Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex21-1.htm |
| EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex23-1.htm |
| EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex31-2.htm |
| EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex32-2.htm |
| EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex32-1.htm |
| EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Limoneira CO | v427844_ex31-1.htm |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-34755
Limoneira Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State of incorporation) |
77-0260692 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| 1141 Cummings Road, Santa Paula, CA | 93060 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 525-5541
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Name Of Each Exchange | ||
| Title of Each Class | On Which Registered | |
| Common Stock, $0.01 par value | The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Based on the closing price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates on April 30, 2015 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $268.4 million. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each stockholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2015 was 14,150,071.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we intend to hold on March 22, 2016, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after October 31, 2015.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This annual report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) contains statements which, to the extent that they do not recite historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may include the words "may," "will," “could," "should," "would," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan" or other words or expressions of similar meaning. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations about future events. The forward-looking statements include statements that reflect management’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations and intentions with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, future performance and business, including statements relating to our business strategy and our current and future development plans.
The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual financial condition, results of operations and future performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this Annual Report include:
| · | changes in laws, regulations, rules, quotas, tariffs and import laws; |
| · | weather conditions, including freezes, rains and drought, that affect the production, transportation, storage, import and export of fresh produce; |
| · | market responses to industry volume pressures; |
| · | increased pressure from disease, insects and other pests; |
| · | disruption of water supplies or changes in water allocations; |
| · | product and raw materials supplies and pricing; |
| · | energy supply and pricing; |
| · | changes in interest and currency exchange rates; |
| · | availability of financing for development activities; |
| · | general economic conditions for residential and commercial real estate development; |
| · | political changes and economic crises; |
| · | international conflict; |
| · | acts of terrorism; |
| · | labor disruptions, strikes, shortages or work stoppages; |
| · | loss of important intellectual property rights; and |
| · | other factors disclosed in this Annual Report. |
In addition, this Annual Report contains industry data related to our business and the markets in which we operate. This data includes projections that are based on a number of assumptions. If these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual results could differ from the projections. We urge you to carefully review this Annual Report, particularly the section entitled “Risk Factors,” for a complete discussion of the risks of an investment in our common stock.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Many factors discussed in this Annual Report, some of which are beyond our control, will be important in determining our future performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those that might be anticipated from forward-looking statements. In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not regard the inclusion of a forward-looking statement in this Annual Report as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved, and you should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our Company,” “the Company,” or “Limoneira” in this Annual Report mean Limoneira Company, a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
3
Limoneira Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1990 as the successor to several businesses with operations in California since 1893. Our business and operations are described below. For detailed financial information with respect to our business and our operations, see our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 in this Annual Report. In addition, general information concerning our Company can be found on our website, the internet address of which is www.limoneira.com. All of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including but not limited to, the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments thereto, are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC.
Overview
We are an agribusiness and real estate development company founded and based in Santa Paula, California, committed to responsibly using and managing our approximately 10,700 acres of land, water resources and other assets to maximize long-term stockholder value. Our current operations consist of fruit production, sales and marketing, rental operations, real estate development and capital investment activities.
We are one of California’s oldest citrus growers. According to Sunkist Growers, Inc. (“Sunkist”), we are one of the largest growers of lemons in the United States and, according to the California Avocado Commission, one of the largest growers of avocados in the United States. In addition to growing lemons and avocados, we grow oranges and a variety of specialty citrus and other crops. We have agricultural plantings throughout Ventura, Tulare, San Bernardino, and San Luis Obispo Counties in California and in Yuma County in Arizona, which plantings consist of approximately 4,200 acres of lemons, 1,100 acres of avocados, 1,400 acres of oranges and 800 acres of specialty citrus and other crops. We also operate our own packinghouses in Santa Paula, California and Yuma, Arizona, where we process, pack and sell lemons that we grow as well as lemons grown by others.
Our water resources include water rights, usage rights and pumping rights to the water in aquifers under, and canals that run through, the land we own. Water for our farming operations is sourced from the existing water resources associated with our land, which includes rights to water in the adjudicated Santa Paula Basin (aquifer) and the un-adjudicated Fillmore and Paso Robles Basins (aquifers). We use ground water from the San Joaquin Valley Basin and water from water districts and irrigation districts in Tulare County, which is in California’s San Joaquin Valley and we use ground water from the Cadiz Valley Basin in San Bernardino County. We also use surface water in Arizona from the Colorado River through the Yuma Mesa Irrigation and Drainage District.
For more than 100 years, we have been making strategic investments in California agricultural and real estate development. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have four active real estate development projects in California. These projects include multi-family housing and single-family homes comprising approximately 250 completed units and another approximately 1,800 units in various stages of planning and entitlement.
Fiscal Year 2015 Highlights and Recent Developments
In fiscal year 2015, we substantially completed our agriculture workforce housing project in Santa Paula, California. We began renting 65 units in May 2015 and annual rental revenue from the additional housing units is anticipated to be approximately $0.9 million. The total cost of the development was approximately $9.5 million and we capitalized approximately $2.7 million of costs related to this project in fiscal year 2015.
A project to double the capacity and increase the efficiency of our lemon packing facilities was substantially completed during fiscal year 2015 and is expected to become operational during the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. To date we have capitalized approximately $24.1 million and in fiscal year 2015 we capitalized approximately $15.6 million of costs in connection with construction services and equipment related to this project. The project is expected to cost approximately $25.0 million in the aggregate.
On February 3, 2015, we amended our lease agreement with Cadiz Real Estate, LLC (“Cadiz”). The amendment, among other things; increased by 200 acres the amount of property leased by us under the lease agreement dated July 1, 2013. In connection with the amendment, we paid a total of $1.2 million to acquire existing lemon trees and irrigations systems from Cadiz and a Cadiz tenant.
4
On February 17, 2015, the City of Santa Paula unanimously approved our updated East Area I Master Tentative Tract Map, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and updated Development Agreement. The property is now fully entitled and we have the requisite approvals to break ground on the East Area I and II projects.
On August 21, 2015, we sold Wilson Ranch property, which was comprised of 52 acres of land with 33 acres of avocado orchards located in Ventura County, California. The sale price was approximately $2.8 million and the gain on the sale was approximately $0.9 million. The sales price represents approximately $53,000 and $83,000 per acre for total acres and productive avocado acres, respectively.
In September 2015, we completed the acquisition of 157 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus orchards in California’s San Joaquin Valley, for approximately $3.4 million. The orchards were acquired pursuant to purchase options contained in certain operating leases we have been party to since 2012 for approximately 1,000 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus and other crops, which we refer to as the Sheldon Ranch leases.
We also entered into a purchase agreement in September 2015 to acquire an additional 757 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus orchards in California’s San Joaquin Valley, for approximately $15.1 million, pursuant to the purchase options contained in the Sheldon Ranches operating leases. We paid a deposit of $50,000 in September 2015 and the transaction closed in December 2015.
On November 10, 2015, we entered into a joint venture with The Lewis Group of Companies (“Lewis”) for the residential development of our East Area I real estate development project. To consummate the transaction, we formed Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC (the “Joint Venture”) as the development entity, contributed our East Area I property to the Joint Venture and sold a 50% interest in the Joint Venture to Lewis for $20.0 million, comprised of a $2.0 million deposit received in September 2015 and $18.0 million received on November 10, 2015. We expect to receive $100.0 million from the Joint Venture over the estimated 7 to 10 year life of the project. The Joint Venture partners will share in capital contributions to fund project costs until loan proceeds and/or revenues are sufficient to fund the project. These funding requirements are currently estimated to total $10.0 to $15.0 million for each Joint Venture partner in the first two years of the project, with a smaller amount of funding expected in the first year. We also entered to a lease agreement with the Joint Venture to lease back a portion of the contributed property, which allows us to continue farming the property during the phased build-out of the project.
On December 18, 2015, we drew an advance of $8,000,000 from Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. and became obligated under an interim funding agreement with Wells Fargo. The advance was obtained in connection with us financing the purchase of certain equipment associated with our new lemon packing facilities. Upon the completion of the purchase of the equipment, we intend to include the advance in the aggregate funding of a $10,000,000 term loan pursuant to a Master Loan and Security Agreement and a Loan Schedule with Wells Fargo, with a first priority security interest in the equipment to Wells Fargo. The interest rate on the interim funding is LIBOR plus 2% and the rate will become fixed upon establishment of the term loan.
For fiscal year 2015, we declared cash dividends to our stockholders totaling $0.18 per common share in the aggregate amount of approximately $2.5 million compared to a total of $0.17 per common share in the aggregate amount of approximately $2.3 million for fiscal year 2014. On December 15, 2015, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share payable on January 15, 2016 in the aggregate amount of approximately $0.7 million to stockholders of record on December 28, 2015. This represents an 11% increase compared to our previous quarterly dividend of $0.045 per common share.
Business Divisions
We have three business divisions: agribusiness, rental operations, and real estate development. The agribusiness division is comprised of two reportable segments, lemon operations and other agribusiness, and includes our farming, harvesting, lemon packing and lemon sales operations. The rental operations division includes our residential and commercial rentals, leased land operations and organic recycling. The real estate development division includes our real estate projects and development. Financial information and discussion of our four reportable segments, lemon operations, other agribusiness, rental operations and real estate development, are contained in the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements of this Annual Report.
Agribusiness Division
The agribusiness division is comprised of two of our reportable segments, lemon operations and other agribusiness, and represented approximately 95%, 95% and 94% of our fiscal year 2015, 2014 and 2013 consolidated revenues, respectively, of which lemon operations represented 79%, 77% and 68% of our fiscal year 2015, 2014 and 2013 consolidated revenues, respectively, and other agribusiness represented 16%, 18% and 26% of our fiscal year 2015, 2014 and 2013 consolidated revenues, respectively.
5
Farming
We are one of California’s oldest citrus growers and one of the largest growers of lemons and avocados in the United States. In addition to growing lemons and avocados, we grow oranges and a variety of specialty citrus and other crops. We have agricultural plantings throughout Ventura, San Bernardino and San Luis Obispo Counties in California and Yuma County in Arizona, which collectively consist of approximately 4,200 acres of lemons, 1,100 acres of avocados, 1,400 acres of oranges and 800 acres of specialty citrus and other crops. We also operate our own packinghouses in Santa Paula, California and Yuma, Arizona, where we process, pack and sell lemons we grow as well as lemons grown by others.
Lemons. Our lemon farming is included in our “lemon operations” reportable segment within our financial statements. We market and sell lemons directly to food service, wholesale and retail customers throughout the United States, Canada, Asia, Australia and certain other international markets. We are one of the largest lemon growers in the United States with approximately 4,200 acres of lemons planted primarily in Ventura and Tulare Counties in California and in Yuma County, Arizona. In California, the lemon growing area stretches from the Coachella Valley to Fresno and Monterey Counties, with the majority of the growing areas being located in the coastal areas from Ventura County to Monterey County. Ventura County is California’s top lemon producing county. Approximately 40% of our lemons are grown in Ventura County, 30% are grown in Tulare County, 20% are grown in Yuma County, Arizona and 10% are grown in San Bernardino County, California.
There are over fifty varieties of lemons, with the Lisbon, Eureka and Genoa being the predominant varieties marketed on a worldwide basis. California grown lemons are available throughout the year, with peak production periods occurring from January through August. Approximately 90% of our lemon plantings are of the Lisbon and Eureka varieties and approximately 10% are of other varieties such as sweet Meyer lemons, proprietary seedless lemons and pink variegated lemons. The storage life of fresh lemons generally ranges from one to 18 weeks, depending upon the maturity of the fruit, the growing methods used and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
With an average annual production of approximately 750,000 tons of lemons, California accounts for approximately 90% of the United States lemon crop, with Arizona producing a vast majority of the rest. Between 50% and 70% of the United States lemon crop is utilized in the fresh market, with the remainder going to the processed market for products such as juice, oils and essences. Most lemons are consumed as either a cooking ingredient, a garnish, or as juice in lemonade or carbonated beverages or other drinks. Demand for lemons is typically highest in the summer, although California producers through various geographical zones are typically able to harvest lemons year round.
Avocados. Our avocado farming is included in our “other agribusiness” reportable segment within our financial statements. We are one of the largest avocado growers in the United States with approximately 1,100 acres of avocados planted throughout Ventura County. In California, the avocado growing area stretches from San Diego County to Monterey County, with the majority of the growing areas located approximately 100 miles north and south of Los Angeles County.
Over the last 75 years, the avocado has transitioned from a single specialty fruit to an array of 10 varieties ranging from the green-skinned Zutanos to the black-skinned Hass, which is the predominant avocado variety marketed on a worldwide basis. California-grown avocados are available year round, with peak production periods occurring between February and September. Other avocado varieties have a more limited picking season and typically command a lower price. Because of superior eating quality, the Hass avocado has contributed greatly to the avocado’s growing popularity through its retail, restaurant and other food service uses. Approximately 98% of our avocado plantings are of the Hass variety. The storage life of fresh avocados generally ranges from one to four weeks, depending upon the maturity of the fruit, the growing methods used and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
We provide all of our avocado production to Calavo Growers, Inc. (“Calavo”), a packing and marketing company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CVGW. Calavo’s customers include many of the largest retail and food service companies in the United States and Canada. Our marketing relationship with Calavo dates back to 2003. Calavo receives fruit from our orchards at its packinghouse located in Santa Paula, California. Calavo’s proximity to our agricultural operations enables us to keep transportation and handling costs to a minimum. Our avocados are packed by Calavo and sold and distributed under its own brands to its customers primarily in the United States and Canada.
Primarily due to differing soil conditions, the care of avocado trees is intensive and during our 75-year history of growing avocados, growing techniques have changed dramatically. The need for more production per acre to compete with foreign sources of supply has required us to take an important lead in the practice of dense planting (typically four times the number of avocado trees per acre versus traditional avocado plantings) and mulching composition to help trees acclimate under conditions that more closely resemble those found in the tropics, a better climate for avocado growth.
Oranges. Our orange farming is included in our “other agribusiness” reportable segment within our financial statements. While we are primarily known for our high-quality lemons, we also grow oranges. We have approximately 1,400 acres of oranges planted throughout Tulare County, California. In California, the growing area for oranges stretches from Imperial County to Yolo County.
6
For many decades, the Valencia variety of oranges was grown in Ventura County primarily for export to the Pacific Rim. Throughout the late 20th century, developing countries began producing the larger, seedless Navel variety of oranges that successfully competed against the smaller Valencia variety. California grown Navel oranges are available from October to June, with peak production periods occurring between January and April. California grown Valencia oranges are available from March to October, with peak production periods occurring between June and September. Approximately 95% of our orange plantings are of the Navel variety and approximately 5% are of the Valencia variety.
Navel oranges comprise most of California’s orange crop, accounting for approximately 75% over the past three growing seasons. Valencia oranges account for a vast majority of the remainder of California’s orange crop. While California produces approximately 25% of the nation’s oranges, its crop accounts for approximately 80% of those going to the fresh market. The share of California’s crop going to fresh market, as opposed to the processed market (i.e. juices, oils and essences) varies by season, depending on the quality of the crop.
We utilize Sunkist to market and sell a portion of our oranges under the Sunkist brand to food service wholesale and retail customers. As an agricultural cooperative, Sunkist coordinates the sales and marketing of our oranges, and orders are processed by Sunkist-member packinghouses for direct shipment to customers. We also utilize packinghouses which are not members of agricultural cooperatives to process, market and sell our oranges. We estimate approximately 70% of our oranges are sold to retail customers and approximately 30% are sold to wholesale customers.
Specialty Citrus and Other Crops. Our specialty citrus and other crop farming is included in our “other agribusiness” reportable segment within our financial statements. A few decades ago we began growing specialty citrus varieties and other crops that we believed would appeal to changing North American and worldwide demand. As a result, we currently have approximately 800 acres of specialty citrus and other crops planted such as Moro blood oranges, Cara Cara oranges, Minneola tangelos, Star Ruby grapefruit, pummelos, pistachios and olives.
Acreage devoted to specialty citrus and other crops in California has been growing significantly over the past few decades, especially with the popularity of the Clementine, a type of mandarin orange. Similar to our oranges, a portion of our specialty citrus is marketed and sold under the Sunkist brand by Sunkist and orders are processed by Sunkist-member packinghouses for direct shipment to customers. We also utilize packinghouses which are not members of agricultural cooperatives to process, market and sell our specialty citrus.
We currently market our other crops, such as pistachios and olives, utilizing packinghouses which are not members of agricultural cooperatives. Our pistachios are harvested and sold to a roaster, packager and marketer of nuts and our olives are harvested and sold to a processor and marketer of olives.
Plantings
We have agricultural plantings on properties located in Ventura, Tulare, San Bernardino and San Luis Obispo Counties in California and in Yuma, Arizona. The following is a description of our agriculture properties:
| Ranch Name | County / State | Total Acres | Lemons | Avocados | Oranges | Specialty Crops | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
| Limoneira/Olivelands | Ventura, CA | 1,700 | 600 | 500 | - | - | 600 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Orchard Farm | Ventura, CA | 1,100 | 400 | - | - | - | 700 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Teague McKevett | Ventura, CA | 500 | 200 | 200 | - | - | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| La Campana | Ventura, CA | 300 | 100 | 200 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rancho La Cuesta | Ventura, CA | 200 | 100 | - | - | - | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Limco Del Mar | Ventura, CA | 200 | 100 | 100 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Porterville Ranches | Tulare, CA | 1,200 | 400 | - | 400 | 200 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ducor Ranches | Tulare, CA | 1,000 | 300 | - | 400 | 200 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sheldon Ranches | Tulare, CA | 1,000 | 200 | - | 600 | 200 | - | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lemons 400 | Tulare, CA | 800 | 400 | - | - | - | 400 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cadiz | San Bernardino, CA | 500 | 400 | - | - | - | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Associated Citrus Packers | Yuma, AZ | 1,300 | 1,000 | - | - | - | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other agribusiness land | Various counties, CA | 900 | - | 100 | - | 200 | 600 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 10,700 | 4,200 | 1,100 | 1,400 | 800 | 3,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of Total | 100 | % | 39 | % | 10 | % | 13 | % | 7 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||
The Limoneira/Olivelands Ranch is the original site of our Company. Our headquarters, lemon packing operations and storage facilities are located on this property.
7
The Teague McKevett Ranch is the site of our real estate development project known as East Area I and described below under the heading “Real Estate Development.”
Limco Del Mar is owned by a limited partnership of which we are the general partner and own an interest of 23.4%, which is comprised of a 1.3% general partner interest and a 22.1% limited partner interest.
We manage the Cadiz Ranches under operating lease arrangements. We purchased substantially all of the Sheldon Ranches property in two separate transactions, which closed in September and December 2015. We previously managed the Sheldon Ranches under operating lease arrangements.
The other agribusiness land in the table above include corporate and lemon packing facilities, land leased to other agricultural businesses, rental units, roads, creeks, hillsides and other open land.
Our orchards can maintain production for many years. For financial reporting purposes, we depreciate our orchards from 20 to 40 years depending on the fruit variety with the majority of our orchards depreciated over 20 to 30 years. We regularly evaluate our orchards’ production and growing costs, and based on these and other factors we may decide to redevelop certain orchards. In addition, we may acquire agricultural property with existing productive orchards or without productive orchards, which would require new orchard plantings. The fruit varieties that we grow typically are non-producing for approximately the first four years after planting. Orchards may continue producing fruit longer than their depreciable lives. The following table presents the number of acres planted by fruit variety and approximate age of our orchards:
| Age of Orchards | ||||||||||||||||
| County, State, Fruit Variety | 0-4 Years | 5-25 Years | Over 25 Years | Total | ||||||||||||
| Ventura, CA | ||||||||||||||||
| Lemons | 100 | 600 | 900 | 1,600 | ||||||||||||
| Avocados | 100 | 600 | 400 | 1,100 | ||||||||||||
| Total Ventura, CA | 200 | 1,200 | 1,300 | 2,700 | ||||||||||||
| Tulare, CA | ||||||||||||||||
| Lemons | 400 | 200 | 600 | 1,200 | ||||||||||||
| Oranges | 100 | 600 | 700 | 1,400 | ||||||||||||
| Specialty | - | 400 | 200 | 600 | ||||||||||||
| Total Tulare, CA | 500 | 1,200 | 1,500 | 3,200 | ||||||||||||
| San Bernardino, CA - Lemons | 300 | 100 | - | 400 | ||||||||||||
| San Luis Obispo, CA – Wine Grapes | 200 | - | - | 200 | ||||||||||||
| Yuma, AZ - Lemons | 200 | 800 | - | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 1,400 | 3,300 | 2,800 | 7,500 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Total | 19 | % | 44 | % | 37 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Lemon Packing and Sales
We are the oldest continuous lemon packing operation in North America. We pack and sell lemons grown by us as well as lemons grown by others, which operations are included in our financial statements under the reportable segment “lemon operations.” Lemons delivered to our packinghouses in Santa Paula, California and Yuma, Arizona are sized, graded, cooled, ripened and packed for delivery to customers. Our ability to accurately estimate the size, grade and timing of the delivery of the annual lemon crop has a substantial impact on both our costs and the sales price we receive for the fruit.
A significant portion of the costs related to our lemon packing operation is fixed. Our strategy for growing the profitability of our lemon packing operations calls for optimizing the percentage of a crop that goes to the fresh market, or fresh utilization, and procuring a larger percentage of the California and Arizona lemon crop.
We invest considerable time and research into refining and improving our lemon operations through innovation and are continuously in search of new techniques to refine how premium lemons are delivered to our consumers. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, we anticipate our new lemon packing facility will become operational, which is expected to double our lemon packing capacity and increase the efficiency of these operations.
8
Rental Operations Division
Our rental operations division is provided for in our financial statements as its own reportable segment and includes our residential and commercial rentals, leased land operations and organic recycling. The rental operations division represented approximately 5%, 4% and 5% of our fiscal year 2015, 2014 and 2013 consolidated revenues, respectively.
Residential
We own and maintain approximately 250 residential housing units located in Ventura and Tulare Counties that we lease to employees, former employees and non-employees. In fiscal 2015, we added 65 new agriculture workforce housing units in Santa Paula, California. These properties generate reliable cash flows which we use to partially fund the operating costs of our business and provide affordable housing for many of our employees and the community.
Commercial
We own several commercial office buildings and a multi-use facility consisting of a retail convenience store, gas station, car wash, and quick-serve restaurant. As with our residential housing units, these properties generate reliable cash flows which we use to partially fund the operating costs of our business.
Leased Land
As of October 31, 2015, we lease approximately 600 acres of our land to third-party agricultural tenants who grow a variety of row crops such as strawberries, raspberries, celery and cabbage. Our leased land business provides us with a profitable method to diversify the use of our land.
Organic Recycling
With the help of one of our tenants, Agromin, a processor of premium soil products and a green waste recycler located in Oxnard, California, we have implemented an organic recycling program. Agromin provides green waste recycling for cities in Santa Barbara, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. We worked with Agromin to develop an organic recycling facility on our land in Ventura County, to receive green materials (lawn clipping, leaves, bark, plant materials) and convert such material into mulch that we spread throughout our agricultural properties to help curb erosion, improve water efficiency, reduce weeds and moderate soil temperatures. We receive a percentage of the gate fees Agromin collects from regional waste haulers and enjoy the benefits of the organic material.
Real Estate Development Division
Our real estate development division is provided for in our financial statements as its own reportable segment and includes our real estate development operations. The real estate development division had no significant revenues in fiscal year 2015 and represented approximately 1% of our consolidated revenues in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively.
For more than 100 years, we have been making strategic real estate investments in California agricultural and developable real estate. Our current real estate developments include developable land parcels, multi-family housing and single-family homes with approximately 1,800 units in various stages of planning and development. The following is a summary of each of the strategic agricultural and development real estate investment properties in which we own an interest:
East Area I - Santa Paula, California. East Area I consists of 523 acres that we presently use as agricultural land and is located in Santa Paula approximately ten miles from the City of Ventura and the Pacific Ocean. This property is also known as our Teague McKevett Ranch. We believe East Area I is an ideal location for a master planned community of commercial and residential properties designed to satisfy expected demand in a region that we believe will have few other developments in this coming decade. In 2008, after we completed a process of community planning and environmental review, the citizens of Santa Paula voted to approve the annexation of East Area I into Santa Paula. This vote was a requirement of the Save Open-Space and Agricultural Resources, or SOAR, ordinance that mandates a public vote of the City of Santa Paula for land use conversion.
9
On November 10, 2015, we entered into a joint venture with The Lewis Group of Companies (“Lewis”) for the residential development of our East Area I real estate development project. To consummate the transaction, we formed Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC (the “Joint Venture”) as the development entity, contributed our East Area I property to the Joint Venture and sold a 50% interest in the Joint Venture to Lewis for $20.0 million, comprised of a $2.0 million deposit received in September 2015 and $18.0 million received on November 10, 2015. We expect to receive $100.0 million from the Joint Venture over the estimated 7 to 10 year life of the project. The Joint Venture partners will share in capital contributions to fund project costs until loan proceeds and/or revenues are sufficient to fund the project. These funding requirements are currently estimated to total $10.0 to $15.0 million for each Joint Venture partner in the first two years of the project, with a smaller amount of funding expected in the first year. We also entered into a lease agreement with the Joint Venture to lease back a portion of the contributed property, which allows us to continue farming the property during the phased build-out of the project.
East Area II - Santa Paula, California. We and our design associates are in the process of formulating plans for East Area II, a parcel of approximately 30 acres adjacent to East Area I, also a part of our Teague McKevett Ranch, that we believe is suited to commercial and/or industrial development along the south side of California Highway 126, a heavily traveled corridor that connects Highway 101 at Ventura on the west with Interstate 5 at Santa Clarita on the east. When completed, we expect that the development will contribute to the economic vitality of the region and allow residents to work and shop within close proximity to their homes.
The successful development of East Area II will be partly dependent on the success of East Area I described above. We expect that East Area II could accommodate large retailers, a medium or large employer, a complex of mixed business and retail, or some combination of the foregoing. We are actively cultivating prospects to buy land in or become future tenants in East Area II and expect that development will closely follow the build-out of East Area I.
Windfall Farms - Creston, California. Windfall Farms is an approximately 700 acre former thoroughbred breeding farm and equestrian facility located in Creston, California, near Paso Robles. The property has paved roads, water wells, irrigation, piping, stables, homes, other out-buildings and a race track. Restrictions imposed by the California Land Conservation Act (also known as the Williamson Act) expired at the end of calendar year 2012 and presently up to as many as 74 parcels as small as ten acres each can be subdivided and resold, creating small agricultural parcels with home sites. We planted approximately 200 acres of vineyards during fiscal years 2014 and 2015. Vineyards are generally productive after four years.
Santa Maria - Santa Barbara County, California. As of October 31, 2015 we were invested in three entitled development parcels in Santa Barbara County, California, a county that, in our experience, entitles very few parcels. Located in Santa Maria, each of these parcels offers a residential and/or commercial development opportunity. A brief description of each parcel follows:
| · | Centennial Square has been approved for 138 apartments on 6 acres, is close to medical facilities, shopping and transportation. |
| · | The Terraces at Pacific Crest is an approximately eight-acre parcel approved for 112 attached-housing units. |
| · | Sevilla is approved for 69 single-family homes adjacent to shopping, transportation, schools, parks and medical facilities, with a parcel of approximately 3 acres zoned for commercial use. |
Competitive Strengths
Agribusiness Division
With agricultural operations dating back to 1893, we are one of California’s oldest citrus growers and one of the largest growers of lemons and avocados in the United States. Consequently, we have developed significant experience with a variety of crops, mainly lemons, avocados and oranges. The following is a brief list of what we believe are our significant competitive strengths with respect to our agribusiness division, which includes our lemon operations and other agribusiness reportable segments unless otherwise noted:
| · | Our agricultural properties in Ventura County are located near the Pacific Ocean, which provides an ideal environment for growing lemons, avocados and row crops. Our agricultural properties in Tulare County, which is in the San Joaquin Valley in Central California, and in Yuma, Arizona, are also located in areas that are well-suited for growing citrus crops. |
| · | Historically, a higher percentage of our crops go to the fresh market, which is commonly referred to as fresh utilization, than that of other growers and packers with which we compete. |
| · | We have contiguous and nearby land resources that permit us to efficiently use our agricultural land and resources. |
10
| · | In all but one of our properties, we are not dependent on State or Federal water projects to support our agribusiness or real estate development operations. |
| · | We own approximately 93% of our agricultural land and take a long view on our fruit production practices. |
| · | A significant amount of our agribusiness property was acquired many years ago, which results in a low cost basis and associated expenses.
| |
| · | We have a well-trained and retentive labor force with many employees remaining with us for more than 30 years. |
| · | In our lemon operations segment, our integrated business model with respect to growing, packing, marketing and selling lemons allows us to better serve our customers. |
| · | Our lemon packing operations provide marketing opportunities with other citrus companies and their respective products. |
| · | Since 2010, we have achieved and maintained GLOBALGAP Certification by successfully demonstrating our adherence to specific GLOBALGAP standards. GLOBALGAP is an internationally recognized set of farm standards dedicated to “Good Agricultural Practices” or GAP. We believe that GLOBALGAP Certification differentiates us from our competitors and serves as reassurance to consumers and retailers that food reaches acceptable levels of safety and quality, and has been produced sustainably, respecting the health, safety and welfare of workers and the environment, and in consideration of animal welfare issues. |
| · | We have made investments in ground-based solar projects that provide us with tangible and intangible non-revenue generating benefits. The electricity generated by these investments provides us with a significant portion of the electricity required to operate our packinghouse and cold storage facilities located in Santa Paula, California and provides a significant portion of the electricity required to operate four deep-water well pumps at one of our ranches in Tulare County. Additionally, these investments support our sustainable agricultural practices, reduce our dependence on fossil-based electricity generation and lower our carbon footprint. Moreover, electricity that we generate and do not use is conveyed seamlessly back to the investor-owned utilities operating in these two markets. Finally, over time, we expect that our customers and the end consumers of our fruit will value the investments that we have made in renewable energy as a part of our farming and packing operations, which we believe may help us differentiate our products from similar commodities.
| |
| · | We have made various other investments in water rights, mutual water companies and cooperative memberships. We own shares in the following mutual water companies: Farmers Irrigation Co., Canyon Irrigation Co., San Cayetano Mutual Water Co., Middle Road Mutual Water Co., and Pioneer Water Company, Inc. In 2007, we acquired additional water rights in the adjudicated Santa Paula Basin (aquifer) and in September 2013 we acquired water rights in the YMIDD with our acquisition of Associated Citrus Packers, Inc. (“Associated”). |
Rental Operations Division
With respect to our rental operations division, we believe our competitive advantages are as follows:
| · | Our housing and land rentals provide a consistent, dependable source of cash flow that helps to counter the volatility typically associated with an agricultural business. |
| · | Our housing rental business allows us to offer a unique benefit to our employees, which in turn helps to provide us with a dependable, long-term employee base. |
| · | Our leased land business allows us to partner with other agricultural producers that can serve as a profitable alternative to under-producing tree crop acreage. |
| · | Our organic recycling tenant provides us with a low cost, environmentally friendly solution to weed and erosion control. |
11
Real Estate Development Division
With respect to our real estate development division, we believe our competitive advantages are as follows:
| · | Our real estate development activities are primarily focused in coastal areas north of Los Angeles and south of Santa Maria, which we believe have desirable climates for lifestyle families, retirees, and athletic and sports enthusiasts.
| |
| · | We have entitlements to build approximately 1,500 residential units in our East Area I (Santa Paula Gateway) development and approximately 300 residential units in our Santa Maria properties.
| |
| · | We have partnered with an experienced and financially strong land developer for our East Area I residential master plan development.
| |
| · | Several of our agricultural and real estate investment properties are unique and carry longer term development potential.
| |
| · | Our East Area II property has approximately 30 acres of land commercially zoned, which is adjacent to our East Area I property. Our Santa Maria properties have approximately 3 acres zoned for mixed use retail, commercial and light manufacturing. |
Business Strategy
While each of our business divisions has a separate business strategy, we are an agribusiness and real estate development company that generates annual cash flows to support investments in agricultural and real estate development activities. As our agricultural and real estate development investments are monetized, we intend to seek to expand our agribusiness into new regions and markets and invest in cash producing residential, commercial and industrial rental assets.
The following describes the key elements of our business strategy for each of our agribusiness, rental operations and real estate development business divisions.
Agribusiness Division
With respect to our agribusiness division, key elements of our strategy are:
| · | Acquire Additional Lemon Producing Properties. To the extent attractive opportunities arise and our capital availability permits, we intend to consider the acquisition of additional lemon producing properties. In order to be considered, such properties would need to have certain characteristics to provide acceptable returns, such as an adequate source of water, a warm micro-climate and well-drained soils. We anticipate that the most attractive opportunities to acquire lemon producing properties will be in the San Joaquin Valley near our existing operations in Tulare County. | |
| · | Expand our Sources of Lemon Supply. Peak lemon production occurs at different times of the year depending on geographic region. In addition to our lemon production in California and Arizona and lemons we acquire from third-party growers, we plan to expand our lemon supply sources to international markets such as Mexico, Chile and Argentina. Increases in lemons procured from third-party growers and international sources improve our ability to provide our customers with fresh lemons throughout the year. |
| · | Increase the Volume of our Lemon Packing Operations. We regularly monitor our costs for redundancies and opportunities for cost reductions. In this regard, cost per carton is a function of throughput. We continually seek to acquire additional lemons from third-party growers to pack through our plant. Third-party growers are only added if we determine their fruit is of good quality and can be cost effective for both us and the grower. Of most importance is the overall fresh utilization rate for our fruit, which is directly related to quality. |
| · | Expand International Production and Marketing of Lemons. We estimate that we currently have approximately 5% of the fresh lemon market in the United States and a larger share of the United States lemon export market. We intend to explore opportunities to expand our international production and marketing of lemons. We have the ability to supply a wide range of customers and markets and, because we produce high quality lemons, we can export our lemons to international customers, which many of our competitors are unable to supply. |
| · | Construction of a New Lemon Packinghouse. Over the years, new machinery and equipment along with upgrades have been added to our nearly 80 year-old packinghouse and cold storage facilities. This, along with an aggressive and proactive maintenance program, has allowed us to operate an efficient, competitive lemon packing facility. As described above in “Overview – Fiscal Year 2015 Highlights and Recent Developments,” a project to double the capacity and increase the efficiency of our lemon packing facilities was substantially completed during fiscal year 2015 and is expected to become operational during the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. We expect that this project will ultimately increase fresh lemon processing capacity and lower our packing costs by reducing labor and handling inputs. |
12
| · | Opportunistically Expand Our Plantings of Oranges, Specialty Citrus and Other Crops. Our plantings of oranges, specialty citrus and other crops have been profitable and have been pursued to diversify our product line. Agricultural land that we believe is not suitable for lemons is typically planted with oranges, specialty citrus or other crops. While we intend to expand our orange, specialty citrus and other crops, we expect to do so on an opportunistic basis in locations that we believe offer a record of historical profitability. |
| · | Opportunistically Expand our Plantings of Avocados. We may opportunistically expand our plantings of avocados primarily because our profitability and cash flow realized from our avocados frequently offset occasional losses in other crops we grow and help to diversify our fruit production base. |
| · | Maintain and Grow our Relationship with Calavo. Our alignment with and ownership stake in Calavo comprises our current marketing strategy for avocados. Calavo has expanded its sourcing into other regions of the world, including Mexico, Chile and Peru, which allows it to supply avocados to its retail and food service customers on a year-round basis. California avocados occupy a unique market window in the year-round supply chain and Calavo has experienced a general expansion of volume as consumption has grown. Thus, we intend to continue to have a strong and viable market for our California avocados as well as an equity participation in Calavo’s overall expansion and profitability. |
Rental Operations Division
With respect to our rental operations division, key elements of our strategy include the following:
| · | Secure Additional Rental and Housing Units. Our housing, commercial and land rental operations provide us with a consistent, dependable source of cash flow that helps to fund our overall activities. Additionally, we believe our housing rental operation allows us to offer a unique benefit to our employees. We have built and leased 65 out of a total of 71 approved additional units through infill projects on existing sites and groupings of units on new sites within our owned acreage. |
| · | Opportunistically Lease Land to Third-Party Crop Farmers. We regularly monitor the profitability of our fruit-producing acreage to ensure acceptable per acre returns. When we determine that leasing the land to third-party row crop farmers would be more profitable than farming the land, we intend to seek third-party row crop tenants.
| |
| · | Opportunistically Expand our Income-Producing Commercial and Industrial Rental Assets. We intend to redeploy our future financial gains to acquire additional income-producing real estate investments and agricultural properties. |
Real Estate Development Division
With respect to our real estate development division, key elements of our strategy include:
| · | Selectively and Responsibly Develop our Agricultural Land. We recognize that long-term strategies are required for successful real estate development activities. We thus intend to maintain our position as a responsible agricultural land owner and major employer in Ventura County while focusing our real estate development activities on those agricultural land parcels that we believe offer the best opportunities to demonstrate our long-term vision for our community. |
| · | Opportunistically Increase our Real Estate Holdings. We intend to redeploy our future financial gains to acquire additional income-producing real estate investments and agricultural properties. |
Customers
In our lemon operations segment, since November 2010, we have marketed and sold our lemons directly to our food service, wholesale and retail customers in the United States, Canada, Asia, Australia and certain other international markets. Previously, Sunkist marketed and sold the majority of our lemons. We sold lemons to approximately 165 U.S. and international customers during fiscal year 2015. In our other agribusiness segment, our oranges, specialty citrus and other crops are sold through Sunkist and other packinghouses. We sell all of our avocados to Calavo.
Raw Materials
In our lemons operations segment, paper is considered to be a material raw product for our business because most of our products are packed in cardboard cartons for shipment. Paper is readily available and we have numerous suppliers for such material.
13
Information about Geographic Areas
During fiscal year 2015, lemon sales were comprised of 75% domestic sales, 21% sales to domestic exporters and 4% international sales. During fiscal year 2014, lemon sales were comprised of 74% domestic sales, 25% sales to domestic exporters and 1% international sales. During fiscal year 2013, lemon sales were comprised of 72% domestic sales, 27% sales to domestic exporters and 1 % international sales. All of our avocados, oranges and specialty citrus and other crops are sold to packinghouses and processors located in the United States. All of our long-lived assets are located within the United States and we have an investment in a citrus packing, marketing and sales business in La Serena, Chile.
Seasonal Nature of Business
As with any agribusiness enterprise, our agribusiness division operations are predominantly seasonal in nature. The harvest and sale of our lemons, avocados, oranges and specialty citrus and other crops occurs in all quarters, but is generally more concentrated during our third quarter. With respect to our lemon operations segment, our lemons are generally grown and marketed throughout the year. In terms of our other agribusiness segment, our avocados are sold generally throughout the year with the peak months being February through September. Our Navel oranges are primarily sold January through April and our Valencia oranges are primarily sold June through September. Our specialty citrus is sold from November through June and our specialty crops, such as pistachios and olives, are sold in September and/or October.
Competition
The agribusiness division crop markets, including those in which our lemon operations and other agribusiness segments operate, are intensely competitive, but no single producer has any significant market power over any market segments, as is consistent with the production of most agricultural commodities. Generally, there are a large number of global producers that sell through joint marketing organizations and cooperatives. Fruit is also sold to independent packers, both public and private, who then sell to their own customer base. Customers are typically large retail chains, food service companies, industrial manufacturers and distributors who sell and deliver to smaller customers in local markets throughout the world. In the purest sense, our largest competitors in our agribusiness division are other citrus and avocado producers in California, Mexico, Chile, Argentina and Florida, a number of which are members of cooperatives such as Sunkist or have selling relationships with Calavo similar to that of Limoneira. In another sense, we compete with other fruits and vegetables for the share of consumer expenditures devoted to fresh fruit and vegetables: apples, pears, melons, pineapples and other tropical fruit. In our other agribusiness segment specifically, avocado products compete in the supermarket with hummus products and other dips and salsas. U.S. producers of fruit and tree nuts generate approximately $19 billion of fruit and tree nuts each year, about 15% of which is exported. For our specific crops, the size of the U.S. market is approximately $375 million for lemons, approximately $300 to $400 million for avocados depending on the year, and approximately $1.5 to $2.0 billion for oranges, both fresh and juice. Competition in the various markets in which our agribusiness division operates is affected by reliability of supply, product quality, brand recognition and perception, price and the ability to satisfy changing customer preferences through innovative product offerings.
The sale and leasing of residential, commercial and industrial real estate is very competitive, with competition coming from numerous and varied sources throughout California. Our greatest direct competition for each of our current real estate development properties in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties comes from other residential and commercial developments in nearby areas. Windfall Farms competes generally with the second home and life-style real estate market, which includes golf course communities, marinas, destination resorts and other equestrian facilities located in Southern California and, therefore, its competition ranges over a greater area and range of consumer options.
Intellectual Property
We have numerous trademarks and brands under which we market and sell our fruits, particularly lemons, domestically and internationally, many of which have been owned for decades. In our lemon operations segment, the brands of Limoneira lemons which are of importance to the segment, including Santa®, Paula®, Bridal Veil®, Fountain®, Golden Bowl® and Level®, are examples of such trademarks owned by us and registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We also acquired certain lemon brands with the acquisition of Associated including Kiva® and Kachina®.
Employees
At October 31, 2015, we had 333 employees, 78 of which were salaried and 255 of which were hourly. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe our relations with our employees are good.
14
Research and Development
For our agribusiness division, our research and development programs concentrate on sustaining the productivity of our agricultural lands, product quality and value-added product development. Agricultural research is directed toward sustaining and improving product yields and product quality by examining and improving agricultural practices in all phases of production (such as the development of specifically adapted plant varieties, land preparation, fertilization, pest and disease control, post-harvest handling, packing and shipping procedures), and includes on-site technical services and the implementation and monitoring of recommended agricultural practices. Research efforts are also directed towards integrated pest management. We conduct agricultural research at field facilities throughout our growing areas. We also sponsor research related to environmental improvements and the protection of worker and community health. The aggregate amounts we spent on research and development in each of the last three years have not been material in any such year.
Environmental and Regulatory Matters
Our agribusiness and real estate development operations are subject to a broad range of evolving federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. For example, the growing, packing, storing and distributing of our products is extensively regulated by various federal and state agencies. The California State Department of Food and Agriculture oversees our packing and processing of lemons and conducts tests for fruit quality and packaging standards. We are also subject to laws and regulations which govern the use of pesticides and other potentially hazardous substances and the treatment, handling, storage and disposal of materials and waste and the remediation of contaminated properties. Advertising of our products is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and our operations are subject to certain health and safety regulations, including those issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
We seek to comply at all times with all such laws and regulations and to obtain any necessary permits and licenses, and we are not aware of any instances of material non-compliance. We believe our facilities and practices are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable governmental laws, regulations, permits and licenses. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that we will be able to comply with any future laws and regulations for necessary permits and licenses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or obtain any necessary permits and licenses could subject us to civil remedies including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions. These remedies can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. The risks described below are not the only ones we will face. If any of the following risks or other risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In such event, the trading price of our common stock could decline and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Related to Our Agribusiness Division
Adverse weather conditions, natural disasters and other natural conditions, including the effects of climate change, could impose significant costs and losses on our business.
Fresh produce is vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, including windstorms, floods, drought and temperature extremes, which are quite common and may occur with higher frequency or be less predictable in the future due to the effects of climate change. Unfavorable growing conditions can reduce both crop size and crop quality. In extreme cases, entire harvests may be lost in some geographic areas. These factors can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Citrus and avocado orchards are subject to damage from frost and freezes and this has happened periodically in the recent past. In some cases, the fruit is damaged or ruined while in the case of extended periods of cold, the trees can also be damaged or killed.
Our agricultural plantings are potentially subject to damage from disease and pests, which could impose losses on our business and the prevention of which could impose significant additional costs on us.
Fresh produce is also vulnerable to crop disease and to pests, e.g. Mediterranean Fruit Fly and the Asian Citrus Psyllid (“ACP”), which may vary in severity and effect, depending on the stage of production at the time of infection or infestation, the type of treatment applied and climatic conditions.
15
One such pest is ACP, an aphid–like insect that is a serious pest to all citrus plants because it can transmit the disease, Huanglongbing (“HLB”), when it feeds on the plants’ leaves and trees. By itself, ACP causes only minor cosmetic damage to citrus trees. HLB, however, is considered to be one of the most devastating diseases of citrus in the world. Trees infected with HLB decline in health, produce inedible fruit and eventually die, usually in 3 to 5 years after becoming infected. Currently, there is no cure for the disease and infected trees must be removed and destroyed to prevent further spreading.
ACP is a federal action quarantine pest subject to interstate and international quarantine restrictions by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), including a prohibition on the movement of nursery stock out of quarantine areas and a requirement that all citrus fruit be cleaned of leaves and stems prior to movement out of the quarantine area. ACP and HLB exist domestically in Florida, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina and Texas and internationally in countries such as Mexico. ACP exists in California, including in our orchards, however, to date only a few instances of HLB have been detected in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, there can be no assurance that HLB will not be further detected in the future. Due to the discovery of ACP in our orchards, we have experienced costs related to the quarantine and treatment of ACP and have incurred approximately $0.4 million of costs in fiscal year 2015 related to pest control efforts targeted against ACP.
There are a number of registered insecticides known to be effective against ACP. However, certain markets and customer responses to the discovery of ACP and the related quarantine could result in a significant decline in revenue due to restrictions on where our lemons can be sold and lower demand for our lemons. Additional government regulations and other quarantine requirements or customer handling and inspection requirements could increase agribusiness costs to us. Our citrus orchards could be at risk if ACP starts to transmit the HLB disease to our trees. Agribusiness costs could also increase significantly as a result of HLB. For example, a recent study in Florida indicated the presence of HLB has increased citrus production costs by as much as 40%.
The costs to control these diseases and other infestations vary depending on the severity of the damage and the extent of the plantings affected. Moreover, there can be no assurance that available technologies to control such infestations will continue to be effective. These infestations can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition
Our business is highly competitive and we cannot assure you that we will maintain our current market share.
Many companies compete in our different businesses. However, only a few well-established companies operate on an international, national and regional basis with one or several product lines. We face strong competition from these and other companies in all our product lines.
Important factors with respect to our competitors include the following:
| · | Some of our competitors may have greater operating flexibility and, in certain cases, this may permit them to respond better or more quickly to changes in the industry or to introduce new products and packaging more quickly and with greater marketing support. |
| · | We cannot predict the pricing or promotional actions of our competitors or whether those actions will have a negative effect on us. |
There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete effectively with our present and future competitors, and our ability to compete could be materially adversely affected by our debt levels and debt service requirements.
Our strategy of marketing and selling our lemons directly to our food service, wholesale and retail customers may not continue to be successful.
Prior to November 1, 2010, most of our lemons were marketed and sold under the Sunkist brand to food service industry wholesale and retail customers in the United States, Canada, Asia and certain other markets primarily through Sunkist, an agricultural marketing cooperative. Effective November 1, 2010, we terminated the Sunkist License Agreement and began to market and sell our lemons directly to our food service, wholesale and retail customers throughout the United States, Canada, Asia, Australia and certain other international markets. This strategy represents a significant departure from our traditional method of selling our lemons through Sunkist.
Obtaining and retaining customers, particularly chain stores and other large customers, is highly competitive, and the prices or other terms of our sales arrangements may not be sufficient to retain existing business, maintain current levels of profitability or obtain new business. Industry consolidation (horizontally and vertically) and other factors have increased the buying leverage of the major grocery retailers in our markets, which may put further downward pressure on our pricing and volume and could adversely affect our results of operations.
16
We depend on our relationship with Calavo and their ability to sell our avocados. Any disruption in this relationship could harm our sales.
We sell 100% of the avocados we grow to Calavo and depend on their willingness and ability to market and sell our avocados to consumers. Calavo sources its avocados from many growers and we cannot control who they will purchase from and how large their orders may be. Should there be any change in our current relationship structure, whereby they buy our entire avocado crop, we would need to find replacement buyers to purchase our remaining crop, which could take time and expense and may result in less favorable terms of sale. Any loss of Calavo as a customer on a whole may cause a material loss in our profits, as they currently purchase 100% of our avocado crop and it may take time to fill any such void.
Our earnings are sensitive to fluctuations in market supply and prices and demand for our products.
Excess supplies often cause severe price competition in our industry. Growing conditions in various parts of the world, particularly weather conditions such as windstorms, floods, droughts and freezes, as well as diseases and pests, are primary factors affecting market prices because of their influence on the supply and quality of product.
Fresh produce is highly perishable and generally must be brought to market and sold soon after harvest. Some items, such as avocados, oranges and specialty citrus, must be sold more quickly, while other items, such as lemons, can be held in cold storage for longer periods of time. The selling price received for each type of produce depends on all of these factors, including the availability and quality of the produce item in the market, and the availability and quality of competing types of produce.
In addition, general public perceptions regarding the quality, safety or health risks associated with particular food products could reduce demand and prices for some of our products. To the extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products that we produce for health or other reasons, and we are unable to modify our products or to develop products that satisfy new consumer preferences, there will be a decreased demand for our products. However, even if market prices are unfavorable, produce items which are ready to be, or have been, harvested must be brought to market promptly. A decrease in the selling price received for our products due to the factors described above could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our earnings may be subject to seasonal variability.
Our earnings may be affected by seasonal factors, including:
| · | the seasonality of our supplies and consumer demand; |
| · | the ability to process products during critical harvest periods; and |
| · | the timing and effects of ripening and perishability. |
Our lemons are generally grown and marketed throughout the year. Our Navel oranges are sold generally January through April and our Valencia oranges are sold generally June through September. Our avocados are sold generally throughout the year with the peak months being February through September. Our specialty citrus is sold generally from November through June and our pistachios and olives are sold in September and October.
Currency exchange fluctuation may impact the results of our operations.
We distribute our products both nationally and internationally. Our international sales are transacted in U.S. dollars. Our results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates in both sourcing and selling locations. In the past, periods of a strong U.S. dollar relative to other currencies have led international customers, particularly in Asia, to find alternative sources of fruit.
Increases in commodity or raw product costs, such as fuel and paper, could adversely affect our operating results.
Many factors may affect the cost and supply of fresh produce, including external conditions, commodity market fluctuations, currency fluctuations, changes in governmental laws and regulations, agricultural programs, severe and prolonged weather conditions and natural disasters. Increased costs for purchased fruit have in the past negatively impacted our operating results, and there can be no assurance that they will not adversely affect our operating results in the future.
The price of various commodities can significantly affect our costs. The cost of petroleum-based products is volatile and there can be no assurance that there will not be further increases in such costs in the future. If the price of oil rises, the costs of our herbicides and pesticides can be significantly impacted.
17
The cost of paper is also significant to us because some of our products are packed in cardboard boxes for shipment. If the price of paper increases and we are not able to effectively pass these price increases along to our customers, then our operating income will decrease. Increased costs for paper have in the past negatively impacted our operating income, and there can be no assurance that these increased costs will not adversely affect our operating results in the future.
Increases in labor, personnel and benefits costs could adversely affect our operating results.
We primarily utilize labor contractors to grow, harvest and deliver our fruit to our lemon packing house or outside packing facilities. We utilize a combination of employees and labor contractors to process our lemons in our lemon packing facility. Our employees and contractors are in demand by other agribusinesses and other industries. Shortages of labor could delay our harvesting or lemon processing activities or could result in increases in labor costs.
We and our labor contractors are subject to government mandated wage and benefit laws and regulations. For example, the State of California has passed regulations increasing minimum wage rates from $9.00 per hour to $10.00 per hour, effective January 1, 2016. In addition, the effects on medical costs brought about by the recently enacted Affordable Care Act are still being determined in the labor market, but could result in increases in our medical costs or the medical costs of our labor contractors that could be passed on to us.
Changes in immigration laws could impact the ability of Limoneira to harvest its crops.
We engage third parties to provide personnel for our harvesting operations. The availability and number of such workers is subject to decrease if there are changes in U.S. immigration laws. The scarcity of available personnel to harvest our agricultural products could cause harvesting costs to increase or could lead to the loss of product that is not timely harvested, which could have a material adverse effect to our citrus grove operations, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The lack of sufficient water would severely impact our ability to produce crops or develop real estate.
The average rainfall in Ventura, Tulare, San Luis Obispo and San Bernardino Counties in California is substantially below amounts required to grow crops and therefore we are dependent on our rights to pump water from underground aquifers. Extended periods of drought in California may put additional pressure on the use and availability of water for agricultural uses and in some cases Governmental authorities have diverted water to other uses. As California has grown, there are increasing and multiple pressures on the use and distribution of water, which many view as a finite resource. Lack of available potable water can also limit real estate development.
Our water resources include water rights, usage rights and pumping rights to the water in aquifers under, and canals that run through, the land we own. Water for our farming operations is sourced from the existing water resources associated with our land, which includes rights to water in the adjudicated Santa Paula Basin (aquifer) and the un-adjudicated Fillmore and Paso Robles Basins (aquifers). We use ground water and water from local water districts in Tulare County and we use ground water in San Bernardino County. Following our acquisition of Associated we began using ground water in Arizona from the Colorado River through the YMIDD.
The need for water in California has been exacerbated of late as California is currently experiencing one of its most severe droughts on record. Rainfall, snow levels and water content of snow pack are significantly below historical averages. These conditions have resulted in reduced water levels in streams, rivers, lakes, aquifers and reservoirs. The governor of California declared a drought State of Emergency in February 2014. Federal officials who oversee the Central Valley Project, California’s largest water delivery system, announced that no water was to be provided to San Joaquin Valley farmers in 2014 and 2015 and only 50% of the contracted amount will be provided to urban areas from this water system. The impact of the drought on water consumers varies with the sources of available water.
For fiscal year 2015, irrigation costs for our agricultural operations were similar to fiscal year 2014. However, costs may increase as we pump more water than our historical averages and federal, state and local water delivery infrastructure costs may increase to access these limited water supplies. In response to the drought, we have an ongoing plan for irrigation improvements in fiscal year 2016 that includes drilling new wells and upgrading existing wells and irrigation systems.
We believe we have access to adequate supplies of water for our agricultural operations as well as our real estate development and rental operations segments of our business and currently do not anticipate that the California drought will have a material impact on our operating results. However, if the current drought conditions persist or worsen or if regulatory responses to such conditions limit our access to water, our business could be negatively impacted by these conditions and responses in terms of access to water and/or cost of water.
18
The use of herbicides, pesticides and other potentially hazardous substances in our operations may lead to environmental damage and result in increased costs to us.
We use herbicides, pesticides and other potentially hazardous substances in the operation of our business. We may have to pay for the costs or damages associated with the improper application, accidental release or use or misuse of such substances. Our insurance may not be adequate to cover such costs or damages or may not continue to be available at a price or under terms that are satisfactory to us. In such cases, payment of such costs or damages could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Environmental and other regulation of our business, including potential climate change regulation, could adversely impact us by increasing our production cost or restricting our ability to import certain products into the United States.
Our business depends on the use of fertilizers, pesticides and other agricultural products. The use and disposal of these products in some jurisdictions are subject to regulation by various agencies. A decision by a regulatory agency to significantly restrict the use of such products that have traditionally been used in the cultivation of one of our principal products could have an adverse impact on us. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, the EPA is undertaking a series of regulatory actions relating to the evaluation and use of pesticides in the food industry. Similarly, in the EU, regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009 which became effective on June 14, 2011, fundamentally changed the pesticide approval process from the current risk base to hazard criteria based on the intrinsic properties of the substance. These actions and future actions regarding the availability and use of pesticides could have an adverse effect on us. In addition, if a regulatory agency were to determine that we are not in compliance with a regulation in that agency’s jurisdiction, this could result in substantial penalties and a ban on the sale of part or all of our products in that jurisdiction.
There has been a broad range of proposed and promulgated state, national and international regulation aimed at reducing the effects of climate change. Such regulations apply or could apply in countries where we have interests or could have interests in the future. In the United States, there is a significant possibility that some form of regulation will be enacted at the federal level to address the effects of climate change. Such regulation could take several forms that could result in additional costs in the form of taxes, the restriction of output, investments of capital to maintain compliance with laws and regulations, or required acquisition or trading of emission allowances. Climate change regulation continues to evolve, and while it is not possible to accurately estimate either a timetable for implementation or our future compliance costs relating to implementation, we do not believe that such regulation is reasonably likely to have a material effect in the foreseeable future on our business, results of operations, capital expenditures or financial position.
Global capital and credit market issues affect our liquidity, increase our borrowing costs and may affect the operations of our suppliers and customers.
The global capital and credit markets have experienced increased volatility and disruption over the past several years, making it more difficult for companies to access those markets. We depend in part on stable, liquid and well-functioning capital and credit markets to fund our operations. Although we believe that our operating cash flows and existing credit facilities will permit us to meet our financing needs for the foreseeable future, there can be no assurance that continued or increased volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets will not impair our liquidity or increase our costs of borrowing. Our business could also be negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy.
A global economic downturn may have an adverse impact on participants in our industry, which cannot be fully predicted.
The full impact of a global economic downturn on customers, vendors and other business partners cannot be anticipated. For example, major customers or vendors may have financial challenges unrelated to us that could result in a decrease in their business with us or, in extreme cases, cause them to file for bankruptcy protection. Similarly, parties to contracts may be forced to breach their obligations under those contracts. Although we exercise prudent oversight of the credit ratings and financial strength of our major business partners and seek to diversify our risk to any single business partner, there can be no assurance that there will not be a bank, insurance company, supplier, customer or other financial partner that is unable to meet its contractual commitments to us. Similarly, stresses and pressures in the industry may result in impacts on our business partners and competitors, which could have wide ranging impacts on the future of the industry.
19
We are subject to the risk of product contamination and product liability claims.
The sale of food products for human consumption involves the risk of injury to consumers. Such injuries may result from tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination or spoilage, including the presence of foreign objects, substances, chemicals, other agents, or residues introduced during the growing, storage, handling or transportation phases. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. We maintain product liability insurance, however, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage.
We are subject to transportation risks.
An extended interruption in our ability to ship our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, any extended disruption in the distribution of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we believe we are adequately insured and would attempt to transport our products by alternative means if we were to experience an interruption due to strike, natural disasters or otherwise, we cannot be sure that we would be able to do so or be successful in doing so in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Events or rumors relating to LIMONEIRA or our other trademarks and related brands could significantly impact our business.
Consumer and institutional recognition of the LIMONEIRA, Santa®, Paula®, Bridal Veil®, Fountain®, Golden Bowl®, Level®, Kiva® and Kachina® trademarks and related brands and the association of these brands with high quality and safe food products are an integral part of our business. The occurrence of any events or rumors that cause consumers and/or institutions to no longer associate these brands with high quality and safe food products may materially adversely affect the value of our brand names and demand for our products.
We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect our prospects.
We currently depend heavily on the services of our key management personnel. The loss of any key personnel could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or our ability to pursue land development. Our success will also depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional qualified management personnel.
Inflation can have a significant adverse effect on our operations.
Inflation can have a major impact on our farming operations. The farming operations are most affected by escalating costs and unpredictable revenues (due to an oversupply of certain crops) and very high irrigation water costs. High fixed water costs related to our farm lands will continue to adversely affect earnings. Prices received for many of our products are dependent upon prevailing market conditions and commodity prices. Therefore, it is difficult for us to accurately predict revenue, just as we cannot pass on cost increases caused by general inflation, except to the extent reflected in market conditions and commodity prices.
System security risks, data protection breaches, cyber-attacks and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations or services provided to customers, and any such disruption could reduce our expected revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our stock price.
Computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third parties, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, cessation of service and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, packing, distribution or other critical functions.
20
Portions of our IT infrastructure also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with systems integration or migration work that takes place from time to time. We may not be successful in implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business disruptions and be more expensive, time consuming, disruptive and resource-intensive. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other processes. Delayed sales, lower margins or lost customers resulting from these disruptions could adversely affect our financial results, stock price and reputation.
Government regulation could increase our costs of production and increase legal and regulatory expenses.
Growing, packaging, storing and distributing food products are activities subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation, as well as foreign regulation. These aspects of our operations are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), the USDA and various state and local public health and agricultural agencies. On January 4, 2011, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, which is intended to ensure food safety, was enacted. This Act provides direct recall authority to the FDA and includes a number of other provisions designed to enhance food safety, including increased inspections by the FDA of food facilities. Our business is also affected by import and export controls and similar laws and regulations, both in the United States and elsewhere. Issues such as health and safety, which may slow or otherwise restrict imports and exports, could adversely affect our business. In addition, the modification of existing laws or regulations or the introduction of new laws or regulations could require us to make material expenditures or otherwise adversely affect the way that we have historically operated our business.
Our strategy to expand international production and marketing may not be successful and may subject us to risks associated with doing business in corrupt environments.
While we intend to expand our lemon supply sources to international markets and explore opportunities to expand our international production and marketing of lemons, we may not be successful in implementing this strategy. Additionally, in many countries outside of the United States, particularly in those with developing economies, it may be common for others to engage in business practices prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar local anti-bribery laws. These laws generally prohibit companies and their employees, contractors or agents from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Failure to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The acquisition of other businesses could pose risks to our operating income.
We intend to continue to consider acquisition prospects that we think complement our business. While we are not currently a party to any agreement with respect to any acquisitions, we may acquire other businesses in the future. Future acquisitions by us could result in accounting charges, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, and increased debt and contingent liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the market price of our common stock. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including the integration of the acquired operations, diversion of management’s attention to other business concerns, risks of entering markets in which we have limited prior experience, and potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations. We may be unable to successfully integrate businesses or the personnel of any business that might be acquired in the future, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business and on the market price of our common stock.
We depend on our infrastructure to have sufficient capacity to handle our annual lemon production needs.
We have an infrastructure that has sufficient capacity for our lemon production needs, but if we lose machinery or facilities due to natural disasters or mechanical failure, we may not be able to operate at a sufficient capacity to meet our lemon production needs. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, which could impact our results of operations and our financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations.
To service our debt, we require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash, make scheduled payments or refinance our obligations depends on our successful financial and operating performance. Our financial and operating performance, cash flow and capital resources depend upon prevailing economic conditions and various financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include among others:
| · | economic and competitive conditions; |
| · | changes in laws and regulations; |
21
| · | operating difficulties, increased operating costs or pricing pressures we may experience; and |
| · | delays in implementing any strategic projects. |
If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell material assets or operations, obtain additional capital or restructure our debt. If we are required to take any actions referred to above, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or that these actions would enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our various debt agreements.
Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments restrict or prohibit our ability to engage in or enter into a variety of transactions, which could adversely restrict our financial and operating flexibility and subject us to other risks.
Our revolving credit and term loan facilities contain various restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions. In particular, these agreements limit our ability to, among other things:
| · | incur additional indebtedness; |
| · | make certain investments or acquisitions; |
| · | create certain liens on our assets; |
| · | engage in certain types of transactions with affiliates; |
| · | merge, consolidate or transfer substantially all our assets; and |
| · | transfer and sell assets. |
Our revolving credit facility (the “Rabobank Credit Facility”) with Rabobank contains a financial covenant that requires us to maintain compliance with a specified debt service coverage ratio on an annual basis. At October 31, 2015 and 2014, we were in compliance with such debt service coverage ratio. Our failure to comply with this covenant in the future may result in the declaration of an event of default under our Rabobank Credit Facility.
Any or all of these covenants could have a material adverse effect on our business by limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition or other corporate opportunities and to fund our operations. Any future debt could also contain financial and other covenants more restrictive than those imposed under our line of credit and term loan facilities. A breach of a covenant or other provision in any credit facility governing our current and future indebtedness could result in a default under that facility and, due to cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in a default under our other credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under any of our credit facilities, the applicable lender(s) could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and, with respect to our revolving credit facility, terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, our lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under our current or future indebtedness were to accelerate the payment of the indebtedness, we cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay in full our outstanding indebtedness.
Despite our relatively high current indebtedness levels and the restrictive covenants set forth in agreements governing our indebtedness, we may still incur significant additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness. Incurring more indebtedness could increase the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.
Subject to the restrictions in our credit facilities, we may incur significant additional indebtedness. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could increase.
22
Some of our debt is based on variable rates of interest, which could result in higher interest expenses in the event of an increase in the interest rates.
Our Rabobank Credit Facility and certain of our term and non-revolving loans that we have with Farm Credit West and its affiliates and Wells Fargo currently bear interest at variable rates, which will generally change as interest rates change. We bear the risk that the rates we are charged by our lenders will increase faster than the earnings and cash flow of our business, which could reduce profitability, adversely affect our ability to service our debt, cause us to breach covenants contained in our Rabobank Credit Facility, or our Farm Credit West Term Loans or Farm Credit West Line of Credit or our Wells Fargo interim funding agreement, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, while we have entered into interest rate swaps as hedging instruments to fix a substantial portion of the variable component of our indebtedness, such interest rate swaps could also have an adverse impact on the comparative results of our operation if prevailing interest rates remain below fixed rates established in such instruments.
Risks Related to Our Real Estate Development Division
We are involved in a cyclical industry and are affected by changes in general and local economic conditions.
The real estate development industry is cyclical and is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions, including:
| · | employment levels; |
| · | availability of financing; |
| · | interest rates; |
| · | consumer confidence; |
| · | demand for the developed product, whether residential or industrial; |
| · | supply of similar product, whether residential or industrial; and |
| · | local, state and federal government regulation, including eminent domain laws, which may result in taking for less compensation than the owner believes the property is worth. |
The process of project development and the commitment of financial and other resources occur long before a real estate project comes to market. A real estate project could come to market at a time when the real estate market is depressed. It is also possible in a rural area like ours that no market for the project will develop as projected.
A recession in the global economy, or a downturn in national or regional economic conditions, could adversely impact our real estate development business.
Future economic instability or tightening in the credit markets could lead to another housing market collapse, which could adversely affect our real estate development operations. Our future real estate sales, revenues, financial condition and results of operations could suffer as a result. Our business is especially sensitive to economic conditions in California and Arizona, where our properties are located.
Higher interest rates and lack of available financing can have significant impacts on the real estate industry.
Higher interest rates generally impact the real estate industry by making it harder for buyers to qualify for financing, which can lead to a decrease in the demand for residential, commercial or industrial sites. Any decrease in demand will negatively impact our proposed developments. Since the most recent recession, the U.S. Federal Reserve has taken actions which have resulted in low interest rates prevailing in the marketplace for a historically long period of time. In December 2015, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point. Market interest rates may continue to increase and the increase may materially and negatively affect us. Lack of available credit to finance real estate purchases can also negatively impact demand. Any downturn in the economy or consumer confidence can also be expected to result in reduced housing demand and slower industrial development, which would negatively impact the demand for land we are developing
23
We are subject to various land use regulations and require governmental approvals for our developments that could be denied.
In planning and developing our land, we are subject to various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, infrastructure design, subdivision of land, and construction. All of our new developments require amending existing general plan and zoning designations, so it is possible that our entitlement applications could be denied. In addition, the zoning that ultimately is approved could include density provisions that would limit the number of homes and other structures that could be built within the boundaries of a particular area, which could adversely impact the financial returns from a given project. In addition, many states, cities and counties (including Ventura County) have in the past approved various “slow growth” or “urban limit line” measures.
If unforeseen regulatory challenges with East Areas I and II occur, we may not be able to develop these projects as planned and the approximately $59.0 million investment we have in the projects could be impaired in the future.
Third-party litigation could increase the time and cost of our real estate development efforts.
The land use approval processes we must follow to ultimately develop our projects have become increasingly complex. Moreover, the statutes, regulations and ordinances governing the approval processes provide third parties the opportunity to challenge the proposed plans and approvals. As a result, the prospect of third-party challenges to planned real estate developments provides additional uncertainties in real estate development planning and entitlements. Third-party challenges in the form of litigation would, by their nature, adversely affect the length of time and the cost required to obtain the necessary approvals. In addition, adverse decisions arising from any litigation would increase the costs and length of time to obtain ultimate approval of a project and could adversely affect the design, scope, plans and profitability of a project.
We are subject to environmental regulations and opposition from environmental groups that could cause delays and increase the costs of our real estate development efforts or preclude such development entirely.
Environmental laws that apply to a given site can vary greatly according to the site’s location and condition, the present and former uses of the site, and the presence or absence of sensitive elements like wetlands and endangered species. Environmental laws and conditions may (i) result in delays, (ii) cause us to incur additional costs for compliance, where a significant amount of our developable land is located, mitigation and processing land use applications, or (iii) preclude development in specific areas. In addition, in California, third parties have the ability to file litigation challenging the approval of a project, which they usually do by alleging inadequate disclosure and mitigation of the environmental impacts of the project. While we have worked with representatives of various environmental interests and wildlife agencies to minimize and mitigate the impacts of our planned projects, certain groups opposed to development may oppose our projects vigorously, so litigation challenging their approval could occur. Recent concerns over the impact of development on water availability and global warming increases the breadth of potential obstacles that our developments face.
Our developable land is concentrated entirely in California and Arizona.
All of our developable land is located in California and Arizona, and our business is especially sensitive to the economic conditions within California. Any adverse change in the economic climate of California, Arizona, or our regions of those states, and any adverse change in the political or regulatory climate of California or Arizona, or the counties where our land is located in such states, could adversely affect our real estate development activities. Ultimately, our ability to sell or lease lots may decline as a result of weak economic conditions or restrictive regulations.
If the real estate industry weakens or instability of the mortgage industry and commercial real estate financing exists, it could have an adverse effect on our real estate business.
Our residential housing projects are currently in various stages of planning and entitlement, and therefore they have not been impacted by the downturn in the housing market or the mortgage lending crisis. Recent trends in the housing market have been improving; however, if the residential real estate market weakens or instability of the mortgage industry and commercial real estate financing exists, our residential real estate business could be adversely affected. An excess supply of homes available due to foreclosures or the expectation of deflation in house prices could also have a negative impact on our ability to sell our inventory when it becomes available.
We rely on contractual arrangements with third party advisors to assist us in carrying out our real estate development projects and are subject to risks associated with such arrangements.
We utilize third party contractor and consultant arrangements to assist us in operating our real estate development segment. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective in providing direct control over this business segment. For example, our third party advisors could fail to take actions required for our real estate development businesses despite its contractual obligation to do so. If the third party advisors fail to perform under their agreements with us, we may have to rely on legal remedies under the law, which may not be effective. In addition, we cannot assure you that our third party advisors would always act in our best interests.
24
If we are unable to complete land development projects within forecasted time and budget expectations, if at all, our financial results may be negatively affected.
We intend to develop land and real estate properties as suitable opportunities arise, taking into consideration the general economic climate. New real estate development projects have a number of risks, including the following:
| · | Construction delays or cost overruns that may increase project costs; |
| · | Receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations; |
| · | Development costs incurred for projects that are not pursued to completion; |
| · | Earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires or other natural disasters that could adversely affect a project; |
| · | Defects in design or construction that may result in additional costs to remedy or require all or a portion of a property to be closed during the period required to rectify the situation; |
| · | Our ability to raise capital; |
| · | The impact of governmental assessments such as park fees or affordable housing requirements; |
| · | Governmental restrictions on the nature and size of a project or timing of completion; and |
| · | The potential lack of adequate building/construction capacity for large development projects. |
If any development project is not completed on time or within budget, our financial results may be negatively affected.
If we are unable to obtain required land use entitlements at reasonable costs, or at all, our operating results would be adversely affected.
The financial performance of our Real Estate segment is closely related to our success in obtaining land use entitlements for proposed development projects. Obtaining all of the necessary entitlements to develop a parcel of land is often difficult, costly and may take several years, or more, to complete. In some situations, we may be unable to obtain the necessary entitlements to proceed with a real estate development or may be required to alter our plans for the development. Delays or failures to obtain these entitlements may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We could experience a reduction in revenues or reduced cash flows if we are unable to obtain reasonably priced financing to support our real estate development projects and land development activities.
The real estate development industry is capital intensive, and development requires significant up-front expenditures to develop land and begin real estate construction. Accordingly, we have and may continue to incur substantial indebtedness to finance our real estate development and land development activities. Although we believe that internally generated funds and current and available borrowing capacity will be sufficient to fund our capital and other expenditures, including additional land acquisition, development and construction activities, and the amounts available from such sources may not be adequate to meet our needs. If such sources were insufficient, we would seek additional capital in the form of debt from a variety of potential sources, including bank financing. The availability of borrowed funds to be used for additional land acquisition, development and construction may be greatly reduced, and the lending community may require increased amounts of equity to be invested in a project by borrowers in connection with new loans. The failure to obtain sufficient capital to fund our planned expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations and our results of operations in future periods.
We may encounter risks associated with the real estate joint venture we entered into on November 10, 2015 with the Lewis Group of Companies including:
| · | the joint venture may not perform financially or operationally as expected; |
| · | land values, project costs, sales absorption or other assumptions included in the development plans may cause the joint venture’s operating results to be less than expected; |
25
| · | the joint venture may not be able to obtain project loans on acceptable terms; |
| · | the joint venture partners may not be able to provide capital to the joint venture in the event external financing or project cash flows are not sufficient to finance the joint venture’s operations; |
| · | the joint venture partners may not manage the project properly; and | |
| · | disagreements could occur between the joint venture partners that could affect the operating results of the joint venture or could result in a sale of a partner’s interest or the joint venture at undesirable values. |
We may encounter other risks that could impact our ability to develop our land.
We may also encounter other difficulties in developing our land, including:
| · | natural risks, such as geological and soil problems, earthquakes, fire, heavy rains and flooding and heavy winds; |
| · | shortages of qualified trades people; |
| · | reliance on local contractors, who may be inadequately capitalized; |
| · | shortages of materials; and |
| · | increases in the cost of certain materials. |
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
The value of our common stock could be volatile.
The overall market and the price of our common stock may fluctuate greatly and we cannot assure you that you will be able to resell shares at or above market price. The trading price of our common stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including:
| · | quarterly fluctuations in our operating results; |
| · | changes in investors’ and analysts’ perception of the business risks and conditions of our business; |
| · | our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors; |
| · | unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts; |
| · | fluctuations in the stock prices of our peer companies or in stock markets in general; and |
| · | general economic or political conditions. |
Concentrated ownership of our common stock creates a risk of sudden change in our share price.
As of October 31, 2015, directors and members of our executive management team beneficially owned or controlled approximately 4.9% of our common stock. Investors who purchase our common stock may be subject to certain risks due to the concentrated ownership of our common stock. The sale by any of our large stockholders of a significant portion of that stockholder’s holdings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the registration of any significant amount of additional shares of our common stock will have the immediate effect of increasing the public float of our common stock and any such increase may cause the market price of our common stock to decline or fluctuate significantly.
Our charter documents contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders. These provisions include the following:
| · | division of our board of directors into three classes, with each class serving a staggered three-year term; |
| · | removal of directors by stockholders by a supermajority of two-thirds of the outstanding shares; |
26
| · | ability of the board of directors to authorize the issuance of preferred stock in series without stockholder approval; and |
| · | prohibitions on our stockholders that prevent them from acting by written consent and limitations on calling special meetings. |
We incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly traded company.
As a Company with publicly traded securities, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting and other expenses not historically incurred. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules promulgated by the SEC and NASDAQ, require us to adopt corporate governance practices applicable to U.S. public companies. These rules and regulations may increase our legal and financial compliance costs, which could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Real Estate
We own our corporate headquarters in Santa Paula, California. We own approximately 8,400 acres of farm land in California, with approximately 4,000 acres located in Ventura County and approximately 3,100 acres located in Tulare County, which is in the San Joaquin Valley, and we own approximately 1,300 acres located in Yuma, Arizona. We lease approximately 30 acres of land located in Ventura County, approximately 800 acres in Tulare County and approximately 400 acres in San Bernardino County. We also have an interest in a partnership that owns approximately 200 acres of land in Ventura County. The land used for agricultural plantings consists of approximately 4,200 acres of lemons, approximately 1,100 acres of avocados, approximately 1,400 acres of oranges and approximately 800 acres of specialty citrus and other crops. Our agribusiness land holdings are summarized below as of October 31, 2015:
| Ranch Name | Acres | Book Value | Acquisition Date | Book Value per Acre | ||||||||||
| Limoneira/Olivelands Ranch | 1,700 | $ | 767,000 | 1907, 1913, 1920 | $ | 451 | ||||||||
| Orchard Farm Ranch | 1,100 | 3,240,000 | 1990 | $ | 2,945 | |||||||||
| La Campana Ranch | 300 | 758,000 | 1964 | $ | 2,526 | |||||||||
| Teague McKevett Ranch | 500 | 8,253,000 | 1994 | $ | 16,506 | |||||||||
| Rancho La Cuesta Ranch | 200 | 2,899,000 | 1994 | $ | 14,495 | |||||||||
| Porterville Ranch | 700 | 6,427,000 | 1997 | $ | 9,181 | |||||||||
| Ducor Ranch | 900 | 6,064,000 | 1997 | $ | 6,738 | |||||||||
| Jencks Ranch | 100 | 846,000 | 2007 | $ | 8,460 | |||||||||
| Stage Coach Ranch | 100 | 603,000 | 2012 | $ | 6,030 | |||||||||
| Martinez Ranch | 200 | 1,363,000 | 2012 | $ | 6,815 | |||||||||
| Associated Citrus Packers, Inc. | 1,300 | 15,035,000 | 2013 | $ | 11,565 | |||||||||
| Lemons 400 | 800 | 5,180,000 | 2013 | $ | 6,475 | |||||||||
| Other agribusiness land | 500 | 4,685,000 | various | $ | 9,370 | |||||||||
| 8,400 | $ | 56,120,000 | ||||||||||||
The book value of our agribusiness land holdings of $56,120,000 differs from the land balance of $48,211,000 included in property plant and equipment in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Form 10-K. The table above presents our current land holdings in agribusiness operations and, therefore, excludes leased farm land, rental and real estate development land and includes the Teague McKevett Ranch, which is classified as real estate development in the consolidated financial statements because of its planned development as East Areas I and II.
We own our packing facilities located in Santa Paula, California and Yuma, Arizona, where we process and pack our lemons as well as lemons for other growers. We are in the process of upgrading our Santa Paula packing facility for additional capacity and are scheduled to complete the upgrade in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. In 2008, we entered into an operating lease agreement and completed the installation of a 5.5 acre, one-megawatt ground-based photovoltaic solar generator, which provides the majority of the power to operate our packing facility. In 2009, we completed the installation of a one-megawatt solar array (which we also lease through an operating lease agreement), which provides us with a majority of the electricity required to operate four deep water well pumps at one of our ranches in the San Joaquin Valley.
27
We own approximately 250 residential units in Santa Paula, California that we lease as part of our rental operations segment to our employees, former employees and outside tenants and we own several commercial office buildings and properties that are leased to various tenants. We have built 65 out of a total approved 71 additional residential rental units in Ventura County, California which we began renting in May 2015.
We own real estate development property in the California counties of San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara and Ventura. These properties are in various stages of development for up to approximately 1,800 residential units and approximately 811,000 square feet of commercial space.
Water and Mineral Rights
Our water resources include water rights, usage rights and pumping rights to the water in aquifers under, and canals that run through, the land we own. We believe we have adequate supplies of water for our agricultural operations as well as our rental and real estate development segments of our business and currently do not anticipate that the California drought will have a material impact on our operating results. Water for our farming operations located in Ventura County, California is sourced from the existing water resources associated with our land, which includes approximately 8,600 acre feet of adjudicated water rights in the Santa Paula Basin (aquifer) and the un-adjudicated Fillmore Basin. We use a combination of ground water provided by wells which derive water from the San Joaquin Valley Basin and water from various water districts and irrigation districts in Tulare County, California, which is in the agriculturally productive San Joaquin Valley. We use ground water provided by wells which derive water from the Cadiz Valley Basin at the Cadiz Ranch in San Bernardino County, California. Our Windfall Farms property located in San Luis Obispo County, California obtains water from wells which derive water from the Paso Robles Basin. Our Associated Citrus Packers farming operations in Yuma, Arizona source water from the Colorado River through the YMIDD, where we have access to approximately 11,700 acre feet of Class 3 Colorado River water rights.
Our rights to extract groundwater from the Santa Paula Basin are governed by the Santa Paula Basin Judgment (the “Judgment”). The Judgment was entered in 1996 by stipulation among the United Water Conservation District, the City of Ventura and various members of the Santa Paula Basin Pumpers Association (the “Association”). The Association is a not-for-profit, mutual benefit corporation, which represents the interests of all overlying landowners with rights to extract groundwater from the Santa Paula Basin and the City of Santa Paula. We are a member of the Association. Membership in the Association is governed by the Association's Bylaws.
The Judgment adjudicated and allocated water rights in the Santa Paula Basin among the Association's members and the City of Ventura. The water rights are established and governed by a seven-year moving average (i.e. production can rise or fall in any particular year so long as the seven year average is not exceeded). Under California law, the water rights are considered "property." A perpetual right to water, evidenced by the Judgment, can be exchanged for interests in real property under IRS Code Section 1031 and if condemned by a public agency, just compensation must be paid to the rightful owner. Our rights under the Judgment are perpetual and considered very firm and reliable which reflects favorably upon their fair market value.
For ease of administration, the Association is appointed by the Judgment as the trustee of its members’ water rights and is responsible for coordinating and promoting the interests of its members. The Judgment includes provisions for staged reductions in production rights should shortage conditions develop. It also allows the adjudicated water rights to be leased or sold among the parties. The Judgment established a Technical Advisory Committee composed of the United Water Conservation District, the City of Ventura and the Association to assist the Superior Court of the State of California, Ventura County (the “Court”), with the technical aspects of Santa Paula Basin management. Finally, the Judgment reserves continuing jurisdiction to the Court to hear motions for enforcement or modification of the Judgment as necessary.
Our California water resources include approximately 17,000 acre feet of water affiliated with our owned properties, of which approximately 8,600 acre feet are adjudicated. In connection with our September 6, 2013 acquisition of Associated and its property ownership in Yuma, Arizona and its related membership in the YMIDD, we have been allocated approximately 11,000 acre feet of water sourced from the Colorado River. In December 2013 and revised in December 2014 and 2015, Associated entered into an agreement with the YMIDD to participate in a Pilot Fallowing Program in which Associated has agreed to forego its water allocation for approximately 300 acres of land in exchange for $750 per acre through December 31, 2016, unless terminated sooner by YMIDD. Additionally, we own shares in five not-for-profit mutual benefit water companies. Our investments in these water companies provide us with the right to receive a proportionate share of water from each of the water companies.
We believe water is a natural resource that is critical to economic growth in the western United States and firm, reliable water rights are essential to our sustainable business practices. Consequently, we have long been a private steward and advocate of prudent and efficient water management. We have made substantial investments in securing water and water rights in quantities that are sufficient to support and, we believe will exceed, our long-term business objectives. We strive to follow best management practices for the diversion, conveyance, distribution and use of water. In the future, we intend to continue to provide leadership in the area of, and seek innovation opportunities that promote, increased water use efficiency and the development of new sources of supply for our neighboring communities.
28
We own oil, gas and mineral rights related to our Ventura County, California properties and in fiscal year 2013 we signed a five year lease with Vintage Petroleum, LLC to allow seismic testing on approximately 1,500 acres. In August of 2015, Vintage released its interest in a portion of the lease, reducing its leased acreage to approximately 30 acres. We will receive a 20% royalty if any oil and gas is extracted.
We are from time to time involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Other than proceedings incidental to our business, we are not a party to, nor is any of our property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are, to our knowledge, contemplated by governmental authorities.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “LMNR.” There is no assurance that our common stock will continue to be traded on NASDAQ or that any liquidity will exist for our stockholders.
Market Price
The following table shows the high and low per share price quotations of our common stock for the two most recently completed fiscal years as reported on NASDAQ.
| High | Low | |||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter Ended October 31, 2015 | $ | 20.72 | $ | 15.86 | ||||
| Third Quarter Ended July 31, 2015 | $ | 23.10 | $ | 19.92 | ||||
| Second Quarter Ended April 30, 2015 | $ | 23.96 | $ | 19.88 | ||||
| First Quarter Ended January 31, 2015 | $ | 25.80 | $ | 20.02 | ||||
| 2014 | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter Ended October 31, 2014 | $ | 25.66 | $ | 21.14 | ||||
| Third Quarter Ended July 31, 2014 | $ | 23.40 | $ | 21.11 | ||||
| Second Quarter Ended April 30, 2014 | $ | 23.70 | $ | 20.51 | ||||
| First Quarter Ended January 31, 2014 | $ | 27.41 | $ | 20.77 | ||||
Holders
On December 31, 2015, there were 264 registered holders of our common stock. The number of registered holders includes banks and brokers who act as nominees, each of whom may represent more than one stockholder.
29
Dividends
The following table presents cash dividends per common share declared and paid in the periods shown.
| Dividend | ||||
| 2015 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter Ended October 31, 2015 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| Third Quarter Ended July 31, 2015 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| Second Quarter Ended April 30, 2015 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| First Quarter Ended January 31, 2015 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| 2014 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter Ended October 31, 2014 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| Third Quarter Ended July 31, 2014 | $ | 0.0450 | ||
| Second Quarter Ended April 30, 2014 | $ | 0.0375 | ||
| First Quarter Ended January 31, 2014 | $ | 0.0375 | ||
In December 2015, we increased our quarterly dividend to $0.05 per common share and we expect to continue to pay quarterly dividends at a similar rate to the extent permitted by the financial results of our business and other factors beyond management’s control.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference herein from our Proxy Statement (as defined in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
30
Performance Graph
The line graph above compares the percentage change in cumulative total stockholder return of our common stock registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) with (i) the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends, and (ii) the cumulative total return of Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends. The comparison is presented since April 13, 2010, which is the effective date of our Company’s registration under the Exchange Act.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
31
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total net revenues | $ | 100,311,000 | $ | 103,462,000 | $ | 84,884,000 | $ | 65,828,000 | $ | 52,495,000 | ||||||||||
| Operating income | $ | 4,583,000 | $ | 9,893,000 | $ | 5,398,000 | $ | 4,556,000 | $ | 1,010,000 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,082,000 | $ | 6,991,000 | $ | 4,906,000 | $ | 3,150,000 | $ | 1,598,000 | ||||||||||
| Basic and diluted net income per common share | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 269,526,000 | $ | 246,887,000 | $ | 209,914,000 | $ | 172,622,000 | $ | 159,028,000 | ||||||||||
| Current and long-term debt | $ | 89,824,000 | $ | 68,354,000 | $ | 62,132,000 | $ | 89,635,000 | $ | 82,871,000 | ||||||||||
| Convertible preferred stock | $ | 12,281,000 | $ | 12,331,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per share of common stock | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||||
In fiscal year 2015, we capitalized approximately $15.6 million of costs for the expansion of our lemon packing facility and capitalized approximately $8.0 million of costs related to our East Areas I & II and Windfall Farms real estate development projects. We capitalized approximately $2.7 million of costs in fiscal year 2015 for our agriculture workforce housing project, which was substantially completed in May 2015. Additionally, in February 2015 we purchased $1.2 million of existing lemon trees and irrigation systems on 200 acres of land we lease from Cadiz.
As further described in notes to the consolidated financial statements, during March and April of 2014, pursuant to a Series B-2 Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 21, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 9,300 shares of Series B-2, 4% voting preferred stock with a par value of $100 per share (“Series B-2 Preferred Stock”) to WPI-ACP Holdings, LLC (“WPI”), which is affiliated with Water Asset Management, LLC (“WAM”) for total proceeds of $9.3 million.
As further described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, on September 6, 2013 we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Associated, a privately owned Arizona corporation, for $18.6 million. The purchase price consisted of the issuance of 705,000 unregistered shares of our Company’s common stock with an aggregate value of $16.0 million based on our Company’s stock price on the acquisition date, $1.0 million in cash and the repayment of $1.6 million in Associated’s long term debt. The acquisition was structured as a tax-free reorganization under section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code.
As further described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, on October 11, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Lemons 400 for $8,750,000 cash. This property, located in the town of Porterville in Tulare County, California, consists of approximately 400 acres of productive lemon orchards and 360 acres primarily leased for cattle grazing. The acquisition also included water assets and agricultural equipment and supplies.
32
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
Limoneira Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1990 as the successor to several businesses with operations in California since 1893. We are an agribusiness and real estate development company founded and based in Santa Paula, California, committed to responsibly using and managing our approximately 10,700 acres of land, water resources and other assets to maximize long-term stockholder value. Our current operations consist of fruit production, sales and marketing, real estate development and capital investment activities.
We are one of California’s oldest citrus growers. According to Sunkist, we are one of the largest growers of lemons in the United States and, according to the California Avocado Commission, one of the largest growers of avocados in the United States. In addition to growing lemons and avocados, we grow oranges and a variety of other specialty citrus and other crops. We have agricultural plantings throughout Ventura, Tulare, San Bernardino and San Luis Obispo Counties in California, and Yuma Arizona, which plantings consist of approximately 4,200 acres of lemons, 1,100 acres of avocados, 1,400 acres of oranges and 800 acres of specialty citrus and other crops. We also operate our own packinghouses in Santa Paula, California and Yuma, Arizona, where we process and pack lemons that we grow, as well as lemons grown by others.
Our water resources include water rights, usage rights and pumping rights to the water in aquifers under, and canals that run through, the land we own. Water for our farming operations is sourced from the existing water resources associated with our land, which includes rights to water in the adjudicated Santa Paula Basin (aquifer) and the un-adjudicated Fillmore and Paso Robles Basins (aquifers). We use ground water from the San Joaquin Valley Basin and water from water districts and irrigation districts in Tulare County, which is in California’s San Joaquin Valley and we use ground water from the Cadiz Valley Basin in San Bernardino County. We also use surface water in Arizona from the Colorado River through the Yuma Mesa Irrigation and Drainage District.
For more than 100 years, we have been making strategic investments in California agribusiness and real estate development. We currently have four active real estate development projects in California. These projects include multi-family housing and single-family homes comprised of approximately 250 completed units and another approximately 1,800 units in various stages of development.
We have three business divisions: agribusiness, rental operations and real estate development. Our agribusiness division is comprised of two reportable segments, lemon operations and other agribusiness, and currently generates the majority of our revenue from its farming, harvesting and lemon packing and sales operations; our rental operations division generates revenue from our housing, organic recycling and commercial and leased land operations; and our real estate development division primarily generates revenues from the sale of real estate development projects. From a general view, we see the Company as a land and farming company that generates annual cash flows to support its progress into diversified real estate development activities. As real estate developments are monetized, our agriculture business will then be able to expand more rapidly into new regions and markets.
33
Recent Developments – refer to Part I, Item 1 “Fiscal Year 2015 Highlights and Recent Developments”
Results of Operations
The following table shows the results of operations for:
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | $ | 95,124,000 | 95% | $ | 98,522,000 | 95% | $ | 79,990,000 | 94% | |||||||||||||||
| Rental operations | 5,104,000 | 5% | 4,640,000 | 4% | 4,250,000 | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate development | 83,000 | - | 300,000 | 1% | 644,000 | 1% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total net revenues | 100,311,000 | 100% | 103,462,000 | 100% | 84,884,000 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | 77,186,000 | 81% | 74,325,000 | 79% | 63,607,000 | 80% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Rental operations | 3,440,000 | 4% | 3,073,000 | 3% | 2,601,000 | 3% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate development | 1,330,000 | 1% | 1,400,000 | 2% | 1,333,000 | 2% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Impairments of real estate development assets | - | - | 435,000 | 1% | 95,000 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 13,772,000 | 14% | 14,336,000 | 15% | 11,850,000 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 95,728,000 | 100% | 93,569,000 | 100% | 79,486,000 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | 17,938,000 | 24,197,000 | 16,383,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Rental operations | 1,664,000 | 1,567,000 | 1,649,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate development | (1,247,000 | ) | (1,535,000 | ) | (784,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | (13,772,000 | ) | (14,336,000 | ) | (11,850,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income | 4,583,000 | 9,893,000 | 5,398,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (188,000 | ) | - | (124,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income from derivative instruments | - | - | 711,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 40,000 | 60,000 | 85,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. | 5,033,000 | - | 3,138,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of Wilson Ranch | 935,000 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity in earnings (losses) of investments | 243,000 | 263,000 | (1,449,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 410,000 | 348,000 | 382,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other income | 6,473,000 | 671,000 | 2,743,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 11,056,000 | 10,564,000 | 8,141,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | (3,974,000 | ) | (3,573,000 | ) | (3,235,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,082,000 | $ | 6,991,000 | $ | 4,906,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
34
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Due to significant depreciable assets associated with the nature of our operations and interest costs associated with our capital structure, management believes that earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and adjusted EBITDA, which excludes impairments on real estate development assets when applicable, is an important measure to evaluate our results of operations between periods on a more comparable basis. Such measurements are not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and should not be construed as an alternative to reported results determined in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP information provided is unique to us and may not be consistent with methodologies used by other companies. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are summarized and reconciled to net income which management considers to be the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP as follows:
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,082,000 | $ | 6,991,000 | $ | 4,906,000 | ||||||
| Total interest expense (income), net | 148,000 | (60,000 | ) | (672,000 | ) | |||||||
| Income taxes | 3,974,000 | 3,573,000 | 3,235,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,184,000 | 3,516,000 | 2,403,000 | |||||||||
| EBITDA | 15,388,000 | 14,020,000 | 9,872,000 | |||||||||
| Impairments of real estate development assets | - | 435,000 | 95,000 | |||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 15,388,000 | $ | 14,455,000 | $ | 9,967,000 | ||||||
Fiscal Year 2015 Compared to Fiscal Year 2014
Revenues
Total revenue for fiscal year 2015 was $100.3 million compared to $103.5 million for fiscal year 2014. The 3% decrease of $3.2 million was primarily the result of decreased agribusiness revenues, as detailed below:
| Agribusiness Revenues for the Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | Change | ||||||||||||||
| Lemons | $ | 78,978,000 | $ | 79,726,000 | $ | (748,000 | ) | (1)% | ||||||||
| Avocados | 7,132,000 | 7,374,000 | (242,000 | ) | (3)% | |||||||||||
| Navel and Valencia oranges | 5,626,000 | 7,616,000 | (1,990,000 | ) | (26)% | |||||||||||
| Specialty citrus and other crops | 3,388,000 | 3,806,000 | (418,000 | ) | (11)% | |||||||||||
| Agribusiness revenues | $ | 95,124,000 | $ | 98,522,000 | $ | (3,398,000 | ) | (3)% | ||||||||
| · | Lemons: The decrease in fiscal year 2015 was primarily the result of decreased volume of fresh lemons sold partially offset by higher prices and increased lemon by-product and other lemon sales. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, fresh lemon sales were $67.0 million and $69.8 million, respectively, on 2.7 million and 2.9 million cartons of lemons sold at average per carton prices of $24.81 and $24.07, respectively. The higher average per carton price in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to more favorable overall market conditions. Additionally, lemon by-products, shipping and handling, commissions and other lemon sales were $12.0 million in fiscal year 2015 compared to $9.9 million in fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Avocados: The decrease in fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to lower prices partially offset by increased production. The California avocado crop typically experiences alternating years of high and low production due to plant physiology. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, 7.0 million and 6.7 million pounds of avocados were sold at average per pound prices of $1.02 and $1.10, respectively. Lower prices in fiscal year 2015 were primarily due to increased supply in the marketplace. Additionally, fiscal year 2014 revenue included a $0.1 million avocado crop insurance claim settlement. |
| · | Navel and Valencia oranges: The decrease in fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to lower prices and decreased volume of oranges sold. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, orange sales were $5.6 million and $7.6 million, respectively, on 744,000 and 754,000 40-pound carton equivalents of oranges sold at average per carton prices of $7.56 and $10.08, respectively. The higher prices in fiscal year 2014 were primarily due to decreased market supply resulting from a period of freezing temperatures in California’s San Joaquin Valley during December 2013. |
35
| · | Specialty citrus and other crops: The decrease in fiscal year 2015 is primarily due to lower price and volume of pistachios sold. In fiscal years 2015 and 2014, we sold 70,000 and 111,000 pounds of pistachios at average per pound prices of $4.33 and $6.15, respectively. |
Rental operations revenue was $5.1 million in fiscal year 2015 compared to $4.6 million in fiscal year 2014. The increase in fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to additional rental revenue from 65 newly completed agricultural workforce housing units that we began renting in May 2015 and increased organic recycling and other revenue.
Real estate development revenue was $0.1 million in fiscal year 2015 compared to $0.3 million in fiscal year 2014. The decrease in fiscal year 2015 revenue compared to fiscal year 2014 is primarily due to lower alfalfa production at our Windfall Farms development property. In fiscal years 2015 and 2014, we removed approximately 200 acres of alfalfa and planted vineyards.
Costs and Expenses
Total costs and expenses for fiscal year 2015 were $95.7 million compared to $93.6 million for fiscal year 2014. This 2% increase of $2.1 million was primarily attributable to increases in our agribusiness costs of $2.9 million partially offset by decreases in our real estate development costs and selling, general and administrative expenses of, in aggregate, $1.1 million. Costs associated with our agribusiness division include packing costs, harvest costs, growing costs, costs related to the lemons we procure from third-party growers and depreciation expense. These costs are discussed further below:
| Agribusiness Costs and Expenses for the Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | Change | ||||||||||||||
| Packing costs | $ | 20,644,000 | $ | 17,925,000 | $ | 2,719,000 | 15% | |||||||||
| Harvest costs | 11,742,000 | 11,110,000 | 632,000 | 6% | ||||||||||||
| Growing costs | 20,131,000 | 19,814,000 | 317,000 | 2% | ||||||||||||
| Third-party grower costs | 21,328,000 | 22,649,000 | (1,321,000 | ) | (6)% | |||||||||||
| Depreciation | 3,341,000 | 2,827,000 | 514,000 | 18% | ||||||||||||
| Agribusiness costs and expenses | $ | 77,186,000 | $ | 74,325,000 | $ | 2,861,000 | 4% | |||||||||
| · | Packing costs: Packing costs consist of the costs to pack lemons for sale such as labor and benefits, cardboard cartons, fruit treatments, packing and shipping supplies and facility operating costs. The increase in fiscal year 2015 is primarily due to $2.5 million of costs at our Yuma, Arizona packinghouse which was acquired in June 2014 and higher per carton packing costs. In fiscal years 2015 and 2014, we packed and sold 2.7 million and 2.9 million cartons of lemons at average per carton costs of $7.65 and $6.18, respectively. The increase in average per carton costs is primarily the result of decreased volume of fresh lemons packed and sold. |
| · | Harvest costs: The increase in fiscal year 2015 was primarily attributable to higher lemon harvest costs and higher avocado and olive harvest volumes compared to fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Growing costs: Growing costs, also referred to as cultural costs, consist of orchard maintenance costs such as cultivation, fertilization and soil amendments, pest control, pruning and irrigation. The increase in fiscal year 2015 is primarily due to increased fertilization and soil amendments and pest control costs of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, partially offset by decreased lease expense and pruning costs of $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, compared to fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Third-party grower costs: We sell lemons that we grow and lemons that we procure from other growers. The cost of procuring lemons from other growers is referred to as third-party grower costs. Of the 2.7 million and 2.9 million cartons sold during fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively, 0.9 million (36%) and 1.0 million (36%) were procured from third-party growers at average per carton prices of $22.36 and $21.00, respectively. Additionally, we incurred $1.2 million of costs for purchased, packed fruit for resale compared to $1.6 million in fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Depreciation expense in fiscal year 2015 was $0.5 million higher than fiscal year 2014 primarily due to a net increase in assets placed into service and the acquisition of our Yuma, Arizona packinghouse in June 2014. |
Real estate development expenses for fiscal year 2015 were $1.3 million compared to $1.8 million in fiscal year 2014. In July 2014, we recognized an impairment charge of $0.4 million on our Centennial real estate development project. There were no impairment charges recognized in fiscal year 2015.
36
Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2015 were $13.8 million compared to $14.3 million for fiscal year 2014. This 4% decrease of $0.5 million is primarily attributable to the following:
| · | $1.3 million net decrease in salaries, benefits and incentive compensation primarily due to incentive compensation decreases as a result of a decrease in operating income in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014; and |
| · | $0.9 million increase in legal and consulting expenses associated with our East Area I real estate development project, which resulted in entering into a real estate development joint venture with the Lewis Group of Companies on November 10, 2015. |
Other Income (Expense)
Other income for fiscal year 2015 was $6.5 million compared to $0.7 million for fiscal year 2014. The $5.8 million increase in income is primarily the result of:
| · | $0.2 million increase in net interest expense; |
| · | $5.0 million gain on the sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc.; and |
| · | $0.9 million gain on the sale of Wilson Ranch. |
Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $4.0 million for fiscal year 2015 on pre-tax income of $11.1 million compared to an income tax provision of $3.6 million for fiscal year 2014 on pre-tax income of $10.6 million. Our effective tax rate is 35.9% for fiscal year 2015 compared to an effective rate of 33.8% for fiscal year 2014.
Fiscal Year 2014 Compared to Fiscal Year 2013
Revenues
Total revenue for fiscal year 2014 was $103.5 million compared to $84.9 million for fiscal year 2013. The 22% increase of $18.6 million was primarily the result of increased agribusiness revenues, as detailed below:
| Agribusiness Revenues for the Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | Change | ||||||||||||||
| Lemons | $ | 79,726,000 | $ | 58,137,000 | $ | 21,589,000 | 37% | |||||||||
| Avocados | 7,374,000 | 11,683,000 | (4,309,000 | ) | (37)% | |||||||||||
| Navel and Valencia oranges | 7,616,000 | 5,528,000 | 2,088,000 | 38% | ||||||||||||
| Specialty citrus and other crops | 3,806,000 | 4,642,000 | (836,000 | ) | (18)% | |||||||||||
| Agribusiness revenues | $ | 98,522,000 | $ | 79,990,000 | $ | 18,532,000 | 23% | |||||||||
| · | Lemons: The increase in fiscal year 2014 was primarily the result of higher prices for fresh lemons sold partially offset by decreased volume. During fiscal years 2014 and 2013, fresh lemon sales were $69.8 million and $51.5 million, respectively, on 2.9 million and 3.1 million cartons of lemons sold at average per carton prices of $24.07 and $16.61, respectively. The higher average per carton price in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 was primarily due to more favorable overall market conditions. Additionally, lemon by-products and other lemon sales were $9.9 million in fiscal year 2014 compared to $6.6 million in fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Avocados: The decrease in fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to decreased production partially offset by higher prices. The California avocado crop typically experiences alternating years of high and low production due to plant physiology. During fiscal years 2014 and 2013, 6.7 million and 15.0 million pounds of avocados were sold at average per pound prices of $1.10 and $0.78, respectively. Higher prices in fiscal year 2014 were due to a decreased supply in the marketplace. Additionally, fiscal year 2014 revenue included a $0.1 million avocado crop insurance claim settlement. |
37
| · | Navel and Valencia oranges: The increase in fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to higher prices partially offset by decreased volume. During fiscal years 2014 and 2013, orange sales were $7.6 million and $5.5 million, respectively, on 754,000 and 799,000 40-pound carton equivalents of oranges sold at average per carton prices of $10.08 and $6.88, respectively. The increase in prices in fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to decreased market supply resulting from a period of freezing temperatures in California’s San Joaquin Valley during December 2013. |
| · | Specialty citrus and other crops: The decrease in fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to decreases in peach, plum and olive revenues. In fiscal year 2014, the peach and plum orchards we leased at the Sheldon Ranch were sold by the owners, resulting in a $0.4 million decrease in revenues. Additionally, other crop revenue decreased $0.4 million in fiscal year 2014 primarily due to decreased volume as a result of removing 80 acres of olive orchards at the Sheldon Ranch. |
Rental operations revenue was $4.6 million in fiscal year 2014 compared to $4.3 million in fiscal year 2013. The increase in fiscal year 2014 was primarily due to rent increases for residential housing and agricultural land leases.
Real estate development revenue was $0.3 million in fiscal year 2014 compared to $0.6 million in fiscal year 2013. The decrease in fiscal year 2014 revenue compared to fiscal year 2013 is primarily due to lower alfalfa production at our Windfall Farms development property.
Costs and Expenses
Total costs and expenses for fiscal year 2014 were $93.6 million compared to $79.5 million for fiscal year 2013. This 18% increase of $14.1 million was primarily attributable to increases in our agribusiness costs, real estate development costs and selling, general and administrative expenses of $10.7 million, $0.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Costs associated with our agribusiness division include packing costs, harvest costs, growing costs, costs related to the lemons we procure from third-party growers and depreciation expense. These costs are discussed further below:
| Agribusiness Costs and Expenses for the Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | Change | ||||||||||||||
| Packing costs | $ | 17,925,000 | $ | 16,762,000 | $ | 1,163,000 | 7% | |||||||||
| Harvest costs | 11,110,000 | 9,025,000 | 2,085,000 | 23% | ||||||||||||
| Growing costs | 19,814,000 | 15,675,000 | 4,139,000 | 26% | ||||||||||||
| Third-party grower costs | 22,649,000 | 20,388,000 | 2,261,000 | 11% | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 2,827,000 | 1,757,000 | 1,070,000 | 61% | ||||||||||||
| Agribusiness costs and expenses | $ | 74,325,000 | $ | 63,607,000 | $ | 10,718,000 | 17% | |||||||||
| · | Packing costs: Packing costs consist of the costs to pack lemons for sale such as labor and benefits, cardboard cartons, fruit treatments, packing and shipping supplies and facility operating costs. Per carton packing costs were $6.18 on 2.9 million cartons for fiscal year 2014, compared to $5.41 on 3.1 million cartons for fiscal year 2013. In fiscal year 2014, we incurred $0.7 million of costs to operate our newly acquired packinghouse in Yuma, Arizona. There were no such costs in fiscal year 2013. Additionally, in fiscal year 2014, our Santa Paula, California packinghouse received $0.1 million of rebates from an electricity utility through the California Solar Initiative compared to $0.5 million of rebates in fiscal year 2013. This rebate program expired in the second quarter of fiscal year 2014. Excluding the cost effects of the Yuma packing house and solar rebates, we packed and sold 2.9 million cartons in fiscal year 2014 at average per carton costs of $5.97 compared to 3.1 million cartons packed and sold at average per carton costs of $5.58 in fiscal year 2013. The increase in average per carton costs is primarily the result of decreased volume of fresh lemons packed and sold. |
| · | Harvest costs: The increase in fiscal year 2014 was primarily attributable to higher lemon harvest volumes resulting from the acquisitions of Associated and Lemons 400, partially offset by lower avocado, orange, specialty citrus and other crop harvest volumes compared to fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Growing costs: Growing costs, also referred to as cultural costs, consist of orchard maintenance costs such as cultivation, fertilization and soil amendments, pest control, pruning and irrigation. The increase in fiscal year 2014 is primarily due to $4.1 million of growing costs incurred at Associated and Lemons 400, which were both acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, compared to $1.0 million in fiscal year 2013. Additionally, in fiscal year 2014 we incurred $0.9 million higher additional rent from profit sharing on the Sheldon Ranch lease compared to fiscal year 2013 due to higher orange operating profit. |
38
| · | Third-party grower costs: We sell lemons that we grow and lemons that we procure from other growers. The cost of procuring lemons from other growers is referred to as third-party grower costs. Of the 2.9 million and 3.1 million cartons sold during fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively, 1.0 million (36%) and 1.7 million (55%) were procured from third-party growers at average per carton prices of $21.00 and $11.65, respectively. Additionally, we incurred $1.6 million of costs for purchased, packed fruit for resale compared to $0.6 million in fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Depreciation expense in fiscal year 2014 was $1.0 million higher than fiscal year 2013 due to the acquisitions of Associated and Lemons 400. |
Real estate development expenses for fiscal year 2014 were $1.8 million compared to $1.4 million in fiscal year 2013. The increase in fiscal year 2014 is primarily the result of $0.4 million impairment on our Centennial real estate development project.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2014 were $14.3 million compared to $11.9 million for fiscal year 2013. This 20% increase of $2.4 million is primarily attributable to the following:
| · | $1.6 million increase in salaries, benefits and incentive compensation primarily due to incentive compensation increases as a result of an increase in operating results in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013; |
| · | $0.3 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses incurred at Associated compared to fiscal year 2013; and |
| · | $0.5 million increase in other selling, general and administrative expenses, including certain consulting and legal expenses associated with our strategic growth initiatives, in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013. |
Other Income (Expense)
Other income for fiscal year 2014 was $0.7 million compared to $2.7 million for fiscal year 2013. The $2.0 million decrease in income is primarily the result of:
| · | $0.1 million decrease in interest expense as a result of lower average debt levels due to repayments of long-term debt made with the proceeds from our February 2013 public offering of common stock. As a result, all interest incurred since February 2013 has been capitalized on non-bearing orchards, real estate development projects and significant construction in process; |
| · | $0.7 million decrease in interest income from derivative instruments in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013. The interest rate swap which was the source of the fiscal year 2013 income expired in June 2013; |
| · | $3.1 million gain on the sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. in fiscal year 2013. There was no such sale of stock in fiscal year 2014; and |
| · | $1.7 million increase in equity in earnings of investments in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 was primarily the result of a $1.8 million loss on the sale of HM East Ridge, LLC property in fiscal year 2013. There was no such loss in fiscal year 2014. |
Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $3.6 million for fiscal year 2014 on pre-tax income of $10.6 million compared to an income tax provision of $3.2 million for fiscal year 2013 on pre-tax income of $8.1 million.
Our effective tax rate is 33.8% for fiscal year 2014 compared to an effective rate of 39.7% for fiscal year 2013. The primary reason for this change in our effective tax rate was a decrease in the state income tax rate due to the acquisition of Associated and an increase in the allowable domestic production deduction as a percentage of pre-tax income in fiscal year 2014 over the fiscal year 2013 amounts.
39
Segment Results of Operations
During the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, we changed the composition of our operating segments from three reportable segments to four reportable segments by presenting our lemon operations separate from other agribusiness. This change was made to align operating segments with the basis that our chief operating decision maker uses to review financial information to make operating decisions, assess performance, develop strategy and allocate capital resources. See Note 25, Segment Information, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information regarding our operating segments. All prior period information below has been recast to present results on a comparable basis.
We evaluate the performance of our lemon operations, other agribusiness, rental operations and real estate development segments separately to monitor the different factors affecting financial results. Each segment is subject to review and evaluations related to current market conditions, market opportunities and available resources.
The following table provides segment information for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013:
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Lemon operations: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 78,978,000 | $ | 79,726,000 | $ | 58,137,000 | ||||||
| Costs and expenses | 61,766,000 | 59,412,000 | 49,252,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 17,212,000 | 20,314,000 | 8,885,000 | |||||||||
| Other agribusiness: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 16,146,000 | 18,796,000 | 21,853,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 12,079,000 | 12,086,000 | 12,598,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 4,067,000 | 6,710,000 | 9,255,000 | |||||||||
| Lemon and other agribusiness depreciation and amortization | 3,341,000 | 2,827,000 | 1,757,000 | |||||||||
| Total agribusiness operating income | 17,938,000 | 24,197,000 | 16,383,000 | |||||||||
| Rental operations: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 5,104,000 | 4,640,000 | 4,250,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 2,859,000 | 2,651,000 | 2,213,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 581,000 | 422,000 | 388,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 1,664,000 | 1,567,000 | 1,649,000 | |||||||||
| Real estate development: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 83,000 | 300,000 | 644,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 1,284,000 | 1,756,000 | 1,361,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 46,000 | 79,000 | 67,000 | |||||||||
| Operating loss | (1,247,000 | ) | (1,535,000 | ) | (784,000 | ) | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | (13,772,000 | ) | (14,336,000 | ) | (11,850,000 | ) | ||||||
| Total operating income | $ | 4,583,000 | $ | 9,893,000 | $ | 5,398,000 | ||||||
40
Fiscal Year 2015 Compared to Fiscal Year 2014
The following analysis should be read in conjunction with the previous section “Results of Operations.”
Lemon operations
For fiscal year 2015 our lemon operations segment revenue was $79.0 million compared to $79.7 million for fiscal year 2014; a 1% decrease of $0.7 million.
Costs and expenses associated with our lemon operations segment include packing costs, harvest costs, growing costs and costs related to the fruit we procure from third-party growers. For fiscal year 2015, our lemon operations costs were $61.8 million compared to $59.4 million for fiscal year 2014. The 4% increase of $2.4 million primarily consists of the following:
| · | Packing costs for fiscal year 2015 were $2.7 million higher than fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Harvest costs for fiscal year 2015 were $0.3 million higher than fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Growing costs for fiscal year 2015 were $0.7 million higher than fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Third-party grower costs for fiscal year 2015 were $1.3 million lower than fiscal year 2014. |
Other agribusiness
For fiscal year 2015 our other agribusiness segment revenue was $16.1 million compared to $18.8 million for fiscal year 2014. The 14% decrease of $2.7 million primarily consists of the following:
| · | Avocado revenue for fiscal year 2015 was $0.3 million lower than fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Navel and Valencia orange revenue in fiscal year 2015 was $2.0 million lower than in fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Specialty citrus and other crop revenue for fiscal year 2015 was $0.4 million lower than fiscal year 2014. |
Costs and expenses associated with our other agribusiness segment include harvest and growing costs. Our other agribusiness costs and expenses for fiscal year 2015 were similar to fiscal year 2014 at $12.1 million:
| · | Harvest costs for fiscal year 2015 were $0.4 million higher than fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Growing costs for fiscal year 2015 were $0.4 million lower than fiscal year 2014. |
Lemon and other agribusiness depreciation and amortization for fiscal year 2015 were $3.3 million compared to $2.8 million for fiscal year 2014. The 18% increase of $0.5 million was primarily due to a net increase in assets placed into service and the acquisition of our Yuma, Arizona packinghouse in June 2014.
Rental Operations
Our rental operations segment had revenues of approximately $5.1 million and $4.6 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. The $0.5 million increase in fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to rental revenue from 65 additional agriculture workforce housing units that we began renting in May 2015 and increased organic recycling and other revenue.
Costs and expenses in our rental operations segment were approximately $3.4 million and $3.1 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. Depreciation expense was $0.6 million and $0.4 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Real Estate Development
Our real estate development segment had revenues of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Costs and expenses in our real estate development segment were approximately $1.3 million and $1.8 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
41
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include corporate and other costs and expenses not allocated to the operating segments. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2015 were $0.5 million lower than fiscal year 2014.
Fiscal Year 2014 Compared to Fiscal Year 2013
The following analysis should be read in conjunction with the previous section “Results of Operations.”
Lemon operations
For fiscal year 2014 our lemon operations segment revenue was $79.7 million compared to $58.1 million for fiscal year 2013; a 37% increase of $21.6 million.
Costs and expenses associated with our lemon operations segment include packing costs, harvest costs, growing costs and costs related to the fruit we procure from third-party growers. For fiscal year 2014, our lemon operations costs were $59.4 million compared to $49.2 million for fiscal year 2013. The 21% increase of $10.2 million primarily consists of the following:
| · | Packing costs for fiscal year 2014 were $1.2 million higher than fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Harvest costs for fiscal year 2014 were $3.2 million higher than fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Growing costs for fiscal year 2014 were $3.5 million higher than fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Third-party grower costs for fiscal year 2014 were $2.3 million higher than fiscal year 2013. |
Other agribusiness
For fiscal year 2014 our other agribusiness segment revenue was $18.8 million compared to $21.9 million for fiscal year 2013. The 14% decrease of $3.1 million primarily consists of the following:
| · | Avocado revenue for fiscal year 2014 was $4.3 million lower than fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Navel and Valencia orange revenue in fiscal year 2014 was $2.0 million higher than in fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Specialty citrus and other crop revenue for fiscal year 2014 was $0.8 million lower than fiscal year 2013. |
Costs and expenses associated with our other agribusiness segment include harvest and growing costs. For fiscal year 2014, our other agribusiness costs and expenses were $12.1 million compared to $12.6 million for fiscal year 2013. The 4% decrease of $0.5 million primarily consists of the following:
| · | Harvest costs for fiscal year 2014 were $1.1 million lower than fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Growing costs for fiscal year 2014 were $0.6 million higher than fiscal year 2013. |
Lemon and other agribusiness depreciation and amortization for fiscal year 2014 were $2.8 million compared to $1.8 million for fiscal year 2013. The 56% increase of $1.0 million was due to the acquisitions of Associated and Lemons 400.
Rental Operations
Our rental operations segment had revenues of approximately $4.6 million and $4.3 million in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Revenues for all three areas of this segment (residential and commercial rentals, leased land and organic recycling) were similar year to year.
Costs and expenses in our rental operations segment were approximately $3.1 million and $2.6 million in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense was similar year to year.
42
Real Estate Development
Our real estate development segment had revenues of approximately $0.3 million and $0.6 million in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Costs and expenses in our real estate development segment were approximately $1.8 million and $1.4 million in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include corporate and other costs and expenses not allocated to the operating segments. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2014 were $2.4 million higher than fiscal year 2013.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of the fiscal quarters in the periods ended October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively. The information for each of these quarters is derived from our unaudited interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. All necessary adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been included to fairly present our unaudited quarterly results. As with any agribusiness enterprise, our agribusiness operations are highly seasonal in nature. The harvest and sale of our lemons, avocados, oranges and specialty citrus and other crops occurs in all quarters, but is generally more concentrated during the third quarter.
| (in thousands, except per common share amounts) | Three Months Ended 2015 | |||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: | Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 14,212 | $ | 29,811 | $ | 28,277 | $ | 28,011 | ||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 19,090 | 21,973 | 24,137 | 30,528 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (4,878 | ) | 7,838 | 4,140 | (2,517 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other income (loss), net | 6,029 | 251 | (121 | ) | 314 | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 1,151 | 8,089 | 4,019 | (2,203 | ) | |||||||||||
| Income tax (provision) benefit | (497 | ) | (2,776 | ) | (1,456 | ) | 755 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 654 | $ | 5,313 | $ | 2,563 | $ | (1,448 | ) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||
| Number of shares used in per common share computations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 14,132 | 14,127 | 14,124 | 14,098 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | 14,132 | 14,953 | 14,124 | 14,098 | ||||||||||||
43
| Three Months Ended 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: | Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 16,302 | $ | 36,476 | $ | 24,802 | $ | 25,882 | ||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 20,826 | 23,096 | 21,572 | 28,075 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (4,524 | ) | 13,380 | 3,230 | (2,193 | ) | ||||||||||
| Other income, net | 226 | 160 | 28 | 257 | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (4,298 | ) | 13,540 | 3,258 | (1,936 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income tax (provision) benefit | 1,463 | (4,608 | ) | (1,145 | ) | 717 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (2,835 | ) | $ | 8,932 | $ | 2,113 | $ | (1,219 | ) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||||
| Number of shares used in per common share computations: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 14,078 | 14,064 | 14,050 | 14,030 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | 14,078 | 14,486 | 14,050 | 14,030 | ||||||||||||
The following information compares our fourth quarter ended October 31, 2015 to the fourth quarter ended October 31, 2014. Information concerning comparisons of our first, second and third quarters can be found in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
| · | Total revenues decreased $2.1 million in the three months ended October 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2014 primarily due to decreased lemon revenues of $2.2 million partially offset by increased rental revenues of $0.2 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, we sold 388,000 cartons of fresh lemons, including 125,000 cartons procured from third party growers, at an average per carton price of $25.00, compared to 413,000 cartons of fresh lemons, including 175,000 cartons procured from third party growers, at an average per carton price of $29.06 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. The increased rental revenues were primarily attributable to 65 additional workforce housing units which became available for rent in May 2015 and were fully occupied by September 2015. |
| · | Total costs and expenses decreased $1.7 million in the three months ended October 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2014 primarily due to decreases in agribusiness costs of $1.9 million associated with third-party grower expenses. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, we sold 125,000 cartons of lemons procured from third-party growers at an average per carton cost of $21.36 compared to 175,000 cartons procured from third-party growers, at an average per carton cost of $25.87 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. |
| · | Total other income increased $5.8 million in the three months ended October 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2014 primarily due to the $0.9 million gain recognized on the sale of Wilson Ranch and the $5.0 million gain recognized on the sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. |
| · | Income tax provision increased $2.0 million in the three months ended October 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2014 primarily due to the increase in pre-tax income of $5.4 million. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our liquidity and capital position fluctuates during the year depending on seasonal production cycles, weather events and demand for our products. Typically, our first and last fiscal quarters coincide with the fall and winter months during which we are growing crops that are harvested and sold in the spring and summer, our second and third quarters. To meet working capital demand and investment requirements of our agribusiness and real estate development divisions and to supplement operating cash flows, we utilize our revolving credit facility to fund agricultural inputs and farm management practices until sufficient returns from crops allow us to repay amounts borrowed. Raw materials needed to propagate the various crops grown by us consist primarily of fertilizer, herbicides, insecticides, fuel and water and are readily available from local sources.
44
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $7.7 million, $16.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The significant components of our cash flows provided by operating activities are as follows:
| · | Net income was $7.1 million, $7.0 million and $4.9 million for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The components of net income in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 consist of a decrease in operating income of $5.3 million, an increase in other income of $5.8 million and an increase in income tax provision of $0.4 million. The increase of $2.1 million in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 was primarily attributable to an increase in operating income of $4.5 million, a decrease in other income of $2.1 million and an increase in income tax provision of $0.3 million. |
| · | Depreciation and amortization was $4.2 million, $3.5 million and $2.4 million for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 was primarily the result of an increase in assets placed into service; including 65 agriculture workforce housing units which we began renting in May 2015. The increase in fiscal year 2014 compared to fiscal year 2013 was primarily the result of our acquisition of Associated and Lemons 400. |
| · | Non-cash impairments of real estate development assets were zero, $0.4 million and $0.1 for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| · | We sold 140,000 and 165,000 shares of common stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. in fiscal years 2015 and 2013, respectively, which resulted in gains of $5.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively. No such transactions occurred in fiscal year 2014. |
| · | We sold our Wilson Ranch in fiscal year 2015 which resulted in a gain of $0.9 million. No such transaction occurred in fiscal years 2014 and 2013. |
| · | Loss on disposals of fixed assets of $0.4 million and $0.5 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively, were the result of expenses incurred from orchard removals related to the Pilot Fallowing Program with YMIDD and our 2015 and 2014 orchard redevelopment plans. |
| · | Non-cash stock compensation expense was $1.1 million, $1.1 million and $0.8 million for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which is primarily comprised of vesting of 2012, 2013 and 2014 grants to management under our stock grant performance bonus program plus the directors stock incentive compensation. |
| · | The $0.2 million and $0.3 million equity in earnings of investments for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively, is primarily comprised of earnings from our investment in Limco Del Mar, Ltd. The $1.4 million equity in losses of investments for fiscal year 2013 is primarily comprised of a $1.8 million loss from sale of the HM East Ridge property, partially offset by $0.3 million of earnings from our investment in Limco Del Mar, Ltd. |
| · | Cash distributions from equity investments of $0.8 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were primarily from our investment in Limco Del Mar. Ltd. |
| · | Non-cash interest income from derivative instrument was $0.7 million of income for fiscal year 2013 and consisted of mark to market adjustments to the underlying fair value net liability, partially offset by amortization of the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance. This swap expired in June 2013. |
| · | Accounts receivable, net balance at October 31, 2015 was $7.4 million compared to $7.2 million at October 31, 2014, resulting in a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows of $0.2 million for fiscal year 2015. Accounts receivable, net balance was $7.2 million at October 31, 2014 compared to $6.4 million at October 31, 2013, resulting in a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows of $0.8 million for fiscal year 2014. Accounts receivable, net balance at October 31, 2013 was $6.4 million compared to $4.3 million at October 31, 2012, resulting in a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows of $1.9 million for fiscal year 2013. The decreases in operating cash flows for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 are primarily due to fluctuations in price and volume related to agribusiness revenues. |
| · | Cultural costs used $0.2 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2015 compared to providing $0.4 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2014, primarily due to an initial lower amount of inventory carried at the beginning of fiscal year 2015. Cultural costs provided $0.4 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2014 compared to providing $0.7 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2013, primarily due to an initial higher amount of inventory carried at the beginning of fiscal year 2014 resulting from the acquisitions of Associated and Lemons 400 and the related increase in amortization of such costs in fiscal year 2014. |
45
| · | Prepaid expenses and other current assets provided $0.2 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2015 compared to using $0.4 million in fiscal year 2014. The $0.6 million increase in operating cash flows in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 is primarily due to a $0.4 million decrease in advances paid to lemon suppliers in fiscal year 2015. Prepaid expenses and other current assets used $0.4 million and $0.2 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| · | Income taxes receivable balance at October 31, 2015 was zero compared to $1.1 million at October 31, 2014, resulting in a corresponding increase in operating cash flows of $1.1 million for fiscal year 2015. Income taxes receivable balance at October 31, 2014 was $1.1 compared to zero at October 31, 2013, resulting in a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows of $1.1 million for fiscal year 2014. Income taxes receivable balance at October 31, 2013 was zero compared to $0.7 million at October 31, 2012, resulting in a corresponding increase in operating cash flows of $0.7 million for fiscal year 2013. |
| · | Accounts payable and growers payable used $0.9 million of operating cash flows in fiscal year 2015 and provided $4.1 million and $0.1 million of operating cash flows in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. The $0.9 million of cash used in fiscal year 2015 was primarily the result of a $0.3 million increase in accounts payable and growers payable offset by $1.1 million of capital expenditures accrued but not paid at year-end. The $4.1 million of cash provided in fiscal year 2014 was primarily the result of a $5.1 million increase in accounts payable and growers payable offset by $1.0 million of capital expenditures accrued but not paid at year-end. The $0.1 million of cash provided in fiscal year 2013 was primarily the result of a $1.3 million increase in accounts payable and growers payable partially offset by $0.5 million of capital expenditures accrued but not paid at year-end. The increases in accounts payable and growers payable in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 were primarily due to higher operating expenses, resulting in corresponding higher levels of payables at year-end. |
| · | Accrued liabilities used operating cash flows of $1.7 million in fiscal year 2015 and provided operating cash flows of $0.9 million and $2.0 million for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. The $1.7 million of operating cash flows used in fiscal year 2015 is primarily the result of a $1.6 million decrease in accrued compensation related to incentive compensation payments. The $0.9 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal year 2014 is primarily the result of a $1.3 million increase in accrued compensation and $1.0 million increase in Sheldon Ranch accrued lease expenses offset by $1.7 million decrease in accrued income taxes payable compared to fiscal year 2013. The $2.0 million of cash from operating activities in fiscal year 2013 is primarily the result of a $0.4 million increase in accrued compensation and $1.7 million of accrued income taxes payable compared to fiscal year 2012. |
| · | Other long-term liabilities provided operating cash flows of $2.5 million in fiscal year 2015 and consisted primarily of $2.0 million contribution deposit received for joint venture interest and $0.9 million of non-cash pension expense offset by $0.4 million of pension contributions. The $0.2 million of operating cash flows provided in fiscal year 2014 represented $0.7 million of non-cash pension expense offset by $0.5 million of pension contributions. The $0.3 million of operating cash flows used in fiscal year 2013 represented $1.3 million of pension contributions offset by non-cash pension expense of $1.0 million. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $25.8 million, $28.6 million and $11.5 million, respectively, and is primarily comprised of capital expenditures, business acquisitions, sales of assets and investments. Capital expenditures for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 include amounts incurred on two significant projects to expand and modernize our lemon packing operations and add 65 additional farm worker housing units.
| · | Capital expenditures for fiscal year 2015 were comprised of $24.7 million for property, plant and equipment, $6.5 million for real estate development projects and $3.4 million for an agriculture property acquisition. These investment activities were partially offset by $2.7 million net proceeds from sale of Wilson Ranch and $6.4 million net proceeds from sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. |
| · | Capital expenditures for fiscal year 2014 were comprised of $21.1 million for property, plant and equipment, $4.8 million for real estate development projects and $0.7 million for a business acquisition. Additionally, we invested $1.8 million in Rosales, S.A., a citrus packing, marketing and selling business located in La Serena, Chile. |
| · | Capital expenditures for fiscal year 2013 were comprised of $5.6 million for property, plant and equipment, $4.8 million for real estate development projects, $0.4 million for agriculture property acquisitions and $11.1 for a business acquisition. These investment activities were partially offset by $4.8 million net proceeds from sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. and $5.7 million net proceeds from the sale of HM East Ridge property. |
46
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, net cash provided by financial activities was $18.1 million, $12.5 million, and $5.9 million, respectively.
| · | The $18.1 million of cash provided by financing activities for fiscal year 2015 is primarily comprised of net borrowings of long-term debt in the amount of $21.5 million. Additionally, we paid common and preferred dividends, in aggregate, of $3.2 million in fiscal year 2015. |
| · | The $12.5 million of cash provided by financing activities for fiscal year 2014 is primarily comprised of net borrowings of long-term debt in the amount of $6.3 million and net proceeds from our issuance of Series B-2 Preferred Stock in the amount of $9.3 million. Additionally, we paid common and preferred dividends, in aggregate, of $2.8 million in fiscal year 2014. |
| · | The $5.9 million of cash provided by financing activities in fiscal year 2013 is primarily comprised of net repayment of long-term debt in the amount of $27.5 million and net proceeds from our public offering of common stock in the amount of $35.9 million. Additionally, we paid common and preferred dividends, in aggregate, of $2.2 million in fiscal year 2013. |
Transactions Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources
We finance our working capital and other liquidity requirements primarily through cash from operations and our Rabobank Credit Facility. In addition, we have the Farm Credit West Term Loans, the Farm Credit West Line of Credit and the Wells Fargo interim funding agreement. Additional information regarding the Rabobank Credit Facility, the Farm Credit West Term Loans, the Farm Credit West Line of Credit and the Wells Fargo interim funding agreement can be found in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
We believe that the cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity from existing and available credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy our capital expenditures, debt service, working capital needs and other contractual obligations for fiscal 2016. In addition, we have the ability to control a portion of our investing cash flows to the extent necessary based on our liquidity demands.
Rabobank Credit Facility
As of October 31, 2015, our outstanding borrowings under the Rabobank Credit Facility were $83.8 million and we had $8.8 million of availability. The Rabobank Credit Facility currently bears interest at a variable rate equal to the one month LIBOR plus 1.80%. The interest rate resets on the first of each month and was 1.99% at October 31, 2015. We have the ability to prepay any amounts outstanding under the Rabobank Credit Facility without penalty. In March 2014, we entered into a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2008 in order to, among other things, release Rabobank’s security interest in Teague McKevett Ranch, which is also known as East Area I real estate development project, in Ventura County, California, and grant Rabobank a secured interest in certain of our agriculture properties in Ventura and Tulare Counties. The line of credit provides for maximum borrowings of $100.0 million and the borrowing capacity based on collateral value was $92.6 million at October 31, 2015. We paid debt financing costs of $0.1 million related to this amendment in fiscal year 2014.
We have the option of fixing the interest rate under the Rabobank Credit Facility on any portion of outstanding borrowings using interest rate swaps. Effective July 2013, we fixed the interest rate at 4.30% utilizing an interest rate swap on $40.0 million of Rabobank Credit facility. Additional information regarding the interest rate swap can be found in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
The Rabobank Credit Facility is secured by certain of our agricultural properties and a portion of the equity interest in the San Cayetano Mutual Water Company, and subjects us to affirmative and restrictive covenants including, among other customary covenants, financial reporting requirements, requirements to maintain and repair any collateral, restrictions on the sale of assets, restrictions on the use of proceeds, prohibitions on the incurrence of additional debt and restrictions on the purchase or sale of major assets. We are also subject to a covenant that we will maintain a debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the Rabobank Credit Facility, of less than 1.25 to 1.0 measured annually at October 31, with which we were in compliance at October 31, 2015.
Farm Credit West Term Loans and Non-Revolving Credit Facility
As of October 31, 2015, we had an aggregate of $6.0 million outstanding under the Farm Credit West Term Loans and Farm Credit West Line of Credit. The following provides further discussion on the term loans and non-revolving credit facility:
47
| · | Term Loan Maturing November 2022. As of October 31, 2015, we had $4.2 million outstanding under the Farm Credit West term loan that matures in November 2022. This term loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to an internally calculated rate based on Farm Credit West’s internal monthly operations and their cost of funds and generally follows the changes in the 90-day treasury rates in increments divisible by 0.25% and is payable in quarterly installments through November 2022. The interest rate resets monthly and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. This term loan is secured by certain of our agricultural properties. |
| · | Term Loan Maturing October 2035. As of October 31, 2015, our wholly owned subsidiary, Windfall Investors, LLC, had $1.3 million outstanding under the Farm Credit West Term Loan that matures in October 2035. This term loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to an internally calculated rate based on Farm Credit West’s internal monthly operations and their cost of funds and generally follows the changes in the 90-day treasury rates in increments divisible by 0.25% and is payable in monthly installments through October 2035. The interest rate resets monthly and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. This term loan is secured by the Windfall Farms property. |
| · | Farm Credit West Line of Credit Maturing May 2018. As of October 31, 2015, we had $0.5 million outstanding under the Farm Credit West Line of Credit that matures in May 2018. The line of credit bears interest at a variable rate equal to an internally calculated rate based on Farm Credit West’s internal monthly operations and their cost of funds and generally follows the changes in the 90-day treasury rates in increments divisible by 0.25% with interest payable on a monthly basis. The interest rate resets monthly and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. This line of credit is secured by certain of our agricultural properties. |
The Farm Credit West Term Loans and Farm Credit West Line of Credit contain various conditions, covenants and requirements with which our Company and Windfall Investors must comply. In addition, our Company and Windfall Investors are subject to limitations on, among other things, selling, abandoning or ceasing business operations; merging or consolidating with a third party; disposing of a substantial portion of assets by sale, transfer, gifts or lease except for inventory sales in the ordinary course of business; obtaining credit or loans from other lenders other than trade credit customary in the business; becoming a guarantor or surety on or otherwise liable for the debts or obligations of a third party; and mortgaging, pledging, leasing for over a year, or otherwise making or allowing the filing of a lien on any collateral.
Wells Fargo Equipment Financing
On December 18, 2015, we drew an advance of $8,000,000 from Wells Fargo and became obligated under an interim funding agreement with Wells Fargo. The advance was obtained in connection with us financing the purchase of certain equipment associated with our new lemon packing facilities. Upon the completion of the purchase of the equipment, we intend to include the advance in the aggregate funding of a $10,000,000 term loan pursuant to a Master Loan and Security Agreement and a Loan Schedule with Wells Fargo, with a first priority security interest in the equipment to Wells Fargo. The interest rate on the interim funding is LIBOR plus 2% and the rate will become fixed upon establishment of the term loan.
Interest Rate Swap
We enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage the risks and costs associated with our financing activities. At October 31, 2015, we had an interest rate swap agreement which locks in the interest rate on $40.0 million of our $89.8 million in debt at 4.30% until June 2018.
In November 2011, we entered into a forward interest swap agreement with Rabobank International, Utrecht to fix the interest rate at 4.30% on $40.0 million of our outstanding borrowings under the Rabobank Credit Facility beginning on July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2018. This interest rate swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge and is accounted for as a hedge under the short-cut method. Therefore, the fair value adjustments to the underlying debt are deferred and included in accumulated other comprehensive income and the liability is being recorded in fair value of derivative instrument and other long-term liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2015. Additional information regarding the interest rate swaps can be found in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
The remaining $49.8 million in debt bears interest at variable rates, which were 2.75% or less at October 31, 2015.
48
Real Estate Development Activities and Related Capital Resources
As noted under “Transactions Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources,” we have the ability to control a portion of our investing cash flows to the extent necessary based upon our liquidity demands. In order for our real estate development operations to reach their maximum potential benefit to us, however, we will need to be successful over time in identifying other third party sources of capital to partner with us to move those development projects forward. While we are frequently in discussions with potential external sources of capital in respect to all of our development projects, current market conditions for California real estate projects, while improving, continue to be challenging and make it difficult to predict the timing and amounts of future capital that will be required to complete the development of our projects.
On November 10, 2015, we entered into a joint venture with The Lewis Group of Companies (“Lewis”) for the residential development of our East Area I real estate development project. To consummate the transaction, we formed Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC (the “Joint Venture”) as the development entity, contributed our East Area I property to the Joint Venture and sold a 50% interest in the Joint Venture to Lewis for $20.0 million, comprised of a $2.0 million deposit received in September 2015 and $18.0 million received on November 10, 2015. We expect to receive $100.0 million from the Joint Venture over the estimated 7 to 10 year life of the project. The Joint Venture partners will share in capital contributions to fund project costs until loan proceeds and or revenues are sufficient to fund the project. These funding requirements are currently estimated to total $10.0 to $15.0 million for each Joint Venture partner in the first two years of the project, with a smaller amount of funding expected in the first year. We also entered into a lease agreement with the Joint Venture to lease back a portion of the contributed property, which allows us to continue farming the property during the phased build-out of the project.
Trend Information
Agribusiness Division
The worldwide fresh produce industry has historically enjoyed consistent underlying demand and favorable growth dynamics. In recent years, the market for fresh produce has increased faster than the rate of population growth, supported by ongoing trends including greater consumer demand for healthy, fresh and convenient foods, increased retailer square footage devoted to fresh produce, and greater emphasis on fresh produce as a differentiating factor in attracting customers. Health-conscious consumers are driving much of the growth in demand for fresh produce. Over the past several decades, the benefits of natural, preservative-free foods have become an increasingly significant element of the public dialogue on health and nutrition. As a result, consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables has markedly increased. According to the USDA, Americans consumed 37 more pounds of fresh fruit and vegetables per capita in 2008 than they did in 1988.
The USDA reports that per capita fresh lemon consumption was 3.8 pounds in 2012 and since 2004 has averaged 3.1 pounds per capita versus 2.7 pounds in the 1990s. Approximately 64% of the California crop has gone into the fresh market in the past decade. The fresh market is significantly more profitable than the processed market and the amount of production sold in the fresh market is referred to as fresh utilization. Our fresh utilization has historically been comparable to the California industry average and we expect that our fresh utilization will increase due to increased flexibility to sell lemons directly to food service wholesale and retail customers and increased customer interaction resulting from our direct lemon sales strategy.
According to the USDA, the U.S. per capita consumption of avocados has increased in recent years from 3.1 pounds per capita in 2004 to 5.3 pounds per capita in 2012. A growing Hispanic population, an increasing awareness of healthier foods and the acceptance of mono-unsaturated fats has helped to spur demand for avocados. California is the largest U.S. producer of avocados and the 2011 crop of 550 million pounds was the second largest in the last ten years and fourth largest in California avocado production history. According to the California Avocado Commission, the 2015 crop will produce approximately 283 million pounds compared to 317 million pounds in 2014 and 500 million pounds in 2013.
Navel oranges comprise most of California’s orange crop, accounting for approximately 75% over the past three growing seasons. Valencia oranges account for a vast majority of the remainder of California’s orange crop. While California produces approximately 25% of the nation’s oranges, its crop accounts for approximately 80% of those going to the fresh market. The share of California’s crop going to fresh market, as opposed to the processed market (i.e. juices, oils and essences) varies by season, depending on the quality of the crop.
49
Real Estate Development Division
We believe the residential real estate market is recovering in the locations that we own real estate development property following the well-known economic downturn of the recent past. However, persistent high unemployment is expected to keep home sales at low levels in terms of volume and price. We have incurred impairment charges on certain of our real estate development projects over the last three years and future impairment is possible. Due to these factors, we anticipate maintaining a cautious and patient perspective with respect to our real estate development activities. However, interest rates are also at historically low levels, which provide a favorable buying opportunity for potential home buyers. Additionally, we believe that our real estate development properties have certain unique characteristics and are located in desirable locations, in particular East Area I, and as economic or real estate market conditions improve or other factors arise, we will take advantage of such opportunities to develop our properties.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table presents our contractual obligations at October 31, 2015 for which cash flows are fixed and determinable:
| Payments due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | < 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5+ years | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed rate debt (principal) | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | - | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
| Variable rate debt (principal) | 49,824,000 | 589,000 | 45,563,000 | 1,306,000 | 2,366,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | 6,758,000 | 1,341,000 | 2,486,000 | 854,000 | 2,077,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 96,582,000 | $ | 1,930,000 | $ | 88,049,000 | $ | 2,160,000 | $ | 4,443,000 | ||||||||||
| Interest payments on fixed and variable rate debt | $ | 8,984,000 | $ | 2,856,000 | $ | 5,675,000 | $ | 234,000 | $ | 219,000 | ||||||||||
We believe that the cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity from existing and available and credit facilities will be sufficient to satisfy our future capital expenditure, debt service, working capital and other contractual obligations for fiscal year 2016. In addition, we have the ability to control a portion of our investing cash flows to the extent necessary based on our liquidity demands.
Fixed Rate and Variable Rate Debt
Details of amounts included in long-term debt can be found above and in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The table above assumes that long-term debt is held to maturity.
Interest Payments on Fixed and Variable Debt
The above table assumes that our fixed rate and long term debt is held to maturity and the interest rates on our variable rate debt remains unchanged for the remaining life of the debt from those in effect at October 31, 2015.
Preferred Stock Dividends
In 1997, in connection with the acquisition of Ronald Michaelis Ranches, Inc., we issued 30,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at $100 par value (the “Series B Stock”). The holders of the Series B Stock are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at an annual rate of 8.75% of par value. Such dividends are payable quarterly on the first day of January, April, July and October in each year commencing July 1, 1997 and totaled $0.3 million in each of the fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013.
During March and April 2014, we issued, in aggregate, 9,300 shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock at $100 par value (the “Series B-2 Preferred Stock”). The holders of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at an annual rate of 4% of the liquidation value of $1,000 per share. Such dividends are payable quarterly on the first day of January, April, July and October in each year commencing July 1, 2014. We paid Series B-2 Preferred Stock dividends of approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We have a noncontributory, defined benefit, single employer pension plan (the “Plan”), which provides retirement benefits for all eligible employees of the Company. Effective June 2004, the Company froze the Plan and no additional benefits accrued to participants subsequent to that date. We may make discretionary contributions to the Plan and we may be required to make contributions to adhere to applicable regulatory funding provisions, based in part on the Plan’s asset valuations and underlying actuarial assumptions. We made funding contributions of $0.4 million, $0.5 million, and $1.3 million for fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively and we expect to contribute approximately $0.5 million to the Plan in fiscal year 2016.
50
Operating Lease Obligations
We have numerous operating lease commitments with remaining terms ranging from less than one year to ten years. We have installed a one mega-watt photovoltaic solar array on one of our agricultural properties located in Ventura County that produces a significant amount of the power to run our lemon packinghouse. The construction of this array was financed by Farm Credit Leasing and we have a long-term lease with Farm Credit Leasing for this array. Annual payments for this lease are $0.5 million, and at the end of ten years we have an option to purchase the array for $1.1 million. We entered into a similar transaction with Farm Credit Leasing for a second photovoltaic array at one of our agricultural properties located in the San Joaquin Valley to supply a significant amount of the power to operate four deep-water well pumps located on our property. Annual lease payments for this facility range from $0.3 million to $0.8 million, and at the end of ten years we have the option to purchase the array for $1.3 million. Additionally, we have agreements with an electricity utility through the California Solar Initiative which entitle us to receive rebates for energy produced by our solar arrays. These rebates, which reduced our agribusiness costs and expenses, expired in fiscal year 2014, and were $0.2 million and $1.0 million in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively, and averaged approximately $1.0 million per year since the inception of the leases.
In January 2012, we entered into six operating leases for the Sheldon Ranch. Each of the leases is for ten-year terms and provides for four five-year renewal options with an aggregate base rent of approximately $0.5 million per year. The leases also contain profit share arrangements with the landowners as additional rent on each of the properties and a provision for the potential purchase of the properties by us in the future. We incurred $1.1 million, $1.6 million and $0.7 million of net lease expense in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We purchased substantially all of the Sheldon Ranch leased acreage in September and December 2015 and expect lease expense on the remaining 80 leased acres to be approximately $0.1 million per year beginning fiscal year 2016 until December 2021.
On July 1, 2013, we entered into a lease agreement with Cadiz, Inc. (“Cadiz”) to develop new lemon orchards on Cadiz’s agricultural property in eastern San Bernardino County, California (the “Cadiz Ranch”). Under the terms of the Lease Agreement, we have the right to lease and plant up to 1,280 acres of lemons over the next five years at the Cadiz Ranch operations in the Cadiz Valley and have leased 320 acres initially, subject to a mutually agreed upon planting schedule. The Lease Agreement provides options to plant up to 960 additional acres (320 acres in Option 1 and 640 acres in Option 2) by 2019. The annual rental payment includes a base rent of $200 per planted acre and a lease payment equal to 20% of net cash flow from the harvested crops grown on Cadiz property. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease Agreement, the annual rental payment will not exceed a total of $1,200 per acre. We incurred approximately $0.1 million and $15,000 of lease expense in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On February 3, 2015, we entered into a Modification of Lease Agreement (the “Amendment”) with Cadiz. The Amendment, among other things, increased by 200 acres the amount of property leased by our Company under the lease agreement dated July 1, 2013. In connection with the Amendment, we paid a total of $1.2 million to acquire existing lemon trees and irrigation systems from Cadiz and a Cadiz tenant.
We lease pollination equipment under a lease renewed through fiscal year 2022 with annual payments of $0.3 million. We also lease machinery and equipment for our packing operations and other land for our agricultural operations under leases with annual lease commitments that are individually immaterial.
Real Estate Development Activities, Capital Expenditures and Related Capital Resources
On November 10, 2015 (the “Transaction Date”), we entered into a joint venture with The Lewis Group of Companies (“Lewis”) for the residential development of our East Area I real estate development project. To consummate the transaction, we formed Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC (the “Joint Venture”) as the development entity, contributed our East Area I property to the Joint Venture and sold a 50% interest in the Joint Venture to Lewis for $20.0 million, comprised of a $2.0 million deposit received in September 2015 and $18.0 million received on the Transaction Date. The deposit is included in other long term liabilities as of October 31, 2015. We received net cash of approximately $18.8 million after transaction costs of approximately $1.2 million, which will be expensed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. Our investment in the Joint Venture was reduced by the $20.0 million paid by Lewis. In addition, on the Transaction Date, we incurred a Success Fee with Parkstone Companies, Inc., as described in Note 7, Real Estate Development, in the amount of $2.1 million, which was capitalized as a component of our investment in the Joint Venture.
The Joint Venture agreement provides that Lewis will serve as the initial manager of the Joint Venture with the right to manage, control, and conduct its day-to-day business and development activities. Certain major decisions, which are enumerated in the Joint Venture agreement, require approval by an executive committee comprised of two representatives appointed by Lewis and two representatives appointed by Limoneira.
Pursuant to the Joint Venture agreement, the Joint Venture will own, develop, subdivide, entitle, maintain, improve, hold for investment, market and dispose of the Joint Venture’s property in accordance with the business plan and budget approved by the executive committee.
51
Further on the Transaction Date, the Joint Venture and Limoneira entered into a lease agreement (the "Lease Agreement"), pursuant to which the Joint Venture will lease certain of the contributed East Area I property back to Limoneira for continuation of agricultural operations, and certain other permitted uses, on the property until the Joint Venture requires the property for development. The Lease Agreement provides a rate of $1 per year. We are in the process of determining a fair value rate for the leased property. The Lease Agreement will terminate in stages corresponding to the Joint Venture's development of the property, which is to occur in stages pursuant to a phased master development plan. The Joint Venture is required to provide Limoneira with written notice 180 days prior to the termination of any portion of the Lease Agreement. In any event, the Lease Agreement will terminate five years from the Transaction Date.
Limoneira and the Joint Venture entity also entered into a Retained Property Development Agreement on the Transaction Date (the "Retained Property Agreement"). Under the terms of the Retained Property Agreement, the Joint Venture will transfer certain contributed East Area I property, which is entitled for commercial development, back to Limoneira (the "Retained Property") and arrange for the design and construction of certain improvements to the Retained Property, subject to certain reimbursements by Limoneira.
We expect to receive $100.0 million from the Joint Venture over the estimated 7 to 10 year life of the project. The Joint Venture partners will share in capital contributions to fund project costs until project loan proceeds and or revenues are sufficient to fund the project. These funding requirements are currently estimated to total $10.0 to $15.0 million for each Joint Venture partner in the first two years of the project, with a smaller amount of funding expected in the first year. The Joint Venture partners may be required to provide loans guarantees for project loans.
Capital Expenditures
In December 2013 we entered into a construction contract that includes design and construction services for the expansion of our lemon packing facilities. The project is expected to double the capacity and increase the efficiency of our packing facilities. The contract is subject to a guaranteed maximum price of approximately $9.3 million which was revised to $11.6 million in March 2015 based on design modifications and finalization of construction costs. The project commenced in fiscal year 2014 and is expected to be operational in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 with total construction services and equipment costs of approximately $25.0 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Inflation
Historically, inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations. However, significant increases in inflation could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to develop critical accounting policies and make certain estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, available relevant data and other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions as new or additional information become available in future periods. We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition – As a general policy, revenue and related costs are recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) selling price is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. We record a sales allowance in the period revenue is recognized as a provision for estimated customer discounts and concessions.
52
Agribusiness revenue - Revenue from lemon sales is generally recognized FOB shipping point when the customer takes possession of the fruit from our packing house. Revenue from the sales of certain of our agricultural products is recorded based on estimated proceeds provided by certain of our sales and marketing partners (Calavo and other third-party packinghouses) due to the time between when the product is delivered by us and the closing of the pools for such fruits at the end of each month. Calavo and other third-party packinghouses are agricultural cooperatives or function in a similar manner as an agricultural cooperative. As such, we apply specific authoritative agriculture revenue recognition guidance related to transactions between patrons and agriculture marketing cooperatives to record revenue at time of delivery to the packinghouses relating to fruits that are in pools that have not yet closed at month end if (i) the related fruits have been delivered to and accepted by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses (i.e. title has transferred to Calavo and other third-party packinghouses) and (ii) sales price information has been provided by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses (based on the marketplace activity for the related fruit) to estimate with reasonable certainty the final selling price for the fruit upon the closing of the pools. Historically, the revenue that is recorded based on the sales price information provided to us by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses at the time of delivery have not materially differed from the actual amounts that are paid after the monthly pools are closed. We also earn commissions on certain brokered fruit sales, which totaled $114,000, $115,000 and $53,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Our avocados, oranges, specialty citrus and other specialty crops are packed and sold by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses. Specifically, we deliver all of our avocado production from our orchards to Calavo. These avocados are then packed by Calavo at its packinghouse, and sold and distributed under Calavo brands to its customers primarily in the United States and Canada. Our arrangements with other third-party packinghouses related to our oranges, specialty citrus and other specialty crops are similar to our arrangement with Calavo.
Our arrangements with third-party packinghouses are such that we are the producer and supplier of the product and the third-party packinghouses are our customers. The revenues we recognize related to the fruits sold to the third-party packinghouses are based on the volume and quality of the fruits delivered, and the market price for such fruit, less the packinghouses’ charges to pack and market the fruit. Such packinghouse charges include the grading, sizing, packing, cooling, ripening and marketing of the related fruit. We bear inventory risk until the product is delivered to the third-party packinghouses at which time title and inventory risk to the product is transferred to the third-party packinghouses and revenue is recognized. Such third-party packinghouse charges are recorded as a reduction of revenue based on the application of specific authoritative revenue recognition guidance related to a “Vendor’s Income Statement Characterization of Consideration Given to a Customer.” The identifiable benefit we receive from the third-party packinghouses for packaging and marketing services cannot be sufficiently separated from the third-party packinghouses’ purchase of our products. In addition, we are not able to reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received from the third-party packinghouses for such services and, as such, these costs are characterized as a reduction of revenue in our consolidated statement of operations.
Revenue from crop insurance proceeds is recorded when the amount of and the right to receive the payment can be reasonably determined. We recorded agribusiness revenues from crop insurance proceeds of $9,000, $184,000 and $36,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Rental revenue - Minimum rental revenues are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective initial lease term. Contingent rental revenues are contractually defined as to the percentage of rent received by us and are based on fees collected by the lessee. Our rental arrangements generally require payment on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Real estate development revenue – We recognize revenue on real estate development projects in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales, which provides for profit to be recognized in full when real estate is sold, provided that a sale has been consummated and profit is determinable, collection of sales proceeds is estimable with the seller’s receivable not subject to subordination, risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the earnings process is substantially complete with no significant seller activities or obligations required after the date of sale. To the extent the above conditions are not met, a portion or all of the profit is deferred.
Incidental operations may occur during the holding or development period of real estate development projects to reduce holding or development costs. Incremental revenue from incidental operations in excess of incremental costs from incidental operations is accounted for as a reduction of development costs. Incremental costs from incidental operations in excess of incremental revenue from incidental operations are charged to operations.
Real estate development costs - We capitalize the planning, entitlement, construction and development costs associated with our various real estate projects. Costs that are not capitalized, which include property maintenance and repairs, general and administrative and marketing expenses, are expensed as incurred. A real estate development project is considered substantially complete upon the cessation of construction and development activities. Once a project is substantially completed, future costs are expensed as incurred. For fiscal year 2015, we capitalized approximately $8.0 million of costs related to our real estate projects and expensed approximately $1.3 million of costs.
53
Income taxes – Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Tax benefits from an uncertain tax position are only recognized if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Derivative financial instruments – We use derivative financial instruments for purposes other than trading to manage our exposure to interest rates as well as to maintain an appropriate mix of fixed and floating-rate debt. Contract terms of our hedge instruments closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation. Contracts that are effective at meeting the risk reduction and correlation criteria are recorded using hedge accounting. If a derivative instrument is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument will be either offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or be recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of an instrument’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. Instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or contracts for which we have not elected hedge accounting, are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of change.
Impairment of long-lived assets - We evaluate our long-lived assets including our real estate development projects for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. As a result of various factors, in recent years we recorded impairment charges of zero, $0.4 million and $0.1 million in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Defined benefit retirement plan - As discussed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, we sponsor a defined benefit retirement plan that was frozen in June 2004, and no future benefits accrued to participants subsequent to that time. Ongoing accounting for this plan under FASB ASC 715 provides guidance as to, among other things, future estimated pension expense, minimum pension liability and future minimum funding requirements. This information is provided to us by third-party actuarial consultants. In developing this data, certain estimates and assumptions are used, including among other things, discount rate, long-term rates of return and mortality tables. During 2015, the Society of Actuaries released a new mortality table, referred to as adjusted RP-201, which is believed to better reflect mortality improvements and is to be used in calculating defined benefit pension obligations. In addition, during fiscal year 2015, the assumed discount rate used to measure the pension obligation increased from 4.0% to 4.1% as a result of changes in market interest rates. The Company used adjusted RP-2014 to measure its pension obligation as of October 31, 2015 and combined with the increase in the assumed discount rate and other demographic assumptions, its pension obligation decreased by approximately $0.9 million as of October 31, 2015 with a corresponding decrease in other comprehensive income recognized net of tax. Further changes in any of these estimates could materially affect the amounts recorded that are related to our defined benefit retirement plan.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Accounting Standards Board – Accounting Standards Update (“FASB ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer (e.g., assets within the scope of Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, and tangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other) are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement (including the constraint on revenue) in this ASU.
The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods
or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
| · | Identify the contract(s) with a customer. |
| · | Identify the performance obligations in the contract. |
54
| · | Determine the transaction price. |
| · | Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. |
| · | Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial Accounting Standards Board – Accounting Standards Update (“FASB ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.
Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities.
Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures.
This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company is evaluating the effect this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU.
The amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
The amendments in this ASU do not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost.
An entity should measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method.
The amendments in this ASU more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards.
For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
55
FASB Accounting Standards Updates No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
The ASU eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.
The amendments apply to all organizations that present a classified balance sheet. For public companies, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted and we adopted this ASU retrospectively in our fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 resulting in the reclassification of $751,000 from net current deferred income tax assets to net deferred income tax liabilities as of October 31, 2014.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Borrowings under each of the Rabobank Credit Facility, Farm Credit West Term Loans and the Farm Credit West Line of Credit are or will be subject to variable interest rates. These variable interest rates subject us to the risk of increased interest costs associated with any upward movements in interest rates. Our borrowing interest rate for the Rabobank Credit Facility is a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread. Under the Farm Credit West Term Loans and the Farm Credit West Line of Credit, our borrowing interest rate is an internally calculated rate based on Farm Credit West’s internal monthly operations and their cost of funds and generally follows the changes in the 90-day treasury rates in increments divisible by 0.25%. At October 31, 2015, our total debt outstanding under the Rabobank Credit Facility and the Farm Credit West Line of Credit was $83.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. At October 31, 2015, our total debt outstanding under the Farm Credit West Term Loans was approximately $4.2 million and $1.3 million for each of the term loans, respectively.
We manage our exposure to interest rate movements by utilizing interest rate swaps (derivatives). We fixed $40.0 million of our outstanding borrowings with a “fixed-to-floating” interest rate swap as described in the following table:
| Notional Amount | Fair Value Net Liability | |||||||||||||||
| October 31, 2015 | October 31, 2014 | October 31, 2015 | October 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Pay fixed-rate, receive floating-rate interest rate swap, maturing June 2018 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 1,702,000 | $ | 1,782,000 | ||||||||
As of October 31, 2015, the fixed interest rate on our $40.0 million swap was 4.30%. Based on our level of borrowings at October 31, 2015, after taking into consideration the effects of our interest rate swap (derivative), a 1% increase in interest rates would increase our interest expense $0.5 million for fiscal year 2016 and an annual average of $0.7 million for the three subsequent fiscal years. Additionally, a 1% increase in the interest rate would decrease our net income by $0.3 million for fiscal year 2016 and an annual average of $0.4 million for the three subsequent fiscal years. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
56
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Limoneira Company
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
All schedules are omitted for the reason that they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes.
57
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of Limoneira Company (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of Limoneira Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2015. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and has issued a report on internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Harold S. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph D. Rumley
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Limoneira Company
We have audited Limoneira Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Limoneira Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Limoneira Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Limoneira Company as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and temporary equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2015 of Limoneira Company and our report dated January 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 11, 2016
59
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Limoneira Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Limoneira Company as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and temporary equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Limoneira Company at October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Limoneira Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated January 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 11, 2016
60
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | 39,000 | $ | 92,000 | ||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 7,420,000 | 7,236,000 | ||||||
| Cultural costs | 3,916,000 | 3,691,000 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,387,000 | 2,658,000 | ||||||
| Income taxes receivable | - | 1,143,000 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 13,762,000 | 14,820,000 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 128,951,000 | 105,873,000 | ||||||
| Real estate development | 96,067,000 | 88,088,000 | ||||||
| Equity in investments | 3,047,000 | 3,638,000 | ||||||
| Investment in Calavo Growers, Inc. | 18,508,000 | 24,270,000 | ||||||
| Note receivable | 589,000 | 2,084,000 | ||||||
| Other assets | 8,602,000 | 8,114,000 | ||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 269,526,000 | $ | 246,887,000 | ||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 6,611,000 | $ | 6,363,000 | ||||
| Growers payable | 5,841,000 | 5,839,000 | ||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 5,864,000 | 7,539,000 | ||||||
| Fair value of derivative instrument | 767,000 | 809,000 | ||||||
| Current portion of long-term debt | 589,000 | 583,000 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 19,672,000 | 21,133,000 | ||||||
| Long-term liabilities: | ||||||||
| Long-term debt, less current portion | 89,235,000 | 67,771,000 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 19,425,000 | 21,041,000 | ||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 7,641,000 | 6,282,000 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 135,973,000 | 116,227,000 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | - | - | ||||||
| Series B Convertible Preferred Stock – $100.00 par value (50,000 shares authorized: 29,500 and 30,000 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 2014) (8.75% coupon rate) | 2,950,000 | 3,000,000 | ||||||
| Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock – $100.00 par value (10,000 shares authorized: 9,300 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 2014) (4% dividend rate on liquidation value of $1,000 per share) | 9,331,000 | 9,331,000 | ||||||
| Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
| Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock – $.01 par value (20,000 shares authorized: zero issued or outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 2014) | - | - | ||||||
| Common Stock – $.01 par value (19,900,000 shares authorized: 14,135,080 and 14,078,077 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively) | 141,000 | 140,000 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 90,759,000 | 89,770,000 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 27,216,000 | 23,308,000 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 3,156,000 | 5,111,000 | ||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 121,272,000 | 118,329,000 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 269,526,000 | $ | 246,887,000 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
61
Consolidated Statements of Operations
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | $ | 95,124,000 | $ | 98,522,000 | $ | 79,990,000 | ||||||
| Rental operations | 5,104,000 | 4,640,000 | 4,250,000 | |||||||||
| Real estate development | 83,000 | 300,000 | 644,000 | |||||||||
| Total net revenues | 100,311,000 | 103,462,000 | 84,884,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | 77,186,000 | 74,325,000 | 63,607,000 | |||||||||
| Rental operations | 3,440,000 | 3,073,000 | 2,601,000 | |||||||||
| Real estate development | 1,330,000 | 1,400,000 | 1,333,000 | |||||||||
| Impairments of real estate development assets | - | 435,000 | 95,000 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 13,772,000 | 14,336,000 | 11,850,000 | |||||||||
| Total cost and expenses | 95,728,000 | 93,569,000 | 79,486,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 4,583,000 | 9,893,000 | 5,398,000 | |||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (188,000 | ) | - | (124,000 | ) | |||||||
| Interest income from derivative instruments | - | - | 711,000 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. | 5,033,000 | - | 3,138,000 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of Wilson Ranch | 935,000 | - | - | |||||||||
| Interest income | 40,000 | 60,000 | 85,000 | |||||||||
| Equity in earnings (losses) of investments | 243,000 | 263,000 | (1,449,000 | ) | ||||||||
| Other income, net | 410,000 | 348,000 | 382,000 | |||||||||
| Total other income | 6,473,000 | 671,000 | 2,743,000 | |||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 11,056,000 | 10,564,000 | 8,141,000 | |||||||||
| Income tax provision | (3,974,000 | ) | (3,573,000 | ) | (3,235,000 | ) | ||||||
| Net income | 7,082,000 | 6,991,000 | 4,906,000 | |||||||||
| Preferred dividends | (635,000 | ) | (460,000 | ) | (262,000 | ) | ||||||
| Net income applicable to common stock | $ | 6,447,000 | $ | 6,531,000 | $ | 4,644,000 | ||||||
| Basic net income per common share | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
| Diluted net income per common share | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
| Dividends per common share | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding-basic | 14,119,000 | 14,055,000 | 12,775,000 | |||||||||
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted | 14,119,000 | 14,055,000 | 12,775,000 | |||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
62
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,082,000 | $ | 6,991,000 | $ | 4,906,000 | ||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability adjustments | 654,000 | (1,199,000 | ) | 1,764,000 | ||||||||
| Unrealized holding gains on security available for sale | 273,000 | 5,790,000 | 2,344,000 | |||||||||
| Reclassification of unrealized gain on security sold | (2,932,000 | ) | - | (1,865,000 | ) | |||||||
| Unrealized gains from derivative instruments | 50,000 | 265,000 | 534,000 | |||||||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (1,955,000 | ) | 4,856,000 | 2,777,000 | ||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 5,127,000 | $ | 11,847,000 | $ | 7,683,000 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
63
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Temporary Equity
Years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
| Stockholders’ Equity | Temporary Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-In | Retained | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Series B Preferred | Series B-2 Preferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Total | Stock | Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 31, 2012 | 11,203,180 | $ | 112,000 | $ | 35,714,000 | $ | 16,398,000 | $ | (2,522,000 | ) | $ | 49,702,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - common | - | - | - | (1,944,000 | ) | - | (1,944,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - Series B | - | - | - | (262,000 | ) | - | (262,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 43,761 | - | 753,000 | - | - | 753,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exchange of common stock | (11,010 | ) | - | (236,000 | ) | - | - | (236,000 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Donation of common stock | 4,859 | - | 100,000 | - | - | 100,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | 2,775,221 | 28,000 | 51,829,000 | - | - | 51,857,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | - | - | 4,906,000 | - | 4,906,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | - | - | - | - | 2,777,000 | 2,777,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 31, 2013 | 14,016,011 | 140,000 | 88,160,000 | 19,098,000 | 255,000 | 107,653,000 | 3,000,000 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - common | - | - | - | (2,321,000 | ) | - | (2,321,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - Series B | - | - | - | (262,000 | ) | - | (262,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - Series B-2 | - | - | - | (198,000 | ) | - | (198,000 | ) | - | 31,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 40,678 | - | 1,116,000 | - | - | 1,116,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exchange of common stock | (6,619 | ) | - | (176,000 | ) | - | - | (176,000 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Donation of common stock | 4,552 | - | 100,000 | - | - | 100,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | 23,455 | - | 518,000 | - | - | 518,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of Series B-2 preferred stock | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9,300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax benefit of stock grant vesting | - | - | 52,000 | - | - | 52,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | - | - | 6,991,000 | - | 6,991,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | - | - | - | - | 4,856,000 | 4,856,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 31, 2014 | 14,078,077 | 140,000 | 89,770,000 | 23,308,000 | 5,111,000 | 118,329,000 | 3,000,000 | 9,331,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - common | - | - | - | (2,539,000 | ) | - | (2,539,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - Series B | - | - | - | (263,000 | ) | - | (263,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends - Series B-2 | - | - | - | (372,000 | ) | - | (372,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | 57,162 | 1,000 | 1,076,000 | - | - | 1,077,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exchange of common stock | (10,907 | ) | - | (275,000 | ) | - | - | (275,000 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Donation of common stock | 4,498 | - | 100,000 | - | - | 100,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of Series B preferred stock | 6,250 | - | 50,000 | - | - | 50,000 | (50,000 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax benefit of stock grant vesting | - | - | 38,000 | - | - | 38,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | - | - | 7,082,000 | - | 7,082,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | - | - | - | - | (1,955,000 | ) | (1,955,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 31, 2015 | 14,135,080 | $ | 141,000 | $ | 90,759,000 | $ | 27,216,000 | $ | 3,156,000 | $ | 121,272,000 | $ | 2,950,000 | $ | 9,331,000 | |||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
64
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Operating activities | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,082,000 | $ | 6,991,000 | $ | 4,906,000 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,184,000 | 3,516,000 | 2,403,000 | |||||||||
| Impairments of real estate development assets | - | 435,000 | 95,000 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of stock in Calavo Growers. Inc. | (5,033,000 | ) | - | (3,138,000 | ) | |||||||
| Gain on sale of Wilson Ranch | (935,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Loss on disposals/sales of assets | 365,000 | 505,000 | - | |||||||||
| Stock compensation expense | 1,077,000 | 1,116,000 | 753,000 | |||||||||
| Equity in (earnings) losses of investments | (243,000 | ) | (263,000 | ) | 1,449,000 | |||||||
| Cash distributions from equity investments | 843,000 | 183,000 | 110,000 | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (350,000 | ) | (129,000 | ) | (1,210,000 | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 47,000 | 44,000 | 33,000 | |||||||||
| Non-cash interest income from derivative instruments | - | - | (711,000 | ) | ||||||||
| Accrued interest on note receivable | (40,000 | ) | (60,000 | ) | (78,000 | ) | ||||||
| Donation of common stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Account receivable, net | (184,000 | ) | (810,000 | ) | (1,918,000 | ) | ||||||
| Cultural costs | (225,000 | ) | 433,000 | 716,000 | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 224,000 | (370,000 | ) | (230,000 | ) | |||||||
| Income taxes receivable | 1,143,000 | (1,143,000 | ) | 712,000 | ||||||||
| Other assets | (286,000 | ) | 344,000 | (128,000 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable and growers payable | (873,000 | ) | 4,125,000 | 93,000 | ||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (1,678,000 | ) | 912,000 | 2,008,000 | ||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 2,477,000 | 163,000 | (296,000 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,695,000 | 16,092,000 | 5,669,000 | |||||||||
| Investing activities | ||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | (31,254,000 | ) | (25,866,000 | ) | (10,428,000 | ) | ||||||
| Agriculture property acquisitions | (3,389,000 | ) | - | (375,000 | ) | |||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of Wilson Ranch | 2,712,000 | - | - | |||||||||
| Business combinations, net of cash acquired | - | (700,000 | ) | (11,101,000 | ) | |||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of stock in Calavo Growers, Inc. | 6,433,000 | - | 4,788,000 | |||||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of HM East Ridge, LLC property | - | - | 5,713,000 | |||||||||
| Equity investments | (9,000 | ) | (1,758,000 | ) | (125,000 | ) | ||||||
| Collection of notes receivable | - | - | 350,000 | |||||||||
| Investments in mutual water companies and water rights | (300,000 | ) | (299,000 | ) | (319,000 | ) | ||||||
| Other | - | - | (30,000 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (25,807,000 | ) | $ | (28,623,000 | ) | $ | (11,527,000 | ) | |||
65
Limoneira Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
| Years Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Borrowings of long-term debt | $ | 120,484,000 | $ | 117,765,000 | $ | 58,450,000 | ||||||
| Repayments of long-term debt | (99,014,000 | ) | (111,543,000 | ) | (85,976,000 | ) | ||||||
| Dividends paid-common | (2,539,000 | ) | (2,321,000 | ) | (1,944,000 | ) | ||||||
| Dividends paid-preferred | (635,000 | ) | (430,000 | ) | (262,000 | ) | ||||||
| Exchange of common stock | (275,000 | ) | (176,000 | ) | (236,000 | ) | ||||||
| Issuance of preferred stock | - | 9,300,000 | - | |||||||||
| Issuance of common stock | - | - | 35,897,000 | |||||||||
| Payments of debt financing costs | - | (106,000 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Tax benefit of stock grant vesting | 38,000 | 52,000 | - | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 18,059,000 | 12,541,000 | 5,929,000 | |||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash | (53,000 | ) | 10,000 | 71,000 | ||||||||
| Cash at beginning of year | 92,000 | 82,000 | 11,000 | |||||||||
| Cash at end of year | $ | 39,000 | $ | 92,000 | $ | 82,000 | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for interest (net of amounts capitalized) | $ | 55,000 | $ | (51,000 | ) | $ | 478,000 | |||||
| Cash paid during the year for income taxes, net of refunds received | $ | 2,963,000 | $ | 6,495,000 | $ | 1,910,000 | ||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized holding gain on Calavo investment | $ | (487,000 | ) | $ | (9,425,000 | ) | $ | (3,893,000 | ) | |||
| Capital expenditures accrued but not paid at year-end | $ | 1,270,000 | $ | 1,134,000 | $ | 487,000 | ||||||
| Non-cash reduction of note receivable | $ | 1,535,000 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
| Accrued interest on note receivable | $ | 40,000 | $ | 60,000 | $ | 78,000 | ||||||
| Donation of common stock | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||||
| Conversion of preferred stock to common stock | $ | 50,000 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
During fiscal year 2015, the holder of the note receivable from a 2004 sale of property completed the drilling of three water wells at the Company’s Windfall Investors, LLC real estate development property and two water wells at property leased by the Company. The fair value of the well drilling services was $1,535,000 and the Company recorded a non-cash reduction of the note receivable.
In September 2015, 500 shares of Series B preferred stock were converted into 6,250 shares of Limoneira common stock.
On June 30, 2014, the Company acquired the packing house property, equipment and certain intangible assets of Marlin Packing Company in Yuma, Arizona for a purchase price of approximately $1,700,000 in cash and stock as further described in Note 3, Acquisitions of Agricultural Property.
On October 11, 2013, the Company purchased a citrus orchard for a cash purchase price of $8,750,000, which was accounted for as a business combination and is further described in Note 3, Acquisitions of Agricultural Property.
On September 6, 2013 the Company completed the acquisition of Associated Citrus Packers, Inc. (“Associated”), a privately-owned Arizona corporation, for $18,580,000. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and is further described in Note 3, Acquisitions of Agricultural Property.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
66
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Business
Limoneira Company, a Delaware Company (the “Company”), engages primarily in growing citrus and avocados, picking and hauling citrus, and packing, marketing and selling lemons. The Company is also engaged in residential rentals and other rental operations and real estate development activities.
The Company markets and sells lemons directly to food service, wholesale and retail customers throughout the United States, Canada, Asia and other international markets. The Company is a member of Sunkist Growers, Inc. (“Sunkist”), an agricultural marketing cooperative, and sells its oranges, specialty citrus and other crops to Sunkist-licensed and other third-party packinghouses.
The Company sells all of its avocado production to Calavo Growers, Inc. (“Calavo”), a packing and marketing company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CVGW. Calavo’s customers include many of the largest retail and food service companies in the United States and Canada. The Company’s avocados are packed by Calavo and sold and distributed under Calavo brands to its customers.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the accounts of all the subsidiaries and investments in which a controlling interest is held by the Company. The consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income, statements of stockholders’ equity and temporary equity and statements of cash flows of Limoneira Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company’s subsidiaries include: Limoneira Company International Division, LLC, Limoneira Mercantile, LLC, Windfall Investors, LLC, Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC and Associated Citrus Packers, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company considers the criteria established under the Financial Accounting Standards Board – Accounting Standards Code (“FASB ASC”) 810, Consolidations and the effect of variable interest entities, in its consolidation process.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounts Receivable
The Company grants credit in the course of its operations to cooperatives, companies and lessees of the Company’s facilities. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company provides allowances on its receivables as required based on accounts receivable aging and other factors. At October 31, 2015 and 2014 the allowances totaled $390,000 and $442,000, respectively. The October 31, 2015 allowance includes $208,000 provided for amounts due on certain brokered fruit sales, on which the Company earns a commission, with the corresponding amount recorded as a reduction to lemon supplier payables, which is included in accrued liabilities. For fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 credit losses were insignificant.
Concentrations
The Company sells all of its avocado production to Calavo. Sales of avocados to Calavo were $7,132,000, $7,374,000 and $11,683,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Lemons procured from third-party growers were approximately 36%, 36% and 52%, of lemon supply in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
The Company maintains its cash in federally insured financial institutions. The account balances at these institutions periodically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes the risk is not significant.
67
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Cultural Costs
Growing costs, also referred to as cultural costs, consist of orchard maintenance costs such as cultivation, fertilization and soil amendments, pest control, pruning and irrigation. Harvest costs are comprised of labor and equipment expenses incurred to harvest and deliver crops to the packinghouses.
Lemons, oranges, specialty citrus and other crops such as pistachio nuts and olives are grown in the Company’s San Joaquin Valley orchards. Additionally, lemons are grown in the Company’s Yuma County, Arizona orchards. These crops have distinct growing periods and distinct harvest and selling periods, each of which lasts approximately four to six months. During the growing period, cultural costs are capitalized as they are associated with benefiting and preparing the crops for the harvest and selling period. During the harvest and selling period, harvest costs and cultural costs are expensed when incurred and capitalized cultural costs are amortized as components of agribusiness costs and expenses.
The Company grows lemons and avocados in its Ventura County orchards. Due to climate, growing conditions and the types of crops grown, the Ventura County orchards may be harvested and sold on a year round basis. Accordingly, the Company does not capitalize cultural costs associated with its Ventura County orchards and therefore such costs, as well as harvest costs associated with the Ventura County orchards, are expensed to operations when incurred as components of agribusiness costs and expenses.
Most cultural costs, including amortization of capitalized cultural costs, and harvest costs are associated with and charged to specific crops. Certain other costs, such as property taxes, indirect labor including farm supervision and management and irrigation that benefit multiple crops are allocated to crops on a per acre basis.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Tax benefits from an uncertain tax position are only recognized if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at original cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method at rates based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows (in years):
| Land improvements | 10 – 20 | |||
| Buildings and building improvements | 10 – 50 | |||
| Equipment | 5 – 20 | |||
| Orchards | 20 – 40 |
Costs of planting and developing orchards are capitalized until the orchards become commercially productive. Planting costs consist primarily of the costs to purchase and plant nursery stock. Orchard development costs consist primarily of maintenance costs of orchards such as cultivation, pruning, irrigation, labor, spraying and fertilization, and interest costs during the development period. The Company ceases the capitalization of costs and commences depreciation when the orchards become commercially productive and orchard maintenance costs are accounted for as cultural costs as described above.
68
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Capitalized Interest
Interest is capitalized on real estate development projects and significant construction in progress using the weighted average interest rate during the fiscal year. Interest of $2,534,000 and $2,315,000 was capitalized during the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and is included in property, plant, and equipment and real estate development assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Real Estate Development Costs
The Company capitalizes the planning, entitlement, construction, development costs and interest associated with its various real estate projects. Costs that are not capitalized, which include property maintenance and repairs, general and administrative and marketing expenses, are expensed as incurred. A real estate development project is considered substantially complete upon the cessation of construction and development activities. Once a project is substantially completed, future costs are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalized costs related to its real estate projects of $7,979,000 and $5,104,000 in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Equity in Investments
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in which the Company has significant influence but less than a controlling interest, or is not the primary beneficiary if the joint venture is determined to be a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”), are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and, accordingly, are adjusted for capital contributions, distributions and the Company’s equity in net earnings or loss of the respective joint venture.
Marketable Securities
The Company classifies its marketable securities as available-for-sale. The Company’s investments in marketable securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains (losses), net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income. At October 31, 2015 and 2014, marketable securities are comprised of the Company’s investment in Calavo.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including its definite-life intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of an asset are less than the carrying value of that asset, a write-down is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its fair value. Assets held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell.
Based on results from independent appraisals and other factors which indicated that the fair values of certain real estate development assets were less than the carry values, the Company recognized impairment losses of zero and $435,000 in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist primarily of acquired water and mineral rights, a patent and certain trade names and trademarks. Certain of the Company’s trade names and trademarks are being amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated lives of eight years. The Company evaluates its indefinite-life intangible assets annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment of the assets’ value may exist.
69
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis or when an event or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill impairment is tested at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment. Goodwill impairment is tested in a two-step process, with the first step performed to determine if there is potential for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If potential impairment is identified as indicated by the carrying value exceeding the fair value of the reporting unit, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment to be recognized in the financial statements by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess amount. Goodwill impairment testing involves significant judgment and estimates. The annual assessment of goodwill impairment was performed as of July 31, 2015 with no impairment noted.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments are based on level-one indicators or quoted market prices, where available, or are estimated using the present value or other valuation techniques. Estimated fair values are significantly affected by the assumptions used.
Accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, growers payable and accrued liabilities reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments.
Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities, the fair value of long-term debt is approximately equal to its carrying amount as of October 31, 2015 and 2014.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to interest rates as well as to maintain an appropriate mix of fixed and floating-rate debt. Contract terms of a hedge instrument closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation. Contracts that are effective at meeting the risk reduction and correlation criteria are recorded using hedge accounting. If a derivative instrument is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument will be either offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or be recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of an instrument’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. Instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or contracts for which the Company has not elected hedge accounting, are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of change.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) represents all changes in a company’s net assets, except changes resulting from transactions with shareholders, and is reported as a component of the Company’s stockholders’ equity.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue and related costs are recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) selling price is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company records a sales allowance in the period revenue is recognized as a provision for estimated customer discounts and concessions.
70
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Revenue Recognition (continued)
Agribusiness revenue - Revenue from lemon sales is generally recognized FOB shipping point when the customer takes possession of the fruit from the Company’s packing house. Revenue from the sales of certain of the Company’s agricultural products is recorded based on estimated proceeds provided by certain of the Company’s sales and marketing partners (Calavo and other third-party packinghouses) due to the time between when the product is delivered by the Company and the closing of the pools for such fruits at the end of each month. Calavo and other third-party packinghouses are agricultural cooperatives or function in a similar manner as an agricultural cooperative. As such, the Company applies specific authoritative agriculture revenue recognition guidance related to transactions between patrons and agriculture marketing cooperatives to record revenue at time of delivery to the packinghouses relating to fruits that are in pools that have not yet closed at month end if: (a) the related fruits have been delivered to and accepted by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses (i.e. title has transferred to Calavo and other third-party packinghouses) and (b) sales price information has been provided by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses (based on the marketplace activity for the related fruit) to estimate with reasonable certainty the final selling price for the fruit upon the closing of the pools. Historically, the revenue that is recorded based on the sales price information provided to the Company by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses at the time of delivery, have not materially differed from the actual amounts that are paid after the monthly pools are closed. The Company also earns commissions on certain brokered fruit sales, which totaled $114,000, $115,000, and $53,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
The Company’s avocados, oranges, specialty citrus and other specialty crops are packed and sold by Calavo and other third-party packinghouses. The Company delivers all of its avocado production from its orchards to Calavo. These avocados are then packed by Calavo at its packinghouse, and sold and distributed under Calavo brands to its customers primarily in the United States and Canada. The Company’s arrangements with other third-party packinghouses related to its oranges, specialty citrus and other specialty crops are similar to its arrangement with Calavo.
The Company’s arrangements with its third-party packinghouses are such that the Company is the producer and supplier of the product and the third-party packinghouses are the Company’s customers. The revenues the Company recognizes related to the fruits sold to the third-party packinghouses are based on the volume and quality of the fruits delivered, the market price for such fruit, less the packinghouses’ charges to pack and market the fruit. Such packinghouse charges include the grading, sizing, packing, cooling, ripening and marketing of the related fruit. The Company bears inventory risk until product is delivered to the third-party packinghouses at which time title and inventory risk to the product is transferred to the third-party packinghouses and revenue is recognized. Such third-party packinghouse charges are recorded as a reduction of revenue based on the application of specific authoritative revenue recognition guidance entitled “Vendor’s Income Statement Characterization of Consideration Given to a Customer”. The identifiable benefit the Company receives from the third-party packinghouses for packaging and marketing services cannot be sufficiently separated from the third-party packinghouses’ purchase of the Company’s products. In addition, the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received from the third-party packinghouses for such services and as such, these costs are characterized as a reduction of revenue in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
Revenue from crop insurance proceeds is recorded when the amount of and the right to receive the payment can be reasonably determined. The Company recorded agribusiness revenues from crop insurance proceeds of $9,000, $184,000 and $36,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Rental operations revenue - Minimum rental revenues are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective initial lease term. Contingent rental revenues are contractually defined as to the percentage of rent received by the Company and are based on fees collected by the lessee. Such revenues are recognized when actual results, based on collected fees reported by the tenant, are received. The Company’s rental arrangements generally require payment on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Real estate development revenue - The Company recognizes revenue on real estate development projects in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales, which provides for profit to be recognized in full when real estate is sold provided that, a sale has been consummated and profit is determinable, collection of sales proceeds is estimable with the seller’s receivable not subject to subordination, risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the earnings process is substantially complete with no significant seller activities or obligations required after the date of sale. To the extent the above conditions are not met, a portion or all of the profit is deferred.
71
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Revenue Recognition (continued)
Incidental operations may occur during the holding or development period of real estate development projects to reduce holding or development costs. Incremental revenue from incidental operations in excess of incremental costs from incidental operations is accounted for as a reduction of development costs. Incremental costs from incidental operations in excess of incremental revenue from incidental operations are charged to operations.
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Such costs in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013 were $364,000, $308,000 and $315,000, respectively.
Leases
The Company records rent expense for its operating leases on a straight-line basis from the lease commencement date as defined in the lease agreement until the end of the base lease term.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
Basic net income per common share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of preferred stock. Diluted net income per common share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of conversion of preferred stock. The Series B and Series B-2 convertible preferred shares were anti-dilutive for fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Unvested stock-based compensation awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends as participating shares are included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. The Company’s unvested, restricted stock awards qualify as participating shares.
Reclassifications and Adjustments
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the October 31, 2015 presentation.
Immaterial Classification Error - An immaterial error in the classification of an equity method investee’s distributions was corrected in the October 31, 2014 and 2013 consolidated financial statements which resulted in the reclassification of an equity method investee’s distributions from investing to operating cash flows in the amounts of $183,000 and $110,000, respectively, in the consolidated statements of cash flows. An immaterial error in the classification of deposits paid for citrus trees was corrected in the October 31, 2014 and 2013 consolidated financial statements which resulted in the reclassification from prepaid expenses and other current assets to property, plant, and equipment in the amounts of $440,000 and $183,000, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows. The Company has evaluated the materiality of these errors both qualitatively and quantitatively in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality, and determined that these errors were not material to our previously reported consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2014 and prior.
Defined Benefit Retirement Plan
The Company sponsors a defined benefit retirement plan that was frozen in June 2004, and no future benefits have been accrued to participants subsequent to that time. Ongoing accounting for this plan under FASB ASC 715, Compensation – Retirement Benefits, provides guidance as to, among other things, future estimated pension expense, minimum pension liability and future minimum funding requirements. This information is provided to the Company by third-party actuarial consultants. In developing this data, certain estimates and assumptions are used, including among other things, discount rate, long-term rates of return and mortality tables. During 2015, the Society of Actuaries released a new mortality table, referred to as adjusted RP-2014, which is believed to better reflect mortality improvements and is to be used in calculating defined benefit pension obligations. In addition, during fiscal year 2015 the assumed discount rate used to measure the pension obligation increased from 4.0% to 4.1% as a result of changes in market interest rates. The Company used adjusted RP-2014 to measure its pension obligation as of October 31, 2015 and combined with the increase in the assumed discount rate and other demographic assumptions, its pension obligation decreased by $864,000 as of October 31, 2015 with a corresponding decrease in other comprehensive income recognized net of tax. Further changes in any of these estimates could materially affect the amounts recorded that are related to our defined benefit retirement plan.
72
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Accounting Standards Board – Accounting Standards Update (“FASB ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer (e.g., assets within the scope of Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, and tangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other) are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement (including the constraint on revenue) in this ASU.
The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
| · | Identify the contract(s) with a customer. | |
| · | Identify the performance obligations in the contract. | |
| · | Determine the transaction price. | |
| · | Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. | |
| · | Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial Accounting Standards Board – Accounting Standards Update (“FASB ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.
Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities.
Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures.
This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company is evaluating the effect this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
73
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU.
The amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
The amendments in this ASU do not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost.
An entity should measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method.
The amendments in this ASU more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards.
For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Updates No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
The ASU eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.
The amendments apply to all organizations that present a classified balance sheet. For public companies, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and employee benefit plans, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted and the Company adopted this ASU retrospectively in its fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 resulting in the reclassification of $751,000 from net current deferred income tax assets to net deferred income tax liabilities as of October 31, 2014.
3. Agriculture Property Acquisitions
In September 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 157 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus orchards in California’s San Joaquin Valley for $3,389,000. The orchards were acquired pursuant to purchase options contained in certain operating leases the Company had been a party to since 2012 covering approximately 1,000 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus and other crops, which the Company refers to as the Sheldon Ranch leases. This acquisition was accounted for as an asset purchase and included in property, plant and equipment in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2015.
74
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
3. Acquisitions Agriculture of Property (continued)
In September 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire 757 acres of lemon, orange and specialty citrus orchards in California’s San Joaquin Valley, for $15,148,000. The orchards were acquired pursuant to purchase options contained in the Sheldon Ranches operating leases. The Company paid a deposit of $50,000 in September 2015 and escrow closed in December 2015, at which time the remaining $15,098,000 was paid.
Business Combinations
Yuma Packinghouse
On June 30, 2014, the Company acquired the packing house property, equipment and certain intangible assets of Marlin Packing Company from its sole shareholder, Marlin Ranching Company. Both companies are privately owned Arizona corporations located in Yuma, Arizona. No liabilities were assumed in the acquisition. The purchase price was $1,700,000, comprised of 23,455 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $518,600, $700,000 in cash, contingent consideration consisting of an earn-out with a fair value of $300,000 and a deferred cash payment of $181,400 which was paid in fiscal year 2015 upon the completion of certain land remediation activities required by the seller. The earn-out has a maximum value of $400,000 in cash based on the operating profits of the acquired business, as defined in the purchase agreement, over a five-year period ending October 31, 2019. The liability for the fair value of the earn-out is included in other long term liabilities and the deferred cash payment is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying October 31, 2015 balance sheet. Transaction costs associated with the acquisition were not significant and were expensed in the year ended October 31, 2014. The results of operations of the Yuma packinghouse have been included in the consolidated results of operations from the acquisition date.
The following is a summary of the fair value of the assets acquired on the date of acquisition based on a third-party valuation, which is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement under FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
| Building | $ | 395,000 | ||
| Land and improvements | 260,000 | |||
| Equipment | 885,000 | |||
| Customer relationships | 160,000 | |||
| Fair value of assets acquired | $ | 1,700,000 |
Customer relationships are subject to amortization over an estimated life of five years.
Revenue and net loss of $136,000 and $522,000, respectively, of the Yuma packinghouse are included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year 2014. The results of operations of the Yuma packinghouse were not material to the Company’s pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the year ended October 31, 2013 had the Yuma packinghouse been included in the consolidated results from the beginning of the year.
75
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
3. Acquisitions (continued)
Business Combinations (continued)
Lemons 400
On October 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of approximately 760 acres of agricultural property in the town of Porterville in Tulare County, California (“Lemons 400”) for $8,750,000 cash. This property consists of approximately 400 acres of productive lemon orchards and 360 acres primarily utilized for cattle grazing. The acquisition also included water assets and agricultural equipment and supplies.
The following is a summary of the fair value of the assets acquired on the date of acquisition based on a third-party valuation, which is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement under FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
| Cultural costs | $ | 1,130,000 | ||
| Land | 5,180,000 | |||
| Land improvements | 309,000 | |||
| Buildings and building improvements | 60,000 | |||
| Equipment | 150,000 | |||
| Orchards | 601,000 | |||
| Investment in mutual water company | 1,320,000 | |||
| Fair value of assets acquired | $ | 8,750,000 |
Lemons 400 (continued)
Results of operations are included in the Company’s fiscal year 2013 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition but are not significant due to the short time period from the acquisition date to the Company’s fiscal year end of October 31, 2013.
The unaudited, pro forma consolidated statement of operations as if the acquisition had been included in the consolidated results of the Company for the entire year ended October 31, 2013, results in revenue of $88,900,000 and net income of $5,879,000.
Associated Citrus Packers
On September 6, 2013 the Company acquired of all of the outstanding stock of Associated, a privately owned Arizona corporation, for $18,580,000. The purchase price consisted of the issuance of 705,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate value of $15,959,000 based on the Company’s stock price on the acquisition date, $1,041,000 in cash and the repayment of $1,580,000 in Associated’s long term debt. The acquisition was structured as a tax-free reorganization under section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Upon completion of the acquisition, Associated became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Associated owns approximately 1,300 acres of property in Yuma County, Arizona, comprised of 950 acres of productive lemon orchards, 350 acres of other crops and agriculture equipment and facilities. Transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition were approximately $270,000, which are included in selling, general and administrative expense. The results of operations of Associated have been included in the consolidated results of operations from the acquisition date.
76
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
3. Acquisitions (continued)
Business Combinations (continued)
Associated Citrus Packers (continued)
The following is a summary of the fair value of the assets acquired on the date of acquisition based on a third-party valuation, which is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement under FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
| Cultural costs | $ | 1,456,000 | ||
| Other current assets | 814,000 | |||
| Land | 15,035,000 | |||
| Land improvements | 1,103,000 | |||
| Buildings and building improvements | 355,000 | |||
| Equipment | 1,751,000 | |||
| Orchards | 4,382,000 | |||
| Other assets | 491,000 | |||
| Goodwill | 680,000 | |||
| Total assets acquired | 26,067,000 | |||
| Current liabilities | (216,000 | ) | ||
| Long-term debt | (24,000 | ) | ||
| Deferred income taxes | (7,247,000 | ) | ||
| Total liabilities assumed | (7,487,000 | ) | ||
| Fair value of net assets acquired | $ | 18,580,000 |
Of the $491,000 of acquired other assets, $486,000 was assigned to trade names and trademarks that are subject to amortization over an estimated life of 8 years.
Revenue of $2,809,000 and net income of $291,000 of Associated are included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date to the period ended October 31, 2013.
The unaudited, pro forma consolidated statement of operations as if Associated had been included in the consolidated results of the Company for the entire year ended October 31, 2013 results in revenue of $86,667,000 and net income of $4,973,000.
77
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
4. Fair Value Measurements
Under the FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, a fair value measurement is determined based on the assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tiered hierarchy draws distinctions between market participant assumptions based on (i) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1), (ii) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2) and (iii) unobservable inputs that require the Company to use present value and other valuation techniques in the determination of fair value (Level 3).
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 that are measured on a recurring basis during the period, segregated by level within the fair value hierarchy:
| 2015 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets at fair value: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available- for -sale securities | $ | 18,508,000 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 18,508,000 | ||||||||
| Liabilities at fair value: | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives | $ | – | $ | 1,702,000 | $ | – | $ | 1,702,000 | ||||||||
| 2014 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets at fair value: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available- for -sale securities | $ | 24,270,000 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 24,270,000 | ||||||||
| Liabilities at fair value: | ||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives | $ | – | $ | 1,782,000 | $ | – | $ | 1,782,000 | ||||||||
Available-for-sale securities consist of marketable securities in Calavo Growers, Inc. common stock. At October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company owned 360,000 and 500,000 shares representing approximately 2.1% and 2.9% of Calavo’s outstanding common stock. These securities are measured at fair value by quoted market prices. Calavo’s stock price at October 31, 2015 and 2014 was $51.41 and $48.54 per share, respectively.
The derivative consists of an interest rate swap; the fair value is estimated using industry-standard valuation models. Such models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs.
5. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Prepaid insurance | $ | 598,000 | $ | 568,000 | ||||
| Prepaid supplies | 1,064,000 | 982,000 | ||||||
| Lemon supplier advances | 35,000 | 390,000 | ||||||
| Deposits | 129,000 | 138,000 | ||||||
| Other | 561,000 | 580,000 | ||||||
| $ | 2,387,000 | $ | 2,658,000 | |||||
78
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
6. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 48,211,000 | $ | 47,246,000 | ||||
| Land improvements | 19,998,000 | 16,715,000 | ||||||
| Buildings and building improvements | 20,655,000 | 12,948,000 | ||||||
| Equipment | 28,624,000 | 28,048,000 | ||||||
| Orchards | 26,648,000 | 25,350,000 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 35,428,000 | 23,388,000 | ||||||
| 179,564,000 | 153,695,000 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | (50,613,000 | ) | (47,822,000 | ) | ||||
| $ | 128,951,000 | $ | 105,873,000 | |||||
Depreciation expense was $4,086,000, $3,448,000 and $2,380,000 for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
7. Real Estate Development
Real estate development assets are comprised primarily of land and land development costs and consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| East Areas I and II | $ | 59,227,000 | $ | 55,016,000 | ||||
| Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC | 11,039,000 | 11,039,000 | ||||||
| Windfall Investors, LLC | 25,801,000 | 22,033,000 | ||||||
| $ | 96,067,000 | $ | 88,088,000 | |||||
East Areas I and II
In fiscal year 2005, the Company began capitalizing the costs of two real estate development projects east of Santa Paula, California, for the development of 550 acres of land into residential units, commercial buildings and civic facilities. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, the Company capitalized $4,211,000 and $3,478,000, respectively, of costs related to these real estate development projects. Additionally, in connection with these projects, the Company incurred expenses of $21,000, $17,000 and $11,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
On August 24, 2010, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to a Real Estate Advisory Management Consultant Agreement (the “Consultant Agreement”) with Parkstone Companies, Inc. (the “Consultant”) dated April 1, 2004, that includes provisions for the Consultant to earn a success fee (the “Success Fee”) upon the annexation by the City of Santa Paula, California of East Area I. Under the terms of the Amendment, the Company agrees to pay the Success Fee in an amount equal to 4% of the incremental Property Value under a formula defined in the Amendment. The Success Fee is due and payable 120 days following the earlier to occur of (a) the sale of all or any portion of East Area I, including any unrelated third party material investment in the property, (b) the determination of an appraised value of East Area I or (c) the second anniversary of the property annexation (each a “Success Fee Event”). The Success Fee, if any, shall be paid in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or any combination of the forgoing at the sole discretion of the Company. If the Success Fee is paid in shares of common stock, deemed to be an equity award, the amount of common stock paid will be determined using a price per share equal to the average of closing prices of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market for the 20 trading days ending on the last trading day prior to the earliest occurring Success Fee Event; provided, however, that the price per share shall be no less than $16.00 per share.
In connection with entering into a joint venture to develop the Company’s East Area I project, on November 10, 2015 (See Note 27, Subsequent Events) the success fee became payable and was determined to be $2,100,000 which will be paid in cash on or before January 31, 2016. The success fee will be capitalized as a component of the Company’s investment in the joint venture.
79
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
7. Real Estate Development (continued)
East Areas I and II (continued)
In connection with facilitating the annexation of East Area I into the City of Santa Paula, during February 2014, the Company entered into a Capital Improvement Cost Sharing Agreement for Improvements to Santa Paula Creek Channel (the “Cost Sharing Agreement”) with the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (the “District”). The Cost Sharing Agreement requires the Company to reimburse the District 28.5% of the costs of the improvements, up to a maximum of $5,000,000. Additionally, the Company is required to pay the cost of preparing a study to determine a feasible scope of work and budget for the improvements. No costs have been incurred to date in relation to this agreement.
Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC
The three real estate development parcels within the Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC project (“Templeton Project”) are described as Centennial Square (“Centennial”), The Terraces at Pacific Crest (“Pacific Crest”) and Sevilla. The carrying values of Centennial, Pacific Crest and Sevilla at October 31, 2015 were $2,983,000, $3,370,000 and $4,686,000, respectively.
During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, the Company capitalized zero and $198,000, respectively, of costs related to these real estate development projects. Additionally, in relation to these projects, the Company incurred net expenses of $167,000, $129,000 and $32,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
On August 25, 2014, the Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell Centennial for $3,100,000 cash. The sale transaction was not completed but an impairment charge of $435,000 was recognized in fiscal year 2014 for the difference in expected net proceeds and the book value of the properties at October 31, 2014.
On November 29, 2013, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions to sell Sevilla and Pacific Crest for a combined purchase price of $8,300,000. The sale transactions were not completed but an impairment charge of $95,000 was recognized in fiscal year 2013 for the difference in expected net proceeds and the book value of the properties at October 31, 2013.
Windfall Investors, LLC
On November 15, 2009, the Company acquired Windfall Investors, LLC, which included $16,842,000 of real estate development assets. During 2015 and 2014, the Company capitalized $3,768,000 and $1,428,000, respectively, of costs primarily related to development of vineyards at this real estate development project. Additionally, in relation to this project, the Company has incurred net expenses of $1,052,000, $954,000 and $644,000, in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
80
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
8. Equity Investments
Limco Del Mar, Ltd.
The Company has a 1.3% interest in Limco Del Mar, Ltd. (“Del Mar”) as a general partner and a 22.1% interest as a limited partner. Based on the terms of the partnership agreement, the Company may be removed without cause from the partnership upon the vote of the limited partners owning an aggregate of 50% or more interest in the partnership. Since the Company has significant influence, but less than a controlling interest, the Company’s investment in Del Mar is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The Company provides Del Mar with farm management, orchard land development and accounting services and received expense reimbursements of $150,000, $141,000 and $141,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company also performed contract lemon packing services for Del Mar and recognized revenues of $568,000, $675,000 and $733,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Fruit proceeds due to Del Mar were $712,000 and $828,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and are included in grower’s payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Romney Property Partnership
In May 2007, the Company and an individual formed the Romney Property Partnership (“Romney”) for the purpose of owning and leasing an office building and adjacent lot in Santa Paula, California. The Company paid $489,000 in 2007 for 75% interest in Romney, and contributed $9,000, $8,000 and $34,000 to the partnership in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The terms of the partnership agreement affirm the status of the Company as a non-controlling investor in the partnership since the Company cannot exercise unilateral control over the partnership. Since the Company has significant influence, but less than a controlling interest, the Company’s investment in Romney is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Net profits, losses and cash flows of Romney are shared by the Company, which receives 75% and the individual, who receives 25%.
HM East Ridge, LLC
In February 2010, the Company and HM Manager, LLC formed HM East Ridge, LLC, (“East Ridge”) for the purpose of developing one of the four Templeton Project parcels. The Company and HM Manager each had a 50% interest in the East Ridge. The Company’s initial capital contribution into East Ridge was the land parcel with a net carrying value of $7,207,000.
On April 8, 2013 the Company and HM East Ridge, LLC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell its East Ridge parcel of property for $6,000,000. The transaction closed in June 2013 and generated net proceeds of $5,713,000. The Company recognized a loss of $1,754,000, which is included in equity earnings (losses) of investments in the Company’s fiscal year 2013 consolidated statements of operations.
81
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
8. Equity Investments (continued)
Limoneira Chile SpA
On August 14, 2014, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Limoneira Chile SpA, the Company invested $1,750,000 for a 35% interest in Rosales S.A, (“Rosales”), a citrus packing, marketing and sales business located in La Serena, Chile. The Company’s investment includes certain preferred interest provisions through December 31, 2016, including cash distributions of the 50% and 40% of the net income of Rosales for the years ending December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively, as well as a liquidation preference on its investment. In addition, the Company has the right to acquire the 52% interest of the majority shareholder of Rosales upon death or disability of Rosales’ general manager for the fair value of the interest on the date of the event as defined in the shareholders’ agreement. Since the Company has significant influence, but less than a controlling interest, the Company’s investment in Rosales is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Rosales’ functional currency is the Chilean Peso. The following financial information has been translated to U.S. dollars. In addition, as a result of the Company’s acquisition of its equity interest, basis differences were identified between the historical cost of the net assets of Rosales and the proportionate fair value of the net assets acquired. Such basis differences aggregated $1,683,000 on the acquisition date and are primarily comprised of intangible assets, including $343,000 of equity method goodwill. The remaining $1,340,000 in basis differences is being amortized over the estimated life of the underlying intangible assets as a reduction in the equity investment and an expense included in equity in earnings (losses) of investments. Amortization amounted to $208,000 and $43,000 for fiscal year 2015 and from the acquisition date to October 31, 2014, respectively and is estimated to be approximately $206,000 per year through October 31, 2018 and $55,000 per year for years ending October 31, 2019 through October 31, 2023.
The following is unaudited financial information of the equity method investees for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013:
| 2015 | Del Mar | Romney | East Ridge | Rosales | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 1,204,000 | $ | 652,000 | $ | – | $ | 2,103,000 | $ | 3,959,000 | ||||||||||
| Liabilities | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 1,113,000 | $ | 1,113,000 | ||||||||||
| Equity | 1,204,000 | 652,000 | – | 990,000 | 2,846,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,204,000 | $ | 652,000 | $ | – | $ | 2,103,000 | $ | 3,959,000 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,817,000 | $ | 13,000 | $ | – | $ | 4,864,000 | $ | 7,694,000 | ||||||||||
| Expenses | 876,000 | 17,000 | – | 4,838,000 | 5,731,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,941,000 | $ | (4,000 | ) | $ | – | $ | 26,000 | $ | 1,963,000 | |||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 2,623,000 | $ | 707,000 | $ | – | $ | 3,722,000 | $ | 7,052,000 | ||||||||||
| Liabilities | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 2,471,000 | $ | 2,471,000 | ||||||||||
| Equity | 2,623,000 | 707,000 | – | 1,251,000 | 4,581,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,623,000 | $ | 707,000 | $ | – | $ | 3,722,000 | $ | 7,052,000 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,003,000 | $ | 6,000 | $ | – | $ | 2,175,000 | $ | 4,184,000 | ||||||||||
| Expenses | 910,000 | 16,000 | – | 2,009,000 | 2,935,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,093,000 | $ | (10,000 | ) | $ | – | $ | 166,000 | $ | 1,249,000 | |||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | $ | 2,286,000 | $ | 712,000 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 2,998,000 | ||||||||||
| Liabilities | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||||||
| Equity | 2,286,000 | 712,000 | – | – | 2,998,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,286,000 | $ | 712,000 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 2,998,000 | ||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 2,218,000 | $ | 9,000 | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | – | $ | 8,227,000 | ||||||||||
| Expenses | 862,000 | 25,000 | 7,754,000 | – | 8,641,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,356,000 | $ | (16,000 | ) | $ | (1,754,000 | ) | $ | – | $ | (414,000 | ) | |||||||
82
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
8. Equity Investments (continued)
The Company’s investment and equity in earnings (losses) of the equity method investees are as follows:
| Del Mar | Romney | East Ridge | Rosales | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment balance October 31, 2012 | $ | 1,058,000 | $ | 513,000 | $ | 7,376,000 | $ | – | $ | 8,947,000 | ||||||||||
| Equity earnings (losses) | 317,000 | (12,000 | ) | (1,754,000 | ) | – | (1,449,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Cash distributions | (110,000 | ) | – | (5,713,000 | ) | – | (5,823,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Investment contributions | – | 34,000 | 91,000 | – | 125,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Investment balance October 31, 2013 | 1,265,000 | 535,000 | – | – | 1,800,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity earnings (losses) | 256,000 | (8,000 | ) | – | 15,000 | 263,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash distributions | (183,000 | ) | – | – | – | (183,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Investment contributions | – | 8,000 | – | 1,750,000 | 1,758,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Investment balance October 31, 2014 | 1,338,000 | 535,000 | – | 1,765,000 | 3,638,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity earnings (losses) | 455,000 | (13,000 | ) | – | (199,000 | ) | 243,000 | |||||||||||||
| Cash distributions | (789,000 | ) | – | – | (54,000 | ) | (843,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Investment contributions | – | 9,000 | – | – | 9,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Investment balance October 31, 2015 | $ | 1,004,000 | $ | 531,000 | $ | – | $ | 1,512,000 | $ | 3,047,000 | ||||||||||
9. Investment in Calavo Growers, Inc.
In June 2005, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Calavo. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company purchased 1,000,000 shares, or approximately 6.9%, of Calavo’s common stock for $10,000,000 and Calavo purchased 1,728,570 shares, or approximately 15.1%, of the Company’s common stock for $23,450,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received net cash consideration of $13,450,000. The Company has classified its Calavo investment as available-for-sale. In fiscal year 2009, the Company sold 335,000 shares of Calavo stock for a total of $6,079,000, recognizing a gain of $2,729,000.
On April 11, 2013, the Company sold 165,000 shares of Calavo stock at a price of $29.02 per share (the closing price on April 10, 2013). Calavo repurchased the shares pursuant to the 2005 stock repurchase agreement between the companies. The net proceeds to the Company from the sale were $4,788,000 and the Company recognized a gain of $3,138,000, which is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations.
In October 2015, the Company sold 140,000 shares of Calavo stock at an average price of $46.00 per share. Following the sale, the Company continues to own 360,000 shares of Calavo common stock. The net proceeds to the Company from the sale were $6,433,000 and the Company recognized a gain of $5,033,000, which is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations.
Additionally, changes in the fair value of the available-for-sale securities result in unrealized holding gains or losses on shares held by the Company and reclassifications of unrealized gains on securities sold by the Company. In fiscal year 2015, the Company recorded unrealized holding gains of $487,000 ($273,000 net of tax) and reclassification of unrealized gain on security sold of $4,850,000 ($2,932,000 net of tax). In fiscal year 2014, the Company recorded unrealized holding gains of $9,425,000 ($5,790,000 net of tax). In fiscal year 2013, the Company recorded unrealized holding gains of $3,893,000 ($2,344,000 net of tax) and reclassification of unrealized gain on security sold of $3,098,000 ($1,865,000 net of tax).
83
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
10. Note Receivable
In fiscal year 2004, the Company sold a parcel of land in Morro Bay, California. The sale was recognized under the installment method and the resulting gain on the sale of $161,000 was deferred. In connection with the sale, the Company recorded a note receivable of $4,263,000. Principal of $2,963,000 and interest was paid in April 2005 and $112,000 of the deferred gain was recognized as income at that time. The remaining deferred gain is included in other long-term liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The remaining principal balance of $1,300,000 and the related accrued interest was initially payable in April 2009; however, the Company and the buyer of the Morro Bay land executed a note extension agreement in March 2009. Based on the terms of the note extension agreement, the remaining principal balance of $1,300,000 and the related accrued interest was to be paid in full on April 1, 2014. During July 2011, the Company and the buyer agreed to extend the due date for the note from April 1, 2014 to April 1, 2020 and to convert the interest rate from a fixed rate of 7.0% to a floating rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% with a floor of 6.0%. On April 1, 2014 the rate converted to a floating rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% with no floor. The note is subordinate to bank financing and provides for repayment that is based on a percentage of net operating cash flows of the underlying avocado orchard as defined in the note, ranging from 35% through 2014 and 50% until fully repaid or any unpaid balance due and payable on the due date. Total principal and interest due was $589,000 and $2,084,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Interest continues to accrue on the principal balance of the note and was $40,000, $60,000 and $78,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In fiscal year 2015, the holder of the note completed the drilling of three water wells at the Company’s Windfall Investors, LLC real estate development property and two water wells at the Sheldon Ranches, which are leased by the Company. The fair value of the well drilling services was $1,535,000 and the Company recorded a non-cash reduction of the note receivable comprised of $824,000 in accrued interest and $711,000 of principal. Additionally, the Company recognized $27,000 of deferred gain in fiscal year 2015.
11. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Investments in mutual water companies | $ | 4,031,000 | $ | 3,731,000 | ||||
| Acquired water and mineral rights | 1,536,000 | 1,536,000 | ||||||
| Deferred lease assets and other | 1,560,000 | 1,282,000 | ||||||
| Revolving funds and memberships | 349,000 | 355,000 | ||||||
| Acquired trade names and trademarks | 446,000 | 530,000 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 680,000 | 680,000 | ||||||
| $ | 8,602,000 | $ | 8,114,000 | |||||
Investments in Mutual Water Companies
The Company’s investments in various not-for-profit mutual water companies provide the Company with the right to receive a proportionate share of water from each of the not-for-profit mutual water companies that have been invested in and do not constitute voting shares and/or rights.
Acquired Water and Mineral Rights
Acquired water and mineral rights are indefinite-life intangible assets not subject to amortization.
84
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Other Assets (continued)
Deferred Lease Assets and Other
Deferred lease assets and other as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 includes $586,000 and $793,000 of deferred rent assets, respectively, $156,000 and $204,000 of net deferred financing costs, respectively, and $79,000 and $91,000 of prepaid lease amounts on pollination equipment, respectively.
In addition, deferred lease assets and other as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 includes a patent for an agricultural variety with a carrying value of $110,000 and $123,000, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $112,000 and $99,000, respectively. Amortization expense associated with the patent was $13,000 for each of the fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013. The Company will amortize $13,000 each year for fiscal years 2016 through 2019 related to its patent.
Revolving Funds and Memberships
Revolving funds and memberships represent the Company’s investments in various cooperative associations.
Acquired Trade Names, Trademarks and Goodwill
The Company acquired $486,000 of trade names and trademarks and $680,000 of goodwill in its acquisition of Associated in September 2013. The Company amortized $60,000 in fiscal year 2015 and will amortize $60,000 each year for fiscal years 2016 through 2019 related to trade names and trademarks. Additionally, we acquired $160,000 of customer relationships with the acquisition of the Yuma packinghouse, which are being amortized over five years.
12. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Compensation | $ | 1,655,000 | $ | 3,280,000 | ||||
| Income taxes | 180,000 | - | ||||||
| Property taxes | 541,000 | 500,000 | ||||||
| Interest | 263,000 | 235,000 | ||||||
| Deferred rental income and deposits | 892,000 | 598,000 | ||||||
| Lease expense | 827,000 | 1,458,000 | ||||||
| Lemon supplier payables | 788,000 | 624,000 | ||||||
| Capital expenditures and other | 718,000 | 844,000 | ||||||
| $ | 5,864,000 | $ | 7,539,000 | |||||
85
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
13. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt is comprised of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Rabobank revolving credit facility: the interest rate is variable based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which was 0.19% at October 31, 2015, plus 1.80%. Interest is payable monthly and the principal is due in full in June 2018. | $ | 83,834,000 | $ | 61,623,000 | ||||
| Farm Credit West term loan: the interest rate is variable and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. The loan is payable in quarterly installments through November 2022. | 4,235,000 | 4,756,000 | ||||||
| Farm Credit West non-revolving line of credit: the interest rate is variable and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. Interest is payable monthly and the principal is due in full in May 2018. | 492,000 | 492,000 | ||||||
| Farm Credit West term loan: the interest rate is variable and was 2.75% at October 31, 2015. The loan is payable in monthly installments through October 2035. | 1,263,000 | 1,475,000 | ||||||
| CNH Capital loans: these loans were fully paid in May and July 2015. | - | 8,000 | ||||||
| 89,824,000 | 68,354,000 | |||||||
| Less current portion | 589,000 | 583,000 | ||||||
| Total long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 89,235,000 | $ | 67,771,000 | ||||
The Rabobank and Farm Credit West loans are secured by certain of the Company’s agricultural properties and a portion of the equity interest in the Company’s investments in certain mutual water companies.
On March 31, 2014, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2008 in order to, among other things, release Rabobank’s security interest in Teague McKevett Ranch, which is also known as East Area I real estate development project, in Ventura County, California, and grant Rabobank a security interest in certain of the Company’s agricultural properties located in Ventura and Tulare Counties. The line of credit provides for maximum borrowings of $100,000,000 and the borrowing capacity based on collateral value was $92,556,000 at October 31, 2015. The Company paid debt financing costs of $106,000 in fiscal year 2014 related to this amendment.
Interest is capitalized on non-bearing orchards, real estate development projects and significant construction in progress. The Company capitalized interest of $2,534,000 and $2,315,000 during the year ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Capitalized interest is included in property, plant and equipment and real estate development assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company incurs certain loan fees and costs associated with its new or amended credit arrangements. Such costs are capitalized as deferred financing costs and amortized as interest expense using the straight-line method over the terms of the credit agreements. The balance of deferred financing costs is $156,000 net of amortization and is included in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2015.
Principal payments on the Company’s long-term debt are due as follows:
| 2016 | $ | 589,000 | ||
| 2017 | 605,000 | |||
| 2018 | 84,948,000 | |||
| 2019 | 640,000 | |||
| 2020 | 657,000 | |||
| Thereafter | 2,385,000 | |||
| $ | 89,824,000 |
86
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
14. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Derivative financial instruments consist of the following at October 31:
| Notional Amount | Fair Value Liability | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Pay fixed-rate, receive floating-rate forward interest rate swap, beginning July 2013 until June 2018 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 1,702,000 | $ | 1,782,000 | ||||||||
In November 2011, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap agreement with Rabobank International, Utrecht to fix the interest rate at 4.30% on $40,000,000 of its outstanding borrowings under the Rabobank line of credit beginning July 2013 until June 2018. This interest rate swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge and is accounted for as a hedge under the short-cut method. Therefore, the fair value liability is included in fair value of derivative instruments, other long-term liabilities and related accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company’s previous interest rate swap, which had a notional amount of $42,000,000 and expired June 2013, did not qualify for hedge accounting. Therefore, mark to market adjustments to the underlying fair value net liability and amortization of the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance resulted in non-cash interest income of $711,000 in fiscal year 2013.
15. Related-Party Transactions
The Company rents certain of its residential housing assets to employees on a month-to-month basis. The Company recorded $622,000, $561,000 and $534,000 of rental income from employees in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no rental payments due from employees at October 31, 2015 and 2014.
The Company has representation on the boards of directors of the mutual water companies in which the Company has investments. The Company recorded capital contributions and purchased water and water delivery services from such mutual water companies, in aggregate, of $1,357,000, $1,232,000 and $1,135,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Capital contributions are included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and purchased water and water delivery services are included in agribusiness expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Water payments due to the mutual water companies were, in aggregate, $175,000 and $74,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The Company has representation on the board of directors of a non-profit cooperative association that provides pest control services for the agricultural industry. The Company purchased services and supplies of $1,567,000, $1,425,000 and $1,266,000 from the association in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Such amounts are included in agribusiness expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Payments due to the cooperative were $142,000 and $177,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The Company recorded dividend income of $375,000, $350,000 and $432,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, on its investment in Calavo, which is included in other income, net, in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company had $7,132,000, $7,374,000 and $11,683,000 in avocado sales to Calavo in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Additionally, the Company had $67,000, zero and $242,000 in lemon sales to Calavo in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Such amounts are included in agribusiness revenues in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company leases office space to Calavo and received rental income of $272,000, $277,000, and $271,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Such amounts are included in rental revenues in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. No amounts were receivable by the Company from Calavo at October 31, 2015 or 2014. The Company purchased $162,000, $658,000 and $2,418,000 of primarily packed avocados and lemons to sell from Calavo in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No amounts were due to Calavo at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Certain members of the Company’s board of directors market lemons through the Company pursuant to its customary marketing agreements. During fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 the aggregate amount of lemons procured from entities owned or controlled by members of the board of directors was $1,472,000, $1,583,000 and $1,101,000, respectively, which is included in agribusiness expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Payments due to these Board members were $531,000 and $592,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
87
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
15. Related-Party Transactions (continued)
On July 1, 2013, the Company and Cadiz Real Estate, LLC (“Cadiz”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cadiz, Inc., entered into a long-term lease agreement (the “Lease”) for a minimum of 320 acres, with options to lease up to an additional 960 acres, located within 9,600 zoned agricultural acres owned by Cadiz in eastern San Bernardino County, California. The initial term of the Lease runs for 20 years and the annual base rental will be equal to the sum of $200 per planted acre and 20% of gross revenues from the sale of harvested lemons (less operating expenses) and will not exceed $1,200 per acre per year. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, $58,000 and $15,000 of lease expense was incurred in connection with this lease. A member of the Company’s Board of Directors serves as the CEO, President and a member of the board of directors of Cadiz, Inc. Additionally, this board member is an attorney with a law firm that provided services of $148,000, $82,000, and $18,000 to the Company during the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively. Payments due to the law firm were $42,000 and $1,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
On February 3, 2015, the Company entered into a Modification of Lease Agreement (the “Amendment”) with Cadiz. The Amendment, among other things, increased by 200 acres the amount of property leased by the Company under the lease agreement dated July 1, 2013. In connection with the Amendment, the Company paid a total of $1,212,000 to acquire existing lemon trees and irrigations systems from Cadiz and a Cadiz tenant.
The Company has representation on the board of directors of Colorado River Growers, Inc. (“CRG”), a non-profit cooperative association of fruit growers engaged in the agricultural harvesting business in Yuma County, Arizona. The Company paid harvest and third-party grower expense to CRG of $6,003,000 for the year ended October 31, 2015 and $6,805,000 for the year ended October 31, 2014. Such amounts are included in agribusiness expense in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Additionally, Associated provided harvest management and administrative services to CRG in the amount of $218,000, $345,000, and $112,000 during the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively. Such amounts are included in agribusiness revenues in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. There was $116,000 and $40,000 due to Associated from CRG at October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively, which is included in accounts receivable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company has representation on the board of directors of Yuma Mesa Irrigation and Drainage District (“YMIDD”). In December 2013, Associated entered into an agreement, as amended in December 2014 and 2015, with YMIDD to participate in a Pilot Fallowing Program in which Associated agreed to forego its water allocation for approximately 300 acres of land in exchange for $750 per acre through December 31, 2016, unless terminated sooner by YMIDD. In relation to this program the Company recorded income of $210,000 and $166,000 during the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In relation to this program, during the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 the Company recorded losses on orchard disposals of $160,000 and $183,000, respectively. These net amounts are included in other income, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, the Company purchased water in the amount of $125,000, $119,000 and $59,000 during fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Such amounts are included in agribusiness expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. There were no amounts receivable from or payments due to YMIDD at October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014.
88
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
16. Income Taxes
The components of the provisions for income taxes for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | (3,315,000 | ) | $ | (2,820,000 | ) | $ | (3,589,000 | ) | |||
| State | (1,007,000 | ) | (882,000 | ) | (856,000 | ) | ||||||
| Foreign | (2,000 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
| Total current provision | (4,324,000 | ) | (3,702,000 | ) | (4,445,000 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | 343,000 | 80,000 | 1,084,000 | |||||||||
| State | 7,000 | 49,000 | 126,000 | |||||||||
| Total deferred provision | 350,000 | 129,000 | 1,210,000 | |||||||||
| Total provision | $ | (3,974,000 | ) | $ | (3,573,000 | ) | $ | (3,235,000 | ) | |||
The income tax provision differs from the amount which would result from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily as a result of dividend exclusions, the domestic production activities deduction and state income taxes.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net of temporary differences between the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The components of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) at October 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Deferred income tax assets (liabilities): | ||||||||
| Labor accruals | $ | 246,000 | $ | 250,000 | ||||
| Property taxes | (205,000 | ) | (181,000 | ) | ||||
| State income taxes | 337,000 | 288,000 | ||||||
| Prepaid insurance and other | 38,000 | 77,000 | ||||||
| Depreciation | (5,518,000 | ) | (5,678,000 | ) | ||||
| Amortization | 683,000 | 332,000 | ||||||
| Impairments of real estate development assets | 3,152,000 | 3,145,000 | ||||||
| Derivative instruments | 669,000 | 699,000 | ||||||
| Minimum pension liability adjustment | 1,715,000 | 1,945,000 | ||||||
| Unrealized net gain on Calavo investment | (5,864,000 | ) | (7,564,000 | ) | ||||
| Book and tax basis difference of acquired assets | (14,482,000 | ) | (14,093,000 | ) | ||||
| Other | (196,000 | ) | (261,000 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (19,425,000 | ) | $ | (21,041,000 | ) | ||
In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes", an update to ASC 740, Income Taxes (“Update”). Current GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this Update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this Update.
For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Board also decided to permit earlier application by all entities as of the beginning of any interim or annual reporting period. The Board further provides that this Update may be applied to all deferred tax liabilities and assets retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company chose to adopt the Update retrospectively in fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 and reclassified $751,000 from net current deferred income tax assets to net deferred income tax liabilities as of October 31, 2014.
89
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
16. Income Taxes (continued)
At October 31, 2015, the Company had state operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $400,000. The state loss carry-forwards will begin to expire in fiscal year 2032, unless previously utilized.
The income tax provision differs from that computed using the federal statutory rate applied to income before taxes as follows for fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013:
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision at statutory rates | $ | (3,757,000 | ) | (34.0)% | $ | (3,587,000 | ) | (34.0)% | $ | (2,768,000 | ) | (34.0)% | ||||||||||||
| State income tax, net of federal benefit | (614,000 | ) | (5.5)% | (552,000 | ) | (5.2)% | (509,000 | ) | (6.2)% | |||||||||||||||
| Dividend exclusion | 94,000 | 0.8% | 83,000 | 0.8% | 103,000 | 1.3% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Production deduction | 495,000 | 4.5% | 461,000 | 4.4% | 175,000 | 2.1% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other permanent items | (192,000 | ) | (1.7)% | 22,000 | 0.2% | (236,000 | ) | (2.9)% | ||||||||||||||||
| Total income tax provision | $ | (3,974,000 | ) | (35.9)% | $ | (3,573,000 | ) | (33.8)% | $ | (3,235,000 | ) | (39.7)% | ||||||||||||
The Company recognizes excess tax deductions associated with the vesting of stock grants directly to stockholders’ equity when realized.
At October 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. The Company reports accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S., California and Arizona. The Company is no longer subject to significant U.S. and state income tax examinations for years prior to the statutory periods of three years for federal and four years for state tax jurisdictions. The Company recognizes interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. There was no accrued interest or penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as of October 31, 2015.
17. Retirement Plans
The Limoneira Company Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is a noncontributory, defined benefit, single employer pension plan, which provides retirement benefits for all eligible employees. Benefits paid by the Plan are calculated based on years of service, highest five-year average earnings, primary Social Security benefit and retirement age. Effective June 2004, the Company froze the Plan and no additional benefits accrued to participants subsequent to that date. The Plan is administered by Wells Fargo Bank and Mercer Human Resource Consulting.
The Plan is funded consistent with the funding requirements of federal law and regulations. There were funding contributions of $375,000 and $500,000 for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. Plan assets are invested in a group trust consisting primarily of pooled funds, mutual funds, short-term investment funds and cash.
The investment policy and strategy has been established to provide a total investment return that will, over time, maintain purchasing power parity for the Plan’s variable benefits and keep the Plan funding at a reasonable level. The long-term target asset allocation ranges are as follows: Domestic Equity 35%-40%; International Equity 10%-15%; Fixed Income 47% and Cash 3%.
The following tables set forth the Plan’s net periodic cost, changes in benefit obligation and Plan assets, funded status, amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, additional year-end information and assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost.
90
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
17. Retirement Plans (continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Plan for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Administrative expenses | $ | 135,000 | $ | 135,000 | ||||
| Interest cost | 852,000 | 820,000 | ||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (1,128,000 | ) | (1,073,000 | ) | ||||
| Recognized actuarial loss | 984,000 | 781,000 | ||||||
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 843,000 | $ | 663,000 | ||||
Following is a summary of the Plan’s funded status as of October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Change in benefit obligation: | ||||||||
| Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 21,959,000 | $ | 19,280,000 | ||||
| Service cost | 135,000 | 135,000 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 852,000 | 820,000 | ||||||
| Benefits paid | (1,031,000 | ) | (1,006,000 | ) | ||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (864,000 | ) | 2,730,000 | |||||
| Benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 21,051,000 | $ | 21,959,000 | ||||
| Change in plan assets: | ||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 17,005,000 | $ | 16,375,000 | ||||
| Actual return on plan assets | 343,000 | 1,136,000 | ||||||
| Employer contributions | 375,000 | 500,000 | ||||||
| Benefits paid | (1,031,000 | ) | (1,006,000 | ) | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 16,692,000 | $ | 17,005,000 | ||||
| Reconciliation of funded status: | ||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets | $ | 16,692,000 | $ | 17,005,000 | ||||
| Benefit obligations | 21,051,000 | 21,959,000 | ||||||
| Net plan obligations | $ | (4,359,000 | ) | $ | (4,954,000 | ) | ||
| Amounts recognized in statements of financial position: | ||||||||
| Noncurrent assets | $ | – | $ | – | ||||
| Current liabilities | – | – | ||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities | (4,359,000 | ) | (4,954,000 | ) | ||||
| Net obligation recognized in statements of financial position | $ | (4,359,000 | ) | $ | (4,954,000 | ) | ||
| Reconciliation of amounts recognized in statements of financial position: | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (8,015,000 | ) | $ | (9,077,000 | ) | ||
| Accumulated contributions in excess of net periodic benefit cost | 3,656,000 | 4,123,000 | ||||||
| Net deficit recognized in statements of financial position | $ | (4,359,000 | ) | $ | (4,954,000 | ) |
91
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
17. Retirement Plans (continued)
Presented below are changes in accumulated other comprehensive income, before tax, in the Plan as of October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Changes recognized in other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
| Net (gain) loss arising during the year | $ | (79,000 | ) | $ | 2,667,000 | |||
| Amortization or settlement recognition of net loss | (984,000 | ) | (781,000 | ) | ||||
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss | $ | (1,063,000 | ) | $ | 1,886,000 | |||
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit and other comprehensive (income) loss | $ | (220,000 | ) | $ | 2,549,000 | |||
Presented below is the October 31 year-ended estimated amount that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income over the next fiscal year:
| 2015 | ||||
| Initial net asset (obligation) | $ | – | ||
| Prior service credit (cost) | – | |||
| Net loss | 746,000 | |||
| Total | $ | 746,000 | ||
The following assumptions, as of October 31, were used in determining benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations: | ||||||||
| Discount rate | 4.10 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||
| Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||
| Discount rate | 4.00 | % | 4.40 | % | ||||
| Expected return on plan assets | 7.00 | % | 7.00 | % | ||||
| Additional year-end information: | ||||||||
| Projected benefit obligation | $ | 21,051,000 | $ | 21,959,000 | ||||
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 21,051,000 | $ | 21,959,000 | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets | $ | 16,692,000 | $ | 17,005,000 | ||||
92
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
17. Retirement Plans (continued)
The Company expects to contribute $500,000 to the Plan in fiscal year 2016. Additionally, benefit payments are expected to be paid during the following fiscal years:
| 2016 | $ | 1,117,000 | ||
| 2017 | 1,168,000 | |||
| 2018 | 1,199,000 | |||
| 2019 | 1,220,000 | |||
| 2020 | 1,225,000 | |||
| 2021-2025 | 6,362,000 | |||
| $ | 12,291,000 |
The following table sets forth the Plan’s assets as of October 31, 2015, segregated by level using the hierarchy established by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 525,000 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 525,000 | ||||||||
| Mutual funds | 1,238,000 | – | – | 1,238,000 | ||||||||||||
| Pooled funds | – | 14,929,000 | – | 14,929,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 1,763,000 | 14,929,000 | $ | – | $ | 16,692,000 | ||||||||||
The Company has a 401(k) plan in which it contributes an amount equal to 4% of an eligible employee’s annual earnings beginning after one year of employment. Employees may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual earnings subject to Internal Revenue Code limits. The Company makes an additional matching contribution on these deferrals up to 4% of the employee’s annual earnings. Employees are 100% vested in the Company’s contribution after six years of employment. Participants vest in any matching contribution at a rate of 20% per year beginning after one year of employment. During fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, the Company contributed to the plan and recognized expenses of $775,000, $647,000, and $615,000, respectively.
93
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
18. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following at October 31:
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||||
| Minimum pension liability | $ | 4,359,000 | $ | 4,954,000 | ||||
| Fair value of derivative instrument | 935,000 | 973,000 | ||||||
| Contingent consideration | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||||||
| Deposit received for joint venture interest | 2,000,000 | - | ||||||
| Deferred gain and other | 47,000 | 55,000 | ||||||
| $ | 7,641,000 | $ | 6,282,000 | |||||
19. Operating Lease Income
The Company rents certain of its assets under net operating lease agreements ranging from one month to 20 years. The cost of land subject to agricultural land leases was $1,865,000 at October 31, 2015. The total cost and accumulated depreciation of buildings, equipment and building improvements subject to leases was $21,042,000 and $5,370,000, respectively, at October 31, 2015. The Company’s rental operations revenue includes contingent rental revenue of $135,000, $200,000 and $119,000 for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The future minimum lease payments to be received by the Company related to these net operating lease agreements as of October 31, 2015, are as follows:
| 2016 | $ | 1,792,000 | ||
| 2017 | 1,621,000 | |||
| 2018 | 1,387,000 | |||
| 2019 | 529,000 | |||
| 2020 | 294,000 | |||
| Thereafter | 1,457,000 | |||
| $ | 7,080,000 |
20. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company has operating leases for agricultural land, pollinating equipment, packinghouse equipment, and photovoltaic generators. Total lease expense for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $2,922,000, $3,390,000 and $2,316,000, respectively, which is included in agribusiness costs and expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
During fiscal year 2008, the Company entered into a contract with Perpetual Power, LLC (“Perpetual”) to install a 1,000 KW photovoltaic generator in order to provide electrical power for the Company’s lemon packinghouse operations. The facility became operational in October 2008. Farm Credit West provided financing for the generator and upon completion of the construction Perpetual sold the generator to Farm Credit West. The Company then signed a 10-year operating lease agreement with Farm Credit West. At the end of the 10-year lease term, the Company will have an option to purchase the generator from Farm Credit West for $1,125,000.
94
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Operating Leases (continued)
Additionally in fiscal year 2008, the Company entered into a contract with Perpetual to install a second 1,000 KW photovoltaic generator in order to provide electrical power for the Company’s farming operations in Ducor, California. Farm Credit West provided the financing for the generator and when construction was completed, Perpetual sold the generator to Farm Credit West. The Company then signed a 10-year operating lease agreement with Farm Credit West for this facility. At the end of the 10-year lease term, the Company will have an option to purchase the generator from Farm Credit West for $1,275,000. The generator in Ducor, California became operational in December 2008. Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is $664,000 and $903,000 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively of deferred rent assets related to the Company’s Ducor solar lease as the minimum lease payments exceed the straight-line rent expense during the earlier terms of the lease.
Additionally, the Company had agreements which expired in 2014, with an electric utility through the California Solar Initiative which entitled it to receive rebates for energy produced by our solar arrays. These rebates were zero, $91,000 and $992,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In January 2012, the Company entered into six operating leases for approximately 1,000 acres of lemon, orange, specialty citrus and other crop orchards in Lindsay, California. Each of the leases is for a ten-year term and provides for four five-year renewal options with an aggregate base rent of approximately $500,000 per year. The leases also contain profit share arrangements with the lessors as additional rent on each of the properties and a provision for the potential purchase of the properties by the Company in the future. The Company incurred $1,137,000, $1,641,000, and $724,000 of net lease expense in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. During August and December 2015 the Company acquired approximately 900 acres of the leased property.
On July 1, 2013, the Company and Cadiz, entered into a long-term lease agreement for a minimum of 320 acres, with an option to lease up to an additional 640 acres, located within 9,600 zoned agricultural acres owned by Cadiz in eastern San Bernardino County, California. The initial term of the lease runs for 20 years and the annual base rental will be equal to the sum of $200 per planted acre and 20% of gross revenues from the sale of harvested lemons (less operating expenses) and will not exceed $1,200 per acre per year.
On February 3, 2015, the Company amended its lease agreement with Cadiz. The amendment, among other things; increased by 200 acres the amount of property leased by the Company under the lease agreement dated July 1, 2013. The Company incurred $58,000 and $15,000 of lease expense related to this lease in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Minimum future lease payments are as follows:
| 2016 | $ | 1,341,000 | ||
| 2017 | 1,259,000 | |||
| 2018 | 1,227,000 | |||
| 2019 | 440,000 | |||
| 2020 | 414,000 | |||
| Thereafter | 2,077,000 | |||
| $ | 6,758,000 |
Letters of Credit
The Company utilizes standby letters of credit to satisfy workers’ compensation insurance security deposit requirements. At October 31, 2015, these outstanding letters of credit totaled $137,000.
95
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
Litigation
The Company is from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At this time, the Company is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against it that it expects will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain, however, and it is possible that the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and/or operating results could be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.
21. Public Offering of Common Stock
During February 2013 the Company completed the sale of 2,070,000 shares of common stock, at a price of $18.50 per share, to institutional and other investors in a registered offering under the shelf registration statement. The offering represented 16% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on an after-issued basis. Upon completion of the offering and issuance of common stock, the Company had 13,307,085 shares of common stock outstanding. The gross proceeds of the offering totaled $38,295,000 and after an underwriting discount of $2,106,000 and other offering expenses of $292,000, the net proceeds were $35,897,000. During February 2013, the Company used the net offering proceeds to repay long-term debt.
22. Series B and Series B-2 Preferred Stock
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
In 1997, in connection with the acquisition of Ronald Michaelis Ranches, Inc., the Company issued 30,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at $100.00 par value (the “Series B Stock”).
Dividends: The holders of shares of Series B Stock are entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at an annual rate of 8.75% of par value. Such dividends are payable quarterly on the first day of January, April, July and October in each year commencing July 1, 1997.
Voting Rights: Each shareholder of Series B Stock is entitled to ten votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company.
Redemption: The Company, at the option of the Board of Directors, may redeem the Series B Stock, as a whole or in part, at any time or from time to time on or after August 1, 2017 and before July 31, 2027, at a redemption price equal to the par value thereof, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date fixed for redemption.
Conversion: The holders of Series B Stock have the right, at their option, to convert such shares into shares of Common Stock of the Company at any time prior to redemption. The conversion price is $8.00 per share of Common Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series B Stock, the conversion price shall be adjusted to reflect any dividends paid in Common Stock of the Company, the subdivision of the Common Stock of the Company into a greater number of shares of Common Stock of the Company or upon the advice of legal counsel.
Put: The holders of Series B Stock may at any time after July 1, 2017 and before June 31, 2027 cause the Company to repurchase such shares at a repurchase price equal to the par value thereof, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to the date fixed for repurchase.
Because the Series B Stock may be redeemed by holders of the shares at their discretion beginning July 1, 2017, the redemption is outside of the control the Company and accordingly, the Series B Stock has been classified as temporary equity.
In September 2015, 500 shares of Series B preferred stock were converted into 6,250 shares of Limoneira common stock.
96
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
22. Series B and Series B-2 Preferred Stock (continued)
Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock
During March and April of 2014, pursuant to a Series B-2 Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 21, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,300 shares of Series B-2, 4% voting preferred stock with a par value of $100.00 per share (“Series B-2 Preferred Stock”) to WPI-ACP Holdings, LLC (“WPI”), an entity affiliated with Water Asset Management, LLC (“WAM”) for total proceeds of $9,300,000. The transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Series B-2 Preferred Stock has the following rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions:
Conversion: Each share of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion price equal to the greater of (a) the then-market price of the Company’s common stock based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC or on such other principal market on which the Company’s common stock may then be trading and (b) $15.00 per share of common stock. Shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock may be converted into common stock (i) at any time prior to the redemption thereof, or (ii) in the event the Option Agreement (as defined below) is terminated without all of the shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock having been redeemed, within 30 calendar days following such termination.
Dividends: The holder of shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock is entitled to receive cumulative cash dividends at an annual rate of 4% of the liquidation value of $1,000 per share. Such dividends are payable quarterly on the first day of January, April, July and October in each year commencing July 1, 2014.
Liquidation Rights: In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holder of shares of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock is entitled to be paid out of the assets available for distribution, before any payment is made to the holders of the Company’s common stock or any other series or class of the Company’s shares ranking junior to the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, an amount equal to the liquidation value of $1,000 per share, plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends.
Voting Rights: Each share of Series B-2 Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders.
Redemption: The Company may redeem shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock only (i) from WPI or its designee and (ii) upon, and to the extent of, an election to exercise the option pursuant to the Option Agreement, described below, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation value of $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
Because the Series B-2 Preferred Stock may be redeemed by WPI at its discretion with the exercise of the Option Agreement, the redemption is outside of the control the Company and accordingly, the Series B-2 Preferred Stock has been classified as temporary equity.
In connection with the sale of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, Associated and another affiliate of WAM (“WPI-ACP”), entered into a series of agreements related to the future ownership and disposition of farmland with associated Colorado River water rights and other real estate that is held by Associated in Yuma, Arizona. The agreements allow the parties to explore strategies that will make the highest and best use of those assets, including but not limited to the sale or lease of assets or the expansion of a fallowing and water savings program in which a portion of Associated’s property is currently enrolled. The net proceeds of any monetization event would be shared equally by the parties. The agreements entered into include a Water Development Agreement and an Option Agreement. Pursuant to the Water Development Agreement, Associated granted WPI-ACP exclusive rights to develop water assets attributable to the real estate owned by Associated for the mutual benefit of Associated and WAM. Pursuant to the Option Agreement, Associated granted WPI-ACP an option to purchase an undivided interest of up to one-half of the real estate owned by Associated in Yuma County, Arizona (the “Property”) and the water rights associated therewith until January 1, 2026. The purchase price for the Property subject to the Option Agreement will be paid via the redemption by the Company of a proportionate percentage of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock. Unless and until a definitive agreement or definitive agreements with respect to Associated’s real estate and water rights is entered into that would cause the cessation of farming operations, Associated expects to continue farming the Property and recognize all results of operations and retain all proceeds from such operations.
97
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement s (continued)
23. Stockholders’ Equity
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and Shareholder Rights Agreement
During fiscal 2007, the Company entered into a shareholder rights agreement with the Bank of New York acting as rights agent. In connection with this agreement, on October 31, 2006, the Company designated 20,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at $.01 par value (the “Series A Stock”). Additionally, on October 31, 2006, the Company declared a dividend to be distributed on December 20, 2006, to each holder of record of the Company’s common stock the right to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Stock. If a triggering event occurs, the Board of Directors has the option to allow rights holders to exercise their rights.
Dividends: The holders of shares of Series A Stock shall be entitled to receive cash dividends in an amount per share equal to the greater of (a) $1.00 or (b) 100 times the aggregate per share amount of all cash dividends and 100 times the aggregate per share amounts of all non-cash dividends, other than a dividend payable in common stock, declared on the common stock. Such dividends are payable quarterly on the fifteenth day of January, April, July and October in each year commencing on the first quarterly dividend payment date after the first issuance of a share or fraction of shares of the Series A Stock.
Voting Rights: Each share of Series A Stock shall be entitled to one hundred votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company.
Redemption: The shares of Series A Stock shall not be redeemable.
Conversion: The shares of Series A Stock shall not be convertible.
Stock-based compensation
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan (the “Stock Plan”) that allows for the grant of common stock of the Company to members of management based on achievement of certain annual financial performance and other criteria. The number of shares granted is based on a percentage of the employee’s base salary divided by the stock price on the grant date. Shares granted under the Stock Plan generally vest over a three year period. In December 2015, 27,424 shares of common stock with a per share value of $15.29 were granted to management under the Stock Plan for fiscal year 2015 performance, resulting in total compensation expense of approximately $410,000, with $130,000 recognized in the year ended October 31, 2015 and the balance to be recognized over the next two years as the shares vest. In December 2014, 42,085 shares of common stock with a per share value of $25.35 were granted to management under the Stock Plan for fiscal 2014 performance, resulting in a total compensation expense of approximately $1,071,000, with $367,000 recognized in the year ended October 31, 2014 and the balance to be recognized over the next two years as the shares vest. In December 2013, 27,091 shares of common stock with a per share value of $26.82 were granted to management under the Stock Plan for fiscal year 2013 performance, resulting in total compensation expense of approximately $727,000, with $253,000 recognized in the year ended December 31, 2013 and the balance to be recognized over the next two years as the shares vest. Stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense and is recognized over the performance and vesting periods as summarized below:
| Performance | Shares | Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||
| Year | Granted | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 62,287 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 91,000 | |||||||||
| 2012 | 34,721 | 33,000 | 209,000 | 209,000 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | 27,091 | 237,000 | 237,000 | 253,000 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | 42,085 | 352,000 | 367,000 | - | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 27,424 | 130,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 752,000 | $ | 813,000 | $ | 553,000 | |||||||||||
98
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
23. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
Stock-based compensation (continued)
During fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, members of management exchanged 10,907, 6,619 and 11,010 shares of common stock with fair value of $275,000, $176,000 and $236,000, at the date of the exchanges, for the payment of payroll taxes associated with the vesting of shares under the Company’s stock-based compensation programs.
During fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, 15,077 13,587 and 9,040 shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s non-employee directors under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. The Company recognized $325,000, $303,000 and $200,000 of stock-based compensation in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Donation of Common Stock
During each June of 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company donated $100,000 of unregistered common stock to the Museum of Ventura County (“the Museum”), a California non-profit corporation. The number of shares of common stock issued was 4,498, 4,552 and 4,859 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which was based on the market value of Limoneira common stock on the date of the donation. The Company recognized expense of $100,000 each year, which is included in selling, general and administrative expense. The donations are to be used by the Museum to establish and operate an agriculture museum in Santa Paula, California depicting the history of agriculture in Ventura County
24. Fruit Growers Supply Cooperative
The Company is a member of Fruit Growers Supply (“FGS”), a cooperative supply corporation. FGS is the manufacturing and supply affiliate of Sunkist. FGS allocates after-tax earnings derived from non-member business to members. The allocations may then be disbursed to members as dividends no less than five years after allocation. As of October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, the Company has been allocated $729,000; however, the declaration of dividends is subject to approval by the FGS Board of Directors and members may receive amounts less than those originally allocated. The Company records allocations disbursed by FGS as reductions of agribusiness expenses. The Company received dividends of zero, $67,000 and $59,000 in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
During September 2011, the Company settled a claim with Sunkist in which Sunkist requested a refund of $586,000 of fiscal year 2010 lemon by-products revenue. The Company assigned 50% of future dividends it receives from FGS up to the amount of claim in the unconditional settlement of the claim. The balance of the claim as of October 31, 2015 was $251,000.
99
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
25. Segment Information
The Company operates in four reportable operating segments; lemon operations, other agribusiness, rental operations and real estate development. The reportable operating segments of the Company are strategic business units with different products and services, distribution processes and customer bases. The lemon operations segment includes farming, harvesting and lemon packing. The other agribusiness segment includes farming and harvesting. The rental operations segment includes housing and commercial rental operations, leased land and organic recycling. The real estate development segment includes real estate development operations. The Company does not separately allocate depreciation and amortization to its lemon operations and other agribusiness segments. No asset information is provided for reportable segments as these specified amounts are not included in the measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The Company measures operating performance, including revenues and operating income, of its operating segments and allocates resources based on its evaluation. The Company does not allocate selling, general and administrative expense, other income, interest expense and income taxes, or specifically identify them to its operating segments.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company changed the composition of its operating segments from three reportable segments to four reportable segments by presenting lemon operations separate from other agribusiness. This change was made to align operating segments with the basis that the chief operating decision maker uses to review financial information to make operating decisions, assess performance, develop strategy and allocate capital resources. All prior period disclosures below have been recast to present results on a comparable basis.
The following table provides segment information for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Lemon operations: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 78,978,000 | $ | 79,726,000 | $ | 58,137,000 | ||||||
| Costs and expenses | 61,766,000 | 59,412,000 | 49,252,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 17,212,000 | 20,314,000 | 8,885,000 | |||||||||
| Other agribusiness: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 16,146,000 | 18,796,000 | 21,853,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 12,079,000 | 12,086,000 | 12,598,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 4,067,000 | 6,710,000 | 9,255,000 | |||||||||
| Lemon and other agribusiness depreciation and amortization | 3,341,000 | 2,827,000 | 1,757,000 | |||||||||
| Total agribusiness operating income | 17,938,000 | 24,197,000 | 16,383,000 | |||||||||
| Rental operations: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 5,104,000 | 4,640,000 | 4,250,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 2,859,000 | 2,651,000 | 2,213,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 581,000 | 422,000 | 388,000 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 1,664,000 | 1,567,000 | 1,649,000 | |||||||||
| Real estate development: | ||||||||||||
| Revenues | 83,000 | 300,000 | 644,000 | |||||||||
| Costs and expenses | 1,284,000 | 1,756,000 | 1,361,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 46,000 | 79,000 | 67,000 | |||||||||
| Operating loss | (1,247,000 | ) | (1,535,000 | ) | (784,000 | ) | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses; | (13,772,000 | ) | (14,336,000 | ) | (11,850,000 | ) | ||||||
| Total operating income | $ | 4,583,000 | $ | 9,893,000 | $ | 5,398,000 | ||||||
100
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
25. Segment Information (Continued)
The following table sets forth revenues by category, by segment for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Lemon operations revenues | $ | 78,978,000 | $ | 79,726,000 | $ | 58,137,000 | ||||||
| Avocados | 7,132,000 | 7,374,000 | 11,683,000 | |||||||||
| Navel and Valencia oranges | 5,626,000 | 7,616,000 | 5,528,000 | |||||||||
| Specialty citrus and other crops | 3,388,000 | 3,806,000 | 4,642,000 | |||||||||
| Other agribusiness revenues | 16,146,000 | 18,796,000 | 21,853,000 | |||||||||
| Rental operations | 2,892,000 | 2,454,000 | 2,385,000 | |||||||||
| Leased land | 1,865,000 | 1,986,000 | 1,746,000 | |||||||||
| Organic recycling | 347,000 | 200,000 | 119,000 | |||||||||
| Rental operations revenues | 5,104,000 | 4,640,000 | 4,250,000 | |||||||||
| Real estate development revenues | 83,000 | 300,000 | 644,000 | |||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 100,311,000 | $ | 103,462,000 | $ | 84,884,000 | ||||||
26. Sale of Property
On August 21, 2015, the Company sold its Wilson Ranch, which is comprised of 52 acres of land with 33 acres of avocado orchards located near the City of Fillmore, in Ventura County, California. The sales price was $2,750,000 and the gain on the sale was $935,000.
27. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events subsequent to October 31, 2015, to assess the need for potential recognition or disclosure in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon this evaluation, except as disclosed below and in the notes to consolidated financial statements, it was determined that no other subsequent events occurred that require recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
East Area I Joint Venture Development Agreement
On November 10, 2015, (the “Transaction Date”) the Company entered into a joint venture with The Lewis Group of Companies (“Lewis”) for the residential development of its East Area I real estate development project. To consummate the transaction, the Company formed Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC (the “LLC” or “Joint Venture”) as the development entity, contributed its East Area I property to the LLC and sold a 50% interest in the LLC to Lewis for $20,000,000, comprised of a $2,000,000 deposit received in September 2015 and $18,000,000 received on Transaction Date. The deposit is included in other long-term liabilities as of October 31, 2015. The Company received net cash of approximately $18,800,000 after transaction costs of approximately $1,200,000, which will be expensed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. The Company’s investment in the Joint Venture was reduced by the $20,000,000 paid by Lewis. In addition, on the Transaction Date, the Company incurred a Success Fee with Parkstone Companies, Inc., as described in Note 7, Real Estate Development, in the amount of $2,100,000, which was capitalized as a component of the Company’s investment in the LLC.
On the Transaction Date, a subsidiary of the Company and Lewis also entered into a limited liability company agreement (the “LLC Agreement”) providing for the admittance of Lewis as a 50% member of the Joint Venture. The LLC Agreement provides that Lewis will serve as the initial manager of the Joint Venture with the right to manage, control, and conduct its day-to-day business and development activities. Certain major decisions, which are enumerated in the LLC Agreement, require approval by an executive committee comprised of two representatives appointed by Lewis and two representatives appointed by the Company.
101
LIMONEIRA COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
27. Subsequent Events (continued)
East Area I Joint Venture Development Agreement (continued)
Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, the Joint Venture will own, develop, subdivide, entitle, maintain, improve, hold for investment, market and dispose of the Joint Venture’s property in accordance with the business plan and budget approved by the executive committee.
Further on the Transaction Date, the Joint Venture and the Company entered into a Lease Agreement (the "Lease Agreement"), pursuant to which the Joint Venture will lease certain of the contributed East Area I property back to the Company for continuation of agricultural operations, and certain other permitted uses, on the property until the Joint Venture requires the property for development. The Lease provides a rate of $1 per year. The Company is in the process of determining a fair value rate for the leased property. The Lease will terminate in stages corresponding to the Joint Venture's development of the property, which is to occur in stages pursuant to a phased master development plan. The Joint Venture is required to provide the Company with written notice 180 days prior to the termination of any portion of the Lease. In any event, the Lease will terminate five years from the Transaction Date.
The Company and the Joint Venture Entity also entered into a Retained Property Development Agreement on the Transaction Date (the "Retained Property Agreement"). Under the terms of the Retained Property Agreement, the Joint Venture will transfer certain contributed East Area I property, which is entitled for commercial development, back to the Company (the "Retained Property") and arrange for the design and construction of certain improvements to the Retained Property, subject to certain reimbursements by the
Company.
Wells Fargo Term Loan
On December 18, 2015, Limoneira Company (the “Company”) drew an advance of $8,000,000 (the “Advance”) from Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”) and became obligated under an interim funding agreement with Wells Fargo (the “Interim Funding Agreement”). The Advance was obtained in connection with the Company financing the purchase of certain equipment associated with the Company’s new lemon packing facilities (“Equipment”). Upon the completion of the purchase of the Equipment, the Company intends to include the Advance in the aggregate funding of a $10,000,000 term loan pursuant to a Master Loan and Security Agreement and a Loan Schedule with Wells Fargo (the “Loan Agreements”), with a first priority security interest in the Equipment to Wells Fargo.
The Interim Funding Agreement provides a “Cutoff Date,” of January 31, 2016 whereby if the Equipment has not been delivered to and accepted by the Company, then upon demand the Company is obligated to repay the Advance together with any unpaid interest thereon to Wells Fargo and Wells Fargo will transfer any and all of its rights to the Equipment to the Company. The Advance matures on the earliest of: (i) the date Wells Fargo demands payment after the Cutoff Date, (ii) the date the Equipment is accepted by the Company or (iii) the date the Company repays the Advance. The foregoing summary of the Interim Funding Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Interim Funding Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1 and incorporated by reference herein. The interest rate on the Interim Funding Agreement is LIBOR plus 2% and the rate will become fixed upon establishment of the term loan.
102
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of October 31, 2015, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. See “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” on page 59 and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” on page 60.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 31, 2015 or, to our knowledge, in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Control systems, no matter how well conceived and operated, are designed to provide a reasonable, but not an absolute, level of assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
None.
103
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report because we will file a definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act (the “Proxy Statement”), not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and the applicable information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant’s Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| (a)(1) | Financial Statements | |
| Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | ||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | ||
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2015 and 2014 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Temporary Equity for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 | ||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 | ||
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | ||
| (b) | Exhibits | |
| See “Exhibit Index” set forth on page E-1. |
104
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on January 11, 2016.
| LIMONEIRA COMPANY | |||
| By: | /s/ Harold S. Edwards | ||
| Harold S. Edwards | |||
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on January 11, 2016 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated:
| Signature | Title | |
| /s/ Gordon E. Kimball | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |
| Gordon E. Kimball | ||
| /s/ Harold S. Edwards | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| Harold S. Edwards | (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| /s/ Joseph D. Rumley | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer | |
| Joseph D. Rumley | and Corporate Secretary | |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
| /s/ John W. Blanchard | Director | |
| John W. Blanchard | ||
| /s/ Lecil E. Cole | Director | |
| Lecil E. Cole | ||
| /s/ John W.H. Merriman | Director | |
| John W.H. Merriman | ||
| /s/ Ronald Michaelis | Director | |
| Ronald Michaelis | ||
| /s/ Donald R. Rudkin | Director | |
| Donald R. Rudkin | ||
| /s/ Robert M. Sawyer | Director | |
| Robert M. Sawyer | ||
| /s/ Scott S. Slater | Director | |
| Scott S. Slater |
105
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 2.1 | Certificate of Merger of Limoneira Company and The Samuel Edwards Associates into Limoneira Company, dated October 31, 1990 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 2.2 | Certificate of Merger of McKevett Corporation into Limoneira Company dated December 31, 1994 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 2.3 | Agreement of Merger Between Ronald Michaelis Ranches, Inc. and Limoneira Company, dated June 24, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Limoneira Company, dated July 5, 1990 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Limoneira Company, dated April 22, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 3.3 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Limoneira Company, dated March 24, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 3.4 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed January 14, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 3.4.1 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 25, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 3.4.2 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 18, 2014 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 4.1 | Specimen Certificate representing shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 4.2 | Rights Agreement dated December 20, 2006 between Limoneira Company and The Bank of New York, as Rights Agent (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 4.3 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $.01 Par Value, of Limoneira Company, dated November 21, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 4.4 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of $8.75 Voting Preferred Stock, $100.00 Par Value, Series B of Limoneira Company, dated May 21, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declare effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 4.5 | Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of $8.75 Voting Preferred Stock, $100.00 Par Value, Series B of Limoneira Company, dated May 21, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declare effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) |
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 4.6 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of 4% Voting Preferred Stock, $100.00 Par Value, Series B-2 of Limoneira Company, dated March 20, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.1 | Real Estate Advisory Management Consultant Agreement dated April 1, 2004, by and between Limoneira Company and Parkstone Companies (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 25, 2010 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.2 | Amendment No. 1 to Real Estate Advisory Management Consultant Agreement dated August 24, 2010, by and between Limoneira Company and Parkstone Companies (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 25, 2010 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.3 | Avocado Marketing Agreement effective February 8, 2003, by and between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Limoneira Company, as amended (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.4 | Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.5 | Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.6 | Standstill Agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.7 | Lease Agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.8 | Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008, by and between Limoneira Company and Rabobank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.9 | Amendment to Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated May 12, 2009, between Limoneira Company and Rabobank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.10 | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated November 14, 2011 between Limoneira Company and Rabobank N.A. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2011 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.11 | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Line of Credit Agreement dated March 19, 2014, between Limoneira Company and Rabobank N.A. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 2, 2014 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.12 | Revolving Equity Line of Credit Promissory Note and Loan Agreement dated October 28, 1997, between Limoneira Company and Farm Credit West, FLCA (as successor by merger to Central Coast Federal Land Bank Association) (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.13 | Promissory Note and Loan Agreement dated April 23, 2007, between Farm Credit West, FLCA and Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) |
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 10.14 | Promissory Note and Loan Agreement dated as of September 23, 2005, among Farm Credit West, FLCA and Windfall Investors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.15 | Master Loan Agreement dated as of May 1, 2012 between Limoneira Company and Farm Credit West, PCA (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.16 | Promissory Note and Supplement to Master Loan Agreement dated as of May 1, 2012 between Limoneira Company and Farm Credit West, PCA (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
10.17†
|
Limoneira Company Amended and Restated 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.18† | Limoneira Company Management Incentive Plan 2009-2010 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Form 10-K, filed January 26, 2011 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.19† | Limoneira Stock Grant Performance Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.20 | Pre-Annexation and Development Agreement dated March 3, 2008, by and between the City of Santa Paula and Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.21 | Judgment, dated March 7, 1996, United Water Conservation Dist. v. City of San Buenaventura, et al. , Case No. 115611, Superior Court of the State of California, Ventura County (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, and amendments thereto, declared effective April 13, 2010 (File No. 000-53885)) | |
| 10.22 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and the C. V. Sheldon Family Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.23 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and the CH Sheldon LP (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.24 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and Charles W. T. Sheldon (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.25 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and Paul N. Sheldon Family Trust, U/D/T 10-27-06 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.26 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and Sheldon Family Revocable Trust, U/D/T 1-31-10 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.27 | Agricultural Land Lease, dated January 6, 2012 and effective January 1, 2012, by and between Limoneira Company and Katherine J. Sheldon as Trustee of the Katherine J. Sheldon Trust (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 11, 2012 (File No. 001-34755)) |
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 10.28 | Option Agreement, dated February 27, 2013, by and among the Company, Jason B. Rushing as Trustee of the Jason B. rushing Trust, Jennifer R. rushing as trustee for the Jennifer R. Rushing Revocable trust, Zella A. Rushing as trustee of the 1988 Zella Rushing Trust (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed June 10, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.29 | Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated April 8, 2013, by and among HM East Ridge LLC, Limoneira Company and IPDC construction, Inc., (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 12, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.30 | Lease Agreement, dated July 1, 2013, by and between the Company and Cadiz, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 2, 2013 (File No. 001-34755))
| |
| 10.31 | Cadiz-Limoneira Amended and Restated Lease, dated February 3, 2015, by and between Cadiz Real Estate LLC and Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed March 9, 2015 (File No. 001-34755)). | |
| 10.32 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 6, 2013, by and among Limoneira Company, ACP Merger Sub, Inc., Associated Citrus Packers, Inc., and Mark Spencer, as the Shareholder Representative defined therein (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on form 8-K, filed September 12, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.33 | Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated September 27, 2013, by and between Sun World International, LLC and Limoneira Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 15, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.34 | Construction Contract and Agreement, dated October 1, 2013, by and between Limoneira Company and NEXGEN Builders, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 4, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.35 | General Conditions of the Contract and Agreement, dated October 1, 2013, by and between Limoneira company and NEXGEN Builders, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 4, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.36 | Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated November 29, 2013, by and between Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC and MI Land, LLC related to the sale of the Sevilla Property (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 4, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.37 | Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions, dated November 29, 2013, by and between Templeton Santa Barbara, LLC and MI Land, LLC related to the sale of the Pacific Crest Property (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 4, 2013 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.38 | Series B-2 Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 21, 2014, by and between Limoneira Company and WPI-ACP Holdings, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 24, 2014 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.39 | Contribution Agreement, dated September 4, 2015, by and among Limoneira Company and Lewis Santa Paula Member, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 10, 2015 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 10.40 | First Amended and Restated limited Liability Company Agreement of Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC, dated November 10, 2015, by and among Limoneira EA1 Land LLC and Lewis Santa Paula Member, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2015 (File No. 001-34755)) |
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 10.43 | Interim Funding Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2015, between Limoneira and Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 22, 2015 (File No. 001-34755)) | |
| 21.1* | Subsidiaries of Limoneira Company | |
| 23.1* | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| 31.1* | Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) | |
| 31.2* | Certificate of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) | |
| 32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
| 101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| * | Filed herewith |
| † | Denotes management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements |
| # | Certain portions have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. Omitted information has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |