Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc.v418430_ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc.v418430_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc.v418430_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc.v418430_ex31-2.htm

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x          QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

or

¨          TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______ to _______.

 

Commission File Number: 000-55154

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada   30-0680119
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)

 

8 Light Sky Court

Sacramento, CA 95828

(Address of principal executive offices (Zip Code)

 

(916) 379-0324

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x  No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ¨   Accelerated filer ¨
     
Non-accelerated filer  ¨   (do not check if smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company x

  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨  No  x

 

As of August 19, 2015, there is 400,498,330 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value outstanding.

 

 

 

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q REPORT

June 30, 2015

 

  Page
  Number
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
   
Item 1.   Financial Statements. 2
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 19
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 23
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures. 24
     
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION  
   
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings. 25
Item 1A. Risk Factors. 25
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. 25
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities. 25
Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures 25
Item 5.   Other Information. 25
Item 6.   Exhibits. 25
     
SIGNATURES 26

 

1 

 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

 

   June 30, 2015   December 31, 2014 
   (Unaudited)     
ASSETS          
Current assets          

Cash

  $8,401   $95,251 
Contracts receivable, net   -    139,908 
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts   8,611    115,801 
Prepaid expenses   75,049    77,161 
Deferred loan costs, current   20,379    96,705 
Other current assets   25,000    - 
Total current assets   137,440    524,826 
           
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $13,721 and $8,731   9,950    14,940 
Deferred loan costs, net   -    1,904 
Prepaid expenses, net   34,965    69,371 
           
Total assets  $182,355   $611,041 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT          
           
Current liabilities          
Bank overdraft  $40   $40 
Accounts payable   152,667    170,529 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities   1,104,646    1,002,854 
Notes payable, current portion   185,000    185,000 
Convertible notes payable, current portion, net of discounts of $292,895 and $95,571   472,509    528,929 
Notes payable, related party, current portion   10,000    10,000 
Derivative liability   1,127,997    167,970 
Accrued interest   111,750    76,671 
Total current liabilities   3,164,609    2,141,993 
           
Notes payable, net of current portion   100,000    100,000 
Convertible notes payable, net of discounts of $0 and $49,829   -    30,171 
           
Total liabilities   3,264,609    2,272,164 
           
Stockholders' deficit          
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 59,960,864 and 30,589,839 issued; 59,910,864 and 30,539,839 outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014   600    306 
Additional paid-in capital   5,603,917    5,247,786 
Treasury stock, 50,000 shares at $.084 per share   (4,200)   (4,200)
Accumulated deficit   (8,682,571)   (6,905,015)
Total stockholders' deficit   (3,082,254)   (1,661,123)
           
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit  $182,355   $611,041 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

2 

 

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

   Three months ended June 30,   Six months ended June 30, 
   2015   2014   2015   2014 
Revenue  $8,612   $401,681   $191,886   $465,833 
Cost of sales   10,033    295,865    149,004    353,880 
Gross profit   (1,421)   105,816    42,882    111,953 
                     
Operating expenses                    
Salaries and wages   43,095    53,084    82,369    106,836 
General and administrative   476,857    717,118    638,202    1,090,039 
Total operating expenses   519,952    770,202    720,571    1,196,875 
                     
Loss from operations   (521,373)   (664,386)   (677,689)   (1,084,922)
                     
Other income (expense)                    
Gain on extinguishment of debt   1,666    34,218    1,666    118,291 
Loss on derivative fair value adjustment   (351,073)   (94,209)   (488,110)   (150,063)
Penalties and settlements   (6,865)   -    (22,427)   - 
Loss on settlement   -    (175,000)   -    (175,000)
Interest expense   (461,313)   (540,635)   (590,996)   (792,975)
Total other expense   (817,585)   (775,626)   (1,099,867)   (999,747)
                     
Loss before income taxes   (1,338,958)   (1,440,012)   (1,777,556)   (2,084,669)
                     
Provision for income taxes   -    -    -    - 
                     
Net loss  $(1,338,958)  $(1,440,012)  $(1,777,556)  $(2,084,669)
                     
Basic and diluted loss per common share  $(0.03)  $(0.10)  $(0.05)  $(0.15)
                     
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding   45,206,521    14,779,792    38,888,866    13,572,784 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

3 

 

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

   Six months ended June 30, 
   2015   2014 
Cash flows from operating activities          
Net loss  $(1,777,556)  $(2,084,669)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities          
Common stock issued for services   154,853    203,324 
Common stock issued for penalties   20,610    - 
Common stock issued for settlement   -    287,064 
Gain on forgiveness of debt   -    (118,291)
Depreciation   4,990    1,848 
Loss on derivative fair value adjustment   488,110    150,063 
Amortization of deferred loan costs   78,230    70,125 
Amortization of loan origination fees   -    90,283 
Amortization of debt discount   188,105    578,205 
Amortization of prepaid expenses   36,518    - 
Expenses paid on behalf of company   48,312    - 
Excess derivative liability charged to interest   275,871    - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities          
Contracts receivable   139,908    (238,703)
Earnings in excess of billings   107,190    - 
Prepaid expenses   -    373,399 
Accounts payable   (17,862)   252,136 
Accrued interest   35,079    12,520 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities   101,792    80,360 
Net cash used in operating activities   (115,850)   (342,336)
           
Cash flows from investing activities          
Purchase of equipment   -    (16,910)
Net cash used in investing activities   -    (16,910)
           
Cash flows from financing activities          
Proceeds from convertible notes payable   -    305,000 
Repayments of convertible notes payable   (10,000)   - 
Proceeds from notes payable   45,000    210,000 
Repayments of notes payable   -    (130,000)
Proceeds from related party notes payable   -    8,000 
Repayment of related party notes payable   (6,000)   - 
Purchase of treasury stock   -    (4,200)
Net cash provided by financing activities   29,000    388,800 
           

Change in cash

   (86,850)   29,554 
Cash at beginning of period   95,251    28,664 
Cash at end of period  $8,401   $58,218 
           
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information          
Cash paid for interest  $9,000   $25,271 
Cash paid for income taxes  $-   $- 
           
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:          
Common stock issued as loan repayment  $-   $602,503 
Common stock issued as interest repayment  $-   $45,165 
Common stock issued for note conversion  $54,208   $- 
Common stock issued for accrued interest conversion  $-   $- 
Exchange of note payable and accrued interest for convertible note payable  $-   $212,526 
Debt discount on convertible notes  $322,800   $392,128 
Initial measurements of derivative liabilities  $598,671   $312,128 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

4 

 

 

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

 

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Organization, Nature of Business and Trade Name

 

Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (the “Company” or “IHS”) was formed on April 22, 2011. IHS is a technology based intelligent highway solutions contractor. Through June 30, 2013, the Company’s primary focus was in the California transportation market providing services that range from providing labor, materials, and related equipment for corrective service and maintenance services for the State’s transportation infrastructure. Since that time, the Company has devoted its time to electrical service contracts. Additionally, the Company intends to develop transportation technology services that enable vehicles, roads, traffic lights, message signs, and other elements to become “intelligent” by embedding them with microchips and sensors and by empowering them to communicate with each other via wireless technologies. The acceleration of data collection and communication will allow state governments to improve transportation system performance by reducing congestion and increasing both traveler safety and convenience.

 

NOTE 2 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the period ended June 30, 2015 and for all periods presented herein, have been made.

 

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.  It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s December 31, 2014 audited financial statements.  The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

 

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

 

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

 

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

 

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

5 

 

 

NOTE 4 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. A change in managements’ estimates or assumptions could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations during the period in which such changes occurred.

 

Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s financial statements reflect all adjustments that management believes are necessary for the fair presentation of their financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented.

 

Cash

 

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The company does not have cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015.

 

Contracts Receivable

 

Contracts receivable from construction, operations and maintenance are based on amounts billed to customers. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful collections which is based upon a review of outstanding receivable, historical collection information, and existing economic conditions. Normal contracts receivable are due 30 days after issuance of the invoice. Contract retentions are usually due 30 days after completion of the project and acceptance by the owner. Contracts receivable past due more than 60 days are considered delinquent. Delinquent contracts receivable are written off based on individual credit evaluation and specific circumstances of the customer. The Company had bad debt expense of $139,483 and $0 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is $0 as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are carried at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged against operations. Renewals and betterments that materially extend the life of the assets are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for the period.

 

Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of depreciable assets are:

 

   Estimated
Useful Life
Furniture and fixtures   3 - 5 years
Machinery and equipment   5 years
Vehicles   5 years

 

6 

 

 

For federal income tax purposes, depreciation is computed under the modified accelerated cost recovery system. For financial statements purposes, depreciation is computed under the straight-line method. Balances of each asset class as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were:

 

   June 30,
 2015
   December 31,
2014
 
Machinery and equipment  $2,149   $2,149 
Furniture and fixtures   6,273    6,273 
Vehicles   15,249    15,249 
Sub Total  $23,671   $23,671 
Accumulated depreciation   (13,721)   (8,731)
Total  $9,950   $14,940 

 

Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $4,990 and $1,848, respectively.

 

Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

   June 30,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 
Deferred rent payable  $-   $(51)
Payroll tax liabilities   771,936    767,109 
Other payroll accruals   29,970    25,234 
Other   302,740    210,562 
Total  $1,104,646   $1,002,854 

 

Revenues and Cost of Revenues

 

Revenues from fixed-price and cost-plus contracts are recognized on the percentage of completion method, whereby revenues on long-term contracts are recorded on the basis of the Company’s estimates of the percentage of completion of contracts based on the ratio of the actual cost incurred to total estimated costs. This cost-to-cost method is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Revenues from cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized on the basis of costs incurred during the period plus the fee earned, measured on the cost-to-cost method.

 

Cost of revenues include all direct material, sub-contract, labor, and certain other direct costs, as well as those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor and fringe benefits. Selling, general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changed in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability may result in revisions to cost and income, which are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Changes in estimated job profitability resulting from job performance, job conditions, contract penalty provisions, claims, change orders, and settlements, are accounted for as changes in estimates in the current period. Claims for additional contract revenue are recognized when realization of the claim in probable and the amount can be reasonably determined.

 

The asset, “cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

 

Cost of sales totaled $10,033 and $295,865 during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and $149,004 and $353,880 during the six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current-year presentation. These reclassifications related to notes payable where prior periods had incorrectly shown certain notes as being related party, when in fact they were not.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

 

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 

7 

 

 

Convertible debt

 

The Company records a beneficial conversion feature related to the issuance of convertible debts that have conversion features at fixed rates. The beneficial conversion feature for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds as an increase in additional paid-in capital and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion features. The beneficial conversion feature will be accreted by recording additional non-cash interest expense over the expected life of the convertible notes.

 

Net Loss Per Share

 

Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the specified period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares during the specified period. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 potential common shares are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.  Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share.  There were 231,807,763 such potentially dilutive shares excluded for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements and their adoption has not had or is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, or statements.

 

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and liabilities based upon the fair value hierarchy.  The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value at
June 30, 2015
 
Liabilities                
Derivative Liability  $-   $1,127,997   $-   $1,127,997 

 

   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Fair Value at
December 31, 2014
 
Liabilities                
Derivative Liability  $-   $167,970   $-   $167,970 

   

The changes in the fair value of recurring fair value measurements are measured using the Black Scholes valuation model, and relate solely to the derivative liability as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2014  $167,970 
Derivative liabilities recorded   598,671 
Change due to note conversion   (126,754)
Fair value adjustment   488,110 
Balance at June 30, 2015  $1,127,997 

 

NOTE 6 – CONCENTRATIONS OF RISK

 

Our revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were generated completely from a single client. Additionally, 100 percent of our contracts receivable as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were due from the same client.

 

8 

 

 

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE

 

On April 14, 2014, the Company received a loan in the amount of $90,000 from Innovest, LLC. The loan was due on August 14, 2014 with a $30,000 payment due on each June 14, 2014; July 14, 2014 and August 14, 2014. The loan is unsecured and non-interest bearing. In the event of default, the note shall bear interest at 18% per annum. Additionally, the Company was obligated to issue 50,000 shares of common stock in the event of late payments. The note holder was also issued 75,000 shares of common stock as an incentive to enter into the note. The Company did not make the required principal payment on July 17, 2014 resulting in 50,000 shares of common stock being issued to Innovest and the note beginning to accrue interest at the rate of 18% per annum. Additionally, the Company did not make the required principal payment on August 17, 2014 resulting in an additional 50,000 shares of common stock being issued to Innovest. There was $60,000 of principal as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 plus accrued interest of $6,256 and $900 outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On August 5, 2014, the Company entered into two separate note agreements for $50,000 ($100,000 total). The notes carried a fixed interest amount of $800 and are due on October 4, 2014. If the loans were not repaid by the due date, the Company had the obligation to issue 25,000 shares of common stock to each note holder for each consecutive week the notes were outstanding. The Company has not yet repaid the notes as of June 30, 2015 resulting in 975,000 common shares being issued to each note holder (1,950,000 total common shares) as penalties. Additionally, the note holders each received 125,000 shares of common stock as an incentive to enter into the notes and had the right to sell back 50,000 shares of common stock to the Company for $4,200. There was a total of $100,000 in principal and $1,600 of accrued interest due at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On April 17, 2014, the Company received a loan in the amount of $20,000 from Seton Securities. An additional $5,000 was received on July 15, 2014. The loans are unsecured, due on demand and non-interest bearing. There was $25,000 in principal and no accrued interest due at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On October 22, 2014, the Company received a loan from an unrelated party totaling $100,000. The note carries an interest rate of 12% per annum and is due on October 22, 2016. During the first quarter of 2015, the note was amended retroactively to October 22, 2014 to adjust the interest rate to 15% per annum. Additionally, the note is secured by the vehicles owned by the company. There was $100,000 of principal and accrued interest of $2,815 and $2,301 due as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

 

On October 26, 2012, the Company received a loan totaling $30,000 from an unrelated party. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and had an original maturity date of April 26, 2013; however, the Company is in negotiations to extend the maturity date. There was $30,000 in principal plus accrued interest of $8,030 and $6,542 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The principal and accrued interest may be converted at the option of the holder to common stock at $0.30.

 

9 

 

 

On February 27, 2014, the Company received a loan totaling $339,026 from an unrelated party. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and matured on February 27, 2015. Of the $339,026 total note, $212,526 was paid to former note holders on our behalf and $1,500 was withheld as debt issue costs resulting in net cash proceeds to the company of $125,000. Additionally, the note may be converted to common stock at the option of the holder at a rate equal to a 35% discount from the lowest daily volume weighted average price in the five days prior to conversion, but not less than $0.00004. On various dates during the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company accepted twenty separate partial conversions of the note resulting in a total of 4,063,247 shares of common stock being issued in exchange for $242,526 of principal. On various dates during the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company accepted seven separate partial conversions of the note resulting in 7,791,630 shares of common stock being issued in exchange for $43,688 of principal. Additionally, the Company accepted a single conversion of accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2014 resulting in 408,727 shares being issued in exchange for $8,369 of accrued interest. There was $52,812 and $96,500 in principal plus $13,653 and $10,165 in accrued interest due at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On June 11, 2015, the Company received a loan totaling $59,800 from an unrelated party. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and matured on June 11, 2016. Of the $59,800 total note, $5,000 was paid to service providers on our behalf, $7,800 was an original issue discount and $2,000 was withheld as debt issue costs resulting in net cash proceeds to the company of $45,000. Additionally, the note may be converted to common stock at the option of the holder at a rate equal to a 50% discount from the lowest trading price during the five days prior to conversion. There was $59,800 and $0 in principal plus $311 and $0 in accrued interest due at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

   

On November 13, 2014, the Company received a loan totaling $104,000 from an unrelated party. The note carries interest at 8% per annum and is due on August 17, 2015 with a default interest rate of 22% should the note not be repaid by the maturity date. The holder has the right to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest to common stock at any time after 180 days from the note date, or May 12, 2015, at a 52% discount from the average of the lowest three trading prices of the Company’s common stock during the preceding ten trading days. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company accepted two separate conversions resulting in a total of 5,129,395 common shares being issued in exchange for $10,520 of principal. There was $93,480 and $104,000 of principal and $5,135 and $1,094 of accrued interest payable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On December 16, 2014, the Company received a loan totaling $54,000 from an unrelated party. The note carries interest at 8% per annum and is due on September 18, 2015 with a default interest rate of 22% should the note not be repaid by the maturity date. The holder has the right to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest to common stock at any time after 180 days from the note, or June 15, 2015, date at a 52% discount from the average of the lowest three trading prices of the Company’s common stock during the preceding ten trading days. There was $54,000 of principal and $2,320 and $178 of accrued interest payable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On December 12, 2014, the Company received a loan totaling $50,000 from an unrelated party. The note carries interest at 10% per annum and is due on December 12, 2015. The holder has the right to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest to common stock at any time after 180 days from the note date, or June 10, 2015, at a 40% discount from the lowest closing bid price for the Company’s common stock for the fifteen prior trading days. There was $50,000 of principal and $2,740 and $260 of accrued interest payable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On June 26, 2015, the Company received a loan totaling $55,000 from an unrelated party. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and is due March 24, 2016. Of the $55,000 total note, $5,000 was an original issue discount resulting in net cash proceeds to the company of $50,000. Additionally, the note may be converted to common stock at the option of the holder at a rate equal to a 45% discount from the lowest trading price during the twenty days prior to conversion but not less than $0.00005. There was $55,000 and $0 in principal plus $286 and $0 in accrued interest due at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On May 14, 2015, the Company received a loan totaling $4,812 from an unrelated party. The note carries interest at 12% per annum and is due on February 18, 2016. The holder has the right to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest to common stock at any time after 180 days from the note date at a 55% discount from the average of the three lowest trading prices for the Company’s common stock for the twenty prior trading days. There was $4,812 of principal and $0 and $30 and $0 of accrued interest payable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

On May 29, 2015, the Company received a loan totaling $5,500 from an unrelated party. The note carries interest at 12% per annum and is due on February 21, 2016. The holder has the right to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest to common stock at any time after 180 days from the note date at a 55% discount from the average of the three lowest trading prices for the Company’s common stock for the twenty prior trading days. There was $5,500 of principal and $0 and $34 and $0 of accrued interest payable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

10 

 

  

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company entered into debt agreements with various individuals to borrow a total of $80,000 which was $75,000 in cash and $5,000 as a reduction of accounts payable. The notes accrue interest at 10% per annum and are due in are due in full between March and April 2016 with no repayments due before maturity. The principal and accrued interest may be converted at the option of the holder to common stock at $0.30. The intrinsic value of the conversion feature in these notes resulted in debt discounts totaling $80,000 which will be amortized over the lives of the notes. $30,171 of the debt discounts were recognized in interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2014 leaving an unamortized discount of $49,829 at December 31, 2014. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company accepted the full conversion of nine notes and the partial conversion of another to common stock at $0.30 per share resulting in 1,733,332 shares of common stock being issued in consideration of $610,000 of principal plus 174,201 shares of common stock being issued in consideration of $55,358 of accrued interest.

 

The following table depicts the amounts due for each convertible note as of December 31, 2014:

 

   Maturity Date  Principal   Debt Discount   Carrying
Amount, Current
Portion
   Carrying
Amount,
Long Term
Portion
   Accrued Interest 
Note holder 1  1/24/2015  $50,000   $-   $50,000   $-   $14,124 
Note holder 1  4/28/2016   15,000    (9,842)   -    5,158    732 
Note holder 4  3/21/2016   30,000    (18,288)   -    11,712    2,342 
Note holder 7  5/9/2015   50,000    (8,836)   41,164    -    8,233 
Note holder 10  11/4/2015   25,000    (10,548)   14,452    -    2,890 
Note holder 11  7/15/2024   50,000    (13,425)   36,575    -    7,315 
Note holder 12  9/3/2015   25,000    (8,425)   16,575    -    3,315 
Note holder 12  10/31/2015   25,000    (10,411)   14,589    -    2,918 
Note holder 13  10/21/2015   20,000    (8,055)   11,945    -    2,389 
Note holder 16  12/30/2015   45,000    (22,438)   22,562    -    4,512 
Note holder 17  3/26/2016   25,000    (15,411)   -    9,589    1,918 
Note holder 18  4/4/2016   10,000    (6,288)   -    3,712    742 
Note holder 19  4/26/13   30,000    -    30,000    -    6,542 
Note holder 20  2/27/15   96,500    (13,434)   83,066    -    10,165 
Note holder 21  8/17/15   104,000    -    104,000    -    1,094 
Note holder 21  9/18/15   54,000    -    54,000    -    178 
Note holder 22  12/12/15   50,000    -    50,000    -    260 
Total     $704,500   $(145,400)  $528,929   $30,171   $69,669 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company made repayments on convertible notes payable of $10,000. Additionally, $79,589 of the debt discounts were recognized in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015 leaving an unamortized discount of $52,377 at June 30, 2015.

 

The following table depicts the amounts due for each convertible note as of June 30, 2015:

 

Title  Maturity Date  Principal   Debt Discount   Carrying Amount   Accrued Interest 
Note holder 1  1/24/2015  $50,000   $-   $50,000   $16,604 
Note holder 1  4/28/2016   15,000    (6,123)   8,877    1,476 
Note holder 4  3/21/2016   30,000    (10,849)   19,151    3,830 
Note holder 7  5/9/2015   50,000    -    50,000    10,713 
Note holder 10  11/4/2015   25,000    (4,349)   20,651    4,129 
Note holder 11  7/15/2024   50,000    (1,027)   48,973    9,795 
Note holder 12  9/3/2015   25,000    (2,226)   22,774    4,554 
Note holder 12  10/31/2015   25,000    (4,212)   20,788    4,157 
Note holder 13  10/21/2015   20,000    (3,096)   16,904    3,381 
Note holder 16  12/30/2015   45,000    (11,281)   33,719    6,744 
Note holder 17  3/26/2016   25,000    (9,212)   15,788    3,157 
Note holder 19  4/26/2013   30,000    -    30,000    8,030 
Note holder 20  2/27/2015   52,812    -    52,812    13,653 
Note holder 20  6/11/2016   59,800    (56,526)   3,274    311 
Note holder 21  8/17/2015   93,480    (42,409)   51,071    5,135 
Note holder 21  9/18/2015   54,000    (43,875)   10,125    2,320 
Note holder 22  12/12/2015   50,000    (43,939)   6,061    2,740 
Note holder 23  3/24/2016   55,000    (53,771)   1,229    286 
Note holder 24  2/18/2016   4,812    -    4,812    30 
Note holder 24  2/21/2016   5,500    -    5,500    34 
Total     $765,404   $(292,895)  $472,509   $101,079 

 

11 

 

 

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

We have engaged an entity controlled by the director of the Company to perform consulting services related to the development of new technologies. Payments to this party totaled $5,409 and $2,500 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received an interest free $8,000 loan from a related party to fund operations. The loan is unsecured, due on demand and as such is included in current liabilities. There was $8,000 due as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received an interest free $2,000 loan from a related party to fund operations. The loan is unsecured, due on demand and as such is included in current liabilities. There was $2,000 due as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company received two separate $3,000 loans from a related party to fund operations. Each loan was entered into by the lender paying expenses on behalf of the company. The loans plus fixed interest of $500 were repaid in March 2015.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued a total of 15,000,000 common shares as bonuses to officers at a total value of $151,500

 

NOTE 10 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

The Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 15,000,000 common shares valued at $151,500 as bonuses to officers, 150,000 common shares valued at $5,000 for services provided by consultants; 12,921,025 common shares for total note conversions of $54,208 and 1,300,000 common shares valued at $20,610 for default penalties on notes payable.

 

On June 29, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement whereby the consultant would provide services for a period of 30 days in exchange for 5,000,000 shares of common stock. The common shares were valued equal to the close price as of the date of the agreement, or $0.006 per share, resulting in a total value of $30,000.

 

There were 59,960,864 shares issued and 59,910,864 outstanding as of June 30, 2015.

 

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

The Company could become a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Matters that are probable of unfavorable outcomes to the Company and which can be reasonably estimated are accrued. Such accruals are based on information known about the matters, the Company’s estimates of the outcomes of such matters and its experience in contesting, litigating and settling similar matters.

 

As of the date of this report, except as described below, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject, nor are there any such proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities.

 

Payroll Tax Liabilities

 

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had accrued $771,936 and $767,109 in payroll tax liabilities.  The payment of these liabilities has not been made due to our limited profitability.  Due to the uncertainty regarding our future profitability, it is difficult to predict our ability to pay these liabilities.   As a result, a federal tax lien has been levied that will have to be satisfied.

 

Federal Income Tax Liability

 

On January 29, 2015, we received a notification from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) regarding deficiencies in our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2011. The notice was the result of not filing our tax return for the year then ended and included the results of an IRS examination which yielded an income tax amount due of $92,804 plus penalties and interest totaling $34,337 for a total amount due of $127,141. While we believe we will be able to successfully reduce the tax liability and assessed penalties to zero or near zero due to our net loss sustained during the year ended December 31, 2011, the possibility exists we will be unsuccessful and could face an assessment for the full amount of $127,141. There is no accrued liability for this potential payout as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014 given the inestimable nature of the outcome at this point.

 

Office and Warehouse Lease

 

The Company is required under the terms of the rental lease to make monthly lease payments.

 

The Company’s property lease is for an initial period of thirteen months from October 2011 and may be extended in two separate thirteen-month increments for up to a total term of 39 months. The lease was extended for an additional twelve month period commencing on January 9, 2015 requiring monthly rental payments of $3,700. The Company may not terminate this lease prior to the agreed upon termination date. The minimum future annual rental commitments are as follows:

 

2015    22,200 
       
Total annual lease commitments   $22,200 

 

12 

 

  

NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

 

As of June 30, 2015 the Company had a $1,127,997 derivative liability balance on the balance sheet and recorded a loss from derivative liability fair value adjustment of $488,110.  The derivative liability activity comes from convertible notes payable as follows:

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, during 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of $30,000 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that matured on April 26, 2013. The Company is currently negotiating an extension of the maturity date and anticipates to successfully do so. The note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate of $0.30 per share.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $73,451.  Of the total, $30,000 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $43,451 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $73,451 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the note was amortized over the term of our stock’s opening trading day to the original maturity, or two days. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to note and determined an aggregate fair value of $31 and recorded a gain of $1,563 from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 359%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .01%, (4) expected life of 0.25 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on February 27, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $339,026 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on February 27, 2015. The note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 35% discount from the lowest daily volume weighted average price in the five days prior to conversion, but not less than $0.00004.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $312,128 which was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  The fair value of $368,056 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $130,478 and recorded a $58,031 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 349%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .01%, (4) expected life of 0.25 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

13 

 

  

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on June 11, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of $59,800 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on June 11, 2016. The note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 50% discount from the lowest daily volume weighted average price in the five days prior to conversion.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $118,374. Of the total, $59,800 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $58,574 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $118,374 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $235,063 and recorded a $116,689 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 449%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .28%, (4) expected life of 0.95 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on November 17, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $104,000 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on August 17, 2015. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 52% discount from the average of the lowest three trading prices in the ten trading days prior to conversion.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $180,678. Of the total, $104,000 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $76,678 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $180,678 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

14 

 

  

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $272,794 and recorded a $124,941 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 323%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .13%, (4) expected life of 0.13 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on December 16, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $54,000 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on September 18, 2015. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 45% discount from the average of the lowest three trading prices in the ten trading days prior to conversion.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $97,019. Of the total, $54,000 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $43,019 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $97,019 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $136,942 and recorded a $39,923 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 294%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .01%, (4) expected life of 0.22 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on December 12, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of $50,000 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on December 12, 2015. The note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 40% discount from the lowest closing price in the fifteen trading days prior to conversion.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

15 

 

  

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $105,838. Of the total, $50,000 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $55,838 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $105,838 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $157,093 and recorded a $51,255 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 475%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .11%, (4) expected life of 0.45 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

As discussed in Note 7 – “Convertible Notes Payable”, on June 26, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of $55,000 Convertible Promissory Notes to an unrelated party that mature on March 24, 2016. The note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and can be convertible into the Company’s common shares, at the holder’s option, at the conversion rate equal to a 45% discount from the lowest closing price in the twenty trading days prior to conversion.  The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the agreement for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to “reset” provisions in the event the Company subsequently issues common stock, stock warrants, stock options or convertible debt with a stock price, exercise price or conversion price lower than conversion price of these notes. If these provisions are triggered, the conversion price of the note will be reduced.  The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability.

 

The embedded derivative for the note is carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value.  The derivative liability is marked-to-market each measurement period and any unrealized change in fair value is recorded as a component of the income statement and the associated fair value carrying amount on the balance sheet is adjusted by the change.  The Company fair values the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The aggregate fair value of the derivative at the inception date of the note was $96,762. Of the total, $55,000 was recorded as a debt discount, which is up to but not more than the net proceeds of the notes.  $41,762 was charged to operations as non-cash interest expense. The fair value of $96,762 was recorded as a derivative liability on the balance sheet on the inception date.

 

The debt discount for the notes will be amortized over the term of the note, or one year. On June 30, 2015, the Company marked-to-market the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to notes and determined an aggregate fair value of $195,596 and recorded a $98,834 loss from change in fair value of derivatives for six months ended June 30, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivatives for the notes was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 471%, (3) risk-free interest rate of .28%, (4) expected life of 0.73 of a year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.006 per share.

 

16 

 

  

NOTE 13 – STOCK OPTIONS

 

The following table summarizes all stock option activity for the six month period ended June 30, 2015:

 

   Shares   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2014   631,905   $0.30 
Granted   -    - 
Exercised   -    - 
Forfeited   -    - 
Expired   -    - 
Outstanding, June 30, 2015   631,905   $0.30 

 

The following table discloses information regarding outstanding and exercisable options at June 30, 2015:

 

    Outstanding   Exercisable 
Exercise
Prices
   Number of
Option Shares
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
   Number of
Option Shares
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
$0.30    631,905   $0.30    1.99    631,905   $0.30 
      631,905   $0.30    1.99    631,905   $0.30 

 

In determining the compensation cost of the stock options granted, the fair value of each option grant has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in these calculations are summarized as follows:

 

   June 30, 2015 
Expected term of options granted   2 - 5 years 
Expected volatility range   394 - 408%
Range of risk-free interest rates   1.70 – 1.73%
Expected dividend yield   0%

  

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On July 1, 2015, the Company issued a total of 60,000,000 shares of common stock to its officers, 30,000,000 shares to each Devon Jones and Philip Kirkland. The common shares were valued equal to the close price as of the date the board approved the issuance, or $0.0055 per share, resulting in a total value of $330,000.

 

The Company issued a total of 50,000 common shares, 25,000 on each July 1 and August1, 2015, valued at $183 pursuant to an existing consulting agreement requiring 25,000 common shares to be issued monthly. The agreement terminated on August 31, 2015 resulting in no additional shares being issued on September 1, 2015.

 

On July 3, 2015, the Company settled a claim from a service provider for amounts due on services provided. The settlement resulted in a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock being issued to the service provider and were valued equal to the close price as of the date of the agreement, or $0.003 per share, resulting in a total value of $18,000.

 

17 

 

  

On July 9, 2015, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former note holder of the Company. The settlement agreement required the Company to issue 500,000 shares of common stock which were valued equal to the close price as the date of the agreement, or $0.0038 per share, resulting in a total value of $1,900.

 

On various dates from July 9 to August 14, 2015, the Company accepted eleven separate conversion notices from an existing note holder resulting in a total of 66,808,613 shares of common stock being issued in exchange for a reduction in the note principal balance of $52,812 plus a reduction of accrued interest payable totaling $17,691.

 

On various dates from July 9 to August 13, 2015, the Company accepted nineteen separate conversion notices from an existing note holder resulting in a total of 144,822,086 shares of common stock being issued in exchange for a reduction in the note principal balance of $124,210.

 

On various dates from July 15 to August 7, 2015, the Company accepted seven separate conversion notices from an existing note holder resulting in a total of 57,406,767 shares of common stock being issued in exchange for a reduction in the note principal balance of $50,000 plus a reduction of accrued interest payable totaling $1,522.

 

On July 8, 2015, the Company entered into a note payable for $27,466. The note accrues interest at 10% annually and is due on July 7, 2016. Additionally, after 180 days from the effective date, the principal plus accrued interest may be converted to shares of common stock at the option of the note holder at a rate equal to a 40% discount from the lowest closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the fifteen trading days immediately preceding the conversion.

 

On July 29, 2015, the Company entered into a note payable for $11,000. The note accrues interest at 10% annually and is due on March 24, 2016. Additionally, the principal plus accrued interest may be converted to shares of common stock at the option of the note holder at a rate equal to a 45% discount from the lowest intra-day trading price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days immediately preceding the conversion but not less than $0.00005.

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company entered into a note payable for $11,500. The note accrues interest at 10% annually and is due on May 16, 2016. Additionally, the principal plus accrued interest may be converted to shares of common stock at the option of the note holder at a rate equal to a 45% discount from the lowest intra-day trading price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty trading days immediately preceding the conversion but not less than $0.00005.

 

On August 6, 2015, the Company entered into line of credit whereby it has the right to sell to the investor up to $5,000,000 of common stock over a period of 24 months. The Company may sell up to $100,000 of common stock, but not less than $5,000, at any time at is sole discretion by issuing a put notice to the investor. The sales price of the stock will be equal to a 30% discount from the average of the lowest two closing bid prices in the preceding five trading days. There is a minimum of ten trading days between put notices. The agreement requires the Company to issue 3% of the total credit line, or $150,000, in common stock with an issue price equal to the average of the daily volume weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock during the five business days immediately preceding the due date of the issuance.

 

18 

 

  

Item 2.        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

 

The information contained in Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

 

This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

 

Overview

 

Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (the “Company” or “IHS”) was formed in April 22, 2011; IHS is a technology based intelligent highway solutions contractor. The Company’s primarily focus is in the California transportation market providing services that range from providing labor, materials, and related equipment for corrective service and maintenance services for the state’s transportation infrastructure. Additionally, the Company intends to develop transportation technology services that enable vehicles, roads, traffic lights, message signs, and other elements to become “intelligent” by embedding them with microchips and sensors and by empowering them to communicate with each other via wireless technologies. The acceleration of data collection and communication will allow state governments to improve transportation system performance by reducing congestion and increasing both traveler safety and convenience. While the Company develops technologies related transportation technology, it will accept general electrical contracting work as a revenue source.

 

Plan of Operations

 

On August 22, 2013, the Company entered into a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with SCS Lighting Solutions Inc. (“SCS”), whereby SCS appointed the Company as its exclusive distributer of SCS products in Sacramento, California and other locations, as determined by both parties in the future. The SCS products include standard lighting solutions, as well as custom lighting products for indoor and outdoor applications. The Distribution Agreement is no longer exclusive.

 

The Distribution Agreement’s term automatically renews for one (1) year increments, unless either party elects to terminate the Agreement by giving not less than sixty (60) days’ notice prior to the end of the current term.

 

On March 19, 2014, the Company announced it had received a significant purchase order from Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) for the installation of a temperature control system and associated sensors in a state owned office building in Alameda, California.

 

On July 1, 2014, the Company announced it had received a second purchase order from Honeywell. The purchase order is for additional work in office buildings owned by the State of California.

 

These purchase orders with Honeywell were the Company’s sole source of income in 2014. The Honeywell project was completed during the first quarter of 2015 and a new electrical contracting project started shortly thereafter. We will continue to accept general electrical contracting projects while we develop technologies related to our planned business of intelligent transportation services.

 

Results of Operations

 

Revenue

 

Revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were generated from contracts with Honeywell for the installation of a temperature control system and other general electrical contracting work.

 

19 

 

 

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Three months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Revenue  $8,612   $401,681   $(393,069)

 

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2015 were $8,612 compared to $401,681 during the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of $393,069 or 98% is the result of the timing associated with the Honeywell projects where one Honeywell project was completed in the first quarter of 2015 and another not started until the end of the second quarter. This resulted in fewer working days on which to earn revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2015 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Six months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Revenue  $191,886   $465,833   $(273,947)

 

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were $191,886 compared to $465,833 during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of $273,947 or 59% is the result of the timing associated with the Honeywell projects where one Honeywell project was completed in the first quarter of 2015 and another not started until the end of the second quarter. The projects required more consistent work from late March through June 2014. This resulted in fewer working days on which to earn revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2015 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Cost of Goods Sold

 

Cost of revenues include all direct material, sub-contract, labor, and certain other direct costs, as well as those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor and fringe benefits.

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Three months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Labor  $1,728   $257,377   $(255,649)
Fuel   -    1,367    (1,367)
Vehicle Lease   7,110    19,990    (12,880)
Other   1,195    17,131    (15,936)
Total  $10,033   $295,865   $(285,832)

 

20 

 

 

Cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2015 were $10,033 compared to $295,865 during the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of 285,8332 or 97% is the result of the Honeywell projects beginning in the latter part of the second quarter of 2015 where it was in effect for the full quarter in 2014. With fewer working days on a project during the three months ended June 30, 2015, overall cost of goods sold were lower than the three months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Six months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Labor  $110,415   $279,224   $(168,809)
Fuel   2,018    2,258    (240)
Vehicle Lease   15,519    29,372    (13,853)
Other   21,052    43,026    (21,974)
Total  $149,004   $353,880   $(204,876)

 

Cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were $149,004 compared to $353,880 during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of $204,876 or 58% is the result of the decreased working days needed to complete the Honeywell projects in the first half of 2015 compared to the same period in 2014. With fewer working days on a project during the six months ended June 30, 2015, overall cost of goods sold were lower than the six months ended June 30, 2014

 

Operating Expenses

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Three months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Salaries and wages  $43,095   $53,084   $(9,989)
Professional services   304,827    503,015    (198,188)
Other   172,030    214,103    (42,073)
Total  $519,952   $770,202   $(250,250)

  

Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2015 were $519,953 compared to $770,202 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of $250,250 or 32% is the result of decreased professional services resulting from the recognition of stock based professional fees and other expenses that existed during the three months ended June 30, 2014 but not during the three months ended June 30, 2015 as the majority of the agreements with the consultants were not renewed.  

 

Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Six months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Salaries and wages  $82,369   $106,836   $(24,467)
Professional services   434,494    844,743    (410,249)
Other   203,708    245,296    (41,588)
Total  $720,571   $1,196,875   $(476,304)

 

21 

 

 

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were $720,571 compared to $1,196,875 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease of $476,304 or 40% is the result of decreased professional services resulting from the recognition of stock based professional fees and other expenses that existed during the six months ended June 30, 2014 but not during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as the majority of the agreements with the consultants were not renewed.  

 

Other Income and Expenses

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Three months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Interest expense, net  $(461,313)  $(540,635)  $79,322 
Gain on extinguishment of debt   1,666    34,218    (32,552)
Loss on settlement   -    (175,000)   175,000 
Penalties   (6,865)   -    (6,865)
Loss on derivative fair value adjustment   (351,073)   (94,209)   (256,864)
Total  $(817,585)  $(775,626)  $(41,959)

 

Other income and expense during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was a net expense of $817,585 compared to a net expense of $775,626 during the three months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in net expense of $41,959 or 5% was the result of increased losses on derivative fair value adjustments partially offset by a loss on settlements of $175,000 that was present during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and not during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

 

Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

  

   Six months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Interest expense, net  $(590,996)  $(792,975)  $201,979 
Gain on extinguishment of debt   1,666    118,291    (116,625)
Loss on settlement   -    (175,000)   175,000 
Penalties   (22,427)   -    (22,427)
Loss on derivative fair value adjustment   (488,110)   (150,063)   (338,047)
Total  $(1,099,867)  $(999,747)  $(100,120)

 

Other income and expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was a net expense of $1,099,867 compared to a net expense of $999,747 during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in net expense of $100,120 or 10% was the result of increased losses on derivative fair value adjustments partially offset by a loss on settlements of $175,000 that was present during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and not during the six months ended June 30, 2015 .

 

Net Loss

 

Three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Three months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Net loss  $(1,338,958)  $(1,440,012)  $101,054 
As a percentage of revenue   -15,548%   -358%   -15,189%

 

Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $1,338,958, or 15,548% of revenue, compared to $1,440,012, or 358% of revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2015 is mostly attributable to the decreased revenues and related gross margins offset by decreased operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014 as discussed previously.

 

Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

 

   Six months ended June 30,     
   2015   2014   Change 
Net loss  $(1,777,556)  $(2,084,669)  $307,113 
As a percentage of revenue   -926%   -448%   -479%

 

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $1,777,556, or 926% of revenue, compared to $2,084,669, or 448% of revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease in net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2015 is mostly attributable to the decreased revenues and related gross margins offset by decreased operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014 as discussed previously.

 

22 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of June 30, 2015, we had cash of $8,401, total current assets of $137,440 and total current liabilities of $3,164,609 creating a working capital deficit of $3,027,169. Current assets consisted of $8,401 in cash, $0 of contracts receivable, $75,049 of prepaid expenses, current deferred loan costs of $20,379 and other current assets of $25,000. Current liabilities consisted of a bank overdraft of $40, accounts payable $152,667, current notes payable of $185,000, current convertible notes payable net of discounts of $472,509, a derivative liability of $1,127,997, accrued interest of $111,750 and accrued expenses and other liabilities of $1,104,646.

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

Cash flows used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $115,850 which consisted of a net loss of $1,777,556, non-cash expenses and gains of $1,295,599 and positive changes in working capital of $366,107. Net cash used in operating activities during the same period in 2014 was $342,336 which consisted of a net loss of $2,084,669, non-cash expenses and gains of $1,262,621 and positive changes in working capital of $479,712. The change in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in net loss of $307,113, relatively flat non-cash expenses and gains and a greater change in prepaid expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we used $-0- of cash in investing activities. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $16,910 and consisted solely of the purchase of equipment.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $29,000 which consisted of convertible note repayments of $10,000, proceeds from notes payable of $45,000 and related party note repayments of $6,000. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $388,800 and consisted of proceeds from convertible notes payable of $305,000, proceeds from notes payable of $210,000, repayments of notes payable of $130,000, proceeds from related party notes payable of $8,000 and the purchase of treasury stock for $4,200.

 

Going Concern

 

Based on our financial history since inception, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We have generated very little revenue and have limited tangible assets. Our company has a limited operating history. Our company’s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to on a profitable basis. If our business plan is not successful, and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in our company.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements and their adoption has not had or is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, or statements.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

There have been no changes in the Company's significant accounting policies for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to those disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2015.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

We are a Smaller Reporting Company and are not required to provide the information under this item.

  

23 

 

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

Disclosure of controls and procedures.

 

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) (the Company’s principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that: (1) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (2) that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “ Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our CEO and Interim CFO have determined and concluded that, as of June 30, 2015, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

 

As defined by Auditing Standard No. 5, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements and Related Independence Rule and Conforming Amendments,” established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), a material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that result in a more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses as of June 30 2015:

 

  (1) Lack of an independent audit committee or audit committee financial expert. Although our board of directors serves as the audit committee it has no independent directors. Further, we have not identified an audit committee financial expert on our board of directors. These factors are counter to corporate governance practices as defined by the various stock exchanges and may lead to less supervision over management.

 

We do not have sufficient experience from our accounting personnel with the requisite U.S. GAAP public company reporting experience that is necessary for adequate controls and procedures.

 

Our management determined that these deficiencies constituted material weaknesses.

 

Due to our small size, we were not able to immediately take any action to remediate these material weaknesses but plan to address these items in the near future. Notwithstanding the assessment that our Internal Controls over Financial Reporting was not effective and that there were material weaknesses identified herein, we believe that our consolidated financial statements contained in this report fairly present our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the quarter covered thereby in all material respects.

 

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

 

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

24 

 

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Legal Proceedings.

 

We are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

  

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

 

We are a Smaller Reporting Company and are not required to provide the information under this item.

 

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued a total of 15,150,000 common shares for services provided by consultants; 12,921,025 common shares for total note conversions of $54,208 and 1,300,000 common shares valued at $20,610 for default penalties on notes payable.

 

The above shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, manner of the issuance and number of shares issued. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the investors had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they either: (1) agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering”; or (2) received shares pursuant to conversions of notes and the notes themselves had been held for longer than 6 months prior to conversion into unrestricted shares. Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

  

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable

 

Item 5.Other Information.

 

None

 

Item 6.Exhibits.

 

Exhibit    
Number   Exhibit Title
     
31.1*   Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2*   Certification of Principal Financial Office pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.1+   Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.2+   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
101.INS *   XBRL Instance Document
     
101.SCH *   XBRL Taxonomy Schema
     
101.CAL *   XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase
     
101.DEF *   XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase
     
101.LAB *   XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase
     
101.PRE *   XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

 

* Filed herewith.

 

+ In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

 

25 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.
   
Date: August 19, 2015 By: /s/ Devon Jones
    Devon Jones
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
     
Date: August 19, 2015 By: /s/ Philip Kirkland
    Philip Kirkland
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

26