UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

or

 

For the transition period from _______ to _________

 

Commission File Number: 814-01211

 

Great Elm Capital Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (617) 375-3006

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☐    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

 

As of May 8, 2018, the registrant had 10,652,401 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

 

 

 

 

---

 

Table of Contents

 

 

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”).

 

The information contained herein may contain “forward-looking statements” based on our current expectations, assumptions and estimates about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan” and other similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from those we express in the forward-looking statements as a result of several factors more fully described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and in this Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

 

i

---

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “GECC,” “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and words of similar import are to Great Elm Capital Corp. and/or its subsidiaries.  We reference materials on our website, www.greatelmcc.com, but nothing on our website shall be deemed incorporated by reference or otherwise contained in this report.  All dollar amounts, other than per share amounts, are disclosed in thousands unless otherwise noted.

Item 1. Financial Statements.

The financial statements listed in the index to financial statements immediately following the signature page to this report are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

We are a business development company (“BDC”) that seeks to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. Our investment focus is on debt obligations of middle-market companies as well as small businesses.  We invest primarily in senior secured and senior unsecured debt instruments, as well as in junior loans and mezzanine debt of middle-market companies and small businesses. We will from time to time make equity investments as part of restructuring credits and in rare instances reserve the right to make equity investments directly.

On September 27, 2016, we and Great Elm Capital Management, Inc. (“GECM”), our external manager, entered into an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”) and an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”), and, upon the closing of the Merger (as discussed below), we began to accrue obligations to our external investment manager under those agreements.

We have elected to be treated as a Regulated Investment Company (“RIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a RIC, we will not be taxed on our income to the extent that we distribute such income each year and satisfy other applicable income tax requirements. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and annually distribute to our stockholders generally at least 90% of our investment company taxable income on a timely basis. If we qualify as a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate level taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders.

Formation Transactions

On June 23, 2016, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with Great Elm Capital Group, Inc. (“GEC”) and the investment funds signatory thereto (the “Subscription Agreement”), under which:

For financial reporting purposes, we have accounted for the contribution of the Initial GECC Portfolio as an asset acquisition per Topic 805, Business Combinations, of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).  For tax purposes, we recorded our basis in the Initial GECC Portfolio at the fair market value of the Initial GECC Portfolio as of the date of contribution.

Under the Subscription Agreement, upon consummation of the Merger, we became obligated to reimburse the costs incurred by GEC and the MAST Funds in connection with the Merger and the transactions contemplated by the Subscription Agreement.

Following the closing of the Merger, we entered into a registration rights agreement with GEC and the MAST Funds.

 

1

---

 

Full Circle Merger

On June 23, 2016, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Full Circle Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“Full Circle”), that provided for a stock-for-stock merger (the “Merger”) of Full Circle with and into GECC.  On November 3, 2016:

We accounted for the Merger as a business combination under ASC Topic 805 and Regulation S-X’s purchase accounting guidance. GECC was designated as the acquirer for accounting purposes. The difference between the fair value of Full Circle’s net assets and the consideration was recorded as a purchase accounting loss because the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as of the date of the Merger, was less than that of the merger consideration paid.

Investments

Our level of investment activity varies substantially from period to period depending on many factors, including, among others, the amount of debt and equity capital available from other sources to middle-market companies, the level of merger and acquisition activity, pricing in the high yield and leveraged loan credit markets, our expectations of future investment opportunities, the general economic environment as well as the competitive environment for the types of investments we make.

As a BDC, our investments and the composition of our portfolio are required to comply with regulatory requirements.

Revenues

We generate revenue primarily from interest on the debt investments that we hold. We also may generate revenue from dividends on the equity investments that we hold, capital gains on the disposition of investments, and lease, fee, and other income. Our investments in fixed income instruments generally have an expected maturity of three to five years, although we have no lower or upper constraint on maturity. Our debt investments generally pay interest quarterly or semi-annually. Payments of principal of our debt investments may be amortized over the stated term of the investment, deferred for several years or due entirely at maturity. In some cases, our debt investments and preferred stock investments may defer payments of cash interest or dividends or pay in kind (“PIK”). In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of prepayment fees, commitment, origination, due diligence fees, end-of-term or exit fees, fees for providing significant managerial assistance, consulting fees and other investment-related income.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses include the payment of a base management fee, administration fees (including the allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement), and, depending on our operating results, an incentive fee. The base management fee and incentive fee remunerates GECM for work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. Our Administration Agreement provides for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred for office space rental, office equipment and utilities allocable to us under the Administration Agreement, as well as costs and expenses incurred relating to non-investment advisory, administrative or operating services provided by GECM or its affiliates to us. We also bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions. Our expenses include interest on our outstanding indebtedness.

Critical Accounting Policies

Valuation of Portfolio Investments

We value our portfolio investments at fair value based upon the principles and methods of valuation set forth in policies adopted by our board of directors (our “Board”). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market quotations unless the quotations are deemed not to represent fair value. We generally obtain market quotations from recognized exchanges, market quotation systems, independent pricing services or one or more broker-dealers or market makers. Short term debt investments with remaining maturities within ninety days are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

2

---

 

Debt and equity securities for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, are valued at fair value using a valuation process consistent with our Board-approved policy.  Our Board approves in good faith the valuation of our portfolio as of the end of each quarter. Due to the inherent uncertainty and subjectivity of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events may impact the market quotations used to value some of our investments.

The valuation process approved by our Board with respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value is as follows:

Those investments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value are valued utilizing a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount.  In following these approaches, the types of factors that we may take into account in determining the fair value of our investments include, among other factors: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables; applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, merger and acquisition comparables; and enterprise values.

We prefer the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in our valuation process. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

Investments are classified by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) into the three broad levels as follows:

All Level 3 investments that comprise more than 5% of the investments of GECC are valued by independent third parties.

Revenue Recognition

Interest and dividend income, including PIK income, is recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront fees, including original issue discounts (“OID”), earned with respect to capital commitments are generally amortized or accreted into interest income over the life of the respective debt investment, as are end-of-term or exit fees receivable upon repayment of a debt investment if such fees are fixed in nature. Other fees, including certain amendment fees, prepayment fees and commitment fees on broken deals, and end-of-term or exit fees that have a contingency feature or are variable in nature are recognized as earned. Prepayment fees and similar income due upon the early repayment of a loan or debt security are recognized when earned and are included in interest income.

3

---

 

We may purchase debt investments at a discount to their face value. Discounts on the acquisition of corporate debt instruments are generally amortized using the effective-interest or constant-yield method, unless there are material questions as to collectability. For debt instruments where we are amortizing OID, when principal payments on the debt instrument are received in an amount in excess of the debt instrument’s amortized cost, the excess principal payments are recorded as interest income.

Net Realized Gains (Losses) and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale of an investment and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized. Realized gains and losses are computed using the first-in, first-out method. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the net change in portfolio investment values and portfolio investment cost bases during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

The following is a summary of our investment activity since our inception in April 2016:

 

 

4

---

 

Portfolio Reconciliation

The following is a reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2018, the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period from inception through December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

Investments in short-term securities, including United States Treasury Bills and money market mutual funds, were excluded.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $(8,222).  $(2,681) of the unrealized depreciation was related to valuation of interest receivable at March 31, 2018 that is anticipated to settle in kind.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded net realized gains on investments of $317.

Portfolio Classifications

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

 

Investments in short-term securities, including United States Treasury Bills and money market mutual funds, were excluded.

5

---

 

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by industry, as of March 31, 2017:

 

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by industry, as of March 31, 2018:

 

6

---

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

 

 

7

---

 

Total Investment Income

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

 

 

Total Investment Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $7,315, which included $6,826 of interest income.  Interest income included net accretion of OID and market discount of $1,178 and total investment income included PIK income of $1,142.  

We also generated $443 of fee income.  

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

Interest income included net accretion of OID and market discount of $951 and total investment income included PIK income of $244.

We also generated $27 of fee income, which is included in other income and is typically not recurring in nature.  

 

Total Investment Income increased for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to increased interest income, as a result of the interest earning investment portfolio growing year over year.  Dividend income increased due to larger distributions received from our short term investments in money market mutual funds, as our short term investments were larger during the 2018 first quarter.  Fee income decreased as there were fewer amendment fees earned as the instruments generating the fees were primarily exited during fiscal year 2017.

Expenses

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

 

 

 

8

---

 

Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were $3,226.

Total advisory fees were $1,616, with $593 of management fees and $1,023 of incentive fees accrued during the period.  We deferred incentive fees in accordance with the Investment Management Agreement.

Total administration fees were $495, which include direct costs deemed reimbursable under the Administration Agreement and fees paid for sub-administration services.  

Interest expense for the period was $631.

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 were $3,632.

Total investment management fees were $1,659, with $693 of management fees and $966 of incentive fees accrued during the period.  We deferred incentive fees in accordance with the Investment Management Agreement.

Total administration fees were $310, which include direct costs deemed reimbursable under the Administration Agreement and fees paid for sub-administration services.  

Interest expense for the period was $1,275, and includes interest on our newly issued GECCM Notes (as defined herein) for the period subsequent to their issuance.  See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources— Notes Payable” for further information.

 

Net expenses increased for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to increased interest expense, as a result of having a greater amount of debt outstanding compared to the prior year.  

Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $4,094.

Net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $3,866.

Net Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we recorded net realized gains of $1,980, primarily in connection with our disposition of our investment in JN Medical, which resulted in a $1,007 gain.  We also realized gains of $281 on the sale of our Trilogy International bonds and $354 on the sale of a portion of our Everi Payments bonds.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recorded net realized gains of $317, primarily in connection with principal amortization of loans that were acquired at a discount and a partial repayment on our PE Facility Solutions Term B loan.

9

---

 

Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments was $(2,695) for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The following table summarizes the significant changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of our investment portfolio, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 by portfolio company.

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments was $(8,222) for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The following table summarizes the significant changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of our investment portfolio, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 by portfolio company.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2018, we had approximately $6,030 of cash and cash equivalents, none of which was restricted in nature. At March 31, 2018, we also had $23,869 invested in a money market fund that is classified as an investment rather than cash and cash equivalents.

At March 31, 2018, we had investments in 30 debt instruments across 23 companies, totaling approximately $194,308 at fair value and equity investments in four companies, totaling approximately $442 at fair value. $11,953 of cumulative accrued PIK income is included in the carrying value of our investments.

In the normal course of business, we may enter into investment agreements under which we commit to make an investment in a portfolio company at some future date or over a specified period of time. As of March 31, 2018, we had approximately $22,406 in unfunded loan commitments, subject to our approval in certain instances, to provide debt financing to certain of our portfolio companies.  We had sufficient cash and other liquid assets on our March 31, 2018 balance sheet to satisfy the unfunded commitments.

10

---

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net cash used for operating activities, consisting primarily of net purchases of investments and the items described in “Results of Operations,” was approximately $36,551, reflecting the purchases and repayments of investments, net investment income resulting from operations, offset by non-cash income related to OID and PIK income, changes in working capital and accrued interest receivable. Net cash used for purchases and sales of investments was approximately $34,151, reflecting principal repayments and sales of $29,069, offset by additional investments of $63,220. Such amounts included draws and repayments on revolving credit facilities.  Our Board previously set our distribution rate at $0.083 per share per month and we intend to re-evaluate our dividend rate from time to time.

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of March 31, 2018 is as follows:

 

 

We have certain contracts under which we have material future commitments. Under the Investment Management Agreement, GECM provides investment advisory services to us. For providing these services, we pay GECM a fee, consisting of two components: (1) a base management fee based on the average value of our total assets and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance.

We are also party to the Administration Agreement with GECM. Under the Administration Agreement, GECM furnishes us with, or otherwise arranges for the provision of, office facilities, equipment, clerical, bookkeeping, finance, accounting, compliance and record keeping services at such office facilities and other such services as our administrator.

If any of the contractual obligations discussed above are terminated, our costs under any new agreements that we enter into may increase. In addition, we would likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under our Investment Management Agreement and our Administration Agreement. Any new investment management agreement would also be subject to approval by our stockholders.

Both the Investment Management Agreement and the Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon no fewer than 60 days’ written notice to the other.

Stock Buyback Program

We implemented a stock buyback program pursuant to Rule 10b5‑1 and Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to repurchase our shares in an aggregate amount of up to $15,000 through May 2018 at market prices at any time our shares trade below 90% of net asset value (“NAV”), subject to our compliance with our liquidity, covenant, leverage and regulatory requirements.  Our Board previously increased the overall size of the stock buyback program to a total of $50,000, with $25,000 remaining available under the program.

Inflation

Inflation has not had a significant effect on our results of operations in any of the reporting periods presented in our financial statements. However, from time to time, inflation may impact the operating results of our portfolio companies.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.

Notes Payable

On November 3, 2016, we assumed approximately $33,646 in aggregate principal amount of Full Circle’s 8.25% Notes due June 30, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”).  Interest on the 2020 Notes was paid quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.25% per annum. The 2020 Notes had a maturity date of June 30, 2020. On October 20, 2017, we redeemed the 2020 Notes completely at their par value plus accrued and unpaid interest.

On September 18, 2017, we sold $28,375 in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% notes due 2022 (the "GECCL Notes"). On September 29, 2017, we sold an additional $4,256 of the GECCL Notes upon full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  As a result of the issuance of these additional GECCL Notes, the aggregate principal balance of GECCL Notes outstanding is $32,631.

11

---

 

The GECCL Notes are our unsecured obligations and rank equal with all of our outstanding and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. The GECCL Notes are effectively subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to any future secured indebtedness that we may incur and structurally subordinated to all future indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries. We pay interest on the GECCL Notes on January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31 of each year. The GECCL Notes will mature on September 18, 2022 and can be called on, or after, September 18, 2019. Holders of the GECCL Notes do not have the option to have the GECCL Notes repaid prior to the stated maturity date. The GECCL Notes were issued in minimum denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof.

On January 11, 2018, we sold $43,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.75% notes due 2025 (the "GECCM Notes"). On January 19, 2018 and February 9, 2018, we sold an additional $1,898 and $1,500 of the GECCM Notes upon partial exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  As a result of the issuance of these additional GECCM Notes, the aggregate principal balance of GECCM Notes outstanding is $46,398.

The GECCM Notes are our unsecured obligations and rank equal with all of our outstanding and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. The GECCM Notes are effectively subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to any future secured indebtedness that we may incur and structurally subordinated to all future indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries. We pay interest on the GECCM Notes on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. The GECCM Notes will mature on January 31, 2025 and can be called on, or after, January 31, 2021. Holders of the GECCM Notes do not have the option to have the GECCM Notes repaid prior to the stated maturity date. The GECCM Notes were issued in minimum denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof.

Recent Developments

In December 2017, Avanti Communications Group plc (“Avanti”) announced a proposed restructuring plan whereby the terms of its second lien debt would be amended (its coupon rate reduced to 9.0%; the company to have the option to PIK its interest payments for the remaining life of the security; and its maturity date to be extended by a year) and its current third lien debt would be “equitized” in a debt-for-equity swap. In April 2018, a majority of the Avanti shareholders voted in support of the proposed restructuring plan, allowing for the plan to close on April 26, 2018. In consideration for their support, the existing shareholders retain 7.5% of the common equity pro-forma for the issuance associated with the restructuring and the third lien debtholders own 92.5%. GECC now owns approximately 9.1% of Avanti’s common equity.

In April 2018, Kyle Whitehill joined Avanti as its new CEO, replacing Alan Harper, previously the company’s Interim CEO. With Mr. Whitehill starting in April, Mr. Harper resumed his role as a Non-Executive Director of the company.

In April 2018, Avanti successfully launched HYLAS 4. HYLAS 4 is Avanti’s largest capacity satellite and will provide data communications services with fixed beams serving Africa and Europe and steerable beams that can cover territory as far west as the United States and as far south as the southern tip of South America. HYLAS 4 is now in its period of in-orbit testing, a period that typically lasts approximately three months.

In April 2018, we purchased an additional $1,764 of par value of Aptean Holdings, Inc. second lien term loan at a price of approximately 101% of par value.  

In April 2018, we purchased an additional $500 of par value of SESAC Holdco II LLC second lien term loan at a price of approximately 100% of par value.  

In April 2018, the senior secured term loan to PR Wireless, Inc. was sold for par, resulting in a realized gain of approximately $800.

In April and May 2018, we funded an additional $1,750 of par value to Tallage Davis, LLC.  

Our Board declared the monthly distributions for the third quarter of 2018 at an annual rate of approximately 8.45% of our March 31, 2018 NAV, which equates to $0.083 per month. The schedule of distribution payments is as follows:

 

 

12

---

 

Reduction in Required Minimum Asset Coverage Ratio

On March 23, 2018, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018, which includes the Small Business Credit Availability Act (the “Act”), was signed into law. The Act amends the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”) to permit a BDC to reduce the required minimum asset coverage ratio applicable to it from 200% to 150%, subject to certain requirements described therein. This reduction significantly increases the amount of debt that BDCs may incur.

Prior to the enactment of the Act, BDCs were required to maintain an asset coverage ratio of at least 200% in order to incur debt or to issue other senior securities. Generally, for every $1.00 of debt incurred or in senior securities issued, a BDC was required to have at least $2.00 of assets immediately following such incurrence or issuance. For those BDCs that satisfy the Act’s disclosure and approval requirements, the minimum asset coverage ratio is reduced such that for every $1.00 of debt incurred or in senior securities issued, a BDC must now have at least $1.50 of assets.

At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, which was held on May 3, 2018 (the “Annual Meeting”), a majority of our stockholders approved the application of the modified minimum asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act, to the Company. As a result of such approval, and subject to satisfying certain ongoing disclosure requirements, effective May 4, 2018 the asset coverage ratio test applicable to the Company was decreased from 200% to 150%, permitting us to incur additional leverage.

As of March 31, 2018, we had approximately $79.0 million of total outstanding indebtedness under two series of senior securities (unsecured senior notes)—the GECCL Notes and the GECCM Notes—and our asset coverage ratio was 255%. For risks associated with the reduction in our required minimum asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150%, see “Risk Factors—Risks Resulting from the Reduction in Required Minimum Asset Coverage Ratio.”

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. As of March 31, 2018, 9 debt investments in our portfolio bore interest at a fixed rate, and the remaining 21 debt investments were at variable rates, representing approximately $88,658 and $105,774 in debt at fair value, respectively. The variable rates are based upon LIBOR.

To illustrate the potential impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our net investment income, we have assumed a 1%, 2%, and 3% increase and 1%, 2%, and 3% decrease in the underlying LIBOR rate, and no other change in our portfolio as of March 31, 2018. We have also assumed that we have no outstanding floating rate borrowings. The below table illustrates the effect such assumed rate changes would have on an annual basis.

 

 

This analysis does not adjust for changes in the credit quality, size and composition of our portfolio, and other business developments that could affect the net increase in net assets resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31, 2018, we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

13

---

 

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we or GECM may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies.  

14

---

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the risk factors set forth below and the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” discussed in our Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Risks Resulting from the Reduction in Required Minimum Asset Coverage Ratio

Incurring additional indebtedness could increase the risk in investing in our Company.

Pursuant to the Act, at the Annual Meeting our stockholders approved of the reduction of our required minimum asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150%, permitting us to incur additional leverage. The use of leverage magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested. The use of leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and increases the risks associated with investing in our securities. If we incur such additional leverage, you may experience increased risks of investing in our common stock.

As of March 31, 2018, we had approximately $79.0 million of total outstanding indebtedness under two series of senior securities (unsecured senior notes)—the GECCL Notes and the GECCM Notes—and our asset coverage ratio was 255%. Holders of our GECCL Notes and GECCM Notes have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders, and such holders may seek to recover against our assets in the event of a default.

If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the GECCL Notes or the GECCM Notes, the holders of such indebtedness would have a superior claim to our assets over our common stockholders in the event of a default by us. If the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged, thereby magnifying losses. Similarly, any decrease in our revenue or income will cause our net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline would also negatively affect our ability to make distributions with respect to our common stock. Our ability to service any debt depends largely on our financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, as the base management fee payable to GECM, our investment adviser, is payable based on the average value of our total assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, GECM will have a financial incentive to incur leverage, which may not be consistent with our stockholders’ interests. In addition, our common stockholders bear the burden of any increase in our fees or expenses as a result of our use of leverage, including interest expenses and any increase in the base management fee payable to GECM.

If our asset coverage ratio falls below the required limit, we will not be able to incur additional debt until we are able to comply with the asset coverage ratio applicable to us. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations, and we may not be able to make distributions to stockholders. The actual amount of leverage that we employ will depend on GECM’s and our Board’s assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us.

Incurring additional leverage may magnify our exposure to risks associated with changes in interest rates, including fluctuations in interest rates which could adversely affect our profitability.

If we incur additional leverage, general interest rate fluctuations may have a more significant negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities than they would have absent such additional incurrence, and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our investment objectives and rate of return on investment capital. A portion of our income will depend upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate on the debt securities in which we invest. Because we may borrow money to make investments and may issue debt securities, preferred stock or other securities, our net investment income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds or pay interest or dividends on such debt securities, preferred stock or other securities and the rate at which we invest these borrowed funds.

15

---

 

We expect that a majority of our investments in debt will continue to be at floating rates with a floor. However, in the event that we make investments in debt at variable rates, a significant increase in market interest rates could also result in an increase in our non-performing assets and a decrease in the value of our portfolio because our floating-rate loan portfolio companies may be unable to meet higher payment obligations. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, resulting in a decrease in our net investment income. Incurring additional leverage will magnify the impact of an increase to our cost of funds. In addition, a decrease in interest rates may reduce net income, because new investments may be made at lower rates despite the increased demand for our capital that the decrease in interest rates may produce. To the extent our additional borrowings are in fixed-rate instruments, we may be required to invest in higher-yield securities in order to cover our interest expense and maintain our current level of return to stockholders, which may increase the risk of an investment in our securities.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

In the prospectus for the Merger, we announced that we would initiate a stock buyback program in an aggregate amount of $15,000.  Our Board has increased the overall size of the stock buyback program by a further $35,000.  During the year ended December 31, 2017, we purchased 2,138,479 shares under our tender offer and our stock buyback program at a weighted average price of $11.20 per share. As of December 31, 2017, we had cumulatively purchased 2,236,651 shares under the tender offer and stock buyback program at a weighted average price of $11.18 per share, resulting in $15,000 of cumulative cash paid, under the program since November 4, 2016. Including the tender offer, we utilized $25,000 under our stock buyback and tender program for repurchasing shares.

 

 

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

16

---

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

17

---

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

Unless otherwise indicated, all references are to exhibits to the applicable filing by Great Elm Capital Corp. (the “Registrant”) under File No. 814-01211 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

18

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

19

---

 

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

F-1

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Dollar amounts in thousands (except per share amounts)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

Dollar amounts in thousands (except per share amounts)

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (unaudited)

Dollar amounts in thousands

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

Dollar amounts in thousands

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

F-5

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2018

Dollar amounts in thousand

F-6

---

F-7

---

 

F-8

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L = LIBOR

 

F-9

---

As of March 31, 2018, the Company’s investments consisted of the following:

 

 

As of March 31, 2018, the industry composition of the Company’s portfolio at fair value was as follows:

 

 

As of March 31, 2018, the geographic composition of the Company’s portfolio at fair value was as follows:

 

 

F-10

---

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

Dollar amounts in thousands

F-11

---

F-12

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-13

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L = LIBOR

 

As of December 31, 2017 the Company’s investments consisted of the following:

 

 

F-14

---

As of December 31, 2017 the industry composition of the Company’s portfolio at fair value was as follows:

 

 

As of December 31, 2017 the geographic composition of the Company’s portfolio at fair value was as follows:

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

F-15

---

 

GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 and

Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts

1. ORGANIZATION

Great Elm Capital Corp. (the “Company”) was formed on April 22, 2016 as a Maryland corporation. The Company is structured as an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company. The Company elected to be regulated as a business development company (a “BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). The Company is managed by Great Elm Capital Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“GECM”), a subsidiary of Great Elm Capital Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Great Elm Capital Group”).

The Company seeks to generate current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. The Company invests primarily in secured and senior unsecured debt instruments that it purchases in the secondary markets.

The Company and Full Circle Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“Full Circle”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 23, 2016 (the “Merger Agreement”). The Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Full Circle with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Company agreed to provide indemnity to Full Circle’s directors and officers under certain circumstances. The Company has concluded that its indemnification obligation is remote as of the date of the accompanying financial statements. The Merger was completed on November 3, 2016 and the Company began operations on November 4, 2016. The Company accounted for the Merger as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The consideration for the Merger consisted of 4,986,585 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”).

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation. The Company’s functional currency is U.S. dollars and these consolidated financial statements have been prepared in that currency. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K.  The Company is an investment company following accounting and reporting guidance in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies.

The Company’s previous consolidated financial statements were reclassified in order to be consistent with the format used for the March 31, 2018 consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Consolidation. Under the Investment Company Act, Article 6 of Regulation S-X and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, the Company is generally precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company or an operating company which provides substantially all of its services and benefits to the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts and the accounts of the Company’s wholly-owned, or previously wholly-owned, subsidiaries PE Facility Solutions, LLC and Double Deuce Lodging LLC.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ materially.

Revenue Recognition. Interest and dividend income, including income paid in kind, is recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront fees, including original issue discounts, earned with respect to capital commitments, are generally amortized or accreted into interest income over the life of the respective debt investment, as are end-of-term or exit fees receivable upon repayment of a debt investment if such fees are fixed in nature. The Company currently has no investments with fixed exit fees.  Other fees, including certain amendment fees, prepayment fees and commitment fees on broken deals, and end-of-term or exit fees that have a contingency feature or are variable in nature are recognized as earned. Prepayment fees and similar income due upon the early repayment of a loan or debt security are generally included in interest income.

F-16

---

 

Interest Income received as paid-in-kind (“PIK”) is reported separately in the Statements of Operations.  Income is included as PIK if the instrument solely provides for settlement in kind.  In the event that the borrower can settle in kind or via cash payment, the income is not included as PIK until the borrower elects to pay in kind and the payment is received by the Company.  In the event there is a lesser cash rate in a PIK toggle instrument, income is accrued at the lesser cash rate until the coupon is paid in kind and such larger payment is received by the Company.

Certain of the Company’s debt investments were purchased at a discount to par as a result of the underlying credit risks and financial results of the issuer, as well as general market factors that influence the financial markets as a whole. Discounts on the acquisition of corporate debt instruments are generally amortized using the effective-interest or constant-yield method assuming there are no material questions as to collectability. For debt instruments where the Company received original issue discounts, when principal payments on the debt instrument are received in an amount in excess of the debt instrument’s amortized cost, the excess principal payments are recorded as interest income.

Net Realized Gains (Losses) and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation). The Company measures realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale of an investment and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized. Realized gains and losses are computed using the first-in first-out method. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the net change in portfolio investment values and portfolio investment cost bases during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.

Organization and Merger Related Costs. Organization and Merger-related costs, including costs relating to the formation and incorporation of the business were deemed to be incurred by the Company only subsequent to the Merger being completed.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents typically consist of bank demand deposits.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments. The Company carries its investments in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is generally based on quoted market prices provided by independent pricing services, broker or dealer quotations or alternative price sources. In the absence of quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations or alternative price sources, investments are measured at fair value as determined by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”).

Due to the inherent uncertainties of valuation, certain estimated fair values may differ significantly from the values that would have been realized had a ready market for these investments existed, and these differences could be material. See Note 4.

The Company values its portfolio investments at fair value based upon the principles and methods of valuation set forth in policies adopted by the Board of Directors. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset that (1) are independent of the Company, (2) are knowledgeable, having a reasonable understanding about the asset based on all available information (including information that might be obtained through due diligence efforts that are usual and customary), (3) are able to transact for the asset, and (4) are willing to transact for the asset (that is, they are motivated but not forced or otherwise compelled to do so).

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market quotations unless the quotations are deemed not to represent fair value. The Company generally obtains market quotations from recognized exchanges, market quotation systems, independent pricing services or one or more broker-dealers or market makers. Short term debt investments with remaining maturities within ninety days are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Debt and equity securities for which market quotations are not readily available, which is the case for many of the Company’s investments, or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, are valued at fair value using a consistently applied valuation process in accordance with the Company’s documented valuation policy that has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors, who also approve in good faith the valuation of such securities as of the end of each quarter. Due to the inherent uncertainty and subjectivity of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that the Company may ultimately realize. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events may have differing impacts on the market quotations used to value some of the Company’s investments than on the fair values of our investments for which market quotations are not readily available. Market quotations may be deemed not to represent fair value in certain circumstances where the Company believes that facts and circumstances applicable to an issuer, a seller or purchaser, or the market for a particular security cause current market quotations to not reflect the fair value of the security.

F-17

---

 

The valuation process approved by the Board of Directors with respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value is as follows:

The Company’s audit committee recommends, and the Board of Directors approves, the fair value of the investments in the Company’s portfolio in good faith based on the input of GECM, the respective independent valuation firms (to the extent applicable) and the inputs of each of the audit committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors.

Those investments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value are valued utilizing a market approach, an income approach, or both approaches, as appropriate. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. In following these approaches, the types of factors that the Company may take into account in determining the fair value of its investments include, as relevant and among other factors: available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, information rights, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public, merger and acquisition comparables, and enterprise values.

Foreign Currency Translation. Amounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars on the following basis: (1) investments and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates effective on the date of valuation; and (2) purchases and sales of investments and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. The portion of gains and losses on foreign investments resulting from fluctuations in foreign currencies is included in net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments.

U.S. Federal Income Taxes. From inception to September 30, 2016, the Company was a taxable association under Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company has elected to be taxed as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under subchapter M of the Code for the partial taxable period beginning on October 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2016. The Company intends to operate in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs in that taxable year and all future taxable years. In order to qualify as a RIC, among other things, the Company will be required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income (“ICTI”) including payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, as defined by the Code, for each taxable year in order to be eligible for tax treatment under subchapter M of the Code. Depending on the level of ICTI earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed prior to the 15th day of the ninth month after the tax year-end. So long as the Company maintains its status as a RIC, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that it distributes at least annually to its stockholders as distributions. Rather, any tax liability related to income earned by the Company represents obligations of the Company’s stockholders and will not be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

If the Company does not distribute (or is not deemed to have distributed) each calendar year the sum of (1) 98% of its net ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years (the “Minimum Distribution Amount”), the Company will generally be required to pay an excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by the which Minimum Distribution Amount exceeds the distributions for the year. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from such taxable income, the Company accrues excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual taxable income.  

The Company accrued $124 of excise tax expense in fiscal 2017 and has accrued $0 for fiscal 2018.

 

F-18

---

 

At December 31, 2017, the Company, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards of $46,984 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Company of any liability for federal income tax. On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Modernization Act”) was signed by the President. The Modernization Act changed the capital loss carryforward rules as they relate to regulated investment companies. Capital losses generated in tax years beginning after the date of enactment may now be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss. Of the capital loss carryforwards at December 31, 2017, $46,984 are limited losses and available for use subject to annual limitation under Section 382. Of the capital losses at December 31, 2017, $16,815 are short-term and $30,169 are long term.

 

ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) provides guidance on the accounting for and disclosure of uncertainty in tax position. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Based on its analysis of its tax position for all open tax years (the current and prior years, as applicable), the Company has concluded that it does not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria of ASC 740. Such open tax years remain subject to examination and adjustment by tax authorities.

Recent Accounting Developments.  

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08; Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20) Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.  The amendments in this Update shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. ASU No. 2017-08 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. The application of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3. SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS AND RELATED PARTIES

Investment Management Agreement. On September 27, 2016, the Company entered into an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”) with GECM in connection with the transactions described in Note 8.  Beginning on November 4, 2016, the Company began accruing for GECM’s fees for its services under the Investment Management Agreement. This fee consists of two components: a base management fee and an incentive fee.

Management Fee The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the Company’s average adjusted gross assets, including assets purchased with borrowed funds. The base management fee will be payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee is calculated based on the average value of the Company’s gross assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the then current calendar quarter. Base management fees for any partial quarter are prorated.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2018, management fees amounted to $593 and $693, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018, $612 and $693 remained payable, respectively.

Incentive Fee The incentive fee consists of two components, an investment income component and a capital gains component. Under the investment income component, on a quarterly basis, the Company will pay GECM 20% of the amount by which the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income (the “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income”) for the quarter exceeds a hurdle rate of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) of the Company’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, subject to a “catch-up” provision pursuant to which GECM receives all of such income in excess of the 1.75% level but less than 2.1875% (8.75% annualized) and subject to a total return requirement (described below). The effect of the “catch-up” provision is that, subject to the total return provision, if pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds 2.1875% of the Company’s net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, in any calendar quarter, GECM will receive 20.0% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income as if the 1.75% hurdle rate did not apply. These calculations will be appropriately prorated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the then current quarter.

F-19

---

 

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes any accretion of original issue discount, market discount, payment-in-kind interest, payment-in-kind dividends or other types of deferred or accrued income, including in connection with zero coupon securities, that the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have recognized in accordance with GAAP, but have not yet received in cash (collectively, “Accrued Unpaid Income”). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains or losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.  Accrued Unpaid Income as of December 31, 2017 was $20,168.  Accrued Unpaid Income as of December 31, 2017 includes PIK income of $11,709 earned during the year ended December 31, 2017 and $1,962 of accrued interest income that is expected to PIK under PIK toggle elections. Accrued Unpaid Income as of March 31, 2018 was $23,677.  Accrued Unpaid Income includes PIK income of $244 earned during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and $1,962 of accrued interest income that is expected to PIK under PIK toggle elections.  

Any income incentive fee otherwise payable with respect to Accrued Unpaid Income (collectively, the “Accrued Unpaid Income Incentive Fees”) is deferred, on a security by security basis, and becomes payable only if, as, when and to the extent cash is received by the Company or its consolidated subsidiaries in respect thereof. Any Accrued Unpaid Income that is subsequently reversed in connection with a write-down, write-off, impairment or similar treatment of the investment giving rise to such Accrued Unpaid Income will, in the applicable period of reversal, (A) reduce Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income and (B) reduce the amount of Accrued Unpaid Income Incentive Fees previously deferred.

Under the capital gains component of the incentive fee, the Company is obligated to pay GECM at the end of each calendar year 20% of the aggregate cumulative realized capital gains from November 4, 2016 through the end of that year, computed net of aggregate cumulative realized capital losses and aggregate cumulative unrealized depreciation through the end of such year, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gains incentive fees.

Payment of the incentive fee is subject to a total return requirement, which provides that no incentive fee in respect of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income will be payable except to the extent that 20% of the cumulative net increase in net assets resulting from operations from and after November 4, 2016 exceeds the cumulative incentive fees accrued and/or paid from and after November 4, 2016. For the purposes of this calculation, the “cumulative net increase in net assets resulting from operations” is the sum of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income, realized gains and losses and unrealized appreciation and depreciation from and after November 4, 2016.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company incurred Incentive Fees based on income of $1,023 and $966, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018, $5,257 and $6,224 remained payable of which $5,257 of the payable at December 31, 2017 and $4,735 of the payable at March 31, 2018 was Accrued Unpaid Income Incentive Fees and $0 was immediately payable after calculating the total return requirement. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company accrued Incentive Fees based on capital gains of $0.

The Investment Management Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, GECM and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of GECM’s services under the Investment Management Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company.

The Company’s chief executive officer is also the chief investment officer of GECM, and the chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors of GEC. The Company’s chief compliance officer is also the chief operating officer, chief compliance officer and general counsel of GECM, and the president and chief operating officer of GEC.

Administration Fees. On September 27, 2016, the Company entered into an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with GECM to provide administrative services, including furnishing the Company with office facilities, equipment, clerical, bookkeeping record keeping services and other administrative services. The Company will reimburse GECM for its allocable portion of overhead and other expenses of GECM in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement.

GECM agreed that the aggregate amount of expenses accrued for reimbursement pursuant to the Administration Agreement that pertain to direct compensation costs of financial, compliance and accounting personnel that perform services for the Company, inclusive of the fees charged by any sub-administrator to provide such financial, compliance and/or accounting personnel to the Company (the “Compensation Expenses”), during the year ending November 4, 2017, when taken together with Compensation Expenses reimbursed or accrued for reimbursement by the Company pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement during such period, shall not exceed 0.50% of the Company’s average net asset value during such period.  GECM’s expense cap was calculated retrospectively for the year ending November 4, 2017 and the cap on costs was determined to be $0 and $70 of the $80 accrued at December 31, 2016 was reversed for the year ended December 31, 2017 with $10 due from our sub-administrator remaining waived.

F-20

---

 

The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, GECM and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of GECM’s services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for the Company.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company incurred expenses under the Administration Agreement of $495 and $310, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018, $257 and $310 remained payable, respectively.

4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price).

The fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The levels used for classifying investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these securities. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Basis of Fair Value Measurement

Level 1 - Investments valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 - Investments valued using other unadjusted observable market inputs, e.g. quoted prices in markets that are not active or quotes for comparable instruments.

Level 3 - Investments that are valued using quotes and other observable market data to the extent available, but which also take into consideration one or more unobservable inputs that are significant to the valuation taken as a whole.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Note 2 should be read in conjunction with the information outlined below.

The table below presents the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs generally used in determining the fair value of Level 2 Instruments.

Level 2 Instruments Valuation Techniques and Significant Inputs

 

 

F-21

---

 

Level 3 Instruments Valuation Techniques and Significant Inputs

 

 

As noted above, the income and market approaches were used in the determination of fair value of certain Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018. The significant unobservable inputs used in the income approach are the discount rate or market yield used to discount the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the underlying investment, which include both future principal and interest payments. An increase in the discount rate or market yield would result in a decrease in the fair value. Included in the consideration and selection of discount rates is risk of default, rating of the investment (if any), call provisions and comparable company valuations. The significant unobservable inputs used in the market approach are based on market comparable transactions and market multiples of publicly traded comparable companies. Increases or decreases in market multiples would result in an increase or decrease, respectively, in the fair value.

The following is a summary of the Company’s investment assets categorized within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2017:

 

The following is a summary of the Company’s investment assets categorized within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2018:

 

 

 

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

F-22

---

 

 

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2017:

 

 

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for the three months ended March 31, 2018:

 

 

No securities were transferred into the Level 3 hierarchy and no securities were transferred out of the Level 3 hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the year ended December 31, 2017 or for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur.

The tables below present the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the Company’s Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018, respectively. These ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of instrument, but they do not represent a range of values for any one instrument. For example, the lowest yield in 1st Lien/Senior Secured is appropriate for valuing that specific debt investment, but may not be appropriate for valuing any other debt investments in this asset class. Accordingly, the ranges of inputs presented below do not represent uncertainty in, or possible ranges of, fair value measurements of the Company’s Level 3 assets.

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

F-23

---

 

March 31, 2018

 

 

 

5. DEBT

On November 3, 2016, the Company assumed $33,646 of Full Circle 8.25% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”) in connection with the Merger by executing the second supplemental indenture dated November 3, 2016. The 2020 Notes had a maturity date of June 30, 2020 and on October 20, 2017 we redeemed them completely at their par value plus accrued and unpaid interest.

On September 13, 2017, we offered $28,375 in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% notes due 2022 (the "GECCL Notes"). On September 29, 2017, we sold to several underwriters an additional $4,256 of the GECCL Notes upon full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  As a result of the issuance of these additional GECCL Notes, the aggregate principal balance of GECCL Notes outstanding is $32,631.

The GECCL Notes are our unsecured obligations and rank equal with all of our outstanding and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. The GECCL Notes are effectively subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to any future secured indebtedness that we may incur and structurally subordinated to all future indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries. We pay interest on the GECCL Notes on January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31 of each year. The GECCL Notes will mature on September 18, 2022 and can be called on, or after, September 18, 2019. Holders of the GECCL Notes do not have the option to have the GECCL Notes repaid prior to the stated maturity date. The GECCL Notes were issued in minimum denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof.

On January 11, 2018, we offered $43,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.75% notes due 2025 (the "GECCM Notes"). On January 19, 2018 and February 9, 2018, we sold an additional $1,898 and $1,500 of the GECCM Notes upon partial exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option.  As a result of the issuance of these additional GECCM Notes, the aggregate principal balance of GECCM Notes outstanding is $46,398.

The GECCM Notes are our unsecured obligations and rank equal with all of our outstanding and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. The GECCM Notes are effectively subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to any future secured indebtedness that we may incur and structurally subordinated to all future indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries. We pay interest on the GECCM Notes on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. The GECCM Notes will mature on January 31, 2025 and can be called on, or after, January 31, 2021. Holders of the GECCM Notes do not have the option to have the GECCM Notes repaid prior to the stated maturity date. The GECCM Notes were issued in minimum denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof.

F-24

---

 

As part of the offerings, the Company incurred fees and costs, which are treated as a reduction of the carrying amount of the debt on our Statements of Assets and Liabilities.  These deferred financing costs presented as a reduction to the Notes payable balance are being amortized into interest expense over the term of the Notes.

The Investment Company Act limits, with certain exceptions, the Company’s borrowing such that its asset coverage ratio, as defined in the Investment Company Act, is at least 2 to 1 after such borrowing. As of March 31, 2018, the Company’s outstanding borrowings were $79,029, and the Company’s asset coverage ratio was 3 to 1.

Information about the Company’s senior securities (including debt securities and other indebtedness) is shown in the following table:

 

 

The indenture’s covenants, include compliance with (regardless of whether the Company is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, as well as covenants requiring the Company to provide financial information to the holders of the Notes and the Trustee if the Company ceases to be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture. The Company may repurchase the Notes in accordance with the Investment Company Act and the rules promulgated thereunder. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had not repurchased any of the Notes.  As of December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018 the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the indentures.

The summary information of the 2020 Notes for the year ended December 31, 2017, is as follows:

 

 

F-25

---

 

The summary information of the GECCL Notes for the year ended December 31, 2017, is as follows:

 

 

The fair value of the Company’s Notes are determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the Company’s Notes is determined by utilizing market quotations at the measurement date as they are Level 1 securities.

 

 

The summary information of the GECCL and GECCM Notes for the three months ended March 31, 2018, is as follows:

GECCL

 

GECCM

 

F-26

---

 

The fair value of the Company’s Notes are determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the Company’s Notes is determined by utilizing market quotations at the measurement date as they are Level 1 securities.

 

 

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into investment agreements under which it commits to make an investment in a portfolio company at some future date or over a specified period of time. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $22,406 in unfunded loan commitments, subject to the Company’s approval in certain instances, to provide debt financing to certain of its portfolio companies.  To the degree applicable, unrealized gains or losses on these commitments as of March 31, 2018 are included in the Company’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the corresponding Schedule of Investments.  The Company believes that it had sufficient cash and other liquid assets on its balance sheet to satisfy the unfunded commitments.

Two complaints, captioned Daniel Saunders, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Full Circle Capital Corporation, et al., filed on September 23, 2016 (the “Saunders Action”), and William L. Russell, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Biderman, et al. filed on September 12, 2016 and amended on September 22, 2016 (the “Russell Action”), were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland and in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, (the “Circuit Court”), respectively. On October 7, 2016, a complaint captioned David Speiser, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Felton, et al., was filed in the Circuit Court (the “Speiser Action”, and together with the Saunders Action and the Russell Action, the “Actions”).

On October 24, 2016, the Company, Full Circle, Great Elm Capital Group, MAST Capital, certain directors of the Full Circle and plaintiffs in the Actions reached an agreement in principle providing for the settlement of the Actions on the terms and conditions set forth in a memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”). Pursuant to the terms of the MOU, without agreeing that any of the claims in the Actions have merit or that any supplemental disclosure was required under any applicable statute, rule, regulation or law, Full Circle and the Company agreed to and did make the supplemental disclosures with respect to the merger. The MOU further provides that, among other things, (a) the parties to the MOU will enter into a definitive stipulation of settlement (the “Stipulation”) and will submit the Stipulation to the Circuit Court for review and approval; (b) the Stipulation will provide for dismissal of the Actions on the merits; (c) the Stipulation will include a general release of defendants of claims relating to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (d) the proposed settlement is conditioned on final approval by the Circuit Court after notice to Full Circle’s stockholders. There can be no assurance that the settlement will be finalized or that the Circuit Court will approve the settlement.

7. INDEMNIFICATION

Under the Company’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business the Company expects to enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations which provide general indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these agreements cannot be known; however, the Company expects any risk of loss to be remote.

8. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS

Formation Transaction

On June 23, 2016, Great Elm Capital Group contributed $30,000 to the Company and the Company issued 30 shares of Common Stock. Such shares were recapitalized into an aggregate of 1,966,667 shares of Common Stock upon the contribution of the Initial GECC Portfolio.

The Company, Great Elm Capital Group and funds managed by MAST Capital (the “MAST Funds”) entered into a Subscription Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2016 (the “Subscription Agreement”). The Subscription Agreement provided for (a) the $30,000 capital contribution by Great Elm Capital Group in exchange for 1,966,667 shares of Company Common Stock and (b) contribution by the MAST Funds of a portfolio of debt instruments (the “Initial GECC Portfolio”) to the Company in exchange for 5,935,800 shares of Common Stock.

F-27

---

 

On September 27, 2016, the MAST Funds conveyed the Initial GECC Portfolio to the Company and that transaction settled November 1, 2016. On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 5,935,800 shares of Common Stock in exchange for the Initial GECC Portfolio in settlement of the transaction. Under ASC 805, the Company accounted for the contribution of the Initial GECC Portfolio as an asset acquisition as of the settlement date.  The cost amounts reflected in the following table are the price at which the assets were transferred, which is viewed as representative of fair value as of November 1, 2016, and the total is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of changes as “Shares issued – formation transactions.”

As of November 3, 2016, the Initial GECC Portfolio was comprised of:

 

 

In the Subscription Agreement, the Company agreed, to reimburse costs associated with the transactions contemplated by the Subscription Agreement and the Merger Agreement incurred by Great Elm Capital Group and the MAST Funds, if the transaction closed. See Note 6.

Merger

On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with Full Circle.  Following approval of the Merger on October 31, 2016 by Full Circle’s stockholders, on November 3, 2016:

The Company has accounted for the Merger as a business combination under ASC Topic 805 and Regulation S-X’s purchase accounting guidance. The Company was designated as the accounting acquirer for accounting purposes. The difference between the fair value of Full Circle’s net assets and the consideration was recorded as a purchase accounting loss because the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as of the date of the Merger, was less than the fair value of the merger consideration paid by the Company. The calculation of the purchase accounting loss is detailed in the table below.

 

 

F-28

---

 

The Company incurred approximately $3,471 of transaction-related expenses related to the Formation Transaction and Merger during the period ended December 31, 2016.  Transaction-related expenses are comprised primarily of legal, accounting and other professional fees and third party costs.

The following table provides the pro forma consolidated operational data as if the Merger had occurred on January 1, 2016 and we were in operations for the full year.  The pro forma consolidated operational data is based on assumptions and estimates; however, these pro forma results are not indicative of the results of operations that would have been obtained had the Merger occurred at the beginning of the period presented, nor do they purport to represent the consolidated results of operations for future periods. Information presented for the year ended December 31, 2015 represents Full Circle’s financial information for the period, unadjusted.

 

 

 

F-29

---

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company purchased 2,138,479 shares under its tender offer and $15,000 stock buyback program at a weighted average price of $11.20 per share. As of March 31, 2018, the Company had cumulatively purchased 2,236,651 shares under its tender offer and stock buyback program at a weighted average price of $11.18 per share, resulting in $15,000 of cumulative cash paid, under the program since November 4, 2016. Including the tender offer, the Company utilized $25,000 under its stock buyback and tender program for repurchasing shares.

 

 

 

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

 

F-30

---

 

The following information sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018:

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share equals basic earnings per share because there were no common stock equivalents outstanding during the periods presented.  

10. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Below is the schedule of financial highlights of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and three months ended March 31, 2018, respectively:

 

 

F-31

---

 

 

F-32

---

 

11. AFFILIATED AND CONTROLLED INVESTMENTS

Affiliated investment as defined by the Investment Company Act, whereby the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the portfolio company's outstanding voting securities and the investments are not classified as controlled investments. The aggregate fair value of non-controlled, affiliated investments at March 31, 2018 represented 0.23% of the Company's net assets. Fair value as of March 31, 2018 along with transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2018 in these affiliated investments was as follows:

 

 

Controlled investment as defined by the Investment Company Act, whereby the Company owns more than 25% of the portfolio company's outstanding voting securities or maintains the ability to nominate greater than 50% of the board representation. The aggregate fair value of controlled investments at March 31, 2018 represented 13.77% of the Company's net assets. Fair value as of March 31, 2018 along with transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2018 in these controlled investments was as follows:

 

 

F-33

---

 

In December 2017, Avanti Communications Group plc (“Avanti”) announced a proposed restructuring plan whereby the terms of its second lien debt would be amended (its coupon rate reduced to 9.0%; the company to have the option to PIK its interest payments for the remaining life of the security; and its maturity date to be extended by a year) and its current third lien debt would be “equitized” in a debt-for-equity swap. In April 2018, a majority of the Avanti shareholders voted in support of the proposed restructuring plan, allowing for the plan to close on April 26, 2018. In consideration for their support, the existing shareholders retain 7.5% of the common equity pro-forma for the issuance associated with the restructuring and the third lien debtholders own 92.5%. GECC now owns approximately 9.1% of Avanti’s common equity.

In April 2018, Kyle Whitehill joined Avanti as its new CEO, replacing Alan Harper, previously the company’s Interim CEO. With Mr. Whitehill starting in April, Mr. Harper resumed his role as a Non-Executive Director of the company.

In April 2018, Avanti successfully launched HYLAS 4. HYLAS 4 is Avanti’s largest capacity satellite and will provide data communications services with fixed beams serving Africa and Europe and steerable beams that can cover territory as far west as the United States and as far south as the southern tip of South America. HYLAS 4 is now in its period of in-orbit testing, a period that typically lasts approximately three months.

In April 2018, we purchased an additional $1,764 of par value of Aptean Holdings, Inc. second lien term loan at a price of approximately 101% of par value.  

In April 2018, we purchased an additional $500 of par value of SESAC Holdco II LLC second lien term loan at a price of approximately 100% of par value.  

In April 2018, the senior secured term loan to PR Wireless, Inc. was sold for par, resulting in a realized gain of approximately $800.

In April and May 2018, we funded an additional $1,750 of par value to Tallage Davis, LLC.  

Our Board declared the monthly distributions for the third quarter of 2018 at an annual rate of approximately 8.45% of our March 31, 2018 NAV, which equates to $0.083 per month. The schedule of distribution payments is as follows:

 

 

At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, which was held on May 3, 2018 (the “Annual Meeting”), a majority of our stockholders approved the application of the modified minimum asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act, to the Company. As a result of such approval, and subject to satisfying certain ongoing disclosure requirements, effective May 4, 2018 the asset coverage ratio test applicable to the Company was decreased from 200% to 150%, permitting us to incur additional leverage.

 

As of March 31, 2018, we had approximately $79.0 million of total outstanding indebtedness under two series of senior securities (unsecured senior notes)—the GECCL Notes and the GECCM Notes—and our asset coverage ratio was 255%.

F-34