1,523		)	(18.2	)	623
Bank owned life insurance	81,700			75,091			6,609			8.8		6,264
Accrued interest receivable	13,602			12,244			1,358			11.1		1,448
Prepaid expenses and other assets	104,666			99,328			5,338			5.4		1,354
Other intangible assets, net	16,563			6,088			10,475			172.1		11,270
Goodwill	187,549			119,029			68,520			57.6		68,520
Total assets	$	4,676,250		$	4,113,270		$	562,980		13.7	%	$	639,162

Liabilities
Deposits	$	3,904,741		$	3,393,060		$	511,681		15.1	%	$	505,885
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	30,700			92,500			(61,800		)	(66.8	)	—
Junior subordinated debentures	20,083			20,009			74			0.4		—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	26,100			31,821			(5,721		)	(18.0	)	—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	59,918			67,575			(7,657		)	(11.3	)	2,504
Total liabilities	4,041,542			3,604,965			436,577			12.1		508,389
Stockholders' equity
Common stock	490,566			360,590			129,976			36.0		130,773
Retained earnings	153,101			149,013			4,088			2.7		—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net	(8,959		)	(1,298		)	(7,661		)	590.2		—
Total stockholders' equity	634,708			508,305			126,403			24.9		130,773
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	4,676,250		$	4,113,270		$	562,980		13.7	%	$	639,162

Total assets increased $563.0 million, or 13.7%, to $4.68 billion as of March 31, 2018 compared to $4.11 billion as of December 31, 2017. The Puget Sound Merger resulted in an increase of total assets, including goodwill, of $639.0 million at merger date. The Company utilized cash acquired from the Puget Sound Merger to pay down FHLB advances during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

Total loans receivable, net, excluding Puget Sound Merger increased $43.2 million, or 6.2% annualized, during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Investment securities increased $11.0 million, or 1.4%, to $821.6 million at March 31, 2018 from $810.5 million at December 31, 2017 primarily as a result of investment purchases, offset partially by maturities, calls and payments of investment securities. The investment securities acquired in the Puget Sound Merger were sold shortly after the merger.

Deposits, excluding Puget Sound Merger, increased $5.8 million, or 0.7% annualized, during the three months ended March 31, 2018. Total non-maturity deposits increased to 89.2% of total deposits at March 31, 2018 from 88.3% at December 31, 2017 and certificates of deposits decreased to 10.8% of total deposits at March 31, 2018 from 11.7% at December 31, 2017.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $61.8 million, or 66.8%, to $30.7 million as of March 31, 2018 from $92.5 million as of December 31, 2017. The decrease was due to the pay down of FHLB advances using cash acquired in the Puget Sound Merger and proceeds from the sale of the investments acquired in the Puget Sound Merger.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $126.4 million, or 24.9%, to $634.7 million as of March 31, 2018 from $508.3 million at December 31, 2017. The Company’s equity position was 13.6% of total assets as of March 31, 2018 and 12.4% as of December 31, 2017. Changes in stockholders' equity during the three months ended March 31, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	508,305
Common stock issued in the Puget Sound Merger	130,770
Net income	9,087
Dividends paid	(5,117		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7,543		)
Other	(794		)
Balance, end of period	$	634,708

Lending Activities

The Bank is a full service commercial bank, which originates a wide variety of loans with a focus on commercial business loans. Total loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses, increased $431.7 million, or 15.3%, to $3.25 billion at March 31, 2018 from $2.82 billion at December 31, 2017. The increase in loans receivable was primarily in commercial and industrial loans which increased $166.3 million, or 25.8%, to $811.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018, in non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans which increased $146.8 million, or 14.9%, to $1.13 billion and in owner-occupied commercial real estate loans which increased $80.2 million, or 12.9%, to $702.4 million during the same period.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about our loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated. These balances are prior to deduction for the allowance for loan losses.



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Balance		% of Total ⁽³⁾		Balance		% of Total ⁽³⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial business:
Commercial and industrial	$	811,678	24.7	%	$	645,396	22.7	%
Owner-occupied commercial real estate	702,356		21.4		622,150		21.8
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1,133,394		34.6		986,594		34.6
Total commercial business	2,647,428		80.7		2,254,140		79.1
One-to-four family residential ⁽¹⁾	89,180		2.7		86,997		3.1
Real estate construction and land development:
One-to-four family residential	73,295		2.2		51,985		1.8
Five or more family residential and commercial properties	98,387		3.0		97,499		3.4
Total real estate construction and land development ⁽²⁾	171,682		5.2		149,484		5.2
Consumer	370,275		11.3		355,091		12.5
Gross loans receivable	3,278,565		99.9		2,845,712		99.9
Net deferred loan costs	3,350		0.1		3,359		0.1
Loans receivable, net	$	3,281,915	100.0	%	$	2,849,071	100.0	%

⁽¹⁾ Excludes loans held for sale of $2.7 million, and $2.3 million as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

⁽²⁾ Balances do not include undisbursed loan commitments.

⁽³⁾ Percent of loans receivable, net.

Table of Contents

Nonperforming Assets and Credit Quality Metrics

The following table provides information about our nonaccrual loans, other real estate owned and performing TDR loans for the indicated dates.



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial business	$	14,356		$	9,098
One-to-four family residential	80			81
Real estate construction and land development	1,147			1,247
Consumer	145			277
Total nonaccrual loans ⁽¹⁾	15,728			10,703
Other real estate owned	—			—
Total nonperforming assets	$	15,728		$	10,703

Allowance for loan losses	$	33,261		$	32,086
Nonperforming loans to loans receivable, net	0.48		%	0.38		%
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net	1.01		%	1.13		%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans	211.48		%	299.79		%
Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.34		%	0.26		%

Performing TDR loans:
Commercial business	$	25,737		$	25,729
One-to-four family residential	215			218
Real estate construction and land development	—			645
Consumer	235			165
Total performing TDR loans	$	26,187		$	26,757
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	—		$	—
Potential problem loans	93,253			83,543


⁽¹⁾	At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $8.2 million and $5.2 million of nonaccrual loans were considered TDR loans, respectively.

Nonperforming Assets. Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned. Nonperforming assets increased $5.0 million to $15.7 million, or 0.34% of total assets at March 31, 2018 from $10.7 million, or 0.26% of total assets, at December 31, 2017 due to the increase in nonaccrual loans discussed below. There was no other real estate owned at March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

Nonaccrual Loans. Nonaccrual loans increased $5.0 million to $15.7 million, or 0.48% of loans receivable, net, at March 31, 2018 from $10.7 million, or 0.38% of loans receivable, net, at December 31, 2017. The increase was due primarily to one agricultural loan relationship in the amount of $3.1 million that was classified as nonaccrual during the period ended March 31, 2018. As this credit relationship is well-secured, the Company did not record a related allowance for loan losses. The increase in the nonaccrual loans was also due to two commercial credit relationships with an outstanding balance of $1.9 million at March 31, 2018 of which approximately $1.0 million is guaranteed by the Small Business Administration.

Table of Contents

The following table reflects the changes in nonaccrual loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018
Nonaccrual loans
Balance, beginning of period	$	10,703
Addition of previously classified pass graded loans	4,066
Addition of previously classified potential problem loans	2,324
Net principal payments	(1,365		)
Balance, end of period	$	15,728

At March 31, 2018, nonaccrual loans of $7.6 million had related allowance for loan losses of $1.9 million and nonaccrual loans of $8.2 million had no related allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2017 nonaccrual loans of $3.2 million had related allowance for loan losses of $720,000 and nonaccrual loans of $7.5 million had no allowance for loan losses.

At March 31, 2018, nonperforming TDR loans, included in the nonaccrual loan table above, were $8.2 million and had a related allowance for loan losses of $336,000. At December 31, 2017, nonperforming TDR loans were $5.2 million had a related allowance for loan losses of $379,000.

Troubled Debt Restructured Loans. TDR loans are considered impaired and are separately measured for impairment whether on accrual or nonaccrual status. The performing TDR loans are not considered nonperforming assets as they continue to accrue interest despite being considered impaired due to the restructured status. Performing TDR loans decreased $570,000, or 2.1%, to $26.2 million at March 31, 2018 from $26.8 million at December 31, 2017.

The following table reflects the changes in performing TDR loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018
Performing TDR loans
Balance, beginning of period	$	26,757
Addition of previously classified potential problem loans	79
Net principal payments	(649		)
Balance, end of period	$	26,187

The related allowance for loan losses on performing TDR loans was $2.6 million as of both March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Potential Problem Loans. Potential problem loans increased $9.7 million, or 11.6%, to $93.3 million at March 31, 2018 from $83.5 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was due primarily to the addition of potential problem loans acquired in the Puget Sound Merger of $6.1 million at March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

The following table reflects the changes in potential problem loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018
Potential problem loans
Balance, beginning of period	$	83,543
Addition of previously classified pass graded loans	25,126
Upgrades to pass graded loan status	(3,636		)
Transfers of loan to nonaccrual or troubled debt restructured status	(2,403		)
Charge-offs	(145		)
Net principal payments	(9,232		)
Balance, end of period	$	93,253

Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged against earnings. The balance of the allowance for loan losses is maintained at the amount management believes will be appropriate to absorb probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying estimated loss factors to the credit exposure from outstanding loans.

We assess the estimated credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio by considering a number of elements including:


•	historical loss experience in the loan portfolio;


•	impact of environmental factors, including:


◦	levels of and trends in delinquencies, classified and impaired loans;


◦	levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries;


◦	trends in volume and terms of loans;


◦	effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices;


◦	experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;


◦	national and local economic trends and conditions;


◦	other external factors such as competition, legal and regulatory;


◦	effects of changes in credit concentrations; and


◦	other factors

We calculate an appropriate allowance for loan losses for the loans in our loan portfolio by applying historical loss factors for homogeneous classes of the portfolio, adjusted for changes to the above-noted environmental factors. We may record specific provisions for impaired loans, including loans on nonaccrual status and TDR loans, after a careful analysis of each loan’s credit and collateral factors. Our analysis of an appropriate allowance for loan losses combines the provisions made for our non-impaired loans and the specific provisions made for each impaired loan.

The allowance for loan losses on loans designated as non-PCI loans is similar to the methodology described above except that for non-PCI loans, the remaining unaccreted discounts resulting from the fair value adjustments recorded at the time the loans were purchased are additionally factored into the allowance methodology.

For the PCI loans, the acquisition date fair value incorporated our estimate of future expected cash flows until the ultimate resolution of these credits. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are less than previously estimated, additional provisions for loan losses on the PCI loan portfolio will be recognized immediately into earnings. To the extent actual or projected cash flows are more than previously estimated, the increase in cash flows is recognized immediately as a recapture of provision for loan losses up to the previously recognized provision for that loan or pool of loans, if any, and then prospectively recognized in interest income as a yield adjustment.

Table of Contents

by bank regulators, as part of their routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional allowance for loan losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

The following table provides information regarding changes in our allowance for loan losses at and for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses on loans at the beginning of the period	$	32,086		$	31,083
Provision for loan losses	1,152			867
Charge-offs:
Commercial business	(81		)	(302		)
Consumer	(485		)	(543		)
Total charge-offs	(566		)	(845		)
Recoveries:
Commercial business	501			372
Real estate construction and land development	—			10
Consumer	88			107
Total recoveries	589			489
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	23			(356		)
Allowance for loan losses at the end of the period	$	33,261		$	31,594

Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net	1.01		%	1.19		%
Net (recoveries) charge-offs on loans to average loans, annualized	—		%	0.05		%

Loans receivable, net at the end of the period ⁽¹⁾	$	3,281,915		$	2,663,704
Average loans receivable during the period ⁽¹⁾	3,150,869			2,631,816

⁽¹⁾ Excludes loans held for sale.

The allowance for loan losses increased to $33.3 million at March 31, 2018 from $32.1 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily the result of provision for loan losses of $1.2 million recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net, decreased to 1.01% at March 31, 2018 from 1.13% at December 31, 2017 primarily as a result of an increase in loans from the Puget Sound Merger with no related allowance for loan losses.

The Company recorded net recoveries during the three months ended March 31, 2018 due primarily to a recovery on a commercial and industrial loan of $324,000, offset partially by charge-offs on a large volume of small dollar consumer loans. The Company recorded net charge-offs on average loans, annualized, of 0.05% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 which were also primarily due to the large volumes of small dollar consumer loans.

As of March 31, 2018, the Bank identified $15.7 million of nonperforming loans and $26.2 million of performing TDR loans for a total of $41.9 million of impaired loans. Of these impaired loans, $11.6 million had no allowances for loan losses as their estimated collateral value or discounted expected cash flow is equal to or exceeds their carrying costs. The remaining $30.3 million of impaired loans had related allowances for loan losses totaling $4.5 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank identified $10.7 million of nonperforming loans and $26.8 million of performing TDR loans for a total of $37.5 million of impaired loans. Of these impaired loans, $10.4 million had no allowances for loan losses. The remaining $27.1 million of impaired loans had related allowances for loan losses totaling $3.4 million.

Table of Contents

The following table outlines the allowance for loan losses and related loan balances on loans at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
General Valuation Allowance:
Allowance for loan losses	$	24,975		$	24,732
Gross loans, excluding PCI and impaired loans	$	3,202,179		$	2,767,650
Percentage	0.78		%	0.89		%

PCI Allowance:
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,811		$	3,999
Gross PCI loans	$	34,471		$	40,603
Percentage	11.06		%	9.85		%

Specific Valuation Allowance:
Allowance for loan losses	$	4,475		$	3,355
Gross impaired loans	$	41,915		$	37,459
Percentage	10.68		%	8.96		%

Total Allowance for Loan Losses:
Allowance for loan losses	$	33,261		$	32,086
Gross loans receivable	$	3,278,565		$	2,845,712
Percentage	1.01		%	1.13		%

Based on the Bank's established comprehensive methodology, management deemed the allowance for loan losses of $33.3 million at March 31, 2018 (1.01% of loans receivable, net and 211.48% of nonperforming loans) appropriate to provide for probable incurred credit losses based on an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio at that date. This compares to an allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2017 of $32.1 million (1.13% of loans receivable, net and 299.79% of nonperforming loans). At the applicable acquisition or merger dates, no allowance for loan losses was established on purchased loans as the loans were accounted for at their fair value and a discount was established for the loans in accordance with U.S. GAAP. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the remaining fair value discount for these purchased loans was $12.7 million and $10.1 million, respectively.

While we believe we use the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, our results of operations could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance. A decline in national and local economic conditions, or other factors, could result in a material increase in the allowance for loan losses and may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators, as part of their routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional allowance for loan losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is appropriate or that increased provisions will not be necessary should the quality of the loans deteriorate. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses would adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Deposits and Other Borrowings

Total deposits increased $511.7 million, or 15.1%, to $3.90 billion at March 31, 2018 from $3.39 billion at December 31, 2017 due primarily to the deposits acquired in the Puget Sound Merger of $505.9 million at merger date. Non-maturity deposits as a percentage of total deposits increased to 89.2% at March 31, 2018 from 88.3% at December 31, 2017 primarily as a result of the mix of deposits acquired from Puget Sound Merger, which had non-maturity deposits as a percentage of total deposits of 93.6% at merger date. Based on the change in the mix and

Table of Contents

volume of deposits, the percentage of certificates of deposit to total deposits decreased to 10.8% at March 31, 2018 from 11.7% at December 31, 2017.

The following table summarizes the Company's deposits as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Balance		% of Total		Balance		% of Total		Change		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest demand deposits	$	1,178,202	30.2	%	$	944,791	27.8	%	$	233,411	24.7	%
Interest bearing demand deposits	1,099,855		28.2		1,051,752		31.1		48,103		4.6
Money market accounts	692,931		17.7		499,618		14.7		193,313		38.7
Savings accounts	511,377		13.1		498,501		14.7		12,876		2.6
Total non-maturity deposits	3,482,365		89.2		2,994,662		88.3		487,703		16.3
Certificate of deposit accounts	422,376		10.8		398,398		11.7		23,978		6.0
Total deposits	$	3,904,741	100.0	%	$	3,393,060	100.0	%	$	511,681	15.1

Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in other sources of funds (such as deposit inflows at less than projected levels). Borrowings may also be used on a longer-term basis to support expanded lending activities and match the maturity of repricing intervals of assets. The Bank is utilizing securities sold under agreement to repurchase as a supplement to its funding sources. Our repurchase agreements are secured by available for sale investment securities. At March 31, 2018, the Bank had securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $26.1 million, a decrease of $5.7 million, or 18.0%, from $31.8 million at December 31, 2017. The decrease was the result of customer activity during the period.

The Company also has junior subordinated debentures with a par value of $25.0 million which pay quarterly interest based on three-month LIBOR plus 1.56%. The debentures mature in 2037. The balance of the junior subordinated debentures was $20.1 million at March 31, 2018, which reflects the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures established during the Washington Banking Merger, adjusted for the accretion of discount from purchase accounting fair value adjustment.

At March 31, 2018, the Bank maintained credit facilities with the FHLB of Des Moines for $913.0 million and credit facilities with the Federal Reserve Bank for $81.4 million. The Company had FHLB advances outstanding of $30.7 million and $92.5 million at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The average cost of the FHLB advances during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was 1.70% and 0.81%, respectively. The Bank also maintains lines of credit with four correspondent banks to purchase federal funds totaling $90.0 million as of March 31, 2018. There were no federal funds purchased as of March 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

Liquidity and Cash Flows

Our primary sources of funds are customer and local government deposits, loan principal and interest payments, loan sales and interest earned on and proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities. These funds, together with retained earnings, equity and other borrowed funds, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

Heritage Bank: The principal objective of the Bank’s liquidity management program is to maintain the ability to meet day-to-day cash flow requirements of its customers who either wish to withdraw funds or to draw upon credit facilities to meet their cash needs. The Bank monitors the sources and uses of funds on a daily basis to maintain an acceptable liquidity position. In addition to liquidity from core deposits and the repayment and maturities of loans, the Bank can utilize established credit facilities and lines with correspondent banks or sale of investment securities.

Heritage Financial Corporation: The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are obtained from dividends declared and paid by the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory provisions that could limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company. However, management believes that such restrictions will not have an adverse impact on the ability of the Company to meets its ongoing cash obligations. At March 31, 2018, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had cash and cash equivalents of $11.7 million.

Table of Contents

We are required to maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to fund loan originations and deposit withdrawals, satisfy other financial commitments and fund operations. We generally maintain sufficient cash and short-term investments to meet short-term liquidity needs. At March 31, 2018, cash and cash equivalents totaled $130.3 million, or 2.8% of total assets. The fair value of investment securities available for sale totaled $821.6 million at March 31, 2018, of which $262.6 million were pledged to secure public deposits or borrowing arrangements. The fair value of investment securities available for sale that were not pledged totaled $559.0 million, or 12.0%, of total assets at March 31, 2018. The fair value of investment securities available for sale with maturities of one year or less were $8.2 million, or 0.2%, of total assets at March 31, 2018.

Consolidated Cash Flows: As disclosed in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, net cash provided by operating activities was $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and primarily consisted of net income of $9.1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, net cash provided by investing activities was $86.4 million, which consisted primarily of net proceeds from purchase and sale of investment securities available for sale of $58.1 million and net cash received from acquisitions of $80.1 million, offset partially by net loan originations of $47.0 million. Net cash used in financing activities was $68.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and primarily consisted of net FHLB repayments of $61.8 million, offset partially by net increase in deposits of $5.8 million during the period.

Capital and Capital Requirements

Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2018 was $634.7 million compared to $508.3 million at December 31, 2017. The changes to stockholders' equity during the three months ended March 31, 2018 is as follows:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	508,305
Common stock issued in the Puget Sound Merger	130,770
Net income	9,087
Dividends paid	(5,117		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7,543		)
Other	(794		)
Balance, end of period	$	634,708

The Company has historically paid cash dividends to its common shareholders. Payments of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our business, operating results and financial condition, capital requirements, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion, any legal or contractual limitation on our ability to pay dividends and other relevant factors. Dividends on common stock from the Company depend substantially upon receipt of dividends from the Bank, which is the Company’s predominant source of income. On April 25, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular dividend of $0.15 per common share payable on May 24, 2018 to shareholders of record on May 10, 2018.

The Company is a bank holding company under the supervision of the Federal Reserve Bank. Bank holding companies are subject to capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. Heritage Bank is a federally insured institution and thereby is subject to the capital requirements established by the FDIC. The Federal Reserve capital requirements generally parallel the FDIC requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and operations. Management believes as of March 31, 2018, the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's categories.

Table of Contents



	Minimum Requirements				Well-Capitalized Requirements				Actual
	(Dollars in thousands)
As of March 31, 2018:
The Company consolidated
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	176,158	4.5	%	N/A		N/A		$	442,817	11.3	%
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	178,471		4.0		N/A		N/A		462,900		10.4
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	234,878		6.0		N/A		N/A		462,900		11.8
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	313,170		8.0		N/A		N/A		496,557		12.7
Heritage Bank
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	175,986		4.5		$	254,203	6.5	%	446,596		11.4
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	178,346		4.0		222,933		5.0		446,596		10.0
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	234,649		6.0		312,865		8.0		446,596		11.4
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	312,865		8.0		391,081		10.0		480,136		12.3

As of December 31, 2017:
The Company consolidated
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	$	154,522	4.5	%	N/A		N/A		$	386,689	11.3	%
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	159,494		4.0		N/A		N/A		406,687		10.2
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	206,029		6.0		N/A		N/A		406,687		11.8
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	274,706		8.0		N/A		N/A		439,044		12.8
Heritage Bank
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	154,400		4.5		$	223,023	6.5	%	391,092		11.4
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets	159,300		4.0		199,125		5.0		391,092		9.8
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	205,867		6.0		274,490		8.0		391,092		11.4
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	274,490		8.0		343,112		10.0		423,348		12.3

Effective January 1, 2015 (with some changes transitioned into full effectiveness over two to four years), the Company became subject to new capital adequacy requirements approved by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC that implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly called Basel III, and address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Under the new capital requirements both the Company and the Bank are required to have a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%. In addition, both the Company and the Bank are required to have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 6.0% and a total risk-based ratio of 8.0%. Both the Company and the Bank are required to establish a “conservation buffer”, consisting of common equity Tier 1 capital of more than 2.5% above the minimum risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to ensure that banks build up capital buffers outside periods of stress which can be drawn down as losses are incurred. An institution that does not meet the conservation buffer will be subject to restrictions on certain activities including payment of dividends, stock repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers. The conservation buffer is being phased in beginning in 2016 and will take full effect on January 1, 2019. Certain calculations under the rules will also have phase-in periods. The capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased-in on January 1, 2016 when more than 0.625% of risk-weighted assets was required, and increases by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it is fully phased-in on January 1, 2019. At March 31, 2018, the capital conservation buffer was 4.69% and 4.28% for the Company and the Bank, respectively.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to interest rate risk through our lending and deposit gathering activities. Our results of operations are highly dependent upon our ability to manage interest rate risk. We consider interest rate risk to be a significant market risk that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Interest rate risk is measured and assessed on a quarterly basis. In our opinion, there has not been a material change in our interest rate risk exposure since the information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Neither we, nor the Bank, maintain a trading account for any class of financial instrument, nor do we, or the Bank, engage in hedging activities or purchase high risk derivative instruments. Moreover, neither we, nor the Bank, are subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedure (as defined in Section 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s Disclosure Committee as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2018 are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company does not expect that its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We, and our Bank, are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business of the Bank.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I. Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) Not applicable.

(b) Not applicable.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017
Repurchased shares to pay withholding taxes ⁽¹⁾	45,426		15,891
Stock repurchase to pay withholding taxes average share price	$	31.66	$	23.95

The following table sets forth information about the Company’s purchases of its outstanding common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2018.



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾	Average Price Paid Per Share⁽¹⁾		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs ⁽²⁾	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2018— January 31, 2018	26,741	$	31.80	7,893,389	935,034
February 1, 2018— February 28, 2018	—	—		7,893,389	935,034
March 1, 2018— March 31, 2018	18,685	31.42		7,893,389	935,034
Total	45,426	$	31.66

⁽¹⁾ All of the common shares repurchased by the Company between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2018 represented the cancellation of stock to pay withholding taxes on vested restricted stock awards or units.

⁽²⁾ Represents cumulative life-to-date shares repurchased.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit	Form	Exhibit	Filing Date/Period End Date

2.5	Agreement and Plan of Merger with Puget Sound Bancorp, Inc	8-K	2.1	7/27/2017

2.6	Agreement and Plan of Merger with Premier Commercial Bancorp, Inc	8-K	2.1	3/9/2018

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ⁽¹⁾

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ⁽¹⁾

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ⁽¹⁾

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document ⁽¹⁾

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document ⁽¹⁾

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document ⁽¹⁾

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document ⁽¹⁾

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ⁽¹⁾

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾ Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Date:
May 10, 2018		/S/ BRIAN L. VANCE
		Brian L. Vance
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:
May 10, 2018		/S/ DONALD J. HINSON
		Donald J. Hinson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/ - FORM 10-Q - May 10, 2018

Attached files

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/ Reports