Attached files

file filename
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - Acacia Communications, Inc.d243388dex211.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - Acacia Communications, Inc.d243388dex231.htm
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2016

Registration No. 333-            

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

Acacia Communications, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   3674   27-0291921

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Three Mill and Main Place, Suite 400

Maynard, Massachusetts 01754

(978) 938-4896

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

Murugesan Shanmugaraj

President and Chief Executive Officer

Acacia Communications, Inc.

Three Mill and Main Place, Suite 400

Maynard, Massachusetts 01754

(978) 938-4896

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

Mark G. Borden, Esq.

David A. Westenberg, Esq.

Jason L. Kropp, Esq.

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

60 State Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Telephone: (617) 526-6000

Telecopy: (617) 526-5000

 

Janene I. Ásgeirsson, Esq.

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Acacia Communications, Inc.

Three Mill and Main Place, Suite 400

Maynard, Massachusetts 01754

Telephone: (978) 938-4896

Telecopy: (978) 938-4899

 

Mark T. Bettencourt, Esq.

Joseph C. Theis, Jr., Esq.

Goodwin Procter LLP

100 Northern Avenue

Boston, Massachusetts 02210

Telephone: (617) 570-1000

Telecopy: (617) 523-1231

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ¨

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨             

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨             

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨             

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   þ    Smaller reporting company   ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)             

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

 

Proposed
Maximum
Aggregate

Offering Price(2)

 

Amount of

Registration Fee

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share

  $450,000,000.00   $45,315.00

 

 

(1) Includes the offering price of shares for which the underwriters have an option to purchase. Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act.
(2) Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act based on the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Subject to Completion, dated                 , 2016

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

                 Shares

 

 

LOGO

Common Stock

Acacia Communications, Inc. is offering              of the shares to be sold in the offering. The selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are offering                  shares. Acacia Communications intends to offer approximately $125 million of shares and the remainder will be offered by the selling stockholders. Acacia Communications will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares being sold by the selling stockholders.

Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ACIA.” The last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on September 23, 2016 was $119.34 per share.

As an “emerging growth company,” we are eligible for reduced public company reporting requirementsSee “Prospectus Summary—Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company.

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of the common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission or other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectusAny representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

     Per Share      Total  

Price to the public

   $                    $                

Underwriting discount(1)

   $         $     

Proceeds, before expenses, to Acacia Communications

   $         $     

Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders

   $         $     

 

(1) See “Underwriting” beginning on page 131 of this prospectus for a description of the compensation paid to underwriters.

To the extent that the underwriters sell more than                  shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional                  shares from certain of the selling stockholders at the same terms set forth above. See “Underwriting.”

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on                 , 2016.

 

Goldman, Sachs & Co.   BofA Merrill Lynch      Deutsche Bank Securities   Morgan Stanley
Needham & Company   Cowen and Company   William Blair   Northland Capital Markets

 

 

Prospectus dated                 , 2016


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page  

Prospectus Summary

     1   

The Offering

     8   

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

     10   

Risk Factors

     12   

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

     43   

Use of Proceeds

     44   

Dividend Policy

     46   

Capitalization

     47   

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

     48   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     53   

Business

     76   

Management

     94   

Executive Compensation

     102   

Related Person Transactions

     113   

Principal and Selling Stockholders

     117   

Description of Capital Stock

     120   

Shares Eligible for Future Sale

     124   

Material U.S. Federal Income and Estate Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders of Common Stock

     127   

Underwriting

     131   

Industry and Other Data

     138   

Legal Matters

     138   

Experts

     138   

Where You Can Find More Information

     138   

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

     F-1   

No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock.

For investors outside the United States: None of us, the selling stockholders, or the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of our common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectusYou should read the following summary together with the more detailed information appearing in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and the risk factors beginning on page 12, before deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stockUnless the context otherwise requires, we use the terms “Acacia Communications,” “Acacia,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” in this prospectus to refer to Acacia Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Overview

Our mission is to deliver high-speed coherent optical interconnect products that transform communications networks, relied upon by cloud infrastructure operators and content and communication service providers, through improvements in performance and capacity and a reduction in associated costs. By converting optical interconnect technology to a silicon-based technology, a process we refer to as the siliconization of optical interconnect, we believe we are leading a disruption that is analogous to the computing industry’s integration of multiple functions into a microprocessor. Our products include a series of low-power coherent digital signal processor application-specific integrated circuits, or DSP ASICs, and silicon photonic integrated circuits, or silicon PICs, which we have integrated into families of optical interconnect modules with transmission speeds ranging from 40 to 400 gigabits per second, or Gbps, for use in long-haul, metro and inter-data center markets. We are also developing optical interconnect modules that will enable transmission speeds of one terabit (1,000 gigabits) per second and more. Our modules perform a majority of the digital signal processing and optical functions in optical interconnects and offer low power consumption, high density and high speeds at attractive price points. Through the use of standard interfaces, our modules can be easily integrated with customers’ network equipment. The advanced software in our modules enables increased configurability and automation, provides insight into network and connection point characteristics and helps identify network performance problems, all of which increase flexibility and reduce operating costs.

Our modules are rooted in our low-power coherent DSP ASICs and/or silicon PICs, which we have specifically developed for our target markets. Our coherent DSP ASICs are manufactured using complementary metal oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, and our silicon PICs are manufactured using a CMOS-compatible process. CMOS is a widely-used and cost-effective semiconductor process technology. Using CMOS to siliconize optical interconnect technology enables us to continue to integrate increasing functionality into our products, benefit from higher yields and reliability associated with CMOS and capitalize on regular improvements in CMOS performance, density and cost. Our use of CMOS also enables us to use outsourced foundry services rather than requiring custom fabrication to manufacture our products. In addition, our use of CMOS and CMOS compatible processes enables us to take advantage of the major investments in manufacturing and the technology and integration improvements driven by other computer and communications markets that rely on CMOS.

Our engineering and management teams have extensive experience in optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, large-scale ASIC design and verification, silicon photonic integration, system software development, hardware design and high-speed electronics design. This broad expertise in a range of advanced technologies, methodologies and processes enhances our innovation, design and development capabilities and has enabled us to develop and introduce ten optical interconnect modules, five coherent DSP ASICs and three silicon PICs since 2009. In the course of our product development cycles, we continuously engage with our customers as they design their current and next-generation network equipment, which provides us with insights into current and future market needs.

 



 

1


Table of Contents

We sell our products through a direct sales force to leading network equipment manufacturers. The number of customers who have purchased and deployed our products has increased from eight in 2011 to more than 25 during the twelve months ended June 30, 2016. We have experienced rapid revenue growth over the last several years. Our revenue for 2015 was $239.1 million, a 63.5% increase from $146.2 million of revenue in 2014. Our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $200.7 million, a 91.0% increase from $105.1 million of revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2015. In 2015, we generated net income of $40.5 million and our adjusted EBITDA was $47.5 million, compared to net income of $13.5 million and adjusted EBITDA of $20.4 million in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we generated net income of $32.2 million and our adjusted EBITDA was $52.6 million, compared to net income of $9.0 million and adjusted EBITDA of $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. See “Selected Consolidated Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information regarding our use of adjusted EBITDA and other non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income.

Industry Background

According to Cisco’s VNI Complete Forecast Highlights Report, dated June 2016, or the VNI Report, global Internet protocol, or IP, traffic is projected to nearly triple from 2.4 exabytes per day in 2015 to 6.4 exabytes per day in 2020, representing a 22% compound annual growth rate, or CAGR. This growth is expected to be driven by a variety of factors, including increased data and video consumption, growth in mobile and 4G/LTE communications, proliferation of cloud services, changing traffic patterns in metro and inter-data center networks, and adoption of the “Internet of Things.” To satisfy this growth in demand for bandwidth, cloud infrastructure operators and content and communications service providers, which we refer to collectively as cloud and service providers, are investing in the capacity and performance of their network equipment.

The table below outlines the principal types of networks and estimated annual spend on high-speed optical network hardware related to the long-haul, metro and inter-data center markets, as described in the ACG 1H-2016 Worldwide Optical Infrastructure and Worldwide Data Center Interconnect (DCI) forecast:

 

          Estimated Spend  

Network Type

  

Description

   2015      Forecast for
2020
     CAGR  

Long-haul

  

Distances greater than

1,500 km, and subsea connections

   $ 4.6 billion       $ 6.9 billion         8.3%   

Metro

   Distances less than 1,500 km connecting regions and cities    $ 6.1 billion       $ 9.6 billion         9.3%   

Inter-data center

   Various lengths connecting large data centers    $ 1.0 billion       $ 4.2 billion         32.1%   

Importance of Optical Interconnect Technologies

Optical equipment that interfaces directly with fiber relies on optical interconnect technologies that take digital signals from network equipment, perform signal processing to convert these digital signals to optical signals for transmission over a fiber network, and then perform the reverse functions on the receive side. These technologies also incorporate advanced signal processing that can monitor, manage and reduce errors and signal impairment in the fiber connection between the transmit and receive sides. Advanced optical interconnect technologies can enhance network performance by

 



 

2


Table of Contents

improving the capabilities and increasing the capacities of optical equipment and routers and switches, while also reducing operating costs. The key characteristics of advanced optical interconnect technologies that dictate performance and capacity include speed, density, robustness, power consumption, automation and manageability.

Our Solution—The Siliconization of Optical Interconnect

We have developed families of high-speed coherent optical interconnect products that reduce the complexity and cost of optical interconnect technology, while simultaneously improving network performance and the pace of innovation in the optical networking industry. Our optical interconnect solution includes sophisticated modules that perform a majority of the digital signal processing and optical functions required to process network traffic at transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and above in long-haul, metro and inter-data center networks. These modules meet the needs of cloud and service providers for optical interconnect products in a simple, open, high-performance form factor that can be easily integrated in a cost-effective manner with existing network equipment.

Our interconnect products are powered by our internally developed and purpose-built coherent DSP ASICs and/or silicon PICs. Our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs are engineered to work together and each integrates numerous signal processing and optical transmission functions that together deliver a complete, cost-effective high-speed coherent optical interconnect solution in a small footprint that requires low power and provides significant automation and management capabilities. We believe that our highly integrated optical interconnect modules, which are based on our coherent DSP ASIC and silicon PIC, were, at the time market introduction, the industry’s first interconnect modules to deliver transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and higher. Prior to the introduction of our highly integrated optical interconnect modules, we believe that these transmission speeds were not possible in modules in an industry standard form factor without sacrificing signal quality or other performance characteristics.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe the following strengths will enable us to maintain and extend our position in the high-speed optical interconnect market:

 

    Leading provider of high-speed integrated optical interconnect modules.    We believe we are the first independent vendor to introduce at commercial scale both a coherent DSP ASIC and a silicon PIC integrated into an optical interconnect module capable of transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and above.

 

    Track record of rapid innovation driven by advanced design methodologies.    Our development capabilities and advanced design methodologies have enabled us to introduce ten optical interconnect modules, five coherent DSP ASICs and three silicon PICs since 2009.

 

    Leveraging the strength of CMOS for photonics.    By using CMOS as the basis for both our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs, our products achieve significant improvements in density and cost and benefit from ongoing advances in CMOS.

 

    Proprietary software framework enables simplified configuration and deployment.    Our software framework is key to increasing the performance of and reducing the capital expenditures and operating expenses associated with high-speed networks, and enables our customers to integrate our products easily into their existing networks.

 

    Customer collaboration provides deep understanding of market needs.    We collaborate closely with our customers, as well as directly with many cloud and service providers, which allows us to better understand their needs and anticipate next generation product and service requirements.

 



 

3


Table of Contents
    Strong management and engineering teams with significant industry expertise.    Our management and engineering teams, of which our founders remain a key part, include personnel with extensive experience in optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, large-scale ASIC design and verification, silicon photonic integration, system software development, hardware design and high-speed electronics design.

Our Growth Strategy

Our goal is to become the leading provider of high-speed optical interconnect technology that underpins the world’s data and communication networks. To grow our business and achieve our vision, we are pursuing the following strategies:

 

    Continue to innovate and extend our technology leadership.    We intend to continue to invest in our technology to deliver innovative and high-performance DSP ASICs, silicon PICs and optical interconnect modules and to identify and solve challenging optical interconnect needs.

 

    Increase penetration within our existing customer base.    As we continue to enhance and expand our product families, and as our existing customers seek to expand and improve their network equipment technology, we expect to generate additional revenue through sales to these customers.

 

    Continue to expand customer base.    We believe that the benefits of our solution, supported by the success of existing customers as references, will drive more network equipment manufacturers to purchase their optical interconnect products from us.

 

    Grow into adjacent markets.    We believe that growth in fiber optics-based communications is likely to accelerate and that this growth, together with expansion in other markets that depend on high-speed networking capabilities, such as intra-data center and network access markets, will result in demand for additional applications for our products.

 

    Selectively pursue strategic investments or acquisitions.    Although we expect to focus our growth strategy on expanding our market share organically, we may pursue future investments or acquisitions that complement our existing business.

Recent Developments

Based on preliminary unaudited information and management estimates for the three months ending September 30, 2016, and subject to the completion of the 2016 third quarter and our financial closing procedures, in the three months ending September 30, 2016, we expect revenue of $127 million to $131 million, GAAP net income of $23 million to $27 million, non-GAAP net income of $29 million to $33 million, GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.58 to $0.67 and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.72 to $0.81.

The above information contains forward-looking statements and was not prepared with a view toward complying with the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to projected financial information, but, in the view of our management, was prepared on a reasonable basis, reflects the best currently available estimates and judgments, and presents, to the best of management’s knowledge and belief, our expectations for the three months ending September 30, 2016. Neither our independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to the above information, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the above information. In addition, the foregoing information is subject to revision as we complete the third quarter of 2016 and our

 



 

4


Table of Contents

corresponding financial closing procedures. The results and other disclosures for the three months ending September 30, 2016 may differ materially from the above information as a result of, among other things, the important factors discussed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

The above information should not be viewed as a substitute for full financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the above information is not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for any future period and is subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are not within our control. The above information should be read together with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

See “Selected Consolidated Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a definition of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, a reconciliation in the form of a range of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to their nearest GAAP equivalents and information regarding our use of non-GAAP financial measures.

Risks Associated with Our Business

You should consider carefully the risks described under the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 12 and elsewhere in this prospectus. These risks, which include the following, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow and prospects, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline and could result in a partial or total loss of your investment:

 

    We have a history of operating losses, and we may not maintain or increase our profitability.

 

    Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects.

 

    We depend on a limited number of customers for a significant percentage of our revenue and the loss or temporary loss of a major customer could harm our financial condition. One such customer, ZTE Kangxun Telecom Co. Ltd., is currently subject to U.S. Department of Commerce restrictions that could prevent any sales to this customer after November 28, 2016.

 

    Our revenue growth is substantially dependent on our successful development and release of new products.

 

    We depend on third parties for a significant portion of the fabrication, assembly and testing of our products.

 

    We depend on a limited number of suppliers, some of which are sole sources, and our business could be disrupted if they are unable to meet our needs.

 

    Our revenue growth rate in recent periods may not be indicative of our future growth or performance.

 

    We may not be able to maintain or improve our gross margins.

 

    We generate a significant portion of our revenue from international sales and therefore are subject to additional risks associated with our sales to foreign customers and other international operations.

 



 

5


Table of Contents
    Quality control problems in manufacturing could result in delays in product shipments to customers or in quality problems with our products.

 

    Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable effort and expense, so our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.

 

    If our products are found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to obtain a license to use the infringed technology from third parties, or we may be prohibited from selling certain products in the future.

Our Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in June 2009. Our principal executive offices are located at Three Mill and Main Place, Suite 400, Maynard, MA 01754, and our telephone number at that address is (978) 938-4896. Our website address is www.acacia-inc.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this prospectus or in deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock.

“Acacia Communications®,” “Acacia®,” our logo, and other trademarks or tradenames of Acacia Communications, Inc. appearing in this prospectus are our property. This prospectus also contains trademarks and trade names of other companies, which are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus may appear without the ® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the right of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies, including:

 

    reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements;

 

    exemption from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or stockholder approval with respect to golden parachute arrangements; and

 

    exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.

We may take advantage of these exemptions up until December 31, 2021 or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1 billion in annual revenue, we have more than $700 million in market value of our stock held by non-affiliates (and we have been a public company for at least 12 months and have filed one annual report on Form 10-K) or we issue more than $1 billion of non-convertible debt securities over a three-year period. We may choose to take advantage of some, but not all, of the available exemptions. We have taken advantage of certain reduced reporting obligations in this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock.

 



 

6


Table of Contents

In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

 



 

7


Table of Contents

THE OFFERING

 

Common stock offered by us

                 shares

 

Common stock offered by the selling stockholders

                 shares

 

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

                 shares

 

Underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock

                 shares from certain of the selling stockholders

 

Use of proceeds

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. See “Use of Proceeds” for more information.

 

Dividend policy

We intend to retain all future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock. See “Dividend Policy” for more information.

 

Risk factors

You should read the “Risk Factors” section and other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock.

 

Nasdaq Global Select Market symbol

“ACIA”

 

 

The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 35,839,175 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 15, 2016 and excludes:

 

    2,734,453 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding under our 2009 Stock Plan and our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, which are referred to as our equity incentive plans, as of September 15, 2016, with a weighted-average exercise price of $6.10 per share;

 

    2,493,840 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units, or RSUs, outstanding under our equity incentive plans as of September 15, 2016;

 

    245,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of September 15, 2016, with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.61 per share; and

 

   

2,603,140 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans, including 1,903,140 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2016

 



 

8


Table of Contents
 

Equity Incentive Plan and 700,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of September 15, 2016. Our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for automatic annual increases in the number of shares reserved thereunder, as more fully described in “Executive Compensation—Stock Option and Other Compensation Plans.”

Except as otherwise noted, all information in this prospectus assumes:

 

    no exercise of outstanding options or warrants; and

 

    no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an additional                  shares from certain of the selling stockholders.

 



 

9


Table of Contents

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents summary consolidated financial and other data for our business for the periods indicatedThe summary consolidated statements of operations data presented below for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 have been derived from our audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectusSee “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The summary consolidated statements of operations data presented below for the year ended December 31, 2013 have been derived from our audited financial statements not appearing in this prospectusThe summary statements of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016 and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2016 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for those periods included elsewhere in this prospectus, and except as described in the notes thereto, have been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of that information for such periodsOur historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future and the results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the full yearYou should read this summary consolidated financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, all included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2014     2015     2015     2016  
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

          

Revenue

   $ 77,652      $   146,234      $ 239,056        105,090        200,681   

Cost of revenue(1)

     47,983        93,558        145,350        68,081        111,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     29,669        52,676        93,706        37,009        89,358   

Operating expenses:

          

Research and development(1)

     24,248        28,471        38,645        16,723        37,253   

Sales, general and administrative(1)

     5,099        6,615        13,124        5,055        12,703   

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     745        108                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     30,092        35,194        51,769        21,778        49,956   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from operations

     (423     17,482        41,937        15,231        39,402   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense, net

     (770     (1,029     (2,132     (1,408     (3,411
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

     (1,193     16,453        39,805        13,823        35,991   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            2,933        (715     4,779        3,796   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

     (1,193     13,520        40,520        9,044        32,195   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders—basic(2)

   $ (4,971   $ 1,728      $ 7,597      $ 1,419      $ 13,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders—diluted(2)

   $ (4,971   $ 1,728      $ 7,597      $ 1,419      $ 13,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders(2):

          

Basic

   $ (1.12   $ 0.31      $ 1.18      $ 0.23      $ 0.95   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   $ (1.12   $ 0.23      $ 0.91      $ 0.18      $ 0.77   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares used to compute net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:

          

Basic

     4,429        5,629        6,429        6,274        13,751   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

     4,429        7,447        8,311        7,973        16,927   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 



 

10


Table of Contents
     Year Ended
December 31,
     Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
     2013      2014      2015      2015      2016  
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Other Operational and Financial Data:

              

Non-GAAP gross profit(3)

   $ 29,694       $   52,693       $   93,781       $ 37,027       $ 90,050   

Non-GAAP income from operations(3)

   $ 1,081       $ 17,889       $ 42,762       $ 15,546       $ 48,863   

Non-GAAP net income(3)

   $ 405       $ 14,410       $ 32,310       $ 10,979       $ 43,452   

Adjusted EBITDA(3)

   $ 3,550       $ 20,395       $ 47,495       $ 17,669       $ 52,605   

 

     As of June 30, 2016  
     Actual      As adjusted(4)  

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 159,009       $     

Working capital

     189,519      

Total assets

     296,225      

Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability

               

Total liabilities

     74,942         74,942   

Redeemable convertible preferred stock

               

Total stockholders’ equity

     221,283      

 

(1) Includes stock-based compensation as follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2013      2014      2015          2015              2016      
     (in thousands)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 25       $ 17       $ 75       $ 18       $ 692   

Research and development

     960         258         561         218         5,578   

Sales, general and administrative

     519         132         189         79         3,191   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation

   $ 1,504       $ 407       $ 825       $ 315       $ 9,461   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(2) See Notes 2, 3 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for an explanation of the calculations of our net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted.
(3) See “Selected Consolidated Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for information regarding our use of non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of such measures to their nearest GAAP equivalents.
(4) The as adjusted column in the consolidated balance sheet data table above reflects our sale of                  shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $        per share, the last reported sale price of our stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on                 , 2016, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 



 

11


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus, before deciding to invest in our common stock. Our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow and prospects could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks or uncertainties. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have a history of operating losses, and we may not maintain or increase our profitability.

Although we were profitable in 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred operating losses in 2009 through 2013. We may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. If we are unable to maintain profitability, the market value of our stock may decline, and you could lose all or a part of your investment.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects and may increase the risk associated with your investment.

We were founded in 2009 and shipped our first products in 2011. Our limited operating history, combined with the rapidly evolving and competitive nature and consolidation of our industry, suppliers, manufacturers and customers, makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects. We have encountered and may continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by rapidly growing companies in constantly evolving industries, including unpredictable and volatile revenues and increased expenses as we continue to grow our business. If we do not manage these risks and overcome these difficulties successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected, and the market price of our common stock could decline. Further, we have limited historic financial data, and we operate in a rapidly evolving market. As such, any predictions about our future revenue and expenses may not be as accurate as they would be if we had a longer operating history or operated in a more predictable market.

Since we began commercial shipments of our products, our revenue, gross profit and results of operations have varied and are likely to continue to vary from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. It is difficult for us to accurately forecast our future revenue and gross profit and plan expenses accordingly and, therefore, it is difficult for us to predict our future results of operations.

We depend on a limited number of customers for a significant percentage of our revenue and the loss or temporary loss of a major customer for any reason, including as a result of U.S. Department of Commerce restrictions currently applied to our largest customer, could harm our financial condition.

We have historically generated most of our revenue from a limited number of customers. In 2013, 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, our five largest customers in each period (which differed by period) collectively accounted for 79.5%, 77.7%, 72.6%, 79.2% and 79.8% of our revenue, respectively. In 2013, 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc. accounted for 13.6%, 23.4%, 22.2%, 28.8% and 23.6% of our revenue, respectively, and ZTE Kangxun Telecom Co. Ltd., or ZTE, accounted for 32.1%, 35.4%, 27.6%, 29.0% and 37.9% of our revenue, respectively. In addition, during 2015 and the six

 

12


Table of Contents

months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, Coriant, Inc. accounted for 13.1%, 12.0% and 10.7% of our revenue, respectively, and during 2013, Alcatel-Lucent accounted for 19.2% of our revenue. As a consequence of the concentrated nature of our customer base, our quarterly revenue and results of operations may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and are difficult to estimate, and any cancellation of orders or any acceleration or delay in anticipated product purchases or the acceptance of shipped products by our larger customers or any government-mandated inability to sell to any of our larger customers could materially affect our revenue and results of operations in any quarterly period.

For example, on March 8, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule in the Federal Register that amended the Export Administration Regulations by adding ZTE, its parent company and two other affiliated entities to the “Entity List,” for actions contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. This rule imposed new export licensing requirements on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of all U.S.-regulated products, software and technology to the designated ZTE entities, which had the practical effect of preventing us from making any sales to ZTE. On March 24, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a temporary general license suspending the enhanced export licensing requirements for ZTE and one of its designated affiliates through June 30, 2016, thereby enabling us to resume sales to ZTE. On June 28, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce extended the temporary general license through August 30, 2016. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce further extended the temporary general license through November 28, 2016. There can be no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Commerce will extend this temporary general license beyond the November 28, 2016 expiration date or permit any sales to the designated ZTE entities after this temporary general license expires. This or future regulatory activity may materially interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or any of its affiliates or other customers. The loss or temporary loss of ZTE as a result of this or future regulatory activity could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may be unable to sustain or increase our revenue from our larger customers or offset the discontinuation of concentrated purchases by our larger customers with purchases by new or existing customers. We expect that such concentrated purchases will continue to contribute materially to our revenue for the foreseeable future and that our results of operations may fluctuate materially as a result of such larger customers’ buying patterns. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2014, our revenue was adversely affected by a delay in anticipated purchases by two customers. In addition, we have seen and may in the future see consolidation of our customer base which could result in loss of customers or reduced purchases. The loss or temporary loss of such customers, or a significant delay or reduction in their purchases, could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our revenue growth is substantially dependent on our successful development and release of new products.

The markets for our products are characterized by changes and improvements in existing technologies and the introduction of new technology approaches. The future of our business will depend in large part upon the continuing relevance of our technological capabilities, our ability to interpret customer and market requirements in advance of product deliveries and our ability to introduce in a timely manner new products that address our customers’ requirements for more cost-effective bandwidth solutions. The development of new products is a complex process, and we may experience delays and failures in completing the development and introduction of new products. Our successful product development depends on a number of factors, including the following:

 

    the accurate prediction of market requirements, changes in technology and evolving standards;

 

    the availability of qualified product designers and technologies needed to solve difficult design challenges in a cost-effective, reliable manner;

 

13


Table of Contents
    our ability to design products that meet customers’ cost, size, acceptance and specification criteria and performance requirements;

 

    our ability to manufacture new products with acceptable quality and manufacturing yields in a sufficient quantity to meet customer demand and according to customer needs;

 

    our ability to offer new products at competitive prices;

 

    our dependence on suppliers to deliver in a timely manner materials that are critical components of our products;

 

    our dependence on third-party manufacturers to successfully manufacture our products;

 

    the identification of and entry into new markets for our products;

 

    the acceptance of our customers’ products by the market and the lifecycle of such products; and

 

    our ability to deliver products in a timely manner within our customers’ product planning and deployment cycle.

A new product development effort may last two years or longer, and requires significant investments in engineering hours, third-party development costs, prototypes and sample materials, as well as sales and marketing expenses, which will not be recouped if the product launch is unsuccessful. We may not be able to design and introduce new products in a timely or cost-efficient manner, and our new products may be more costly to develop, may fail to meet the requirements of the market or our customers, or may be adopted by customers slower than we expect. In that case, we may not reach our expected level of production orders and may lose market share, which could adversely affect our ability to sustain our revenue growth or maintain our current revenue levels.

We depend on third parties for a significant portion of the fabrication, assembly and testing of our products.

A significant portion of the fabrication, assembly and testing of our products is done by third-party contract manufacturers and foundries. As a result, we face competition for manufacturing capacity in the open market. We rely on foundries to manufacture wafers and on third-party manufacturers to assemble, test and manufacture substantially all of our coherent digital signal processor application-specific integrated circuits, or DSP ASICs, silicon photonic integrated circuits, or silicon PICs, and modules. Accordingly, we cannot directly control our product delivery schedules and quality assurance. This lack of control could result in product shortages or quality assurance problems. These issues could delay shipments of our products, increase our assembly or testing costs or lead to costly epidemic failure claims. In addition, the consolidation of contract manufacturers and foundries, as well as the increasing capital intensity and complexity associated with fabrication in smaller process geometries, has limited the number of available contract manufacturers and foundries and increased our dependence on a smaller number of contract manufacturers and foundries. The small number of contract manufacturers or foundries could also increase the costs of components or manufacturing and adversely affect our results of operations, including our gross margins. In addition, to the extent we engage additional contract manufacturers or foundries, introduce new products with new manufacturers or foundries and/or move existing internal or external production lines to new manufacturers or foundries, we could experience supply disruptions during the transition process.

Because we rely on contract manufacturers and foundries, we face several significant risks in addition to those discussed above, including:

 

    a lack of guaranteed supply of manufactured wafers and other raw and finished components and potential higher wafer and component prices due to supply constraints;

 

    the limited availability of, or potential delays in obtaining access to, key process technologies;

 

14


Table of Contents
    the location of contract manufacturers and foundries in regions that are subject to earthquakes, typhoons, tsunamis and other natural disasters; and

 

    competition with our contract manufacturers’ or foundries’ other customers when contract manufacturers or foundries allocate capacity or supply during periods of capacity constraint or supply shortages.

The manufacture of our products is a complex and technologically demanding process that utilizes many state of the art manufacturing processes and specialized components. Our foundries have from time to time experienced lower than anticipated manufacturing yields for our wafers or photonic integrated circuit, or PIC, modules. This often occurs during the production or assembly of new products or the installation and start-up of new process technologies and can occur even in mature processes due to break downs in mechanical systems, clean room controls, equipment failures, calibration errors and the handling of the material from station to station as well as damage resulting from the shipment and handling of the products to various points of processing.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers, some of which are sole sources, and our business could be disrupted if they are unable to meet our needs.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers of the key materials, including silicon wafers, substrate materials and components, equipment used to manufacture and test our products, and key design tools used in the design, testing and manufacturing of our products. Some of these suppliers are sole sources. With some of these suppliers, we do not have long-term agreements and instead purchase materials and equipment through a purchase order process. As a result, these suppliers may stop supplying us materials and equipment, limit the allocation of supply and equipment to us due to increased industry demand or significantly increase their prices at any time with little or no advance notice. Our reliance on sole source suppliers or a limited number of suppliers could result in delivery problems, reduced control over product pricing and quality, and our inability to identify and qualify another supplier in a timely manner. Some of our suppliers may experience financial difficulties that could prevent them from supplying us materials, or equipment used in the design and manufacture of our products. In addition, our suppliers, including our sole source suppliers, may experience manufacturing delays or shut downs due to circumstances beyond their control such as labor issues, political unrest or natural disasters. Our suppliers, including our sole source suppliers, could also determine to discontinue the manufacture of materials, equipment and tools that may be difficult for us to obtain from alternative sources. In addition, the suppliers of design tools that we rely on may not maintain or advance the capabilities of their tools in a manner sufficient to meet the technological requirements for us to design advanced products or provide such tools to us at reasonable prices. Further, the industry in which our suppliers operate is subject to a trend of consolidation. To the extent these trends continue, we may become dependent on even fewer suppliers to meet our material and equipment needs.

Any supply deficiencies or industry allocation shortages relating to the quantities of materials, equipment or tools we use to design and manufacture our products could materially and adversely affect our ability to fulfill customer orders and our results of operations. Lead times for the purchase of certain materials, equipment and tools from suppliers have increased and in some instances have exceeded the lead times provided to us by our customers. In some cases these lead time increases have limited our ability to respond to or meet customer demand. We have in the past and may in the future, experience delays or reductions in supply shipments, which could reduce our revenue and profitability. If key components or materials are unavailable, our costs would increase and our revenue would decline.

Although we are developing relationships with additional suppliers, doing so is a time-consuming process, and we may not be able to enter into necessary arrangements with these additional suppliers in time to avoid supply constraints in sole sourced components.

 

15


Table of Contents

Our revenue growth rate in recent periods may not be indicative of our future growth or performance.

Our revenue growth rate in recent periods may not be indicative of our future growth or performance. We experienced revenue growth rates of 88.3%, 63.5% and 91.0% in 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, in each case compared to the corresponding periods in the immediately preceding year. We may not achieve similar revenue growth rates in future periods. You should not rely on our revenue for any prior quarterly or annual period as any indication of our future revenue or revenue growth. If we are unable to maintain consistent revenue or revenue growth, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We may not be able to maintain or improve our gross margins.

We may not be able to maintain or improve our gross margins. Factors such as slow introductions of new products, our failure to effectively reduce the cost of existing products, our failure to maintain or improve our product mix or pricing, changes in customer demand, annual, or semi-annual or quarterly price reductions and pricing discounts required under the terms of our customer contracts, pricing pressure resulting from increased competition, the availability of superior or lower-cost technologies, market consolidation or the potential for future macroeconomic or market volatility to reduce sales volumes have the potential to adversely affect our gross margins. Our gross margins could also be adversely affected by unfavorable production yields or variances, increases in costs of components and materials, the timing changes in our inventory, warranty costs and related returns, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, our inability to reduce manufacturing costs in response to any decrease in revenue, possible exposure to inventory valuation reserves and failure to obtain the anticipated benefits of our tax planning strategies. Our competitors have a history of reducing their prices to increase or avoid losing market share, and if and as we continue to gain market share we may have to reduce our prices to continue to effectively compete. If we are unable to maintain or improve our gross margins, our financial results will be adversely affected.

Product quality problems, defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our products could harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We produce complex products that incorporate advanced technologies. Despite our testing prior to their release, our products may contain undetected defects or errors, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. Product defects or errors could affect the performance of our products and could delay the development or release of new products or new versions of products. Allegations of unsatisfactory performance could cause us to lose revenue or market share, increase our service costs, cause us to incur substantial costs in redesigning the products, cause us to lose significant customers, subject us to liability for damages or divert our resources from other tasks, any one of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

From time to time, we have had to replace certain components of products that we had shipped and provide remediation in response to the discovery of defects or bugs, including failures in software protocols or defective component batches resulting in reliability issues, in such products, and we may be required to do so in the future. We may also be required to provide full replacements or refunds for such defective products. Such remediation could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

16


Table of Contents

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from international sales and therefore are subject to additional risks associated with our international operations.

Since January 1, 2013, we have shipped our products to customers located in 18 foreign countries. In 2013, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, we derived 85.1%, 79.2%, 82.3%, 82.9% and 80.1%, respectively, of our revenue from sales to customers with delivery locations outside the United States. A significant portion of our international sales are made to customers with delivery locations in China. In 2013, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, we derived 32.1%, 36.5%, 36.0%, 33.3% and 43.5%, respectively, of our revenue from sales to customers with delivery locations in China. We also work with manufacturing facilities outside of the United States. In the future, we intend to further expand our international operations to locate additional functions related to the development, manufacturing and sale of our products outside of the United States. Our current and anticipated future international operations are subject to inherent risks, and our future results could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

 

    U.S. or foreign governmental action, such as export control or import restrictions, that could prevent or significantly hinder our ability to sell our products to ZTE or any of its affiliates or other customers in certain foreign jurisdictions;

 

    greater difficulty in enforcing contracts and accounts receivable obligations and longer collection periods;

 

    difficulties in managing and staffing international offices, and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;

 

    the impact of general economic and political conditions in economies outside the United States, including the uncertainty arising from the June 2016 referendum vote in the United Kingdom in favor of exiting from the European Union;

 

    tariff and trade barriers, changes in custom and duties requirements or compliance interpretations and other regulatory requirements or contractual limitations on our ability to sell or develop our products in certain foreign markets;

 

    heightened risk of unfair or corrupt business practices in certain geographies and of improper or fraudulent sales arrangements that may impact financial results and result in restatements of, or irregularities in, financial statements;

 

    certification requirements;

 

    greater difficulty documenting and testing our internal controls;

 

    reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;

 

    potentially adverse tax consequences;

 

    the effects of changes in currency exchange rates;

 

    changes in service provider and government spending patterns;

 

    social, political and economic instability;

 

    higher incidence of corruption or unethical business practices that could expose us to liability or damage our reputation; and

 

    natural disasters, health epidemics and acts of war or terrorism.

International customers may also require that we comply with additional testing or customization of our products to conform to local standards, which could materially increase the costs to sell our products in those markets.

 

17


Table of Contents

As we continue to operate on an international basis, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. Our failure to manage any of these risks could harm our international operations and reduce our international sales.

We are subject to government regulation, including import, export, economic sanctions, and anti-corruption laws and regulations that may limit our sales opportunities, expose us to liability and increase our costs.

Our products are subject to export controls, including the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations and economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls, and similar laws and regulations that apply in other jurisdictions in which we distribute or sell our products. Export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations include restrictions and prohibitions on the sale or supply of certain products and on our transfer of parts, components, and related technical information and know-how to certain countries, regions, governments, persons and entities. For example, on March 8, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule in the Federal Register that amended the Export Administration Regulations by adding ZTE and three of its affiliates to the “Entity List,” for actions contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. This rule imposed new export licensing requirements on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of all U.S.-regulated products, software and technology to the designated ZTE entities, which had the practical effect of preventing us from making any sales to ZTE. On March 24, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a temporary general license suspending the enhanced export licensing requirements for ZTE and one of its designated affiliates through June 30, 2016, thereby enabling us to resume sales to ZTE. On June 28, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce extended the temporary general license through August 30, 2016. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce further extended the temporary general license through November 28, 2016. There can be no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Commerce will extend this temporary general license beyond the November 28, 2016 expiration date or permit any sales to the designated ZTE entities after this temporary general license expires. This or future regulatory activity may materially interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or other customers. The loss or temporary loss of ZTE as a result of this or future regulatory activity could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, our association with ZTE could subject us to actual or perceived reputational harm among current or prospective investors in our common stock, suppliers or customers, customers of our customers, other parties doing business with us, or the general public. Any such reputational harm could result in the loss of investors in our common stock, suppliers or customers, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

In addition, various countries regulate the importation of certain products, through import permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products. The exportation, re-exportation, transfers within foreign countries and importation of our products, including by our partners, must comply with these laws and regulations, with any violations subject to reputational harm, government investigations, penalties, and/or a denial or curtailment of our ability to export our products. Complying with export control and sanctions laws for a particular sale may be time consuming, may increase our costs and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Although we take precautions to prevent our products from being provided in violation of such laws and regulations, if we are found to be in violation of U.S. sanctions or export control laws, we and the individuals working for us could incur substantial fines and penalties. Changes in export, sanctions or import laws or regulations may delay the introduction and sale of our products in international markets, require us to spend resources to seek necessary government authorizations or to develop different versions of our products, or, in some cases, such as with ZTE, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, regions, governments, persons or entities altogether, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

 

18


Table of Contents

We are also subject to various domestic and international anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, as well as other similar anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from offering or making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining, retaining or directing business. Our exposure for violating these laws and regulations increases as our international presence expands and as we increase sales and operations in foreign jurisdictions.

If we fail to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, or if we fail to retain and motivate our founders, our business could suffer.

Our business depends on the services of highly qualified employees in a variety of disciplines, including optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, large-scale ASIC design and verification, silicon photonic integration, system software development, hardware design and high-speed electronics design. Our success depends on the skills, experience and performance of these employees, our founders and other members of our senior management team, as well as our ability to attract and retain other highly qualified management and technical personnel. There is intense competition for qualified personnel in our industry and a limited number of qualified personnel with expertise in the areas that are relevant to our business, and as a result we may not be able to attract and retain the personnel necessary for the expansion and success of our business. All of our co-founders are currently employees of our company. The loss of services of any of our founders or of any other officers or key personnel, or our inability to continue to attract qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The failure to increase sales to our existing customers as anticipated could adversely affect our future revenue growth and adversely affect our business.

We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to expand sales to our existing customers for use in a customer’s existing or new product offerings. Our efforts to increase product sales to existing customers may generate less revenue than anticipated or take longer than anticipated. If we are unable to increase sales to our existing customers as anticipated, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected.

If we do not effectively expand and train our direct sales force, we may be unable to add new customers or increase sales to our existing customers, and our business will be adversely affected.

We depend on our direct sales force to increase sales with existing customers and to obtain new customers. As such, we have invested and will continue to invest in our sales organization. In recent periods, we have been adding personnel and other resources to our sales function as we focus on growing our business, entering new markets and increasing our market share, and we expect to incur additional expenses in expanding our sales personnel in order to achieve revenue growth. There is significant competition for sales personnel with the skills and technical knowledge that we require. Our ability to achieve significant revenue growth will depend, in large part, on our success in recruiting, training, retaining and integrating sufficient numbers of sales personnel to support our growth, particularly in international markets. New hires require significant training and may take significant time before they achieve full productivity. Our planned hires may not become productive as quickly as we expect, and we may be unable to hire, retain or integrate into our corporate culture sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in the markets where we do business or plan to do business. If we are unable to hire, integrate and train a sufficient number of effective sales personnel, or the sales personnel we hire are not successful in increasing sales to our existing customer base or obtaining new customers, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects will be adversely affected.

 

19


Table of Contents

Our corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we cannot maintain this culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, creativity and teamwork fostered by our culture, and our business may be harmed.

We believe that a critical contributor to our success has been our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, teamwork, passion for customers and focus on execution, as well as facilitating critical knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing. As we grow and change, we may find it difficult to maintain these important aspects of our corporate culture, which could limit our ability to innovate and operate effectively. Any failure to preserve our culture could also negatively affect our ability to retain and recruit personnel, continue to perform at current levels or execute on our business strategy.

Quality control problems in manufacturing could result in delays in product shipments to customers or in quality problems with our products which could adversely affect our business.

We may experience quality control problems in our manufacturing operations or the manufacturing operations of our contract manufacturers. If we are unable to identify and correct certain quality issues in our products prior to the products’ being shipped to customers, failure of our deployed products could cause failures in our customers’ products, which could require us to issue a product recall or trigger epidemic failure claims pursuant to our customer contracts, which may require us to indemnify or pay liquidated damages to affected customers, repair or replace damaged products, or discontinue or significantly delay shipments. As a result, we could incur additional costs that would adversely affect our gross margins. In addition, even if a problem is identified and corrected at the manufacturing stage, product shipments to our customers could be delayed, which would negatively affect our revenue, competitive position and reputation.

We may not be able to manufacture our products in volumes or at times sufficient to meet customer demands, which could result in delayed or lost revenue and harm to our reputation.

Given the high level of sophisticated functionality embedded in our products, our manufacturing processes are complex and often involve more than one manufacturer. This complexity may result in lower manufacturing yields and may make it more difficult for our current and future contract manufacturers to scale to higher production volumes. If we are unable to manufacture our products in volumes or at times sufficient to meet demand, our customers could postpone or cancel orders or seek alternative suppliers for these products, which would harm our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations.

Customer requirements for new products are increasingly challenging, which could lead to significant executional risk in designing such products. We may incur significant expenses long before we can recognize revenue from new products, if at all, due to the costs and length of research, development and manufacturing process cycles.

Network equipment manufacturers seek increased performance optical interconnect products, at lower prices and in smaller and lower-power designs. These requirements can be technically challenging, and are sometimes customer-specific, which can require numerous design iterations. Because of the complexity of design requirements, including stringent customer-imposed acceptance criteria, executing on our product development goals is difficult and sometimes unpredictable. These difficulties could result in product sampling delays and/or missing targets on key specifications and customer requirements and acceptance criteria. Our failure to meet our customers’ requirements could result in our customers seeking alternative suppliers, which would adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.

 

20


Table of Contents

Additionally, we and our competitors often incur significant research and development and sales and marketing costs for products that, at the earliest, will be purchased by our customers long after much of the cost is incurred and, in some cases, may never be purchased due to changes in industry or customer requirements in the interim.

Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable effort and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.

The timing of our sales and revenue recognition is difficult to predict because of the length and unpredictability of our products’ sales cycles. A sales cycle is the period between initial contact with a prospective network equipment manufacturer customer and any sale of our products. Customer orders are complex and difficult to complete because prospective customers generally consider a number of factors over an extended period of time before committing to purchase the products we sell. Customers often view the purchase of our products as a significant and strategic decision and require considerable time to evaluate, test and qualify our products prior to making a purchase decision and placing an order. The length of time that customers devote to their evaluation, contract negotiation and budgeting processes varies significantly. Our products’ sales cycles can be lengthy in certain cases. During the sales cycle, we expend significant time and money on sales and marketing activities and make investments in evaluation equipment, all of which lower our operating margins, particularly if no sale occurs or if the sale is delayed as a result of extended qualification processes or delays from our customers’ customers. Even if a customer decides to purchase our products, there are many factors affecting the timing of our recognition of revenue, which makes our revenue difficult to forecast. For example, there may be unexpected delays in a customer’s internal procurement processes.

Even after a customer makes a purchase, there may be circumstances or terms relating to the purchase that delay our ability to recognize revenue from that purchase. For example, the sale of our products may be subject to acceptance testing or may be placed into a remote stocking location. In addition, the significance and timing of our product enhancements, and the introduction of new products by our competitors, may also affect customers’ purchases. For all of these reasons, it is difficult to predict whether a sale will be completed, the particular period in which a sale will be completed or the period in which revenue from a sale will be recognized. If our sales cycles lengthen, our revenue could be lower than expected, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we fail to accurately predict market requirements or market demand for our products, our business, competitive position and operating results will suffer.

We operate in a dynamic industry and use significant resources to develop new products for existing and new markets. After we have developed a product, there is no guarantee that our customers will integrate our product into their equipment or devices and, ultimately, bring the equipment and devices incorporating our product to market. In addition, there is no guarantee that cloud, network and communications service providers will ultimately choose to purchase network equipment that incorporates our products. In these situations, we may never produce or deliver significant quantities of our products, even after incurring substantial development expenses. From the time a customer elects to integrate our interconnect technology into their product, it typically takes up to 24 months for high-volume production of that product to commence. After volume production begins, we cannot be assured that the equipment or devices incorporating our product will gain market acceptance by network operators.

 

21


Table of Contents

If we fail to accurately predict and interpret market requirements or market demand for our new products, our business and growth prospects will be harmed. If high-speed networks are deployed to a lesser extent or more slowly than we currently anticipate, we may not realize anticipated benefits from our investments in research and development. As a result, our business, competitive position, market share and operating results will be harmed.

As demand for our products in one market grows, demand in another market may decrease. For example, if we sell our products directly to content providers in addition to network equipment manufacturers, our sales to network equipment manufacturers may decrease due to reduced demand from their customers or due to dissatisfaction by network equipment manufacturers with this change in our business model. Any reduction in demand in one market that is not offset by an increase in demand in another market could adversely affect our market share or results of operations.

Most of our long-term customer contracts do not commit customers to specified purchase commitments, and our customers may decrease, cancel or delay their purchases at any time with little or no advance notice to us.

Most of our customers purchase our products pursuant to individual purchase orders or contracts that do not contain purchase commitments. Although some of our customers have committed to purchase a specified share of their required volume for a particular product from us, monitoring and enforcing these commitments can be difficult. Some customers provide us with their expected forecasts for our products several months in advance, but customers may decrease, cancel or delay purchase orders already in place, and the impact of any such actions may be intensified given our dependence on a small number of large customers. If any of our major customers decrease, stop or delay purchasing our products for any reason, our business and results of operations would be harmed. For example, several of our customers have historically elected to defer purchases scheduled for the fourth quarter into the first quarter of the following year, resulting in a decrease in our anticipated revenue during the fourth quarter. Cancellation or delays of such orders may cause us to fail to achieve our short-term and long-term financial and operating goals and result in excess and obsolete inventory.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive.

The market for high-speed interconnect is highly competitive. We are aware of a number of companies that have developed or are developing coherent DSP ASICs, non-coherent PICs and 100 gigabits per second, or Gbps, and 400 Gbps modules, among other technologies, that compete directly with some or all of our current and proposed product offerings.

Competitors may be able to more quickly and effectively:

 

    develop or respond to new technologies or technical standards;

 

    react to changing customer requirements and expectations;

 

    devote needed resources to the development, production, promotion and sale of products;

 

    attain high manufacturing yields on new product designs;

 

    establish and take advantage of operations in lower-cost regions; and

 

    deliver competitive products at lower prices, with lower gross margins or at lower costs than our products.

In order to expand market acceptance of our products, we must differentiate our products from those of our competition. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in making this differentiation

 

22


Table of Contents

or increasing acceptance of our products as we have limited resources dedicated to marketing of our products. In addition, established companies in related industries or newly funded companies targeting markets we serve, such as semiconductor manufacturers and data communications providers, may also have significantly more resources than we do and may in the future develop and offer competing products. All of these risks may be increased if the market were to further consolidate through mergers or other business combinations between our competitors or if more capital is invested in the market to create additional competitors.

We may not be able to compete successfully with our competitors and aggressive competition in the market may result in lower prices for our products and/or decreased gross margins. New technology and investments from existing competitors and competitive threats from newly funded companies may erode our technology and product advantages and slow our overall growth and profitability. Any such development could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our results of operations may suffer if we do not effectively manage our inventory, and we may continue to incur inventory-related charges.

We need to manage our inventory of component parts and finished goods effectively to meet changing customer requirements. Accurately forecasting customers’ product needs is difficult. Our product demand forecasts are based on multiple assumptions, each of which may introduce error into our estimates. In the event we overestimate customer demand, we may allocate resources to manufacturing products that we may not be able to sell. As a result, we could hold excess or obsolete inventory, which would reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand or if insufficient manufacturing capacity is available, we could forego revenue opportunities, lose market share and damage our customer relationships. Also, due to our industry’s use of management techniques to reduce inventory levels and the period of time inventory is held, any disruption in the supply chain could lead to more immediate shortages in product or component supply. Additionally, any enterprise system failures, including in connection with implementing new systems or upgrading existing systems that help us manage our financial, purchasing, inventory, sales, invoicing and product return functions, could harm our ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other billing and logistical processes.

Some of our products and supplies have in the past, and may in the future, become obsolete or be deemed excess while in inventory due to rapidly changing customer specifications, changes to product structure, components or bills of material as a result of engineering changes, or a decrease in customer demand. We also have exposure to contractual liabilities to our contract manufacturers for inventories purchased by them on our behalf, based on our forecasted requirements, which may become excess or obsolete. Our inventory balances also represent an investment of cash. To the extent our inventory turns are slower than we anticipate based on historical practice, our cash conversion cycle extends and more of our cash remains invested in working capital. If we are not able to manage our inventory effectively, we may need to write down the value of some of our existing inventory or write off non-saleable or obsolete inventory. We have from time to time incurred significant inventory-related charges. Any such charges we incur in future periods could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Increasingly, our customers require that we ship our finished products to a central location, which is not controlled by us. If that facility is damaged, or if our relationship with that facility deteriorates, we may suffer losses or be forced to find an alternate facility. In addition, revenue is only recognized once our customers take delivery of the products from this location, rather than when we ship them, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We often lack insight into when customers will take delivery of our products, making it difficult to forecast our revenue.

 

23


Table of Contents

The industry in which we operate is subject to significant cyclicality.

Industries focused on semiconductor and optical network technologies can be highly cyclical and characterized by constant and rapid technological change and price erosion, evolving technical standards, increasing effects of competition, frequent new product introductions and technology displacement, short product life cycles both for semiconductors and optical technologies and for many of the end products in which they are used. In addition, product demand in the markets in which we compete is tied to the aggregate capital expenditures of telecommunications and network and content service providers as they build out and upgrade their network infrastructure. Capital expenditures can be highly cyclical due to the importance and focus of local initiatives, such as the ongoing telecommunications build out and upgrade in China, government funding and other factors, thus resulting in wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. From time to time, these factors, together with changes in general economic conditions, have caused significant industry upturns and downturns that have had a direct impact on the financial stability of our customers, their customers and our suppliers. Periods of industry downturns have been characterized by diminished demand for products, unanticipated declines in telecommunications and communications system capital expenditures, industry consolidation, excess capacity compared to demand, high inventory levels and periods of inventory adjustment, under-utilization of manufacturing capacity, changes in revenue mix and erosion of average selling prices, any of which could result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We expect our business to continue to be subject to cyclical downturns even when overall economic conditions are relatively stable. To the extent we cannot offset recessionary periods or periods of reduced growth that may occur in the industry or in our target markets in particular through increased market share or otherwise, our business can be adversely affected, revenue may decline and our financial condition and results of operations may be harmed. In addition, in any future economic downturn or periods of inflationary increase we may be unable to reduce our costs quickly enough to maintain profitability levels.

Our business is subject to currency fluctuations that have adversely affected our results of operations in recent quarters and may continue to do so in the future.

Our financial results have and in the future could continue to be adversely affected by foreign currency fluctuations. Historically, a significant portion of our expenses, predominately related to outsourced development services, were denominated in Euros while substantially all of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between these currencies and other currencies in which we collect revenue and/or pay expenses have and could have a material effect on our future operating results. For example, in 2014, we agreed with one of our suppliers to pay for supplies in U.S. dollars instead of Euros, based on a predetermined exchange rate, which resulted in a significant increase in the cost of those supplies when the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate fell substantially below the predetermined rate. Currency rate fluctuations may also affect the ability of our customers to purchase our products in the event that such fluctuations result in a significant increase to the purchase price of our products under the customers’ local currency.

Although we do not currently engage in currency hedging transactions, we may choose to do so in the future in an effort to reduce our exposure to U.S. dollar to Euro or other currency fluctuations. In connection with any currency hedging transaction in the future, we may be required to convert currencies to meet our obligations. These transactions may not operate to fully hedge our exposure to currency fluctuations, and under certain circumstances, these transactions could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

 

24


Table of Contents

If our customers do not qualify our manufacturing lines or the manufacturing lines of our subcontractors for volume shipments, our operating results could suffer.

Our manufacturing lines have passed our qualification standards, as well as our technical standards. However, our customers may also require that our manufacturing lines pass their specific qualification standards and that we, and any subcontractors that we may use, be registered under international quality standards. In addition, many of our customers require that we maintain our ISO certification. In the event we are unable to maintain process controls required to maintain ISO certification, or in the event we fail to pass the ISO certification audit for any reason, we could lose our ISO certification. In addition, we may encounter quality control issues in the future as a result of relocating our manufacturing lines or ramping new products to full volume production. We may be unable to obtain customer qualification of our or our subcontractors’ manufacturing lines or we may experience delays in obtaining customer qualification of our or our subcontractors’ manufacturing lines. Such delays or failure to obtain qualifications would harm our operating results and customer relationships. If we introduce new contract manufacturers and move any production lines from existing internal or external facilities, the new production lines will likely need to be re-qualified with our customers. Any delay in the qualification of our or our subcontractors’ manufacturing lines may adversely affect our operations and financial results. Any delay in the qualification or requalification of our or our subcontractors’ manufacturing lines may delay the manufacturing of our products or require us to divert resources away from other areas of our business, which could adversely affect our operations and financial results.

Acquisitions that we may pursue in the future, whether or not consummated, could result in operating and financial difficulties.

We may in the future acquire businesses or assets in an effort to increase our growth, enhance our ability to compete, complement our product offerings, enter new and adjacent markets, obtain access to additional technical resources, enhance our intellectual property rights or pursue other competitive opportunities. If we seek acquisitions, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates at prices we consider appropriate. We are in an industry that is actively consolidating and, as a result, there is no guarantee that we will successfully and satisfactorily bid against third parties, including competitors, when we identify a target we seek to acquire.

We cannot readily predict the timing or size of our future acquisitions, or the success of any future acquisitions. Failure to successfully execute on any future acquisition plans could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent that we consummate acquisitions, we may face financial risks as a result, including increased costs associated with merged or acquired operations, increased indebtedness, economic dilution to gross and operating profit and earnings per share, or unanticipated costs and liabilities, including the impairment of assets and expenses associated with restructuring costs and reserves, and unforeseen accounting charges. We would also face operational risks, such as difficulties in integrating the operations, retention of key personnel and our ability to maintain and support products of the acquired businesses, disrupting their or our ongoing business, increasing the complexity of our business, failing to successfully further develop the combined, acquired or remaining technology, and impairing management resources and management’s relationships with employees and customers as a result of changes in their ownership and management. Further, the evaluation and negotiation of potential acquisitions, as well as the integration of an acquired business, may divert management time and other resources.

 

25


Table of Contents

We may need additional equity, debt or other financing in the future, which we may not be able to obtain on acceptable terms, or at all, and any additional financing may result in restrictions on our operations or substantial dilution to our stockholders.

We may need to raise funds in the future, for example, to develop new technologies, expand our business or acquire complementary businesses. We may try to raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. Our ability to obtain debt or equity funding will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions, interest rates, our operating performance and investor interest. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If adequate funding is not available, we may be required to reduce expenditures, including curtailing our growth strategies and reducing our product development efforts, or forgo acquisition opportunities. If we succeed in raising additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, then the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock, these new securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. In addition, any preferred equity issuance or debt financing that we may obtain in the future could have restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies are based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, our results of operations could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the market price of our stock.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, contract manufacturing liabilities and income taxes. If our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, our results of operations may be adversely affected and may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the market price of our stock.

We may face product liability claims, which could be expensive and time consuming and result in substantial damages to us and increases in our insurance rates.

Despite quality assurance measures, defects may occur in our products. The occurrence of any defects in our products could give rise to product liability or epidemic failure claims, which could divert management’s attention from our core business, be expensive to defend, result in the loss of key customer contracts and result in sizable damage awards against us and, depending on the nature or scope of any network outage caused by a defect in or epidemic failure related to our products, could also harm our reputation. Our current insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover these claims. Moreover, in the future, we may not be able to obtain insurance in amount or scope sufficient to provide us with adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Any product liability claims brought against us, with or without merit, could increase our product liability insurance rates or prevent us from securing continuing coverage, could harm our reputation in the industry and reduce product sales. We would need to pay any product losses in excess of our insurance coverage out of cash reserves, harming our financial condition and adversely affecting our operating results.

 

26


Table of Contents

Our business and operating results may be adversely affected by natural disasters, health epidemics or other catastrophic events beyond our control.

Our internal manufacturing headquarters and new product introduction labs, design facilities, assembly and test facilities, and supply chain, and those of our contract manufacturers, are subject to risks associated with natural disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, tsunami, typhoons, volcanic activity, floods and health epidemics as well as other events beyond our control such as power loss, telecommunications failures and uncertainties arising out of terrorist attacks in the United States and armed conflicts or terrorist attacks overseas. The majority of our semiconductor products are currently fabricated and assembled in Japan, Singapore and Taiwan. The majority of the internal and outsourced assembly and test facilities we utilize or plan to utilize are located in China, New Hampshire and Thailand, and some of our internal design, assembly and test facilities are located in California (design only), New Jersey and Massachusetts, regions with severe weather activity and, in the case of California, above average seismic activity. In addition, our research and development personnel are concentrated primarily in our headquarters in Maynard, Massachusetts and in our research center in Hazlet, New Jersey. Any catastrophic loss or significant damage to any of these facilities or facilities we use in the future would likely disrupt our operations, delay production, and adversely affect our product development schedules, shipments and revenue. In addition, any such catastrophic loss or significant damage could result in significant expense to repair or replace the facility and could significantly curtail our research and development efforts in a particular product area or primary market, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and operating results.

Breaches of our cybersecurity systems could degrade our ability to conduct our business operations and deliver products to our customers, compromise the integrity of the software embedded in our products, result in significant data losses and the theft of our intellectual property, damage our reputation, expose us to liability to third parties and require us to incur significant additional costs to maintain the security of our networks and data.

We increasingly depend upon our information technology, or IT, systems to conduct virtually all of our business operations, ranging from our internal operations and product development and manufacturing activities to our marketing and sales efforts and communications with our customers and business partners. Computer programmers may attempt to penetrate our network security, or that of our website, and misappropriate our proprietary information, embed malicious code in our products or cause interruptions of our service. Because the techniques used by such computer programmers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system. We have also outsourced a number of our business functions to third-party contractors, including our manufacturers and logistics providers, and our business operations also depend, in part, on the success of our contractors’ own cybersecurity measures. Additionally, we depend upon our employees and contractors to appropriately handle confidential data and deploy our IT resources in safe and secure fashion that does not expose our network systems to security breaches and the loss of data. Accordingly, if our cybersecurity systems and those of our contractors fail to protect against unauthorized access, sophisticated cyberattacks and the mishandling of data by our employees and contractors, our ability to conduct our business effectively could be damaged in a number of ways, including:

 

    sensitive data regarding our employees or business, including intellectual property and other proprietary data, could be stolen;

 

    our electronic communications systems, including email and other methods, could be disrupted, and our ability to conduct our business operations could be seriously damaged until such systems can be restored;

 

27


Table of Contents
    our ability to process customer orders and deliver products could be degraded or disrupted, resulting in delays in revenue recognition; and

 

    defects and security vulnerabilities could be introduced into the software embedded in or used in the development of our products, thereby damaging the reputation and perceived reliability and security of our products.

Should any of the above events occur, we could be subject to significant claims for liability from our customers and regulatory actions from governmental agencies. In addition, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights could be compromised and our reputation and competitive position could be significantly harmed. Additionally, we could incur significant costs in order to upgrade our cybersecurity systems and remediate damages. Consequently, our financial performance and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to successfully manage the growth of our business if we are unable to improve our internal systems, processes and controls.

Our business is growing rapidly and we anticipate that it will continue to do so in the future. In order to effectively manage our operations and growth, we need to continue to improve our internal systems, processes and controls. We may not be able to successfully implement improvements to these systems, processes and controls in an efficient or timely manner. In addition, our systems and processes may not prevent or detect all errors, omissions or fraud. We may experience difficulties in managing improvements to our systems or processes and controls, which could impair our ability to provide products to our customers in a timely manner, causing us to lose customers, limit us to smaller deployments of our products or increase our technical support costs.

We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which could subject us to liabilities, increase our costs or restrict our business or operations in the future.

Our manufacturing operations and our products are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate or sell our products. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, employee health and safety and the use of hazardous materials in, and the recycling of, our products. Failure to comply with present and future environmental, health or safety requirements, or the identification of contamination, could cause us to incur substantial costs, monetary fines, civil or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations. In addition, these laws and regulations have increasingly become more stringent over time. The identification of presently unidentified environmental conditions, more vigorous enforcement of current environmental, health and safety requirements by regulatory agencies, the enactment of more stringent laws and regulations or other unanticipated events could restrict our ability to use or expand our facilities, require us to incur additional expenses or require us to modify our manufacturing processes or the contents of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in industry standards and regulations could make our products obsolete, which would cause our net revenues and results of operations to suffer.

We design our products to conform to regulations established by governments and to standards set by industry standards bodies worldwide. Various industry organizations are currently considering whether and to what extent to create standards applicable to our current products or those under development. Because certain of our products are designed to conform to current specific industry standards, if competing or new standards emerge that are preferred by our customers, we may have to

 

28


Table of Contents

make significant expenditures to develop new products. If our customers adopt new or competing industry standards with which our products are not compatible, or industry groups adopt standards or governments issue regulations with which our products are not compatible, our existing products would become less desirable to our customers and our net revenues and results of operations would suffer.

We recently implemented a corporate restructuring that is more closely aligned with the international nature of our business activities, and if we do not achieve the anticipated financial, operational and effective tax rate efficiencies as a result of our new corporate structure, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

In 2015, we implemented a reorganization of our corporate structure and intercompany relationships to more closely align our corporate structure with the international nature of our business activities. This corporate restructuring has allowed us to reduce our overall effective tax rate in the six months ended June 30, 2016 through changes in our use of intellectual property, international procurement and manufacturing and sales operations. This corporate restructuring has also allowed us to achieve financial and operational efficiencies. We cannot provide assurance that these tax benefits and efficiencies will continue into future periods. Our efforts in connection with this corporate restructuring have required and will continue to require us to incur expenses for which we may not realize related benefits. If the structure is not accepted by the applicable taxing authorities upon audit or if there are adverse changes in domestic or international tax laws, including changes in any proposed legislation to reform U.S. taxation of international business activities, the structure may be negatively affected. In addition, if we do not operate our business in a manner that is consistent with this corporate restructuring or any applicable tax provisions, we may fail to achieve the financial, operational and effective tax rate efficiencies that we anticipate and our results of operations may be negatively affected.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, or OECD, released guidance relating to various international tax related topics in an initiative referred to as Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, or BEPS, that aims to standardize and modernize global tax policy. Depending on the final form of the BEPS guidance and the legislation ultimately enacted by the OECD members, BEPS could have material adverse consequences on our effective tax rate, the amount of tax we pay and on our financial position and results of operations.

The implementation of our corporate restructuring increases the likelihood that unfavorable tax law changes, unfavorable government review of our tax returns, changes in our geographic earnings mix or imposition of withholding taxes on repatriated earnings could have an adverse effect on our effective tax rate and our operating results.

We have expanded and will likely continue to expand our operations into multiple non-U.S. jurisdictions in connection with our recent corporate restructuring, including those having lower tax rates than those we are subject to in the United States. As a result, our effective tax rate will be influenced by the amounts of income and expense attributed to each such jurisdiction which is materially affected by our valuation and pricing of intercompany transactions, which can be based on significant management assumptions or estimates. If such amounts were to change so as to increase the amounts of our net income subject to taxation in higher tax jurisdictions, or if we were to commence operations in jurisdictions assessing relatively higher tax rates, our effective tax rate could be adversely affected. The continued availability of lower tax rates in non-U.S. jurisdictions, if any, will be dependent on how we conduct our business operation on a going forward basis across all tax jurisdictions. As a result of our corporate restructuring, we will be subject to periodic audits or other reviews by tax authorities in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our activities in the future and there is a risk that tax authorities could challenge our assertion that we have conducted or will conduct our business operations appropriately in order to benefit from these lower tax rate jurisdictions. In addition, tax

 

29


Table of Contents

proposals are being considered by the U.S. Congress and the legislative bodies in some of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, which could affect our corporate restructuring, our tax rate, the carrying value of deferred tax assets or our other tax liabilities. We cannot predict the form or timing of potential legislative changes, but any newly enacted tax law could have a material adverse impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows. This could result in additional tax liabilities or other adjustments to our historical results.

Also, under GAAP, we currently do not provide for U.S. income taxes on the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are to be reinvested indefinitely. Under GAAP, U.S. income taxes will be provided on such earnings if and when they are distributed to our U.S. headquarters in the form of dividends or otherwise or if the shares of the relevant foreign subsidiaries were sold or otherwise transferred. At such time, we would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes, subject to adjustment for foreign tax credits, and foreign withholding taxes on such distributions or sold or transferred shares. If GAAP were to be changed in the future and we were required to provide U.S. income taxes on the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries when earned and not distributed, our effective tax rate would materially increase.

In addition, we may determine in the future that it is advisable to repatriate earnings from non-U.S. subsidiaries under circumstances that could result in a significant amount of U.S. tax at the higher U.S. corporate tax rate. In addition, the repatriation of foreign earnings could give rise to the imposition of potentially significant withholding taxes by the jurisdictions in which such amounts were earned and substantial tax liabilities in the United States. In addition, we may not receive the benefit of any offsetting foreign tax credits, which also could adversely affect our effective tax rate.

Although we believe our tax estimates, which include the impact of anticipated tax benefits with the implementation of our corporate restructuring, are and will be reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may materially differ from the tax amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and may materially affect our income tax provision, net income or cash flows in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

The final determination of our income tax liability may be materially different from our income tax provision.

The final determination of our income tax liability, which includes the impact of our corporate restructuring, may be materially different from our income tax provision. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and, as a result of our corporate restructuring, have become subject to income taxes in international jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are some transactions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Additionally, our calculations of income taxes are based on our interpretations of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file or will file as a result of the proposed corporate restructuring. Although we believe our tax estimates, which include the impact of anticipated tax benefits in connection with our corporate restructuring, are and will be appropriate, there is no assurance that the final determination of our income tax liability will not be materially different than what is reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals.

We are also subject to periodic examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service in the United States and will be subject to periodic examination of our income tax returns by taxing authorities in other tax jurisdictions. We assess and will continue to assess on a regular basis the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. The outcomes from these examinations may have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

 

30


Table of Contents

Furthermore, our provision for income tax could increase as we further expand our international operations, adopt new products or undertake intercompany transactions in light of acquisitions, changing tax laws, expiring rulings and our current and anticipated business and operational requirements.

Our ability to utilize certain net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards may be limited under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code.

As of December 31, 2015, we had net operating loss carryforward amounts, or NOLs, of approximately $12.2 million and $12.8 million for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes, respectively, and tax credit carryforward amounts of approximately $2.5 million and $4.5 million for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes, respectively. The federal and state tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2016 through 2033 and $0.2 million of such carryforwards will expire between 2016 and 2018 if not used. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2029 through 2033. Utilization of these net operating loss and tax credit carryforward amounts could be subject to a substantial annual limitation if the ownership change limitations under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions are triggered by changes in the ownership of our capital stock. Such an annual limitation would result in the expiration of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforward amounts before utilization. Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, including in connection with our initial public offering and any future follow-on public offerings. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change that we may pursue. There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. Additionally, state NOLs generated in one state cannot be used to offset income generated in another state. For these reasons, we may be limited in our ability to fully utilize the tax benefit from the use of our NOLs, even if our profitably would otherwise allow for it.

We are a multinational organization faced with increasingly complex tax issues in many jurisdictions, and we could be obligated to pay additional taxes in various jurisdictions.

As a multinational organization, we may be subject to taxation in jurisdictions around the world with increasingly complex tax laws, the application of which can be uncertain. The amount of taxes we pay in these jurisdictions could increase substantially as a result of changes in the applicable tax principles, including increased tax rates, new tax laws or revised interpretations of existing tax laws and precedents, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operating results. In addition, the authorities in these jurisdictions could review our tax returns and impose additional tax, interest and penalties, and the authorities could claim that various withholding requirements apply to us or our subsidiaries or assert that benefits of tax treaties are not available to us or our subsidiaries, any of which could have a material impact on us and the results of our operations.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which could result in expensive litigation or require us to obtain a license to use the technology from third parties, or we may be prohibited from selling certain products in the future.

Companies in the industry in which we operate frequently are sued or receive informal claims of patent infringement or infringement of other intellectual property rights. We have, from time to time, received such claims from companies, including from competitors and customers, some of whom have substantially more resources and have been developing relevant technologies for much longer than us.

Third parties may in the future assert claims against us concerning our existing products or with respect to future products under development, or with respect to products that we may acquire through

 

31


Table of Contents

acquisitions. We have entered into and may in the future enter into indemnification obligations in favor of our customers that could be triggered upon an allegation or finding that we are infringing other parties’ proprietary rights. If we do infringe a third party’s rights and are unable to provide a sufficient work around, we may need to negotiate with holders of those rights in order to obtain a license to those rights or otherwise settle any infringement claim. A party that makes a claim of infringement against us may obtain an injunction preventing us from shipping products containing the allegedly infringing technology. We have from time to time received notices from third parties alleging infringement of their intellectual property and in one case have entered into a license agreement with a third party with respect to such intellectual property. Any license agreements that we wish to enter into the future with respect to intellectual property rights may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Generally, a license, if granted, would include payments of up-front fees, ongoing royalties or both. These payments or other terms, including any that restrict our ability to utilize the licensed technology in specified markets or geographic locations, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results. In addition, in the event we are granted such a license, it is possible the license would be non-exclusive and other parties, including competitors, may be able to utilize such technology. Our larger competitors may be able to obtain licenses or cross-license their technology on better terms than we can, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, our larger competitors may be able to buy such technology and preclude us from licensing or using such technology.

We may not in all cases be able to resolve allegations of infringement through licensing arrangements, settlement, alternative designs or otherwise. We may take legal action to determine the validity and scope of the third-party rights or to defend against any allegations of infringement. Holders of intellectual property rights could become more aggressive in alleging infringement of their intellectual property rights and we may be the subject of such claims asserted by a third party. For example, as described further under “Business—Legal Proceedings”, on January 22, 2016, ViaSat, Inc. filed a suit against us alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and misappropriation of trade secrets. In the course of pursuing any of these means or defending against any lawsuits filed against us, we could incur significant costs and diversion of our resources and our management’s attention. Due to the competitive nature of our industry, it is unlikely that we could increase our prices to cover such costs. In addition, such claims could result in significant penalties or injunctions that could prevent us from selling some of our products in certain markets or result in settlements or judgments that require payment of significant royalties or damages.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand.

Our future success will depend, in large part, upon our intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, design rights, trade secrets, trademarks and know-how. We maintain a program of identifying technology appropriate for patent and trade secret protection. Our practice is to require employees and consultants to execute non-disclosure and proprietary rights agreements upon commencement of employment or consulting arrangements. These agreements acknowledge our exclusive ownership of all intellectual property developed by the individuals during their work for us and require that all proprietary information disclosed will remain confidential. Such agreements may not be enforceable in full or in part in all jurisdictions and any breach could have a negative effect on our business and our remedy for such breach may be limited.

Despite our efforts, these measures can only provide limited protection. Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our products, may breach our cybersecurity defenses or may otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. Patents owned by us may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged, may not be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at all. Legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights in

 

32


Table of Contents

other countries are uncertain and may afford little or no effective protection for our proprietary rights. Consequently, we may be unable to prevent our intellectual property rights from being exploited abroad. Policing the unauthorized use of our proprietary rights is expensive, difficult and, in some cases, impossible. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources, either of which could harm our business. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property. If we cannot protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, we may not remain competitive.

Furthermore, many of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to developing and protecting their technology or intellectual property rights than we do. In addition, our attempts to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights may be further limited as our employees may be recruited by our current or future competitors and may take with them significant knowledge of our proprietary information. Consequently, others may develop services and methodologies that are similar or superior to our services and methodologies or may design around our intellectual property.

We may be subject to intellectual property litigation that could divert our resources.

In recent years, there has been significant litigation involving patents and other intellectual property rights in our industry. To the extent we gain greater market visibility, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims. The risk of patent litigation has been amplified by the increase in the number of a type of patent holder, which we refer to as a non-practicing entity, whose sole business is to assert such claims. We could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending any intellectual property litigation. If we sue to enforce our rights or are sued by a third party that claims that our products infringe its rights, the litigation could be expensive and could divert our management resources.

Confidentiality arrangements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our technology, business operations and business plans. In order to protect our trade secrets and proprietary information, we rely in significant part on confidentiality arrangements with our employees, licensees, independent contractors, advisers, channel partners, resellers and customers. These arrangements may not be effective to prevent disclosure of confidential information, including trade secrets, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, if others independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, we would not be able to assert trade secret rights against such parties. Effective trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our services are available or where we have employees or independent contractors. The loss of trade secret protection could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products by copying functionality. In addition, any changes in, or unexpected interpretations of, the trade secret and employment laws in any country in which we operate may compromise our ability to enforce our trade secret and intellectual property rights. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that our employees or contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employees or other parties.

We could in the future be subject to claims that employees or contractors, or we, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of our

 

33


Table of Contents

competitors or other parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending against such claims, a court could order us to pay substantial damages and prohibit us from using technologies or features that are essential to our products, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of these parties. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to develop, market and support potential products or enhancements, which could severely harm our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, such litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

We license technology from third parties, and our inability to maintain those licenses could harm our business.

We incorporate technology, including software, that we license from third parties into our products. We cannot be certain that our licensors are not infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties or that our licensors have sufficient rights to the licensed intellectual property in all jurisdictions in which we may sell our products. Some of our agreements with our licensors may be terminated for convenience by them. If we are unable to continue to license any of this technology because of intellectual property infringement claims brought by third parties against our licensors or against us, or if we are unable to continue our license agreements or enter into new licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to develop and sell products containing that technology would be severely limited, and our business could be harmed. Additionally, if we are unable to license necessary technology from third parties, we may be forced to acquire or develop alternative technology of lower quality or performance standards. This would limit and delay our ability to offer new or competitive products and increase our costs of production. As a result, our margins, market share and operating results could be significantly harmed.

The use of open source software in our offerings may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property.

Open source software is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable. Certain open source software licenses require a user who intends to distribute the open source software as a component of the user’s software to disclose publicly part or all of the source code to the user’s software. In addition, certain open source software licenses require the user of such software to make any derivative works of the open source code available to others on unfavorable terms or at no cost. This can subject previously proprietary software to open source license terms.

We monitor and control our use of open source software in an effort to avoid unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to successfully commercialize our products and believe that our compliance with the obligations under the various applicable licenses has mitigated the risks that we have triggered any such conditions or restrictions. However, such use may have inadvertently occurred in the development and offering of our products. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source software into software that we have licensed from such third party, we could be subject to the obligations and requirements of the applicable open source software licenses. This could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The terms of many open source software licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that those licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to successfully commercialize our products. For example, certain open source software licenses may be interpreted to require that we offer our products that use the open source software for no cost; that we make available the source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating or using the open source

 

34


Table of Contents

software (or that we grant third parties the right to decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, or otherwise derive such source code); that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of the particular open source license; or that otherwise impose limitations, restrictions or conditions on our ability to use, license, host, or distribute our products in a manner that limits our ability to successfully commercialize our products.

We could, therefore, be subject to claims alleging that we have not complied with the restrictions or limitations of the applicable open source software license terms or that our use of open source software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. In that event, we could incur significant legal expenses, be subject to significant damages, be enjoined from further sale and distribution of our products that use the open source software, be required to pay a license fee, be forced to reengineer our products, or be required to comply with the foregoing conditions of the open source software licenses (including the release of the source code to our proprietary software), any of which could adversely affect our business. Even if these claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor or without significant cash settlements, the time and resources necessary to resolve them could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation.

Additionally, the use of open source software can lead to greater risks than the use of third-party commercial software, as open source software does not come with warranties or other contractual protections regarding indemnification, infringement claims or the quality of the code.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and this Offering

Our stock price may be volatile and investors in our common stock may be unable to sell their shares at or above the price at which they were purchased.

The trading prices of the securities of technology companies, including technology companies in the industry in which we operate, have been highly volatile and the market price of our common stock may decline below the offering price in this offering. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:

 

    price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

 

    volatility in the market price and trading volume of comparable companies;

 

    actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of securities analysts;

 

    announcements of technological innovations, new products, strategic alliances, or significant agreements by us or by our competitors;

 

    announcements by our customers regarding significant increases or decreases in capital expenditures;

 

    departure of key personnel;

 

    litigation involving us or that may be perceived as having an impact on our business;

 

    changes in general economic, industry and market conditions and trends, including the economic slowdown in China that began in 2015 and the uncertainty arising from the June 2016 referendum vote in the United Kingdom in favor of exiting from the European Union;

 

    investors’ general perception of us;

 

    sales of large blocks of our stock; and

 

    announcements regarding further industry consolidation.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Because of the potential volatility

 

35


Table of Contents

of our stock price, we may become the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Our quarterly operating results or other operating metrics may fluctuate significantly, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

Our quarterly operating results and other operating metrics have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. We expect that this trend will continue as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including:

 

    the level of demand for our products and our ability to maintain and increase our customer base;

 

    the timing and success of new product introductions by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive landscape of our market;

 

    the mix of products sold in a quarter;

 

    export control laws or regulations that could impede our ability to sell our products to ZTE or any of its affiliates or other customers in certain foreign jurisdictions;

 

    pricing pressure as a result of competition or otherwise or price discounts negotiated by our customers;

 

    delays or disruptions in our supply or manufacturing chain;

 

    our ability to reduce manufacturing costs;

 

    errors in our forecasting of the demand for our products, which could lead to lower revenue or increased costs;

 

    seasonal buying patterns of some of our customers;

 

    introduction of new products, with initial sales at relatively small volumes with resulting higher product costs;

 

    increases in and timing of sales and marketing, research and development and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;

 

    insolvency, credit, or other difficulties faced by our customers, affecting their ability to purchase or pay for our products;

 

    insolvency, credit, or other difficulties confronting our suppliers and contract manufacturers leading to disruptions in our supply or distribution chain;

 

    levels of product returns and contractual price protection rights;

 

    adverse litigation judgments, settlements or other litigation-related costs;

 

    product recalls, regulatory proceedings or other adverse publicity about our products;

 

    fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;

 

    costs related to the acquisition of businesses, talent, technologies or intellectual property, including potentially significant amortization costs and possible write-downs; and

 

    general economic conditions in either domestic or international markets.

Any one of the factors above or the cumulative effect of some of the factors above may result in significant fluctuations in our operating results.

The variability and unpredictability of our quarterly operating results or other operating metrics could result in our failure to meet our expectations or those of any analysts that cover us or investors in our common stock with respect to revenue or other operating results for a particular period. If we fail to meet or exceed such expectations for these or any other reasons, the market price of our common stock could fall substantially, and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

 

36


Table of Contents

We will have broad discretion in the use of the proceeds of this offering and may not use them effectively.

Our management will have broad discretion to use our net proceeds from this offering, and you will be relying on the judgment of our management regarding the application of these proceeds. We expect to use the proceeds of this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Because we will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, our management may fail to apply these funds effectively, which could adversely affect our ability to operate and grow our business. You will not have the opportunity to influence our decisions on how to use our net proceeds from this offering.

If securities or industry analysts cease publishing, research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, the price of our stock and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by industry or financial analysts. If no or few analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price of our stock would likely decrease. Even if we do obtain analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Purchasers in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of their investment as a result of this offering.

If you purchase common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution of $        per share, representing the difference between the assumed public offering price of $        per share, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on                 , 2016, and our as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering. Moreover, we issued warrants and options in the past to acquire common stock at prices significantly below the assumed public offering price. As of September 15, 2016, there were 245,000 shares subject to outstanding warrants with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.61 per share and 2,734,453 shares subject to outstanding options with a weighted-average exercise price of $6.10 per share and 2,493,840 shares subject to outstanding restricted stock units, or RSUs. To the extent that these outstanding warrants or options are ultimately exercised, and these outstanding RSUs vest and are settled, you will incur further dilution.

Because we do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, returns to investors in our common stock will be limited to any increase in the value of our common stock.

You should not rely on an investment in our common stock to provide dividend income. We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we plan to retain any earnings to maintain and expand our existing operations. Accordingly, investors in our common stock must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any return on their investment. As a result, investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

 

37


Table of Contents

Insiders will continue to have substantial control over us after this offering, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.

After this offering, our directors and executive officers and entities with which they are affiliated will beneficially own, in the aggregate, more than     % of our outstanding common stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock in this offering. As a result, in the event these stockholders acted together, they could have significant influence over the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and over the management and affairs of our company. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company and might affect the market price of our common stock.

Some of these persons or entities may have interests different than yours. For example, because many of these stockholders purchased their shares at prices substantially below the price at which shares are being sold in this offering and have held their shares for a longer period, they may be more interested in selling our company to an acquirer than other investors or may want us to pursue strategies that deviate from the interests of other stockholders.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the public market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time after the expiration of the lock-up agreements described in the “Underwriting” section of this prospectus. These sales, or the market perception that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. After the closing of this offering, we will have             shares of common stock outstanding based on the number of shares outstanding as of September 15, 2016. This includes the              shares that we are selling in this offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately. Of the remaining              shares,              shares or     % of our outstanding shares after this offering, are currently, and will be following the closing of this offering, restricted as a result of securities laws or lock-up agreements but will be able to be sold, subject to any applicable volume limitations under federal securities laws with respect to affiliate sales, in the near future as set forth below. The remaining              shares or     % of our outstanding shares after this offering are unrestricted.

 

Number of Shares and Percentage of Total Outstanding

  

Date Available for Sale Into Public Market

             shares, or     %

   On the date of this prospectus

             shares, or     %

   On November 9, 2016

             shares, or     %

   90 days after the date of this prospectus due to lock-up agreements between the holders of these shares and the underwriters or between the holders of these shares and us. However, the underwriters can waive the provisions of these lock-up agreements and allow these stockholders to sell their shares at any time.

In addition, approximately 31,425,067 shares are subject to lock-up agreements entered into in connection with our initial public offering. These lock-up agreements were originally set to expire on November 8, 2016. However, the underwriters from our initial public offering have consented to partially release these lock-up restrictions with respect to the selling stockholders to permit them to sell up to                  shares (including the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares) in this offering,

 

38


Table of Contents

including                  shares beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers or entities with which they are affiliated. The underwriters from our initial public offering have also consented to partially release the lock-up restrictions with respect to approximately 435,000 shares held by our employees who are not executive officers, which represents approximately 10% of the shares held by such employees, effective as of the day immediately succeeding the closing of this offering, and such shares will be eligible for sale in the public market following such time subject to our insider trading policies and procedures and any other applicable limitations. See “Management—Executive Officers, Directors and Significant Employees” for additional information.

In addition, as of September 15, 2016, there were 245,000 shares subject to outstanding warrants, 2,734,453 shares subject to outstanding options, 2,493,840 shares subject to outstanding RSUs, and an additional 2,603,140 shares reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans that will become eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by any applicable vesting requirements, lock-up agreements and the restrictions imposed on our affiliates under Rule 144. Moreover, after this offering, holders of an aggregate of                  shares of our common stock as of September 15, 2016, will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our common stock.

Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares of our common stock. These provisions may also prevent or delay attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management. Our corporate governance documents include provisions:

 

    establishing a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms so that not all members of our board are elected at one time;

 

    providing that directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause and only with a vote of the holders of at least 75% of the issued and outstanding shares of voting stock;

 

    limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special meetings and to take action by written consent in lieu of a meeting;

 

    requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors;

 

    authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; and

 

    limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding voting stock from engaging in certain business combinations with us. Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated by-laws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors in our common stock are willing to pay for our common stock.

 

39


Table of Contents

The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors in our common stock might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common stock in an acquisition.

Our restated certificate provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our restated certificate provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are currently an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are currently an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted, and intend, to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements. In this prospectus, we have not included all of the executive compensation related information that would be required if we were not an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Accordingly, we will incur additional costs in connection with complying with the accounting standards applicable to public companies and may incur further costs when the accounting standards are revised and updated.

 

40


Table of Contents

Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.

Most members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to being a public company subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our management team and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

As a public company, and particularly after we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” we will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or NASDAQ. These requirements have increased and will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and have made and will continue to make some activities more time consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting annually and the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures quarterly. In particular, beginning in 2018, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, will require us to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm potentially to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

We are currently evaluating our internal controls, identifying and remediating deficiencies in those internal controls and documenting the results of our evaluation, testing and remediation. As an emerging growth company, we avail ourselves of the exemption from the requirement that our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. However, we may no longer avail ourselves of this exemption when we cease to be an emerging growth company. When our independent registered public accounting firm is required to undertake an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, the cost of our compliance with Section 404 will correspondingly increase. Our compliance with applicable provisions of Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management time on compliance-related issues as we implement additional corporate governance practices and comply with reporting requirements. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 applicable to us in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

 

41


Table of Contents

Furthermore, investor perceptions of our company may suffer if deficiencies are found, and this could cause a decline in the market price of our stock. Irrespective of compliance with Section 404, any failure of our internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our stated operating results and harm our reputation. If we are unable to implement these requirements effectively or efficiently, it could harm our operations, financial reporting, or financial results and could result in an adverse opinion on our internal controls from our independent registered public accounting firm.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expense and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

 

42


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this prospectus are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Some of the key factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations include:

 

    our expectations regarding our expenses and revenue, our ability to maintain and expand gross profit, the sufficiency of our cash resources and needs for additional financing;

 

    our anticipated growth strategies;

 

    our expectations regarding competition;

 

    the anticipated trends and challenges in our business and the market in which we operate;

 

    our expectations regarding, and the stability of our, supply chain and manufacturing;

 

    the scope, progress, expansion, and costs of developing and commercializing our products;

 

    the size and growth of the potential markets for our products and the ability to serve those markets;

 

    the rate and degree of market acceptance of any of our products;

 

    our ability to establish and maintain development partnerships;

 

    our ability to attract or retain key personnel;

 

    our expectations regarding federal, state and foreign regulatory requirements, including export controls, tax law changes and interpretations, economic sanctions and anti-corruption regulations;

 

    regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries, including under export control laws or regulations that could impede our ability to sell our products to our customer ZTE or any of its affiliates or other customers in certain foreign jurisdictions;

 

    our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our products; and

 

    our use of proceeds from this offering.

Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein until after we distribute this prospectus, whether as a result of any new information, future events or otherwise.

 

43


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $        million, assuming a public offering price of $        per share, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on                 , 2016, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders.

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. In addition, we believe that opportunities may exist from time to time to expand our current business through acquisitions of or investments in complementary products, technologies or businesses. While we have no current agreements, commitments or understandings for any specific acquisitions at this time, we may use a portion of our net proceeds for these purposes.

Pending use of the proceeds as described above, we intend to invest the proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade securities, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government. The goal with respect to the investment of these net proceeds will be capital preservation and liquidity so that these funds are readily available to fund our operations.

 

44


Table of Contents

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ACIA” since May 13, 2016. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low intraday sales prices per share of our common stock, as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market, for the periods indicated.

 

     Price Range  
     High      Low  

2016

     

Quarter ended June 30, 2016(1)

   $ 45.75       $ 27.05   

Quarter ending September 30, 2016 (through September 23, 2016)

   $ 128.73       $ 39.29   

 

(1) Our common stock began trading on May 13, 2016.

The closing sale price per share of our common stock, as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market, on September 23, 2016 was $119.34. As of September 15, 2016, there were 128 holders of record of our common stock.

 

45


Table of Contents

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid any dividends on our capital stock. We intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare dividends will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and applicable law, and will depend on various factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, prospects and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

 

46


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of June 30, 2016, as follows:

 

    on an actual basis;

 

    on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of                  shares of our common stock in this offering based upon an assumed public offering price of $        per share, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on                 , 2016, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

You should read this information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and other financial information contained in this prospectus.

 

     As of June 30, 2016  
                     Actual                                   As Adjusted               
    

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 159,009      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding, actual and as adjusted

               

Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 150,000,000 shares authorized, 35,658,911 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 150,000,000 shares authorized,                  shares issued and outstanding as adjusted

     4      

Additional paid-in capital

     181,747      

Retained earnings

     39,532         39,532   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     221,283      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total capitalization

   $ 221,283      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The table above is illustrative only and does not include:

 

    2,733,737 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding under our equity incentive plans as of June 30, 2016, with a weighted-average exercise price of $5.21 per share;

 

    2,392,378 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs outstanding under our equity incentive plans as of June 30, 2016;

 

    245,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2016, with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.61 per share; and

 

    2,744,802 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, including 2,044,802 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, and 700,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for automatic annual increases in the number of shares reserved thereunder, as more fully described in “Executive Compensation—Stock Option and Other Compensation Plans.”

 

47


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectusThe consolidated statements of operations data presented below for the year ended December 31, 2013 have been derived from our audited financial statements not appearing in this prospectusThe consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2016, are derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectusThe unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statementsOur historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future period and the results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the full yearYou should read the following selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2013     2014     2015     2015     2016  
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

          

Revenue

   $ 77,652      $ 146,234      $ 239,056      $ 105,090      $ 200,681   

Cost of revenue(1)

     47,983        93,558        145,350        68,081        111,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     29,669        52,676        93,706        37,009        89,358   

Operating expenses:

          

Research and development(1)

     24,248        28,471        38,645        16,723        37,253   

Sales, general and administrative(1)

     5,099        6,615        13,124        5,055        12,703   

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     745        108                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     30,092        35,194        51,769        21,778        49,956   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from operations

     (423     17,482        41,937        15,231        39,402   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other (expense) income, net

     (770     (1,029     (2,132     (1,408     (3,411
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

     (1,193     16,453        39,805        13,823        35,991   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            2,933        (715     4,779        3,796   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

     (1,193     13,520        40,520        9,044        32,195   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders—basic(2)

   $ (4,971   $ 1,728      $ 7,597      $ 1,419      $ 13,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders —diluted(2)

   $ (4,971   $ 1,728      $ 7,597      $ 1,419      $ 13,006   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders(2):

          

Basic

   $ (1.12   $ 0.31      $ 1.18      $ 0.23      $ 0.95   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   $ (1.12   $ 0.23      $ 0.91      $ 0.18      $ 0.77   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares used to compute net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:

          

Basic

     4,429        5,629        6,429        6,274        13,751   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

     4,429        7,447        8,311        7,973        16,927   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Operational and Financial Data:

          

Non-GAAP gross profit(3)

   $ 29,694      $ 52,693      $ 93,781      $ 37,027      $ 90,050   

Non-GAAP income from operations(3)

   $ 1,081      $ 17,889      $ 42,762      $ 15,546      $ 48,863   

Non-GAAP net income(3)

   $ 405      $ 14,410      $ 32,310      $ 10,979      $ 43,452   

Adjusted EBITDA(3)

   $ 3,550      $ 20,395      $ 47,495      $ 17,669      $ 52,605   

 

48


Table of Contents
     December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2015
     June 30,
2016
 
     (in thousands)  

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

       

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 21,128      $ 27,610       $ 159,009   

Working capital

     31,710        55,147         189,519   

Total assets

     65,660        130,744         296,225   

Long-term debt, including current portion

     2,115                  

Total liabilities

     28,409        51,948         74,942   

Redeemable convertible preferred stock

     66,427        70,780           

Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity

     (29,176     8,016         221,283   

 

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense related to options granted to employees and others as follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
         2013              2014              2015              2015              2016      
     (in thousands)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 25       $ 17       $ 75       $ 18       $ 692   

Research and development

     960         258         561         218         5,578   

Sales, general and administrative

     519         132         189         79         3,191   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation

   $ 1,504       $ 407       $ 825       $ 315       $ 9,461   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(2) See Notes 2, 3, and 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for an explanation of the calculations of our net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted.
(3) See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for information regarding our use of these non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of such measures to their nearest GAAP equivalents.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we monitor and consider non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP income from operations, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share and adjusted EBITDA, which are non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and are not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures presented by other companies.

Non-GAAP gross profit.    We define non-GAAP gross profit as gross profit as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, excluding the impact of stock-based compensation, which is a non-cash charge. We have presented non-GAAP gross profit because we believe that the exclusion of stock-based compensation allows for more accurate comparisons of our results of operations to other companies in our industry.

Non-GAAP income from operations.    We define non-GAAP income from operations as income from operations as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, excluding the impact of stock-based compensation. We have presented non-GAAP income from operations because we believe that the exclusion of stock-based compensation allows for more accurate comparisons of our results of operations to other companies in our industry.

Non-GAAP net income.    We define non-GAAP net income as net income as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, excluding the impact of stock-based compensation and preferred stock warrant liability, both of which are non-cash charges, and the effect of an income tax benefit related to the release and reversal of a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets and the tax impact on those excluded items. We have presented non-GAAP net income because we believe that the exclusion of stock-based compensation, preferred stock warrant liability and the reversal of the valuation allowance allows for more accurate comparisons of our results of operations to other companies in our industry.

 

49


Table of Contents

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share.     Prior to our initial public offering, in order to calculate non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, we used a non-GAAP weighted-average share count. We defined non-GAAP weighted-average shares used to compute non-GAAP diluted earnings per share as GAAP weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders, adjusted to reflect the conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock and the conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants into common stock warrants, both as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Upon the closing of our initial public offering during the second quarter of 2016, all of our outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock converted into common stock, and our redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants converted into common stock warrants. As a result, for the forecasted results for the three months ending September 30, 2016, adjustments related to the preferred stock and warrants were no longer required. We have presented non-GAAP diluted earnings per share because we believe that the exclusion of stock-based compensation, the change in fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability, and the conversion of preferred stock, allows for more accurate comparisons of our results of operations to other companies in our industry.

Adjusted EBITDA.    We define adjusted EBITDA as our net income excluding stock-based compensation and preferred stock warrant liability; interest expense; depreciation; and our provision for income taxes. We have presented adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, to establish budgets and to develop operational goals for managing our business. In particular, we believe that the exclusion of the expenses eliminated in calculating adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our core operating performance.

We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our operating performance and trends and make planning decisions. We believe that each of these non-GAAP financial measures help identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the expenses that we exclude. Accordingly, we believe that these financial measures provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results, enhancing the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects, and allowing for greater transparency with respect to key financial metrics used by our management in its financial and operational decision-making.

Our non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation of, or as an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures rather than gross profit, (loss) income from operations, net (loss) income or diluted earnings per share, which are the nearest GAAP equivalents. Some of these limitations are:

 

    we exclude stock-based compensation expense from each of our non-GAAP financial measures, as it has recently been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense for our business and an important part of our compensation strategy;

 

    we exclude the revaluation of our preferred stock warrant liability from our non-GAAP net income and adjusted EBITDA measures, as it has historically been a recurring non-cash charge but it will not recur in the periods following the completion of this offering;

 

    adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation expense and, although these are non-cash expenses, the assets being depreciated may have to be replaced in the future;

 

    adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest, which reduces cash available to us;

 

    adjusted EBITDA does not reflect income tax payments that reduce cash available to us; and

 

50


Table of Contents
    the expenses and other items that we exclude in our calculation of adjusted EBITDA may differ from the expenses and other items, if any, that other companies may exclude from adjusted EBITDA when they report their operating results.

We believe that providing these non-GAAP measures to our investors, in addition to providing the corresponding income statement measures, provides investors the benefit of viewing our performance using the same financial metrics that our management team uses in making many key decisions and evaluating how our results of operations may look in the future. Our management does not believe that items not involving cash expenditures, such as non-cash compensation related to stock options and redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability costs derived from mark-to-market adjustments, are part of our critical decision making process. Therefore, we exclude those items from non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP income from operations, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share and adjusted EBITDA.

Because of these limitations, adjusted EBITDA should be considered along with other operating and financial performance measures presented in accordance with GAAP.

Our non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results under GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures versus their nearest GAAP equivalents. Non-GAAP gross profit, income from operations, net income and diluted earnings per share are not substitutes for gross profit, (loss) income from operations, net (loss) income or diluted earnings per share. In addition, other companies may calculate non-GAAP financial measures differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures as tools for comparison. Adjusted EBITDA excludes some costs, namely, non-cash stock-based compensation, interest expense and provision for income taxes, which are recurring, and therefore does not reflect the non-cash impact of stock-based compensation or working capital needs that will continue for the foreseeable future.

The following tables reconcile the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to each of these non-GAAP financial measures.

 

     Year Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
           2013                 2014                 2015                 2015                 2016        
     (in thousands)  

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

          

Gross profit

   $ 29,669      $ 52,676      $ 93,706      $ 37,009      $ 89,358   

Stock-based compensation—cost of revenue

     25        17        75        18        692   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP gross profit

   $ 29,694      $ 52,693      $ 93,781      $ 37,027      $ 90,050   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP gross profit margin

     38.2     36.0     39.2     35.2     44.9

 

     Year Ended December 31,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
           2013                 2014                  2015                  2015                  2016        
     (in thousands)  

Non-GAAP Income from Operations

             

(Loss) income from operations

   $ (423   $ 17,482       $ 41,937       $ 15,231       $ 39,402   

Stock-based compensation

     1,504        407         825         315         9,461   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income from operations

   $ 1,081      $ 17,889       $ 42,762       $ 15,546       $ 48,863   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

51


Table of Contents
     Year Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
           2013                 2014                  2015                 2015                  2016        
     (in thousands)  

Non-GAAP Net Income

            

Net (loss) income

   $ (1,193   $ 13,520       $ 40,520      $ 9,044       $ 32,195   

Stock-based compensation

     1,504        407         825        315         9,461   

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability

     94        483         2,154        1,443         3,361   

Reversal of valuation allowance

                    (11,142               

Tax effect of excluded items

                    (47     177         (1,565
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income

   $ 405      $ 14,410       $ 32,310      $ 10,979       $ 43,452   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
           2013                 2014                  2015                 2015                  2016        
     (in thousands)  

Adjusted EBITDA

            

Net (loss) income

   $ (1,193   $ 13,520       $ 40,520      $ 9,044       $ 32,195   

Stock-based compensation

     1,504        407         825        315         9,461   

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability

     94        483         2,154        1,443         3,361   

Depreciation

     2,629        2,662         4,576        1,956         3,820   

Interest income (expense), net

     516        390         135        132         (28

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            2,933         (715     4,779         3,796   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 3,550      $ 20,395       $ 47,495      $ 17,669       $ 52,605   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016
 
     Low End
of Range
    High End
of Range
 
     (in thousands)  

Non-GAAP Net Income

    

Net income

   $ 23,400      $ 27,200   

Stock-based compensation

     6,750        6,500   

Tax effect of stock-based compensation

     (750     (700
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP net income

   $ 29,400      $ 33,000   

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016
 
     Low End
of Range
    High End
of Range
 

Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share

    

GAAP diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.58      $ 0.67   

Stock-based compensation

     0.17        0.16   

Tax effect of stock-based compensation

     (0.02     (0.02
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.72      $ 0.81   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    

Weighted-average shares used to compute GAAP and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share

     40,600        40,900   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share amounts in the table above are based on actual values. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

 

52


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectusThe following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefsOur actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statementsFactors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in the section titled “Risk Factors.” In this discussion, we use financial measures that are considered non-GAAP financial measures under Securities and Exchange Commission rulesThese rules require supplemental explanation and reconciliation, which is included elsewhere in this prospectusInvestors should not consider non-GAAP financial measures in isolation from or in substitution for, financial information presented in compliance with GAAP.

Company Overview

Our mission is to deliver high-speed coherent optical interconnect products that transform communications networks, relied upon by cloud infrastructure operators and content and communication service providers, through improvements in performance and capacity and a reduction in associated costs. By converting optical interconnect technology to a silicon-based technology, a process we refer to as the siliconization of optical interconnect, we believe we are leading a disruption that is analogous to the computing industry’s integration of multiple functions into a microprocessor. Our products include a series of low-power coherent digital signal processor application-specific integrated circuits, or DSP ASICs, and silicon photonic integrated circuits, or silicon PICs, which we have integrated into families of optical interconnect modules with transmission speeds ranging from 40 to 400 gigabits per second, or Gbps, for use in long-haul, metro and inter-data center markets. We are also developing optical interconnect modules that will enable transmission speeds of one terabit (1,000 gigabits) per second and more. Our modules perform a majority of the digital signal processing and optical functions in optical interconnects and offer low power consumption, high density and high speeds at attractive price points.

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, we generated 77.7% and 72.6% of our revenue, respectively, from our five largest customers over these periods. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, we generated 79.2% and 79.8% of our revenue, respectively, from our five largest customers.

Key Business Metrics

In addition to the measures presented in our consolidated financial statements, we use the following key business metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions.

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2014      2015      2015      2016  
     (in thousands)  

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

   $ 52,693       $ 93,781       $ 37,027       $ 90,050   

Non-GAAP Income from Operations

   $ 17,889       $ 42,762       $ 15,546       $ 48,863   

Non-GAAP Net Income

   $ 14,410       $ 32,310       $ 10,979       $ 43,452   

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 20,395       $ 47,495       $ 17,669       $ 52,605   

These key business metrics are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see “Selected Consolidated Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for information regarding the limitations

 

53


Table of Contents

of using these financial measures and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP gross profit to gross profit, of non-GAAP income from operations to income from operations, of non-GAAP net income to net income and of adjusted EBITDA to net income, in each case the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Key Factors Affecting our Performance

We believe that our future success will depend on many factors, including our ability to expand sales to our existing customers and add new customers over time. While these areas present significant opportunity, they also present risks that we must manage to ensure successful results. See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of these risks. If we are unable to address these challenges, our business could be adversely affected.

Network Service Provider Investment in High-Speed Optical Equipment.    Cloud and service providers are continuing to invest in higher capacity networks to support the continued growth in demand for data traffic. We believe that 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps coherent optical technologies will continue to replace older technologies in long-haul, metro and inter-data center networks. Our business and results depend on the continued investment by network service providers in these advanced networks.

Expanding Sales to Existing Customer Base.    We expect that a substantial portion of our future sales will be follow-on sales to existing customers. One of our sales strategies is to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction by delivering our products with compelling value propositions. We believe that our current customers present us with significant opportunities for additional product sales given the existing and expected market share of these customers and our prior sales experience with them. We also believe that our customers will continue to design our products into their network equipment products in an effort to maintain and potentially grow their market share over time as growth in the overall market for optical interconnect continues to grow. Our customers have historically shown a high propensity to purchase new products from us over multiple quarters and in many cases over multiple years at increasing volumes. In addition, several of our customers have elected to integrate an increasing number of our products into their network equipment product lines. For example, the eight customers who first purchased products from us in 2011 generated $12.7 million of revenue in 2011 compared to $124.6 million of revenue in 2014 and $174.9 million of revenue in 2015, representing a compound annual growth rate through 2015 of 93%. For the period of 2011 through 2015, these eight customers generated cumulative revenue of $400.7 million.

Adding New Customers.    We believe that the metro and inter-data center markets are still in the early stages of adoption. We intend to add new customers over time by continuing to invest in our technology and business development team to capitalize on these new opportunities. Our products and technology have accelerated the rate at which optical interconnect technology can be easily deployed and designed into newer generation network equipment, thus making it easier to integrate our products across many system applications. Generally, we educate prospective customers in these markets about the technical merits and capabilities of our products, the potential cost savings of our products and the costs of designing and utilizing internally developed solutions. We build relationships with prospective customers at all levels in a customer’s organizational hierarchy. We believe that customer references and our existing customers’ ability to gain market share combined with our product and technology strengths and capabilities have been, and will continue to be, an important factor in winning new business.

Selling More Highly Integrated and Higher-Performance Products.    Our results of operations have been, and we believe will continue to be, affected by our ability to design and sell more highly integrated products with improved performance and increased functionality. We aim to grow our

 

54


Table of Contents

revenue and expand our margins by enabling customers to transition from previously deployed 10 Gbps and 40 Gbps solutions to our 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps modules and demonstrate the value proposition to the growing number of metro and inter-data center network equipment designers and manufacturers. Our ability to sustain our revenue growth and gross margin improvement will depend, in part, upon our continued sales of our newer, more integrated and higher performance products, and our quarterly results of operations can be significantly impacted by the mix of products sold during the period.

Investing in Research and Development for Growth.    We believe that the market for our optical interconnect technology products is still in the early stages of adoption and we intend to continue investing for long-term growth. We expect to continue to invest heavily in coherent digital signal processing, optics integration, silicon photonics, hardware engineering and software, all of which afford ongoing vertical integration of components into our core technologies. By investing in research and development, we believe we will be well positioned to continue to design new products and grow our business and take advantage of our large market opportunity. We expect that our results of operations will be impacted by the timing and size of these investments.

Customer Concentration.    During 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, our five largest customers in each period (which differed by period) accounted for 77.7%, 72.6%, 79.2% and 79.8% of our revenue, respectively. During 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, our largest customer in each period, ZTE Kangxon Telecom Co. Ltd., or ZTE, accounted for 35.4%, 27.6%, 29.0% and 37.9% of our revenue, respectively. On March 8, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security imposed restrictions on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of U.S.-regulated products, software and technology to ZTE, its parent company and two other affiliated entities, which had the effect of preventing us from making any sales to ZTE. On March 24, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a temporary general license suspending the enhanced export licensing requirements for ZTE and one of the designated affiliates through June 30, 2016, thereby enabling us to resume sales to ZTE. On June 28, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce extended the temporary general license through August 30, 2016. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce further extended the temporary general license through November 28, 2016. There can be no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Commerce will extend this temporary general license beyond the November 28, 2016 expiration date or permit any sales to the designated ZTE entities after this temporary general license expires. This or future regulatory activity may interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or other customers. This or future regulatory activity may interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or other customers. We expect continued variability in our customer concentration and timing of sales on a quarterly and annual basis. In addition, we have provided, and may in the future provide, annual and semi-annual pricing reductions and pricing discounts to large volume customers, which may result in lower margins for the period in which such sales occur. Our gross margins may also fluctuate as a result of the timing of such sales and the mix of products sold to large volume customers.

Key Components of our Results of Operations

Revenue

We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of our products within our 100 and 400 Gbps product families, which we sell through our direct sales force. We sell a substantial majority of our products to network equipment manufacturers for ultimate sale to communications and content service providers and data center and cloud infrastructure operators, which we refer to together as cloud and service providers, and we expect network equipment manufacturer customers to be the primary market for our products for the foreseeable future. Our negotiated terms and conditions of sale do not allow for product returns.

 

55


Table of Contents

Our revenue is affected by changes in the number, product mix and average selling prices of our products. We also have experienced declines in revenue in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter due to our customers’ ability to delay or reschedule shipments under the terms of their contracts with us. Our product revenue is typically characterized by a life cycle that begins with sales of pre-production samples and prototypes followed by the sale of early production models with higher average selling prices and lower volumes, followed by broader market adoption, higher volumes, and average selling prices that are lower than initial levels. In addition, our product revenue may be affected by contractual commitments to significant customers that obligate us to reduce the selling price of our products on an annual or semi-annual basis.

Cost of Revenue

Our cost of revenue is comprised primarily of the costs of procuring goods from our contract manufacturers and other suppliers. In addition, cost of revenue includes assembly, test, quality assurance, warranty and logistics-related fees, impacts of manufacturing yield, and costs associated with excess and obsolete inventory.

Personnel-related expenses include salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation, as well as consulting fees for those personnel engaged in the management of our contract manufacturers, new product manufacturing activities, logistical support and manufacturing and test engineering and supply chain management.

Gross Profit

Our gross profit has been, and may in the future be, influenced by several factors including changes in product mix, sales of more highly integrated products, target end markets for our products, pricing due to competitive pressure, and favorable and unfavorable changes in production costs, including global demand for electronic components used in our products. As some products mature and unit volumes increase, the average selling prices of those products may decline. These declines often coincide with improvements in manufacturing yields and lower wafer, component, assembly and test costs, which lower production costs and may offset some of the margin reduction that results from lower selling prices. We anticipate that our newer modules, which integrate our silicon PIC, will contribute higher gross profit over time than some of our older products, because the integration of our silicon PIC into these products eliminates the need for us to purchase several high-cost discrete components for the same level of functionality, thus improving margins on these products. In addition, we plan to shift the manufacturing of some of our high volume products to contract manufacturers located in lower-cost regions, which would decrease the cost of the manufacturing of these products and correspondingly improve margins. Although we primarily procure and sell our products in U.S. dollars, our contract manufacturers incur many costs, including labor and component costs, in other currencies. To the extent that the exchange rates move unfavorably for our contract manufacturers, they may try to pass resulting costs on to us, which could have a material effect on our future average unit costs. Our gross profit may fluctuate from period to period as a result of changes in average selling prices related to new product introductions, existing product transitions into larger scale commercial volumes, maturity of a product within its life cycle, the effect of prototype and sample sales and resulting mix of products within a family of products. In future periods, we may hedge certain significant transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

Operating Expenses

We classify our operating expenses as research and development and sales, general and administrative expenses.

 

   

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary and benefit expenses, including stock-based compensation, for employees and costs for contractors engaged in

 

56


Table of Contents
 

research, design and development activities incurred directly and with support from external vendors, such as outsourced research and development costs, as well as costs for prototypes, depreciation, purchased intellectual property, facilities and travel. In future periods, we may hedge certain significant outsourced research and development transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Over time, we expect our research and development costs to increase in absolute dollars as we continue making significant investments in developing new products and new technologies, including with respect to increased performance and smaller industry-standard form factors.

 

    Sales, general and administrative expenses include salary and benefit expenses, including stock-based compensation, for employees and costs for contractors engaged in sales, marketing, customer service, technical support, and general and administrative activities, as well as the costs of legal expenses, trade shows, marketing programs, promotional materials, bad debt expense, legal and other professional services, facilities, general liability insurance and travel. Over time, we expect our sales, general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars primarily due to our continued growth and the costs of compliance associated with being a public company.

Other (Expense) Income, Net

Other (expense) income, net consists of interest expense associated with our working capital line of credit and term loan, amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount, interest income earned on our cash balances, gain or loss on the revaluation of our redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability, and foreign currency transactions gains and losses. To date, we have not utilized derivatives to hedge our foreign exchange risk as we believe the risk to be immaterial to our results of operations. In future periods, we may hedge certain significant transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as we expand our international operations.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions in which we do business. These foreign jurisdictions have statutory tax rates different from those in the United States. Our effective tax rates will vary depending on the relative proportion of foreign to U.S. income, the utilization of foreign tax credits, changes in corporate structure, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax laws and interpretations. We plan to regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes that could result from the examination of our tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and other tax authorities to determine the adequacy of our income tax reserves and expense. Should actual events or results differ from our then-current expectations, charges or credits to our provision for income taxes may become necessary. Any such adjustments could have a significant effect on our results of operations.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, we began the process of restructuring our international operations and, as a result, we expect that our future effective tax rates may be lower than our historical rate; however, the extent to which we realized the benefits of such reduction in the fourth quarter of 2015 was immaterial.

 

57


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations for the periods shown:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,,
 
     2014     2015     2015     2016  
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

        

Revenue

   $ 146,234      $ 239,056      $ 105,090      $ 200,681   

Cost of revenue(1)

     93,558        145,350        68,081        111,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     52,676        93,706        37,009        89,358   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

        

Research and development(1)

     28,471        38,645        16,723        37,253   

Sales, general and administrative(1)

     6,615        13,124        5,055        12,703   

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

     108                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     35,194        51,769        21,778        49,956   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

     17,482        41,937        15,231        39,402   

Other (expense) income:

        

Interest (expense) income, net

     (390     (135     (132     28   

Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability

     (483     (2,154     (1,443     (3,361

Other (expense) income

     (156     157        167        (78
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense, net

     (1,029     (2,132     (1,408     (3,411
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     16,453        39,805        13,823        35,991   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     2,933        (715     4,779        3,796   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 13,520      $ 40,520      $ 9,044      $ 32,195   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data was as follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
         2014              2015              2015              2016      
     (in thousands)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 17       $ 75       $ 18       $ 692   

Research and development

     258         561         218         5,578   

Sales, general and administrative

     132         189         79         3,191   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation

   $ 407       $ 825       $ 315       $ 9,461   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

58


Table of Contents
     Year Ended
December 31,
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2014     2015     2015     2016  

Revenue

     100     100     100     100

Cost of revenue

     64        61        65        55   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     36        39        35        45   

Operating expenses:

        

Research and development

     19        16        16        19   

Selling, general and administrative

     5        5        5        6   

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

                            
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     24        21        21        25   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

     12        18        14        20   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense, net

     (1     (1     (1     (2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

     11        17        13        18   

Income tax (benefit) provision

     2               5        2   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

     9     17     9     16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Percentages in the table above are based on actual values. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenue

Revenue and the related changes during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
     Change in  
     2015      2016      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Revenue

   $ 105,090       $ 200,681       $ 95,591         91

Revenue increased by $95.6 million, or 91%, to $200.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $105.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $64.2 million net increase in revenue from sales of products within our 100 Gbps product family and $31.9 million in revenue attributable to the introduction of new products in our 400 Gbps product family. These increases in revenue were partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in revenue from sales of products within our 40 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings.

Our product sales based on the geographic region of our customers’ delivery location are as follows:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
     As a %
of Total
Revenue
    Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
     As a %
of Total
Revenue
    Change in  
               $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Americas

   $   18,766         18   $   43,753         22   $ 24,987         133

EMEA

       51,328         49       58,188         29       6,860         13

APAC

       34,996         33       98,740         49     63,744         182
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total revenue

   $ 105,090         100   $ 200,681         100   $ 95,591         91
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

59


Table of Contents

Americas

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in the Americas increased by $25.0 million, or 133%, to $43.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $18.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $13.3 million net increase in sales of products within our 100 Gbps product family and an $11.7 million increase in sales due to the introduction of new products in our 400 Gbps product family.

Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in EMEA increased by $6.9 million, or 13%, to $58.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $51.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $4.9 million net increase in sales of products within our 100 Gbps product family and a $2.5 million increase in sales due to the introduction of new products in our 400 Gbps product family. These increases in revenue were partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in revenue from sales of products within our 40 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings.

Asia Pacific

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in APAC increased by $63.7 million, or 182%, to $98.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $35.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $46.0 million net increase in sales of products within our 100 Gbps product family and a $17.7 million increase in sales due to the introduction of new products in our 400 Gbps product family.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
    Change in  
     2015     2016     $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 68,081      $ 111,323      $ 43,242         64

Gross profit percentage

     35.2     44.5     

Cost of revenue increased $43.2 million, or 64%, to $111.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $68.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to the increased volume of products sold from our 100 Gbps product family and the introduction of our 400 Gbps family, partially offset by a volume decline in our 40 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings.

Our gross profit percentage increased to 44.5% in the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 35.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to the favorable effects of product mix within our 100 Gbps product family and the introduction of products in our 400 Gbps product family.

Research and Development

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
     Change in  
     2015      2016      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Research and development

   $ 16,723       $ 37,253       $ 20,530         123

 

60


Table of Contents

Research and development expense increased $20.5 million, or 123%, to $37.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $16.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, due to an $11.2 million increase in personnel-related and other costs as well as a $5.5 million increase in outsourced development costs, and a $3.8 million increase in prototype development costs, each to support our new product development initiatives. The increase in personnel-related costs was primarily attributable to a $5.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense driven by RSUs that included a performance condition which was met upon completion of our initial public offering.

Sales, General and Administrative

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
     Change in  
     2015      2016      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Sales, general and administrative

   $ 5,055       $ 12,703       $ 7,648         151

Sales, general and administrative expenses increased $7.6 million, or 151%, to $12.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $5.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, due to a $6.7 million increase in personnel-related and other costs, and a $0.9 million increase in professional services expense, primarily all of which was associated with preparing to be a public company. The increase in personnel-related costs was primarily attributable to a $3.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense driven by RSUs that included a performance condition which was met upon completion of our initial public offering.

Other Expense, Net

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
     Change in  
     2016      2015      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Total other expense, net

   $ (1,408    $ (3,411    $ (2,003      142

Total other expense, net, increased by $2.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The loss associated with the revaluation of our preferred stock warrant liability increased $2.0 million, from $1.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 to $3.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016. In connection with the closing of our initial public offering in May 2016, the outstanding preferred stock warrants automatically converted into common stock warrants. Accordingly, the preferred stock warrant liability was reclassified to additional paid-in capital and revaluation of the preferred stock warrants will not be required in subsequent periods.

Provision for Income Taxes

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
    Change in  
     2016     2015     $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Provision for income taxes

   $ 4,779      $ 3,796      $ (983      (21 )% 

Effective tax rate

     35     11     

Provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $3.8 million compared to $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate of 24% primarily resulted from a decrease in the foreign rate differential due to the jurisdictional mix of profits under our corporate structure.

 

61


Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Revenue

Revenue and the related changes during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 were as follows:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     Change in  
     2014      2015      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Revenue

   $ 146,234       $ 239,056       $ 92,822         63

Revenue increased by $92.8 million, or 63%, from $146.2 million in 2014 to $239.1 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to $92.4 million and $11.0 million of revenue attributable to new product introductions within our 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps product families, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a $6.4 million decrease in sales of existing products in our 100 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings, and a $4.2 million decrease in revenue from sales of products in our 40 Gbps product family, which has reached the end of its volume life cycle.

Our product sales based on the geographic region of our customers’ delivery location are as follows:

 

     Year Ended
December 31, 2014
     As a %
of Total
Revenue
    Year Ended
December 31, 2015
     As a %
of Total
Revenue
    Change in  
               $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)  

Americas

   $   32,109         22   $   46,624         20   $ 14,515         45

EMEA

       60,101         41     103,150         43     43,049         72

APAC

       54,024         37       89,282         37     35,258         65
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenue

   $ 146,234         100   $ 239,056         100   $ 92,822         63
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Americas

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in the Americas increased by $14.5 million, or 45%, from $32.1 million in 2014 to $46.6 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to $22.5 million and $2.9 million of revenue attributable to new product introductions within our 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps product families, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a $10.9 million decrease in sales of existing products in our 100 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings.

Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in EMEA increased by $43.0 million, or 72%, from $60.1 million in 2014 to $103.2 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $24.7 million increase in sales for existing products within our 100 Gbps product family and $21.7 million and $0.8 million of revenue attributable to new product introductions within our 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps product families, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease in sales of products in our 40 Gbps product family, which has reached the end of its volume life cycle.

Asia Pacific

Revenue from product sales to customers with delivery locations in APAC increased by $35.3 million, or 65%, from $54.0 million in 2014 to $89.3 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to

 

62


Table of Contents

$48.2 million and $7.3 million of revenue attributable to new product introductions within our 100 Gbps and 400 Gbps product families, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a $20.2 million decrease in sales of existing products in our 100 Gbps product family, as customers migrated to new product family offerings.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
    Change in  
     2014     2015     $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)         

Cost of revenue

   $ 93,558      $ 145,350      $ 51,792         55

Gross profit percentage

     36.0     39.2     

Cost of revenue increased $51.8 million, or 55%, from $93.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 to $145.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to the increased volume of products sold from our 100 Gbps product family and the introduction of our 400 Gbps family, partially offset by a volume decline in our 40 Gbps product family, which has reached the end of its volume life cycle.

Our gross profit percentage increased to 39.2% in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 36.0% in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was due to the favorable effects of product mix within our 100 Gbps product family and the introduction of products in our 400 Gbps product family.

Research and Development

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     Change in  
     2014      2015      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)         

Research and development

   $ 28,471       $ 38,645       $ 10,174         36

Research and development expense increased $10.2 million, or 36%, from $28.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 to $38.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, due to a $3.7 million increase in personnel-related and other costs as well as a $3.0 million increase in outsourced development costs, a $1.9 million increase in depreciation expense and a $1.6 million increase in prototype development costs, each to support our new product development initiatives.

Sales, General and Administrative

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     Change in  
     2014      2015      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)         

Sales, general and administrative

   $ 6,615       $ 13,124       $ 6,509         98

Sales, general and administrative expenses increased $6.5 million, or 98%, from $6.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 to $13.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, due to a $3.8 million increase in personnel-related and other costs, and a $2.7 million increase in professional services expense, primarily driven by the activities associated with preparing to be a public company.

 

63


Table of Contents

Other Expense, Net

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
     Change in  
     2014      2015      $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)         

Total other expense, net

   $ (1,029    $ (2,132    $ (1,103      107

Total other expense, net, increased by $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the expense associated with the revaluation of our preferred stock warrant liability increased $1.7 million. This increase in expense was partially offset by a $0.3 million gain on foreign exchange transactions and a $0.3 million decrease in interest expense as a result of our full repayment of our working capital line of credit in October 2014 and our term loan in May 2015.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
    Change in  
     2014     2015     $      %  
     (dollars in thousands)         

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   $ 2,933      $ (715   $ (3,648      (124 )% 

Effective tax rate

     18     (2 )%      

Benefit for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $(0.7) million compared to a provision of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in the provision for income taxes primarily results from the release of $9.9 million of the valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets, primarily related to net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

Refer to our discussion in “—Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” for additional information regarding the release of the valuation allowance.

 

64


Table of Contents

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly consolidated statement of operations data for each three-month period in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2016. In management’s opinion, the data has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus and reflect all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this data. You should read this information together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our operating results may fluctuate due to a variety of factors. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full year or any future period.

 

    March 31,
2014
    June 30,
2014
    September
30, 2014
    December
31, 2014
    March 31,
2015
    June 30,
2015
    September
30, 2015
    December
31, 2015
    March 31,
2016
    June 30,
2016
 

Revenue

  $ 27,291      $ 31,151      $ 46,780      $ 41,012      $ 47,244      $ 57,846      $ 65,419      $ 68,547      $ 84,489        116,192   

Cost of revenue

    18,538        20,307        28,029        26,684        30,640        37,441        40,209        37,060        49,083        62,240   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

    8,753        10,844        18,751        14,328        16,604        20,405        25,210        31,487        35,406        53,952   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

                   

Research and development

    6,675        5,668        7,275        8,853        7,903        8,820        9,604        12,318      $ 15,414        21,839   

Selling, general and administrative

    1,397        1,501        1,642        2,075        2,123        2,932        3,005        5,064        4,054        8,649   

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

                         108                                             
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

    8,072        7,169        8,917        11,036        10,026        11,752        12,609        17,382        19,468        30,488   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

    681        3,675        9,834        3,292        6,578        8,653        12,601        14,105        15,938        23,464   

Other (expense) income:

                   

Interest (expense) income

    (87     (109     (117     (77     (48     (84     (6     3        9        20   

Change in fair value of warrant liability

    (158     (88     (79     (158     (382     (1,061     (370     (341     248        (3,609

Other (expense) income

    (19     (3     (191     57        252        (85     (32     22        (20     (58
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other (expense) income, net

    (264     (200     (387     (178     (178     (1,230     (408     (316     237        (3,647
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes

    417        3,475        9,447        3,114        6,400        7,423        12,193        13,789        16,175        19,817   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    75        623        1,676        559        2,063        2,716        3,354        (8,848     1,577        2,219   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $ 342      $ 2,852      $ 7,771      $ 2,555      $ 4,337      $ 4,707      $ 8,839      $ 22,637      $ 14,598        17,598   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
                   
    March 31,
2014
    June 30,
2014
    September
30, 2014
    December
31, 2014
    March 31,
2015
    June 30,
2015
    September
30, 2015
    December
31, 2015
    March 31,
2016
    June 30,
2016
 

Revenue

    100     100     100     100     100     100     100     100     100     100

Cost of revenue

    68     65     60     65     65     65     61     54     58     54
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

    32     35     40     35     35     35     39     46     42     46

Operating expenses:

                   

Research and development

    25     18     16     22     17     15     15     18     18     19

Selling, general and administrative

    5     5     3     5     4     5     4     7     5     7

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

                                                                     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

    30     23     19     27     21     20     19     25     23     26
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

    2     12     21     8     14     15     20     21     19     20

Total other (expense) income, net

    (1 %)      (1 %)      (1 %)      (1 %)             (2 %)      (1 %)      (1 %)             (3 %) 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes

    1     11     20     7     14     13     19     20     19     17

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    0     2     3     1     5     5     5     (13 )%      2     2
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

    1     9     17     6     9     8     14     33     17     15
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our revenue has generally increased over the periods presented due to increased demand for products in our 100 Gbps product family, as well as the introduction of new products in our 400 Gbps product family. In 2014, we experienced a decline in revenue in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter due to our customers’ ability to delay or reschedule shipments under the terms of their contracts with us, resulting in $4.0 million of anticipated purchases by two customers being delayed to

 

65


Table of Contents

the first quarter of 2015. Our gross profit percentage is primarily driven by product mix within our families of products and trends in the average per unit selling price and cost of our products over their respective product life cycles, including quarterly fluctuations due to contract pricing arrangements. Our gross profit percentage increased to 46% during the second quarter of 2016, compared to 35% during the second quarter of 2016. The increase was due to the favorable effects of product mix within our 100 Gbps product family and the introduction of products in our 400 Gbps product family.

Our operating expenses have generally increased over the periods presented, primarily related to the development of new products, as well as increases in salary and personnel costs resulting from increases in functional headcount to support the growth of our business. The increase in research and development costs was primarily attributable to increased personnel added throughout each of the quarters presented, as well as the timing of outsourced development costs in the fourth quarter of each of 2014 and 2015. Sales, general and administrative expenses have increased over the periods presented primarily due to increases in headcount to support the growth of our business and infrastructure costs in preparation for becoming a public company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

     Year Ended December 31,     Six Months Ended June 30,  

(in thousands)

         2014                 2015                 2015                 2016        

Cash

   $ 21,128      $ 27,610      $ 16,024      $ 159,009   

Working capital

     31,710        55,147        37,726        189,519   

Net cash provided by operating activities

     13,397        22,450        1,788        42,920   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (6,478     (12,116     (4,811     (8,056

Net cash used in (provided by) financing activities

     (6,020     (3,847     (2,078     96,535   

Since fiscal 2014, we have primarily funded our operations through cash generated from operations. In May 2016, we completed our initial public offering in which we received aggregate proceeds of $97.8 million, net of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, before deducting offering costs of approximately $3.8 million. As of June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $159.0 million and accounts receivable of $77.9 million.

We believe our existing cash balances and anticipated cash flow from future operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned and will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and other business initiatives, purchases of capital equipment to support our growth, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, any expansion of our business through acquisitions of or investments in complementary products, technologies or businesses, the use of working capital to purchase additional inventory, the timing of new product introductions, market acceptance of our products and overall economic conditions. To the extent that current and anticipated future sources of liquidity are insufficient to fund our future business activities and requirements, we may be required to seek additional equity or debt financing. In the event additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Working Capital Facility

Prior to June 2, 2016, we maintained a working capital line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, which provided us with access to up to $15.0 million of financing in the form of revolving loans. The working capital line of credit expired by its terms on June 2, 2016 and was not extended.

 

66


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2015 and June 2, 2016, the date the working capital line of credit expired, we were in compliance with all the covenants in the working capital line of credit.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities consists primarily of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation expense, stock-based compensation expense, loss on the change in fair value of our preferred stock warrant liability, and other non-cash charges, net, as well as the effect of changes in working capital.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $1.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $41.1 million was primarily due to a $23.2 million increase in net income, a $12.4 million increase in non-cash expense items primarily consisting of stock-based compensation, depreciation expense and the change in fair value of our preferred stock warrant liability, and a $5.5 million increase in cash related to changes in operating assets and liabilities. Changes in cash flows related to operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of a $14.8 million increase in cash due to the timing of payments associated with our accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a $4.7 million increase in cash due to a decreased inventory balance as compared to December 31, 2015, and a $2.5 million increase related to deferred product costs, partially offset by a $14.9 million decrease in cash due to the timing of accounts receivable collections in the second quarter of 2016, and a $2.6 million decrease in prepaid expense and other assets.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $22.5 million in 2015 as compared to $13.4 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to a $27.0 million increase in net income, partially offset by a $7.3 million decrease in non-cash adjustments primarily consisting of depreciation expense, the change in fair value of our preferred stock warrant liability and the partial release of the valuation allowance, and a $10.7 million decrease in cash related to changes in operating assets and liabilities. Changes in cash flows related to operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of a $17.2 million decrease in cash due to timing of accounts receivable collections in 2015 and a $14.1 million decrease in cash due to an increase in inventory to fulfill sales orders during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, partially offset by a $16.7 million increase in cash due to the timing of payments associated with our accounts payable and accrued liabilities, an increase of $2.7 million in deferred revenue, a $0.8 million increase in prepaid expense and other assets and a $0.4 million increase in other long-term liabilities.

Investing Activities

Our investing activities have consisted primarily of purchases of lab and computer equipment and software to support the development of new products and increase our manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand for existing products. In addition, our investing activities include expansion of, and improvements to, our leased facilities. As our business expands, we expect that we will continue to invest in these areas.

Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $8.1 million, as compared to $4.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to increased purchases of lab equipment to support the development and manufacturing phases of our product life cycles.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2015 was $12.1 million, as compared to $6.5 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to increased purchases of lab equipment to support the development and manufacturing phases of our product life cycles.

 

67


Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Our financing activities have consisted primarily of proceeds received from the completion of our initial public offering, net of issuance costs, cash from borrowings prior to 2014 and, in 2014 and 2015, repayments of short- and long-term borrowings.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $96.5 million, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we completed our initial public offering in which we received aggregate proceeds of $97.8 million, net of underwriters’ discounts and commissions. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, we paid $1.5 million of initial public offering costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the net cash used in financing activities was primarily for the advanced repayment of principal on our long-term debt obligation.

Net cash used in financing activities during 2015 was $3.8 million, as compared to $6.0 million during 2014. The cash used in 2015 primarily consisted of $2.2 million for the advanced repayment of principal on our long-term debt obligation and $1.8 million for the payment of initial public offering costs, partially offset by $0.2 million in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options. During 2014, cash flows used in financing activities consisted of $5.3 million of repayments on our working capital line of credit and $0.8 million of repayment of principal on our long-term debt obligation.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our principal commitments consist of operating lease payments for our facilities and purchase obligations. The following table summarizes these contractual obligations at June 30, 2016. Future events could cause actual payments to differ from these estimates.

 

     Payments due by period  
     Total      Less
than
1 Year
(Remaining
2016)
     1 to 3
Years
(2017

to
2019)
     3 to 5
Years
(2019

to
2021)
     More
than
5 Years
(2021
and
beyond)
 
     (in thousands)  

Operating leases(1)

   $ 22,481       $ 622       $ 6,190       $ 5,857       $ 9,812   

Purchase obligations(2)

     249,267         249,267                           

Unrecognized tax benefits(3)

     964                                   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total(4)

   $ 272,712       $ 249,889       $ 6,190       $ 5,857       $ 9,812   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Our principal facilities are located in Maynard, Massachusetts and Hazlet, New Jersey and are leased under non-cancelable operating leases that expire in January 2019, with respect to the Massachusetts facility, and June 2018 and July 2018, with respect to various floors of the New Jersey facility. We also lease office space in various locations with expiration dates between 2016 and 2020. The lease agreements often include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require us to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or defined rent increases. All of our facility leases are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense is recorded over the lease terms on a straight-line basis. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, rent expense amounted to $709,000, $889,000, $419,000 and $551,000, respectively.

In March 2016, we entered into a lease to relocate the current Hazlet operations to Holmdel, New Jersey which expires in 2021. In April 2016, we entered into a lease to relocate the Maynard operations to another section of the current facility which expires in 2024. Future minimum payments under the leases are included in the table above and below.

 

68


Table of Contents

Future minimum lease payments due under these non-cancelable lease agreements as of June 30, 2016, are as follows (in thousands):

 

Year ending December 31,

   Amounts  

Remaining 2016

   $ 622   

2017

     2,914   

2018

     3,276   

2019

     2,929   

2020

     2,928   

Thereafter

     9,812   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 22,481   
  

 

 

 

In addition to the lease payments, we have committed to approximately $5.0 million of tenant improvements related to the Maynard lease which are expected to be incurred during 2016.

 

(2) Our purchase obligations primarily consist of outstanding purchase orders with our contract manufacturers for inventory and other third parties for the manufacturing of our wafers. Our relationships with these vendors typically allow for the cancellation of outstanding purchase orders, but require payments of all expenses incurred through the date of cancellation. Other obligations include future non-inventory purchases and commitments related to future fixed asset purchases.

 

(3) As of June 30, 2016, we had $1.0 million of liabilities for uncertain tax benefits. We are not able to provide reasonably reliable estimates of future payments relating to these obligations.

 

(4) We incorporate technology into our products that is licensed from third parties. We have not committed to any future minimum obligations under the terms of the technology licensing agreements, and therefore no amounts have been included in the contractual commitments table. We are required to pay royalties to the licensors of $15 to $17 per unit sold within our new 400 Gbps product family and for our newest product within the 100 Gbps product family. In addition, we pay royalties of $150 per unit sold for our older products within the 100 Gbps and 40 Gbps product families. Our 40 Gbps product family has reached the end of its volume life cycle. As the composition of product sales continues to become increasingly weighted toward newer products, we anticipate that our royalty expense will decrease in absolute dollars as compared to the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 as the per unit cost of royalties is less for our newer products. We do not anticipate royalty expense will have a material impact on our results of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, such as the use of unconsolidated subsidiaries, structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a significant effect on our reported revenue, results of operations and net income or loss, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet during and as of the reporting periods. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary because future events and their effects on our results and the value of our assets cannot be determined with certainty, and are made based on our

 

69


Table of Contents

historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur or additional information is obtained, and we may periodically be faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within our control and may not be known for a prolonged period of time. As the use of estimates is inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Our products are fully functional at the time of shipment and do not require production, modification or customization. We recognize revenue from product sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Our fee is considered fixed or determinable at the execution of an agreement, based on specific products and quantities to be delivered at specified prices, which is evidenced by a customer purchase order or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Our agreements with our customers do not include rights of return. Product revenue is recognized upon shipment of product to customers except for instances where title and risk of loss pass to the customer upon delivery or acceptance, where revenue is recognized upon the occurrence of delivery or acceptance, as applicable.

A limited number of revenue arrangements with our customers include more than one element and require the application of ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition—Multiple Element Arrangements. Arrangement consideration is allocated to each element with standalone value based on the relative selling prices of all of the elements in the arrangement using the fair value hierarchy. We determine the relative selling price of elements based on prices charged for standalone products, when sufficiently concentrated, and third-party evidence of similar elements, or, in the absence of these sources of evidence, based on management’s best estimate of selling price. Revenue recognized from multiple-element arrangements accounted for less than 2% of our total revenue during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016.

Inventories

Inventories consist of finished goods and component parts, which are purchased from contract manufacturers and other suppliers. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. Our assessment of market value requires the use of estimates regarding the net realizable value of our inventory balances, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventories. We determine excess and obsolete inventories based on an estimate of the future demand for our products within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months. The estimates used for future demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchases, and are consistent with revenue forecast assumptions. If our demand forecast is greater than actual demand, we may be required to record an excess inventory charge reflected in cost of goods sold, which would decrease gross profit. Any write-downs taken establish a new cost basis for the underlying inventory and cannot be reversed if there are subsequent increases in our demand forecast.

Income Taxes

We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the cumulative difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance when it is not more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized. We recognize the benefit of an uncertain tax position that has been taken or that we expect to take on income tax returns if such tax position is more likely than not to be sustained.

 

70


Table of Contents

We follow the authoritative guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to research tax credits calculated and claimed on federal and state income tax returns. We apply a variety of methodologies in making these estimates, including advice and studies performed by independent subject matter experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the IRS and other taxing authorities, as well as our own industry experience. We provide estimates for unrecognized tax benefits which may be subject to material adjustments until matters are resolved with taxing authorities or statutes expire. If our estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, our results of operations can be materially affected.

A valuation allowance is provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our assessment included a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, as well as objective and subjective. Based on the weight of that evidence, we determined that a valuation allowance is only required against a portion of our deferred tax assets which consist of tax attributes we expect to expire prior to full utilization. Our assessment recognizes that future realization of the tax benefit of an existing deductible temporary difference or carryforward ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period available under applicable tax laws. Four possible sources of taxable income may be available under applicable tax laws to realize a tax benefit for deductible temporary differences and carryforwards:

 

    future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences;

 

    future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;

 

    taxable income in carryback years if permitted under tax law; and

 

    tax planning strategies that would be implemented.

The more objective the evidence, the more robust the basis is likely to be for a decision as to the need for and the amount of any valuation allowance. Two sources of income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and taxable income in prior carryback years, involve objective assessments on which to base a valuation allowance decision. However, the other income sources (e.g., tax planning strategies and especially future taxable income) involve subjective assessments. Assessing subjective income sources involves a review of our capability and willingness to implement certain tax planning strategies that will generate future taxable income and an assessment of our experience in forecasting future taxable income. In addition to assessing positive and negative evidence for the need for a valuation allowance related to these four potential sources of income, we also weighed the objectively verifiable positive and negative sources.

Under ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, examples of positive evidence that might support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed, despite negative evidence, include:

 

    strong earnings history;

 

    unrealized appreciation in assets over their tax basis; and

 

    existing contracts or a firm sales backlog of profitable orders that management expects will produce more than enough future taxable income to utilize the deferred tax asset.

As of December 31, 2015, we were in a significant cumulative three-year book income position in the U.S. in excess of $50 million, and we believe we will have strong future profitability based on our recent financial performance and current projections. We have generated taxable profits in all years beginning in 2013. Our prior losses for tax purposes occurred as we were in our early stages of development. We expect to continue to generate taxable profits in subsequent years.

 

71


Table of Contents

ASC 740-10 requires positive evidence of sufficient quality and quantity to offset such negative evidence in order to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed. Negative evidence includes, among other factors:

 

    cumulative losses incurred in recent years;

 

    history of potential tax attributes expiring unused;

 

    losses expected in the next few years even if the company is currently profitable;

 

    carryback or carryforward periods that are so brief that they would limit the realization of tax benefits; and

 

    uncertainties that, if resolved unfavorably, would adversely affect future operations and profits.

We have not had any history of expiring tax attributes other than Massachusetts net operating losses, which had a five-year carryforward period for losses generated prior to January 1, 2010. We have had cumulative losses in the United States for all years prior to 2014. 2014 was the first year in which we had cumulative profits, totaling $8.5 million, over a three-year period. In assessing this negative evidence, we also considered our expected future results, including the impact of the reorganization of our corporate structure.

After weighing the factors and performing the analysis outlined above, we determined at December 31, 2015 that we would release the valuation allowance against $9.9 million of our U.S. net deferred tax assets. We have a small portion of federal net operating losses and federal research credits that we expect to expire unutilized based on limitations imposed on their utilization. We have also accumulated state research tax credits in a jurisdiction in which we do not anticipate generating tax expense to utilize these credits in future years. We have retained a valuation allowance against these portions of our tax attributes. As of December 31, 2015, we had net deferred tax assets, prior to valuation allowance, of $11.8 million. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $0.6 million against the aforementioned tax attributes, reducing the net deferred tax assets reported to $11.2 million.

As of each reporting date, our management considers new evidence, both positive and negative, that could impact its view with regard to future realization of deferred tax assets. If we determine that our assessments on all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will change in a future period, we will record material adjustments to the provision for income taxes in that period.

We recorded a valuation allowance against all of our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2014 of approximately $12.9 million and $10.5 million, respectively. For the year ending December 31, 2015, management determined that sufficient positive evidence exists to conclude that it is more likely than not that deferred taxes of $11.2 million are realizable, and therefore, reduced the valuation allowance accordingly. Our valuation allowance as of December 31, 2015 was reduced to $0.6 million.

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize compensation expense for equity awards based on the fair value of the award and on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award based on the estimated portion of the award that is expected to vest.

Inherent in the valuation and recording of stock-based compensation, there are several estimates that we make, including in regard to valuation and expense that will be incurred. We apply estimated forfeiture rates to the awards based on analyses of historical data, including termination patterns, employee position and other factors. This is done to record the expense we expect to actually incur for employees that provide the required service time.

 

72


Table of Contents

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of our option awards when they are granted. We estimate the value of common stock at the grant date with the help of an independent third-party service provider. See “Valuation of Common Stock” below for further discussion of the valuation process. We use the daily historical volatility of companies we consider to be our peers. To determine our peer companies, we used the following criteria: optical telecommunications companies; similar histories and relatively comparable financial leverage; sufficient public company trading history; and in similar businesses and geographical markets. We used the peers’ stock price volatility over the expected term of our granted options to calculate the expected volatility. The expected term of employee option awards is determined using the average midpoint between vesting and the contractual term for outstanding awards, or “the simplified method,” because we do not yet have a sufficient history of option exercises. We determine the risk-free interest rate on the grant date of the award based on the rate of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities approximately equal to the estimated expected term of the awards. We have not paid dividends and do not anticipate paying a cash dividend in the foreseeable future and, accordingly, use an expected dividend yield of zero.

The following table summarizes the assumptions, other than fair value of our common stock, relating to our stock options granted in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, and in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016:

 

    Year ended December 31,    Six months ended June 30,
    2014    2015    2015    2016
              (unaudited)

Risk-free interest rate

  1.8% - 2.2%    1.6% - 1.9%    1.7% - 1.8%    1.4 to 1.6%

Expected dividend yield

  None    None    None    None

Expected volatility

  71.1% to 71.3%    59.4% to 70.8%    63.8% to 70.9%    59.6% to 59.8%

Expected term (in years)

  6.5    6.3 - 6.5    6.3 to 6.5    6.3

In addition to the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, we historically have estimated a forfeiture rate to calculate the stock-based compensation expense for our awards. Our forfeiture rate was based on an analysis of our actual forfeitures. In the second quarter of 2016, we adopted ASU 2016-09, CompensationStock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. As a result, we made a policy change to account for stock-based compensation forfeitures as they occur with no adjustment for estimated forfeitures. This did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements as forfeitures have historically been trued-up as they occur.

We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the expected volatility, expected term and forfeiture rate utilized in our stock-based compensation expense calculations on a prospective basis. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock, we may refine our estimates of expected volatility, expected term and forfeiture rates, which could materially affect our future stock-based compensation expense.

Our stock-based compensation expense for RSUs is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of our common stock. The RSUs vest upon the satisfaction of both a service condition and a performance condition. The service condition for a majority of the RSUs is satisfied over a period of four years. The performance condition was satisfied on May 18, 2016, the date of our initial public offering.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to the “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” footnote within our consolidated financial statements for analysis of recent accounting pronouncements that are applicable to our business.

 

73


Table of Contents

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values or future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative, hedging or trading purposes, although in the future we may enter into exchange rate hedging arrangements to manage the risks described below.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our operations outside of the United States incur a portion of their operating expenses in foreign currencies, principally the Danish Krone, but these expenses are de minimis compared to our overall expenses. To date, the majority of our product sales and inventory purchases have been denominated in U.S. dollars. However, we have contracts for our outsourced development that are not denominated in U.S. dollars and that represent significant spending within the research and development area of our business. The functional currency of all of our entities is the U.S. dollar. However, we believe that exposure to foreign currency fluctuation from operating expenses is material as the related costs do constitute a significant portion of our total expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, the total amount of our outsourced development contracts denominated in U.S. dollars was $6.5 million, $9.6 million, $6.2 million, and $1.0 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, the total amount of our outsourced development contracts denominated in Euros was 4.8 million, 8.5 million, 5.5 million and 900,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred foreign currency transaction losses of $156,000 and $78,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, we recorded foreign currency transaction gains of $157,000 and $167,000, respectively. These foreign currency transaction gains and losses have been recorded as a component of “other expense” in our consolidated statements of operations. We believe that a 5% change in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and Euro would not materially impact our operating results or financial position. To date, we have not entered into any foreign currency exchange contracts. In future periods, we may hedge certain significant transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as we expand our international operations.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2016 consisted of cash maintained in money market funds and FDIC-insured operating accounts. Our primary exposure to market risk for our cash and cash equivalents is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. However, we do not believe a sudden change in the interest rates would have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Inflation Risk

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business. However, if global demand for the base materials utilized in our suppliers’ components were to significantly increase for the components we purchase from our suppliers to manufacture our products, our costs could become subject to significant inflationary pressures, and we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

74


Table of Contents

Emerging Growth Company Status

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the JOBS Act for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards. However, we are choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to not take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

 

75


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Overview

Our mission is to deliver high-speed coherent optical interconnect products that transform communications networks, relied upon by cloud infrastructure operators and content and communication service providers, through improvements in performance and capacity and a reduction in associated costs. By converting optical interconnect technology to a silicon-based technology, a process we refer to as the siliconization of optical interconnect, we believe we are leading a disruption that is analogous to the computing industry’s integration of multiple functions into a microprocessor. Our products include a series of low-power coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs, which we have integrated into families of optical interconnect modules with transmission speeds ranging from 40 to 400 Gbps for use in long-haul, metro and inter-data center markets. We are also developing optical interconnect modules that will enable transmission speeds of one terabit (1,000 gigabits) per second and more. Our modules perform a majority of the digital signal processing and optical functions in optical interconnects and offer low power consumption, high density and high speeds at attractive price points. Through the use of standard interfaces, our modules can be easily integrated with customers’ network equipment. The advanced software in our modules enables increased configurability and automation, provides insight into network and connection point characteristics and helps identify network performance problems, all of which increase flexibility and reduce operating costs.

Our modules are rooted in our low-power coherent DSP ASICs and/or silicon PICs, which we have specifically developed for our target markets. Our coherent DSP ASICs are manufactured using complementary metal oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, and our silicon PICs are manufactured using a CMOS-compatible process. CMOS is a widely-used and cost-effective semiconductor process technology. Using CMOS to siliconize optical interconnect technology enables us to continue to integrate increasing functionality into our products, benefit from higher yields and reliability associated with CMOS and capitalize on regular improvements in CMOS performance, density and cost. Our use of CMOS also enables us to use outsourced foundry services rather than requiring custom fabrication to manufacture our products. In addition, our use of CMOS and CMOS-compatible processes enables us to take advantage of the technology, manufacturing and integration improvements driven by other computer and communications markets that rely on CMOS.

Our engineering and management teams have extensive experience in optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, large-scale ASIC design and verification, silicon photonic integration, system software development, hardware design and high-speed electronics design. This broad expertise in a range of advanced technologies, methodologies and processes enhances our innovation, design and development capabilities and has enabled us to develop and introduce ten optical interconnect modules, five coherent DSP ASICs and three silicon PICs since 2009. In the course of our product development cycles, we continuously engage with our customers as they design their current and next-generation network equipment, which provides us with deep insights into the current and future market needs.

We sell our products through a direct sales force to leading network equipment manufacturers. The number of customers who have purchased and deployed our products has increased from eight in 2011 to more than 25 during the twelve months ended June 30, 2016. We have experienced rapid revenue growth over the last several years. Our revenue for 2015 was $239.1 million, a 63.5% increase from $146.2 million of revenue in 2014. Our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $200.7 million, a 91.0% increase from $105.1 million of revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2015. In 2015, we generated net income of $40.5 million and our adjusted EBITDA was $47.5 million, compared to net income of $13.5 million and adjusted EBITDA of $20.4 million in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we generated net income of $32.2 million and

 

76


Table of Contents

our adjusted EBITDA was $52.6 million, compared to net income of $9.0 million and adjusted EBITDA of $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. See “Selected Consolidated Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information regarding our use of adjusted EBITDA and other non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income.

Industry Background

Growing Demand for Bandwidth and Network Capacity

Global Internet protocol, or IP, traffic is projected to nearly triple from 2.4 exabytes per day in 2015 to 6.4 exabytes per day in 2020, representing a 22% compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, according to Cisco’s Visual Networking Index Complete Forecast Highlights Report, dated June 2016, or the VNI Report. This rapid growth in IP traffic is the result of several factors, including:

 

    Increased data and video consumption.    Over the last decade, the proliferation of new technologies, applications, Web 2.0-based services and Internet-connected devices has led to increasing levels of Internet traffic and congestion and the need for greater bandwidth. Video traffic, in particular, is growing rapidly, and placing significant strains on network capacity. The VNI Report estimates that video traffic will represent 82% of all global IP traffic in 2020, reaching 158.9 exabytes per month, up from 51.0 exabytes per month in 2015.

 

    Growth in mobile and 4G/LTE communications.    The increasing demand for data- and video-intensive content and applications on mobile devices is driving significant growth in mobile data and video traffic and has led to the proliferation of advanced wireless communication technologies, such as 4G/LTE, which depend on wired networks to function. According to Cisco’s Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2015-2020 White Paper, dated February 2016, global mobile data traffic grew 74% in 2015 from the prior year and is expected to increase nearly eight-fold from 2015 to 2020, a 53% compound annual growth rate.

 

    Proliferation of cloud services.    Enterprises are increasingly adopting cloud services to reduce IT costs and enable more flexible operating models. Consumers are increasingly relying on cloud services to satisfy video, audio and photo storage and sharing needs. Together, these factors are driving increased Internet traffic as cloud services are accessed and used. Daily global cloud traffic is expected to quadruple from 5.8 exabytes in 2014 to 23.6 exabytes in 2019, according to the Cisco Global Cloud Index, dated October 2015. Forrester Research, in its report on Public Cloud Markets, released in September 2016, forecasts that the public cloud market will reach $236 billion by 2020, growing at a CAGR of 22% between 2015 and 2020.

 

    Changing traffic patterns.    Content service providers and data center operators are increasingly building their own networks of connected data centers to handle increasing amounts of data. The architectures of these connected data centers dramatically increase the amount of data being transmitted within these data center networks. For example, Facebook found that a single 1 kB data inquiry generated 930 kB of traffic within its private data center network as reported in Facebook’s Data Center Network Architecture, abstract from the proceedings of the IEEE Optical Interconnects Conference, published in May 2013.

 

    Adoption of the “Internet of Things.”    Significant consumer, enterprise and governmental adoption of the “Internet of Things,” which refers to the global network of Internet-connected devices embedded with electronics, software and sensors, is anticipated to strain network capacity further and increase demand for bandwidth. The VNI Report estimates that 26.3 billion devices and objects will be connected to the Internet by 2020, compared to 16.3 billion in 2015.

 

77


Table of Contents

Increasing Investment in Network Equipment

To satisfy the growth in demand for bandwidth, communications and content service providers and data center and cloud infrastructure operators, which we refer to collectively as cloud and service providers, are investing in the capacity and performance of their network equipment. Network equipment can be broadly categorized as routing and switching networking equipment, which, among other things, manages data routing functions, and optical equipment, which transports data over the fiber optic network.

Historically, data routing and switching capacities have increased at a faster pace than optical transmission speeds supported by optical transport equipment. We believe this imbalance is causing investments in optical transport equipment to grow at a faster rate than overall investments in network equipment and is driving the need for faster and more cost-effective optical equipment.

The table below outlines the principal types of networks and estimated annual spend on high-speed optical network hardware related to the long-haul, metro and inter-data center markets:

 

          Estimated Spend

Network Type

  

Description

   2015    Forecast for 2020    CAGR

Long-haul

   Distances greater than 1,500 km, and subsea connections    $4.6 billion    $6.9 billion    8.3%

Metro

   Distances less than 1,500 km connecting regions and cities    $6.1 billion    $9.6 billion    9.3%

Inter-data center

   Various lengths connecting large data centers    $1.3 billion    $4.2 billion    32.1%

Long-haul networks, which require sophisticated and high-capacity transmission capabilities, were traditionally the earliest adopters of high-speed optical technologies. Recently, changing traffic patterns have also driven metro network operators and cloud and service providers to demand new technologies that can increase the capacity of their networks more rapidly. Even more recently, cloud infrastructure operators and content service providers have been building private networks of data centers, which are increasingly dependent on higher speed optical solutions to connect their data centers to each other.

Importance of Optical Interconnect Technologies

Optical equipment that interfaces directly with fiber relies on optical interconnect technologies that take digital signals from network equipment, perform signal processing to convert the digital signals to optical signals for transmission over the fiber network, and then perform the reverse functions on the receive side. These technologies also incorporate advanced signal processing that can monitor, manage and reduce errors and signal impairment in the fiber connection between the transmit and receive sides. Advanced optical interconnect technologies can enhance network performance by improving the capabilities and increasing the capacities of optical equipment and routers and switches, while also reducing operating costs.

The key characteristics of advanced optical interconnect technologies that dictate performance and capacity include:

 

    Speed.    Speed refers to the rate at which information can be transmitted over an optical channel and is measured in Gbps.

 

78


Table of Contents
    Density.    Density refers to the physical footprint of the optical interconnect technology. Density is primarily a function of the size and power consumption of the technology.

 

    Robustness.    Robustness refers to the ability of an optical interconnect technology to compensate for the signal impairment that accumulates through the fiber network and prevent and correct errors introduced by the network.

 

    Power Consumption.    Power consumption refers to the amount of electricity an optical interconnect technology consumes. Lower power consumption permits improved density and product reliability, and results in lower operating expense for electricity and cooling.

 

    Automation.    Automation refers to the ability of an optical interconnect technology to handle network tasks that historically were required to be performed manually, such as activation and channel provisioning.

 

    Manageability.    Manageability refers to the ability of an optical interconnect technology to monitor network performance, detect and address network issues easily and efficiently, which helps increase reliability and reduce ongoing maintenance and operational needs.

As they build their network service offerings, cloud and service providers and the network equipment manufacturers weigh these characteristics differently based on the particular demands and challenges they face. For example, cloud or service providers operating long-haul networks that transmit large amounts of data between Boston and San Francisco have relatively few connection points in their networks and may be more sensitive to speed and manageability of the optical interconnect and less focused on power consumption. In contrast, metro network operators or cloud or service providers operating inter-city or intra-city networks may face space and power constraints, as well as constantly changing workload needs, and be most focused on density, power consumption and automation.

Improvements in these characteristics can lead to reductions in development costs for network equipment manufacturers, who might otherwise need to develop their own optical interconnect technologies. In addition, improvements in these characteristics can lead to reductions in acquisition and development costs for network equipment manufacturers who incorporate third-party optical interconnect technologies into their equipment, which in turn can reduce capital costs for cloud and service providers. Further, improvements in power consumption, automation and manageability can result in reduced operating costs for cloud and service providers.

Advent of Coherent Interconnect Technologies

Traditional techniques for transmitting information via light signals over a fiber optic network used simple “on/off” manipulation, or modulation, of the light signal. These traditional techniques are adequate for transmission speeds up to 10 Gbps, as separate optical equipment can be used to monitor the fiber connection and to compensate for the degradation of the light signals when they travel through the fiber. At transmission speeds in excess of 10 Gbps, however, it becomes increasingly difficult to compensate for the degradation of light signals using traditional techniques. In addition, these traditional techniques require cumbersome and expensive equipment and do not meet network operators’ demands for high-quality signals. In the mid-2000s, advanced modulation techniques enabled by coherent communications techniques and digital signal processing were introduced to increase transmission speeds above 10 Gbps. However, these advanced modulation techniques required significant changes in the underlying optical interconnect technologies and architecture.

Coherent communications is a more complex method of transmitting and receiving information via optical signals. Coherent technologies enable greater utilization of complex formats that manipulate both a signal’s amplitude and its phase to yield a higher data transmission rate with better resilience to

 

79


Table of Contents

signal degradation. Coherent communications enables powerful digital signal processing to counter digitally the effects of signal degradation that were previously managed through an array of discrete components and costly techniques, such as optical dispersion compensation. By taking advantage of coherent communications technologies, some cloud and service providers are able to operate networks at transmission speeds of up to 400 Gbps today and are increasingly planning to adopt technologies that enable up to 1,000 Gbps transmission speeds. These providers require advanced coherent interconnect solutions.

The Shortcomings of Existing Coherent Interconnect Solutions

Digital signal processing in coherent interconnect technologies takes place in an application-specific integrated circuit known as a coherent DSP ASIC. Building a coherent DSP ASIC is a multi-disciplinary undertaking requiring advanced knowledge of several complex technologies, such as optical systems, transmission, communications theory, digital signal processing algorithms and mixed signal design, and the development and verification of complex communications ASICs. Given the breadth of expertise and the significant costs required to develop coherent DSP ASICs, few independent vendors provide commercially available coherent DSP ASICs and a limited number of network equipment manufacturers are capable of producing next generation coherent DSP ASICs. Although these DSP ASICs provide basic transmit, receive, monitoring and compensation functionality required for an advanced coherent interconnect, they generally are not able to simultaneously achieve the low power, density, speed and transmission distance requirements of cloud and service providers.

To complete an interconnect solution, the coherent DSP ASIC must be used in conjunction with a number of photonic functions, such as modulation and transmission/reception. These functions have traditionally been performed by several discrete, bulky, expensive components that must be purchased by a network equipment manufacturer and designed into custom interface circuit boards before deployment. This approach requires significant time and engineering resources of network equipment manufacturers and often inhibits overall improvements in density, reliability and cost-efficiency. Some vendors have attempted to simplify this process by integrating a number of these photonic functions into optical modules. This approach, however, often results in performance limitations with respect to key characteristics, such as speed and density.

The development of a photonic integrated circuit, or PIC, enables dramatic improvements in size and cost by tightly integrating multiple photonic functions into a small integrated circuit. However, PICs are not widely available in the market today and the few that have been developed for commercial sale typically rely on expensive non-silicon approaches, such as indium phosphide, that generally require special packaging and temperature stabilization, often require custom foundries to manufacture and are less able to benefit from the cost and yield improvements that are possible from the use of silicon. In addition, the use of these PICs to date has generally been limited to custom systems that typically require a different transport architecture than is widely deployed today.

None of these traditional approaches permits the complete integration of the coherent DSP ASIC and photonic components in a cost-effective manner that meets the needs of network equipment manufacturers. As a result, network equipment manufacturers are increasingly seeking to replace traditional products with simple, open and complete coherent interconnect solutions that perform both digital signal processing and photonic functions.

Our Solution—The Siliconization of Optical Interconnect Technology

We have developed families of high-speed coherent interconnect products that reduce the complexity and cost of optical interconnect technology, while simultaneously improving network performance and accelerating the pace of innovation in the optical networking industry. We build these

 

80


Table of Contents

advanced optical interconnect products using silicon, a process we refer to as the siliconization of optical interconnect. The siliconization of optical interconnect allows us to integrate previously disparate optical functions into a single solution, leading to significant improvements in density and cost and allowing us to benefit from ongoing advances in CMOS. Our optical interconnect solution includes sophisticated modules that perform a majority of the digital signal processing and optical functions required to process network traffic at transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and above in long-haul, metro and inter-data center networks. These modules meet the needs of cloud and service providers for optical interconnect products in a simple, open, high-performance form factor that can be easily integrated in a cost-effective manner with existing network equipment.

Our optical interconnect products are powered by our internally developed and purpose-built coherent DSP ASICs and/or silicon PICs. Our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs are engineered to work together, and each integrates numerous signal processing and optical functions that together deliver a complete, cost-effective high-speed coherent optical interconnect solution in a small footprint that requires low power and provides significant automation and management capabilities. We believe that our highly integrated optical interconnect modules, which are based on our coherent DSP ASIC and silicon PIC, were, at the time of market introduction, the industry’s first interconnect modules to deliver transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and higher. Prior to the introduction of our highly integrated optical interconnect modules, we believe that these transmission speeds were not possible in modules in an industry standard form factor without sacrificing signal quality or other performance characteristics. For example, our 100 Gbps CFP modules, which are based on the industry-standard CFP form factor, enable cloud and service providers to easily upgrade their existing metro and inter-data center networks to 100 Gbps using their existing, deployed equipment chassis or newly designed network equipment with CFP slot capabilities. Furthermore, by providing an integrated solution that incorporates digital signal processing and optical functionality required to process and transmit data through a high-speed optical channel, our optical interconnect products reduce the resource requirements of the network equipment manufacturers necessary to build and service equipment with high-speed optical interconnect functionality.

We believe we are the first independent vendor to introduce at commercial scale both a coherent DSP ASIC and a silicon PIC integrated into an optical interconnect module. By designing our silicon PIC in a CMOS-compatible process, which is widely used in the semiconductor industry and generally does not require special packaging, we are able to reduce cost, increase reliability and take advantage of the ongoing improvement of CMOS technology, as well as contract with foundries for the manufacture of many of our products. Our silicon PIC incorporates several key optics functions, including modulation and transmission/reception functions, and supports transmission distances for long-haul, metro and inter-data center applications. We believe that our silicon PIC was the first commercially available PIC to include all of these functions over a broad range of transmission distances and we are not aware of any other commercially available silicon PICs with similar functionality. By building both our coherent DSP ASIC and our silicon PIC in CMOS-compatible processes, we can improve the performance and efficiency of the optical interconnect and benefit from engineering synergies. We refer to this integration of advanced optical interconnect technologies onto CMOS as the siliconization of optical interconnect technology.

The advantages of our solution include:

 

    Industry-leading speed, density and power consumption.    We believe that our coherent DSP ASICs, silicon PICs and 100 and 400 Gbps optical interconnect modules consume less power and have higher density than comparable optical interconnect products. Our modules perform functions that have traditionally been provided by several discrete pieces of network equipment.

 

   

Breadth of integration.    By integrating many photonic functions into our silicon PIC and further integrating our silicon PIC in our modules, we enable simplified network equipment

 

81


Table of Contents
 

designs and reduce the amount of development and optical engineering our customers would otherwise do internally, thereby freeing up their engineering resources to focus on other networking functions.

 

    Software intelligence.    Our products incorporate software intelligence that automates tasks, such as channel provisioning, and increases manageability through a high level of software features, including increased monitoring and optimization.

 

    Cost-efficiency.    We are able to offer our products at attractive price points as a result of the scale and process benefits of our CMOS platforms. In addition, the performance capabilities of our products permit greater flexibility and can reduce both design cost for the network equipment manufacturer and network design and ongoing operational cost for the cloud or service provider.

 

    Ease of deployment.    By leveraging industry-standard interfaces, our modules enable cloud and service providers to immediately increase the speed and capacity of their networks by replacing their legacy 10 Gbps or 40 Gbps components with our 100 Gbps or 400 Gbps modules in their existing equipment. Our modules can also easily be deployed in next generation network equipment.

Our Competitive Strengths

We plan to maintain and extend our competitive advantages through rapid innovation delivering industry-leading high-speed interconnect products to our customers by focusing on the following key areas:

 

    Leading provider of high-speed integrated optical interconnect modules.    We believe we are the first independent vendor to introduce at commercial scale both a coherent DSP ASIC and a silicon PIC integrated into an optical interconnect module capable of transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and above. Our modules solve many of the shortcomings of existing interconnect solutions and meet the majority of a cloud or service provider’s interconnect needs in a standard and compact form factor that can be easily integrated with other network equipment. Our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs enable us to offer advanced optical interconnect products with desirable features such as high density, low power and high performance.

 

    Track record of rapid innovation driven by advanced design methodologies.    We maximize the pace of innovation through a number of measures, including the creation of a continuously expanding tool box of digital signal processing algorithms, ASIC implementations, CMOS-compatible optics subsystems and related intellectual property, which enable us to develop complex products at an increasing pace by reusing and expanding existing solutions. Our development, verification and test infrastructure and methodologies involve extensive automation, which increase the speed and quality of our development. Our ability to innovate at a rapid pace enables us to offer products purpose-built for different applications and based on the newest CMOS technology. These design and development capabilities have enabled us to introduce ten optical interconnect modules since 2009 for multiple markets, including long-haul, metro and inter-data center. Using our innovation and development model, since 2009 we have introduced five coherent DSP ASICs, each of which was built using the newest CMOS technology available at the time of their market introduction, and three silicon PICs, which we believe are the industry’s only commercially-available silicon PICs for coherent interconnect products.

 

   

Leveraging the strength of CMOS for photonics.    The density and cost of high-speed optical interconnect products have traditionally been determined by the photonic components. Implementing the photonic components in CMOS, and using CMOS as the

 

82


Table of Contents
 

platform for the integration of multiple discrete photonics functions, enables us to significantly reduce the density and cost of our optical interconnect products compared to traditional approaches, which typically rely on complex materials such as lithium niobate and indium phosphide that do not permit the same level of integration and do not benefit from the ongoing advances in CMOS technology driven by the entire electronics industry.

 

    Proprietary software framework enables simplified configuration and deployment.    We have made substantial investments in the software components of our products, which we believe is key to increasing the performance and reducing the capital expenditures and operating expenses associated with high-speed networks. Our software framework also facilitates the integration of the many complex digital signal processing, ASIC, hardware and optical functions required in high-speed interconnect technologies and enables our customers to integrate our products easily into their existing networks. Through the use of software, we are able to configure the same product to be deployed in various network types with different needs and requirements, without the need to modify or reconfigure the network’s architecture, providing us with significant development and manufacturing efficiencies.

 

    Customer collaboration provides deep understanding of market needs.    We collaborate closely with our customers, as well as directly with many cloud and service providers, and solicit their input as they design their network equipment and as we design our next-generation products. This provides us with deep insights into the current and future needs of our customers and the market, which in turn enables us to develop and deliver products that meet customer demands and anticipate market developments.

 

    Strong management and engineering teams with significant industry expertise.    We have deliberately built our management and engineering teams, of which our founders remain a key part, to include personnel with extensive experience in optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, large-scale ASIC design and verification, silicon photonic integration, system software development, hardware design and high-speed electronics design. As of September 15, 2016, approximately 74% of our employees are engineers or have other technical backgrounds, and approximately 46% of our employees hold a Ph.D. or other advanced degree. Each element of our solution is developed by experts in the relevant field. Our collaborative development culture encourages employees with diverse experiences and expertise to work together to create innovative solutions.

Our Growth Strategy

Our goal is to become the leading provider of high-speed interconnect technology that underpins the world’s data and communication networks. To grow our business and achieve our mission, we are pursuing the following strategies:

 

    Continue to innovate and extend our technology leadership.    Our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs are at the heart of our products’ abilities to deliver cost-efficient high performance. We intend to continue to invest in our technology to deliver innovative and high-performance products and to identify and solve challenging interconnect needs. We expect that our continued investments in research and development will enable us to expand and enhance the capabilities of our CMOS-based products in order to continue to develop higher-capacity and higher-density software-enabled products. For example, we are currently developing optical interconnect modules that will enable transmission speeds of one terabit per second and more. We also plan to continue to invest in silicon PIC innovation and its optimization with our coherent DSP ASICs in order to serve the growing demand for bandwidth.

 

   

Increase penetration within our existing customer base.    We focus heavily on the needs of our customers and frequently innovate in partnership with them to deliver cost-effective products that meet their specific needs. As we continue to enhance and expand our product

 

83


Table of Contents
 

family, and as our existing customers seek to expand and improve their network equipment technology, we expect to generate additional revenue through sales of existing and new products to these customers. At the same time, we design our latest-generation products to interoperate with prior-generation products so that our customers can continue to derive long-term value from their investments.

 

    Continue to expand customer base.    We have increased the number of customers who purchase and use our products in each of the last five years, and we believe there continues to be unmet need for high-speed, cost-efficient interconnect products among cloud and service providers. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we sold our optical interconnect products to more than 25 customers. Historically, our sales have been primarily to network equipment manufacturers that do not have internally developed coherent DSP ASICs. More recently, we have had success in marketing and selling our products to network equipment manufacturers that have internally developed their own coherent DSP ASICs. We believe that the benefits of our solution, supported by the success of existing customers as references, will drive more network equipment manufacturers to purchase their interconnect products from us. We plan to continue to acquire new customers through expanded sales and marketing and brand recognition efforts.

 

    Grow into adjacent markets.    We believe that growth in fiber optics-based communications is likely to accelerate, partly driven by the cost and density advantages of our CMOS solution, and that this growth, together with expansion in other markets that depend on high-speed networking capabilities, such as intra-data center and network access markets, will result in demand for additional applications for our products. By continuing to reduce the size, design complexity and power of the interconnect and the ease of integration into the equipment, we believe we can create opportunities to serve new types of customers that may seek to incorporate high-speed optical interconnect technologies into their products, including companies that do not have sufficient optical engineering expertise to develop systems using current interconnect technologies.

 

    Selectively pursue strategic investments or acquisitions.    Although we expect to focus our growth strategy on expanding our market share organically, we may pursue future investments or acquisitions that complement our existing business, represent a strategic fit and are consistent with our overall growth strategy.

Our Products

Our families of optical interconnect technology products consist of high-capability, scalable, cost-efficient optical interconnect modules that are rooted in our five coherent DSP ASIC and three silicon PIC components. Our products are built to meet the specific needs of various networks and support transmission capacities between 40 Gbps and 400 Gbps per module. Our products incorporate our proprietary advanced system-in-a-module software, which, through a standardized interface, enables seamless installation, configuration and operation and a high level of performance monitoring. We also selectively offer our coherent DSP ASIC and silicon PIC elements as standalone components.

 

84


Table of Contents

We have developed and manufacture, sell and support the following high-speed coherent interconnect modules:

AC100-MSA Product Family

Our AC100-MSA product family contains three modules that all support 100 Gbps transmission speeds in an industry-standard 5” x 7” form factor.

 

LOGO

 

    AC100-G: Released in 2011, this module supports transmission distances of up to 4,000 km. This module is mainly used in the long-haul and metro markets. It is based on our Everest DSP ASIC. We believe it was the industry’s first commercially available coherent 100 Gbps module and the first commercially available coherent interconnect to rely on advanced soft decision forward error correction for improved transmission reach.

 

    AC100-S: Released in 2012, this module supports transmission distances of up to 12,000 km through extended digital compensation of signal impairment and advanced modulation. This module is mainly used in subsea applications. It is based on our Mauna Kea DSP ASIC. We believe it was the industry’s first commercially available coherent 100 Gbps module for subsea applications.

 

    AC100-C: Released in 2014, this module supports transmission distances of up to 4,000 km. This module provides similar functionality to the AC100-G and is based on our Everest DSP ASIC and our Acadia silicon PIC. It is mainly used in the long-haul and metro markets. We believe it is the industry’s first commercially available coherent 100 Gbps module that uses a silicon PIC.

AC100-CFP Product Family

Our AC100-CFP product family contains two modules that support 100 Gbps transmission speeds in an industry-standard, pluggable CFP form factor.

 

 

LOGO

 

    AC100-CFP-M: Released in 2014, this module supports transmission distances of up to 2,500 km. This module is mainly used in the metro and inter-data center markets. It is based on our Sky DSP ASIC and our Acadia silicon PIC. We believe it was the industry’s first commercially available coherent 100 Gbps CFP module.

 

85


Table of Contents
    AC100-CFP-ZR: Released in 2014, this module supports coherent transmission over distances of up to 80 km at an ultra-low power consumption. It is based on our Sky DSP ASIC and our Acadia silicon PIC. This module is mainly used in the metro and inter-data center markets.

 

    AC100-CFP-L: Released in 2016, this module supports transmission distances of up to 2,500 km. This module is mainly used in long-haul applications and features the enhanced performance required for those applications. It is based on our Sky DSP ASIC and our Glacier silicon PIC.

CFP2-ACO Product Family

Our CFP2-ACO product family contains a single module that has an analog electrical interface and supports up to 200 Gbps transmission speeds. Its form factor was designed in accordance with the Implementation Agreement defined by the Optical Internetworking Forum, an industry-standard, pluggable CFP2 form factor. Based on the Orion silicon PIC, the CFP2-ACO is our fourth product family to leverage our coherent silicon PIC technology.

 

 

LOGO

 

    CFP2-ACO: Released in sample form in the first quarter of 2016, this module has a linear optical transmitter and receiver supporting multiple modulation formats and transmission capabilities of 100 Gbps and 200 Gbps based on the selected format. With an analog electrical interface to a coherent DSP on the host board, our CFP2-ACO will offer an optics-only solution for customers who currently rely on in-house DSP capabilities. Based on the Orion silicon PIC, the CFP2-ACO leverages our coherent silicon PIC technology. We believe that this module will primarily be used in inter-data center and metro markets.

AC400 Flex Product Family

Our AC400 Flex product family contains three modules that support transmission capacities ranging from 100 Gbps to 400 Gbps per module. By changing the configuration of these modules through software configuration, customers can use these modules to support the transmission speed and distance that is best suited to their needs.

 

 

LOGO

 

   

AC400-U: Released in 2015, this dual-core, flex-rate and flex-modulation module supports transmission capacities of 100, 200, 300 and 400 Gbps in an industry-standard 5” x 7” form factor. This module is software configurable to optimize transmission speeds, fiber capacity, compensation for signal impairment and power consumption for multiple applications, including inter-data center, metro, long-haul and subsea applications spanning transmission distances up

 

86


Table of Contents
 

to 12,000 km and greater. It is based on our Denali DSP ASIC and our silicon PIC. We believe it is the industry’s first commercially available dual-core coherent module, the first commercially available module to support multiple transmission speeds in a single product and the first commercially available module to support transmission capacities of up to 400 Gbps.

 

    AC400-S: Released in 2015, this dual-core module provides similar functionality to our AC400-U module and incorporates enhanced-performance 100 Gbps configuration that allows for upgrades of subsea systems originally equipped with 40 Gbps optical interconnect technology. It is based on our Denali DSP ASIC.

 

    AC400-UL: Released in 2015, this module supports a transmission speed of 100 Gbps for subsea applications in an industry-standard 5” x 7” form factor with a digital electrical interface compatible with our AC100-MSA product family. It is based on our Denali DSP ASIC and our silicon PIC.

DSP ASICs

We have developed and manufacture, sell and support the following five coherent DSP ASICs:

 

 

LOGO

 

    Everest: Released in 2011, this DSP ASIC targets the metro and long-haul markets at transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and includes advanced soft decision forward error correction.

 

    Mauna Kea: Released in 2012, this DSP ASIC targets subsea applications at transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and includes advanced soft decision forward error correction and digital compensation of fiber dispersion to support transmission distances of up to 12,000 km.

 

    K2: Released in 2013, this DSP ASIC targets subsea applications at transmission speeds of 40 Gbps and includes advanced soft decision forward error correction and digital compensation of fiber dispersion to support transmission distances of 12,000 km or greater.

 

    Sky: Released in 2014, this DSP ASIC targets the inter-data center and metro markets, which are power-sensitive, at transmission speeds of 100 Gbps and includes ultra-low power soft decision forward error correction.

 

    Denali: Released in 2015, this dual core, flex-rate and flex-modulation coherent DSP ASIC is software configurable and supports inter-data center, metro, long-haul and subsea applications at transmission speeds of 100, 200, 300 and 400 Gbps. This DSP ASIC also includes high-performing soft decision forward error correction and digital compensation of fiber dispersion to support transmission distances of 12,000 km or greater.

 

87


Table of Contents

Silicon PICs

We have developed the following three coherent silicon PICs:

 

LOGO

 

    Acadia: Released in 2014 and currently being manufactured, sold and supported by us, this silicon PIC performs, in a single package, multiple coherent optical functions such as transmission and reception.

 

    Glacier: Released in 2016, this silicon PIC performs, in a single package, the same functions as our Acadia silicon PIC at a higher level of optical performance.

 

    Orion: Released in sample form in the second quarter of 2016 and scheduled for production release in the fourth quarter of 2016, this silicon PIC performs the same functions at the same performance level as our Glacier silicon PIC in a smaller package. The smallest footprint silicon PIC that we have developed to date, the Orion PIC is utilized in our CFP2-ACO module.

Sales and Marketing

We market and sell our products through our direct sales force consisting of sales personnel and centralized technical customer support. Our sales force also works closely with our product line management personnel to support strategic sales activities.

Our products typically have a long sales cycle, requiring discussions with prospective customers in order to better understand their network and system level requirements and technology roadmaps. Our customers are predominantly network equipment manufacturers, and we have discussions with them regarding the requirements of their end customers, which provides our sales force with insight into how our products will be deployed in the networks of these end customers. This sales process requires us to develop strong customer relationships. The period of time from our initial contact with a prospective or current customer to the receipt of an actual purchase order is frequently a year or more. Prospective customers perform system and network level testing before equipment is deployed in a network carrying live traffic. Customers require us to perform extensive verification testing and qualification based on industry standards. This phase of our sales cycle can take several months and purchase arrangements may not be entered into until after this phase is completed.

We invest time and resources to meet with leading carriers and cloud service providers to understand network system performance issues. These efforts provide us with a deep understanding of the challenges faced by carriers and cloud service providers which, in turn, enables us to focus our future product and technology development efforts to address those challenges. For example, understanding that several of our customers are planning to adopt technologies that enable up to one terabit per second transmission speeds, we are currently developing products to satisfy these requirements.

Our in-house sales personnel also assist customers with forecasts, orders, delivery requirements, warranty returns and other administrative functions. Our technical support engineers respond to technical and product-related questions and provide application support to customers who have

 

88


Table of Contents

incorporated our products into their systems. We have centralized our technical support operations at our corporate headquarters in Maynard, Massachusetts. Our centralized customer support operations allow our technical customer support personnel to work directly with our research and development and operations personnel on a regular basis, which reduces the time it takes to identify and address our customers’ technical issues and helps our technical support personnel maintain and improve upon their technical skills.

Customers

The number of customers who have purchased and deployed our products has increased from eight in 2011 to more than 25 during the twelve months ended June 30, 2016. The following table sets forth our revenue by geographic region for the periods indicated, based on the country or region to which the products were shipped:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
           2013                  2014                  2015        
     (in thousands)  

Americas

   $ 13,945       $ 32,109       $ 46,624   

EMEA

     37,866         60,101         103,150   

APAC

     25,841         54,024         89,282   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 77,652       $ 146,234       $ 239,056   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

We have historically generated most of our revenue from a limited number of customers. In 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, our five largest customers in each period (which differed by period) collectively accounted for 77.7%, 72.6%, 79.2% and 79.8% of our revenue, respectively. In 2014, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, ADVA Optical Networking North America, Inc. accounted for 23.4%, 22.2%, 28.8% and 23.6% of our revenue, respectively, and ZTE, accounted for 35.4%, 27.6%, 29.0% and 37.9% of our revenue, respectively. In addition, during 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, Coriant, Inc. accounted for 13.1%, 12.0% and 10.7% of our revenue, respectively. The loss of any a large customer, which could be due to reasons beyond our or their control, could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

For example, on March 8, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security imposed restrictions on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of U.S.-regulated products, software and technology to ZTE, its parent company and two other affiliated entities, which had the effect of preventing us from making any sales to ZTE. On March 24, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a temporary general license suspending the enhanced export licensing requirements for ZTE and one of the designated affiliates through June 30, 2016, thereby enabling us to resume sales to ZTE. On June 28, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce extended the temporary general license through August 30, 2016. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce further extended the temporary general license through November 28, 2016. Under this temporary general license, we were able to resume sales to ZTE for so long as it remains in place. There can be no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Commerce will extend this temporary general license beyond the November 28, 2016 expiration date or permit any sales to the designated ZTE entities after this temporary general license expires. This or future regulatory activity may interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or other customers.

Manufacturing

We contract with third parties to manufacture, assemble and test our products. We utilize a range of CMOS and CMOS-compatible processes to develop and manufacture the coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs that are designed into our modules. We select the semiconductor process and foundry that

 

89


Table of Contents

provides the best combination of performance, cost and feature attributes necessary for our products. For several of our products, a single foundry fab is selected for semiconductor wafer production.

We contract with three third-party contract manufacturers to test, build and inspect modules incorporating our coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs for high-volume production of our modules. Our contract manufacturers also implement many customer-specific configurations and packaging before customer shipments. We build the test systems used by our contract manufacturers. We also directly manufacture prototype products and limited production quantities during initial new product introduction.

We believe our outsourced manufacturing model enables us to focus our resources and expertise on the design, sale, support and marketing of our products to best meet customer requirements. We also believe that this manufacturing model provides us with the flexibility required to respond to new market opportunities and changes in customer demand, simplifies the scope of our operations and administrative processes and significantly reduces our working capital requirements, while providing the ability to scale production rapidly.

We subject our third-party manufacturing contractors and foundries to qualification requirements in order to meet the high quality and reliability standards required of our products. Our engineers and supply chain personnel work closely with third-party contract manufacturers and fab foundries to increase yield, reduce manufacturing costs, improve product quality and ensure that component sourcing strategies are in place to support our manufacturing needs.

Research and Development

Our engineering group has extensive experience in optical systems and networking, digital signal processing, ASIC development and design, silicon photonic integration, system software development and high-speed electronics design. As of September 15, 2016, approximately 74% of our employees are engineers or have other technical backgrounds, and approximately 46% of our employees hold a Ph.D. or other advanced degree. We utilize our hardware and software expertise to integrate coherent DSP ASICs and silicon PICs into high-speed interconnect products that are compatible with industry-standard form factor, interfaces and power consumption requirements. We participate in industry groups such as Optical Internetworking Forum to help drive the industry towards standardization that allows our customers to more easily integrate our products into their systems. In addition, we offer our integration expertise to our customers to help expedite their adoption of new products.

We use simulation tools at many levels of product development, reducing the number of design errors and the need for costly and time consuming development cycles. Our simulation environment makes use of industry standard computer aided design tools as well as models and tools that are developed internally. Our simulation tools also allow us to make efficient tradeoffs between power consumption, size and performance early in the development cycle. We believe this contributes to the ability of our products to deliver superior performance with low power consumption.

Our research and development facilities are located in Maynard, Massachusetts, Hazlet, New Jersey, San Jose, California, Bangalore, India, and Wooburn Green, United Kingdom. We have devoted approximately 30,000 square feet of space to our research and development facilities, which we expect to increase in the future. Our research and development facilities are equipped with industry standard test equipment, including optical spectrum analyzers, high-speed sampling oscilloscopes, logic analyzers, wafer probes, wafer saws, optical network and Ethernet test sets, thousands of kilometers of optical fiber and associated optical amplifiers and other optical test equipment. We use these facilities to conduct comprehensive testing and validation procedures on internally produced chips, components and products before transferring production to our contract manufacturers for commercial, higher-volume manufacturing.

 

90


Table of Contents

As research and development is critical to our continuing success, we are committed to maintaining high levels of research and development over the long term. We incurred research and development expenses of $24.2 million, $28.5 million and $38.7 million in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2016, we incurred research and development expenses of $16.7 million and $37.3 million, respectively.

Intellectual Property

Our success and ability to compete depend substantially upon our core technology and intellectual property rights. We rely on patent, trademark and copyright laws, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, we generally require employees and consultants to execute appropriate non-disclosure and proprietary rights agreements. These agreements acknowledge our exclusive ownership of intellectual property developed for us and require that all proprietary information remain confidential.

We maintain a program designed to identify technology that is appropriate for patent and trade secret protection, and we file patent applications in the United States and certain other countries for inventions that we consider significant. As of September 15, 2016, we had 51 patent applications pending in the United States, six patent applications pending under Patent Cooperation Treaty filings and 14 patents granted in the United States, which expire between 2027 and 2034. Although our business is not materially dependent upon any one patent, our patent rights and the products made and sold under our patents, taken as a whole, are a significant element of our business. In addition to patents, we also possess other intellectual property, including trademarks, know-how, trade secrets, design rights and copyrights. We control access to and use of our software, technology and other proprietary information through internal and external controls, including contractual protections with employees, contractors, customers and partners. Our software is protected by U.S. and international copyright, patent and trade secret laws. Despite our efforts to protect our software, technology and other proprietary information, unauthorized parties may still copy or otherwise obtain and use our software, technology and other proprietary information. In addition, we intend to expand our international operations, and effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may not be available or may be limited in foreign countries.

Companies in the industry in which we operate frequently are sued or receive informal claims of patent infringement or infringement of other intellectual property rights. We have, from time to time, received such claims from companies, including from competitors and customers, some of which have substantially more resources and have been developing relevant technology for much longer than us. If we become more successful, we believe that competitors will be more likely to try to develop products that are similar to ours and that may infringe our proprietary rights. It may also be more likely that competitors or other third parties will claim that our products infringe their proprietary rights. Successful claims of infringement by a third party, if any, could result in significant penalties or injunctions that could prevent us from selling some of our products in certain markets, result in settlements or judgements that require payment of significant royalties or damages or require us to expend time and money to develop non-infringing products. We cannot assure you that we do not currently infringe, or that we will not in the future infringe, upon any third-party patents or other proprietary rights.

Competition

The optical communications markets are highly competitive and rapidly evolving. We compete with domestic and international companies, many of which have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. We encounter substantial competition in most of our markets, although we believe no one competitor competes with us across all our product lines and markets. Our principal competitors include Oclaro, Finisar, Lumentum Holdings, Neophotonics and Avago Technologies, as

 

91


Table of Contents

well as equipment manufacturers such as Fujitsu and Sumitomo Electric Industries. Competitors for coherent DSP ASICs also include semiconductor companies such as NEL and ClariPhy. We also compete with internally developed coherent interconnect solutions of certain network equipment manufacturers, including Ciena, Infinera, Huawei, Cisco and Alcatel-Lucent (which was acquired by Nokia in January 2016). Consolidation in the optical systems and components industry has increased in recent years, and future consolidation could further intensify the competitive pressures that we face.

The principal competitive factors upon which we compete include performance, low power consumption, rapid innovation, breadth of product line, availability, product reliability, multi-sourcing and selling price. We believe that we compete effectively by offering high levels of customer value through high speed, high density, low power consumption, broad integration of photonic functions, software intelligence for configuration, control and monitoring, cost-efficiency, ease of deployment and collaborative product design. We cannot be certain we will continue to compete effectively.

We also may face competition from companies that may expand into our industry and introduce additional competitive products. Existing and potential customers are also potential competitors. These customers may internally develop or acquire additional competitive products or technologies, which may cause them to reduce or cease their purchases from us.

Government Regulation

Our products and services are subject to export controls, including the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations and economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls, and similar laws and regulations that apply in other jurisdictions in which we distribute or sell our products and services. Export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations include restrictions and prohibitions on the sale or supply of certain products and services and on our transfer of parts, components, and related technical information and know-how to certain countries, regions, governments, persons and entities. For example, on March 8, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a final rule in the Federal Register that amended the Export Administration Regulations by adding ZTE and three of its affiliates to the “Entity List,” for actions contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. This rule imposed new export licensing requirements on exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of all U.S.-regulated products, software and technology to the designated ZTE entities, which had the practical effect of preventing us from making any sales to ZTE. On March 24, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued a temporary general license suspending the enhanced export licensing requirements for ZTE and one of its designated affiliates through June 30, 2016. On June 28, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce extended the temporary general license through August 30, 2016. On August 19, 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce further extended the temporary general license through November 28, 2016. It is unclear whether the U.S. Department of Commerce will extend this temporary general license beyond the November 28, 2016 expiration date or permit sales to the designated ZTE entities after this temporary general license expires. There can be no guarantee that this or future regulatory activity would not materially interfere with our ability to make sales to ZTE or other customers. In addition, various countries regulate the importation of certain products, through import permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our products. The exportation, re-exportation, transfers within foreign countries, and importation of our products, including by our partners, must comply with these laws and regulations.

We are also subject to various domestic and international anti-corruption laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, as well as other similar anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from offering or making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of

 

92


Table of Contents

obtaining, retaining or directing business. Our exposure for violating these laws and regulations increases as our international presence expands and as we increase sales and operations in foreign jurisdictions.

In addition, we are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate or sell our products. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, employee health and safety and the use of hazardous materials in, and the recycling of, our products.

Facilities

Our corporate headquarters are located in Maynard, Massachusetts, which we occupy under a lease expiring in January 2019, renewable for one additional two-year term. We have additional facilities located in Wooburn Green, United Kingdom, which we will occupy under a lease expiring in October 2021, in San Jose, California, which we occupy under a lease expiring in August 2020, in Hazlet, New Jersey, which we occupy under leases expiring in June and July 2018 with respect to various floors, in Mountain View, California, which we occupy under a lease expiring on July 21, 2018, renewable for an additional one-year term, in Bangalore, India, which we will occupy under a lease expiring in September 2018, in Limerick, Ireland, which we occupy under a lease expiring on January 31, 2017, renewable for an additional term of four years and nine months, and in Nanshan, Shenzhen, which we occupy under a lease expiring on January 12, 2017.

Employees

As of September 15, 2016, we employed 257 full-time employees, consisting of 123 in research and development, 64 in operations, which includes manufacturing, supply chain, quality control and assurance, and 70 in executive, sales, general and administrative. We have never had a work stoppage, and none of our employees are represented by a labor organization or under any collective bargaining arrangements. We consider our employee relations to be good.

Legal Proceedings

On January 22, 2016, ViaSat, Inc. filed a suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and misappropriation of trade secrets. On February 19, 2016, we responded to ViaSat’s suit and alleged counterclaims against ViaSat including, among other things, patent misappropriation, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition, which ViaSat denied in its response filed March 16, 2016. The lawsuit is still pending. We are continuing to evaluate ViaSat’s claims, but based on the information available to us today, we currently believe that this suit will not have a material adverse effect on our business or our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, from time to time we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

 

93


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers, Directors and Significant Employees

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers, directors and significant employees.

 

Name

   Age     

Position

Murugesan “Raj” Shanmugaraj

     58       President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

John F. Gavin

     57       Chief Financial Officer

Benny P. Mikkelsen

     56       Founder, Chief Technology Officer and Director

Christian J. Rasmussen

     47       Founder, Vice President of Digital Signal Processing and Optics

Mehrdad Givehchi

     51       Founder, Vice President of Hardware and Software

Bhupendra C. Shah

     58       Vice President of Engineering

John J. LoMedico

     58       Vice President of Sales and Business Development

Janene I. Ásgeirsson

     46       Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

John P. Kavanagh

     53       Senior Vice President of Operations/Supply Chain

Renee M. Pianka

     48       Chief Human Resources Officer

Eric A. Swanson(1)

     56       Chairman of the Board of Directors

Peter Y. Chung(1)(2)(3)

     48       Director

Stan J. Reiss(2)(3)

     44       Director

John Ritchie(2)

     50       Director

Vincent T. Roche (3)

     56       Director

 

(1) Member of nominating and corporate governance committee
(2) Member of audit committee
(3) Member of compensation committee

Murugesan “Raj” Shanmugaraj has served as our president and chief executive officer and a director of our company since April 2010. Prior to joining Acacia, from February 2002 to February 2010, Mr. Shanmugaraj was the vice president of business development in the optical networking division of Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., a network equipment manufacturer. Prior to that, Mr. Shanmugaraj founded and served as the chief executive officer of Astral Point Communications Inc., an optical equipment company, and held various senior executive level positions at PictureTel Corp., a commercial videoconferencing product company, Multilink, Inc., an engineering and product development-based manufacturer of telecommunications network components, and Motorola Inc., a multinational telecommunications company. Mr. Shanmugaraj holds an M.S. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Iowa and a B.E. in electronics and communications from the National Institute of Technology, Trichy in India. We believe that Mr. Shanmugaraj is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive leadership experience in the optics and network industries, his extensive knowledge of our company and his service as our president and chief executive officer.

John F. Gavin has served as our chief financial officer since February 2012. Prior to joining Acacia, from January 2011 to February 2012, Mr. Gavin was the chief financial officer of Hiperos LLC, a software-as-a-service company. From June 2005 to January 2011, he served as the chief operating officer of Akorri Networks, Inc., a data center virtualization management company, where he also served as the interim acting chief executive officer in 2010. Previously, Mr. Gavin served as the chief financial officer and chief operating officer of SMaL Camera Technologies, Inc., a designer of CMOS digital imaging solutions for a variety of business and consumer applications, the chief financial officer of Pirus Networks, Inc., a provider of multi-protocol storage networking switching products, and the

 

94


Table of Contents

chief financial officer of C-Port Corporation, a developer of CMOS microprocessor-based technologies for communications routers and switches. Mr. Gavin also served in various roles, most recently as the vice president of finance, sales and marketing North America, at Digital Equipment Corporation, a vendor of computer systems, for over 17 years. Mr. Gavin holds a B.S. in accounting from Stonehill College and a M.B.A. from Anna Maria College.

Benny P. Mikkelsen, one of the founders of our company, has served as our chief technology officer and a director since June 2009. Prior to joining Acacia, Mr. Mikkelsen co-founded and served as the vice president of technology of Mintera Corporation, a high-speed transceiver company. Prior to that, he held various engineering positions with Bell Laboratories, a research and scientific development company owned by Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. Mr. Mikkelsen holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the Technical University of Denmark. We believe that as a founder, and based on Mr. Mikkelsen’s deep experience in the optics and network industries, his extensive knowledge of our company and his position as our chief technology officer, Mr. Mikkelsen provides a valuable contribution to our board of directors.

Christian J. Rasmussen, one of the founders of our company, has served as our vice president of digital signal processing and optics since June 2015 and as our director of digital signal processing and optics from June 2009 to June 2015. Prior to joining Acacia, Mr. Rasmussen was a principal optical engineer of Mintera Corporation, a high-speed transceiver company. Mr. Rasmussen holds an M.S. in electrical engineering and a Ph.D. in optical communications from the Technical University of Denmark.

Mehrdad Givehchi, one of the founders of our company, has served as our vice president of hardware and software since June 2015 and previously served as our director of hardware and software from June 2009 to June 2015. Prior to joining Acacia, Mr. Givehchi was the consulting optical engineer of Mintera Corporation, a high-speed transceiver company. Prior to that, he served as the principal hardware engineer of Sycamore Networks, Inc., a developer and marketer of intelligent networking products for fixed line and mobile network operators, and as the principal hardware engineer of Tektronix, Inc., a designer of test and measurement equipment. Mr. Givehchi holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Bhupendra C. Shah has served as our vice president of engineering since June 2009. Prior to joining Acacia, Mr. Shah was the director of engineering at Juniper Networks, Inc., a provider of networking products. Prior to that, he was the director of hardware and software development at Broadcom Corporation, a fabless semiconductor company. Previously, Mr. Shah co-founded and served as the vice president of engineering of Atlantic Cores Incorporated, a developer of standard products and on-chip intellectual property. Mr. Shah holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Lowell.

John J. LoMedico has served as our vice president of sales and business development since August 2009. Prior to joining Acacia, Mr. LoMedico was the vice president of sales and marketing of CHiL Semiconductor Corp., a producer of digital power management integrated circuits. Prior to CHiL Semiconductor, Mr. LoMedico served as the vice president of marketing of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation, a fabless semiconductor company, and as the vice president of sales and marketing of Cimaron Communications Corp., a framer integrated circuit company. Prior to that, Mr. LoMedico served in various management positions in the sales and marketing function at National Semiconductor, a semiconductor manufacturer that was acquired by Texas Instruments. Mr. LoMedico holds a B.A. from the University of New Hampshire and an M.B.A. from Northeastern University.

Janene I. Ásgeirsson has served as our vice president, general counsel and secretary since April 2015. Prior to joining Acacia, from January 2012 to April 2015, Ms. Ásgeirsson was a counsel in the

 

95


Table of Contents

corporate practice group of the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Prior to that, Ms. Ásgeirsson served as the senior corporate counsel of Entropic Communications, Inc., a semiconductor company, from June 2010 to January 2012. From August 2006 to June 2010, Ms. Ásgeirsson was a senior associate in the corporate practice group of the law firm Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP. Previously, Ms. Ásgeirsson was an associate in the corporate practice group of the law firm Foley Hoag LLP. Ms. Ásgeirsson holds a B.A. from the University of San Diego and a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law.

John P. Kavanagh has served as our senior vice president of operations/supply chain since May 2015. Prior to joining Acacia, from October 2010 to May 2015, Mr. Kavanagh served as the vice president, supply chain of JDS Uniphase Corporation, an optical communications network company. From June 2000 to October 2010, he held several roles, including vice president, general manager and vice president of supply chain, at Finisar Corporation, a manufacturer of optical communication components. Mr. Kavanagh holds a B.S. in computer engineering from the University of Limerick in Ireland.

Renee M. Pianka has served as our chief human resources officer since December 2015. Prior to joining Acacia, Ms. Pianka was a vice president, human resources for the global services division of EMC Corporation, an information storage and infrastructure company, from January 2015 to December 2015, where she also served in increasingly senior roles in the human resources department from July 2002 to January 2015, most recently as a senior director of human resources from July 2011 to January 2015, and as a director of human resources from March 2007 to July 2011. Ms. Pianka holds a B.S. and an M.B.A. from Northeastern University.

Eric A. Swanson has served as the chairman of our board of directors since August 2009. Since 2006, Mr. Swanson has served as a research associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. From January 2004 to September 2016, he provided consulting services to The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Previously, Mr. Swanson co-founded Sycamore Networks, Inc., a developer and marketer of intelligent networking products for fixed line and mobile network operators, and served as its general manager and chief scientist. Mr. Swanson holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and an M.S. in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We believe that Mr. Swanson is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience in the telecommunication and photonics industries, his deep knowledge of our company, and his experience on other boards of directors.

Peter Y. Chung has served as a director of our company since April 2013. Mr. Chung is a managing director and the chief executive officer of Summit Partners, L.P., a growth equity firm, where he has been employed since 1994. He is currently a director of A10 Networks, Inc., a provider of application networking solutions, and M/A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc., a provider of analog semiconductor solutions for use in radio frequency, microwave and millimeter wave applications. Previously, Mr. Chung served as a director of various other entities, including NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc., a private company that provides teleradiology services, SeaBright Holdings, Inc., a private specialty workers’ compensation insurer, and Ubiquiti Networks, Inc., a developer of networking technology for service providers and enterprises. Mr. Chung holds an A.B. in economics from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Chung is qualified to serve as a director of our company due to his wide-ranging experience in investment banking, private equity and venture capital investing in the communications technology sector and his participation on private and public company boards.

Stan J. Reiss has served as a director of our company since August 2009. Mr. Reiss is a general partner of Matrix Partners, a venture capital investment firm specializing in technology companies, where he has worked since July 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Reiss was an engagement manager at