UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015

[    ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 333-150028

LIBERTY SILVER CORP.

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

[ X ] Yes   [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ X ] Yes   [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting Company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting Company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

1

---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ]Yes [X ] No

As of February 12, 2016 the Issuer had 12,354,497 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

2

---

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements of Liberty Silver Corp., (“Liberty Silver”, the “Company”, or the “Registrant”) a Nevada corporation, included herein were prepared, without audit, pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Because certain information and notes normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America were condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the audited financial statements of the Company in the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, and all amendments thereto.

LIBERTY SILVER CORP.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

INTERIM UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:	Page
Balance Sheets	4
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	5
Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Interim Unaudited Financial Statements	7-12

3

---

4

---

5

---

6

---

Liberty Silver Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to Interim Unaudited Financial Statements

For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2015

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

The accompanying interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, stockholders’ equity or cash flows. It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The interim unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains the annual audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, for the year ended June 30, 2015. The interim results for the period ended December 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. The interim unaudited financial statements are presented in USD, which is the functional currency.

These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $13,121,291 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. The ability of the Company to emerge from the exploration stage is dependent upon, among other things, obtaining additional financing to continue operations, explore and develop the mineral properties and the discovery, development, and sale of reserves. The Company does not have sufficient working capital needed to meet its current fiscal obligations. In order to continue to meet its fiscal obligations in the current fiscal year and beyond, the Company must seek additional financing. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The accompanying interim unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Management considers various financing alternatives including, but not limited to, merger and acquisition activity, raising capital through the equity markets and debt financing. These unaudited interim financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

On January 30, 2015, the Company completed a share consolidation of its common shares on the basis of one (1) new post-consolidation common share for every 15 pre-consolidated common shares. The number of authorized shares was not reduced as a result of this share consolidation. The 185,309,574 common shares of the Company outstanding immediately prior to consolidation were reduced to 12,354,497 common shares, as approved by shareholders at the Company’s annual general and special meeting held on December 5, 2014. No fractional shares were issued. Any fractions of a share were rounded up to the next whole common share. A new CUSIP number of 53121P206 replaced the old CUSIP number of 53121P107, to distinguish between the pre- and post-consolidated shares.  In conjunction with this share consolidation, corresponding adjustments were made in the number of options and warrants issued and outstanding, and in the exercise prices of such options and warrants. All outstanding common shares and per share amounts contained in the interim unaudited financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this share consolidation for all periods presented.

7

---

Note 2 – Nature of Operations

Liberty Silver Corp. was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada, U.S.A on February 20, 2007 under the name Lincoln Mining Corp. Pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment dated February 11, 2010, the Company changed its name to Liberty Silver Corp. The Company’s registered office is located at 1802 N. Carson Street, Suite 212, Carson City Nevada 89701, and its head office is located at 181 Bay Street, Suite 2330, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2T3, and its telephone number is 888-749-4916. As of the date of this Form 10-Q, the Company had no subsidiaries.

The Company was incorporated for the purpose of engaging in mineral exploration activities. On March 29, 2010, the Company entered into an Exploration Earn-In Agreement relating to the Trinity Project located in Pershing County, Nevada. The Company is currently engaged in the exploration of the Trinity Project, and has not yet commenced development stage activities, however, the Company intends to engage in efforts to develop the Trinity Project in the future. Subject to securing adequate financing, the plan of operation for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016 is to conduct additional mineral exploration activities at the Trinity Silver property, which plan will extend into the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. Subject to the availability of funding, operations at the Trinity Project will consist of (i) an effort to expand the known mineralized material through drilling, (ii) permitting for operation, if deemed economically viable, (iii) metallurgical studies aimed at enhancing the recovery of the silver and by-product lead and zinc, (iv) engineering design related to potential construction of a new mine, and (v) complete feasibility studies relating to possible re-opening of the historic mine. Exploration of the property would be conducted simultaneously with the mine development in order to locate additional mineralized materials.

Note 3 - Mineral Property

The Company acquired its interest in the Trinity Project through an Exploration Earn-In Agreement. On March 29, 2010, the Company entered into the Earn-In Agreement relating to the Trinity Project with AuEx, Inc., a Nevada company beneficially owned by another Nevada company AuEx Ventures, Inc. AuEx, Inc. held an exclusive interest in the Trinity Project by way of a Minerals Lease and Sublease with Newmont Mining USA Limited, a Delaware corporation who owns or leases the various unpatented mining claims and portions of private land comprising the Trinity Project. As part of a restructuring transaction by AuEx Ventures, Inc., another Nevada company Renaissance Exploration Inc. (“Renaissance”) was spun out, and on July 1, 2010 AuEx, Inc. assigned all of its interest in the Trinity Project and the Earn-In Agreement to Renaissance, who currently holds a 100% leasehold interest in the Trinity Project. The Minerals Lease and Sublease grants to Newmont, a right of first offer on any transfer of AuEx, Inc.’s interests in the Trinity Project to any non-affiliate of AuEx, Inc., and also gives Newmont a right to either enter into a joint venture agreement covering the Trinity Project and any other real property interests that AuEx, Inc. holds or acquires within the Trinity Project, or receive a royalty on all mineral production from such properties. Currently the rights to the Trinity Project are held 100% by Renaissance, pursuant to an assignment of such rights from AuEx, Inc. The Company entered into the Earn-In Agreement providing the Company with a right to earn a 70% undivided interest in rights of Renaissance in the Trinity Project (the “70% Interest”).

Under the Earn-In Agreement, the Company may earn-in the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project during a 6-year period in consideration of (1) a signing payment of $25,000, which has been made, (2) an expenditure of a cumulative total of $5,000,000 in exploration and development expenses on the Trinity Project by March 29, 2016, including a minimum of $500,000 which must be expended within one year from the effective date of the Agreement, and (3) completion of a bankable feasibility study on the Trinity Project on or before the 7^th anniversary date of the Agreement.  Item (1) has been completed by the Company, and the Company has satisfied item (2), and has reported its compliance as of March 29, 2013, which is the end of the third year from the inception of the Earn-in Agreement.

On October 15, 2012, the Company entered into and closed a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Primus Resources, L.C. and James A. Freeman (collectively “Seller”) to acquire unpatented mining claims, Nevada BLM Serial No. 799907, 799908, 799909, 799910, and 799911 covering approximately 100 acres of property located adjacent to the former Trinity Silver mine on the Company’s Trinity Project (the “Hi Ho Properties”). The Hi Ho Properties were previously the only acreage not controlled by the Company or its joint venture partner Renaissance Exploration Inc. in the Trinity Project. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company provided cash consideration of $250,000 and issued 172,222 restricted shares of common stock of the Company to Seller. In addition the Seller was granted a 2% net smelter royalty on future production from the Hi Ho Properties pursuant to the terms of a Deed with Reservation of Royalty Hi Ho Silver Claims.

8

---

The Trinity Project consists of a total of approximately 10,020 acres, including 5,676 acres of fee land and 253 unpatented mining claims.

The Company has completed some financing transactions, and continues to pursue additional financing opportunities in order to obtain the capital needed to fulfill its obligations under the terms of the Earn-In Agreement. There has been no mining of resources to date.

During the interim period ended December 31, 2014, the Company had incurred approximately $227,626 in exploration expenditures, which were reported under various line items on the statement of operations.

During the interim period ended December 31, 2015, the Company had incurred approximately $89,460 in exploration expenditures, which were reported under various line items on the statement of operations.

Note 4 – Convertible Loan Payable

On October 17, 2014, the Company amended and restated its agreement in relation to an existing $1,210,000 principal amount secured loan facility (the “Original Loan”) made available by BG Capital Group Ltd. (“BGCG”). Under the terms of the revised agreement, BGCG has made available to the Company a committed non-revolving term credit facility in the principal amount of $1,250,000 (the “New Loan”), which shall initially bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum and which shall be secured by a charge on all of the assets of the Company. The Company has also repaid the indebtedness to BGCG under the Original Loan by converting the outstanding, aggregate total sum of the principal amount of the Original Loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, being $1,248,653 (the “Debt”), into 6,659,486 common shares of the Company (“Common Shares”) at a price of $0.1875 per Common Share, in full satisfaction of the Debt under the Original Loan.

The New Loan consists of up to $1,250,000 of new credit facilities, of which $25,000 had been advanced to the Company pursuant to a promissory note, which was superseded by the New Loan and became part of the first advance under the New Loan in the aggregate amount of $350,000.

The key terms of the New Loan are as follows:

·

a total of $1,125,000 of up to $1,250,000 was advanced to Liberty by the end of the period;

·

the outstanding principal amount bears interest at 11% per annum from date of advance and becomes due and payable in its entirety one year following the Closing Date (the “Maturity Date”). The Company has the option to extend the Maturity Date by six months, with interest payable at 15% per annum accruing on the outstanding principal amount during such extension period. On September 25, 2015, the Company exercised the option to extend the Maturity date to April 15, 2016;

·

the New Loan is secured by a charge on all of the assets of the Company; and

·

BGCG, at any time up to one business day prior to the Maturity Date, at its sole option, shall be entitled to convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal amount of the New Loan advanced to Liberty (including all deferred interest), together with all accrued interest, into Common Shares, on the basis of $0.1875 per Common Share. The conversion rights are subject to the Company having sufficient authorized capital available to satisfy the exercise of the conversion rights from time to time. To the extent there is not sufficient authorized capital at any time to permit the full exercise of all conversion rights available to BGCG at such time, the Company shall take all reasonable commercial efforts to hold, as expeditiously as possible, a shareholders’ meeting to approve the necessary increase to the authorized capital in order that the conversion rights available to BGCG may be exercised to its fullest extent.

The carrying value of the conversion option equity component of the convertible loan has been determined to be nil and the carrying value of the liability component is $1,125,000. The effective interest rate on the liability component of the convertible loan was 11% for the period ending October 15, 2015 and 15% per annum during the extended period beginning October 15, 2015.

9

---

The lender pursuant to the New Loan is BGCG. Immediately following the Closing Date, BGCG and certain of its related parties owned, directly and indirectly, 8,657,417 Common Shares, which represented approximately 70.1% of the Company’s 12,354,497 issued and outstanding Common Shares on the Closing Date. Other than pursuant to the New Loan, the Company does not have any contractual or other relationship with BGCG.

As at December 31, 2015, the Company had only received $125,000 of the final advance of $250,000, which had become due on June 30, 2015. The remaining $125,000 portion of the advance remains outstanding.

Note 5 – Capital Stock and Warrants

Authorized

The total authorized capital is as follows:

-

300,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per common share; and

-

10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per preferred share

Issued and outstanding

On June 30, 2014, the Company reached an agreement with arm’s-length creditors to settle indebtedness in the aggregate amount of $226,000 by issuing 48,800 common shares, including 25,466 common shares at a price of $7.50 per share and 23,334 common shares at a price of $1.50 per share.

On September 30, 2014, the Company issued 34,889 common shares to employees of the Company, at a price of $7.50 per share, in settlement of arrears compensation obligations of $261,665.

On October 17, 2014, the Company issued 6,659,487 common shares, at a price of $0.1875 per share, in settlement of a secured loan facility, which included any unpaid and accrued interest, totaling $1,248,654. In conjunction with the issuance of these common shares, the Company incurred $40,400 in share issuance costs.

On December 31, 2014, the Company issued 11,333 common shares to employees of the Company, at a price of $7.50 per share, in settlement of arrears compensation obligations of $85,000.

For the above share issuances, the shares were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance upon the exemptions from registration contained in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933. No underwriters were used, nor were any brokerage commissions paid in connection with the above share issuances.

Warrants

As at December 31, 2015, the aggregate weighted average intrinsic value of 13,333 warrants outstanding was $0, and the weighted average grant date fair value of each warrant outstanding was CAD $11.25. The 13,333 warrants expire on August 4, 2016.

10

---

Stock Options

On November 14, 2014, the vested and non-vested portion of the 400,000 stock options granted to purchase common shares by directors, officers and employees were cancelled or forfeited.

On February 17, 2015, the Company granted a total of 1,182,667 stock options to purchase common shares to directors, officers and an employee of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.1875 per share and for a term of 5 years.

Stock based compensation expense, resulting from the vesting of stock options, for the three months ended December 31, 2015 was $15,240 (2014 - $69,672), which is included in operation and administration expense on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

Stock based compensation expense, resulting from the vesting of stock options, for the six months ended December 31, 2015 was $33,752 (2014 - $115,747), which is included in operation and administration expense on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

As at December 31, 2015 there were 1,229,334 stock options outstanding, exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $0.61 per share, and expiring as follows: 46,667 options, exercisable at $11.25 per share, expiring on March 31, 2016; and, 1,182,667 options, exercisable at $0.1875 per share, expiring on February 17, 2020.

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

Effective November 1, 2011, and terminating on April 28, 2016, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement for the lease of premises in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, for a term of 54 months. The Company has its head office at these premises, which is approximately 1,400 square feet. The annual base rent commitment for the Toronto head office space is $35,851 (CAD $48,094).

Effective February 8, 2012, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the lease of premises in Sparks, Nevada, USA, for a term of 12 months, and terminating on January 31, 2013.  The lease agreement was amended such that the term was extended for a further 24 months, and terminating on January 31, 2015, and then extended for a further 12 months, terminating on January 31, 2016. The Company has its field office and warehouse at these premises, which is approximately 5,500 square feet. The annual base rent commitment for the Sparks field office space is $30,624 for the period from February 1, 2014 to January 31, 2015, and $30,624 for the period from February 1, 2015 to February 1, 2016.

As at December 31, 2015, the Company had a commitment, for the above noted leases, of $14,502 remaining.

The following table outlines the remaining lease commitment to the end of the next five fiscal years based on the leases that are currently entered into by the Company:

	Total Lease Commitment
June 30, 2016 and thereafter	$0

On September 12, 2013, the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors (the “Liberty Silver Parties”) were named as defendants in a proposed securities class action lawsuit filed against Robert Genovese, certain individuals alleged to have collaborated with Mr. Genovese, and an offshore investment firm allegedly controlled by Mr. Genovese (the “Action,” Case No. 9:13-cv-80923-KLR, Stanaford v. Genovese et al.). The action alleged violations of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rules thereunder relating to anomalous trading activity and fluctuations in the Company’s share price from August through October 2012.

11

---

On December 8, 2014, without in any way acknowledging any fault or liability, the Company reached a settlement in principle, providing for a payment of $1 million cash, to be paid by the Company's D&O insurance carriers. On August 17, 2015, with no admission of fault or liability by the Liberty Silver Parties, the Court approved the settlement class and fully and finally dismissed with prejudice all claims against Liberty Silver, Geoffrey Browne, and William Tafuri in the litigation. Although defendants continue to deny plaintiffs' allegations, the Company believed it was in the best interests of its stockholders to focus its attention on its business and put the matter behind it.

Additionally, in the normal course of operations, certain other contingencies may arise relating to legal actions undertaken against the Company. In the opinion of management, whether the impact of such potential legal actions would have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, liquidity, or its financial position, cannot be determined in advance.

12

---

ITEM 2.

 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SPECIAL NOTE OF CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING STATEMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, ARE WHAT ARE KNOWN AS "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS", WHICH ARE BASICALLY STATEMENTS ABOUT THE FUTURE. FOR THAT REASON, THESE STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISK AND UNCERTAINTY SINCE NO ONE CAN ACCURATELY PREDICT THE FUTURE. WORDS SUCH AS "PLANS," "INTENDS," "WILL," "HOPES," "SEEKS," "ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS "AND THE LIKE OFTEN IDENTIFY SUCH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS, BUT ARE NOT THE ONLY INDICATION THAT A STATEMENT IS A FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT. SUCH FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE STATEMENTS CONCERNING OUR PLANS AND OBJECTIVES WITH RESPECT TO THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY, AND STATEMENTS WHICH EXPRESS OR IMPLY THAT SUCH PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS WILL OR MAY PRODUCE REVENUES, INCOME OR PROFITS. NUMEROUS FACTORS AND FUTURE EVENTS COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY TO CHANGE SUCH PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OR FAIL TO SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT SUCH PLANS OR ACHIEVE SUCH OBJECTIVES, OR CAUSE SUCH PRESENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS TO FAIL TO PRODUCE REVENUES, INCOME OR PROFITS. THEREFORE, THE READER IS ADVISED THAT THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN LIGHT OF THE DISCUSSION OF RISKS AND OTHER FACTORS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IN THE COMPANY'S OTHER FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. NO STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTEE OR ASSURANCE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE OR FUTURE RESULTS.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Corporation

Liberty Silver Corp. was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada, U.S.A on February 20, 2007 under the name Lincoln Mining Corp. Pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment dated February 11, 2010, the Company changed its name to Liberty Silver Corp. The Company’s registered office is located at 1802 N. Carson Street, Suite 212, Carson City Nevada 89701, and its head office is located at 181 Bay Street, Suite 2330, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2T3, and our telephone number is 888-749-4916.

Current Operations

Overview

The Company was incorporated for the purpose of engaging in mineral exploration activities, and on May 24, 2007, purchased the Zone Lode mining claim located in Elko County, Nevada, for a purchase price of $10,000. The objective was to conduct mineral exploration activities on the Zone Lode claim to assess whether it contained economic reserves of copper, gold, silver, molybdenum or zinc. The Company was not able to determine whether this property contained reserves that were economically recoverable and as a result, ceased to explore this property. The Company’s current business operations are focused on exploring and developing the Trinity Silver property located in Pershing County, Nevada (the “Trinity Project”).

The Company acquired its interest in the Trinity Project through an Exploration Earn-In Agreement with AuEx, Inc., a Nevada company (the “Earn-In Agreement”), discussed below. The Earn-In Agreement is subject to the rights and obligations of AuEx, Inc. and its successors and assigns under a Minerals Lease and Sublease between AuEx, Inc. and Newmont Mining USA Limited. As part of a restructuring transaction by AuEx Ventures, Inc., another Nevada company

13

---

Renaissance Gold Inc. (“Renaissance”) was spun out, and on July 1, 2010 AuEx, Inc. assigned all of its interest in the Trinity Project and the Earn-In Agreement to Renaissance, who currently holds a 100% leasehold interest in the Trinity Project pursuant to the Minerals Lease and Sublease. The Company’s rights in the Trinity Project are derived from and based upon the rights of Renaissance through the Minerals Lease and Sublease.  

The Trinity Project consists of a total of approximately 10,020 acres, including 5,676 acres of fee land and 253 unpatented mining claims.  Under the Earn-In Agreement, the Company may earn-in the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project during a 6-year period in consideration of (1) a signing payment of $25,000, which has been made, (2) an expenditure of a cumulative total of $5,000,000 in exploration and development expenses on the Trinity Project by March 29, 2016, including a minimum of $500,000 which must be expended within one year from the effective date of the Agreement, and (3) completion of a bankable feasibility study on the Trinity Project on or before the 7^th anniversary date of the Agreement. Item (1) has been completed by the Company, and the Company has satisfied item (2), and has reported its compliance as of March 29, 2013, which is the end of the third year from the inception of the Earn-in Agreement.

The Company’s business operations are currently focused on efforts to explore the Trinity Project. The Company has not yet commenced development stage activities, however, subject to the availability of adequate funding, the Company intends to engage in efforts to develop the Trinity Project in the future. The Company foresees future operations at the Trinity Project consisting of (i) an effort to expand the known mineralized material through drilling, (ii) permitting for operation, if deemed economically viable, (iii) metallurgical studies aimed at enhancing the recovery of the silver and by-product lead and zinc, and (iv) engineering design related to potential construction of a new mine. Exploration of the property would be conducted simultaneously with the mine development in order to locate additional mineralized materials.

Products

The Company’s anticipated product will be precious and base metal-bearing concentrates and/or precious metal bullion produced from ores from mineral deposits which it hopes to discover and exploit through exploration and acquisition. The Company anticipates such products will be silver, lead and zinc.

Trinity Project Location

The Trinity Project is located along the west flank of the Trinity Range in Pershing County, Nevada, about 25 miles by road northwest of Lovelock, NV, the county seat. The Trinity Project consists of approximately 10,020 acres, which includes 253 unpatented lode mining claims and portions of nine sections of private land.  Each claim filed with the BLM has an associated maintenance fee of $140 per year for each assessment year (which runs from September 1 through August 31). This fee must be paid by midnight on August 31 of each year to maintain the claim's validity for the succeeding assessment year. The fees for the claims comprising the Trinity Project are paid by Renaissance in accordance with the Lease they hold with Newmont. The Company reimburses Renaissance for this expenditure. All of the fees have been paid to the BLM for the current assessment year and all filings are current. There are 253 claims, which based upon current maintenance fees, costs approximately $35,420 per assessment year to maintain.

Infrastructure

The Trinity Project is situated in western Nevada, a locale which is host to many metal mines, mining equipment companies, drilling companies, mining and metallurgical consulting expertise, and experienced mining personnel. Its location is accessible by all-weather road through an area of very sparse population. There is no infrastructure on the property. All buildings have been removed, all wells have been properly abandoned, and there is no equipment on site. The mine site has been totally reclaimed to the satisfaction of the State of Nevada. The need for power and water would be defined by a feasibility study and mine plan both of which are premature at this point in time.

Government Regulation and Approval

The following permits will be necessary to put the Trinity Project into production.

14

---

	Permit/notification	Agency
	- Mine registry	Nevada Division of Minerals
	- Mine Opening notification	State Inspector of Mines
	- Solid Waste Landfill	Nevada Bureau of Waste Management
	- Hazardous Waste Management Permit	Nevada Bureau of Waste Management
	- General Storm Water Permit	Nevada Bureau of Pollution Control
	- Hazardous material Permit	State Fire Marshal
	- Fire and Life Safety	State Fire Marshal
	- Explosives Permit	Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
	- Notification of Commencement of Operations	Mine Safety and Health Administration
	- Radio License	Federal Communications Commission

All of the Company's drilling operations to date have been on private land and, as a result, have not been subject to U.S. Bureau of Land Management jurisdiction. On private land in Nevada, the Company's activities are regulated by The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the Nevada Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation (“NBMRR”) and no permit is needed as long as the disturbance created is less than five acres. Our total disturbance to date has been less than four acres, much of which has already been reclaimed, and as a result, we have not yet applied for a NBMRR permit. However, as a matter of courtesy, we have provided written correspondence to NBMRR to advise them of our activities.

Environmental Regulations

Our current exploration activities and any future mining operations (of which we currently have none planned), are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, waste disposal, worker safety, mine construction, and protection of endangered and protected species. We have made, and expect to make in the future, significant expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations. Future changes in applicable laws, regulations and permits or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could have an adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. In the event that we make a mineral discovery and decide to proceed to production, the costs and delays associated with compliance with these laws and regulations could stop us from proceeding with a project or the operation or further improvement of a mine or increase the costs of improvement or production.

We anticipate that the following environmental permits will be necessary for our anticipated operations:

·

Permit for Reclamation

·

Water Pollution Control Permit

·

Air Quality Operating Permit

·

Industrial Artificial Pond Permit

·

Water Rights

The Company anticipates that, subject to the availability of funds or financing, it will begin soliciting bids for the programs necessary to obtain these permits. The cost, timing, and work schedules are not yet available.

Competition

We compete with other mining and exploration companies in connection with the acquisition of mining claims and leases on silver and other precious metals prospects and in connection with the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. Many of these companies are much larger than we are, have greater financial resources and have been in the mining business much longer than we have. As such, these competitors may be in a better position through size, finances and experience to acquire suitable exploration properties. We may not be able to compete against these companies in acquiring new properties and/or qualified people to work on our current Trinity Project, or any other properties we may acquire in the future.

Given the size of the world market for precious metals such as silver and gold relative to the number of individual producers and consumers, we believe that no single company has sufficient market influence to significantly affect the price or supply of precious metals such as silver and gold in the world market.

15

---

Employees

The Company currently has three employees: Manish Z. Kshatriya, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of the Board; and, two independent directors serving on the Company’s board of directors.

Trinity Project Agreements

The Company acquired its interest in the Trinity Project through an Exploration Earn-In Agreement executed on March 29, 2010 with AuEx, Inc., a Nevada corporation. AuEx, Inc. held an exclusive interest in the Trinity Project by way of a Minerals Lease and Sublease with Newmont Mining USA Limited. Effective as of July 1, 2010, AuEx, Inc., assigned all its rights in the Exploration Earn-In Agreement to another Nevada company, Renaissance Exploration, Inc. The terms of the Minerals Lease and Sublease Agreement and the Exploration Earn-In Agreement are discussed below.

Lease and Sublease Agreement

Renaissance’s rights in the Trinity Project are derived through a Minerals Lease and Sublease dated July 29, 2005 (the “Lease”) by and between Newmont Mining USA Limited, a Delaware corporation (“Newmont”) and AuEx, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

Consideration

The Lease was granted to Renaissance for the following consideration:

a)

Renaissance agreed to pay Newmont a claim fee reimbursement of $10,955 concurrently with the execution of the Lease (this amount was paid);

b)

Renaissance is required to expend a total of $2,000,000 in ascertaining the existence, location, quantity, quality or commercial value of a deposit of minerals within the Trinity Project on or before the seventh anniversary of the Lease;

c)

Prior to the commencement of any commercial production, Renaissance shall supply Newmont with a feasibility study with respect to the Trinity Project.

In the event the Company did not meet its minimum expenditure obligation in any year, it would have been obligated under the terms of the Earn-In Agreement to pay the amount of any deficiency to Renaissance Exploration, Inc. However, the Company exceeded its minimum expenditure obligation in each of the first three years, and by the end of the third year it had incurred a total of approximately $5,652,397 in expenses. As a result, the Company will not be obligated to pay any deficiency amounts to Renaissance for any future years.

Joint Venture / Royalty

The Lease gives Newmont a right to either enter into a joint venture with Renaissance covering the Trinity Project and any other real property interests that Renaissance holds or acquires within the Trinity Project, or receive a royalty on all mineral production from such properties.

Joint Venture: The Lease contemplates the following schedule with respect to Newmont’s rights to enter into a joint venture with Renaissance:

a)

Before Renaissance spends $5 million and provides a feasibility study, Newmont can elect at any time to enter into a joint venture in which event Newmont would be required to pay all future joint venture expenses up to 250% of the expenditures made by Renaissance as of the date of Newmont’s election to enter into the joint venture.

b)

Upon Renaissance spending $5 million, but before the feasibility study, Renaissance shall deliver written notice to Newmont containing a summary of the expenditures made by Renaissance on the Trinity Project. Newmont may thereafter elect to enter into a joint venture by notifying Renaissance in writing of such election within 60 days of Newmont’s receipt of Renaissance’s initial notice. Under the joint venture, Newmont would be required to pay all

16

---

future joint venture expenses up to 250% of the expenditures made by Renaissance as of the date of Newmont’s election to enter into the joint venture.

c)

After Renaissance spending $5 million, but before the feasibility study, at any time after the expiration of the 60 day period identified in section b above, Newmont can elect to enter into a joint venture in which event Newmont would be required to pay Renaissance 50% of the expenditures made in the Trinity Project up to the date of Newmont’s election to participate in a joint venture, and all future joint venture expenses up to 200% of such expenditures.

d)

At any time within 60 days after Renaissance’s delivery of feasibility study, Newmont can elect to enter into a joint venture at which time Newmont would be required to pay Renaissance 200% of expenditures made by Renaissance as of the date of Newmont’s election to enter into the joint venture. Additionally, Renaissance can elect to have Newmont finance Renaissance’s share of the joint venture expenses until the Trinity Project is put into commercial production. Following the commencement of commercial production, Newmont shall be entitled to recover such paid expenses with interest at the London Interbank Offering Rate. If Newmont fails to elect to participate in the Joint Venture within 60 days following the delivery of the feasibility study, Newmont’s right to participate in a joint venture shall terminate.

Should Newmont elect to participate in a joint venture with Renaissance, pursuant to the Lease, and its payment terms, Newmont will serve as the manager of the joint venture and own 51% of the joint venture with an option to acquire an additional 14% for additional payments to Renaissance (for a total participating interest of 65%). Pursuant to the Earn-In Agreement, we are entitled to 70% interest in the Trinity Project, subject only to the Newmont interest. Accordingly, if Newmont exercised all of its joint venture options under the Lease, we would own a 35% interest in the Trinity Project.

Royalty: In the event Newmont does not elect to participate in a joint venture, then Newmont shall have the right to receive a royalty on all mineral production from the Trinity Project. Pursuant to the Lease, if Newmont elects to not participate in the joint venture, then Renaissance shall pay to Newmont $1 million and the Lease shall terminate and Newmont shall transfer title to all property comprising the Trinity Project to Renaissance, and thereafter receive a royalty payment of up to 5% of the net smelter returns generated from the properties comprising the Trinity Project.

Buyout Option

The Lease provides Renaissance with a buyout option pursuant to which Renaissance holds the right to purchase Newmont’s rights in the Trinity Project through the payment of $1 million to Newmont. In the event Renaissance elects the buyout option, Newmont would transfer title to the Trinity Project to Renaissance through quit claim deed while retaining certain rights in the Trinity Project; such rights may include some form of joint venture or a royalty interest.

Ownership Interest – Earn-In Agreement

As noted above, the rights to the Trinity Project are held 100% by Renaissance, pursuant to an assignment of such rights from AuEx, Inc. The Company entered into the Earn-In Agreement providing the Company with a right to earn a 70% undivided interest in rights of Renaissance in the Trinity Project (the “70% Interest”), as set out below. The following is intended to be a summary of the material terms of the Earn-In Agreement, and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety, by the full text of the Earn-In Agreement.

Consideration

The exclusive right to acquire the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project was granted to the Company for the following consideration:

a)

The Company agreed to pay $25,000 upon execution of the Earn-In Agreement (this amount was paid);

b)

In order to obtain the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project, the Company is required to (i) produce a bankable feasibility study by March 29, 2017 and (ii) to expend a minimum of $5,000,000 in exploration on the Trinity Project as follows: $500,000 in the first year; $1,000,000 in the second year; $1,000,000 in the third year; $1,000,000 in the fourth year; $1,000,000 in the fifth year; and $500,000 in the sixth year.

17

---

Any excess expenditure in any year shall be carried forward and applied to the subsequent year’s expenditure requirement, and the Company may accelerate the expenditures at its discretion. If the Company elects not to meet the minimum expenditure obligation during any year but wishes to maintain the Earn-In Agreement in full force and effect, or if it is subsequently determined that the minimum amount was not expended in any given year, the Company shall pay the amount of any deficiency to Renaissance.

Work Program

The Company shall be the operator and shall have full control over the content of work programs and annual expenditure amounts during the earn-in period, including having the authority to apply for all necessary permits, licenses and other approvals from the U.S., the State of Nevada or any other governmental or other entity having regulatory authority over any part of the Trinity Project.

Joint Venture

Upon the Company having acquired the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project by satisfying the minimum expenditure amounts and producing a bankable feasibility study, the Company and Renaissance shall enter into a formal joint venture agreement, and the Company will be the operator of the joint venture.

At such time as the Company earns the 70% Interest in the Trinity Project, the parties will thereafter participate in expenditures on the Trinity Project in accordance with their respective interests therein, or have their interest diluted in accordance with a straight-line dilution formula, as set forth in the joint venture agreement.

If through dilution the interest of a party is reduced to less than 10%, then that party’s participating interest shall automatically be converted to a 3% net smelter returns royalty interest. Should third party claims be acquired with royalties within the area of interest, the 3% royalty described above would be reduced by the amount of such royalty but not below 1%. This reduction does not apply to the royalty described under the heading “Royalty upon Termination of Interest” below.

Royalty upon Termination of Interest

If the Company elects to terminate its right to earn an interest in the Trinity Project prior to completing a bankable feasibility study by March 29, 2017, but has expended at least $3,000,000, the Company shall be entitled to a 4% net smelter returns royalty capped at twice its expenditure on the Trinity Project.

Termination

The Company may in its sole discretion terminate the Earn-In Agreement at any time by giving not less than 30 days prior written notice to that effect to Renaissance. Upon expiry of the 30-day notice period, the Earn-In Agreement will be of no further force and effect. Upon such termination, the Company shall have no further obligation to incur expenses on or for the benefit of the Trinity Project and shall have no further obligations or liabilities to Renaissance under the Earn-In Agreement or with respect to the Trinity Project (including without limitation liability for lost profits or consequential damages as a result of an election by the Company to terminate the agreement), other than (a) as set forth below, and (b) to reclaim (in accordance with applicable law) any disturbances of the Trinity Project made by the Company.

At any time the Company may, at its option, terminate its interest in some but less than all of the claims comprising the Trinity Project by written notice to Renaissance, provided that if such notice (or notice of termination of the Earn-In Agreement in its entirety) is received by Renaissance after June 30^th of any year, the Company shall remain obligated to pay the claim maintenance fees (and make all filings and recordings required in connection therewith) for those claims to which such termination applies for the upcoming assessment year. To the extent the Company terminates its interest in some but less than all of the claims, the Earn-In Agreement shall remain in full force and effect with respect to the remaining claims.

In the event the Company is in default in the observance or performance of any of the Company’s covenants, agreements or obligations under the Earn-In Agreement, Renaissance may give written notice of such alleged default specifying the details of same. The Company shall have 30 days following receipt of said notice within which to remedy any such default described therein, or to diligently commence action in good faith to remedy such default. If the Company does not cure or diligently commence to cure such default by the end of the applicable 30-day period, then Renaissance shall have the right to terminate the Earn-In Agreement by providing 30 days advance written notice to the Company.

18

---

Confidentiality

All data and information coming into possession of Renaissance or the Company by virtue of the Earn-In Agreement with respect to the business or operations of the other party, or the Trinity Project generally, shall be kept confidential and shall not be disclosed to any person not a party thereto without the prior written consent of the other party, except: (a) as required by law, rule, regulation or policy of any stock exchange or securities commission having jurisdiction over a party; (b) as may be required by a party in the prosecution or defense of a lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceedings; (c) as required by a financial institution in connection with a request for financing relating to development or mining activities; or (d) as may be required in connection with a proposed conveyance to a third party of an interest in the Trinity Project or the Earn-In Agreement, provided such third party agrees in writing in a manner enforceable by the other party to abide by all of the applicable confidentiality provisions of the Earn-In Agreement with respect to such data and information.

To the extent either party intends to disclose data or information via press release or other similar format as may be required, the disclosing party shall provide the other party with not less than five business days’ notice of the text of the proposed disclosure, and the other party shall have the right to comment on the same.

Deed With Reservation of Royalty Hi Ho Silver Claims.

On October 15, 2012, the Company entered into and closed a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Primus Resources, L.C. and James A. Freeman (collectively “Seller”) to acquire unpatented mining claims, Nevada BLM Serial No. 799907, 799908, 799909, 799910, and 799911 covering approximately 100 acres of property located adjacent to the former Trinity Silver mine on the Company’s Trinity Project (the “Hi Ho Properties”). The Hi Ho Properties were previously the only acreage not controlled by the Company or its joint venture partner Renaissance Exploration Inc. in the Trinity Project. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company provided cash consideration of $250,000 and issued 172,222 restricted shares of common stock of the Company to Seller. In addition the Seller was granted a 2% net smelter royalty on future production from the Hi Ho Properties pursuant to the terms of a Deed with Reservation of Royalty Hi Ho Silver Claims.

In conjunction with the entry into the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with Seller, pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, within thirty (30) days of the closing, which registers the common stock issued to the Seller pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement the Company paid the Seller total consideration consisting of 190,741 of its common shares.  

Trinity Project Technical Report

In the process of compiling and synthesizing information on the Trinity Project, on February 15, 2011, the Company completed an independently verified mineralized materials estimate on the Trinity Project (the “Trinity Project Technical Report”); the report was publicly released by the Company on March 2, 2011. The Technical Report for the Trinity mine project was prepared in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) by Mine Development Associates of Reno, Nevada, and has been reviewed by the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Trinity Project Technical Report may be viewed on the Company’s website at www.libertysilvercorp.com, and also on www.SEDAR.com, where it has been filed. Mineralized materials defined in the Trinity Project Technical Report are not recognized by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Work Completed by Company & Plan of Operation

As of the date of this Form 10-Q, the Company has completed the following items: (a) a magnetotelluric geophysical survey has been completed; (b) the drill hole database has been digitized; (c) a mineralized material estimate for the original deposit identified in the Earn-In Agreement; in addition, environmental and permitting work has begun, and all of the past geologic data has been compiled.  

Past exploration activities consisted of a magnetotelluric survey that was completed in August of 2010, a gravity survey that was completed in March of 2012, an induced polarization survey that was completed in May of 2012 and a drill program

19

---

that was started in January of 2012 and completed in April of 2012, consisting of 20 reverse circulation holes comprising 22,565 ft of drill hole. The Magnetotelluric Survey was initiated in June of 2010 and completed in August of 2010. The Gravity survey was initiated in February of 2012 completed in March of 2012. The Induced Polarization Survey was initiated in April of 2012 completed in May of 2012. The drill program was started in January of 2012 and completed in April of 2012.

It is estimated that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, the Company incurred approximately $554,145 in exploration expenses, and that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the Company incurred approximately $1,667,497 in exploration expenses, and that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $3,299,000 in exploration expenses, and that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, the Company incurred approximately $460,432 in exploration expenses, and that during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, the Company incurred approximately $398,975, and during the interim period ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred approximately $89,460. These amounts include both direct exploration costs as well as various indirect costs related to exploration and the costs of acquiring mineral properties, which under the terms of the Earn-In Agreement, are included in the calculations for purposes of determining whether the Company has met its minimum annual expenditure commitment.

It is anticipated, subject to the availability of financing, that additional exploration work will be needed, although specific plans for this additional work have not yet been finalized. It is currently anticipated that the additional exploration work to be completed will include additional drilling to upgrade the level of confidence in the mineralization and to expand the mineralized area, as well as drilling to collect metallurgical samples. The estimated budgeted cost for this additional drilling is approximately $1,500,000, which the Company currently does not have. Metallurgical testing, which is budgeted to cost approximately $300,000, is expected to be undertaken for the purpose of defining the estimated silver recovery of the mineralized rock. The Company may not be able to complete metallurgical testing with the funds currently available to it. Once adequate funding is secured, engineering design work, budgeted at approximately $500,000, is expected to be undertaken for the purpose of studying the feasibility of developing a mine, and as soon as design work is completed, permitting will need to start. The budget for permitting work is expected to be approximately $100,000. No further geophysical work is currently planned.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for the interim period ended December 31, 2015 through the date that these interim unaudited financial statements were issued, and concluded that there were no other events or transactions occurring during this period that required recognition or disclosure in its interim financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operation and financial condition for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the three and six months ended December 31, 2014. Unless otherwise stated, all figures herein are expressed in U.S. dollars, which is the functional currency of the Company.

Results of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2014.

Revenue

During the three-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company generated no revenue.

Operating expenses

During the three month period ended December 31, 2015, the Company reported total operating expenses of $69,749 compared to $253,237 during the three month period ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $183,488, or approximately 72%. The net decrease in total operating expenses is comprised of: a decrease in direct exploration expenses of $99,673; a decrease in legal and accounting expense of $64,170; and, a decrease of $22,645 in operation and administration expenses. The decrease in these expenses was partially offset by an increase of $3,000 in consulting expense.

20

---

Exploration expense decreased by $99,673 to an expense of $8,773 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to exploration expense of $108,446 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014.  During the comparative period, pursuant to the Earn-In Agreement with Renaissance, the Company paid approximately $68,000 in rental payments for not incurring a minimum threshold of expenditures on the property. The Company also made payments of approximately $29,000 relating to work done on the property during the comparative period that were not incurred during the current period.

For financial accounting purposes, the Company reports all direct exploration expenses under the exploration expense line item of the statement of operations. Certain indirect expenses, which are related to the exploration activities, may be reported as operation and administration expense or consulting expense on the statement of operations, as the case may be, or in certain cases, these expenses may also be capitalized to the balance sheet if they relate to costs incurred to acquire mineral properties. During the interim period ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred a total of $26,804 of direct and indirect expenses, which related to its exploration activities, as compared to approximately $111,801 during the interim period ended December 31, 2014.

Legal and accounting expense reported decreased by net $64,170 to an expense recovery of $68,379 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to a legal and accounting expense recovery of $4,209 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014. The primary reason for the net decrease is that during the current period, legal fees previously incurred in connection with the Class Complaint against the Company were reimbursed by the Company’s Directors’ and Officers’ insurance provider. If the reimbursement of legal fees is not considered for either period, the Company’s net legal and accounting expense during the current period would be approximately $15,000 compared to net legal and accounting expense of approximately $37,000 during the comparative period. The Class Compliant against the Company was settled in December of 2014, and the settlement was finalized and approved in August of 2015 at which time, the case against the Company was dismissed.

Operation and administration expense decreased by $22,645 to an expense of $126,355 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to an expense of $149,000 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014. During the comparative period, the Company realized a recovery of approximately $72,000 of investor relations expense, compared to no recovery or expense relating to investor relations expense during the current period. If the recovery of investor relations in the comparative period is not considered, then the decrease in operation and administration expense is far greater than the currently reported amount. The net decrease was comprised of certain notable fluctuations, which are as follows: stock based compensation expense decreased by $54,432; salaries and related expenses decreased by net $31,875; insurance expense decreased by $7,939; and, most other individual expenses which comprise the total operation and administration expense also experienced net decreases. These examples of expenses comprising the total net decrease in the operation and administration expense amount were partially offset by an increase in Director fees of $19,500, which were accrued, but not paid, and certain other minor fluctuations in operations expenses.

Consulting expense increased by $3,000 during the current period ended December 31, 2015 compared to $nil during the comparative period. The Consulting expense related to fees paid to a former employee who provides consulting services to the Company from time-to-time.

Net loss and comprehensive loss  

The Company had a net loss and comprehensive loss of $93,091 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to a net loss and comprehensive loss of $253,865 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, a change of $160,774 or approximately 63%. The decrease in net loss and comprehensive loss was due to a net decrease in total operating expenses as described above and fluctuations in foreign exchange period over period, which resulted in a greater gain during the current period. The net decrease in expenses, along with the greater gain from foreign exchange, was partially offset by the increase in interest expense.

Results of Operations for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Revenue

During the six-month periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company generated no revenue.

21

---

Operating expenses

During the six month period ended December 31, 2015, the Company reported total operating expenses of $284,188 compared to $625,313 during the six month period ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $341,125, or approximately 55%. The net decrease in total operating expenses is comprised of: a decrease in legal and accounting expense of $180,828; a decrease in direct exploration expenses of $99,815; and, a decrease of $66,482 in operation and administration expenses. The decrease in these expenses was partially offset by an increase of $6,000 in consulting expense.

Legal and accounting expense reported decreased by net $180,828 to a net reported expense recovery of $16,009 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to a legal and accounting expense of $164,819 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014. The primary reason for the net decrease is that during the current and comparative periods, legal fees incurred in connection with the Class Complaint against the Company were reimbursed by the Company’s Directors’ and Officers’ insurance provider, and the legal fees incurred in connection with the Class Complaint were less during the current period, compared to the prior period. If the reimbursement of legal fees is not considered for either period, the Company’s net legal and accounting expense during the current period would be approximately $101,000 compared to net legal and accounting expense of approximately $342,091 during the comparative period. The Class Compliant against the Company was settled in December of 2014, and the settlement was finalized and approved in August of 2015 at which time, the case against the Company was dismissed.

Exploration expense decreased by $99,815 to an expense of $18,093 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to exploration expense of $117,908 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014. During the comparative period, pursuant to the Earn-In Agreement with Renaissance, the Company paid approximately $68,000 in rental payments for not incurring a minimum threshold of expenditures on the property. The Company also made payments of approximately $29,000 relating to work done on the property during the comparative period that were not incurred during the current period.

For financial accounting purposes, the Company reports all direct exploration expenses under the exploration expense line item of the statement of operations. Certain indirect expenses, which are related to the exploration activities, may be reported as operation and administration expense or consulting expense on the statement of operations, as the case may be, or in certain cases, these expenses may also be capitalized to the balance sheet if they relate to costs incurred to acquire mineral properties. During the interim period ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred a total of $89,460 of direct and indirect expenses, which related to its exploration activities, as compared to approximately $227,626 during the interim period ended December 31, 2014.

Operation and administration expense decreased by $66,482 to an expense of $276,104 during the period ended December 31, 2015, compared to an expense of $342,586 reported during the period ended December 31, 2014. During the comparative period, the Company realized a recovery of approximately $72,000 of investor relations expense, compared to no recovery or expense relating to investor relations expense during the current period. If the recovery of investor relations in the comparative period is not considered, then the decrease in operation and administration expense is far greater than the currently reported amount. The net decrease was comprised of certain notable fluctuations, which are as follows: stock based compensation expense decreased by $81,994; salaries and related expenses decreased by net $61,932; insurance expense decreased by $11,667; expenses incurred in relation to be a public company decreased by $16,467; and, most other individual expenses which comprise the total operation and administration expense also experienced net decreases. These examples of expenses comprising the total net decrease in the operation and administration expense amount were partially offset by an increase in Director fees of $39,000, which were accrued, but not paid, and certain other minor fluctuations in operations expenses.

Consulting expense increased by $6,000 during the current period ended December 31, 2015 compared to a consulting expense amount of $nil during the comparative period. The Consulting expense related to fees paid to a former employee who provides consulting services to the Company from time-to-time.

Net loss and comprehensive loss  

The Company had a net loss and comprehensive loss of $309,016 for the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to a net loss and comprehensive loss of $652,213 for the six months ended December 31, 2014, a change of $343,197 or approximately 53%. The decrease in net loss and comprehensive loss was due to a net decrease in total operating expenses as described above and fluctuations in foreign exchange period over period, which resulted in a greater gain during the

22

---

current period. The net decrease in expenses, along with the greater gain from foreign exchange, was partially offset by the increase in interest expense.

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company does not have sufficient working capital needed to meet its current fiscal obligations. In order to continue to meet its fiscal obligations in the current fiscal year and beyond the next twelve months, the Company must seek additional financing. Management is considering various financing alternatives including, but not limited to, merger and acquisition activity, raising capital through the equity markets and debt financing.

In order to acquire a 70% interest in the Trinity Project, the Company is required to incur $5,000,000 in exploration expenditures over a six-year period from March 29, 2010, the date of the Earn-In Agreement, to March 29, 2016. In addition, by the end of March 29, 2017, the Company is required to produce a bankable feasibility study. As of March 29, 2013, the end of the third year following the date of the Earn-In Agreement, the Company had incurred approximately $5,652,397 in expenditures related to the Trinity Project, and therefore had satisfied the $5,000,000 exploration expenditure commitment. The Company is seeking financing, as described above, with the objective to raise approximately $5,000,000 to meet immediate financial obligations; to fund its near-term working capital requirements and fieldwork plans; to secure its interest in the Trinity property; and, subject to favorable commodity prices, continue additional development work on the property. The additional work would consist of engineering and metallurgical testing, confirmation drilling, and an update of the National Instrument 43-101 compliant resource estimate.

The primary source for capital for the Company is the equity markets.  Management plans to continue its canvassing efforts of investors and financial institutions to invest capital in the Company through private placement offerings of common shares or units consisting of common shares and warrants. The terms and pricing of any such financing would be determined in the context of the markets and the Company’s financial condition. The Company has not entered into an agency agreement or arrangement with any financial institution or investor group to raise capital at this time.

In such an event where the Company is not successful at raising capital through the issuance of capital stock, the Company may consider raising capital by the issuance of debt. However, unless the appropriate features, such as convertible options, are attached to the debt instruments, this form of financing is less desirable until such time as the Company may be in a position to reasonably foresee the generation of cash flow to service and repay debt.  

On October 17, 2014, the Company amended and restated its agreement in relation to an existing $1,210,000 principal amount secured loan facility made available by BG Capital Group Ltd. (“BGCG”) on November 14, 2013 (“Original Loan”). Under the terms of the revised agreement, BGCG has made available to the Company a committed non-revolving term credit facility in the principal amount of $1,250,000 (the “New Loan”), which shall initially bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum and which shall be secured by a charge on all of the assets of the Company. The Company has also repaid the indebtedness to BGCG under the Original Loan by converting the outstanding, aggregate total sum of the principal amount of the Original Loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, being $1,248,654 (the “Debt”), into 6,659,487 common shares of the Company (“Common Shares”) at a price of $0.1875 per Common Share, in full satisfaction of the Debt under the Original Loan. Details of the New Loan are provided in Note 4 to the financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2015.  

Since November 14, 2013, to sustain operations, the Company has been dependent on BGCG as the only available source of capital in the form of debt or equity. There is no assurance that such financing will continue to be available from BGCG.

Further, on an ongoing basis, management will review potential merger or acquisition targets to determine if certain synergies exist for the Company and if the potential target would strengthen the Company’s financial position. Management does not currently have any merger or acquisition target identified, and any such discussions are at the very preliminary stages.

In the event that the Company raises some funds, but, due to difficult capital market conditions or other factors, is not successful at raising all funds needed to complete the bankable feasibility study and fund ongoing working capital, subject

23

---

to the availability of funds, management plans to reduce overhead and maintain the Trinity Project under a care and maintenance program, until such time as the capital markets improve for junior exploration companies.

On June 30, 2014, the Company reached an agreement with arm’s-length creditors to settle indebtedness in the aggregate amount of $226,000 by issuing 48,800 common shares, including 25,467 common shares at a deemed price of $7.50 per share and 23,334 common shares at a deemed price of $1.50 per share.

On September 30, 2014, the Company issued 34,889 common shares to employees of the Company, at a deemed price of $7.50 per share, in settlement of arrears compensation obligations of $261,666.

On November 14, 2014, the vested and non-vested portion of the 400,000 stock options granted to purchase common shares by directors, officers and employees were cancelled or forfeited.

On December 31, 2014 the Company issued 11,333 common shares to employees of the Company, at a deemed price of $7.50 per share, in settlement of arrears compensation obligations of $85,000.

On February 17, 2015, the Company granted a total of 1,182,667 stock options to purchase common shares to directors, officers and an employee of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.1875 per share and for a term of 5 years.

As at the filing date of this Form 10-Q, there were 1,229,334 stock options outstanding, which may be exercised at various exercise prices, for gross proceeds of $746,750, however the exercise prices of the stock options exceed the market price of the Company’s shares.

As at the filing date of this Form 10-Q, there were 13,333 warrants outstanding, which may be exercised at $11.25 per common share, for gross proceeds of $150,000, however the exercise prices of these warrants exceed the market price of the Company’s shares.

Current Assets and Total Assets

As of December 31, 2015, the unaudited balance sheet reflects that the Company had: i) total current assets of $138,869, compared to total current assets of $294,000 at June 30, 2015, a decrease of $155,131, or approximately 53%; and ii) total assets of $2,695,815, compared to total assets of $2,854,420 at June 30, 2015, a decrease of $158,605, or approximately 6%. The decrease in current and total assets was primarily due to the cash used to fund working capital during the period, partially offset by the receipt of $100,000 from the new loan facility.

Total Current Liabilities and Total Liabilities

As of December 31, 2015, the unaudited balance sheet reflects that the Company had total current liabilities and total liabilities of $1,993,838, compared to total current liabilities and total liabilities of $1,877,179 at June 30, 2015, an increase of $116,659, or approximately 6%. The increase in current and total liabilities was due to: an increase in accrued liabilities of $23,998; an increase in interest payable of $67,693; and, an increase of $100,000 in convertible loan payable. The increases in these amounts were partially offset by a decrease of $75,032 in accounts payable.

24

---

Cash Flow – for the interim periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

During the six months ended December 31, 2015 cash was primarily used to fund working capital and operations. The Company reported a net decrease in cash of $145,721 during the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to a net increase in cash of $51,796 during the six months ended December 31, 2014.  The following provides additional discussion and analysis of cash flow.

	For the six months ended December 31,
	2015 $		2014 $
Net cash used in operating activities	(245,721)		(657,804)
Net cash provided by financing activities	100,000		709,600
Net Change in Cash	(145,721)		51,796

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in operating activities was $245,721, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $657,804 during the six months ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in net cash used in operating activities of $412,083 is the result of a net loss and comprehensive loss of $309,016 during the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to a net loss and comprehensive loss of $652,213 during the six months ended December 31, 2014, and the effects of the net changes in working capital items, which contributed to an increase in cash of $26,069 during the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to net changes in working capital items, which contributed to a decrease in cash of $510,132 during the comparative period. The decrease in net loss and comprehensive loss and the net changes in working capital items, both of which contributed to less cash being used in the current period, were partially offset by non-cash items of $37,226 being reported during the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $504,541 of non-cash items being reported during the comparative period.

During the six months ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company did not use any cash in investing activities.

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the Company reported $100,000 of cash from financing activities, compared to net cash from financing activities of $709,600 during the comparative period, which was comprised of $750,000 in proceeds from the loan facility offset by $40,400 in issue costs.

Going Concern

These interim unaudited financial statement filings have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes that adequate sources of financing will be obtained as required and that the Company’s assets will be realized and liabilities settled in due course of business. Accordingly, the interim unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company not be able to continue as a going concern.  The going concern assumption is discussed in the financial statements Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Going Concern.

25

---

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET

RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Securities and Exchange Commission defines the term “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean a Company's controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company maintains such a system of controls and procedures in an effort to ensure that all information which it is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under the SEC's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to principal executive and principal financial officers to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s sole officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation management identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting related to the fact that the Company has not established adequate financial reporting monitoring procedures to mitigate the risk of management override. Specifically, because there is only a single officer and director with management functions there is lack of segregation of duties. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2015, management concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management believes that the material weakness identified above is temporary. The Company does not currently have the resources to fund sufficient staff to ensure a complete segregation of responsibilities within the accounting function. However, the Company is currently seeking to raise additional capital, and once adequate resources become available, the Company intends to hire additional management personnel.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the period ended December 31, 2015, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On September 12, 2013, the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors (the “Liberty Silver Parties”) were named as defendants in a proposed securities class action lawsuit filed against Robert Genovese, certain individuals alleged to have collaborated with Mr. Genovese, and an offshore investment firm allegedly controlled by Mr.

26

---

Genovese (the “Action,” Case No. 9:13-cv-80923-KLR, Stanaford v. Genovese et al.).  The action alleged violations of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rules thereunder relating to anomalous trading activity and fluctuations in the Company’s share price from August through October 2012.

On December 8, 2014, without in any way acknowledging any fault or liability, the Company reached a settlement in principle, providing for a payment of $1 million cash, to be paid by the Company's D&O insurance carriers. On August 17, 2015, with no admission of fault or liability by the Liberty Silver Parties, the Court approved the settlement class and fully and finally dismissed with prejudice all claims against Liberty Silver, Geoffrey Browne, and William Tafuri in the litigation. Although defendants continue to deny plaintiffs' allegations, the Company believed it was in the best interests of its stockholders to focus its attention on its business and put the matter behind it.

Neither the Company nor its property is the subject of any other pending legal proceedings, and no other such proceeding is known to be contemplated by any governmental authority. The Company is not aware of any other legal proceedings in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder of the Company, is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

ITEM 1A.

 RISK FACTORS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“the Act”) requires the operators of mines to include in each periodic report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission certain specified disclosures regarding the Company’s history of mine safety. The Company is currently in the exploration phase and does not operate mines at any of its properties, and as such is not subject to disclosure requirements regarding mine safety that were imposed by the Act.

27

---

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

On December 11, 2015 James J. Sbrolla resigned as a Director of the Company. On January 31, 2016 W. Thomas Hodgson resigned as a Director of the Company.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

(a)

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

31.1

Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.

SCH XBRL Schema Document.

101

INS XBRL Instance Document.

101.

CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.

LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.

PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.

DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

By: /s/    Manish Z. Kshatriya

 Manish Z. Kshatriya, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 12, 2016

By: /s/    Manish Z. Kshatriya

 Manish Z. Kshatriya, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date:  February 12, 2016

28