ENDEAVOR IP, INC. - FORM 10-Q - September 19, 2016

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - ENDEAVOR IP, INC.	ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - ENDEAVOR IP, INC.	ex32-1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: July 31, 2016

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission File Number: 000-55094

Endeavor IP, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		45-2563323
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

	140 Broadway, 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005 Phone: 212-858-7514
	(Name, Address and Telephone Number Of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o		Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of September 19, 2016, there were 2,341,204,979 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements			1
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			2
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			6
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			6

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			7
Item 1A. Risk Factors			7
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			7
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			7
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			7
Item 5. Other Information			7
Item 6. Exhibits			8

SIGNATURES			9

Table of Contents

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENDEAVOR IP, INC. Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
	Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015 (Unaudited)		F-1

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		F-2

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		F-3

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		F-4

-1-

Table of Contents

ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	July 31, 2016			October 31, 2015

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	5,885		$	87,589
Accounts receivable		472			50,000
Total Current Assets		6,357			137,589

Property and equipment, net		1,829			3,031

Patents, net		492,460			587,510

Total Assets	$	500,646		$	728,130

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	196,478		$	122,697
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		25,000			-
Loan payable		20,000			-
Convertible notes payable - net of debt discount and debt issuance costs		85,029			153,384
Payroll tax payable		97,415			87,583
Accrued compensation - officers		1,010,958			834,986
Accrued interest		3,517			11,052
Derivative liabilities, current portion		155,215			370,412
Total Current Liabilities		1,593,612			1,580,114

LONG TERM LIABILITIES
Derivative liabilities, net of current portion		523			1,575
Total Long Term Liabilities		523			1,575

Total Liabilities		1,594,135			1,581,689

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:

Preferred stock; par value $0.0001; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock; par value $0.0001; 3,000,000,000 shares authorized; 2,341,204,979 and 1,196,130,329 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015, respectively		234,121			119,613
Additional paid-in capital		2,543,212			2,157,038
Accumulated deficit		(3,860,015	)		(3,119,403	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation loss		(10,807	)		(10,807	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(1,093,489	)		(853,559	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	500,646		$	728,130

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-1

Table of Contents

ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	For the three months			For the three months			For the nine months			For the nine months
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
	July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015			July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015

REVENUES	$	-		$	752,237		$	320,000		$	1,219,737

COST OF REVENUES
Legal and inventor fees		-			322,264			150,192			514,466
Settlement revenue fees and compensation		-			304,934			80,000			304,934

GROSS MARGIN		-			125,039			89,808			400,337

OPERATING EXPENSES
Compensation		79,705			112,859			249,932			604,694
Director fees		27,000			24,000			81,000			72,099
Professional fees		49,215			57,168			138,673			271,649
General and administrative		46,051			62,956			153,246			229,309

Total operating expenses		201,971			256,983			622,851			1,177,751

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(201,971	)		(131,944	)		(533,043	)		(777,414	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Gain on settlement of accounts payable		-			-			-			64,000
Interest expense		(1,779	)		(137,915	)		(25,184	)		(589,464	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		3,807			68,460			(182,385	)		117,534

Other income (expense), net		2,028			(69,455	)		(207,569	)		(407,930	)

NET LOSS	$	(199,943	)	$	(201,399	)	$	(740,612	)	$	(1,185,344	)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
- BASIC AND DILUTED		2,340,746,740			343,529,594			2,256,821,681			200,274,468

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Table of Contents

ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the nine months			For the nine months
	Ended			Ended
	July 31, 2016			July 31, 2015

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(740,612	)	$	(1,185,344	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation expense		1,202			1,198
Stock based compensation		10,341			360,129
Gain on settlement of accounts payable		-			(64,000	)
Amortization of patents		95,050			94,703
Amortization of debt issuance costs		1,018			21,562
Amortization of debt discount		18,497			306,337
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		182,385			(117,534	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		-			10,604
Accounts receivable		49,528			(100,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		73,780			(64,300	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		25,000			-
Accrued interest		(1,095	)		261,565
Payroll taxes payable		9,832			-
Accrued compensation - officers		175,972			284,124

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(99,102	)		(190,956	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from loan payable		20,000			-
Repayments on convertible notes payable		(2,602	)		-
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		-			132,000
Cash paid for debt issuance costs		-			(10,100	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		17,398			121,900

NET CHANGE IN CASH		(81,704	)		(69,056	)

Cash at beginning of period		87,589			210,704
Cash at end of period	$	5,885		$	141,648

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	4,398		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-

NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued upon conversion of notes payable	$	91,707		$	329,271
Derivative cease to exist upon conversion of notes payable	$	398,635		$	534,330
Debt discount recorded on convertible debts and warrants	$	-		$	99,177

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Nature of Operations

Nature of Operations

Endeavor IP, Inc.

Endeavor IP, Inc. (“Endeavor” or the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 8, 2009.

Name Change and Change in Business

Effective May 15, 2013, the Company filed with the State of Nevada, a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation, changing its name from Finishing Touches Home Goods, Inc. to Endeavor IP, Inc.

On May 13, 2013, Endeavor, through its wholly owned subsidiary, IP Acquisition Sub I, Inc., purchased certain intellectual property rights from Mesh Comm, LLC (“Mesh”) under the terms of a patent purchase agreement. Mesh was incorporated in the State of Georgia on November 7, 2008. Subsequent to the purchase IP Acquisition Sub I, Inc. transferred the intellectual property to Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. See below regarding the formation of Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. IP Acquisition Sub I, Inc. is currently inactive.

On May 13, 2013, Endeavor, through its wholly owned subsidiary, IP Acquisition Sub I, Inc., purchased certain intellectual property rights from Solid Solar Energy, Inc., n/k/a Spiral Energy Tech, Inc. under the terms of a patent purchase agreement. Subsequent to the purchase IP Acquisition Sub II, Inc. transferred the intellectual property to Endeavor Energy, Inc. See below regarding the formation of Endeavor Energy, Inc.

The Company is engaged in the commercialization and development of intellectual property assets in the United States. The Company actively pursues licensing revenues by providing a license to its intellectual property to those entities that wish to acquire a right to use the technology. The intellectual property was acquired from a third parties and includes U.S. issued patents and applications.

Formation of Subsidiaries to Acquire Intellectual Property

On May 6, 2013, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary in the State of Delaware, Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. (“MeshTech”). MeshTech owns the two patents and one patent application acquired in connection with the business acquisition of Mesh Comm, LLC.

On July 8, 2013, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary in the State of Delaware, Endeavor Energy, Inc. (“Endeavor Energy”). Endeavor Energy owns the patents acquired from Solid Solar Energy, Inc. under the terms of a patent purchase agreement.

Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

F-4

Table of Contents

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2016.

Fiscal Year-End

The Company elected October 31st as its fiscal year ending date.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i) Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii) Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

(iii) Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

(iv) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, or other capital-raising transaction, among other factors.

F-5

Table of Contents

(v) Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of derivative liability and equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value derivative liability, share options and similar instruments.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Corporate Structure

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:

Name of Subsidiary or Consolidated Entity	Place of Formation/Incorporation (Jurisdiction)	Date of Incorporation (Date of Disposition, if Applicable)	Attributable Interest

Endeavor MeshTech, Inc.	Delaware	May 6, 2013		100	%

Endeavor Energy, Inc.	Delaware	July 8, 2013		100	%

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

F-6

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10 35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, payroll tax payable and accrued interest approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company’s convertible notes payable and notes payable approximate their fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015.

The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative conversion feature and warrant liability.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative conversion features

The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative warrant liability and derivative liability on the conversion feature at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities.

F-7

Table of Contents

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-35-29 through 35-36 Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall include only the future cash flows (cash inflows less associated cash outflows) that are directly associated with and that are expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall incorporate the entity’s own assumptions about its use of the asset (asset group) and shall consider all available evidence. The assumptions used in developing those estimates shall be reasonable in relation to the assumptions used in developing other information used by the entity for comparable periods, such as internal budgets and projections, accruals related to incentive compensation plans, or information communicated to others. However, if alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) are under consideration or if a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows associated with the likely course of action, the likelihood of those possible outcomes shall be considered. A probability-weighted approach may be useful in considering the likelihood of those possible outcomes. Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall be made for the remaining useful life of the asset (asset group) to the entity. For long-lived assets (asset groups) that have uncertainties both in timing and amount, an expected present value technique will often be the appropriate technique with which to estimate fair value.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

F-8

Table of Contents

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Pursuant to FASB ASC Paragraph 310-10-35-47, trade receivables that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future shall be reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows FASB ASC Paragraphs 310-10-35-7 through 310-10-35-10 to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. Pursuant to FASB ASC Paragraph 310-10-35-9, losses from uncollectible receivables shall be accrued when both of the following conditions are met: (a) information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired at the date of the financial statements, and (b) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Those conditions may be considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables. If the conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular receivables that are uncollectible may not be identifiable. The Company reviews individually each trade receivable for collectability and performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

Pursuant to FASB ASC Paragraph 310-10-35-41, credit losses for trade receivables (uncollectible trade receivables), which may be for all or part of a particular trade receivable, shall be deducted from the allowance. The related trade receivable balance shall be charged off in the period in which the trade receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously charged off shall be recorded when received. The Company charges off its trade account receivables against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

The Company had no bad debt expense for the reporting period ended July 31, 2016 or 2015.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

	Estimated Useful Life (Years)

Computer equipment		3

Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill

The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

Patent portfolios that have finite useful lives, are amortized on the straight-line method over their useful lives ranging from 7 to 16 years. Costs incurred to acquire these patents, including legal costs, are also capitalized as long-lived assets and amortized on a straight-line basis with the associated patent.

Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment.

F-9

Table of Contents

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include (a.) affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); (b). Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c.) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d.) principal owners of the Company and members of their immediate families; (e.) management of the Company and members of their immediate families; (f.) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g.) Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 850-10-50-1 and 50-5 financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amount due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Debt with Conversion and Other Options

The Company follows the guidance of ASC Subtopic 470-20 (“Subtopic 470-20”) for debt with conversion and other options.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 470-20-25-1 the guidance in this Section shall be considered after consideration of the guidance in the Fair Value Options Subsections of Subtopic 825-10 and the guidance in Subtopic 815-15 on bifurcation of embedded derivatives, as applicable.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 470-20-25-2 proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) shall be allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The portion of the proceeds so allocated to the warrants shall be accounted for as paid-in capital. The remainder of the proceeds shall be allocated to the debt instrument portion of the transaction. This usually results in a discount (or, occasionally, a reduced premium), which shall be accounted for under Topic 835.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 470-20-25-5 and 25-6 an embedded beneficial conversion feature present in a convertible instrument shall be recognized separately at issuance by allocating a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional paid-in capital. A contingent beneficial conversion feature shall be measured using the commitment date stock price but, shall not be recognized in earnings until the contingency is resolved.

F-10

Table of Contents

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 470-20-30-5, 30-8 and 30-13 the Company (a) first, allocates the proceeds received in a financing transaction that includes a convertible instrument to the convertible instrument and any other detachable instruments, such as detachable warrants, on a relative fair value basis; (b) then, calculates an effective conversion price and uses that effective conversion price to measure the intrinsic value, if any, of the embedded conversion option. If the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is greater than the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument, the amount of the discount assigned to the beneficial conversion feature is limited to the amount of the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument. Issuance costs incurred with parties other than the investor shall not be offset against the proceeds received in the issuance in calculating the intrinsic value of a conversion option; however, any amounts paid to the investor when the transaction is consummated represent a reduction in the proceeds received by the issuer (not issuance costs) and shall affect the calculation of the intrinsic value of an embedded option.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 835-30-45-1A and 45-3 the discount, premium, or debt issuance costs shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from or addition to the face amount of the note as it is not an asset or liability separable from the note that gives rise to it. The discount, premium, or debt issuance costs shall not be classified as a deferred charge or deferred credit. Amortization of discount, premium, or debt issuance costs shall be reported as interest expense in the case of liabilities or as interest income in the case of assets.

Derivative Instruments

In accordance with ASC Paragraph 815-15-25-1 the conversion feature and certain other features are considered embedded derivative instruments, such as a conversion reset provision, a penalty provision and redemption option, which are to be recorded at their fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible note and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The Company records the resulting discount on debt related to the conversion features at initial transaction and amortizes the discount using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments. The conversion liability is then marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown in the statements of operations.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

The Company follows ASC Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock. Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The adoption of Section 815-40-15 has affected the accounting for (i) certain freestanding warrants that contain exercise price adjustment features and (ii) convertible bonds issued by foreign subsidiaries with a strike price denominated in a foreign currency.

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then that the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to compute the fair value of the embedded conversion feature of convertible notes and warrants as the Company determined the fair value of the embedded conversion feature and warrants using either the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or a more sophisticated model to be materially the same. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time equal to the remaining contractual term of the instrument granted.

F-11

Table of Contents

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue is recognized, for paid-up licenses, as of the date each license agreement or settlement is signed, or when an enforceable agreement is reached.

The Company makes estimates and judgments when determining whether the collectability of fees receivable from licensees is reasonably assured. The Company assesses the collectability of fees receivable based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and the credit-worthiness of licensees. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, the fee is recognized when collectability becomes reasonably assured, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, which is generally upon receipt of cash for transactions where collectability may have been an issue. The Company’s estimates regarding collectability impact the actual revenues recognized each period and the timing of the recognition of revenues. The Company’s assumptions and judgments regarding future collectability could differ from actual events and thus materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

The Company generally receives a one-time, lump sum payment, in exchange for granting a non-exclusive license. At the time of payment, there are typically no further obligations for the Company or any licensee.

Revenues from patent enforcement activities accounted for 100% of revenues since the Company’s inception. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful with future patent enforcement activities which may have an adverse material effect on the financial results of the Company. Currently, the Company has no recurring revenue from customers.

Costs of Revenue

Costs of revenue include the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s patent licensing and enforcement activities, including inventor royalties paid to original patent owners, contingent legal fees and other patent related legal expenses paid to external patent counsel, licensing and enforcement related research, consulting and other expenses paid to third parties. These expenses are included in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that the related revenues are recognized.

The Company pays approximately 25% to 40% of gross recoveries from litigation settlements to its legal counsel. These fees are based upon a gradual scale as negotiated between the Company and its legal counsel.

F-12

Table of Contents

Settlement revenue fees and compensation include the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s patent licensing and enforcement activities for services provided pursuant to the employment agreement of the Company’s CEO, President and General Counsel. The Company pays approximately 25% of gross recoveries from litigation settlements. These expenses are included in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that the related revenues are recognized.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A non-employee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, non-employee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to non-employee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to non-employee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.

If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

F-13

Table of Contents

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:

a.	The exercise price of the option.
b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
c.	The current price of the underlying share.
d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.
e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeit-ability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.

F-14

Table of Contents

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).

Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC paragraphs 505-50-25-6 and 505-50-25-7, a grantor shall recognize the goods acquired or services received in a share-based payment transaction when it obtains the goods or as services are received. A grantor may need to recognize an asset before it actually receives goods or services if it first exchanges share-based payment for an enforceable right to receive those goods or services. Nevertheless, the goods or services themselves are not recognized before they are received. If fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

F-15

Table of Contents

a.	The exercise price of the instrument.
b.	The expected term of the instrument, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
c.	The current price of the underlying share.
d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.
e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.

F-16

Table of Contents

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes. Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Earnings per Share

Earnings Per Share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from net income (loss). The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-40 through 45-42 convertible securities shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the if-converted method. The convertible preferred stock or convertible debt shall be assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later). In applying the if-converted method, conversion shall not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted EPS if the effect would be anti-dilutive.

F-17

Table of Contents

The Company’s contingent shares issuance arrangements, stock options or warrants are as follows:

	July 31, 2016		July 31, 2015

Stock options, exercise price ($0.75)		-		10,000
Warrants		5,248,619		55,800
Convertible notes payable		1,554,945,844		443,565,286
		1,560,194,463		443,631,086

There were 1,560,194,437 and 443,631,086 potentially outstanding dilutive common shares for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company follows Section 830-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-10-45”) for foreign currency translation to translate the financial statements of the foreign subsidiary from the functional currency, generally the local currency, into U.S. Dollars. Section 830-10-45 sets out the guidance relating to how a reporting entity determines the functional currency of a foreign entity (including of a foreign entity in a highly inflationary economy), re-measures the books of record (if necessary), and characterizes transaction gains and losses. Pursuant to Section 830-10-45, the assets, liabilities, and operations of a foreign entity shall be measured using the functional currency of that entity. An entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates; normally, that is the currency of the environment, or local currency, in which an entity primarily generates and expends cash.

The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is determined based on management’s judgment and involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which the subsidiary transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency, but any dependency upon the parent and the nature of the subsidiary’s operations must also be considered. If a subsidiary’s functional currency is deemed to be the local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of that subsidiary’s financial statements is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. However, if the functional currency is deemed to be the U.S. Dollar, then any gain or loss associated with the re-measurement of these financial statements from the local currency to the functional currency would be included in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company disposes of foreign subsidiaries, then any cumulative translation gains or losses would be recorded into the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss). If the Company determines that there has been a change in the functional currency of a subsidiary to the U.S. Dollar, any translation gains or losses arising after the date of change would be included within the statement of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant subsidiaries’ local currencies to be their respective functional currencies.

The financial records of the Company's discontinued subsidiaries are maintained in their local currency, which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated from the local currency into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates for the period to approximate translation at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates those elements are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency translation gain (loss) resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

F-18

Table of Contents

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, or ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 amends current presentation guidance by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Prior to the issuance of ASU 2015-03, debt issuance costs were required to be presented as an asset in the balance sheet. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 on April 30, 2016 and prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. As of October 31, 2015, $1,018 of debt issuance costs were reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet from current assets to convertible notes payable. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 did not impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, “Leases” (topic 842). The FASB issued this update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging” (topic 815). The FASB issued this update to clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in this update is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

F-19

Table of Contents

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (topic 606). In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross verses Net)” (topic 606). These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on materiality of performance obligations; evaluating distinct performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity's promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use an entity's intellectual property or a right to access an entity's intellectual property. The amendments in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or service for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity's adoption of ASU 2014-09, which we intend to adopt for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

There were no other new accounting pronouncements that were issued or became effective since the issuance of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at July 31, 2016, a net loss and negative cash flows from operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering or other capital-raising transaction, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering or other capital-raising transaction.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Patents and Cost of Revenues

Patents were comprised of the following at July 31, 2016:

	Estimated Life (years)	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment Charges		Net
Patent #1	7	$	800,000	$	(383,050	)	$	-	$	416,950
Patent #2	16	$	50,034	$	(10,124	)	$	-	$	39,910
Patent #3	11	$	50,034	$	(14,434	)	$	-	$	35,600
Total		$	900,068	$	(407,608	)	$	-	$	492,460

For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016, amortization expense related to the intangibles with finite lives totaled $31,915 and $95,050, respectively and $31,914 and $94,703 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2015, respectively.

F-20

Table of Contents

At July 31, 2016, future amortization of intangible assets is as follows:

Year Ending October 31,
2016 (remainder of year)	$	31,914
2017		126,616
2018		126,616
2019		126,616
2020 and Thereafter		80,698
	$	492,460

Note 5 – Loan Payable

On June 28, 2016, the Company received an advance of $20,000 from a third party. The proceeds interest free were used for the Company’s general operating expenses. The Company did not impute interest on the loan as it was deemed to be de minimus to the financial statements.

Note 6 – Convertible Notes Payable

On June 10, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement for the issuance of two convertible notes to a third party lender totaling $63,000. Each note accrues interest at 8% per annum maturing on June 10, 2015. The notes are convertible at the discretion of the lender after 180 days from execution of the agreement at a conversion price of approximately 55% of the average of the lowest trading price for the common stock during the 10 day trading period ending on the latest and complete trading day prior to the notice of conversion. The gross proceeds of $31,500 from the first note were received upon execution of the agreement. The remaining $31,500 or “back-end note” was received by the Company on December 19, 2014. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $32,111 of principal and accrued interest of the first note into 54,244,495 shares of Common Stock. As of October 31, 2015, the balance on the first note due to the lender after the above conversions was $0. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $15,557 of principal and accrued interest of the back-end note into 151,497,618 shares of Common Stock. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the lender converted an aggregate of $19,220 of principal and accrued interest of the back-end note into 279,413,089 shares of Common Stock. As of July 31, 2016, the principal balance on the back-end note due to the lender was $0. Thus, there will be no more conversions on this note.

On June 24, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement for the issuance of two convertible notes to a third party lender totaling $40,000. Each note accrues interest at 8% per annum maturing on June 24, 2015. The notes are convertible at the discretion of the lender after 180 days from execution of the agreement at a conversion price of approximately 55% of the average of the lowest trading price for the common stock during the 10 day trading period ending on the latest and complete trading day prior to the notice of conversion. The gross proceeds of $20,000 from the first note were received upon execution of the agreement. The remaining $20,000 or “back-end note” was received by the Company on March 23, 2015. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $21,124 of principal and accrued interest into 60,521,372 shares of Common Stock. As of October 31, 2015, the balance on the first note due to the lender after the above conversions was $0. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $8,215 of principal and accrued interest of the back-end note into 98,987,151 shares of Common Stock. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the lender elected to convert an aggregate of $12,721 of principal and accrued interest of its back-end note into 231,284,909 shares of common stock. As of July 31, 2016, the principal and accrued interest on the back-end notes due to the lender was $0. Thus, there will be no more conversions on this note.

F-21

Table of Contents

On July 16, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party lender, under which the Company issued a secured convertible note in the amount of $279,000. The note includes an original issue discount of $25,000 plus an additional $4,000 to cover the lender’s due diligence and legal fees. The principal amount will be paid to the lender in five tranches of an initial amount under the note of $100,000 and four additional amounts of $37,500. The initial $100,000 in cash has been paid to the Company and the remaining $150,000 has yet to be funded as of or subsequent to July 31, 2016 because the Company has yet to request additional funding. The notes are convertible into common stock, at the option of the lender, at $0.06 per share subject to adjustment in the case of a default, a dilutive issuance, an installment payment in stock, a reorganization or recapitalization as set forth in the agreement. In the event the Company elects to prepay all or any portion of the notes, the Company is required to pay the lender an amount in cash equal to 125% of the outstanding balance of the note, plus accrued interest and any other amounts owing. Beginning on the date that is six months after the initial funding of the note and on the same day of each month thereafter until the maturity date, the Company shall pay to the note holder the applicable installment amount due, as per the installment formula further outlined in the agreement, in cash or by converting such installment amount into shares of common stock. The installment conversion price shall be the lesser of (i) $0.06 per share, and (ii) 60% of the lowest closing bid price in the fifteen trading days immediately preceding the applicable conversion. If at any time the lowest closing bid price in the fifteen trading days immediately preceding any date of measurement is below $0.01, then in such event the then-current conversion factor shall be reduced to 55% for all future conversions. On the date that is twenty-three trading days (a “True-Up Date”) from each date the Company delivers free trading installment conversion shares to the note holder, there shall be a true-up where the Company shall deliver to the note holder additional conversion shares (“True-Up Shares”) if the installment conversion price as of the True-Up Date is less than the installment conversion price used in the applicable installment notice. Concurrently with the issuance of the note, 5,248,619 warrants were issued with an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The warrants are fully vested, have a life of five years from date of issuance and contain a cashless exercise provision. On October 14, 2015 the Company entered into an amendment to the note. The note balance including accrued interest on the date of the amendment was $104,492. The material modifications of the note terms as per the amendment are summarized below:

●	In exchange for the note amendment the aggregate principal and accrued interest amount of the note was increased to $107,367;
●	The notes are convertible into common stock, at the option of the lender, at the lesser of (i) $0.06 per share, and (ii) 55% of the lowest closing bid price in the fifteen trading days immediately preceding the applicable conversion;
●	All down round anti-dilution provisions, installment provisions and true-up provisions were deleted in their entirety;
●	The note holder waives any and all breaches of the note and any and all events of default that may have occurred prior to the execution of the amendment;
●	The original note had a maturity date of December 18, 2015. The amendment is silent as to the date of maturity.

In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-10, since the present value of the cash flows under the new debt instrument was not at least ten percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original debt instrument, the Company accounted for the amendment to the secured convertible note agreement as a debt modification. Accordingly, the Company recorded a debt discount of $2,875 which will be amortized over the remaining life of the debt to interest expense.

On June 10, 2016, the Company entered into a Note Settlement Agreement with the above third party lender; thereby reducing the amount owed to the third party lender to $40,000. On the date of the Note Settlement Agreement, the principal balance on the notes due to the lender was approximately $86,000. Under the Note Settlement Agreement, if the Company pays $40,000 in cash or makes 20 monthly payments of $2,000 to the third party lender, the Company shall be deemed to have paid the entire balance of the outstanding balance of the original Note in full. The Company was able to negotiate the amount it owes the third party lender down to $40,000. At any time, the Company has the right to payoff the difference between the $40,000 and any amount already paid. In no event shall the aggregate amount owed by the Company exceed $40,000 (so long as at least $2,000 is paid by the 5th day of every month until the $40,000 is paid off). Once the $40,000 is paid off, the Company shall have no further obligation to the third-party lender and the Note shall be deemed to be fully satisfied. Effective June 10, 2016, the third party lender shall have no right to convert all or any portion of the note, as long as the Company is paying a minimum of $2,000 per month until the $40,000 is paid off. The principal reduction of the notes and accrued interest is contingent upon the Company making all payments timely; therefore, the accounting implication cannot be measured at this time.

F-22

Table of Contents

During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $26,797 of principal and accrued interest into 209,100,000 shares of Common Stock. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the lender elected to convert an aggregate of $11,456 of principal and accrued interest into 138,855,000 shares of common stock. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the Company paid $2,602 of principal and $4,398 accrued interest on the note.

On January 16, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement for the issuance of a convertible note to a third party lender for $42,500. The note accrues interest at 8% per annum maturing on October 9, 2015. The notes are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to approximately 58% of the average of the lowest 3 trading prices for the common stock during the 10 day trading period ending on the latest and complete trading day prior to the conversion. During the year ended October 31, 2015, the lender converted an aggregate of $35,410 of principal into 358,693,138 shares of Common Stock. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the lender elected to convert an aggregate of $8,790 of principal and accrued interest into 146,500,000 shares of common stock. As of July 31, 2016, the principal and accrued interest on the notes due to the lender was $0. Thus, there will be no more conversions on this note.

On April 6, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement for the issuance of a convertible note to a third party lender for $38,000. The note accrues interest at 8% per annum maturing on January 9, 2016. The note is convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to approximately 58% of the average of the lowest 3 trading prices for the common stock during the 10 day trading period ending on the latest and complete trading day prior to the conversion. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the lender elected to convert an aggregate of $39,520 of principal and accrued interest into 352,121,499 shares of common stock. As of July 31, 2016, the principal and accrued interest on the notes due to the lender was $0. Thus, there will be no more conversions on this note.

Derivative Analysis

Because the conversion feature included in the convertible note payable and the warrants have full reset adjustments tied to future issuances of equity securities by the Company, they are subject to derivative liability treatment under Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“Section 815-40-15”).

Generally accepted accounting principles require that:

a.	Derivative financial instruments be recorded at their fair value on the date of issuance and then adjusted to fair value at each subsequent balance sheet date with any change in fair value reported in the statement of operations; and

b.	The classification of derivative financial instruments be reassessed as of each balance sheet date and, if appropriate, be reclassified as a result of events during the reporting period then ended.

Upon issuance of the notes, a debt discount was recorded and any difference in comparison to the face value of the note, representing the fair value of the conversion feature and the warrants in excess of the debt discount, was immediately charged to interest expense. The debt discount is amortized over the earlier of (i) the term of the debt or (ii) conversion of the debt, using the straight-line method which approximates the interest method. The amortization of debt discount is included as a component of interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. There was unamortized debt discount of $0 and $18,497 as of July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015, respectively.

The fair value of the embedded conversion feature and the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following estimates and assumptions at July 31, 2016:

Risk-free interest rate	0.67% to 0.76%
Expected life of grants	1.6 to 3.00 years
Expected volatility of underlying stock	432% - 480%
Dividends	$0

F-23

Table of Contents

Future minimum principal payments of the Company’s notes payable and convertible notes payable are as follows:

Year ending October 31,
2016 (remainder of year)	$	85,029
	$	85,029

Interest expense on the promissory and convertible notes for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016 totaled $1,779 and $5,670, respectively, and $81,219 and $261,565 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2015, respectively.

Accrued interest as of July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015 were $3,517 and $11,052, respectively.

The following are the major categories of assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value during the nine months ended July 31, 2016, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

	Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance

Embedded conversion feature	$	-	$	-	$	155,215	$	155,215
Warrant liability		-		-		523		523
July 31, 2016	$	-	$	-	$	155,738	$	155,738

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the nine months ended July 31, 2016.

	Warrant Liability			Embedded Conversion Feature			Total
Balance - October 31, 2015	$	1,575		$	370,412		$	371,987
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(1,052	)		183,438			182,386
Extinguishment of debt		-			-			-
Included in debt discount		-			-			-
Included in interest expense		-			-			-
Conversion of debt to equity		-			(398,635	)		(398,635	)
Balance – July 31, 2016	$	523		$	155,215		$	155,738

F-24

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

Consulting Agreements

Effective May 13, 2013, the Company entered into a two (2) year consulting agreement with the manager of Mesh; this individual assisted with all aspects of the acquired patent portfolio, including, among other things, maintenance of inventions, patent prosecutions and applications related to the patents. This individual was paid $7,000 per month. The agreement expired in May 2015. Professional fees recorded relating to the consulting agreement totaled $0 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016 and $0 and $42,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2015, respectively.

Employment Arrangements

On July 31, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Peter Charles as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Charles will be employed on an at-will basis and will receive a salary of $2,000 per week while he holds the position of Interim Chief Executive Officer. Other than with respect to the payment of salary on a weekly basis, no compensatory arrangements have been entered into with Mr. Charles in connection with his appointment as Interim Chief Executive Officer.

Note 8 – Separation Agreement

On July 31, 2016, Franciscus Diaba, the Chief Executive Officer, President and General Counsel of the Company, resigned from all positions he held as an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including his positions as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and General Counsel. Mr. Diaba’s resignation was effective July 31, 2016.

On July 31, 2016, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Diaba that provided for the following: (i) payment of Mr. Diaba’s base salary through July 31, 2016; (ii) Mr. Diaba’s entitlement to receive any payments pursuant to Section 4(d) of his Employment Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2014, as amended to date (the “Diaba Employment Agreement”) for so long as Mr. Diaba remains a director of the Company; (iii) Mr. Diaba’s entitlement to receive any payments pursuant to Sections 4(e) and (f) of the Diaba Employment Agreement through July 31, 2016 and for a period of 90 days thereafter should such rights to compensation occur; (iv) voluntary waiver in full of the fiscal 2016 bonus payment (the “Bonus Waiver”); (v) voluntary waiver in full of all payments in respect of accrued and unused vacation time (the “Vacation Payment Waiver”); and (vi) waiver of all equity grants made to Mr. Diaba which have not vested as of July 31, 2016 (the “Unvested Equity Waiver”). The Separation Agreement also provides that except with respect to the Bonus Waiver, the Vacation Payment Waiver and the Unvested Equity Waiver, nothing in the Separation Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any compensation or amounts that (x) were owed to Mr. Diaba as of July 31, 2016 and (y) had not been paid to Mr. Diaba as of July 31, 2016. Mr. Diaba did not forfeit any vested equity grants pursuant to the Separation Agreement.

On August 18, 2016, Mr. Diaba resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company, effective immediately.

Note 9 – Stockholders’ Deficit

(A) Common Stock

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, the Company issued the following common stock:

Transaction Type	Quantity of Shares	Valuation		Value per Share
Conversion of debt – (1)	1,148,174,497	$	91,707	$	0.000055-0.00017
Total	1,148,174,497	$	91,707

(1)	As discussed in Note 6 above, the Company issued 1,148,174,497 shares of Common Stock to five of the third party lenders upon conversion of $91,707 of principal and interest. The number of shares issued to each lender upon conversion was determined according to the convertible note agreements.

F-25

Table of Contents

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation totaled $(5,367) and $10,341 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016, respectively, and $0 and $360,129 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2015, respectively.

Forfeiture of unvested common stock

As per the terms of the Separation Agreement with Mr. Diaba, 3,099,848 shares of unvested restricted common stock granted to Mr. Diaba were forfeited.

F-26

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

References in this report to “Endeavor IP, Inc.,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Endeavor IP, Inc. and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires.

Our Business

General

On January 23, 2015, we reached an agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Ravinder Dhat resulting in his resignation as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board on January 23, 2015, but at that time Mr. Dhat remained a member of our Board of Directors. We entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Dhat that provided for, among other things, Mr. Dhat’s agreement to forfeit in full the following items as part of the Separation Agreement: (i) waiver in full of the 2014 bonus payment; (ii) non-payment of portions of various settlement proceeds that we entered into from ongoing litigation which payment was provided to Mr. Dhat by a board resolution offering such compensation; and (iii) agreement to terminate in full any and all obligations due and owing to Mr. Dhat under the amendment agreement we and Mr. Dhat entered into on November 7, 2014 (less vested equity grants). The Separation Agreement also terminated in full Mr. Dhat’s right to receive any further compensation resulting from any litigation settlements or license agreement that we enter into after January 23, 2015. In addition, the Separation Agreement also provided for the right to receive 20% of the proceeds that we may have received if we had sold or executed a letter of intent relating to the sale of our patent portfolio prior to June 23, 2015; payment of $8,653.85 for all earned, but unused vacation time as provided for in the Dhat Initial Employment Agreement; continuation of insurance coverage for Mr. Dhat and his family for a period of six (6) months from his resignation date; acknowledgement that the covenants with respect to our confidential information (as defined in the Dhat Initial Employment Agreement) will remain in place; waiver of any non-competition or non-solicitation provisions as well as any clawback rights described in Section 10 of the Dhat Initial Employment Agreement; and cooperation on the part of Mr. Dhat from time to time on matters that we may request and the right to retain 5,671,362 shares of restricted stock.

On January 23, 2015, our Board of Directors appointed Franciscus Diaba as our new Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. We also entered into an amendment to the Employment Agreement with Franciscus Diaba that appoints him as our new Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board assuming the duties formerly held by Ravinder Dhat in addition to his current role as our President.

On February 5, 2015, the Company appointed David Waldman as a director of the Company.

On February 9, 2015, Ravinder Dhat resigned from the board of directors of the Company.

On July 15, 2015, in addition to his position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Board also appointed Franciscus Diaba as General Counsel of the Company.

-2-

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

For the Three Months Ended July 31, 2016 compared to the Three Months Ended July 31, 2015

Revenue and Cost of Revenues

We recognized revenue of $0 and $752,237 for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The revenue for the three month period ending July 31, 2015 is the result of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits during the three months ended July 31, 2015. There was no settlement of patent infringement lawsuits during the three months ended July 31, 2016. The cost of revenues related to these settlements during the three months ended July 31, 2015 were legal fees of $224,444 and inventor fees of $97,820. Settlement revenue compensation related to settlements during the three months ended July 31, 2015 was $304,934.

Operating Expenses

During the three months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred compensation expense of $79,705, a decrease of $33,154 or 29% from $112,859 during the three months ended July 31, 2015. The primary reason for the decrease was that during the three months ended July 31, 2015 the Company incurred approximately $112,859 in officer compensation as compared to $75,000 in officer compensation during the three months ended July 31, 2016.

During the three months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred director fees of $27,000, an increase of $3,000 or 13% from $24,000 during the three months ended July 31, 2015.

During the three months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred professional fees of $49,215, a decrease of $7,953 or 14% compared to $57,168 during the three months ended July 31, 2015. During the three months ended July 31, 2016 the Company incurred a decrease in consulting fees related to business development and investor relations. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in legal fees related to public filing requirements, various employment agreements, and amendments thereto entered into during the period.

During the three months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred other general and administrative expenses of $46,051, a decrease of $16,905 or 27% from $62,956 during the three months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease primarily resulted from decreases in insurance expense, other miscellaneous overhead expenses, and miscellaneous service fees.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expenses) consist primarily of gains and losses on the change in fair value of derivative liabilities and interest expense all primarily related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes, promissory notes and warrant issuances.

Other income (expenses) - net increased by $71,483 to $2,028 during the three months ended July 31, 2016 as compared to other income (expenses) - net of $(69,455) during the three months ended July 31, 2015. For the three months ended July 31, 2016 other income (expenses) consisted of $(1,779) in interest expense and a gain on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $3,807. For the three months ended July 31, 2015 other income (expenses) consisted of $(137,915) in interest expense and a gain on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $68,460.

Net Loss

For the three months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred a net loss of $199,943, as compared to a net loss of $201,399 for the three months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease in net loss compared to the prior period was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating expenses as detailed above, a decrease in interest expense and a decrease in gain on change in fair value of derivative liabilities.

For the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2016 compared to the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015

-3-

Table of Contents

Revenue and Cost of Revenues

We recognized revenue of $320,000 and $1,219,737 for the nine months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The revenue for these periods are the result of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits during the nine months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The cost of revenues related to these settlements during the current period were legal fees of $110,234 and inventor fees of $39,958 as compared to legal fees of $348,756 and inventor fees of $165,710 for the nine months ended July 31, 2015. Settlement revenue compensation related to these settlements during the nine months ended July 31, 2016 was $80,000 compared to $304,934 for the nine months ended July 31, 2015.

Operating Expenses

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred compensation expense of $249,932, a decrease of $354,762 or 59% from $604,694 during the nine months ended July 31, 2015. The primary reason for the decrease was that during the nine months ended July 31, 2015 the Company recorded $335,829 in stock based compensation as compared to $10,341 in stock based compensation during the nine months ended July 31, 2016. In addition, during the nine months ended July 31, 2015 the Company recorded approximately $269,000 in officer compensation as compared to $225,000 in officer compensation during the nine months ended July 31, 2016.

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred director fees of $81,000, an increase of $8,901 or 12% from $72,099 during the nine months ended July 31, 2015. The increase in director’s fees was primarily the result of the Company appointing a new director of the Company on February 5, 2015 and an increase in monthly compensation to an existing director in January 2015. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in stock based compensation to directors. During the nine months ended July 31, 2015 the Company recorded $24,300 in stock based compensation to directors as compared to $0 in stock based compensation during the nine months ended July 31, 2016.

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred professional fees of $138,673, a decrease of $132,976 or 49% compared to $271,649 during the nine months ended July 31, 2015. During the nine months ended July 31, 2016 the Company incurred a decrease in consulting fees related to business development, financial advisory services and investor relations, and a decrease in legal fees primarily related to public filing requirements, debt conversion agreements, a rights agreement entered into during a prior period and various employment agreements, consulting agreements and amendments thereto entered into during a prior period. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in auditing fees primarily related to public filing requirements.

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred other general and administrative expenses of $153,246, a decrease of $76,063 or 33% from $229,309 during the nine months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease primarily resulted from decreases in travel and travel related expenses, insurance expense, miscellaneous overhead expenses, and miscellaneous service fees.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expenses) - net decreased by $200,361 to $(207,569) during the nine months ended July 31, 2016 as compared to other income (expenses) - net of $(407,930) during the nine months ended July 31, 2015. For the nine months ended July 31, 2016 other income (expenses) consisted of $(25,184) in interest expense and a loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $(182,385). For the nine months ended July 31, 2015 other income (expenses) consisted of a gain on settlement liabilities of $64,000, $(589,464) in interest expense and a gain on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $117,534.

Net Loss

For the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we incurred a net loss of $740,612, as compared to a net loss of $1,185,344 for the nine months ended July 31, 2015. The decrease in net loss compared to the prior period was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating expenses as detailed above and a decrease in interest expense offset by the change in fair value of derivative liability.

-4-

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of July 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015, we had cash balances of $5,885 and $87,589, respectively. As of July 31, 2016, we had a working capital deficit of $1,587,255, an increase in our working capital deficit of $144,730 or 10% compared to a working capital deficit of $1,442,525 at October 31, 2015. The change is primarily a result of a decrease in accounts receivable, a decrease in convertible notes payable, a decrease in accrued interest on notes payable and a decrease in derivative liabilities. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued officer compensation.

Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended July 31, 2016 was $99,102, a decrease of $91,854 or 48% compared with net cash used in operating activities of $190,956 for the nine months ended July 31, 2015.

Cash used in operating activities consist of net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items, including stock-based compensation expense, depreciation, amortization, accretion, changes in fair value of derivative liabilities, as well as the effect of changes in working capital and other activities.

The adjustments for the non-cash items decreased from the nine months ended July 31, 2015 to the nine months ended July 31, 2016 primarily attributed to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense as a result of no equity awards issued during the nine months ended July 31, 2016, a decrease in accretion of debt discount on convertible notes and the change in fair value of derivative liabilities due primarily to the mark to market of the Company’s derivatives embedded in the convertible notes and warrants. In addition, the net decrease in cash from changes in working capital activities from the nine months ended July 31, 2015 to the nine months ended July 31, 2016 primarily consisted of a decrease in accounts receivable, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses to related party, a decrease in interest accrued on the Company’s debt instruments, an increase in payroll taxes payable, and an increase in accrued compensation to an officer.

During the nine months ended July 31, 2016, we received proceeds of $20,000 through the issuance of demand loans. We also repaid $2,602 of principal towards convertible notes. During the nine months ended July 31, 2015, we raised gross proceeds of $132,000 through the issuance of convertible notes. We also paid $10,100 in debt issuance costs in relation to the convertible notes.

For the long term; however, we must raise additional funds or increase revenues from licensing our patents in order to fund our continuing operations. We may not be successful in our efforts to raise additional funds or achieve profitable operations. Even if we are able to raise additional funds through the sale of our equity or debt securities, or loans from financial institutions, our cash needs could be greater than anticipated in which case we could be forced to raise additional capital. Management believes that that the market value of our common stock as traded on the OTCQB is significantly undervalued and the market has underestimated the value of our patent portfolio. Management will consider various options to increase the value of our common stock. Management has informed the members of the board of directors that it will not continue to defer compensation and have initiated a dialog to consider various alternatives given our lack of liquidity.

At the present time, aside from that identified above, we have no commitments for any additional financing, and there can be no assurance that, if needed, additional capital will be available to us on commercially acceptable terms or at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, which may make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital when needed. If we cannot get the needed capital, we may not be able to become profitable and may have to curtail or cease our operations.

Going Concern

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we incurred a net loss from operations of $740,612 and had net cash used in operations of $99,102 for the nine months ended July 31, 2016 and a working capital deficit and stockholders’ deficit of $ 1,587,255 and $1,093,489, respectively, as of July 31, 2016. These factors raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going-concern.

-5-

Table of Contents

We expect to incur losses as we implement our business plan to develop and commercialize intellectual property assets. During the prior fiscal year, our cash flow requirements were primarily met by revenues from licensing efforts. Management expects to keep operating costs to a minimum until sufficient cash is available through financing or operating activities. Management plans to continue to seek other sources of financing on favorable terms; however, there are no assurances that any such financing can be obtained on favorable terms, if at all. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenues or obtain additional funds for our working capital needs, we may need to cease or curtail operations. Furthermore, there is no assurance the net proceeds from any successful financing arrangement will be sufficient to cover cash requirements for our operations. For these reasons, our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2016, included elsewhere in this document.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of the date of this report, we did not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file with the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive, financial and accounting officer Mr. Peter Charles of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, Mr. Charles concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive, financial and accounting officer, or officers performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. On July 31, 2016, Franciscus Diaba, the Chief Executive Officer, President and General Counsel of the Company, resigned from all positions he held as an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including his positions as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and General Counsel. Mr. Diaba’s resignation did not have an impact on our internal control over financial reporting.

-6-

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

In the ordinary course of business, we pursue legal remedies to enforce our intellectual property rights. Other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, we know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against us. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered beneficial shareholder is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to us. The following is a summary of our pending patent infringement litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights:

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Endeavor Energy, Inc. (“Endeavor Energy”), filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Tucson Electric Power Company (“TEP”) in the United States District Court of Arizona, Case No. 4:13-CV-2396-TUC-RCC. Endeavor Energy is asserting claims of patent infringement related to U.S. Patent No. 7,366,201 (the ‘201 patent), entitled “Remote Access Energy Meter System and Method.” The lawsuit alleges that the defendant has infringed, and continues to infringe, the claims of the ‘201 patent. Endeavor requested and was granted a stay of the lawsuit against TEP because Endeavor initiated a Reissue, which results in a patent application being filed post-grant to correct an error in an issued patent where the error renders the patent wholly or partially inoperable or invalid.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. (“Endeavor MeshTech”), filed patent infringement lawsuits against: Strix Systems, Inc. (“Strix”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Firetide, Inc. (“Firetide”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and Ericsson, Inc., BelAir Networks, Corp., and BelAir Networks, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The lawsuits allege that Strix, Firetide, Ericsson, Inc., BelAir Networks, Corp., and BelAir Networks, Inc. have infringed and continue to infringe the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,379,981, 8,700,749, and 8,855,019.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on January 28, 2016.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

-7-

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

d) Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Document Description
10.1		Separation Agreement dated July 31, 2016 between Endeavor IP, Inc. and Franciscus Diaba (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2016)
31.1*		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
32.1*		Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EX-101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
EX-101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
EX-101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
EX-101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
EX-101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
EX-101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

-8-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 19, 2016

	ENDEAVOR IP, INC.

	By:	/s/ Peter Charles
		Peter Charles
		Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

-9-

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

ENDEAVOR IP, INC. Reports