UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

or

 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ____________

Commission File Number 333-188152

MJP INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(403) 237–8330
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] YES [ ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[X] YES [ ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
[ ] YES [X] NO

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Check whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. 
[ ] YES [ ] NO

 APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
16,108,500 common shares issued and outstanding as of May 4, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Our unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2016 form part of this quarterly report. They are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

3

Going Concern (Note 1)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements
F-1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements
F-2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements
F-3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed interim consolidated financial statements
F-4

NOTE 1 – NATURE AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

MJP International Ltd. (“MJP” or the “Corporation”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada, United States on October 24, 2012. On December 10, 2012, the Corporation acquired MJP Lighting Solutions Ltd. (“MJP BVI”) and MJP BVI’s wholly owned subsidiary, MJP Holdings Ltd. (“MJP Alberta”) by issuing 12,000,000 common stock in exchange for 100 percent of the outstanding common stock of MJP BVI (the “Transaction”). Although the Corporation was the legal acquirer, the transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of MJP BVI in the form of a reverse merger, whereby MJP BVI becomes the accounting acquirer and was deemed to have retroactively adopted the capital structure of the Corporation. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of MJP BVI for all periods presented, and do not include the historical financial statements of the Corporation. All costs associated with the reverse merger transaction were expensed as incurred.

MJP BVI, a British Virgin Islands company, with its main office located in Hong Kong, was incorporated on October 31, 2012. MJP Alberta was incorporated on July 19, 2010 under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada. MJP BVI, operating through MJP Alberta, specializes in the sale and distribution of LED lighting and technology solutions and is focused on the North American market. MJP Alberta has set up an agency in Guangzhou, China in search of high quality products offered by reputable manufacturers to be introduced to Canada.

Going Concern

These condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Corporation and its subsidiaries will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for next fiscal year. Realizable values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these condensed interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Corporation be unable to continue as a going concern. At March 31, 2016, the Corporation had not yet achieved profitable operations and has accumulated losses of $268,622 since its inception. The Corporation expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of common stock. Management may also seek to obtain short-term loans from the directors of the Corporation. There are no current arrangements in place for equity funding or short-term loans.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. The condensed interim consolidated financial statements and notes are the representations of the Corporation’s management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore do not include all the information necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporation’s filed Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT.)

Basis of Presentation

The Corporation’s condensed interim consolidated financial statements included herein are prepared under the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed interim consolidated financial statements include the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiaries MJP Lighting Solutions Ltd. and MJP Holdings Ltd. and 100 percent of their assets, liabilities and net income or loss. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

F-5

While the information presented in the accompanying condensed interim three and six months consolidated financial statements is unaudited, it includes all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operation and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the period ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ended June 30, 2016.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company adopts new pronouncements relating to generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the Company as they are issued, which may be in advance of their effective date. Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASC 2013-05). ASC 2013-05 requires that when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The Corporation has determined that the adaptation of this guidance has no material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-2, “Consolidation (Topic 820): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-2 provides a revised consolidation model for all reporting entities to use in evaluating whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities will be subject to reevaluation under this revised consolidation model. The revised consolidation model, among other things, (i) modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entitiesare VIEs or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and (iii) modifies the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs through fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-2 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT.)

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest -Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts and the accounting for debt issue costs under IFRS. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. ASU 2015-03 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-6

In August 2014, the FASB issued amended standards No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (''ASU 2014-15"), to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures requirement. The amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation for each annual and interim reporting period, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position.

NOTE 3 – DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

As at March 31, 2016, the Corporation was obligated to shareholders for funds advanced to the Corporation for working capital. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and no payback schedule has been established.

NOTE 4 – CAPITAL STOCK

As at March 31, 2016, there were no warrants or options outstanding (2015 - nil).

F-7

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology including “could”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential” and the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested in this report.

In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this quarterly report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “our company”, mean MJP International Ltd. and our wholly owned subsidiaries, MJP Lightings Solutions Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation and MJP Holdings Ltd., an Alberta, Canada corporation.

General Overview

Our company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 24, 2012. We are a development stage company; having entered into the development stage on October 24, 2012. Founded in Calgary, Canada, we aim to capitalize on new opportunities found in the North American market for light-emitting diode (“LED”) lighting. With China as the manufacturing backbone of future LED products, we have set up office in Guangzhou, China in search of high quality products offered by reputable manufacturers to be introduced to Canada, the United States, and abroad. Our president, chief executive officer and director, Chris Tong Tang spends more than 50% of his time in the Southern China region, including Guangzhou and Hong Kong. While there, he operates from our Guangzhou office. In addition to seeing suppliers and sourcing and inspecting products at factories, he is also actively seeking to develop a market for our products in that region.

Our executive offices are located at Suite 2806, 505 - 6th Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 1X5. Our telephone number is (403) 237 – 8330.

Current Business

On December 10, 2012, we entered into a share exchange agreement with MJP Lighting Solutions Ltd. and the shareholders of MJP Lighting Solutions pursuant to which we acquired MJP Lighting Solutions and MJP Holdings Ltd., as our wholly owned subsidiaries. As a result of the acquisition, we issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for 100% of the outstanding common shares of MJP Lighting Solutions and MJP Holdings.

MJP Lighting Solutions, a British Virgin Islands company, with its main office located in Hong Kong, was incorporated in October 31, 2012. MJP Lighting Solutions operated through its then wholly owned subsidiary, MJP Holdings, of Alberta, Canada. MJP Holdings was incorporated on July 19, 2010 under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada. MJP Holdings specializes in the sale and distribution of LED lighting and technology solutions.

4

On January 1, 2012 we received a letter of authorization from Gysun Opto-Electronic Co. Ltd. pursuant to which we were designated as an authorized dealer in Canada for all LED products produced by Gysun Opto-Electronic. The letter of authorization entitles us to market and distribute products of Gysun Opto-Electronic in Canada. All purchase orders made by us are negotiated and determined on a case by case basis. The letter of authorization has no fixed term and is valid until revoked.

Products and Services

Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs)

Light-emitting diode, commonly known as LED, is a solid-state semiconductor technology that is rapidly gaining momentum in the lighting industry. Early market for LEDs was driven by specific niche markets, mainly backlighting, that optimized on the products’ coloured light and small package size. From backlighting, the product slowly made inroads into the automotive industry. Today, the focus of the industry has largely been shifted towards general lighting. LED applications are evolving quickly into viable sources for general illumination as they promise many benefits over conventional lighting. Within the past few years, LED technology has improved significantly with respect to brightness, energy efficiency, and colour quality and consistency. Branded as a disruptive technology, LED has played a tremendous role in revolutionizing the lighting industry. LEDs have the following attributes:

• Efficiency. LEDs have exceptionally high theoretical energy efficiency. They can produce much higher lumen per watt than conventional technologies, thus providing energy savings up to 50 to 70%.
• Lifespan. The materials used in making LEDs are inherently stable. High quality LEDs may last for 50,000 to 100,000 hours or more. Unlike conventional lighting technologies, lifespan of an LED is unaffected by rapid cycling, its lifespan actually increases when the average current flowing through it is reduced.
• Controllability. LEDs have superior control over light colour, intensity, and direction. Newer white LEDs bring the potential to illuminate public spaces, homes and offices with light that mimics daylight. The controllability of LED- generated light enables intelligent light systems, making them better suited to smart controls than any previous light technology.
• Durability. LEDs are extremely durable; and are resistant to vibration, mechanical stress, and extreme weather conditions whereby conventional lighting solutions are at a disadvantage.
• Environmentally Friendly. LEDs do not contain toxic materials such as mercury, a necessary component of fluorescent bulbs.

Today’s LEDs boast many benefits over conventional technologies. In addition to the many objective advantages mentioned above, they also provide social benefits that play an important role in enhancing human emotions, motivation, abilities, health, and perception of public safety.

MJP International’s LED Products

Through our Canadian subsidiary, MJP Holdings, we currently sell LED products in Canada primarily to retail clients (end users) or through agents. To date, the majority of our products sold in Canada have been sold through two independent agents, ECCOS Lifestyle Ltd. and PSL Enterprises Ltd., both of Calgary, Alberta. In June, 2013, through our wholly owned British Virgin Island subsidiary, MJP Lighting Solutions, we made a sale to an end user in Hong Kong. Our company has established relationships with and has purchased most of our products from two suppliers in Southern China, Gysun Opto-Electronic Co. Ltd. and Odin Optoelectronics Technology Co., Limited. To date, our sales have consisted primarily of LED tube lights, LED PAR (parabolic aluminized reflector) lamps for spot lights, and LED down lights. These products are certified for sale in North America with UL® (Underwriters Laboratories) or CSA® (Canadian Standards Association). All of these products have numerous applications in both commercial and residential structures and offer a number of benefits over both incandescent and fluorescent lighting products.

5

PAR Series

The LED PAR Series bulb is a replacement bulb for traditional PAR 30/38 lamps, where typically halogen bulbs are used. Diameter and length are identical to traditional lighting products; however, the mid-section is wider to allow necessary thermal management. Normally this difference is accommodated by the standard fixtures. The LED bulb is available with either a spot or wide beam lens and can be used in recessed, track and pendant lighting. Traditionally, the PAR light series has two product alternatives: halogen lamps and compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs). LED PAR Series are superior in many ways over these two product alternatives. Both the halogen and CFL bulbs operate at higher wattages resulting in higher yearly power consumption and heat emissions. Furthermore, halogen and CFL lighting products are also deficient in luminosity (light intensity) and longevity.

Down Light

The LED Down Light series is a complete lighting fixture with bulb and installation housing. The model has three variations: recessed, narrow spot, and wide beam; allowing for a wide range of applications. The LED Down Light series’ lack of heat output and spot capabilities make this product ideal for display lighting. However the fixtures can also be used in any commercial office space or residential dwelling.

The Down Light series bulb is superior in many ways over the halogen and CFL lighting products. However, a feature that truly sets the LED Down Light product apart from its alternatives is that the bulb is available in both a wide and narrow beam model; allowing the product a greater amount of versatility over alternative lighting products.

Tube Series

The LED Tube series products are designed to replace fluorescent lamps and fit into existing light fixtures. The new LED lighting products are easy to install and require only some minor wiring adjustments, which includes removing the now obsolete ballasts. As well, the LED Tube series pins can be configured for horizontal or vertical lighting and are available in either clear or frosted lenses.

The LED Tube series contains many advantages over traditional fluorescent tube lighting. Overall product performance is far superior; they are capable of starting at much colder temperatures, and do not flicker or hum like traditional fluorescent tubes tend to do. Quality of light is also much better, and both wattage and yearly power consumption is much lower. LED Tube series products also do not require a ballast like traditional fluorescent tubes do, and last significantly longer resulting in a substantial decrease in installation and maintenance costs.

Results of Operations

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are outlined in the table below:

6

Revenues

We earned revenues of $1,658 for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 compared to $1,548 for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 for an increase of approximately 7.11% . The relatively small increase in revenues for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due the strong competition in the market and due to the slow acceptance of LED lighting by consumers. Our gross profit for three month period ended March 31, 2016 was $206 compared to a gross profit of $318 for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 for a decrease of $112 primarily due to higher cost of goods sold.

We earned revenues of $3,450 for the nine month period ended March 31, 2016 compared to $4,507 for the nine month period ended March 31, 2015 for a decrease of approximately 23.45% . The decrease in sales for the nine month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to strong competition in the market and the slow acceptance of LED lighting by consumers. Our gross profit for nine month period ended March 31, 2016 was $564 compared to $693 for the nine month period ended March 31, 2015 for a decrease of approximately 18.61% primarily due to lower revenues.

Operating Expenses

Our consolidated expenses for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

Our general and administrative expenses include rent, telephone and internet services, banking changes and miscellaneous office supply costs. Our professional fees include legal and accounting fees. The increase in expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to higher general and administrative expense.

The decrease in expenses for the nine month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to a decrease in salary and wage expense.

Earnings after Taxes

The net loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 was $10,403 compared to a net loss of $8,710 during the three month period ended March 31, 2015. The higher loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to an increase in general and administrative expense.

The net loss for the nine month period ended March 31, 2016 was $26,850 compared to a net loss of $29,401 during the nine month period ended March 31, 2015. The lower loss for the nine month period ended March 31, 2016 is primarily due to a decrease in salary and wage expense for the period.

7

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at March 31, 2016, we were obligated to related parties, including Chris Tong Tang, our president, chief executive officer and director and a number of shareholders, for $130,061 (June 30, 2015 $95,284) in funds advanced to us for working capital. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and no payback schedule has been established.

At March 31, 2016, our company had a cash balance and total assets of $731 compared with a cash balance and total assets of $617 as at June 30, 2015.

As at March 31, 2016, our company had total liabilities of $140,319 compared with $116,938 as at June 30, 2015. The increase of $23,381 was attributed to a relative low profit and expenses incurred during the period.

As at March 31, 2016, our company had a working capital deficit of $139,588 compared with a working capital deficit of $116,321 as at June 30, 2015.

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the nine months ended March 31, 2016, our company used $134 of cash for operating activities compared with $4,778 used during the nine months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease in the use of cash for operating activities was primarily due to the increase in trade and other payables.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, our company did not receive any cash for financing activities. There were no financing activities during the last nine month period.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

We have not engaged in any investing activities since inception.

Going Concern

We incurred a net loss of $268,622 since inception (July 19, 2010) to March 31, 2016. We have commenced limited operations, raising substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We will seek additional sources of capital through the issuance of debt or equity financing, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing our objectives.

8

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of our plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our stockholders.

Estimated Expenses

Our expenses for the twelve month period beginning from April 1, 2016 are estimated to be approximately $70,000. With our working capital deficit of $139,388 as at March 31, 2016, we will need to raise additional capital to cover our expenses for this twelve month period beginning from April 1, 2016. We plan to raise additional funding either from new share issuance or from loans from shareholders.

At present, our cash requirements for the next 12 months (beginning April 1, 2016) outweigh the funds available to maintain or develop our business. Of the $70,000 that we require for the next 12 months, we have $731 in cash as of March 31, 2016 and a working capital deficit of $139,388. In order to improve our liquidity, we plan to pursue additional equity financing from private investors or possibly a registered public offering. We do not currently have any definitive arrangements in place for the completion of any further private placement financings and there is no assurance that we will be successful in completing any further private placement financings. If we are unable to achieve the necessary additional financing, then we plan to reduce the amounts that we spend on our business activities and administrative expenses in order to be within the amount of capital resources that are available to us.

We have not investigated the availability of commercial loans or other debt financing to supplement or meet our cash requirements. In the uncertain event that any such debt financing alternatives were available to us on acceptable terms, they would increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

If we are able to raise the required funds to fully implement our business plan, we plan to implement the business actions in the order provided below. If we are not able to raise all required funds, we will prioritize our corporate activities as chronologically as follows:

April 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016:

• Maintain company’s filing requirements.
• Market our services to our various contacts.
• Carry out marketing activities.
• Seeking partnership or strategic relationship with other distribution companies.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares and funding from directors and shareholders in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our operations and other activities.

9

Critical Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the interim consolidated financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements and notes are the representations of our company’s management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore do not include all the information necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The interim consolidated financial statements, included herein, should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our company’s filed Form 10-K.

Basis of Presentation

Our company’s interim consolidated financial statements included herein are prepared under the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These interim consolidated financial statements include our company’s wholly owned subsidiaries MJP Lighting Solutions Ltd. and MJP Holdings Ltd. and 100% of their assets, liabilities and net income or loss. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

While the information presented in the accompanying interim three months consolidated financial statements is unaudited, it includes all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operation and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the period ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ended June 30, 2016.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASC 2013-05). ASC 2013-05 requires that when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. Our company has determined that the adaptation of this guidance has no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-2, “Consolidation (Topic 820): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-2 provides a revised consolidation model for all reporting entities to use in evaluating whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities will be subject to reevaluation under this revised consolidation model. The revised consolidation model, among other things, (i) modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entitiesare VIEs or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and (iii) modifies the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs through fee arrangements and related party relationships. ASU 2015-2 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Our company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

10

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest -Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts and the accounting for debt issue costs under IFRS. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. ASU 2015-03 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Our company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued amended standards No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (''ASU 2014-15"), to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures requirement. The amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation for each annual and interim reporting period, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. Our company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of the end of our quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our president (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in Internal Control

During the period covered by this report there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

11

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

As a “smaller reporting company” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

None.

None.

Not applicable.

None.

12

13

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

14