As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21 , 2015

 Registration No.                  

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form S-1

Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada		[                        ]		45-1560906
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

11825 Major Street

Culver City, California 90230

(714) 505-4460

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Copies to:

 

Louis Taubman, Esq.

Hunter Taubman Fischer

1450 Broadway, 26^th Floor

New York, New York 10018

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [X]

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer	[  ]	Accelerated filer	[  ]
Non-accelerated filer	[  ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of each class of securities to be registered		Amount to be registered (1)				Proposed maximum offering price per share (2)				Proposed maximum aggregate offering price				Amount of registration fee (3)
Common Stock			1,002,906	(4)		$	0.35			$	351,017.10			$	40.79
Common Stock underlying Warrants			297,375	(5)		$	0.35			$	104,081.25			$	12.09
Total			1,300,281											$	52.88

 

(1) This Registration Statement covers the resale by our selling shareholder of up to 1,300,281 shares of common stock. Pursuant to Rule 416 and 457 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the shares of common stock offered hereby also include such presently indeterminate number of shares of our common stock as shall be issued by the Registrant to the selling stockholders to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.

 

(2) The offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(a). Our common stock is not traded on any national exchange and in accordance with Rule 457, the offering price was determined by the price of the shares that were sold to our shareholders in a private placement, as further described below. The price of $0.35 is a fixed price at which the selling security holders shall sell their shares until they are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, after which time they will be sold at prevailing market prices; we are currently in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. There can be no assurance that our application for quotation will be approved.

 

(3) The Registrant previously paid $201.82 in connection with the filing of the initial Registration Statement to which this serves as Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 .

 

(4) Includes 572,118 shares of common stock underlying $200,241.30 Series A Convertible Redeemable Notes (the “Notes”) issued pursuant to the private placement of up to $1,200,000 principal amount of Notes we completed on April 9, 2015 (the “Private Placement”) and 430,788 shares issuable to a consultant pursuant to a Consulting and Service Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”).

 

(5) Includes 297,375 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants issued pursuant to the Private Placement.

 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES PUBLICLY UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED August 21 , 2015

 

PROSPECTUS

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

 

1,300,281 Shares of Common Stock

 

This prospectus relates to the sale by the selling shareholders listed on page 43 of up to 1,300,281 shares of our common stock.

 

Initially, t he selling stockholders named herein will sell the common stock at the fixed price of $0.35 per share until our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board; thereafter the common stock shall be sold at prevailing market prices may sell common stock from time to time in the principal market on which the stock is traded at the prevailing market price, at prices related to such prevailing market price, in negotiated transactions or a combination of such methods of sale and pursuant to any other method permitted by applicable law. Although we are currently in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, there can be no assurance that our application for quotation will be approved. Unless all or a portion of the 1,300,281 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and to which this prospectus relates, are exercised, we will not receive any proceeds from the sales by the selling stockholders.

 

The number of shares of common stock which may be sold by each of the selling stockholders are subject under certain conditions to certain agreed upon limits described elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

THIS INVESTMENT INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD PURCHASE SHARES ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF YOUR INVESTMENT. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 FOR A DISCUSSION OF RISKS APPLICABLE TO US AND AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK.

 

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES, OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

 

The date of this prospectus is August 21 , 2015.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Summary		3
The Offering		7
Summary Financial Data		8
Notes Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		9
Risk Factors		9
Selected Financial Information		17
Use of Proceeds		18
Market for Our Common Stock, Dividends and Related Stockholder Information		19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		20
Business		25
Management		36
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		41
Selling Stockholders		44
Plan of Distribution		46
Description of Securities		47
Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities		48
Part II
Item 13. Other Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution		50
Item 15. Recent Sales Of Unregistered Securities		50
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule		51
Item 17. Undertakings		52

 

We have not authorized any person to give you any supplemental information or to make any representations for us. You should not rely upon any information about us that is not contained in this prospectus or in one of our public reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and incorporated into this prospectus. Information contained in this prospectus or in our public reports may become stale. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus, any prospectus supplement or any documents incorporated by reference are accurate as of any date other than their respective dates, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates. The selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted.

 

Until [ ], all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters.

 

 

Explanatory Note: This Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-204465), as amended on July 15, 2015 and August 6, 2015 (collectively, the “Registration Statement”), is being filed in response to comments the Company received from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding the Registration Statement. Due to the comments, we revised the cover page of the prospectus to state that the selling shareholders will sell at a fixed price until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices; please note however that although we are in the process of applying to have our common stock quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, there can be no guarantee that it will be so listed. Also in response to the SEC’s comments, we reduced the number of shares being registered that underlie the warrants issued in the private placement.

 

SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights selected information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. While this summary highlights what we consider to be the most important information about us, you should carefully read this prospectus and the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part in their entirety before investing in our common stock, especially the risks of investing in our common stock, which we discuss later in “Risk Factors,” and our financial statements and related notes beginning on page 48. Unless the context requires otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” “eWellness” and the “Company” refer to eWellness Healthcare Corporation.

 

Our Business

 

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange we completed in April 2014, pursuant to which eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based medical technology company that combines digital physical therapy with progressive in-home exercise programs that includes active real-time monitoring and assessment by physical therapists. Our services are provisioned through our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Program utilizing our proprietary WWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems and in-office visits. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

 

As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have one patient who is fully monitored on our WWW.PHZIO.COM platform with limited insurance reimbursement to date; however, our WWW.PHZIO.COM platform is fully operational, we have completed an 8-week patient in-house study in Los Angeles and as of April 29, 2015 we are provisioning our WWW.PHZIO.COM program to patients in Los Angeles through a cooperation agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”). (See “Recent Developments” and “Business – PHZIO Platform”)

 

To date, we have not identified any other program that is designed to provide insurance reimbursable Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Telemedicine that has been specifically designed to help prevent pre-diabetic patients from becoming diabetic and therefore believe that once adequately funded, we will be the first to market with our specific innovative service and program. Our program combines in-office direct-contact physical therapy evaluations, re-evaluations and physical performance testing with an on-line telemedicine exercise program. This business model allows us to bill for traditional in-office patient visits and when insurance companies allow, for our telemedicine exercise program sessions too. We also intend to offer to enroll our patients in a no-cost online healthy living nutrition and meal planning platform to be developed in the second quarter of 2015.

 

Assuming we receive sufficient financing to do so, we intend to start servicing patients in the second fiscal quarter of 2015 in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, when we also anticipate rolling out our WWW.PHZIO.COM platform. As an innovator of certain services, we are aware that the proposed DMpt services will be launched in an industry with deeply established and regulated billing approaches. For this reason, we designed a business model to succeed in the current billing environment by anticipating that the only reimbursement available to us for the next three years will be generated by using procedures and codes that insurance providers currently accept, even though we believe insurance companies will start providing more telemedicine reimbursement prior to such time given its benefits. Currently, depending on each patient’s insurance coverage, existing codes cover up to 14 in-office visits and/or up to 24 remotely monitored physical therapy sessions during our six-month program. Today, some insurance companies do not reimburse for any physical therapy sessions, whether or not they are monitored, and none of the insurance companies within our patient base provide codes that reimburse non-monitored physical therapy sessions. Our plans and goals factor in these non-reimbursed sessions as part of the overall Cost of Goods Sold (COGS); we still believe that we can earn revenues and generate profit based solely on the services for which insurance companies currently provide reimbursement. In light of current insurance practices, we configured four separate reimbursement plans designed to maximize the needs of today’s patient base. Our DMpt system is currently configured to deliver a six-month therapy program with at least three sessions per week using a combination of 78 remote monitored and/or remote non-monitored therapy sessions and 6 to 26 in-office visits (number of office visits depend on insurance coverage). This assures us that we will be able to deliver a consistent service to the patients and achieve our internal operating goals without any innovation in the insurance industry codes. While the current, somewhat archaic, reimbursement standards do not reimburse for some aspects of our six month program, based upon feedback from industry leaders, we believe that the regulatory and insurance environment is trending towards a payment structure that will be more favorable to remote monitored and non-monitored programs within the telemedicine sphere, although there can be no guarantee such trend will be realized. Part of our current plan is to compile six months of compelling patient outcomes in the form of a clinical study, to submit to the insurance agencies to encourage the trend towards remote-services based reimbursement and enhance our reimbursement opportunities. Regardless, our business model suggests that we will be able to generate revenues and sustain a profitable business; however, there is no guarantee that we will be able to generate any revenues or realize any profits, as we have yet to launch any of our services. If the insurance industry recognizes the advantages telemedicine can provide to patients, medical professionals and insurance companies, and then more readily provides reimbursement for same, we will stand to earn significant more revenues.

 

 

Our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (“DMpt”) program, including: design, testing, exercise intervention, follow-up, and exercise demonstration, has been developed by accomplished Los Angeles based physical therapist Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt has extensive experience and education working with diverse populations from professional athletes to morbidly obese. He understands the most beneficial exercise prescription to achieve optimal results and has had great success in motivating all patient types to stay consistent in working toward their goals. Additionally, his methods have proven effective and safe as he demonstrates exercises with attention to proper form to avoid injury. Mr. Fogt has established himself as a national leader in his field and has successfully implemented progressive solutions to delivering physical therapy: he has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner’s World, Men’s Health, Men’s Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. He has bridged the gap between physical therapy and fitness by opening EPT, which uses licensed physical therapists to teach high intensity circuit training fitness classes. He also founded one of the first exclusive prenatal and postnatal physical therapy clinic in the country. Mr. Fogt is a leader in advancing the profession to incorporate research-based methods and focus on, not only rehabilitation but also wellness, functional fitness, performance, and prevention. He is able to recognize that the national healthcare structure (federal and private insurance) is moving toward a model of prevention and that the physical therapy profession will take a larger role in providing wellness services to patients.

 

Our History

 

We entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Initial Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to issue 9,200,000 shares of our unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”), to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“eWellness” or “Private Co.”). In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation and also to assign from his holdings an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of eWellness Corporation resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders, as well as a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein. There were no warrants, options or other equity instruments issued in connection with the share exchange agreement.

 

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. However, Rule 419 required that the share exchange transaction (the “Share Exchange”) contemplated by the Initial Exchange Agreement occur on or before March 18, 2014. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management and eWellness, the parties entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the 419 transaction into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”). We also agreed to change our name to eWellness Healthcare Corporation to more accurately reflect our new business and operations after the Share Exchange, which occurred and was effective as of April 25, 2014.

 

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we purchased 100% of eWellness’ common stock in exchange for 9,200,000 shares of our then outstanding shares of common stock and the share exchange closed. As a result, eWellness became our wholly owned subsidiary and its shareholders owned approximately 76.97% of our then issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to the cancellation of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock held by Andreas A. McRobbie-Johnson, our former chief executive officer and the further assignment of his shares of common stock as described therein.

 

Recent Developments

 

In early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy (“CSBPT”) that we could operate our PHZIO.COM platform and bill patients insurance within the Association’s rules in the state of California. That led us to induct sample patients into our PHZIO.COM platform at our Culver City offices and complete an 8-week research study where we successfully billed for telemedicine visits for one of our patients who has Blue Shield insurance.

 

Following that study, we determined that it would be significantly less expensive to launch our services in California rather than New York, as initially planned. As a result, our introductions to physician offices will now come from existing relationships held by our CEO, Darwin Fogt, rather than from Millennium Healthcare, Inc., (“MHI”). In December 2014, we determined that it was possible to license our PHZIO.com platform to any physical therapy practice under a “White Labeling”¹ program in return for a percentage of the reimbursements such therapists receive from patients participating in our PHZIO.COM program; we hope to begin white labeling our PHZIO.COM platform by August 2015. Due to the transition to our PHZIO.COM platform, our relationship with MHI is now more of a marketing arrangement in which they market their cardio testing services to physicians, who may incorporate our platform.

 

 

¹ “White-labeling” is the strategy in which a company (the marketer) rebrands another company’s (the producer) product to make it appear as if the marketer had made it.

 

  

On April 1, 2015, we entered into an Operating Agreement with EPT, wherein we agreed that EPT would be able to operate our telemedicine platform www.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. We shall receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. We will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 120 days from the start of patient induction. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using www.phzio.com.

 

On April 17, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H., pursuant to which Dr. Bajaj shall serve as a consultant and as the Chairman of our Clinical Advisory Board. The term of the agreement is for one year with annual renewal as desired. The agreement further sets the hourly rate to be paid at $225 per hour with payment to be at the end of each month. Further, we granted Dr. Bajaj a five-year non-statutory option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The options will vest over a 12 month period at 8,333 per month.

 

Initially, we believed that our success depended on our ability to maintain our relationship with MHI and their successful marketing and use of our product. We also noted that our initial and sole service contract covered the New York City and northern New Jersey tri-borough area. However, our disclosure as of October 2014 also stated that we had not yet required or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor had MHI marketed our services as of such date, which remains true as of the date of this Registration Statement. Frustrated by these results and always seeking different ways to achieve success and break into the market, we realized the opportunity provided by the information from the CSBPT. As a measure to augment our contract with MHI and diversify our revenue base, we have pursued other opportunities revealed by the information from the CSBPT. Below is an illustration of the ways in which our PHZIO.COM platform may likely reduce costs and improve patient outcomes. In light of the potential created by our platform and the Association’s rules, we moved our initial focus and efforts from the New York/New Jersey area to California.

 

 

 

As of the date of this Statement, we accomplished the following:

 

What We Have Built To Date: Over the last two and one-half years in four phases we have conceptualized, developed, designed, programed, built and tested our PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform.

 

Phase I: Q-3 and Q4 2013 and all of 2013: Designed unique exercise video-based program and designed PHZIO video & telemedicine platform and designed exercise programs.

 

Phase II: Q-1 and Q-2 2014: Filmed 78 unique 40 minute exercise programing.

 

Phase III: Q-3 2014: Finalized programing of our PHZIO.COM video management platform and two way interactive telemedicine program.

 

Phase IV: Q-4 2014: Pilot Study with 8 sample patients working out three days per week for 8-weeks; patients were 100% compliant with the regimen.

 

Phase V: Q-2 2015: On April 29, 2015, we began provisioning our WWW.PHZIO.COM program to patients in Los Angeles through a cooperation agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy in our first patient induction office located in Marina del Rey, California.

 

Banking Agreements

 

At the end of May, we entered into separate financial advisor/consulting agreements with each of Merriman Capital, Inc. and Mavericks Capital LLC. Pursuant to these agreements, each entity has agreed to assist us with our financing plans and other relevant financial advising services. Although no agreements or commitments have been made as of the date of this Registration Statement, we hope that these agreements will enable us to receive additional financing within the next several months. As compensation for their services, and in addition to fees payable upon consummation of specified financing transactions, we agreed to issue each of Merriman and Mavericks a warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share; additionally, we shall pay Merriman and Mavericks $6,000 and $10,000 per month, respectively for their advisory services, although payment is deferred until each begins their respective capital raising activities.

 

Risk Factors

 

The securities offered by this prospectus are speculative and involve a high degree of risks associated with our business. For more discussion of these and other risk factors affecting us and our business, see the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 9 of this prospectus.

 

The Private Placement

 

On April 9, 2015, we closed a second round of our private placement offering with eight accredited investors in which we raised gross proceeds of approximately $270,080 (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) and sold that same amount of Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment as provided therein (the “Note(s)”), and Series A Warrants (the “Warrant(s)”), all  pursuant to separate Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with each investor (the ”Purchase Agreements”).  Initially, the Notes are convertible into 771,657 shares of Common Stock. The sale was part of the private placement offering in which we offered for sale a maximum of $1,200,000 principal amount of Notes (the “Private Placement”).  Prior to this closing, we raised gross proceeds of $202,500 in the initial closing of the Private Placement and issued approximately $213,337 Notes (to reflect monies owed for certain pre-existing interest payments) and issued Series A Warrants exercisable to purchase up to 609,534 shares of Common Stock. As a result, we raised a total of approximately $472,580 pursuant to the Private Placement and issued an aggregate of approximately $483,417 of Notes and Warrants to purchase up to 1,381,191 shares of our Common Stock.

 

The Notes were offered on a “best efforts” basis in the Private Placement. The Notes pay a 12.0% cash coupon, payable at maturity (or upon conversion or redemption); accrued unpaid interest shall be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Common Stock” ) upon conversion at the option of the Investors. The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt and may not be subordinated to any other debt of the Company, without the appropriate consent from the Note holders. The Notes are secured by the Company’s assets, including cash flow. Following the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares this Registration Statement effective, the Notes may be converted by the Investors into shares of Common Stock (the shares of Common Stock underlying the Notes are hereinafter referred to as the “Note Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.35 per share (the “Conversion Price”). In the event the Common Stock shall be listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may redeem the Notes, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to convert the Notes into Common Stock at the Conversion Price. Upon an Event of Default, which event shall remain un-remedied for a period of sixty (60) days, the Investors shall have the option to require the Company to redeem its outstanding Notes at a price equal to 150% of the principal amount being redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. As long as any of the Notes shall remain outstanding, the Investors shall be extended standard anti-dilution protection with respect to stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations affecting any outstanding Notes.

 

The Warrants contain cashless exercise provisions in the event a registration statement registering the Common Stock underlying the Warrants is not effective 180 days after the issuance date and is subject to customary anti-dilution protection and registration rights. The Warrants expire on the third anniversary of the issuance date and have an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share. Each warrant is exercisable for one shares of Common Stock.

 

Each investor also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Company under which the Company is obligated to file this registration statement to register the shares of Common Stock underlying the Notes and Warrants within 30 days following the final Closing.

 

 

THE OFFERING

 

Issuer		eWellness Healthcare Corporation
Common Stock being offered by Selling Stockholders			●	572,118 shares of common stock underlying $200,241.30 Series A Convertible Redeemable Notes issued pursuant to the private placement we completed on April 9, 2015 (the “Private Placement”);
			●	297,375 shares of common stock underlying common stock purchase warrants issued pursuant to the Private Placement; and,
			●	430,788 shares issuable to a consultant pursuant to our Consulting and Service Agreement with same. Pursuant to this Agreement, the consultant shall provide advice and guidance regarding investment and general corporate matters.
Selling Stockholders		Noteholders and the other entities or persons listed under “Selling Stockholders” elsewhere in this prospectus.
Risk Factors		The securities offered by this prospectus are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and should only be purchased by investors prepared to sustain a loss of their entire investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.

 

 

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table summarizes the relevant financial data for our business and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary set forth below should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

 

		For the six months ended June 30,
		2015				2014
		(in thousands)
Net Revenues		$	0			$	0
Gross profit
Comprehensive Loss		$	750,959			$	656,823

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
		As of June 30, 2015
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets		$	93,917
Total assets			122,062
Total current liabilities, net of debt discounts			911,507
Total liabilities, net of debt discounts			1,343,387
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		$	(1,221,325	)

 

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

 

		For the years ended December 31,
		2014				2013
		(in thousands)
Net Revenues		$	0			$	0
Gross profit
Comprehensive Loss		$	1,339,585			$	466,636

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

		As of December 31, 2014
Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets		$	34,228
Total assets			60,275
Total current liabilities, net of debt discounts			679,380
Total liabilities, net of debt discounts			857,813
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		$	(797,538	)

  

 

NOTES REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

The statements contained in this prospectus that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These include statements about the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which are indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “the Company believes,” “management believes” and similar words or phrases. The forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Investing in our securities involves a great deal of risk. Careful consideration should be made of the following factors as well as other information included in this prospectus before deciding to purchase our common stock. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be affected materially and adversely by any or all of these risks.

 

THE FOLLOWING MATTERS MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR PROSPECTS, FINANCIAL OR OTHERWISE. REFERENCE TO THIS CAUTIONARY STATEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF A FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A STATEMENT THAT ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS.

 

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

 

If we fail to raise additional capital, our ability to implement our business model and strategy could be compromised.

 

We have limited capital resources and operations. To date, our operations have been funded entirely from the proceeds from equity and debt financings or loans from our management. While we have sufficient funds once the financing is completed to our launch our PHZIO.COM platform in Los Angeles, if we take on any additional markets in the United States, we will likely require substantial additional capital in the near future to develop and market new products, services and technologies. We also hope to reach other markets through our “White Labeling” strategy, but that cannot be guaranteed.

 

We need at least $400,000 to carry out the first phase of our program. Accordingly, we have closed on sufficient funds necessary to carryout our initial business launch. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have received and closed on a total of $483,416.88 pursuant to the Private Placement; this is sufficient to allow us to carry out phase one of our program. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Even if we obtain financing for our near term operations and product development, we may require additional capital beyond the near term. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected, and we could be forced to reduce or discontinue our operations.

 

eWellness is an early stage company with a going concern qualification to our financial statements and a short operating history and a relatively new business model in an emerging and rapidly evolving market, which makes it difficult to evaluate its future prospects.

 

eWellness is an early stage company with a short operating history and a relatively new business model in an emerging and rapidly evolving market, which makes it difficult to evaluate its future prospects; as a pre-revenue, early stage entity, it is subject to all of the risks inherent in a young business enterprise, such as, among other things, lack of market recognition and limited banking and financial relationships. As a result, we have little operating history to aid in assessing future prospects. We will encounter risks and difficulties as an early stage company in a new and rapidly evolving market. We may not be able to successfully address these risks and difficulties, which could materially harm our business and operating results.

 

Our financial statements as of December 31, 2014 were prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited our 2014 financial statements, in their report, included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring losses since inception and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate revenue.

 

 

We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act.

 

We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act. Prior to our acquisition of eWellness Corporation, we did not technically comply with the requirements of Rule 419 under the Securities Act. We previously offered for sale in a direct public offering 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, pursuant to Rule 419 of the Securities Act (the “419 Transaction”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-181440) that was declared effective by the SEC on September 14, 2012 (the “419 Registration Statement”). We sold 1,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”) to investors at a price of $0.10 per share, for total subscription proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to the 419 Registration Statement. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”). Prior to the Share Exchange, we were considered a “blank check” company and a “shell” company and therefore, needed to fully comply with Rule 419. Among other things, Rule 419 requires that we deposit the securities being offered and proceeds of the offering contemplated by the 419 Registration Statement into an escrow or trust account pending the execution of an agreement for an acquisition or merger. If a consummated acquisition meeting the requirements of Rule 419 did not occur by a date 18 months after the September 14, 2012 effective date of the 419 Registration Statement, Rule 419(e)(2)(iv) requires a blank check company to return the funds held in the escrow account to all investors who participated in the offering within five (5) business days². When we did not complete the Share Exchange by March 18, 2014, rather than physically return the funds, we gave the investors who participated in the financing that was initially conducted pursuant to Rule 419, the right to have their funds returned or use their funds to purchase the same shares in a private offering to be conducted pursuant to Rule 506(b) of the Securities Act; all of the investors directed us to use their respective funds for the private placement. Regardless, after various comments and discussions with the SEC’s staff within the division of corporate finance, it seems that such constructive compliance with Rule 419 is not permissible and we should have physically returned the investors’ funds when the Share Exchange was not completed by March 18, 2014. Ultimately, although we responded to all of the comments, the SEC continued to have concerns about the issues it raised and terminated its review of the relevant Form 8-K without clearing all of the comments and stated it would take further steps its deems necessary. Consequently, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

 

Risks Related to our Products and Development of our Business

 

Our telemedicine platform is new and has only limited operation experience.

 

eWellness’ has developed and tested its unique telemedicine platform www.phzio.com that is a Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

 

Our success is currently dependent upon our ability to maintain and develop Mr. Fogt’s relationship with other physicians.

 

Now that we are using our PHZIO.COM platform to generate our success, we are dependent upon our CEO’s ability to maintain his current relationship with other physicians and our collective ability to establish relationships with other physicians. If we cannot generate new relationships or current relationships do not translate into service contracts or license agreements for our PHZIO.com platform, we may not have alternative streams of revenue and therefore we may need to cease operations until such time as we find an alternative provider or forever.

 

We depend upon reimbursement by third-party payers.

 

Substantially all of our revenues are anticipated to be derived from private third-party payers. Initiatives undertaken by industry and government to contain healthcare costs affect the profitability of our clinics. These payers attempt to control healthcare costs by contracting with healthcare providers to obtain services on a discounted basis. We believe that this trend will continue and may limit reimbursement for healthcare services. If insurers or managed care companies from whom we receive substantial payments were to reduce the amounts paid for services, our profit margins may decline, or we may lose patients if we choose not to renew our contracts with these insurers at lower rates. In addition, in certain geographical areas, our operations may be approved as providers by key health maintenance organizations and preferred provider plans; failure to obtain or maintain these approvals would adversely affect our financial results. Although we created a business plan that will enable us to achieve revenue based on current reimbursement policies, if our belief that the insurance industry is poised for change, to offer more reimbursement for the services we seek to provide is not realized, we may not achieve the success we predict and we may not be able to carry out all the plans we disclose herein related to telemedicine. Ultimately, a shift in thinking and a willingness to adapt to new physical therapy telemedicine services and reimbursement thereof by healthcare providers is needed for the successful integration of our PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform in mainstream healthcare environments.

 

² Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. Here, the Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

 

 

We are currently contractually committed to a 14 state exclusive supply and distribution agreement

 

The Company entered into an exclusive supply and distribution agreement with Millennium Healthcare, Inc., (“MHI”) covering 14 states that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, in which the company is required to pay MHI a 20% fee on DMpt patient revenue generated in those states, in return for providing marketing and program billing services to the Company. To date, this contract has not been activated as our DMpt program has not commenced operations; additionally, MHI has shown little interest in our program. If at the time that our DMpt program commences operations and MHI has not used their best efforts to market and manage the billing of our program to various insurance carriers, then the Company may be in a position to cancel the contract with MHI and pursue other marketing and billing management relationships. Alternatively, if the company acts to engage other distribution companies within the covered 14 states, the Company may be required to include the 20% MHI fee into any new arrangement or worse, may be prohibited from entering into any new engagement within any such states. If we cannot cancel the agreement and since there is not guarantee that any distribution or billing activity outside of the agreement between the Company and MHI within the 14 states will be permitted, we may be required to pay the contractual fees noted above or face strategic road blocks that hinder our ability to grow and succeed. Since neither party has taken any steps to carry out the agreement, we may seek to terminate same, although there can be no guarantee the outcome of such efforts.

 

Dependence on Key Existing and Future Personnel

 

Our success will depend, to a large degree, upon the efforts and abilities of our officers and key management employees. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, as our business model is implemented, we will need to recruit and retain additional management and key employees in virtually all phases of our operations. Key employees will require a strong background in our industry. We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully attract and retain key personnel.

 

Currently, our management’s participation in our business and operations is limited

 

To date, we have been unable to offer cash compensation to our officers due to our lack of revenue. Accordingly, each of the Company’s executive officers maintain jobs outside of their position at eWellness. Although each of our executive officers have made preparations to devote their efforts, on a full time basis, towards our objectives once we can afford executive compensation commensurate with that being paid in the marketplace, until such time, our officers will not devote their full time and attention to the operations of the Company. None of our officers have committed a specific portion of their time or an approximate number of hours per week in writing to the objectives of the company and no assurances can be given as to when we will be financially able to engage our officers on a full time basis and therefore, until such time, it is possible that the inability of such persons to devote their full time attention to the Company may result in delays in progress toward implementing our business plan.

 

We operate in a highly competitive industry

 

We encounter competition from local, regional or national entities, some of which have superior resources or other competitive advantages. Intense competition may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may also experience competition from companies in the wellness space. These competitors may be larger and more highly capitalized, with greater name recognition. We will compete with such companies on brand name, quality of services, level of expertise, advertising, product and service innovation and differentiation of product and services. As a result, our ability to secure significant market share may be impeded. Although we believe our DMpt services will enable us to service more patients than traditional physical therapy providers, if these more established offices or providers start offering similar services to ours, their name recognition or experience may enable them to capture a greater market share.

 

Limited product testing and operations

 

We have built out the technology platform and video library necessary to execute our planned business strategy. Of course, there may be other factors that prevent us from successfully marketing a product including, but not limited to, our limited cash resources. Further, our proposed reimbursement plan and the eventual operating results could susceptible to varying interpretations by scientists, medical personnel, regulatory personnel, statisticians and others, which may delay, limit or prevent our executing our proposed business plan.

 

We face substantial competition, and others may discover, develop, acquire or commercialize products before or more successfully than we do

 

We operate in a highly competitive environment. Our products compete with other products or treatments for diseases for which our products may be indicated. Other healthcare companies have greater clinical, research, regulatory and marketing resources than us. In addition, some of our competitors may have technical or competitive advantages for the development of technologies and processes. These resources may make it difficult for us to compete with them to successfully discover, develop and market new products.

 

We depend upon the cultivation and maintenance of relationships with the physicians in our markets.

 

Our success is dependent upon referrals from physicians in the communities we will service and our ability to maintain good relations with these physicians and other referral sources. Physicians referring patients to our clinics are free to refer their patients to other therapy providers or to their own physician owned therapy practice. If we are unable to successfully cultivate and maintain strong relationships with physicians and other referral sources, our business may decrease and our net operating revenues may decline.

 

 

We also depend upon our ability to recruit and retain experienced physical therapists

 

Our future revenue generation is dependent upon referrals from physicians in the communities our clinics serve, and our ability to maintain good relations with these physicians. Our therapists are the front line for generating these referrals and we are dependent on their talents and skills to successfully cultivate and maintain strong relationships with these physicians. If we cannot recruit and retain our base of experienced and clinically skilled therapists, our business may decrease and our net operating revenues may decline.

 

Our revenues may fluctuate due to weather

 

We anticipate having a significant number of clinical locations in states that normally experience snow and ice during the winter months. Also, a significant number of our clinics may be located in states along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic Coast, which are subject to periodic winter storms, hurricanes and other severe storm systems. Periods of severe weather may cause physical damage to our facilities or prevent our staff or patients from traveling to our clinics, which may cause a decrease in our future net operating revenues.

 

We may incur closure costs and losses

 

The competitive, economic or reimbursement conditions in the markets in which we operate may require us to reorganize or to close certain clinical locations. In the event a clinic is reorganized or closed, we may incur losses and closure costs. The closure costs and losses may include, but are not limited to, lease obligations, severance, and write-down or write-off of intangible assets.

 

Certain of our internal controls, particularly as they relate to billings and cash collections, are largely decentralized at our clinic locations

 

Our future clinical operations are largely decentralized and certain of our internal controls, particularly the processing of billings and cash collections, occur at the clinic level. Taken as a whole, we believe our future internal controls for these functions at our clinical facilities will be adequate. Our controls for billing and collections largely depend on compliance with our written policies and procedures and separation of functions among clinic personnel. We also intend to maintain corporate level controls, including an audit compliance program, that are intended to mitigate and detect any potential deficiencies in internal controls at the clinic level. The effectiveness of these controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the level of compliance with our policies and procedures deteriorates.

 

Risks Related to Regulation

 

Our products may be subject to product liability legal claims, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Certain of our products provide applications that relate to patient clinical information. Any failure by our products to provide accurate and timely information concerning patients, their medication, treatment and health status, generally, could result in claims against us which could materially and adversely impact our financial performance, industry reputation and ability to market new system sales. In addition, a court or government agency may take the position that our delivery of health information directly, including through licensed practitioners, or delivery of information by a third party site that a consumer accesses through our websites, exposes us to assertions of malpractice, other personal injury liability, or other liability for wrongful delivery/handling of healthcare services or erroneous health information. We anticipate that in the future we will maintain insurance to protect against claims associated with the use of our products as well as liability limitation language in our end-user license agreements, but there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage or contractual language would adequately cover any claim asserted against us. A successful claim brought against us in excess of or outside of our insurance coverage could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even unsuccessful claims could result in our expenditure of funds for litigation and management time and resources.

 

Certain healthcare professionals who use our Cloud-based products will directly enter health information about their patients including information that constitutes a record under applicable law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual obligations, govern collection, dissemination, use and confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information, including:

 

	●	state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
	●	contracts with clients and partners;
	●	state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
	●	Medicaid laws;
	●	the HIPAA and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration; and
	●	Health Care Financing Administration standards for Internet transmission of health data.

 

 

HIPAA establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal privacy and security standards for the use and protection of Protected Health Information. Any failure by us or by our personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may result in a material liability to us.

 

Although we have systems and policies in place for safeguarding Protected Health Information from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not preclude claims against us for alleged violations of applicable requirements. Also, third party sites and/or links that consumers may access through our web sites may not maintain adequate systems to safeguard this information, or may circumvent systems and policies we have put in place. In addition, future laws or changes in current laws may necessitate costly adaptations to our policies, procedures, or systems.

 

There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to product liability claims, that such claims will not result in liability in excess of our insurance coverage, that our insurance will cover such claims or that appropriate insurance will continue to be available to us in the future at commercially reasonable rates. Such product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

There is significant uncertainty in the healthcare industry in which we operate, and we are subject to the possibility of changing government regulation, which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The healthcare industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences that may affect the procurement processes and operation of healthcare facilities. During the past several years, the healthcare industry has been subject to an increase in governmental regulation of, among other things, reimbursement rates and certain capital expenditures.

 

Recently enacted public laws reforming the U.S. healthcare system may have an impact on our business. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590; Public Law 111-148) (“PPACA”) and The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) (the “Reconciliation Act”), which amends the PPACA (collectively the “Health Reform Laws”), were signed into law in March 2010. The Health Reform Laws contain various provisions which may impact us and our patients. Some of these provisions may have a positive impact, while others, such as reductions in reimbursement for certain types of providers, may have a negative impact due to fewer available resources. Increases in fraud and abuse penalties may also adversely affect participants in the health care sector, including us.

 

Various legislators have announced that they intend to examine further proposals to reform certain aspects of the U.S. healthcare system. Healthcare providers may react to these proposals, and the uncertainty surrounding such proposals, by curtailing or deferring investments, including those for our systems and related services. Cost-containment measures instituted by healthcare providers as a result of regulatory reform or otherwise could result in a reduction of the allocation of capital funds. Such a reduction could have an adverse effect on our ability to sell our systems and related services. On the other hand, changes in the regulatory environment have increased and may continue to increase the needs of healthcare organizations for cost-effective data management and thereby enhance the overall market for healthcare management information systems. We cannot predict what effect, if any, such proposals or healthcare reforms might have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As existing regulations mature and become better defined, we anticipate that these regulations will continue to directly affect certain of our products and services, but we cannot fully predict the effect at this time. We have taken steps to modify our products, services and internal practices as necessary to facilitate our compliance with the regulations, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in a timely or complete manner. Achieving compliance with these regulations could be costly and distract management’s attention and divert other company resources, and any noncompliance by us could result in civil and criminal penalties.

 

Developments of additional federal and state regulations and policies have the potential to positively or negatively affect our business. Our software is not anticipated to be considered a medical device by the FDA. Yet, if it were, it could be subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) as a medical device. Such regulation could require the registration of the applicable manufacturing facility and software and hardware products, application of detailed record-keeping and manufacturing standards, and FDA approval or clearance prior to marketing. An approval or clearance requirement could create delays in marketing, and the FDA could require supplemental filings or object to certain of these applications, the result of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

We may be subject to false or fraudulent claim laws

 

There are numerous federal and state laws that forbid submission of false information or the failure to disclose information in connection with submission and payment of physician claims for reimbursement. In some cases, these laws also forbid abuse of existing systems for such submission and payment. Any failure of our services to comply with these laws and regulations could result in substantial liability including, but not limited to, criminal liability, could adversely affect demand for our services and could force us to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to address the failure. Errors by us or our systems with respect to entry, formatting, preparation or transmission of claim information may be determined or alleged to be in violation of these laws and regulations. Determination by a court or regulatory agency that our services violate these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, invalidate all or portions of some of our client contracts, require us to change or terminate some portions of our business, require us to refund portions of our services fees, cause us to be disqualified from serving clients doing business with government payers and have an adverse effect on our business.

 

We are subject to the Stark Law, which may result in significant penalties

 

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. § 1395nn) (the “Stark Law”) prohibit referrals by a physician of “designated health services” which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician’s immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the “designated health services”. Further, the Stark Law has application to the Company’s management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients. Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

 

If our products fail to comply with evolving government and industry standards and regulations, we may have difficulty selling our products

 

We may be subject to additional federal and state statutes and regulations in connection with offering services and products via the Internet. On an increasingly frequent basis, federal and state legislators are proposing laws and regulations that apply to Internet commerce and communications. Areas being affected by these regulations include user privacy, pricing, content, taxation, copyright protection, distribution, and quality of products and services. To the extent that our products and services are subject to these laws and regulations, the sale of our products and services could be harmed.

 

We incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company and our management will have to devote substantial time to public company compliance obligations

 

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the stock exchange, has imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance requirements and any new requirements that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 may impose on public companies. Moreover, these rules and regulations, along with compliance with accounting principles and regulatory interpretations of such principles, have increased and will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and have made and will continue to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or our board committees, or as executive officers. We will evaluate the need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting and financial knowledge. We estimate the additional costs we expect to be incurred as a result of being a public company to be up to $500,000 annually.

 

Part of the requirements as a public company will be to document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company.

 

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and to effectively prevent fraud. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

 

We cannot assure that we will not, in the future, identify areas requiring improvement in our internal control over financial reporting. We cannot assure that the measures we will take to remediate any areas in need of improvement will be successful or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future as we continue our growth. If we are unable to maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in the restatement of our financial statements, harm our operating results, subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanction, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the market price for shares of our common stock.

 

Risks Relating to Our Securities

 

There is not now, and there may never be, an active market for our common stock and we cannot assure you that the common stock will become liquid or that it will be listed on a securities exchange.

 

There currently is no market for our common stock. We plan to list our common stock as soon as practicable following the effective date of this Registration Statement. However, we cannot assure that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of any stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain any such listing. An investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of the common stock and trading of our common stock may be extremely sporadic. For example, several days may pass before any shares may be traded. A more active market for the common stock may never develop. In addition, if we fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling the common stock, which may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

 

We cannot assure you that following the effective date of this Registration Statement, our common stock will be listed on NASDAQ or any other securities exchange; and if listed we may be subject to penny stock rules.

 

Following the effective date of this Registration Statement, we shall seek the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ or the American Stock Exchange. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of either, or any other stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain a listing of common stock on either of those or any other stock exchange. Until our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ or another stock exchange, we expect that our common stock will be eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, another over-the-counter quotation system, or on the “pink sheets,” where our stockholders may find it more difficult to dispose of shares or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock.

 

In addition, after such listing, our securities may be classified as penny stock. The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share whose securities are admitted to quotation but do not trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market or on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require delivery of a document to investors stating the risks, special suitability inquiry, regular reporting and other requirements. Prices for penny stocks are often not available and investors are often unable to sell this stock. Consequently, such rule may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our common stock, which may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital following a business combination.

 

Our stock price and ability to finance may be adversely affected by our outstanding convertible securities and warrants.

 

Sales of the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and upon conversion of our convertible securities, would likely have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock. Further, the existence of, and/or potential exercise or conversion of all or a portion of these securities, create a negative and potentially depressive effect on our stock price because investors recognize that they “over hang” the market at this time. As a result, the terms on which we may obtain additional financing during the period any of these warrants or convertible securities remain outstanding may be adversely affected by the existence of such warrants and convertible securities.

 

Insiders have substantial control over us, and they could delay or prevent a change in our corporate control even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur.

 

Our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 65% of our outstanding common stock at August 21 , 2015. These stockholders are able to control all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with us, or other business consolidation even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur; it may also discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer for our common stock, which may further affect its liquidity.

 

 

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

 

We currently intend to retain any earnings to support our growth strategy and may begin paying dividends in late 2015, although that is not guaranteed.

 

We intend to issue more shares to raise capital, which will result in substantial dilution.

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Any additional financings effected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and the substantial dilution in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued in any such transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our current stockholders. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a financing, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holder of common stock might be materially and adversely affected.

 

Our publicly filed reports are subject to review by the SEC, and any significant changes or amendments required as a result of any such review may result in material liability to us and may have a material adverse impact on the trading price of the Company’s common stock.

 

The reports of publicly traded companies are subject to review by the SEC from time to time for the purpose of assisting companies in complying with applicable disclosure requirements, and the SEC is required to undertake a comprehensive review of a company’s reports at least once every three years under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SEC reviews may be initiated at any time. We could be required to modify, amend or reformulate information contained in prior filings as a result of an SEC review. Any modification, amendment or reformulation of information contained in such reports could be significant and result in material liability to us and have a material adverse impact on the trading price of the Company’s common stock.

 

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

The selected financial information set forth below is derived from our unaudited statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the audited financial statements for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, which appears elsewhere in this prospectus commencing on page 48 and which include footnotes required under generally accepted accounting principles. Prospective investors are urged to carefully review such detailed financial statements in their entirety.

 

		Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2015				June 30, 2014
OPERATING EXPENSES
Executive compensation		$	372,000			$	372.000
General and administrative			96,872				109,700
Professional fees			240,062				174,248
Research and development - related party			-				30
Total Operating Expenses			708,934				656,038
Loss from Operations			(708,934	)			(656,038	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain from extinguishment of debt			11,323				-
Interest income			-				7
Interest expense, related parties			(1,957	)			(608	)
Interest expense			(51,391	)			(184	)
Loss before Income Taxes			(750,959	)			(656,823	)
Income tax expense			-				-
Net Loss		$	(750,959	)		$	(656,823	)

  

 

		For Year Ended
		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
TOTAL REVENUE		$	-			$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES
Executive compensation			744,000				423,000
General and administrative			231,124				40,930
Professional fees			259,856				-
Contingent liability expense			90,000				-
Research and development - related party			30				2,706
Total Operating Expenses			1,325,010				466,636
Loss from Operations			(1,325,010	)			(466,636	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain on extinguishment of debt			1,200				-
Interest income			7				-
Interest expense, related parties			(2,708	)			-
Interest expense			(13,074	)			-
Loss before Income Taxes			(1,339,585	)			(466,636	)
Income tax expense			-				-
Net Loss		$	(1,339,585	)		$	(466,636	)

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We will not receive any net proceeds from sales of shares of our common stock being registered for resale by the Selling Stockholders named in this prospectus.

 

We may, however, receive proceeds from the issuance of shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the Warrants.

 

If all of the outstanding Warrants were exercised for cash at an exercise price of approximately $0.35 per share (subject to adjustment), we could receive up to a total of approximately $483,417. However, the holders of Warrants are only obligated to exercise such warrants for cash if the underlying Warrant Shares have been registered for resale under a current registration statement declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and there can be no guarantee they will exercise any Warrants.

 

We intend to use any proceeds we may receive from the cash exercise of the Warrants for working capital and other general corporate purposes. There is no assurance that any or all of the Warrants will ever be exercised or that additional shares underlying the Warrants will be registered for resale.

 

 

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK, DIVIDENDS AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION

 

As of the date of this Statement, there is no public market for the Company’s common stock. This Registration Statement is a step toward creating a public market for our stock upon. However, there can be no assurance that a meaningful trading market will develop. The Company and its management make no representation about the present or future value of our common stock.

 

As of August 21 , 2015:

 

	1.	There are 4,854,405 outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or other instruments convertible into, common equity of the Company;
	2.	There are currently about 6,000,000 shares of our common stock eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144; and,
	3.	Other than the stock registered under this Registration Statement, there is no stock that has been proposed to be publicly offered resulting in dilution to the current shareholders or that could have a material effect on the market price of our common equity.

 

Record Holders. As of August 21 , 2015, there were approximately 91 record holders of our common stock.

 

Dividend Policy. We have neither declared nor paid any cash dividends on either preferred or common stock. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our preferred or common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon then existing conditions, including its financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, and other factors that the Board of Directors considers relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. The Company does not have any equity compensation plans or any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common stock. The issuance of any of our common stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions.

 

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we, nor any other person, assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We are under no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements after the filing of this Registration Statement to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

 

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to the operations and financial condition reported in the financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation for the quarter ending June 30 , 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and related notes included in this report.

 

Overview

 

eWellness is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

 

Initially, our focus was on patients with pre-diabetes conditions. However, we have broadened our focus to include overweight patients saddled with lower back pain and knee pain caused by tissue strain and inactivity. We also decided to launch our platform in Los Angeles instead of New York after Blue Shield of California reimbursed our physical therapy telemedicine. We were poised to launch our business in New York through a partnership with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”), but the partnership did not provide the results we were expecting. Additionally, management determined that relocating the Company’s operations closer to where the CEO and Chairman lived made the business more manageable and avoided time and monies lost due to travel. Management believes that by broadening the Company’s focus to include lower back pain and knee pain caused from excess weight, provides additional opportunities for success. The Company remains committed to servicing patients diagnosed as pre-diabetes as well.

 

As shown in the financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report, the Company has had no revenues to date and has incurred only losses since its inception. The Company has had no operations and has been issued a “going concern” opinion from our accountants, based upon the Company’s reliance upon the sale of our common stock as the sole source of funds for our future operations.

 

The Company’s operations and corporate offices are located at 11825 Major Street Culver City, CA, 90230, with a telephone number of (310) 915-9700.

 

The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31 

 

Plan of Operations

 

During November and December 2014, we conducted a pilot study of our PHZIO.COM platform (the “PHZIO Study”), which included two men and six women aged between 33 and 56 years old over an eight week period; six were based in Los Angeles and two were based in Louisiana. Three of the participants were recruited from Craigslist and the rest were friends or family of the Company’s management team. The goals for each were to gain physical strength, stamina, balance and to lose weight. The study required each participant to attend exercise/therapy sessions three days per week from 6:30 am – 8:30 am during the trial period. Each patient attended every scheduled session and a few lost 15 pounds by the end of the study period; most said they improved their abdominal muscle strength and flexibility. Management believes these results will only improve with a longer therapy regimen period. Management is hopeful that a larger study with more patients over a six month period may produce meaningful data that would increase the likelihood for reimbursement for Medicaid plans.

 

The participants of our PHZIO Study indicated that they would prefer to interact with a physical therapy exercise program provided via telemedicine rather than travel to a facility; the majority agreed (88%) that they would not have travelled to our Culver City facilities to participate in a brick and mortar program and/or their attendance record would have declined. Additionally, all participants stated that they want to continue using the PHZIO.COM platform. They also indicated that having a physical therapist provide exercise instructions via the web was not a barrier to interacting with our PHZIO.COM program.

 

Our initial PHZIO.COM program is focused on patients that have back, hip and or knee pain and are overweight and may be pre-diabetic. Based upon the successful development of our initial PHZIO.COM platform, and with proper funding, we intend on expanding our on-line exercise system to include various other exercise programs including dietary guidance programs, hip replacement, orthopedic exercise programs and osteoporosis exercise programs.

 

We have developed various key performance indicators that we anticipate using to assess our business after operations are launched:

 

Patient Induction Rate. Our DMpt programs are 26 weeks long and start with the induction. Our patient induction rate will provide us a weekly direct understanding of how we are coordinating with the referring doctors and how efficiently we are managing the inductions; it will also give us a foundation for modeling the next six months of revenue.

 

 

Patient Attrition Rate. This indicator may be the single most important indicator of long term business outlook. The long term health of our business is directly linked to the long term health of our patients. If the patient stays with the program and does well, the probability of a health changing lifestyle shift is dramatically increased. When the patient stays with the program the Company’s business is rewarded with additional revenue. Furthermore, the increased success of each patient in our program enhances the insurance provider’s cost/benefits actuarial view of our service and thus motivates a better reimbursement schedule and more patients for us in the long run.

 

New Offices Per Month. This indicator will be useful in determining how fast or slow our distribution system will be growing. It will also provide us a predictive measure for resource requirements that will be emerging over the next six months.

 

Selling General and Administrative Expenses (SGA). Before even launching, we have received a high indication of interest in our service. We think the demand is warranted, but recognize that in the early stages of our services, we may experience bottlenecks in our ability to meet the demand for same. Under this type of environment it is critical to maintain awareness of the Company’s operational budget goals and how they are being met in our attempts to address demand. Regardless of our growth pace, it is critical to shareholder value that we are mindful of our operational spending.

 

Cashflow. Because the Company is “early stage” and launching with a minimum of capital, monitoring cashflow on a constant basis will be essential to growth.

 

We received a total of approximately $483,417 from the Private Placement. Upon receipt of at least $1.2million, the Company’s plans are to pursue the targets set forth below to achieve controlled operational break-even within four months and open up to 24 offices within 12 months after the close of such private financing and healthy profitability and growth thereafter. Specifically, it is our intention to launch our services the first month after funding into two pre-existing physician locations; for each of the 11 months thereafter, we intend to launch into two additional pre-existing physician offices each month, for a total of 24 offices within the first 12 months after receipt of adequate funding. If we do not receive the full $1.2 million, we will scale our plans back accordingly, in accordance with the priorities set forth below. We need at least $400,000 to carry out our 1st objective, make good on some of the outstanding liabilities that are to come due within the next 3-6 months as disclosed herein and become profitable. Until we receive it, the majority of our efforts will be geared towards obtaining sufficient financing to launch and complete our 1st objective.

 

Specifically, other than completing our 1st objective, we anticipate expending an aggregate of approximately $31,000 per month to compensate our executive officers to encourage them to devote more time to our Company, as we will be simultaneously launching and rolling out our operations in light of the received funds. Additionally, in light of its importance to our operations, we plan to pay the remaining $15,000 due on our license agreement with Bistromatics Corp. (See, “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Person”).

 

1^st Objective: Activate the system and begin provisioning. The Company’s first objective is to complete the final activation of our DMpt system and begin provisioning our service to new patients in the Los Angeles metropolitan area.

 

a.

New induction offices per month

 

i. Month 3 – (1) Offices per month

ii. Month 6 – (2) Offices per month

iii. Month 9 – (2) Offices per month

iv. Month 12 – (2) Offices per month

 

b.

New patient inductions per office per month

 

i. Month 3 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

ii. Month 6 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

iii. Month 9 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

iv. Month 12 – (100) New patient inductions per office per month

 

c.

Total new patients per week across all offices

 

i. Month 3 – (100) Weekly new patients

ii. Month 6 – (250) Weekly new patients

iii. Month 9 – (400) Weekly new patients

iv. Month 12 – (621) Weekly new patients

 

 

We estimate that our anticipated launch cash expenditures for the first 90 days will be a total of $382,133 expended on SGA and operations, as detailed in the following chart. However, these expenditure estimates are created using operations modeling and may not accurately reflect the actual cost of launching our service and do not reflect collecting revenue. Furthermore, because our service in not currently operational and has never been deployed as designed, management may encounter expenditures not planed or foreseen and these estimates may be materially different than actual results.

 

Estimated Launch Cash Expenditures (90 Days)

 

Service Activation		Month 1				Month 2				Month 3				3 Month Total
Printing and Reproduction		$	1,300			$	1,300			$	1,300			$	3,900
Tech Info Sys Development			26,400				26,400				8,000				60,800
Video Production			6,251				6,251				6,251				18,753
Web-Site			3,541				3,541				3,541				10,623
		$	37,492			$	37,492			$	19,092			$	94,076
SGA
Fees - Bank		$	-			$	-			$	250			$	250
Executives & Employees			31,000				37,000				41,000				109,000
Equipment Rental			3,715				3,795				3,904				11,414
Factoring			0				3,561				11,781				15,342
Insurance			9,632				10,534				11,136				31,302
Interest			-				-				-				-
Internet Access			500				500				500				1,500
Licenses and Permits			1,200				1,200				1,200				3,600
Marketing, PR, Advertising			20,000				20,000				20,000				60,000
Millennium & Dr Training			5,000				5,000				5,000				15,000
Miscellaneous Expense			400				480				1,260				2,140
Office Expenses			398				420				1,500				2,318
Professional Fees			30,000				20,000				20,000				70,000
Postage and Delivery			167				179				191				537
Rent			-				-				9,825				9,825
Repairs			500				500				500				1,500
Taxes			6,405				7,605				8,405				22,415
Telephone			997				997				997				2,991
Travel & Entertainment			4,980				8,019				10,000				22,999
Utilities			-				-				-				-
		$	114,894			$	119,790			$	147,449			$	382,133

 

Results of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $397,952 compared to $405,289 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 totaled $708,934 compared to $656,038 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses increased for the six month period primarily as a result of an increase in professional fees for consulting services.

 

Interest Expense.

 

Interest expense, including interest expense–related parties, was $36,128 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. Interest expense, including expense-related parties was $53,348 and $792 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The increase was related to costs of convertible debt with unrelated parties.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $434,080 compared to $405,304 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2015, totaled $750,959 compared to $656,823 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in the net loss is a result of increased operating and interest expenses as discussed above.

 

 

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013

 

Revenues

 

eWellness has reported $0 revenues from operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. We anticipate the beginning of revenue generation by the end of the third quarter of 2015.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Total operating expenses increased to $1,325,010 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $466,636 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase is a result of executive compensation and legal and accounting services expenses.

 

Net Loss

 

The Company incurred a net loss of $1,339,585 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with a net loss of $466,636 for the year ended December 31, 2013, which reflects an increase of $872,949. The increase is as a result of executive compensation and legal and accounting services expenses.

 

CONTINGENCIES

 

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

 

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

 

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

 

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

 

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

 

As disclosed in the prior amendments to the Initial Form 8-K, we have filed the prior amendments in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. Although the Company has continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, based upon latest communications with the persons reviewing the Form 8-K, they do not agree with the assessments the Company presented to them. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

 

 

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

 

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Company had $4,604 and $900 cash as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $287,169 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $117,020 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015, was $295,080 compared to $130,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

We had not yet earned any revenues as of the period ending June 30, 2015. Our current cash position is not sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next twelve months including operations and capital expenditures. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

We had assets at June 30, 2015 of $122,062. We will be reliant upon shareholder loans, private placements or public offerings of equity to fund any kind of operations, although there can be no guarantee we will be able to secure such finding on beneficial terms, if at all. We have secured no sources of loans.

 

We believe that anticipated cash flows from operations will be insufficient to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements. We are seeking financing in the form of equity capital in order to provide the necessary working capital. Our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, we may be unable to implement our current plans which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operations.

 

If we are not successful in generating sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising sufficient capital resources, on terms acceptable to us, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations liquidity and financial condition.

 

The independent auditors’ opinion expresses doubt about eWellness’ ability to continue as a going concern. The independent auditors report on eWellness’ December 31, 2014 and 2013 financial statements included in this Registration Statement states that the Company’s recurring losses, lack of revenues and operations and not having any positive operating cash flows since inception, raise substantial doubts about eWellness’ ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

For a discussion of the Company’s changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure, please refer to the information set forth under Item 4.04 in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2015, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

BUSINESS

 

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from in-office visits.

 

The Physical Therapy Telemedicine Space

 

One of the most promising and rapidly developing areas of healthcare and rehabilitation is telemedicine – the use of telecommunication technologies to provide health information, assessment, monitoring, and treatment to individuals with chronic conditions from a distance. Increasingly, insurers, healthcare providers, and technology vendors are using telemedicine solutions and services to make medical intervention both more convenient and accessible to patients to raise the quality of care while reducing costs. (Herrick, 2007).

 

Low back pain is second only to upper respiratory problems as a symptom-related reason for visits to a physician. (Andersson, 1999 Hart LG). By 2023, the estimated cost of chronic conditions including low back pain and diabetes including treatment and lost productivity will swell to $4.2 trillion annually. (Deyo RA, 2001). Home-based telemedicine holds promise as an effective method for providing physical therapy exercise programs to these segments of our populations including people with back, hip and knee pain and for those individuals who may be pre-diabetic and/or are obese.

 

Physical therapy intervention including core muscle strengthening exercise along with lumbar flexibility and gluteus maximus strengthening is an effective rehabilitation technique for all chronic low back pain patients irrespective of different duration (less than one year and more than one year) of their pain. (Kumar T, 2014). It has also been widely proven that strengthening and aerobic exercises are effective at reducing symptoms and preventing knee pain among patients with osteoarthritis and other painful knee conditions. (Senanik P, 2012).

 

Physical therapy intervention is becoming an increasingly accepted mode of intervention delivery and policy recommendations have been made to State Boards of Physical Therapy. (Julian J. 2014). The PHZIO.COM platform complies and exceeds the recommendations for physical therapy intervention delivered via telemedicine.

 

The PHZIO.COM platform eliminates the barrier of transportation, offers participants the flexibility of exercising at their preferred time of day, and does not involve as much energy or time necessary to get to an exercise or fitness facility.

 

Traditionally, physical therapy exercise programs are based upon exercise and education provisioned by physical therapist to patients at a brick and mortar facility using a face-to-face model of care. Over the past three years, we have conceptualized, designed, engineered, tested and deployed our PHZIO.COM platform.

 

Physical Therapy Industry Statistics

 

Below are some statistics we recently gathered regarding the Physical Therapy industry.¹

 

U.S. Current Annual Industry Revenue		$	31 Billion
(IBIS World, 2015)
U.S. Clinics			103,311
(IBIS World, 2015)
U.S. Industry Consolidated Clinics			15	%
U.S. Largest Consolidator Penetration			3	%
U.S. Industry Projected Annual Growth in Demand			7	%
(Harris Williams & Co., 2014)
U.S. Physical Therapy Average Clinic Annual Revenue		$	543,000
(Cafariello, August 5th, 2014)
U.S. Clinic Median Profit			13	%
Larger locations, with an annual income greater than $1 million, generated a significantly higher median profit level (23 percent) than smaller sites (8 percent).
(Charles R. Felder)
U.S. Total Individual Therapist 2012			204,200
U.S. Total Individual Therapist 2022			277,700
(Healthcare Wages)
U.S. Physical Therapist Labor Costs
Median wage for a licensed Physical Therapist
Per hour		$	38.39
Per year		$	79,860
(U.S. Department of Labor)

 

¹Works Cited

Cafariello, J. (August 5th, 2014). Investing in Physical Therapy. Wealth Daily.

Charles R. Felder, P. S. (n.d.). Reality Check. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://physica therapy.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=98030: http://physical-therapy.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=98030

Harris Williams & Co. (2014). PHYSICAL THERAPY MARKET OVERVIEW. Harris Williams LLC.

Healthcare Wages. (n.d.). PHYSICAL THERAPIST SALARY INFORMATION. Retrieved June 11, 2015, from Healthcare Wages : http://www.healthcarewages.org/physical-therapist-salary/

IBIS World. (2015). Physical Therapists Market Research Report | NAICS 62134 | Jun 2015. Physical Therapists in the US: Market Research Report.

U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2014-15 Edition, Physical Therapists. Retrieved June 12, 2015, from Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/physical-therapists.htm

 

PHZIO Platform

 

Our PHZIO.COM 6-month 78 session 40-minute on-line distance monitored telemedicine exercise program is a physician prescribed (insurance reimbursable) physical therapy exercise program designed around an exercise kit that includes: an inflatable exercise ball, latex resistance bands, a yoga mat and stretch strap that provides a comprehensive exercise regimen that minimizes stress on the joints while allowing for hundreds of progressive exercises that focus on strength, balance, cardiovascular conditioning, coordination and flexibility.

 

	●	Our PHZIO.COM platform is an on-line distance monitored telemedicine exercise program with a 6-month duration, wherein seventy-eight (78) individual 40-minute progressive exercise sessions are watched & interacted with by a patient on their laptop computer.
	●	The patients are inducted into the PHZIO.COM program through a physician prescription and physical therapist evaluation. The PHZIO.COM physical therapy program is designed around an exercise kit that includes: an inflatable exercise ball, latex resistance bands, a yoga mat and stretch strap.
	●	The patient follows the PHZIO.COM instructions and performs the specific exercises while being remotely monitored by a physical therapist through the camera located on the laptop computer. The PHZIO.COM program provides a comprehensive exercise regiment that minimizes stress on the joints while allowing for hundreds of progressive exercises that focuses on strength, balance, coordination, and flexibility.
	●	The PHZIO.COM program is designed to be operated in a patient’s home or office in order to increase compliance and eliminate transportation to a fitness center or gym.
	●	Our physical therapists monitor up to 30 patients at a time while these patients are on-line and following along with our PHZIO.COM exercise program. Each patient and physical therapist has real-time text and video conferencing capability when interaction is needed between the patient and our physical therapist.

 

 

When patients are referred to eWellness, a physical therapist and assistant will evaluate patients for the program. The goal is to ensure compliance with the regimen, reduce BMI to a healthy number, help patients lose weight and boost their activity level for the six-month program.

 

Patients can access a series of progressively difficult workouts in 40- to 45-minute videos from home. They use a unique log-in from an application, which will securely store all their data over a six-month period. When patients log on, it triggers a camera in the physical therapists’ remote office.

 

Teams of four physical therapy assistants supervised by a senior physical therapist will monitor patients to ensure compliance. A remote physical therapist watches in real time while the patient is performing the exercises and guides him through his exercise sessions. The therapist provides constant feedback, instruction and motivation and ensures patients are doing the exercises properly and safely. The supervising therapist can speak to the user or communicate through text message.

 

Competition

 

To date, we have not identified any other program that is designed to provide Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Telemedicine Program that has been specifically designed to help prevent pre-diabetic patients from becoming diabetic. Although we compete against typical brick and mortar physical therapy practices, they are limited significantly by the number of patients that can be seen in an 8 hour shift and do not offer any telemedicine products. The national average is approximately 16 patients per day per Physical Therapist (“PT”) or PT assistant (“PTA”). Once we launch our DMpt services, our PTs and PTAs are anticipated to be as high as 137 patients per day. We anticipate being able to deliver up to 850% more patient volume per PT and PTA. Additionally, existing telemedicine physical therapy businesses do create and sell exercise videos, but such business is not insurance reimbursable and there is little patient engagement. (See, Risk Factors, “We operate in a highly competitive industry.”) Accordingly, we believe that we are first-to-market with the innovative service and program we seek to provide.

 

eWellness DMpt Program Cost Savings for the Insurance Industry. Diabetes is not only common and serious; it is also a very costly disease. The cost of treating diabetes is staggering. According to the American Diabetes Association, the annual cost of diabetes in medical expenses and lost productivity rose from $98 billion in 1997 to $132 billion in 2002 and to $174 billion in 2007. New York State Department of health, http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/conditions/diabetes/, Paragraph titled “Diabetes is Serious and Costly”. The American Diabetes Association released new research on March 6, 2013 estimating the total costs of diagnosed diabetes have risen to $245 billion in 2012 from $174 billion in 2007, when the cost was last examined. This figure represents a 41 percent increase over a five year period. American Diabetes Association, http://www.diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/2013/annual-costs-of-diabetes-2013.html. The average yearly health care costs for a person without diabetes is $2,560; for a person with diabetes, that figure soars to $11,744 or an increase of $9,184 per year. New York State Department of health, http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/conditions/diabetes/. Much of the human and financial costs can be avoided with proven diabetes prevention and management steps. Our 6-month DMpt program has a simple goal of preventing pre-diabetics from becoming diabetic. As an example of the magnitude of potential savings, based upon successfully taking 10,000 patients through our program and lowering their BMI and weight and significantly improving their wellness, the cost savings to the insurance industry could be significant. Based on the above statistics, for every 10,000 patients that do not become diabetic, it would create a savings of approximately $2.296 billion over a 25-year period or $91.84 million per year. The program costs to insurers for those 10,000 patients would have otherwise been approximately $17.82 million.

 

The DMpt PZHIO.COM Exercise Program

 

A Monitored In-office & Telemedicine Exercise Program: Our 6-month DMpt exercise program has been designed to provide patients, who are accepted into the program, with traditional one-on-one PT evaluations, re-evaluations (every one to four weeks throughout the DMpt program depending on type of insurance), and at the conclusion of the program a Physical Performance Test. These PTs are known as Induction & Evaluation Physical Therapists (“IEPTs”). All patient medical data, information and records are retained in the files of the IEPT. The IEPT will also evaluate the progress of the patient’s participation in our DMpt program.

 

	●	Physician Diagnosis: Following a physician’s diagnosis of a patient with non-acute back pain, who is also likely overweight and pre-diabetic, a physician may prescribe the patient to participate in the eWellness DMpt exercise program.
	●	Enrollment Process: The accepted patients are assessed by our in-office PTs and PTAs, located at selected company referred physician offices and then enrolled in our DMpt program by going online to our DMpt program virtual private network (“VPN”) and creating a login name and password. The patient will then populate their calendar with planned times when they anticipate exercising. They will also be provided with a free exercise ball, resistance stretch bands, stretch strap and yoga mat at induction.
	●	Exercising Begins: The day after the patient receives the equipment, the patient will log on to our VPN at least 3 times per week, to watch and follow the prescribed 40 minute on-line exercise program. The DMpt platform also allows two-way communication (videoconferencing) with one of our On-line Physical Therapists (“OLPT’s”), who is responsible for monitoring on-line patients. The OLPT’s are also available to answer patient’s questions. When available the patients exercise sessions are recorded and stored in our system as proof that they completed the prescribed exercises. There are 26 various 40-minute exercise videos that are viewed by our patients in successive order.
	●	Open 6am-9am 5 days per week: Our DMpt system has a calendar function so that patients can schedule when they will login to our DMpt system. This calendar enables us to better spread the load of patients participating in any forty-minute on-line exercise program during our 15 hours of weekly operations, 6am through 9am Monday through Friday. Also, if the patient is not on-line at the planned exercise time, our system can send them an automated reminder, via text, voicemail and or e-mail messaging.

 

 

Trackable Physical Therapy. The exercise DMpt prescription and instruction will be delivered with a series of on-line videos easily accessed by each patient on the internet. Each video will be 40 minutes in length with exercises, which will specifically address the common impairments associated with diabetes and/or obesity. Exercise programs will be able to be performed within each patient’s own home or work location without requiring standard gym equipment. Each patient will be required to log in to the system with will monitor performance automatically in order to ensure their compliance. Each patient will be required to follow up with their referring physician and PT at designated intervals and metrics such as blood pressure, blood sugars, BMI, etc. will be recorded to ensure success of the program.

 

Patient Program Goals. On average each patient is targeted to lose 2 pounds per week, totaling up to 48 pounds over the duration of the program to progress toward healthier defined BMI, reduction body fat percentage by at least 8%, reduced reliance on medication for blood glucose regulation and dosage or frequency and a goal of at least a 50% adherence to continuing the DMpt program independently at conclusion of program.

 

Trackable Video Exercise Program. The On-Line DMpt video content will include all aspects of wellness preventative care to ensure the best results: cardiovascular training, resistance training, flexibility, and balance and stabilization; research studies on all such distinct impairments have shown to provide effective treatment results. Each video will integrate each of the four components to guarantee a comprehensive approach to the wellness program, but each video will specifically highlight one of the four components. All of our DMpt video content will be fully mobile application compliant and are also available on all desktops, tablets, PC’s and MAC computers and devices. Multiple DMpt exercise videos will be shot to improve adherence to the program and limit redundancy for the patients. Our plan is to recruit recognizable athletes and celebrities to participate as subjects in the videos to improve interest for the patients and improve compliance.

 

Specific Video Programs. Each patient would receive a prescription for six months (26 week) of physical therapy and exercise that is provided by viewing on-line programs produced by eWellness where the patient can do these exercises and stretching on their own at least 3 days per week for at least 40 minutes. The DMpt videos can be watched on a laptop or desktop computer. In order to view the videos the patient would log onto the eWellness web-site and would be directed to watch the appropriate video in sequence. As the patient is logged-in, eWellness will be able to monitor how often and if the entire video session was viewed. This data would be captured and sent weekly to the prescribing physician and eWellness PT for review. At all times, a licensed OLPT/PTA will have access to each patient utilizing the videos and will be able to communicate with a patient via video-conferencing and/or instant messaging. This will help improve adherence to the program as well as the success and safety of the patients’ treatments. A patient will also be instructed to walk or ride a bike at least 30 minutes three days per week in addition to participating in our program.

 

If the patient is not viewing the videos, then the prescribing physician and/or the eWellness PT would reach out to the patient by telephone and/or e-mail to encourage the patient to keep up their physical fitness regime. After each series the patient returns for an office visit to the prescribing physician for blood tests, blood pressure and a weight management check- up as well as a follow-up visit with the PT for assessment of the patient’s progress toward established goals.

 

Exercise Patient Kits. Each patient will receive a home exercise tool kit, which will include: an inflatable exercise ball, a hand pump, a yoga mat, a yoga strap, and varying levels of resistance bands, free of any additional charges. Each of the DMpt exercise videos will include exercises that incorporate the items in the tool kit. By using a bare minimum of equipment, patients should be able to participate more easily at home or at their workplace. Our estimated cost of the kit is $49, which we pay and factored in to our revenue stream and internal projections.

 

Our Cloud-based DMpt System Design. Our Chief Technology Officer (CTO), Curtis Hollister, is currently a principal shareholder and operator of two video content platform based businesses in Ottawa Canada that have built and own the intellectual property for various global corporate and governmental projects having similar requirements as ours. Not only will Mr. Hollister’s experience stand to significantly shorten our path to service activation of our own program, but his industry contacts will provide immediate access to valuable resources. Because of this access, initially all system maintenance, updates and upgrades of our PHZIO.com platform will be made by Mr. Hollister as our Chief Technology Officer and a readily available team of independent freelance consultants in Ottawa. Additionally, through his ownership in these video content platform businesses, the Company was able to enter into an agreement with one of them to secure the rights to intellectual property completing approximately 80% of the Company’s systems requirements at a total cost of $20,000. The remaining efforts to build-out our cloud-based platform were completed in late October 2014 and were tested on a limited basis during November and December 2014, with a now completed launch on April 29, 2015. Our platform was built based on the Zendesk® highly-scalable customer service application platform. Initially, all system maintenance, updates and upgrades will be made by Mr. Hollister’s team in Ottawa.

 

 

Text based Patient Engagement Protocol & Engagement Tools. We intend on using text based messaging to assist in continuous patient engagement in order to improve on our patient program drop-out rate, which is anticipated to be 50%, spread-out over the 6-month program. eWellness’ Text based Patient Engagement Protocol will initially include:

 

	●	Exercise reminder after 3 minutes past the anticipated start time, if the patient is not logged into our exercise system at the time noted in their patient calendar.
	●	Daily meal suggestions for breakfast, lunch and dinner to be sent out daily at 5:30am, 11:00am and 5:00pm.
	●	Four hours after a patient has watched an exercise video, each will be asked how they feel: more energy, less energy, tired, in pain?
	●	Remind patients on days off days to fit in cardio that day by riding a bike, walking and taking the stairs for at least 30 minutes.
	●	Recommend for the more advanced patients to have them add up to 100 squats per day to their work out. Remind them daily in the morning and then ask them in the afternoon if they did the squats.

 

Follow-on Program. Upon conclusion of the prescribed exercise prescription, each successful patient shall be given the option of continuing to have access to the library of videos for continued independent progression for a nominal fee of $29.95 per year. New video content with exercises specifically designed for the assigned population prescribed and demonstrated by a licensed PT will be filmed to maintain interest in the exercises among the viewing audience.

 

Treatment & Reimbursement Strategy. We have formulated a treatment and reimbursement strategy that eliminates a significant portion of our reimbursement risk associated with billing for telemedicine sessions. After thoroughly reviewing our DMpt program with MHI, it is clear that our initial billing will be highly focused on in-office physical therapy patient visits rather than telemedicine sessions. In fact, we now anticipate that telemedicine visits will only account for a small portion of total billing in year one. We have developed three DMpt Program Reimbursement Plans that allow us to provide our program to all patients that have insurance. Please see, “Insurance/Reimbursement” below.

 

MHI Physican Collaboration Process. We will provide each participating physician with market-value rent for one of their treatment room’s on a monthly basis, to house one of our PTs and PTAs. Our onsite team will induct patients into our program and complete ongoing assessments of patients as they proceed through our 6-month program. Each onsite team consisting of one certified Physical Therapist (PT) and one certified Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) will attend to 21 patients per day between the two of them. Assuming a seven hour work day, that averages to approximately one patient every 40 minutes per certified professional. These patient visits will consist of either first time enrollments or follow-up assessments, which in the general realm of Physical Therapy tasks are considered neither time consuming or intensive.

 

Additionally, each patient who is participating in our DMpt program is required to return to the physical office location at monthly or weekly intervals (depending on the type of health insurance plan), at which time they may also have a follow-up office visit with their physician.

 

Physicians can confidently prescribe the eWellness program to qualified patients and be sure that those patients are receiving the best guidance and support with respect to physical activity and diet in order to reduce their risk factors associated with diabetes and obesity. The remote-based treatments also represent additional opportunities for each patient to perform preventative biometric screening which may have been prescribed by the physician and be reimbursable.

 

The physician will only need to sign a prescription for the physical therapy for qualified patients in order for them to become enrolled into the eWellness DMpt program. The physician is not responsible for any additional paperwork or treatment.

 

On Line Physical Therapy (OLPT). Our PTs will interface with our patients in two settings. One setting is the “in office” enrollment and follow-up visits as previously described and the other setting is the On Line Physical Therapy (OLPT) portion of our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) program. In the OLPT setting, the patient interacts with a certified professional via a mobile device within the patients chosen space time three times per week.

 

 

OLPT Physical Therapy Operational Assumptions. We will begin operations with just a single OLPT PT and expand the OLPT team size to up to 2 PTAs supervised by 1 PT as our patient load grows. Eventually we anticipate that we will grow to 3 OLPT teams with 1 OLPT and 4 PTs. If a patient requests a video conference, that patient is switched over to the OLPT for any answers to questions. The patient will continue to be monitored for the remainder of the session by the OLPT.

 

Based upon discussions with various healthcare professionals, the most active work out times are between 6:00am and 9:00am. We will also know through our calendar what times the patient has selected for his/her the work outs, which will also be a guide to staffing. We will need to try to drive patients into open slots in our OLPT/PTA schedule. Initial service hours will be from 6:00am to 9:00am (3 hours per day), 5-days per week.

 

Insurance/Reimbursement

 

Based on management’s experience and review of insurance literature, they believe that if a provider offers telemedicine reimbursement, such provider will typically reimburse the same number of telemedicine visits as the number of allowable in-office physical therapy visits. Currently, management has successfully received reimbursement by California Blue Shield that allows for reimbursement associated with telemedicine physical therapy and other insurers including Medicare, Medicaid and other private insurers currently will not reimburse for physical therapy via telemedicine. This is why we have created multiple billing plans that may or may not include reimbursement for telemedicine physical therapy. We anticipate negotiating individual reimbursement plans with each insurance company. We also believe that the definition of telemedicine may broaden over the next 1-5 years to include physical therapy. While we believe our management team has a strong grasp of the pulse and trends of the insurance industry, there can be no assurance that management’s industry perceptions are accurate or that there will there will be any changes to insurance reimbursement policy associated with physical therapy telemedicine at any insurance company.

 

For patients whose insurance companies provide little or no reimbursement for Physical Therapy Telemedicine Reimbursement, they will have higher co-payments for our services or be responsible to pay the full cost of such services.

 

Telemedicine Physical Therapy Reimbursement:

 

We believe that by introducing and leveraging telemedicine in certain categories of physical therapy patients, we will create access and convenience to services for the patient and efficiency cost savings, as well as long term patient outcome savings for the insurance provider. We have divided our planned program into 4 different basic billing groups to accommodate reimbursement for our program from a variety of sources typical of our anticipated patient base. We will continue to add billing groups as our patient base evolves and grows. In all four programs remote telemedicine represents at least 75% of the appointments we will be conducting with each patient. Our proposed business operations never include more than 25% in-office appointments for any of the four patient programs. While our proposed operations and delivery of services in all our patient programs is predominantly remote telemedicine and we believe that insurance providers will eventually find telemedicine a rewarding mechanism, our plan does not rely on evolving telemedicine billing codes to sustain our current patient programs. Therefore, early on our sustainability plans are to anticipate that a significant portion of our reimbursement will be generated via the insignificant in-office appointments portion of our operations.

 

Our operations and delivery of services is predominantly remote monitored telemedicine. We anticipate having significant patient data on the value of monitored patients verses non-monitored patients after the initial 6-months of running our DMpt Program and we suspect this data will show that active monitoring significantly improves outcomes. Thus, we believe that private insurers and Medicare/Medicaid will start reimbursing for our telemedicine visits some time in year two, after these results are revealed. Accordingly, in year one, although we will provide our telemedicine services, only a small portion of our gross revenues will be from telemedicine reimbursements; we expect that revenue stream to increase in year two and year three, during which we project the majority of our revenues to come from telemedicine reimbursement. Additional revenue in year 1 will come from patients whose insurance does not cover telemedicine, but who want to be monitored and are willing to pay out of pocket, the $100 monthly fee we charge for a set number of monitored telemedicine sessions; based on our understanding of this industry and the current and anticipated state of medical insurance and reimbursement, we have based our projections on the belief that a small portion of patients whose insurance does not cover telemedicine are willing to pay for it themselves.

 

Five Separate Reimbursement Plans

 

Our program is a combination of therapy for 26 weeks and is designed to guide a patient through active physical retraining. We have divided our program into 4 different basic billing models to accommodate the majority of reimbursability of our anticipated patient base. The following is a further break down of those billing groups by type of appointment and reimbursement:

 

●

Program A (Private Insured) - 6 in-office visits and 24 monitored and 54 un-monitored telemedicine sessions: We anticipate that in year 1, a smaller portion of our patients will have private health insurance that accepts physical therapy telemedicine billing and that our average per patient reimbursement will be approximately $2,935 for the completed six-month DMpt program that includes 6 in-office visits and 24 telemedicine sessions; Program A also includes 54 non-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes. In year 2, we anticipate this insurance covered segment to grow, but by year 3, become a significant portion of our patient load.

 

 

Program A - Private Insured
Total patient appointments			84				100	%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes (30 Appointments Total - 36%)
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)			6				7	%
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions (insurance reimbursed)			24				29	%
Appointments not insurance reimbursed undercurrent codes
Non-monitored remote physical therapy sessions (not reimbursed)			54				64	%

 

●

Program B (Partial Insurance + Self Pay) - 14 in-office visits reimbursed via insurance and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions for $100.00 per month via out-of-pocket: We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a significant portion of our patients will consist of patients with insurance that only reimburses for in-office visits. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this program will be approximately $1,872.25 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 14 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes, but for which the patient can receive for an out of pocket cost of $100.00 per month at their discretion.

 

Program B - Limited or Catastrophic Insured
Total patient appointments			92				100	%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)			14				15	%
Appointments patient pays $100 monthly flat rate
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions			78				85	%

 

●

Program C (Medicare) - 14 in-office visits and 78 un-monitored telemedicine sessions: We anticipate that in year 1, a significant portion of our patients will have Medicare or state insurance that does not initially reimburse for physical therapy telemedicine, but will reimburse for in-office visits. We anticipate that the average per patient reimbursement will be approximately $1,369 for a completed six-month DMpt program that includes 12 in-office patient visits; Program C also includes up to 78 un-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes. In year 2, we anticipate this segment to decline, but still remain significant and become a minor portion of our patient base in year 3.

 

Program C - Medicare Medicaid
Total patient appointments			92				100	%
Appointments reimbursed undercurrent insurance codes
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)			14				15	%
Appointments not reimbursed under current insurance code
Un-monitored remote physical therapy sessions			78				85	%

 

●

Program D (Self-Insured / Self-Pay) - 14 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions for $300.00 per month via out-of-pocket: We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a very small portion of our patients will consist of patients self-insured or self-pay. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this Program will be approximately $2,100 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 14 in-office visits; Program D also includes up to 78 non-monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes.

 

Program D - Non-Insured/Cash Pay
Total patient appointments			92				100	%
Appointments patient pays $300 monthly flat rate (no insurance reimbursement)
In-office enrollments or check-ups (non-reimbursed & covered under flat rate)			14				15	%
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions (non-reimbursed & covered under flat rate)			78				85	%

 

●

Program E (Brick-n-Mortar) - 26 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine sessions. We anticipate that in year 1 through year 3, a significant portion of our patients will consist of patients with insurance that only reimburses for in-office visits. We anticipate that our average per patient reimbursement for patients in this program will be approximately $1,948.33 for a completed 26 week DMpt program that includes 26 in-office visits and up to 78 monitored telemedicine therapy sessions that are not eligible for reimbursement based on existing insurance codes.

 

Program E - Brick-n-Mortar
Total patient appointments			104				100	%
Appointments insurance reimbursed under current codes
In-office enrollments or check-ups (insurance reimbursed)			26				25	%
Appointments patient pays $0
Monitored remote physical therapy sessions			78				75	%

 

 

Non-monitored sessions include watching our on-line exercise classes and receiving engagement communications from our system without direct monitoring; if needed, patients will also be able to log-in and communicate with one of our OLPTs between 6:00am and 9:00pm, 7 days per week.

 

There is virtually no cost to us to send out the digital content that makes up the bulk of the non-monitored sessions. The patient retention data we can discern from this segment provides great value to us because we can provide it to the insurance agencies to demonstrate the benefits of monitoring.

 

Expansion into other markets where telemedicine has high support. On December 20^th 2013, we executed a 25-year licensing agreement with a London, Ontario based telemedicine company Physical Relief Telemedicine Health Care Services (“PRTHCS”), pursuant to which we granted PRTHCS a limited, transferable right to use and promote our DMpt Program within the province of Ontario; additional Canadian territories may be added at the parties mutual discretion. PRTHCS has a known track-record in the telemedicine industry in Canada.

 

They will also pay us a 20% monthly royalty fee on gross billing for services under our DMpt program. PRTHCS also agreed to pay us all costs to setup their own cloud-based system and to film 26 unique English and French speaking versions of our exercise video in Ontario; the estimated costs of these services is estimated at $117,000 (the “Cloud Fee”), which shall be made in three separate payments. However, after meeting with them in February of 2014, it was determined that PRTHCS could deploy our cloud based service in Canada just as it was designed for the U.S. domestic market and therefore, we agreed to waive the Cloud Fee and all parties agreed to move forward accordingly in June 2014.

 

Pursuant to the agreement, we agreed to provide technical support, as needed and issued them a one year limited warranty on our program. The agreement also provides for the parties to indemnify one another against certain program or agreement related losses.

 

The agreement provides a 25 year license, which term shall renew annually thereafter, unless earlier terminated. We may terminate the agreement after a material breach of the agreement by either party, if either party is dissolved for any reason, if PRTHC is restrained from transacting a substantial part of its business for 60 consecutive days due to court, administrative or governmental order, or if either party becomes party to a bankruptcy proceeding or makes an assignment to liquidate all of its assets. PRTHC may terminate the agreement at any time with 30 days notice to the Company, although such termination does not relieve them of all of their payment obligations under the agreement. They have yet to begin marketing our DMpt program.

 

Our Planned Expansion into other States where Telemedicine has high support. The most common path being taken by states is to cover telemedicine services in their Medicaid program. 42 states now provide some form of Medicaid reimbursement for telemedicine services (mostly physician to physician consultations). More importantly 16 states have now expanded their definition of telemedicine to include physical therapy and have also required that state and private insurance plans cover telemedicine services. Those 16 states with the broadest telemedicine policies include: Alaska, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Virginia and Vermont.

 

Company Development Costs. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have spent approximately 14 months developing our unique business model and our design for eWellness’ automated website and systems for the DMpt program. Over the course of the 14-month development phase we expended approximately $780,078 in travel expenses, legal, consulting services and miscellaneous expenses. Additionally, we expended a total of approximately 2,575 professional man-hours between the various management team members that if billed at a rate of $200.00 per hour equates to approximately $515,000 in professional time. Thus, our imbedded development costs have totalled approximately $1,295,078.

 

Market Information

 

Diabetes Statistics. According to the American Diabetes Association (“ADA”), the data from the 2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet (released Jan. 26, 2011) (http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/) the overall prevalence of diabetes includes 25.8 million children and adults in the United States or approximately 8.3% of the population. In 2007, diabetes was listed as the underlying cause on 71,382 deaths and was listed as a contributing factor on an additional 160,022 deaths. This means that diabetes contributed to a total of 231,404 deaths. There were approximately 1.9 million new cases of diabetes diagnosed in people aged 20 years and older in 2010.

 

Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. According to the ADA 2012 Economic Study (http://professional.diabetes.org/News_Display.aspx?TYP=9&CID=91943&loc=ContentPage-statistics) the total estimated costs of diagnosed diabetes have increased 41%, to $245 billion from $174 billion in 2007. Direct medical costs are $176 billion, which includes costs for hospital and emergency care, office visits, and medications. Indirect medical costs total $69 billion, which includes costs for absenteeism, reduced productivity, unemployment caused by diabetes-related disability, and lost productivity due to early mortality. Medical expenditures for people with diabetes are 2.3 times higher than for those without diabetes. More than 1 in 10 health care dollars in the U.S. are spent directly on diabetes and its complications, and more than 1 in 5 health care dollars in the U.S. goes to the care of people with diagnosed diabetes. The absolute cost of hospital inpatient care for people with diabetes has risen from $58 billion in 2007 to $76 billion in 2012. However, hospital inpatient care costs have fallen from 50 percent to 43 percent of total direct medical costs.

 

 

Diabetes Costs in Specific Populations. According to the ADA (http://professional.diabetes.org/News_Display.aspx?TYP=9&CID=91943&loc=ContentPage-statistics), most of the cost for diabetes care in the U.S., 62.4%, is provided by government insurance (including Medicare, Medicaid, and the military). The rest is paid by private insurance (34.4%) or by the uninsured (3.2%). People with diabetes who do not have health insurance have 79% fewer physician office visits and are prescribed 68% fewer medications than people with insurance coverage, but they also have 55% more emergency department visits than people who have insurance. Total per-capita health care expenditures are lower among Hispanics ($5,930) and higher among non-Hispanic blacks ($9,540) than among non-Hispanic whites ($8,101). Non-Hispanic blacks also have 75% more emergency department visits than the population with diabetes as a whole. Total per-capita health expenditures are higher among women than men ($8,331 vs. $7,458). Compared to non-Hispanic whites, per capita hospital inpatient costs are 41.3% higher among non-Hispanic blacks and 25.8% lower among Hispanics. Among states, California has the largest population with diabetes and thus the highest costs, at $27.6 billion. Although Florida’s total population is 4th among states behind California, Texas, and New York, Florida is 2nd in costs at $18.9 billion.

 

Diabetes and Exercise. A recent ADA study indicated that 150 minutes of physical activity a week (30 minutes, five times a week) helped prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. http://www.diabetes.org/are-you-at-risk/lower-your-risk/activity.html Paragraph titled “Aerobic Exercise.” In this study, people also lost 10 to 20 pounds by making changes in their eating habits http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/resources.htm sub section “How does the lifestyle intervention help participants prevent type 2 diabetes?”. The Top10 Benefits of Being Active include http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/fitness/physical-activity-is-important.html:

 

	●	Improved blood glucose management. Activity makes your body more sensitive to the insulin you make and activity also burns glucose (calories). Both actions lower blood glucose.
	●	Lower blood pressure. Activity helps your heart pump stronger and slower.
	●	Improved blood fats. Exercise can raise good cholesterol (HDL) and lower bad cholesterol (LDL) and triglycerides (heart healthy changes).
	●	Reduced insulin or diabetes pills. Activity can lower blood glucose and weight. Both of these may lower the amount of insulin or diabetes pills required.
	●	Weight loss and maintaining loss. Activity burns calories. If you burn enough calories, you’ll trim a few pounds. Stay active and you’ll keep the weight off.
	●	Lower risk for other health problems such as heart attack or stroke, some cancers, and bone loss.
	●	Gain more energy and sleep better.
	●	Reduced stress, anxiety, and depression. Work out or walk off daily stress.
	●	Build stronger bones and muscles. Weight-bearing activities, such as walking, make bones stronger. Strength-training activities makes muscles strong.
	●	Be more flexible. Move easier when you are active.

 

Diabetes, Exercise & The Affordable HealthCare Act. The diabetes and obesity epidemic in America is on the rise and presents the health care community with a unique opportunity to capitalize on wellness and prevention measures to address the large populations requiring intervention. The Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) has a provision requiring insurance companies to cover preventative techniques (http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts/bystate/publichealth/ppht-map.html and http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/index.html). Insurance companies understand that preventative measures for this population is not only an effective but also a cost-efficient approach. One of the most efficacious treatments of Type II diabetes and obesity is a prescribed exercise plan. There is an abundance of controlled studies, which demonstrate the benefits of exercise with this patient population. Unfortunately, health information delivered to the patient alone is not an effective approach for successful outcomes. A guided, monitored exercise protocol that holds patients accountable to their health is the best way to achieve results.

 

Diabetes & Cardiac Physical Therapy. Physical therapists are uniquely trained and experienced in exercise prescription especially with special patient populations such as those with diabetes. The specialty is positioned to be the health care professionals of the future who are responsible for wellness and preventative care in addition to rehabilitation services, which have been historically performed. No other healthcare profession has as much knowledge of proper exercise prescription, biomechanics, posture, and safe execution of occupational and functional tasks as PTs. The diabetic and obese populations have a specific set of complications and considerations with their conditions and PTs are well qualified to deliver education and instruction on effective modes and types of exercise to reduce co-morbidities and improve overall health.

 

 

Initial Program Patient Inclusion Criteria

 

While eWellness hopes to be able to provide assistance to as many people as possible, we do have some requirements for entrance into our program. Each individual must be:

 

	●	Cleared for cardiovascular exercise.
	●	Covered by private health insurance or federal or state insurance and/or pay the partial or full monthly program fee themselves.
	●	Experiencing some level of back pain and be overweight.
	●	Screened and identified as pre-diabetic or early-stage Type II (NIDDM) diabetes.
	●	Capable of accessing a smart phone or computer with internet access.
	●	Experiencing no neuropathy.

 

Insurance Company Partnerships

 

We will also be seeking partnership agreements with various insurance companies that include six of the biggest health insurance companies: WellPoint, CIGNA, Aetna, Humana, United Healthcare and BlueCross BlueShield, although the latter works on a state-by-state basis. The five biggest health insurance companies insure approximately half of the insured population, or well over 100 million people. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not made any agreements with any insurance carriers. Once we commence our DMpt program and generate at least six months of program patient result data, we will approach active and prospective insurance carriers about establishing a tailored reimbursement agreement with us that will cover all of our services, including monitored and non-monitored telemedicine sessions and services.

 

Intellectual Property

 

With adequate funding, we anticipate the development of various Application and Pioneering Methods patent protect and Trademark protection associated with our technology platform and unique physical therapy treatments.

 

On April 30, 2015, we filed for a Utility Patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program.

 

Also on April 4th, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for our Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program. A provisional patent is filed without any formal patent claims, oath or declaration, or any information disclosure or prior art statement. Under United States patent law, a provisional application establishes an early filing date for the related invention, but which does not mature into an issued patent unless the applicant files a regular non-provisional patent application within one year. There is no such thing as a “provisional patent”. A provisional application can establish an early effective filing date in one or more continuing patent applications later claiming the priority date of an invention disclosed in earlier provisional applications by one or more of the same inventors.

 

A “provisional” is automatically abandoned (expires) one year after it is filed. The provisional filing date is not counted as part of the 20-year life of any patent that may issue with a claim to the provisional filing date.

 

A provisional application, as such, is never examined by the USPTO, and therefore can never become a patent. It is also not “published”, but will become a part of any later non-provisional application file that references it, and thus becomes “public” upon issuance of a patent claiming its priority benefit. We anticipate that we can file an application for a patent within the next 10 months. If approved, of which there can be no guarantee, the patent would provide us with certain level of intellectual property rights to our DMpt system.

 

REGULATIONS AND HEALTHCARE REFORM

 

Numerous federal, state and local regulations regulate healthcare services and those who provide them. Some states into which we may expand have laws requiring facilities employing health professionals and providing health-related services to be licensed and, in some cases, to obtain a certificate of need (that is, demonstrating to a state regulatory authority the need for, and financial feasibility of, new facilities or the commencement of new healthcare services). Only one of the states in which we intend to roll out our services requires a certificate of need for the operation of our physical therapy business functions. Our therapists however, are required to be licensed, as determined by the state in which they provide services. Failure to obtain or maintain any required certificates, approvals or licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

State Legislation

 

Insurance reimbursement for our PHZIO.COM services is likely to improve in 2016 and beyond based upon current draft legislation in Congress that seeks to significantly expand Medicare’s reimbursement for telemedicine services including for physical therapy. If passed, this legislation would drive private healthcare insurers to also reimburse for physical therapy associated with telemedicine. Also, in early November 2014, we were advised by the California State Board of Physical Therapy (“CSBPT”) that we could operate our PHZIO.COM platform and bill patients insurance within the Association’s rules in the state of California.

 

Stark Law

 

Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. § 1395nn) (the “Stark Law”) prohibit referrals by a physician of “designated health services” which are payable, in whole or in part, by Medicare or Medicaid, to an entity in which the physician or the physician’s immediate family member has an investment interest or other financial relationship, subject to several exceptions. Unlike the Fraud and Abuse Law, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute. Proof of intent to violate the Stark Law is not required. Physical therapy services are among the “designated health services”. Further, the Stark Law has application to the Company’s management contracts with individual physicians and physician groups, as well as, any other financial relationship between us and referring physicians, including any financial transaction resulting from a clinic acquisition. The Stark Law also prohibits billing for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. Several states have enacted laws similar to the Stark Law. These state laws may cover all (not just Medicare and Medicaid) patients. Many federal healthcare reform proposals in the past few years have attempted to expand the Stark Law to cover all patients as well. As with the Fraud and Abuse Law, we consider the Stark Law in planning our clinics, marketing and other activities, and believe that our operations are in compliance with the Stark Law. If we violate the Stark Law, our financial results and operations could be adversely affected. Penalties for violations include denial of payment for the services, significant civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

 

HIPAA

 

In an effort to further combat healthcare fraud and protect patient confidentially, Congress included several anti-fraud measures in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”). HIPAA created a source of funding for fraud control to coordinate federal, state and local healthcare law enforcement programs, conduct investigations, provide guidance to the healthcare industry concerning fraudulent healthcare practices, and establish a national data bank to receive and report final adverse actions. HIPAA also criminalized certain forms of health fraud against all public and private insurers. Additionally, HIPAA mandates the adoption of standards regarding the exchange of healthcare information in an effort to ensure the privacy and electronic security of patient information and standards relating to the privacy of health information. Sanctions for failing to comply with HIPAA include criminal penalties and civil sanctions. In February of 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) was signed into law. Title XIII of ARRA, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), provided for substantial Medicare and Medicaid incentives for providers to adopt electronic health records (“EHRs”) and grants for the development of health information exchange (“HIE”). Recognizing that HIE and EHR systems will not be implemented unless the public can be assured that the privacy and security of patient information in such systems is protected, HITECH also significantly expanded the scope of the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA. Most notable are the new mandatory breach notification requirements and a heightened enforcement scheme that includes increased penalties, and which now apply to business associates as well as to covered entities. In addition to HIPAA, a number of states have adopted laws and/or regulations applicable in the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information that can be more stringent than comparable provisions under HIPAA.

 

We believe that our future business operations will be fully compliant with applicable standards for privacy and security of protected healthcare information. We cannot predict what negative effect, if any, HIPAA/HITECH or any applicable state law or regulation will have on our business.

 

Other Regulatory Factors

 

Political, economic and regulatory influences are fundamentally changing the healthcare industry in the United States. Congress, state legislatures and the private sector continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems. Based upon newly finalized FDA rules, we believe that our planned DMpt is exempt from Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulation. Yet, in the unlikely event that these rules change in the future, the FDA could then require us to seek 510K approvals for our on-line services that could create delays in provisioning our DMpt services. (See FDA ruling noted below) Also, potential alternative approaches could include mandated basic healthcare benefits, controls on healthcare spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, and price controls. Legislative debate is expected to continue in the future and market forces are expected to demand only modest increases or reduced costs. For instance, managed care entities are demanding lower reimbursement rates from healthcare providers and, in some cases, are requiring or encouraging providers to accept capitated payments that may not allow providers to cover their full costs or realize traditional levels of profitability. We cannot reasonably predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state healthcare reform measures or future private sector reform may have on our business.

 

 

FDA Ruling: Examples of Mobile App’s which it Intends to Exclude from Regulation

 

On September 25, 2013, the FDA issued Finalized Guidance of medical mobile applications (“Apps”). The FDA has issued a ruling on Apps that may meet the definition of a medical device, but they have determined that they will not exercise enforcement on these Apps. The Guidance contains an appendix that provides examples of mobile apps that MAY meet the definition of medical device but for which FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion. These mobile apps may be intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Even though these mobile apps may meet the definition of medical device, the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for these mobile apps because they pose lower risk to the public. The FDA understands that there may be other unique and innovative mobile apps that may not be covered in this list that may also constitute healthcare related mobile apps. This list is not exhaustive; it is only intended to provide clarity and assistance in identifying the mobile apps that will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time. Based on our understanding of the Guidance, although there can be no guarantee, we believe our DMpt services will not be subject to regulatory requirements at this time because such services seem to fall within the statutory examples.

 

Employees. As of the periods ended June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had four employees and various consultants. Our employees are neither represented by a union nor subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our relations with our employees to be favorable. We have entered into certain agreements with our employees regarding their services. We utilize the services of consultants for safety testing, regulatory and legal compliance, and other services.

 

Legal Proceedings. We are not currently a party to any litigation. However, from time to time, we may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against us. Although we have not received notice that any proceeding or enforcement action has been instituted as of the date of this Registration Statement, as further explained elsewhere in this Registration Statement, the final comment received from the SEC regarding the Current Report of Form 8-K that we initially filed on May 6, 2014, was that they were terminating their review of that filing because they continued to have concerns about certain of the issues raised, specifically a Rule 419 violation, that they could not resolve and were going to take further steps they deem appropriate. Please refer to the related discussion in Risk Factors “We may be subject to liability for failure to comply with Rule 419 under the Securities Act” and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Contingencies.”

 

Property

 

Our eWellness Corporate Office is located in Culver City, California. We lease 150 square feet for $500 per month from Evolution Physical Therapy, a company owned by our CEO. (See “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Person” below).

 

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company signed a contract for short term office services with Regus Management Group, LLC, (Regus) in New York City, but never physically occupied the space and the provider cancelled the contract in November 2014. While there was $27,994 of services payments payable to Regus at the period ended December 31, 2014 and the period ended June 30 , 2015, the Company mitigated the liability by introducing an alternate user for the space and ultimately settled the outstanding debt with a payment of $5,500 on April 24, 2015.

 

Our eWellness OLPT Operational Office Space Model calls for approximately 500 square feet of office space with a net per square foot rental price of approximately $1 per square foot per month. Required tenant improvements would be added to the rent. We anticipate a 1-year lease with one 1-year renewal option. These offices were occupied during the period ended December 31, 2014. We have located multiple locations in Los Angeles that meet our criteria, but as of the date of this Registration Statement, have not entered into any lease. All tenant improvements will be part of our monthly lease payment. The anticipated cost for the computers, software packages telephone system, routers, cabling, racking, servers and equipment and supplies is approximately $100,000 to provision services by one PTA on one DMpt platform.

 

Available Information

 

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, in accordance therewith, file reports and other information with the SEC. Our reports and other information filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can also be obtained from the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a Web site that contains reports and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s Web site is http://www.sec.gov.

 

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the common stock offered hereby. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC, this prospectus, which is part of the registration statement, omits certain information, exhibits, schedules and undertakings set forth in the registration statement. Copies of the registration statement and the exhibits are on file with the SEC and may be obtained from the SEC’s Web site or upon payment of the fee prescribed by the SEC, or may be examined, without charge, at the offices of the SEC set forth above. For further information, reference is made to the registration statement and its exhibits. Information located on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into this filing unless this filing specifically indicates otherwise.

 

MANAGEMENT

 

Directors and Executive Officers

 

The following table and text set forth the names and ages of all directors and executive officers as of August 21 , 2015.

 

There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers. Each director is elected at our annual meeting of shareholders and holds office until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until his successor is elected and qualified. Also provided herein are brief descriptions of the business experience of each director, executive officer and advisor during the past five years and an indication of directorships held by each director in other companies subject to the reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws. None of our officers or directors is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us.

 

Name		Age		Position(s)
Darwin Fogt		40		President, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors
David Markowski		54		Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Board of Directors
Douglas MacLellan		59		Chairman and Secretary
Curtis Hollister		41		Chief Technology Officer and Member of the Board of Directors
Douglas Cole		58		Member of the Board of Directors
Brandon Rowberry		40		Member of the Board of Directors
Rochelle Pleskow		50		Member of the Board of Directors

 

Darwin Fogt, President, CEO & Director. Mr. Fogt has been CEO of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. Since 2001, he has been founder, President and practicing therapist of Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc, a privately held company in Los Angeles, CA providing sports and orthopedic physical therapy services. From 2008 to present, Mr. Fogt has also been founder and President of Bebe PT, a physical therapy practice specializing in perinatal rehabilitation and wellness. Additionally, from 2012 to present Mr. Fogt has been founder and President of Evolution Fitness, a primarily cash-based fitness and rehabilitation center serving high level athletes and clients in Culver City, CA. Mr. Fogt has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner’s World, Men’s Health, Men’s Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. Mr. Fogt earned his B.S. in Exercise Science from the University of Southern California in 1996 and his MPT (Master’s of Physical Therapy) from California State University: Long Beach in 2001. He is currently working toward earning his DPT (Doctorate of Physical Therapy) degree.

 

David Markowski, Chief Financial Officer & Director. Mr. Markowski has been CFO of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. From October 1997 to October 2002 he was CEO and Co-Founder of GFNN, Inc. From 2002 to 2013 Mr. Markowski has maintained various active roles within GFNN’s subsidiaries including Founder, Director and CEO positions. From October 2009 to December 2011, he was the Director of Corporate Development for Visualant, Inc. From June 2003 to 2010 he was President of Angel Systems, Inc. an independent consulting firm with competencies in strategic marketing and business development. From January 1998 to October 1998, Mr. Markowski served as the Vice President of Finance for Medcom USA, a NASDAQ listed company. Prior to that, he had a decade of investment banking experience on Wall Street involved in financing start-ups and public offerings. He is a business development specialist with accolades in INC Magazine and others. Mr. Markowski obtained a BA degree in Marketing from Florida State University in 1982.

 

Curtis Hollister, Chief Technology Officer & Director. Mr. Hollister has been a founder and CTO of eWellness since May 2013. From November 2008 to present he has been the founder and President of Social Pixels, a privately held Canadian company focused on helping companies apply online media and digital campaigning. From November 2008 to present he has been the founder and President of Ripplefire, a privately held Canadian company also specializing in the digital campaigning space. He is a global entrepreneur and innovator known for his ability to identify and capitalize on industry trends. His high profile projects include such clients as Government of Canada, AT&T, Bell Canada, Microsoft, Nokia, Conversant IP and TD Bank. From 1998 to 2002 Mr. Hollister founded and operated TeamCast.com, a technology spin-off focusing on peer-to-peer networking. From 1997 to 2002 Mr. Hollister founded and operated Intrasoft Technologies, a technology start-up to capitalize on the emerging Intranet application market. From 1995 to 1997 Mr. Hollister founded and operated Intranet Technologies, the first successful Internet service provider in Ottawa, Canada’s capital city. Mr. Hollister graduated from Center Hastings Secondary in 1991 and from 1991 to 1995 attended Carleton University with a special focus on Economics.

 

 

Douglas MacLellan, Chairman of the Board. Mr. MacLellan currently serves as Chairman of the Board of eWellness Corporation since May 2013. From November 2009 to present Mr. MacLellan has been an independent director of ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNET) a media development, advertising and communications company. From June 2011 to present Mr. MacLellan has been Chairman of Innovare Products, Inc., a privately held company that develops innovative consumer products. In May 2014, Mr. MacLellan join the Board as an independent director of Star Mountain Resources, Inc. (OTCBB: SMRS) an early stage mining company. Until April 2014, Mr. MacLellan was Chairman and chief executive officer at Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (OTCQB: RXPC.PK), a vertically integrated specialty pharmaceutical company. He also continues to serve as president and chief executive officer for the MacLellan Group, an international financial advisory firm since 1992. From August 2005 to May 2009, Mr. MacLellan was co-founder and vice chairman at Ocean Smart, Inc., a Canadian based aquaculture company. From February 2002 to September 2006, Mr. MacLellan served as chairman and cofounder at Broadband Access MarketSpace, Ltd., a China based IT advisory firm, and was also co-founder at Datalex Corp., a software and IT company specializing in mainframe applications, from February 1997 to May 2002. Mr. MacLellan was educated at the University of Southern California in economics and international relations.

 

Douglas Cole, Director. Mr. Cole has been a Director of the company since May 2014. From 2005 to the present Mr. Cole has been a Partner overseeing all ongoing deal activities with Objective Equity LLC, a boutique investment bank focused on the technology, healthcare and mining and mineral sectors. From 2002 to 2005 Mr. Cole has played various executive roles as Executive Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of TWL Corporation (TWLP.OB). From May 2000 to September 2005, he was also the Director of Lair of the Bear, The University of California Family Camp located in Pinecrest, California. During the period between 1991 and 1996 he was the CEO of HealthSoft and he also founded and operated Great Bear Technology,(GBT) which acquired Sony Image Soft and Starpress, then went public and eventually sold to Graphix Zone. In 1995 Mr. Cole was honored by NEA, a leading venture capital firm, as CEO of the year for his work in the Starpress integration. From 1996-199 He was the CEO and Board member of NetAmerica.com (NAMI) 1996-1999. He has also served on various public boards including Longwei Petroleum ( LPH)  2011-Feb 2013, Advanced Therapeutics (AVTH) Dec 2013- January 2104 and China Chemical. (CHCC), 2011-2012.

 

Brandon Rowberry, Director. Mr Rowberry has been a Director since June 2014. He is a well-known healthcare innovation executive. From 2010 to 2014 he drove enterprise-wide Innovation/Venturing for United Health Group where in 2012 they were awarded the prestigious PDMA Outstanding Corporate Innovation Award. From 2012 to present he has also been Managing Director of 7R Ventures an investment and advisory firm. From 2005 to 2009, he was Director of Strategy & Innovation at Circuit City. From 2001 to 2005, he was a Sr. Corporate Consultant focusing on Organizational Development and Innovation at Hallmark. From 2000 to 2001, he was a Manager of Organizational Development & Innovation at Honeywell. Mr. Rowberry has also been a frequent corporate innovation guest speaker on NBC, FOX, ABC. Mr. Rowberry obtained his Masters of Organizational Behavior from Marriott School, BYU in 2000.

 

Rochelle Pleskow, Director. From 2010 through 2014, she has served as the Chief Healthcare Information Officer for Hewlett Packard. She developed the framework of healthcare analytics platform, which encompasses quality improvement, outcomes analysis, patient safety, operational analytics, clinical informatics, physician performance, and regulatory compliance monitoring for health plans, hospitals and physicians. From 2008 through 2010, she acted as a senior consultant to various companies on healthcare policy and procedures including acting as an advisor for ASP model start-up, whose business included a HIPAA/HL7 and PCI compliant processing tool, which verifies a patient’s insurance coverage, accurately calculates out-of-pocket costs, and processes payments in one system and at the time of service. This model improves revenue cycle management as it accelerates the collection of patient payments. From 2007 through 2008, she was Director of business Architecture for Blue Shield of California, where she developed the business framework and core elements of a large scale IT systems implementation to increase competitive advantage for Blue Shield of California. Re-engineered core business processes in Health Services Division in order to modernize the technology. Ms. Pleskow received her B.A. and M.S. from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

 

Director Qualifications

 

We seek directors with established strong professional reputations and experience in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our businesses. We also seek directors who possess the qualities of integrity and candor, who have strong analytical skills and who are willing to engage management and each other in a constructive and collaborative fashion, in addition to the ability and commitment to devote time and energy to service on the Board and its committees, as necessary. We believe that all of our directors meet the foregoing qualifications.

 

The Board believes that the leadership skills and other experience of the Board members described below, in addition to each person’s experience set forth above in their respective biographies, provide the Company with a range of perspectives and judgment necessary to guide our strategies and monitor our executives business execution.

 

Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving as a physical therapist for over 12 years and has built three successful physical therapy practices. Mr. Fogt has contributed to the Board’s strong leadership and vision for the development of the Company’s innovative business model.

 

Douglas MacLellan. Mr. MacLellan is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving as an officer and/or director of various advance technology and high growth companies over the past 20 years. Mr. MacLellan has contributed to the Board’s strong leadership and vision for the development of the Company’s innovative business model.

 

Curtis Hollister. Mr. Hollister is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving in senior management positions in various advance technology, software and video content business over the past 20 years. He holds a wealth of experience in software development, video content management and network technology.

 

David Markowski. Mr. Markowski is a co-founder of the Company and has been serving in senior management positions in various companies over the past 20 years, with an emphasis on corporate finance, accounting, audit, financial modeling and marketing. He holds a wealth of experience in company management skills.

 

 

Doug Cole. Mr. Cole is an international business executive with over 20 years of active management and board roles in various software, educational and technology public and private companies.

 

Brandon Rowberry. Mr. Rowberry holds over 15 years in senior management positions as an innovation expert in various advance technology and healthcare industries. He is anticipated to greatly expand our industry relationships within healthcare insurers and the telemedicine industry.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, none of the following events occurred during the past ten years that are material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our executive officers, directors or promoters:

 

(1) A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

 

(2) Convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

 

(3) Subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

 

(i) Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

 

(ii) Engaging in any type of business practice; or

 

(iii) Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

 

(4) Subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (3)(i) above, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

 

(5) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

 

(6) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

 

(7) Subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

 

(i) Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

 

(ii) Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

 

(iii) Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

 

(8) Subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

 

 

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

 

In light of the efforts and services they provided to the Private Co. prior to the Share Exchange, we believe that Douglas MacLellan and Darwin Fogt may be deemed “promoters” (within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act), since they took the initiative in the formation of our business and received 10% of our equity securities in exchange for the contribution of property or services, during the last five years. In addition, Gregg C. E. Johnson may be deemed a “promoter” of the Company as a result of his receipt of shares of our common stock at the time of completion of the Share Exchange.

 

Executive Compensation

 

For the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we did not pay any compensation to our executive officers, nor did any other person receive a total annual salary and bonus exceeding $100,000. Prior to the Share Exchange, which closed in April 2014, we did not pay our sole officer any compensation nor did we have an employment agreement.

 

Following the Share Exchange, we do not currently have any formal employment salary arrangement with any of or new officers. However, the Board determined that the following salaries shall be recorded and accrued on a monthly basis as contributed capital and compensation for the following individuals for the services they provide to us:

 

After 1-1-14,but before profitability

 

Monthly		Recognized				Contributed				Compensated
Douglas MacLellan, Chairman		$	20,000			$	11,000			$	9,000
Darwin Fogt, CEO/President		$	14,000			$	7,000			$	7,000
David Markowski, CFO		$	14,000			$	7,000			$	7,000
Curtis Hollister, CTO		$	14,000			$	7,000			$	7,000

 

At profitability and after

 

Monthly		Recognized				Contributed				Compensated
Douglas MacLellan, Chairman		$	20,000			$	0			$	20,000
Darwin Fogt, CEO/President		$	14,000			$	0			$	14,000
David Markowski, CFO		$	14,000			$	0			$	14,000
Curtis Hollister, CTO		$	14,000			$	0			$	14,000

 

All of our current officers have agreed to defer their compensation until such time as we are cash flow positive; therefore, none of our officers have received any compensation as of the date of this Registration Statement. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company for the benefit of the Company’s employees.

 

Director’s Compensation

 

We shall continue to maintain the policy regarding director compensation that existed prior to the Share Exchange, pursuant to which directors are not entitled to receive compensation for service rendered to us or for meeting(s) attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. There are no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate employee directors for service provided as a director; however, compensation for new non-employee directors is determined on an ad hoc basis by the existing members of the board of directors at the time a director is elected.

 

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to the Company’s Risk Management

 

We believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Employment Contracts

 

We do not have any formal employment agreement with any of our current Officers. Any future compensation will be determined by the Board of Directors, and, as appropriate, an employment agreement will be executed. We do not currently have plans to pay any compensation until such time as the Company maintains a positive cash flow.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards

 

There were no equity awards outstanding as of the end of the six month period ending June 30, 2015 or the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

On July 31, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan. The following is a brief description of certain important features of the 2015 Plan, the full text of which is attached as Exhibit 10.7. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit 10.7.

 

General. The 2015 Plan provides for any option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance award, dividend equivalent, or other stock-based award to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company and its affiliates.

 

Administration. The 2015 Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Board of Directors or by a Committee appointed by the Board of Directors. If the Board of Directors administers the 2015 Plan, references to the “Committee” shall be deemed to refer to the Board of Directors. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may at any time delegate to one or more officers or directors of the Company some or all of its authority over the administration of the 2015 plan. Such delegation may be revoked at any time.

 

 

The Committee has the authority to administer and interpret the 2010 Plan, to determine the employees to whom awards will be made under the 2015 Plan and, subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, the type and size of each award, the terms and conditions for vesting, cancellation and forfeiture of awards and the other features applicable to each award or type of award. The Committee may accelerate or defer the vesting or payment of awards, cancel or modify outstanding awards, waive any conditions or restrictions imposed with respect to awards of the stock issued pursuant to awards and make any and all other determinations that it deems appropriate with respect to the administration of the 2015 Plan, subject to the minimum vesting requirements of the 2015 Plan, the provisions of Sections 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and any applicable laws or exchange rules.

 

Eligibility. All employees, officers, directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Plan. The definition of “employee” means any person including officers and directors of the Company or a parent or subsidiary of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company. Participation is discretionary — awards are subject to approval by the Committee. Pursuant to the 2015 Plan, the Company is permitted to grant nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock units and other stock based awards to the employees, directors and consultants. Incentive stock options are not issuable under the 2015 Plan.

 

Shares Subject to the Plan. The number of Shares available for granting awards under the 2015 Plan shall be (A) 3,000,000, plus (B) additional Shares as follows: As of January 1 of each year, commencing with the January 2, 2016, the aggregate number of Shares available for granting Awards under the Plan shall automatically increase by a number of Shares equal to the lesser of (x) 2% of the total number of Shares then outstanding and (y) such lower number of Shares as may be determined by the Committee, subject to certain adjustment. Shares of Company common stock issued in connection with awards under the 2015 Plan may be shares that are authorized but unissued, or previously issued shares that have been reacquired, or both.

 

Types of Awards. The following types of awards may be made under the 2015 Plan. All of the awards described below are subject to the conditions, limitations, restrictions, vesting and forfeiture provisions determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, subject to such limitations as are provided in the plan. The number of shares subject to any award is also determined by the Committee, in its discretion.

 

Fair Market Value. Fair Market Value means shall mean, with respect to any property (including, without limitation, any shares or other securities), the fair market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Board or the Committee.

 

Option. Option shall mean a non-qualified stock option.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan shall confer on the holder thereof a right to receive, upon exercise thereof, the excess of (1) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise or, if the Board or the Committee shall so determine in the case of any such right other than one related to any Incentive Stock Option, at any time during a specified period before or after the date of exercise over (2) the grant price of the right as specified by the Board or the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the grant price, term, methods of exercise, methods of settlement, and any other terms and conditions of any Stock Appreciation Right shall be as determined by the Board or the Committee. The Board and the Committee may impose such conditions or restrictions on the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Right as it may deem appropriate.

 

Restricted Stock. A restricted stock award is an award of outstanding shares of Company common stock that does not vest until after a specified period of time, or satisfaction of other vesting conditions as determined by the Committee, and which may be forfeited if conditions to vesting are not met. Participants generally receive dividend payments on the shares subject to their award during the vesting period (unless the awards are subject to performance-vesting criteria) and are also generally entitled to indicate a voting preference with respect to the shares underlying their awards. All shares underlying outstanding restricted stock awards are voted proportionately to the restricted shares for which voting instructions are received.

 

Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units shall consist of a Restricted Stock, Performance Share or Performance Unit Award that the Administrator in its sole discretion permits to be paid out in installments or on a deferred basis, in accordance with rules and procedures established by the Administrator.

 

Performance Awards. Performance Awards may be granted to Employees, directors and consultants at any time and from time to time, as will be determined by the Administrator. The Administrator may set performance objectives based upon the achievement of Company-wide, divisional or individual goals, applicable federal or state laws, or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its discretion.

 

Dividend Equivalents. The Board and the Committee are hereby authorized to grant Awards under which the holders thereof shall be entitled to receive payments equivalent to dividends or interest with respect to a number of Shares determined by the Board or the Committee, and the Board and the Committee may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or otherwise reinvested. Subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, such Awards may have such terms and conditions as the Board or the Committee shall determine.

 

Other Stock-based Awards. The Board and the Committee are authorized to grant such other Awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares (including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares), as are deemed by the Board or the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan, provided, however, that such grants must comply with applicable law. Subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, the Board or the Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards.

 

Duration. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan, including, without limitation, any amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation, or termination that would impair the rights of any Participant, or any other holder or beneficiary of any Award theretofore granted, without the consent of any share owner, participant of the 2015 Plan, other holder or beneficiary of an Award, or other Person. No Award shall be granted under the Plan more than 10 years after August 1, 2015. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Board and the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any conditions or rights under any such Award, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond such date.

 

As of August 21, 2015, we have agreed to issue 350,000 options under the 2015 Plan.

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of August 21 , 2015 by (i) each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is known by us to own more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each director, executive officer and director nominee, and (iii) all of our directors, executive officers and director nominees as a group.

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of the respective table. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of the respective table is deemed to be outstanding for such person, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

 

The business address of each beneficial owner listed is in care of 11825 Major Street, Culver City, California, 90230 unless otherwise noted. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent that power may be shared with a spouse.

 

As of August 21 , 2015, we had 17,131,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

 

Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, our former sole director and CEO, Mr. McRobbie-Johnson, agreed to cancel 5,000,000 shares of common stock that he owned and to transfer an aggregate of 4,600,000 shares of our common stock that he owned. Accordingly, after the Share Exchange, Mr. McRobbie-Johnson owns 400,000 of common stock shares, or approximately 2.6%, of our issued and outstanding common stock.

 

Pursuant to our Supply and Distribution Agreement with Millennium Healthcare, Inc., we shall issue them 110,000 shares of our common stock, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares, for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received by us from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing). As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not issued MHI any shares and such shares shall not be included in the number of our outstanding shares of common stock until they are issued, if ever; however, if all 1.1million shares were issued today, MHI would own approximately 7.2% of our outstanding common stock.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent of Class
Darwin Fogt			3,750,000	(1)			21.9	%
David Markowski			1,100,000				6.4	%
Douglas MacLellan			3,750,000				21.9	%
Curtis Hollister			1,950,000				11.4	%
Douglas Cole			200,000				1.2	%
Brandon Rowberry			200,000				1.2	%
Rochelle Pleskow			250,000	(2)			1.5	%
All officers and directors as a group (7 persons)			11,200,000				65.4	%
J.F.S. Investments, Inc. (3)			950,000				5.5	%
Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc. (4)			1,000,000	(1)			5.8	%
Gregg C.E. Johnson (5)			1,545,669	(6)			9.0	%

 

	(1)	This includes 1,000,000 shares held by Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc., which is owned by Mr. Fogt.
	(2)	This includes 250,000 5-year stock options at a price of $0.80 per share.
	(3)	Joseph Salvani is the President and the sole indirect owner of, and controls, J.F.S. Investments, Inc.
	(4)	Darwin Fogt is the President and the sole indirect owner of, and controls, Evolution Physical Therapy, Inc.
	(5)	The mailing address for Gregg C.E. Johnson is 6081 W. Park Ave, Chandler, AZ 85226.
	(6)	This amount includes: (i) 1,240,669 shares held by Summit Capital USA, Inc. (“Summit USA”), which is beneficially owned by Mr. Johnson, who has voting and dispositive control over the securities held by Summit USA and (ii) 305,000 shares Mr. Johnson owns directly. Mr. Johnson disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stock owned by Summit USA, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such company.

 

 

Changes in Control

 

As a result of the Share Exchange, eWellness became our wholly owned subsidiary and the officers and directors appointed as of the closing of such transaction own approximately 66.7% of the shares of the Company outstanding post-exchange common stock. As a result, the newly appointed board members control the board.

 

Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters And Certain Control Persons

 

Other than the relationships and transactions discussed below, we are not a party to, nor are we proposed to be a party, to any transaction during the last fiscal year involving an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which a related person, as such term is defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

 

Related Party Debt: Prior to the closing of the Share Exchange through the year ended December 31, 2014, a related party, a company in which our former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO also served as CFO, paid $67,710 on behalf of the Company. The amount outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $56,155 and $40,893, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $3,867 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party. At the period ended June 30 , 2015, the amount outstanding was $45,336 and the Company recorded $1,976 of imputed interest on that outstanding amount. The debt remains a Company liability, which is to be repaid when the Company has sufficient capital to do so and there is no specific time frame within which such repayment must be made.

 

Share Transfers: Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, Mr. McRobbie (our former CEO and sole director) transferred an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares to the following parties: 1,500,000 to Summit Capital USA, Inc. (“Summit”), over which our former CFO serves as CFO; 300,000 to an unrelated third party; and, 300,000 to Gregg Johnson, who, together with his wife beneficially owns Summit Capital Corp., which is a 50% owner of Summit; all of these shares were issued as compensation for a variety of business consulting services each such named party performed on behalf of the Company pursuant to oral agreements between each party and Mr. McRobbie. The services provided included identifying, evaluating, structuring and providing advice in connection with potential acquisitions, mergers or combinations with potential acquisitions, performance of due diligence, coordination of accounting and legal due diligence, familiarization with the business, operations, properties, financial condition, management and prospects of potential target companies and the coordination of the preparation of all required documentation to complete the acquisition and the filing of all required public disclosures to complete such transaction. These services also included the evaluation of several different business opportunities, including the transaction with eWellness Corporation that was ultimately consummated. Based on the oral agreements with Mr. McRobbie, the fee for these services was earned and due upon the closing of the Share Exchange. The transfer of the 2,100,000 shares was a private transaction between the named individuals and was not a Company issuance.

 

MHI Agreement: On May 24, 2013, eWellness entered into an exclusive 25-year Supply and Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”) for the following 14 states that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Under the agreement, eWellness agrees to provide its eWellness Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to MHI affiliated physicians within the terms of the Agreement. MHI agreed to market the eWellness DMpt and agreed to use its best efforts to promote and use the DMpt program; MHI also agreed to assist in managing the insurance reimbursement to eWellness for PT evaluations, re-evaluations and physical tests that eWellness staff perform at selected MHI facilities; however, we will be responsible for seeking reimbursement opportunities from insurance providers who do not currently reimburse for our telemedicine services. MHI, through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, provide primary care physician practices, physician groups and healthcare facilities of all sizes with cutting edge medical devices focused primarily on preventive care through early detection. MHI currently provides their services to 70 medical group offices in NYC and approximately 130 in Northern New Jersey. There are approximately 400 individual physicians in these various practices. Approximately 20 percent of those patient visits are reoccurring visits.

 

MHI will charge eWellness a 20% billing fee on all insurance reimbursement or patient fees for marketing the DMpt Program and assisting in the processing of insurance reimbursement. We have also agreed that for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing), we will issue 110,000 shares of our common stock to MHI, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not issued any shares to MHI under this Agreement because we have not yet required or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor has MHI marketed our services.

 

Each party has the right to terminate the agreement upon breach of the Agreement or dissolution of either party. We may also terminate the Agreement if MHI is, for a period of 60 continuous days, restrained or prevented from transacting a substantial part of their business by reason of a judgment order or regulation of any court or authority; MHI may terminate the Agreement at any time with 30 days written notice. The parties may also terminate the Agreement if either becomes the subject to any bankruptcy or similar proceeding. The Agreement also includes standard indemnification provisions for both parties.

 

 

Programming Agreement: On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors, Curtis Hollister, is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000; $2,000 of which was due upon execution, $5,000 of which is due on August 1, 2014 and the $13,000 balance is due by September 15, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the $20,000 license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; Mr. Hollister purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

 

Operating Agreement: On April 1, 2015, we entered into an Operating Agreement with EPT (a company owned by our CEO), wherein we agreed that EPT would be able to operate our telemedicine platform www.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. We shall receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. We will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the start of patient induction.

 

Office Space: The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy (“Evolution”), a company owned by our CEO. Evolution has agreed to contribute the annual rent for the period ended June 30 , 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 towards founding eWellness and its operations; the market value of such rent is $500 per month. During the period and year ended, the Company recorded rent expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

 

Research and Development: The officers of the Company from time to time charge the Company for research and development services. During the six months ended June 30 , 2015 and June 30 , 2014 the expenses for these services were $0 and $30, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the expenses for these services were $30 and $2,706, respectively.

 

Review, Approval and Ratification of Related Party Transactions

 

Our Board of Directors conducts an appropriate review of and oversees all related-party transactions. We have not yet adopted formal standards in respect of the review and approval or ratification of related-party transactions; however, our board has conformed to the following standards: (i) all related-party transactions must be fair and reasonable to us and on terms comparable to those reasonably expected to be agreed to with independent third parties for the same goods and/or services at the time authorized by the board; and (ii) all related-party transactions must be authorized, approved or ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors who have no interest, either directly or indirectly, in any such related party transaction.

 

Corporate Governance and Director Independence

 

Presently, we are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system and therefore are not required to comply with the director independence requirements of any securities exchange. In determining whether our directors are independent, however, we intend to comply with the rules of NASDAQ. The board of directors will also consult with counsel to ensure that the boards of director’s determinations are consistent with those rules and all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors, including those adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with respect to the independence of audit committee members. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2)defines an “independent director” generally as a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our Board of Directors has determined that Douglas Cole Brandon Rowberry and Rochelle Pleskow would qualify as “independent” as that term is defined by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). Further, Mr. Cole qualifies as “independent” under Nasdaq Listing Rules applicable to board committees.

 

Due to our lack of operations and size prior to the Share Exchange, we did not have an Audit Committee. For these same reasons, we did not have any other separate committees prior to the Share Exchange; all functions of a nominating committee, audit committee and compensation committee were performed by our sole director. Although, as stated above, we are not the subject of any listing requirements, in connection with the Share Exchange, our Board of Directors established several committees to assist it in carrying out its duties. In particular, committees shall work on key issues in greater detail than would be practical at a meeting of all the members of the Board of Directors; each committee reviews the results of its deliberations with the full Board of Directors

 

The standing committees of the Board of Directors currently consist of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Current copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, may be found on our website at www.ewellnesshealth.com, under the heading “Corporate Information—Governance Documents.” Printed versions also are available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to our corporate Secretary at our corporate address. Our Board of Directors may, from time to time, establish certain other committees to facilitate our management.

 

The Board will consider appointing members to each of the Committees at such time as a sufficient number of independent directors are appointed to the Board or as otherwise determined by the Board. Until such time, the full board of directors will undertake the duties of the audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee.

 

A copy of our Code of Ethics is attached as Exhibit 14.1 which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

 

Other than as described below, none of the Selling Stockholders nor any of their affiliates has held any position or office with, been employed by or otherwise has had any material relationship with us or our affiliates during the three years prior to the date of this prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated below, none of the Selling Stockholders are broker-dealers or affiliates of a broker-dealer within the meaning of Section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act.

 

This prospectus relates to the offering and sale, from time to time, of up to 1,300,281 shares of our common stock held by the stockholders named in the table below.

 

The table below lists the selling stockholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder) of our common stock with respect to the securities held by each of the selling stockholders. The second column lists the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each of the selling stockholders as of August 21 , 2015, including assuming exercise of the Notes and Warrants held by each such selling stockholder on that date but taking account of any limitations on exercise set forth therein.

 

The third column lists the shares of common stock underlying the Notes and Warrants being offered by this prospectus by the selling stockholders and does not take into account any limitations on conversion or exercise of the Notes or Warrants, respectively set forth therein.

 

The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus.

 

Under the terms of the Warrants, a selling stockholder may not exercise the warrants to the extent (but only to the extent) such selling stockholder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own a number of shares of our common stock which would exceed 4.99%. The number of shares in the second column reflects these limitations and other limitations on conversion and exercise of other convertible and exercisable instruments of the company held by each selling stockholder. The selling stockholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

We estimate that our costs and expenses of registering the shares listed herein for resale will be approximately $4,901.82.

 

Name of Selling Stockholder		Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned Prior to Offering				Maximum Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Sold Pursuant to this Prospectus				Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned After Offering
Rodney Ryan Schoemann Jr. Inter Vivos Trust of 1998*			818,098(1)+				210,858(2)				607,240
Rodney R. Schoemann			1,250,000 (3)				265,100 (4)				984,900
Thomas Madden*			186,686+ +				77,329				109,357
Mikhael Rogol*			17,143++				7,101				10,042
Marquis Healthcare*			397,143++				164,505				232,638
Donald Ulferts*			142,857++				59,174				83,683
Len Chanasyk*			200,000++				82,844				117,156
Christopher Bailey*			14,286++				5,918				8,368
Victoria Lundell*			11,429++				4,734				6,695
Theodore Aspergren*			142,857++				59,174				83,683
Ed Umlauf*			300,000++				124,266				175,734
Parallax Group*			23,429++				9,705				13,724
Kristina Schoemann*			908,458(5)+				229,573(6)				678,885

 

 

Except as otherwise indicated above or in the footnotes to the table, the selling stockholders have not held any position or office or had any material relationship with us or any of our subsidiaries within the past three years and possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.

 

* This person received shares from the Private Placement and the number of shares of Common Stock to be sold pursuant to this Prospectus includes an equal amount of shares underlying such persons Note and Warrant received pursuant thereto, unless otherwise noted in the footnotes below.

 

+  Represents the shares underlying all of the Notes and Warrants such person received pursuant to the Private Placement and other shares held by such person; however, due to the application of Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we are unable to register all of these shares at this time.

 

++ Represents the shares underlying all of the Notes and Warrants such person received pursuant to the Private Placement; however, due to the application of Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we are unable to register all of these shares at this time.

 

	(1)	Includes: 200,000 shares received from another shareholder and an aggregate of 618,098 shares underlying the securities issued in the Private Placement.
	(2)	Includes: 82,844 shares received from another shareholder and 128,014 shares underlying the Notes issued in the Private Placement.
	(3)	Includes: 150,000 shares from the 419 Transaction; 400,000 shares issued pursuant to the Consulting Agreement dated April 21, 2014; 400,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0.35 per share, issued pursuant to the extension of a Consulting Agreement; 150,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0.35 per share, issued pursuant to a short term loan provided by this shareholder; and 150,000 shares underlying warrants, exercisable at $0. 80 per share, issued pursuant to a short term loan provided by this shareholder.
	(4)	These are shares issued pursuant to Mr. Schoemann’s Consulting Agreement dated April 21, 2014.
	(5)	Includes: 200,000 shares received from another shareholder and an aggregate of 708,458 shares underlying the securities issued in the Private Placement.
	(6)	Includes: 82,844 shares received from another shareholder and 146,729 shares underlying the Notes issued in the Private Placement.

 

 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

 

We are registering 1,300,281 shares under the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Pursuant to Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the 1,300,281 shares being offered for sale by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus represents less than one-third of the estimated 5,471,000 shares of common stock we believe will be outstanding and held by non-affiliates as at the date of this prospectus and which we reasonably expect will be offered and sold within two years from the date of this prospectus. In the event that less than 5,471,000 shares our issued and outstanding on the date of this prospectus, we will proportionally reduce the 1,300,281 shares to which this prospectus relates to an amount equal to one-third of such issued and outstanding shares. We have also agreed with the holders of the registered shares to register for resale in future registration statements additional shares of their common stock underlying the Notes and Warrants, to the maximum extent permitted by Rule 415 and the SEC, and at such time as the 1,300,281 shares to which this prospectus relates have been sold.

 

We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of common stock.

 

The selling security holders and any of their pledgees, donees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock being offered under this prospectus on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which shares of our common stock are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling security holders may use any one or more of the following methods when disposing of shares:

 

	●	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
	●	block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
	●	purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resales by the broker-dealer for its account;
	●	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
	●	privately negotiated transactions;
	●	to cover short sales made after the date that the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the Commission;
	●	broker-dealers may agree with the selling security holders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
	●	a combination of any of these methods of sale; and
	●	any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

 

The shares may also be sold under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus. The selling security holders have the sole and absolute discretion not to accept any purchase offer or make any sale of shares if they deem the purchase price to be unsatisfactory at any particular time.

 

The selling security holders may pledge their shares to their brokers under the margin provisions of customer agreements. If a selling security holder defaults on a margin loan, the broker may, from time to time, offer and sell the pledged shares.

 

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling security holders may arrange for other broker-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling security holders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, which commissions as to a particular broker or dealer may be in excess of customary commissions to the extent permitted by applicable law.

 

If sales of shares offered under this prospectus are made to broker-dealers as principals, we would be required to file a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. In the post-effective amendment, we would be required to disclose the names of any participating broker-dealers and the compensation arrangements relating to such sales.

 

The selling security holders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares offered under this prospectus may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with these sales. Commissions received by these broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Any broker-dealers or agents that are deemed to be underwriters may not sell shares offered under this prospectus unless and until we set forth the names of the underwriters and the material details of their underwriting arrangements in a supplement to this prospectus or, if required, in a replacement prospectus included in a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

 

The selling security holders and any other persons participating in the sale or distribution of the shares offered under this prospectus will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations under that act, including Regulation M. These provisions may restrict activities of, and limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares by, the selling security holders or any other person. Furthermore, under Regulation M, persons engaged in a distribution of securities are prohibited from simultaneously engaging in market making and other activities with respect to those securities for a specified period of time prior to the commencement of such distributions, subject to specified exceptions or exemptions. All of these limitations may affect the marketability of the shares.

 

 

If any of the shares of common stock offered for sale pursuant to this prospectus are transferred other than pursuant to a sale under this prospectus, then subsequent holders could not use this prospectus until a post-effective amendment or prospectus supplement is filed, naming such holders. We offer no assurance as to whether any of the selling security holders will sell all or any portion of the shares offered under this prospectus.

 

We have agreed to pay all fees and expenses we incur incident to the registration of the shares being offered under this prospectus. However, each selling security holder and purchaser is responsible for paying any discounts, commissions and similar selling expenses they incur.

 

We and the selling security holders have agreed to indemnify one another against certain losses, damages and liabilities arising in connection with this prospectus, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

 

Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

 

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

 

Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

 

Common Stock

 

As of August 21 , 2015, our authorized capital consists of 100,000,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. As of August 21, 2015, there were 17,131,000 shares of our common stock outstanding and 0 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.

 

The holders of the Company’s common stock:

 

1. Have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors;

 

2. Are entitled to share ratably in all of assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of corporate affairs;

 

3. Do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights; and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and

 

4. Are entitled to one vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote.

 

Holders of the Company’s common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors.

 

The declaration of any cash dividend will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon earnings, if any, capital requirements and our financial position, general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions.

 

All of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. To the extent that additional shares of our common stock are issued, the relative interests of existing stockholders will be diluted.

 

Notes

 

The Notes pay a 12.0% cash coupon, payable at maturity (or upon conversion or redemption); accrued unpaid interest shall be payable in common stock upon conversion at the option of the holder. The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt and may not be subordinated to any other debt of the Company, without the appropriate consent from the Note holders. The Notes are secured by the Company’s assets, including cash flow. Following the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares this Registration Statement effective, the Notes may be converted by the holders into shares of Common Stock (the shares of Common Stock underlying the Notes are hereinafter referred to as the “Note Shares”) at a conversion price of $0.35 per share (the “Conversion Price”). So long as certain contractual conditions are met, if our Common Stock is listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may redeem the Notes, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to convert the Notes into Common Stock at the Conversion Price. Upon an Event of Default, which event shall remain un-remedied for a period of sixty (60) days, the Investors shall have the option to require the Company to redeem its outstanding Notes at a price equal to 150% of the principal amount being redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. As long as any of the Notes shall remain outstanding, the holders shall be extended standard anti-dilution protection with respect to stock splits, stock dividends and recapitalizations affecting any outstanding Notes.

 

 

Warrants

 

The Warrants contain cashless exercise provisions in the event a registration statement registering the Common Stock underlying the Warrants is not effective 180 days after the issuance date and is subject to customary anti-dilution protection and registration rights. The Warrants expire on the third anniversary of the issuance date and have an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share. Each warrant is exercisable for one shares of Common Stock. So long as certain contractual conditions are met, if our Common Stock is listed on a U.S. stock exchange and trade, as determined by the daily closing price, for twenty (20) consecutive trading days at or above $1.50 per share, we may call the Warrants at the Exercise Price, in cash or shares of common stock and the holder may elect to exercise the Warrants at that time. There is also an ownership cap on the Warrants preventing the holder from exercising the Warrant if it would result in such holder owner more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock.

 

Transfer Agent

 

The transfer agent for our common stock is First American Stock Transfer, Inc. in Phoenix, Arizona.

 

Interest of Named Experts and Counsel

 

The validity of the securities offered hereby has been passed upon for us by Hunter Taubman Fischer, LLC, New York, New York. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 included in this prospectus and in the registration statement have been audited by HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their respective reports appearing herein.

 

The audited consolidated financial statements of eWellness Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended included in this registration statement have been so included in reliance on the report of Mantyla McReynolds, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting. The report (dated April 1, 2014) on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, as described more fully in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements.

 

DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by one of our directors, officers or controlling persons in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by that director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether that indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of that issue.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

		PAGES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		F-1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS		F-2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		F-3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-4 - F-16
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS		F-18 - F-19
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		F-20
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS		F-21
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		F-22
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-24 - F-36

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

		June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
		(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		$	4,604			$	900
Advances - related party			-				7,054
Prepaid Expenses			89,313				26,274
Total current assets			93,917				34,228
Property & equipment, net			6,806				3,231
Intangible assets, net			21,339				22,816
TOTAL ASSETS		$	122,062			$	60,275
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	194,151			$	174,044
Accounts payable - related party			45,336				56,155
Accrued expenses - related party			54,532				30,181
Accrued compensation			503,000				329,000
Contingent liability			90,000				90,000
Short term note and liabilities			24,488				-
Total current liabilities			911,507				679,380
Convertible debt, net of discount			431,880				178,433
Total Liabilities			1,343,387				857,813
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, authorized, 10,000,000 shares, $.001 value, 0 shares issued and outstanding			-				-
Common stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 16,881,000 and 16,421,000 issued and outstanding, respectively			16,881				16,421
Additional paid in capital			1,414,032				1,087,320
Accumulated deficit			(2,652,238	)			(1,901,279	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)			(1,221,325	)			(797,538	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$	122,062			$	60,275

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

For the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

 

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2015				June 30, 2014				June 30, 2015				June 30, 2014
OPERATING EXPENSES
Executive compensation			186,000				183,747				372,000				372,000
General and administrative			62,284				84,728				96,872				109,760
Professional fees			149,668				136,814				240,062				174,248
Research and development - related party			-				-				-				30
Total Operating Expenses			397,952				405,289				708,934				656,038
Loss from Operations			(397,952	)			(405,289	)			(708,934	)			(656,038	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain on extinguishment of debt			-				-				11,323				-
Interest income			-				(15	)			-				7
Interest expense, related parties			(879	)			-				(1,957	)			(608	)
Interest expense			(35,249	)			-				(51,391	)			(184	)
Net Loss before Income Taxes			(434,080	)			(405,304	)			(750,959	)			(656,823	)
Income tax expense			-				-				-				-
Net Loss		$	(434,080	)		$	(405,304	)		$	(750,959	)		$	(656,823	)
Basic and diluted (loss) per share		$	(0.03	)		$	(0.03	)		$	(0.04	)		$	(0.04	)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding			16,881,000				15,434,714				16,811,276				15,318,006

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

 

		For Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2015				June 30, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss		$	(750,959	)		$	(656,823	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			2,109				898
Contributed services			195,000				3,000
Shares issued for services			24,222				41,500
Imputed interest - related party			1,956				608
Warrants issued for services			22,592				-
Convertible debt discount amortization			28,944				-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Advances - related parties			7,054				(302	)
Prepaid expense			(25,726	)			(8,936	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			20,108				82,139
Accounts payable - related party			(10,820	)			48,896
Accrued expenses - related party			24,351				-
Accrued compensation			174,000				372,000
Net cash used in operating activities			(287,169	)			(117,020	)
Cash flows from investing activities Purchase of equipment			(4,207	)			-
Net cash used in investing activities			(4,207	)			-
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt			270,080				-
Promissory note			25,000				130,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			295,080				130,000
Net increase in cash			3,704				12,980
Cash, beginning of period			900				-
Cash, end of period		$	4,604			$	12,980
Supplemental Information:
Cash paid for:
Taxes		$	-			$	50
Interest Expense		$	-			$	-

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1. The Company

 

The Company and Nature of Business

 

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date. Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

 

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange detailed below we completed in April 2014, pursuant to which eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs utilizing its proprietary WWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

 

Share Exchange Agreement

 

On April 11, 2014, Digntye, Inc. (“Dignyte”), a publicly held Nevada corporation and eWellness Corporation (“Private Co”), a privately held company incorporated in Nevada, executed a Share Exchange Agreement (or “Initial Exchange Agreement”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the final Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Dignyte approved the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, the Board of Directors of the Private Co. approved the exchange. On April 25, 2014, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Dignyte amended its certificate of incorporation to change its corporate name from “Dignyte, Inc.” to “eWellness Healthcare Corporation.”

 

Pursuant to the Agreement, eWellness Healthcare Corporation issued 9,200,000 shares of unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”) to the shareholders of the Private Co. in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Private Co.’s common stock. In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed: (i) to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation; (ii) assign from his holdings, an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of the Private Co. resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders; and, (iii) to a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein (collectively, the “CEO Stock Actions”).

 

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, we closed the Share Exchange. As a result, the Private Co. shareholders own approximately 76.97% of our issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to CEO Stock Actions.

 

Following the Share Exchange, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing the Private Co.’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. The Private Co. is the surviving company under the share exchange and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

For financial reporting purposes, the Share Exchange represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination. Consequently, the transaction is accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. eWellness Corporation is the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and Dignyte, Inc. is the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that are reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the transactions are those of eWellness Corporation and are recorded at the historical cost basis of eWellness Corporation, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the transaction include the assets, liabilities and operations of eWellness Healthcare Corporation, and eWellness Corporation from the closing date of the transaction. Additionally all historical equity accounts and awards of eWellness Corporation, including par value per share, share and per share numbers, have been adjusted to reflect the number of shares received in the transaction.

 

The foregoing description of the Share Exchange Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the Share Exchange Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2014. At the execution of the Share Exchange Agreement, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding was 15,200,000.

 

The Company is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Programs (“DMpt”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic. The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including failure to secure funding to operationalize the Company’s business plan.

 

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The interim financial information of the Company as of periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 is unaudited. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 is derived from audited financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they omit or condense footnotes and certain other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting conform to the accounting policies disclosed in ASU 2014-10. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the interim periods reported have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2015. The unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Going Concern

 

For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company has no revenues and no operations. The Company has an accumulated loss of $2,652,238. In view of these matters, there is substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Deferred Offering and Acquisition Costs

 

The Company defers as other assets the direct incremental costs of raising capital until such time as the offering is completed. At the time of the completion of the offering, the costs will be charged against the capital raised. Should the offering be terminated, the deferred offering costs will be charged to operations during the period in which the offering is terminated. Direct acquisition costs will be expensed as incurred.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company complies with the accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, as well as certain related FASB staff positions. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact business and considers assumptions that marketplace participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

 

The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for measurements of fair value as follows:

 

Level 1 – quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have Level 1, 2, or 3 financial assets or liabilities.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash deposits and highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity to the Company of three months or less.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consists of assets with useful lives longer than one year. Useful lives for assets have been determined to be 5 years for the Company.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company has yet to realize revenues from operations. Once the Company has commenced operations, it will recognize revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is probable.

 

Loss per Common Share

 

The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the loss per share. Basic loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. As the Company has no common stock equivalents and has incurred losses for the period ended June 30, 2015, no dilutive shares are added into the loss per share calculations.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements presentation.

 

Note 3. Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment that is stated at cost $8,420 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $1,615 and $983 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Depreciation expense was $632 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $421 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is five years for computer equipment.

 

Note 4. Intangible Assets

 

The Company recognizes the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets were $24,770 and $24,770 less accumulated amortization of $3,431 and $1,954 for the periods ended June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. For the periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the amortization expense recorded was $1,477 and $477, respectively.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 5. Related Party Transactions

 

A company for which the Company’s former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO is also serving as CFO, has paid $79,890 on the Company’s behalf. The amount outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $45,336 and $56,155, respectively. The Company recorded $1,976 and $608 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rate of 8% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively.

 

During 2014, the Company entered into a license agreement with a programming company in which one of our directors is Chief Marketing Officer. Through the licensing agreement, we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000. The license fee is recorded as an Intangible Asset and Accounts Payable on the Balance Sheet.

 

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

 

The officers of the Company incur personal expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $54,532 and $30,181, respectively.

 

Note 6. Income Taxes

 

The tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the Company’s effective tax rate for the full year adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes, the Company makes a cumulative adjustment.

 

At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, net of expected reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities, as it believes it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized.

 

The Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions of the Company on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company has not had operations and has deferred items consisting entirely of

unused Net Operating Losses.. Since it is not thought that this Net Operating Loss will ever produce a tax benefit, even if examined by taxing authorities and disallowed entirely, there would be no effect on the financial statements.

 

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the periods ended June 30 2015, and June 30, 2014 the Company did not recognize nor accrue for any interest or penalties.

 

Note 7. Non-Convertible Notes Payable

 

On January 27, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with a shareholder for $20,000 at an interest rate of 12% due and payable on April 23, 2015. On April 9, 2015, as part of the second closing of the convertible debt discussed in Note 8 below, the note for $20,000, accrued interest for $3,980 through March 31, 2015 and future consulting fees due and payable through October 2015 totaling $100,000 were converted to a convertible note totaling $123,980.11. The consulting fees for future months were booked to prepaid expense and are being amortized over the remaining time of the consulting agreement.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

On May 27, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $768. For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $118 of accrued interest for this note.

 

Note 8. Convertible Notes Payable

 

On December 23, 2014 the Company issued $213,337 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to four individual investors. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

 

	●	Interest rate: 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $9,907 of accrued interest.
	●	Due date: December 31, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
	●	Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
	●	Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
	●	Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
	●	The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
	●	The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.
	●	Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through December 31, 2015 to purchase 609,534 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share.
	●	During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

●

The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

 

		June 30, 2015
Principal amount		$	213,337
Unamortized debt discount			(17,452	)
Net carrying amount		$	195,885

 

●

The Company valued the cash conversion feature as the different in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%.

 

On April 9, 2015, the Company issued $270,080 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to eight individual investors. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

 

	●	Interest rate: 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $7,382 of accrued interest.
	●	Due date: April 30, 2016. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
	●	Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
	●	Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
	●	Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
	●	The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
	●	The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.
	●	Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through April 30, 2016 to purchase 771,658 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $1,132.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

	●	During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.
	●	The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

 

		June 30, 2015
Principal amount		$	270,080
Unamortized debt discount			(34.085	)
Net carrying amount		$	235,995

 

●

The Company valued the cash conversion feature as the difference in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%. The value of the cash conversion feature at inception of the notes was $44,189.

 

For the period ended June 30, 2015, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.

 

Under the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the common shares of the Company, pending being listed on the OTC, and the net settlement requirements of the warrants will be analyzed at the end of each quarter to determine if the conversion does become readily convertible to cash which would require derivative accounting calculations and recording.

 

Note 9. Preferred and Common Stock

 

Preferred Stock

 

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001. There have been no preferred shares issued as of June 30, 2015.

 

Common Stock

 

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.

 

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares for consulting services at a value of $40,000 that will be amortized over the life of the contract.

 

On February 23, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 60,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $6,000 that will be amortized over the life of the contract

 

As of the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company has 16,881,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

 

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

 

Warrants

 

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 warrants that were issued as part of a consulting agreement extension that expired on October 21, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $32,187 and the Company recorded $17,882 as consulting expense and $14,305 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires in October 2015.

 

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 warrants that were issued as part of an advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $4,598 and the Company recorded this as consulting expense.

 

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 warrants that were issued as part of an advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $1,342 and the Company recorded $112 as consulting expense and $1,230 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires May 20, 2016.

 

The following is a summary of the status of all of the Company’s warrants as of June 30, 2015 and changes during the six months ended on that date:

 

							Weighted
			Number of				Average
			Warrants				Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2015				609,533			$	0.35
Granted				1,821,658			$	0.35
Exercised				-			$	-
Cancelled				-			$	-
Outstanding at June 30, 2015				2,431,191			$	0.35

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

For purpose of determining the fair market value of the warrants issued during the three months ended June 30, 2015, we used the Black Scholes option valuation model. These valuations were done throughout the period at the date of issuance and not necessary as of the reporting date. As there is no current market for the Company’s shares, we used $0.10 as the stock price at valuation date to be consistent with prior issuances and the stock prices of comparable companies to determine volatility. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the date of issuance are as follows:

 

Stock price on the valuation date		$	0.10
Exercise price of warrants		$	0.35
Dividend yield			0.00	%
Years to maturity			1.5 – 5.0
Risk free rate			.029% - 1.57	%
Expected volatility			55% - 56	%

 

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

 

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

 

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

 

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

 

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

 

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document (which was essentially a form of rescission) was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to an alleged violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

 

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

 

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

 

On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000 due by September 31, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; our director purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

 

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The rental agreement provides for the value of the rent of $500 per month be recorded as contributed towards the founding eWellness and its operations. During the period ended June 30, 2015, we have recorded this rent payment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

 

In May 2014, the Company signed an Office Service Agreement for office space in New York, New York. A deposit of $17,874 was paid and recorded in prepaid expense. The utilization of the office space began on August 1, 2014 and terminated at December 31, 2014. The Company negotiated a settlement of $5,500 in April, 2015 for the cancellation of the agreement. The settlement resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $11,323.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

On January 24, 2015, the Company received $20,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum. For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $447 of accrued interest for this note. On April 9, 2015, this note and accrued interest through March 31, 2015 was converted into convertible debt.

 

On January 24, 2015 the Company extended a previous consulting and service agreement with a consultant from April 21, 2015 to October 20, 2015 for which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share. These shares were issued on April 9, 2015. With this extension agreement, the Company is to pay $10,000 per month consulting fee beginning with February 1, 2015 through the end of the agreement. As discussed in Footnote 7 above, the full $100,000 consulting fees were rolled into a convertible note. The fees for months after the period ended June 30, 2015, are recorded in prepaid expense and are being amortized over the life of the contract extension.

 

On February 14, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with BMT, Inc. as a consultant and advisor in connection with certain business development advisory. This agreement is on an at-will basis as determined by the company in exchange for cash compensation to be invoiced monthly. The total compensation paid as of June 30, 2015 on this agreement is $11,950.

 

On February 23, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock. These shares were issued on April 14, 2015.

 

On March 16, 2015, the Company extended a $20,000 licensing fee payment agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. pertaining to intellectual property utilized by the company until July 1, 2015. The Company made an initial payment of $5,000 with the remaining fees to be to be paid on or before July 1, 2015.

 

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”), a company owned by one of the Company’s officers, wherein it is agreed that EPT would be able to operate the Company’s telemedicine platform www.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company is to receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the start of patient induction.

 

On April 17, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H. The agreement is for Dr. Bajaj to serve as a consultant and as the Chairman of the Company’s Clinical Advisory Board. The term of the agreement is for one year with annual renewal as desired. The agreement further sets the hourly rate to be paid at $225 per hour with payment to be at the end of each month. Further, the Company granted Dr. Bajaj a five-year non-statutory option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The options will vest over a 12 month period at 8,333 per month. The value of the options are deemed to be zero since the Board of Directors have not yet approved the issuant of the options.

 

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a strategic advisory services company. The term of the contract begins on the effective date and can be terminated within 30 days upon written notice by either party. The Company is to pay the consultant a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 that is deferred until the Company raises $250,000 in new investor funds from the effective date. In addition, the Company granted the consultant 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into a one year agreement with financial advisory company. As the retainer, the Company granted the consultant 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share.

 

On May 27, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. For the period ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $118 of accrued interest for this note.

 

From time to time the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Except as may be outlined above, management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Note 11. Segment Reporting

 

The Company has one operating segment, which was identified based upon the availability of discrete financial information and the chief operating decision makers’ regular review of financial information.

 

Note 12. Subsequent Events

 

On July 15, 2015, the Company received $18,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share.

 

On July 22, 2015, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the Company and, therefore, no longer exists as a separate entity.

 

On July 30, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for conversion of $87,500 of convertible debt. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

 

On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Rochelle Pleskow as the seventh member of the Board of Directors, effective immediately. Ms. Pleskow is the current head of Healthcare Informatics at HP, and the Board is confident that Ms. Pleskow can add value to the Company’s PHZIO platform through helping to create better patient outcome data. The Company agreed to pay Ms. Pleskow $2,000 per month fees, which shall accrue as of July 1, 2015 and be paid upon the first closing of our next financing, plus 250,000 5-year stock options at a price of $0.80 per share. She shall also be eligible to receive any other benefits that are offered to other directors.

 

On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which certain directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligible for certain stock options and grants. The Plan is effective as of August 1, 2015 and the maximum number of shares reserved and available for granting awards under the Plan shall be an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock, provided however that on each January 1, starting with January 1, 2016, an additional number of shares equal to the lesser of (A) 2% of the outstanding number of shares (on a fully-diluted basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (B) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee charged with administering the plan. This plan may be amended at any time by the Board or appointed plan Committee.

 

On August 11, 2015, the Company signed an addendum to the licensing agreement with Bistromatics to extend the payment of the licensing fee to October 31, 2015.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

		PAGES
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS		F-18 - F-19
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		F-20
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS		F-21
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		F-22
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-24 - F-36

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

(Formerly Dignyte, Inc.)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of eWellness Healthcare Corporation (formerly Dignyte, Inc.) as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eWellness Healthcare Corporation (formerly Dignyte, Inc.) as of December 31, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit, a deficit in stockholders’ equity and has sustained recurring losses from operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 7, 2015

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

eWellness Corporation (currently d.b.a. eWellness Healthcare Corporation)

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of eWellness Corporation (currently d.b.a. eWellness Healthcare Corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013, and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of eWellness Corporation as of December 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company had no revenues, experienced losses from operations, and no positive operating cash flows from operations during the year ended December 31, 2013. These issues raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Mantyla McReynolds, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 1, 2014

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		$	900			$	-
Advances - related party			7,054				-
Prepaid Expenses			26,274				4,770
Total current assets			34,228				4,770
Property & equipment, net			3,231				4,074
Intangible assets, net			22,816				-
TOTAL ASSETS		$	60,275			$	8,844
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	174,044			$	-
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party			56,155				-
Accrued expenses - related party			30,181
Accrued compensation			329,000				-
Contingent liability			90,000				-
Total current liabilities			679,380				-
Convertible debt, net of discount			178,433				-
Total Liabilities			857,813				-
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, authorized, 10,000,000 shares, $.001 value, 0 shares issued and outstanding			-				-
Common stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares, $.001 par value, 16,421,000 and 9,200,000 issued and outstanding, respectively			16,421				9,200
Shares to be issued			-				-
Additional paid in capital			1,087,320				561,338
Accumulated deficit			(1,901,279	)			(561,694	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)			(797,538	)			8,844
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$	60,275			$	8,844

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

		For Year Ended
		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
TOTAL REVENUE		$	-			$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES
Executive compensation			744,000				423,000
General and administrative			231,124				40,930
Professional fees			259,856				-
Contingent liability expense			90,000				-
Research and development - related party			30				2,706
Total Operating Expenses			1,325,010				466,636
Loss from Operations			(1,325,010	)			(466,636	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain on extinguishment of debt			1,200				-
Interest income			7				-
Interest expense, related parties			(2,708	)			-
Interest expense			(13,074	)			-
Loss before Income Taxes			(1,339,585	)			(466,636	)
Income tax expense			-				-
Net Loss		$	(1,339,585	)		$	(466,636	)
Basic and diluted (loss) per share		$	(0.10	)		$	(0.05	)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding			13,698,896				9,200,000

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

																		Additional								Total
		Preferred Shares								Common Shares								Paid in				Accumulated				Stockholders’
		Shares				Amount				Shares				Amount				Capital				Deficit				Deficit
Balance at December 31, 2012			-			$	-				-			$	-			$	95,058			$	(95,058	)		$	-
Common stock issued at incorporation											9,200,000				9,200				(200	)							9,000
Contributed services																			414,000								414,000
Expenses paid and assets contributed by shareholders																			52,480								52,480
Net loss																							(466,636	)			(466,636	)
Balance at December 31, 2013			-				-				9,200,000				9,200				561,338				(561,694	)			8,844
Imputed interest																			2,708								2,708
Contributed services																			390,000								390,000
Recapitalization at merger											6,000,000				6,000				(22,509	)							(16,509	)
Shares issued for services @ $.10/share											1,221,000				1,221				120,879								122,100
Convertible debt discount																			34,904								34,904
Net loss																							(1,339,585	)			(1,339,585	)
Balance at December 31, 2014			-			$	-				16,421,000			$	16,421			$	1,087,320			$	(1,901,279	)		$	(797,538	)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

		For Year Ended
		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss		$	(1,339,585	)		$	(466,636	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			2,797				140
Contributed services			390,000				423,000
Expenses paid by shareholders			-				43,496
Shares issued for services			122,100				-
Convertible debt discount			34,904				-
Imputed interest - related party			2,708				-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Advances - related parties			(7,054	)			-
Prepaid expense			(26,274	)			-
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			67,535				-
Accounts payable - related party			56,155				-
Accrued expenses - related party			30,181				-
Contingent liability			90,000				-
Accrued compensation			329,000				-
Net cash used in operating activities			(247,533	)			-
Cash flows from investing activities
Intangible asset purchase			(20,000	)			-
Cash acquired in merger			90,000				-
Net cash provided by investing activities			70,000				-
Cash flows from financing activities
Convertible loan payable proceeds			178,433				-
Net cash provided by financing activities			178,433				-
Net increase (decrease) in cash			900				-
Cash, beginning of period			-				-
Cash, end of period		$	900			$	-
Supplemental Information:
Cash paid for:
Taxes		$	-			$	-
Interest Expense		$	-			$	-
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Assets contributed by shareholders		$	-			$	8,844
Prepaid expense transferred to intangible assets		$	4,770			$	-

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1. The Company

 

The Company and Nature of Business

 

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date. Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

 

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange detailed below we completed in April 2014, pursuant to which eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs utilizing its proprietary WWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

 

Share Exchange Agreement

 

On April 11, 2014, Digntye, Inc. (“Dignyte”), a publicly held Nevada corporation and eWellness Corporation (“Private Co”), a privately held company incorporated in Nevada, executed a Share Exchange Agreement (or “Initial Exchange Agreement”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the final Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Dignyte approved the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, the Board of Directors of the Private Co. approved the exchange. On April 25, 2014, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Dignyte amended its certificate of incorporation to change its corporate name from “Dignyte, Inc.” to “eWellness Healthcare Corporation.”

 

Pursuant to the Agreement, eWellness Healthcare Corporation issued 9,200,000 shares of unregistered common stock, $.001 par value (the “common stock”) to the shareholders of the Private Co. in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Private Co.’s common stock. In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed: (i) to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock back to the Company for cancellation; (ii) assign from his holdings, an additional 2,500,000 shares to the shareholders of the Private Co. resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders; and, (iii) to a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares to other parties as stated therein (collectively, the “CEO Stock Actions”).

 

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, we closed the Share Exchange. As a result, the Private Co. shareholders own approximately 76.97% of our issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to CEO Stock Actions.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Following the Share Exchange, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing the Private Co.’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. The Private Co. is the surviving company under the share exchange and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

 

For financial reporting purposes, the Share Exchange represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination and eWellness is deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the transaction. The Share Exchange is being accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. eWellness is the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and the Company (eWellness Healthcare Corporation, formerly known as Dignyte, Inc.) is the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that will be reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the Share Exchange will be those of eWellness and will be recorded at the historical cost basis of eWellness, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the Share Exchange will include the assets and liabilities of the Company and eWellness, and the historical operations of eWellness and operations of the Combined Company from the closing date of the Share Exchange.

 

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

These financial statements have been prepared to reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of eWellness Healthcare Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary eWellness Corporation. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Financial Statement Reclassification

 

Certain account balances from prior periods have been reclassified in these audited consolidated financial statements so as to conform to current period classifications.

 

Loss Per Share

 

Basic loss per common share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock or “as converted” method, as appropriate. During periods of net loss, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because they are antidilutive.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost. Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The Company uses other depreciation methods (generally accelerated) for tax purposes where appropriate. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

 

Furniture and Fixtures		5 - 7 Years
Computer Equipment		5 - 7 Years
Software		3 Years

 

The Company regularly evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. If factors indicate the asset may not be recoverable, we compare the related undiscounted future net cash flows to the carrying value of the asset to determine if impairment exists. If the expected future net cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized based on the fair value of the asset. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no impairment recognized.

 

Intangible Assets

 

The Company accounts for assets that are not physical in nature as intangible assets. Intangible assets have either an identifiable or indefinite useful life. Intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their economic or legal life, whichever is shorter. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reassessed each year for impairment. If an impairment has occurred, then a loss is recognized. An impairment loss is determined by subtracting the asset’s fair value from the asset’s book/carrying value.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-30. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Accounting standards require the consideration of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if it is “more likely than not” that some component or all of the benefits of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

Recent Pronouncements

 

Adoption of ASU 2014-10 Development Stage Entities

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2014-10 Development Stage Entities. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 remove the definition of a development stage entity from Topic 915 Development Stage Entities, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from US GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholder’s equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations. ASU 2014-10 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.

 

The Company adopted this standard effective June 30, 2014. The Company’s financial statements have been impacted by the adoption of this ASU mainly by the removal of inception-to-date information in the Company’s statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity.

 

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and accounts payable. The carrying amount of cash and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 3. Going Concern

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has no revenues and no operations and had not emerged from the development stage. The Company has an accumulated loss of $1,901,279. In view of these matters, there is substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Note 4. Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment at a stated cost of $4,214 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $983 and $140 for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense was $843 and $140 for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Note 5. Intangible Assets

 

The Company recognized the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets were $24,770 and $0 less accumulated amortization of $1,954 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Note 6. Income Taxes

 

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Net deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

		2014				2013
Deferred tax assets:
NOL Carryover		$	314,000			$	15,067
Deferred Rent			2,300				-
Accrued Payroll			115,200				-
Contingent Liability			31,500				-
Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation			(300	)			-
Valuation allowance			(462,700	)			(15,067	)
Net deferred tax asset		$	-			$	-

 

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 due to the following:

 

		2014				2013
Book Income		$	(468,900	)		$	(158,656	)
Depreciation			(300	)			-
Contributed Services							143,820
Non-Deductible Expenses			-				709
Meals & Entertainment			2,500				-
Stock for Expense Accounts			21,000				-
Contributed Interest Expense			900				-
Gain/Loss on settlement of debt through equity			(400	)			-
Deferred Rent			-				-
Accrued Payroll			115,200				-
Related Party Interest			-				-
Contingent Liability			31,500				-
Valuation allowance			298,500				14,127
		$	-			$	-

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

At December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $897,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2015 through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2014 consolidated financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

 

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.

 

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not recognize any interest or penalties, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to unrecognized benefits.

 

The Company has filed for an extension of the federal income tax return in the U.S for the year ended December 31, 2014. The tax years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are open for examination for federal income tax purposes and by other major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

 

Note 7. Related Party Transactions

 

Through the year ended December 31, 2014, a related party, a company in which the former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO of the Company is also serving as CFO, has paid $67,710 on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $56,155 and $0, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $2,708 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rate of 8%.

 

During the period ending December 31, 2014, the Company entered into a license agreement with a programming company in which one of our directors is Chief Marketing Officer. Through the licensing agreement, we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000. The license fee is recorded as an Intangible Asset and Accounts Payable on the Balance Sheet.

 

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

 

Through the year ended December 31, 2014, the officers of the Company incur personal expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $30,181 and $0 respectively. In addition, advances were made to officers. The amounts due from officers as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $7,054 and $0, respectively.

 

The Company periodically incurs expenses for research and development with a related party. At the periods ending December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had recorded expenses of $30 and $2,706, respectively.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 8. Convertible Notes

 

On December 23, 2014 the Company issued $213,337 convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to four individual investors. The overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

 

	●	Interest rate: 12% per annum.
	●	Due date: December 31, 2015. The Company is to pay the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest on or before the due date.
	●	Redemption right: Any time the closing price of the Company’s common stock has been at or above $1.50 for 20 consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to redeem all or any part of the principal and accrued interest of the Notes, following written notice to the holders of the Notes.
	●	Optional Conversion: At the option of the holders, the Notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.35 per share.
	●	Additionally, if the Company elects to exercise the redemption right, the holders have the opportunity to elect to take the cash payment or to convert all or any portion of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
	●	The conversion price is subject to proportional adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar corporate events.
	●	The Notes are senior in rank to any other debt held by our officers, directors or affiliates and may not be subordinated to any other debt issued by us without the written consent of the holder.
	●	Warrants: The holders of the Notes are granted the right through December 31, 2015 to purchase 609,534 additional shares of common stock at $.35 per share.
	●	During the time that any portion of these Notes are outstanding, if any Event of Default occurs and such Default is not cured by the Company within sixty (60) days of the occurrence of the Event of Default (the “Cure Period”), the amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the outstanding principal amount of this Note, together with accrued interest and other amounts owing shall become at the holder’s election, immediately due and payable in cash. The holders at its option have the right, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the Company after the expiration of the Cure Period, to elect to convert the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Optional Conversion rights disclosed above.
	●	The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets report the following related to the convertible promissory note:

 

		December 31, 2014
Principal amount		$	213,337
Unamortized debt discount			(34,904	)
Net carrying amount		$	178,433

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

The Company valued the warrants as the difference in the value of the Note at its stated interest rate of 12% and the fair value of the Note at its discounted value using an expected borrowing rate of 18%.

 

For the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a debt discount of $34,904 associated with the value of the warrants which is being amortized over the life of the notes. At December 31, 2014, none of the debt had been converted and no warrants to purchase common stock had been exercised.

 

Under the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the common shares of the Company, pending being listed on the OTC, and the net settlement requirements of the warrants will be analyzed at the end of each quarter to determine if the conversion does become readily convertible to cash which would require derivative accounting calculations and recording.

 

Note 9. Preferred and Common Stock

 

Preferred Stock

 

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001. There have been no preferred shares issued as of the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Common Stock

 

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.

 

As of the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company has 16,421,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

 

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

 

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

 

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

 

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

 

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

 

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

 

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

 

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

 

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

 

MHI Agreement: On May 24, 2013, eWellness entered into an exclusive 25-year Supply and Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”) for the following 14 states that include: Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Under the agreement, eWellness agrees to provide its eWellness Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to MHI affiliated physicians within the terms of the Agreement. MHI agreed to market the eWellness DMpt and agreed to use its best efforts to promote and use the DMpt program; MHI also agreed to assist in managing the insurance reimbursement to eWellness for PT evaluations, re-evaluations and physical tests that eWellness staff perform at selected MHI facilities; however, we will be responsible for seeking reimbursement opportunities from insurance providers who do not currently reimburse for our telemedicine services. MHI, through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, provide primary care physician practices, physician groups and healthcare facilities of all sizes with cutting edge medical devices focused primarily on preventive care through early detection. MHI currently provides their services to 70 medical group offices in NYC and approximately 130 in Northern New Jersey. There are approximately 400 individual physicians in these various practices. Approximately 20 percent of those patient visits are reoccurring visits.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

MHI will charge eWellness a 20% billing fee on all insurance reimbursement or patient fees for marketing the DMpt Program and assisting in the processing of insurance reimbursement. We have also agreed that for every $100,000.00 of insurance reimbursement received from MHI patients for our DMpt program (up to $1 million in billing), we will issue 110,000 shares of our common stock to MHI, up to a maximum amount of 1.1 million shares. As of the date of this Report, we have not issued any shares to MHI under this Agreement because we have not yet required or utilized MHI’s reimbursement services, nor has MHI marketed our services.

 

Each party has the right to terminate the agreement upon breach of the Agreement or dissolution of either party. We may also terminate the Agreement if MHI is, for a period of 60 continuous days, restrained or prevented from transacting a substantial part of their business by reason of a judgment order or regulation of any court or authority; MHI may terminate the Agreement at any time with 30 days written notice. The parties may also terminate the Agreement if either becomes the subject to any bankruptcy or similar proceeding. The Agreement also includes standard indemnification provisions for both parties.

 

Programming Agreement: On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors, Curtis Hollister, is Chief Marketing Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000; $2,000 of which was due upon execution, $5,000 of which is due on August 1, 2014 and the $13,000 balance is due by September 15, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the $20,000 license fee to December 31, 2014 and another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; Mr. Hollister purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

 

Office Space: The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from Evolution Physical Therapy (“Evolution”), a company owned by our CEO, Mr. Fogt. Evolution has agreed to cancel and contribute the annual rent for the year ended December 31, 2013 towards founding eWellness and its operations; the market value of such rent is $500 per month. During the period ended December 31, 2014, we have recorded this rent payment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

 

 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(FORMERLY DIGNYTE, INC.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 11. Subsequent Events

 

On January 24, 2015, the Company received $20,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum.

 

On January 24, 2015 the Company extended a previous consulting and service agreement with a consultant from April 21, 2015 to October 20, 2015 for which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share. As of the date of this report the 400,000 shares have not been issued.

 

On February 14, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with BMT, Inc. as a consultant and advisor in connection with certain business development advisory. This agreement is on an at-will basis as determined by the company in exchange for cash compensation to be invoiced monthly. The total compensation paid to date on this agreement is $11,950.

 

On February 23, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock. As of the date of this report, the 60,000 shares have not been issued.

 

On March 16, 2015, the Company extended a $20,000 licensing fee payment agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. pertaining to intellectual property utilized by the company until July 1, 2015. The Company made an initial payment of $5,000 with the remaining fees to be to be paid on or before July 1, 2015.

 

 

PART II

 

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

 

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, to be paid by the Registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution of the common stock being registered. All amounts other than the SEC registration fee are estimates.

 

SEC Registration Fee		$	52.88
Legal Fees and Expenses		$	0*
Accounting Fees and Expenses		$	4,700.00*
Total		$	4,752.88*

 

*Estimated as permitted under Rule 511 of Regulation S-K

 

ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

 

Article VI of our Bylaws provides that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be a party to or is involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (“proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she or a person for whom he or she is the legal representative is or was one of our directors or officers, employees or agents or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer, employee or agent of another corporation, or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless to the fullest extent authorized by the Nevada Revised Statutes. Such right includes the right to be paid by the Company for expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition; provided, however, that the payment of such expenses in advance of the final disposition of such proceeding, shall be made only upon delivery of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer, to repay all amounts so advanced if it should be determined ultimately that such officer or director is not entitled to be indemnified under our the laws.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant, pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.

 

ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

 

During the past three years, we effected the following transactions in reliance upon exemptions from registration under the Securities Act as amended. Unless stated otherwise: (i) that each of the persons who received these unregistered securities had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters which allowed them to evaluate the merits and risk of the receipt of these securities, and that they were knowledgeable about our operations and financial condition; (ii) no underwriter participated in, nor did we pay any commissions or fees to any underwriter in connection with the transactions; (iii) the transactions did not involve a public offerings; and (iv) each certificate issued for these unregistered securities contained a legend stating that the securities have not been registered under the Act and setting forth the restrictions on the transferability and the sale of the securities.

 

On April 7, 2011, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement. The shares were valued at $10,000.

 

On April 30, 2014, we issued 9,200,000 shares pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement.

 

On May 9, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 403,000 shares of our common stock: 400,000 of which were issued pursuant to a consulting agreement with a value of $40,000 and 3,000 of which were issued pursuant to a verbal agreement Management as compensation for website services provided to the Company, with a value of $1,500.

 

On October 16, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 618,000 shares of our common stock to two consultants pursuant to consulting agreements with such persons. The shares were valued at $61,800.

 

 

On October 16, 2014, per Board approval, we issued an aggregate of 200,000 shares of our common stock to one of our directors for his director services. The shares were valued at $2,000.

 

On December 23, 2014, we issued $213,337 Series A Senior Convertible Redeemable Notes (the “Notes”) that are initially convertible into 609,532 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 609,532 shares of our common stock, pursuant to a private financing.

 

On January 24, 2015, we extended the term of an outstanding consulting and service agreement, pursuant to which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share.

 

On February 23, 2015, we entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock.

 

On April 9, 2015, we issued $270,080.11 Notes (including an aggregate of $123,980.11 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) that are initially convertible into 771,657 shares of our common stock, pursuant to a private financing.

 

Except as otherwise noted, all of the transactions listed above were made pursuant to the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for sales not involving a public offering or Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC. The securities issued have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

 

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

EXHIBITS

 

The following exhibits are filed as part of this registration statement:

  

Exhibit Number		Description:
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 15, 2012.)
3.2		Bylaws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 15, 2012.)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on August 30, 2012.)
3.4		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2014.)
5.1		Opinion of Hunter Taubman Fischer, LLC (Filed Herewith)
10.1		Extension of Consulting and Services Agreement with Rodney Schoemann dated as of January 24, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 27, 2015)
10.2		Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.3		Form of 12% Senior Convertible Promissory Note (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.4		Form of Series A Warrant Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.5		Form of Registration Rights Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.6		Form of Security Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2015)
10.7		2015 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2015)
14.1		Code of Ethics (Incorporated by Reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2014)
21.1		Subsidiaries of eWellness: eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
23.1		Consent of Hunter, Taubman, Fischer, contained in Exhibit 5.1
23.2		Consent of HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP (Filed herewith.)
23.3		Consent of Mantyla McReynolds, LLC (Filed herewith.)
24.1		Power of Attorney. (Included on signature page.)

 

 

101.INS +		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH +		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL +		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF +		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB +		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE +		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

+Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on May 27, 2015.

 

 

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

 

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made pursuant to this Registration Statement, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.

 

(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

 

(iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this Registration Statement or any material change to such information in this Registration Statement.

 

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

(4) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the Registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

(5) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions described in Item 15 above, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Culver City, State of California on August 21 , 2015.

 

	EWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
	By:	/s/ Darwin Fogt
	Name:	Darwin Fogt
	Title:	CEO

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Darwin Fogt and Douglas MacLellan, or either of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 and any documents related to this report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Darwin Fogt		President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer)		August 21 , 2015
/s/ David Markowski		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Director		August 21 , 2015
/s/ Douglas MacLellan		Director		August 21 , 2015
/s/ Douglas Cole		Director		August 21 , 2015
/s/ Rochelle Pleskow		Director		August 21, 2015