AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.	ex32_1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.	ex31_1.htm

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015

☐ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number 000-53076

AFH ACQUISITION VII, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		32-0217153
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

269 S. Beverly Drive, Ste #1600

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

(Address of principal executive offices)

(310) 475-3500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None.

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Check whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Check whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

☐ Yes ☒ No

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) contained herein, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Check whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer	☐	Accelerated Filer	☐

Non-accelerated Filer	☐	Smaller Reporting Company	☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)

Check whether the issuer is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☒ No ☐

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, April 30, 2014.

There has never been a market for any of our securities.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

As of January 28, 2016, there were 6,483,218 shares of common stock, par value $.001, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference. None.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of AFH Acquisition VII, Inc. (the “Company”) to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

The following factors and risks, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: inability to consummate the proposed merger with Eurocar and Park Place; business conditions in the U.S.; changing interpretations of generally accepted accounting principles; requirements or changes adversely affecting the business in which the Company is engaged; management of rapid growth; intensity of competition; and the Company’s ability to raise necessary funds.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The Company’s plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes its assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance the forward-looking statements included in this Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved.

PART I

Item 1.

Description of Business.

The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on September 24, 2007. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in organizational efforts and obtaining initial financing. The Company was formed as a vehicle to pursue a business combination. The business purpose of the Company is to seek the acquisition of, or merger with, an existing company. As described below, the Company has engaged in efforts to identify suitable target companies. However, the Company has not entered into a definitive agreement concerning any target business.

Letter of Intent with Eurocar and Park Place

On October 5, 2012, AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC (“AFH Advisory”), a major shareholder of the Company, entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with two target companies, Eurocar, Inc. (“Eurocar”) and Park Place Motors Ltd. (“Park Place,” together with Eurocar, the “Target Companies”), pursuant to which the Company would acquire the Target Companies through a series of transactions including a merger or other business combination pursuant to which the Company would cease to be a shell company, as defined in the rules of the SEC (the “Reverse Merger”).

On October 26, 2012, AFH Advisory, Eurocar and Park Place entered into an amendment to the LOI, pursuant to which the parties to the LOI agreed to revise the provision with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company post Reverse Merger. On January 28, 2013, the parties to the LOI entered into an Amended and Restated Letter of Intent (the “Amended and Restated LOI”), pursuant to which the parties to the LOI agreed to revise the provision with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company post Reverse Merger, provided for certain acknowledgments regarding the proceeds of the Offering, amended a provision regarding a potential subsequent financing and amended certain financial representations made by each of Eurocar and Park Place. On February 1, 2013, the parties to the Amended and Restated LOI entered into an amendment to the Amended and Restated LOI to revise, among other things, the beneficial ownership of the Company post Reverse Merger. On May 20, 2013, the parties to the Amended and Restated LOI entered into a Second Amended and Restated Letter of Intent (the “Second Amended and Restated LOI”).

In October 2012, the Company commenced a private placement offering, as amended, (the “Offering”) to several accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for up to 1,300,000 Shares (the “Maximum Offering”) for aggregate proceeds equal to $2,600,000 (the “Maximum Offering Amount”). The Company may increase the Maximum Offering to 1,560,000 Shares and the Maximum Offering Amount to $3,120,000 to cover over-allotments. There is no minimum number of Shares that may be purchased in the Offering. No warrants were issued to investors in the Offering. The Offering was conducted pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Regulation D, Section 4(2) and Rule 506 thereunder.

Proceeds from the Offering were used to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Reverse Merger with the Target Companies as indicated in the Second Amended and Restated LOI.

The Target Companies acknowledged and agreed that they shall not be entitled to the proceeds of the Offering, $1.2 million of which will be kept in AFH Advisory’s account and used by AFH Advisory for all expenses incurred by AFH Advisory in connection with the Offering, the Reverse Merger and all related going public expenses (the “Going Public Expenses”). The remaining proceeds of the Offering will also be kept in AFH Advisory’s account and allocated by AFH Advisory in its sole discretion for any expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the Going Public Expenses. In the event the Reverse Merger does not take place, any remaining proceeds of the Offering that have not been used in connection with the Offering, the Reverse Merger and the Going Public Expenses will be used in a future transaction. To date, in excess of $1,860,700 has been either spent or allocated for certain expenses. To the extent AFH Advisory advances expenses to the Company in an amount in excess of the total proceeds raised in the Offering, AFH Advisory shall be entitled to be reimbursed such amount.

Current Status of Letter of Intent with EuroCar and Park Place

Subsequent to the events referenced above, EuroCar informed the Company that it was not proceeding forward with the terms of the LOI, as amended. Furthermore, Park Place has expressed a reluctance to proceed forward under the terms of the LOI, as amended. As such, there is a substantial likelihood that AFH will not effect the acquisition of Park Place and that the Reverse Merger referenced above will not be consummated. For this reason, AFH has decided to pursue other targets to acquire. It is currently expected that any acquisition target will be an entity focuses on the automobile space, whether that be a new and/or used car retailer and/or such an entity with an additional primary focus on automotive repairs and ancillary services.

In addition to the efforts described above, the Company has not restricted its search for any specific kind of businesses, and it may acquire a business which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its business life. It is impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, in that such business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity.

It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such business combination would be issued in reliance upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its transaction, the Company may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. If such registration occurs, it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business combination or has consummated a business combination. The issuance of additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company’s securities may depress the market value of the Company’s securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is no assurance. However, if the Company cannot effect a non-cash acquisition, the Company may have to raise funds from a private offering of its securities under Rule 506 of Regulation D. There is no assurance the Company would obtain any such equity funding.

The Company will participate in a business combination only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Negotiations with a target company will likely focus on the percentage of the Company which the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings.

Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing and will include miscellaneous other terms. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company’s shareholders at such time.

Private Placement Commencing from October 2012

In October 2012, the Company commenced a private placement offering, as amended, (the “Offering”) to several accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for up to 1,300,000 Shares for aggregate proceeds equal to $2,600,000. No warrants were issued to investors in the Offering. The Offering was conducted pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Regulation D, Section 4(2) and Rule 506 thereunder.

Proceeds from the Offering were used to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Reverse Merger with the Target Companies as indicated in the Second Amended and Restated LOI.

The Offering was undertaken pursuant to a definitive Subscription Agreement between the Company and the Purchasers (the “Subscription Agreement”), which contains customary representations, warranties and covenants of the parties.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has received proceeds in an aggregate amount of $1,815,700. No additional amounts are expected to be raised further to the Offering until such time as other acquisition targets are identified.

Business Strategy

The Company, based on proposed business activities, is a “blank check” company. The SEC defines such a company as “a development stage company that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person and is issuing ‘penny stock,’ as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act.” Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, the Company also qualifies as a “shell company,” because it has no or nominal operations and no or nominal assets (other than cash or cash equivalents). Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions, and certain SEC rules and regulations restrict the activities of both blank check and shell companies. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in any of our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as it is subject to those requirements.

The Company was organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. The Company’s principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict its potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business. The Company will seek to consummate its acquisition with Eurocar and Park Place, but if that is not completed, it will continue its search for an appropriate operating business with which to consider consummating a business combination.

The analysis of new business opportunities has and will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the Company’s management. The Company has considered potential acquisition transactions, but while one of its principal stockholders entered into the LOI with Eurocar and Park Place which contemplates a business combination between Eurocar, Park Place and AFH, as of this date has not entered into any definitive agreement with any party. The Company has unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In its efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, the Company will consider the following kinds of factors:

(a) Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

(b) Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

(d) Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;

(e) The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

(f) The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

(g) The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

(h) Other relevant factors.

In applying the foregoing criteria, no one of which will be controlling, management will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to the Company’s limited capital available for investigation, the Company may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired. In addition, we will be competing against other entities that possess greater financial, technical and managerial capabilities for identifying and completing business combinations. In evaluating a prospective business combination, we will conduct as extensive a due diligence review of potential targets as possible given the lack of information which may be available regarding private companies, our limited personnel and financial resources and the inexperience of our management with respect to such activities.

We expect that our due diligence will encompass, among other things, meetings with the target business’s incumbent management and inspection of its facilities, as necessary, as well as a review of financial and other information which is made available to us. This due diligence review will be conducted either by our management or by unaffiliated third parties we may engage, including but not limited to attorneys, accountants, consultants or other such professionals. At this time the Company has not specifically identified any third parties that it may engage, except that AFH Advisory, whose sole member and manager is our President and Secretary, Amir F. Heshmatpour, may assist the Company with due diligence in identifying a business combination target. The costs associated with hiring third parties as required to complete a business combination may be significant and are difficult to determine as such costs may be vary depending on a variety of factors, including the amount of time it takes to complete a business combination, the location of the target company, and the size and complexity of the business of the target company.

Our limited funds and the lack of full-time management will likely make it impracticable to conduct a complete and exhaustive investigation and analysis of a target business before we consummate a business combination. Management decisions, therefore, will likely be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analysis, market surveys and the like which, if we had more funds available to us, would be desirable. We will be particularly dependent in making decisions upon information provided by the promoters, owners, sponsors or other associated with the target business seeking our participation.

We do not currently intend to retain any entity to act as a “finder” to identify and analyze the merits of potential target businesses. However, we contemplate that at least one of the third parties who may introduce business combinations to us may be AFH Advisory. There are currently no agreements or preliminary agreements or understandings between us and AFH Advisory other than those already disclosed. Any transaction or consulting fees paid to AFH Advisory will be comparable with unaffiliated third party fees.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete a business combination cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty. The amount of time it takes to complete a business combination, the location of the target company, and the size and complexity of the business of the target company are all factors that determine the costs associated with completing a business combination transaction. The time and costs required to complete a business combination can be estimated once a business combination target has been identified. Any costs incurred with respect to the evaluation of a prospective business combination that is not ultimately completed will result in a loss to us.

The Company is in a highly competitive market for a small number of business opportunities which could reduce the likelihood of consummating a successful business combination. We are, and will continue to be, an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do; consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. These competitive factors may reduce the likelihood of our identifying and consummating a successful business combination.

Form of Acquisition

The manner in which the Company participates in an opportunity will depend upon the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and the promoters of the opportunity, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such promoters.

It is likely that the Company will acquire its participation in a business opportunity through the issuance of its Common Stock or other securities of the Company. Although the terms of any such transaction cannot be predicted, it should be noted that in certain circumstances the criteria for determining whether or not an acquisition is a so-called “tax free” reorganization under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) depends upon whether the owners of the acquired business own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. If a transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other “tax free” provisions provided under the Code, all prior stockholders would in such circumstances retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity.

Under other circumstances, depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, prior stockholders may retain substantially less than 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. This could result in substantial additional dilution to the equity of those who were stockholders of the Company prior to such reorganization. The Company does not intend to supply disclosure to shareholders concerning a target company prior to the consummation of a business combination transaction, unless required by applicable law or regulation. In the event a proposed business combination involves a change in majority of directors of the Company, the Company will file and provide to shareholders a Schedule 14F-1, which shall include, information concerning the target company, as required. The Company will file a current report on Form 8-K, as required, within four business days of a business combination which results in the Company ceasing to be a shell company. This Form 8-K will include complete disclosure of the target company, including audited financial statements.

The controlling stockholders of the Company will likely not have control of a majority of the voting securities of the Company following a reorganization transaction. As part of such a transaction, all or a majority of the Company’s directors may resign and one or more new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.

In the case of an acquisition, the transaction may be accomplished upon the sole determination of management without any vote or approval by stockholders. In the case of a statutory merger or consolidation directly involving the Company, it will likely be necessary to call a stockholders’ meeting and obtain the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding securities. The necessity to obtain such stockholder approval may result in delay and additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain appraisal rights to dissenting stockholders. Most likely, management will seek to structure any such transaction so as not to require stockholder approval.

It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. The costs that will be incurred are not ascertainable at this time as the costs are expected to be tied to the amount of time it takes to identify and complete a business combination transaction as well as the specific factors related to the business combination target that is chosen, including such factors as the location, size and complexity of the business of the target company. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation might not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.

We presently have no employees apart from our management. Our sole officer and our directors are engaged in outside business activities and anticipate that they will devote to our business very limited time until the acquisition of a successful business opportunity has been identified. We expect no significant changes in the number of our employees other than such changes, if any, incident to a business combination.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 2.

Description of Property.

The Company neither rents nor owns any properties. The Company utilizes the office space and equipment of its management at no cost. Management estimates such amounts to be immaterial. The Company currently has no policy with respect to investments or interests in real estate, real estate mortgages or securities of, or interests in, persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

To the best knowledge of our management, the Company is not a party to any legal proceeding or litigation.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Common Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”). The Common Stock is not listed on a publicly-traded market. As of January 28, 2016, there were 33 holders of record of the Common Stock.

Preferred Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company has not yet issued any of its Preferred Stock.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, if any, its capital requirements and financial condition and such other factors as the Board of Directors may consider.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company adopted a 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan with 3,187,636 shares of the Common Stock initially reserved for issuance thereunder, with the number of shares reserved for issuance under such plan to increase on January 1 of each year pursuant to an evergreen provision by an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company on such date and (b) 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or such lesser amount as determined by the Company’s board of directors in its discretion. No shares have been issued under the plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On September 24, 2007, the Company offered and sold 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock for aggregate proceeds equal to $25,000 to Amir Farrokh Heshmatpour, our sole officer and a director. The Company sold these shares of Common Stock under the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. On August 7, 2008, Mr. Heshmatpour contributed his 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock to AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC, where such contribution was deemed an additional capital contribution to AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC.

In October 2012, the Company commenced a private placement offering, as amended, (the “Offering”) to several accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for up to 1,300,000 Shares (the “Maximum Offering”) for aggregate proceeds equal to $2,600,000 (the “Maximum Offering Amount”)The Company may increase the Maximum Offering to 1,560,000 Shares and the Maximum Offering Amount to $3,120,000 to cover over-allotments. There is no minimum number of Shares that may be purchased in the Offering. No warrants were issued to investors in the Offering. The Offering was conducted pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Regulation D, Section 4(2) and Rule 506 thereunder.

Proceeds from the Offering were used to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Reverse Merger with the Target Companies as indicated in the Second Amended and Restated LOI.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has received proceeds in an aggregate amount of $1,815,700 and entered into stock subscriptions for the issuance of 907,850 shares of its Common Stock in connection with the Offering.

On May 29, 2013, Roger Jenkins (“Jenkins”) entered into an agreement with AFH Advisory for the purchase of shares and warrants as described below. In consideration for $1,000,000 in cash, Jenkins received the following from AFH Advisory:

1,250,000 shares of AFH Acquisition VII, Inc. Common Stock held by AFH Advisory;

25% of the warrants entitled to AFH Advisory pursuant to the letter of intent with Eurocar and Park Place;

AFH Advisory agreed to contribute its right to receive the additional shares entitled to AFH Advisory pursuant to the aforementioned letter of intent to a newly formed limited liability company, in which AFH Advisory will hold 60% membership interest and Jenkins will hold 40% membership interest.

This transfer was made through a privately conducted and consummated transaction not involving a sale in the public markets and not involving a public solicitation and therefore exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

There were no sales of unregistered stock during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

The Company currently does not engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. During the next twelve months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

(i) filing Exchange Act reports, and

(ii) investigating, analyzing and consummating an acquisition.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds in our treasury, through deferral of fees by certain service providers and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

The Company may consider acquiring a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks.

The Company anticipates that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking even the limited additional capital which we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of October 31, 2015, the Company had assets equal to $62,695, comprised of a receivable from a related party. This compares with assets of $62,695, comprised of receivable from related party, as of October 31, 2014. The Company’s current liabilities as of October 31, 2015 totaled $97,270, comprised of accrued expenses and monies due to parent. This compares with liabilities of $93,020 comprised exclusively of accrued expenses and monies due to parent, as of October 31, 2014. The Company can provide no assurance that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The following is a summary of the Company’s cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2015		Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities	$	(4,071)	$	(9,066)
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities		-		-
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	$	4,071	$	8,553
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	-	$	(513)

The Company has nominal assets and has generated no revenues since inception. The Company is also dependent upon the receipt of capital investment or other financing to fund its ongoing operations and to execute its business plan of seeking a combination with a private operating company. In addition, the Company is dependent upon certain related parties to provide continued funding and capital resources. If continued funding and capital resources are unavailable at reasonable terms, the Company may not be able to implement its plan of operations.

Private Placement Commencing from October 2012

In October 2012, the Company commenced a private placement offering, as amended, (the “Offering”) to several accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for up to 1,300,000 Shares for aggregate proceeds equal to $2,600,000 No warrants were issued to investors in the Offering. The Offering was conducted pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Regulation D, Section 4(2) and Rule 506 thereunder.

Proceeds from the Offering were used to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Reverse Merger with the Target Companies as indicated in the Second Amended and Restated LOI.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has received proceeds in an aggregate amount of $1,815,700.

Results of Operations

The Company has not conducted any active operations since inception, except for its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates. No revenue has been generated by the Company from September 24, 2007 (Inception) to October 31, 2015. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance. It is management’s assertion that these circumstances may hinder the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months shall be to continue its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, the Company had a net loss of $4,250, consisting of legal, accounting, audit, other professional service fees and expenses incurred in relation to the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $61,302, consisting of legal, accounting, audit, other professional service fees and expenses incurred in relation to the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K and $52,253 of reverse merger expenses incurred in the first quarter of our fiscal year.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15, an evaluation was completed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal controls over financial reporting are designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

	1.	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
	2.	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
	3.	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2015.

This annual report does not include a report from the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting due to the permanent exemption established by the Securities and Exchange Commission for public companies designated as small filers.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company did not maintain effective control over the preparation, review, presentation and disclosure of amounts related to the stock liability in connection with the September 2012 private placement that were included in balance sheets and statements of income in 2012. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of our liabilities, non-cash expense relating to the issuance of stock for services and equity accounts and related financial disclosures that was not prevented or detected on a timely basis. Due to their relative inexperience, the Company’s accounting staff was not able to properly account for such complex transactions in a timely manner.

During the quarter ended October 31, 2015, we implemented procedures to assemble, record and maintain information related to complex transactions including the issuance of stock and stock based transactions. We believe these procedures address our previously disclosed material weakness.

Except as disclosed above, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting with regard to significant deficiencies that occurred during the year ended October 31, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B.

Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

(a) Identification of Directors and Executive Officers. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company’s directors and executive officers:

Name		Age		Position
Amir F. Heshmatpour		49		President, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Director

The Company’s officers and directors are elected annually for a one-year term or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

Amir Farrokh Heshmatpour has served as the Company’s President, Secretary and a director since inception. Mr. Heshmatpour has been the Managing Director of AFH Holding & Advisory LLC from July 2003 to the present. Prior to that, he took some time off. From 1996 through January 2002, Mr. Heshmatpour served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Metrophone Telecommunications, Inc. Mr. Heshmatpour has a background in venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, investing and corporate finance. Mr. Heshmatpour was the recipient of the Businessman of the Year award in 2003 at the National Republican Congressional Committee. Mr. Heshmatpour currently serves as sole officer and director of AFH Acquisition V, Inc., AFH Acquisition VI, Inc., and AFH Acquisition VIII, Inc., AFH Acquisition IX, Inc., AFH Acquisition XI, Inc. and AFH Acquisition XII, Inc., all of which are publicly reporting, non-trading, blank check shell companies. Since October 10, 2007 Mr. Heshmatpour has served as President, Secretary and a member of the board of directors of AFH Holding I, Inc. and AFH Holding II, Inc. Since inception, Mr. Heshmatpour has served as President, Secretary and sole director of AFH Holding III, Inc., AFH Holding IV, Inc., AFH Holding V, Inc., AFH Holding VI, Inc. and AFH Holding VII, Inc. Mr. Heshmatpour attended Pennsylvania State University from 1985 to 1988, and in 2010 he completed the UCLA Anderson Director Education & Certification Program. Mr. Heshmatpour is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience in the financial industry.

(b) Significant Employees.

As of the date hereof, the Company has no significant employees.

There are no family relationships among directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by the issuer to become directors or executive officers.

(d) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.

Litigation with AFH Advisory and Amir F. Heshmatpour

Emmaus Life Sciences, Inc.

AFH Advisory is presently a plaintiff and a counterclaim defendant in a matter that is pending in both Delaware Superior Court (Index No. N12C-09-045-MMJ [CCLD]) and Delaware Chancery Court (Index No. C.A. No. 8005-JJ). AFH Advisory brought the suit against Emmaus Life Sciences, Inc. ("Emmaus") in regards to Emmaus' attempt to cancel AFH Advisory's ownership interest in Emmaus, and its refusal to reimburse AFH Advisory for expenses relating to a reverse merger. Emmaus has brought counterclaims against AFH Advisory for a declaratory judgment canceling AFH Advisory's ownership interest in Emmaus, fraud, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. All parties completed document discovery and filed motions for summary judgment. Emmaus' motion for partial summary judgment was granted by the Court, which held that the Third Letter of Intent ("LOI III") between AFH Advisory and Emmaus was terminated, the public offering contemplated by LOI III was terminated, the advisor shares Emmaus gave to AFH Advisory and its affiliates pursuant to the terms of LOI III had been canceled, and that AFH and its affiliated must return all Emmaus shares in their possession. The partial summary judgment motion brought by individual counterclaim defendant Amir Heshmatpour, and joined in by AFH Advisory, was granted in part by the Court, which held that Emmaus was not entitled to compensatory damages on its fraud and fraud in the inducement claims. Following the Court's decision on these summary judgment motions, AFH Advisory does not have any remaining claims against Emmaus. Emmaus continues to maintain claims against AFH Advisory for breach of contract, fraud, and unjust enrichment. AFH Advisory has asserted defenses for these remaining claims, and it is defending this matter. Pursuant to a settlement agreement with Emmaus, the terms of which are confidential, the fraud claims against AFH and Heshmatpour brought by Emmaus have been dismissed. On April 7, 2015, a settlement of all claims was reached between the parties whereby AFH Advisory agreed to transfer publicly traded securities of one of AFH’s portfolio companies to Emmaus with a current trading value of $30,000.

Emerald Dairy, Inc.

AFH Advisory and other entities brought a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County against Emerald Dairy, Inc. (“Emerald”) and its Chairman, Mr. Shan, asserting that they were entitled to a large number of shares of Emerald, both from Emerald and from shares individually owned, and pledged, by Chairman Shan. Emerald and Chairman Shang defaulted. On March 27, 2015, a default judgment was issued by the Superior Court of California in favor of AFH Advisory in the amount of $1,132,181 which includes damages of $897,121, prejudgment interest of $224,260, and attorney fees of $10,800.

Banner Bank Judgment

Mr. Amir Heshmatpour is a defendant in two lawsuits related to Banner Bank which have been reduced to judgment.

The lawsuits arise from three loans issued in the late 1990’s. The lender was Town Bank, a Washington State Bank which is no longer in existence, having been acquired by Banner Bank in the early 2000’s. The borrowers on the three separate loans were H&H Holdings, Metrophone Telecom, and Amir and Kathy Heshmatpour. In the early 2000’s, the three loans were consolidated into one loan, shortly before Banner Bank acquired Town Bank. Once this acquisition occurred, the relationship between the borrowers and the successor lender soured, and a default was ultimately declared on the loans.

Banner Bank was awarded judgment in the Superior Court for the State of Washington in May 2003 in the amount of $11,073,409 with interest accruing at 12 percent per annum. In November 2003, Banner Bank was awarded a second, separate judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in the amount of $429,863 with interest accruing at 6.875 percent per annum. Both judgments have been renewed and extended in the state and federal courts in Washington and valid until at least 2023. Mr. Heshmatpour contends that negotiated agreements were reached for payment of the outstanding loan balance, resulting in an agreement to pay approximately $11,000,000. Mr. Heshmatpour further contends that the agreements were satisfied, but that Banner Bank failed to properly account for the payments received.

In December 2012, the Federal Judgment was certified in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in the amount of $711,899 with interest accruing. In March 2013, the State Court Judgment was registered as a sister state judgment in the Los Angeles County Superior Court of California in the amount of $22,873,953 with interest accruing.

Banner Bank has renewed its efforts to enforce the judgments beginning in 2013 and has consistently sought enforcement thereafter. Debtor exams of the Heshmatpours have been taken. While the parties have discussed settlement, no settlement has been reached as of the date of this filing.

On June 24, 2013 and December 18, 2013, Banner Bank obtained a charging order against Mr. Heshmatpour’s membership interest in AFH Holding & Advisory LLC in the Central District of California and Los Angeles Superior Court, respectively. Under the charging orders, AFH and all members are directed to pay any distributions due or that become due to Mr. Heshmatpour directly to Banner Bank until the judgments plus all accrued interest are paid in full. On December 18, 2013, the Heshmatpours’ Motion to Vacate the State Court Judgment was denied. This was not appealed by the Heshmatpours and, therefore, fully enforceable.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of the Company’s securities with the SEC on Forms 3, 4 and 5. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on the Company’s review of the copies of the forms received by it during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that no person who, at any time during such fiscal year, was a director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock failed to comply with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during such fiscal years.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions in that our sole officer and director serve in these capacities.

Nominating Committee

We have not adopted any procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Audit Committee

The Board of Directors acts as the audit committee.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth the cash compensation paid by the Company to its President and all other executive officers who earned annual compensation exceeding $100,000 for services rendered during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014.

Name and Position

Year

Compensation

Amir F. Heshmatpour,

President, Secretary, Chief
Financial Officer and Director

2014

2013

None

Director Compensation

Director compensation shall be determined by the Board with the assistance of a compensation expert. The Company will reimburse for all reasonable expenses incurred by Directors in connection with service to the Company. No fees were paid during the year ended October 31, 2015.

Employment Agreements

The Company is not a party to any employment agreements.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

(a) The following tables set forth certain information as of January 28, 2016, regarding (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) each director, nominee and executive officer of the Company and (iii) all officers and directors as a group.

Name and Address	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership			Percentage of Class
Amir F. Heshmatpour (1) 10830 Massachusetts Ave., Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90024		3,750,000	(2)		57.84	%

AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC 10830 Massachusetts Ave., Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90024		3,750,000			57.84	%

Roger Jenkins 10830 Massachusetts Ave., Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90024		1,250,000			19.28	%
Greg Mauzy 3805 Mockingbird Midland Texas 79707		667,000			10.29	%

All Officers and Directors as a group		3,750,000			57.84	%

_______________________

(1)

Amir F. Heshmatpour serves as the sole officer and a director of the Company.

(2)

Represents 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock owned by AFH Holding & Advisory LLC (“AFH Holding”). Mr. Heshmatpour is the sole member of AFH Holding & Advisory LLC and has sole voting and investment control over the shares of Common Stock owned of record by AFH Holding. Accordingly, he may be deemed a beneficial owner of the 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock owned by AFH Holding.

(b) The Company adopted a 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan with 3,187,636 shares of the Common Stock initially reserved for issuance thereunder, with the number of shares reserved for issuance under such plan to increase on January 1 of each year pursuant to an evergreen provision by an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company on such date and (b) 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or such lesser amount as determined by the Company’s board of directors in its discretion. No shares have been issued under the plan.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Except as otherwise indicated herein, there have been no related party transactions, or any other transactions or relationships required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to the Company, for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings were $2,600 and $4,680 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed to the Company for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014.

Tax Fees

There were no fees billed to the Company for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014.

All Other Fees

There were no fees billed to the Company for other products and services for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Process

The Board of Directors acts as the audit committee of the Company, and accordingly, all services are approved by all the members of the Board of Directors.

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) We set forth below a list of our audited financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Statement		Page*

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Balance Sheets at October 31, 2015 and 2014		F-2

Statements of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014		F-3

Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014		F-4

Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2015 and 2014		F-5

Notes to Financial Statements		F-6 - F-9

____________

*Page F-1 follows page 14 to this annual report on Form 10-K.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

AFH Acquisition VII, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of AFH Acquisition VII, Inc. (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the two years ended October 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to the above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AFH Acquisition VII, Inc. as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the two years ended October 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and income since inception. These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 4, which includes the raising of additional equity financing or merger with another entity. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP

Newport Beach, California

January 28, 2016

F-1

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)


BALANCE SHEETS

	October 31, 2015			October 31, 2014


CURRENT ASSETS
Receivable from Related Party	$	62,695		$	62,695

Total Assets	$	62,695		$	62,695

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities
Accrued Expenses	$	84,646		$	84,467
Due to Parent		12,624			8,553

Total Liabilities		97,270			93,020

Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred Stock: $.001 Par; 20,000,000 Shares Authorized, -0- Issued and Outstanding		—			—
Common Stock: $.001 Par; 100,000,000 Shares Authorized; 6,483,218 Issued and Outstanding at October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014		6,483			6,483
Additional Paid-In-Capital		2,984,953			2,984,953
Accumulated Deficit		(3,026,011	)		(3,021,761	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(34,575	)		(30,325	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	62,695		$	62,695

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-2

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Years Ended
	October 31,
		2015			2014


Revenues	$	—		$	—

Expenses
Reverse Merger Expenses	$	—		$	52,253
Legal and Professional		3,500			8,203
Office Expenses		—			96

Total Expenses	$	3,500		$	60,552

Net Loss for the Period	$	(3,500	)	$	(60,552	)

Income Tax Provision		750			750

Net Loss for the Period	$	(4,250	)	$	(61,302	)

Loss per Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		6,483,218			6,483,218

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-3

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)


STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

	Common Stock
	of Shares		Value		Additional Paid-In Capital		Stock to be Issued		Stock Subscription Receivable		Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity

Balance - October 31, 2013	6,483,218		6,483		2,984,953		—		—		(2,960,459	)		30,977

Net Loss for the Year	—		—		—		—		—		(61,302	)		(61,302	)

Balance - October 31, 2014	6,483,218		6,483		2,984,953		—		—		(3,021,761	)		(30,325	)

Net Loss for the Year	—		—		—		—		—		(4,250	)		(4,250	)

Balance - October 31, 2015	6,483,218	$	6,483	$	2,984,953	$	—	$	—	$	(3,026,011	)	$	(34,575	)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-4

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.
(A DELAWARE CORPORATION)


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years Ended
	October 31,
		2,015			2014

Operating Activities
Net Loss for the Year	$	(4,250	)	$	(61,302	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities

Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Accrued Expenses		179			52,236
Receivable from Related Party		—			—

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(4,071	)		(9,066	)

Financing Activities
Cash Advance by Parent		4,071			8,553
Cash Proceeds from Issuance of Stock		—			—

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		4,071			8,553

Net Decrease in Cash		—			(513	)

Cash - Beginning of Year		—			513

Cash - End of Year	$	—		$	—

Cash Paid During the Year for:
Interest	$	—		$	—
Income Taxes	$	—		$	—

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

F-5

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - The Company

AFH Acquisition VII, Inc., a development stage company (the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 24, 2007. The Company is 57.84% owned by AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC (the “Parent”). The Company is looking to acquire an existing company or acquire the technology to begin operations.

As a blank check company, the Company’s business is to pursue a business combination through acquisition, or merger with, an existing company.

Since inception, the Company has been engaged in organizational efforts and as set forth below has entered into an LOI.

On October 5, 2012, AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC (“AFH Advisory”), a major shareholder of the Company, entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with two target companies, Eurocar, Inc. (“Eurocar”) and Park Place Motors Ltd. (“Park Place,” together with Eurocar, the “Target Companies”), pursuant to which the Company will acquire the Target Companies through a series of transactions including a merger or other business combination pursuant to which the Company would cease to be a shell company, as defined in the rules of the SEC (the “Reverse Merger”).

Proceeds from the Offering were used to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Reverse Merger with the Target Companies as indicated in the Second Amended and Restated LOI.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results can differ from those estimates.

F-6

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, wherein deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.

The Company's short-term and long-term deferred tax liability is based on the calculation of the deferred taxes on the Company's unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities using a 40% effective tax rate based on a 31% federal income tax rate (net of state tax deduction) combined with an 8.84% California state income tax rate. The Company recognizes a deferred tax asset (through changes in the valuation allowance) for the exact amount of the deferred tax liability. The classification of these deferred taxes is concurrent with the classification of investments for which the unrealized gain is derived. For balance sheet presentation, current deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset and presented as a single amount and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities within each tax jurisdiction have been offset and presented as a single amount.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly probable that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. As of October 31, 2015, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, and the Company had no positions which, in the opinion of management, would be reversed if challenged by a taxing authority. The Company’s evaluation of tax positions was performed for those tax years which remain open to audit. The Company may from time to time, be assessed interest or penalties by the taxing authorities, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to the Company’s financial results. In the event the Company is assessed interest and/or penalties, such amounts will be classified as income tax expense in the financial statements.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of due to parent. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value, unless otherwise noted.

Recent Pronouncements

On June 10, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915). The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from Topic 915, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information on the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder’s equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this accounting standard during the current period.

F-7

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," which is the new comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard's core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in the ASU. The Company currently has no revenues and doesn’t expect any impact of adopting this guidance.

August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Topic 205-40)”, which requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for each annual and interim reporting period. If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosure is required. This new standard will be effective for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the adoption of this accounting standard to determine what material impacts it may have on the financial statements and related disclosures.

There are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that the Company has yet to adopt that are expected to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 3 - Equity Securities

Holders of shares of common stock shall be entitled to cast one vote for each common share held at all stockholder’s meetings for all purposes, including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

The preferred stock of the Company shall be issued by the Board of Directors of the Company in one or more classes or one or more series within any class and such classes or series shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences, limitations or restrictions as the Board of Directors of the Company may determine, from time to time.

No holder of shares of stock of any class shall be entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class, or of securities convertible into shares of stock or any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

Note 4 - Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has reported recurring losses from operations. As a result, there is an accumulated deficit of $3,026,011 at October 31, 2015.

The Company’s continued existence is dependent upon its ability to raise capital or acquire a marketable company. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 5 – Receivable from Related Party

Receivable from Related Party represents funds received by the Company for reverse merger expenses that were forwarded to the parent company and which have not yet been allocated to fees incurred with the transaction described in Note 1. It is expected that all funds will be collected and shall be used for expenses in future periods.

F-8

Note 6 – Due to Parent

Due to parent represents cash advances from AFH Holding & Advisory LLC and totaled $12,624 and $8,553 as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. AFH Holding & Advisory LLC is the majority shareholder of the Company. They are due on demand and will be paid when the entity merges through acquisition. There has been no demand of payment as of October 31, 2015.

Note 7 – Reverse Merger Expenses

Reverse merger expenses represent cash from the private placement offering (see Note 1) which were used towards fees in relation to the LOI. The expenses incurred to date have been reflected under Reverse Merger Expenses in the accompanying financial statements with any remainder in Receivable from Related Party.

Note 8 - Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014:

October 31, 2015

October 31, 2014

Current

U.S.

—

Deferred

U.S.

—

Total

—

A valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets has been recorded as it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized through future operations.

Deferred tax assets consist of the following as of October 31, 2015 and 2014:

	October 31, 2015			October 31, 2014
Net operating loss carryforward	$	(1,205,697	)	$	(1,203,887	)
general business tax credit		—			—
Accrued expenses		—			—
Other		—			—
		(1,205,697	)		(1,203,887	)
Valuation allowance		1,205,697			1,203,887
Total	$	—		$	—

F-9

During the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, the valuation allowance increased by $1,810 and $24,442, respectively.

As of October 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) for federal and state reporting purposes of approximately $1,205,697 and $1,203,887, respectively, which expire in various years through 2035. The Federal and state tax codes provide for restrictive limitations on the annual utilization of NOLs to offset taxable income when the stock ownership of a company significantly changes, as defined.

The income tax provision effective rate of 0% differs from that computed using the 31% federal income tax rate, a 2.7% federal benefit of state tax deduction, combined with an 8.84% California state income tax rate, for a blended rate of 42.6%, due to the following:

	October 31, 2015			October 31, 2014
Tax benefit at statutory federal rate	$	(1,434	)	$	(19,019	)
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit		(376	)		(5,423	)
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance		1,810			24,442
Other		—			—
Permanent Items		—			—
General business tax credit		—			—
Total	$	—		$	—

Note 9 - Related Parties

Litigation with AFH Advisory and Amir F. Heshmatpour

Emmaus Life Sciences, Inc.

Emerald Dairy, Inc.

Banner Bank Judgment

Mr. Amir Heshmatpour is a defendant in two lawsuits related to Banner Bank which have been reduced to judgment.

F-10

(b) Index to Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit		Description

*3.1		Certificate of Incorporation

*3.2		By-laws

10.1		Form of Subscription Agreement between the Company and Investors

31.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2015

32.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s registration statement on Form 10-SB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2008 and incorporated herein by this reference.
**	Filed Herewith.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	AFH Acquisition VII, INC.

Dated: January 28, 2016	By:	/s/ Amir F. Heshmatpour
		Amir F. Heshmatpour
		President and Director
		Principal Executive Officer
		Principal Financial Officer
		Principal Accounting Officer

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	Title	Date

/s/ Amir F. Heshmatpour	President, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer	January 28, 2016
Amir F. Heshmatpour	and Sole Director
	(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Attached files

AFH ACQUISITION VII, INC. Reports

Also read