UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission File Number: 000-55617

 

Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

10 Terrace Road

Ladera Ranch, California 92694

(Address of principal executive offices)

(877) 327-3485

(Registrant’s telephone number)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial account standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of November 10, 2017, there were 49,142,991 outstanding shares of Class A common stock and 7,314,922 outstanding shares of Class T common stock of the registrant.

 

 

 

 

 

---

FORM 10-Q

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

2

---

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q of Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc., other than historical facts, may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “seek,” “continue,” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations and provide distributions to stockholders, and our ability to find suitable investment properties, may be significantly hindered. See the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as supplemented by the risk factors included in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, for a discussion of some, although not all, of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.

 

3

---

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity and cash flows reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) that are, in management’s opinion, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the aforementioned financial statements.

The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to our financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this report on Form 10-Q. The accompanying financial statements should also be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.

 

4

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

7

---

 

 

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(Unaudited)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

8

---

 

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

9

---

 

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Organization

Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), was formed on January 8, 2013 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in self storage facilities. The Company’s year-end is December 31. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc. and each of our subsidiaries.

SmartStop Asset Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company organized in 2013, was the sponsor (“Sponsor”) of our Offering of shares of common stock, as described below. Our Sponsor is a company focused on providing real estate advisory, asset management, and property management services. Our Sponsor owns 97.5% of the economic interests (and 100% of the voting membership interests) of Strategic Storage Advisor II, LLC (our “Advisor”) and owns 100% of Strategic Storage Property Management II, LLC (our “Property Manager”).

On October 1, 2015, SmartStop Self Storage, Inc. (“SmartStop”) and Extra Space Storage Inc. (“Extra Space”), along with subsidiaries of each of SmartStop and Extra Space, closed on a merger transaction (the “Extra Space Merger”) in which SmartStop was acquired by Extra Space for $13.75 per share in cash, representing an enterprise value of approximately $1.4 billion. At the closing of the Extra Space Merger, our Sponsor was sold to an entity controlled by H. Michael Schwartz, our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and became our sponsor. The former executive management team of SmartStop continues to serve as the executive management team for our Sponsor. In addition, our management team at the time of the Extra Space Merger continues to serve on our management team, as well as the management team of our Advisor and Property Manager.

We have no employees. Our Advisor, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed on January 8, 2013. Our Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf under the terms of the advisory agreement we have with our Advisor (our “Advisory Agreement”). The officers of our Advisor are also officers of us and our Sponsor.

On August 2, 2013, our Advisor purchased 100 shares of our common stock for $1,000 and became our initial stockholder. Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended, authorized 350,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class A Shares”) and 350,000,000 shares of Class T common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class T Shares”) and 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. We offered a maximum of $1.0 billion in common shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and $95.0 million in common shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”).

On January 10, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared our registration statement effective. On May 23, 2014, we satisfied the $1.5 million minimum offering requirements of our Offering and commenced formal operations. On September 28, 2015, we revised our Offering to offer two classes of shares of common stock: Class A Shares and Class T Shares. On January 9, 2017, our Offering terminated. We sold approximately 48 million Class A Shares and approximately 7 million Class T Shares for approximately $493 million and $73 million respectively, in our Offering. On November 30, 2016, prior to the termination of our Offering, we filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-3, which registered up to an additional $100.9 million in shares under our distribution reinvestment plan (our “DRP Offering”). The DRP Offering may be terminated at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. As of September 30, 2017, we had sold approximately 1.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.2 million Class T Shares for approximately $10.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in our DRP Offering.

On April 13, 2017, our board of directors, upon recommendation of our nominating and corporate governance committee, approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.22 for our Class A Shares and Class T Shares based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, or net asset value, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of December 31, 2016. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2017 for a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to determine, and the limitations of, the estimated value per share.

10

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

As a result of the calculation of our estimated value per share, beginning in May 2017, shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are being sold at the estimated value per share of $10.22 for both Class A Shares and Class T Shares.

Our operating partnership, Strategic Storage Operating Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (our “Operating Partnership”), was formed on January 9, 2013. During 2013, our Advisor purchased limited partnership interests in our Operating Partnership for $200,000 and on August 2, 2013, we contributed the initial $1,000 capital contribution we received to our Operating Partnership in exchange for the general partner interest. In conjunction with the Toronto Merger (as defined in Note 7) we issued an aggregate of approximately 483,197 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership to the common stockholders of Strategic Storage Toronto Properties REIT, Inc. (“SS Toronto”), consisting of Strategic 1031, LLC (“Strategic 1031”), a subsidiary of our Sponsor, and SS Toronto REIT Advisors, Inc., an affiliate of our Sponsor. Our Operating Partnership owns, directly or indirectly through one or more special purpose entities, all of the self storage properties that we have acquired and the self storage properties we will acquire in the future. As of September 30, 2017, we owned approximately 99.1% of the common units of limited partnership interests of our Operating Partnership. The remaining approximately 0.9% of the common units are owned by our Advisor, Strategic 1031, and SS Toronto REIT Advisors, Inc. As the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of our Operating Partnership. We conduct certain activities through our taxable REIT subsidiary, Strategic Storage TRS II, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “TRS”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership.

Our Property Manager was formed on January 8, 2013 to manage our properties. Our Property Manager derives substantially all of its income from the property management services it performs for us. Our Property Manager may enter into sub-property management agreements with third party management companies and pay part of its management fee to such sub-property manager. At the closing of the Extra Space Merger, we entered into new property management agreements with our Property Manager and our Property Manager entered into sub-property management agreements with an affiliate of Extra Space for the management of our properties in the United States. Furthermore, Extra Space acquired the rights to the “SmartStop^® Self Storage” brand in the United States through the Merger, and all properties in the United States were subsequently operated under the Extra Space name. However, any properties owned or acquired in Canada are managed by a subsidiary of our Sponsor and continue to be branded using the SmartStop^® Self Storage brand.

On July 14, 2017, our Property Manager provided written notice to Extra Space of its intention to terminate each sub-property management agreement effective October 1, 2017. As of October 1, 2017, our Property Manager now manages all of our properties directly. In addition, our Sponsor reacquired the rights to the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand in the United States. As a result, we began using the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand at our United States properties effective October 1, 2017. Please see Note 7 – Related Party Transactions – Property Management Agreement.

All properties owned or acquired in Canada have been and will continue to be, managed by a subsidiary of our Sponsor and branded using the SmartStop® Self Storage brand.

Our dealer manager is Select Capital Corporation, a California corporation (our “Dealer Manager”). Our Dealer Manager was responsible for marketing our shares offered pursuant to our Primary Offering. Our Sponsor owns a 15% non-voting equity interest in our Dealer Manager. Affiliates of our Dealer Manager own a 2.5% non-voting membership interest in our Advisor.

As we accepted subscriptions for shares of our common stock, we transferred all of the net offering proceeds to our Operating Partnership as capital contributions in exchange for additional units of interest in our Operating Partnership. However, we were deemed to have made capital contributions in the amount of gross proceeds received from investors, and our Operating Partnership was deemed to have simultaneously paid the sales commissions and other costs associated with the Offering. In addition, our Operating Partnership is structured to make distributions with respect to limited partnership units that are equivalent to the distributions made to holders of common stock. Finally, a limited partner in our Operating Partnership may later exchange his or her limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership for shares of our common stock at any time after one year following the date of issuance of their limited partnership units, subject to certain restrictions outlined in our Operating Partnership’s limited partnership agreement (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”). Our Advisor is prohibited from exchanging or otherwise transferring its limited partnership units so long as it is acting as our Advisor pursuant to our Advisory Agreement.

11

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Principles of Consolidation

Our financial statements, and the financial statements of our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The portion of these entities not wholly-owned by us is presented as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Consolidation Considerations

Current accounting guidance provides a framework for identifying a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is an entity or other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. Generally, a VIE should be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual, or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) has the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must initially record all of the VIE’s assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interest at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were consolidated based on majority voting interest. Our Operating Partnership is deemed to be a VIE and is consolidated by the Company as the primary beneficiary.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had not entered into any other contracts/interests that would be deemed to be variable interests in VIEs.

Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Entities

We account for the noncontrolling interest in our Operating Partnership in accordance with the related accounting guidance. Due to our control through our general partnership interest in our Operating Partnership and the limited rights of the limited partner, our Operating Partnership, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, are consolidated with the Company and the limited partner interest is reflected as a noncontrolling interest in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interest shall be attributed its share of income and losses, even if that attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. Management will adjust such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates made include the allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, the determination if certain entities should be consolidated, the evaluation of potential impairment of long-lived assets, and the estimated useful lives of real estate assets and intangibles.

12

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

We may maintain cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believe this risk will be mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of impound reserve accounts for property taxes, insurance and capital improvements in connection with the requirements of certain of our loan agreements.

Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation

We account for acquisitions in accordance with GAAP which requires that we allocate the purchase price of the property to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. This guidance requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the acquisition date. Acquisitions of portfolios of facilities are allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which take into account the relative size, age, and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available. Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment, building and site improvements. In allocating the purchase price, we determine whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired properties are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. We also consider whether in-place, market leases represent an intangible asset. We recorded approximately $4.4 million and approximately $17.0 million in intangible assets to recognize the value of in-place leases related to our acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We do not expect, nor to date have we recorded, intangible assets for the value of customer relationships because we expect we will not have concentrations of significant customers and the average customer turnover will be fairly frequent. Our acquisition-related transaction costs are required to be expensed as incurred. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we expensed none and approximately $1.1 million, respectively, of acquisition-related transaction costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we expensed approximately $0.5 million and $11.8 million, respectively, of acquisition-related transaction costs.

Should the initial accounting for an acquisition be incomplete by the end of a reporting period that falls within the measurement period, we will report provisional amounts in our financial statements. During the measurement period, we will adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date and we will record those adjustments to our consolidated financial statements. We will recognize any measurement period adjustments during the period in which we determine the amount of the adjustment to our consolidated financial statements, potentially including adjustments to interest, depreciation and amortization expense.

Evaluation of Possible Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Management monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present that indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable, we will assess the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying value of the long-lived assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived assets to the fair value and recognize an impairment loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, no impairment losses were recognized.

13

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Revenue Recognition

Management believes that all of our leases are operating leases. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues from any long-term operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents received over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and contractually due but unpaid rent is included in other assets.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Tenant accounts receivable is reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Management’s estimate of the allowance is based upon a review of the current status of tenant accounts receivable. It is reasonably possible that management’s estimate of the allowance will change in the future.

Real Estate Facilities

Real estate facilities are recorded based on fair value as of the date of acquisition. We capitalize costs incurred to develop, construct, renovate and improve properties, including interest and property taxes incurred during the construction period. The construction period begins when expenditures for the real estate assets have been made and activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use are in progress. The construction period ends when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.

Depreciation of Real Property Assets

Our management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives.

Depreciation of our real property assets is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives
as follows:

 

 

Depreciation of Personal Property Assets

Personal property assets consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives generally ranging from 3 to 5 years, and are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

Intangible Assets

We have allocated a portion of our real estate purchase price to in-place lease intangibles. We are amortizing in-place lease intangibles on a straight-line basis over the estimated future benefit period. As of September 30, 2017, the gross amounts allocated to in-place lease intangibles was approximately $34.0 million and accumulated amortization of in-place lease intangibles totaled approximately $27.3 million. As of December 31, 2016, the gross amounts allocated to in-place lease intangibles was approximately $29.2 million and accumulated amortization of in-place lease intangibles totaled approximately $16.1 million.

The total estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and thereafter is approximately $2.5 million, $2.5 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $1.4 million respectively.

14

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Debt Issuance Costs

The net carrying value of costs incurred in connection with our revolving credit facility is presented as debt issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheets. Debt issuance costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan, which is not materially different than the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs related to our revolving credit facility totaled approximately $1.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

The net carrying value of costs incurred in connection with obtaining non revolving debt are presented on the balance sheet as a deduction from debt (see Note 5). Debt issuance costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related loan, which is not materially different than the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs related to non-revolving debt totaled approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Organization and Offering Costs

Our Advisor funded organization and offering costs on our behalf. We were required to reimburse our Advisor for such organization and offering costs; provided, however, our Advisor was required to reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which the Offering terminated to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. Such costs would have been recognized as a liability when we had a present responsibility to reimburse our Advisor, which is defined in our Advisory Agreement as the date we satisfied the minimum offering requirements of our Offering (which occurred on May 23, 2014). If at any point in time we determined that the total organization and offering costs were expected to exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds anticipated to be received from the Primary Offering, we would have recognized such excess as a capital contribution from our Advisor. However, subsequent to the termination of our Primary Offering on January 9, 2017, we determined that organization and offering costs did not exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds from the Primary Offering, and thus there was no reimbursement. Offering costs are recorded as an offset to additional paid-in capital, and organization costs are recorded as an expense.

We pay our Dealer Manager an ongoing stockholder servicing fee that is payable monthly and accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1% of the purchase price per share of the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering. We will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering at the earlier of (i) the date we list our shares on a national securities exchange, merge or consolidate with or into another entity, or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, (ii) the date at which the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources equals 10% of the gross proceeds from the sale of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding proceeds from sales pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan), which calculation shall be made by us with the assistance of our Dealer Manager commencing after the termination of the Primary Offering; (iii)  the fifth anniversary of the last day of the fiscal quarter in which our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding our distribution reinvestment plan offering) terminated; and (iv) the date that such Class T Share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding. Our Dealer Manager entered into participating dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers which authorized them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager re-allowed all of the sales commissions and, subject to certain limitations, the stockholder servicing fees paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager was also permitted to re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of their dealer manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses. Our Dealer Manager also received reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses; however, to the extent the due diligence expenses could not be justified, any excess over actual due diligence expenses would have been considered underwriting compensation subject to a 10% FINRA limitation and, when aggregated with all other non-accountable expenses in connection with our Public Offering, could not exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds from sales in the Public Offering. We recorded a liability within Due to affiliates for the future estimated stockholder servicing fees at the time of sale of Class T Shares as an offering cost.

15

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Foreign Currency Translation

For non-U.S. functional currency operations, assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates for the period. All related adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of equity. Transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the related operation are recorded at rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded in other income (expense).

Redeemable Common Stock

We adopted a share redemption program that enables stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances.

We record amounts that are redeemable under the share redemption program as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets since the shares are redeemable at the option of the holder and therefore their redemption is outside our control. The maximum amount redeemable under our share redemption program is limited to the number of shares we can repurchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan. However, accounting guidance states that determinable amounts that can become redeemable should be presented as redeemable when such amount is known. Therefore, the net proceeds from the distribution reinvestment plan are considered to be temporary equity and are presented as redeemable common stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In addition, current accounting guidance requires, among other things, that financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation of us to repurchase shares be classified as liabilities and reported at settlement value. Our redeemable common shares are contingently redeemable at the option of the holder. When we determine we have a mandatory obligation to repurchase shares under the share redemption program, we reclassify such obligations from temporary equity to a liability based upon their respective settlement values.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $1.5 million (approximately 160,000 shares), $380,000 of which were fulfilled in April 2017, $460,000 of which were fulfilled in July 2017 and $650,000 of which were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2017, and fulfilled in October 2017.

Accounting for Equity Awards

The cost of restricted stock is required to be measured based on the grant date fair value and the cost recognized over the relevant service period.

Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, we are required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, we are required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs and hierarchy of fair value we use when measuring fair value:

16

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement will fall within the lowest level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In determining fair value, we will utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment will be necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the fair values we will present will be indicative of amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or other disposition of these assets.

Financial and non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements consist of real estate and related liabilities assumed related to our acquisitions. The fair values of these assets and liabilities were determined as of the acquisition dates using widely accepted valuation techniques, including (i) discounted cash flow analysis, which considers, among other things, leasing assumptions, growth rates, discount rates and terminal capitalization rates, (ii) income capitalization approach, which considers prevailing market capitalization rates, and (iii) comparable sales activity. In general, we consider multiple valuation techniques when measuring fair values. However, in certain circumstances, a single valuation technique may be appropriate. All of the fair values of the assets and liabilities as of the acquisition dates were derived using Level 3 inputs.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other assets, variable-rate debt, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, distributions payable and amounts due to affiliates approximate fair value.

The table below summarizes our fixed rate notes payable at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and is dependent on a number of important assumptions, including discount rates and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The fair value of the fixed rate notes payable was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.

 

 

As of September 30, 2017, we had interest rate swaps on four of our loans (See Notes 5 and 6). The valuations of these instruments were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivative. The analysis reflected the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and used observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair value of the interest rate swaps were determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments. The variable cash payments were based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

To comply with GAAP, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of derivative contracts for the effect of non-performance risk, we will consider the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Although we had determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives were within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, through September 30, 2017, we had assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our

17

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We record all derivatives on our balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation.

For derivatives designated as net investment hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. Amounts are reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings when the hedged net investment is either sold or substantially liquidated. As of September 30, 2017, all of our derivative instruments met the criteria for hedge accounting.

Income Taxes

We made an election to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To qualify as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of the REIT’s ordinary taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gains and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner that we will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Even if we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

We filed elections to treat our TRS as a taxable REIT subsidiary effective January 1, 2014. In general, the TRS performs additional services for our customers and generally engages in any real estate or non-real estate related business. The TRS is subject to corporate federal and state income tax. The TRS follows accounting guidance which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes represent the tax effect of future differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities.

Per Share Data

Basic earnings per share attributable to our common stockholders for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to our common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including the dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock, utilizing the treasury stock method. For all periods presented, the dilutive effect of unrestricted stock was not included in the diluted weighted average shares as such shares were antidilutive.

18

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” as ASC Topic 606. The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the new standard, companies will perform a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. ASU 2014-09 applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB ASC. In July 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. This ASU will still be applied using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. We have determined that our self storage rental revenues will not be subject to the guidance in ASU 2014-09, as they qualify as lease contracts, which are excluded from its scope.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments–Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 updates guidance related to recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments in ASU 2016-01 also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. In addition, the amendments in ASU 2016-01 eliminate the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet for public business entities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We do not anticipate the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 amends the guidance on accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short term leases) at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under ASU 2016-02, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. It also includes extensive amendments to the disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not yet been made available for issuance. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. While we continue to evaluate the standard, based upon our assessment to date, we do not anticipate the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, because substantially all of our lease revenues are derived from month-to-month leases.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows. The guidance will become effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We do not anticipate the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.” ASU 2016-18 will require companies to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 will require a disclosure of a reconciliation between the statement of financial position and the statement of cash flows when the statement of financial position includes more than one line item for cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents. Entities with material restricted cash and restricted cash equivalent balances will be required to disclose the nature of the restrictions. ASU 2016-18 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We are in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.

19

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework provides guidance for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. This update is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for transactions that have not been reported in previously issued (or available to be issued) financial statements and shall be applied on a prospective basis. We expect that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets) or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay. The adoption of this guidance will likely result in a decrease in acquisition related costs being expensed, as our acquisition of real estate properties will likely be considered asset acquisitions rather than business combinations under ASU 2017-01.

Note 3. Real Estate Facilities

The following summarizes the activity in real estate facilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

 

 

The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation for our acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

 

 

20

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The purchase price allocations included above are preliminary and therefore, subject to change upon the completion of our analysis of appraisals and other information related to the acquisitions. We anticipate finalizing the purchase price allocations by December 31, 2017, as further evaluations are completed and additional information is received from third parties.

We incurred acquisition fees to our Advisor related to the Aurora II acquisition of approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Note 4. Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)

The table set forth below summarizes on an unaudited pro forma basis the combined results of operations of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and 2016 as if the Company’s acquisitions that occurred during 2017 and 2016 each had occurred as of January 1, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what our actual results of operations would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.

 

 

The pro forma financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was adjusted to exclude approximately $0.5 million and $11.7 million, respectively, for acquisition related expenses.

21

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 5. Debt

The Company’s debt is summarized as follows:

 

 

22

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The weighted average interest rate on our consolidated debt as of September 30, 2017 was approximately 4.26%.

As of September 30, 2017, we provided recourse guarantees totaling approximately $43.7 million in connection with certain of our loans. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to the outstanding debt.

Amended KeyBank Credit Facility

On December 22, 2015, we, through our Operating Partnership, and certain affiliated entities (the “Borrower”), entered into an amended and restated revolving credit facility (the “Amended KeyBank Credit Facility”) with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”), as administrative agent and KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as the sole book runner and sole lead arranger, and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., and Comerica Bank as co-lenders. The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility replaced our term credit facility with KeyBank in which we had a maximum borrowing capacity of approximately $71.3 million.

Under the terms of the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility, we initially had a maximum borrowing capacity of $105 million. The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility may be increased to a maximum credit facility size of $500 million, in minimum increments of $10 million, which KeyBank will arrange on a best efforts basis.

On February 18, 2016, we entered into a first amendment and joinder to the amended and restated credit agreement (the “First Amendment”) with KeyBank. Under the terms of the First Amendment, we added an additional $40 million to our maximum borrowing capacity for a total of $145 million with the admission of US Bank National Association (the “Subsequent Lender”). The Subsequent Lender also became a party to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility through a joinder agreement in the First Amendment.

On March 8, 2017, we removed five of the properties held as collateral (Plantation, Wellington, Naples, Port St. Lucie II, and Doral) under the Amended KeyBank Property Loan (as defined below) and added them to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility. In conjunction with adding these five properties to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility, we borrowed $56 million which was used to repay approximately $46 million of principal on the Amended KeyBank Property Loan and the remaining outstanding principal balance on the Amended KeyBank Subordinate Loan of $10 million. As of September 30, 2017, we had approximately $89 million in borrowings outstanding under the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility.

The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility is a revolving loan with an initial term of three years, maturing on December 22, 2018, with two one-year extension options subject to certain conditions outlined further in the credit agreement for the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). Payments due pursuant to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility are interest-only for the first 36 months and a 30-year amortization schedule thereafter. The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility bears interest based on the type of borrowing. The ABR Loans bear interest at the lesser of (x) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) plus the Applicable Rate, or (y) the Maximum Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). The Eurodollar Loans bear interest at the lesser of (a) the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) for the Interest Period in effect plus the Applicable Rate, or (b) the Maximum Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). The Applicable Rate corresponds to our total leverage, as specified in the Amended Credit Agreement. For any ABR Loans, the Applicable Rate is 125 basis points if our total leverage is less than 50%, and 150 basis points if our leverage is greater than 50%. For any Eurodollar Loan, the Applicable Rate is 225 basis points if our total leverage is less than 50% and 250 basis points if our total leverage is greater than 50%.

23

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility is fully recourse and is secured by cross-collateralized first mortgage liens on the mortgaged properties. The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility may be prepaid or terminated at any time without penalty, provided, however, that the Lenders (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) shall be indemnified for any breakage costs. Pursuant to that certain guaranty (the “KeyBank Guaranty”), dated December 22, 2015, in favor of the Lenders, we serve as a guarantor of all obligations due under the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility.

Under certain conditions, the Borrower may cause the release of one or more of the properties serving as collateral for the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility, provided that no default or event of default is then outstanding or would reasonably occur as a result of such release, and after taking into account any prepayment of outstanding Loans (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) necessary to maintain compliance with the financial covenants.

The Amended KeyBank Credit Facility contains a number of other customary terms and covenants, including the following (capitalized terms are as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement): the aggregate borrowing base availability under the Amended KeyBank Facility is limited to the lesser of: (1) 60% of the Pool Value of the properties in the collateral pool, or (2) an amount that would provide a minimum Debt Service Coverage Ratio of no less than 1.35 to 1.0; and we must meet the following financial tests, calculated as of the close of each fiscal quarter: (1) a Total Leverage Ratio of no more than 60%; (2) at any time, a Tangible Net Worth not less than the Base Amount plus 80% of Net Equity Proceeds received after the Effective Date; (3) an Interest Coverage Ratio of no less than 1.85 to 1.0; (4) a Fixed Charge Ratio of no less than 1.6 to 1.0; (5) a ratio of varying rate Indebtedness to total Indebtedness not in excess of 30%; (6) a Loan to Value Ratio of not greater than 60%; and (7) a Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.35 to 1.0.

On December 30, 2016, our Operating Partnership purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $100 million that capped LIBOR at 1.5% through July 3, 2017. On May 1, 2017, our Operating Partnership purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $90 million, such that as of the effective date of July 1, 2017, LIBOR is capped at 1.25% through December 22, 2018.

The Amended KeyBank Property Loan

On March 25, 2016, one of our subsidiaries executed purchase and sale agreements with unaffiliated third parties for the acquisition of 22 self storage facilities (10 in Florida, 11 in North Carolina, and one in Maryland), two parcels of land adjacent to the North Carolina properties and one redevelopment property in North Carolina, which was subsequently assigned to Strategic Storage Growth Trust, Inc., (the “27 Property Portfolio”). On June 1, 2016 we closed on 11 self storage facilities in Florida and Maryland for approximately $275 million representing the first phase (“First Phase”) of the 27 Property Portfolio.

On June 1, 2016, we, through certain affiliated entities (collectively, the “Property Loan Borrower”) entered into a credit agreement (the “Property Loan Agreement”) for a secured loan in the amount of $105 million (the “KeyBank Property Loan”) with KeyBank, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as the sole book runner and sole lead arranger, and the lenders party thereto. The Property Loan Borrower borrowed $105 million in connection with the purchase of the properties in the First Phase of the 27 Property Portfolio. The KeyBank Property Loan was a term loan facility with an original maturity date of December 31, 2016. On December 29, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment to the KeyBank Property Loan”) in connection with the KeyBank Property Loan. Prior to the First Amendment to the KeyBank Property Loan, one of the properties held as collateral was removed and added to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility and the KeyBank Property Loan was reduced to approximately $92.8 million. The First Amendment to the KeyBank Property Loan extended the maturity date of the loan (the “Amended KeyBank Property Loan”) from December 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017.

On March 8, 2017, we removed five of the properties held as collateral (Plantation, Wellington, Naples, Port St. Lucie II, and Doral) under the Amended KeyBank Property Loan and added them to the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility. On March 30, 2017 we entered into a Second Amendment to the Amended KeyBank Property Loan to extend the maturity date from March 31, 2017 to May 1, 2017. On April 11, 2017, we removed the remaining five properties that served as collateral under the Amended KeyBank Property Loan and entered into the KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan (as defined below) in which we borrowed $52 million, the proceeds of which were primarily used to pay off the outstanding balance on the Amended KeyBank Property Loan.

24

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The Amended KeyBank Subordinate Loan

On June 1, 2016, in conjunction with the acquisition of the First Phase of the 27 Property Portfolio, we entered into a credit agreement (the “Subordinate Loan Agreement”) in which we borrowed $30 million (the “KeyBank Subordinate Loan”) with KeyBank, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as the sole book runner and sole lead arranger, and the lenders party thereto. The KeyBank Subordinate Loan is a term loan facility with an original maturity date of December 31, 2016. During the third and fourth quarters of 2016, we made payments totaling $20 million on the KeyBank Subordinate Loan, reducing the loan amount to $10 million as of December 29, 2016. On December 29, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to the Subordinate Loan Agreement (the “First Amendment to the Subordinate Loan”), which extended the maturity date of the Subordinate Loan Agreement (subsequently, the “Amended KeyBank Subordinate Loan”) from December 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017. On March 8, 2017, we paid off the outstanding balance of $10 million on the Amended KeyBank Subordinate Loan through a draw on the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility.

KeyBank CMBS Loan

On July 28, 2016, we, through 29 special purpose entities wholly owned by our Operating Partnership, entered into a loan agreement with KeyBank in which we borrowed $95 million from KeyBank (the “KeyBank CMBS Loan”). Pursuant to the loan agreement, the collateral under the loan consists of our respective fee interests in 29 self storage properties (the “29 Mortgaged Properties”). The proceeds of the KeyBank CMBS Loan were primarily used to pay down our Amended KeyBank Credit Facility, after which the 29 Mortgaged Properties were released as collateral under the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility.

The KeyBank CMBS Loan has an initial term of ten years, maturing on August 1, 2026. In connection with the KeyBank CMBS Loan, we entered into two promissory notes, dated July 28, 2016, in the amounts of $70 million and $25 million (the “Promissory Notes”). Monthly payments due under the Promissory Notes are interest-only for the first five years and payments reflecting a 30-year amortization schedule begin thereafter. The Promissory Notes bear interest at 3.89%.

KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan

On April 11, 2017, we removed the remaining five properties that served as collateral under the Amended KeyBank Property Loan and, through five special purpose entities wholly owned by our Operating Partnership, entered into a new loan agreement with KeyBank in which we borrowed $52 million (the “KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan”). Pursuant to the loan agreement, the five properties released from the Amended KeyBank Property Loan now serve as collateral under the KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan. The proceeds of the KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan were primarily used to pay off the outstanding balance on the Amended KeyBank Property Loan.

The KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan has an initial term of ten years, maturing on May 1, 2027. Monthly payments due are interest-only for the first five years and payments reflecting a 30-year amortization schedule begin thereafter. The loan bears interest at 4.65%.

$11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan

On June 1, 2017, we entered into a credit agreement (the “$11M Subordinate Loan Agreement”) in which we borrowed $11 million (the “$11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan”) with KeyBank, as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as the sole book runner and sole lead arranger, and the lenders party thereto. This loan is subordinate to the existing KeyBank CMBS Loan and the KeyBank Florida CMBS Loan, and encumbers the same 34 properties already encumbered by these two loans.

25

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The $11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan has an initial term of three years, maturing on June 1, 2020, with a one-year extension option subject to certain conditions in the credit agreement. The $11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan bears interest based on the type of borrowing elected by us. An ABR Borrowing bears interest at the lesser of (x) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the $11M Subordinate Loan Agreement) plus the Applicable Rate, or (y) the Maximum Rate (as defined in the $11M Subordinate Loan Agreement). A Eurodollar Borrowing bears interest at the lesser of (a) the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the $11M Subordinate Loan Agreement) for the Interest Period in effect plus the Applicable Rate, or (b) the Maximum Rate (as defined in the $11M Subordinate Loan Agreement). The Applicable Rate means 375 basis points for any Eurodollar Borrowing and 275 basis points for any ABR Borrowing. The proceeds from the $11M KeyBank Subordinate Loan were primarily used to pay down the Amended KeyBank Credit Facility.

The following table presents the future principal payment requirements on outstanding debt as of September 30, 2017:

 

 

Note 6. Derivative Instruments

Interest Rate Swaps

Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we used interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

The effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative designated and that qualifies as a cash flow hedge is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt.

Foreign Currency Forward

Our objectives in using foreign currency derivatives are to add stability to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar and to manage our exposure to exchange rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we use foreign currency forwards as part of our exchange rate risk management strategy. A foreign currency forward contract is a commitment to deliver a certain amount of currency at a certain price on a specific date in the future. By entering into the forward contract and holding it to maturity, we are locked into a future currency exchange rate in an amount equal to and for the term of the forward contract. We have designated the foreign currency forward as a net investment hedge and changes in the fair value of the derivative are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income.

26

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

The following table summarizes the terms of our derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2017:

 

 

On February 1, 2017, to hedge our net investment related to the Toronto Merger, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract with a notional amount of $58.5 million CAD, and a forward rate of approximately 1.3058. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we settled our two foreign currency forward contracts which resulted in us receiving a net settlement of approximately $1.4 million, and simultaneously entered into a third foreign currency forward contract with a notional amount of $101 million CAD, and a forward rate of approximately 1.3439. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, we settled our third foreign currency forward contract, which resulted in us paying a net settlement of approximately $5.5 million, and simultaneously entered into a fourth foreign currency forward contract as noted in the table above. Our gain (loss) from our settled hedges is recorded net in foreign currency forward contract gain (loss) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.

The following table summarizes the terms of our derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

The following table presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

 

27

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 7. Related Party Transactions

Fees to Affiliates

Our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor and dealer manager agreement, as amended (“Dealer Manager Agreement”) with our Dealer Manager entitle our Advisor and our Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and investment of funds in real estate properties, among other services, as well as reimbursement for organization and offering costs incurred by our Advisor on our behalf and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by our Advisor in providing services to us.

Organization and Offering Costs

Organization and offering costs of the Offering could be paid by our Advisor on our behalf and were reimbursed to our Advisor from the proceeds of our Offering. Organization and offering costs consist of all expenses (other than sales commissions, the dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) paid by us in connection with the Offering, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charges of our escrow holder and other accountable organization and offering expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse our Advisor for all marketing related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of our Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our shares; (ii) technology costs associated with the Offering; (iii) our costs of conducting our training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v) payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. Our Advisor was obligated to reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month which the Offering terminated to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions, dealer manager fees, and stockholder servicing fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. However, subsequent to the termination of our Primary Offering on January 9, 2017, we determined that organization and offering costs did not exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds from the Primary Offering, and thus there was no reimbursement.

Advisory Agreement

We do not have any employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the directives of our board of directors. Our Advisor receives various fees and expenses under the terms of our Advisory Agreement. As noted above, we were required under our Advisory Agreement to reimburse our Advisor for organization and offering costs.

Our Advisory Agreement also required our Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses, including sales commissions, dealer manager fees, stockholder servicing fees and organization and offering expenses, were in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the Offering. However, subsequent to the termination of our Primary Offering on January 9, 2017, we determined offering expenses were not in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from the Offering, and thus there was no reimbursement.

Our Advisor receives acquisition fees equal to 1.75% of the contract purchase price of each property we acquire plus reimbursement of any acquisition expenses incurred by our Advisor. Our Advisor also receives a monthly asset management fee equal to 0.05208%, which is one-twelfth of 0.625%, of our aggregate asset value, as defined in the Advisory Agreement.

Under our Advisory Agreement, our Advisor receives disposition fees in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) one-half of the competitive real estate commission or (ii) 1% of the contract sale price for each property we sell, as long as our Advisor provides substantial assistance in connection with the sale. The total real estate commissions paid (including the disposition fee paid to our Advisor) may not exceed the lesser of a competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6% of the contract sale price of the property.

Our Advisor is also entitled to various subordinated distributions pursuant to our Operating Partnership Agreement if we (1) list our shares of common stock on a national exchange, (2) terminate our Advisory Agreement (other than a voluntary termination), (3) liquidate our portfolio, or (4) enter into an Extraordinary Transaction, as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement.

28

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Our Advisory Agreement provides for reimbursement of our Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our Advisor is obligated to pay or reimburse us the amount by which our aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income, as defined, unless a majority of our independent directors determine that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For any fiscal quarter for which total operating expenses for the 12 months then ended exceed the limitation, we will disclose this fact in our next quarterly report or within 60 days of the end of that quarter and send a written disclosure of this fact to our stockholders. In each case the disclosure will include an explanation of the factors that the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the excess expenses were justified. Our aggregate annual operating expenses, as defined, did not exceed the thresholds described above.

Dealer Manager Agreement

Our Dealer Manager received a sales commission of up to 7.0% of gross proceeds from sales of Class A Shares and up to 2.0% of gross proceeds from the sales of Class T Shares in the Primary Offering and a dealer manager fee up to 3.0% of gross proceeds from sales of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in the Primary Offering under the terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement. In addition, our Dealer Manager receives an ongoing stockholder servicing fee that is payable monthly and accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1% of the purchase price per share of the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering. We will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to the Class T Shares sold in the Primary Offering at the earlier of (i) the date we list our shares on a national securities exchange, merge or consolidate with or into another entity, or sell or dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, (ii) the date at which the aggregate underwriting compensation from all sources equals 10% of the gross proceeds from the sale of both Class A Shares and Class T Shares in our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding proceeds from sales pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan), which calculation shall be made by us with the assistance of our Dealer Manager commencing after the termination of the Primary Offering; (iii) the fifth anniversary of the last day of the fiscal quarter in which our Primary Offering (i.e., excluding our distribution reinvestment plan offering) terminated; and (iv) the date that such Class T Share is redeemed or is no longer outstanding. Our Dealer Manager entered into participating dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers which authorized them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager re-allowed all of the sales commissions and, subject to certain limitations, the stockholder servicing fees paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager could also re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of their dealer manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses. Our Dealer Manager also received reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses; however, to the extent these due diligence expenses could not be justified, any excess over actual due diligence expenses would have been considered underwriting compensation subject to a 10% FINRA limitation and, when aggregated with all other non-accountable expenses in connection with our Offering, could not exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds from sales in the Offering.

Affiliated Dealer Manager

Our Sponsor owns a 15% non-voting equity interest in our Dealer Manager. Affiliates of our Dealer Manager own a 2.5% non-voting membership interest in our Advisor.

Property Management Agreement

Since inception, our Property Manager has served as the property manager for each of our properties pursuant to separate property management agreements. From October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, our Property Manager contracted with Extra Space for Extra Space to serve as the sub-property manager for each of our properties located in the United States pursuant to separate sub-property management agreements for each property. On July 14, 2017, our Property Manager provided written notice to Extra Space of its intention to terminate each sub-property management agreement effective October 1, 2017. As of October 1, 2017, our Property Manager terminated each sub-property management agreement, and our Property Manager now manages all our properties directly. In connection with these terminations, each property management agreement that was subject to a sub-property management agreement with Extra Space was amended and, where applicable, we paid Extra Space a termination fee, as described below.

29

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Prior Arrangement

Under the property management agreements in effect from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017 for our properties located in the United States, our Property Manager received a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $2,500 or 6% of the gross revenues, plus reimbursement of our Property Manager’s costs of managing the properties. In addition, Extra Space agreed to pay up to $25,000 per property toward the signage and set-up costs associated with converting such property to the Extra Space brand (the “Set-Up Amount”). The property management agreements had a three year term and automatically renewed for successive one year periods thereafter, unless we or our Property Manager provided prior written notice at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In general, if we terminated a property management agreement without cause during the initial three year term, we would have been required to pay our Property Manager a termination fee equal to the Set-Up Amount, reduced by 1/36th of the Set-Up Amount for every full month of the term that had elapsed. After the end of the initial three year term, we could have terminated a property management agreement on 30 days prior written notice without payment of a termination fee. Our Property Manager could have terminated a property management agreement on 60 days prior written notice to us.

The sub-property management agreements between our Property Manager and Extra Space were substantially the same as the foregoing property management agreements. Under the sub-property management agreements, our Property Manager paid Extra Space a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $2,500 or 6% of the gross revenues, plus reimbursement of Extra Space’s costs of managing the properties; provided, however that no management fee was due and payable to Extra Space for the months of January and July each year during the term. Extra Space had the exclusive right to offer tenant insurance to the tenants and was entitled to all of the benefits of such tenant insurance. The sub-property management agreements also had a three year term and automatically renewed for successive one year periods thereafter, unless our Property Manager or Extra Space provided prior written notice at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. In general, if our Property Manager terminated a sub-property management agreement without cause during the initial three year term, it would have been required to pay Extra Space a termination fee equal to the Set-Up Amount, reduced by 1/36th of the Set-Up Amount for every full month of the term that had elapsed. After the end of the initial three year term, our Property Manager could have terminated a sub-property management agreement on 30 days prior written notice without payment of a termination fee. Extra Space could have terminated a sub-property management agreement on 60 days prior written notice to our Property Manager.

Termination of Sub-property Manager

As of October 1, 2017, our Property Manager terminated each sub-property management agreement with Extra Space, and we amended each of our corresponding property management agreements as described below. To the extent a termination fee would have been owed by any of our property-owning subsidiaries had its corresponding property management agreement with our Property Manager been terminated, each such property-owning subsidiary agreed to pay the termination fee owed by our Property Manager in accordance with its termination of the sub-property management agreements. The aggregate costs incurred in connection with the property management changes were approximately $0.8 million. This amount was included in property operating expenses – affiliates in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

30

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Property Management Subsequent to September 30, 2017

In connection with the termination of each sub-property management agreement, each corresponding property management agreement was amended effective as of October 1, 2017. Pursuant to the amended property management agreements, our Property Manager receives: (i) a monthly management fee for each property equal to the greater of $3,000 or 6% of the gross revenues from the properties plus reimbursement of the Property Manager’s costs of managing the properties and (ii) a construction management fee equal to 5% of the cost of construction or capital improvement work in excess of $10,000. In addition, we have agreed with our Property Manager to share equally in the net revenue attributable to the sale of tenant insurance at our properties. The property management agreements have a three year term and automatically renew for successive one year periods thereafter, unless we or our Property Manager provide prior written notice at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the term. After the end of the initial three year term, either party may terminate a property management agreement generally upon 60 days prior written notice. With respect to each new property we acquire for which we enter into a property management agreement with our Property Manager we will also pay our Property Manager a one-time start-up fee in the amount of $3,750.

In connection with the change in our property management operations, each of our stores in the United States has been rebranded under the “SmartStop® Self Storage” brand.

Our self storage properties located in Canada are subject to separate property management agreements with our Property Manager. Under each agreement, our Property Manager receives a fee for its services in managing our properties, generally equal to the greater of $3,000 or 6% of the gross revenues from the properties plus reimbursement of the Property Manager’s costs of managing the properties. Reimbursable costs and expenses include wages and salaries and other expenses of employees engaged in operating, managing and maintaining our properties. Our Property Manager also receives a one-time fee for each property acquired by us that is managed by our Property Manager in the amount of $3,750. In the event that our Property Manager assists with the development or redevelopment of a property, we pay a separate market-based fee for such services. In addition, our Property Manager is entitled to a construction management fee equal to 5% of the cost of construction or capital improvement work in excess of $10,000. In addition, we agreed with our Property Manager to share net tenant protection plan revenues equally between us and our Property Manager.

Pursuant to the terms of the agreements described above, the following table summarizes related party costs incurred and paid by us for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as well as any related amounts payable as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2017:

 

 

31

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Extra Space Self Storage

In connection with the Extra Space Merger of SmartStop into Extra Space, certain of our executive officers, including H. Michael Schwartz, Paula Mathews, Michael McClure and James Berg, received units of limited partnership interest in Extra Space Storage LP, the operating partnership for Extra Space, in exchange for units of limited partnership of SmartStop Self Storage Operating Partnership, L.P., the operating partnership for SmartStop, owned by such executives.

Tenant Protection Plan

We participate in a tenant protection plan pursuant to which we receive 50% of the net revenues generated for each tenant protection plan purchased by a customer at our Canadian properties and our Property Manager receives the other 50% of such net revenues.

Storage Auction Program

In March 2017, our Sponsor acquired a minority interest in a company (the “Auction Company”) that serves as a web portal for self storage companies to post their auctions for the contents of abandoned storage units online instead of using live auctions conducted at the self storage facilities. The Auction Company is expected to receive a service fee for such services. Through September 30, 2017, our sub-property manager did not utilize the Auction Company at our properties. Our Property Manager may in the future utilize the Auction Company, and we would be responsible for paying any fees related to our properties. Our properties would receive the proceeds from such online auctions.

Toronto Merger

On February 1, 2017, we entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Toronto Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which SST II Toronto Acquisition, LLC, a wholly owned and newly formed subsidiary of our Operating Partnership, merged (the “Toronto Merger”) with and into SS Toronto, a subsidiary of our Sponsor, with SS Toronto surviving the Toronto Merger and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership. In connection with the Toronto Merger, we acquired five self storage properties located in the Greater Toronto Areas of North York, Mississauga, Brampton, Pickering and Scarborough (the “SS Toronto Properties”). Each property is operated under the “SmartStop” brand.

At the effective time of the Toronto Merger, each share of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of SS Toronto issued and outstanding was automatically converted into the right to receive $11.0651 USD in cash and 0.7311 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership. We paid an aggregate of approximately $7.3 million USD in cash consideration and issued an aggregate of approximately 483,197 Class A Units of our Operating Partnership to the common stockholders of SS Toronto, consisting of Strategic 1031 and SS Toronto REIT Advisors, Inc., affiliates of our Sponsor. We acquired the SS Toronto Properties subject to approximately $50.1 million CAD (approximately $38.4 million USD) in outstanding debt (as described further below), $0.8 million in other net liabilities, and paid approximately $33.1 million USD to an affiliate of Extra Space as repayment of outstanding debt and accrued interest owed by SS Toronto. No acquisition fee was paid to our Advisor for the Toronto Merger.

The terms of the Toronto Merger and the execution of the Toronto Merger Agreement were recommended by a special committee (the “Special Committee”) of our board of directors consisting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the members of which were all of our independent directors. The Special Committee, with the assistance of its independent financial advisor and independent legal counsel, approved the transaction and determined that the Toronto Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Toronto Merger Agreement were advisable and in the best interests of us, were fair and reasonable to us and were on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

In connection with the Toronto Merger, we entered into guarantees, dated as of February 1, 2017 (the “Guarantees”), under which we agreed to guarantee certain obligations of SS Toronto. The SS Toronto loans consist of (i) term loans totaling approximately $34.8 million CAD pursuant to promissory notes executed by SS Toronto in favor of Bank of Montreal on June 3, 2016, and (ii) mortgage financings in the aggregate amount of up to $17.7 million CAD pursuant to two promissory notes executed by subsidiaries of SS Toronto in favor of DUCA Financial Services Credit Union Ltd. on June 3, 2016.

32

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

We have adopted an amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan that allows both our Class A and Class T stockholders to have distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our Class A and Class T Shares, respectively. The purchase price per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan is equivalent to the estimated value per share approved by our board of directors and in effect on the date of purchase of shares under the plan. In conjunction with the board of directors’ declaration of a new estimated value per share of our common stock on April 13, 2017, beginning in May 2017, shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan are sold at the new estimated value per share of $10.22 per Class A Share and Class T Share. We may amend or terminate the amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan for any reason at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders. No sales commissions, dealer manager fee, or stockholder servicing fee will be paid on shares sold through the amended and restated distribution reinvestment plan. Through the termination of our Offering on January 9, 2017, we had sold approximately 1.1 million Class A shares and 0.1 million Class T Shares through our original distribution reinvestment plan. As of September 30, 2017, we had sold approximately 1.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.2 million Class T Shares through our DRP Offering.

Share Redemption Program

We adopted a share redemption program that enables stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. As long as our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market, our stockholders who have held their stock for at least one year may be able to have all or any portion of their shares of stock redeemed by us. We may redeem the shares of stock presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to fund such redemption.

Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program with 30 days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or by a separate mailing to our stockholders. The complete terms of our share redemption program are described in our prospectus.

The amount that we may pay to redeem stock for redemptions is the redemption price set forth in the following table which is based upon the number of years the stock is held:

 

 

At any time we are engaged in an offering of shares, the Redemption Amount for shares purchased under our share redemption program will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per share offering price. As long as we are engaged in an offering, the Redemption Amount shall be the lesser of the amount the stockholder paid for their shares or the price per share in the current offering. If we are no longer engaged in an offering, our board of directors will announce any redemption price adjustment and the time period of its effectiveness as a part of its regular communications with our stockholders. At any time the redemption price during an offering is determined by any method other than the offering price, if we have sold property and have made one or more special distributions to our stockholders of all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sales, the per share redemption price will be reduced by the net sale proceeds per share distributed to investors prior to the redemption date as a result of the sale of such property in the special distribution. Our board of directors will, in its sole discretion, determine which distributions, if any, constitute a special distribution. While our board of directors does not have specific criteria for determining a special distribution, we expect that a special distribution will only occur upon the sale of a property and the subsequent distribution of the net sale proceeds.

33

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

There are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares under the share redemption program including, but not limited to:

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we received redemption requests totaling approximately $1.5 million (approximately 160,000 shares), $380,000 of which were fulfilled in April 2017, $460,000 of which were fulfilled in July 2017 and $650,000 of which were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2017, and fulfilled in October 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we received redemption requests for an aggregate of approximately 110,000 shares (approximately $1.1 million), $530,000 of which were fulfilled in April 2016, $160,000 of which were fulfilled in July 2016 and $370,000 of which were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2016 and fulfilled in October 2016.

Operating Partnership Redemption Rights

The limited partners of our Operating Partnership have the right to cause our Operating Partnership to redeem their limited partnership units for cash equal to the value of an equivalent number of our shares, or, at our option, we may purchase their limited partnership units by issuing one share of our common stock for each limited partnership unit redeemed. These rights may not be exercised under certain circumstances that could cause us to lose our REIT election. Furthermore, limited partners may exercise their redemption rights only after their limited partnership units have been outstanding for one year. Our Advisor is prohibited from exchanging or otherwise transferring its limited partnership units so long as our Advisor is acting as our advisor under the Advisory Agreement.

Other Contingencies

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.

Note 9. Declaration of Distributions

On September 18, 2017, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the fourth quarter of 2017 of approximately $0.001644 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock payable to both Class A and Class T stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on October 1, 2017 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including December 31, 2017. Such distributions payable to each stockholder of record during a month will be paid the following month.

34

---

STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST II, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

 

Note 10. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the periods shown below:

 

 

Note 11. Subsequent Events

Distribution Reinvestment Plan Offering

As of November 10, 2017, we have issued approximately 1.1 million Class A shares of our common stock and approximately 0.2 million Class T Shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $11.6 million and approximately $1.7 million, pursuant to our DRP Offering.

 

 

 

35

---

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should also be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I.

Overview

Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), was formed on January 8, 2013 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in self storage facilities and related self storage real estate investments. Our year-end is December 31. As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Strategic Storage Trust II, Inc. and each of our subsidiaries.

SmartStop Asset Management, LLC (our “Sponsor”) was the sponsor of our Offering (as defined below). Our Sponsor owns 97.5% of the economic interests (and 100% of the voting membership interests) of Strategic Storage Advisor II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (our “Advisor”) and owns 100% of Strategic Storage Property Management II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (our “Property Manager”). See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Statements contained in this report for further details about our affiliates.

On January 10, 2014, we commenced a public offering of a maximum of $1.0 billion in common shares for sale to the public (the “Primary Offering”) and $95.0 million in common shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (collectively, the “Offering”). On May 23, 2014, we satisfied the $1.5 million minimum offering requirements of our Offering and commenced formal operations. On September 28, 2015, we revised our Primary Offering and offered two classes of shares of common stock: Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class A Shares”) and Class T common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Class T Shares”). Our Primary Offering terminated on January 9, 2017. We sold approximately 48 million Class A Shares and approximately 7 million Class T Shares in our Offering for gross proceeds of approximately $493 million and approximately $73 million, respectively. On November 30, 2016, we filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-3, which registered up to an additional $100.9 million in shares under our distribution reinvestment plan (our “DRP Offering”). As of September 30, 2017, we had sold approximately 1.0 million Class A Shares and approximately 0.2 million Class T Shares for approximately $10.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in our DRP Offering. The DRP Offering may be terminated at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to stockholders.

As of September 30, 2017, our self storage portfolio was comprised as follows:

 

 

36

---

 

Critical Accounting Policies

We have established accounting policies which conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. Following is a discussion of the estimates and assumptions used in setting accounting policies that we consider critical in the presentation of our financial statements. Many estimates and assumptions involved in the application of GAAP may have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance, or on the comparability of such information to amounts reported for other periods, because of the subjectivity and judgment required to account for highly uncertain items or the susceptibility of such items to change. These estimates and assumptions affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and our reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period covered by this report. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied or different amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses would have been recorded, thus resulting in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may use different estimates and assumptions that may impact the comparability of our financial condition and results of operations to
those companies.

We believe that our critical accounting policies include the following: real estate purchase price allocations; the evaluation of whether any of our long-lived assets have been impaired; the determination of the useful lives of our long-lived assets; and the evaluation of the consolidation of our interests in joint ventures. The following discussion of these policies supplements, but does not supplant the description of our significant accounting policies, as contained in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, and is intended to present our analysis of the uncertainties involved in arriving upon and applying each policy.

Real Estate Purchase Price Allocation

We allocate the purchase prices of acquired properties based on a number of estimates and assumptions. We allocate the purchase prices to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. These estimated fair values are based upon comparable market sales information for land and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment, building and site improvements. Acquisitions of portfolios of properties are allocated to the individual properties based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates which we estimate based upon the relative size, age, and location of the individual property along with actual historical and estimated occupancy and rental rate levels, and other relevant factors. If available, and determined by management to be appropriate, appraised values are used, rather than these estimated values. Because we believe that substantially all of the leases in place at properties we will acquire will be at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts, we do not expect to allocate any portion of the purchase prices to above or below market leases. The determination of market rates is also subject to a number of estimates and assumptions. Our allocations of purchase prices could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as such allocations may vary dramatically based on the estimates and assumptions we use.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The majority of our assets, other than cash and cash equivalents, consist of long-lived real estate assets as well as intangible assets related to our acquisitions. We will evaluate such assets for impairment based on events and changes in circumstances that may arise in the future and that may impact the carrying amounts of our long-lived assets. When indicators of potential impairment are present, we will assess the recoverability of the particular asset by determining whether the carrying value of the asset will be recovered, through an evaluation of the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. This evaluation is based on a number of estimates and

37

---

 

assumptions. Based on this evaluation, if the expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will adjust the value of the long-lived asset and recognize an impairment loss. Our evaluation of the impairment of long-lived assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the amount of impairment loss recognized, if any, may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.

Estimated Useful Lives of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the useful lives of the assets underlying our properties based upon a subjective determination of the period of future benefit for each asset. We record depreciation expense with respect to these assets based upon the estimated useful lives we determine. Our determinations of the useful lives of the assets could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as such determinations, and the corresponding amount of depreciation expense, may vary dramatically based on the estimates and assumptions
we use.

Consolidation of Investments in Joint Ventures

We will evaluate the consolidation of our investments in joint ventures in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. This evaluation requires us to determine whether we have a controlling interest in a joint venture through a means other than voting rights, and, if so, such joint venture may be required to be consolidated in our financial statements. Our evaluation of our joint ventures under such accounting guidance could result in a materially different presentation of the financial statements or materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements, as the joint venture entities included in our financial statements may vary based on the estimates and assumptions we use.

REIT Qualification

We made an election under Section 856(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code) to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2014. By qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which our qualification is denied. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in a manner that will enable us to continue to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and we intend to continue to operate as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Results of Operations

Overview

We derive revenues principally from: (i) rents received from tenants who rent storage units under month-to-month leases at each of our self storage facilities; (ii) sales of packing- and storage-related supplies at our storage facilities and (iii) exclusive to our properties in Canada, our tenant protection plan program. Therefore, our operating results depend significantly on our ability to retain our existing tenants and lease our available self storage units to new tenants, while maintaining and, where possible, increasing the prices for our self storage units. Additionally, our operating results depend on our tenants making their required rental payments to us.

Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects the occupancy levels, rental rates, rental revenues and operating expenses of our facilities. Development of any new self storage facilities would intensify competition of self storage operators in markets in which we operate.

As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, we owned 83 and 66 self storage facilities, respectively. Our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2016 include full quarter results for 63 self storage facilities and partial quarter results for three facilities acquired during the quarter ended September 30, 2016. Our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2017 include full quarter results for those 66 self storage facilities plus full quarter results for an additional 17 self storage facilities acquired during the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017. Therefore, we believe there is little basis for comparison between the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

38

---

 

Our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 include full nine months of operations for 33 self storage facilities and partial nine months of operations for 33 facilities acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 include full nine months of operations for those 66 self storage facilities and the 11 self storage facilities acquired during the fourth quarter of 2016, plus partial nine months of operations for the additional six self storage facilities acquired during the first quarter of 2017. Therefore, we believe there is little basis for comparison between the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Operating results in future periods will depend on the results of operations of our existing properties and of the real estate properties that we acquire in the future.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Total Revenues

Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $19.9 million and $14.5 million, respectively. The increase in total revenues is primarily attributable to a full quarter of operations for 83 properties for the third quarter of 2017, compared to a full quarter of operations for 63 properties and a partial quarter of operations for three properties for the third quarter of 2016.

Property Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $6.5 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Property operating expenses includes the cost to operate our facilities including payroll, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, and marketing. The increase in property operating expenses is primarily attributable to a full quarter of operations for 83 properties for the third quarter of 2017, compared to a full quarter of operations for 63 properties and a partial quarter of operations for three properties for the third quarter of 2016.

Property Operating Expenses – Affiliates

Property operating expenses – affiliates for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $3.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Property operating expenses – affiliates includes property management fees and asset management fees. The increase in property operating expenses – affiliates is primarily attributable to a full quarter of operations for 83 properties for the third quarter of 2017, compared to a full quarter of operations for 63 properties and a partial quarter of operations for three properties for the third quarter of 2016, as well as the costs incurred in conjunction with the property management changes.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of legal expenses, transfer agent fees, directors’ and officers’ insurance expense, an allocation of a portion of our Advisor’s payroll related costs, accounting expenses and board of directors related costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to increases in accounting, legal, and board of directors related costs commensurate with our increased operational activity.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $8.7 million and $7.4 million, respectively. Depreciation expense consists primarily of depreciation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of intangible assets resulting from our acquisitions. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to a full quarter of operations for 83 properties for the third quarter of 2017, compared to a full quarter of operations for 63 properties and a partial quarter of operations for three properties for the third quarter of 2016.

39

---

 

Acquisition Expenses – Affiliates

There were no acquisition expenses – affiliates for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to approximately $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. These acquisition expenses primarily relate to the costs associated with the self storage properties acquired during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Other Property Acquisition Expenses

There were no other property acquisition expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. These acquisition expenses include property acquisition expenses incurred by third parties and primarily relate to the costs associated with the self storage properties acquired during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest Expense and Accretion of Fair Market Value of Secured Debt

Interest expense and the accretion of fair market value of secured debt for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $4.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to the additional debt obtained in conjunction with the three properties acquired during the third quarter of 2016, the 11 self storage facilities acquired during the fourth quarter of 2016, and six properties acquired during the first quarter of 2017. We expect interest expense to fluctuate in future periods commensurate with our future debt level.

Interest Expense – Debt Issuance Costs

Interest expense – debt issuance costs for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $0.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense – debt issuance costs is primarily attributable to approximately $0.8 million of costs incurred related to the KeyBank CMBS Loan that were expensed in accordance with GAAP during the third quarter of the 2016, and the amortization of debt issuance costs related to the Amended KeyBank Property Loan which were fully amortized in 2016.  We expect debt issuance costs to fluctuate commensurate with our future financing activity.

Same-Store Facility Results

The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store facilities (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since July 1, 2016 excluding Oakville I, which completed development during the second quarter of 2016) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. We consider the following data to be meaningful as this allows for the comparison of results without the effects of acquisition or development activity.

 

 

N/M Not meaningful

40

---

 

Our increase in same-store revenue of approximately $1.0 million was primarily the result of increased average physical occupancy of approximately 0.7% and increased rent per occupied square foot of approximately 6.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 over the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Our same-store property operating expenses increased by approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in property taxes caused by reassessments on the Florida properties acquired during 2016.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to operating income as presented on our consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:

 

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Total Revenues

Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $56.7 million and $30.5 million, respectively. The increase in total revenues is primarily attributable to a full nine months of operations for 77 properties and a partial nine months of operations for six properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to a full nine months of operations for 33 properties and a partial nine months of operations for 33 properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Property Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $18.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively. Property operating expenses includes the cost to operate our facilities including payroll, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, and marketing. The increase in property operating expenses is primarily attributable to a full nine months of operations for 77 properties and a partial nine months of operations for six properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to a full nine months of operations of 33 properties and a partial nine months of operations for 33 properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

41

---

 

Property Operating Expenses – Affiliates

Property operating expenses – affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $8.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively. Property operating expenses – affiliates includes property management fees and asset management fees. The increase in property operating expenses – affiliates is primarily attributable to a full nine months of operations of 77 properties and a partial nine months of operations for six properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to a full nine months of operations for 33 properties and a partial nine months of operations for 33 properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as well as the costs incurred in conjunction with the property management changes.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $2.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of legal expenses, transfer agent fees, directors’ and officers’ insurance expense, an allocation of a portion of our Advisor’s payroll related costs, accounting expenses and board of directors related costs. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to increases in accounting, transfer agent fees, legal, and board of directors related costs commensurate with our increased operational activity.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $25.9 million and $16.0 million, respectively. Depreciation expense consists primarily of depreciation on the buildings and site improvements at our properties. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of intangible assets resulting from our acquisitions. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is primarily attributable to a full nine months of operations for 77 properties and a partial nine months of operations for six properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to a full nine months of operations for 33 properties and a partial nine months of operations for 33 properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Acquisition Expenses – Affiliates

Acquisition expenses – affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $0.2 million and $9.0 million, respectively. These acquisition expenses primarily relate to the costs associated with the self storage properties acquired in the respective periods.

Other Property Acquisition Expenses

Other property acquisition expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $0.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. These acquisition expenses include property acquisition expenses incurred by third parties and primarily relate to the costs associated with the self storage properties acquired in the respective periods.

Interest Expense and Accretion of Fair Market Value of Secured Debt

Interest expense and the accretion of fair market value of secured debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $11.7 million and $4.4 million, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to the debt obtained in conjunction with the three properties acquired during the third quarter of 2016, the 11 self storage facilities acquired during the fourth quarter of 2016, and the six properties acquired during the first quarter of 2017. We expect interest expense to increase in future periods commensurate with our future debt level.

Interest Expense – Debt Issuance Costs

Interest expense – debt issuance costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $1.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense – debt issuance costs is primarily attributable to the amortization of debt issuance costs related to the Amended KeyBank Property Loan which were fully amortized in 2016. We expect debt issuance costs to fluctuate commensurate with our future financing activity.

42

---

 

Same-Store Facility Results

The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store facilities (those properties included in the consolidated results of operations since January 1, 2016) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. We consider the following data to be meaningful as this allows for the comparison of results without the effects of acquisition or development activity.

 

 

N/M Not meaningful

Our increase in same-store revenue of approximately $2.2 million was primarily the result of increased average physical occupancy of approximately 4.8% and increased rent per occupied square foot of approximately 6.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 over the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Our same-store property operating expenses decreased by approximately $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreased repair and maintenance expense.

43

---

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to operating income as presented on our consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Diminution in value may occur if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances or other measures necessary to maintain the assets are not undertaken. However, we believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. In addition, in the determination of FFO, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying value, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Testing for impairment is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an

44

---

 

impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations; it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property. To date, we have not recognized any impairments.

Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization and impairments, assists in providing a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income (loss).

However, FFO or modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), discussed below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be considered a more relevant measure of operational performance and is, therefore, given more prominence than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO. Changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that were put into effect and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, that are expensed as operating expenses under GAAP. We believe these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-traded REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. The purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key feature of our business plan in order to generate operational income and cash flow in order to make distributions to investors. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-traded REITs are unique in that they typically have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. We have used the proceeds raised in our Offering, including our DRP Offering, to acquire properties, and we expect to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger or sale, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another similar transaction) within three to five years after the completion of our Primary Offering, which is generally comparable to other publicly registered, non-traded REITs. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase assets and intend to have a limited life. The decision whether to engage in any liquidity event is in the sole discretion of our board of directors. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-traded REITs, the Investment Program Association, or the IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered, non-traded REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-traded REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not ultimately engage in a liquidity event. We believe that, because MFFO excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired and that we consider more reflective of investing activities, as well as other non-operating items included in FFO, MFFO can provide, on a going-forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our Primary Offering has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the publicly registered, non-traded REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our Primary Offering and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our Primary Offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition fees and expenses that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds From Operations (the “Practice Guideline”) issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income (loss): acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to straight line rents and amortization of above or below intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on

45

---

 

debt investments; non-recurring impairments of real estate related investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; non-recurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, adjustments relating to contingent purchase price obligations included in net income, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income (loss) in calculating cash flows from operations and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.

Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses, the amortization of fair value adjustments related to debt, realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign exchange holdings and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. The other adjustments included in the IPA’s Practice Guideline are not applicable to us for the periods presented. Acquisition fees and expenses are paid in cash by us, and we have not set aside or put into escrow any specific amount of proceeds from our Offering to be used to fund acquisition fees and expenses. We do not intend to fund acquisition fees and expenses in the future from operating revenues and cash flows, nor from the sale of properties and subsequent re-deployment of capital and concurrent incurrence of acquisition fees and expenses. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our Advisor and third parties. Acquisition related expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In the future, if we are not able to raise additional proceeds from our DRP Offering or other offerings, this could result in us paying acquisition fees or reimbursing acquisition expenses due to our Advisor, or a portion thereof, with net proceeds from borrowed funds, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or ancillary cash flows. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) in determining cash flows from operations. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives and the amortization of fair value adjustments related to debt as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized or as items which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance.

We use MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-traded REITs which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-traded REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures may be useful to investors. For example, acquisition fees and expenses are intended to be funded from the proceeds of our Offering and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition fees and expenses, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations, which is an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our

46

---

 

performance. MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT, nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-traded REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO. The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for each of the periods presented below:

 

 

As discussed above, our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been significantly impacted by our acquisitions. The information below should be read in conjunction with the discussion regarding the acquisitions above.

Non-cash Items Included in Net Loss:

Provided below is additional information related to selected non-cash items included in net loss above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results:

47

---

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

A comparison of cash flows for operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $13.9 million and ($2.1 million), respectively, a change of approximately $16.0 million. The change in cash provided by (used in) our operating activities is primarily the result a change from a net loss of ($5.6 million) to net income of $13.3 million, when excluding depreciation and amortization.

Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $57.0 million and $466.2 million, respectively, a decrease in the use of cash of approximately $409.1 million. The change in cash used in investing activities primarily relates to cash consideration paid of approximately $49.4 million for our acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $454.4 million for the purchase of our acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were approximately $39.9 million and $452.2 million, respectively, a decrease in the cash provided of approximately $412.3 million. The change in cash provided by financing activities was comprised of approximately $218.9 million less in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock, and approximately $191.9 million less in net proceeds from the issuance of secured debt.

Short-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources

We generally expect that we will meet our short-term operating liquidity requirements from the combination of the proceeds from our Offering, proceeds from secured or unsecured financing from banks or other lenders, net cash provided by property operations and advances from our Advisor which will be repaid, without interest, as funds are available after meeting our current liquidity requirements, subject to the limitations on reimbursement set forth in our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor. Per the Advisory Agreement, all advances from our Advisor shall be reimbursed no less frequently than monthly, although our Advisor has indicated that it may waive such a requirement on a month-by-month basis. The organization and offering costs associated with the Offering were paid by us or our Advisor. Our Advisor was required to reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which the Primary Offering terminated to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. However, subsequent to the termination of our Primary Offering on January 9, 2017, we determined that organization and offering costs did not exceed 3.5% of the gross proceeds from the Primary Offering, and thus there was no reimbursement.

Our Primary Offering terminated on January 9, 2017. We believe the combination of proceeds from our Primary Offering and potential borrowing capacity should be sufficient to allow us to meet our short-term capital needs and move to the next phase of our life cycle.

Distribution Policy

On September 18, 2017, our board of directors declared a distribution rate for the fourth quarter of 2017 of approximately $0.001644 per day per share on the outstanding shares of common stock payable to both Class A and Class T stockholders of record of such shares as shown on our books at the close of business on each day during the period, commencing on October 1, 2017 and continuing on each day thereafter through and including December 31, 2017. Such distributions payable to each stockholder of record during a month will be paid the following month.

48

---

 

Historically, we have primarily made distributions to our stockholders using proceeds of the Offering in anticipation of future cash flow. As such, this reduced the amount of capital we ultimately had available to invest in properties. Because substantially all of our operations will be performed indirectly through our Operating Partnership, our ability to pay distributions depends in large part on our Operating Partnership’s ability to pay distributions to its partners, including to us. In the event we do not have enough cash from operations to fund cash distributions, we may borrow, issue additional securities or sell assets in order to fund the distributions. Though we presently intend to pay only cash distributions, and potentially stock distributions, we are authorized by our charter to pay in-kind distributions of readily marketable securities, distributions of beneficial interests in a liquidating trust established for our dissolution and the liquidation of our assets in accordance with the terms of the charter or distributions that meet all of the following conditions: (a) our board of directors advises each stockholder of the risks associated with direct ownership of the property; (b) our board of directors offers each stockholder the election of receiving such in-kind distributions; and (c) in-kind distributions are only made to those stockholders who accept such offer.

For some period after our Offering, we may not be able to pay distributions from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from debt financing.

Distributions are paid to our stockholders based on the record date selected by our board of directors. We currently declare and pay distributions monthly based on daily declaration and record dates so that investors may be entitled to distributions immediately upon purchasing our shares. We expect to continue to regularly pay distributions unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions, or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Distributions will be authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which will be directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. Our board of directors may increase, decrease or eliminate the distribution rate that is being paid at any time. Distributions will be made on all classes of our common stock at the same time. The per share amount of distributions on Class A Shares and Class T Shares will likely differ because of different allocations of class-specific expenses. Specifically, distributions on Class T Shares will likely be lower than distributions on Class A Shares because Class T Shares are subject to ongoing stockholder servicing fees. The funds we receive from operations that are available for distribution may be affected by a number of factors, including the following:

49

---

 

The following shows our distributions and the sources of such distributions for the respective periods presented:

 

 

From our inception through September 30, 2017, we paid cumulative distributions of approximately $54.6 million, as compared to cumulative FFO of approximately $0.5 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we paid distributions of approximately $24.6 million, as compared to an FFO of approximately $13.0 million which reflects acquisition related expenses of approximately $0.5 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we paid distributions of approximately $15.1 million, as compared to a negative FFO of approximately $5.7 million which reflects acquisition related expenses of approximately $11.8 million. The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

We must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income each year in order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Code. Our directors may authorize distributions in excess of this percentage as they deem appropriate. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period, but may be made in anticipation of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. To allow for such differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the effect of required debt payments, among other things, we could be required to borrow funds from third parties on a short-term basis, issue new securities, or sell assets to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies, and we may use an unlimited amount from any source to pay our distributions. These methods of obtaining funding could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs and decreasing available cash, which could reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment in our shares. In addition, such distributions may constitute a return of investors’ capital.

Historically, we have not been able to and in the future may not be able to pay distributions from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from debt financing or from proceeds from the issuance of common stock in our Primary Offering and pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The payment of distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.

Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flows from operations. However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including our ability to raise and invest capital at favorable yields, the financial performance of our investments in the current real estate and financial environment and the types and mix of investments in our portfolio. As a result, future distributions declared and paid may exceed cash flow from operations.

Indebtedness

As of September 30, 2017, our total indebtedness was approximately $401 million, which included approximately $264 million in fixed rate debt, $137 million in variable rate debt and approximately $2 million in debt premium less approximately $3 million in debt issuance costs. See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our indebtedness.

50

---

 

Long-Term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for property acquisitions, either directly or through entity interests, for the payment of operating expenses, capital improvements on our properties, distributions, and for the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness.

Long-term potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, issuance of equity instruments, undistributed funds from operations, and additional public or private offerings. We believe our ability to refinance or secure new debt will in part be affected by our ability to continue to lease-up certain development projects and other lease-up acquisitions. If such facilities continue to progress we believe our ability to borrow against those assets will be favorably impacted. To the extent we are not able to secure requisite additional financing in the form of a credit facility or other debt, we will be dependent upon proceeds from the issuance of equity instruments and cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our long-term liquidity requirements and to fund our distributions.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2017:

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships. Such entities are often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitments or intent to provide funding to any such entities.

Subsequent Events

Please see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.

Seasonality

We believe that we will experience minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which we believe will be slightly higher over the summer months due to increased moving activity.

51

---

 

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk and to a lesser extent, foreign currency risk. We may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and fund acquisition, expansion, and financing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed rates or variable rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

As of September 30, 2017, our total indebtedness was approximately $401 million, which included approximately $264 million in fixed rate debt, $137 million in variable rate debt and approximately $2 million in debt premium less approximately $3 million in debt issuance costs. As of December 31, 2016, our total indebtedness was approximately $321 million, which included approximately $184 million in fixed rate debt, $137 million in variable rate debt and approximately $2 million in debt premium less approximately $3 million in debt issuance costs. Our debt instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes. Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable debt. A change in interest rates on fixed rate debt impacts its fair value but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in interest rates on variable debt could impact the interest incurred and cash flows and its fair value. If the underlying rate of the related index on our variable rate debt were to increase by 100 basis points, the increase in interest would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $0.4 million annually.

Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

The following table summarizes future debt maturities and average interest rates on our outstanding debt as of September 30, 2017:

 

 

In the future, we may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and fund acquisition, expansion, and financing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations.

Currently, our only foreign exchange rate risk comes from our Canadian properties and the Canadian Dollar (“CAD”). Our existing foreign currency hedge mitigates our foreign currency exposure of our net CAD denominated investments; however, we generate all of our revenues and expend essentially all of our operating expenses and third party debt service costs related to our Canadian properties in CAD. As a result of fluctuations in currency exchange, our cash flows and results of operations could be affected.

52

---

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

The following should be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. With the exception of the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

We have incurred a net loss to date, have an accumulated deficit, and we anticipate that our operations may not be profitable in 2017.

We incurred a net loss of approximately $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Our accumulated deficit was approximately $56.3 million as of September 30, 2017.

We have paid, and may continue to pay, distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations; therefore, we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties, and our stockholders’ overall return may be reduced.

In the event we do not have enough cash from operations to fund our distributions, we may borrow, issue additional securities, or sell assets in order to fund the distributions or make the distributions out of net proceeds from our Offering. We are not prohibited from undertaking such activities by our charter, bylaws or investment policies, and we may use an unlimited amount from any source to pay our distributions. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015, and 2016, we funded 100% of our distributions using proceeds from our Offering. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we funded 57% of our distributions using cash flow from operations and 43% using proceeds from our DRP Offering. If we continue to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations, we will have fewer funds available for acquiring properties, which may reduce our stockholders’ overall returns. Additionally, to the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock may be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize a capital gain.

We may only calculate the value per share for our shares annually and, therefore, you may not be able to determine the net asset value of your shares on an ongoing basis.

On April 13, 2017, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share for our Class A shares and Class T shares of $10.22. Our board of directors approved this estimated value per share pursuant to recent amendments to rules promulgated by FINRA, which require us to disclose an estimated per share value of our shares based on a valuation no later than 150 days following the second anniversary of the date on which we broke escrow in our Offering. When determining the estimated value per share from and after 150 days following the second anniversary of breaking escrow in our Offering and annually thereafter, there are currently no SEC, federal and state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology

53

---

 

to employ in determining an estimated value per share; provided, however, that the determination of the estimated value per share must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.

We intend to use this estimated per share value of our shares until the next net asset valuation approved by our board of directors, which we are required to approve at least annually. We may not calculate the net asset value per share for our shares more than annually. Therefore, you may not be able to determine the net asset value of your shares on an ongoing basis.

In determining our estimated value per share, we primarily relied upon a valuation of our portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2016. Valuations and appraisals of our properties are estimates of fair value and may not necessarily correspond to realizable value upon the sale of such properties; therefore our estimated net asset value per share may not reflect the amount that would be realized upon a sale of each of our properties.

For the purposes of calculating the estimated value per share, an independent third party appraiser valued our properties as of December 31, 2016. The valuation methodologies used to value our properties involved certain subjective judgments. Ultimate realization of the value of an asset depends to a great extent on economic and other conditions beyond our control and the control of our advisor and independent appraiser. Further, valuations do not necessarily represent the price at which an asset would sell, since market prices of assets can only be determined by negotiation between a willing buyer and seller. Therefore, the valuations of our properties and our investments in real estate related assets may not correspond to the timely realizable value upon a sale of those assets. Because the price you will pay for shares in this offering is primarily based on the estimated net asset value per share, you may pay more than realizable value when you purchase your shares or receive less than realizable value for your investment when you sell your shares.

 

 

54

---

 

None.

Not applicable.

The exhibits required to be filed with this report are set forth on the Exhibit Index hereto and incorporated by
reference herein.

55

---

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are included in this report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

 

 

 

56

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

57