Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - BOULDER BRANDS, INC.bdbd9302015ex-311.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - BOULDER BRANDS, INC.bdbd9302015ex-321.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - BOULDER BRANDS, INC.bdbd9302015ex-322.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - BOULDER BRANDS, INC.bdbd9302015ex-312.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 
____________________________ 
FORM 10-Q 
____________________________
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
Commission File Number 001-33595
 
____________________________
Boulder Brands, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 ____________________________
 
Delaware
20-2949397
(State of or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1600 Pearl Street - Suite 300
Boulder, Colorado
80302
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 652-0521  
____________________________
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer      x
Accelerated Filer                        o
Non-Accelerated Filer        o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company     o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o     No x
 
As of November 3, 2015, the Registrant had 61,738,832 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share, outstanding.  





BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX



i



Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
 
Statements made in this quarterly report that are not historical facts, including statements about the plans, strategies, beliefs and expectations of Boulder Brands, Inc. (the "Company"), are forward-looking and subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include the use of the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “project,” “may,” “believe” and similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including those risks and uncertainties set forth in "Item 1A. Risk Factors," located in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "2014 Form 10-K"), as well as the following factors:

the Company’s ability to implement its growth strategy, including without limitation enhancing the recognition and appeal of its brands, increasing distribution of its existing products across multiple channels, attracting new consumers to its products, and introducing new products and product extensions;
the exploration of strategic alternatives, including whether any potential sale or merger of the Company will be consummated and, if so, the timing and terms of any such transaction, the potential loss of personnel and distraction to the Company and its management as a result of the process;
the Company’s ability to manage its supply chain effectively, including maintaining sufficient capacity and appropriate inventory levels to satisfy demand for its products;
the Company’s ability to drive compelling product innovation;
lack of growth in consumer demand for packaged food products in the health and wellness space, including gluten free products, generally and for the Company’s products in particular;
the Company’s ability to maintain distribution, particularly at key customer accounts;
the Company’s ability to generate purchase volume while maintaining or growing profitability;
the Company’s ability to maintain the health of its brands, and to prevent erosion of the reputation or appeal of the Company’s brands, through sufficient and effective marketing of, and investment in, the brands;
continued adverse developments with respect to the sale of the Company’s buttery spreads and related products;
adverse developments with respect to the demand for the Company’s gluten free products, including as a result of customer and consumer shifts to private label brands;
risks associated with maintaining and upgrading the Company’s manufacturing facilities in order to, among other things, keep up with demand, produce new products and increase margins;
the loss of a manufacturer or the inability of a manufacturer to timely fulfill the Company’s orders or to maintain the quality of its products;
the departure of one or more members of the Company’s executive management team;
risks related to the Company’s rapid growth, including the need to build and enhance its infrastructure and workforce sufficient to meet the growing demand for the Company’s products;
the termination of the Company’s relationship with Acosta, Inc. and/or Presence Marketing, Inc. to act as its primary sales agents for a significant portion of its products;
changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending;
potential unavailability of necessary capital to fund the Company’s obligations and growth initiatives;
the Company’s ability to maintain existing pricing on its products and, where appropriate, effectuate price increases;
the Company’s ability to protect its intellectual property;
the expiration of certain patents utilized in some of the Company’s Balance segment products;
any sustained economic downturn in the United States, Canada or abroad and related consumer sentiment;
fluctuations in various food and supply costs as well as increased costs associated with product processing and transportation;
regulation of the Company’s advertising;
adverse publicity or consumer concern regarding the safety and quality of food products or health concerns;
the absence of long-term contracts with the Company’s customers;
economic and political conditions in the U.S. and abroad;
foreign currency fluctuations;
the identification of new acquisition opportunities and the execution and integration of acquisitions;
the realization of the expected growth benefits from the Company's acquisitions;
the risks involved in manufacturing gluten free products;
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;
risks related to an increased number of employees, labor disputes and adverse employee relations;
risks associated with conducting business outside of the United States;
potential liabilities of litigation;

1



the potential unavailability of insurance for potential liabilities;
increases in costs of medical and other employee health and welfare benefits;
the failure of the Company’s information technology systems to operate effectively and securely;
a further impairment in the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets;
volatility of the market price and trading volume of the Company’s common stock;
the numerous laws and governmental regulations the Company’s business operations may be subject to;
liabilities resulting from claims, including defense costs and negative publicity, should the consumption of any food or beverage products manufactured or marketed by the Company cause injury, illness or death;
risks that customers will not accept the Company’s products for their stores or set reasonable prices for the Company’s products;
changes in retail distribution arrangements and the trend toward fewer products stocked at retail channels;
competition; and
the Company’s cash requirements and debt, including compliance with financial covenants that restrict the Company’s operations.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and, except for the Company's ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether to reflect actual results of operations, changes in financial condition, changes in general economic or business conditions, changes in estimates, expectations or assumptions, or circumstances or events arising after the filing of this quarterly report.







2



Part I.  Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)  
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash
$
23,883

 
$
31,660

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of: $1,039 (September 30, 2015) and $1,362 (December 31, 2014)
44,382

 
40,065

Accounts receivable - other
2,843

 
4,709

Inventories
63,350

 
52,888

Prepaid taxes
6,167

 
6,985

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
5,100

 
3,844

Deferred tax asset
10,377

 
6,721

Total current assets
156,102

 
146,872

Property and equipment, net
59,143

 
53,151

Other assets:
 

 
 

Goodwill
229,552

 
233,592

Intangible assets, net
181,181

 
191,400

Deferred costs, net
6,539

 
7,830

Investments, at cost
9,751

 
11,751

Other assets
1,989

 
1,996

Total other assets
429,012

 
446,569

Total assets
$
644,257

 
$
646,592

Liabilities and Equity
 

 
 

Current liabilities:
 

 
 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
66,694

 
$
53,774

Current portion of long-term debt
1,136

 
4,101

Total current liabilities
67,830

 
57,875

Long-term debt
287,781

 
301,113

Deferred tax liability
41,184

 
41,536

Other liabilities
6,421

 
4,909

Total liabilities
403,216

 
405,433

 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies


 


Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries stockholders' equity:
 

 
 

Common stock, $.0001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 65,290,767 and 64,876,335 issued at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively and 61,600,104 and 61,185,672 outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
6

 
6

Additional paid in capital
581,791

 
574,721

Accumulated deficit
(314,564
)
 
(313,414
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(11,348
)
 
(5,837
)
Treasury stock, at cost (3,690,663 shares)
(15,595
)
 
(15,595
)
Total Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries stockholders' equity
240,290

 
239,881

Noncontrolling interest
751

 
1,278

Total equity
241,041

 
241,159

Total liabilities and equity
$
644,257

 
$
646,592

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements  

3



BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net sales
$
132,917

 
$
133,865

 
$
379,634

 
$
388,065

Cost of goods sold
84,891

 
83,422

 
243,826

 
244,319

Gross profit
48,026

 
50,443

 
135,808

 
143,746

 
 
 


 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Marketing
6,635

 
6,206

 
19,031

 
16,840

Selling
11,362

 
11,685

 
34,080

 
33,052

General and administrative
21,694

 
20,378

 
69,831

 
63,706

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs
5,084

 
(186
)
 
6,534

 
3,900

Goodwill and tradename impairment

 
150,507

 
2,696

 
150,507

Total operating expenses
44,775

 
188,590

 
132,172

 
268,005

Operating income (loss)
3,251

 
(138,147
)
 
3,636

 
(124,259
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense), net:
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Interest expense
(4,180
)
 
(5,341
)
 
(12,482
)
 
(13,906
)
Other income (expense), net
4,464

 
(580
)
 
4,193

 
(714
)
Total other income (expense), net
284

 
(5,921
)
 
(8,289
)
 
(14,620
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
3,535

 
(144,068
)
 
(4,653
)
 
(138,879
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
2,726

 
(11,873
)
 
(3,644
)
 
(9,832
)
Net income (loss)
809

 
(132,195
)
 
(1,009
)
 
(129,047
)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(455
)
 
36

 
(141
)
 
150

Net income (loss) attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries common stockholders
$
354

 
$
(132,159
)
 
$
(1,150
)
 
$
(128,897
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries common stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          Basic
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)
          Diluted
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Basic
61,514,355

 
61,032,874

 
61,354,796

 
60,803,632

Diluted
63,051,813

 
61,032,874

 
61,354,796

 
60,803,632

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
809

 
$
(132,195
)
 
$
(1,009
)
 
$
(129,047
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(2,282
)
 
(803
)
 
(4,852
)
 
(1,092
)
Cash flow hedges
(1,050
)
 

 
(659
)
 

Other comprehensive income (loss)
(3,332
)
 
(803
)
 
(5,511
)
 
(1,092
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
(2,523
)
 
(132,998
)
 
(6,520
)
 
(130,139
)
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(455
)
 
36

 
(141
)
 
150

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
$
(2,978
)
 
$
(132,962
)
 
$
(6,661
)
 
$
(129,989
)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

4



BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
Cash flows from operating activities
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(1,009
)
 
$
(129,047
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
 

 
 
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles
15,943

 
16,750

Amortization of deferred financing costs
1,567

 
1,399

Deferred income taxes
(4,605
)
 
(14,000
)
Excess tax deficiency (benefit) from stock-based payment arrangements
44

 
(4,548
)
Stock-based compensation
6,911

 
7,162

                   Asset write-offs

 
584

Loss on disposal of property and equipment
200

 
192

Impairment loss
2,696

 
150,507

Gain on sale of investment
(4,691
)
 

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 

 
 
Accounts receivable
(5,497
)
 
(14,535
)
Inventories
(11,311
)
 
(16,367
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
889

 
(7,541
)
Prepaid taxes
774

 
3,613

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
15,172

 
5,455

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
17,083

 
(376
)
Cash flows from investing activities
 

 
 

Acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired

 
(4
)
Purchase of investment
(1,000
)
 

Proceeds from sale of investment
7,691

 

Purchase of property and equipment
(13,984
)
 
(9,284
)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
13

 
28

Patent/trademark defense costs
(191
)
 
(713
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(7,471
)
 
(9,973
)
Cash flows from financing activities
 

 
 

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 
26,933

Repayment of debt
(17,941
)
 
(18,589
)
Payments for loan costs

 
(1,433
)
Contribution from (purchase of) noncontrolling interest
100

 
(280
)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
(769
)
 

Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes
(98
)
 
(2,510
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
1,460

 
3,892

Excess tax (deficiency) benefit from stock-based payment arrangements
(44
)
 
4,548

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(17,292
)
 
12,561

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
(97
)
 
(37
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash for the period
(7,777
)
 
2,175

Cash - beginning of period
31,660

 
16,732

Cash - end of period
$
23,883

 
$
18,907

Cash paid during the period for:
 

 
 

Income taxes
$
217

 
$
172

Interest
$
10,992

 
$
11,161

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

5


BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

1.     General and Basis of Presentation
 
Boulder Brands, Inc. (the "Company," "we" or "us") is a consumer foods company that markets and manufactures a wide array of consumer foods products for sale primarily in the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom.

The significant accounting policies summarized in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "2014 Form 10-K") have been followed in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2014 Form 10-K. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

We offer our customers and consumers a variety of sales and incentive programs, including discounts, allowances, coupons, slotting fees, and advertising; such amounts are estimated and recorded as a reduction in revenue. For interim reporting, we estimate the total annual sales incentives for most programs and record a pro rata share in proportion to forecasted annual revenue. As a result, we have recorded an accrued liability at September 30, 2015 of $1,314.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss from December 31, 2014 to September 30, 2015 of $5,511 includes $5,591 of losses on intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment nature.

Investments

In 2013, the Company formed a new partnership called Boulder Brands Investment Group, LLC ("BIG") with a third party. BIG invests in early-stage growth companies in the natural and organic food and beverage sectors. All investments have been accounted for under the cost method and fair value has not been estimated as there have been no identified events or changes in circumstances that would have an adverse effect on the value of these investments. As the Company has a controlling financial interest in BIG, it is consolidated with these Consolidated Financial Statements, and the applicable noncontrolling interest is reflected herein. In August of 2015, BIG sold a portion of one of its investments and recorded a consolidated gain on the sale of $4,691, of which $469 was attributable to BIG’s noncontrolling interest. The consolidated gain was recorded in “Other income (expense), net”, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, "Revenue Recognition," and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires entities to recognize the amount of revenue that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be

6

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


entitled in exchange for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of assessing both the method and the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and financial statement disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern: Disclosures about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 on its financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU No. 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability, rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance will be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company currently presents debt issuance costs as an asset and upon adoption of this ASU in 2017, will present such debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the related debt liability.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out ("FIFO") or average cost. Under the updated guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 on its financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.

2. Derivatives, Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses certain interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate exposures on the Company’s variable rate debt. The Company also enters into foreign currency derivative contracts with financial institutions to reduce the risk that its cash flows and earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Finally, the Company may also enter into commodity exchange contracts to manage risks from fluctuations in commodity costs. The Company’s hedging program is not designated for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value using market prices and rates prevailing at the balance sheet date obtained from independent exchanges. The Company records changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives that have been designated as accounting hedges in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as “Cost of goods sold,” “Interest expense, net,” or to “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
Cash Flow Hedges

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to fix the variable interest rate on a portion of the Company’s debt. The Company also uses foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges to hedge certain forecasted transactions of its Canadian subsidiary, which are denominated in U.S. dollars. The Company initially reports any gain or loss on the effective portion of a cash flow hedge as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.” Depending on the type of cash flow hedge, the gain or loss is subsequently reclassified to either interest expense when the interest expense on the variable rate debt is recognized, or to cost of goods sold when the hedged transactions affect net income. If the hedged transaction becomes probable of not occurring, any gain or loss related to interest rate swap agreements or foreign currency forward contracts would be recognized in “Other income (expense), net.”

As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements (forward starting in July 2016) had a total notional amount of $100,000, with an average fixed rate of 2.11%, expiring on July 16, 2020. At September 30, 2015, the

7

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


total notional principal amount of foreign currency forward contracts to purchase U.S. dollars with Canadian dollars (CAD) was $759 (or CAD 1,000). At December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any interest rate swap agreements or foreign currency forward contracts outstanding.

Derivatives not Designated as Accounting Hedges

The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts, which are not designated as accounting hedges, to hedge other monetary liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of a subsidiary. Gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in “Other income (expense), net” along with the offsetting losses and gains of the related hedged items. These foreign currency forward contracts result from the dedesignation of cash flow hedges in the month in which the related foreign currency forward contracts mature. Therefore, no foreign currency forward contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges are outstanding as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Fair Value Measurements

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short term trade receivables, payables, note payables, accrued expenses and derivative instruments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short term receivables and payables and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturities. Our debt bears interest at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin and, therefore, approximates fair value. We measure fair value based on authoritative accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements,” which requires a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to measure fair value.  These tiers include:  Level 1, defined as inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; or Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for use when little or no market value exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.   When available, we use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of an asset or liability. If quoted market prices are not available, we measure fair value using valuation techniques that use, when possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters.

The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis:
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Assets:
 
 
 
Recurring fair value measurements (1)
 
 
 
Deferred compensation (a)
$
1,650

 
$
1,611

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:


 


     Foreign currency forward contracts (c)
10

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:


 


     Commodity exchange contracts (d)

 
88

Total recurring fair value measurements of assets
$
1,660

 
$
1,699

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 

 
 

Recurring fair value measurements (1)


 


Deferred compensation (a)
$
1,334

 
$
1,516

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:


 


     Interest rate swap agreements (b)
1,098

 

Total recurring fair value measurements of liabilities
$
2,432

 
$
1,516


(1) All recurring fair value measurements were based upon significant other observable inputs (Level 2).
(a)
Deferred compensation assets are recorded in "Other assets" and deferred compensation liabilities are recorded in "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(b) 
Interest rate swap agreements assets are recorded in "Other liabilities."
(c) 
Foreign currency forward contracts assets are recorded in "Prepaid expenses and other assets."
(d)    Commodity exchange contracts assets are recorded in "Accounts receivable - other."

8

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)



Goodwill for the Level Life reporting unit with a carrying amount of $2,666 was written down to its implied fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The nonrecurring fair value measurements for Level Life goodwill were calculated using the Company's best internal estimates, which includes unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5 for additional discussion regarding the impairment of goodwill.

At September 30, 2015, the effective portion of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges before tax effect was a loss of $1,098, of which $0 is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense within the next 12 months. At September 30, 2015, the effective portion of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges before tax effect was $15, all of which is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to cost of goods sold within the next 12 months.

The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on income and other comprehensive income is summarized below:

 
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss on Derivatives Before Tax Effect (Effective Portion)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2015

2014
 
2015

2014
Interest rate swap agreements
$
(1,689
)
 
$

 
$
(1,098
)
 
$

Foreign currency forward contracts
33

 

 
43

 

          
 
 
 
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Location
 
2015

2014
 
2015

2014
Foreign currency forward contracts
Cost of goods sold
 
$
49

 
$

 
$
28

 
$


The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on income is summarized below:
 
 
 
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income in Derivatives
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Location
 
2015

2014
 
2015

2014
Commodity exchange contracts
Other income (expense)
 
$

 
$
(55
)
 
$

 
$
(103
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
Other income (expense)
 
26

 

 
38

 



 
$
26

 
$
(55
)
 
$
38

 
$
(103
)


9

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


3.    Inventory

Inventories consisted of the following:
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Finished product
$
45,670

 
$
38,278

Raw materials
17,680

 
14,610

Inventories
$
63,350

 
$
52,888


4.    Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Land
$
521

 
$
538

Buildings and improvements
2,289

 
2,361

Software development costs
10,598

 
10,268

Machinery and equipment
53,853

 
47,589

Furniture and fixtures
2,886

 
2,240

Leasehold improvements
15,419

 
11,584

Gross assets
85,566

 
74,580

Less: accumulated depreciation
(26,423
)
 
(21,429
)
Property and equipment, net
$
59,143

 
$
53,151


Depreciation expense was $2,354 and $6,865 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $2,241 and $6,470 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

10

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


5.    Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following summarizes the changes in our goodwill, by segment:

 
Balance
 
Natural
 
Total
Goodwill
$
381,299

 
$
95,777

 
$
477,076

Accumulated impairment loss
(243,484
)
 

 
(243,484
)
Balance as of January 1, 2015
137,815

 
95,777

 
233,592

Impairment loss
(2,666
)
 

 
(2,666
)
Translation adjustments

 
(1,374
)
 
(1,374
)
Balance as of September 30, 2015
$
135,149

 
$
94,403

 
$
229,552

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance
 
Natural
 
Total
Goodwill
$
381,299

 
$
95,928

 
$
477,227

Accumulated impairment loss
(130,000
)
 

 
(130,000
)
Balance as of January 1, 2014
251,299

 
95,928

 
347,227

Impairment loss
(113,484
)
 

 
(113,484
)
Goodwill acquired during the year

 
800

 
800

Translation adjustments

 
(951
)
 
(951
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
137,815

 
$
95,777

 
$
233,592


Intangible assets, net consisted of the following major classes as of September 30, 2015:
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying Value
Patent technology
$
46,058

 
$
(39,219
)
 
$
6,839

Proprietary recipes
4,225

 
(2,287
)
 
1,938

Non-compete agreements
600

 
(575
)
 
25

Supply relationships
1,000

 
(560
)
 
440

Customer relationships
58,474

 
(17,869
)
 
40,605

Subscription database
2,900

 
(2,755
)
 
145

Trademarks/tradenames
131,678

 
(489
)
 
131,189

Intangible assets, net
$
244,935

 
$
(63,754
)
 
$
181,181

    
Intangible assets, net consisted of the following major classes as of December 31, 2014:
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying Value
Patent technology
$
46,058

 
$
(35,452
)
 
$
10,606

Proprietary recipes
4,225

 
(1,745
)
 
2,480

Non-compete agreements
600

 
(433
)
 
167

Supply relationships
1,000

 
(509
)
 
491

Customer relationships
60,616

 
(14,665
)
 
45,951

Subscription database
2,900

 
(2,320
)
 
580

Trademarks/tradenames
131,537

 
(412
)
 
131,125

Intangible assets, net
$
246,936

 
$
(55,536
)
 
$
191,400


11

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


 
As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the total carrying amount of indefinite-lived intangible assets included in the tables above under trademarks was $130,456 and $130,498, respectively.    
Amortization expense was $2,725 and $9,078 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $3,424 and $10,280 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.  Based on our amortizable intangible assets as of September 30, 2015, amortization expense is expected to be approximately $2,720 for the remainder of 2015, $10,193 in 2016, $7,870 in 2017, $5,845 in 2018, $5,513 in 2019 and $5,513 in 2020.
We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the goodwill may not be recoverable. We also review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles annually.  At June 30, 2015, we performed our annual assessment of fair value and concluded that there was no impairment related to our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, except for an impairment associated with our Level Life brand goodwill. The Level Life brand has not developed as we originally anticipated and no longer coincides with the strategic vision of the Company. As such, through internal and external analysis, we determined that the fair value of the Level Life brand no longer exceeds its carrying value, and therefore we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2,666 in the second quarter of 2015.



12

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)



6.    Restructuring and Other Actions

In 2013, we began a process to increase efficiency at our Udi’s manufacturing facilities, which involved the consolidation of several facilities into one new, state-of the art facility.  During 2013, charges of $2,395 were incurred for asset write-offs and $359 were incurred for related expenses associated with this restructuring effort. During 2014, additional charges of $1,064 were incurred in connection with the Udi's facility consolidation, of which $480 were for lease exit costs, net of estimated subleases, and $584 were incurred for asset write-offs. During 2015, we made a final lease termination payment and adjusted the remaining accrual to reflect such.

During 2014, we also incurred additional charges of $2,068 associated with the restructuring of certain executive management positions. Additionally in 2014, we determined it was necessary to relocate certain functional departments within the company to one central location. As a result of this, we incurred charges of $2,252 associated with one-time termination benefits, with $1,782 incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

In June 2015, we initiated a plan to restructure our organization to better align functional teams, improve our operational effectiveness and deliver improved and consistent results. These initiatives include the integration of our sales, marketing and innovation functions to activate consumer-driven marketing programs and drive sustainable profitable growth. Additionally, this plan includes a number of executive officer and management changes, including certain employment terminations, in connection with the organizational realignment.  As a result of this plan, we expect to incur charges of approximately $5,615 associated with one-time termination benefits. Charges of $4,995 have been incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Restructuring charges are included in "Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The following table sets forth the activity affecting the restructuring accrual:

 
Severance
 
Other Closure
and Exit Costs
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
551

 
$
140

 
$
691

Charges incurred
6,777

 

 
6,777

Cash payments
(3,882
)
 
(194
)
 
(4,076
)
Adjustments
(291
)
 
54

 
(237
)
Balance as of September 30, 2015
$
3,155

 
$

 
$
3,155


The accrued restructuring costs as of September 30, 2015 of $3,155 are reflected in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  We expect to pay remaining one-time termination benefits by October 31, 2016.


13

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)



7.    Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following:
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Accounts payable
$
35,204

 
$
28,989

Accrued payroll-related
6,357

 
2,691

Accrued marketing
4,425

 
3,125

Accrued trade spend
4,238

 
4,007

Accrued restructuring
3,155

 
691

Accrued interest
2,871

 
3,036

Accrued other
10,444

 
11,235

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
66,694

 
$
53,774


8.    Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Term Loan
$
281,063

 
$
296,537

Revolving Facility

 

Capital lease
7,854

 
8,677

Total debt
288,917

 
305,214

Less: Current portion
1,136

 
4,101

Long-term debt
$
287,781

 
$
301,113


Credit Facility

The Company is party to a senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), established pursuant to a Credit Agreement dated as of July 9, 2013 (as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013, the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013 and the Amendment Agreement dated as of July 29, 2014) by and among Boulder Brands USA, Inc. (f/k/a GFA Brands, Inc.) as borrower (the "Borrower"), the Company, as a guarantor, the other guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (the "Agent"), consisting of a term loan (the "Term Loan") in an aggregate principal amount of $302,000 and a revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Facility") in an aggregate principal amount of $115,000 (with sublimits for swingline loans and the issuance of letters of credit). The Term Loan will mature on July 9, 2020 and the Revolving Facility will mature on July 9, 2018.     
As of September 30, 2015, we had $281,063 outstanding under the Term Loan and the full $115,000 was available for borrowing under the Revolving Facility.
    
The interest rate for outstanding obligations at September 30, 2015 was 4.50% per annum for the Term Loan while the commitment fee on the unused Revolving Facility was 0.50% per annum. The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to fix the variable rate on a portion of the Company's debt. See Note 2 - "Derivatives, Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements."
 
Guarantees

The loans and other obligations under the Credit Facility (including in respect of hedging agreements and cash management obligations) are (a) guaranteed by the Company and its existing and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and (b) secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its existing and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain customary exceptions and limitations.
 

14

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


Covenants

So long as any borrowings under the Revolving Facility are outstanding (other than letters of credit that have been cash collateralized in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of the Company, the terms of the Credit Facility require the Company and its subsidiaries (on a consolidated basis and subject to certain customary exceptions) to maintain a maximum total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of not more than (i) 6.50 to 1.0 for any fiscal quarter ending prior to December 31, 2015 and (ii) 6.0 to 1.0 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2015 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter. As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with our financial covenant.
 
Capital Leases    

The Company has four capital leases resulting in $7,854 of capital lease obligations for certain of its manufacturing equipment as of September 30, 2015. These leases have terms that expire from August 31, 2017 through December 1, 2021.
    
Maturities
 
Under the Credit Facility and capital leases, the Company and the Borrower intend to pay the following amounts for their collective debt and capital lease obligations during the following years ending December 31:
Remainder of 2015
$
279

2016
1,154

2017
1,226

2018
1,255

2019
1,344

Thereafter
285,408

Total
$
290,666

    
9.    Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation consists of stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs").

Total stock-based compensation expense for stock options and RSUs was $2,401 and $6,911 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $2,512 and $7,162 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

Stock Options
    
We and our stockholders have authorized the issuance of up to 16,825,000 stock options under our Second Amended and Restated Stock and Awards Plan (the "Stock Plan").  As a result of the 2011 option exchange program (the "Option Exchange"), 1,032,178 of these options are no longer available to be granted. As of September 30, 2015, 2,493,669 options remained available for future grants.

We utilize traditional service-based stock options typically with a four year graded vesting (25% vest each year). We have also issued service-based stock options with a two year graded vesting (50% vest both years). In addition, we have granted market condition-based stock options which vest when the underlying stock price closes at $8.00, $12.00, $16.00, $16.75 and $20.25 for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days. Stock options are granted to recipients at exercise prices not less than the fair market value of our stock on the dates of grant.


15

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


Additional information with respect to stock option activity is as follows:
 
Number of
Outstanding
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2014
11,644,968

 
$
9.40

 
5.83
Options granted
370,000

 
8.65

 
9.50
Options exercised
(246,957
)
 
5.91

 
5.49
Options canceled/forfeited
(1,440,192
)
 
11.48

 
5.76
Options outstanding at September 30, 2015
10,327,819

 
$
9.22

 
5.25
Exercisable at September 30, 2015
7,571,932

 
$
8.11

 
4.33

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $4.50.

As of September 30, 2015, the total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $12,216 with a weighted average remaining period of 1.59 years over which it is expected to be recognized.

We account for our stock-based compensation awards in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation," which requires companies to recognize compensation expense for all equity-based compensation awards issued to employees that are expected to vest. Compensation cost is based on the fair value of awards as of the grant date.

Stock-based compensation expense relating to stock options included in operations is as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Service period-based
$
1,826

 
$
2,209

 
$
5,650

 
$
5,998

Market price-based $16.75
227

 

 
227

 
6

Market price-based $20.25

 
3

 
1

 
33

Total
$
2,053

 
$
2,212

 
$
5,878

 
$
6,037


For the traditional service-based stock options, we estimated the fair value, as of the date of grant, using a Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.07% - 4.67%, expected life of 5.75 - 6.25 years for the service-based options, no dividends and volatility of 35.9% - 59.96%. The cost of the service-based stock options is being amortized over vesting periods of two and four years, as applicable. In the case of the market price-based stock options, we used the Monte Carlo valuation model and have assumed an expected life of ten years.  We have incorporated a forfeiture rate of 4.0% on all stock options.  We recognize compensation expense for the market price-based options over the estimated vesting period.

Restricted Stock Units

In September 2011, we began granting RSUs to certain board members and employees. These RSUs were issued under the Stock Plan and are subject to its terms and conditions. We issued RSUs where the compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite period the holder is required to render service. We recognized $348 and $1,033 of stock-based compensation for our RSUs in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $300 and $1,125 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

Additional information with respect to RSU activity is as follows:

16

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


 
Number of
Outstanding
Units
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
RSUs outstanding (unvested) at December 31, 2014
448,750

 
2.02
RSUs granted
50,000

 
3.96
RSUs vested
(177,500
)
 
0.00
RSUs forfeited
(10,000
)

3.17
RSUs outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 2015
311,250

 
1.88

10.    Income Taxes

We estimate our annual effective income tax rate at the end of each quarterly period. This estimate takes into account the mix of expected income (loss) before income taxes by tax jurisdiction and enacted changes in tax laws. Our quarterly tax provision and quarterly estimate of the annual effective tax rate is subject to significant volatility due to several factors including, but not limited to, having to forecast income (loss) before income taxes by jurisdictions for the full year prior to the completion of the full year, changes in non-deductible expenses, jurisdictional mix of our income, non-recurring and impairment charges, as well as the actual amount of income (loss) before income taxes. For example, the impact of non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate is greater when income (loss) before income taxes is lower. To the extent there are fluctuations in any of these variables during any given period, the provision for income taxes will vary accordingly.

Our  provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $2.7 million compared with a benefit of $(11.9) million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 77.1%, and the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 8.2%.   The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the actual amount of income before income taxes being low in the three months ended September 30, 2015, as well as  changes in the jurisdictional mix of where income was earned/loss was generated and discrete events that occurred during the quarter.  The effective tax rate in 2014 was also impacted by the goodwill and tradename impairment charges which were treated as discrete during the period.

Our benefit for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $(3.6) million compared with $(9.8) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was 78.3%, and the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was 7.1%. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the actual amount of loss before income taxes being low in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as well as changes in the jurisdictional mix of where income was earned/loss was generated and discrete events that occurred during the period. The effective tax rate in 2014 was also impacted by the goodwill and tradename impairment charges which were treated as discrete during the period.



17

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


11.    Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries common stockholders
$
354

 
$
(132,159
)
 
$
(1,150
)
 
$
(128,897
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Denominator (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Weighted average shares used in basic computation
61,514

 
61,033

 
61,355

 
60,804

     Add: Stock options and RSUs
1,538

 

 

 

     Weighted average shares used in diluted computation
63,052

 
61,033

 
61,355

 
60,804

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) per share, basic
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share excluded the weighted-average impact of the assumed exercise of approximately 6.6 million and 10.6 million stock options and RSUs in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and approximately 12.3 million stock options and RSUs in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, because such impact would be anti-dilutive.

12.    Legal Proceedings and Contingencies

Commitments

In addition to those disclosed in the Company's 2014 Form 10-K, as of September 30, 2015, we had the following commitments:

Forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected commodity requirements may be stated at a firm price or as a discount or premium from a future commodity market price. These commitments totaled approximately $49,187 as of September 30, 2015. The majority of these commitments are expected to be settled within one year.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently involved in the following legal proceedings:

On August 29, 2012, legal proceedings were filed against the Company and others in Canada, Province of Quebec, District of Montreal, by Stepworth Holdings Inc. in connection with an indemnification claim made by the Company against Stepworth, which sold Glutino to the Company. In those legal proceedings, Stepworth sought a declaration that it was not required to indemnify the Company for losses arising from claims made against the Company by Osem and Carmit, both Glutino suppliers. As such, it sought a declaration that it was entitled to recover the amount placed in escrow to cover indemnification claims made by the Company against Stepworth.  In a related proceeding, on September 24, 2012, the Company filed proceedings in the same court in Canada against Osem, Carmit and Stepworth, seeking a declaration that the suppliers’ claims against the Company are not valid.  The two foregoing proceedings are now deemed to have been discontinued (and thus, no longer active) under Quebec law.

18

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


In parallel, on December 4, 2012, Osem filed proceedings against the Company, in the same Canadian court, seeking $16.9 million (in Canadian dollars) for the Company's reduction in the volume of purchases from Osem.   In response, the Company filed a claim against Stepworth on December 10, 2012, in order to receive indemnification from Stepworth on the basis of Osem’s allegations.  The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this litigation and continues to assert its indemnification claim against Stepworth.
On April 1, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against the Company and three of its officers alleging violations of federal securities laws. The complaint alleges that beginning in December 2013, the Company made false or misleading statements in its quarterly Securities and Exchange Commission filings and analyst conference calls about its financial performance and prospects, which supposedly were proven to have been untrue when the Company pre-announced its anticipated financial results for the third quarter of 2014. A substantially similar lawsuit against the Company, and the same three officers, was filed in the same federal district court on May 18, 2015. We expect these two lawsuits to be consolidated and that the plaintiffs will thereafter file an amended complaint. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend itself.
On April 28, 2015, a purported derivative action entitled Dennis Palkon v. Stephen B. Hughes, et al., was filed, ostensibly on the Company's behalf, in Colorado state court against the Company’s directors and certain of its senior officers, and against the Company itself as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges that the officers made false statements about the Company’s financial performance and prospects (substantially the same ones that are at issue in the securities class action lawsuit described immediately above), that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by allowing such statements to be made, and that the Company should be suing to recover damages for the allegedly false statements. The complaint further alleges claims for waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and restitution in favor of the Company, certain corporate actions to purportedly improve the Company’s corporate governance, and an award of costs and expenses to the plaintiff, including attorneys’ fees.  A similar shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed on June 24, 2015 against the same eight directors and officers and one additional former director in the same court. The two state court derivative actions have been consolidated and stayed pending the outcome of the previously mentioned class action lawsuit. We believe that the plaintiffs in the derivative actions lack standing to pursue litigation on behalf of the Company.
A complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania by H.J. Heinz Company for de novo review of a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “TTAB”) that dismissed Heinz’s opposition to the Company’s applications for the intended use of the Smart Balance mark on certain products. The complaint does not seek any damages against the Company. The Company intends to vigorously defend the complaint for de novo review and assert that the TTAB acted properly.
In September 2015, Pure Growth Consulting, LLC sued the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Company entered into and subsequently breached a purported long-term marketing contract, and is seeking damages of $6,600.  The Company is not yet due to respond to the complaint. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and believes the allegations are without merit.
We do not expect that the resolution of any of the matters described above will have a material adverse effect on our business, although any of them could have a material adverse effect on our results in any given quarter in the event of an adverse judgment or settlement.
We are not a party to any other legal proceeding that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

13.    Segments

Our business consists of two reportable segments: Natural and Balance. The Natural segment consists of our Udi's, Glutino, Davies and EVOL branded products. The Balance segment consists of Smart Balance, Earth Balance and Level Life branded products.
    
Net sales and brand profit are the primary measures used by our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. Our CODM is the Company's Interim Chief Executive Officer. Brand profit is calculated as gross profit less marketing, selling, royalty expense (income), net and certain other one-time costs. Assets are reviewed by the CODM on a consolidated basis and are not reported by operating segment.


19

BOULDER BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)


The contribution of our reportable segments to net sales and brand profit and the reconciliation to consolidated amounts are summarized below.

 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Natural
$
88,969

 
$
83,460

 
$
246,511

 
$
236,921

     Balance
43,948

 
50,405

 
133,123

 
151,144

 
$
132,917

 
$
133,865

 
$
379,634

 
$
388,065

 

 

 

 

Brand Profit:

 

 

 

     Natural
$
13,709

 
$
14,891

 
$
36,655

 
$
41,315

     Balance
16,699

 
18,344

 
50,096

 
55,031

Total for reportable segments
30,408

 
33,235

 
86,751

 
96,346

     Less:

 

 

 

General and administrative, excluding royalty expense (income), net
21,994

 
21,061

 
71,595

 
66,198

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs
5,084

 
(186
)
 
6,534

 
3,900

Goodwill and tradename impairment

 
150,507

 
2,696

 
150,507

Other non-recurring items*
79

 

 
2,290

 

Interest expense
4,180

 
5,341

 
12,482

 
13,906

Other (income) expense, net
(4,464
)
 
580

 
(4,193
)
 
714

      Income (loss) before income taxes
$
3,535

 
$
(144,068
)
 
$
(4,653
)
 
$
(138,879
)
*Represents charges associated with the discontinuance of our Level Life brand as well as a bonus to be paid to certain production employees, each considered to be one-time in nature.


20



Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the September 30, 2015 Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and our 2014 Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements in this section are qualified by the cautionary statements included under the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information,” above.

Company Overview

Boulder Brands, Inc. (the "Company") is a leader in the natural foods industry and is committed to creating food solutions that give people opportunities to improve their lives, one product at a time. The Company’s health and wellness platform consists of brands that target specific health trends: the Glutino® and Udi’s® Gluten Free brands for gluten free diets; the Earth Balance® brand for plant-based diets; the Level Life™ brand for diabetic diets; the EVOL® brand for consumers seeking convenient foods made with pure and simple ingredients; and the Smart Balance® brand for heart healthier diets. We distribute our products in all major retail channels, including natural, grocery, club and mass merchandise, and we also have a presence in the foodservice and industrial channels. The Company’s stated purpose is to “Lead change and improve lives.” Our promise is to empower people, respect our planet, create profit and build brave brands. Our principles embody humility, accountability, collaboration, tenacity, wellness and transparency.

Our business consists of two reportable segments: Natural and Balance. The Natural segment consists of our Udi's, Glutino, Davies and EVOL branded products. The Balance segment consists of Smart Balance, Earth Balance and Level Life branded products.

We have been taking actions to improve our financial results and build a healthier long-term sustainable growth platform. These actions include: (1) being more efficient with our overall cost structure; (2) being more effective in managing our brands, products and channels; and (3) becoming more balanced and efficient with our marketing programs.

First, we are focused on improving our long-term overall profitability and cost structure of our business. We continue to improve our operations with efforts including, but not limited to, outsourcing specific frozen manufacturing to co-packers where we can gain savings; increasing the efficiency of our three North American plants; and improving upon our supply chain from a service, quality and cost perspective. While these opportunities are long-term in nature, we are well on our way to implementing them and have already begun to see benefits and should continue to see even more favorable results in 2016.

Additionally, we are maintaining tight controls around all aspects of our general and administrative expenses. In addition to reducing headcount and restructuring our organization, we have reduced other aspects of general and administrative expenses.
 
The second area where we are focused on improvement is being more effective in managing our portfolio of brands and products, as well as channels. We have identified a number of items for SKU rationalization which we plan to implement during 2016. In addition, in the quarter we discontinued Level Life given this business was not profitable, small in size and less strategic to our overall vision.
 
On the innovation front, in the third quarter of 2015, we launched EVOL Cups at a key customer. This new frozen food format leverages the way many consumers want to eat which is smaller portion meals, with unique ingredients, that are portable, convenient and taste great.
     
Finally, our approach to being more balanced and effective in marketing is twofold. First, from a longer-term perspective, we are investing towards having a better understanding of our consumers and the unique roles our brands play in their lives. This research will help to provide us with the insights necessary to develop a long-term brand strategy and positioning. Second, and more near-term in nature, we are being more disciplined and efficient in our spending. We have intentionally focused the second half of 2015 marketing funds against our key brands across key categories and among our top retailers. Specifically, we have been diligently validating our initial consumer research and programs to give us confidence before we roll out more broadly. Our approach will be to activate velocity driving tactics like regional freestanding inserts, digital couponing, in-store sampling and merchandising to help support existing distribution. Velocity indicates how quickly a product turns on the shelf (i.e. measure of the purchase of products by consumers) and is calculated as volume (based on dollar retail sales) over a given time divided by our current breadth and depth of distribution (products available to consumers). We analyze product velocities in order to assess how a category, brand and/or product is performing relative to its gains and/or losses in distribution. We primarily use the latest twelve weeks to understand the trend in our velocities relative to other periods. We obtain our velocity data from Nielsen using their eXtended All Outlet Combined, or "xAOC," data for multi-channel markets.

21




We are extremely focused on improving velocities in key categories through effective retail and consumer programs, renovation and innovation, as well as pricing and merchandising strategies. Where implemented, these strategies are already having a positive impact in velocities for several of our key categories. When assessing our 12-week and 52-week trends we are seeing improvement in Smart Balance spreads, Udi’s bread and pizza, and Glutino’s cookies and crackers.

Overall, we are seeing the benefits of our initiatives as reflected in our three months ended September 30, 2015 results. The changes we are making to the business should ultimately support sustainable, profitable long-term growth.

Restructuring

In 2013, we began a process to increase efficiency at our Udi’s manufacturing facilities, which involved the consolidation of several facilities into one new, state-of the art facility.  During 2013, charges of $2.4 million were incurred for asset write-offs and $0.4 million were incurred for related expenses associated with this restructuring effort. During 2014, additional charges of $1.1 million were incurred in connection with the Udi's facility consolidation, of which $0.5 million were for lease exit costs, net of estimated subleases, and $0.6 million were incurred for asset write-offs. During 2015, we made a final lease termination payment and adjusted the remaining accrual to reflect such.

During 2014, we also incurred additional charges of $2.1 million associated with the restructuring of certain executive management positions. Additionally in 2014, we determined it was necessary to relocate certain functional departments within the company to one central location. As a result of this, we incurred charges of $2.3 million associated with one-time termination benefits, with $1.8 million incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

In June 2015, we initiated a plan to restructure our organization to better align functional teams, improve our operational effectiveness and deliver improved and consistent results. These initiatives include the integration of our sales, marketing and innovation functions to activate consumer-driven marketing programs and drive sustainable profitable growth. Additionally, this plan includes a number of executive officer and management changes, including certain employment terminations, in connection with the organizational realignment.  As a result of this plan, we expect to incur charges of approximately $5.6 million associated with one-time termination benefits. Charges of $5.0 million have been incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.


22



Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(In millions, except per share data)
2015
 
2014
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
2015
 
2014
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Net sales
$
132.9

 
$
133.9

 
$
(1.0
)
 
(0.7
)%
 
$
379.6

 
$
388.1

 
$
(8.5
)
 
(2.2
)%
Cost of goods sold
84.9

 
83.4

 
1.5

 
1.8
 %
 
243.8

 
244.3

 
(0.5
)
 
(0.2
)%
Gross profit
48.0

 
50.4

 
(2.4
)
 
(4.8
)%
 
135.8

 
143.7

 
(7.9
)
 
(5.5
)%
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Marketing
6.6

 
6.2

 
0.4

 
6.9
 %
 
19.0

 
16.8

 
2.2

 
13.0
 %
   Selling
11.4

 
11.7

 
(0.3
)
 
(2.8
)%
 
34.1

 
33.1

 
1.0

 
3.1
 %
   General and administrative
21.7

 
20.4

 
1.3

 
6.5
 %
 
69.8

 
63.7

 
6.1

 
9.6
 %
   Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs
5.1

 
(0.2
)
 
5.3

 
NM

 
6.5

 
3.9

 
2.6

 
67.5
 %
   Goodwill and tradename impairment

 
150.5

 
(150.5
)
 
NM

 
2.7

 
150.5

 
(147.8
)
 
NM

      Total operating expenses
44.8

 
188.6

 
(143.8
)
 
(76.3
)%
 
132.2

 
268.0

 
(135.8
)
 
(50.7
)%
Operating income (loss)
3.3

 
(138.1
)
 
141.4

 
(102.4
)%
 
3.6

 
(124.3
)
 
127.9

 
(102.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense), net:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Interest expense
(4.2
)
 
(5.3
)
 
1.1

 
(21.7
)%
 
(12.5
)
 
(13.9
)
 
1.4

 
(10.2
)%
    Other income (expense), net
4.5

 
(0.6
)
 
5.1

 
(869.7
)%
 
4.2

 
(0.7
)
 
4.9

 
(687.3
)%
       Total other income (expense), net
0.3

 
(5.9
)
 
6.2

 
(104.8
)%
 
(8.3
)
 
(14.6
)
 
6.3

 
(43.3
)%
Income (loss) before income taxes
3.5

 
(144.1
)
 
147.6

 
(102.5
)%
 
(4.7
)
 
(138.9
)
 
134.2

 
(96.6
)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
2.7

 
(11.9
)
 
14.6

 
(123.0
)%
 
(3.6
)
 
(9.8
)
 
6.2

 
(62.9
)%
Net income (loss)
0.8

 
(132.2
)
 
133.0

 
(100.6
)%
 
(1.0
)
 
(129.0
)
 
128.0

 
(99.2
)%
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(0.5
)
 

 
(0.5
)
 
NM

 
(0.1
)
 
0.2

 
(0.3
)
 
(194.0
)%
Net income (loss) attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries common stockholders
$
0.4

 
$
(132.2
)
 
$
132.6

 
(100.3
)%
 
$
(1.2
)
 
$
(128.9
)
 
$
127.7

 
(99.1
)%
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries common stockholders:
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Basic
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
2.18

 
(100.5
)%
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)
 
$
2.10

 
(99.1
)%
     Diluted
$
0.01

 
$
(2.17
)
 
$
2.18

 
(100.5
)%
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(2.12
)
 
$
2.10

 
(99.1
)%
Note: Amounts may not add due to rounding.
NM = Not meaningful


23





Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

Net Sales

Total net sales of $132.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $1.0 million, or 0.7%, from $133.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to a decrease in net sales in our Balance segment, partly offset by an increase in net sales in our Natural segment.

Net sales from our Balance segment of $43.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $6.5 million, or 12.8%, from $50.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily related to a decrease in sales of Smart Balance spreads and grocery products. Volume and price decreases resulted in a decrease in net sales in our Balance segment of $6.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2015. These decreases in net sales were partly offset by decreases in trade promotions, slotting and coupon expenses totaling $2.4 million. Volume declines in our Balance segment were primarily related to a decline in the overall spreads category. The price decreases were primarily related to our spreads category and were aimed at lowering our everyday average price.

Net sales from our Natural segment of $89.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $5.5 million, or 6.6%, from $83.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Volume and price increases resulted in an increase in net sales in our Natural segment of $6.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2015. These increases in net sales were partly offset by increases in trade promotions, slotting and coupon expenses totaling $1.7 million, as well as the impact of foreign currency translation of $1.5 million. Volume increases in our Natural segment were primarily related to our EVOL brand and specifically related to growing distribution and velocities. The price increases were primarily related to Udi's products, specifically bread.

Cost of Goods Sold

Total cost of goods sold of $84.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $1.5 million, or 1.8%, from $83.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was related to an increase in the cost of goods sold in our Natural segment, partly offset by a decrease in the cost of goods sold in our Balance segment.

Cost of goods sold for our Natural segment was $62.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $5.5 million, or 9.6%, from $56.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily related to volume increases.

Cost of goods sold for our Balance segment was $22.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $4.0 million, or 14.9%, from $26.6 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily related to volume decreases.    

Brand Profit

The Company uses the term "brand profit" as its segment measure of profitability. Brand profit is a non-GAAP measure. Brand profit is calculated as gross profit less marketing, selling, royalty expense (income), net and certain other one-time costs. Brand profit is the measure utilized by the Chief Operating Decision Maker, or "CODM," in making decisions about allocating resources to segments and measuring their performance. For a reconciliation of brand profit to income (loss) before income taxes, see "Non-GAAP Financial Measure" below.

Total brand profit of $30.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $2.8 million, or 8.5%, from $33.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to decreases in brand profit for our Balance and Natural segments.

Brand profit from our Balance segment of $16.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $1.6 million, or 9.0%, from $18.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The primary reason for the decrease in brand profit was the decrease in gross profit. Although gross profit for the Balance segment decreased $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014, as a percentage of net sales it increased to 48.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2015 from 47.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2014 benefiting from a favorable mix of products within the Smart Balance portfolio. The decrease in brand profit was also related to a decrease in royalty income, net of $0.4 million, partly offset by decreases in selling expenses of $0.7 million and non-promotional marketing of $0.6 million.

24




Brand profit from our Natural segment of $13.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $1.2 million, or 7.9%, from $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in brand profit primarily relates to increases in non-promotional marketing of $1.0 million and selling expenses of $0.4 million. Gross profit for the Natural segment increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 and as a percentage of net sales was 30.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 31.9% during the same period in 2014. Gross margin was negatively impacted by higher yield loss in bread at our Denver facility, as we have the ability to remove bread items with air pockets or holes from our production line. In addition, gross margin was impacted by lower overhead absorption at our Canadian facility and a negative mix impact from our lower margin frozen category.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses of $21.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $1.3 million, or 6.5%, from $20.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase primarily related to an increase in compensation benefits and other employee costs of $1.5 million and costs associated with the Company’s exploration of strategic alternatives of $0.7 million, partly offset by decreases in depreciation and amortization of $0.8 million and research and development costs of $0.4 million.
 
Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration-related Costs

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $5.1 million mainly related to the restructuring plan initiated in June 2015 to better align functional teams. This June 2015 initiative included the integration of our sales, marketing and innovation functions as well as a number of executive officer and management changes.

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were $(0.2) million mainly related to adjustments to sub-lease assumptions made on exited space.

Goodwill and tradename impairment

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we did not record an impairment charge related to goodwill and tradenames.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded an impairment charge of $150.5 million, of which $113.5 million related to goodwill of our Smart Balance reporting unit and $37.0 million related to our Smart Balance tradename.

Total Other Income (Expense), Net

We had total other income (expense), net of $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and $(5.9) million in the corresponding period in 2014. The results for 2015 and 2014 included interest expense of $(4.2) million and $(5.3) million, respectively.  Also included in total other income (expense), net in 2015 was a gain on sale of an investment of $4.7 million and currency losses of $(0.2) million. Also included in total other income (expense), net in 2014 were gains of $0.4 million on commodity hedging and currency losses of $(0.9) million.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

Our  provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $2.7 million compared with a benefit of $(11.9) million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 77.1%, and the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 8.2%.   The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the actual amount of income before income taxes being low in the three months ended September 30, 2015, as well as  changes in the jurisdictional mix of where income was earned/loss was generated and discrete events that occurred during the quarter. The effective tax rate in 2014 was also impacted by the goodwill and tradename impairment charges which were treated as discrete during the period.

We estimate our annual effective income tax rate at the end of each quarterly period. This estimate takes into account the mix of expected income (loss) before income taxes by tax jurisdiction and enacted changes in tax laws. Our quarterly tax provision and quarterly estimate of the annual effective tax rate is subject to significant volatility due to several factors including, but not limited to, having to forecast income (loss) before income taxes by jurisdictions for the full year prior to the completion of the full year, changes in non-deductible expenses, jurisdictional mix of our income, non-recurring and impairment charges, as well as the actual amount of income (loss) before income taxes. For example, the impact of non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate is greater

25



when income (loss) before income taxes is lower. To the extent there are fluctuations in any of these variables during any given period, the provision for income taxes will vary accordingly.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Boulder Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries Common Stockholders, or “Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Boulder Brands”

Our net income attributable to Boulder Brands for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $0.4 million compared to net loss attributable to Boulder Brands of $(132.2) million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The $132.6 million increase in net income was primarily due to goodwill and intangible impairment charge in 2014 of $136.1 million, net of tax.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

Net Sales

Total net sales of $379.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $8.5 million, or 2.2%, from $388.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to a decrease in net sales in our Balance segment, partly offset by an increase in net sales in our Natural segment.

Net sales from our Balance segment of $133.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $18.0 million, or 11.9%, from $151.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily related to decreases in sales of Smart Balance spreads and grocery products, partly offset by an increase in Earth Balance products of $3.4 million. Volume and price decreases resulted in a decrease in net sales in our Balance segment of $18.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These decreases in net sales were partly offset by decreases in trade promotions, slotting and coupon expenses totaling $7.6 million. Volume declines in our Balance segment were primarily related to a decline in the overall spreads category. The price decreases were primarily related to our spreads category and were aimed at lowering our everyday average price.

Net sales from our Natural segment of $246.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $9.6 million, or 4.0%, from $236.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Volume and price increases resulted in an increase in net sales in our Natural segment of $14.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These volume and price increases were partly offset by increases in trade promotions, slotting and coupon expense totaling $5.4 million and the negative impact of foreign currency translation of $4.0 million. Volume increases in our Natural segment were primarily related to our EVOL and Udi’s brands and specifically related to growing distribution and velocities. The price increases were primarily related to Udi's products, specifically bread.

Cost of Goods Sold

Total cost of goods sold of $243.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $0.5 million, or 0.2%, from $244.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to a decrease in our Balance segment cost of goods sold, partly offset by an increase in our Natural segment cost of goods sold.

Cost of goods sold for our Balance segment was $70.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $9.6 million, or 12.0%, from $80.5 million in 2014. The decrease was related to decreases in cost of goods sold for Smart Balance spreads and spreadable butter which was primarily driven by decreased volume.
    
Cost of goods sold for our Natural segment was $172.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $9.2 million, or 5.6%, from $163.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily related to volume increases.

Brand Profit

Total brand profit of $86.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $9.6 million, or 10.0%, from $96.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to declines in brand profit for our Natural and Balance segments.

Brand profit from our Balance segment of $50.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $4.9 million, or 9.0%, from $55.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The primary reason for the decrease in brand profit was the decrease in gross profit. Gross profit for the Balance segment decreased $8.4 million for the nine months ended

26



September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014, however as a percentage of net sales remained constant at 46.7% in both the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 includes $2.2 million of charges associated with our Level Life brand which is not included in brand profit as they are considered one-time in nature as a result of us discontinuing this brand. The decrease in brand profit also relates to a decrease in royalty income, net of $0.8 million, partly offset by decreases in non-promotional marketing of $1.4 million and selling expense of $0.7 million.

Brand profit from our Natural segment of $36.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $4.7 million, or 11.3%, from $41.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Although brand profit decreased, gross profit for the Natural segment increased $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and as a percentage of net sales was 29.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 30.9% during the same period in 2014. The decrease in brand profit primarily related to increases in non-promotional marketing of $3.5 million and selling expenses of $1.7 million.

For a reconciliation of brand profit to income (loss) before income taxes, see "Non-GAAP Financial Measure" below.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses of $69.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $6.1 million, or 9.6%, from $63.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase primarily related to increases in severance and relocation costs of $5.3 million, insurance costs of $1.1 million, costs associated with the Company’s exploration of strategic alternatives of $1.0 million, costs associated with class action settlements of $0.4 million and information technology costs of $0.4 million, partly offset by a decrease in compensation, benefits and other employee costs of $1.5 million and depreciation and amortization of $1.3 million.

Restructuring, Acquisition and Integration-related Costs

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $6.5 million primarily relating to the restructuring plan initiated in June 2015 to better align functional teams, as well as the relocation of certain functional departments within the Company to one central location. The June 2015 initiative included the integration of our sales, marketing and innovation functions as well as a number of executive officer and management changes.

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $3.9 million, comprised of restructuring costs associated with the consolidation of several of Udi’s manufacturing facilities and the restructuring of certain executive management positions of $3.2 million and acquisition and integration-related costs of $0.7 million, primarily related to the acquisition of EVOL.

Goodwill and tradename impairment

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.7 million. The impairment charge related to goodwill associated with our Level Life reporting unit and tradename.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded an impairment charge of $150.5 million, of which $113.5 million related to goodwill of our Smart Balance reporting unit and $37.0 million related to our Smart Balance tradename.

Total Other Income (Expense), Net

We had total other income (expense), net of $(8.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and $(14.6) million in the corresponding period in 2014. The results for 2015 and 2014 included interest expense of $(12.5) million and $(13.9) million, respectively.  Also included in total other income (expense), net in 2015 was a gain on sale of an investment of $4.7 million, miscellaneous income of $0.4 million received from one of the Company’s distribution centers for service disruptions, currency losses of $(0.4) million, other taxes of $(0.3) and losses on asset disposals of $(0.2) million. Also included in total other income (expense), net in 2014 were currency translation losses of $(0.7) million, other taxes of $(0.3) million and gains of $0.3 million on commodity hedging.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

Our benefit for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $(3.6) million compared with $(9.8) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was 78.3%, and the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was 7.1%.     The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily

27



due to the actual amount of loss before income taxes being low in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as well as changes in the jurisdictional mix of where income was earned/loss was generated and discrete events that occurred during the period. The effective tax rate in 2014 was also impacted by the goodwill and tradename impairment charges which were treated as discrete during the period.

We estimate our annual effective income tax rate at the end of each quarterly period. This estimate takes into account the mix of expected income (loss) before income taxes by tax jurisdiction and enacted changes in tax laws. Our quarterly tax provision and quarterly estimate of the annual effective tax rate is subject to significant volatility due to several factors including, but not limited to, having to forecast income (loss) before income taxes by jurisdictions for the full year prior to the completion of the full year, changes in non-deductible expenses, jurisdictional mix of our income, non-recurring and impairment charges, as well as the actual amount of income (loss) before income taxes. For example, the impact of non-deductible expenses on our effective tax rate is greater when income (loss) before income taxes is lower. To the extent there are fluctuations in any of these variables during any given period, the provision for income taxes will vary accordingly.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Boulder Brands

Our net loss attributable to Boulder Brands for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $(1.2) million compared to $(128.9) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The $127.7 million increase in net income was primarily due to goodwill and intangible impairment charge in 2014 of $136.1 million, net of tax.

28




Non-GAAP Financial Measure

The Company reports its financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or “GAAP.”

The Company uses the term “brand profit” as its segment measure of profitability. Brand profit is a non-GAAP measure. Brand profit is calculated as gross profit less marketing, selling, royalty expense (income), net and certain other one-time costs. Brand profit is the measure utilized by our CODM in making decisions about allocating resources to segments and measuring their performance. Management believes this measure best reflects each segment's financial results from ongoing operations. The following table reconciles brand profit by segment to income before income taxes calculated in accordance with GAAP:

(in millions)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Natural
$
89.0

 
$
83.5

 
$
246.5

 
$
236.9

     Balance
43.9

 
50.4

 
133.1

 
151.1

 
$
132.9

 
$
133.9

 
$
379.6

 
$
388.1

 

 

 

 

Brand Profit:

 

 

 

     Natural
$
13.7

 
$
14.9

 
$
36.7

 
$
41.3

     Balance
16.7

 
18.3

 
50.1

 
55.0

Total for reportable segments
30.4

 
33.2

 
86.8

 
96.3

     Less:

 

 

 

General and administrative, excluding royalty expense (income), net
22.0

 
21.1

 
71.6

 
66.2

Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs
5.1

 
(0.2
)
 
6.5

 
3.9

Goodwill and tradename impairment


150.5


2.7


150.5

Other non-recurring items*
0.1




2.3



Interest expense
4.2

 
5.3

 
12.5

 
13.9

Other (income) expense, net
(4.5
)
 
0.6

 
(4.2
)
 
0.7

      Income (loss) before income taxes
$
3.5

 
$
(144.1
)
 
$
(4.7
)
 
$
(138.9
)
Note: Amounts may not add due to rounding.
*Represents charges associated with the discontinuance of our Level Life brand as well as a bonus to be paid to certain production employees, each considered to be one-time in nature.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

As of September 30, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $23.9 million, a decrease of $7.8 million from December 31, 2014. The following table summarizes the change:

 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in millions)
2015
 
2014
 
$ Change
Cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
 


    Operating activities
$
17.1

 
$
(0.4
)
 
$
17.5

    Investing activities
(7.5
)
 
(10.0
)
 
2.5

    Financing activities
(17.3
)
 
12.6

 
(29.9
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
$
(7.8
)
 
$
2.2

 
$
(10.0
)
Note: Amounts may not add due to rounding.

29




Cash provided by operating activities was $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to cash used in operations of $0.4 million in the corresponding period in 2014. This change was mostly due to decreased working capital needs.

Cash used in investing activities decreased $2.5 million to $7.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $10.0 million in the corresponding period in 2014. Capital expenditures were higher in 2015 compared to 2014 by $4.7 million, however this was more than offset by proceeds from a sale of an investment in 2015 of $7.7 million.

We used $29.9 million more cash from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the same period in 2014. Cash from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included proceeds from the issuance of debt of $26.9 million.

Liquidity

Our liquidity planning is largely dependent on our operating cash flows, which is highly sensitive to changes in demand, operating costs and pricing for our major products. While changes in key operating costs, such as outsourced production, advertising, promotion and distribution, may adversely affect cash flows, we have been able to continue to generate significant cash flows by adjusting costs. Our principal liquidity requirements are to finance current operations, pay down existing indebtedness, fund future expansion and meet severance obligations resulting from the recent restructuring plan. Under our Credit Facility (as defined below), we can also repurchase common stock subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Currently, our primary source of liquidity is cash generated by operations. We may from time to time, depending on market conditions, seek to refinance our debt, issue debt or equity securities or engage in other capital markets or financing activities. However, there can be no assurance that we will consummate such transactions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our inventories balance has increased $10.5 million, or 19.8%, versus December 31, 2014. The increase in inventories primarily relates to products associated with our growing Natural segment and anticipated increased distribution. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our accounts payable and accrued expenses balance increased $12.9 million, or 24.0%, versus December 31, 2014. The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily relates to increases in accounts payable of $6.2 million, accrued payroll-related items (including severance) of $3.7 million, accrued restructuring costs of $2.5 million and accrued marketing expenses of $1.3 million.  The increase in accounts payable primarily relates to timing of payments, as well as the increase in inventories.
 
We believe that cash flows generated from operations, existing cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our Revolving Facility (as defined below) should be sufficient to finance working capital requirements for our business for the foreseeable future.

As of September 30, 2015 we had $23.9 million of cash.
    
Financing

We are party to a senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"), established pursuant to a Credit Agreement dated as of July 9, 2013 (as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013, the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 20, 2013 and the Amendment Agreement dated as of July 29, 2014) by and among Boulder Brands USA, Inc. (f/k/a GFA Brands, Inc.) as borrower (the "Borrower"), the Company, as a guarantor, the other guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (the "Agent"), consisting of a term loan (the "Term Loan") in an aggregate principal amount of $302.0 million and a revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Facility") in an aggregate principal amount of $115.0 million (with sublimits for swingline loans and the issuance of letters of credit). The Term Loan will mature on July 9, 2020 and the Revolving Facility will mature on July 9, 2018.

As of September 30, 2015, we had $281.1 million outstanding under the Term Loan and the full $115.0 million was available for borrowing under our Revolving Facility.

Cash paid for interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $11.0 million. The interest rates for outstanding obligations at September 30, 2015 were 4.50% per annum for the Term Loan while the commitment fee on the unused line was 0.50% per annum.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we repaid $15.8 million under the Term Loan.

Guarantees

30




The loans and other obligations under the Credit Facility (including in respect of hedging agreements and cash management obligations) are (a) guaranteed by us and our existing and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and (b) secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of our existing and future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain customary exceptions and limitations.

Covenants

So long as any borrowings under the Revolving Facility are outstanding (other than letters of credit that have been cash collateralized in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of the Company, the terms of the Credit Facility require the Company and its subsidiaries (on a consolidated basis and subject to certain customary exceptions) to maintain a maximum total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of not more than (i) 6.50 to 1.0 for any fiscal quarter ending prior to December 31, 2015 and (ii) 6.0 to 1.0 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2015 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter. As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with our financial covenant.
    
Capital Leases

We have four capital leases resulting in $7.9 million of capital lease obligations for certain of our manufacturing equipment as of September 30, 2015. These leases have terms that expire from August 31, 2017 through December 1, 2021.

Maturities
 
Under the Credit Facility and the capital leases, the Company and the Borrower intend to pay the following amounts for their collective debt and capital lease obligations during the following years ending December 31 (in millions):
Remainder of 2015
$
0.3

2016
1.2

2017
1.2

2018
1.3

2019
1.3

Thereafter
285.4

Total
$
290.7


    
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “variable interest entities.”

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    
We are exposed to financial market risks due primarily to changes in interest rates on our variable interest rate debt. The impact on earnings is subject to change as a result of movements in market rates. A hypothetical increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a potential reduction of future pre-tax earnings of approximately $2.8 million per year, until our interest rate swaps take effect in July 2016, at which time the potential reduction in future pre-tax earnings would be approximately $1.8 million per year. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance which, in turn, is subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors.
 
We are exposed to market risk from commodity pricing changes. We purchase significant amounts of soy, palm and canola oil, peanuts, rice products and egg whites to support the needs of our brands. The price and availability of these commodities directly impacts our results of operations and can be expected to impact our future results of operations. These forward purchase commitments qualify as normal purchases and sales in the normal course of business and accordingly, do not qualify as derivatives under existing authoritative accounting guidance, namely ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Based on the most recent prices for soy, palm and canola oil, peanuts and rice products, as of September 30, 2015 we had commitments of $49.2 million. We also may enter into derivative hedging arrangements with counterparties for vegetable oil. These derivatives must be net settled in cash and are marked-to-market each period within the consolidated statement of operations.

31




We sell and produce products in Canada and in the United Kingdom for both sale and distribution in the Canadian, U.S. and U.K. markets.  By doing business in foreign markets, we are subject to risks associated with currency fluctuations which can reduce the ultimate amount of money we receive for the sales of our products into other foreign markets or add costs to the products we purchase from others in other foreign markets. In order to minimize the adverse effect of foreign currency fluctuations, we may use foreign currency contracts and other hedging arrangements as needed.
 
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Conclusion regarding the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures 

Our management, with the participation of our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officers, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of September 30, 2015. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on management's evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2015, our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





32



Part II.    Other Information

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

We are currently involved in the following legal proceedings:

On August 29, 2012, legal proceedings were filed against the Company and others in Canada, Province of Quebec, District of Montreal, by Stepworth Holdings Inc. in connection with an indemnification claim made by the Company against Stepworth, which sold Glutino to the Company. In those legal proceedings, Stepworth sought a declaration that it was not required to indemnify the Company for losses arising from claims made against the Company by Osem and Carmit, both Glutino suppliers. As such, it sought a declaration that it was entitled to recover the amount placed in escrow to cover indemnification claims made by the Company against Stepworth.  In a related proceeding, on September 24, 2012, the Company filed proceedings in the same court in Canada against Osem, Carmit and Stepworth, seeking a declaration that the suppliers’ claims against the Company are not valid.  The two foregoing proceedings are now deemed to have been discontinued (and thus, no longer active) under Quebec law.
In parallel, on December 4, 2012, Osem filed proceedings against the Company, in the same Canadian court, seeking $16.9 million (in Canadian dollars) for the Company's reduction in the volume of purchases from Osem.   In response, the Company filed a claim against Stepworth on December 10, 2012, in order to receive indemnification from Stepworth on the basis of Osem’s allegations.  The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this litigation and continues to assert its indemnification claim against Stepworth.
On April 1, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against the Company and three of its officers alleging violations of federal securities laws. The complaint alleges that beginning in December 2013, the Company made false or misleading statements in its quarterly Securities and Exchange Commission filings and analyst conference calls about its financial performance and prospects, which supposedly were proven to have been untrue when the Company pre-announced its anticipated financial results for the third quarter of 2014. A substantially similar lawsuit against the Company, and the same three officers, was filed in the same federal district court on May 18, 2015. We expect these two lawsuits to be consolidated and that the plaintiffs will thereafter file an amended complaint. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaints are without merit and it intends to vigorously defend itself.
On April 28, 2015, a purported derivative action entitled Dennis Palkon v. Stephen B. Hughes, et al., was filed, ostensibly on the Company's behalf, in Colorado state court against the Company’s directors and certain of its senior officers, and against the Company itself as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges that the officers made false statements about the Company’s financial performance and prospects (substantially the same ones that are at issue in the securities class action lawsuit described immediately above), that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by allowing such statements to be made, and that the Company should be suing to recover damages for the allegedly false statements. The complaint further alleges claims for waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and restitution in favor of the Company, certain corporate actions to purportedly improve the Company’s corporate governance, and an award of costs and expenses to the plaintiff, including attorneys’ fees.  A similar shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed on June 24, 2015 against the same eight directors and officers and one additional former director in the same court. The two state court derivative actions have been consolidated and stayed pending the outcome of the previously mentioned class action lawsuit. We believe that the plaintiffs in the derivative actions lack standing to pursue litigation on behalf of the Company.
A complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania by H.J. Heinz Company for de novo review of a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “TTAB”) that dismissed Heinz’s opposition to the Company’s applications for the intended use of the Smart Balance mark on certain products. The complaint does not seek any damages against the Company. The Company intends to vigorously defend the complaint for de novo review and assert that the TTAB acted properly.
In September 2015, Pure Growth Consulting, LLC sued the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Company entered into and subsequently breached a purported long-term marketing contract, and is seeking damages of $6.6 million.  The Company is not yet due to respond to the complaint. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and believes the allegations are without merit.
We do not expect that the resolution of any of the matters described above will have a material adverse effect on our business, although any of them could have a material adverse effect on our results in any given quarter in the event of an adverse judgment or settlement.
We are not a party to any other legal proceeding that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

33




Item 1A.  Risk Factors
    
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk.  There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously reported under Item 1A of our 2014 Form 10-K and under Part II Item 1A of our second quarter Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. 


Item 6.    Exhibits

See the exhibit index located elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


34



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
November 5, 2015
BOULDER BRANDS, INC.
(Registrant)
 
 
 
/s/ James B. Leighton
 
James B. Leighton
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
(Authorized officer of Registrant)
 
 
 
/s/ Christine Sacco
 
Christine Sacco
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer of Registrant)



35



Exhibit Index

3.1
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Boulder Brands, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 20, 2015).
 
 
10.1
Boulder Brands, Inc. Separation and Release Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2015).
 
 
10.2
Boulder Brands, Inc. Separation and Release Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21, 2015).
 
 
10.3
Boulder Brands, Inc. Separation and Release Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 9, 2015).
 
 
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
32.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 
 



36