Attached files

file filename
EX-23.1 - CONSENT - PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.precisionoptics_10k-ex2301.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.precisionoptics_10k-ex3101.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.precisionoptics_10k-ex3201.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.precisionoptics_10k-ex3102.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015

 

or

 

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________   to __________

 

Commission File Number 001-10647

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Massachusetts   04-2795294
(State or other jurisdiction   (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)

 

22 East Broadway

Gardner, Massachusetts 01440

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(978) 630-1800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o  Yes  x  No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. o  Yes  x  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  Yes  o  No

  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  x  Yes  o  No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  o   Accelerated filer  o
oNon-accelerated filer  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o  Yes  x  No

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on December 31, 2014 was approximately $1,260,159 based on a total of 2,100,265 shares of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on December 31, 2014, at the closing price of $0.60 per share as reported on the OTCQB market.

 

The number of shares of outstanding common stock of the registrant as of September 15, 2015 was 6,389,806.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:  None. 

 

   
 

 

 
 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

      PAGE
PART I      
  Item 1. Business 1
  Item 1A. Risk Factors 5
  Item 2. Properties 8
  Item 3. Legal Proceedings 8
  Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures (Not applicable.) 8
       
PART II      
  Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 9
  Item 6. Selected Financial Data 10
  Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 10
  Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 13
  Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 14
  Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 29
  Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 29
  Item 9B. Other Information 30
       
PART III      
  Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 31
  Item 11. Executive Compensation 34
  Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 37
  Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 41
  Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 42
  Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 42
 
 

 

 

 

   
 

 

PART I

 

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as defined under the federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding our financial performance, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations and any other future events are forward-looking statements and based on our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “might,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” and other similar words are one way to identify such forward-looking statements. Actual results could vary materially from these forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties contained in the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings made with the SEC. Although we believe that our expectations are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Based upon changing conditions, any one or more of these events described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended may not occur. All prior and subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to our Company or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS.

 

Overview

 

We have been developing and manufacturing advanced optical instruments since 1982. Today, the vast majority of our business is the design and manufacture of high-quality medical devices and approximately 10% of our business is the design and manufacture of military and industrial products. Our medical instrumentation line includes traditional endoscopes and endocouplers as well as other custom imaging and illumination products for use in minimally invasive surgical procedures. Much of our recent development efforts have been targeted at the development of next generation endoscopes. For the last ten years, we have funded internal research and development programs to develop next generation capabilities for designing and manufacturing 3D endoscopes and very small Microprecision™ lenses, anticipating future requirements as the surgical community continues to demand smaller and more enhanced imaging systems for minimally invasive surgery. Our unique proprietary technology in these areas, combined with recent developments in the areas of 3D displays and millimeter sized image sensors, has allowed us to begin commercialization of these technologies. We believe that new products based on these technologies provide enhanced imaging for existing surgical procedures and can enable development of many new procedures.

 

History

 

We incorporated in Massachusetts in December 1982 and have been publicly-owned since November 1990. References to our Company contained herein include our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Precise Medical, Inc. and Wood’s Precision Optics Corporation, Limited, except where the context otherwise requires. Our website is www.poci.com. Information contained on our website does not constitute part of this report.

 

Principal Products and Services

 

Our Current Core Business:  Since 1982, we have manufactured medical products such as endoscopes and endocouplers. We have developed and sold endoscopes incorporating various optical technologies including our proprietary Lenslock™ technology, for use in a variety of minimally invasive surgical and diagnostic procedures. Today, we produce endoscopes for various applications, which are CE marked and therefore certified for sale throughout the European Economic Area. Since 1985, we have developed, manufactured and sold a proprietary product line of endocouplers. We also design and manufacture custom optical medical devices to satisfy our customers’ specific requirements. In addition to medical devices, we also manufacture and sell components and assemblies specially designed for industrial and military use.

 

Microprecision™ Lenses and Micro Medical Cameras: While the size of endoscopes has gradually decreased over time, the widespread use of very small endoscopes, with diameters of one millimeter or smaller, has been limited, in part, we believe, by the inability of traditional lens fabrication methods to support these smaller sizes with good image quality and acceptable manufacturing costs. We believe our Microprecision™ optics technology provides a solution to this problem. Combined with recent advances by other companies in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor, or CMOS, image sensor fabrication techniques, our Microprecision™ lenses and proprietary manufacturing techniques enable the manufacture of micro medical cameras at low prices and with sizes on the order of one millimeter or less, characteristics that make them well suited to medical applications.

 

In June 2015 we announced a partnership with OmniVision Technologies, Inc, and Fujikura, Ltd., in which we have jointly developed a CMOS based camera module with a diameter of only 1.6 mm and 400 x 400 pixel resolution, representing the best image quality of any camera module of its size. OmniVision supplies the CMOS sensor, Fujikura provides flexible printed circuit technology and we design and fabricate the micro-optics and assemble them to the CMOS sensor to form the camera module. This camera module is well suited for many different medical device applications requiring small size and superior image quality.

 

 

 1 
 

 

We have been engaged by various customers for an increasing amount of development work relating to the design of endoscopes and camera assemblies that utilize our Microprecision™ technology. We have a limited amount of production orders for these designed products, but believe such orders will increase in the future as a result of this development work.

 

3D Endoscopes: Our 3D endoscopes provide next generation optical imaging for minimally invasive surgical procedures that utilize hand-held rigid endoscopes by using the brain’s natural ability to perceive depth, which is the third dimension, by viewing one’s environment through two eyes. Utilizing our proprietary technology to provide independent images to right and left eyes, surgeons can view the operative field with 3D perception.

 

Competition and Markets

 

We sell our products in a highly competitive market and we compete for business with both foreign and domestic manufacturers. Many of our current competitors are larger than us and have substantially greater resources than we do. In addition, there is an ongoing risk that other domestic or foreign companies who do not currently service or manufacture products for our target markets, some with greater experience in the optics industry and greater financial resources than we have, may seek to produce products or services that compete directly with ours.

 

While our resources are substantially more limited than those of some of our competitors, we believe that we can compete successfully in this market on the basis of product quality, price, delivery and innovation. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain a technological advantage over our competitors. To this end, we intend to continue to aggressively support and augment our internal engineering, research and development resources and to aggressively pursue patent protection for existing and new technology. We believe that our unique technical capabilities in the areas of Microprecision™ optics and micro medical cameras, as well as 3D endoscopes currently represent competitive advantages for us in the minimally invasive surgical device market.

 

Market Opportunities

 

Microprecision™ lenses and Micro Medical Cameras: While other approaches exist for the manufacture of camera lenses, we believe that no lens on the market today has the combination of low cost, small size, range of optical specifications and high image quality required for many medical applications that our lenses have. By enabling the production of millimeter sized and smaller cameras with low manufacturing costs, we believe our Microprecision technology opens the possibility to replace existing re-sterilizable endoscopes with a single-use alternative. Also, the small size of our Microprecision™ lenses and micro medical cameras can provide visualization for existing procedures that are currently performed blind or with sub-optimal imaging, and we believe can facilitate the development of new surgical procedures that are currently impractical without sub-millimeter visualization instrumentation.

 

3D Endoscopes: 3D endoscopes have been used for many years as part of robotic surgery systems partly because the market price of robotic surgery systems is high enough to support the cost of a high quality custom 3D display. However, we believe the use of 3D endoscopes in hand-held, non-robotic systems has been limited in the past by the high cost of good quality 3D display systems. Recently, the cost of high quality 3D display systems has dropped dramatically, driven by demand in the consumer market. Now, low cost, high quality 3D display systems, such as 3D televisions, are newly available in the market, which we believe enables the development of 3D hand-held endoscopy and creates a new market opportunity for our 3D endoscopes. To take advantage of this developing market, we have designed and built a high definition 3D endoscope for use in hand-held 3D endoscopy systems.

  

Sales and Marketing

 

We market our 3D endoscopes, Microprecision™ optical components and micro medical cameras by leveraging our existing relationships with major medical device companies – many of whom are current customers. We intend to make our existing and future technologies available to our customers for use in their current and newly developed minimally invasive surgical products and to eventually develop and market our own proprietary products, which incorporate these new technologies. In addition to direct sales channels through our existing customer relationships, we also develop new sales opportunities through our website, email mailings, and attendance at market specific tradeshows.

 

International Business

 

We have had negligible direct export sales to date. However, our medical products have received the CE Mark certification, which permits sales into the European Economic Area. In the future, we may establish or use additional production facilities overseas to produce key components for our business, such as lenses. Since the 1990s, we have maintained a presence in Asia to support business and quality control activities throughout the region as needed. We believe that the cost savings from such overseas production may be essential to our ability to compete on a price basis in the medical products area particularly and to our profitability generally.

 

 

 2 
 

 

Research and Development

 

We believe that our future success depends to a large degree on our ability to continue to conceive and develop new optical products and technologies to enhance the performance characteristics and methods of manufacture of existing and new products. Research and development expenses are incurred on our own proprietary products and technology such as Microprecision™ optics, micro medical cameras and 3D endoscopes, as well as on certain custom projects on behalf of our customers. Accordingly, we expect to continue to seek to obtain product-related design and development contracts with customers and to invest our own funds in research and development. For the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, research and development expenses, net amounted to $492,937 and $471,106, respectively. For the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, research and development expenses were net of reimbursement from customers of related costs of $23,404 and $45,997, respectively.

 

Raw Materials and Principal Suppliers

 

A key raw material component for our products is precision grade optical glass, which we obtain from a few suppliers, principally SCHOTT North America, Inc. and Ohara Corporation. For optical thin film coatings, the basic raw materials we utilize are metals and dielectric compounds, which we obtain from a variety of chemical suppliers. Certain of the thin film coatings utilized in our products are currently procured from an outside supplier, but most thin film coatings are produced in-house. We believe that our demand for these raw materials and thin film coating services is small relative to the total supply and that the materials and services required for the production of our products are currently available in sufficient production quantities and will remain available for at least the next twelve months.

 

Patents and Trademarks

 

We rely, in part, upon patents, trade secrets and proprietary knowledge as well as personnel policies and employee confidentiality agreements concerning inventions and other creative efforts to develop and maintain our competitive position. We plan to file for patents, copyrights and trademarks in the United States and in other appropriate countries to protect our intellectual property rights to the greatest extent practicable. We currently hold rights to thirteen United States patents, and have five patent applications pending, including applications for our new generation of micro medical cameras and 3D endoscopes. Our current patent portfolio includes patents, rights to patents and patent applications that cover various aspects of our technology in the following areas:

 

  Medical devices: 7 issued, 1 pending

 

  3-D endoscopes: 3 issued, 2 pending

 

  Microprecision™ lenses and micro medical cameras: 2 issued, 2 pending

 

  Military products: 1 issued

 

The patents contained in our current patent portfolio have expiration dates ranging from October 2015 to August 2026. We are not aware of any infringements of these patents. While we believe that our pending applications relate to patentable devices or concepts, these patents may not ultimately be issued and we may not be able to successfully defend these patents or effectively limit the development of competitive products and services.

 

In July 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., in which we received $2.5 million in connection with the sale of certain intellectual property. Pursuant to the agreement, we agreed to assign to Intuitive Surgical all of the issued and non-expired patents and pending patent applications that we held on the date of the agreement, and in return, Intuitive Surgical agreed to grant to us a royalty-free, worldwide license to these patents in fields outside of medical robotics.

 

We intend to continue to innovate and extend our technological capabilities in the areas of 3-D endoscopy Microprecision™ optics and micro medical cameras and to aggressively pursue patent protection for such developments.

 

Employees

As of June 30, 2015, we had 38 employees, 35 of which were full-time employees. There were 25 employees in manufacturing, 6 in engineering/research and development, 1 in sales and marketing and 6 in finance and administration. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements. We believe our relations with our employees are very good.

 

 

 3 
 

 

Customers

Revenues from our largest customers, as a percentage of total revenues, for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

 

   2015   2014 
Customer A   23%    21% 
Customer B   15      14   
Customer C   11      1   
Customer D   9      21   
All Others   42      43   
    100%    100% 

 

No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in fiscal years 2015 and 2014. At June 30, 2015, receivables from our four largest customers were 38%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. At June 30, 2014, receivables from our three largest customers were 30%, 17% and 11%, of the total accounts receivable.

 

Environmental Matters

 

Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relative to the protection of the environment. From time to time, we use a small amount of hazardous materials in our operations. We believe that we currently comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations and intend to do our best efforts to remain in compliance.

 

Government Regulations

 

Domestic Regulation. We currently develop, manufacture and sell several medical products, the marketing of which is subject to governmental regulation in the United States. Medical devices are regulated in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and, in some cases, by certain state agencies. The FDA regulates the research, testing, manufacture, safety, effectiveness, labeling, promotion and distribution of medical devices in the United States. Generally, medical devices require clearance or approval prior to commercial distribution. Additionally, certain material changes to, and changes in intended uses of, medical devices are also subject to FDA review and clearance or approval. Non-compliance with applicable requirements can result in failure of the FDA to grant pre-market clearance or approval, withdrawal or suspension of approval, suspension of production, or the imposition of various other penalties.

 

We previously notified the FDA of our intent to market our endoscopes, image couplers, beamsplitters, adapters and video ophthalmoscopes, and the FDA has determined that we may market such devices, subject to the general control provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. We obtained this FDA permission without the need to undergo a lengthy and expensive approval process due to the FDA’s determination that such devices met the regulatory standard of being substantially equivalent to existing FDA-approved devices.

 

In the future, we plan to market additional medical devices that may require the FDA’s permission to market such products. We may also develop additional products or seek to sell some of our current or future medical products in a manner that requires us to obtain the permission of the FDA to market such products, as well as the regulatory approval or license of other federal, state and local agencies or similar agencies in other countries. The FDA has authority to conduct detailed inspections of manufacturing plants in order to assure that “good manufacturing practices” are being followed in the manufacture of medical devices, to require periodic reporting of product defects to the FDA and to prohibit the sale of devices, which do not comply with law.

 

Foreign Requirements. Sales of medical device products outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that may vary from country to country. Our failure to comply with foreign regulatory requirements would jeopardize our ability to market and sell our products in foreign jurisdictions. The regulatory environment in the European Union member countries of the European Economic Area for medical device products differs from that in the United States. Medical devices sold in the European Economic Area must bear the Conformité Européenne, or CE mark. Devices are classified by manufacturers according to the risks they represent, with a classification of Class III representing the highest risk devices and Class I representing the lowest risk devices. Once a device has been classified, the manufacturer can follow one of a series of conformity assessment routes, typically through a registered quality system, and demonstrate compliance to a “European Notified Body.” The CE mark may then be applied to the device. Maintenance of the system is ensured through annual on-site audits by the notified body and a post-market surveillance system requiring the manufacturer to submit serious complaints to the appropriate governmental authority. All of our medical products are manufactured in conformity with the CE mark requirements.

 

 4 
 

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS.

 

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

 

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should give careful consideration to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and you may lose some or all of your investment. 

 

We have a history of losses, we expect to continue to incur losses and we may never achieve profitability; and our June 30, 2015 audited consolidated financial statements included disclosure that casts substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

During the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we incurred net losses of $1,178,793 and $1,160,638, respectively. Our accumulated deficit at June 30, 2015 amounted to $42,629,510. We had working capital of $592,537 and $718,352 as of June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2015, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $773,793. Our independent auditors have included a “going concern” qualification in their audit report for the year ended June 30, 2015. We expect to continue incurring losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or sustain profitability. We must generate sufficient cash flow or raise additional capital to pursue our product development initiatives, penetrate markets for the sale of our products and continue as a going concern. We cannot provide any assurance that we will raise additional capital. We believe that we have access to capital resources through possible public or private equity offerings, debt financings, corporate collaborations or other means. We may not raise enough capital to meet our needs and we may have to raise additional capital in the future. If we are unable to secure additional capital, we may be required to curtail our research and development initiatives and take additional measures to reduce costs in order to conserve our cash in amounts sufficient to sustain operations and meet our obligations. These measures could cause significant delays in our efforts to further commercialize our products, which are critical to the realization of our business plan and to our future operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern or become profitable.

 

We rely on a small number of customers who may not consistently purchase our products in the future and if we lose any one of these customers, our revenues may decline.

 

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, our four largest customers represented approximately 23%, 15%, 11% and 9%, respectively, of our total revenues. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, our three largest customers represented approximately 21%, 21% and 14%, respectively, of our total revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues during those periods. At June 30, 2015, receivables from our four largest customers were 38%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of the total accounts receivable. At June 30, 2014, receivables from our three largest customers were 30%, 17% and 11%, of the total accounts receivable.

 

In the future, a small number of customers may continue to represent a significant portion of our total revenues in any given period. These customers may not consistently purchase our products at a particular rate over any subsequent period. A loss of any of these customers could adversely affect our revenues.

 

We could suffer unrecoverable losses on our customers’ accounts receivable, which would adversely affect our financial results.

 

At June 30, 2015, receivables from our four largest customers were 38%, 13%, 12% and 10%, respectively, of the total accounts receivable. While we believe we have a varied customer base and have experienced strong collections in the past, we may experience changes in our customer base, including reductions in purchasing commitments, which could also have a material adverse effect on our revenues and liquidity. We have not purchased insurance on our accounts receivable balances.

 

We rely heavily upon the talents of our Chief Executive Officer, the loss of whom could damage our business.

 

Our performance depends to a large extent on a small number of key scientific, technical, managerial and marketing personnel. In particular, we believe our success is highly dependent upon the services and reputation of our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Joseph N. Forkey. The loss of Dr. Forkey’s services could damage our business. Dr. Forkey provides highly valuable contributions to our capabilities in optical instrument development, in management of new technology and in potentially significant longer-term Company initiatives related to biophysics and biomedical instrumentation.

 

We must continue to be able to attract employees with the scientific and technical skills that our business requires and if we are unable to attract and retain such individuals, our business could be severely damaged.

 

Our ability to attract employees with a high degree of scientific and technical talent is crucial to the success of our business. There is intense competition for the services of such persons and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract and retain individuals possessing the necessary qualifications. If we cannot attract such individuals, we may not be able to produce our products and our business could be damaged.

 

 

 5 
 

 

We are subject to a high degree of regulatory oversight and, if we do not continue to receive the necessary regulatory approvals, our revenues may decline.

 

The FDA has granted us clearance to market the medical products we currently sell in the United States. However, prior FDA approval may be required before we can market additional medical products that we may develop in the future. We may also seek to sell current or future medical products in a manner that requires us to obtain FDA permission to market such products. We may also require the regulatory approval or license of other federal, state or local agencies or comparable agencies in other countries.

 

We may lose the FDA’s permission to market our current products or may not obtain the necessary regulatory permission, approvals or licenses for the marketing of any of our future products. Also, we cannot predict the impact on our business of FDA regulations or determinations arising from future legislation or administrative action. If we lose the FDA’s permission to market our current products or we do not obtain regulatory permission to market our future products, our revenues may decline and our business may be harmed.

 

We face risks inherent in product development and production under fixed-price purchase orders and these purchase orders may not be profitable over time.

 

A portion of our business has been devoted to research, development and production under fixed-price purchase orders. For our purposes, a fixed-price purchase order is any purchase order under which we will provide products or services for a fixed-price over an extended period of time, usually six months or longer. Fixed-price purchase orders represented approximately 25% to 50% of our total revenues during the last several years. We expect that revenues from fixed-price purchase orders will continue to represent a significant portion of our total revenues in future fiscal years.

Because they involve performance over time, we cannot predict with certainty the expenses involved in meeting our obligations under fixed-price purchase orders. Therefore, we can never be sure at the time we enter into any single fixed-price purchase order that such purchase order will be profitable for us.

 

Third parties may infringe on our intellectual property and, as a result, we could incur significant expense in protecting our patents or not have sufficient resources to protect them.

 

We utilize a number of licensed patents that are important to our business. In July 2011, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., in which we received $2.5 million in connection with the sale of certain intellectual property. Pursuant to the agreement, we agreed to assign to Intuitive Surgical all of the issued and non-expired patents and pending patent applications we held at the time of the agreement and, in return, Intuitive Surgical agreed to grant to us a royalty-free, worldwide license to these patents in fields outside of medical robotics.

 

Although we are not currently aware of any past or present infringements of our patents, we plan, jointly with Intuitive Surgical, to protect these patents from infringement and obtain additional patents whenever feasible. To this end, we have obtained confidentiality agreements from our employees and consultants and others who have access to the design of our products and other proprietary information. Protecting and obtaining patents, however, is both time consuming and expensive. We therefore may not have the resources necessary to assert all potential patent infringement claims or pursue all patents that might be available to us. If our competitors or other third parties infringe on our patents, our business may be harmed.

 

Third parties may claim that we have infringed on their patents and, as a result, we could be prohibited from using all or part of any technology used in our products.

 

Should third parties claim a proprietary right to all or part of any technology that we use in our products, such a claim, regardless of its merit, could involve us in costly litigation. If successful, such a claim could also result in us being unable to freely use the technology that was the subject of the claim, or sell products embodying such technology. If we engage in litigation, our expenses may increase and our business may be harmed. If we are prohibited from using a particular technology in our products, our revenues may decline and our business may be harmed.

 

We depend on the availability of certain key supplies and services that are available from only a few sources and if we experience difficulty with a supplier, we may have difficulty finding alternative sources of these supplies or services.

 

We require certain key supplies to develop and manufacture our products, particularly our precision grade optical glass, which is available from only a few sources, each of which is located outside of the United States. Additionally, we rely on outside vendors to grind and polish certain of our lenses and other optical components, such as prisms and windows. Based upon our ordering experience to date, we believe the materials and services required for the production of our products are currently available in sufficient quantities to meet our needs. Our requirements are small relative to the total supply, and we are not currently encountering problems with availability. However, this does not mean that we will continue to have timely access to adequate supplies of essential materials and services in the future or that supplies of these materials and services will be available on satisfactory terms when the need arises. Our business could be severely damaged if we become unable to procure these essential materials and services in adequate quantities and at acceptable prices.

 

 6 
 

 

 

From time to time, subcontractors may produce some of our products for us, and our business is subject to the risk that these subcontractors fail to make timely delivery. Our products and services are also used as components of the products and services of other manufacturers. We are therefore subject to the risk that manufacturers that integrate our products or services into their own products or services are unable to acquire essential supplies and services from third parties in a timely fashion. If this occurs, we may not be able to deliver our products on a timely basis and our revenues may decline.

 

Our customers may claim that the products we sold them were defective and if our insurance is not sufficient to cover such a claim, we would be liable for the excess.

 

Like any manufacturer, we are and always have been exposed to liability claims resulting from the use of our products. We maintain product liability insurance to cover us in the event of liability claims, and as of September 23, 2015, no such claims have been asserted or threatened against us. However, our insurance may not be sufficient to cover all possible future product liabilities.

 

We would be liable if our business operations harmed the environment and a failure to maintain compliance with environmental laws could severely damage our business.

 

Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. From time to time, we use hazardous materials in our operations. Although we believe that we are in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, our business could be severely damaged by any failure to maintain such compliance.

 

Our quarterly financial results vary quarter to quarter and depend on many factors. As a result, we cannot predict with a high degree of certainty our operating results in any particular fiscal quarter.

 

Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly depending upon factors such as:

 

  the timing of completion of significant customer orders;

 

  the timing and amount of our research and development expenditures;

 

  the costs of initial product production in connection with new products;

 

  the timing of new product introductions—both by us and by our competitors;

 

  the timing and level of market acceptance of new products or enhanced versions of our existing products;

 

  our ability to retain existing customers and customers’ continued demand for our products and services;

 

  our customers’ inventory levels, and levels of demand for our customers’ products and services; and

 

  competitive pricing pressures.

 

We may not be able to grow or sustain revenues or achieve or maintain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis and levels of revenue and/or profitability may vary from one such period to another.

 

Some of our competitors are large, well-financed companies who have research and marketing capabilities that are superior to ours.

 

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive. Many of our existing and potential competitors have greater financial resources and manufacturing capabilities, more established and larger marketing and sales organizations and larger technical staffs than we have. Other companies, some with greater experience in the optics, semiconductor or medical products industries, are seeking to produce products and services that compete with our products and services.

 

RISKS RELATED TO OUR STOCK

 

Trading in our common stock is limited and the price of our common stock may be subject to substantial volatility.

 

Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB, the OTC market tier for companies that report to the SEC, under the symbol PEYE. We expect our common stock to continue to be quoted on the OTCQB for the foreseeable future. Broker-dealers may decline to trade in OTCQB stocks given the market for such securities is often limited, the stocks are more volatile and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of their shares. This could cause our stock price to decline.

 

 7 
 

 

 

Additionally, the price of our common stock may be volatile as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

  our ability to successfully conceive and to develop new products and services to enhance the performance characteristics and methods of manufacture of existing products;

 

  our ability to retain existing customers and customers’ continued demand for our products and services;

 

  the timing of our research and development expenditures and of new product introductions;

 

  the timing and level of acceptance of new products or enhanced versions of our existing products; and

 

  price and volume fluctuations in the stock market at large which do not relate to our operating performance.

 

“Penny stock” rules may make buying or selling our securities difficult which may make our stock less liquid and make it harder for investors to buy and sell our securities.

 

Trading in our securities is subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules and we anticipate that trading in our securities will continue to be subject to the penny stock rules for the foreseeable future. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any broker-dealer who recommends our securities to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the liquidity of our securities and consequently adversely affect the market price for our securities.

 

We are contractually obligated to issue shares in the future, diluting your interest in us.

 

As of June 30, 2015, there were 1,079,079 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options outstanding, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.43 per share. As of June 30, 2015, a total of 968,596 shares of our common stock are reserved for issuance under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. As of June 30, 2015, there are also warrants outstanding for the issuance of an aggregate of an additional 3,275,444 shares of our common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.15 per share. Moreover, we expect to issue additional shares and options to purchase shares of our common stock to compensate employees, consultants and directors, and we may issue additional shares to raise capital. Any such issuances will have the effect of further diluting the interest of the holders of our securities.

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES.

 

We conduct our domestic operations at two facilities in Gardner, Massachusetts. The main Gardner facility is leased from a corporation owned by Mr. Richard E. Forkey, who resigned from our board of directors on July 9, 2014. We are currently a tenant-at-will, paying rent of $9,000 per month. We rent the other Gardner facility on a month-to-month basis.

 

We believe these facilities are adequate for our current operations and are adequately covered by insurance. Significant increases in production or the addition of significant equipment additions or manufacturing capabilities in connection with the production of our line of endoscopes and other products may, however, require the acquisition or lease of additional facilities. We may establish production facilities domestically or overseas to produce key assemblies or components, such as lenses, for our products. Overseas facilities may subject us to the political and economic risks associated with overseas operations. The loss of or inability to establish or maintain such additional domestic or overseas facilities could materially adversely affect our competitive position and profitability.

 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

  

Our Company, on occasion, may also be involved in other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. While management believes that such matters are currently insignificant, matters arising in the ordinary course of business for which we are or could become involved in litigation may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us or our officers and directors in their capacity as such that could have a material impact on our operations or finances, other than as set forth above.

 

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

 

Not applicable.

 

 

 8 
 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock is quoted on OTCQB, the OTC market tier for companies that report to the SEC under the symbol PEYE. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our common stock for each quarter during the last two fiscal years and the first quarter of the current fiscal year as quoted on OTCQB. Such OTC market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

    High     Low  
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014                  
First Quarter ended September 30, 2013   $ 1.09     $ 0.33    
Second Quarter ended December 31, 2013   $ 1.09     $ 0.40    
Third Quarter ended March 31, 2014   $ 1.05     $ 0.70    
Fourth Quarter ended June 30, 2014   $ 1.00     $ 0.70    
                   
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015                  
First Quarter ended September 30, 2014   $ 1.30     $ 0.71    
Second Quarter ended December 31, 2014   $ 0.87     $ 0.37    
Third Quarter ended March 31, 2015   $ 0.90     $ 0.35    
Fourth Quarter ended June 30, 2015   $ 0.80     $ 0.55    
                   
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016                  
First Quarter ended September 30, 2015   $ 0.90     $ 0.40    

 

Holders

 

As of September 25, 2015, we had approximately 98 holders of record of our common stock. Holders of record include nominees who may hold shares on behalf of multiple owners.

 

Dividends

 

We have not declared any dividends during the last two fiscal years. At present, we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance research and development and expansion of our business.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

Since April 1, 2015, we issued the securities indicated below.

 

On May 21, 2015, we issued 45,000 restricted shares of our common stock valued at $0.60 per share to Mr. Donald Major as compensation for consulting services rendered to us.

 

We relied on the Section 4(a)(2) exemption from securities registration under the federal securities laws for transactions not involving any public offering. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities were issued to an accredited investor. The securities were offered for investment purposes only and not for the purpose of resale or distribution. The transfer thereof was appropriately restricted by us.

 

 9 
 

 

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2015.

 

Plan category  Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders   189,977   $4.12     
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders   889,102   $0.86    935,898 
Total   1,079,079   $1.43    935,898 

 

2006 Equity Incentive Plan

 

On November 28, 2006, our stockholders approved the Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, referred to as the 2006 Plan, which succeeded the Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, referred to as the 1997 Plan. No further awards have been or will be granted under the 1997 Plan. The 2006 Plan allows for the grant of stock options to selected employees, directors and other persons who provide services to us or our affiliates.

 

2011 Equity Incentive Plan

 

The Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, referred to as the 2011 Plan, was adopted by our Board of Directors on October 13, 2011. The 2011 Plan allows for the grant of stock options to selected employees, directors and other persons who provide services to us or our affiliates.

 

On April 16, 2015, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan which increased the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be awarded under the Plan from 325,000 to 1,825,000, an increase of 1,500,000 shares. In connection therewith, on April 20, 2015, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

As a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item.

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains descriptions of our expectations regarding future trends affecting our business. The following discussion sets forth certain factors we believe could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.

 

Overview

 

We have been a developer and manufacturer of advanced optical instruments since 1982. Today, the vast majority of our business is the design and manufacture of high-quality medical devices and approximately 10% of our business is the design and manufacture of military and industrial products. Our medical instrumentation line includes traditional endoscopes and endocouplers as well as other custom imaging and illumination products for use in minimally invasive surgical procedures. Much of our recent development efforts have been targeted at the development of next generation endoscopes. For the last ten years, we have funded internal research and development programs to develop next generation capabilities for designing and manufacturing 3D endoscopes and very small Microprecision™ lenses, anticipating future requirements as the surgical community continues to demand smaller and more enhanced imaging systems for minimally invasive surgery.

 

 

 10 
 

 

 

In June 2015 we announced a partnership with OmniVision Technologies, Inc., and Fujikura, Ltd., in which we have jointly developed a CMOS based camera module with a diameter of only 1.6 mm and 400 x 400 pixel resolution, representing the best image quality of any camera module of its size. OmniVision supplies the CMOS sensor, Fujikura provides flexible printed circuit technology and we design and fabricate the micro-optics and assemble them to the CMOS sensor to form the camera module. This camera module is well suited for many different medical device applications requiring small size and superior image quality.

 

Our unique proprietary technology in the areas of micro optical lenses and prisms, micro medical fiber and CMOS based cameras, and custom design of medical grade instruments, combined with recent developments in the areas of 3D displays, has allowed us to begin commercialization of related product and service offerings to a widening group of customers addressing various medical device, defense and aerospace applications. We believe that new products based on these technologies provide enhanced optical and imaging qualities for many uses including existing surgical procedures and development of new procedures enabled by the small size and image quality of our camera modules.

 

We are registered to the ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 13485:2003 Quality Standards and comply with the FDA Good Manufacturing Practices and the European Union Medical Device Directive for CE marking of our medical products. Our internet website is www.poci.com.

 

The markets in which we do business are highly competitive and include both foreign and domestic competitors. Many of our competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources than we do. Furthermore, other domestic or foreign companies, some with greater financial resources than we have, may seek to produce products or services that compete with ours. We routinely outsource specialized production efforts as required to obtain the most cost effective production. Over the years, we have achieved extensive experience collaborating with other optical specialists worldwide and since the 1990s, we have maintained a presence in Asia via a Hong Kong subsidiary to support business and quality control activities throughout the region as needed.

 

We believe that competition for sales of our medical products and services, which have been principally sold to original equipment manufacturers, or OEM, customers, is based on performance and other technical features, as well as other factors, such as scheduling and reliability, in addition to competitive price.

 

We believe that our future success depends to a large degree on our ability to develop new optical products and services to enhance the performance characteristics and methods of manufacture of existing products. Accordingly, we expect to continue to seek and obtain product-related design and development contracts with customers and to selectively invest our own funds on research and development, particularly in the areas of Microprecision™ optics, micro medical cameras and 3D endoscopes.

 

For the year ended June 30, 2015, approximately 65% of our sales were made to five customers. Of these, two are large, international, medical device companies who have been our customers for many years. Both of these customers continue to purchase products that we developed over five years ago, and both now purchase new products that were developed and launched into production by us more recently. The other three top customers purchase products that we developed in recent years, and which rely heavily on our unique, proprietary Microprecision™ lens technology and optical visualization system expertise.

 

Current sales and marketing activities are intended to broaden awareness of the benefits of our new technology platforms, which we believe are ready for general application to medical device projects requiring surgery-grade visualization from sub-millimeter sized devices and handheld 3D endoscopy. We continue to attend trade shows to announce our new technology, most recently at the Medical Design and Manufacturing West show in Anaheim in February 2015, and at the MD&M East show in June 2015 in New York City. Beginning in fiscal year 2014, we have advertised through, and received numerous leads from a business-to-business e-commerce platform. Photonics Online, www.photonicsonline.com, has a target audience of optical engineering design and manufacturing professionals and has over 34,000 subscribers to their monthly email newsletter. Because of the increased awareness of our new technology generated by our presence at trade shows, advertising on Photonics Online and direct email messages to our own customer database that we have built over the last 30 years, we more than doubled the rate that we received requests for quotes during fiscal year 2014. We are continuing to build on recent successes in this area by continuing the activities summarized above while adding additional advertising through a second business-to-business e-commerce platform, Med Device Online, www.meddeviceonline.com, which targets technical professionals working in the medical device industry. We do not intend for the information on either the Med Device Online or Photonics websites to be incorporated into this report.

 

 11 
 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our critical accounting policies are included in the Notes to our Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 as Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014

 

Total revenues for fiscal year 2015 were $3,912,060, an increase of $260,879, or 7.1%, from revenues for fiscal year 2014 of $3,651,181. The increase in revenues for fiscal year 2015 as compared to the prior year was due to higher unit volume sales of new ultra small fiberscopes and micro imaging systems and higher revenues from engineering services, partially offset by lower unit volume sales of optical components and the advanced surgical visualization system used in spinal surgery.

 

Revenues from our largest customers, as a percentage of total revenues, were as follows:

 

   Year Ended June 30 
   2015   2014 
Customer A   23%    21% 
Customer B   15      14   
Customer C   11      1   
Customer D   9      21   
All others   42      43   
    100%    100% 

 

No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

 

Gross profit for fiscal year 2015 of $798,271 reflected a decrease of $2,524 as compared to gross profit for fiscal year 2014 of $800,795. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues for fiscal year 2015 was 20.4% as compared to gross profit as a percentage of revenues for fiscal year 2014 of 21.9%. The decrease in our gross profit percentage was due primarily to less favorable product mix and certain nonrecurring manufacturing startup expenses related to the introduction of new products, which was partially offset by higher overall unit sales volume.

 

Research and development expenses, net were $492,937 for fiscal year 2015 as compared to $471,106 for fiscal year 2014. The increase of $21,831, or 4.6%, for fiscal year 2015 as compared to the prior year was due primarily to higher spending on research and development related efforts. Research and development expenses depend on our assessment of new product opportunities and available resources. Research and development expenses were net of reimbursement from customers of related costs of $23,404 during fiscal year 2015 and $45,997 during fiscal year 2014.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $42,019, or 2.8 %, to $1,545,462 for fiscal year 2015 as compared to $1,503,443 for fiscal year 2014. The increase for fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to higher selling, consulting, and investor relations expenses, partially offset by lower stock-based compensation and professional services expenses.

 

The gain on sale of assets and other in fiscal years 2015 and 2014 of $27,075 and $14,028, respectively, represents primarily the sale of previously written off assets for proceeds of $27,075 and $14,028, respectively.

  

The income tax provisions in fiscal years 2015 and 2014 represent the minimum statutory state income tax liability.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We has sustained recurring net losses for several years. During the year ended June 30, 2015, we incurred a net loss from operations of $1,213,053 and used cash in operating activities of $773,793. As of June 30, 2015, cash and cash equivalents were $241,051, accounts receivable were $588,042, and current liabilities were $1,374,994. As of June 30, 2014, cash and cash equivalents were $202,380, accounts receivable were $531,049, and current liabilities were $1,095,877. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

We have traditionally funded working capital needs through product sales, management of working capital components of our business, and by cash received from public and private offerings of our common stock, warrants to purchase shares of our common stock or convertible notes. We have incurred quarter to quarter operating losses during our efforts to develop current products including Microprecision™ optical elements, micro medical camera assemblies and 3D endoscopes. Our management believes that the opportunities represented by these products have the potential to generate sales increases to achieve breakeven and profitable results.

 

 12 
 

 

 

Until we achieve breakeven and profitable results, we will be required to pursue several options to manage cash flow and raise capital, including issuing debt or equity or entering into a strategic alliance. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities, if converted into common stock, would result in additional dilution to our current stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that could restrict our operations or finances. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms or achieve positive cash flow, we may not be able to continue to conduct operations, develop new products, grow market share, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, any of which would negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

On July 1 through July 7, 2014, we closed agreements with institutional and accredited investors for the sale and purchase of 1,717,152 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.60 per share. We received $1,030,291 in gross proceeds from the offering. We used the majority of the net proceeds from this placement for general working capital purposes. Of this amount, $50,000 was received in June 2014 and the remainder was received in July 2014.

 

Capital equipment expenditures during fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2014 were $62,418 and $1,680, respectively. Future capital equipment expenditures will be dependent upon future sales and success of on-going research and development efforts.

 

Contractual cash commitments for the fiscal years subsequent to June 30, 2015 are summarized as follows:

 

   2016   Thereafter   Total 
Operating Leases  $13,780   $   $13,780 

 

We have contractual cash commitments related to open purchase orders as of June 30, 2015 of approximately $338,000.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.   

 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

As a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item.

 

 

 13 
 

 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

 

Index to Financial Statements

 

  Page
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 15
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014 16
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 17
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 18
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 19
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 20

 

 

 

 14 
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are described in Note 1. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Stowe & Degon LLC

 

Westborough, Massachusetts

October 13, 2015

 

 

 15 
 

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   2015   2014 
ASSETS          
Current Assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents  $241,051   $202,380 
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $22,500 in 2015 and 2014)   588,042    531,049 
Inventories   1,073,256    988,878 
Prepaid expenses   65,182    91,922 
Total current assets   1,967,531    1,814,229 
Fixed Assets:          
Machinery and equipment   2,431,127    2,368,709 
Leasehold improvements   553,596    553,596 
Furniture and fixtures   148,303    148,303 
Vehicles   19,674    19,674 
    3,152,700    3,090,282 
Less—Accumulated depreciation and amortization   3,096,993    3,075,722 
Net fixed assets   55,707    14,560 
Patents, net   18,644    7,672 
   $2,041,882   $1,836,461 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
Current Liabilities:          
Accounts payable  $912,150   $715,192 
Customer advances   118,800    26,200 
Accrued employee compensation   222,222    200,207 
Accrued professional services   60,735    60,250 
Accrued warranty expense   25,000    25,000 
Other accrued liabilities   36,087    69,028 
Total current liabilities   1,374,994    1,095,877 
Commitments (Note 2)          
Stockholders’ Equity:          
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding – 6,389,806 shares at June 30, 2015 and 4,455,134 shares at June 30, 2014   63,898    44,551 
Additional paid-in capital   43,232,500    42,146,750 
Accumulated deficit   (42,629,510)   (41,450,717)
           
Total stockholders’ equity   666,888    740,584 
   $2,041,882   $1,836,461 

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 16 
 

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   2015   2014 
Revenues  $3,912,060   $3,651,181 
Cost of goods sold   3,113,789    2,850,386 
Gross profit   798,271    800,795 
Research and development expenses, net   492,937    471,106 
Selling, general and administrative expenses   1,545,462    1,503,443 
Gain on sale of assets   (27,075)   (14,028)
Total operating expenses   2,011,324    1,960,521 
Operating loss   (1,213,053)   (1,159,726)
Other income   35,172     
Loss before provision for income taxes   (1,177,881)   (1,159,726)
Provision for income taxes   912    912 
Net loss  $(1,178,793)  $(1,160,638)
Loss per share:          
Basic  $(0.19)  $(0.26)
Diluted  $(0.19)  $(0.26)
           
Weighted average common shares outstanding:          
Basic   6,272,264    4,455,134 
Diluted   6,272,264    4,455,134 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 17 
 

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Number of Shares   Common
Stock
   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
   Accumulated
Deficit
   Total
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
 
                          
Balance, July 1, 2013   4,455,134   $44,551   $41,955,717   $(40,290,079)  $1,710,189 
Advance proceeds from private placement of common stock           50,000        50,000 
Stock-based compensation           141,033        141,033 
Net loss               (1,160,638)   (1,160,638)
Balance, June 30, 2014   4,455,134   $44,551   $42,146,750   $(41,450,717)  $740,584 
Proceeds from private placement of common stock, net of issuance costs of $127,512   1,717,152    17,172    835,607        852,779 
Common stock issued for services rendered to the Company   217,520    2,175    124,468        126,643 
Stock-based compensation           125,675        125,675 
Net loss               (1,178,793)   (1,178,793)
Balance, June 30, 2015   6,389,806   $63,898   $43,232,500   $(42,629,510)  $666,888 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 18 
 

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the

Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

 

   2015   2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:          
Net loss  $(1,178,793)  $(1,160,638)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities-          
Depreciation and amortization   21,271    20,020 
Gain on sale of assets   (27,075)   (14,028)
Stock-based compensation expense   125,675    141,033 
Non-cash consulting expense   66,750    64,507 
Non-cash gain on settlement of liabilities by issuing common stock   (35,172)    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities-          
Accounts receivable, net   (56,993)   (252,349)
Inventories   (84,378)   (92,705)
Prepaid expenses   26,740    (30,355)
Accounts payable   210,958    425,937 
Customer advances   92,600    (11,844)
Accrued expenses   64,624    24,391 
Net cash used in operating activities   (773,793)   (886,031)
           
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:          
Proceeds from sale of assets   27,075    14,028 
Additional patent costs   (10,972)   (8,524)
Purchases of fixed assets   (62,418)   (1,680)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (46,315)   3,824 
           
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:          
Proceeds from July 2014 private placement of common stock   980,291    50,000 
Private placement expenses incurred and paid as of June 30, 2015   (121,512)    
Net cash provided by financing activities   858,779    50,000 
           
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents   38,671    (832,207)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year   202,380    1,034,587 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year  $241,051   $202,380 
           
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:          
Cash paid during the year for income taxes  $912   $912 
           
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
Issuance of 217,520 shares of common stock for services rendered to the company  $126,643   $ 
Private placement expenses incurred but not yet paid as of June 30, 2015  $6,000   $ 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 19 
 

 

PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(1)           SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

(a)           Nature of Business and Liquidity

 

Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) designs, develops, manufactures and sells specialized optical systems and components and optical thin-film coatings. The Company conducts business in one industry segment only and its customers are primarily domestic. The Company’s products and services fall into two principal areas: (i) medical products for use by hospitals and physicians; and (ii) advanced optical system design and development services and products used by military and industrial customers.

 

The Company has sustained recurring net losses for several years. During the year ended June 30, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss from operations of $1,213,053 and used cash in operating activities of $773,793. As of June 30, 2015, cash and cash equivalents were $241,051, accounts receivable were $588,042, and current liabilities were $1,374,994. As of June 30, 2014, cash and cash equivalents were $202,380, accounts receivable were $531,049, and current liabilities were $1,095,877. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Until the Company achieves breakeven and profitable results, the Company will be required to pursue several options to manage cash flow and raise capital, including issuing debt or equity or entering into a strategic alliance. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities, if converted into common stock, would result in additional dilution to the Company’s current stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that could restrict our operations or finances. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. If the Company cannot raise funds on acceptable terms or achieve positive cash flow, the Company may not be able to continue to conduct operations, develop new products, grow market share, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, any of which would negatively impact the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

 

(b)           Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its two wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

(c)           Revenues

 

The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s shipping terms are customarily FOB shipping point.

 

The sales price of products and services sold is fixed and determinable after receipt and acceptance of a customer’s purchase order or properly executed sales contract, typically before any work is performed. Management reviews each customer purchase order or sales contract to determine that the work to be performed is specified and there are no unusual terms and conditions that would raise questions as to whether the sales price is fixed or determinable. The Company assesses credit worthiness of customers based upon prior history with the customer and assessment of financial condition. Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided for that portion of accounts receivable considered to be uncollectible, based upon historical experience and management’s evaluation of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the year. Bad debts are written off against the allowance when identified.

 

The Company’s revenue transactions typically do not contain multiple deliverable elements for future performance obligations to customers, other than a standard one-year warranty on materials and workmanship, the estimated costs for which are provided for at the time revenue is recognized.

Revenues for industrial and medical products sold in the normal course of business are recognized upon shipment when delivery terms are FOB shipping point and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Gross shipping charges reimbursable from customers, to deliver product, are insignificant and are included in “Revenues” section of the Company’s consolidated statement of operations, while shipping costs are classified in the “selling, general and administrative expenses” section of the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

 

 20 
 

 

 

(d)           Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company includes in cash equivalents all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents of $241,051 and $202,380 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, consist primarily of cash at banks and money market funds. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash and cash equivalents.

 

(e)           Inventories

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. The components of inventories at June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

 

   2015   2014 
Raw material  $485,266   $445,210 
Work-in-progress   388,503    385,601 
Finished goods   199,487    158,067 
   $1,073,256   $988,878 

 

The Company provides for estimated obsolescence on unmarketable inventory based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Inventory, once written down, is not subsequently written back up, as these adjustments are considered permanent adjustments to the carrying value of the inventory.

  

(f)            Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair items are expensed as incurred. The Company provides for depreciation and amortization by charges to operations, using the straight-line and declining-balance methods, which allocate the cost of property and equipment over the following estimated useful lives:

 

Asset Classification   Estimated Useful Life
Machinery and equipment   2-7 years
Leasehold improvements   Shorter of lease term or estimated useful life
Furniture and fixtures   5 years
Vehicles   3 years

 

Depreciation expense was $21,271 and $19,168 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

(g)           Significant Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company places its investments with highly rated financial institutions. The Company has not experienced any losses on these investments to date. At June 30, 2015, receivables from the Company’s four largest customers were 38%, 13%, 12% and 10% of the total accounts receivable. At June 30, 2014, receivables from the Company’s three largest customers were 30%, 17% and 11%, of the total accounts receivable. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s receivables as of June 30, 2015 and 2014. The Company has not experienced any material losses related to accounts receivable from individual customers. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security as a condition of sale, rather it relies on credit approval, balance limitation and monitoring procedures to control credit risk of trade account financial instruments. Management believes that allowances for doubtful accounts, which are established based upon review of specific account balances and historical experience, are adequate.

 

Revenues from the Company’s largest customers, as a percentage of total revenues, were as follows:

 

   Year Ended June 30 
   2015   2014 
Customer A   23%    21% 
Customer B   15      14   
Customer C   11      1   
Customer D   9      21   
All others   42      43   
    100%    100% 

 

No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

 

 21 
 

 

 

(h)           Loss per Share

 

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income or net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, plus the number of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period such as stock options and warrants. For the year ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the effect of such securities was antidilutive and not included in the diluted calculation because of the net loss generated in those periods.

 

The following is the calculation of loss per share for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

   Year Ended June 30 
   2015   2014 
         
Net Loss– Basic and Diluted  $(1,178,793)  $(1,160,638)
           
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding   6,272,264    4,455,134 
Potentially Dilutive Securities        
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding   6,272,264    4,455,134 
           
Loss Per Share          
Basic  $(0.19)  $(0.26)
Diluted  $(0.19)  $(0.26)

 

 

The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants that were excluded from the computation as their effect was antidilutive was approximately 4,355,000 and 3,393,000 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

(i)            Stock-Based Compensation

 

The measurement and recognition of compensation costs for all stock-based awards made to employees and the Board of Directors are based upon fair value over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Stock-based compensation costs recognized for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $125,675 and $141,033, respectively.

 

(j)            Patents

 

Patent costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their legal or estimated useful lives, generally five to ten years. Amortization expense was $0 and $852 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

In July 2011, the Company assigned all of its currently issued and pending patents, as well as new inventions that it conceives before July 28, 2012, to Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.

 

(k)           Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying value due to their short-term nature.

 

(l)          Long-Lived Assets

 

Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

 

 

 22 
 

 

 

(m)          Warranty Costs

 

The Company does not incur future performance obligations in the normal course of business other than providing a standard one-year warranty on materials and workmanship to its customers (except in certain unusual and infrequently occurring situations where extended warranty terms beyond one year are negotiated with the customer). The Company provides for estimated warranty costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Warranty costs have been included as a component of cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The following tables summarize warranty reserve activity for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

   2015   2014 
Balance at beginning of period  $25,000   $25,000 
Provision for warranty claims   32,477    11,917 
Warranty claims incurred   (32,477)   (11,917)
Balance at end of period  $25,000   $25,000 

 

(n)           Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. The Company groups development and prototype costs and related reimbursements in research and development. For the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, research and development expense is shown net of reimbursements of $23,404 and $45,997, respectively, in the accompanying statements of operations.

 

(o)           Comprehensive Income

 

Comprehensive income or loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owners sources. The Company’s comprehensive loss or income for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was equal to its net loss for the same periods.

 

(p)           Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the likelihood of utilization of existing deferred tax assets, management has considered historical results of operations and the current operating environment.

 

(q)           Segment Reporting

 

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief decision-maker is its Chief Executive Officer. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as principally one segment. For all periods presented, over 90% of the Company’s sales have been to customers in the United States.

 

(r)           Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

(s)           Recent Accounting Pronouncements

  

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new accounting guidance for measuring inventory.  The core principal of the guidance is that an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.  This guidance does not apply to inventory that is being measured using the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 on a prospective basis.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this will have on the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 23 
 



On June 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements, which amends a number of topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The update is a part of an ongoing project on the FASB’s agenda to facilitate Codification updates for non-substantive technical corrections, clarifications, and improvements that are not expected to have a significant effect on accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. The ASU will apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. Certain amendments in the update require transition guidance and are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this will have on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 provides a single, comprehensive accounting model for revenues arising from contracts with customers that supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. Under this model, revenue is recognized at an amount that an entity expects to be entitled to upon transferring control of goods or services to a customer, as opposed to when risks and rewards transfer to a customer under existing revenue recognition guidance. ASU 201-09 is effective for the Company beginning in its fiscal year 2018, and may be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented or through a cumulative adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance in the year of adoption. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

(2)           COMMITMENTS

 

(a)           Related Party Transactions

 

The Company leases its main Gardner facility from a corporation owned by Mr. Richard E. Forkey, who resigned from our board of directors on July 9, 2014. The Company is currently a tenant-at-will, paying rent of $9,000 per month. Total rent expense paid or accrued to such related party was $108,000 in each of fiscal years 2015 and 2014, and is included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

  

Transactions with Stockholders Known by the Company to Own 5% or More of the Company’s Common Stock

 

On July 1 through July 7, 2014, the Company closed agreements with institutional and accredited investors (the “Investors”) for the sale and purchase of 1,717,152 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value at a purchase price of $0.60 per share. The Company received $1,030,291 in gross proceeds from the offering. The Company used the net proceeds from this placement for general working capital purposes. Of this amount, $50,000 was received in June 2014 and the remainder was received in July 2014.

 

In conjunction with the placement, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with the Investors, whereby the Company was obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission on or before 45 calendar days after July 1, 2014 to register the resale by the investors of the 1,717,152 shares of the common stock purchased in the placement. Subsequent to the execution of the agreement, the parties agreed to extend the time period by which the Company was obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission. The registration statement was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on October 9, 2014, in accordance with the extended timetable, and became effective on October 30, 2014.

 

Pursuant to the above transaction, Mr. Arnold Schumsky purchased 83,334 shares of common stock in exchange for an aggregate price of $50,000 and MHW Capital Partners, LP purchased 125,000 shares of common stock in exchange for an aggregate price of $75,000. Arnold Schumsky and MHW Capital Partners, LP were beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock at the time of the transaction. Mr. Woodward is the principal of MHW Capital Partners, LP, and holds the power to vote and direct the disposition of the shares of common stock owned by MHW Partners, LP. Pursuant to the transaction described above, Mr. Woodward was subsequently appointed as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors on July 9, 2014.

 

(b)           Operating Lease Commitments

 

The Company has entered into operating leases for its office space and equipment that expire at various dates through fiscal year 2016. Total future minimum rental payments under all non-cancelable operating leases are $13,780 in fiscal year 2015.

 

Rent expense on operating leases, excluding the related party rent described above, was $58,077 and $68,232 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

 24 
 

 

 

(3)           STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

(a)           Stock Options

 

Stock-based compensation costs recognized during the year ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $125,675 and $141,033 respectively, and were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in: selling, general and administrative expenses (2015 — $107,300; 2014 — $134,800), cost of goods sold (2015 — $0; 2014 — $4,033), and research and development expenses, net (2015 — $18,375; 2014 — $2,200). No compensation has been capitalized because such amounts would have been immaterial. There was no net income tax benefit recognized related to such compensation for the years ended June 30, 2015 or 2014, as the Company is currently in a loss position. There were 714,000 stock options granted during the year ended June 30, 2015 and 9,000 stock options granted during the year ended June 30, 2014.

 

As of June 30, 2015, the unrecognized compensation costs related to options vesting in the future is $0. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model as the most appropriate method for determining the estimated fair value for the stock awards. The Black-Scholes method of valuation requires several assumptions: (1) the expected term of the stock award; (2) the expected future stock volatility over the expected term; and (3) risk-free interest rate. The expected term represents the expected period of time the Company believes the options will be outstanding based on historical information. Estimates of expected future stock price volatility are based on the historic volatility of the Company’s common stock and the risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Zero-Bond rate. The Company utilizes a forfeiture rate based on an analysis of the Company’s actual experience. The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated with the following assumptions for options granted in fiscal 2015:

 

    Year Ended  
    June 30,
2015
 
Assumptions:        
Option life     5.3 years  
Risk-free interest rate     2.65%  
Stock volatility     487%  
Dividend yield     0  
Weighted average fair value of grants   $ 0.73  

 

Stock Option and Other Compensation Plans:

 

The type of share-based payments currently utilized by the Company is stock options.

 

The Company has various stock option and other compensation plans for directors, officers, and employees. The Company has the following stock option plans outstanding as of June 30, 2015: the Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”); the Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), and the Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”). Vesting periods under the 2011 Plan, the 2006 Plan, and the 1997 Plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and typically average three to five years. Options under these Plans are granted at fair market value on the date of grant and have a term of ten years from the date of grant.

 

The 2011 Plan, which provides eligible participants (certain employees, directors, consultants, etc.) the opportunity to receive a broad variety of equity based and cash awards. Options granted vest and are exercisable for periods determined by the Board of Directors, not to exceed 10 years from the date of grant. On April 16, 2015, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan which increased the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be awarded under the Plan from 325,000 to 1,825,000, an increase of 1,500,000 shares. In connection therewith, on April 20, 2015, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At June 30, 2015, a total of 889,102 stock options are outstanding and 968,596 shares of common stock were available for future grants under the 2011 Plan.

  

The 2006 Plan, which provides eligible participants (certain employees, directors, consultants, etc.) the opportunity to receive a broad variety of equity based and cash awards. Options granted vest and are exercisable for periods determined by the Board of Directors, not to exceed 10 years from the date of grant. A total of 139,898 shares of common stock, including shares rolled forward from the 1997 Plan, have been reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan. At June 30, 2015, a total of 139,898 stock options are outstanding and no shares of common stock are available for future grants under the 2006 Plan.

 

The 1997 Plan provided eligible participants (certain employees, directors, consultants, etc.) the opportunity to receive a broad variety of equity based and cash awards. Options granted vested and were exercisable for periods determined by the Board of Directors, not to exceed 10 years from the date of grant. Options for a total of 50,079 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2015 under the 1997 Plan, as amended and restated in fiscal year 2006. Upon the adoption of the 2006 Plan, no new awards were granted under the 1997 Plan. No shares are available for future grants under the 1997 Plan.

 

 25 
 

 

 

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

    Options Outstanding  
    Number of
Shares
    Weighted Average
Exercise Price
    Weighted Average
Contractual Life
 
Outstanding at July 1, 2013     400,087     $ 4.49       6.27 years  
Grants     9,000     0.90          
Outstanding at June 30, 2014     409,087     $ 4.41       6.27 years  
Grants     714,000     $ 0.75          
Cancellations     (44,008)     $ 18.04          
Outstanding at June 30, 2015     1,079,079     $ 1.43       8.46 years  

 

 

Information related to the stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2015 is as follows:

 

Range of Exercise Prices       Number of Shares       Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)     Weighted-Average Exercise Price       Exercisable Number of Shares     Exercisable Weighted-Average Exercise Price  
$ 0.73       319,000       9.89     $ 0.73       0     $ 0.73  
$ 0.73       330,000       9.89     $ 0.73       110,000     $ 0.73  
$ 0.90       35,000       9.03     $ 0.90       17,500     $ 0.90  
$ 0.90       30,000       9.03     $ 0.90       30,000     $ 0.90  
$ 1.20       207,800       6.68     $ 1.20       207,800     $ 1.20  
$ 0.90       9,000       8.52     $ 0.90       9,000     $ 0.90  
$ 0.85       9,000       7.52     $ 0.85       9,000     $ 0.85  
$ 0.55       44,000       6.62     $ 0.55       44,000     $ 0.55  
$ 0.27       40,000       6.04     $ 0.27       40,000     $ 0.27  
$ 1.35       1,200       4.41     $ 1.35       1,200     $ 1.35  
$ 1.25       1,200       3.41     $ 1.25       1,200     $ 1.25  
$ 6.25       1,600       1.42     $ 6.25       1,600     $ 6.25  
$ 7.75       1,200       2.41     $ 7.75       1,200     $ 7.75  
$ 11.50       800       0.42     $ 11.50       800     $ 11.50  
$ 13.75       49,279       0.86     $ 13.75       49,279     $ 13.75  
$ 0.27–$20.75       1,079,079       8.46     $ 1.43       522,579     $ 2.17  

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of the Company’s “in-the-money” outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2015 was $40,980 and $30,200, respectively.

 

(b)           Warrants

  

As of June 30, 2015, there are warrants outstanding for the issuance of an aggregate of 3,270,444 shares of common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.12 per share.

 

(c)            Sale of Stock

 

On July 1 through July 7, 2014, the Company closed on agreements with institutional and accredited investors (the “Investors”) for the sale and purchase of 1,717,152 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value at a purchase price of $0.60 per share (the “Shares”). The Company received $1,030,291 in gross proceeds from the offering. The Company used the majority of the net proceeds from this placement for general working capital purposes. Of this amount, $50,000 was received in June 2014 and the remainder was received in July 2014.

 

In conjunction with the placement, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with the Investors, whereby the Company was obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission on or before forty-five calendar days after July 1, 2014 to register the resale by the Investors of the 1,717,152 shares of the common stock purchased in the placement. Subsequent to the execution of the agreement, the parties agreed to extend the time period by which the Company was obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission. The registration statement was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on October 9, 2014, in accordance with the extended timetable, and became effective on October 30, 2014.

 

 26 
 

 

 

In conjunction with the offering, certain anti-dilution provisions of the warrants issued in conjunction with the Company’s June 25, 2008 and September 28, 2012 financing transactions were triggered. As a result, the number of existing June 25, 2008 warrants increased from 430,678 to 493,398 and the related exercise price of the warrants decreased from $1.18 per share to $1.03 per share. Also, as a result of the offering, the number of existing September 28, 2012 warrants increased from 1,944,475 to 2,189,724 and 194,446 to 217,322, respectively, and the related exercise price decreased from $1.25 to $1.11 and from $0.95 to $0.85, respectively.

 

(4)            INCOME TAXES

 

The Company has identified its federal tax return and its state tax return in Massachusetts as “major” tax jurisdictions. The periods subject to examination for its federal and state income tax returns are the years ended in 2013 and thereafter. The Company believes its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and it does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position. Therefore, no liabilities for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.

 

The provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations consists of the minimum statutory state income tax liability of $912 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

 

A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 is as follows

 

   2015   2014 
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate   (34.0)%   (34.0)%
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:          
State taxes, net of federal benefit   (5.3)   (5.3)
Change in valuation allowance   36.9    15.0 
Nondeductible items   0.2    0.3 
Prior-year tax adjustments   (2.1)   14.0 
Other   4.2    9.9 
Effective tax rate   (0.1)%   (0.1)%

 

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2015 and 2014 are approximately as follows:

 

    2015     2014  
Deferred tax assets:                
Net operating loss carry forwards   $ 3,161,000     $ 2,747,000  
Tax credit carry forwards     414,000       405,000  
Reserves and accruals not yet deducted for tax purposes     305,000       286,000  
Total deferred tax assets     3,880,000       3,438,000  
Valuation allowance     (3,880,000 )     (3,438,000 )
Net deferred tax asset   $     $  

 

The Company has provided a valuation allowance to reduce the net deferred tax asset to an amount the Company believes is “more likely than not” to be realized. The valuation allowance increased in fiscal 2015, as compared to the prior year, by approximately $442,000.

 

At June 30, 2015, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $7,654,000 and $3,100,000, respectively, which will, if not used, expire at various dates from 2016 through 2034. In addition, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards from its Hong Kong operations of approximately $2,252,000, which carry forward indefinitely.

 

(5)            PROFIT SHARING PLAN

 

The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) profit sharing plan. Employer profit sharing and matching contributions to the plan are discretionary. No employer profit sharing or matching contributions were made to the plan in fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

 

(6)            SALE OF ASSETS

 

In fiscal year 2015, the Company sold equipment that was previously written off for proceeds totaling $27,075 and recorded a gain of $27,075.  In fiscal year 2014, the Company sold equipment that was previously written off for proceeds totaling $14,028 and recorded a gain of $14,028. These gains are included within operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

 27 
 

 

 

(7)            OTHER INCOME  

 

Other income in the amount of $35,172 for the year ended June 30, 2015 represents non-cash gains on the settlement of liabilities for services rendered to the Company, by issuing 82,222 shares of common stock in January and 45,000 shares in May 2015. The non-cash gain is the difference between the recorded amount of the liabilities and the value of the stock when issued.

 

 

 

 28 
 

 

 

 

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, including internal control over financial reporting, were not effective, as of June 30, 2015, to ensure the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are intended to be designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with our Company have been detected.

 

A “material weakness” is defined as a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. A “significant deficiency” is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects a company’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2015.

 

The following is a description of two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

 

Segregation of Duties: As previously disclosed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008-2014, our management identified a control deficiency during the 2008 fiscal year because we lacked sufficient staff to segregate accounting duties. We believe the control deficiency resulted primarily because we have the equivalent of one and one-half persons performing all accounting-related on-site duties. As a result, we did not maintain adequate segregation of duties within our critical financial reporting applications, the related modules and financial reporting processes. This control deficiency could result in a misstatement of balance sheet and income statement accounts in our interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be detected. Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

 

To address and remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above, beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we instituted a procedure whereby our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and other members of our Board of Directors perform a higher level review of the quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K prior to filing.

 

We believe that the step outlined above strengthens our internal control over financial reporting and mitigates the material weakness described above. As part of our 2015 assessment of internal control over financial reporting, our management has evaluated this additional control and has determined that it is operating effectively.

 

 29 
 

 

Inventory Valuation: As previously disclosed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009-2014, we reported a material weakness with respect to the valuation of our inventories. Specifically, the amounts used to value our inventory at June 30, 2009 with respect to overhead rates and purchased items were often inconsistent with the supporting documentation, due to year-to-year changes in overhead rates and costs of purchased items that were not properly reflected in inventory valuation. Accordingly, management had determined that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness as of June 30, 2009. One audit adjustment of approximately $58,000 to our audited financial statements as of June 30, 2011 was necessary as a result of this condition.

 

To address and remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above, beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and continuing through the year ended June 30, 2015, we implemented procedures to improve our inventory controls and documentation surrounding inventory valuation for overhead rates, and performed procedures to ensure that the pricing of inventory items was consistent with the supporting documentation. We believe that the step outlined above strengthens our internal control over financial reporting and mitigates the material weakness described above.

 

We intend to continue to remediate material weaknesses and enhance our internal controls but cannot guarantee that our efforts will result in remediation of our material weaknesses or that new issues will not be exposed in this process.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION.

 

None.

 

 30 
 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

 

Identification of Directors

 

Set forth below is certain information with respect to the individuals who are our directors as of September 15, 2015.

 

Name   Age   Position(s) or Office(s) Held
Joseph N. Forkey   47   Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Director
Donald A. Major   54   Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and Director
Richard B. Miles   72   Director
Joel R. Pitlor   72   Director
Kenneth S. Schwartz   70   Director
Peter H. Woodward   42   Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

 

Board Composition. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes that are as nearly equal in number as possible, with each class serving for a staggered term of office. Only one class is elected each year. Each director serves a three year term and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. Our Board currently consists of six directors. Our Class I directors are Peter H. Woodward and Kenneth S. Schwartz. Our Class II directors are Joel R. Pitlor and Donald A. Major. Our Class III directors are Joseph N. Forkey and Richard Miles.

 

Biographies and Qualifications of Our Directors. The biographies of our directors and certain information regarding each director’s experience, attributes, skills and/or qualifications that led to the conclusion that the individual should be serving as a director of our Company are as follows:

 

Dr. Joseph N. Forkey

 

Dr. Joseph N. Forkey, son of Richard E. Forkey, has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer since February 8, 2011. Dr. Forkey has been a member of our Board of Directors since 2006.  He served as our Chairman of our Board of Directors from February 2011 to July 2014. He served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer from April 2006 to February 2011, and held the position of our Chief Scientist from September 2003 to April 2006. Since joining us, he has been involved in general technical and management activities of our Company, as well as investigations of opportunities that leverage our newly developed technologies. Dr. Forkey holds B.A. degrees in Mathematics and Physics from Cornell University, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University. Prior to joining us, Dr. Forkey spent seven years at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School as a postdoctoral fellow and research staff member. Dr. Forkey is a valuable member of our Board due to his depth of scientific, operating, strategic, transactional, and senior management experience in our industry. Additionally, Dr. Forkey has held positions of increasing responsibility at our Company and holds an intimate knowledge of our Company due to his longevity in the industry and with us.

 

Donald A. Major

 

Effective February 9, 2012, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Donald A. Major as our Executive Vice President for Corporate Development, in addition to his ongoing role as a member of our Board of Directors. He has served as a member of our Board since 2005. Mr. Major is co-founder & Chief Manager of Window2Decor, LLC, a start-up e-commerce retailer of window coverings and complimentary home accent products, and has been employed as an independent consultant since October 2007, providing companies with interim management, turnaround, restructuring and reorganization services as well as sourcing services for a private equity firm. From October 2006 to May 2007, he served as Vice President of Corporate Development of Advanced Duplication Services LLC. From February 2002 to late 2008, Mr. Major served as Vice President and Treasurer of Anderson Entertainment, LLC (formerly Digital Excellence LLC), which was owned by a private equity firm and sold to Advanced Duplication Services LLC. He earned his B.A. in Accounting in 1984 from Michigan State University. He is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has experience in the field of public accounting and in financial officer positions in publicly held and start-up medical device companies. Mr. Major is a valuable member of our Board due to his depth of operating, financial, accounting, management, and corporate efficiency experience.

 

Richard B. Miles

 

Professor Richard B. Miles was appointed to our Board of Directors in November 2005. He has been a member of the faculty at Princeton University since 1972, and serves as the Director of the Applied Physics Group in Princeton University’s Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department. Professor Miles is a valuable member of our Board due to his depth of scientific experience and familiarity with the field of our technologies, insight into the academic community, and familiarity with the latest developments and innovations in science and technology.

 

Joel R. Pitlor

 

Mr. Joel R. Pitlor has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 1990. Since 1979, he has held the position of president of J.R. Pitlor, a management consulting firm which he founded that provides strategic business planning for executive officers. Mr. Pitlor has provided business planning consultation to us since 1983. Mr. Pitlor is a valuable member of our Board due to his depth of operating, strategic, financial planning, and management experience. Additionally, Mr. Pitlor has a detailed knowledge of the history of our Company having advised senior management for over 25 years.

 

 31 
 

 

Kenneth S. Schwartz

 

Dr. Schwartz was appointed to our Board effective July 9, 2014 in connection with the sale and purchase agreement we entered into in July 2014. Dr. Schwartz is currently the Medical Director at New York Radiology Alliance, a position he has held since October 2010, and the Director of the Radiology Residency Program at Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center. He was the founding and managing Partner of S and D Medical LLP, a 60 person radiology group providing radiology services to eleven hospitals and imaging centers in the New York metropolitan area, for over ten years until he sold the Practice in 2010. He has served on the Board of Directors at ARKS Radiology Management, Inc. since June 1999 and serves on the Board of Trustees at the Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical Center. Dr. Schwartz also served as the Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Medical Imaging at the New York Institute of Technology in the College of Osteopathic Medicine from July 2007 to July 2012. Dr. Schwartz earned a BS from Brooklyn College and a Medical Degree from Albert Einstein College of Medicine. He was a Diagnostic Radiology Resident at North Shore University Hospital in the Memorial Hospital-Sloan Kettering Cornell Cooperating Program.

 

Peter H. Woodward

 

Mr. Woodward was appointed to our Board effective July 9, 2014 and as chairman of the Board in connection with the sale and purchase agreement we entered into in July 2014. Mr. Woodward is the founder of MHW Capital Management, LLC, or MHW, a position he has held since September 2005. MHW specializes in large equity investments in public companies implementing operating strategies to significantly improve their profitability. From 1996 to 2005, Mr. Woodward was the Managing Director for Regan Fund Management, LLC. He currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Cartesian, Inc. and Chairman of the Board and member of the Audit Committee for TSS, Inc. Mr. Woodward holds a BA in economics from Colgate University and a Masters of International Affairs with a concentration in international economics and finance from Columbia University. He is also a Chartered Financial Analyst.

 

Richard E. Forkey

 

Mr. Richard E. Forkey currently serves as Founder and Director Emeritus. Effective February 8, 2011, Mr. Forkey resigned as Chief Executive Officer, President, and Treasurer of our Company, and effective July 9, 2014, he resigned as Director. He had served as a Director and Chief Executive Officer since he founded our Company in 1982.

 

Identification of Executive Officers

 

Set forth below is certain information with respect to the individuals who are our executive officers as of September 15, 2015.

 

Name   Age   Position(s) or Office(s) Held
Joseph N. Forkey   47   Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Director
Jack P. Dreimiller   67   Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Donald A. Major   54   Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and Director

 

Biographies and Qualifications of Our Executive Officers. The biographies of our executive officers and certain information regarding each officer’s experience, attributes, skills and/or qualifications that led to the conclusion that the individual should be serving as an executive officer of our Company are as follows:

 

Dr. Joseph N. Forkey

 

For Dr. Forkey’s full biography, please refer to page 31 in the section entitled “Biographies and Qualifications of Our Directors.”

 

Jack P. Dreimiller

 

Mr. Jack P. Dreimiller has served as our Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer since August 15, 2008. Prior to that time, he served as our Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from April 1992 until June 2005, and as an independent consultant to our Company from June 2005 to December 2005. Since June 2005, he has served as an independent consultant serving various roles as financial/accounting executive, including interim Chief Financial Officer, for a number of companies. Mr. Dreimiller is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and holds a BS in Business Administration from the University of Buffalo. He has over twenty-five years of experience in various senior financial management positions, including audit and consulting experience with an international accounting firm, and Controller and VP Finance experience with both small firms and multi-national corporations.

 

Donald A. Major

 

For Mr. Major’s full biography, please refer to page 31 in the section entitled “Biographies and Qualifications of Our Directors.”

 

Other Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any bankruptcy or criminal proceedings, nor have there been any judgments or injunctions brought against any of our directors or executive officers during the last ten years that we consider material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any director or executive officer.

 

 

 32 
 

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our securities to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership), 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities) and 5 (Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities). Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

Based solely upon a review of reports provided to us by our officers and directors, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, no person required to file reports under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 failed to file such reports on a timely basis during such fiscal year.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We previously adopted a Corporate Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to all employees, officers and directors of our Company, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2008. A copy of our Corporate Code of Ethics and Conduct can be obtained free of charge by contacting our Secretary, c/o Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., 22 East Broadway, Gardner, Massachusetts 01440.

 

Procedure for Nominating Directors

 

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directors will consider candidates for director positions that are recommended by any of our stockholders. Any such recommendation should be provided to our Secretary. The recommended candidate should be submitted to us in writing addressed to our Secretary, c/o Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., 22 East Broadway, Gardner, Massachusetts 01440. The recommendation should include the following information: name of candidate; address, phone and fax number of candidate; a statement signed by the candidate certifying that the candidate wishes to be considered for nomination to our Board of Directors and stating why the candidate believes that he or she would be a valuable addition to our Board of Directors; a summary of the candidate’s work experience for the prior five years and the number of shares of our stock beneficially owned by the candidate.

 

The Board will evaluate the recommended candidate and shall determine whether or not to proceed with the candidate in accordance with our procedures. We reserve the right to change our procedures at any time to comply with the requirements of applicable laws.

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

The Board of Directors has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and reviewing our overall performance rather than day-to-day operations. The Board’s primary responsibility is to oversee management of our Company and, in so doing, serve the best interests of our Company and our stockholders.

 

Our Board of Directors has the ability to establish, or disband, such committees as necessary or appropriate to serve the needs of our Company. In February 2012, our Board of Directors made the determination to restructure and unanimously voted to disband its committees, including its Audit Committee. Our full Board of Directors performs all of the functions normally designated to an audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee.

 

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

As of February 2012, the Board of Directors no longer has a separately designated audit committee. Now, the functions of the audit committee are conducted by the entire Board, whose members are named above. We do not currently have an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

 

Mr. Major, whom formerly served as Chair of the Audit Committee and was determined by the Board to qualify as an audit committee financial expert, no longer meets the criteria set forth in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K as he is employed by our Company as an executive officer and therefore is not “independent” as independence for audit committee members is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. We believe that each member of our Board is financially literate and possesses sufficient experience, both professionally and by virtue of his service on our Board, to be fully capable of discharging his duties as a member of our Board performing audit committee functions. However, the Board believes that Mr. Major’s professional background and services assist the Board when additional financial expertise is warranted.

 

 33 
 

 

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

Executive Compensation

 

Summary Executive Compensation

 

The following table sets forth all compensation for our fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Principal Executive Officer, our most highly compensated executive officer and our most highly compensated employee, all of which are referred to herein as the “Named Executive Officers.” No other executive officer earned over $100,000 in the last completed fiscal year.

 

Summary Executive Compensation Table for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

Name and Principal Position  Year
June 30,
   Salary
($)
   Bonus
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($) (1)
   All Other Compensation (4)   Total
($)
 
Joseph N. Forkey   2015    120,000    0    0    0    0    120,000 
Director,   2014    120,000    0    0    0    0    120,000 
Chief Executive Officer,                                   
President and Treasurer                                   
Donald A. Major   2015    69,000(2)   0    27,000    43,800(3)   2,000    141,800 
Executive Vice President for   2014    30,078    0    0    29,700    1,250    34,028 
Corporate Development and                                   
Director                                   
Richard G. Cyr   2015    145,000    16,137(4)   0    18,250    0    179,387 
Optics Laboratory Manager   2014    145,000    26,374(4)   0    0    0    171,374 

 

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards granted in the respective fiscal year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the amounts in this column may be found in the Notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2015 set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized by the directors during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
   
(2)

Don Major has been a Director of the Company since 2005. Since 2012, he has consulted to the Company. Beginning January 2015, his compensation was increased concurrent with his increased responsibilities as an on-site consultant, on a quarter-by-quarter basis for as long as mutually agreed to by the Company and Mr. Major. Mr. Major’s compensation consisted of: (a) $2,000 earned as compensation for his services as a member of our Board of Directors, (b) $69,000 earned as salary compensation for his services as our Executive Vice President for Corporate Development, and (c) 45,000 shares of restricted stock earned for his services rendered to the Company valued at $0.60 per share or $27,000 in the aggregate.

   
(3) On September 23, 2014, we granted Mr. Major an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock as compensation for services rendered to us as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development. The option expires September 23, 2024 and the exercise price is $0.90 per share. On May 18, 2015, we granted Mr. Major an option to purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock as compensation for services rendered to us as a Director. These options vest in three installments: one-third vested immediately on the date of grant; one-third vests in one year on May 18, 2016; the remaining one-third vests in two years on May 18, 2017. The options have an exercise price of $0.73 and expire on May 18, 2025.
   
(4) Represents a performance award for the respective fiscal year.

 

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment Arrangements

 

We have no employment contracts in place with any Named Executive Officer. We have no compensatory plan or arrangement with respect to any Named Executive Officer where such plan or arrangement will result in payments to such Named Executive Officer upon or following his resignation, or other termination of employment with us and our subsidiaries, or as a result of a change-in-control of our Company or a change in the Named Executive Officers’ responsibilities following a change-in-control.

 

 34 
 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

 

The following table shows grants of options outstanding on June 30, 2015, the last day of our fiscal year, to each of the Named Executive Officers named in the Summary Executive Compensation Table.

 

Name  Number of securities
underlying unexercised
options exercisable
   Number of securities
underlying unexercised
options unexercisable
   Option exercise
price ($)
   Option expiration
date
Joseph N. Forkey   600    0    13.75    05/09/2016
    11,208    0    13.75    05/09/2016
    17,520    0    1.11    09/28/2017
    150,000    0    1.20    03/02/2022
                     
Donald A. Major   400    0    11.50    11/29/2015
    400    0    13.75    05/09/2016
    400    0    6.25    11/28/2016
    21,898    0    1.11    09/28/2017
    400    0    7.75    11/27/2017
    400    0    1.25    11/25/2018
    400    0    1.35    11/24/2019
    27,600    0    1.20    03/02/2022
    3,000    0    0.85    01/02/2023
    3,000    0    0.90    01/02/2024
    30,000    0    0.95    07/09/2024
    20,000(1)   40,000(1)   0.73    05/18/2025
                     
Richard G. Cyr   10,200    0    13.75    05/09/2016
    2,500    0    0.55    05/09/2016
    40,000    0    0.27    07/14/2021
    5,000(2)   20,000(2)   0.73    05/18/2025

 

  (1) The options were granted on May 18, 2015. These options vest in three installments: one-third vested immediately on the date of grant; one-third vests in one year on May 18, 2016; the remaining one-third vests in two years on May 18, 2017.
     
  (2) The options were granted on May 18, 2015. 5,000 shares vested on August 18, 2015. The remaining 20,000 shares will vest in accordance with the achievement of specified performance criteria.

 

Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan

 

We have a defined contribution 401(k) profit sharing plan. Employer profit sharing and matching contributions to the plan are discretionary. No employer profit sharing contributions were made to the plan in fiscal years 2015 and 2014. No employer matching contributions were made to the plan in fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

 

 

 35 
 

 

Director Compensation

 

The following table sets forth cash amounts and the value of other compensation paid to our directors, but does not include the compensation of Dr. Joseph N. Forkey, our Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, as his compensation is reflected in the Summary Executive Compensation Table. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, our Board of Directors determined that Dr. Joseph N. Forkey and Mr. Richard E. Forkey were our employee directors and, therefore, would not earn any fees related to service on our Board.

 

Director Compensation Table for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

 

Name of Director   Fees earned or
paid in cash
($)(1)
  Option awards
($) (2) (3)
    All other
compensation
($)
  Total
($) 
Richard E. Forkey (4)   0     0       96 (5)   96  
Donald A. Major *   *     *       *     *  
Richard B. Miles   2,000     43,800       0     45,800  
Joel R. Pitlor   1,500     43,800       0     45,300  
Kenneth S. Schwartz   1,250     43,800       0     45,050  
Peter H. Woodward   1,500     65,700             67,200  

 

* Mr. Major’s compensation is disclosed above in the Summary Executive Compensation Table. Mr. Donald A Major, although an officer of the Company continues to earn fees for his services as a director.
   
(1) Under our director compensation plan, each director receives $250 per board or committee meeting that the director attends. We also reimburse our directors for travel expenses. As our Board has determined that Dr. Joseph N. Forkey and Mr. Richard E. Forkey are employees of our Company, Dr. Forkey and Mr. Forkey do not earn any fees related to service on our Board of Directors.

 

(2) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards granted in the respective fiscal year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the amounts in this column may be found in the Notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2015 set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These amounts do not represent the actual amounts paid to or realized by the directors during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

 

(3) On May 18, 2015, we granted Messrs. Major, Miles, Pitlor and Schwartz options to purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock and granted Mr. Woodward an option to purchase 90,000 shares of our common stock. These options were fully vested as of the date of grant, have an exercise price of $0.73 and expire on May 18, 2025.

 

(4) Mr. Forkey served as our Chief Executive Officer until February 8, 2011 and as a Director until July 9, 2014. He currently serves as the Founder and Director Emeritus.

 

(5) Mr. Forkey’s compensation consisted of $96 earned as salary compensation for his services in the executive position of Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer.

 

Narrative to Director Compensation Table

 

Under our director compensation plan, each director receives $250 per board or committee meeting that the director attends. We also reimburse our directors for travel expenses.

 

On May 18, 2015, as a one-time grant, we granted Messrs. Major, Miles, Pitlor and Schwartz options to purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock and granted Mr. Woodward an option to purchase 90,000 shares of our common stock. These options vest in three installments: one-third vested immediately on the date of grant; one-third vests in one year on May 18, 2016; the remaining one-third vests in two years on May 18, 2017.The options have an exercise price of $0.73 and expire on May 18, 2025.

 

 36 
 

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

 

The following tables set forth information regarding our common stock owned as of the close of business on September 25, 2015 by the following persons: (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors who beneficially owns our common stock, (iii) each of our Named Executive Officers who beneficially own our common stock and (iv) all executive officers and directors, as a group, who beneficially own our common stock. The information on beneficial ownership in the table and footnotes thereto is based upon data furnished to us by, or on behalf of, the persons listed in the table.

 

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.

 

In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of common stock subject to options held by that person or group that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after September 25, 2015. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group.

 

Stockholders Known by Us to Own Over 5% of Our Common Stock

 

    Amount of beneficial ownership (1)   Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner   Shares Owned   Shares –
Rights to
Acquire
  Total 
Number
  Shares
Beneficially
Owned (2)
                         

AWM Investment Company, Inc. (3)

c/o Special Situations Funds 
527 Madison Avenue, Suite 2600 
New York, NY 10022

  1,269,213     1,325,131     2,594,344     33.6%  
                         

MHW Partners, L.P. (4)

150 East 52 nd  Street

30 th  Fl.

New York, New York 10022

  351,700     168,386     520,086     7.9%  
                         
DAFNA Capital Management LLC (5) 
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90024
  311,537     306,557     695,446     9.2%  
                         
Alpha Capital Anstalt (6) 
150 Central Park South 
New York, New York 10019
  277,778     218,970     496,748     7.5%  
                         

Hershey Strategic Capital, LP (7)

888 7 th Ave., 17 th Floor

New York, New York 10019

  1,166,667     0     1,166,667     18.3%  

 

(1) Represents shares with respect to which each beneficial owner listed has or will have, upon acquisition of such shares upon exercise or conversion of options, warrants, conversion privileges or other rights exercisable within 60 sixty days, sole voting and investment power. For the purposes of this table, we have not assumed the limitations on exercise set forth in certain warrants, which limit the number of shares of common stock that the holder, together with all other shares of common stock beneficially owned by such person, does not exceed 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock.
   

 

 37 
 

 

(2) As of September 25, 2015, there were 6,389,806 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Percentages are calculated on the basis of the amount of issued and outstanding common stock plus, for each person or group, any securities that such person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other rights.
   
(3) We relied, in part, on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2015 and a Form 4 filed on February 8, 2015 by AWM Investment Company, Inc. for this information.

 

  AWM Investment Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation is the investment adviser to Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P., Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. Austin W. Marxe, David M. Greenhouse and Adam C. Stettner are the controlling principals of AWM Investment Company, Inc. Messrs. Marxe, Greenhouse and Stettner are members of Special Situations Cayman, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of Special Situations Cayman Fund; MGP Advisers Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership and the general partner of Special Situations Fund III QP; and MG Advisers, L.L.C., a New York limited liability company and the general partner of Special Situations Private Equity Fund.
   
  Special Situations Cayman Fund owns 1 share of common stock. Special Situations Fund III QP owns 934,212 shares of common stock; 3,630,000 warrants to purchase 246,699 shares of common stock, expiring May 11, 2017; warrants to purchase 481,733 shares of common stock, expiring September 28, 2017; and warrants to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock, expiring February 12, 2016. Special Situations Private Equity Fund owns 335,000 shares of common stock; 3,630,000 warrants to purchase 246,699 shares of common stock, expiring May 11, 2017; and warrants to purchase 175,000 shares of common stock, expiring February 12, 2016. AWM Investment Company has the power to vote and direct the disposition of all shares of common stock and warrants owned by Special Situations Cayman Fund, Special Situations Fund III QP, and Special Situations Private Equity Fund.

 

  AWM Investment Company, Messrs. Marxe, Stettner and Greenhouse are deemed to beneficially own a total of 1,269,213 shares of common stock; 7,230,000 warrants to purchase an aggregate of 493,398 shares of common stock, expiring May 11, 2017; warrants to purchase 481,733 shares of common stock, expiring September 28, 2017; and warrants to purchase 350,000 shares of common stock, expiring February 12, 2016. However, the aggregate number of shares of common stock into which 481,733 warrants of the total warrants held by Special Situations Fund III QP are exercisable, and which AWM Investment Company, Messrs. Marxe, Stettner and Greenhouse have the right to acquire beneficial ownership, is limited to the number of shares of common stock that, together with all other shares of common stock beneficially owned by AWM Investment Company, Messrs. Marxe, Stettner and Greenhouse, does not exceed 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, the 481,733 warrants expiring September 28, 2017 are not currently exercisable into common stock until the actual shares of common stock held by AWM Investment Company, Messrs. Marxe, Stettner and Greenhouse is less than 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Special Situations Fund III QP may waive this 4.999% restriction with 61 days’ notice to us. Mr. Marxe holds an additional 204 shares of common stock that may be acquired by Mr. Marxe as an individual upon the exercise of outstanding stock options. AWM Investment Company disclaims beneficial ownership for the shares and warrants.

  

(4)

We relied, in part, on a Schedule 13D jointly filed with the SEC on July 24, 2014 by MHW Partners, L.P., MHW Capital, LLC, MHW Capital Management, LLC and a Form 4 filed by Peter H. Woodward on July 2, 2015 for this information.

 

MHW Partners, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership. MHW Capital, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company. MHW Capital Management, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company. MHW Capital, LLC is the general partner of MHW Partners, L.P. Mr. Woodward is the principal of MHW Capital Management, LLC and MHW Capital, LLC and in such capacity, Mr. Woodward holds the power to vote and direct the disposition of all shares of common stock owned by MHW Partners, L.P. MHW Partners, L.P., MHW Capital, LLC, MHW Capital Management, LLC and Mr. Woodward share the power to vote and direct the disposition of all shares of common stock owned by MHW Partners, L.P. Mr. Woodward is a citizen of the United States and our current Chairman of our Board of Directors.

 

MHW Partners, L.P. beneficially owns 351,700 shares of common stock, and 168,386 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. However, the aggregate number of shares of common stock into which such warrants are exercisable, and which MHW Partners, L.P. has the right to acquire beneficial ownership, is limited to the number of shares of common stock that, together with all other shares of common stock beneficially owned by MHW Partners, L.P., does not exceed 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, such warrants are not currently exercisable into common stock until the actual shares of common stock held by MHW Partners, L.P. is less than 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. MHW Partners, L.P. may waive this 4.999% restriction with 61 days’ notice to us.

   

 

 38 
 

 

(5)

We relied, in part, on a Schedule 13G jointly filed with the SEC on February 13, 2015 by DAFNA Capital Management, LLC, Nathan Fischel and Fariba Ghodsian for this information.

 

DAFNA Capital Management, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company. DAFNA Capital Management is the investment adviser of DAFNA LifeScience, L.P., DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, L.P. and DAFNA LifeScience Select, L.P. DAFNA Capital Management, LLC in its capacity as investment adviser to DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, DAFNA LifeScience Select, and DAFNA LifeScience, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares owned by DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, DAFNA LifeScience Select, and DAFNA LifeScience, as in its capacity as investment adviser it has the power to dispose, direct the disposition of, and vote the shares of the issuer owned by DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, DAFNA LifeScience Select, and DAFNA LifeScience. Nathan Fischel and Fariba Ghodsian are part-owners of DAFNA Capital Management and managing members of DAFNA Capital Management. As controlling persons of DAFNA Capital Management, Drs. Fischel and Ghodsian may each respectively be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned by DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, DAFNA LifeScience Select, and DAFNA LifeScience. Nathan Fischel is a citizen of Austria and a United States permanent resident. Fariba Ghodsian is a citizen of the United States. Pursuant to Rule 13d-4, Drs. Fischel and Ghodsian disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities.

 

DAFNA Capital Management beneficially owns 311,537 shares of common stock, in the aggregate. DAFNA Capital Management holds common stock purchase warrants exercisable into 306,557 shares of common stock, in the aggregate. DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral owns 77,778 shares of common stock and 61,312 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. DAFNA LifeScience Select owns 200,000 shares of common stock and 157,657 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. DAFNA LifeScience owns 111,111 shares of common stock and 87,588 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. However, the aggregate number of shares of common stock into which such warrants are exercisable, and which DAFNA Capital Management has the right to acquire beneficial ownership, is limited to the number of shares of common stock that, together with all other shares of common stock beneficially owned by DAFNA Capital Management, does not exceed 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, such warrants are not currently exercisable into common stock until the actual shares of common stock held by DAFNA Capital Management is less than 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral, DAFNA LifeScience Select, and DAFNA LifeScience may waive this 4.999% restriction with 61 days’ notice to us.

 

(6) Alpha Capital Anstalt beneficially owns 277,778 shares of common stock and 218,970 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. However, the aggregate number of shares of common stock into which such warrants are exercisable, and which Alpha Capital Anstalt has the right to acquire beneficial ownership, is limited to the number of shares of common stock that, together with all other shares of common stock beneficially owned by Alpha Capital Anstalt, does not exceed 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, such warrants are not currently exercisable into common stock until the actual shares of common stock held by Alpha Capital Anstalt is less than 4.999% of the total outstanding shares of common stock. Alpha Capital Anstalt may waive this 4.999% restriction with 61 days’ notice to us.
   
(7)

We relied, in part, on the Schedule 13D and Form 3 jointly filed by Hershey Strategic Capital, LP, Hershey Management I, LLC and Hershey Strategic Capital GP, LLC on July 11, 2014 for this information.

 

Hershey Management I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is the investment advisor of Hershey Strategic Capital, LP, a Delaware limited partnership. Hershey Strategic Capital GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is the general partner of Hershey Strategic Capital, LP. Adam Hershey is the sole managing member of both Hershey Management I, LLC and Hershey Strategic Capital GP, LLC. As the investment advisor, Hershey Management I, LLC has the voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares of Common Stock owned by Hershey Strategic Capital, LP. On July 9, 2014, Richard E. Forkey resigned as a director and Hershey Strategic Capital, LP designated Peter H. Woodward and Dr. Kenneth S. Schwartz to our Board of Directors and such designees were so appointed.

 

Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement among us and several investors dated July 1, 2014, Hershey Strategic Capital, LP is entitled to designate two members of our Board of Directors, one of whom will be Chairman. If either of the directors designated by Hershey Strategic Capital, LP resigns from the Board of Directors before the third anniversary of the closing date of the transaction reflected in the purchase agreement, Hershey Strategic Capital, LP has the right to appoint an additional member of our Board of Directors, provided that funds and accounts managed Hershey Strategic Capital, LP at such time own more than one-half the number of shares purchased by Hershey Strategic Capital, LP in the transaction.

 

Hershey Strategic Capital, LP beneficially owns 1,166,667 shares of common stock. Hershey Strategic Capital, LP is managed by Adam Hershey, and in such capacity, Mr. Hershey holds the power to vote and direct the disposition of all shares of common stock owned by Hershey Strategic Capital, LP. Hershey Management I disclaims beneficial ownership in the shares.

 

 39 
 

 

Officers and Directors

 

        Amount of beneficial ownership (2)   Percent of
Name and address of beneficial owner (1)   Nature of beneficial ownership   Shares
Owned
  Shares – Rights
to Acquire
  Total
Number
  Shares
Beneficially
Owned (3)
Joseph N. Forkey (4)   Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Director   33,620     179,328     212,948     3.2%  
                             
Jack P. Dreimiller (5)   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   583     15,000     15,583     *  
                             
Donald A. Major (6)   Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and Director   80,778     107,898     188,676     2.9%  
                             
Richard E. Forkey (7)   Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer and Director Emeritus   212,993     36,842     249,835     3.9%  
                             
Richard B. Miles (8)   Director   15,112     44,021     59,133     *  
                             
Joel R. Pitlor (9)   Director   205,395     45,978     251,373     3.9%  
                             
Richard G. Cyr (10)   Optics Laboratory Manager   0     55,200     55,200     *  
                             
Peter H. Woodward (11)   Chairman of the Board of Directors   351,700     198,386     550,086     8.4%  
                             
Kenneth S. Schwartz (12)   Director   0     20,000     20,000     *  
                             
All directors and executive officers as a group       900,181     702,653     1,602,834     22.6%  

 

_________________

* Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed one percent of issued and outstanding shares of stock.

 

(1) Unless otherwise stated, the address of each beneficial owners listed on the table is c/o Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., 22 East Broadway, Gardner, MA 01440.
   
(2) Represents shares with respect to which each beneficial owner listed has or will have, upon acquisition of such shares upon exercise or conversion of options, warrants, conversion privileges or other rights exercisable within 60 sixty days, sole voting and investment power.
   
(3) As of September 25, 2015, we had 6,389,806 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Percentages are calculated on the basis of the amount of issued and outstanding common stock plus, for each person or group, any securities that such person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days of September 25, 2015 pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other rights.
   
(4) Dr. Forkey is a member of our Board of Directors and serves as our Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer. Dr. Forkey’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 33,620 shares of common stock held in joint ownership with his wife, Heather Forkey, with whom he shares voting and dispositive control, (b) 17,520 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, and (c) 161,808 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(5) Mr. Dreimiller is our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Dreimiller’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 583 shares of common stock, and (b) 15,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(6) Mr. Major is our Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Major’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 80,778 shares of common stock, (b) 21,898 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and (c) 86,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.

 

 

 40 
 

 

(7) Mr. Forkey is our Director Emeritus. He served as our Chief Executive Officer until February 8, 2011, and Director until July 9, 2014. Mr. Forkey’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 212,993 shares of common stock, (b) 21,898 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, and (c) 14,944 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(8) Mr. Miles is a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Miles’ beneficial ownership consists of (a) 15,112 shares of common stock, (b) 8,421 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, and (c) 35,600 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(9) Mr. Pitlor is a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Pitlor’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 205,395 shares of common stock, (b) 10,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, and (c) 35,978 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.

 

(10) Mr. Cyr is our Optics Laboratory Manager and is considered a “named executive officer” as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K. Mr. Cyr’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 0 shares of common stock, and (b) 55,200 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(11) Mr. Peter Woodward is the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Woodward is the managing member and general partner of MHW Partners and in such capacity, Mr. Woodward holds the power to vote and direct the disposition of all shares of common stock owned by MHW Partners. On July 2, 2014, MHW Partners purchased 125,000 shares of common stock. On September 28, 2012, MHW Partners purchased 222,223 shares of our common stock, and warrants to purchase up to 168,386 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.11 per share, subject to adjustment and a call provision if certain market price targets are reached, and an expiration date of September 28, 2017. Mr. Woodward’s beneficial ownership consists of (a) 351,700 shares of common stock held through MHW Partners, L.P., and (b) 168,386 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding warrants held through MHW Partners, L.P., and (c) 30,000 shares of common stock which may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
   
(12) Mr. Kenneth Schwartz is a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Schwartz’s beneficial ownership consists of 20,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.

 

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

We lease our main facility in Gardner, Massachusetts from Equity Assets, Inc., a company wholly-owned by Mr. Richard E. Forkey, our Director Emeritus and our former Director and Chief Executive Officer until July 9, 2014. We are currently a tenant-at-will, paying rent of $9,000 per month, or an aggregate of $108,000 per year, for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

 

Transactions with Stockholders Known by Us to Own 5% or More of Our Common Stock

 

On July 1 through July 7, 2014, we closed agreements with institutional and accredited investors for the sale and purchase of 1,717,152 shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value at a purchase price of $0.60 per share. We received $1,030,291 in gross proceeds from the offering. We used the net proceeds from this placement for general working capital purposes. Of this amount, $50,000 was received in June 2014 and the remainder was received in July 2014.

 

In conjunction with the placement, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with the investors, whereby we were obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission on or before 45 calendar days after July 1, 2014 to register the resale by the investors of the 1,717,152 shares of the common stock purchased in the placement. Subsequent to the execution of the agreement, the parties agreed to extend the time period by which we were obligated to file a registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission. The registration statement was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on October 9, 2014, in accordance with the extended timetable, and became effective on October 30, 2014.

 

Pursuant to the above transaction, Mr. Arnold Schumsky purchased 83,334 shares of our common stock for an aggregate price of $50,000 and MHW Capital Partners, LP purchased 125,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate price of $75,000. Arnold Schumsky and MHW Capital Partners, LP were beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock at the time of the transaction. Mr. Woodward is the principal of MHW Capital Partners, LP, and holds the power to vote and direct the disposition of the shares of common stock owned by MHW Partners, LP. Pursuant to the transaction described above, Mr. Woodward was subsequently appointed as Chairman of our Board of Directors on July 9, 2014.

 

  

 41 
 

 

Director Independence

 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors determined that Messrs. Richard B. Miles and Joel R. Pitlor were “independent” as defined under the standards of independence set forth in the NASDAQ Listing Rules and the rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

 

Our principal and sole independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015 and 2014 is Stowe & Degon LLC, referred to as Stowe. The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered by Stowe, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

   2015   2014 
Audit Fees (1)  $72,000   $72,000 
Audit-Related Fees (2)   2,500     
Total Audit and Audit-Related Fees   74,500    72,000 
Tax Fees (3)   7,750    13,250 
Total Fees  $82,250   $85,250 

  

(1) Audit fees for fiscal 2015 are comprised of fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements of $72,000, including direct out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $1,500. Audit fees for fiscal 2014 are comprised of fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements of $72,000, including direct out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $1,500.
   
(2) Audit-related fees are comprised of fees for assurance and related attestation services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of our annual financial statements, or the review thereof, and fees for due diligence services.
   
(3) Tax fees for fiscal 2015 and 2014 by Stowe are comprised of fees for professional services performed with respect to corporate tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice.

 

Pre-Approval Policies

 

Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer, our Board of Directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. 100% of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors either before or after the respective services were rendered. The Board of Directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by Stowe and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining the firm’s independence.

 

 

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

a. The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on 10-K:

 

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following documents are filed in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 42 
 

 

2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.

 

3. EXHIBITS

 

The exhibits listed below are filed with or incorporated by reference in this report.

 

Exhibit   Description
     
2.1   Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Optometrics Corporation, dated January 18, 2008 (included as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.1   Articles of Organization of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., as amended (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form SB-2 filed March 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.2   Bylaws of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-1 filed December 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.3   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Organization of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., dated November 25, 2008 and effective December 11, 2008 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed December 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
3.4   Amended and Restated Bylaws of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 11, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

4.1   Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated February 1, 2007 (included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.2   Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock (included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed February 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.3   Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated June 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed June 27, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.4   Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, dated June 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed June 27, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.5   Form of 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated June 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed June 27, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.6   Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, dated September 28, 2012 (included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed October 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.7   Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated September 28, 2012 (included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed October 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.8   Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock issued to Loewen, Ondaatje, McCutcheon USA LTD, dated September 28, 2012 (included as Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed October 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 

 43 
 

 

4.9   Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock (Special Situations Settlement), dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.10   Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company, Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
4.11   Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock (Pitlor and Schumsky Settlement), dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.1   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-QSB filed November 13, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.2   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (included as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed December 4, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.3   Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated February 1, 2007 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.4   Form of Incentive Stock Option Certificate (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-QSB filed February 14, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.5   Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Certificate (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-QSB filed February 14, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.6   Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated June 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed June 27, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.7   Pledge and Security Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated June 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed June 27, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.8   Consulting Agreement between the Company and Jack P. Dreimiller, dated August 15, 2008 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed August 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.9   Side Letter Agreement between the Company and the investors signatory to the Purchase Agreement, dated November 25, 2008 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed December 11, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.10   Side Letter Agreement between the Company and the holders signatory to the 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated December 11, 2008 (included as Exhibit 10.15 to the Form S-1 filed December 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

10.11   Side Letter Agreement between the Company and the holders signatory to the 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated April 2, 2009 (included as Exhibit 10.16 to the Form S-1/A filed April 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.12   Compensation Agreement with Richard E. Forkey, dated December 3, 2010 (included as Exhibit 10.11 to the Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     

 

 44 
 

 

10.13   Compensation Agreement with Joseph N. Forkey, dated December 3, 2010 (included as Exhibit 10.12 to the Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.14   Compensation Agreement with Joel R. Pitlor, dated December 3, 2010 (included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.15   Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., dated July 27, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed August 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.16   Amendment to Pledge and Security Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated July 27, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed August 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.17   Demand Note in the amount of $10,000, dated July 13, 2011, issued by the Company to Dr. Joseph N. Forkey (included as Exhibit 10.22 to the Form 10-K filed September 28, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.)
     
10.18   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, dated October 13, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.2 to Form S-8 filed October 14, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.)

 

10.19   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 2011 Deferred Compensation Plan, dated October 13, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.3 to Form S-8 filed October 14, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.)
     
10.20   Side Letter Agreement to the Compensation Agreement with Richard E. Forkey, dated October 14, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K filed October 19, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.21   Side Letter Agreement to the Compensation Agreement with Joseph N. Forkey, dated October 14, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K filed October 19, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.22   Side Letter Agreement to the Compensation Agreement with Joel N. Pitlor, dated October 14, 2011 (included as Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 8-K filed October 19, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.23   Endorsement to 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note by the Company, dated October 31, 2011, and accepted by Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed November 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.24   Endorsement to 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note by the Company, dated October 31, 2011, and accepted by Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed November 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.25   Endorsement to 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note by the Company, dated July 31, 2012, and accepted by Arnold Schumsky (included as Exhibit 10.27 to the Form 10-K filed October 15, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.)
     
10.26   Endorsement to 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note by the Company, dated August 31, 2012, and accepted by Arnold Schumsky (included as Exhibit 10.28 to the Form 10-K filed October 15, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.)
     
10.27   Notice of Repayment of 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note in Full by the Company, dated September 28, 2012, and accepted by Arnold Schumsky (included as Exhibit 10.29 to the Form 10-K filed October 15, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.)
     

 

 45 
 

 

10.28   Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and each investor named therein, dated September 28, 2012 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed October 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.29    Settlement Agreement by and among the Company, Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.30   Settlement Agreement by and between the Company and Joel Pitlor, dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.31   Settlement Agreement by and between the Company and Arnold Schumsky, dated February 12, 2013 (included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed February 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.32   Form of Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and investor (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.33   Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and investor (included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 7, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
10.34   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Amended 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, dated October 14, 2011, as amended on April 16, 2015 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 20, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
     
14.1   Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. Corporate Code of Ethics and Conduct (included as Exhibit 14.1 to the Form 10-K filed September 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
21.1   Subsidiaries of the Registrant (included as Exhibit 21.1 to the Form 10-K filed September 26, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
     
23.1*   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
     
31.1*   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2*   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.1*   Certification of Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

   

101.INS*   XBRL Instance Document
     
101.SCH*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
     
101.CAL*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
     
101.DEF*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
     
101.LAB*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
     
101.PRE*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* Filed herewith.

 

 46 
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

  PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
   
     
Date: October 13, 2015 By: /s/ Joseph N. Forkey
   

Joseph N. Forkey

President and Chief Executive Officer

    (Principal Executive Officer)
     
     
Date: October 13, 2015 By: /s/ Jack P. Dreimiller
   

Jack P. Dreimiller

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature Capacity Date
     

/s/ Joseph N. Forkey

Joseph N. Forkey

Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
October 13, 2015
     

/s/ Jack P. Dreimiller

Jack P. Dreimiller

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
October 13, 2015
     
/s/ Donald A. Major Director October 13, 2015

Donald A. Major

 

   
/s/ Peter H.  Woodward Director, Chairman October 13, 2015

Peter H. Woodward

 

   
/s/ Richard B. Miles Director October 13, 2015
Richard B. Miles    

 

/s/ Joel R. Pitlor

 

Director

 

October 13, 2015

Joel R. Pitlor

 

   
/s/Kenneth S. Schwartz Director October 13, 2015
Kenneth S. Schwartz    

 

 

 47