Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - BROWN FORMAN CORPbfb-1312018xex32january.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - BROWN FORMAN CORPbfb-1312018xex312january.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - BROWN FORMAN CORPbfb-1312018xex311january.htm
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
 
  þ
QUARTERLY REPORT  PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2018
OR
  o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File No. 001-00123

Brown-Forman Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware
61-0143150
(State or other jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
 
 
850 Dixie Highway
 
Louisville, Kentucky
40210
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(502) 585-1100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ   No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ   No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
þ
 
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o     No  þ
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  February 28, 2018
Class A Common Stock ($.15 par value, voting)
169,062,093

Class B Common Stock ($.15 par value, nonvoting)
311,827,161








2



PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)


BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31,
 
January 31,
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
Sales
$
1,059

 
$
1,156

 
$
2,969

 
$
3,251

Excise taxes
251

 
278

 
670

 
736

Net sales
808

 
878

 
2,299

 
2,515

Cost of sales
272

 
291

 
758

 
825

Gross profit
536

 
587

 
1,541

 
1,690

Advertising expenses
102

 
114

 
291

 
314

Selling, general, and administrative expenses
162

 
173

 
488

 
497

Other expense (income), net
(1
)
 
(4
)
 
(16
)
 
(15
)
Operating income
273

 
304

 
778

 
894

Interest income
1

 
2

 
2

 
4

Interest expense
16

 
17

 
44

 
49

Income before income taxes
258

 
289

 
736

 
849

Income taxes
76

 
99

 
212

 
242

Net income
$
182

 
$
190

 
$
524

 
$
607

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.38

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.08

 
$
1.26

Diluted
$
0.38

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.07

 
$
1.25

Cash dividends per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Declared
$
0.292

 
$
1.316

 
$
0.564

 
$
1.608

Paid
$
0.146

 
$
0.158

 
$
0.418

 
$
0.450

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31,
 
January 31,
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
Net income
$
182

 
$
190

 
$
524

 
$
607

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Currency translation adjustments
(25
)
 
38

 
(110
)
 
47

Cash flow hedge adjustments
(7
)
 
(32
)
 
14

 
(48
)
Postretirement benefits adjustments
6

 
3

 
13

 
9

Net other comprehensive income (loss)
(26
)
 
9

 
(83
)
 
8

Comprehensive income
$
156

 
199

 
$
441

 
$
615

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
April 30,
2017
 
January 31,
2018
Assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
182

 
$
287

Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 at April 30 and January 31
557

 
725

Inventories:
 
 
 
Barreled whiskey
873

 
923

Finished goods
186

 
204

Work in process
119

 
122

Raw materials and supplies
92

 
94

Total inventories
1,270

 
1,343

Other current assets
342

 
286

Total current assets
2,351

 
2,641

Property, plant and equipment, net
713

 
766

Goodwill
753

 
768

Other intangible assets
641

 
680

Deferred tax assets
16

 
17

Other assets
151

 
170

Total assets
$
4,625

 
$
5,042

Liabilities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
501

 
$
584

Dividends payable

 
557

Accrued income taxes
9

 
18

Short-term borrowings
211

 
327

Current portion of long-term debt
249

 

Total current liabilities
970

 
1,486

Long-term debt
1,689

 
1,770

Deferred tax liabilities
152

 
61

Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits
314

 
282

Other liabilities
130

 
242

Total liabilities
3,255

 
3,841

Commitments and contingencies

 

Stockholders’ Equity
 
 
 
Common stock:
 
 
 
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized)
25

 
25

Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized)
43

 
47

Additional paid-in capital
65

 
7

Retained earnings
4,470

 
1,620

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(390
)
 
(382
)
Treasury stock, at cost (88,175,000 and 3,665,000 shares at April 30 and January 31, respectively)
(2,843
)
 
(116
)
Total stockholders’ equity
1,370

 
1,201

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,625

 
$
5,042

 See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31,
 
2017
 
2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
524

 
$
607

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
42

 
48

Stock-based compensation expense
10

 
14

Deferred income taxes
(11
)
 
(32
)
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisition of business
(120
)
 
(75
)
Cash provided by operating activities
445

 
562

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
(307
)
 

Additions to property, plant, and equipment
(71
)
 
(100
)
Computer software expenditures
(2
)
 
(1
)
Cash used for investing activities
(380
)
 
(101
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Net change in short-term borrowings
(24
)
 
111

Repayment of long-term debt

 
(250
)
Proceeds from long-term debt
717

 

Debt issuance costs
(5
)
 

Net payments related to exercise of stock-based awards
(5
)
 
(24
)
Acquisition of treasury stock
(561
)
 
(1
)
Dividends paid
(203
)
 
(216
)
Repayment of short-term obligation associated with acquisition of business
(30
)
 

Cash used for financing activities
(111
)
 
(380
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(20
)
 
24

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(66
)
 
105

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
263

 
182

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
197

 
$
287

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

6



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

In these notes, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Brown-Forman Corporation.

1.    Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 
We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. In accordance with those rules and regulations, we condensed or omitted certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We suggest that you read these condensed financial statements together with the financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017 (2017 Form 10-K). We prepared the accompanying financial statements on a basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our 2017 Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments (unless otherwise indicated), necessary for a fair statement of our financial results for the periods covered by this report.

The BenRiach acquisition occurred during the first fiscal quarter of 2017 and the purchase price allocation was finalized as of June 1, 2017. There have been no material changes to the purchase price allocation.

As discussed in Note 11, our shares of common stock were split during February 2018 through the issuance of a stock dividend. As a result, all share and per share amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and related notes are presented on a split-adjusted basis.

New accounting pronouncements to be adopted. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new revenue recognition standard that, along with various amendments issued in 2015 and 2016, will replace substantially all existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The core principle of the standard requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also requires significantly more financial statement disclosures than existing revenue standards do.

The new standard can be adopted using either of two transition options: a full retrospective transition method or a modified retrospective method. Under the full retrospective method, the guidance would be applied to each prior reporting period presented. Under the modified retrospective method, the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance would be recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application.

We are continuing to assess the potential impact of the new guidance on our financial statements. Based on our assessment to date, we currently expect our accounting for certain customer incentives to be the area most likely affected by the new recognition requirements. We also expect to disclose additional information about revenues under the new standard. As we progress in our assessment, we are also identifying and preparing to make any changes to our accounting policies and practices, systems, processes, and controls that may be required to implement the new standard. We currently expect to choose the modified retrospective method in transitioning to the new standard, which we will adopt effective May 1, 2018.

We are also currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial statements of the additional new accounting pronouncements described below:
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard on accounting for leases. Under the new standard, a lessee should recognize on its balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The standard permits an entity to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The standard, which also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements, will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2020. It is to be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the adoption-period financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued new guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance, which addresses eight specific cash flow classification issues, is intended

7



to reduce diversity in practice. It will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2019 and is to be applied retrospectively.
In October 2016, the FASB issued revised guidance that requires the recognition of the income tax consequences (expense or benefit) of an intercompany transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. It maintains the existing requirement to defer the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intercompany transfer of inventory until the inventory is sold to an outside party. The guidance will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2019 and is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
In January 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance that eliminates the second step of the existing two-step quantitative test of goodwill for impairment. Under the new guidance, the quantitative test will consist of a single step in which the carrying amount of the reporting unit will be compared to its fair value. An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the amount of the impairment would be limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The guidance does not affect the existing option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. Although adoption is not required until fiscal 2021, we currently expect to adopt the new standard, prospectively, beginning in fiscal 2019.
In March 2017, the FASB issued new guidance for the presentation of the net periodic cost (NPC) associated with pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The guidance requires the service cost component of the NPC to be reported in the income statement in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of the NPC are to be presented separately from the service cost and outside of income from operations. In addition, the guidance allows only the service cost component of NPC to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. The guidance will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2019. It is to be applied retrospectively for the presentation in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of service cost.
In August 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance on hedge accounting. The guidance expands hedge accounting for financial and nonfinancial risk components, eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, simplifies the way assessments of hedge effectiveness may be performed, and amends some presentation and disclosure requirements for hedges. The guidance will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2020. It is to be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach for cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. Although we have not yet determined our plans for adoption, we are considering the possibility of adopting this new guidance before the required adoption date.
In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance that would allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the U.S. government in December 2017. The guidance will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2020. It is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized.

Early adoption of any of the new accounting pronouncements described above is permitted. However, except as noted above, we do not currently expect to adopt the new pronouncements before their effective dates.

2.    Inventories 
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Some of our consolidated inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which we use for the majority of our U.S. inventories. If the LIFO method had not been used, inventories at current cost would have been $272 million higher than reported as of April 30, 2017, and $293 million higher than reported as of January 31, 2018. Changes in the LIFO valuation reserve for interim periods are based on a proportionate allocation of the estimated change for the entire fiscal year.

3.    Income Taxes
Our consolidated interim effective tax rate is based upon our expected annual operating income, statutory tax rates, and income tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant or unusual items, including adjustments to accruals for tax uncertainties, are recognized in the quarter in which the related event or a change in judgment occurs. The effective tax rate of 28.5% for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, is higher than the expected tax rate of 26.1% on ordinary income for the full fiscal year, primarily due to (a) the net impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (discussed below) and (b) true-ups related to

8



our recently-filed U.S. Federal income tax return, partially offset by (c) the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation and (d) a reduction in U.S. tax recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 for certain prior years on foreign exchange gains in non-U.S. entities due to a change in method of accounting for U.S. tax purposes. Our expected tax rate includes current fiscal year additions for existing tax contingency items.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act significantly revises the future ongoing U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering U.S. corporate income tax rates and implementing a territorial tax system. As we have an April 30 fiscal year-end, the lower corporate income tax rate will be phased in, resulting in a U.S. statutory federal rate of 30.4% for our fiscal year ending April 30, 2018, and 21% for subsequent fiscal years. During the quarter ended January 31, 2018, the impact of the lower tax rate resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $20 million for the three and nine months then ended. With the enactment of the Tax Act, we are evaluating our global working capital requirements and may change our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.

There are also certain transitional impacts of the Tax Act. As part of the transition to the new territorial tax system, the Tax Act imposes a one-time repatriation tax on deemed repatriation of historical earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate required us to adjust our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower federal base rate of 21%. These transitional impacts resulted in a provisional net charge of $43 million for the quarter ended January 31, 2018, comprised of a provisional repatriation U.S. tax charge of $91 million and a provisional net deferred tax benefit of $48 million.

The Tax Act also established new tax laws that may impact our financial statements beginning in fiscal 2019. These new laws include, but are not limited to (a) Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (“GILTI”), a new tax on low tax foreign jurisdictions, (b) Base Erosion Anti-abuse Tax (“BEAT”), a new minimum tax, (c) repeal of the domestic production activity deduction, and (d) limitations on certain executive compensation.

The changes included in the Tax Act are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of the Tax Act may differ from the above estimates, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, or any updates or changes to estimates the company has utilized to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates and foreign exchange rates of foreign subsidiaries.

Shortly after the Tax Act was enacted, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118). Under SAB 118, companies are provided a measurement period, not to extend beyond one year since the date of enactment. To the extent a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects are incomplete, the company may determine a reasonable estimate and record a provisional amount within the first reporting period in which a reasonable estimate can be determined. 

4.    Earnings Per Share 
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards. We calculate that dilutive effect using the “treasury stock method” (as defined by GAAP).


9



The following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31,
 
January 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2017
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
Net income available to common stockholders
$
182

 
$
190

 
$
524

 
$
607

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share data (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic average common shares outstanding
480,650

 
480,361

 
486,105

 
480,193

Dilutive effect of stock-based awards
3,308

 
3,883

 
3,515

 
3,318

Diluted average common shares outstanding
483,958

 
484,244

 
489,620

 
483,511

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per share
$
0.38

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.08

 
$
1.26

Diluted earnings per share
$
0.38

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.07

 
$
1.25


We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately 2,789,000 shares and 0 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended January 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively. We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately 2,225,000 shares and 1,073,000 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended January 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively. We excluded those awards because they were not dilutive for those periods under the treasury stock method.

5.    Commitments and Contingencies
We operate in a litigious environment, and we are sued in the normal course of business. Sometimes plaintiffs seek substantial damages. Significant judgment is required in predicting the outcome of these suits and claims, many of which take years to adjudicate. We accrue estimated costs for a contingency when we believe that a loss is probable and we can make a reasonable estimate of the loss, and then adjust the accrual as appropriate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that these existing loss contingencies, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. No material accrued loss contingencies are recorded as of January 31, 2018.

We have guaranteed the repayment by a third-party importer of its obligation under a bank credit facility that it uses in connection with its importation of our products in Russia. If the importer were to default on that obligation, which we believe is unlikely, our maximum possible exposure under the existing terms of the guaranty would be approximately $12 million (subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates). Both the fair value and carrying amount of the guaranty are insignificant. As of January 31, 2018, our actual exposure under the guaranty of the importer’s obligation is approximately $6 million.

Based on the financial support we provide to the importer, we believe it meets the definition of a variable interest entity. However, because we do not control this entity, it is not included in our consolidated financial statements.

10




6.    Debt
Our long-term debt (net of unamortized discount and issuance costs) consists of:
(Principal and carrying amounts in millions)
April 30,
2017
 
January 31,
2018
1.00% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2018
$
249

 
$

2.25% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023
248

 
248

1.20% senior notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026
324

 
369

2.60% senior notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028
383

 
419

3.75% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043
248

 
248

4.50% senior notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045
486

 
486

 
1,938

 
1,770

Less current portion
249

 

 
$
1,689

 
$
1,770

We repaid the $250 million principal amount of 1.00% notes on their maturity date of January 15, 2018.
As of April 30, 2017, our short-term borrowings of $211 million included $208 million of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of 1.04% and a remaining maturity of 22 days. As of January 31, 2018, our short-term borrowings of $327 million included $320 million of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of 1.62% and a remaining maturity of 21 days.

7.    Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits 
The following table shows the components of the pension and other postretirement benefit cost recognized for our U.S. benefit plans. Information about similar international plans is not presented due to immateriality.
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31,
 
January 31,
(Dollars in millions)
2017
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
Pension Benefits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service cost
$
6

 
$
6

 
$
19

 
$
18

Interest cost
9

 
7

 
26

 
22

Expected return on plan assets
(10
)
 
(10
)
 
(31
)
 
(31
)
Amortization of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service cost (credit)

 

 
1

 

Net actuarial loss
6

 
6

 
19

 
16

Settlement loss
1

 

 
1

 

Net cost
$
12

 
$
9

 
$
35

 
$
25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Postretirement Benefits:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service cost
$

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
1

Interest cost
1

 
1

 
2

 
1

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 
(2
)
Net cost
$

 
$

 
$
1

 
$


We have increased the amount we plan to contribute to our pension plans during fiscal 2018 to approximately $155 million.


11



8.    Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
April 30, 2017
 
January 31, 2018
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Carrying
 
Fair
(Dollars in millions)
Amount
 
Value
 
Amount
 
Value
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
182

 
$
182

 
$
287

 
$
287

Currency derivatives
25

 
25

 
2

 
2

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives
10

 
10

 
69

 
69

Short-term borrowings
211

 
211

 
327

 
327

Current portion of long-term debt
249

 
249

 

 

Long-term debt
1,689

 
1,752

 
1,770

 
1,840


Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize the fair values of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to determine those values. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in inactive markets; or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.

We determine the fair values of our currency derivatives (forward contracts) using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models, which are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, include the applicable spot rates, forward rates, and discount rates. The discount rates are based on the historical U.S. Treasury rates. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

We determine the fair value of long-term debt primarily based on the prices at which similar debt has recently traded in the market and also considering the overall market conditions on the date of valuation. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

The fair values of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.

We measure some assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. That is, we do not measure them at fair value on an ongoing basis, but we do adjust them to fair value in some circumstances (for example, when we determine that an asset is impaired). No material nonrecurring fair value measurements were required during the periods presented in these financial statements.

9.    Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Our multinational business exposes us to global market risks, including the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We use derivatives to help manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the currency exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions (expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges (except any ineffective portion) in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at which time we reclassify that amount into earnings. We assess the effectiveness of these hedges based on changes in forward exchange rates. The ineffective portion

12



of the changes in fair value of our hedges (recognized immediately in earnings) during the periods presented in this report was not material.

We had outstanding currency derivatives, related primarily to our euro, British pound, and Australian dollar exposures, with notional amounts totaling $1,188 million at April 30, 2017 and $1,100 million at January 31, 2018.

During fiscal 2017, we designated some currency derivative forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated long-term debt as after-tax net investment hedges of our investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. During fiscal 2018, we have continued to designate some foreign currency-denominated debt for that purpose. Any change in value of the designated portion of the hedging instruments is recorded in AOCI, offsetting the foreign currency translation adjustment of the related net investments that is also recorded in AOCI. As of January 31, 2018, $649 million of our foreign currency-denominated debt was designated as a net investment hedge. Our net investment hedges are intended to mitigate foreign exchange exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries against changes in foreign exchange rates. There was no ineffectiveness related to our net investment hedges in any of the periods presented.

We do not designate some of our currency derivatives and foreign currency-denominated debt as hedges because we use them to at least partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately recognize the change in fair value of these instruments in earnings.

We use forward purchase contracts with suppliers to protect against corn price volatility. We expect to physically take delivery of the corn underlying each contract and use it for production over a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, we account for these contracts as normal purchases rather than as derivative instruments.

13




The following tables present the pre-tax impact that changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments and non-derivative hedging instruments had on AOCI and earnings:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
January 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Classification
2017
 
2018
Derivative Instruments
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 

 
 

Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
n/a
$
5

 
$
(51
)
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings
Sales
15

 
(1
)
Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 

 
 

Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Sales

 
(5
)
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Other income
(5
)
 
3

Non-Derivative Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge:
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
n/a
(5
)
 
(42
)
Foreign currency-denominated debt not designated as hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Other income
4

 
(9
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
January 31,
(Dollars in millions)
Classification
2017
 
2018
Derivative Instruments
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 

 
 

Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
n/a
$
57

 
$
(80
)
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings
Sales
34

 
(4
)
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedge:
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
n/a
8

 

Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 

 
 

Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Sales
3

 
(8
)
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Other income
(13
)
 
8

Non-Derivative Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge:
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
n/a
19

 
(57
)
Foreign currency-denominated debt not designated as hedging instrument:
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings
Other income
6

 
(24
)

We expect to reclassify $34 million of deferred net losses on cash flow hedges recorded in AOCI as of January 31, 2018, to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged transactions occur. As of January 31, 2018, the maximum term of our outstanding derivative contracts was 36 months.


14



The following table presents the fair values of our derivative instruments:

(Dollars in millions)


Classification
 
Fair value of derivatives in a gain position
 
Fair value of derivatives in a
loss position
April 30, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
Designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives
Other current assets
 
$
21

 
$
(2
)
Currency derivatives
Other assets
 
9

 
(4
)
Currency derivatives
Accrued expenses
 
2

 
(8
)
Currency derivatives
Other liabilities
 
1

 
(4
)
Not designated as hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives
Other current assets
 
2

 
(1
)
Currency derivatives
Accrued expenses
 

 
(1
)
January 31, 2018:
 
 
 
 
 
Designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives
Other current assets
 

 

Currency derivatives
Other assets
 

 

Currency derivatives
Accrued expenses
 
4

 
(40
)
Currency derivatives
Other liabilities
 
1

 
(34
)
Not designated as hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
Currency derivatives
Other current assets
 
3

 
(1
)
Currency derivatives
Accrued expenses
 

 


The fair values reflected in the above table are presented on a gross basis. However, as discussed further below, the fair values of those instruments that are subject to net settlement agreements are presented in our balance sheets on a net basis.

In our statement of cash flows, we classify cash flows related to cash flow hedges in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items.

Credit risk. We are exposed to credit-related losses if the counterparties to our derivative contracts default. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the contracts. To manage this risk, we contract only with major financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings and with whom we have standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements that allow for net settlement of the derivative contracts. Also, we have established counterparty credit guidelines that are regularly monitored, and we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of these safeguards, we believe we have no derivative positions that warrant credit valuation adjustments.

Some of our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall below that level, then the counterparties to our derivative instruments could request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability position was $9 million at April 30, 2017 and $67 million at January 31, 2018.

Offsetting. As noted above, our derivative contracts are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlement of derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to present the fair values of current derivatives (i.e., those with a remaining term of 12 months or less) with the same counterparty on a net basis in the balance sheet. Similarly, we present the fair values of noncurrent derivatives with the same counterparty on a net basis. Current derivatives are not netted with noncurrent derivatives in the balance sheet.


15



The following table summarizes the gross and net amounts of our derivative contracts:
(Dollars in millions)
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)
 
Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
 
Net Amounts
April 30, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
$
35

 
$
(10
)
 
$
25

 
$
(1
)
 
$
24

Derivative liabilities
(20
)
 
10

 
(10
)
 
1

 
(9
)
January 31, 2018:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
8

 
(6
)
 
2

 
(2
)
 

Derivative liabilities
(75
)
 
6

 
(69
)
 
2

 
(67
)

No cash collateral was received or pledged related to our derivative contracts as of April 30, 2017 or January 31, 2018.

10.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill and other intangible assets during the nine months ended January 31, 2018:
(Dollars in millions)
Goodwill
 
Other Intangible Assets
Balance at April 30, 2017
$
753

 
$
641

Foreign currency translation adjustment
15

 
39

Balance at January 31, 2018
$
768

 
$
680


Our other intangible assets consist of trademarks and brand names, all with indefinite useful lives.

11.    Stockholders’ Equity
The following table summarizes the changes in stockholders’ equity during the nine months ended January 31, 2018:
(Dollars in millions)
Class A Common Stock
 
Class B Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
AOCI
 
Treasury Stock
 
Total
Balance at April 30, 2017
$
25

 
$
43

 
$
65

 
$
4,470

 
$
(390
)
 
$
(2,843
)
 
$
1,370

Retirement of treasury stock
 
 
(10
)
 
(8
)
 
(2,684
)
 
 
 
2,702

 

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
607

 
 
 
 
 
607

Net other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8

 
 
 
8

Cash dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
(773
)
 
 
 
 
 
(773
)
Acquisition of treasury stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Stock-based compensation expense
 
 
 
 
14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14

Stock issued under compensation plans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26

 
26

Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans
 
 
 
 
(50
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
(50
)
Stock split

 
14

 
(14
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Balance at January 31, 2018
$
25

 
$
47

 
$
7

 
$
1,620

 
$
(382
)
 
$
(116
)
 
$
1,201


Common Stock. On May 24, 2017, we retired 67,000,000 shares of Class B common stock previously held as treasury shares. This retirement reduced the number of issued shares of Class B common stock by that same amount.


16



On January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors approved a stock split, effected in the form of a stock dividend. For every four shares of either Class A or Class B common stock held, shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 7, 2018, received one share of Class B common stock, with any fractional shares payable in cash. The additional shares and cash for fractional shares were distributed to stockholders on February 28, 2018.

The following table shows the effects of the treasury stock retirement and stock split (as if the additional shares issued thereunder were issued on January 31, 2018) on the number of issued common shares:
 
Issued Common Shares
(Shares in thousands)
Class A
 
Class B
 
Total
Balance at April 30, 2017
170,000

 
284,627

 
454,627

Retirement of treasury stock

 
(67,000
)
 
(67,000
)
Stock split

 
96,905

 
96,905

Balance at January 31, 2018
170,000

 
314,532

 
484,532


Except for the pre-split share balances and activity included in the above table, all share and per share amounts reported in these financial statements and related notes are presented on a split-adjusted basis.

Dividends. The following table summarizes the cash dividends declared per share on our Class A and Class B common stock during the nine months ended January 31, 2018:
Declaration Date
 
Record Date
 
Payable Date
 
Amount per Share
May 24, 2017
 
June 5, 2017
 
July 3, 2017
 
$0.1460
July 27, 2017
 
September 7, 2017
 
October 2, 2017
 
$0.1460
November 16, 2017
 
December 7, 2017
 
January 2, 2018
 
$0.1580
January 23, 2018
 
March 5, 2018
 
April 2, 2018
 
$0.1580
January 23, 2018
 
April 2, 2018
 
April 23, 2018
 
$1.0000

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The following table summarizes the changes in each component of AOCI, net of tax, during the nine months ended January 31, 2018:
(Dollars in millions)
Currency Translation Adjustments
 
Cash Flow Hedge Adjustments
 
Postretirement Benefits Adjustments
 
Total AOCI
Balance at April 30, 2017
$
(204
)
 
$
11

 
$
(197
)
 
$
(390
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
47

 
(48
)
 
9

 
8

Balance at January 31, 2018
$
(157
)
 
$
(37
)
 
$
(188
)
 
$
(382
)



17



12.    Other Comprehensive Income
The following tables present the components of net other comprehensive income (loss):
 
Three Months Ended
 
Three Months Ended
 
January 31, 2017
 
January 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)
Pre-Tax
 
Tax
 
Net
 
Pre-Tax
 
Tax
 
Net
Currency translation adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) on currency translation
$
(27
)
 
$
2

 
$
(25
)
 
$
24

 
$
14

 
$
38

Reclassification to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
(27
)
 
2

 
(25
)
 
24

 
14

 
38

Cash flow hedge adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments
5

 
(3
)
 
2

 
(51
)
 
18

 
(33
)
Reclassification to earnings1
(15
)
 
6

 
(9
)
 
1

 

 
1

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
(10
)
 
3

 
(7
)
 
(50
)
 
18

 
(32
)
Postretirement benefits adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost
2

 
(1
)
 
1

 

 

 

Reclassification to earnings2
7

 
(2
)
 
5

 
5

 
(2
)
 
3

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
9

 
(3
)
 
6

 
5

 
(2
)
 
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net
$
(28
)
 
$
2

 
$
(26
)
 
$
(21
)
 
$
30

 
$
9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
January 31, 2017
 
January 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)
Pre-Tax
 
Tax
 
Net
 
Pre-Tax
 
Tax
 
Net
Currency translation adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) on currency translation
$
(99
)
 
$
(11
)
 
$
(110
)
 
$
27

 
$
20

 
$
47

Reclassification to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
(99
)
 
(11
)
 
(110
)
 
27

 
20

 
47

Cash flow hedge adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments
57

 
(23
)
 
34

 
(80
)
 
29

 
(51
)
Reclassification to earnings1
(34
)
 
14

 
(20
)
 
4

 
(1
)
 
3

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
23

 
(9
)
 
14

 
(76
)
 
28

 
(48
)
Postretirement benefits adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost
2

 
(1
)
 
1

 

 

 

Reclassification to earnings2
19

 
(7
)
 
12

 
15

 
(6
)
 
9

Other comprehensive income (loss), net
21

 
(8
)
 
13

 
15

 
(6
)
 
9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net
$
(55
)
 
$
(28
)
 
$
(83
)
 
$
(34
)
 
$
42

 
$
8

1Pre-tax amount is classified as sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
2Pre-tax amount is a component of pension and other postretirement benefit expense (as shown in Note 7, except for amounts related to non-U.S. benefit plans, about which no information is presented in Note 7 due to immateriality).


18



Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with both our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and our 2017 Form 10-K. Note that the results of operations for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 do not necessarily indicate what our operating results for the full fiscal year will be. In this Item, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Brown-Forman Corporation.

Presentation Basis
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use certain financial measures in this report that are not measures of financial performance under GAAP. These non-GAAP measures, defined below, should be viewed as supplements to (not substitutes for) our results of operations and other measures reported under GAAP. The non-GAAP measures we use in this report may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner.
“Underlying change” in income statement measures. We present changes in certain income statement measures, or line items, that are adjusted to an “underlying” basis. We use “underlying change” for the following income statement measures: (a) underlying net sales, (b) underlying cost of sales, (c) underlying gross profit, (d) underlying advertising expenses, (e) underlying selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses, (f) underlying other expense (income), (g) underlying operating expenses1, and (h) underlying operating income. To calculate these measures, we adjust, as applicable, for (a) acquisitions and divestitures, (b) foreign exchange, and (c) estimated net changes in distributor inventories. We explain these adjustments below.
“Acquisitions and divestitures.” This adjustment removes (a) any non-recurring effects related to our acquisitions and divestitures (e.g., transaction gains or losses, transaction costs, and integration costs), and (b) the effects of operating activity related to acquired and divested brands for periods that are not comparable on a year-over-year basis (non-comparable periods). By excluding non-comparable periods, we therefore include the effects of acquired and divested brands only to the extent that results are comparable on a year-over-year basis.
In fiscal 2016, we sold our Southern Comfort and Tuaca brands and related assets to Sazerac Company, Inc. and entered into a related transition services agreement (TSA). During fiscal 2017, we completed our obligations under the TSA. This adjustment removes the net sales, cost of sales, and operating expenses recognized in fiscal 2017 pursuant to the TSA related to (a) contract bottling services and (b) distribution services in certain markets.
On June 1, 2016, we acquired The BenRiach Distillery Company Limited (BenRiach). This adjustment removes (a) transaction and integration costs related to the acquisition and (b) operating activity for the acquisition for the non-comparable period. For both fiscal 2017 and 2018, the non-comparable period is the month of May.
“Foreign exchange.” We calculate the percentage change in our income statement line items in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjusting for foreign exchange allows us to understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current year results at prior-year rates and remove foreign exchange gains and losses from the current and prior-year periods.
“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.” This adjustment refers to the estimated net effect of changes in distributor inventories on changes in our income statement line items. For each period compared, we use depletion information provided by our distributors to estimate the effect of distributor inventory changes on our income statement line items.
We use the non-GAAP measures “underlying change” for the following reasons: (a) to understand our performance from period to period on a consistent basis; (b) to compare our performance to that of our competitors; (c) in connection with management incentive compensation calculations; (d) in our planning and forecasting processes; and (e) in communications concerning our financial performance with the board of directors, stockholders, and investment analysts. We provide reconciliations of the “underlying changes in income statement measures” to their nearest GAAP measures in the tables below under “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Period Comparisons.” We have consistently applied the adjustments within our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure.
 
 
1Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.

19



Definitions
Aggregations.
From time to time, in order to explain our results of operations or to highlight trends and uncertainties affecting our business, we aggregate markets according to stage of economic development as defined by the International Monetary Fund and we aggregate brands by spirits category. Below are definitions of the aggregations used in this report.
Geographic Aggregations.
“Developed” markets are “advanced economies” as defined by the International Monetary Fund, with the largest for Brown-Forman being the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Developed international markets are developed markets excluding the United States.
“Emerging” markets are “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the International Monetary Fund, with the largest for Brown-Forman being Mexico and Poland.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2018 Year-to-Date Highlights”, we provide supplemental information for our largest markets ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2017 net sales. In addition to markets that are listed by country name, we include the following aggregations:
“Rest of Europe” includes all markets in the continent of Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States other than those specifically listed.
“Remaining geographies.” All other markets (approximately 110), other than those specifically listed or included in “Rest of Europe”, with the largest being Brazil, South Africa, and China.
“Travel Retail” represents our sales to global duty free customers, travel retail customers, and the U.S. military.
“Other non-branded” includes used barrel, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling sales.
Brand Aggregations.
“Premium bourbon” products include Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Coopers’ Craft.
“American whiskey” products include the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, premium bourbons, and Early Times.
“Tequila” products include el Jimador, Herradura, New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.
In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2018 Year-to-Date Highlights”, we provide supplemental information for our largest brands ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2017 net sales. In addition to brands that are listed by name, we include the following aggregations:
“Jack Daniel’s family of brands” includes Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey (JDTH), Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP products (JD RTDs/RTP), Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF), Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye Whiskey, Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, and Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey.
“Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP” products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Cider (JD Cider), Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade (JD Lynchburg Lemonade), and the seasonal Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.
Other Metrics.
“Depletions.” When discussing volume, unless otherwise specified, we refer to “depletions,” a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry. Depending on the context, “depletions” means either (a) our shipments directly to retailers or wholesalers, or (b) shipments from our distributor customers to retailers and wholesalers. We generally record revenues when we ship our products to our customers, so our reported sales for a period do not reflect actual consumer purchases during that period. We believe that our depletions measure volume in a way that more closely reflects consumer demand than our shipments to distributor customers do.
“Drinks-equivalent.” Volume is discussed on a nine-liter equivalent unit basis (nine-liter cases) unless otherwise specified. At times, we use a “drinks-equivalent” measure for volume when comparing single-serve ready-to-drink (RTD) or ready-

20



to-pour (RTP) brands to a parent spirits brand. “Drinks-equivalent” depletions are RTD and RTP nine-liter cases converted to nine-liter cases of a parent brand on the basis of the number of drinks in one nine-liter case of the parent brand. To convert RTD volumes from a nine-liter case basis to a drinks-equivalent nine-liter case basis, RTD nine-liter case volumes are divided by 10, while RTP nine-liter case volumes are divided by 5.
“Consumer takeaway.” When discussing trends in the market, we refer to “consumer takeaway”, a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol industry. “Consumer takeaway” refers to the purchase of product by the consumer from the retail outlet as measured by volume or retail sales value. This information is provided by third-parties, such as Nielsen and the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA). Our estimates of market share or changes in market share are derived from consumer takeaway data using the retail sales value metric.

Important Information on Forward-Looking Statements:
This report contains statements, estimates, and projections that are “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “envision,” “estimate,” “expect,” “expectation,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “see,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” and similar words identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors (many beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience or from our current expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include those described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our 2017 Form 10-K and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including:
Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions, and related low consumer confidence, high unemployment, weak credit or capital markets, budget deficits, burdensome government debt, austerity measures, higher interest rates, higher taxes, political instability, higher inflation, deflation, lower returns on pension assets, or lower discount rates for pension obligations
Risks associated with being a U.S.-based company with global operations, including commercial, political, and financial risks; local labor policies and conditions; protectionist trade policies or economic or trade sanctions; compliance with local trade practices and other regulations, including anti-corruption laws; terrorism; and health pandemics
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly a stronger U.S. dollar
Changes in laws, regulations, or policies – especially those that affect the production, importation, marketing, labeling, pricing, distribution, sale, or consumption of our beverage alcohol products
Tax rate changes (including excise, sales, VAT, tariffs, duties, corporate, individual income, dividends, capital gains) or changes in related reserves, changes in tax rules (for example, LIFO, foreign income deferral, U.S. manufacturing, and other deductions) or accounting standards, and the unpredictability and suddenness with which they can occur
Dependence upon the continued growth of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands
Changes in consumer preferences, consumption, or purchase patterns – particularly away from larger producers in favor of smaller distilleries or local producers, or away from brown spirits, our premium products, or spirits generally, and our ability to anticipate or react to them; bar, restaurant, travel, or other on-premise declines; shifts in demographic trends; or unfavorable consumer reaction to new products, line extensions, package changes, product reformulations, or other product innovation
Decline in the social acceptability of beverage alcohol products in significant markets
Production facility, aging warehouse, or supply chain disruption
Imprecision in supply/demand forecasting
Higher costs, lower quality, or unavailability of energy, water, raw materials, product ingredients, labor, or finished goods
Route-to-consumer changes that affect the timing of our sales, temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of our products, or result in higher implementation-related or fixed costs
Inventory fluctuations in our products by distributors, wholesalers, or retailers
Competitors’ consolidation or other competitive activities, such as pricing actions (including price reductions, promotions, discounting, couponing, or free goods), marketing, category expansion, product introductions, or entry or expansion in our geographic markets or distribution networks
Risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions, business partnerships or investments – such as acquisition integration, termination difficulties or costs, or impairment in recorded value
Inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights
Product recalls or other product liability claims; product counterfeiting, tampering, contamination, or product quality issues
Significant legal disputes and proceedings; government investigations (particularly of industry or company business, trade or marketing practices)

21



Failure or breach of key information technology systems
Negative publicity related to our company, brands, marketing, personnel, operations, business performance, or prospects
Failure to attract or retain key executive or employee talent
Our status as a family “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules

22



Overview
Fiscal 2018 Year-to-Date Highlights
Key highlights of our operating results for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 include:
We delivered net sales of $2,515 million, an increase of 9% compared to the same period last year. Excluding (a) the positive effect of foreign exchange driven by the strengthening of the euro, Polish zloty, and British pound and (b) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States, we grew underlying net sales 7%.
From a brand perspective, our underlying net sales growth was driven by the Jack Daniel's family of brands, our premium bourbon brands, and our tequila brands.
From a geographic perspective, emerging markets led the growth in underlying net sales, the United States and developed international markets contributed meaningfully, and Travel Retail accelerated the rate of underlying net sales growth compared to the same period last year.
We delivered operating income of $894 million, an increase of 15% compared to the same period last year. Excluding the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, we grew underlying operating income 11%.
Our underlying operating income benefited from flat underlying SG&A spend, as well as underlying advertising expense growth of 5% compared to underlying net sales growth of 7%.
We delivered diluted earnings per share of $1.25, an increase of 17% compared to the same period last year due to an increase in reported operating income and a reduction in shares outstanding.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, which is discussed in more detail in “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Period Comparisons.” See Note 3 to the accompanying financial statements for additional information.
Summary of Operating Performance
 
Three months ended January 31,
 
Nine months ended January 31,
(Dollars in millions)
2017
 
2018
 
Reported Change
 
Underlying Change1
 
2017
 
2018
 
Reported Change
 
Underlying Change1
Net sales
$
808

 
$
878

 
9
%
 
6
%
 
$
2,299

 
$
2,515

 
9
%
 
7
%
Cost of sales
272

 
291

 
7
%
 
8
%
 
758

 
825

 
9
%
 
8
%
Gross profit
536

 
587

 
9
%
 
5
%
 
1,541

 
1,690

 
10
%
 
7
%
Advertising
102

 
114

 
11
%
 
6
%
 
291

 
314

 
8
%
 
5
%
SG&A
162

 
173

 
7
%
 
4
%
 
488

 
497

 
2
%
 
%
Other expense (income), net

(1
)
 
(4
)
 
153
%
 
30
%
 
(16
)
 
(15
)
 
(11
%)
 
6
%
Operating income
$
273

 
$
304

 
11
%
 
5
%
 
$
778

 
$
894

 
15
%
 
11
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses3
$
263

 
$
283

 
8
%
 
4
%
 
$
763

 
$
796

 
4
%
 
2
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As a percentage of net sales2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit
66.4
%
 
66.8
%
 
0.4
 pp
 
 
 
67.0
%
 
67.2
%
 
0.2
 pp
 
 
Operating expenses3
32.5
%
 
32.2
%
 
(0.3
)pp
 
 
 
33.2
%
 
31.7
%
 
(1.5
)pp
 
 
Operating income
33.8
%
 
34.6
%
 
0.8
 pp
 
 
 
33.8
%
 
35.5
%
 
1.7
 pp
 
 
Interest expense, net
$
15

 
15

 
%
 
 
 
$
42

 
45

 
7
%
 
 
Effective tax rate
29.4
%
 
34.4
%
 
5.0
 pp
 
 
 
28.7
%
 
28.5
%
 
(0.2
)pp
 
 
Diluted earnings per share
$
0.38

 
$
0.39

 
4
%
 
 
 
$
1.07

 
$
1.25

 
17
%
 
 
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying changes,” including how these measures are calculated and the reasons why we believe this information is useful to readers.
2Year-over-year changes in percentages are reported in percentage points (pp).
3See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for definitions of operating expenses presented here.

23



Fiscal 2018 Outlook
Below we discuss our outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2018, reflecting the trends, developments, and uncertainties that we expect to affect our business. This updated outlook revises certain aspects of the 2018 outlook included in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our 2017 Form 10-K.
Net sales. We expect underlying net sales growth in the remainder of fiscal 2018 to be generally in line with the growth in the nine months ended January 31, 2018.
Cost of sales. We expect total cost of sales to grow at a higher rate than net sales in the remainder of fiscal 2018. We expect underlying cost of sales growth from cost/mix to grow at a higher rate in the remainder of the year compared to 3% cost/mix growth for the nine months ended January 31, 2018.
Operating expenses. We expect total operating expenses to grow at a higher rate in the remainder of the fiscal year compared to the growth rate experienced in the nine months ended January 31, 2018. For the remainder of fiscal 2018, we expect (a) advertising expenses to grow at a higher rate than net sales growth and (b) underlying SG&A to grow compared to the flat spend for the nine months ended January 31, 2018.
Operating income. We expect slower growth rates for operating income in the remainder of fiscal 2018 compared to growth rates experienced in the nine months ended January 31, 2018.
Foreign exchange. For the nine months ended January 31, 2018, net sales and operating income were positively affected by foreign exchange and we expect that benefit to continue for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Estimated net change in distributor inventories. Our reported net sales and operating income benefited from an estimated net increase in distributor inventories during the nine months ended January 31, 2018. We expect that benefit to moderate slightly in the remainder of the fiscal year.
Effective tax rate. The provisional effect of the Tax Act was recorded in the third quarter. We expect our full year effective tax rate to be approximately 28% based on the tax rate of 26.1% on ordinary income for the full fiscal year adjusted for known discrete items.
Capital Deployment. As announced on January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors approved capital deployment actions aimed at benefiting shareholders, employees, and the community. These actions included a special dividend, additional contributions to our pension plan, and the creation of a $60-$70 million charitable foundation.

24



Results of Operations – Fiscal 2018 Year-to-Date Highlights
Market Highlights
The following table provides supplemental information for our largest markets for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to the same period last year. We discuss results for the markets most affecting our performance below the table. Unless otherwise indicated, all related commentary is for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to the same period last year.
Top 10 Markets1 - Fiscal 2018 Net Sales Growth by Geographic Area
 
Percentage change versus prior year period
Nine months ended January 31, 2018
Net Sales
Geographic area
Reported
Acquisitions & Divestitures
Foreign Exchange
Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories
 
Underlying2
United States
7
%
%
%
(2
%)

5
%
Europe
15
%
%
(6
%)
1
%

9
%
United Kingdom
10
%
%
(3
%)
%

6
%
Germany
16
%
%
(5
%)
%

11
%
France
10
%
%
(5
%)
%

5
%
Poland
25
%
%
(15
%)
%

10
%
Russia
62
%
%
(4
%)
(22
%)

37
%
Rest of Europe
12
%
%
(6
%)
3
%

9
%
Australia
10
%
1
%
(2
%)
%

10
%
Other geographies
8
%
%
(1
%)
1
%

9
%
Mexico
13
%
%
(3
%)
1
%

10
%
Japan
(13
%)
%
2
%
4
%

(7
%)
Canada
4
%
%
1
%
(2
%)

2
%
Remaining geographies3
11
%
%
%
2
%

12
%
Travel Retail3
17
%
%
1
%
(7
%)

11
%
Other non-branded3
(2
%)
15
%
%
%

13
%
Total
9
%
%
(2
%)
(1
%)

7
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1“Top 10 markets” are ranked based on percentage of total fiscal 2017 net sales. See 2017 Form 10-K “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2017 Market Highlights” and “Note 15. Supplemental Information.”
2See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how this measure is calculated and the reasons why we believe this information is useful to readers.
3See “Definitions” above for definitions of market aggregations presented here.

United States. Reported net sales grew 7%, while underlying net sales increased 5% after adjusting for an estimated net increase in distributor inventories driven in part by the launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye. Underlying net sales gains were driven primarily by the growth of (a) the Jack Daniel’s family of brands; (b) our premium bourbons; and (c) our tequila brands, led by Herradura and el Jimador.
Europe. Reported net sales increased 15%, while underlying net sales grew 9% after adjusting for (a) the positive effect of foreign exchange reflecting the broad weakening of the dollar compared to the same period last year and (b) an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories in Spain, partially offset by an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in Russia. Underlying net sales gains were led by Russia, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Poland.
In the United Kingdom, underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes of JDTW and JD RTDs, the latter of which was fueled by the launch of JD Cider.
In Germany, underlying net sales growth was driven by solid growth of JD RTDs, which included the launch of JD Lynchburg Lemonade, and volumetric growth and favorable price/mix of JDTW.

25



In France, underlying net sales growth was led by JDTW and JDTH, as both experienced higher consumer takeaway compared to the total whiskey category in that market.
In Poland, underlying net sales growth was fueled by volume gains of JDTW, which has experienced strong consumer takeaway trends.
In Russia, underlying net sales growth was driven by a buy-in ahead of an upcoming distributor change as well as higher pricing and volumetric growth of Finlandia. The higher price of Finlandia is partly attributed to import duties resulting from a change in our route-to-consumer.
The increase in underlying net sales in the Rest of Europe was led by Turkey, Ukraine, and Spain. Trends improved for JDTW in Turkey, where our results in the same period last year were negatively affected by geopolitical and economic instability. In Ukraine, growth was led by Finlandia and JDTW. In Spain, JDTW grew volumes along with favorable price/mix, where our new owned-distribution organization has led to recent acceleration in performance.
Australia. Reported net sales increased 10%, while underlying net sales also increased 10% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and the loss of net sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca. Underlying net sales growth was driven by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands due to price increases, a shift in product mix to higher margin RTD brands, and higher volumes of JD RTDs and JDTW.
Other geographies. Reported net sales for our other markets collectively increased 8%, while underlying net sales increased 9% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by continued strong results in Mexico as well as the return to growth of Brazil, China, and Southeast Asia after declines in the same period last year. These gains were partially offset by volume declines in Japan.
Travel Retail. Reported net sales increased 17%, while underlying net sales increased 11% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by higher volumes of JDTW, Woodford Reserve, Gentleman Jack, and JDTH.
Other non-branded. Reported net sales decreased 2%, while underlying net sales increased 13% after adjusting for the net effect of our Scotch acquisition and the loss of net sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca. The underlying net sales growth was driven by higher volumes of used barrel sales, which benefited from increased demand in the current period as well as an easy comparison to a weak prior-year period.

26



Brand Highlights
The following table highlights the worldwide results of our largest brands for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to the same period last year. We discuss results of the brands most affecting our performance below the table. Unless otherwise indicated, all related commentary is for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to the same period last year.
Major Brands Worldwide Results
 
Percentage change versus prior year period
Nine months ended January 31, 2018
Volumes
 
Net Sales
Brand family / brand
9L Depletions2
 
Reported
Foreign Exchange
Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories
 
Underlying1
Jack Daniel’s Family
8
%
 
10
%
(2
%)
(1
%)
 
7
%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey
6
%
 
7
%
(2
%)
%
 
5
%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey
9
%
 
11
%
(2
%)
%
 
9
%
Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP2
11
%
 
17
%
(3
%)
%
 
14
%
Gentleman Jack
9
%
 
11
%
(1
%)
(1
%)
 
9
%
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire
14
%
 
22
%
(1
%)
(6
%)
 
15
%
Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands2
22
%
 
29
%
(1
%)
(14
%)
 
14
%
Woodford Reserve
23
%
 
25
%
%
(3
%)
 
22
%
Finlandia
3
%
 
14
%
(6
%)
(1
%)
 
7
%
el Jimador
7
%
 
13
%
%
(4
%)
 
9
%
Herradura
15
%
 
19
%
(2
%)
2
%
 
20
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how this measure is calculated and the reasons why we believe this information is useful to readers.
2See “Definitions” above for definitions of brand aggregations and volume measures presented here.

Jack Daniel’s family of brands grew reported net sales 10%, while underlying net sales grew 7%, and was the most significant contributor to our overall underlying net sales growth. Reported net sales were helped by foreign exchange due to the weakening of the dollar against the euro, British pound, and Polish zloty and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The following are details about the underlying performance of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands:
JDTW grew underlying net sales in the majority of its markets including the United Kingdom, the United States, Poland, Travel Retail, Brazil, Turkey, Germany, Australia, and France.
JDTH grew underlying net sales led by the United States, its largest market, Russia, France, and Travel Retail.
The increase in underlying net sales growth for Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP was driven primarily by Australia, Germany, and the United States, with all of these markets benefiting from new RTD line extensions.
Gentleman Jack grew underlying net sales led by volumetric gains in the United States, its largest market, and Travel Retail.
Growth of JDTF was driven by higher volumes in the United States and Germany and the launch of the brand in Brazil and Chile.
The launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye in September of this fiscal year in the United States was the primary driver of underlying net sales growth for Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands.
Woodford Reserve led the growth of our premium bourbons as the brand’s reported net sales increased 25% and underlying net sales grew 22%. This growth was driven by the United States, where the brand continued to grow volumetrically with strong consumer takeaway trends. Reported net sales were also helped by an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States and Travel Retail.
Reported net sales for Finlandia grew 14%, while underlying net sales increased 7% led by higher price and volumetric growth in Russia. The higher price in Russia is partly attributed to import duties resulting from a change in

27



our route-to-consumer. Reported net sales were helped by foreign exchange due to the weakening of the dollar against the Polish zloty and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in Russia.
Reported net sales for el Jimador increased 13%, while underlying net sales increased 9% driven by volume gains in the United States supported by strong consumer takeaway trends. Reported net sales were helped by an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States.
Herradura grew reported net sales 19%, while underlying net sales increased 20% driven by higher volumes and favorable price/mix in the brand’s largest markets, Mexico and the United States, the former of which benefited from volumetric growth of Herradura Ultra. Reported net sales were hurt by an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories in the United States, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange.


28



Year-over-Year Period Comparisons
Net Sales
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended January 31
3 Months
 
9 Months
Change in reported net sales
9
%
 
9
%
Acquisitions and divestitures
%
 
%
Foreign exchange
(4
%)
 
(2
%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories
1
%
 
(1
%)
Change in underlying net sales
6
%
 
7
%
 
 
 
 
Change in underlying net sales attributed to:
 
 
 
Volume
3
%
 
5
%
Net price/mix
3
%
 
2
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
For the three months ended January 31, 2018, net sales were $878 million, an increase of $70 million, or 9%, compared to the same period last year. After adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories, underlying net sales grew 6%. The change in underlying net sales was driven by 3% volume growth and 3% of price/mix. Volume growth was led by the Jack Daniel’s family, tequilas, and premium bourbons. Price/mix was driven by (a) an increase in share of sales from higher priced brands, most notably the Jack Daniel’s family and Woodford Reserve, and (b) higher average pricing on the Jack Daniel’s family.
The primary factors contributing to the growth in underlying net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2018 were:
volumetric growth of JDTW in several international markets, most notably, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Travel Retail, Australia, Poland, Germany, Japan, France, and Spain;
growth of brands in our American whiskey portfolio in the United States led by Woodford Reserve, Gentleman Jack, the launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye, JDTF, JDTH, and Old Forester;
our tequila brands, led by (a) volumetric growth and favorable price/mix of Herradura in Mexico and the United States and (b) higher prices and volume gains of New Mix in Mexico;
higher volume of JD RTDs led by Germany, Australia, Mexico, and China as well as higher pricing in Australia;
growth of Finlandia in Europe led by Russia;
increased volumes of JDTH in several international markets, most notably Brazil and Travel Retail, and the launch of JDTF in Brazil and Chile;
higher volume of used barrel sales; and
volumetric growth of Woodford Reserve in Travel Retail.
These gains in underlying net sales were partially offset by:
volume declines of Korbel Champagne in the United States;
volume declines of JDTW in the United States, partially offset by favorable price/mix;
declines in our contract bottling operations; and
declines of Chambord in the United Kingdom.
For the nine months ended January 31, 2018, net sales were $2,515 million, an increase of $216 million, or 9%, compared to the same period last year. After adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, underlying net sales grew 7%. The change in underlying net sales was driven by 5% volume growth and 2% of price/mix. Volume growth was led by the Jack Daniel's family, tequilas, and premium bourbons. Price/mix was driven by (a) an increase in share of sales from higher priced brands, most notably the Jack Daniel's family and Woodford Reserve, and (b) higher average pricing on tequilas.
The primary factors contributing to the growth in underlying net sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 were:
volumetric growth of JDTW in several international markets, most notably, the United Kingdom, Poland, Travel Retail, Brazil, Turkey, Germany, Australia, and France;
growth of our American whiskey portfolio in the United States, led by the Jack Daniel’s family, Woodford Reserve, and Old Forester;

29



our tequila brands, led by (a) volumetric growth and favorable price/mix of Herradura in Mexico and the United States, (b) higher prices and volume gains of New Mix in Mexico, and (c) volume growth of el Jimador in the United States;
higher volume of JD RTDs, led by Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom, all of which benefited from new RTD line extensions;
higher price and volume growth of Finlandia in Russia;
higher volume of used barrel sales; and
increased volumes of JDTH in several international markets, most notably Russia, France, and Travel Retail.
These gains in underlying net sales were partially offset by volume declines of Korbel Champagne in the United States.
Cost of Sales
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended January 31
3 Months
 
9 Months
Change in reported cost of sales
7
%
 
9
%
Acquisitions and divestitures
%
 
2
%
Foreign exchange
%
 
(2
%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories
1
%
 
(1
%)
Change in underlying cost of sales
8
%
 
8
%
 
 
 
 
Change in underlying cost of sales attributed to:
 
 
 
Volume
3
%
 
5
%
Cost/mix
5
%
 
3
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

 
 
 
Cost of sales for the three months ended January 31, 2018 increased $19 million, or 7%, to $291 million when compared to the same period last year. Underlying cost of sales increased 8% after adjusting reported costs for an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying cost of sales for three months ended January 31, 2018 was driven by higher input costs including wood, higher volumes, and incremental value-added packaging, partially offset by a shift in product mix to lower-cost brands.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 increased $67 million, or 9%, to $825 million when compared to the same period last year. Underlying cost of sales increased 8% after adjusting reported costs for (a) the net effect of our Scotch acquisition and the loss of net sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying cost of sales for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 was driven by higher volumes, higher input costs including wood, and incremental value-added packaging. Looking ahead to the remainder of fiscal 2018, we expect that cost/mix will increase in the mid-single digits.
Gross Profit
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended January 31
3 Months
 
9 Months
Change in reported gross profit
9
%
 
10
%
Acquisitions and divestitures
%
 
%
Foreign exchange
(5
%)
 
(2
%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories
1
%
 
(1
%)
Change in underlying gross profit
5
%
 
7
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 

30



Gross Margin
For the period ended January 31
3 months
 
9 Months
Prior year gross margin
66.4
%
 
67.0
%
Price/mix
0.7
%
 
0.8
%
Cost
(1.5
%)
 
(0.9
%)
Acquisitions and divestitures
%
 
0.3
%
Foreign exchange
1.2
%
 
%
Change in gross margin
0.4
%
 
0.2
%
Current year gross margin
66.8
%
 
67.2
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
Gross profit of $587 million increased $51 million, or 9%, for the three months ended January 31, 2018. Underlying gross profit grew 5% after adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying gross profit resulted from the same factors that contributed to the increase in underlying net sales and the increase in underlying cost of sales.
For the three months ended January 31, 2018, gross margin increased approximately 0.4 percentage points to 66.8%, from 66.4% in the same period last year driven by the positive effect of foreign exchange and favorable price/mix, partially offset by an increase in underlying cost of sales.
Gross profit of $1,690 million increased $149 million, or 10%, for the nine months ended January 31, 2018. Underlying gross profit grew 7% after adjusting reported results for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying gross profit resulted from the same factors that contributed to the increase in underlying net sales and the increase in underlying cost of sales.
For the nine months ended January 31, 2018, gross margin increased approximately 0.2 percentage points to 67.2%, from 67.0% in the same period last year driven by favorable price/mix and the loss of lower margin net sales related to our TSA for Southern Comfort and Tuaca, partially offset by an increase in underlying cost of sales.

Operating Expenses
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended January 31
3 Months
Reported
Acquisitions & Divestitures
Foreign Exchange
 
Underlying
Advertising
11
%
%
(5
%)
 
6
%
SG&A
7
%
%
(3
%)
 
4
%
Other expense (income), net
153
%
%
(123
%)
 
30
%
Total
8
%
%
(3
%)
 
4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 Months
 
 
 
 
 
Advertising
8
%
%
(2
%)
 
5
%
SG&A
2
%
%
(1
%)
 
%
Other expense (income), net
(11
%)
(8
%)
25
%
 
6
%
Total
4
%
%
(2
%)
 
2
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses totaled $283 million and increased $20 million, or 8%, for the three months ended January 31, 2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating expenses grew 4% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange.
Reported advertising expenses grew 11% for the three months ended January 31, 2018, while underlying advertising expenses grew 6% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. The increase in the underlying expense was driven by continued investment in the Jack Daniel’s family, including the launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye, and our premium bourbon brands, most notably Woodford Reserve.

31



Reported SG&A expenses grew 7% for the three months ended January 31, 2018, while underlying SG&A grew 4% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. The increase in underlying SG&A was driven by higher incentive compensation related expenses, partially offset by continued tight management of discretionary spending.
For the three months ended January 31, 2018, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales declined 0.3 percentage points to 32.2%, from 32.5% in the same period last year. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales declined as combined underlying operating expenses grew at a slower rate than underlying net sales.
Operating expenses totaled $796 million and increased $33 million, or 4%, for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating expenses grew 2% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange.
Reported advertising expenses grew 8% for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, while underlying advertising expenses grew 5% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. Underlying advertising expense increased as we supported the launch of Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye and Slane Irish Whiskey, and continued investing in (a) the Jack Daniel's family, (b) our premium bourbon brands, and (c) our tequila brands, most notably Herradura.
Reported SG&A expenses increased 2% for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, while underlying SG&A expenses were flat after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange. Underlying SG&A expenses were driven by lower pension expense and continued tight management of discretionary spending, offset by higher incentive compensation related expenses and personnel costs, driven in part by investments in our new Spain distribution operation.
For the nine months ended January 31, 2018, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales declined 1.5 percentage points to 31.7%, from 33.2% in the same period last year. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net sales declined as combined underlying operating expenses grew at a slower rate than underlying net sales driven by flat year-over-year SG&A spend.
Operating Income
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended January 31
3 Months
 
9 Months
Change in reported operating income
11
%
 
15
%
Acquisitions and divestitures
%
 
%
Foreign exchange
(7
%)
 
(1
%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories
2
%
 
(2
%)
Change in underlying operating income
5
%
 
11
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
Operating income of $304 million increased $31 million, or 11%, for the three months ended January 31, 2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating income grew 5% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. The same factors that contributed to the growth in underlying gross profit also contributed to the growth in underlying operating income, while an increase in total underlying operating expenses partially offset these gains.
For the three months ended January 31, 2018, operating margin increased 0.8 percentage points to 34.6%, from 33.8% in the same period last year. The increase in our operating margin was driven by foreign exchange and operating expense leverage as combined operating expenses grew at a slower rate than underlying net sales.
Operating income of $894 million increased $116 million, or 15%, for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating income grew 11% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The same factors that contributed to the growth in underlying gross profit also contributed to the growth in underlying operating income, while an increase in total underlying operating expenses partially offset these gains.
Operating margin increased 1.7 percentage points to 35.5% for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 from 33.8% in the same period last year. The increase in our operating margin was driven by operating expense leverage as underlying SG&A spend was flat year-over-year and underlying advertising expenses grew 5% compared to underlying net sales growth of 7%.


32



Effective Tax Rate
For the period ended January 31
3 Months
 
9 Months
Prior year effective tax rate
 
29.4
%
 
 
28.7
%
Change in effective tax rate - before impact of Tax Act
 
(2.9
%)
 
 
(2.9
%)
Tax Act
 
 
 
 
 
Repatriation tax on overseas earnings
$
91

 
 
$
91

 
Re-measurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities
(48
)
 
 
(48
)
 
Net tax rate reduction
(20
)
 
 
(20
)
 
Total Tax Act effect
$
23

7.9
%
 
$
23

2.7
%
Current year effective tax rate


34.4
%
 


28.5
%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
 
 
 
 
 
The effective tax rate in the three months ended January 31, 2018 was 34.4% compared to 29.4% for the same period last year. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily driven by the net impact of the Tax Act, partially offset by an increase in the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation.
The effective tax rate in the nine months ended January 31, 2018 was 28.5% compared to 28.7% for the same period last year. The decrease in our effective tax rate was primarily driven by a decrease in foreign exchange gains in non-U.S. entities that are currently subject to U.S. tax and an increase in excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, partially offset by the net impact of the Tax Act.
Diluted earnings per share of $0.39 in the three months ended January 31, 2018 increased 4% from the $0.38 reported for the same period last year. The increase in diluted earnings per share for the three months ended January 31, 2018 resulted from an increase in reported operating income, offset by the negative effect of a higher effective tax rate. Diluted earnings per share of $1.25 in the nine months ended January 31, 2018 increased 17% from the $1.07 reported for the same period last year. The increase in diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended January 31, 2018 resulted from an increase in reported operating income and a reduction in shares outstanding.

Liquidity and Financial Condition
Cash flows. Cash and cash equivalents increased $105 million during the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to a decrease of $66 million during the same period last year. Cash provided by operations of $562 million was up $117 million from the same period last year, reflecting higher earnings and a lower seasonal increase in working capital. Cash used for investing activities was $101 million during the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to $380 million for the same period last year. The $279 million decrease largely reflects $307 million in cash paid to acquire BenRiach in June 2016, partially offset by a $29 million increase in capital spending during the current nine-month period. The increase in capital spending is largely attributable to the construction of new distilleries and homeplaces for both Slane Irish Whiskey and Old Forester and to the modernization and automation of our Brown-Forman Cooperage operation.
Cash used for financing activities was $380 million during the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to $111 million for the same period last year. The $269 million increase largely reflects a $717 million decrease in proceeds from long-term debt issuance and the repayment of $250 million of notes that matured in January 2018, partially offset by a $560 million decline in share repurchases and a $135 million increase in net proceeds from short-term borrowings.

The impact on cash and cash equivalents as a result of exchange rate changes was an increase of $24 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2018, compared to a decline of $20 million for the same period last year.
Liquidity. We continue to manage liquidity conservatively to meet current obligations, fund capital expenditures, sustain and grow our dividends, and repurchase shares from time to time while reserving adequate debt capacity for acquisition opportunities.
In addition to our cash and cash equivalent balances, we have access to several liquidity sources to supplement our cash flow from operations. One of those sources is our $800 million commercial paper program that we regularly use to fund our short-term credit needs and to maintain our access to the capital markets. During the three months ended January 31, 2018, our commercial paper borrowings averaged $536 million, with an average maturity of 35 days and an average interest rate of 1.43%. During the nine months ended January 31, 2018, our commercial paper borrowings averaged $508 million, with an average maturity of 31 days and an average interest rate of 1.31%. Commercial paper outstanding was $208 million at April 30, 2017, and $320 million at January 31, 2018.

33



On November 10, 2017, we entered an amended and restated five-year credit agreement with various U.S. and international banks. The credit agreement provides an $800 million unsecured revolving credit commitment that expires on November 10, 2022. This agreement amended and restated our previous credit agreement dated November 18, 2011. The new agreement does not contain any financial covenants.
The $800 million revolving credit facility is currently undrawn and supports our commercial paper program. Although unlikely, under extreme market conditions, one or more participating banks may not be able to fully fund its commitments under our credit facility. The debt capital markets for bonds and private placements are accessible sources of long-term financing that could meet any additional liquidity needs. We believe our current liquidity position is sufficient to meet all of our future financial commitments. We have high credit standards when initiating transactions with counterparties, and we closely monitor our counterparty risks with respect to our cash balances and derivative contracts. If a counterparty’s credit quality were to deteriorate below our credit standards, we would expect either to liquidate exposures or require the counterparty to post appropriate collateral.

As of January 31, 2018, approximately 78% of our cash and cash equivalents were held by our foreign subsidiaries whose earnings we expect to reinvest indefinitely outside of the United States. With the enactment of the Tax Act, we are evaluating our global working capital requirements and may change our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.

As announced on January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors has approved a number of capital deployment actions aimed at benefiting shareholders, employees, and the community. As further described below, these actions include a stock split and a special dividend. Additionally, U.S. tax reform afforded us an opportunity to tax-efficiently fund our pension plan and charitable giving programs that would have otherwise been funded in future years. We anticipate funding these actions with incremental debt.

The stock split was effected in the form of a dividend on both Class A and Class B common stock, payable in shares of Class B common stock. For every four shares of either Class A or Class B common stock held, shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 7, 2018, received one share of Class B common stock, with any fractional shares payable in cash. The additional shares and cash for fractional shares were distributed to stockholders on February 28, 2018.

In addition, the Board declared a special cash dividend of $1.00 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock. Stockholders of record on April 2, 2018, will receive the special cash dividend on April 23, 2018. This equates to roughly $480 million after the implementation of the stock split.

The Board also approved additional funding of $120 million for our pension plan, further strengthening an important employee retirement benefit. Further, with the goal of helping to fund our ongoing philanthropic endeavors in the communities where our employees live and work, we intend to create a foundation with a contribution of $60-$70 million in our fourth quarter. The charitable foundation is expected to partially reduce ongoing expenses related to our annual giving programs.

As also announced on January 23, 2018, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.158 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock, which took into account the five-for-four stock split. Stockholders of record on March 5, 2018 will receive the quarterly cash dividend on April 2, 2018.
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks arising from adverse changes in (a) foreign exchange rates, (b) commodity prices affecting the cost of our raw materials and energy, and (c) interest rates. We try to manage risk through a variety of strategies, including production initiatives and hedging strategies. Our foreign currency hedging contracts are subject to changes in exchange rates, our commodity forward purchase contracts are subject to changes in commodity prices, and some of our debt obligations are subject to changes in interest rates. Established procedures and internal processes govern the management of these market risks. Since April 30, 2017, there have been no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our 2017 Form 10-K.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) (our principal executive and principal financial officers), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the

34



company in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


35




PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We operate in a litigious environment and we are sued in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate that any currently pending suits will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2017 Form 10-K, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our 2017 Form 10-K.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 
None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information
None.

Item 6.  Exhibits
The following documents are filed with this Report:
10.1
 
31.1
 
31.2
 
32
 
101
 
The following materials from Brown-Forman Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (a) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (c) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (e) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



36




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 
 
BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
Date:
March 7, 2018
By:
/s/ Jane C. Morreau
 
 
 
Jane C. Morreau
 
 
 
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(On behalf of the Registrant and
as Principal Financial Officer)

37