UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

Commission File Number 000-52831

(949) 341-1834

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x YES    o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x YES    o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) o YES    x NO

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

507,669,616 common shares issued and outstanding as of February 20, 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Nate’s Food Co.

Condensed Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements

Nate’s Food Co.

Condensed Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements

Nate’s Food Co.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements

NATE’S FOOD CO.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Nate’s Food Co. (“we”, “us”, “our”, the "Company" or the "Registrant") was incorporated in the state of Colorado on January 12, 2000. Nate’s Food Co. is domiciled in the state of Colorado, and its corporate headquarters are located in Huntington Beach, California. The Company selected May 31 as its fiscal year end. On May 12, 2014, Nate’s Pancakes Inc. was incorporated in the state of Indiana. On May 19, 2014, the Company completed a reverse merger between Nate’s Pancakes, Inc and Capital Resource Alliance. Nate’s Pancakes was the surviving Company. In May 2014, the Company changed its name from Capital Resource Alliance to Nate’s Food Co.

We sell a ready-to-use, pre-mixed pancake and waffle batter delivered in a pressurized can. Our current product is an original flavor of pancake and waffle batter. We are currently in the process of developing additional flavors and products with the goal to have 10 products in development in 2017. Currently, we have developed three flavors for our pancake and waffle mix. We plan to continue to expand into other baked goods and other non-breakfast areas.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's annual report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K, on December 22, 2017. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year 2017 as reported in Form 10-K, have been omitted.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. A change in managements’ estimates or assumptions could have a material impact on Nate’s Food Co. financial condition and results of operations during the period in which such changes occurred. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Nate’s Food Co.’s financial statements reflect all adjustments that management believes are necessary for the fair presentation of their financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accrued expenses, convertible notes and notes payable. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments.

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC Topic 820"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on an exit price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the nature of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.

The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements is defined as follows:

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at August 31, 2017, and May 31, 2017, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Note 2 – Going Concern

The Company's financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has negative working capital, recurring losses from operations, and does not have an established source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plan described in the preceding paragraph and eventually attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

In the coming year, the Company’s foreseeable cash requirements will relate to continual development of the operations of its business, maintaining its good standing and making the requisite filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the payment of expenses associated with operations and business developments. The Company may experience a cash shortfall and be required to raise additional capital.

Historically, it has mostly relied upon internally generated funds such as shareholder loans and advances to finance its operations and growth. Management may raise additional capital by retaining net earnings or through future public or private offerings of the Company’s stock or through loans from private investors, although there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain such financing. The Company’s failure to do so could have a material and adverse effect upon it and its shareholders.

Note 3 – Related Party Transactions

Notes Payable – Related Parties

During the three months ended August 31, 2017, the Company converted an existing accounts payable to our officer of $2,929 to a note payable. As at August 31, 2017, the total amount owed to this officer was $202,357. Of this amount, $57,500 of the loan is at 10% interest and was to be repaid by June 28, 2017 and currently is in default. $71,902 of the loan is at 10% interest, and $72,955 of the loan is at 0% interest. Both of the loans were to be repaid by December 31, 2016 and are currently in default.

Note 4 – Convertible Debt

The Company had the following convertible notes payable outstanding as of August 31, 2017 and May 31, 2017:

Typenex Co

On July 24, 2015, the Company received financing in the amount of $93,000 from Typenex Co-Investment, LLC with $13,000 cash discount to the lender and incurred $8,000 in financing costs to third parties. The deferred financing cost is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method. The $93,000 bears an 8% interest rate and matured in nine months. The holder shall be entitled to convert any portion of the outstanding and unpaid conversion amount in to fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. Conversion price is 50% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for the 15 previous consecutive trading days prior to the payment date. The Company may prepay the note at any time at an amount equal to 120% of the outstanding principal and the accrued and unpaid interest. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 5 for details) and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method. On July 8, 2016, the Company made a payment of 50% of the balance then due in the amount of $57,000. The payment of $57,000 was applied to an interest penalty and accrued interest. The Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with Typenex regarding conversion of the balance of $57,000 debt into shares of common stock at an agreed upon discount and frequency of conversions. During the three months ended August 31, 2017, 27,575,932 shares of common stock were issued based on the True-Up conversion. We accounted for the issuance of the common stock as a derivative.

JSJ Investments

On October 13, 2016, the Company received financing in the amount of $85,500 from JSJ Investments with $5,000 original issue discount and incurred $8,000 in financing costs. The original issue discount and financing costs are being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method. The $85,500 bears 10% interest and matured on July 13, 2017. The note is currently in default. The holder shall be entitled to convert any portion of the outstanding and unpaid conversion amount in to fully paid and non-assessable shares of common Stock. The conversion price is the 45% discount to the lowest traded price during the previous 20 trading days to the date of a conversion notice. The Company may redeem the note at rates ranging from 125% to 150% depending on the redemption date. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 5 for details) and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method. The Company amortized discount and financing costs of $11,539 for the three months ended August 31, 2017. During the three months ended May 31, 2017, the note of $36,440 was converted into 98,887,236 shares of common stock. During the three months ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $1,963 and $0.

Note 5– Derivative Liability

The Company analyzed the conversion options for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and determined that the instrument should be classified as a liability when the conversion option becomes effective and there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options.

The following table summarizes the derivative liabilities included in the balance sheet at August 31, 2017:

The following table summarizes the gain/loss on derivative liability included in the income statement for the periods ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The table below shows the Black-Scholes option-pricing model inputs used by the Company to value the derivative liability, as well as the determined value of the option liability at each measurement date:

Note 6 – Equity Transactions

Preferred Stock

Series A Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 2,000,000 shares of series A Preferred Stock at a par value of $0.0001. The Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to 1,000 votes for each 1 share of common stock owned.

There were no issuances of the Series A Preferred Stock during the three months ended August 31, 2017.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 150,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at a par value of $0.0001. The Series B Preferred converts into Common Stock at a ratio of 1:1,000. However, the Series B may not be converted for a period of 12 months.

There were no issuances of the Series B Preferred Stock during the three months ended August 31, 2017.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 250,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a par value of $1. The Preferred Stock can be converted to common stock, at a conversion rate of 66 common shares for each preferred share owned. The Company evaluated the conversion feature and concluded that it did not qualify as a derivative transaction. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ACS 470-20-30 and determined it does not contain a beneficial conversion feature.

There were no issuances of the Series C Preferred Stock during the three months ended August 31, 2017.

Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

On June 13, 2016, pursuant to its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the Board of Directors of the Company, unanimously approved the designation of a new series of preferred stock, "Series D Convertible Preferred Stock.

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a par value of $0.0001.

Beginning January 1, 2017, each holder of shares of Series D Preferred Stock may, at any time and from time to time, convert each of its shares of Series D Preferred Stock into a 15 fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock. Beginning January 1, 2018, the Company may convert shares of Series D Preferred Stock at any time and from time to time, each of its shares of Series D Preferred Stock into 15 of fully paid and nonassessable shares of common stock.

There were no issuances of the Series D Preferred Stock during the three months ended August 31, 2017.

Series E Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 15,000,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock at a par value of $0.0001. Beginning October 1, 2016, each share of Series E Preferred Stock is convertible into ten (10) shares of common stock. From October 1, 2016 to October 1, 2018, holders of Series E Preferred Stock may at any time convert to shares of common stock, thereafter, the Company may elect to convert any outstanding stock at any time without notice to the shareholders. The Company evaluated the conversion feature and concluded that it did not qualify as a derivative transaction. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ACS 470-20-30 and determined it does not contain a beneficial conversion feature.

There were no issuances of the Series E Preferred Stock during the three months ended August 31, 2017.

Common stock

During the three months ended August 31, 2017, the Company issued 126,463,168 common shares for the conversion of debt and accrued interest of $36,440.

As of August 31, 2017 and May 31, 2017, 507,669,616 and 381,206,448 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.

Warrants

On September 29, 2015, the Company granted 1,000,000 warrants to Vista Capital Investments, LLC, in exchange for interest owed of $12,222, and recognized a loss on debt settlement of $16,778. Warrants were originally exercisable into 1,000,000 shares of common stock, for a period of five years from issuance, at a price of $0.05 per share, with multiple reset provisions when the share price is below $0.05. As a result of these reset features, additional warrants were issued and became exercisable into 36,933,026 shares of common stock at $0.00028 per share. Each warrant is exercisable into one share of common stock.

The following table summarizes information relating to outstanding and exercisable warrants as of August 31, 2017:

The following table summarizes warrant activity for the three months ended August 31, 2017:

Aggregate intrinsic value is the sum of the amounts by which the quoted market price of the Company's stock exceeded the exercise price of the stock options at August 31, 2017, for those stock options for which the quoted market price was in excess of the exercise price ("in-the-money options"). As of August 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was approximately $26,776 based on the closing market price of $0.001 on August 31, 2017.

Note 7 – Subsequent Events

On December 22, 2017, the board of directors approved the issuance of Preferred Stock to four officers as compensation of $15,000 per officer as follows,

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained herein involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

General Overview

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado on January 12, 2000, under the name Capital Resources Alliance, Inc. At inception, we were a development stage company in the business of mining and exploration. On May 19, 2014 our company completed a reverse merger with Nate’s Pancakes, Inc., an Indiana company, with Nate’s Pancakes being the surviving entity. In May 2014, we changed our name from Capital Resource Alliance, Inc. to Nate’s Food Co.

In connection with the reverse merger, we became a food manufacturing and product company, and in May 2014, we executed a licensing agreement with Nate’s Pancakes to market and sell “Nate’s Homemade”, exclusively throughout the world.

Our Current Business

We are a food manufacturing and product company that manufactures, distributes and sells ready-to-use, pre-mixed pancake and waffle batter. We hold a 20 year worldwide exclusive license agreement for Nate’s Homemade.

On August 23, 2016, we entered in to an arrangement with one of California’s largest aerosol producers to begin pilot production runs of Nate’s Homemade Pancake and Waffle Batter in order to start supplying Southern California grocery stores. This will enable our company to expand our current online sales activity to include distribution to regional grocery chains without impacting our ongoing development activities with ABCO Laboratories Inc. in Northern California.

On December 8, 2016, we met with the senior buyer for Bristol Farms grocery stores. Bristol Farms will become our 1^st retail grocery store customer. Bristol Farms is an independent grocery store chain in California focused on marketing to an affluent customer base. We have provided Bristol Farms everything required to complete the vendor certification process. The buyer is preparing purchase orders for delivery of Nate’s Homemade Pancake and Waffle Batter to begin after February 1, 2017. We are currently setting up a schedule for in-store demonstrations at Bristol Farms stores in order to introduce customers to the great taste, convenience and simplicity of our product.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended August 31, 2017 Compared to the Three Months Ended August 31, 2016

Revenue

Our company generated $1,942 in revenue with a gross profit of $1,670 or 86%, for the three months ended August 31, 2017 as compared to $2,734 in revenue with a gross profit of $2,734, or 100%, for the three months ended August 31, 2016.

Operating Expenses

During the period ended August 31, 2017, we incurred general and administrative expenses of $4,129 compared to $38,794 incurred during the period ended August 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in license fee and professional fee. During the period ended August 31, 2017, we incurred depreciation of $0 compared to $9,880 incurred during the period ended August 31, 2016. The Company impaired equipment in fiscal year 2017.

Other (income) expense

During the period ended August 31, 2017, we incurred loss on derivatives of $273,503 compared to $1,668,865 in gain on derivative during the period ended August 31, 2016. During the period ended August 31, 2016 the Company recorded gain on derivative due to the repayment of convertible notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

Cash Flows

As of August 31, 2017, our company had $1,564 in cash. In management’s opinion, our company’s cash position is insufficient to maintain our operations at the current level for the next 12 months. Any expansion may cause our company to require additional capital until such expansion begins generating revenue. It is anticipated that the raising of additional funds will principally be through the sales of our securities.

As of August 31, 2017, our total current liabilities were $613,228 which primarily consisted of $202,357 in notes payable – related parties, $194,884 in derivative liability, $179,169 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $36,818 in convertible notes as compared to May 31, 2017, with total current liabilities of $525,698 which primarily consisted of $90,986 in derivative liability, $199,428 in notes payable - related parties, $173,565 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $61,719 in convertible notes.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $837 for the three months ended August 31, 2017 compared with net cash used in operating activities of $143,654 in the same period in 2016.

Investing Activities

During the three months ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, our company did not have any investing activities.

Financing Activities

Net cash from financing activities was $0 for the three months ended August 31, 2017 compared to $145,125 provided from financing activities in the same period in 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact on our business operations and any associated risks related to these policies are discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported or expected financial results.

In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

The material estimates for our company are that of derivative liabilities and income tax valuation allowance recorded for deferred tax assets. We recorded stock-based compensation for options and warrants issued and the fair value of embedded conversion options that are convertible into a variable amount of shares. The fair values of options, warrants, and embedded conversion options are determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We have no historical data on the accuracy of these estimates. The estimated sensitivity to change is related to the various variables of the Black-Scholes option pricing model stated below. The specific quantitative variables are included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of options is recognized as expense on the straight-line basis over the options’ vesting periods. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the expected life, dividend yield, expected volatility, and risk-free interest rate weighted-average assumptions used for options and warrants granted. Expected volatility for 2017 and 2016 was estimated using our common stock for convertible notes and warrants. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date. The expected life of options is based on the life of the instrument on grant date.

Basis of Accounting and Going Concern

Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with GAAP. In addition, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We generated accumulated losses of approximately $4,195,355 through August 31, 2017 and have insufficient working capital and cash flows to support operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The unaudited condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets such as property and equipment are stated at their fair value acquisition cost and reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Amortization of long-lived assets are calculated by the straight line method over their estimated useful lives. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, our company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery of the assets.

Convertible Notes

Convertible notes are regarded as compound instruments, consisting of a liability component and an equity component. The component parts of compound instruments are classified separately as financial liabilities and equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement. At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for a similar non-convertible instrument. This amount is recorded as a liability on an amortized cost basis until extinguished upon conversion or at the instrument’s maturity date. The equity component is determined by deducting the amount of the liability component from the fair value of the compound instrument as a whole. This is recognized as additional paid-in capital and included in equity, net of income tax effects, and is not subsequently remeasured. After initial measurement, they are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair value of an embedded conversion option that is convertible into a variable amount of shares and warrants that include price protection reset provision features are deemed to be “down-round protection” and, therefore, do not meet the scope exception for treatment as a derivative under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”, since “down-round protection” is not an input into the calculation of the fair value of the conversion option and warrants and cannot be considered “indexed to the Company’s own stock” which is a requirement for the scope exception as outlined under ASC 815.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the embedded conversion option and warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses the classification of its derivative instruments at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was used to estimate the fair value of the conversion options. The model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time, of other comparative securities, equal to the weighted average life of the options.

Conversion options are recorded as debt discount and are amortized as interest expense over the life of the underlying debt instrument.

Also, refer to Note 1 - Significant Accounting Policies and Note 5 - Derivative Liabilities in the unaudited financial statements that are included in this Report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of the end of the quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principle accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of August 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules, regulations and forms, and (ii) that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this report there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are included as part of this report:

_____________

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.