Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. - FORM 8-K - EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1

Attached files

file	filename
8-K - 8-K - Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.	a20170316form8-kreearnings.htm

Exhibit 99.1



		18100 Von Karman Avenue Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 949.852.0700

NEWS RELEASE


Contact:	Angela Barbera


Phone:	949.333.1721


Email:	abarbera@steadfastcmg.com

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC. ANNOUNCES

RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

Irvine, Calif., March 16, 2017 — Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) announced today its operating results for the year ended December 31, 2016.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had total revenues of $218.2 million compared to $209.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net loss was $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net loss of $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Total assets of the Company increased from $1.57 billion at December 31, 2015 to $1.59 billion at December 31, 2016.

Highlights:

The Company:


•	Increased net operating income (“NOI”) to $113.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $112.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. (See the reconciliation of NOI to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates NOI.)

•

Experienced a decrease in modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as defined by the Investment Program Association, from MFFO of $55.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $49.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to costs associated with the refinancing of certain of the Company's existing loans (the "Refinancing Transactions") during the year ended December 31, 2016. (See the reconciliation of MFFO to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates MFFO.)

•

Experienced a decrease in funds from operations (“FFO”), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, from FFO of $52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to FFO of $43.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to costs associated with the Refinancing Transactions. (See the reconciliation of FFO to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates FFO.)


•	Funded $28.3 million for additions to real estate investments for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.


•	Funded $30.0 million received in connection with the Refinancing Transactions in short-term investments for the year ended December 31, 2016.

•

Owned a multifamily property portfolio at December 31, 2016 of 65 properties comprising a total of 16,709 apartment homes with an aggregate purchase price, including development and construction costs, of $1.6 billion, exclusive of closing costs. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $471.5 million of fixed rate debt with a weighted-average interest rate of 4.06% and $746.2 million of variable rate debt with a weighted- average interest rate of 2.92%. The weighted average interest rate on the Company's total outstanding debt as of December 31, 2016 was 3.36%.


•	Reported net cash provided by operating activities of $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $51.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net cash used in investing activities was $56.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $29.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015


•	Reported net cash provided by financing activities of $36.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, which included $54.9 million of distributions paid, all of which were paid in cash. Net cash used in financing activities was $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which included $55.1 million of distributions paid, all of which were paid in cash.


•	The Company's board of directors approved an estimated value per share of common stock of $11.65 as of December 31, 2016, an increase from the estimated value per share of common stock of $11.44 as of December 31, 2015. The valuation was performed in accordance with Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Investment Program Association.

"'The Steadfast Income REIT portfolio of 65 well-located, well-maintained apartment communities continues to perform well," said Ella Neyland, president of the Company. "We believe that our most recent increase in estimated value per share reflects the results of our proactive, 'hands- on' approach to drive value for the benefit of our shareholders."

About Steadfast Income REIT

Steadfast Income REIT is a real estate investment trust that was formed to acquire and operate a diverse portfolio of real estate investments focused primarily on the multifamily sector, including stable, income-producing and value-added properties.

Steadfast Income REIT is sponsored by Steadfast REIT Investments, LLC, an affiliate of Steadfast Companies, an Orange County, California-based group of affiliated real estate investment and operating companies that acquire, develop and manage real estate in the U.S. and Mexico.

###

This release contains certain forward-looking statements. Words such as "anticipates", "expects", "intends", "plans", "believes", "seeks", "estimates", "may" and "should" and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Because such statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on any such statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this release. Such factors include those described in the Risk Factors section of the Company's public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date on which such statements were made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update any such statements that may become untrue because of subsequent events. Such forward-looking statements are subject to the safe harbor protection for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

FINANCIAL TABLES, NOTES AND EXHIBITS FOLLOW

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015

ASSETS
Assets:
Real Estate:
Land	$	174,102,422		$	174,102,422
Building and improvements	1,517,532,273			1,487,961,762
Other intangible assets	2,644,263			2,644,263
Construction-in-progress	—			2,192,635
Total real estate, cost	1,694,278,958			1,666,901,082
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(232,744,083		)	(163,445,987		)
Total real estate, net	1,461,534,875			1,503,455,095
Cash and cash equivalents	66,224,027			32,076,582
Restricted cash	27,553,851			27,700,811
Short-term investments	30,084,750			—
Rents and other receivables	2,750,520			2,742,011
Other assets, net	4,786,762			4,328,851
Total assets	$	1,592,934,785		$	1,570,303,350
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	47,377,341		$	40,752,458
Notes payable:
Mortgage notes payable, net	985,080,154			1,115,752,899
Credit facilities, net	232,636,126			—
Total notes payable, net	1,217,716,280			1,115,752,899
Distributions payable	4,625,355			4,668,261
Due to affiliates	2,787,566			2,682,209
Total liabilities	1,272,506,542			1,163,855,827
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 999,999,000 shares authorized, 76,202,862 and 76,674,502 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	762,029			766,745
Convertible stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	10			10
Additional paid-in capital	672,018,194			677,624,840
Cumulative distributions and net losses	(352,351,990		)	(271,944,072		)
Total stockholders’ equity	320,428,243			406,447,523
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,592,934,785		$	1,570,303,350

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Revenues:
Rental income	$	192,088,348		$	186,264,470		$	175,267,082
Tenant reimbursements and other	26,149,184			23,126,188			20,662,774
Total revenues	218,237,532			209,390,658			195,929,856
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance and management	57,832,187			53,915,306			52,427,001
Real estate taxes and insurance	36,507,827			35,825,445			34,750,097
Fees to affiliates	25,440,718			21,927,913			23,923,921
Depreciation and amortization	69,513,484			65,640,196			69,681,177
Interest expense	40,551,427			39,149,018			40,370,846
Loss on debt extinguishment	4,932,369			—			1,939,817
General and administrative expenses	9,039,171			5,949,993			6,896,519
Acquisition costs	—			7,145			1,626,904
Total expenses	243,817,183			222,415,016			231,616,282
Loss from continuing operations	(25,579,651		)	(13,024,358		)	(35,686,426		)
Gain on sales of real estate, net	—			—			9,944,134
Net loss	$	(25,579,651	)	$	(13,024,358	)	$	(25,742,292	)
Loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.34	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted	76,195,083			76,335,114			75,450,215

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.

Non-GAAP Measures - FFO and MFFO Reconciliation

For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations ("FFO"), which the Company believes to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a real estate investment trust ("REIT"). The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to the Company's net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

The Company defines FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004 (the "White Paper"). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and non-cash impairment charges of real estate related investments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In particular, the Company believes it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of the Company's operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. The Company's FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. The Company believes that since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, the Company believes that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of its performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on its operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. However, FFO, and modified funds from operations ("MFFO") as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the

Company's operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. The Company's management believes these fees and expenses do not affect the Company's overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, the Company believes that public, non-listed REITs, are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases. The Company's board of directors will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that the then-current market conditions are favorable. Thus, as a limited life REIT the Company will not continuously purchase assets and will have a limited life.

Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association ("IPA"), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which the Company believes to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a public, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. The Company believes that, because MFFO excludes costs that it considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect its operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of its operating performance after the period in which it is acquiring properties and once its portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, the Company believes it is presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering has been completed and its properties have been acquired. The Company also believes that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, the Company believes MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of the Company's operating performance after its offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on the Company's operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

The Company defines MFFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (the "Practice Guideline"), issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such

payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While the Company relies on its external advisor for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, the Company does not retain an outside consultant to review all of its hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of the Company's operations, the Company believes it is appropriate to exclude such non-recurring gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.

The Company's MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, the Company excludes acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by the Company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the Company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In the event that operational earnings and cash flow are not available to fund its reimbursement of acquisition fees and expenses incurred by its advisor, such fees and expenses will need to be reimbursed to the advisor from other sources, including debt, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. The acquisition of properties, and the corresponding acquisition fees and expenses, is the key operational feature of the Company's business plan to generate operational income and cash flow to fund distributions to stockholders. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, the Company views fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets and loss on extinguishment of debt as non-recurring items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance.

The Company's management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO in order to evaluate the Company's performance against other public, non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate in this manner. The Company believes that its use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO allow the Company to present its performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to public, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with the Company's management's analysis of the operating

performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to the Company's current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, the Company believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance to that of other public, non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all public, non-listed REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other public, non-listed REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of the Company's performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of the Company's liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including the Company's ability to make distributions to stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of the Company's performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure where there is no regular net asset value determination of the Company. MFFO is useful in assisting the Company's management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that the Company uses to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and in response to such standardization the Company may have to adjust its calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.

The Company's calculation of FFO and MFFO is presented in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



	For the Years Ended December 31,
Reconciliation of net loss to MFFO:	2016			2015			2014
Net loss	$	(25,579,651	)	$	(13,024,358	)	$	(25,742,292	)
Depreciation of real estate assets	69,360,316			65,271,243			59,014,085
Amortization of lease-related costs	153,168			368,953			10,667,092
Gain on sales of real estate, net	—			—			(9,944,134		)
FFO	43,933,833			52,615,838			33,994,751
Acquisition fees and expenses⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	960			194,880			4,878,304
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments	(61,698		)	2,032,746			4,353,301
Loss on debt extinguishment	4,932,369			—			1,939,817
Amortization of below-market leases	—			—			(163,237		)
Change in value of restricted common stock to Advisor	312,353			300,440			—
MFFO	$	49,117,817		$	55,143,904		$	45,002,936

___________

(1)

By excluding acquisition fees and expenses, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of the Company's properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to the Company's advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property. In the event that proceeds from the Company's initial public offering are not available to fund the reimbursement of acquisition fees and expenses incurred by the Company's advisor, such fees and expenses will need to be reimbursed to the advisor from other sources, including debt, operational earnings or cash flow, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows.

(2)

Acquisition fees and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 includes acquisition fees of $960, $187,735 and $3,251,400, respectively, that are recorded in fees to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and acquisition expenses of $0, $7,145 and $1,626,904, respectively, that are recorded in acquisition costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.

Non-GAAP Measures - Net Operating Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

Net Operating Income ("NOI") is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. NOI is used by investors and the Company's management to evaluate and compare the performance of the Company's properties and to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of the Company's properties as it is not affected by (1) the cost of funds of the Company, (2) acquisition costs of the Company, (3) non-operating fees paid to affiliates, (4) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with GAAP, or (5) general and administrative expenses and other gains and losses that are specific to the Company. The cost of funds is eliminated from net income because it is specific to the particular financing capabilities and constraints of the Company. The cost of funds is also eliminated because it is dependent on historical interest rates and other costs of capital as well as past decisions made by the Company regarding the appropriate mix of capital which may have changed or may change in the future. Acquisition costs and non-operating fees to affiliates are eliminated because they do not reflect continuing operating costs of the Company. Depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets are eliminated because they may not accurately represent the actual change in value in the Company's multifamily properties that result from use of the properties or changes in market conditions. While certain aspects of real property do decline in value over time in a manner that is reasonably captured by depreciation and amortization, the value of the properties as a whole have historically increased or decreased as a result of changes in overall economic conditions instead of from actual use of the property or the passage of time. Gains and losses from the sale of real property vary from property to property and are affected by market conditions at the time of sale which will usually change from period to period. These gains and losses can create distortions when comparing one period to another or when comparing the Company's operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies that have not made similarly timed purchases or sales. The Company believes that eliminating these costs from net (loss) income is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating its properties as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.

However, the usefulness of NOI is limited because it excludes general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income and other expense, acquisition costs, certain fees paid to affiliates, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, and other gains and losses as stipulated by GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company's properties, all of which are significant economic costs. NOI may fail to capture significant trends in these components of net income which further limits its usefulness.

NOI is a measure of the operating performance of the Company's properties but does not measure the Company's performance as a whole. NOI is therefore not a substitute for net (loss) income as computed in accordance with GAAP. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net (loss) income computed in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may use different methods for calculating NOI or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, the Company's NOI may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as the Company does.

The following is a reconciliation of the Company's NOI to net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:



	For the Three Months Ended December 31,						For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2014
Net loss	$	(4,223,102	)	$	(2,685,557	)	$	(25,579,651	)	$	(13,024,358	)	$	(25,742,292	)
Fees to affiliates⁽¹⁾	3,538,199			3,484,384			17,360,515			14,042,560			16,503,709
Depreciation and amortization	17,789,498			16,807,484			69,513,484			65,640,196			69,681,177
Interest expense	9,843,905			9,621,910			40,551,427			39,149,018			40,370,846
Loss on debt extinguishment	—			—			4,932,369			—			1,939,817
General and administrative expenses	2,550,631			1,544,005			9,039,171			5,949,993			6,896,519
Acquisition costs	—			—			—			7,145			1,626,904
Gain on sales of real estate	—			—			—			—			(9,944,134		)
Other (gains) and losses⁽²⁾	(516,752		)	84,709			(2,141,740		)	581,376			465,350
Net operating income	$	28,982,379		$	28,856,935		$	113,675,575		$	112,345,930		$	101,797,896

________________

(1)

Fees to affiliates for the three months and year ended December 31, 2016 excludes property management fees of $1,612,601 and $6,406,479 and other fees of $342,312 and $1,673,724, respectively, that are included in NOI. Fees to affiliates for the three months and year ended December 31, 2015 excludes property management fees of $1,566,955 and $6,188,525 and other fees of $434,665 and $1,696,828, respectively, that are included in NOI. Fees to affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2014 excludes property management fees of $5,802,772 and other fees of $1,617,440 that are included in NOI.


(2)	Other gains and losses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 include non-recurring insurance proceeds and certain corporate level expenses that are not included in NOI.

EXHIBIT A





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	OCTOBER 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	130	86.1%	93.2%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	201	91.4%	94.3%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	117	95.1%	97.4%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	198	99.0%	99.9%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	97	95.1%	96.8%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	387	91.3%	93.0%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	199	92.1%	93.7%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	237	94.0%	95.8%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	339	94.2%	96.3%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	304	90.5%	93.9%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	272	92.5%	95.7%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	221	95.3%	97.0%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	1	159	152	95.0%	95.8%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	191	95.0%	97.0%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	245	98.0%	98.6%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	200	96.2%	99.2%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	232	96.7%	98.3%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	30	—	30	28	93.3%	95.0%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	441	95.5%	96.4%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	192	96.0%	96.6%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	208	96.3%	97.8%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	424	97.2%	98.5%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	89	98.9%	99.4%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	291	97.0%	97.9%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	117	91.4%	93.7%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	243	90.7%	93.7%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	301	95.9%	97.6%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	277	96.2%	98.3%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	115	97.5%	98.1%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	257	97.3%	99.2%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	275	93.5%	95.3%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	215	96.0%	96.5%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	227	94.6%	96.1%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	139	96.5%	97.9%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	221	92.1%	95.6%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	261	97.4%	98.4%
Arbors of Carrolton		Carrolton, TX	131	—	131	129	98.5%	99.0%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plano, TX	350	—	350	329	94.0%	95.5%



Property	Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
The Belmont	Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	243	93.5%	94.6%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch	Austin, TX	502	3	499	464	92.4%	95.6%
Tapestry Park Apartments	Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	335	94.6%	95.8%
Dawntree Apartments	Carrolton, TX	400	—	400	386	96.5%	96.9%
Stuart Hall Lofts	Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	108	93.9%	95.7%
Bricegrove Park Apartments	Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	227	94.6%	97.0%
Retreat at Hamburg Place	Lexington, KY	150	1	149	143	95.3%	97.3%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village	Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	201	97.6%	98.8%
The Landing at Mansfield	Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	323	96.1%	97.7%
Heights at 2121	Houston, TX	504	4	500	452	89.7%	91.5%
Villas at Huffmeister	Houston, TX	294	1	293	271	92.2%	93.8%
Villas at Kingwood	Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	304	92.1%	93.7%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch	Cypress, TX	228	1	227	208	91.2%	96.3%
Carrington Place	Houston, TX	324	1	323	290	89.5%	91.6%
Carrington at Champion Forest	Houston, TX	284	1	283	259	91.2%	93.9%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister	Cypress, TX	232	1	231	221	95.3%	97.6%
Willow Crossing Apartments	Elk Grove Village, IL	579	2	577	545	94.1%	96.4%
Echo at Katy Ranch	Katy, TX	260	1	259	245	94.2%	96.9%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation	Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	226	94.2%	95.6%
Audubon Park Apartments	Nashville, TN	256	9	247	232	90.6%	95.3%
Mallard Crossing Apartments	Loveland, OH	350	2	348	332	94.9%	97.6%
Renaissance at Carol Stream	Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	269	91.8%	94.4%
Reserve at Creekside	Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	181	94.3%	97.4%
Mapleshade Park	Dallas, TX	148	1	147	139	93.9%	95.4%
Richland Falls	Murfreesboro, TN	276	1	275	257	93.1%	94.7%
Oak Crossing Apartments	Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	213	95.9%	96.6%
Park Shore Apartments	St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	151	94.4%	97.2%
Total		16,709	72	16,637	15,726	94.1%	96.1%


		Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial	Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	12,480	74.8%
Stuart Hall Commercial	Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial	Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total		4	25,973	16,930	65.2%





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	NOVEMBER 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	140	92.7%	93.5%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	200	90.9%	94.0%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	116	94.3%	96.5%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	195	97.5%	99.5%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	94	92.2%	93.9%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	384	90.6%	92.2%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	195	90.3%	91.9%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	236	93.7%	96.1%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	338	93.9%	95.1%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	307	91.4%	94.8%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	272	92.5%	95.0%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	221	95.3%	96.7%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	1	159	150	93.8%	95.9%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	191	95.0%	96.6%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	238	95.2%	96.5%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	198	95.2%	97.0%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	231	96.3%	97.6%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	30	—	30	28	93.3%	94.2%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	445	96.3%	97.7%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	185	92.5%	93.8%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	205	94.9%	96.3%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	421	96.6%	97.6%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	88	97.8%	98.6%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	286	95.3%	96.4%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	120	93.8%	94.9%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	245	91.4%	93.7%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	298	94.9%	96.3%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	278	96.5%	98.2%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	114	96.6%	97.0%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	258	97.7%	99.5%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	269	91.5%	94.3%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	213	95.1%	96.3%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	229	95.4%	97.3%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	139	96.5%	97.7%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	216	90.0%	94.6%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	259	96.6%	98.1%
Arbors of Carrolton		Carrolton, TX	131	—	131	129	98.5%	98.1%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plano, TX	350	—	350	324	92.6%	95.0%
The Belmont		Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	243	93.5%	95.4%
Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
Meritage at Steiner Ranch		Austin, TX	502	3	499	461	91.8%	94.1%
Tapestry Park Apartments		Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	334	94.4%	96.2%
Dawntree Apartments		Carrolton, TX	400	—	400	382	95.5%	96.3%
Stuart Hall Lofts		Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	105	91.3%	93.9%
Bricegrove Park Apartments		Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	228	95.0%	95.7%
Retreat at Hamburg Place		Lexington, KY	150	1	149	145	96.7%	97.7%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village		Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	198	96.1%	96.7%
The Landing at Mansfield		Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	322	95.8%	97.4%
Heights at 2121		Houston, TX	504	4	500	453	89.9%	91.6%
Villas at Huffmeister		Houston, TX	294	1	293	270	91.8%	94.0%
Villas at Kingwood		Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	300	90.9%	93.6%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch		Cypress, TX	228	1	227	210	92.1%	94.7%
Carrington Place		Houston, TX	324	1	323	293	90.4%	93.5%
Carrington at Champion Forest		Houston, TX	284	1	283	264	93.0%	94.7%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister		Cypress, TX	232	1	231	225	97.0%	98.1%
Willow Crossing Apartments		Elk Grove Village, IL	579	2	577	538	92.9%	95.0%
Echo at Katy Ranch		Katy, TX	260	1	259	248	95.4%	96.4%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation		Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	229	95.4%	96.8%
Audubon Park Apartments		Nashville, TN	256	9	247	234	91.4%	96.1%
Mallard Crossing Apartments		Loveland, OH	350	2	348	333	95.1%	96.8%
Renaissance at Carol Stream		Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	265	90.4%	92.5%
Reserve at Creekside		Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	180	93.8%	95.3%
Mapleshade Park		Dallas, TX	148	1	147	139	93.9%	95.8%
Richland Falls		Murfreesboro, TN	276	1	275	261	94.6%	95.9%
Oak Crossing Apartments		Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	209	94.1%	95.9%
Park Shore Apartments		St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	153	95.6%	97.2%
Total			16,709	72	16,637	15,677	93.8%	95.7%


			Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial		Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	12,480	74.8%
Stuart Hall Commercial		Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial		Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total			4	25,973	16,930	65.2%





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	DECEMBER 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	131	86.8%	90.5%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	197	89.5%	94.5%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	113	91.9%	93.2%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	195	97.5%	99.4%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	95	93.1%	95.7%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	381	89.9%	91.8%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	196	90.7%	94.0%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	236	93.7%	95.9%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	331	91.9%	94.0%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	316	94.0%	96.0%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	272	92.5%	95.0%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	216	93.1%	94.8%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	1	159	151	94.4%	95.5%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	194	96.5%	98.2%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	234	93.6%	94.9%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	194	93.3%	96.2%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	224	93.3%	95.7%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	30	—	30	28	93.3%	94.0%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	448	97.0%	98.1%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	179	89.5%	91.8%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	202	93.5%	95.6%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	413	94.7%	96.0%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	86	95.6%	96.9%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	281	93.7%	94.9%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	119	93.0%	94.4%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	245	91.4%	94.2%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	292	93.0%	94.2%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	273	94.8%	96.7%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	111	94.1%	95.8%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	256	97.0%	98.3%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	271	92.2%	94.1%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	212	94.6%	96.5%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	231	96.3%	97.5%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	140	97.2%	99.0%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	223	92.9%	97.4%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	258	96.3%	98.4%
Arbors of Carrollton		Carrollton, TX	131	—	131	127	96.9%	97.7%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plano, TX	350	—	350	328	93.7%	95.5%
Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
The Belmont		Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	246	94.6%	95.5%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch		Austin, TX	502	3	499	458	91.2%	94.1%
Tapestry Park Apartments		Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	335	94.6%	96.7%
Dawntree Apartments		Carrollton, TX	400	—	400	381	95.3%	96.0%
Stuart Hall Lofts		Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	105	91.3%	91.3%
BriceGrove Park Apartments		Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	228	95.0%	95.8%
Retreat at Hamburg Place		Lexington, KY	150	1	149	144	96.0%	98.0%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village		Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	195	94.7%	96.4%
The Landing at Mansfield		Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	322	95.8%	97.1%
Heights at 2121		Houston, TX	504	4	500	461	91.5%	92.9%
Villas at Huffmeister		Houston, TX	294	1	293	268	91.2%	94.0%
Villas of Kingwood		Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	302	91.5%	93.8%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch		Cypress, TX	228	1	227	208	91.2%	94.3%
Carrington Place		Houston, TX	324	1	323	299	92.3%	94.8%
Carrington at Champion Forest		Houston, TX	284	1	283	266	93.7%	95.3%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister		Cypress, TX	232	1	231	221	95.3%	97.3%
Willow Crossing Apartments		Elk Grove Village, IL	579	2	577	539	93.1%	93.9%
Echo at Katy Ranch		Katy, TX	260	1	259	242	93.1%	95.0%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation		Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	227	94.6%	95.8%
Audubon Park Apartments		Nashville, TN	256	1	255	232	90.6%	92.6%
Mallard Crossing Apartments		Loveland, OH	350	2	348	330	94.3%	95.8%
Renaissance at Carol Stream		Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	270	92.2%	96.0%
Reserve at Creekside		Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	176	91.7%	94.2%
Mapleshade Park		Dallas, TX	148	1	147	144	97.3%	98.8%
Richland Falls		Murfreesboro, TN	276	1	275	261	94.6%	96.4%
Oak Crossing Apartments		Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	209	94.1%	96.6%
Park Shore Apartments		St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	153	95.6%	97.4%
Total			16,709	64	16,645	15,621	93.5%	95.4%


			Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial		Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	16,680	100.0%
Stuart Hall Commercial		Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial		Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total			4	25,973	21,130	81.4%

DEFINITIONS OF PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE METRICS


Total Units:	Number of units per property at the end of the reporting period.


Non-Revenue Units:	Number of model units or other non-revenue administrative units at the end of the reporting period.


Rentable Units:	Total Units less Non-Revenue Units at the end of the reporting period.


Average Occupied Units:	Number of units occupied based on a weekly average during the reporting period.


Average Percent Occupied:	Percent of units occupied (Average Occupied Units divided by Total Units).


Percent Leased:	Percent of Total Units leased at the end of the reporting period (number of leased units divided by Total Units).


Total Square Footage:	Total square footage of commercial property at the end of the reporting period.


Occupied Square Footage:	Total square footage of commercial property occupied at the end of the reporting period.


Percent Occupied:	Percent of square footage occupied (Occupied Square Footage divided by Total Square Footage).

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. - FORM 8-K - EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - March 16, 2017

Attached files

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. Reports