Exhibit 99.1

Consolidated Financial Statements

Heritage Oaks Bancorp

and Subsidiaries

Financial Statements

2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors

Heritage Oaks Bancorp

Paso Robles, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013).

/s/Crowe Horwath LLP

Sacramento, California

March 3, 2017

3

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(continued on next page)

8

Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

9

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Heritage Oaks Bancorp (“Bancorp”) is a California corporation organized in 1994, and is the holding company for Heritage Oaks Bank (the “Bank”), which opened for business in 1983.  The Bank, which is the Company’s sole operating subsidiary, operates branches within San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties and has a loan production office in Ventura County. The Bank offers traditional banking products such as checking, savings, money market accounts and certificates of deposit, as well as mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans to customers who are predominately small to medium-sized businesses and to individuals.  As such, the Company is subject to a concentration risk associated with its banking operations in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties, and to a lesser degree Ventura County.  No one customer accounts for more than 10% of revenue or assets in any period presented and the Company has no assets nor does it generate any revenue from outside of the United States.  While the chief decision-makers of the Company monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis.  Operating segments are aggregated into one as operating results for all segments are similar.  Accordingly, all of the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the holding company (“Bancorp”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and CCMS Systems, Inc. (an inactive entity).  All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2014 and 2015 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation.  These reclassifications did not have any effect on the prior years’ reported net income or shareholders’ equity.

Investment in Non-Consolidated Subsidiaries

The Company accounts for its investment in Heritage Oaks Capital Trust II, Mission Community Capital Trust I, and Santa Lucia Bancorp (CA) Capital Trust, as unconsolidated subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting, as the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the trust. Mission Community Capital Trust I and Santa Lucia Bancorp (CA) Capital Trust were acquired as part of the acquisition of Mission Community Bancorp on February 28, 2014.  The sole purpose of each of these trusts is for the issuance of trust preferred securities.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and to general practices within the banking industry.  In order to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses, the valuation of real estate acquired through foreclosure, the carrying value of the Company’s deferred tax assets and estimates used in the determination of the fair value of certain financial instruments.

In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the value of foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans and leases, and foreclosed real estate and collateral, future additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions.  In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses and foreclosed real estate.

10

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

These agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan and lease losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.  Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the allowance for loan and lease losses and foreclosed real estate may change in future periods.  See also Note 6. Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, of these consolidated financial statements.

The Company uses an estimate of its future earnings in determining if it is more likely than not that the carrying value of its deferred tax assets will be realized over the period they are expected to reverse.  If based on all available evidence, the Company believes that a portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized; a valuation allowance may be established. See also Note 8. Income Taxes, of these consolidated financial statements.

The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments, and assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations generally correlates to the level of pricing observability.  Financial instruments, and acquired assets and liabilities with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of observable pricing and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments, and acquired assets and liabilities rarely traded or not quoted will generally have little or no observable pricing and a higher degree of judgment is utilized in measuring the fair value. Observable pricing is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of asset or liability, whether the asset or liability is new to the market and not yet established, and the characteristics specific to the transaction. See also Note 3. Business Combination, and Note 4. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities, of these consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations and Related Matters

Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations.  Under the acquisition method the acquiring entity in a business combination recognizes 100 percent of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, regardless of the percentage owned, at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition.  Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.  Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from contingencies must also be recognized at fair value, if the fair value can be determined during the measurement period. Results of operations of an acquired business are included in the statement of operations from the date of acquisition.  Acquisition-related costs, including conversion charges, are expensed as incurred.  The Company applied this guidance to the acquisition of Mission Community Bancorp that was consummated on February 28, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Guidance Adopted

In September, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments (Topic 805).  This ASU eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.  The new guidance under this update requires the cumulative impact of measurement period adjustments be recognized in the period the adjustment is determined.  This update does not change what constitutes a measurement period adjustment, nor does it change the length of the measurement period.  The new standard became effective for interim annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date.  This update did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Effective

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows — Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230).  This update clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this update, but does not expect the adoption of the amendments within this update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

11

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326). This update changes the methodology used by financial institutions under current U.S. GAAP to recognize credit losses in the financial statements.  Currently, U.S. GAAP requires the use of the incurred loss model, whereby financial institutions recognize in current period earnings, incurred credit losses and those inherent in the financial statements, as of the date of the balance sheet.  This guidance results in a new model for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses, commonly referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model.  Under the CECL model, financial institutions are required to estimate future credit losses and recognize those losses in current period earnings.  The amendments within the update are effective for fiscal years and all interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.  Upon adoption of the amendments within this update, the Company will be required to make a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this update will have on its consolidated financial statements.  The Company believes the CECL model will generally result in earlier recognition of credit losses for loans and other financing receivables in the consolidated financial statements.  The Company is evaluating historical loan level data requirements necessary for the implementation of the CECL model, as well as various methodologies for determining expected credit losses.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).  This update improves the understanding and comparability of lessees’ financial commitments by requiring lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP.  This update requires a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability to make lease payments and a right of use asset, representing the right to use the underlying asset, during the term of the lease.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, using a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of this update will have on its financial statements.  While the impact of the adoption of this update is dependent upon leases outstanding at the time of adoption, the Company preliminarily believes the adoption of this update will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as the current gross amount of estimated future lease payments is less than 0.4% of total assets as of December 31, 2016.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718).  This update simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.  The new guidance under the update requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recognized as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement.  The amendments within the update are effective for fiscal years and all interim periods beginning after December 31, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this update will have on the consolidated financial statements.  The Company preliminarily believes the adoption of this update will result in a marginal amount of volatility within income tax expense, depending on the amount and timing of share-based compensation award activity such as: the vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, as well as the exercise of stock options.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  This update requires an entity to recognize revenue as performance obligations are met, in order to reflect the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity is entitled to receive for those goods or services.  The following steps are applied in the updated guidance: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  The amendments within this update are effective for the quarter ending March 31, 2018.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this update will have on the consolidated financial statements.  The Company preliminarily believes the adoption of this update will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, as a majority of the Company’s revenue generating transactions are not included in the scope of this update.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Topic 825).  The amendments in this update require that public entities measure equity investments with readily determinable fair values, at fair value, with changes in their fair value recorded through net income.  This ASU also clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets.  The amendments within the update are effective for fiscal years and all interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this update, but preliminarily does not expect a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the majority of the Company’s investment securities are classified as available for sale debt securities.

12

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Estimates of fair value have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value.  Accordingly, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since the balance sheet date and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented in the accompanying notes.

The Company determines the fair market values of financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in U.S. GAAP.  The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than a forced or liquidation sale, and is based on an exit price in the principal market or most advantageous market in which the reporting entity could transact.  Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings or a particular financial instrument.  Pursuant to U.S. GAAP, the Company is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  Specifically, U.S. GAAP describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, as outlined below:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities may include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market and that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over the counter markets.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments where fair value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies using market interest rates, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments.  Many of these estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate the fair values of those assets due to the short-term nature of the assets.

Investments in Securities Available for Sale

Fair values are based upon quoted market prices, where available.  If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are extrapolated from the quoted prices of similar instruments or through the use of other observable data supported by a valuation model.  The fair value of newly issued securities, for which there is not a sufficient history of market transactions on which to base a fair value determination under Level 1 or 2 of the hierarchy, are initially valued under Level 3 of the hierarchy.  At such time that sufficient history of market transactions is established, the securities’ fair value is determined under Level 1 or 2 of the hierarchy and accordingly the security is transferred out of Level 3 and into the applicable level.

13

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock is not readily determinable due to the lack of its transferability, as ownership of these securities is restricted to member banks.

Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Accrued Interest Receivable

For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying amounts.  The fair values for other loans (for example, fixed rate loans and loans that possess a rate variable other than daily or that are at their floor rate) are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.  Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics.

The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices.  If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of the loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.  The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Impairment is measured based on a discounted cash flow analysis or in the case of loans that are deemed collateral dependent, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which is supported by the appraised value of the collateral less any estimated costs to sell.  Collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as non-recurring Level 2 when the fair value of the underlying collateral is based on an observable market price or current appraised value.  When current market prices are not available or the Company determines that the fair value of the underlying collateral is further impaired below appraised values based on Company specific experience with similar collateral, the Company records impaired loans as non-recurring Level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Collateral

Other real estate owned and foreclosed collateral are adjusted to fair value, less any estimated costs to sell, at the time the loans are transferred into this category.  The fair value of these assets is based on independent appraisals, observable market prices for similar assets, or management’s estimation of value.  When the fair value is based on independent appraisals or observable market prices for similar assets, the Company records other real estate owned or foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 2 assets. When appraised values are not available, there is no observable market price for similar assets, or management determines the fair value of the asset is further impaired below appraised values or observable market prices based on Company specific experience with similar assets, the Company records other real estate owned or foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 3 assets.  The most common adjustment to reported appraised values of collateral is a monthly discount linked to the passage of time since the last appraisal.  This discount factor may range between 1% and 3% per month and is consistent with that used in the appraisals to discount for the passage of time between the transaction date for comparable properties used in the appraisal and the appraisal date.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

The fair value disclosed for FHLB advances is determined by discounting contractual cash flows at current market interest rates for similar instruments.

Non-Interest Bearing Deposits

The fair values disclosed for non-interest bearing deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts).

14

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Interest Bearing Deposits and Accrued Interest Payable

The fair values disclosed for interest bearing deposits (for example, interest bearing checking accounts and savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts).  The fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated contractual maturities on such time deposits.  The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

The fair value disclosed for junior subordinated debentures is based on market prices of similar instruments issued with similar contractual terms and by issuers with a similar credit profile as the Company.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments consist of back-to-back interest rate swap contracts between the Company and certain of its borrowers, as well as between the Company and a counterparty bank.  These interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable rate interest payments between the Company and its counterparties, and are accounted for as free standing derivative contracts, carried at fair value in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  The fair value of these contracts is determined through a third party valuation model used by the Company’s counterparty bank, which uses observable market data inputs such as cash LIBOR rates, prices of Eurodollar futures contracts, and market swap rates.  The Company records interest rate swap contacts as recurring Level 2 assets and liabilities.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments

Fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are based upon fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Banking regulations require that all banks maintain a percentage of their deposits as reserves in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank.  In management’s opinion, the Bank is in compliance with the reserve requirements as of December 31, 2016.  The Company maintains amounts due from banks that exceed federally insured limits.  Historically the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.  For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks. Generally, interest bearing balances due from banks represent excess liquidity that the Company and/or Bank invests through other institutions overnight.

Investment Securities Available for Sale

The Company’s investment securities are classified as available for sale and are measured at fair value, with changes in unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.  The fair values of most securities that are designated available for sale are based on quoted market prices.  If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are extrapolated from the quoted prices of similar instruments or through the use of other observable data supporting a valuation model.  Gains or losses on sales of investment securities are determined on the specific identification method and recorded as a component of non-interest income.  Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted using the interest method over the expected lives of the related securities and recognized in interest income.

Other than Temporary Impairment (“OTTI”)

The Company periodically evaluates investments in the portfolio for OTTI and more specifically when conditions warrant such an evaluation.  When evaluating whether impairment is other than temporary, the Company considers, among other things, the following: (1) the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, (2) the extent to which the security’s fair value is less than its cost, (3) the financial condition of the issuer, (4) any adverse changes in ratings issued by various rating agencies, (5) the intent and ability of the Company to hold such securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value and (6) in the case of mortgage related securities, credit enhancements, loan-to-values, credit scores, delinquency and default rates, cash flows and the extent to which those cash flows are within management’s initial expectations based on pre-purchase analyses.

15

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

When an investment is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, the Company assesses whether it has the intent to sell the investment, or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the investment before its anticipated recovery of its full basis in the security.  If the Company does not intend, nor anticipates it will be required to sell the investment, it must still perform an evaluation of future cash flows it expects to receive from the investment to determine if a credit loss has occurred. The evaluation includes future cash flows from the investment the Company expects to collect, based on an assessment of all available information about the applicable investment.  The Company considers such factors as: the structure of the security and the Company’s position within that structure, the remaining payment terms for the security, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity on the collateral supporting the security, expected changes in real estate prices, and assumptions regarding interest rates, to determine whether the Company will recover the remaining amortized cost basis of the security.

In the event that a credit loss is deemed to have occurred, only the amount of impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in current period earnings. OTTI amounts related to all other factors, such as market conditions, are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The Bank is a member of the FHLB and as a condition of membership, the Bank is required to purchase stock in the FHLB. The required ownership of FHLB stock is based on the level of borrowing the Bank has obtained from the FHLB.  FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value.  There have been no events that would suggest that an impairment in the carrying value of the stock has occurred as of December 31, 2016.  Dividends received on the FHLB stock are reported as a component of interest income.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, which is determined by the specified value in the sales contract with the third party buyer.  Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance through charges to other non-interest expense.

Loans Held for Investment

Loans management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances reduced by any charge-offs or specific valuation allowances and net of any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.  Nonrefundable fees and certain costs associated with originating or acquiring loans are deferred and accreted/amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the contractual lives of the loan.  Upon prepayment, unamortized loan fees, net of costs, are immediately recognized in interest income.  Other fees, including those collected upon principal prepayments, are included in interest income when received.

Loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as non-accruing loans.  The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when principal and/or interest has become delinquent 90 days or more based on the contractual terms of the loan and/or when, in the opinion of management, there is reasonable doubt as to collectability, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection.  When loans are placed on non-accrual status, all interest previously accrued, but not collected, is reversed against current period interest income.  This policy is consistently applied to all portfolio segments.

Interest income generally is not recognized on non-accruing loans unless the likelihood of further loss is remote.  Interest payments received on non-accrual loans is generally applied as a reduction to the loan principal balance.  Interest accruals are resumed only when the loan is brought current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, all remaining principal and interest is deemed to be fully collectable, there has been at least six months of sustained repayment performance since the loan was placed on non-accrual status and/or management believes, based on current information, that the loan is no longer impaired.  Interest payments received from the borrower and applied as a reduction to the principal balance of the loan while the loan was on non-accrual status is not recognized in interest income until such time that the loan is repaid in full.

16

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Measurement of impairment is based on expectations of future cash flows which are discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, or measured by reference to an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral for a collateral-dependent loan.  The Company selects the measurement method on a loan-by-loan basis except that collateral dependent loans for which foreclosure is probable are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral.  The Company recognizes interest income on impaired loans based on its existing methods of recognizing interest income on non-accrual loans.  All impaired loans are generally charged-off, either partially or fully, at such time that it is highly certain a loss has been realized.

Acquired Loans and Leases

Loans and leases acquired through purchase or through a business combination are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan and lease losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.  Subsequent to acquisition, if the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses methodology indicates that the credit discount associated with acquired, non-purchased credit impaired loans, is no longer sufficient to cover probable losses inherent in those loans, the Company establishes an allowance for those loans through a charge to provision for loan and lease losses.

Purchased Credit Impaired Loans (“PCI loans”)

Acquired loans are evaluated upon acquisition for evidence of deterioration in credit quality since their origination to determine if it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments.  These loans are classified as PCI loans, while all other acquired loans are classified as non-PCI loans. The Company has elected to account for PCI loans at the individual loan level.  The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each loan.  The expected cash flow in excess of the loan’s carrying value, which is fair value on the date of acquisition, is referred to as the accretable yield, and is recorded as interest income over the remaining expected life of the loan.  The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is referred to as the non-accretable difference, and is representative of contractual amounts the Company does not expect to collect.  The non-accretable difference is not recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”)

The Company manages credit risk not only through extensive risk analyses performed prior to a loan’s approval, but also through the ongoing monitoring of loans within the portfolio, and more specifically certain types of loans that generally involve a greater degree of risk, such as commercial real estate, commercial lines of credit, agriculture, and construction/land loans. The Company monitors loans in the portfolio through an exhaustive internal process, at least quarterly, as well as with the assistance of independent loan reviews.  These reviews generally not only focus on problem loans, but also internally rated “pass” credits within certain pools of loans that may be expected to experience stress due to economic conditions.  This process allows the Company to validate credit risk grade ratings, underwriting structure, and the Company’s estimated exposure in the current economic environment as well as enhance communications with borrowers where necessary in an effort to mitigate potential future losses.  All significant problem loans are analyzed in detail at least quarterly, in order to properly estimate potential exposure to loss associated with these loans in a timely manner.

Each segment of loans in the portfolio possesses varying degrees of risk, based on, among other things, the type of loan, the purpose of the loan, the type of collateral securing the loan, and the sensitivity the borrower has to changes in certain external factors such as economic conditions.  The following provides a summary of the risks associated with various segments of the Company’s loan portfolio, which are factors management regularly considers when evaluating the adequacy of the ALLL:

·                  Real estate secured loans — consist primarily of loans secured by commercial real estate, multi-family, farmland, and 1 to 4 family residential properties.  As the majority of this segment is comprised of commercial real estate loans, risks associated with this segment lie primarily within that loan type.  Adverse economic conditions may result in a decline in business activity and increased vacancy rates for commercial properties.  These factors, in conjunction with a decline in real estate prices, may expose the Company to the potential for losses if a borrower cannot continue to service the loan with operating revenues, and the value of the property has declined to a level such that it no longer fully covers the Company’s recorded investment in the loan.

17

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

·                  Construction and land — although construction and land loans generally possess a higher inherent risk of loss than other loans, improvements in the mix, collateral and nature of loans help to mitigate risks within this segment of the portfolio.  Risk arises from the necessity to complete projects within specified cost and time limits.  Trends in the construction industry may also impact the credit quality of these loans, as demand drives construction activity.  In addition, trends in real estate values significantly impact the credit quality of these loans, as property values determine the economic viability of future construction projects.

·                  Commercial — consist primarily of commercial and industrial loans (business lines of credit), agriculture loans, and other commercial purpose loans.  Repayment of commercial and industrial loans is generally provided from the cash flows of the related business to which the loan was made.  Adverse changes in economic conditions may result in a decline in business activity, which can impact a borrower’s ability to continue to make scheduled payments.  The risk of repayment of agriculture loans arises largely from factors beyond the control of the Company or the related borrower, such as commodity prices, general weather conditions, and drought.

·                  Consumer — the consumer loan portfolio is comprised primarily of a large number of small loans with scheduled amortization over a specific period.  The majority of consumer loans include installment loans, revolving credit plans, and credit card balances.  Weakened economic conditions may result in an increased level of delinquencies within this segment, as economic pressures may impact the capacity of such borrowers to repay their obligations.

ALLL Model Methodology

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company made a specific enhancement to its methodology for determining the general reserve component of the ALLL.  This enhancement related specifically to the methodology used to calculate the loss rates for loan risk grades within each loan type in the determination of the general reserve component of the ALLL. The enhanced methodology uses more granular loan level data to calculate loss rates for specific loan grades within each loan type, allowing for more detailed loan migration analysis, and the ability to determine average loss rates for each loan risk grade.  Although the total general reserve component of the ALLL for each loan type and portfolio segment is still based on total average historical losses for their respective loan types, management believes the allocation of the ALLL to each loan risk grade, within each loan type and the evaluation of the loss emergence period has become more granular under this methodology enhancement. The implementation of the ALLL model enhancement did not result in a required increase or decrease in the balance of the ALLL, or a material impact to the overall allocation of the ALLL.

The ALLL is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is appropriate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the loans within the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.  The amount of the ALLL is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature and volume of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, the level of certain classified balances and specific impaired loans, and economic conditions and the related impact on specific borrowers and industry groups.  The ALLL is increased by provisions for loan and lease losses and decreased by reversals of provisions for loan and lease losses, charged or credited to current period earnings.  The ALLL is also decreased by loan charge-offs and increased by recoveries on previously charged-off loans.  Changes in the ALLL relating to impaired loans, including troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), are charged or credited to the provision for loan and lease losses.  Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the related allowance may change.

The process in which management determines the appropriate level of the ALLL involves the exercise of considerable judgment and the use of estimates.  While management utilizes its best judgment and all available information in determining the adequacy of the ALLL, the ultimate adequacy of the ALLL is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control, including but not limited to, the performance of the loan portfolio, changes in current and future economic conditions and the view of regulatory agencies regarding the level of classified assets.  Weakness in economic conditions and any other factor that may adversely affect credit quality and/or that may result in higher levels of: past due and non-accruing loans, loan defaults, and/or increased loan charge-offs, may require additional provisions for loan and lease losses in future periods and a higher balance in the Company’s ALLL.  The ALLL, as more fully described below, is comprised of three components: general reserves, specific loan reserves, and a reserve for PCI loans.  Please also see “Acquired Loans and Leases” of this Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for discussion concerning PCI loans.

18

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

General Reserves — The general reserve component of the ALLL, which is not attributable to loans specifically identified as impaired, is determined through a two-step process.  First a quantitative allocation is determined by pooling performing loans by collateral type and purpose.  These pools of loans are then further segmented by an internal risk grading system that classifies loans as: pass, special mention, substandard and doubtful.  The Company’s risk grade system allows management, among other things, to identify the risk associated with each loan, and to provide a basis for estimating credit losses inherent in the portfolio. Risk grades are generally assigned based on information concerning the borrower and the strength of the collateral.  Risk grades are reviewed regularly by the Company’s credit committee and are scrutinized by independent loan reviews performed semi-annually, as well as by regulatory agencies during scheduled examinations.  Once credit risk grades have been assigned, estimated loss rates are then applied to each segment according to risk grade to determine the amount of the general portfolio allocation.  Estimated loss rates are determined through a migration analysis of historical losses for each segment of the loan portfolio, based on the Company’s prior experience with such loans, and the use of detailed loan level data, encompassing historical losses and average balance information for each loan type and risk grade.  The following provides brief definitions for credit risk grade ratings assigned to loans in the portfolio:

·                  Pass — credits that have strong credit quality with adequate collateral or secondary source of repayment and little existing or known weaknesses.  However, pass may include credits with exposure to certain potential factors that may adversely impact the credit, if they materialize, resulting in these credits being put on a watch list to monitor more closely than other pass rated credits. Such factors may be credit / relationship specific or general to an entire industry.

·                  Special Mention — credits that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention.  If not corrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit at some future date.

·                  Substandard — credits that have a defined weakness or weaknesses which may jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the loan through cash flows, making it likely that repayment may have to come from some other source, such as the liquidation of collateral.  The Company is more likely to incur losses on substandard credits if the weakness or weaknesses identified in the credit are not corrected.

·                  Doubtful — credits that possess the characteristics of a substandard credit, but because of certain existing deficiencies related to the credit, full collection is highly questionable.  The probability of incurring some loss on such credits is high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to the advantage of strengthening the credit, charge-off is deferred until such time as the Company becomes reasonably certain that certain pending factors related to the credit will no longer provide some form of benefit.

The second component of the general reserve allocation of the ALLL is the qualitative allocation, and is determined by estimates the Company makes in regard to certain internal and external factors that may have either a positive or negative impact on the overall losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  Internal factors include trends in credit quality of the loan portfolio, the existence and the effects of concentrations, the composition and volume of the loan portfolio and the scope and frequency of the loan review process as well as any other factor determined by management to have an impact on the credit quality of the loan portfolio.  External factors include local, state and national economic and business conditions, as well as the estimated impact that environmental factors may have on certain segments of the loan portfolio, such as drought.  While management regularly reviews the estimated impact these internal and external factors are expected to have on the loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that an adverse change in any one or combination of these factors will not be in excess of management’s expectations.

Specific Loan Reserves — The specific reserve component of the ALLL is determined through the measurement of impairment on loans that have been identified as impaired during each reporting period.  A comprehensive analysis is performed at the time a loan is deemed impaired, which includes obtaining updated financial information regarding the borrower, obtaining updated appraisals on any collateral securing the loan and ultimately determining the extent to which the loan is impaired.  In measuring the fair value of the collateral, management uses assumptions and methodologies consistent with those that would be utilized by third party valuation experts.  For collateral dependent loans, impairment is measured based on an evaluation of the fair value of the collateral relative to the recorded investment in the loan.  If the primary source of repayment of the loan is deemed to be cash flows from the borrower, impairment is measured through a discounted cash flow analysis using the loan’s effective interest rate.  Once the amount of impairment has been determined, the Company establishes a corresponding valuation allowance which then becomes a component of the Company’s specific loan reserve in the ALLL.

19

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Reserve for PCI Loans — Quarterly, management performs an evaluation of future cash flows for PCI loans.  These evaluations are performed on the individual loan level for each PCI loan.  If current expectations of future cash flows are less than management’s previous expectations, other than due to decreases in interest rates and prepayment assumptions, an allowance for loan and leases losses is recorded with a charge to provision for loan and lease losses.  In the event there has been a probable and significant increase in expected future cash flows over that which was previously expected, the Company first reduces any previously established allowance for loan and lease losses, and then records an adjustment to interest income through a prospective increase in the accretable yield.

Impaired Loans

A loan is identified as impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.  The Company periodically performs a review of all significant problem loans.  If based on this review it is determined that the loan is impaired, the Company obtains updated appraisal information on the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans and updated cash-flow information if the loan is unsecured or primarily dependent on future operating or other cash flows from the borrower.  Once the updated financial information is obtained and analyzed by management, a valuation allowance, if necessary, is established against the loan or a loss is recognized by a charge to the ALLL.  Therefore, at the time a loan is considered impaired a valuation allowance typically has already been established or balances deemed uncollectable have been charged-off.

When a borrower discontinues making payments according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, the Company must determine if it is appropriate to continue the accrual of interest on the loan.  Generally, the Company places loans on non-accrual status and ceases the recognition of interest income when a loan has become delinquent 90 days or more, and/or when management believes the collection of all contractually required amounts is unlikely.  Therefore, the Company generally places impaired loans on non-accrual status due to doubt surrounding the ultimate collection of contractual amounts due.  Loans typically move to non-accrual status from the Company’s substandard risk grade.  When a loan is first classified as substandard, the Company performs a review of the loan in order to determine if the loan is impaired.  If upon a loan’s migration to non-accruing status, the financial information on the borrower previously obtained while the loan was classified as substandard is deemed to be outdated, the Company typically orders new appraisals on underlying collateral or obtains the most recent cash-flow information in order to have the most current indication of fair value.  For collateral dependent loans, if a complete appraisal is expected to take a significant amount of time to complete, the Company may also rely on a broker’s price opinion or other meaningful market data, such as comparable sales, in order to derive its best estimate of a property’s fair value, while waiting for an appraisal at the time of the decision to classify the loan as substandard and/or non-accruing.

An analysis of the underlying collateral is performed for loans on non-accrual status at least quarterly and new appraisals are typically received at least annually.  Corresponding changes in any related valuation allowance are made or balances deemed to be fully uncollectable are charged-off.  Cash-flow information for impaired loans dependent primarily on future operating or other cash-flows are updated quarterly as well, with subsequent shortfalls resulting in valuation allowance adjustments.

In certain instances the Company may work with the borrower to modify the terms of the loan agreement or otherwise restructure the loan in a way that would allow the borrower to continue to perform under the modified terms of the loan agreement. In those instances where modifications are made to loans, for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company has granted the borrower a concession that it would not have otherwise considered, the modifications constitute a TDR.  Concessions may include a reduction in the contractual rate of interest, extension payments or maturity, and/or a combination of other actions designed to maximize collection efforts.  The Company’s policy for monitoring loan modifications for potential TDRs is focused on loans risk graded as special mention, substandard or doubtful.  TDRs are considered impaired loans and require the Company to measure the amount of impairment, if any, and establish a specific reserve for the loan at the time the loan is restructured.

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Measurement of impairment is based on expectations of future cash flows which are discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, or measured by reference to an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral for a collateral-dependent loan.  The Company selects the measurement method on a loan-by-loan basis except that collateral dependent loans for which foreclosure is probable are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral.  The Company recognizes interest income on impaired loans based on its existing methods of recognizing interest income on non-accrual loans.  All impaired loans are generally charged-off, either partially or fully, at such time that it is highly certain a loss has been realized.

20

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Loan Charge-offs

The Company typically moves to charge-off loan balances when the loan becomes 90 days past due, unless it is well secured and in the process of collection.  The Company may also move to charge-off a loan when based on various evidence, it believes those balances are no longer collectable.  Evidence may include updated information related to a borrower’s financial condition or updated information related to collateral securing the loan.  If a loan’s credit quality deteriorates to the point that collection of principal through traditional means is believed by management to be doubtful, and management determines there is value in the collateral securing the loan through obtaining periodic appraisals, the Company generally takes steps to protect and liquidate the collateral.

Any loss resulting from the difference between the Company’s recorded investment in the loan and the fair market value of the collateral obtained through repossession is recognized by a charge to the ALLL.  For most real estate and commercial loans, the Company generally recognizes a charge-off to bring the carrying balance of the loan down to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral or some other estimate of fair value when: (i) management determines that the asset is no longer collectable, (ii) repayment prospects for the credit have become unclear and/or are likely to occur over a time-frame the Company deems to be no longer reasonable, (iii) the loan or portion of the loan has been deemed a loss by the Company’s internal review and/or independent review functions, or has been deemed a loss by regulatory examiners, (iv) the borrower has or is in the process of filing for bankruptcy.  The Company’s charge-off policy is consistently applied to all portfolio segments.

The Company may defer charge-off on a loan, due to certain factors the Company has identified that may work to its benefit in minimizing potential losses.  Those factors may include: working with the borrower to restructure the loan in an effort to bring about a more favorable outcome, the identification of an additional source of repayment, sufficient collateral to cover the Company’s recorded investment in the loan, or any other identified factor that may work to strengthen the credit and reduce the potential for loss.

Appraisals for Loans Secured by Real Estate Collateral

For loan commitments greater than $750 thousand and a remaining term greater than one year at the loan’s anniversary date, the Bank has a policy to perform an annual review of the borrower’s financial condition and of any real estate securing the loan. This review includes, among other things, a physical inspection of the real estate securing the loan, an analysis of any related rent rolls, an analysis of all borrower and guarantor tax returns and financial statements. This information is used internally by the Bank to validate all covenants and the risk grade assigned to the loan. If during the review process the Bank learns of additional information that would suggest that the borrower’s ability to repay has deteriorated since the original underwriting of the loan, and repayment may now be dependent on liquidation of the collateral, an additional independent appraisal of the collateral is requested. If based on the updated appraisal information it is determined the value of the collateral is impaired and the Bank no longer expects to collect all previously determined amounts related to the loan as stipulated in the loan’s original agreement, the Bank typically moves to establish a valuation allowance for the loan or charge-off such differences.

In general, once a loan is deemed to be impaired and/or the loan was downgraded to substandard status, the loan becomes the responsibility of the Bank’s Special Assets department, which provides more diligent oversight of problem credits. This oversight includes, among other things, a review of all previous appraisals of collateral securing such loans and determining in the Bank’s best judgment if those appraisals still represent the current fair value of the loan. Additional appraisals may be ordered at this time and annually thereafter, if deemed necessary.

Reserve for Off-Balance Sheet Loan Commitments

The Company has exposure to losses from unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.  Since the funds have not been disbursed on these commitments, they are not reported as loans outstanding.  Estimated losses related to these commitments are not included in the ALLL, instead they are accounted for as a separate loss contingency reserve and included within other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.  Adjustments to this reserve are recorded as a charge to earnings, which is included in other non-interest expense on the consolidated statements of income.  Losses are experienced when the Company is contractually obligated to make a payment under these instruments and must seek repayment from a party that may not be as financially sound in the current period as it was when the commitment was originally made.

21

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost.  Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which range from three to ten years for furniture and fixtures and thirty years for buildings.  Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the remaining lease term, whichever is shorter.  Expenditures for improvements or major repairs are capitalized and those for ordinary repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

Income Taxes

Income taxes reported in the consolidated financial statements are computed based on an asset and liability approach. The Company recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year, and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences that have been recognized in the financial statement or tax returns.  The measurement of tax assets and liabilities is based on the provisions of enacted tax laws.  The Company files consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns.  A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur.  The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination.  For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.  Interest expense and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits, if any, are classified as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.  Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes.

Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not.  In making the determination whether a deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be realized, management performs a quarterly evaluation of all available positive and negative evidence including the possibility of future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial results.  A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is established to reduce the net carrying amount of deferred tax assets if it is determined to be more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. See also Note 8. Income Taxes, of these consolidated financial statements for additional information related to deferred income taxes.

Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”)

The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain employees, which are referred to as BOLI.  These policies are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at their cash surrender value.  Income and expense from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in non-interest income and non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are comprised of goodwill, core deposit intangibles and other identifiable intangibles acquired in business combinations. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives.  If an event occurs that indicates the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be recoverable, management reviews the asset for impairment.  Any goodwill and any intangible asset acquired in a purchase business combination determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment, at a minimum, on an annual basis.

The Company applies a qualitative analysis of conditions in order to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying value is impaired.  In the event that the qualitative analysis suggests that the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired, the Company, with the assistance of an independent third party valuation firm, uses several quantitative valuation methodologies in evaluating goodwill for impairment including a discounted cash flow approach that includes assumptions made concerning the future earnings potential of the organization, and a market-based approach that looks at values for organizations of comparable size, structure and business model.  The current year’s review of qualitative factors did not indicate that impairment has occurred, as such no quantitative analysis was performed at December 31, 2016.

22

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

Real estate and other property acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations is referred to as OREO.  These assets are originally recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements at their estimated fair value less any costs to sell the property.  When OREO assets are acquired, typically through foreclosure or surrendered in lieu of foreclosure, the Company compares the estimated fair value of the property against its recorded investment in the related loan.  If the estimated fair value of the property, including estimates for the cost to sell, is less than the recorded investment in the related loan, the difference in the carrying value of the loan is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses prior to the loan’s transfer to OREO.  Should the fair value of OREO decline in subsequent periods, the Company establishes a valuation allowance for OREO through a charge to non-interest expense.  All related operating or maintenance costs are charged to non-interest expense as incurred. Any subsequent gains or losses on the sale of OREO assets are recorded as a component of non-interest income.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

The Company may borrow from the FHLB at competitive rates, which typically approximate the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for the equivalent term because they are secured with investments in high quality loans.  Interest is accrued on a monthly basis based on the outstanding borrowing’s interest rate and is included in interest expense on other borrowings.

Salary Continuation Plan Agreements

The Company has entered into salary continuation plan agreements with certain executive and senior officers.  The measurement of the liability under these agreements is estimated using a discounted cash flow model, which includes estimates involving the length of time before retirement, estimated long-term discount rates based on the Bank’s long-term borrowing rates at the time the agreement is executed, and expected benefit levels.  Should these estimates vary substantially from actual events, the level of expense recognized in the future to provide these benefits could materially vary.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The Company records changes in the unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities, net of income taxes, as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income.  Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities are reclassified to current period earnings as the gains (losses) are realized upon the sale of securities.  Unrealized losses related to OTTI are reclassified to current period earnings at the time OTTI is deemed to have occurred.  Unrealized gains (losses) related to available for sale securities was the only component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company grants incentive and non-qualified stock options, as well as restricted stock to directors and employees as a form of compensation. U.S. GAAP requires the Company to recognize compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based forms of compensation over the period the awards are expected to vest.  For liability classified awards, the Company re-measures the amount of the liability attributable to those each period, which is based on changes in the Company’s stock price.  The Company uses a straight-line method for the recognition of all share-based compensation expense.  See also Note 13. Share-Based Compensation Plans, of these consolidated financial statements for additional information related to share-based compensation.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income allocable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period.  Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income allocable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding over the reporting period, adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive common shares.  Potentially dilutive common shares are determined using the treasury stock method and include incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and other share-based compensation awards, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units that settle in shares of the Company’s common stock.  Unvested restricted stock awards contain non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends.  As such, these awards are considered participating securities and the Company has applied the two-class method in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share in periods where these awards are outstanding.

23

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

Under the two-class method, distributed and undistributed earnings allocable to participating securities are deducted from net income to determine net income allocable to common shareholders, which is then used in the numerator of both basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.  The computation of diluted earnings per common share excludes the impact of the assumed exercise or issuance of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect, which can occur when the Company reports a net loss or when the market price for the Company’s stock falls below the exercise price of equity awards issued by the Company.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.  Legal costs incurred to defend such matters are expensed as incurred.  Management does not believe there are any such matters that will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments consist of back-to-back interest rate swap contracts which are accounted for as free standing derivative contracts, carried at fair value, and are included in other assets and other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  These interest rate swaps allow the Company to provide variable rate financing to qualified borrowers, while allowing these borrowers to effectively convert their variable rate obligations to a fixed stream of cash flows.  Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded in other non-interest income.  Since the interest rate swap contacts the Company enters into with certain of its borrowers have identical terms to the interest rate swap contracts entered into with the counterparty bank, changes in the fair value of interest rate swap assets and liabilities offset each other in the consolidated statements of income.  Favorable variances in the pricing of interest rate swaps between the Company and its borrowers compared to that of the pricing of corresponding swaps between the Company and its counterparty bank are recognized as gains on derivative instruments at the inception of the transaction and are included in non-interest income.

Note 2. Merger Agreement

Merger Agreement

On December 12, 2016, the Company and Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PPBI”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will be merged with and into PPBI, with PPBI surviving (the “Corporate Merger”), immediately followed by the merger of Heritage Oaks Bank with and into Pacific Premier Bank, the wholly-owned bank subsidiary of PPBI (“Pacific Premier”), with Pacific Premier surviving (the “Bank Merger”).  The Corporate Merger and Bank Merger are collectively referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the “Announced Transaction.”  The consideration paid to shareholders of the Company will consist of whole shares of PPBI common stock, and cash in lieu of fractional shares of PPBI common stock.  Upon consummation of the Corporate Merger, each share of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 0.3471 shares of PPBI common stock.

The Merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties from the Company to PPBI, which are qualified by the confidential disclosures provided by the Company to PPBI, and customary representations and warranties from PPBI to the Company.

Note 3. Business Combination

Acquisition of Mission Community Bancorp

On February 28, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Mission Community Bancorp (“MISN”) and all unexercised warrants and options to purchase MISN common stock were cancelled, in exchange for 7,541,326 shares of the Company’s common stock and $8.7 million in cash (the “MISN Transaction”).  Through the MISN Transaction, the Company acquired $453.7 million in assets, including $280.6 million in loans, and assumed $384.7 million in liabilities, including $371.5 million in deposits.  The MISN Transaction was valued at $69.0 million.  In conjunction with the MISN Transaction, MISN’s wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Mission Community Bank, was merged with and into Heritage Oaks Bank.

24

Note 3. Business Combination - continued

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the MISN Transaction had occurred on January 1, 2013, which includes the pre-acquisition period for MISN.  The unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments for interest income on loans and securities acquired, amortization of intangibles arising from the transaction, depreciation expense on property acquired, interest expense on deposits and borrowings acquired, and the related income tax effects.  The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been effected on the assumed date.

Note 4. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Recurring Basis

The following table provides a summary of the financial instruments the Company measures at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015: