PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex312.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex322.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex321.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex311.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_____________ to _____________.

Commission file number 000-54563

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		27-2635666
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

P.O. Box 31374 El Paso, TX		79930
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (814) 786-8849

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
None		None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.00001

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016 (the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $3,464,258 based on the closing price of $0.029 on June 30, 2016

On April 26, 2017, there were 491,852,004 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

None.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1 –	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A –	RISK FACTORS	10
ITEM 1B –	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	22
ITEM 2 –	PROPERTIES	22
ITEM 3 –	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	22
ITEM 4 –	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	22

PART II

ITEM 5 –	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	23
ITEM 6 –	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	25
ITEM 7 –	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	25
ITEM 7A –	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	36
ITEM 8 –	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	F-1
ITEM 9 –	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	37
ITEM 9A –	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	37
ITEM 9B –	OTHER INFORMATION	39

PART III

ITEM 10 –	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	40
ITEM 11 –	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	44
ITEM 12 –	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	46
ITEM 13 –	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	48
ITEM 14 –	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	51

PART IV

ITEM 15 –	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	53

Table of Contents

PART I

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Company set forth under the heading “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The Company's future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

Corporate History

We were incorporated on May 10, 2010 in the State of Nevada.

Overview

Pain Management

On September 13, 2016, we entered into an operating agreement to form a pain management joint venture company with Advanced Technologies Solutions (ATS), a company based in San Diego, California and owned by Ronald T. La Borde, a member of our Board of Directors. The joint venture company, Premier Biomedical Pain Management Solutions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (PBPMS), will develop and market natural and cannabis-based generalized, neuropathic, and localized pain relief treatment products. We own 50% of PBPMS and ATS owns the other 50%, with 89% of the profits allocated to us and the remaining 11% of profits allocated to ATS.

Through the use of technologies previously developed, PBPMS has developed two new products that we are in the process of marketing. The first is a CBD, or Cannabidiol, topical patch. The patent-pending reservoir patch design features a unique barrier between the foam adhesive and the pain relieving ingredients to ensure that the adhesive is not transmitted and absorbed through the skin, as with many competitive patches. The formulations for the products contain no psychoactive components and, therefore, are not expected to affect drug test results.

The second product is a roll-on that consists of the same primary ingredients as contained in our reservoir patch, but in a convenient, pocket-size applicator. PBPMS is also seeking to develop additional pain relief products, including creams, sprays, gel pens and capsules. We plan to launch at least three new products into the market in 2017. As of December 31, 2016, except for administrative and formation matters, we had not yet commenced any activities under the joint venture.

Table of Contents

	These products are designed to provide natural relief from:

	·	Knee pain,
	·	Shoulder pain,
	·	Joint pain,
	·	Arthritis pain,
	·	Muscle soreness and tenderness,
	·	Headaches, and
	·	Migraines.

Sales of our pain management products began on February 1, 2017. We sell our products via our website at www.painreliefmeds.com and various distributors. To date, three pharmacies and three chiropractic clinics have approved our products for sale and are distributing our products. We anticipate that our products will eventually be placed in several large pharmacy chains and sold in several states.

Research and Development

We intend to continue to discover and develop medical treatments for humans, specifically targeting the pain management industry and the treatment of:

-	Cancer	-	Fibromyalgia
-	Multiple Sclerosis (MS)	-	Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
-	Neuropathic Pain	-	Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
-	Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis	-	Blood Sepsis and Viremia
	(ALS/Lou Gehrig’s Disease)

We have a three-fold corporate focus:

One is to develop and market pain management products. Particularly, we are in the process of developing and marketing natural and cannabis-based generalized, neuropathic and localized pain relief treatment products with a joint venture partner.

The second is to target Cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, ALS, Blood Sepsis, Leukemia, and other life-threatening cancers, and to do this we intend to develop our proprietary Sequential-Dialysis Technique. The methodology involved in this technique is largely unexplored and has been described by scientists as the “wild west” of modern medicine. Consequently, our first entry into the therapeutics market for medications that work against cancer, Multiple Sclerosis, infectious diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, strokes and traumatic brain injury carries significant obstacles before reaching the opportunities of a $700 billion industry.

The third is the development of our proprietary drug candidate Feldetrex™, a potential treatment for Multiple Sclerosis, Fibromyalgia, Neuropathic Pain and Traumatic Brain Injury. The formulation used in the current Feldetrex™will be individually tailored to the various illnesses we intend to target, with each formulation being given a unique proprietary brand name. The annual market size of MS treatment is $500 million and the annual market size for all proposed Feldetrex™ market segments is $16 billion.

Table of Contents

To overcome the significant obstacles inherent to the development of our Sequential-Dialysis Technique and Feldetrex™ candidate drug, we are seeking to partner with prestigious institutions and pharmaceutical companies with the substantial infrastructure and resource capacity to perform experimentation and to engage in product development in an inexpensive and efficient manner.

Innovation by our research and development operations is very important to our success. Our goal is to discover, develop and bring to market innovative products and treatments that address major unmet medical needs, including initially, Multiple Sclerosis, Septicemia, and Cancer. We expect this goal to be supported by substantial research and development investments.

We plan on conducting research internally and may also through contracts with third parties, through collaborations with universities and biotechnology companies and in cooperation with pharmaceutical firms. We may also seek out promising compounds and innovative technologies developed by third parties to incorporate into our discovery or development methods and procedures or projects, as well as our future product lines, through acquisition, licensing or other arrangements.

In addition to discovering and developing new products, methods and procedures of treatment and treatments, we expect our research operations to add value to our existing products and methods and procedures of treatment in development by improving their effectiveness and by discovering new uses for them.

Sequential-Dialysis Technique

Our proprietary Sequential-Dialysis Technique is a methodology for the removal of those molecules which are harmful and responsible for causing diseases. A significant disappointment in the practice of modern medicine is that the capabilities do exist to eliminate the presence of most illnesses, including life-threatening diseases such as AIDS and cancer, but with a caveat that the process of treatment comes with catastrophic side effects that can and often do kill the patient.

Our development is that the innovative Sequential-Dialysis Methodology is done extracorporeally (outside the body). This is a truly unique and innovative method for alleviating disease.

We believe that this methodology can be used for the prevention of cancer metastasis, for directly attacking the causation of intractable seizures, for preventing the death of anterior motor neurons in ALS, for preventing the cause of the neuropathological changes in Alzheimer’s disease and Traumatic Brain Injury and for eradicating the causations of infectious diseases, and our intention is that the effectiveness of this technique will be demonstrated and supported in future clinical studies.

Through our Sequential-Dialysis Technique, we ultimately hope to provide a cure for cancer if not only to dramatically extend the lives of suffering patients. Our initial focus is on lab and animal tests. Clinical trials, as required, will be undertaken subsequently.

Feldetrex™

Although a combination of generic medications, we have a U.S. Patent (No. 8,865,733) on our Feldetrex™ candidate drug. In this way, Feldetrex™ is similar to Viagra®, which was a proprietary cardiac drug prior to its current use and ownership by Pfizer. Consequently, we have one pending patent application for our Feldetrex™ candidate drug—intending to increase our Feldetrex™ related patent applications to three in the near future.

Table of Contents

Feldetrex™ may serve as an additional medication utilized by physicians for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis, Fibromyalgia, or Traumatic Brain Injury, and is designed to decrease symptomatology in those conditions. Feldetrex™ will not compete against our proprietary Sequential-Dialysis Technique in the market to treat Traumatic Brain Injury, but rather the two will work conjunctively.

Feldetrex™ utilizes a low dosage of Naltrexone which has been shown in multiple medical articles, in the medical literature, to increase endogenous enkephalins^{^[1]} (endogenous enkephalins are pain-relieving pentapeptides produced in the body, located in the pituitary gland, brain, and GI tract. Axon terminals that release enkephalins are concentrated in the posterior horn of the gray matter of the spinal cord, in the central part of the thalamus, and in the amygdala of the limbic system of the cerebrum. Endogenous Enkephalins function as neurotransmitters that inhibit neurotransmitters in the pathway for pain perception, thereby reducing the emotional as well as the physical impact of pain). We have not independently conducted medical or laboratory tests to show the mechanism of action of this medication. While Naltrexone in high dosages acts as an opioid antagonist, it inhibits opiate receptors. Naltrexone in low dosages causes a compensatory upregulation (increase in the number of receptors) of native endorphins and enkephalins, which last beyond the effects of the Naltrexone itself. We believe that this means, paradoxically, that a daily dose of low dose Naltrexone can be used to chronically increase endorphin and enkephalin levels. We believe that by utilizing a low dosage, Naltrexone has a unique ability to increase enkephalins and other neurotransmitters in the brainstem of patients.

__________________

1	A.	Bowling, Allen C.. "Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) The "411" on LDN" National Multiple Sclerosis Society. http://www.nationalmssociety.org/multimedia-library/momentum-magazine/back-issues/momentum-spring-09/index.aspx. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
	B.	Bourdette, Dennis. "Spotlight on Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN)". US Department of Veteran Affairs. http://www.va.gov/MS/articles/Spotlight_on_Low_Dose_Naltrexone_LDN.asp. Retrieved 5 July 2011.
	C.	Giesser, Barbara S. (2010). Primer on Multiple Sclerosis. New York: Oxford University Press US. pp. 377. ISBN 978-0-19-536928-1.
	D.	Moore, Elaine A. 1948. The promise of low dose naltrexone therapy: potential benefits in cancer, autoimmune, neurological and infectious disorders. Elaine A. Moore and Samantha Wilkinson. ISBN 978-0-7864-3715-3.
	E.	Crain SM, Shen K-F (1995). Ultra-low concentrations of naloxone selectively antagonize excitatory effects of morphine on sensory neurons, thereby increasing its antinociceptive potency and attenuating tolerance/dependence during chronic cotreatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 10540–10544.
	F.	Powell KJ, Abul-Husn NS, Jhamandas A, Olmstead MC, Beninger RJ, et al. (2002). Paradoxical effects of the opioid antagonist naltrexone on morphine analgesia, tolerance, and reward in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300: 588–596.
	G.	Wang H-Y, Friedman E, Olmstead MC, Burns LH (2005). Ultra-low-dose naloxone suppresses opioid tolerance, dependence and associated changes in Mu opioid receptor-G protein coupling and Gβγ signaling. Neuroscience 135: 247–261

Table of Contents

Marketing

Currently, we manage our marketing responsibilities internally. We intend to seek a partnership with and/or sale of our product candidates/technologies to large pharmaceutical and/or medical devices firms. These firms have the ability to effectively promote our product candidates to healthcare providers and patients. Through their marketing organizations, they can explain the approved uses, benefits and risks of our product candidates to healthcare providers, such as doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, hospitals, Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), Managed Care Organizations (MCOs), employers and government agencies. They also market directly to consumers in the U.S. through direct-to-consumer advertising that communicates the approved uses, benefits, and risks of our product candidates while continuing to motivate people to have meaningful conversations with their doctors. In addition, they sponsor general advertising to educate the public on disease awareness, important public health issues, and patient assistance programs.

The large pharmaceutical/medical devices firms principally sell their products to wholesalers, but they also sell directly to retailers, hospitals, clinics, government agencies and pharmacies and also work with MCOs, PBMs, employers and other appropriate healthcare providers to assist them with disease management, patient education and other tools that help their medical treatment routines.

Patents and Intellectual Property Rights

We have licensed three U.S. patents: Sequential Extracorporeal Treatment of Bodily Fluids, U.S. Patent No. 9,216,386 and Utilization of Stents for the Treatment of Blood Borne Carcinomas, U.S. Patent No. 8,758,287 (both from Marv Enterprises, LLC), and Medication and Treatment for Disease, U.S. Patent No. 8,865,733 (from Altman Enterprises, LLC), in the areas of cancer, sepsis, and multiple sclerosis. We expect these patents to cover the medical treatments discussed above for Multiple Sclerosis, Blood Sepsis, and Cancer and be effective until 2029. Marv and Altman have licensed these technologies to us pursuant to the terms of the License Agreements. Because our license agreements cover the patents and “all applications of the United States and foreign countries that claim priority to the above PCT applications, including any non-provisionals, continuations, continuations-in-part, divisions, reissues, re-examinations or extensions thereof,” we anticipate that other technologies that derive from these patents will also belong to us and are covered by the license agreements.

Patents extend for twenty years from the date of patent filing. The actual protection afforded by a patent, which can vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent, the scope of its coverage and the availability of legal remedies in the country.

Dr. Felder is the owner of the Feldetrex mark, and has also licensed this to us pursuant to the terms of the License Agreements.

We expect our patent and related rights to be of material importance to our business.

Table of Contents

Competition

Our business is conducted in an intensely competitive and often highly regulated market. Our treatments face competition in the form of branded drugs, generic drugs and the currently practiced treatments for Multiple Sclerosis, Blood Sepsis, and Cancer. The principal forms of competition include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and cost effectiveness. Where possible, companies compete on the basis of the unique features of their products, such as greater efficacy, better patient ease of use or fewer side effects. A lower overall cost of therapy is also an important factor. Products that demonstrate fewer therapeutic advantages must compete for inclusion based primarily on price. Though the means of competition vary among product categories, demonstrating the value of our medications and procedures will be a critical factor for our success.

Our competitors include large worldwide research-based drug companies, smaller research companies with more limited therapeutic focus, and generic drug manufacturers. We compete with other companies that manufacture and sell products that treat similar diseases as our major medications and procedures.

Environment

Our business may be subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental protection measures. We intend to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations.

Regulation

We expect our business to be subject to varying degrees of governmental regulation in the United States and any other countries in which our operations are conducted. In the United States, regulation by various federal and state agencies has long been focused primarily on product safety, efficacy, manufacturing, advertising, labeling and safety reporting. The exercise of broad regulatory powers by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”) continues to result in increases in the amounts of testing and documentation required for FDA clearance of new drugs and devices and a corresponding increase in the expense of product introduction. Likewise, the approval process with the FDA is estimated to take approximately seven (7) years from the time it is started. Similar trends are also evident in major markets outside of the United States.

Clinical trials are a set of procedures in medical research conducted to allow safety (or more specifically, information about adverse drug reactions and adverse effects of other treatments) and efficacy data to be collected for health interventions (e.g., drugs, diagnostics, devices, therapy protocols). These trials can take place only after satisfactory information has been gathered on the quality of the non-clinical safety, and Health Authority/Ethics Committee approval is granted in the country where the trial is taking place.

Depending on the type of product and the stage of its development, investigators enroll healthy volunteers and/or patients into small pilot studies initially, followed by larger scale studies in patients that often compare the new product with the currently prescribed treatment. As positive safety and efficacy data are gathered, the number of patients is typically increased. Clinical trials can vary in size from a single center in one country to multicenter trials in multiple countries.

Table of Contents

Due to the sizable cost a full series of clinical trials may incur, the burden of paying for all the necessary people and services is usually borne by the sponsor who may be a governmental organization, a pharmaceutical, or biotechnology company. Since the diversity of roles may exceed resources of the sponsor, often a clinical trial is managed by an outsourced partner such as a contract research organization or a clinical trials unit in the academic sector.

The regulatory agencies under whose purview we intend to operate have administrative powers that may subject us to such actions as product withdrawals, recalls, seizure of products and other civil and criminal sanctions.

Because we intend to seek a partnership with and/or sale of our product candidates/technologies to large pharmaceutical and/or medical devices firms, we anticipate that a larger pharmaceutical company will undertake to navigate the regulatory pathway, including conducting clinical trials, for a product such as Feldetrex™.

Employees

As of the date hereof, we do not have any employees other than our officers and directors. Our officers and directors will continue to work for us for the foreseeable future. We anticipate hiring appropriate personnel on an as-needed basis, and utilizing the services of independent contractors as needed.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. – RISK FACTORS.

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide a statement of risk factors. Nonetheless, we are voluntarily providing risk factors herein.

Any investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report, before you decide to buy our common stock. If one or more of the following events actually occurs, our business will suffer, and as a result our financial condition or results of operations will be adversely affected. In this case, the market price, if any, of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.

We are developing medical treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, fibromyalgia, traumatic brain injury, blood sepsis and virema, and cancer. We face risks in developing our product candidates and services and eventually bringing them to market. We also face risks that our business model may become obsolete. The following risks are material risks that we face. If any of these risks occur, our business, our ability to achieve revenues, our operating results and our financial condition could be seriously harmed.

Risk Factors Related to the Business of the Company

We have a limited operating history and our financial results are uncertain.

We have a limited history and face many of the risks inherent to a new business. As a result of our limited operating history, it is difficult to accurately forecast our potential revenue. We were incorporated in Nevada in 2010. Our revenue and income potential is unproven and our business model is still emerging. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will provide a return on investment in the future. An investor in our common stock must consider the challenges, risks and uncertainties frequently encountered in the establishment of new technologies, products and processes in emerging markets and evolving industries. These challenges include our ability to:

	·	execute our business model;
	·	create brand recognition;
	·	manage growth in our operations;
	·	create a customer base in a cost-effective manner;
	·	retain customers;
	·	access additional capital when required; and
	·	attract and retain key personnel.

There can be no assurance that our business model will be successful or that it will successfully address these and other challenges, risks and uncertainties.

We will need additional funding in the future, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product candidate development programs, commercial efforts, or sales efforts.

Developing products and methods and procedures of treatment and marketing developed products is costly. We will need to raise substantial additional capital in the future in order to execute our business plan and help us and our collaboration partners fund the development and commercialization of our product candidates.

Table of Contents

In 2014 and through 2016, we raised funds through a public equity offering. We may need to finance future cash needs through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or strategic collaboration and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our shareholders may experience additional dilution, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and may result in high interest expense. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our product candidates, processes and technologies or our development projects or to grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available from the foregoing sources, we may consider additional strategic financing options, including sales of assets, or we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or curtail some of our commercialization efforts of our operations. We may seek to access the public or private equity markets whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital.

We do not own our technologies, they are owned by, and licensed from, two entities that are under the control of the Chairman of our Board of Directors and another entity under the control of one of our Directors.

We do not currently own the technologies necessary to conduct our operations. The patents necessary to pursue our intended business plan are under the control of our Chairman of the Board of Directors. As consideration for the two licenses, we agreed to (i) pay a royalty of five percent (5%) of any sales of products using the technology, with no minimum royalty and (ii) reimburse the licensor for any costs incurred in pursuing its proprietary rights in the licensed technology and pay any costs incurred for maintaining or obtaining the licensors’ proprietary rights in the licensed technology in the U.S. and in extending the intellectual property to other countries around the world. The licensor has the sole discretion to select other countries into which exclusive rights in the licensed technology may be pursued, and if we decline to pay those expenses, then the licensor may pay said expenses and our licensed rights in those countries will revert to the licensor. The license agreements contain provisions that require us to indemnify the licensor for any claims, including costs of litigation, brought against them related to the licenses, and require us to maintain insurance that may be burdensome. In the event of a breach of our obligations under the license agreements, the licensors are entitled to various damages and remedies, up to and including termination of said license agreements. The licensors are entities under the control of Dr. Mitchell S. Felder, the Chairman of our Board of Directors. While Dr. Felder is one of our Company’s founders and the Chairman of our Board of Directors, there can be no assurance that he will extend the offer to license these technologies to us in the future as currently contemplated.

In addition, our joint venture in PBPMS with ATS relies upon technologies owned by ATS. We have not yet entered into license agreements with ATS. ATS is under the control of Ronald La Borde, one of our Directors. Our investment in PBPMS depends on the continued support of ATS and Mr. La Borde and future licensing agreements with ATS. Failure to secure licensing agreements or the withdrawal of ATS from PBPMS may cause us to lose our investment in PBPMS and affect our financial results.

Table of Contents

We do not intend to take our Feldetrex® product candidate past the development stage, but instead intend to enter into collaboration agreements with collaboration partners. If we are unable to enter into an agreement with collaboration partners, our Feldetrex® product candidate cannot be marketed, and it will not generate revenue for us.

We do not intend to conduct clinical trials on our Feldetrex® product candidate. We instead intend to enter into one or more collaboration agreements with third parties to do so. However, we have not entered into any such agreements, or discussions for any such agreements, and we cannot guarantee that we will be successful in doing so. If we do not find a collaboration partner, the Feldetrex® product candidate cannot be marketed, and it will not generate any revenue for us.

The failure to generate revenue from our Feldetrex® product candidate will have a materially adverse effect on our overall revenues, profitability, and we may not be able to continue operations.

If an individual used any of our product candidates prior to their approval by the FDA or other regulatory authority, we face risks of unforeseen medical problems, and up to a complete ban on the sale of our product candidates.

The efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products is established through a process of clinical testing under FDA oversight. No individual is authorized or should use any of our products outside of an established process of clinical testing and FDA approval and authorization. If an individual were to use one of our product candidates in such a manner, we cannot predict the potential medical harm to that individual. If such an event were to occur, the FDA or similar regulatory agency might impose a complete ban on the sale or use of our candidate products.

Our pain management products are currently our sole revenue source and if these products come under increased regulatory scrutiny, our financial results will be adversely affected.

Our pain management products have not been approved by the FDA or any other regulatory agency, and the FDA does not have a pre-market approval system for our pain management products. However, our products may become subject to more extensive regulation in the future. These events could interrupt the marketing and sale of our pain management products, severely damage our brand reputation and image in the marketplace, increase the cost of our products, cause us to fail to meet customer expectations or cause us to be unable to deliver merchandise in sufficient quantities or of sufficient quality to our distributors, any of which could result in lost sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability and cash flows.

The FDA might not approve our product candidates for marketing and sale.

We intend to enter into agreements with larger pharmaceutical companies as collaboration partners, in part to help cover the cost of seeking regulatory approvals. We believe that FDA approval of some of our product candidates will need to undergo a full investigational new drug (IND) application with the FDA, including clinical trials. There can be no assurance that the FDA will approve our IND application or any other applications. Failure to obtain the necessary FDA approval will have a material negative affect on our operations. While we intend to license our Feldetrex®® product to a larger pharmaceutical company, they in turn, may not be able to obtain the necessary approval to market and sale the product.

Table of Contents

New regulations governing the introduction, marketing and sale of our products to consumers could harm our business.

Our operations could be harmed if new laws or regulations are enacted that restrict our ability to market or distribute our products or impose additional burdens or requirements on us in order to continue selling our products. In addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretations of existing regulations may result in significant compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may impair the marketability of our products, resulting in significant loss of net sales.

We have observed a general increase in regulatory activity and activism in the United States and the regulatory landscape is becoming more complex with increasingly strict requirements. If this trend continues, we may find it necessary to alter some of the ways we have traditionally marketed our products in order to stay in compliance with a changing regulatory landscape and this could add to the costs of our operations and/or have an adverse impact on our business.

We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations, or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business. Future changes could include requirements to make certain changes to our products to meet new standards, the recall or discontinuation of certain products that cannot be changed, additional record keeping, expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling, and additional scientific substantiation. Any or all of these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

We are affected by extensive laws, governmental regulations, administrative determinations, court decisions and similar constraints, and our failure to comply with these constraints could lead to the imposition of significant penalties or claims, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to rules of the FDA for current good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, for the manufacture, packing, labeling and holding of over-the-counter drugs and related products distributed in the United States. If we should be found not to be in compliance with cGMPs for the products we self-manufacture, it could negatively impact our reputation and ability to sell our products even after any such situation had been rectified. Further, if contract manufacturers whose products bear our labels fail to comply with the cGMPs, this could negatively impact our reputation and ability to sell its products even though we are not directly liable under the cGMPs for such compliance.

We may fail to deliver commercially successful new product candidates, methods and procedures of treatment, and treatments.

Our technology is at an early stage of research and development. As of the date hereof, we have partnered with the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), and protocol for animal testing procedures is being developed in conjunction with UTEP at this time. Subsequent clinical trials on human patients will be coordinated with our development partners in the near future. We have also entered into a joint venture agreement with ATS to form PBPMS and develop new products.

Table of Contents

The development of commercially viable new products and methods and procedures of treatment, as well as the development of additional uses for existing products and methods and procedures of treatment, is critical to our ability to generate sales and/or sell the rights to manufacture and distribute our product and process candidates to another firm. Developing new products and methods and procedures of treatment is a costly, lengthy and uncertain process. A new product or process candidate can fail at any stage of the development or commercialization, and one or more late-stage product or process candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval.

New product and process candidates may appear promising in development, but after significant investment, fail to reach the market or have only limited commercial success. This, for example, could be as a result of efficacy or safety concerns, inability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, difficulty or excessive costs to manufacture, erosion of patent term as a result of a lengthy development period, infringement of third-party patents or other intellectual property rights of others or inability to differentiate the product or process adequately from those with which it competes.

The commercialization of product and process candidates under development may not be profitable.

In order for the commercialization of our product candidates to be profitable, our product and process candidates must be cost-effective and economical to manufacture on a commercial scale. Furthermore, if our product candidates and methods and procedures of treatment do not achieve market acceptance, we may not be profitable. Subject to regulatory approval, we expect to incur significant development, sales and marketing expenses in connection with the commercialization of our new product and process candidates. Even if we receive additional financing, we may not be able to complete planned development and marketing of any or all of our product or process candidates. Our future profitability may depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

	·	the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish;
	·	the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
	·	the costs of establishing manufacturing and production, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities; and
	·	the effect of competing technological and market developments.

Even if our collaboration partners receive regulatory approval for our product and process candidates, we may not earn significant revenues from such product or process candidates. With respect to the product and methods and procedures of treatment candidates in our development pipeline that are being developed by or in close conjunction with third parties, our ability to generate revenues from such product and process candidates will depend in large part on the efforts of such third parties. To the extent that our collaboration partners are not successful in commercializing our product or process candidates, our revenues will suffer, we will incur significant additional losses and the price of our common stock will be negatively affected.

Table of Contents

We may engage in strategic transactions that fail to enhance shareholder value.

From time to time, we may consider possible strategic transactions, including the potential acquisitions or licensing of products or technologies or acquisition of companies, and other alternatives with the goal of maximizing shareholder value. We may never complete a strategic transaction, and in the event that we do complete a strategic transaction, implementation of such transactions may impair shareholder value or otherwise adversely affect our business. Any such transaction may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges and may pose significant integration challenges and/or management and business disruptions, any of which could harm our results of operation and business prospects.

Our business is heavily regulated by governmental authorities, and failure to comply with such regulation or changes in such regulations could negatively impact our financial results.

We must comply with a broad range of regulatory controls on the testing, approval, manufacturing and marketing of our product candidates, procedures and other treatments, particularly in the United States and countries of the European Union, that affect not only the cost of product development but also the time required to reach the market and the uncertainty of successfully doing so. Health authorities have increased their focus on safety when assessing the benefit risk/balance of drugs in the context of not only initial product approval but also in the context of approval of additional indications and review of information regarding marketed products. Stricter regulatory controls also heighten the risk of changes in product profile or withdrawal by regulators on the basis of post-approval concerns over product safety, which could reduce revenues and can result in product recalls and product liability lawsuits. There is also greater regulatory scrutiny, especially in the United States, on advertising and promotion and in particular on direct-to-consumer advertising.

The regulatory process is uncertain, can take many years, and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. In particular, proposed human pharmaceutical therapeutic product requirements set by the FDA in the United States, and similar health authorities in other countries, require substantial time and resources to satisfy. We may never obtain regulatory approval for our product and process candidates.

We may not be able to gain or sustain market acceptance for our services and product candidates.

Failure to establish a brand and presence in the marketplace on a timely basis could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will successfully complete our development and introduction of new products or product enhancements, or methods and procedures of treatment or that any such product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment will achieve acceptance in the marketplace. We may also fail to develop and deploy new products and product enhancements on a timely basis.

The market for products, methods and procedures of treatment and services in the pharmaceuticals industry is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete successfully.

We intend to operate in highly competitive markets. We will likely face competition both from proprietary products of large international manufacturers and producers of generic pharmaceuticals. Most of the competitors in the industry have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than us, and may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities and customer requirements. Also, many competitors have greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that they can leverage to gain market share. Such competitors are able to undertake more extensive promotional activities, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and offer more attractive terms to purchasers than we can.

Table of Contents

Significant product innovations, technical advances or the intensification of price competition by competitors could adversely affect our operating results. We cannot predict the timing or impact of competitive products or their potential impact on sales of our product candidates.

If any of our major product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment were to become subject to a problem such as unplanned loss of patent protection, unexpected side effects, regulatory proceedings, publicity affecting doctor or patient confidence or pressure from competitive products and methods and procedures of treatment, or if a new, more effective treatment should be introduced, the adverse impact on our revenues and operating results could be significant.

We are dependent on the services of key personnel and failure to attract qualified management could limit our growth and negatively impact our results of operations.

We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management and scientific staff and certain key consultants, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board of Directors. We will continue to depend on operations management personnel with pharmaceutical and scientific industry experience. At this time, we do not know of the availability of such experienced management personnel or how much it may cost to attract and retain such personnel. The loss of the services of any member of senior management or the inability to hire experienced operations management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If physicians and patients do not accept our current or future product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment, we may be unable to generate significant additional revenue, if any.

The products and methods and procedures of treatment that we may develop or acquire in the future may fail to gain market acceptance among physicians, health care payors, patients and the medical community. Physicians may elect not to recommend these treatments for a variety of reasons, including:

	·	timing of market introduction of competitive drugs;
	·	lower demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy compared to other drugs or treatments;
	·	lack of cost-effectiveness;
	·	lack of availability of reimbursement from managed care plans and other third-party payors;
	·	lack of convenience or ease of administration;
	·	prevalence and severity of adverse side effects;
	·	other potential advantages of alternative treatment methods; and
	·	ineffective marketing and distribution support.

	If our product candidates and processes fail to achieve market acceptance, we would not be able to generate significant revenue.

Table of Contents

We are exposed to the risk of liability claims, for which we may not have adequate insurance.

Since we participate in the pharmaceutical industry, we may be subject to liability claims by employees, customers, end users and third parties. We do not currently have product liability insurance. We intend to have proper insurance in place; however, there can be no assurance that any liability insurance we purchase will be adequate to cover claims asserted against us or that we will be able to maintain such insurance in the future. We intend to adopt prudent risk management programs to reduce these risks and potential liabilities; however, we have not taken any steps to create these programs and have no estimate as to the cost or time required to do so and there can be no assurance that such programs, if and when adopted, will fully protect us. We may not be able to put risk management programs in place, or obtain insurance, if we are unable to retain the necessary expertise and/or are unsuccessful in raising necessary capital in the future. Adverse rulings in any legal matters, proceedings and other matters could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Pre-clinical and clinical trials are conducted during the development of potential products and other treatments to determine their safety and efficacy for use by humans. Notwithstanding these efforts, when our treatments are introduced into the marketplace, unanticipated side effects may become evident. Manufacturing, marketing, selling and testing our product candidates under development or to be acquired or licensed, entails a risk of product liability claims. We could be subject to product liability claims in the event that our product candidates, processes, or products under development fail to perform as intended. Even unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds in litigation and the diversion of management time and resources, and could damage our reputation and impair the marketability of our product candidates and processes. While we plan to maintain liability insurance for product liability claims, we may not be able to obtain or maintain such insurance at a commercially reasonable cost. If a successful claim were made against us, and we don’t have insurance or the amount of insurance was inadequate to cover the costs of defending against or paying such a claim or the damages payable by us, we would experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Other companies may claim that we have infringed upon their intellectual property or proprietary rights.

We do not believe that our product candidates and methods and procedures violate third-party intellectual property rights; however, we have not had an independent party conduct a study of possible patent infringements. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee that claims relating to violation of such rights will not be asserted by third parties. If any of our product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment are found to violate third-party intellectual property rights, we may be required to expend significant funds to re-engineer or cause to be re-engineered one or more of those product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment to avoid infringement, or seek to obtain licenses from third parties to continue offering our product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment without substantial re-engineering, and such efforts may not be successful.

In addition, future patents may be issued to third parties upon which our product candidates and methods and procedures of treatment may infringe. We may incur substantial costs in defending against claims under any such patents. Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which effectively could block our ability to further develop or commercialize some or all of our products or methods and procedures of treatment in the United States or abroad, and could result in the award of substantial damages against us. In the event of a claim of infringement, we may be required to obtain one or more licenses from third parties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such licenses at a reasonable cost, if at all. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any such license could be costly and have a material adverse effect on our business.

Table of Contents

Our success depends on our ability to protect our proprietary technology.

Our success depends, to a significant degree, upon the protection of our proprietary technology, and that of any licensors. Legal fees and other expenses necessary to obtain and maintain appropriate patent protection could be material. Insufficient funding may inhibit our ability to obtain and maintain such protection. Additionally, if we must resort to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive, and could involve a high degree of risk to our proprietary rights if we are unsuccessful in, or cannot afford to pursue, such proceedings.

Our licensors have been granted three U.S. patents: Sequential Extracorporeal Treatment of Bodily Fluids, U.S. Patent No. 9,216,386; Utilization of Stents for the Treatment of Blood Borne Carcinomas, U.S. Patent No. 8,758,287; and Medication and Treatment for Disease, U.S. Patent No. 8,865,733, in the areas of cancer, sepsis, and multiple sclerosis. We expect these patents to cover the medical treatments for Multiple Sclerosis, Blood Sepsis, and Cancer and be effective until 2029. Our licensors have licensed these technologies to us pursuant to the terms of the license agreements. We anticipate that other technologies that derive from these patents will also belong to us and are covered by the license agreements. However, we have not conducted thorough prior art or novelty studies, but we are not aware of existing prior art that would prevent us from obtaining patents on our product candidates or methods and procedures of treatment. Prior art preventing us from obtaining broad patent protection is a possibility. Inability to obtain valid and enforceable patent protection would have a material negative impact on our business opportunities and success. Because the patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions, the patents may not be granted on our applications, and any future patents owned and licensed by us may not prevent other companies from developing competing products or ensure that others will not be issued patents that may prevent the sale of our products or require licensing and the payment of significant fees or royalties. Furthermore, to the extent that: (i) any of our future products or methods are not patentable; (ii) such products or methods infringe upon the patents of third parties; or (iii) our patents or future patents fail to give us an exclusive position in the subject matter to which such patents relate, our business will be adversely affected. We may be unable to avoid infringement of third-party patents and may have to obtain a license, or defend an infringement action and challenge the validity of such patents in court. A license may be unavailable on terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all. Patent litigation is costly and time consuming, and we may be unable to prevail in any such patent litigation or devote sufficient resources to even pursue such litigation. If we do not obtain a license under such patents, are found liable for infringement and are not able to have such patents declared invalid, we may be liable for significant monetary damages, encounter significant delays in bringing products to market or may be precluded from participating in the manufacture, use or sale of products or methods of treatment requiring such licenses.

We may also rely on trademarks, trade secrets and contract law to protect certain of our proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that any trademarks will be approved, that such contract will not be breached, or that if breached, we will have adequate remedies. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any of our trade secrets will not become known or independently discovered by third parties.

Table of Contents

Additionally, we may, from time to time, support and collaborate in research conducted by universities and governmental research organizations. There can be no assurance that we will have or be able to acquire title or exclusive rights to the inventions or technical information derived from such collaborations, or that disputes will not arise with respect to rights in derivative or related research programs conducted by us or such collaborators.

Our future growth may be inhibited by the failure to implement new technologies.

Our future growth is partially tied to our ability to improve our knowledge and implementation of medical and pharmaceutical technologies. The inability to successfully implement commercially viable medical and pharmaceutical technologies in response to market conditions in a manner that is responsive to our customers’ requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related To Our Common stock

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control.

The market price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to, among other factors:

	·	variations in our operating results and market conditions specific to Biomedical Industry companies;
	·	changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
	·	announcements of innovations or new products or services by us or our competitors;
	·	the emergence of new competitors;
	·	operating and market price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable;
	·	changes in our board or management;
	·	sales or purchases of our common stock by insiders;
	·	commencement of, or involvement in, litigation;
	·	changes in governmental regulations; and
	·	general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the market price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause the price of our common stock to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to the board of directors and management.

Table of Contents

If we are unable to pay the costs associated with being a public, reporting company, we may not be able to continue trading on the OTCQB and/or we may be forced to discontinue operations.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the OTCQB. We expect to have significant costs associated with being a public, reporting company, which may raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue trading on the OTCQB and/or continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue trading on the OTCQB and/or continue as a going concern will depend on positive cash flow, if any, from future operations and on our ability to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing. If we are unable to achieve the necessary product sales or raise or obtain needed funding to cover the costs of operating as a public, reporting company, our common stock may be deleted from the OTCQB and/or we may be forced to discontinue operations.

Our common stock is listed for quotation on the OTCQB tier of the marketplace maintained by OTC Markets Group, Inc., which may make it more difficult for investors to resell their shares due to suitability requirements.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB tier of the marketplace maintained by OTC Markets Group, Inc. Broker-dealers often decline to trade in over-the-counter stocks given the market for such securities are often limited, the stocks are more volatile, and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of their shares. This could cause our stock price to decline.

Our principal shareholders have the ability to exert significant control in matters requiring shareholder approval and could delay, deter, or prevent a change in control of our company.

William A. Hartman and Dr. Mitchell S. Felder collectively own 29,257,672 shares of our outstanding common stock, 2,000,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (which is convertible into an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock), and through the exercise of warrants could acquire another 15,510,000 shares of our common stock. The shares of our preferred stock have 100 votes per share, giving these two shareholders over 40% of our current voting securities. As a result, they have the ability to influence matters affecting our shareholders, including the election of our directors, the acquisition or disposition of our assets, and the future issuance of our shares. Because they control such shares, investors may find it difficult to replace our management if they disagree with the way our business is being operated. Because the influence by these shareholders could result in management making decisions that are in the best interest of those shareholders and not in the best interest of the investors, you may lose some or all of the value of your investment in our common stock. Investors who purchase our common stock should be willing to entrust all aspects of operational control to our current management team.

We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We do not plan on making any cash distributions in the manner of a dividend or otherwise. Our Board presently intends to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any.

Table of Contents

We have the right to issue additional common stock and preferred stock without consent of shareholders. This would have the effect of diluting investors’ ownership and could decrease the value of their investment.

We are authorized to issue up to 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, of which there were 491,852,004 shares issued and outstanding as of April 26, 2017. An additional 112,690,004 shares may be issued and outstanding if all of our currently outstanding preferred stock and warrants were exercised and converted into common stock. We therefore have up to an additional 395,457,992 authorized but unissued shares of our common stock that may be issued by us for any purpose without the consent or vote of our shareholders that would dilute shareholders’ percentage ownership of our company.

In addition, our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of shares of preferred stock, the rights, preferences, designations and limitations of which may be set by the Board of Directors. Our certificate of incorporation has authorized the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in the discretion of our Board. The shares of authorized but undesignated preferred stock may be issued upon filing of an amended certificate of incorporation and the payment of required fees; no further shareholder action is required. If issued, the rights, preferences, designations and limitations of such preferred stock would be set by our Board and could operate to the disadvantage of the outstanding common stock. Such terms could include, among others, preferences as to dividends and distributions on liquidation. We have designated a series of convertible preferred stock, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time after the issuance of such share into one (1) fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock. Each outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one hundred (100) votes per share on all matters to which the shareholders of the Corporation are entitled or required to vote. As of April 26, 2017, there were 2,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

Our officers and directors can sell some of their stock, which may have a negative effect on our stock price and ability to raise additional capital, and may make it difficult for investors to sell their stock at any price.

Our officers and directors, as a group, are the owners of 32,453,672 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 6.6% of our total issued shares, with convertible preferred stock, options and warrants to acquire another 24,400,000 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 5.0% of our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Each individual officer and director may be able to sell up to 1% of our outstanding common stock (currently approximately 4,918,520 shares) every ninety (90) days in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, which may have a negative effect on our stock price and may prevent us from obtaining additional capital. In addition, if our officers and directors are selling their stock into the open market, it may make it difficult or impossible for investors to sell their stock at any price.

Our common stock is governed under The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990.

The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure relating to the market for penny stocks in connection with trades in any stock defined as a penny stock. The Commission has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Such exceptions include any equity security listed on NASDAQ and any equity security issued by an issuer that has (i) net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for three years; (ii) net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years; or (iii) average annual revenue of at least $6,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith.

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made forward-looking statements in this Annual Report, including the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of future regulation, and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate” or similar expressions. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance or achievement. We are not under any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report to conform these statements to actual results, unless required by law.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

We do not currently lease or use any office space. We have not paid any amounts to Mr. Hartman for the use of his personal office or for reimbursement of personal office expenses incurred by him.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to or otherwise involved in any legal proceedings.

In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and it is possible that the resolution of such matters might have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition and/or results of operations. However, in the opinion of our management, other than as set forth herein, matters currently pending or threatened against us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKETFOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB tier of the marketplace maintained by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol “BIEI.” Our stock has traded there since February 23, 2012. Our common stock trades on a limited or sporadic basis and should not be deemed to constitute an established public trading market. There is no assurance that there will be liquidity in the common stock.

The following table sets forth the high and low transaction price for each quarter within the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, as provided by OTC Markets Group, Inc. The information reflects prices between dealers, and does not include retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

		Transaction Prices
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,	Period	High		Low
2017	First Quarter	$	0.0245	$	0.0036

2016	Fourth Quarter	$	0.0255	$	0.0030
	Third Quarter	$	0.0280	$	0.0081
	Second Quarter	$	0.0400	$	0.0043
	First Quarter	$	0.0410	$	0.0120

2015	Fourth Quarter	$	0.0529	$	0.0027
	Third Quarter	$	0.1200	$	0.0070
	Second Quarter	$	0.1400	$	0.1000
	First Quarter	$	0.2250	$	0.1000

Holders

As of April 26, 2017, there were 491,852,004 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding and held by 134 holders of record, not including shares held in “street name” in brokerage accounts which is unknown.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. We intend to apply our earnings, if any, in expanding our operations and related activities. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, our financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

Table of Contents

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not currently have a stock option or grant plan.

Recent Issuance of Unregistered Securities

We issued the following unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2016 that were not previously reported on a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K:

On May 27, 2016 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Redwood Management, LLC (“Redwood”), which provides that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Redwood is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $2.0 million of our shares of common stock over the 36-month term of the Purchase Agreement.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we have issued the following shares of common stock on the dates indicated and in the amounts shown to Redwood:

Date	Purchase Amount		Shares Issued
7/21/2016	$	29,000		4,027,778
8/9/2016		39,520		5,200,000
11/8/2016		25,000		6,097,561
11/22/2016		25,000		6,377,551
12/13/2016		25,000		6,250,000
1/4/2017		10,323		3,147,110
Totals	$	153,843		31,100,000

On March 28, 2017, we agreed with Redwood to terminate the Purchase Agreement.

On November 16, 2016, we issued 2,626,867 shares of our common stock to a service provider in satisfaction of outstanding liabilities owed to the service provider.

On November 27, 2016, we issued warrants to acquire 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 to a service provider.

On November 27, 2016, we issued warrants to acquire 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 to a service provider.

Warrant Exercise

On August 19, 2016, we issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock, restricted in accordance with Rule 144, to each of William Hartman and Mitchell Felder, officers and directors of the Company, upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share.

Table of Contents

On December 20, 2016, we issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock, restricted in accordance with Rule 144, to each of William Hartman and Mitchell Felder, officers and directors of the Company, upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share.

All of the securities above were issued and sold in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"). These securities may not be offered or sold in the United States in the absence of an effective registration statement or exemption from the registration requirements under the Act. The investors are accredited investors and there was no general solicitation.

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

Summary Overview

We are a research-based company that intends to discover and develop medical treatments for humans. We have a three-fold corporate focus: (i) develop and market pain management products, (ii) develop our proprietary Sequential-Dialysis Technique to target cancer Alzheimer’s disease, ALS, blood sepsis, leukemia and other life-threateneing cancers, and (iii) develop our proprietary drug candidate Feldetrex™, a potential treatment for Multiple Sclerosis, Fibromyalgia, Neuropathic Pain and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Table of Contents

We have partnered with Advanced Technologies Solutions (ATS) to develop and market natural and cannabis-based generalized, neuropathic and localized pain relief treatment products. We have seen great success in the early stages of this partnership. We have developed two new products that are now on the market as of February 1, 2017, and we have made initial sales of these products. In addition to online sales, we have also established a distribution network consisting of three pharmacies and three chiropractic clinics. We expect distribution of these products to grow rapidly as we find other local pharmacies and clinics to distribute our products. With proof of marketability from the growing sales of our products, we are seeking to enter into distribution arrangements with several large pharmacy chains that operate in multiple states, and we believe we are close to coming to an agreement with these pharmacy chains.

In addition, we are in the process of negotiating potential off-shore partnerships to manufacture and market our products worldwide. We expect that these partnerships will make new markets available to us and allow us to rapidly increase our revenues profitability. We hope that through these partnerships our sales will grow rapidly and we will be able to see considerable cost-savings through favorable manufacturing arrangements. In addition to growing the sales of our existing products, we plan to launch at least three new products into the market in 2017.

In the past as we worked through the development of these products, we have relied heavily on financing through various issuances of common stock, warrants and convertible debt. We appreciate the patience of our faithful stockholders during this period as we were determined to develop and market new, ground-breaking products. As we begin to turn the corner and see the first sales being made, we expect to find stockholder-friendly financing solutions in the future that help us expand our operations, avoid dilution of our stockholders and raise our stock prices. For example, new opportunities have allowed us to cancel the equity line financing we had with Redwood, and we have closed a financing that will give us the capital we need to grow our business in the near future. On March 30, 2017, we raised $300,000 from investors in a sale of stock and warrants. These investors have also committed to purchase up to another $300,000 upon the registration of the stock and warrants purchased by the investors.

As of the date hereof, we have repaid our convertible debt, and we expect to move forward with financing that will be more favorable to investors as we begin to grow our revenues. While we have begun to generate revenues with the products we have launched in the first quarter of 2017, the cash generated by these new products is not yet sufficient to finance our volume ramp-up and planned product introductions. Therefore, we expect to finance the company through the issuance of securities that are more favorable to our current investors, such as issuing warrants with fixed exercise prices above the market price on the date of issuance.

Through 2017, we will continue to market our pain management products and seek a wider distribution network through the negotiation of distribution agreements with large pharmacy chains and international partners.

Going Concern

As a result of our current financial condition, we have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm for our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 that includes an explanatory paragraph describing the uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern. In order to continue as a going concern we must effectively balance many factors and generate more revenue so that we can fund our operations from our sales and revenues. If we are not able to do this we may not be able to continue as an operating company. We recently completed the sale of stock and warrants to raise $300,000 from a group of investors and expect to be able to raise another $300,000 from the same investors once we complete registration of the investors’ securities. This should give us the capital we need in the short term to push forward in the production and marketing of our new pain management products. However, if we are unable to grow revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, we must again raise capital by issuing debt or through the sale of our stock. There is no assurance that our cash flow will be adequate to satisfy our operating expenses and capital requirements.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Introduction

We had no revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Our operating expenses were $637,891 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $2,383,282 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,745,391, or 73%. Our operating expenses consisted of research and development costs, general and administrative expenses, and professional fees as we incurred additional research and development costs and as we provided stock based compensation to our Officers and Directors.

Revenues and Net Operating Loss

Our revenues, operating expenses, and net operating loss for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

				Year Ended
	Year Ended December 31,			December 31, 2015			Increase /
	2016			(Restated)			(Decrease)

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
Research and development		113,862			234,095			(120,233	)
General and administrative		191,379			133,289			58,090
Professional fees		332,650			2,015,898			(1,683,248	)
Total operating expenses		637,891			2,383,282			(1,745,391	)

Net operating loss		(637,891	)		(2,383,282	)		1,745,391
Other expense		(1,130,330	)		(218,125	)		912,205

Net loss	$	(1,768,221	)	$	(2,601,407	)	$	833,186

Revenues

The Company was established on May 10, 2010, and had no revenues through December 31, 2016. We have begun sales of our pain management products and expect to report revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses were $113,862 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $234,095 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $120,233, or 51%. The expenses decreased as we cut back on our research efforts with the University of Texas and looked for more sustainable research options.

Table of Contents

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses were $191,379 for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $133,289 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $58,090, or 44%. The increase was primarily due to increased insurance and investor relations expenses.

Professional Fees

Professional fees expense was $332,650 for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $2,015,898 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,683,248, or 84%. The decrease was primarily due to decreased stock based compensation issued to directors and consultants for services rendered. A total of $98,569 of stock based compensation was awarded during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $1,849,169 of stock based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,750,600 from 2015 to 2016.

Net Operating Loss

Net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $637,891, compared to a net operating loss of $2,383,282 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $1,745,391, or 73%. Net operating loss decreased, as set forth above, primarily due to a decrease in stock based compensation issued to directors and consultants for services rendered.

Other Expense

Other expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,130,330, compared to $218,125 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $912,205, or 418%. Other expense consisted of interest and finance charges on debt and equity financing, as well as a net loss on the settlement of the Typenex warrants during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase of approximately $625,000 in the amortization of debt discounts related to significant increased convertible debt financing during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, and a $340,647 judgment expense related to a judgment that was awarded to Typenex in satisfaction of disputed warrants, that was diminished by a gain of $53,788 on the ultimate settlement of the judgment during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,768,221, or $(0.01) per share, compared to a net loss of $2,601,407, or $(0.08) per share, for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $833,186, or 32%. Net loss decreased, as set forth above, primarily due to decreased stock based compensation issued to directors and consultants for services rendered, as diminished by increased debt financing costs and the associated net settlement costs related to warrants issued to Typenex in connection with the debt financing.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Introduction

During the year ended December 31, 2016, because we did not generate any revenues, we had negative operating cash flows. Our cash on hand as of December 31, 2016 was $22,437, which was derived from the sale of convertible promissory notes to investors. Our monthly cash flow burn rate has increased from approximately $39,000 in 2015 to approximately $40,500 in 2016. Although we have moderate short term cash needs, as our operating expenses increase we will face strong medium to long term cash needs. We anticipate that these needs will be satisfied through the issuance of debt or the sale of our securities until such time as our cash flows from operations will satisfy our cash flow needs.

Our cash, current assets, total assets, current liabilities, and total liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows:

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015 (Restated)		Change

Cash	$	22,437	$	35,414	$	(12,977	)
Total Current Assets		33,867		44,580		(10,713	)
Total Assets		38,967		48,227		(9,260	)
Total Current Liabilities		699,671		473,786		225,885
Total Liabilities	$	699,671	$	473,786	$	225,885

Our cash decreased by $12,977 as of December 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015. Our total current assets decreased by $10,713 primarily for the same reason. Our total assets decreased by $9,260 primarily for the same reasons.

Our current liabilities increased by $225,885 as of December 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in accounts payable of $32,475, accrued interest of $10,234, accrued interest, related parties of $2,400, convertible notes payable of $111,209, and derivative liabilities of $71,746. Our total liabilities increased by the same $225,885 for the same reasons.

In order to repay our obligations in full or in part when due, we will be required to raise significant capital from other sources. There is no assurance, however, that we will be successful in these efforts.

Cash Requirements

Our cash on hand as of December 31, 2016 was $22,437, which was derived from the sale of convertible promissory notes and common stock. Our monthly cash flow burn rate is approximately $40,500. Although we have moderate short term cash needs, as our operating expenses increase we will face strong medium to long term cash needs. We anticipate that these needs will be satisfied through the sale of our securities until such time as our cash flows from operations will satisfy our cash flow needs.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operations

Our net cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $483,622 and $462,225, respectively, an increase of $21,397, or 5%. The increase primarily consisted of a decrease in stock based compensation, related parties of $1,504,152, a decrease in stock based compensation of $234,626, and an increase in gain on settlement of judgment of $53,788, offset in part by a decrease in net loss from operations of $833,186, an increase in amortization of debt discounts of $573,455, and an increase in judgment payable of $340,647.

Table of Contents

Investments

Our net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $3,536 and zero, respectively, an increase of $3,536. The slight increase reflected a lack of purchases of property and equipment in 2015 compared to 2016.

Financing

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $474,181 and $395,040, respectively, an increase of $79,141, or 20%. The increase was a result of an increase in proceeds from the sale of convertible notes payable of $52,500, from $365,000 to $417,500, and an increase in proceeds from sale of stock on equity line of credit from zero to $143,520, offset by a decrease in the proceeds from the sale of notes payable to related parties from $30,000 to zero and an increase in repayments of convertible notes payable from zero to $89,039.

Securities Purchase Agreements

On March 30, 2017 we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with several investors to sell an aggregate of $600,000 of our common stock and warrants. Payment for the stock and warrants pursuant to the Purchase Agreement will be completed in three tranches: the first at $300,000 was completed on March 30, 2017, the second at $150,000 is due within five trading days of our filing a registration statement to cover the investors’ shares of common stock and shares underlying their warrants, and the third at $150,000 is due within five trading days of the registration statement being declared effective.

Purchase Agreement with Redwood Management, LLC

On May 27, 2016, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Redwood Agreement”) with Redwood Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Redwood”), which provides that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Redwood is committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $2.0 million of our shares of common stock over the 36-month term of the Redwood Agreement.

On July 12, 2016, a registration statement was declared effective that permitted Redwood to offer and sell up to 33,100,000 shares. As of the date hereof, we have sold 31,100,000 shares of our common stock to Redwood under the Redwood Agreement. These sales, in the aggregate, have generated proceeds of $153,843. However, we have cancelled the Redwood Agreement and will make no further sales thereunder to Redwood.

Convertible Promissory Note

On March 11, 2016, we issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $105,000 at a discount for $100,000 to Redwood (the “Note”). The Note was issued to Redwood in a private transaction, will mature on February 27, 2017 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 10.0% per annum. The Note and interest due thereunder is payable on any conversion date chosen by the holder or on the maturity date in cash or our common stock at Redwood’s discretion. The outstanding principal balance of the Note as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2016 was $105,000 and $27,480, respectively. However, in March 2017, we paid the remaining balance owed under the Note.

Table of Contents

Warrant Purchase and Exchange

On October 10, 2016, we entered into a Warrant Purchase Agreement by and among Redwood, the Company and Typenex Co-Investment, LLC (“Typenex”) whereby Redwood committed to purchase Typenex’s warrant (the “Warrant”) from Typenex. Redwood paid a purchase price of $300,000.

Also on October 10, 2016, we entered into an Exchange Agreement by and between the Company and Redwood. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we exchanged a 10% Convertible Promissory Note (the “TypenexNote”) for the Warrant. The Typenex Note has a principal amount of $300,000, an interest rate of 10%. We entered into the Warrant Purchase Agreement and the Exchange Agreement and issued the Typenex Note to settle a previously disclosed dispute with Typenex. This note has been paid in full.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Nature of Business

Premier Biomedical, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 10, 2010 (“Inception”). The Company was formed to develop and market medications and procedures that address a significant number of the most highly visible health issues currently affecting mankind. The Company will market these medications and procedures to leading worldwide pharmaceutical firms via publication in medical journals and by direct contact.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We maintain cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts, which do not currently exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Patent Rights and Applications

Patent rights and applications costs include the acquisition costs and costs incurred for the filing of patents. Patent rights and applications are amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life of the patent rights beginning at the time the patents are approved. Patent costs for unsuccessful patent applications are expensed when the application is terminated.

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, the Financial Accounting Standards Board establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement reaffirms that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements as reflected herein. The carrying amounts of cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheet are estimated by management to approximate fair value primarily due to the short term nature of the instruments.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the periods presented, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

Stock-Based Compensation

Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The Company’s stock based compensation consisted of the following during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

Common stock issued for services	$	70,621	$	-
Warrants issued for services, related parties		25,030		1,529,182
Warrants issued for services		14,739		319,986
Total stock based compensation	$	110,390	$	1,849,168

Revenue Recognition

Sales on fixed price contracts are recorded when services are earned, the earnings process is complete or substantially complete, and the revenue is measurable and collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue from sales in which payment has been received, but the earnings process has not occurred. Sales have not yet commenced.

Table of Contents

Advertising and Promotion

All costs associated with advertising and promoting products are expensed as incurred. These expenses were $82,246 and $59,956 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such asset will not be recovered through future operations.

Uncertain Tax Positions

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be capable of withstanding examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. These standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. The Company has not yet undergone an examination by any taxing authorities.

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The amendment requires an entity to perform its annual, or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company intends to early adopt the ASU in 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2016-20 amended guidance regarding accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. When effective, this standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in GAAP. This guidance is required to be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 by either recasting all years presented in our financial statements or by recording the impact of adoption as an adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the year of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties that are under Common Control. The amendments in this Update improve GAAP involving situations consisting of common control, wherein a single decision maker focuses on the economics to which it is exposed when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) before potentially evaluating which party is most closely associated with the VIE. ASU 2016-17 is effective for public entities for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which reduces the complexity in the accounting standards by allowing the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. Historically, recognition of the income tax consequence was not recognized until the asset was sold to an outside party. This amendment should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. ASU 2016-16 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. That is, earlier adoption should be in the first interim period if an entity issues interim financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In August, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). Effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

In June, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. For public business entities that are U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filers, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. All entities may adopt the amendments in this Update earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”). The provisions of the update amend ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, and includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements, including accounting for the income tax consequences, estimates of forfeitures and classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

Table of Contents

In March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of Update 2014-09. Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

In March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. Effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

In March, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-04, Liabilities—Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20): Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). Effective for public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s financial statements.

No other new accounting pronouncements, issued or effective during the year ended December 31, 2016, have had or are expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)		F-3

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)		F-4

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)		F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)		F-6

Notes to Financial Statements		F-7 to F-41

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Premier Biomedical, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Premier Biomedical, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has insufficient working capital, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the 2015 financial statements have been restated to correct an error in the financial statements.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

May 8, 2017

F-2

Table of Contents

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
				(Restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	22,437		$	35,414
Prepaid expenses		11,430			9,166
Total current assets		33,867			44,580

Property and equipment, net		5,100			3,647

Total assets	$	38,967		$	48,227

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	220,740		$	188,265
Accounts payable, related parties		52,489			54,668
Accrued interest		18,026			7,792
Accrued interest, related parties		3,570			1,170
Convertible notes payable, net of discounts of $149,456 and
$246,185 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		153,024			41,815
Notes payable, related parties		30,000			30,000
Derivative liabilities		221,822			150,076
Total current liabilities		699,671			473,786

Total liabilities		699,671			473,786

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,000,000 and -0- shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		2,000			-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 304,556,650 and 82,331,062 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		3,046			823
Additional paid in capital		11,899,504			10,370,651
Accumulated deficit		(12,565,254	)		(10,797,033	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(660,704	)		(425,559	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	38,967		$	48,227

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Years
	Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
				(Restated)
Revenue	$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
Research and development		113,862			234,095
General and administrative		191,379			133,289
Professional fees		332,650			2,015,898
Total operating expenses		637,891			2,383,282

Net operating loss		(637,891	)		(2,383,282	)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(817,423	)		(198,049	)
Loss on judgment, Typenex		(340,647	)		-
Gain on settlement, Typenex		53,788			-
Change in derivative liabilities		(26,048	)		(20,076	)
Total other income (expense)		(1,130,330	)		(218,125	)

Net loss	$	(1,768,221	)	$	(2,601,407	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted		151,651,420			31,264,255

Net loss per share - basic and fully diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.08	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

																	Total
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Additional Paid-In			Accumulated			Stockholders' Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			(Deficit)

Balance, December 31, 2014		-	$	-		21,757,175		$	218		$	8,127,649		$	(8,195,626	)	$	(67,759	)

Common stock issued on debt conversions		-		-		56,723,887			567			226,821			-			227,388

Exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share, related party		-		-		4,000,000			40			-			-			40

Common stock cancelled		-		-		(150,000	)		(2	)		2			-			-

Amortization of warrants granted for services, related parties		-		-		-			-			1,529,182			-			1,529,182

Amortization of warrants granted for services		-		-		-			-			319,986			-			319,986

Beneficial conversion feature of convertible note		-		-		-			-			167,011			-			167,011

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015		-		-		-			-			-			(2,601,407	)		(2,601,407	)

Balance, December 31, 2015 (Restated)		-	$	-		82,331,062		$	823		$	10,370,651		$	(10,797,033	)	$	(425,559	)

Common stock issued on equity line of credit		-		-		27,952,890			280			143,240			-			143,520

Common stock issued on debt conversions		-		-		165,196,985			1,652			736,064			-			737,716

Exercise of preferred stock warrants at $0.001 per share, related parties		2,000,000		2,000		-			-			-			-			2,000

Exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share, related parties		-		-		20,000,000			200			-			-			200

Exercise of cashless warrants at $0.00001 per share		-		-		2,248,846			22			(22	)		-			-

Shares issued for serttlement of reimbursements, related party		-		-		600,000			6			13,759			-			13,765

Shares issued for services		-		-		6,226,867			63			70,558			-			70,621

Amortization of warrants granted for services, related parties		-		-		-			-			25,030			-			25,030

Amortization of warrants granted for services		-		-		-			-			14,739			-			14,739

Adjustments to derivative liability due to debt conversions		-		-		-			-			525,485			-			525,485

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016		-		-		-			-			-			(1,768,221	)		(1,768,221	)

Balance, December 31, 2016		2,000,000	$	2,000		304,556,650		$	3,046		$	11,899,504		$	(12,565,254	)	$	(660,704	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years
	Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES				(Restated)
Net loss	$	(1,768,221	)	$	(2,601,407	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		2,083			1,462
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		26,048			20,076
Amortization of debt discounts		749,162			175,707
Gain on settlement of judgment		(53,788	)		-
Stock based compensation, related parties		25,030			1,529,182
Stock based compensation		85,360			319,986
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Prepaid expenses		(2,264	)		284
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		32,475			40,774
Accounts payable, related parties		11,586			29,369
Accrued interest		65,860			21,172
Accrued interest, related parties		2,400			1,170
Judgment payable		340,647			-
Net cash used in operating activities		(483,622	)		(462,225	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment		(3,536	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(3,536	)		-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of warrants, related party		2,200			40
Proceeds from sale of stock on equity line of credit		143,520			-
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		417,500			365,000
Proceeds from notes payable, related parties		-			30,000
Repayments of convertible notes payable		(89,039	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		474,181			395,040

NET CHANGE IN CASH		(12,977	)		(67,185	)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		35,414			102,599

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	22,437		$	35,414

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	13,539		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Discount on beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes	$	-		$	167,011
Value of debt discounts	$	571,183		$	130,000
Value of derivative adjustment due to debt conversions	$	525,485		$	-
Value of shares issued for conversion of debt	$	737,716		$	227,388
Convertible note issued in settlement of judgment payable	$	300,000		$	-
Common stock issued for settlement of accounts payable, related party	$	13,765		$	-
Cashless exercise of common stock warrants, 2,250,000 warrants exercised	$	22		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein.

Use of Estimates

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Patent Rights and Applications

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

F-7

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Stock-Based Compensation

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

Common stock issued for services	$	70,621	$	-
Warrants issued for services, related parties		25,030		1,529,182
Warrants issued for services		14,739		319,986
Total stock based compensation	$	110,390	$	1,849,168

Revenue Recognition

Advertising and Promotion

All costs associated with advertising and promoting products are expensed as incurred. These expenses were $82,246 and $59,956 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Income Taxes

Uncertain Tax Positions

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

F-8

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

F-9

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

F-10

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

No other new accounting pronouncements, issued or effective during the year ended December 31, 2016, have had or are expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

F-11

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 2 – Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no revenues, incurred net losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $12,565,254, and had negative working capital of ($665,804) at December 31, 2016. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is actively pursuing new products and services to begin generating revenues. In addition, the Company is currently seeking additional sources of capital to fund short term operations. The Company, however, is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful; therefore, without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Restatement

The Company is restating its December 31, 2015 financial statements and the interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2016, the six months ended June 30, 2016 and nine months ended September 30, 2016 in order to account for embedded derivatives within the Redwood Notes, rather than beneficial conversion feature discounts. The financial statements will be restated prospectively during 2017.

The Company determined that it had not properly recognized embedded derivative liabilities within the Redwood Notes that originated on various dates between December 28, 2015 and May 27, 2016. The Company has recognized a derivative liability in lieu of the previously recognized beneficial conversion feature and the related change in derivative liabilities and amortization of the debt discount expenses have been adjusted to correct this error.

F-12

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following adjustments were made to the December 31, 2015 Restated Balance Sheet:

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
BALANCE SHEET

	As Originally
	Reported						As Restated
	December 31,						December 31,
	2015			Adjustments			2015

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	35,414		$	-		$	35,414
Prepaid expenses		9,166			-			9,166
Total current assets		44,580			-			44,580

Property and equipment, net		3,647			-			3,647

Total assets	$	48,227		$	-		$	48,227

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	188,265		$	-		$	188,265
Accounts payable, related parties		54,668			-			54,668
Accrued interest		7,792			-			7,792
Accrued interest, related parties		1,170			-			1,170
Convertible notes payable, net of discounts of $245,345		42,655			(840	)		41,815
Notes payable, related parties		30,000			-			30,000
Derivative liabilities		-			150,076			150,076
Total current liabilities		324,550			149,236			473,786

Total liabilities		324,550			149,236			473,786

Commitments and contingencies		-			-			-

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-			-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 82,331,062 and 21,757,175 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively		823			-			823
Additional paid in capital		10,500,651			(130,000	)		10,370,651
Accumulated deficit		(10,777,797	)		(19,236	)		(10,797,033	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(276,323	)		(149,236	)		(425,559	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	48,227		$	-		$	48,227

F-13

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following adjustments were made to the December 31, 2015 Restated Statement of Operations:

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

	As Originally
	Reported						As Restated
	December 31,						December 31,
	2015			Adjustments			2015

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
Research and development		234,095			-			234,095
General and administrative		133,289			-			133,289
Professional fees		2,015,898			-			2,015,898
Total operating expenses		2,383,282			-			2,383,282

Net operating loss		(2,383,282	)		-			(2,383,282	)

Other expense:
Interest expense		(198,889	)		840			(198,049	)
Change in derivative liabilities		-			(20,076	)		(20,076	)
Total other expenses		(198,889	)		(19,236	)		(218,125	)

Net loss	$	(2,582,171	)	$	(19,236	)	$	(2,601,407	)

The December 31, 2015 Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) was restated to increase the Accumulated Deficit from $10,777,797 to $10,797,033 for the additional net loss for the year of $19,236. The net loss as originally stated was $2,582,171, and as restated amounted to a net loss of $2,601,407. Additional Paid-In Capital was also restated to remove a $130,000 beneficial conversion feature from Additional Paid-In Capital that was corrected to be accounted for as an embedded derivative. The impact of the correction is summarized below:

F-14

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
SUMMARY OF CORRECTIONS TO STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

	As Originally
	Reported						As Restated
	December 31,						December 31,
	2015			Adjustments			2015

Beneficial conversion feature of convertible note	$	297,011		$	(130,000	)	$	167,011
Additional Paid-In Capital	$	10,500,651		$	(130,000	)	$	10,370,651

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015	$	(2,582,171	)	$	(19,236	)	$	(2,601,407	)
Accumulated Deficit	$	(10,777,797	)	$	(19,236	)	$	(10,797,033	)

F-15

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following adjustments were made to the December 31, 2015 Restated Statement of Cash Flows:

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

	As Originally
	Reported						As Restated
	December 31,						December 31,
	2015			Adjustments			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)	$	(2,582,171	)	$	(19,236	)	$	(2,601,407	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		1,462			-			1,462
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		-			20,076			20,076
Amortization of debt discounts		176,547			(840	)		175,707
Stock based compensation, related parties		1,529,182			-			1,529,182
Stock based compensation		319,986			-			319,986
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Prepaid expenses		284			-			284
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		40,774			-			40,774
Accounts payable, related parties		29,369			-			29,369
Accrued interest		21,172			-			21,172
Accrued interest, related parties		1,170			-			1,170
Net cash used in operating activities		(462,225	)		-			(462,225	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of warrants, related party		40			-			40
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		365,000			-			365,000
Proceeds from notes payable, related parties		30,000			-			30,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		395,040			-			395,040

NET CHANGE IN CASH		(67,185	)		-			(67,185	)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		102,599			-			102,599

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	35,414		$	-		$	35,414

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Discount on beneficial conversion feature on convertible note	$	297,011		$	(130,000	)	$	167,011
Value of debt discounts	$	-		$	130,000		$	130,000
Value of shares issued for conversion of debt	$	227,388		$	-		$	227,388

F-16

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 4 – Related Party

Accounts Payable

The Company owed $46,016 and $37,486 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to entities owned by the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The amounts are related to patent costs paid by the Chairman on behalf of the Company.

The Company owed $306 and $3,265 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to the Company’s CEO for reimbursable expenses.

The Company owed $6,167 and $13,917 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, amongst members of the Company’s Board of Directors for reimbursable expenses.

Notes Payable

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from the Company’s CEO.

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from the Company’s Chairman of the Board.

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from one of the Company’s Directors.

Accrued interest of $3,570 was outstanding on these notes as of December 31, 2016.

Preferred Stock Issuances for Exercise of Preferred Stock Warrants

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of series A preferred stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.001 per share for total proceeds of $1,000.

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of series A preferred stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.001 per share for total proceeds of $1,000.

Common Stock Warrants Exercised

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

F-17

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On October 1, 2015, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $30.

On September 10, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $10.

Common Stock Warrants

One half of the shares underlying each of the respective warrants vest on June 15, 2016, with the balance vesting on December 15, 2016. In order for the warrants to vest on each of the foregoing dates, however, the holders must be serving in the same capacity on behalf of the Company as he or she was serving on October 21, 2015. The issuance of the warrants was fully approved by our Board of Directors on October 21, 2015, the date a fully executed resolution authorizing the issuance was delivered. The issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, the investors are sophisticated and familiar with our operations, and there was no solicitation in connection with the issuance.

A total of $25,030 and $1,529,182 of previously issued warrants were amortized and expensed to professional fees as stock-based compensation during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Common Stock Issuances for Settlement of Accounts Payments

On March 28, 2016, upon the resignation of Richard Najarian as one of the members of our Board of Directors, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Najarian in settlement of $13,765 of outstanding expense reimbursements. The total fair value of the common stock was $9,120 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Note 5 – Patent Rights and Applications

The Company amortizes its patent rights and applications on a straight line basis over the expected useful technological or economic life of the patents, which is typically 17 years from the legal approval of the patent applications when there is probable future economic benefits associated with the patent. The Company has elected to expense all of their patent rights and application costs due to difficulties associated with having to prove the value of their future economic benefits. All patent applications are currently pending and the Company has no patents that have yet been approved. It is the Company’s policy that it performs reviews of the carrying value of its patent rights and applications on an annual basis.

F-18

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On March 4, 2015, we entered into a Patent License Agreement (“PLA”) with the University of Texas at El Paso (“UTEP”) regarding our joint research and development of CTLA-4 Blockade with Metronomic Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer. This is the first PLA with UTEP following our Collaborative Agreement with them dated May 9, 2012, and memorializes the joint ownership of the applicable patent and the financial and other terms related thereto.

On June 19, 2015, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to this Agreement, pursuant to which we explicitly included Provisional Patent Application No. 62/161,116 entitled, “Anti-CTLA-4 Blockade” (the “Application”) under the definition of “Patent Rights” as set forth in the PLA. The Application was filed with the United States Patent and Trademarks Office on May 13, 2015; the underlying technology was invented by Robert Kirken and Georgialina Rodriguez, and is solely-owned by The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System.

Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Under FASB ASC 820-10-5, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

The Company has certain financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

	Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

	Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

	Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

F-19

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Cash	$	22,437	$	-		$	-
Total assets		22,437		-			-
Liabilities
Convertible note payable, net of discounts		-		153,024			-
Notes payable, related parties		-		30,000			-
Total liabilities		-		183,024			-
	$	22,437	$	(183,024	)	$	-

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Cash	$	35,414	$	-		$	-
Total assets		35,414		-			-
Liabilities
Convertible note payable, net of discounts		-		41,815			-
Notes payable, related parties		-		30,000			-
Total liabilities		-		71,815			-
	$	35,414	$	(71,815	)	$	-

The fair values of our related party debts are deemed to approximate book value, and are considered Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2016 or the year ended December 31, 2015.

Note 7 – Joint Venture

On September 13, 2016, we entered into an operating agreement to form a pain management joint venture company with Advanced Technologies Solutions (ATS), a company based in San Diego, California and owned by Ronald T. LaBorde, a member of our Board of Directors. The joint venture company, Premier Biomedical Pain Management Solutions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (PBPMS), will develop and market natural and cannabis-based generalized, neuropathic, and localized pain relief treatment products. We own 50% of PBPMS and ATS owns the other 50%, with 89% of the profits allocated to us and the remaining 11% of profits allocated to ATS. As part of the agreement with ATS, Mr. LaBorde was appointed a member of our Board of Directors.

PBPMS must enter into separate license agreements with us and ATS for the use of technology previously developed by both companies. Intellectual property developed jointly by the parties will be the property of PBPMS. However, ATS and Mr. LaBorde may develop inventions and intellectual property independently from PBPMS, and such inventions and intellectual property will be the sole property of ATS or Mr. LaBorde. Pursuant to the terms of the PBPMS operating agreement, we will tender 1,250,000 warrants, for the purchase of an equal number of shares of our common stock at a strike price of $0.05, pursuant to the license agreement between ATS and PBPMS. As of December 31, 2016, we had not yet issued these warrants or commenced the joint venture.

F-20

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Our initial capital contribution to PBPMS is $25,000, which has not yet been funded. ATS will contribute (i) technical, labor, manufacturing information and know-how required to produce the initial product, an extended duration topical pain relief patch; (ii) $5,000 worth of primary ingredients; and (iii) $5,000 worth of other materials to produce the initial prototype pain relief patches.

PBPMS will be managed by a board of managers (PBPMS Board). Initially, the PBPMS Board will consist of William A. Hartman, our President and Chief Executive Officer and member of our Board of Directors, Ronald T. LaBorde, the Founder of ATS and member of our Board of Directors, Dr. Patricio Reyes, our Chief Technology Officer and member of our Board of Directors, and John Borza, our Vice-President and member of our Board of Directors. Decisions of the PBPMS Board require unanimous approval.

The PBPMS operating agreement is subject to other common terms and ownership transfer restrictions, including a right of first refusal; however, we anticipate signing a more detailed and complete operating agreement to better clarify the terms of the joint venture as summarized above. No activity, outside of the execution of this agreement, had commenced as of December 31, 2016.

Note 8 – Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible notes payable consist of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

On October 10, 2016, the Company issued a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $300,000 (“Seventh Redwood Note”), which matures on October 10, 2017, pursuant to a Warrant Purchase Agreement by and among Redwood Management, LLC, the Company and Typenex. Pursuant to this agreement, Redwood purchased the warrants from Typenex, and Typenex provided a Satisfaction of Judgment and Release of Garnishment to release the Writ of Garnishment Typenex had placed on our transfer agent. Redwood paid installment payments to Typenex in the aggregate amount of $300,000, which were completed on, or about November 10, 2016. The principal and interest of the Seventh Redwood Note is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. This settled the dispute with Typenex. A total of $25,000 of principal was converted into 8,620,690 shares of common stock on November 21, 2016.	$	275,000	$	-

F-21

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On May 27, 2016, the Company received net proceeds of $85,000 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $105,000 (“Sixth Redwood Note”), which matures on February 27, 2017. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $106,879, consisting of $105,000 of principal and $1,879 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 20,039,892 shares of common stock at various dates between July 13, 2016 and December 7, 2016.	-	-

On March 11, 2016, the Company received net proceeds of $90,000 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $105,000 (“Fifth Redwood Note”), which matures on December 11, 2016. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $81,070, consisting of $77,520 of principal and $3,550 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 32,647,975 shares of common stock at various dates between November 8, 2016 and December 22, 2016.	27,480	-

On March 7, 2016, the Company received net proceeds of $67,500 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $78,750 (“Fourth Redwood Note”), which matures on December 7, 2016. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $83,930, consisting of $78,750 of principal and $5,180 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 20,628,179 shares of common stock at various dates between October 26, 2016 and December 7, 2016.	-	-

F-22

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On February 24, 2016, the Company received net proceeds of $67,500 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note dated February 22, 2016 with a face value of $78,750 (“Third Redwood Note”), which matures on November 22, 2016. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $83,357, consisting of $78,750 of principal and $4,607 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 17,926,514 shares of common stock at various dates between August 26, 2016 and December 7, 2016.	-	-

On January 8, 2016, the Company received net proceeds of $107,500 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $131,250 (“Second Redwood Note”), which matures on October 8, 2016. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $131,250 of principal was converted into an aggregate of 23,360,868 shares of common stock at various dates between July 11, 2016 and August 1, 2016.	-	-

On December 28, 2015, the Company received net proceeds of $130,000 in exchange for a 10% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note dated December 28, 2015 with a face value of $157,500 (“First Redwood Note”), which matures on September 28, 2016. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of (i) 60% of the lowest traded price over the 15 days prior to conversion or (ii) a fixed $0.00005 per share. The note carries liquidated damages of $1,000 per day for failure to provide certificates, and compensation for Buy-In on failure to timely deliver certificates. Principal and interest is due upon default at 50% of the lowest traded price over the previous fifteen (15) days, and an additional interest rate equal to the lesser of 2% per month (24% per annum) or the maximum rate per applicable law. A total of $164,007, consisting of $157,500 of principal and $6,507 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 29,612,923 shares of common stock at various dates between April 6, 2016 and December 7, 2016.	-	157,500

F-23

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On December 15, 2015, the Company received net proceeds of $25,000 in exchange for a non-interest bearing, unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $27,500 (“Second JMJ Note”), which matures on December 15, 2016, as part of a larger financing agreement that enables the Company to draw total proceeds of $250,000 at the discretion of the lender. The principal and interest was convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock over the twenty five (25) trading days prior to the conversion request date, or a fixed rate of $0.00005 per share, as amended within the original promissory note on September 8, 2015 (In the case that conversion shares are not deliverable by DWAC an additional 10% discount will apply; and if the shares are ineligible for deposit into the DTC system and only eligible for Xclearing deposit an additional 5% discount shall apply; in the case of both an additional cumulative 15% discount shall apply). The note carries a one-time twelve percent (12%) of principal interest charge in the event of default, and the debt holder is limited to owning 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. The promissory note carried a $2,500 Original Issue Discount that was being amortized over the life of the loan on the straight line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The Company reserved at least 24 million shares of common stock for potential conversions. The note was paid in full on March 4, 2016 out of the proceeds from the Redwood Notes.	-	27,500

On September 21, 2015, the Company received net proceeds of $45,000 in exchange for an 8% interest bearing; unsecured convertible promissory note dated September 3, 2015 with a face value of $48,000 (“First Vis Vires Note”), which matures on June 8, 2016. The principal and interest was convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of fifty eight percent (58%) of the average of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices over the 10 days prior to conversion, or a fixed rate of $0.00001 per share. The note included various prepayment penalties ranging from 112% through 130%, and default provisions of 150% of the then outstanding principal and interest, and an interest rate of 22% thereafter. The debt holder was limited to owning 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. The Company must at all times reserve at least 20,250,000 shares of common stock for potential conversions. The note was paid in full on January 19, 2016 out of the proceeds from the Redwood Notes.	-	48,000

On September 2, 2015, the Company received net proceeds of $50,000 in exchange for a non-interest bearing, unsecured convertible promissory note with a face value of $55,000 (“First JMJ Note”), which matures on September 1, 2016, as part of a larger financing agreement that enables the Company to draw total proceeds of $250,000 at the discretion of the lender. The principal and interest is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to the greater of sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of the Company’s common stock over the twenty five (25) trading days prior to the conversion request date, or a fixed rate of $0.00005 per share, as amended within the original promissory note on September 8, 2015 (In the case that conversion shares are not deliverable by DWAC an additional 10% discount will apply; and if the shares are ineligible for deposit into the DTC system and only eligible for Xclearing deposit an additional 5% discount shall apply; in the case of both an additional cumulative 15% discount shall apply). The note carries a one-time twelve percent (12%) of principal interest charge in the event of default, and the debt holder is limited to owning 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares. The promissory note carries a $5,000 Original Issue Discount that is being amortized over the life of the loan on the straight line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The Company reserved at least 24 million shares of common stock for potential conversions. A total of $62,222, consisting of $55,000 of principal and $7,222 of interest, was converted into an aggregate of 12,359,944 shares of common stock at various dates between March 2, 2016 and April 19, 2016.

55,000

F-24

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Total convertible notes payable		302,480		288,000
Less unamortized debt discounts:
Derivative discounts		149,456		129,422
Discounts on beneficial conversion feature		-		81,648
Original issue discounts		-		13,164
Loan origination discounts		-		21,951
Convertible notes payable		153,024		41,815
Less: current portion		153,024		41,815
Convertible notes payable, less current portion	$	-	$	-

The Company recognized interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as follows:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

Interest on judgment payable	$	13,141	$	-
Interest on convertible notes		52,720		21,172
Interest on related party loans		2,400		1,170
Amortization of derivative discounts		551,149		578
Amortization of loan origination costs		79,451		10,272
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		81,648		117,500
Amortization of OID		36,914		14,384
Amortization of warrants issued with convertible notes		-		32,973
Total interest expense	$	817,423	$	198,049

In accordance with ASC 470-20 Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded total discounts of $652,433 and $346,798 for the variable conversion features of the convertible debts incurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The discounts, as recognized below, are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the debentures using the effective interest method. The Company recorded $749,162 and $175,707 of interest expense pursuant to the amortization of note discounts during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-25

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The Company recognized interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as follows:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

Derivative discounts	$	571,183	$	130,000
Beneficial conversion feature discounts		-		167,011
Original issue discounts		23,750		21,037
Loan origination costs		57,500		28,750
Total debt discounts	$	652,433	$	346,798

All of the convertible debentures carry default provisions that place a “maximum share amount” on the note holders. The maximum share amount that can be owned as a result of the conversions to common stock by the note holders is 4.99% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

In accordance with ASC 815-15, the Company determined that the variable conversion feature and shares to be issued on the Redwood Notes represented embedded derivative features, and these are shown as derivative liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company calculated the fair value of the compound embedded derivatives associated with the convertible debentures utilizing a lattice model.

Note 9 – Notes Payable, Related Parties

Notes payable, related parties consist of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from the Company’s CEO.	$	10,000	$	10,000

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from the Company’s Chairman of the Board.		10,000		10,000

On July 6, 2015, the Company received an unsecured loan in the amount of $10,000, due on demand, bearing interest at a simple interest rate of 8%, from one of the Company’s Directors.		10,000		10,000

Total notes payable, related parties		30,000		30,000
Less: current portion		30,000		30,000
Notes payable, related parties, less current portion	$	-	$	-

The Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $2,400 and $1,170 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively related to notes payable, related parties.

Accrued interest of $3,570 was outstanding on these notes as of December 31, 2016.

F-26

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Derivative Liabilities

As discussed in Note 8 under Convertible Notes Payable, the Company issued debts that consist of the issuance of convertible notes with variable conversion provisions. The conversion terms of the convertible notes are variable based on certain factors, such as the future price of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the promissory note is indeterminate. Due to the fact that the number of shares of common stock issuable could exceed the Company’s authorized share limit, the equity environment is tainted and all additional convertible debentures and warrants are included in the value of the derivative. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives, the fair values of the variable conversion option and warrants and shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities on the issuance date.

The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a lattice model. The Company recognized current derivative liabilities of $221,822 and $150,076 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities resulted in a loss of $26,048 and a loss of $20,076 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which has been reported within other expense in the statements of operations. The loss of $26,048 for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of a loss of $12,232 due to the value in excess of the face value of the convertible notes and a net loss in market value of 13,816 on the convertible notes. The loss of $20,076 for the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of a loss of $14,748 due to the value in excess of the face value of the convertible notes and a net loss in market value of $5,328 on the convertible notes.

The following is a summary of changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

	Derivative
	Liability
	Total
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	-
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		144,748
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		5,328
Debt conversions		-
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	150,076
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		583,415
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		13,816
Debt conversions		(525,485	)
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	221,822

F-27

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Key inputs and assumptions used to value the convertible debentures and warrants issued during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	·	Stock price ranging from $0.0435 to $0.0050 during these periods would fluctuate with projected volatility.
	·	The notes convert with variable conversion prices and fixed conversion prices (tainted notes).
	·	An event of default would occur -0-% of the time, increasing 1% per month to a maximum of 20%.
	·	The projected annual volatility curve for each valuation period was based on the historical annual volatility of the company in the range of 145% - 385%.
	·	The Company would redeem the notes -0-% of the time, increasing 1% per month to a maximum of 5%.
	·	All notes are assumed to be extended at maturity by 2 years – the time required to convert out this volume of stock.
	·	The holders of the securities would automatically convert midway through to maturity on a monthly basis based on ownership and trading volume limitations.
	·	A change of control and fundamental transaction would occur initially -0-% of the time and increase monthly by -0-% to a maximum of -0-%.
	·	The monthly trading volume would average $556,020 to $911,155 and would increase at 1% per month.

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

Collaborative Patent License Agreements

On May 9, 2012, the Company entered into a Collaborative Agreement with the University of Texas at El Paso. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company will work jointly with the University to develop a series of research and development programs around its sequential-dialysis technology in the areas of Alzheimer's Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease), Blood Sepsis, Cancer, Heart Attacks and Strokes. The programs will utilize the facilities at one or more of the University of Texas’ campuses. The Company will pay the University’s actual overhead for the projects, plus a negotiated facility and administration overhead expense, and 10% of all gross revenues associated with the sale, license and/or royalties of all products and treatment procedures directly affiliated with programs. Intellectual property jointly invented and developed as a result of the projects will be owned jointly by the University and the Company. The Agreement has an initial term of five (5) years, and is renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties.

On March 4, 2015, we entered into a Patent License Agreement (PLA) with the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) regarding our joint research and development of CTLA-4 Blockade with Metronomic Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer. This is the first PLA with UTEP following our Collaborative Agreement with them dated May 9, 2012, and memorializes the joint ownership of the applicable patent and the financial and other terms related thereto.

F-28

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock Commitments

On May 27, 2016, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Redwood Management, LLC, pursuant to which we agreed to sell, and Redwood, or its assigns, agreed to purchase, up to Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, we may issue a purchase notice directing Redwood to purchase our common stock at a 20% discount to the lowest sale price of our common stock during the five (5) previous business days and in an amount of the lesser of (i) $150,000 or (ii) 100% of the average daily trading volume of our common stock in the ten (10) business days immediately preceding the date we give notice to Redwood. We may issue multiple purchase notices to Redwood, subject to these limitations, but we may not issue such a purchase notice to Redwood within ten (10) business days of the completion of funding under the prior purchase notice. We must have a registration statement in effect under the Securities Act that covers the resale of any shares of common stock sold to Redwood pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. We issued five purchase notices and received aggregate proceeds of $143,520 pursuant to the issuance of 27,952,890 shares of common stock over various dates between July 21, 2016 and December 13, 2016.

Typenex Judgment

On July 28, 2016, the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County in the State of Utah awarded Typenex Co-Investment, LLC a Default Judgment in the amount of $340,647, pursuant to a dispute over the number of warrants that Typenex was awarded with their convertible note entered into on November 25, 2014. The outstanding judgment award carries an interest rate of 22% until the judgment amount is paid in full. The Company had accrued the potential liability, and on October 10, 2016, we entered into a Warrant Purchase Agreement by and among Redwood Management, LLC, the Company and Typenex. Pursuant to this agreement, Redwood purchased the warrants from Typenex, and Typenex provided a Satisfaction of Judgment and Release of Garnishment to release the Writ of Garnishment Typenex had placed on our transfer agent. Redwood paid installment payments to Typenex in the aggregate amount of $300,000 through November of 2016 to settle the judgment. In conjunction with this transaction, we entered into an Exchange Agreement with Redwood whereby, in exchange for the warrants that Redwood purchased from Typenex, we issued a 10% Convertible Promissory Note to Redwood with a principal amount of $300,000. This settled the dispute with Typenex upon satisfaction of the payments to Typenex over various dates in October and November of 2016, and the warrants were cancelled. A total of $13,141 of interest had been accrued, which together with the $340,647 default judgment, resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $53,788.

Note 12 – Stockholders’ Equity

Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A

The Company has 10,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock, of which 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) have been designated. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time after the issuance of such share into one (1) fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock. Each outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one hundred (100) votes per share on all matters to which the shareholders of the Corporation are entitled or required to vote. The Company shall reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock such number of shares sufficient to effect the conversions.

Preferred Stock Issuances for Exercise of Preferred Stock Warrants, Related Parties

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of series A preferred stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.001 per share for total proceeds of $1,000.

F-29

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock

The Company has one billion authorized shares of $0.00001 par value Common Stock, as increased pursuant to an amendment to the articles of incorporation on February 9, 2016.

Common Stock Issuances for Debt Conversions (2016)

On various dates between April 6, 2016 and December 22, 2016, the Company issued a total of 152,837,041 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of an aggregate of $675,494, consisting of $653,771 of principal and $21,723 of interest, among the Seven Redwood Notes. The notes were converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On April 19, 2016, the Company issued 3,159,944 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $10,238 of principal on the First JMJ Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On April 11, 2016, the Company issued 2,800,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $9,744 of principal on the First JMJ Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On March 17, 2016, the Company issued 4,400,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $29,040 of principal on the First JMJ Financial Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On March 2, 2016, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $13,200 of principal on the First JMJ Financial Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

Common Stock Issuances on Stock Purchase Agreement (2016)

On December 13, 2016, the Company drew down $25,000 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 6,250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Fifth Put Notice.

On November 22, 2016, the Company drew down $25,000 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 6,377,551 shares of common stock pursuant to the Fourth Put Notice.

On November 8, 2016, the Company drew down $25,000 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 6,097,561 shares of common stock pursuant to the Third Put Notice.

On August 12, 2016, the Company drew down $39,520 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 5,200,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Second Put Notice.

On July 21, 2016, the Company drew down $29,000 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 4,027,778 shares of common stock pursuant to the First Put Notice.

F-30

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock Issuances for Exercise of Common Stock Warrants (2016)

On December 23, 2016, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $60.

On December 23, 2016, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $60.

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

On February 10, 2016, the Company issued 2,248,846 shares of common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise of 2,250,000 warrants by the Company’s securities attorney at $0.00001 per share.

Common Stock Issuances for Debt Financing (2016)

On February 10, 2016, the Company issued 600,000 shares of our common stock to a third-party for services rendered in connection with our recent financing transactions with Redwood Fund III, Ltd. The total fair value of the common stock was $9,600 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On February 10, 2016, the Company issued 2,400,000 shares of our common stock to a third-party for services rendered in connection with our recent financing transactions with Redwood Fund III, Ltd. The total fair value of the common stock was $38,400 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Common Stock Issuances for Settlement of Accounts Payments, Related Party (2016)

Common Stock Issuances for Services (2016)

On November 14, 2016, we issued 2,626,867 shares of our common stock to a third-party for legal services rendered. The total fair value of the common stock was $11,821 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On February 12, 2016, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock to a third-party for services rendered in connection with our recent financing transactions. The total fair value of the common stock was $10,800 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

F-31

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock Issuances for Debt Conversions (2015)

On December 15, 2015, the Company issued 1,762,516 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $16,039, consisting of $15,000 of principal and $1,039 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On December 8, 2015, the Company issued 2,794,392 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $18,094, consisting of $16,946 of principal and $1,148 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On December 4, 2015, the Company issued 1,526,070 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,258, consisting of $3,054 of principal and $204 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On December 2, 2015, the Company issued 3,022,017 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $5,183, consisting of $4,860 of principal and $323 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On December 1, 2015, the Company issued 4,441,702 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $7,413, consisting of $559 of principal and $6,854 of interest, on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 25, 2015, the Company issued 3,003,665 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,941, consisting of $4,640 of principal and $301 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 17, 2015, the Company issued 2,261,963 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,721, consisting of $3,500 of principal and $221 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 16, 2015, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $5,007 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 12, 2015, the Company issued 2,400,940 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,370, consisting of $2,115 of principal and $2,255 of interest, on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 11, 2015, the Company issued 2,259,167 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,716, consisting of $3,500 of principal and $216 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 11, 2015, the Company issued 2,375,275 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,323 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

F-32

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On November 9, 2015, the Company issued 2,375,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,322 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 9, 2015, the Company issued 3,510,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $6,234 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 6, 2015, the Company issued 1,979,568 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,256, consisting of $3,070 of principal and $186 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On November 2, 2015, the Company issued 2,168,067 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $5,160 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 27, 2015, the Company issued 1,839,530 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,700 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 26, 2015, the Company issued 1,620,522 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,630, consisting of $3,430 of principal and $200 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 26, 2015, the Company issued 1,753,425 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,480 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 26, 2015, the Company issued 3,091,128 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $7,700 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 19, 2015, the Company issued 1,284,109 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $6,000 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 13, 2015, the Company issued 1,076,992 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $4,222, consisting of $4,000 of principal and $222 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 8, 2015, the Company issued 1,116,799 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $6,000 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On October 1, 2015, the Company issued 2,344,032 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $13,000 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

F-33

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On September 18, 2015, the Company issued 681,800 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $6,300, consisting of $6,000 of principal and $300 of interest on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On September 3, 2015, the Company issued 459,242 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $7,000 of principal on the First Adar Bay Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On August 26, 2015, the Company issued 446,711 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $6,270, consisting of $6,000 of principal and $270 of interest on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On August 25, 2015, the Company issued 823,121 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $13,500 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On August 17, 2015, the Company issued 371,556 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $5,215, consisting of $5,000 of principal and $215 of interest on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On August 4, 2015, the Company issued 292,181 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $3,835, consisting of $3,687 of principal and $148 of interest, on the First LG Capital Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On July 23, 2015, the Company issued 260,866 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $13,000 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On June 25, 2015, the Company issued 208,719 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $15,000 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

On June 3, 2015, the Company issued 172,812 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $12,500 of principal on the First Typenex Note. The note was converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

Common Stock Issuances for Exercise of Warrants, Related Party (2015)

On October 1, 2015, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $30.

F-34

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock Cancellations (2015)

On August 12, 2015, the Company cancelled and returned to treasury a total of 150,000 shares of common stock previously issued to a consultant for services provided.

Beneficial Conversion Feature

On December 24, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with JMJ Financial. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.03262 below the market price of $0.034 on the origination date of December 24, 2015, resulted in a debt discount value of $25,000 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan.

On September 21, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Vis Vires Group, Inc. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.00747 below the market price of $0.016 on the origination date of September 21, 2015, resulted in a debt discount value of $39,448 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan.

On September 2, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with JMJ Financial. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.0194 below the market price of $0.032 on the origination date of September 2, 2015, resulted in a debt discount value of $50,000 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan.

On February 24, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Adar Bays, LLC. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.0473 below the market price of $0.14 on the origination date of February 24, 2015, resulted in a debt discount value of $20,420 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan.

On January 30, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with LG Capital Funding, LLC. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.042 below the market price of $0.14 on the origination date of January 30, 2015, resulted in a debt discount value of $32,143 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan.

Note 13 – Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants Granted

No series A preferred stock warrants were granted during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Cancelled

No series A preferred stock warrants were cancelled during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Expired

No series A preferred stock warrants were expired during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

F-35

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Exercised

On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of series A preferred stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.001 per share for total proceeds of $1,000.

No series A preferred stock warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2015.

No Series A Preferred Stock Warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2016.

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding series A preferred stock warrants:

				Weighted
				Average
	Number of			Exercise
	Shares			Price

Balance, December 31, 2014		2,000,000		$	0.001
Warrants expired		-			-
Warrants granted		-			-
Warrants exercised		-			-

Balance, December 31, 2015		2,000,000		$	0.001
Warrants expired		-			-
Warrants granted		-			-
Warrants exercised		(2,000,000	)		(0.001	)

Balance, December 31, 2016		-		$	-

Exercisable, December 31, 2016		-		$	-

Note 14 – Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2015)

On October 7, 2015, the Company granted warrants to the following officers and directors, which will allow them to purchase shares of our common stock in the amounts indicated: William Hartman (1,000,000 shares); Mitchell Felder (1,000,000 shares), Heidi Carl (750,000 shares), John Borza (600,000 shares), Richard Najarian (200,000 shares), and Jay Rosen (200,000 shares). The exercise price of the foregoing warrants is five cents ($0.05) per share. The warrants are exercisable over ten (10) years. The total fair value of the 3,750,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $31,109, or $0.0083 per share, based on a volatility rate of 232%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.75% and an expected term of 10 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. One half of the shares underlying each of the respective warrants vest on June 15, 2016, with the balance vesting on December 15, 2016. In order for the warrants to vest on each of the foregoing dates, however, the holders must be serving in the same capacity on behalf of the Company as he or she was serving on October 21, 2015. The issuance of the warrants was fully approved by our Board of Directors on October 21, 2015, the date a fully executed resolution authorizing the issuance was delivered. The Company recognized a total of $25,030 and $6,079 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-36

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On October 7, 2015, we also issued warrants to purchase a total of one million eight hundred thousand (1,800,000) shares of our common stock amongst six members of our Scientific Advisory Board. The exercise price of the foregoing warrants is five cents ($0.05) per share. The warrants are exercisable over ten (10) years. The total fair value of the 1,800,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $14,931, or $0.0083 per share, based on a volatility rate of 232%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.75% and an expected term of 10 years. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. One half of the shares underlying each of the respective warrants vest on June 15, 2016, with the balance vesting on December 15, 2016. In order for the warrants to vest on each of the foregoing dates, however, the holders must be serving in the same capacity on behalf of the Company as he or she was serving on October 21, 2015. The issuance of the warrants was fully approved by our Board of Directors on October 21, 2015, the date a fully executed resolution authorizing the issuance was delivered. The Company recognized a total of $14,739 and $14,421 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On July 25, 2015, the Company granted cashless common stock warrants to an independent contractor to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share for advisory services. The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years from July 25, 2015. The warrants vest in full on December 1, 2015. The initial estimated value using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model, based on a volatility rate of 204% and a call option value of $0.0497, was $24,872. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The total fair value of the 500,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was re-measured at $4,720, or $0.0094 per share as of September 30, 2015, based on a volatility rate of 232%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.75% and an expected term of 7 years. The Company recognized a total of $-0- and $11,943 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On May 30, 2015, the Company granted cashless common stock warrants to an independent contractor to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for advisory services. The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years from May 30, 2015. The warrants vest in full on December 1, 2015. The initial estimated value using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model, based on a volatility rate of 199% and a call option value of $0.13751, was $68,756. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The total fair value of the 500,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model was re-measured at $4,706, or $0.0094 per share as of September 30, 2015, based on a volatility rate of 232%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.75% and an expected term of 7 years. The Company recognized a total of $-0- and $11,939 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-37

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

On March 20, 2015, the Company granted cashless common stock warrants to an independent contractor to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share for investor relation services. The warrants are exercisable over five (5) years from March 20, 2015. The warrants vest in accordance with the schedule presented below, whereby the price per share is defined by the closing bid price over three consecutive trading days:

	·	125,000 warrants will vest at $0.20 per share
	·	125,000 warrants will vest at $0.30 per share
	·	125,000 warrants will vest at $0.40 per share
	·	125,000 warrants will vest at $0.50 per share

The estimated value using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model, based on a volatility rate of 204% and a call option value of $0.1166, was $58,301. The vesting period is indeterminate, therefore, the Company recognized the entire $58,301 of stock based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2015.

A total of $39,769 and $1,849,169 of warrants were amortized and expensed to professional fees as stock-based compensation during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, including $25,030 and $1,529,182 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to warrants issued to related parties.

Common Stock Warrants Cancelled

A total of 351,455 warrants exercisable at the lesser of (i) $0.18, and (ii) 70% of the Market Price, which is the average of the three (3) lowest VWAPs, not less than a fixed floor of $0.0001, during the twenty (20) trading day period ending on the last complete trading day prior to the date the conversion notice is delivered, or 65% if that price is less than $0.10 per share was cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2016 pursuant to the settlement reached with Typenex.

No warrants were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Common Stock Warrants Expired

A total of 300,000 and 50,000 warrants exercisable at $0.96 and $0.25 per share expired during years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Exercise of Common Stock Warrants (2016)

On February 10, 2016, the Company issued 2,248,846 shares of common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise of 2,250,000 warrants by the Company’s securities attorney at $0.00001 per share.

Exercise of Common Stock Warrants, Related Party (2016)

On December 23, 2016, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $60.

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s CEO at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

On October 19, 2016, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $40.

F-38

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Common Stock Issuances for Exercise of Warrants, Related Party (2015)

On October 1, 2015, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants by the Company’s Chairman of the Board at $0.00001 per share for total proceeds of $30.

The following is a summary of information about the Common Stock Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2016.

Shares Underlying

Shares Underlying Warrants Outstanding

Warrants Exercisable

Weighted

Shares

Average

Weighted

Shares

Weighted

Range of

Underlying

Remaining

Average

Underlying

Average

Exercise

Warrants

Contractual

Exercise

Warrants

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.00001 – $1.45

30,690,000

4.91 years

0.24407

30,690,000

0.24407

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015

Average risk-free interest rates		N/A		1.75	%
Average expected life (in years)		N/A		9.22

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s common stock warrants have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its common stock warrants. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no warrants granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

The weighted average fair value of warrants granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock was approximately $0.0784 per warrant granted during the year ended December 31, 2015.

F-39

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding common stock warrants:

				Weighted
				Average
	Number of			Exercise
	Shares			Price

Balance, December 31, 2014		50,591,455		$	0.1443
Warrants expired		(50,000	)		(0.25	)
Warrants granted		7,050,000			0.0784
Warrants exercised		(4,000,000	)		(0.00001	)
Balance, December 31, 2015		53,591,455		$	0.1463
Warrants cancelled		(351,455	)		(0.18	)
Warrants expired		(300,000	)		(0.96	)
Warrants exercised		(22,250,000	)		(0.00001	)
Balance, December 31, 2016		30,690,000		$	0.24407

Exercisable, December 31, 2016		30,690,000		$	0.24407

Note 15 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred a net operating loss and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $4,334,000 and $2,663,000 of federal net operating losses, respectively. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2031.

The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	1,516,900		$	932,050

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance	$	1,516,900		$	932,050
Less: Valuation allowance		(1,516,900	)		(932,050	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

F-40

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015

Federal and state statutory rate		35	%		35	%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets	(35		%)	(35		%)

In accordance with FASB ASC 740, the Company has evaluated its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.

Note 16 – Subsequent Events

Securities Purchase Agreement

On March 30, 2017, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between the Company and each of The Special Equities Group, LLC, RDW Capital LLC, and DiamondRock, LLC (each a “Purchaser” and collectively, the “Purchasers”) to sell our common stock and warrants at a fixed price. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we received from the Purchasers an aggregate of $300,000 in exchange for 40,000,002 shares of our common stock, warrants to purchase up to 40,000,002 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 (“Series A Warrants”) and warrants to purchase up to 40,000,002 shares or our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 (“Series B Warrants”). Both the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are exercisable immediately upon receipt and have a term of three years.

The Purchasers will buy additional shares of our common stock and warrants for $150,000 within five trading days of our filing a registration statement to cover the Purchasers’ shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, including shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the warrants (the “Second Closing”). Within five trading days of the registration statement being declared effective, we will receive another $150,000 from the Purchasers in exchange for shares or our common stock and warrants (the “Third Closing”).

The per share purchase price of the Second Closing and Third Closing will be the lesser of (i) $0.02, subject to certain adjustments for stock splits and other similar transactions, or (ii) 50% of the closing price on the trading day immediately prior to the date of sale. The total number of shares to be sold in the Second Closing and Third Closing will be determined by dividing the total purchase amount of each closing (i.e., $150,000) by the per share purchase price.

In each of the Second Closing and Third Closing, Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants will be issued to the Purchasers, both in an amount equal to the number of shares of common stock issued in the closing.

The Purchase Agreement limits each Purchaser to beneficial ownership of our common stock of no more than 9.99%. The Purchasers also have certain anti-dilution rights in the Purchase Agreement for a period of 12 months. These rights allow the Purchasers to exchange their shares of common stock received pursuant to the Purchase Agreement for additional shares on the same terms and conditions of a subsequent financing.

F-41

Table of Contents

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

Registration Rights Agreement

On March 30, 2017, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Purchasers in connection with the Purchase Agreement. In the Registration Rights Agreement, we agreed to prepare and file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the resale of all of the shares of common stock sold to the Purchasers and the shares issuable upon exercise of the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants. We agreed to file an initial registration statement as promptly as possible and have it declared effective no later than June 28, 2017 (or July 28, 2017 if the registration statement is reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission) and keep it continuously effective until the securities are sold or may be sold under Rule 144 of the Securities Act without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions. If all of the securities cannot be registered on one registration statement, we agreed to file subsequent registration statements to register the remaining securities as promptly as allowed.

Common Stock Issuances for Debt Conversions

On various dates between January 10, 2017 and March 13, 2017, the Company issued a total of 142,148,242 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of an aggregate of $323,197, consisting of $302,480 of principal and $20,717 of interest, among the Second, Fifth and Seventh Redwood Notes. The notes were converted in accordance with the conversion terms; therefore no gain or loss has been recognized.

Common Stock Issuances on Stock Purchase Agreement

On February 13, 2017, the Company drew down $8,000 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Seventh Put Notice.

On January 10, 2017, the Company drew down $10,323 on their Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2016, with Redwood and issued 3,147,110 shares of common stock pursuant to the Sixth Put Notice.

F-42

Table of Contents

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are no events required to be disclosed under this Item.

ITEM 9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2016, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission's rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses identified and described in Item 9A(b).

Our principal executive officers do not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Although our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our principal executive officers have determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at doing so, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented if there exists in an individual a desire to do so. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

(b) Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:

	·	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and any disposition of our assets;
	·	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
	·	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, Management identified the following two material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting, were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

Table of Contents

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only our management’s report in this Annual Report.

(c) Remediation of Material Weaknesses

To remediate the material weakness in our documentation, evaluation and testing of internal controls we plan to engage a third-party firm to assist us in remedying this material weakness once resources become available.

We also intend to remedy our material weakness with regard to insufficient segregation of duties by hiring additional employees in order to segregate duties in a manner that establishes effective internal controls once resources become available.

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report, fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

There are no events required to be disclosed by the Item.

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and biographical information of each of our current directors and executive officers, and the positions with the Company held by each person, and the date such person became a director or executive officer of the Company. Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors. The directors serve one-year terms until their successors are elected. The executive officers serve terms of one year or until their death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. Family relationships among any of the directors and officers are described below.

Name	Age	Position(s)

William A. Hartman	75	President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (June 2010)

Dr. Mitchell S. Felder	62	Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Scientific Advisory Board (June 2010)

Heidi H. Carl	46	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (June 2010)

Dr. Patricio F. Reyes	70	Chief Technology Officer and Director (August 2016)

John S. Borza	62	Vice President and Director (August 2012)

Jay Rosen	61	Director (June 2010)

Ronald T. La Borde	73	Director (September 2016)

William A. Hartman, age 75, is our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors. From March 2008 until June 2010, Mr. Hartman was not directly employed but was planning the formation of Premier Biomedical, Inc. From October 2006 to March 2008, Mr. Hartman was the Chief Operating Officer of Nanologix, Inc. From July 1991 to July 2000, Mr. Hartman was a Director at TRW Automotive. From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Hartman was Chief Engineer at TRW Automotive and from 1979 to 1984 he was Division Quality Compliance Manager at Ford Motor Company. At TRW Automotive, Mr. Hartman was one of the auto industry pioneers of the concept of grouping related components into systems and modules and shipping just-in-time to the vehicle assembly plants. He founded and headed a separate business group within TRW Automotive with plants in the U.S., Mexico and Europe with combined annual sales of $1.3 Billion. Academic credentials include a BSME degree from Youngstown State University and a MSIA degree (Industrial Administration/Management) from the University of Michigan.

Table of Contents

Dr. Mitchell S. Felder, age 62, is our Chairman of the Board of Directors and our Scientific Advisory Board. Dr. Felder is a practicing Board Certified Neurologist. Dr. Felder acquired a B.A. Degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1975 and an M.D. Degree from the University of Rome, Faculty of Medicine in 1983. He has been Board Certified by both the American Academy of Clinical Neurology and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Dr. Felder has authored or co-authored six publications, three studies, and has 18 issued patents. Dr. Felder is the former President, Chairman, and founder of Infectech/Nanologix (from its founding in 1989 through March 2007)—growing the company from startup to a $100 million market cap. During the past five years, Dr. Felder has had as his principal occupation and employment work as an attending neurologist. Dr. Felder is presently an attending neurologist at the William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso, Texas. Dr. Felder has more than 20 years of management experience.

Heidi H. Carl, age 46, is our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and a member of our Board of Directors. From May 2009 until June 2010, Ms. Carl was not directly employed but was working with Mr. Hartman in planning the formation of Premier Biomedical, Inc. From June 2007 to May 2009, Ms. Carl was the Product Development Specialist at General Motors Corporation. From May 2006 to May 2007, Ms. Carl was the Associate Marketing Manager at General Motors Corporation. From May 2003 to May 2006, Ms. Carl was the Marketing Specialist at General Motors Corporation and from May 1999 to May 2003, Ms. Carl was the District Area Parts Manager at General Motors Corporation. Academic credentials include a BSBA degree from Madonna University and an ASBA degree from Oakland Community College.

Dr. Patricio F. Reyes, MD, FAAN, age 70, is a board certified neurologist and neuropathologist, has served as the Chief Medical Officer and Board Member of the Retired National Football League Players Association since 2013. Dr. Reyes has been a board member of the Association of Ringside Physicians since 2008 and was previously its Chair of the Education Committee and 2009 Distinguished Educator. Dr. Reyes has worked as a neurologist and neuropathologist for the Phoenix VA Hospital since 2014. Dr. Reyes is the co-founder, Chief Medical Officer and Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of Yuma Therapeutics, Inc. where he has worked since 2012. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology and was former Professor of Neurology and Neuropathology at Thomas Jefferson Medical School in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Professor of Neurology, Pathology and Psychiatry at Creighton University School of Medicine in Omaha, Nebraska.

John S. Borza, PE, AVS, age 62, is our Vice President and was appointed to our Board of Directors on August 17, 2012. Mr. Borza is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Value Innovation, LLC, a consulting firm focused on value engineering and creative problem solving, where he has served since August 2009. Prior to Value Innovation, Mr. Borza was a Specialist with TRW Automotive from September 2007 to September 2009, and a Director at TRW Automotive from May 1999 to September 2007. Earlier in his career, Mr. Borza worked in R&D for 12 years on a variety of products and technologies in various capacities ranging from Engineer to Chief Engineer, before moving into launch and production support roles. Mr. Borza is an Altshuller Institute certified TRIZ Practitioner, and a SAVE International certified Associate Value Specialist. He is active in the local chapter of SAVE International and currently serves as the chapter Past-President. Mr. Borza holds a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and an MBA from the University of Michigan.

Table of Contents

Jay Rosen, age 61, has been a member of our Board of Directors since our inception in June 2010. Mr. Rosen has been a partner at Rosen Associates, a real estate holding and management company, since 1971. He is also a partner at Midway Industrial Terminal, a real estate holding and management company, and has been since 2005. Mr. Rosen privately owns and manages the Rosen Farm, cellular towers and various other real estate properties, is the President of XintCorp, a small start-up company for developing intellectual property, and is a former member of the NY Mercantile Exchange and the New York Futures Exchange. Mr. Rosen studied economics and finance at New York University and Columbia University.

Ronald T. La Borde, age 73, was appointed to our Board of Directors in September 2016. Mr. La Borde is the founder and owner of ATS, our partner in the PBPMS joint venture. Ron T. La Borde has been working in the areas of Biotechnology, analytics and diagnostics for over 40 years. He is currently the Owner of RTL Consulting, a consulting business he has been operating since 1990, the Chief Scientific Officer of SD Chem, a diagnostic start-up where he has worked since 2015, and founder of Pure Ratios, a CBD pain relief device company. Ron holds a BS degree in Geochemistry, from San Diego State University. His post-graduate studies were undertaken at San Diego State University and Oregon State University.

During his career, Mr. La Borde has worked for several companies and institutions in various capacities including Research Assistant, Laboratory Manager, Analytical Laboratory Director, Director of Biotechnology, and President. He has done extensive consulting with numerous companies involved in a wide range of businesses and industries.

Mr. La Borde holds four issued patents and four pending patents in the biotechnology field, including one for a novel transdermal delivery system for local pain relief medication.

Family Relationships

Heidi H. Carl is the daughter of William A. Hartman.

Other Directorships; Director Independence

Other than as set forth above, none of our officers and directors is a director of any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of section 15(d) of such Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2). The OTCQB on which shares of common stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements. The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Officer” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. According to the NASDAQ definition, only Mr. Rosen is an independent director.

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, the following is a list of individuals that have not filed, or filed late, a report reflecting a change in ownership as required pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934:

Name of Individual	Number of Late Reports		Number of Transactions that Were Not Timely Reported

Dr. Mitchell S. Felder		2		3
William A. Hartman		2		3
Dr. Patricio F. Reyes		1		-

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors does not maintain a separate audit, nominating or compensation committee. Functions customarily performed by such committees are performed by its Board of Directors as a whole. We are not required to maintain such committees under the applicable rules of the OTCQB of the OTC Markets. We do not currently have an “audit committee financial expert” since we currently do not have an audit committee in place. We intend to create board committees, including an independent audit committee, in the near future.

We do not currently have a process for security holders to send communications to the Board.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Board of Directors met approximately on a bi-weekly basis.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our officers or directors has, in the past ten years, filed bankruptcy, been convicted in a criminal proceeding or named in a pending criminal proceeding, been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any court permanently or temporarily enjoining him or her from any securities activities, or any other disclosable event required by Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a written code of ethics, primarily because we believe and understand that our officers and directors adhere to and follow ethical standards without the necessity of a written policy.

Table of Contents

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Narrative Disclosure of Executive Compensation

Effective on September 28, 2012, we entered into employment agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer, William A. Hartman, and our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board, Dr. Mitchell S. Felder. In December 2012, the Company and Dr. Felder agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception.

Pursuant to the employment agreement with Hartman, he will be compensated in the amount of $150,000 per year for the duration of the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, Hartman has waived the salary and the accrual thereof in exchange for being issued a Common Stock Purchase Warrant whereby Hartman may purchase a maximum of 105,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $1.45 per share. The agreement has a one-year term and provides for two (2) years of severance in the event Hartman is terminated due to death, disability or without cause.

We do not currently have written employment agreements with our other executives. All are at-will employees or consultants whose compensation is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)

William A.	2016 (2)		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
Hartman, CEO (1)	2015 (2)		-0-		-0-		-0-		8,296		-0-		-0-		-0-		8,296

Heidi H. Carl	2016 (4)		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
Secretary/Treasurer (3)	2015 (4)		-0-		-0-		-0-		6,222		-0-		-0-		-0-		6,222

_________________

(1)	Mr. Hartman does not receive a salary for his services as Chief Executive Officer.
(2)	Option awards consist of warrants to purchase 1,600,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 over seven (7) years from the grant date of November 18, 2014, vesting in two (2) equal tranches, on January 15, 2015 and June 15, 2015, each with the condition that the individual is an employee of or rendering services to the Company on such date.
(3)	Ms. Carl does not receive a salary for her services as Secretary and Treasurer. Ms. Carl received warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.45, vesting in two (2) tranches, on January 15, 2013 and June 15, 2013, each with the condition that the individual is an employee of or rendering services to the Company on such date. In order to exercise the warrants, our common stock must reach a closing bid price of Three Dollars ($3.00) per share and remain at or above Three Dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days prior to exercise.
(4)	Option awards consist of warrants to purchase 1,400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 over seven (7) years from the grant date of November 18, 2014, vesting in two (2) equal tranches, on January 15, 2015 and June 15, 2015, each with the condition that the individual is an employee of or rendering services to the Company on such date.

Table of Contents

Director Compensation

On October 21, 2015, we issued warrants to the following officers and directors, which will allow them to purchase shares of our common stock in the amounts indicated: William Hartman (1,000,000 shares); Mitchell Felder (1,000,000 shares), Heidi Carl (750,000 shares), John Borza (600,000 shares), Richard Najarian (200,000 shares), and Jay Rosen (200,000 shares). One half of the shares underlying each of the respective warrants vest on June 15, 2016, with the balance vesting on December 15, 2016. In order for the warrants to vest on each of the foregoing dates, however, the holders must be serving in the same capacity on behalf of the Company as he or she was serving on October 21, 2015. The issuance of the warrants was fully approved by our Board of Directors on October 21, 2015, the date a fully executed resolution authorizing the issuance was delivered to us.

We do not currently have an established policy to provide compensation to members of our Board of Directors for their services in that capacity. We intend to develop such a policy in the near future.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

We do not currently have a stock option or grant plan.

Table of Contents

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of April 26, 2017, certain information with respect to the Company’s equity securities owned of record or beneficially by (i) each Officer and Director of the Company; (ii) each person who owns beneficially more than 5% of each class of the Company’s outstanding equity securities; and (iii) all Directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Name and Address ⁽¹⁾	Common Stock Ownership			Percentage of Common Stock Ownership ₍₂₎			Series A Preferred Stock Ownership		Percentage of Series A Preferred Stock Ownership ₍₃₎

William A. Hartman ⁽⁴⁾⁽⁷⁾		23,755,000	(5)		4.7	%		1,000,000		50.0	%

Dr. Mitchell S. Felder ^{(4) (11)}		23,012,672	(6)		4.6	%		1,000,000		50.0	%

Heidi H. Carl ^{(4) (7)}		3,270,000	(9)	*				-		-

Jay Rosen ⁽⁴⁾		1,670,000	(10)	*				-		-

John S. Borza ⁽⁴⁾		3,976,000	(8)	*				-		-

Ronald T. La Borde ^{(4) (12)}		-			-			-		-

Dr. Patricio Reyes ^{(4) (13)}		1,170,000	(14)	*				-		-

RDW Capital LLC ⁽¹⁵⁾		40,000,002	(18)		7.7	%		-		-

The Special Equities Group, LLC ⁽¹⁶⁾		40,000,002	(19)		7.7	%		-		-

DiamondRock, LLC ⁽¹⁷⁾		40,000,002	(20)		7.7	%		-		-

All Officers and Directors as a Group (5 Persons)		56,853,672	(5)(6)(8)(9)(10)(14)		11.0	%		2,000,000		100.0	%

________

*	Less than 1%
(1)	Unless otherwise indicated, the address of the shareholder is c/o Premier Biomedical, Inc.
(2)	Unless otherwise indicated, based on 491,852,004 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of the person or group holding such options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of any other person.
(3)	Unless otherwise indicated, based on 2,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

Table of Contents

(4)	Indicates one of our officers or directors.
(5)	Includes 7,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the conversion of 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 50,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired at $1.45 per share, 105,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired at $1.45 per share if the Company’s common stock reaches a closing bid price of $3.00 per share and remains at or above $3.00 per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges on which the Company’s common stock is traded, 1,600,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(6)	Includes 3,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the conversion of 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 50,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired at $1.45 per share, 105,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired at $1.45 per share if the Company’s common stock reaches a closing bid price of $3.00 per share and remains at or above $3.00 per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges on which the Company’s common stock is traded, 1,600,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(7)	William A. Hartman is the father of Heidi H. Carl. Mr. Hartman disclaims ownership of shares held by his daughter.
(8)	Includes 20,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Borza’s spouse, 1,050,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired by Mr. Borza at $1.45 per share upon the exercise of warrants, 70,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired at $1.45 per share upon the exercise of warrants if the Company’s common stock reaches a closing bid price of $3.00 per share and remains at or above $3.00 per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges on which the Company’s common stock is traded, 1,200,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 600,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(9)	Includes 50,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $1.45 per share, 70,000 shares of common stock that can be acquired at $1.45 per share if the Company’s common stock reaches a closing bid price of $3.00 per share and remains at or above $3.00 per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges on which the Company’s common stock is traded, 1,400,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 750,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(10)	Includes 50,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $1.45 per share, 400,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 200,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(11)	Dr. Felder’s address is P.O. Box 1332, Hermitage, PA 16148.
(12)	Mr. La Borde’s address is 13220 Evening Creek Dr. S., Suite 114, San Diego, CA 92128-4103.
(13)	Dr. Reyes’ address is 10618 North Eleventh Place, Phoenix, AZ 85020
(14)	Includes 700,000 shares or the Company’s common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.25 per share, and 350,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(15)	RDW Capital LLC’s address is 110 Chestnut Ridge Road #138, Montvale, NJ 07645.
(16)	The Special Equities Group, LLC’s address is 106 Woods Drive, Roslyn, NY 11576.

(17)	DiamondRock, LLC’s address is 321 10^th Avenue, Suite 202, San Diego, CA 92101.
(18)	Includes 13,333,334 shares of common stock, 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.03 per share and 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(19)	Includes 13,333,334 shares of common stock, 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.03 per share and 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.
(20)	Includes 13,333,334 shares of common stock, 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.03 per share and 13,333,334 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of warrants at $0.05 per share.

The issuer is not aware of any person who owns of record, or is known to own beneficially, five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding securities of any class of the issuer, other than as set forth above.

There are no current arrangements which will result in a change in control.

Table of Contents

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Employment Agreements

Pursuant to the employment agreement with Hartman, he will be compensated in the amount of $150,000 per year for the duration of the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, Hartman has waived the salary and the accrual thereof in exchange for being issued a Common Stock Purchase Warrant whereby Hartman may purchase a maximum of 105,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $1.45. The agreement has a one-year term and provides for two (2) years of severance in the event Hartman is terminated due to death, disability or without cause.

Joint Venture

On September 13, 2016, we entered into an operating agreement to form a pain management joint venture company with Advanced Technologies Solutions (ATS), a company owned by Ronald T. La Borde, a member of our Board of Directors. The joint venture company, Premier Biomedical Pain Management Solutions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (PBPMS), will develop and market natural and cannabis-based generalized, neuropathic, and localized pain relief treatment products. We own 50% of PBPMS and ATS owns the other 50%, with 89% of the profits allocated to us and the remaining 11% of profits allocated to ATS.

The PBPMS operating agreement calls for ATS to enter into a licensing agreement with PBPMS. Upon entering into the license agreement, Mr. La Borde will receive 1,250,000 warrants to purchase our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.

License Agreements

On May 12, 2010, we entered into two separate License Agreements. One License Agreement was entered into with Altman Enterprises, LLC, wherein we obtained certain exclusive rights in (i) proprietary technology that is the subject of one pending PCT patent application relating to the treatment of auto-immune diseases, and (ii) the “Feldetrex” trademark. The other License Agreement was entered into with Marv Enterprises, LLC, wherein we obtained certain exclusive rights in proprietary technology that is the subject of two PCT patent applications relating to the treatment of blood borne carcinomas and sequential extracorporeal treatment of blood. Authority to execute the License Agreements on behalf of Altman and Marv is vested in Dr. Mitchell S. Felder, the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Because the licensors are controlled by one of our directors, there may exist a conflict of interest in decisions made by the Company with respect to the licenses.

Table of Contents

As consideration for the two licenses, we agreed to (i) pay a royalty of five percent (5%) of any sales of products using the technology, with no minimum royalty, and (ii) reimburse the licensor for any costs already incurred in pursuing its proprietary rights in the licensed technology and pay any costs incurred for maintaining or obtaining the licensors’ proprietary rights in the licensed technology in the U.S. and in extending the intellectual property to other countries around the world. Licensor shall have sole discretion to select other countries into which exclusive rights in the licensed technology may be pursued, and if we decline to pay those expenses, then licensor may pay said expenses and our licensed rights in those countries will revert to the licensor.

As of December 31, 2015, we have not generated any revenues and thus have not paid any license fees. We have, however, paid $142,873 in reimbursement of expenses associated with the technology we have licensed, and owe them an additional $37,486.

Stock Issuances

Preferred Stock

On January 2, 2016, two of our officers and directors, William A. Hartman and Mitchell Felder, exercised warrants to acquire one million (1,000,000) shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock each. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at the election of the holder thereof, into one (1) share of our common stock, and has one hundred (100) votes per share. We issued the warrants on June 21, 2010 and they have an exercise price of $0.001 per share.

The Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into one share of common stock for each share of Preferred Stock converted. The holders of our Preferred Stock also have 100 votes per share of Preferred Stock that they hold. It also contains protective provisions as follows:

The Company may not take any of the following actions without the approval of a majority of the holders of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock: (i) effect a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or which results in the holders of the Company’s capital stock prior to the transaction owning less than fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock after the transaction, (ii) alter or change the rights, preferences, or privileges of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, (iii) increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, (iv) authorize the issuance of securities having a preference over or on par with the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, or (v) effectuate a forward or reverse stock split or dividend of the Company’s common stock.

Common stock

On October 1, 2015, we issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock, restricted in accordance with Rule 144, to Mitchell Felder, one of our directors, upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share.

Table of Contents

On September 10, 2015, we issued warrants to purchase five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of our common stock to a new member of our Scientific Advisory Board. The exercise price of the warrants is Ten Cents ($0.10) per share. The warrants are vested immediately.

On September 8, 2015, we issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock, restricted in accordance with Rule 144, to Mitchell Felder, one of our directors, upon the exercise of warrants at $0.00001 per share.

On November 18, 2014, we issued warrants to the following officers and directors, which will allow them to purchase shares of our common stock in the amounts indicated: William Hartman (1,600,000 shares); Richard Najarian (1,200,000 shares); John Borza (1,200,000 shares); Justin Felder (1,200,000 shares); Jay Rosen (400,000 shares); Heidi Carl (1,400,000 shares); and Mitchell Felder (1,600,000 shares).

On September 25, 2013, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, restricted in accordance with Rule 144, to Richard T. Najarian, one of the members of our Board of Directors, for total consideration of $50,000. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, the investor was accredited, and there was no solicitation in connection with the offering.

On February 20, 2013 and February 25, 2013, we sold an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $0.05 per share, to three members of our Board of Directors as follows: Richard T. Najarian purchased 1,500,000 shares, John S. Borza purchased 1,000,000 shares, and Mitchell Felder purchased 500,000 shares, for total cash consideration of $150,000. The issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and all parties receiving shares of common stock were accredited investors because they are members of our Board of Directors.

On October 1, 2012, we issued Common stock Purchase Warrants to Richard T. Najarian and John S. Borza for their services as members of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the warrants, both will be able to purchase a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.45. The warrants may be exercised immediately. The issuance of these warrants is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and all parties receiving warrants were accredited investors because they are members of our Board of Directors.

On September 28, 2012, we issued warrants to each of the nine (9) members of our Board of Directors as compensation. Each Director received warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.45, vesting in two (2) tranches, on January 15, 2013 and June 15, 2013, each with the condition that the individual is a member of our Board of Directors on such date.

On September 28, 2012, we issued warrants to each of the following six (6) executives as compensation: Hartman, Dr. Felder, Heidi H. Carl, Justin Felder, Richard T. Najarian and John S. Borza. Hartman and Dr. Felder each received warrants to purchase 105,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.45, vesting in two (2) tranches, on January 15, 2013 and June 15, 2013, each with the condition that our common stock reach a closing bid price of Three Dollars ($3.00) per share and remain at or above Three Dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days and that the individual is an employee of or rendering services to the Company on such date. In December 2012, the Company and Dr. Felder agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception. The other four (4) executives received warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.45, also vesting in two (2) tranches, on January 15, 2013 and June 15, 2013, each with the condition that our common stock reach a closing bid price of Three Dollars ($3.00) per share and remain at or above Three Dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days and that the individual is an employee of or rendering services to the Company on such date.

Table of Contents

On January 20, 2011, we issued 500,000 founders shares of our common stock to Scott Barnes, for services rendered as a director. The shares are restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the shareholder was a sophisticated investor, had access to the type of information that is normally available in a prospectus, and agreed not to resell or distribute the securities to the public.

Directors Notes

On December 2, 2013, we entered into a Directors Bridge Loan Agreement Promissory Note dated November 18, 2013 with each of William A. Hartman, one of our officers and directors, and John S. Borza, one of our directors. Pursuant to each Promissory Note, we borrowed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). The principal amount of each Promissory Note, plus the Prepayment Premium (defined below), shall be due and payable on or before the earlier of (a) the date which is nine (9) months from the date of the note, or (b) three (3) business days following the receipt by us of funding (net of offering expenses, including finders fees, commissions, legal and other fees, and discounts) from any source, of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) (the “Maturity Date”). The Prepayment Premium shall be determined by multiplying the then-outstanding principal amount of the Promissory Note by the Prepayment Premium based on the following schedule:

No. of Days After Issue Date:	Prepayment Premium:
0-30 days		115	%
31-60 days		120	%
61-90 days		125	%
91-120 days		130	%
121 days or more		135	%

In the event the Promissory Note is not prepaid prior to the Maturity Date, the Prepayment Premium of 135% shall apply. Interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount on an annual basis at a rate of eight percent (8.0%).

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

M&K CPAS, PLLC (“M&K”) was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and has served the Company as its independent registered public accounting firm since our inception.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by M&K for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Table of Contents

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Audit Fees (1)	$	11,500	$	12,350
Audit Related Fee (2)		10,500		9,650
Tax Fees		-		-
All Other Fees		-		-
Total	$	22,000	$	22,000

(1) Audit fees were principally for audit services.

(2) Audit related fees were principally for work performed in the preparation and review of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Of the fees described above for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, all were approved by the entire Board of Directors.

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following financial statements are filed as part of this report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)	F-3

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)	F-4

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)	F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Restated) (Audited)	F-6

Notes to Financial Statements	F-7 to F-41

Table of Contents

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

We do not have any financial statement schedules required to be supplied under this Item.

(a)(3) Exhibits

Refer to (b) below.

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

3.1 (1)		Articles of Incorporation of Premier Biomedical, Inc.

3.2 (2)		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Premier Biomedical, Inc.

3.2 (1)		Bylaws of Premier Biomedical, Inc., as amended

3.3 (1)		Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

10.1 (1)		License Agreement dated May 12, 2010 with Altman Enterprises, Inc.

10.2 (1)		License Agreement dated May 12, 2010 with Marv Enterprises, LLC.

10.3 (1)		Preferred Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Mitchell Felder

10.4 (1)		Preferred Stock Purchase Warrant issued to William A. Hartman

10.5 (1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Mitchell Felder

Table of Contents

10.6 (1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to William A. Hartman

10.7 (1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to The Lebrecht Group, APLC

10.8 (1)		Promissory Note issued to William A. Hartman dated December 31, 2010

10.9 (1)		Promissory Note issued to Mitchell Felder dated December 31, 2010

10.10 (1)		Promissory Note issued to William A. Hartman dated March 31, 2011

10.11 (1)		Promissory Note issued to Mitchell Felder dated March 31, 2011

10.12 (1)		Form of Warrant Sold in Private Placement

10.13 (3)		First Addendum to License Agreement dated August 17, 2011 with Marv Enterprises, LLC.

10.14 (3)		Frist Addendum to License Agreement dated August 17, 2011 with Altman Enterprises, LLC.

10.15 (4)		Collaboration Agreement with the University of Texas System dated May 9, 2012

10.16 (5)		Employment Agreement with William A. Hartman, dated September 28, 2012

10.17 (6)		Form of Directors and Officers Warrant

10.18 (7)		Form of Directors Stock Purchase Agreement

10.19 (8)		Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command

10.20 (9)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 13, 2013

10.21 (9)		Convertible Promissory Note dated August 13, 2013

10.22 (10)		Form of Directors Bridge Loan Agreement Promissory Note dated November 18, 2013

10.23 (11)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 25, 2014

10.24 (11)		Convertible Promissory Note dated November 25, 2014

Table of Contents

10.25 (12)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 30, 2015

10.26 (12)		Convertible Promissory Note dated January 30, 2015

10.27 (13)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 24, 2015

10.28 (13)		Convertible Promissory Note dated February 24, 2015

10.29 (14)		Amendment to Note dated March 4, 2015

10.30 (15)		Patent License Agreement dated March 4, 2015

10.31 (16)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated March 20, 2015

10.32 (17)		Amendment No. 1 to Patent License Agreement dated June 19, 2015.

10.33 (18)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Ryan Fields dated March 30, 2015

10.34 (19)		Consulting Agreement with FBROCCO dated June 23, 2015

10.35 (20)		Convertible Promissory Note dated September 2, 2015

10.36 (21)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 3, 2015 with Vis Vires Group, Inc.

10.37 (21)		Convertible Promissory Note dated September 3, 2015 with Vis Vires Group, Inc.

10.38 (22)		Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 28, 2015 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.39 (22)		Convertible Promissory Note dated December 28, 2015 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.40 (22)		Registration Rights Agreement dated December 28, 2015 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.41 (23)		Convertible Promissory Note dated January 8, 2016, with Redwood Fund III Ltd.

10.42 (24)		Convertible Promissory Note dated February 22, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.43 (25)		First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 22, 2016

10.44 (25)		Second Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 7, 2016

10.45 (25)		Convertible Promissory Note dated March 7, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

Table of Contents

10.46 (26)		Convertible Promissory Note dated March 11, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.47 (27)		Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 27, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.48 (27)		Convertible Promissory Note dated May 27, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.49 (27)		Registration Rights Agreement dated May 27, 2016 with Redwood Management, LLC

10.50 (28)		Warrant Purchase Agreement by and among Typenex Co-Investment, LLC, Redwood Management, LLC and the Company, dated October 10, 2016

10.51 (28)		Exchange Agreement by and between Redwood Management, LLC and Premier Biomedical, Inc., dated October 10, 2016

10.52 (28)		10% Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $300,000, due October 10, 2017, issued to Redwood Management, LLC by the Company, dated October 10, 2016

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

___________

(1) Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated June 13, 2011, filed with the Commission on June 14, 2011.

(2) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2016, filed with the Commission on February 10, 2016.

(3) Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A dated and filed with the Commission on October 4, 2011.

(4) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 14, 2012.

(5) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2012.

(6) Incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 1, 2013.

(7) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2013, filed with the Commission on February 27, 2013.

(8) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Commission on June 12, 2013.

(9) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2013, filed with the Commission on August 28, 2013.

(10) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2013, filed with the Commission on December 9, 2013.

(11) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2014, filed with the Commission on December 2, 2014.

(12) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2015, filed with the Commission on February 4, 2015.

Table of Contents

(13) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2015, filed with the Commission on March 4, 2015.

(14) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Commission on March 6, 2015.

(15) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 16, 2015, filed with the Commission on March 18, 2015.

(16) Incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 14, 2015, filed with the Commission on May 15, 2015.

(17) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 19, 2015, filed with the Commission on June 23, 2015.

(18) Incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated and filed with the Commission on August 14, 2015.

(19) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2015, filed with the Commission on July 9, 2015.

(20) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 2015, filed with the Commission on September 9, 2015.

(21) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2015, filed with the Commission on September 23, 2015.

(22) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2015, filed with the Commission on December 31, 2015.

(23) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2016, filed with the Commission on January 12, 2016.

(24) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2016, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2016.

(25) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Commission on March 11, 2016.

(26) Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A dated and filed with the Commission on March 15, 2016.

(27) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Commission on June 3, 2016.

(28) Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Commission on October 14, 2016.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ William A. Hartman
		William A. Hartman
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ William A. Hartman
		William A. Hartman
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ Heidi H. Carl
		Heidi H. Carl
	Its:	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ Dr. Mitchell S. Felder
		Dr. Mitchell S. Felder,
		Director

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ Jay Rosen
		Jay Rosen,
		Director

Dated: May 8, 2017	By:	/s/ John S. Borza
		John S. Borza,
		Director

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC - FORM 10-K - May 8, 2017

Attached files

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC Reports