Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.exhibit312may122016.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.exhibit321may122016.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.exhibit322may122016.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.exhibit311may122016.htm


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 
_________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                     
Commission file number: 000-51948
_________________________________
Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________
Maryland
 
20-1432284
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago IL, 60606
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
(312) 897-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
_________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large accelerated filer
 
¨ 
  
Accelerated filer
 
¨
Non-accelerated filer
 
x  
  
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on May 12, 2016 were 48,531,906 shares of Class A Common Stock, 30,411,785 shares of Class M Common Stock, 7,320,485 of Class A-I Common Stock, 5,118,410 of Class M-I Common Stock and 6,387,184 shares of Class D Common Stock.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
INDEX

 
PAGE
NUMBER
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2


Item 1. Financial Statements.
Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
$ in thousands, except per share amounts
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Investments in real estate:
 
 
 
 
Land (including from VIEs of $32,645 and $32,645, respectively)
 
$
249,991

 
$
251,331

Buildings and equipment (including from VIEs of $187,824 and $187,505, respectively)
 
889,830

 
889,307

Less accumulated depreciation (including from VIEs of $(24,304) and $(23,146), respectively)
 
(81,265
)
 
(75,245
)
Net property and equipment
 
1,058,556

 
1,065,393

Investment in unconsolidated real estate affiliates
 
103,338

 
103,003

Net investments in real estate
 
1,161,894

 
1,168,396

Cash and cash equivalents (including from VIEs of $13,616 and $13,365, respectively)
 
160,293

 
34,739

Restricted cash (including from VIEs of $890 and $666, respectively)
 
1,727

 
1,227

Tenant accounts receivable, net (including from VIEs of $1,495 and $1,724, respectively)
 
4,164

 
3,500

Deferred expenses, net (including from VIEs of $146 and $118, respectively)
 
9,861

 
10,022

Acquired intangible assets, net (including from VIEs of $8,911 and $9,208, respectively)
 
83,070

 
86,471

Deferred rent receivable, net (including from VIEs of $951 and $852, respectively)
 
10,642

 
9,445

Prepaid expenses and other assets (including from VIEs of $287 and $373, respectively)
 
9,536

 
5,978

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,441,187

 
$
1,319,778

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes and other debt payable, net (including from VIEs of $141,706 and $141,972, respectively)
 
$
518,107

 
$
485,178

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses (including from VIEs of $1,888 and $2,058, respectively)
 
18,284

 
17,235

Distributions payable
 
9,445

 
8,633

Accrued interest (including from VIEs of $562 and $560, respectively)
 
1,699

 
1,659

Accrued real estate taxes (including from VIEs of $888 and $802, respectively)
 
3,562

 
1,925

Advisor fees payable
 
1,082

 
3,241

Acquired intangible liabilities, net
 
16,245

 
16,984

TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
568,424

 
534,855

Commitments and contingencies
 

 

Equity:
 
 
 
 
Class A common stock: $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 44,847,501 and 37,092,768 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
448

 
371

Class M common stock: $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 29,134,965 and 27,909,411 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
291

 
279

Class A-I common stock: $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 6,788,479 and 6,116,812 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
68

 
61

Class M-I common stock: $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 3,912,988 and 3,356,619 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
39

 
34

Class D common stock: $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 6,319,475 and 7,787,823 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
63

 
78

Additional paid-in capital (net of offering costs of $30,596 and $26,911 as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
 
1,146,482

 
1,051,230

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(1,820
)
 
(2,327
)
Distributions to stockholders
 
(160,733
)
 
(151,277
)
Accumulated deficit
 
(122,214
)
 
(123,700
)
Total Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. stockholders’ equity
 
862,624

 
774,749

Noncontrolling interests
 
10,139

 
10,174

Total equity
 
872,763

 
784,923

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
$
1,441,187

 
$
1,319,778

The abbreviation “VIEs” above means consolidated Variable Interest Entities.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$ in thousands, except share and per share amounts
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Three months ended March 31, 2016
 
Three months ended March 31, 2015
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 
 
$
23,570

 
$
17,650

Tenant recoveries and other rental income
 
 
5,776

 
4,075

Total revenues
 
 
29,346

 
21,725

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate taxes
 
 
3,722

 
2,845

Property operating
 
 
5,192

 
4,465

Provision for doubtful accounts
 
 
135

 
125

Property general and administrative
 
 
328

 
165

Advisor fees
 
 
3,028

 
1,638

Company level expenses
 
 
606

 
687

Acquisition expenses
 
 
180

 
133

Depreciation and amortization
 
 
9,009

 
6,564

Total operating expenses
 
 
22,200

 
16,622

Operating income
 
 
7,146

 
5,103

Other income and (expenses):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
 
(5,961
)
 
(4,227
)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates
 
 
335

 
180

Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt
 
 
40

 
29,009

Total other income and (expenses)
 
 
(5,586
)
 
24,962

Net income
 
 
1,560

 
30,065

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
 
 
(74
)
 
(6,553
)
Net income attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
 
 
$
1,486

 
$
23,512

Net income attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. per share-basic and diluted
 
 
$
0.02

 
$
0.48

Weighted average common stock outstanding-basic and diluted
 
 
87,274,769

 
49,162,338

Other comprehensive gain (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 
 
507

 
(692
)
Total other comprehensive gain (loss)
 
 
507

 
(692
)
Net comprehensive income
 
 
$
1,993

 
$
22,820


See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
$ in thousands, except share and per share amounts
(Unaudited)
 
 
Common Stock
 
Additional
Paid In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Distributions
to 
Stockholders
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
 
Shares
 
Amount
Balance, January 1, 2016
 
82,263,433

 
$
823

 
$
1,051,230

 
$
(2,327
)
 
$
(151,277
)
 
$
(123,700
)
 
$
10,174

 
$
784,923

Issuance of common stock
 
11,377,875

 
113

 
128,657

 

 

 

 

 
128,770

Repurchase of shares
 
(2,637,900
)
 
(27
)
 
(29,720
)
 

 

 

 

 
(29,747
)
Offering costs
 

 

 
(3,685
)
 

 

 

 

 
(3,685
)
Net income
 

 

 

 

 

 
1,486

 
74

 
1,560

Other comprehensive income
 

 

 

 
507

 

 

 

 
507

Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
20

 
20

Cash distributed to noncontrolling interests
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(129
)
 
(129
)
Distributions declared per share ($0.12)
 

 

 

 

 
(9,456
)
 

 

 
(9,456
)
Balance, March 31, 2016
 
91,003,408

 
$
909

 
$
1,146,482

 
$
(1,820
)
 
$
(160,733
)
 
$
(122,214
)
 
$
10,139

 
$
872,763

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
$ in thousands (Unaudited)

 
 
Three months ended March 31, 2016
 
Three months ended March 31, 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
1,560

 
$
30,065

Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
8,602

 
6,267

Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt
 
(40
)
 
(29,009
)
Provision for doubtful accounts
 
135

 
125

Straight line rent
 
(1,347
)
 
(276
)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates
 
(335
)
 
(180
)
Net changes in assets, liabilities and other
 
(637
)
 
(290
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
7,938

 
6,702

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from sale of real estate investments and fixed assets
 
7,371

 
119,706

Capital improvements and lease commissions
 
(4,135
)
 
(1,450
)
Investment in unconsolidated real estate affiliates
 

 
(73
)
Loan escrows
 
(500
)
 
1,092

Net cash provided by investing activities
 
2,736

 
119,275

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
 
120,554

 
48,399

Repurchase of shares
 
(29,747
)
 
(14,294
)
Offering costs
 
(3,437
)
 
(2,139
)
Distributions to stockholders
 
(2,869
)
 
(2,735
)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
 
(129
)
 
(10,891
)
Contributions received from noncontrolling interests
 
20

 
329

Deposits for loan commitments
 
(1,115
)
 
(344
)
Payment on credit facility
 
(30,000
)
 

Proceeds from mortgage notes and other debt payable
 
62,800

 

Debt issuance costs
 
(874
)
 
(28
)
Payment on early extinguishment of debt
 

 
(711
)
Principal payments on mortgage notes and other debt payable
 
(448
)
 
(80,683
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 
114,755

 
(63,097
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
125,429

 
62,880

Effect of exchange rates
 
125

 
(125
)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
 
34,739

 
32,211

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
 
$
160,293

 
$
94,966

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
 
Interest paid
 
$
5,189

 
$
4,132

Non-cash activities:
 
 
 
 
Write-offs of receivables
 
$
12

 
$
52

Write-offs of retired assets and liabilities
 
373

 
(288
)
Change in liability for capital expenditures
 
(309
)
 
1,081

Deposit of holdback proceeds from sale of real estate investments
 

 
1,847

Net liabilities transferred at sale of real estate investment
 

 
973

Change in issuance of common stock receivable
 
2,441

 
(294
)
Change in accrued offering costs
 
248

 
718

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
$ in thousands, except per share amounts
NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION
General
Except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. The terms “Advisor” and “LaSalle” refer to LaSalle Investment Management, Inc.
Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. is an externally managed, non-listed, daily valued perpetual-life real estate investment trust ("REIT") that owns and manages a diversified portfolio of apartment, industrial, office, retail and other properties located primarily in the United States. We expect over time that our real estate portfolio will be further diversified on a global basis through the acquisition of additional properties outside of the United States and will be complemented by investments in real estate-related debt and equity securities. We were incorporated on May 28, 2004 under the laws of the State of Maryland. We believe that we have operated in such a manner to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2004, when we first elected REIT status. As of March 31, 2016, we owned interests in a total of 53 properties, 52 of which are located in 14 states and one of which is located in Canada.
From our inception to October 1, 2012, we raised equity proceeds through private offerings of shares of our common stock. On October 1, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") declared effective our Registration Statement on Form S-11 with respect to our continuous public offering of up to $3,000,000 in any combination of Class A and Class M shares of common stock (the "Initial Public Offering"). Affiliates of our sponsor, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated ("JLL" or our "Sponsor"), currently have invested an aggregate of $50,200 through purchases of shares of our common stock. As of January 15, 2015, the date our Initial Public Offering terminated, we had raised aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our Class A and Class M common stock in our Initial Public Offering of $268,981.
On January 16, 2015, our follow-on Registration Statement on Form S-11 was declared effective by the SEC (Commission File No. 333-196886) with respect to our continuous public offering of up to $2,700,000 in any combination of shares of our Class A, Class M, Class A-I and Class M-I common stock, consisting of up to $2,400,000 of shares offered in our primary offering and up to $300,000 in shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (the “First Extended Public Offering”). We reserve the right to terminate the First Extended Public Offering at any time and to extend the First Extended Public Offering term to the extent permissible under applicable law. As of March 31, 2016, we have raised aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our Class A, Class M, Class A-I and Class M-I shares in our First Extended Public Offering of $482,580.
On June 19, 2014, we began a private offering of up to $400,000 in any combination of our Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D shares of common stock (the "Initial Private Offering"). Upon the SEC declaring the registration statement for our First Extended Public Offering effective, we terminated the Initial Private Offering. As of January 15, 2015, we had raised aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D common stock in our Initial Private Offering of approximately $43,510. On March 3, 2015, we commenced a new private offering (the "Follow-on Private Offering") of up to $350,000 in shares of our Class D common stock with indefinite duration. As of March 31, 2016, we have raised aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of our Class D shares in our Follow-on Private Offering of $50,082.
As of March 31, 2016, 44,847,501 shares of Class A common stock, 29,134,965 shares of Class M common stock, 6,788,479 shares of Class A-I common stock, 3,912,988 shares of Class M-I common stock, and 6,319,475 shares of Class D common stock were outstanding and held by a total of 8,468 stockholders.
LaSalle acts as our advisor pursuant to the second amended and restated advisory agreement between the Company and LaSalle (the “Advisory Agreement”). On May 10, 2016, we renewed our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor for a one-year term expiring on June 5, 2017. Our Advisor, a registered investment advisor with the SEC, has broad discretion with respect to our investment decisions and is responsible for selecting our investments and for managing our investment portfolio pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement. LaSalle is a wholly-owned, but operationally independent subsidiary of JLL, a New York Stock Exchange-listed global financial and professional services firm specializing in commercial real estate services. We have no employees, as all operations are managed by our Advisor. Our executive officers are employees of and compensated by our Advisor.

7


NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, consolidated variable interest entities ("VIE") and the unconsolidated investment in real estate affiliate accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We consider the authoritative guidance of accounting for investments in common stock, investments in real estate ventures, investors accounting for an investee when the investor has the majority of the voting interest but the minority partners have certain approval or veto rights, determining whether a general partner or general partners as a group controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights and the consolidation of VIEs in which we own less than a 100% interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Parenthetical disclosures are shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets regarding the amounts of VIE assets and liabilities that are consolidated. As of March 31, 2016, our VIEs include The District at Howell Mill, The Edge at Lafayette, Campus Lodge Tampa, Grand Lakes Marketplace and Townlake of Coppell due to the limited partnership structures and our partners having limited participation rights and no kick out rights. The creditors of our VIEs do not have general recourse to us. Prior to new consolidation guidance adopted on January 1, 2016, Grand Lakes Marketplace and Townlake of Coppell were not classified as VIEs. VIE disclosures as of December 31, 2015 on our Consolidated Balance Sheets have been updated to include Grand Lakes Marketplace and Townlake of Coppell for comparative purposes.
Noncontrolling interests represent the minority members’ proportionate share of the equity in our VIEs. At acquisition, the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests were measured and recorded at the estimated fair value. Noncontrolling interests will increase for the minority members’ share of net income of these entities and contributions and decrease for the minority members’ share of net loss and distributions. As of March 31, 2016, noncontrolling interests represented the minority members’ proportionate share of the equity of the entities listed above as VIEs.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016 (our “2015 Form 10-K”) and should be read in conjunction with such consolidated financial statements and related notes. The following notes to these interim consolidated financial statements highlight changes to the notes included in the December 31, 2015 audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 Form 10-K and present interim disclosures as required by the SEC.
The interim financial data as of March 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is unaudited. In our opinion, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against the portion of accounts receivable and deferred rent receivable that is estimated to be uncollectible. Such allowance is reviewed periodically based upon our recovery experience. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $436 and $312, respectively.
Deferred Expenses
Deferred expenses consist of lease commissions. Lease commissions are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related lease as a component of depreciation and amortization expense. Accumulated amortization of deferred expenses at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $1,583 and $1,234, respectively.
Acquisitions
We have allocated a portion of the purchase price of our acquisitions to acquired intangible assets, which include acquired in-place lease intangibles, acquired above-market in-place lease intangibles and acquired ground lease intangibles, which are reported net of accumulated amortization of $24,632 and $21,660 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The acquired intangible liabilities represent acquired below-market in-place leases, which are reported net of accumulated amortization of $4,109 and $3,364 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

8


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering assumptions, authoritative guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1—Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have access to at the measurement date.
Level 2—Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or instances where prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions that market participants would use to price the asset or liability based on the best available information.
The authoritative guidance requires the disclosure of the fair value of our financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The guidance does not apply to all balance sheet items. Market information as available or present value techniques have been utilized to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed. Since such amounts are estimates, there can be no assurance that the disclosed value of any financial instrument could be realized by immediate settlement of the instrument.
Partnership interests accounted for under the fair value option are stated at the fair value of our ownership in the partnership. The fair value is recorded based upon changes in the net asset value of the limited partnership as determined from the financial statements of the limited partnership. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we recorded unrealized changes in fair value classified within the Level 3 category of $223 in our investment in NYC Retail Portfolio (see Note 4-Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates).
We have estimated the fair value of our mortgage notes and other debt payable reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at amounts that are based upon an interpretation of available market information and valuation methodologies (including discounted cash flow analysis with regard to fixed rate debt) for similar loans made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same maturities. The fair value of our mortgage notes payable using Level 2 inputs was $5,810 and $927 higher than the aggregate carrying amounts at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition of our mortgage notes payable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We record all derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value in prepaid expenses and other assets or accounts payable and other accrued expenses. Changes in the fair value of our derivatives are recorded as a component of interest expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as we have not designated our derivative instruments as hedges. Our objective in using interest rate derivatives is to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we use interest rate caps and swaps.
As of March 31, 2016, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives related to managing our interest rate risk:
Interest Rate Derivative
 
Number of Instruments
 
Notional Amount
Interest Rate Caps
 
6
 
$
97,930

Interest Rate Swaps
 
3
 
71,400

The fair value of our interest rate caps and swaps represent liabilities of $653 and $153 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

9


Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets, recoverable amounts of receivables, fair value of derivatives and real estate assets, initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 3—PROPERTY
The primary reason we make acquisitions of real estate investments in the apartment, industrial, office, retail and other property sectors is to invest capital contributed by stockholders in a diversified portfolio of real estate assets. There were no consolidated properties acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred $180 and $133, respectively, of acquisition expenses recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
2016 Dispositions
On March 1, 2016, we sold 36 Research Park Drive for approximately $7,900 less closing costs. We recorded a gain on the sale of the property in the amount of $40.

NOTE 4—UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES
Fair Value Option Investment
NYC Retail Portfolio
On December 8, 2015, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company acquired an approximate 28% interest in a newly formed limited partnership, Madison NYC Core Retail Partners, L.P., which acquired an approximate 49% interest in entities that own 15 retail properties located in the greater New York City area (the “NYC Retail Portfolio”), the result of which is that we own an approximate 14% interest in the NYC Retail Portfolio. The purchase price for such portion was approximately $85,600 including closing costs. The NYC Retail Portfolio contains approximately 2,700,000 square feet across urban infill locations in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island and New Jersey.
At acquisition we made the election to account for our interest in the NYC Retail Portfolio under the fair value option. Our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio will be presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets within investments in unconsolidated real estate affiliates. Changes in the fair value of our investment as well as cash distributions received will be recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income within equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio was $85,291 and $85,068, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 we recorded a $223 increase in fair value of our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio and received no cash distributions. For the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded no changes in fair value of our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio and received no cash distributions.
Equity Method Investment
Chicago Parking Garage
On December 23, 2014, we acquired a condominium interest in Chicago Parking Garage, a 366 stall, multi-level parking facility located in a large mixed-use property in Chicago, Illinois for approximately $16,900 using cash on hand. In accordance with authoritative guidance, Chicago Parking Garage is accounted for as an investment in an unconsolidated real estate affiliate. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of our investment in Chicago Parking Garage was $18,047 and $17,935, respectively.

10



NOTE 5—MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT PAYABLE
Mortgage notes and other debt payable have various maturities through 2027 and consist of the following:
Mortgage notes and other debt payable
 
Maturity Date
 
Interest
Rate
 
Amount payable as of
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Mortgage notes payable (1) (2)
 
October 1, 2016 - March 1, 2027
 
2.49% - 6.14%
 
$
521,330

 
$
487,615

Net debt premium on assumed debt and debt issuance costs
 

 
(3,223
)
 
(2,437
)
Mortgage notes and other debt payable, net
 
$
518,107

 
$
485,178

(1)
On February 17, 2016, we entered into a $40,000 mortgage note payable on Monument IV at Worldgate. The mortgage note is for seven years and bears a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.75%. We entered into an interest rate swap for this loan which fixed the interest rate at 3.13% for the seven year term.
(2)
On March 17, 2016, we entered into a $22,800 mortgage note payable on 140 Park Avenue. The mortgage note is for five years and bears a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.75%. We entered into an interest rate swap for this loan which fixed the interest rate at 3.00% for the five year term.
Aggregate future principal payments of mortgage notes payable as of March 31, 2016 are as follows: 
Year
 
Amount
2016
 
$
32,850

2017
 
81,366

2018
 
19,994

2019
 
11,309

2020
 
50,431

Thereafter
 
325,380

Total
 
$
521,330

 
Line of Credit
On June 8, 2015, we extended our existing $40,000 revolving line of credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. The line of credit has a two-year term with a one-year extension at our option and bears interest based on LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.35% to 2.10%, depending on our leverage ratio (1.35% spread at March 31, 2016). The line of credit also contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the facility to $100,000, which we exercised in December 2015. We intend to use the line of credit to cover short-term capital needs, for new property acquisitions and working capital. We may not draw funds on our line of credit if we (i) experience a material adverse effect, which is defined to include, among other things, (a) a material adverse effect upon the operations, business, assets, liabilities or financial condition of the Company, taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the rights and remedies of any lender under any loan document or the ability of any loan party to perform its obligations under any loan document; or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against any loan party of any loan document to which it is a party or (ii) are in default, as that term is defined in the agreement, including a cross default under certain other loan agreements and/or guarantees entered into by the Company or its subsidiaries. As of March 31, 2016, we believe no material adverse effects had occurred. Our line of credit does require us to meet certain customary debt covenants which include a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum debt service coverage ratio as well as maintaining minimum amounts of equity and liquidity. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $0 and $30,000, respectively, borrowings outstanding on the revolving line of credit.
At March 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective agreements as a component of interest expense. Accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $2,301 and $2,107, respectively. Upon implementing FASB Accounting Standard Update 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs during the period ended March 31, 2016, we reclassified $2,914 of net debt issuance costs from Deferred expenses, net to Mortgage notes and other debt payable, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.

11



NOTE 6—COMMON STOCK
We have five classes of common stock authorized as of March 31, 2016, Class A, Class M, Class A-I, Class M-I, and Class D. The fees payable to LaSalle Investment Management Distributors, LLC, an affiliate of our Advisor and the dealer manager for our offerings (the "Dealer Manager"), with respect to each outstanding share of each class, as a percentage of NAV, are as follows:
 
 
Selling Commission (1)
 
Dealer Manager Fee (2)
Class A Shares
 
up to 3.5%
 
1.05%
Class M Shares
 
None
 
0.30%
Class A-I Shares
 
up to 1.5%
 
0.30%
Class M-I Shares
 
None
 
0.05%
Class D Shares (3)
 
up to 1.0%
 
None
(1)
Selling commissions are paid on the date of purchase.
(2)
Dealer manager fees are accrued daily on a continuous basis equal to 1/365th of the stated fee.
(3)
Shares of Class D common stock are only being offered pursuant to a private offering.
The selling commission and dealer manager fee are offering costs and are recorded as a reduction of additional paid in capital.
Stock Transactions
The stock transactions for each of our classes of common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were as follows:
 
 
Shares of
Class A
Common Stock
 
Shares of
Class M
Common Stock
 
Shares of
Class A-I
Common Stock
 
Shares of
Class M-I
Common Stock
 
Shares of
Class D
Common Stock
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
37,092,768

 
27,909,411

 
6,116,812

 
3,356,619

 
7,787,823

Issuance of common stock
 
7,848,394

 
2,120,944

 
769,098

 
556,369

 
83,070

Repurchase of shares
 
(93,661
)
 
(895,390
)
 
(97,431
)
 

 
(1,551,418
)
Balance, March 31, 2016
 
44,847,501

 
29,134,965

 
6,788,479

 
3,912,988

 
6,319,475

Stock Issuances
The stock issuances for our classes of shares, including those issued through our distribution reinvestment plan, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were as follows:
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
# of shares
 
Amount
Class A Shares
 
7,848,394
 
$
88,984

Class M Shares
 
2,120,944
 
23,882

Class A-I Shares
 
769,098
 
8,703

Class M-I Shares
 
556,369
 
6,266

Class D Shares
 
83,070
 
935

Total
 
 
 
$
128,770

Share Repurchase Plan
Our share repurchase plan allows stockholders, subject to a one-year holding period, with certain exceptions, to request that we repurchase all or a portion of their shares on a daily basis at that day's NAV per share, limited to 5% of aggregate Company NAV per quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we repurchased 2,637,900 shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we repurchased 1,342,088 shares of common stock.

12



Distribution Reinvestment Plan
Pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, holders of shares of any class of our common stock may elect to have their cash distributions reinvested in additional shares of our common stock at the NAV per share applicable to the class of shares being purchased on the distribution date. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we issued 513,733 shares of common stock for $5,775 under the distribution reinvestment plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we issued 224,956 shares of common stock for $2,410 under the distribution reinvestment plan.
Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)
Basic per share amounts are based on the weighted average of shares outstanding of 87,274,769 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 49,162,338 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. We have no dilutive or potentially dilutive securities.
Organization and Offering Costs
Organization and offering costs include, but are not limited to, legal, accounting and printing fees and personnel costs of our Advisor (including reimbursement of personnel costs for our executive officers prior to the commencement of the offerings) attributable to our organization, preparation of the registration statement, registration and qualification of our common stock for sale with the SEC and in the various states and filing fees incurred by our Advisor. LaSalle agreed to fund our organization and offering expenses through January 16, 2015, which is the date the SEC declared our registration statement effective for the First Extended Public Offering, following which time we commenced reimbursing LaSalle over 36 months for organization and offering costs incurred prior to the commencement date of the First Extended Public Offering. Following the First Extended Public Offering commencement date, we began paying directly or reimbursing LaSalle if it pays on our behalf any organization and offering costs incurred during the First Extended Public Offering period (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) as and when incurred. After the termination of the First Extended Public Offering, our Advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that the organization and offering costs that we incur exceed 15% of our gross proceeds from the First Extended Public Offering. Organization costs are expensed, whereas offering costs are recorded as a reduction of capital in excess of par value. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, LaSalle had paid $2,044 and $2,009, respectively, of organization and offering costs on our behalf which we had not yet reimbursed. These costs are included in Accounts payable and other accrued expenses.
NOTE 7—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Effective as of October 1, 2012, we entered into a first amended and restated advisory agreement with LaSalle, pursuant to which we pay a fixed advisory fee of 1.25% of our NAV calculated daily. The Advisory Agreement allows for a performance fee to be earned for each share class based on the total return of that share class during the calendar year. The performance fee is calculated as 10% of the return in excess of 7% per annum. On May 10, 2016, we renewed our Advisory Agreement with our Advisor for a one year term expiring on June 5, 2017.
The fixed advisory fees for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were $3,028 and $1,638, respectively. There were no performance fees for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Included in Advisor fees payable at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $1,082 and $3,241 of fixed advisory fee and performance fee expenses, respectively.
We pay Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. (“JLL Americas”), an affiliate of our Advisor, for property management, leasing, mortgage brokerage and sales brokerage services performed at various properties we own, on terms no less favorable than we could receive from other third party service providers. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, JLL Americas was paid $83 and $74, respectively, for property management and leasing services. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we paid JLL Americas $114 in loan placement fees related to the mortgage note payable on 140 Park Avenue and $197 in sales brokerage fees for the 36 Research Park Drive property sale.
We pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees in connection with our offerings. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees totaling $2,342 and $978, respectively. A majority of the selling commissions and dealer manager fees are reallowed to participating broker-dealers.
As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we owed $2,044 and $2,009, respectively, for organization and offering costs paid by LaSalle (see Note 6-Common Stock). These costs are included in Accounts payable and other accrued expenses.


13



NOTE 8—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages. Many of these matters are covered by insurance, although they may nevertheless be subject to deductibles or retentions. Although the ultimate liability for these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
From time to time, we have entered into contingent agreements for the acquisition and financing of properties. Such acquisitions and financings are subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence or meeting certain leasing or occupancy thresholds.
We are subject to fixed ground lease payments on South Beach Parking Garage of $94 per year until September 30, 2016. The fixed amount will increase on September 30, 2016 and every five years thereafter by the lesser of 12% or the cumulative CPI over the previous five year period. We are also subject to a variable ground lease payment calculated as 2.5% of revenue. The lease expires September 30, 2041 and has a ten-year renewal option.
The operating agreement for Townlake of Coppell allows the unrelated third party joint venture partner, owning a 10% interest, to put their interest to us at a market determined value for a period of 90 days beginning in 2018.

14



NOTE 9—SEGMENT REPORTING
We have five operating segments: apartment, industrial, office, retail and other properties. Consistent with how we review and manage our properties, the financial information summarized below is presented by operating segment and reconciled to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
 
 
 Apartment
 
 Industrial
 
 Office
 
 Retail
 
Other
 
 Total
Assets as of March 31, 2016
 
$
210,688

 
$
291,422

 
$
277,423

 
$
392,281

 
$
22,240

 
$
1,194,054

Assets as of December 31, 2015
 
211,532

 
292,730

 
281,582

 
392,718

 
21,981

 
1,200,543

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Minimum rents
 
$
5,610

 
$
4,834

 
$
7,113

 
$
5,944

 
$
69

 
$
23,570

   Tenant recoveries and other rental income
 
299

 
1,540

 
1,117

 
2,136

 
684

 
5,776

Total revenues
 
$
5,909

 
$
6,374

 
$
8,230

 
$
8,080

 
$
753

 
$
29,346

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Real estate taxes
 
$
614

 
$
1,095

 
$
829

 
$
1,056

 
$
128

 
$
3,722

   Property operating
 
1,797

 
413

 
1,664

 
1,109

 
209

 
5,192

 Provision for doubtful accounts
 
11

 

 

 
124

 

 
135

Total segment operating expenses
 
$
2,422

 
$
1,508

 
$
2,493

 
$
2,289

 
$
337

 
$
9,049

Operating income - Segments
 
$
3,487

 
$
4,866

 
$
5,737

 
$
5,791

 
$
416

 
$
20,297

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures by segment
 
$
410

 
$
415

 
$
3,236

 
$
363

 
$

 
$
4,424

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to net income
Operating income - Segments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
20,297

   Property general and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
328

   Advisor fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,028

   Company level expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
606

   Acquisition expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
180

   Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9,009

Operating income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
7,146

Other income and (expenses):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(5,961
)
   Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
335

   Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt
 
 
 
40

Total other income and (expenses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(5,586
)
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,560

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to total consolidated assets as of March 31, 2016
Assets per reportable segments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,194,054

Corporate level assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
247,133

Total consolidated assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,441,187

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2015
Assets per reportable segments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,200,543

Corporate level assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
119,235

Total consolidated assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,319,778


15



 
 
 Apartment
 
 Industrial
 
 Office
 
 Retail
 
Other
 
 Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Minimum rents
 
$
4,900

 
$
3,139

 
$
6,172

 
$
3,369

 
$
70

 
$
17,650

   Tenant recoveries and other rental income
 
247

 
752

 
1,083

 
1,211

 
782

 
4,075

Total revenues
 
$
5,147

 
$
3,891

 
$
7,255

 
$
4,580

 
$
852

 
$
21,725

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Real estate taxes
 
$
511

 
$
560

 
$
780

 
$
843

 
$
151

 
$
2,845

   Property operating
 
1,827

 
199

 
1,655

 
525

 
259

 
4,465

   Provision for doubtful accounts
 
19

 

 
1

 
105

 

 
125

Total segment operating expenses
 
$
2,357

 
$
759

 
$
2,436

 
$
1,473

 
$
410

 
$
7,435

Operating income - Segments
 
$
2,790

 
$
3,132

 
$
4,819

 
$
3,107

 
$
442

 
$
14,290

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures by segment
 
$
136

 
$

 
$
316

 
$
70

 
$
24

 
$
546

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation to net income
Operating income - Segments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
14,290

   Property general and administrative
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
165

   Advisor fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,638

   Company level expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
687

   Acquisition expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
133

   Depreciation and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6,564

Operating income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,103

Other income and (expenses):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(4,227
)
   Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate
 
 
 
 
 
180

   Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt
 
 
 
 
29,009

Total other income and (expenses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
24,962

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
30,065

 
 
 
 


16



NOTE 10—DISTRIBUTIONS PAYABLE
On March 8, 2016, our board of directors approved a gross dividend for the first quarter of 2016 of $0.12 per share to stockholders of record as of March 30, 2016. The dividend was paid on May 2, 2016. Class A, Class M, Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D stockholders received $0.12 per share, less applicable class-specific fees, if any.
NOTE 11— RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, that will use a five step model to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries.  The model will identify the contract, identify any separate performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.  The new standard will replace most existing revenue recognition in GAAP when it becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018.  We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-01 Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The new standard requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The standard will become effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-02 Leases (ASC 842), which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification.  Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The update is expected to impact our consolidated financial statements as we have certain operating and land lease arrangements for which we are the lessee. ASC 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, ASC 840 Leases. The standard is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance.
NOTE 12—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April 1, 2016, we acquired San Juan Medical Center, a newly constructed 40,000 square foot medical office building located in San Juan Capistrano, California, for approximately $26,390. The property is 100% leased to four tenants. The acquisition was funded with cash on hand.
On April 11, 2016, we acquired Tampa Distribution Center, a 386,000 square foot industrial building located in Tampa, Florida, for approximately $28,240. The property is 100% leased to two tenants. The acquisition was funded with cash on hand.
On May 10, 2016, our board of directors approved a gross dividend for the second quarter of 2016 of $0.12 per share to stockholders of record as of June 29, 2016. The dividend will be paid on or around August 1, 2016. Class A, Class M, Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D stockholders will receive $0.12 per share, less applicable class-specific fees, if any.
On May 10, 2016, we renewed the Advisory Agreement with our Advisor for one year. The term of the Advisory Agreement is for one year from its effective date of June 5, 2016, subject to renewals by our board of directors for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated without penalty (1) immediately by us for “cause,” upon the bankruptcy of our Advisor or upon a material breach of the agreement by our Advisor, (2) upon 60 days’ written notice by us without cause upon the vote of a majority of our independent directors, or (3) upon 60 days’ written notice by our Advisor. “Cause” is defined in the Advisory Agreement to mean fraud, criminal conduct, willful misconduct or willful or negligent breach of fiduciary duty by our Advisor in connection with performing its duties.
*  *  *  *  *  *

17



Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
$ in thousands, except per share amounts
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), regarding, among other things, our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and financial. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that represent our beliefs concerning future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as, but not limited to, “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “would be,” “believe,” or “continue” or the negative or other variations of comparable terminology. Because these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change, actual results could be materially different. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC. Except as required by law, we do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Item 1. Business” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our 2015 Form 10-K and our periodic reports filed with the SEC.
Management Overview
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. All references to numbered Notes are to specific notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 7 of this Form 10-Q, and the descriptions referred to are incorporated into the applicable portion of this section by reference. References to “base rent” in this Form 10-Q refer to cash payments made under the relevant lease(s), excluding real estate taxes and certain property operating expenses that are paid by us and are recoverable under the relevant lease(s) and exclude adjustments for straight-line rent revenue and above- and below-market lease amortization.
The discussions surrounding our Consolidated Properties refer to our wholly or majority owned and controlled properties, which as of March 31, 2016, were comprised of:
Apartment
Station Nine Apartments,
The Edge at Lafayette,
Campus Lodge Tampa,
Townlake of Coppell (acquired in 2015) and
AQ Rittenhouse (acquired in 2015).
Industrial
Kendall Distribution Center,
Norfleet Distribution Center,
Joliet Distribution Center,
Suwanee Distribution Center,
South Seattle Distribution Center,
Grand Prairie Distribution Center,
Charlotte Distribution Center,
DFW Distribution Center (acquired in 2015) and
O'Hare Industrial Portfolio (acquired in 2015).

18



Office
Monument IV at Worldgate,
111 Sutter Street,
14600 Sherman Way,
14624 Sherman Way,
Railway Street Corporate Centre and
140 Park Avenue (acquired in 2015).
Retail
The District at Howell Mill,
Grand Lakes Marketplace,
Oak Grove Plaza,
Rancho Temecula Town Center,
Skokie Commons (acquired in 2015),
Whitestone Market (acquired in 2015) and
Maui Mall (acquired in 2015).
Other
South Beach Parking Garage.
Sold Properties
Cabana Beach San Marcos (sold in 2015),
Cabana Beach Gainesville (sold in 2015),
Campus Lodge Athens (sold in 2015),
Campus Lodge Columbia (sold in 2015) and
36 Research Park Drive (sold in 2016).

Discussions surrounding our Unconsolidated Properties refer to properties owned through joint venture arrangements or condominium interests, which were comprised of the Chicago Parking Garage and the NYC Retail Portfolio as of March 31, 2016. Our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio was acquired on December 8, 2015. We elected the fair value option to account for this investment.
Our primary business is the ownership and management of a diversified portfolio of apartment, industrial, office, retail and other properties primarily located in the United States. It is expected that over time our real estate portfolio will be further diversified on a global basis and will be complemented by investments in real estate-related assets.
We are managed by our Advisor, LaSalle Investment Management, Inc., a subsidiary of our Sponsor, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (NYSE: JLL), a leading global financial and professional services firm that specializes in commercial real estate. We hire property management and leasing companies to provide the on-site, day-to-day management and leasing services for our properties. When selecting a property management or leasing company for one of our properties, we look for service providers that have a strong local market or industry presence, create portfolio efficiencies, have the ability to develop new business for us and will provide a strong internal control environment that will comply with our Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) internal control requirements. We currently use a mix of property management and leasing service providers that include large national real estate service firms, including an affiliate of our Advisor and smaller local firms.
We seek to minimize risk and maintain stability of income and principal value through broad diversification across property sectors and geographic markets and by balancing tenant lease expirations and debt maturities across the real estate portfolio. Our diversification goals also take into account investing in sectors or regions we believe will create returns consistent with our investment objectives. Under normal conditions, we intend to pursue investments principally in well-located, well-leased properties within the apartment, industrial, office, retail and other sectors. We expect to actively manage the mix of properties and markets over time in response to changing operating fundamentals within each property sector and to changing economies and real estate markets in the geographic areas considered for investment. When consistent with our investment objectives, we also seek to maximize the tax efficiency of our investments through like-kind exchanges and other tax planning strategies.

19



The following charts summarize our portfolio diversification by property sector and geographic region based upon the fair value of our properties. These tables provide examples of how our Advisor evaluates our real estate portfolio when making investment decisions.
Estimated Percent of Fair Value as of March 31, 2016:


20



Seasonality
For our two student-oriented apartments, the majority of our leases commence mid-August and terminate the last day of July. These dates generally coincide with the commencement of the universities’ fall academic term and the completion of the subsequent summer school session. In certain cases we enter into leases for less than the full academic year, including nine-month or shorter-term leases. As a result, cash flows may be reduced during the summer months at properties having lease terms shorter than 12 months. The annual releasing cycle results in significant turnover in the tenant population from year to year. Accordingly, certain property revenues and operating expenses tend to be seasonal in nature, and therefore not incurred ratably over the course of the year. Prior to the commencement of each new lease period, mostly during the first two weeks of August, we prepare the units for new incoming tenants. Other than revenue generated by in-place leases for returning tenants, we do not generally recognize lease revenue during this period, referred to as the “Turn,” as we have no leases in place. In addition, during the Turn we incur significant expenses making our units ready for occupancy, which we recognize immediately. This lease Turn period results in seasonality impacts on our operating results during the second and third quarter of each year.
With the exception of our student-oriented apartments described above, our investments are not materially impacted by seasonality, despite certain of our retail tenants being impacted by seasonality. Percentage rents (rents computed as a percentage of tenant sales) that we earn from investments in retail properties may, in the future, be impacted by seasonality.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to the useful lives of assets, recoverable amounts of receivables, fair value of derivatives and real estate assets, initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Critical Accounting Policies
This MD&A is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe there have been no significant changes during the three months ended March 31, 2016 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our 2015 Form 10-K.
Initial Valuations and Estimated Useful Lives or Amortization Periods for Real Estate Investments and Intangibles
These estimates are particularly important as they are used for the allocation of purchase price between depreciable and non-depreciable real estate and other identifiable intangibles, including above, below and at-market leases. As a result, the impact of these estimates on our operations could be substantial. Significant differences in annual depreciation or amortization expense may result from the differing useful life or amortization periods related to such purchased assets and liabilities.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Our estimate of the expected future cash flows used in testing for impairment is highly subjective and based on, among other things, our estimates regarding future market conditions, rental rates, occupancy levels, costs of tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other tenant concessions, assumptions regarding the residual value of our properties at the end of our anticipated holding period, discount rates and the length of our anticipated holding period. These assumptions could differ materially from actual results. If our strategy changes or if market conditions otherwise dictate a reduction in the holding period and an earlier sale date, an impairment loss could be recognized and such loss could be material.

21



Dealer Manager Fee Accounting
No authoritative GAAP guidance specifically addresses the accounting treatment for dealer manager fees.  Dealer manager fees are accrued daily into our NAV based on a specified percentage for each publicly offered share class multiplied by the NAV of that share class at the end of each day. There are two acceptable accounting practices used by the industry to account for dealer manager fees in GAAP-based financial statements. The first practice involves accruing the liability for the dealer manager fees on a daily basis as offering costs, which are recorded as a reduction of capital in excess of par value. The second practice involves accruing all future dealer manager fees on the day the share of stock is sold, up to the maximum ten percent as allowed under applicable regulations. We have selected the first practice as our accounting policy. We selected the policy of accruing dealer manager fees on a daily basis because we are obligated to pay the fee every day that a share of common stock is outstanding until it has been repurchased or we have reached the ten percent limit.  We believe dealer manager fees are offering costs and recorded as a reduction of capital in excess of par value as there are limited ongoing services required to be performed in order for the dealer manager fee to be paid to our Dealer Manager.  In addition, the Dealer Manager reallows a majority of the dealer manager fee to participating broker-dealers who receive the fee as compensation for providing services to the stockholders. For common stock sold in the Initial Public Offering and First Extended Public Offering through March 31, 2016, we estimate we will pay out an additional $48,210 in offering costs, primarily in the form of dealer manager fees, which are not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2016. We estimate these additional offering costs to be paid out over the next ten years.

22



Properties
Properties owned at March 31, 2016 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Percentage
Leased as of March 31, 2016
Property Name
 
Location
 
Acquisition Date
 
Ownership
%
 
Net Rentable
Square Feet
 
Consolidated Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apartment Segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Station Nine Apartments
 
Durham, NC
 
April 16, 2007
 
100%
 
312,000
 
95%
Townlake of Coppell (1)
 
Coppell, TX
 
May 22, 2015
 
90
 
351,000
 
93
AQ Rittenhouse
 
Philadelphia, PA
 
July 30, 2015
 
100
 
92,000
 
84
Student-oriented Apartment Communities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Edge at Lafayette (1)
 
Lafayette, LA
 
January 15, 2008
 
78
 
207,000
 
97
Campus Lodge Tampa (1)
 
Tampa, FL
 
February 29, 2008
 
78
 
477,000
 
99
Industrial Segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kendall Distribution Center
 
Atlanta, GA
 
June 30, 2005
 
100
 
409,000
 
100
Norfleet Distribution Center
 
Kansas City, MO
 
February 27, 2007
 
100
 
702,000
 
100
Joliet Distribution Center
 
Joliet, IL
 
June 26, 2013
 
100
 
442,000
 
100
Suwanee Distribution Center
 
Suwanee, GA
 
June 28, 2013
 
100
 
559,000
 
100
South Seattle Distribution Center
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3800 1st Avenue
 
Seattle, WA
 
December 18, 2013
 
100
 
162,000
 
100
3844 1st Avenue
 
Seattle, WA
 
December 18, 2013
 
100
 
101,000
 
100
3601 2nd Avenue
 
Seattle, WA
 
December 18, 2013
 
100
 
60,000
 
100
Grand Prairie Distribution Center
 
Grand Prairie, TX
 
January 22, 2014
 
100
 
277,000
 
100
Charlotte Distribution Center
 
Charlotte, NC
 
June 27, 2014
 
100
 
347,000
 
100
DFW Distribution Center
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4050 Corporate Drive
 
Grapevine, TX
 
April 15, 2015
 
100
 
441,000
 
100
4055 Corporate Drive
 
Grapevine, TX
 
April 15, 2015
 
100
 
202,000
 
100
O’Hare Industrial Portfolio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
200 Lewis
 
Wood Dale, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
31,000
 
100
1225 Michael Drive
 
Wood Dale, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
109,000
 
100
1300 Michael Drive
 
Wood Dale, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
71,000
 
100
1301 Mittel Drive
 
Wood Dale, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
53,000
 
100
1350 Michael Drive
 
Wood Dale, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
56,000
 
100
2501 Allan Drive
 
Elk Grove, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
198,000
 
74
2601 Allan Drive
 
Elk Grove, IL
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
124,000
 
100
Office Segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Monument IV at Worldgate
 
Herndon, VA
 
August 27, 2004
 
100
 
228,000
 
100
111 Sutter Street
 
San Francisco, CA
 
March 29, 2005
 
100
 
286,000
 
85
14600 Sherman Way
 
Van Nuys, CA
 
December 21, 2005
 
100
 
50,000
 
94
14624 Sherman Way
 
Van Nuys, CA
 
December 21, 2005
 
100
 
53,000
 
89
Railway Street Corporate Centre
 
Calgary, Canada
 
August 30, 2007
 
100
 
135,000
 
74
140 Park Avenue
 
Florham Park, NJ
 
December 21, 2015
 
100
 
100,000
 
100
Retail Segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The District at Howell Mill (1)
 
Atlanta, GA
 
June 15, 2007
 
88
 
306,000
 
97
Grand Lakes Marketplace (1)
 
Katy, TX
 
September 17, 2013
 
90
 
131,000
 
100
Oak Grove Plaza
 
Sachse, TX
 
January 17, 2014
 
100
 
120,000
 
93
Rancho Temecula Town Center
 
Temecula, CA
 
June 16, 2014
 
100
 
165,000
 
90
Skokie Commons
 
Skokie, IL
 
May 15, 2015
 
100
 
97,000
 
97
Whitestone Market
 
Austin, TX
 
September 30, 2015
 
100
 
145,000
 
100
Maui Mall
 
Kahului, HI
 
December 22, 2015
 
100
 
235,000
 
92

23



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Segment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
South Beach Parking Garage (2)
 
Miami, FL
 
January 28, 2014
 
100
 
130,000
 
N/A
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unconsolidated Properties:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chicago Parking Garage (3)
 
Chicago, IL
 
December 23, 2014
 
100
 
167,000
 
N/A
NYC Retail Portfolio (4)
 
NY/NJ
 
December 8, 2015
 
14
 
2,700,000
 
98

(1)
We own an interest in the joint venture that owns a fee interest in this property.    
(2)
The parking garage contains 343 stalls. This property is owned subject to a ground lease.
(3)
We own a condominium interest in the building that contains a 366 stall parking garage.
(4)
We own an approximate 14% interest in a portfolio of 15 urban infill retail properties located in the greater New York City area.
Operating Statistics
We generally hold investments in properties with high occupancy rates leased to quality tenants under long-term, non-cancelable leases. We believe these leases are beneficial to achieving our investment objectives. The following table shows our operating statistics by property type for our consolidated properties as of March 31, 2016:
 
 
Number of
Properties
 
Total Area
(Sq Ft)
 
% of Total
Area
 
Occupancy %
 
Average Minimum
Base Rent per
Occupied Sq Ft (1)
Apartment
 
5

 
1,438,000

 
18
%
 
95
%
 
$
16.60

Industrial
 
18

 
4,345,000

 
54

 
99

 
4.29

Office
 
6

 
852,000

 
11

 
90

 
34.50

Retail
 
7

 
1,197,000

 
15

 
95

 
19.18

Other
 
1

 
130,000

 
2

 
N/A

 
N/A

Total
 
37

 
7,962,000

 
100
%
 
97
%
 
$
11.54

 
(1)
Amount calculated as in-place minimum base rent for all occupied space at March 31, 2016 and excludes any straight line rents, tenant recoveries and percentage rent revenues.
As of March 31, 2016, our average effective annual rent per square foot, calculated as average minimum base rent per occupied square foot less tenant concessions and allowances, was $10.83 for our consolidated properties.
Recent Events and Outlook
General Company and Market Commentary
On January 16, 2015, we commenced our First Extended Public Offering of up to $2,700,000 in any combination of Class A, Class M, Class A-I and Class M-I shares of common stock, consisting of up to $2,400,000 of shares in our primary offering and up to $300,000 of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, and our Initial Public Offering automatically terminated. We intend to offer shares of our common stock on a continuous basis for an indefinite period of time by filing a new registration statement before the end of each offering period, subject to regulatory approval. The per share purchase price varies from day-to-day and, on each day, equals our NAV per share for each class of common stock, plus, for Class A and Class A-I shares, applicable selling commissions. The Dealer Manager has agreed to distribute shares of our common stock in our First Extended Public Offering. We intend to primarily use the net proceeds from the offering, after we pay the fees and expenses attributable to the offerings and our operations, to (1) grow and further diversify our portfolio by making investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies, (2) reduce borrowings and repay indebtedness incurred under various financing instruments and (3) fund repurchases of our shares under our share repurchase plan.
On March 3, 2015, we commenced a private offering of up to $350,000 in shares of our Class D common stock with an indefinite duration. Proceeds from our private offering will be used for the same corporate purposes as the proceeds from the First Extended Public Offering.
Over the past four years we have acquired 43 properties (all of these consistent with our investment strategy), sold 22 non-strategic properties, reduced our Company leverage ratio, decreased our average interest rate on debt, and increased cash reserves and Company-wide liquidity, while also providing cash flow to our stockholders through our regular quarterly dividend payments.

24



Capital Raised and Use of Proceeds
As of March 31, 2016, we raised gross proceeds of over $890,000 from our offerings and private share sales since 2012. We used these proceeds along with proceeds from mortgage debt to acquire approximately $940,000 of real estate investments, deleverage the company by repaying mortgage loans of approximately $240,000 and repurchase shares of our common stock of approximately $170,000.
Property Acquisitions and Financings
On February 17, 2016, we entered into a $40,000 mortgage note payable on Monument IV at Worldgate. The mortgage note is for seven years and bears a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.75%. We entered into an interest rate swap for this loan which fixed the interest rate at 3.13% for the seven year term.
On March 17, 2016, we entered into a $22,800 mortgage note payable on 140 Park Avenue. The mortgage note is for five years and bears a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.75%. We entered into an interest rate swap for this loan which fixed the interest rate at 3.00% for the five year term.
Property Disposition
On March 1, 2016, we sold 36 Research Park Drive for approximately $7,900 less closing costs. We recorded a gain on the sale of the property in the amount of $40.
Stock Repurchases
For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we repurchased $29,747 of shares of our common stock through the share repurchase plan.
Subsequent Events
On April 1, 2016, we acquired San Juan Medical Center, a newly constructed 40,000 square foot medical office building located in San Juan Capistrano, California, for approximately $26,390. The property is 100% leased to four tenants. The acquisition was funded with cash on hand.
On April 11, 2016, we acquired Tampa Distribution Center, a 386,000 square foot industrial building located in Tampa, Florida, for approximately $28,240. The property is 100% leased to two tenants. The acquisition was funded with cash on hand.
Investment Objectives and Strategy
Our primary investment objectives are:
to generate an attractive level of current income for distribution to our stockholders;
to preserve and protect our stockholders' capital investments;
to achieve appreciation of our NAV over time; and
to enable stockholders to utilize real estate as an asset class in diversified, long-term investment portfolios.
The cornerstone of our investment strategy is to acquire and manage income-producing commercial real estate properties and real estate-related assets around the world. We believe this strategy enables us to provide our stockholders with a portfolio that is well-diversified across property type, geographic region and industry, both in the United States and internationally. It is our belief that adding international investments to our portfolio over time will serve as an effective tool to construct a well-diversified portfolio designed to provide our stockholders with stable distributions and attractive long-term risk-adjusted returns.
We believe that our broadly diversified portfolio benefits our stockholders by providing:
diversification of sources of income;
access to attractive real estate opportunities currently in the United States and, over time, around the world; and
exposure to a return profile that should have lower correlations with other investments.

25



Since real estate markets are often cyclical in nature, our strategy allows us to more effectively deploy capital into property types and geographic regions where the underlying investment fundamentals are relatively strong or strengthening and away from those property types and geographic regions where such fundamentals are relatively weak or weakening. We intend to meet our investment objectives by selecting investments across multiple property types and geographic regions to achieve portfolio stability, diversification, current income and favorable risk-adjusted returns. To a lesser degree, we also intend to invest in debt and equity interests backed principally by real estate, which we refer to collectively as “real estate-related assets.”
Our board of directors has adopted investment guidelines for our Advisor to implement and actively monitor in order to allow us to achieve and maintain diversification in our overall investment portfolio. Our board of directors formally reviews our investment guidelines on an annual basis and our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis or, in each case, more often as they deem appropriate. Our board of directors reviews the investment guidelines to ensure that the guidelines are being followed and are in the best interests of our stockholders.
We seek to invest:
up to 95% of our assets in properties;
up to 25% of our assets in real estate-related assets; and
up to 15% of our assets in cash, cash equivalents and other short-term investments.
Notwithstanding the above, the actual percentage of our portfolio that is invested in each investment type may from time to time be outside these target levels due to numerous factors including, but not limited to, large inflows of capital over a short period of time, lack of attractive investment opportunities or increases in anticipated cash requirements for repurchase requests.
We expect to maintain a targeted Company leverage ratio (calculated as our share of total liabilities divided by our share of the fair value of total assets) of between 30% and 50%. We intend to use low leverage, or in some cases possibly no leverage, to finance new acquisitions in order to maintain our targeted Company leverage ratio. Our Company leverage ratio was 38% as of March 31, 2016.
2016 Key Initiatives
During 2016, we intend to use capital raised from our public and private offerings to make new acquisitions that will further our investment objectives and are in keeping with our investment strategy. Likely acquisition candidates may include well-located industrial warehouses, grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers, urban infill retail and conventional apartments in either urban and transit-oriented locations or suburban, supply-constrained markets with highly-rated school districts. We will look to acquire other property types when the opportunities and risk profile match our investment objectives and strategy. We will also attempt to further our geographic diversification. We will use debt financing to take advantage of the current favorable interest rate environment, while looking to keep the Company leverage ratio in the 30% to 50% range in the near term. We also intend to use our revolving line of credit to allow us to more efficiently manage our cash flows.

26



Results of Operations
General
Our revenues are primarily received from tenants in the form of fixed minimum base rents and recoveries of operating expenses. Our expenses primarily relate to the costs of operating and financing the properties. Our share of the net income or net loss from our unconsolidated real estate affiliates is included in the equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates. We believe the following analysis of reportable segments provides important information about the operating results of our real estate investments, such as trends in total revenues or operating expenses that may not be as apparent in a period-over-period comparison of the entire Company. We group our investments in real estate assets from continuing operations into five reportable operating segments based on the type of property, which are apartment, industrial, office, retail and other. Operations from corporate level items and real estate assets sold are excluded from reportable segments.
Properties acquired or sold during any of the periods presented are presented within the recent acquisitions and sold properties line until the property has been owned for all periods presented. The properties currently presented within the recent acquisitions and sold properties line include the properties listed as either acquired or sold in the Management Overview section above. Properties owned for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are referred to as our comparable properties.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
Revenues
The following chart sets forth revenues by reportable segment for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
$
 Change
 
%
Change
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 
 
 
 


 


Apartment
$
3,771

 
$
3,631

 
$
140

 
3.9
 %
Industrial
3,255

 
3,139

 
116

 
3.7

Office
6,183

 
5,844

 
339

 
5.8

Retail
3,315

 
3,369

 
(54
)
 
(1.6
)
Other
69

 
70

 
(1
)
 
(1.4
)
Comparable properties total
$
16,593

 
$
16,053

 
$
540

 
3.4
 %
Recent acquisitions and sold properties
6,977

 
1,597

 
5,380

 
336.9

Total
$
23,570

 
$
17,650

 
$
5,920

 
33.5
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tenant recoveries and other rental income
 
 
 
 


 


Apartment
$
177

 
$
197

 
$
(20
)
 
(10.2
)%
Industrial
811

 
752

 
59

 
7.8

Office
974

 
1,027

 
(53
)
 
(5.2
)
Retail
1,236

 
1,211

 
25

 
2.1

Other
684

 
782

 
(98
)
 
(12.5
)
Comparable properties total
$
3,882

 
$
3,969

 
$
(87
)
 
(2.2
)%
Recent acquisitions and sold properties
1,894

 
106

 
1,788

 
1,686.8

Total
$
5,776

 
$
4,075

 
$
1,701

 
41.7
 %
Total revenues
$
29,346

 
$
21,725


$
7,621

 
35.1
 %
Minimum rents at comparable properties increased by $540 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is primarily due to increases of $342 at 111 Sutter Street and $167 at our student-oriented apartment properties related to increased rental rates and occupancy during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Additionally, there was an increase of $149 at Monument IV at Worldgate as a result of Amazon executing a new lease late last year. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease of $180 at Railway Street Corporate Centre related to lower occupancy during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015.

27



Tenant recoveries relate mainly to real estate taxes and certain property operating expenses that are paid by us and are recoverable under the various tenants’ leases. Other rental income includes daily transient parking, percentage rents and other non-recurring charges. Tenant recoveries and other rental income at comparable properties decreased by $87 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease is primarily related to lower recoveries of $109 at Railway Street Corporate Centre due to lower occupancy in the building and a $98 decrease in parking revenue at South Beach Parking Garage due to a lower volume of daily pay parkers during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in recoveries of $67 at Grand Prairie Distribution Center related to higher operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015.
Operating Expenses
The following chart sets forth real estate taxes, property operating expenses and provisions for doubtful accounts by reportable segment, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
$
 Change
 
%
Change
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apartment
 
$
360

 
$
361

 
$
(1
)
 
(0.3
)%
Industrial
 
620

 
560

 
60

 
10.7

Office
 
686

 
723

 
(37
)
 
(5.1
)
Retail
 
700

 
843

 
(143
)
 
(17.0
)
Other
 
128

 
151

 
(23
)
 
(15.2
)
Comparable properties total
 
$
2,494

 
$
2,638

 
$
(144
)
 
(5.5
)%
Recent acquisitions and sold properties
 
1,228

 
207

 
1,021

 
493.2

Total
 
$
3,722

 
$
2,845

 
$
877

 
30.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apartment
 
$
1,277

 
$
1,253

 
$
24

 
1.9
 %
Industrial
 
193

 
199

 
(6
)
 
(3.0
)
Office
 
1,659

 
1,653

 
6

 
0.4

Retail
 
584

 
525

 
59

 
11.2

Other
 
209

 
259

 
(50
)
 
(19.3
)
Comparable properties total
 
$
3,922

 
$
3,889

 
$
33

 
0.8
 %
Recent acquisitions and sold properties
 
1,270

 
576

 
694

 
120.5

Total
 
$
5,192

 
$
4,465

 
$
727

 
16.3
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net provision for doubtful accounts
 
 
 
 
 


 


Apartment
 
$
11

 
$
4

 
$
7

 
175.0
 %
Office
 

 
1

 
(1
)
 
(100.0
)
Retail
 
124

 
105

 
19

 
18.1

Comparable properties total
 
$
135

 
$
110

 
$
25

 
22.7
 %
Recent acquisitions and sold properties
 

 
15

 
(15
)
 
(100.0
)
Total
 
$
135

 
$
125

 
$
10

 
8.0
 %
Total operating expenses
 
$
9,049

 
$
7,435

 
$
1,614

 
21.7
 %
Real estate taxes at comparable properties decreased by $144 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease is primarily related to decreases of $81 at The District at Howell Mill related to lower tax reassessment and $39 at Oak Grove Plaza related to a refund for 2014 taxes received during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Our properties are reassessed periodically by the taxing authorities, which may result in increases or decreases in the real estates taxes that we owe. Overall, we expect real estate taxes to increase over time; however, we utilize real estate tax consultants to attempt to control assessment increases.

28



Property operating expenses consist of the costs of ownership and operation of the real estate investments, many of which are recoverable under net leases. Examples of property operating expenses include insurance, utilities and repair and maintenance expenses. Property operating expenses at comparable properties increased $33 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is primarily related higher repairs and maintenance expenses of $44 at The District at Howell Mill. Partially offsetting the increase was a decrease at South Beach Garage of $50 related to lower repairs and maintenance and salary expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.
Net provision for doubtful accounts relates to receivables deemed potentially uncollectable due to the age of the receivable or the status of the tenant. Provision for doubtful accounts at comparable properties increased by $25 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily related to the write-off of rent receivables of $27 at Rancho Temecula Town Center for a tenant that vacated the property in 2015.
The following chart sets forth expenses not directly related to the operations of the reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
$
 Change
 
%
 Change
Property general and administrative
 
$
328

 
$
165

 
$
163

 
98.8
 %
Advisor fees
 
3,028

 
1,638

 
1,390

 
84.9

Company level expenses
 
606

 
687

 
(81
)
 
(11.8
)
Acquisition expenses
 
180

 
133

 
47

 
35

Depreciation and amortization
 
9,009

 
6,564

 
2,445

 
37.2

Interest expense
 
5,961

 
4,227

 
1,734

 
41.0

Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates
 
(335
)
 
(180
)
 
(155
)
 
86.1

Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt
 
(40
)
 
(29,009
)
 
28,969

 
(99.9
)
Total expenses
 
$
18,737

 
$
(15,775
)
 
$
34,512

 
(218.8
)%
Property general and administrative expenses relate mainly to property expenses unrelated to the operations of the property. Property general and administrative expenses increased $163 primarily due to the acquisition of properties subsequent to March 31, 2015.
Advisor fees relate to the fixed advisory and performance fees earned by the Advisor. Fixed fees increase or decrease based on changes in our NAV which will be primarily impacted by changes in capital raised and the value of our properties. The performance fee is accrued when the total return per share for a share class exceeds 7% for that calendar year, where in our Advisor will receive 10% of the excess total return above the 7% threshold. The increase in advisor fees of $1,390 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period of 2015 is related to the increase in our net asset value attributable to capital raised over the past year.
Company level expenses relate mainly to our compliance and administration related costs. Company level expenses decreased $81 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 primarily related to reduced professional service fees in 2016.
Acquisition expenses relate to expenses incurred during the acquisition of a property. Acquisition expenses increased $47 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period ended March 31, 2015. The increase is primarily related to acquisitions that closed subsequent to March 31, 2015. We did not make an acquisition during the three months ended March 31, 2016, but did incur expenses related to acquisitions we are pursuing.
Depreciation and amortization expense is impacted by the values assigned to buildings, personal property and in-place lease assets as part of the initial purchase price allocation. The increase of $2,445 in depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 is primarily related to an increase of $3,305 for our acquisitions that occurred in 2015. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $876 at 111 Sutter Street related to intangible assets that were fully depreciated at the end of 2015.
Interest expense increased by $1,734 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of new debt taken out on properties acquired in 2015.

29



Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates relates to the income from Chicago Parking Garage as well changes in fair value and distributions received from our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 we recorded a $223 increase in the fair value of our investment in the NYC Retail Portfolio.
Gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt of $40 is related to the disposition of 36 Research Park Drive during the three months ended March 31, 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the gain on disposition of property and extinguishment of debt of $29,009 is related to the disposition of four student-oriented apartment properties as well as the payoff of a mortgage note payable.
Funds From Operations
Consistent with real estate industry and investment community preferences, we consider funds from operations ("FFO") as a supplemental measure of the operating performance for a real estate investment trust and a complement to GAAP measures because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") defines FFO as net income (loss) attributable to the Company (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from cumulative effects of accounting changes, extraordinary items, impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for these items related to noncontrolling interests and unconsolidated affiliates.
FFO does not give effect to real estate depreciation and amortization because these amounts are computed to allocate the cost of a property over its useful life. Because values for well-maintained real estate assets have historically increased or decreased based upon prevailing market conditions, we believe that FFO provides investors with an additional view of our operating performance. We also use Adjusted FFO ("AFFO") as a supplemental measure of operating performance. We define AFFO as FFO adjusted for straight-line rental income, amortization of above- and below-market leases, amortization of net discount on assumed debt, gains or losses on the extinguishment and modification of debt, performance fees based on the investment returns on shares of our common stock and acquisition costs.
In order to provide a better understanding of the relationship between FFO, AFFO and GAAP net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial reporting measure, we have provided reconciliations of GAAP net income attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. to FFO, and FFO to AFFO. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flow from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Our presentations of FFO and AFFO are not necessarily comparable to the similarly titled measures of other REITs due to the fact that not all REITs use the same definitions.
The following table presents a reconciliation of GAAP net income to NAREIT FFO for the periods presented:
 Reconciliation of GAAP net income to NAREIT FFO
 
Three months ended March 31, 2016
 
Three months ended March 31, 2015
Net income attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. Common Stockholders (1)
 
$
1,486

 
$
23,512

Real estate depreciation and amortization (1)
 
8,895

 
6,486

Gain on disposition of property and unrealized gain on investment in unconsolidated real estate affiliate (1)
 
(263
)
 
(23,754
)
NAREIT FFO attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. Common Stockholders
 
$
10,118

 
$
6,244

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
87,274,769

 
49,162,338

NAREIT FFO per share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.12

 
$
0.13

(1)
Excludes amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests and includes our ownership share of both consolidated properties and unconsolidated real estate affiliates.

30



We believe AFFO is useful to investors because it provides supplemental information regarding the performance of our portfolio over time.
The following table presents a reconciliation of NAREIT FFO to AFFO for the periods presented:
 Reconciliation of NAREIT FFO to AFFO
 
Three months ended March 31, 2016
 
Three months ended March 31, 2015
NAREIT FFO attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. Common Stockholders
 
$
10,118

 
$
6,244

Straight-line rental income (1)
 
(1,273
)
 
(252
)
Amortization of above- and below-market leases (1)
 
(498
)
 
(337
)
Amortization of net discount on assumed debt (1)
 
(80
)
 
(80
)
Loss on derivative instruments and extinguishment or modification of debt (1)
 
719

 
1,240

Adjustment for investment accounted for under the fair value option (2)
 
1,123

 

Acquisition expenses (1)
 
180

 
148

AFFO attributable to Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. Common Stockholders
 
$
10,289

 
$
6,963

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted
 
87,274,769

 
49,162,338

AFFO per share, basic and diluted
 
$
0.12

 
$
0.14

(1)
Excludes amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests and includes our ownership share of both consolidated properties and unconsolidated real estate affiliates.
(2)
Represents the normal and recurring AFFO reconciling adjustments for the NYC Retail Portfolio.
NAV as of March 31, 2016
The following table provides a breakdown of the major components of our NAV as of March 31, 2016:
 
 
March 31, 2016
Component of NAV
 
Class A Shares
 
Class M Shares
 
Class A-I Shares
 
Class M-I Shares
 
Class D Shares
Real estate investments (1)
 
$
709,309

 
$
462,512

 
$
106,485

 
$
62,207

 
$
100,330

Debt
 
(286,000
)
 
(186,489
)
 
(42,936
)
 
(25,082
)
 
(40,454
)
Other assets and liabilities, net
 
75,535

 
49,253

 
11,340

 
6,624

 
10,684

Estimated enterprise value premium
 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

NAV
 
$
498,844

 
$
325,276

 
$
74,889

 
$
43,749

 
$
70,560

Number of outstanding shares
 
44,742,255

 
29,111,061

 
6,699,033

 
3,912,988

 
6,319,475

NAV per share
 
$
11.15

 
$
11.17


$
11.18

 
$
11.18

 
$
11.17

(1)
The value of our real estate investments was greater than the historical cost by 4.4% as of March 31, 2016.
The following table provides a breakdown of the major components of our NAV as of December 31, 2015:
 
 
December 31, 2015
Component of NAV
 
Class A Shares
 
Class M Shares
 
Class A-I Shares
 
Class M-I Shares
 
Class D Shares
Real estate investments (1)
 
$
649,538

 
$
489,821

 
$
107,397

 
$
58,934

 
$
136,610

Debt
 
(246,853
)
 
(186,153
)
 
(40,816
)
 
(22,398
)
 
(51,918
)
Other assets and liabilities, net
 
11,576

 
8,778

 
1,915

 
1,051

 
2,435

Estimated enterprise value premium
 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

 
None assumed

NAV
 
$
414,261

 
$
312,446

 
$
68,496

 
$
37,587

 
$
87,127

Number of outstanding shares
 
37,092,768

 
27,909,411

 
6,116,812

 
3,356,619

 
7,787,832

NAV per share
 
$
11.17

 
$
11.20

 
$
11.20

 
$
11.20

 
$
11.19

(1)
The value of our real estate investments was less than the historical cost by 3.3% as of December 31, 2015.

31



The decrease in NAV per share from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016, was related to a net decrease of 0.1% in the value of our portfolio as expenditures for leasing commissions, tenant and building improvements exceeded the increase in property valuations. Property operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 had an insignificant impact on NAV as dividends declared offset property operations for the period. Our NAV for the different share classes is reduced by normal and recurring class-specific fees and offering and organization costs.
The following are key assumptions (shown on a weighted-average basis) that are used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of our real estate investments as of March 31, 2016:
 
 
Apartment
 
Industrial
 
Office
 
Retail
 
Other (1)
 
Total
Company
Exit capitalization rate
 
6.30
%
 
6.13
%
 
6.31
%
 
5.91
%
 
7.25
%
 
6.17
%
Discount rate/internal rate of return (IRR)
 
7.65

 
6.92

 
7.07

 
6.63

 
8.39

 
7.08

Annual market rent growth rate
 
3.03

 
3.14

 
2.82

 
3.14

 
3.52

 
3.05

Holding period (years)
 
10.00

 
10.00

 
10.00

 
10.00

 
24.62

 
10.40

(1)
Other includes South Beach Parking Garage, which is subject to a ground lease. Its appraisal incorporates discounted cash flows over the remaining term of the ground lease.
The following are key assumptions (shown on a weighted-average basis) that are used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of our real estate investments as of December 31, 2015:
 
 
Apartment
 
Industrial
 
Office
 
Retail
 
Other (1)
 
Total
Company
Exit capitalization rate
 
6.54
%
 
6.31
%
 
6.36
%
 
6.07
%
 
7.25
%
 
6.32
%
Discount rate/internal rate of return (IRR)
 
7.84

 
7.06

 
7.28

 
6.94

 
8.39

 
7.29

Annual market rent growth rate
 
2.98

 
3.10

 
2.96

 
3.11

 
3.59

 
3.06

Holding period (years)
 
10.00

 
10.00

 
10.00

 
10.00

 
23.63

 
10.38

(1)
Other includes South Beach Parking Garage, which is subject to a ground lease. Its appraisal incorporates discounted cash flows over the remaining term of the ground lease.
While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, a change in these assumptions would impact the calculation of the value of our real estate investments. For example, assuming all other factors remain unchanged, an increase in the weighted-average discount rate/internal rate of return ("IRR") used as of March 31, 2016 of 0.25% would yield a decrease in our total real estate investment value of 1.5% and our NAV per share class would have been $10.92, $10.93, $10.94, $10.94 and $10.93 for Class A, Class M, Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D, respectively. An increase in the weighted-average discount rate/IRR used as of December 31, 2015 of 0.25% would yield a decrease in our total real estate investment value of 1.2% and our NAV per each share class would have been $10.96, $10.98, $10.99, $10.98 and $10.97 for Class A, Class M, Class A-I, Class M-I and Class D, respectively.
Limitations and Risks
As with any valuation methodology, our methodology is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different NAV per share. Accordingly, with respect to our NAV per share, we can provide no assurance that:
a stockholder would be able to realize this NAV per share upon attempting to resell his or her shares;
we would be able to achieve for our stockholders the NAV per share upon a listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, selling our real estate portfolio or merging with another company; or
the NAV per share, or the methodologies relied upon to estimate the NAV per share, will be found by any regulatory authority to comply with any regulatory requirements.
Furthermore, the NAV per share was calculated as of a particular point in time. The NAV per share will fluctuate over time in response to, among other things, changes in real estate market fundamentals, capital markets activities and attributes specific to the properties and leases within our portfolio.


32



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary uses and sources of cash are as follows:
Uses
 
Sources
 
 
 
 
Short-term liquidity and capital needs such as:
 
Operating cash flow, including the receipt of distributions of our share of cash flow produced by our unconsolidated real estate affiliates
Interest payments on debt
 
 
Distributions to stockholders
 
Proceeds from secured loans collateralized by individual properties
Fees payable to our Advisor
 
 
Minor improvements made to individual properties that are not recoverable through expense recoveries or common area maintenance charges to tenants
 
Proceeds from our revolving line of credit
 
 
Sales of our shares
General and administrative costs
 
Sales of real estate investments
Costs associated with our continuous public offering
 
Draws from lender escrow accounts
Other Company level expenses
 
 
 
Lender escrow accounts for real estate taxes, insurance, and capital expenditures
 
 
 
Fees payable to our Dealer Manager
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Longer-term liquidity and capital needs such as:
 
 
 
Acquisitions of new real estate investments
 
 
 
Expansion of existing properties
 
 
 
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions
 
 
 
Debt repayment requirements, including both principal and interest
 
 
 
Repurchases of our shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan
 
 
 
Fees payable to our Dealer Manager
 
 
 
The sources and uses of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 
 
 
Three months ended March 31, 2016
 
Three months ended March 31, 2015
 
$ Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
$
7,938

 
$
6,702

 
$
1,236

Net cash provided by investing activities
 
2,736

 
119,275

 
(116,539
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 
114,755

 
(63,097
)
 
177,852

Cash provided by operating activities increased $1,236 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Cash from operating activities increased $1,583 primarily related to acquisitions of properties that occurred in 2015. Also impacting our cash provided by operating activities are changes in our working capital, which include tenant accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, Advisor fee payable and accounts payable and other accrued expenses. These changes in our working capital caused a decrease to cash provided by operating activities of $347 between the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the same period in 2015 which was primarily related to the higher amount of Advisor fees paid.
Cash provided by investing activities decreased by $116,539 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease was primarily related to cash received from the sale of four student-oriented apartment properties during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

33



Cash provided by financing activities increased by $177,852 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase primarily relates to $55,404 of net proceeds received from the sale of common stock during 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Offsetting the increase are net proceeds from mortgage note payables of $30,363 received during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to net paydowns of $81,766 during the same period in 2015. Also increasing cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was a decrease in distributions to noncontrolling interests of $10,762 related to the sale of four student-oriented apartment properties in 2015.
Financing
We have relied primarily on fixed-rate financing, locking in what were favorable spreads between real estate income yields and mortgage interest rates and have tried to maintain a balanced schedule of debt maturities. We also use interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure to interest rate movements on our variable rate debt. The following consolidated debt table provides information on the outstanding principal balances and the weighted average interest rates at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
Consolidated Debt
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate
 
Principal
Balance
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate
Fixed
 
$
491,650

 
4.21
%
 
$
435,257

 
4.39
%
Variable
 
29,680

 
3.03

 
59,680

 
2.40

Total
 
$
521,330

 
4.14
%
 
$
494,937

 
4.15
%
Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments
From time to time, we have entered into contingent agreements for the acquisition and financing of properties. Such acquisitions and financings are subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence or meeting certain leasing or occupancy thresholds.
We are subject to fixed ground lease payments on South Beach Parking Garage of $94 per year until September 30, 2016. The fixed amount will increase on September 30, 2016 and every five years thereafter by the lesser of 12% or the cumulative CPI over the previous five year period. We are also subject to a variable ground lease payment calculated as 2.5% of revenue. The lease expires September 30, 2041 and has a ten-year renewal option.
The operating agreement for Townlake of Coppell allows the unrelated third party joint venture partner, owning a 10% interest, to put their interest to us at a market determined value for a period of 90 days beginning in 2018.
Other Sources
On January 16, 2015, our First Extended Public Offering registration statement was declared effective with the SEC (Commission File No. 333-196886) to register up to $2,700,000 in any combination of shares of our Class A, Class M, Class A-I and Class M-I common stock, consisting of up to $2,400,000 of shares offered in our primary offering and up to $300,000 in shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We intend to offer shares of our common stock on a continuous basis for an indefinite period of time by filing a new registration statement before the end of each three-year offering period, subject to regulatory approval. We intend to use the net proceeds from the First Extended Public Offering, which are not used to pay the fees and other expenses attributable to our operations, to (1) grow and further diversify our portfolio by making investments in accordance with our investment strategy and policies, (2) reduce borrowings and repay indebtedness incurred under various financing instruments and (3) fund repurchases under our share repurchase plan.
On March 3, 2015, we commenced a private offering of up to $350,000 in shares of our Class D common stock with an indefinite duration. Proceeds from our private offering will be used for the same corporate purposes as the proceeds of our First Extended Public Offering. We will reserve the right to terminate the Follow-on Private Offering at any time and to extend the Follow-on Private Offering term to the extent permissible under applicable law.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had approximately $150 in outstanding letters of credit, none of which are reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet. We have no other off balance sheet arrangements.

34



Distributions to Stockholders
To remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute or pay tax on 100% of our capital gains and distribute at least 90% of ordinary taxable income to stockholders.
The following factors, among others, will affect operating cash flow and, accordingly, influence the decisions of our board of directors regarding distributions:
scheduled increases in base rents of existing leases;
changes in minimum base rents and/or overage rents attributable to replacement of existing leases with new or renewal leases;
changes in occupancy rates at existing properties and procurement of leases for newly acquired or developed properties;
necessary capital improvement expenditures or debt repayments at existing properties; and
our share of distributions of operating cash flow generated by the unconsolidated real estate affiliate, less management costs and debt service on additional loans that have been or will be incurred.
We anticipate that operating cash flow, cash on hand, proceeds from dispositions of real estate investments or refinancings will provide adequate liquidity to conduct our operations, fund general and administrative expenses, fund operating costs and interest payments and allow distributions to our stockholders in accordance with the REIT qualification requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, that will use a five step model to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries.  The model will identify the contract, identify any separate performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.  The new standard will exclude lease contracts, however will include the sale of real estate and will replace most existing revenue recognition in GAAP when it becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018.  We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-01 Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The new standard requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset, and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The standard will become effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-02 Leases (ASC 842), which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification.  Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The update is expected to impact our consolidated financial statements as we have certain operating and land lease arrangements for which we are the lessee. ASC 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, ASC 840 Leases. The standard is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance.

35



Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates in terms of our variable-rate debt and the price of new fixed-rate debt for refinancing of existing debt. We manage our interest rate risk exposure by obtaining fixed-rate loans where possible as well as by entering into interest rate cap and swap agreements. As of March 31, 2016, we had consolidated debt of $521,330, which included $29,680 of variable-rate debt. Including the $3,223 net debt premium on assumed debt and debt issuance costs, we have consolidated debt of $518,107 at March 31, 2016. We also entered into interest rate cap and swap agreements on $89,080 of debt which cap the LIBOR rate at between 1.0% and 3.3% over the next three years. A 0.25% movement in the interest rate on the $29,680 of variable-rate debt would have resulted in an $74 annualized increase or decrease in consolidated interest expense and cash flow from operating activities.
We are subject to interest rate risk with respect to our fixed-rate financing in that changes in interest rates will impact the fair value of our fixed-rate financing. To determine fair market value, the fixed-rate debt is discounted at a rate based on an estimate of current lending rates, assuming the debt is outstanding through maturity and considering the collateral. At March 31, 2016, the fair value of our mortgage notes payable was estimated to be $5,810 higher than the carrying value of $521,330. If treasury rates were 0.25% higher at March 31, 2016, the fair value of our mortgage notes payable would have been $936 lower than the carrying value.
In August 2007, we purchased Railway Street Corporate Centre located in Calgary, Canada. For this investment, we use the Canadian dollar as the functional currency. When preparing consolidated financial statements, assets and liabilities of foreign entities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, while income and expense items are translated at weighted average rates for the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and foreign currency translation adjustment on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
As a result of our Canadian investment, we are subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These risks include the translation of local currency balances of our Canadian investment and transactions denominated in Canadian dollars. Our objective is to control our exposure to these risks through our normal operating activities. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized a foreign currency translation gain of $507 and loss of $692, respectively. At March 31, 2016, a 10% unfavorable exchange rate movement would have caused our $507 foreign currency translation gain to be decreased by $741, resulting in a foreign currency translation loss of $234.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on management’s evaluation as of March 31, 2016, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

36



PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages. Many of these matters are covered by insurance, although they may nevertheless be subject to deductibles or retentions. Although the ultimate liability for these matters cannot be determined, based upon information currently available, we believe the ultimate resolution of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
The most significant risk factors applicable to the Company are described in Item 1A to our 2015 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to those previously-disclosed risk factors.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Share Repurchase Plan
Our share repurchase plan limits repurchases during any calendar quarter to shares with an aggregate value (based on the repurchase price per share on the day the repurchase is effected) of 5% of the combined NAV of all classes of shares as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter, which means that in any 12-month period, we limit repurchases to approximately 20% of our total NAV. If the quarterly volume limitation is reached on or before the third business day of a calendar quarter, repurchase requests during the next quarter will be satisfied on a stockholder by stockholder basis, which we refer to as a “per stockholder allocation,” instead of a first-come, first-served basis. Pursuant to the per stockholder allocation, each of our stockholders would be allowed to request repurchase at any time during such quarter of a total number of shares not to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock the stockholder held as of the end of the prior quarter. The per stockholder allocation requirement will remain in effect for each succeeding quarter for which the total repurchases for the immediately preceding quarter exceeded four percent of our NAV on the last business day of such preceding quarter. If total repurchases during a quarter for which the per stockholder allocation applies are equal to or less than four percent of our NAV on the last business day of such preceding quarter, then repurchases will again be first-come, first-served for the next succeeding quarter and each quarter thereafter.
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we repurchased 2,637,900 shares of common stock under the share repurchase plan.
Period
  
Total Number of Shares Redeemed
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Pursuant to the Program (1)
January 1-January 31, 2016
 
109,420

 
$11.19
 
109,420
 
February 1-February 29, 2016
 
112,397

 
$11.27
 
112,397
 
March 1-March 31, 2016
 
2,416,083

 
$11.28
 
2,416,083
 
(1)     Redemptions are limited as described above. 
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
On March 3, 2015, we commenced the Follow-on Private Offering of up to $350,000 in shares of our Class D common stock with an indefinite duration. On February 8, 2016, we received $935 related to the issuance of 83,070 of our Class D common stock at $11.25 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. No selling commissions are paid on the sale of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan.
These sales are exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the purchaser is an accredited investor within the meaning of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. LaSalle Investment Management Distributors, LLC serves as the dealer manager for the Follow-on Private Offering.

37




Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information.
None.
Item 6.
Exhibits.
The Exhibit Index that immediately follows the signature page to this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.


38



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc., has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
JONES LANG LASALLE INCOME PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
 
 
 
 
Date:
May 12, 2016
By:
/s/ C. Allan Swaringen
 
 
 
C. Allan Swaringen
 
 
 
President, Chief Executive Officer
            
 
 
 
JONES LANG LASALLE INCOME PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
 
 
 
 
Date:
May 12, 2016
By:
/s/ Gregory A. Falk
 
 
 
Gregory A. Falk
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


39



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
  
Description
 
 
 
31.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
31.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
101.INS*
  
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH*
  
XBRL Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL*
  
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF*
  
Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB*
  
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE*
  
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
 
*    Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.





40