Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC | exhibit322-certification6x.htm |
| EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC | exhibit312-certification6x.htm |
| EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC | exhibit311-certification6x.htm |
| EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC | exhibit321-certification6x.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 | |
o | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
Commission file number 000-53202 | |
HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC | |||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | |||
Iowa | 20-3919356 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||
2779 Highway 24, Lawler, Iowa | 52154 | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | ||
(563) 238-5555 | |||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | |||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None | |||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Membership Units | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | o | Accelerated filer | o | |
Non-accelerated filer | x | Smaller Reporting Company | o | |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | ||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes x No
As of August 14, 2015, we had 90,445 membership units outstanding. On June 13, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Steve Retterath, the Company's largest equity holder, to repurchase and retire all of the units owned by Mr. Retterath. The Company agreed to repurchase and retire 25,860 membership units owned by Mr. Retterath in exchange for $30 million. The Company believes that it has a binding agreement with Mr. Retterath. Mr. Retterath contends he is not bound by the agreement. The Company's position is as of the closing date, Mr. Retterath is no longer the equitable owner of any membership units in the Company. As a result, the Company has recorded a $30 million short-term liability related to the amount the Company agreed to pay Mr. Retterath to repurchase his membership units and has correspondingly reduced members' equity on our balance sheet. The 90,445 membership units outstanding include the contested membership units the Company agreed to repurchase from Mr. Retterath.
INDEX
Page No. | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC
Balance Sheets
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
ASSETS | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||
CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 18,438,379 | $ | 32,522,840 | |||
Trading securities | 40,734,401 | 32,220,801 | |||||
Accounts receivable | 4,445,185 | 1,248,484 | |||||
Inventory | 10,560,977 | 9,517,127 | |||||
Prepaid and other | 1,777,280 | 1,978,443 | |||||
Derivative instruments | — | 1,304,697 | |||||
Total current assets | 75,956,222 | 78,792,392 | |||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | |||||||
Land and improvements | 22,539,771 | 22,539,771 | |||||
Buildings | 5,659,487 | 5,528,027 | |||||
Equipment | 141,853,408 | 140,904,830 | |||||
Construction in progress | 4,031,585 | 440,875 | |||||
174,084,251 | 169,413,503 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 69,389,788 | 64,194,898 | |||||
Total property and equipment | 104,694,463 | 105,218,605 | |||||
OTHER ASSETS | |||||||
Utility rights, net of amortization of $1,114,635 and $1,046,441 | 1,193,394 | 1,261,588 | |||||
Other assets | 3,410,536 | 3,234,488 | |||||
Total other assets | 4,603,930 | 4,496,076 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 185,254,615 | $ | 188,507,073 | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
3
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC
Balance Sheets (continued)
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY | (Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 4,696,177 | $ | 9,000,883 | |||
Due to former member | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | |||||
Property tax payable | 472,575 | 483,036 | |||||
Payroll payable | 240,089 | 753,939 | |||||
Derivative instruments | 635,056 | — | |||||
Total current liabilities | 36,043,897 | 40,237,858 | |||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | |||||||
Other liabilities | 240,869 | 419,904 | |||||
Total long-term liabilities | 240,869 | 419,904 | |||||
MEMBERS' EQUITY (64,585 units issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014) | 148,969,849 | 147,849,311 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY | $ | 185,254,615 | $ | 188,507,073 | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
4
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 72,749,789 | $ | 87,823,949 | $ | 134,419,822 | $ | 169,576,255 | |||||||
Costs of goods sold | 63,524,613 | 64,787,918 | 122,288,399 | 131,100,373 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 9,225,176 | 23,036,031 | 12,131,423 | 38,475,882 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 925,185 | 991,541 | 1,869,458 | 1,994,300 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 8,299,991 | 22,044,490 | 10,261,965 | 36,481,582 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) | — | (81,986 | ) | — | (129,480 | ) | |||||||||
Interest income | 12,319 | 5,362 | 18,048 | 14,187 | |||||||||||
Other income | 32,991 | 177,636 | 657,445 | 474,576 | |||||||||||
Total other income | 45,310 | 101,012 | 675,493 | 359,283 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 8,345,301 | $ | 22,145,502 | $ | 10,937,458 | $ | 36,840,865 | |||||||
Basic & diluted net income per capital unit | $ | 129.21 | $ | 342.89 | $ | 169.35 | $ | 570.42 | |||||||
Weighted average number of units outstanding for the calculation of basic & diluted net income per capital unit | 64,585 | 64,585 | 64,585 | 64,585 | |||||||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
5
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Net income | $ | 10,937,458 | $ | 36,840,865 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,263,084 | 5,281,234 | |||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on risk management activities | 1,939,753 | (2,244,209 | ) | ||||
Unrealized (gain) on trading securities activities | (259,569 | ) | — | ||||
Change in working capital components: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (3,196,701 | ) | 3,558,042 | ||||
Inventory | (1,043,850 | ) | (5,658,017 | ) | |||
Prepaid and other | 201,163 | 132,679 | |||||
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses | (5,008,052 | ) | (4,282,366 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 8,833,286 | 33,628,228 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Purchase of trading securities | (8,254,031 | ) | — | ||||
Payments for equipment and construction in progress | (4,670,748 | ) | (612,449 | ) | |||
Increase in other assets | (176,048 | ) | (339,413 | ) | |||
Net cash (used in) investing activities | (13,100,827 | ) | (951,862 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Distribution to members | (9,816,920 | ) | (13,046,170 | ) | |||
Increase in cash restricted for redemption of units | — | (30,000,000 | ) | ||||
Payments for debt issuance costs | — | (76,681 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | — | 30,000,000 | |||||
Payments on long-term borrowings | — | (45,000,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (9,816,920 | ) | (58,122,851 | ) | |||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (14,084,461 | ) | (25,446,485 | ) | |||
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning | 32,522,840 | 38,490,952 | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending | $ | 18,438,379 | $ | 13,044,467 | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | — | $ | 130,841 | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Commitment to redeem membership units | $ | — | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
6
1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies |
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, contained in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for 2014.
In the opinion of management, the interim condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation. The adjustments made to these statements consist only of normal recurring adjustments.
Nature of Business
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (an Iowa Limited Liability Company) is located near Lawler, Iowa and was organized to pool investors for a 100 million gallon ethanol plant with distribution primarily throughout the United States. The Company has capacity to produce in excess of 135 million gallons annually and sells distillers dried grains and corn oil as byproducts of ethanol production.
Organization
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC is organized as an Iowa limited liability company. The members' liability is limited as specified in Homeland Energy Solutions' operating agreement and pursuant to the Iowa Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act.
Significant Accounting Policies:
Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash & Cash Equivalents
The Company maintains its accounts primarily at one financial institution. At various times, the Company's cash balances may exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company has not experienced losses in such accounts.
Trading Securities
Investments bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the the near term are classified as trading securities. Trading securities are measured at fair value using prices obtained from pricing services. Any unrealized or realized gains and losses on the trading securities are recorded as part of other income (expense).
At December 31, 2014, trading securities consisted of short term bond mutual funds with an approximate cost of $32,201,000 and fair value of $32,221,000, respectively. At June 30, 2015, trading securities consisted of short term bond mutual funds with an approximate cost of $40,455,000 and fair value of $40,734,000, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 the Company recorded a net unrealized loss of $7,000 from these investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 the Company recorded a net unrealized gain of $260,000. There were no trading securities held as of June 30, 2014.
The Board of Directors voted to set aside up to $30 million in trading securities that will be used by the Company for the repurchase of 25,860 membership units held by Steve Retterath per the terms of an agreement with Mr. Retterath entered into on June 13, 2013 by the Company.
Receivables
Credit sales are made primarily to one customer and no collateral is required. The Company carries these accounts receivable at original invoice amount with no allowance for doubtful accounts due to the historical collection rates on these accounts.
Investments
The Company has a less than 20% investment interest in Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC (RPMG). This investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting under which the Company's share of net income is recognized as
7
income in the Company's statement of operations and added to the investment account. The investment balance is included in other assets and the income recognized as other income. The investment is evaluated for indications of impairment on a regular basis. A loss would be recognized when the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value.
Revenue and Cost Recognition
Revenue from the sale of the Company's products is recognized at the time title to the goods and all risks of ownership transfer to the customers. This generally occurs upon shipment, loading of the goods or when the customer picks up the goods. Interest income is recognized as earned. Shipping costs incurred by the Company in the sale of ethanol and distiller grains are not specifically identifiable and as a result, revenue from the sale of ethanol and distiller grains is recorded based on the net selling price reported to the Company from the marketer. Rail car lease costs incurred by the Company in the sale and shipment of distiller grain products are included in the cost of goods sold.
Inventories
Inventories are generally valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In the valuation of inventories and purchase and sale commitments, market is based on current replacement values except that it does not exceed net realizable values and is not less than net realizable values reduced by allowances for approximate normal profit margin.
Property & Equipment
The Company reviews its property and equipment for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group to the carrying value of the asset group. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.
Derivative Instruments
The Company evaluates its contracts to determine whether the contracts are derivative instruments. Certain contracts that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted from derivative accounting as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that meet the requirements of normal purchases or sales are documented as normal and exempted from the accounting and reporting requirements of derivative accounting.
The Company enters into short-term cash, option and futures contracts as a means of securing purchases of corn, natural gas and sales of ethanol for the plant and managing exposure to changes in commodity and energy prices. All of the Company's derivatives are designated as non-hedge derivatives for accounting purposes, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Although the contracts are economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as and accounted for as hedging instruments.
As part of its trading activity, the Company uses futures and option contracts through regulated commodity exchanges to manage its risk related to pricing of inventories. To reduce that risk, the Company generally takes positions using cash and futures contracts and options.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to derivative contracts related to corn and natural gas are included as a component of cost of goods sold and derivative contracts related to ethanol are included as a component of revenue in the accompanying financial statements. All contracts with the same counter party are reported on a net basis. The fair values of contracts entered through commodity exchanges are presented on the accompanying balance sheet as derivative instruments.
Committed Shares to be Redeemed
On June 13, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Steve Retterath, the Company's largest member, to repurchase and retire all of the membership units owned by Mr. Retterath. The Company agreed to close on this repurchase on or before August 1, 2013. The Company agreed to repurchase and retire 25,860 membership units owned by Mr. Retterath in exchange for $30 million, to be paid in two equal installments payable at closing and on July 1, 2014. The transaction failed to close by the scheduled date due to objections by Mr. Retterath. Due to all conditions of the agreement being met prior to, or on, August 1, 2013, the Company believes that it has a binding agreement with Mr. Retterath; as such the commitment to repurchase and retire
8
the membership units is reflected in the financial statements as a current liability, due to former member, as if the transaction had closed on August 1, 2013. See Note 9 for additional information.
Net Income per Unit
Basic and diluted net income per unit is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of members' units and members' unit equivalents outstanding during the period. There were no member unit equivalents outstanding during the periods presented; accordingly, the Company's basic and diluted net income per unit are the same.
Prior to, or on, August 1, 2013, the Company believes it has a binding agreement with Steve Retterath to repurchase and retire all 25,860 membership units owned by Mr. Retterath. These membership units have thus been excluded in the determination of net income per capital unit as presented in the Statement of Operations. The Company is currently involved in litigation with Mr. Retterath. There is potential that Mr. Retterath will continue as a unit holder upon conclusion of the litigation and said membership units would not be redeemed under the repurchase agreement. If the units are not redeemed, basic and diluted net income per unit, including the 25,860 units, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 would be $92.27 and $120.93. Net income per unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 would have been $244.85 and $407.33, respectively.
Risks and Uncertainties
The Company has certain risks and uncertainties that it will experience during volatile market conditions, which can have a severe impact on operations. The Company's revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of ethanol, distiller grains and corn oil to customers primarily located in the United States. Corn for the production process is supplied to the plant primarily from local agricultural producers and from purchases on the open market. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, ethanol sales averaged approximately 73% of total revenues, while approximately 24% of revenues were generated from the sale of distiller grains and 3% of revenues were generated from the sale of corn oil. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, corn costs averaged approximately 78% of cost of goods sold.
The Company's operating and financial performance is largely driven by the prices at which ethanol is sold and the net expense of corn. The price of ethanol is influenced by factors such as supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs, and unleaded gasoline and the petroleum markets. Excess ethanol supply in the market, in particular, puts downward pressure on the price of ethanol. The Company's largest cost of production is corn. The cost of corn is generally impacted by factors such as supply and demand, weather, and government policies and programs. The Company's risk management program is used to protect against the price volatility of these commodities.
2. INVENTORY
Inventory consisted of the following as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Raw Materials | $ | 5,434,589 | $ | 5,962,251 | ||||
Work in Process | 1,315,803 | 1,402,369 | ||||||
Finished Goods | 3,810,585 | 2,152,507 | ||||||
Totals | $ | 10,560,977 | $ | 9,517,127 | ||||
3. DEBT
Master Loan Agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank
On November 30, 2007, the Company entered into a Master Loan Agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank ("Home Federal") establishing a senior credit facility with Home Federal for the construction of a 100 million gallon per year natural gas powered dry mill ethanol plant. In return, the Company executed a mortgage in favor of Home Federal creating a senior lien on the real estate and plant and a security interest in all personal property located on Company property. The Company currently has a term revolving loan with Home Federal.
9
Term Revolving Loan
Under the terms of the Master Loan Agreement, the Company has a $20 million term revolving loan which has a maturity date of August 1, 2018. Interest on the term revolving loan accrues at a rate equal to the one month LIBOR plus 310 basis points, 3.292% on June 30, 2015. The Company is required to make monthly payments of interest until the maturity date of the term revolving loan on August 1, 2018, on which date the unpaid principal balance of the term revolving loan becomes due. There was no balance outstanding on the term revolving loan as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Covenants
During the term of the Loans, the Company is subject to certain financial covenants at various times calculated monthly, quarterly or annually, including restriction of the payment of dividends and capital expenditures and maintenance of certain financial ratios including the minimum working capital, tangible net worth, and a fixed charge ratio as defined by the Master Loan Agreement. Failure to comply with the protective loan covenants or maintain the required financial ratios may cause acceleration of the outstanding principal balances on the loans and/or the imposition of fees, charges or penalties.
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Due to former member
On June 13, 2013, we entered into an agreement with Steve Retterath, the Company's largest member, to repurchase and retire all of the units owned by Mr. Retterath. The Company agreed to close on this repurchase on or before August 1, 2013. The Company agreed to repurchase and retire 25,860 membership units owned by Mr. Retterath in exchange for $30 million, to be paid in two equal installments payable at closing and on July 1, 2014. The transaction failed to close by the scheduled date due to objections by Mr. Retterath. The Company believes that it has a binding agreement with Mr. Retterath. On August 14, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Mr. Retterath in Iowa state court to enforce the terms of the repurchase agreement. The Company is asking the Iowa state court to require Mr. Retterath to complete the repurchase agreement pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Retterath contends he is not bound by the agreement. The Company's position is as of the closing date, Mr. Retterath is no longer the equitable owner of any membership units in the Company. As a result, in 2013 the Company recorded a $30 million short-term liability related to the amount the Company agreed to pay Mr. Retterath to repurchase his membership units and correspondingly reduced members' equity on the balance sheet. If the Company is ultimately unsuccessful in its lawsuit against Mr. Retterath, the Company will reevaluate the accounting considerations made during the period of time that the lawsuit is pending.
Other matters
The Company has purchased corn and materials from members of its Board of Directors who own or manage elevators or are local producers of corn. Purchases during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 totaled approximately $991,000 and $3,194,000 respectively and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $65,000 and $65,000 respectively. Amounts due to these members was $0 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Previously, the Company had an agreement with Golden Grain Energy, LLC (Golden Grain), a member of the Company, for management services. Pursuant to the agreement, Homeland Energy and Golden Grain agreed to share management services in an effort to reduce the costs of administrative overhead. Homeland Energy and Golden Grain agreed to split the compensation costs associated with each of the employees covered by the agreement. This agreement was terminated on May 16, 2014, thus the Company incurred no costs under the agreement for the three and six months ending June 30, 2015. The cost for the same periods of 2014 related to this agreement were approximately $11,800 and $47,200, respectively.
5. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND AGREEMENTS
Ethanol, corn oil, and distiller grains marketing agreements and major customers
The Company has entered into a marketing agreement with RPMG, a related party, to sell all ethanol produced at the plant at a mutually agreed on price, less commission and transportation charges. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had commitments to sell approximately 20% of its produced gallons of ethanol at various fixed prices and 80% of its produced gallons of ethanol at basis price levels indexed against exchanges for delivery through September 30, 2015.
10
The Company has entered into a marketing agreement with RPMG to sell all corn oil produced at the plant at a mutually agreed on price, less marketing fees and transportation charges. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had commitments to sell approximately 2,000,000 pounds of corn oil at various fixed and basis price levels indexed against exchanges for delivery through July 31, 2015.
The Company also has an investment in RPMG, included in other assets, totaling approximately $2,694,000 as of June 30, 2015.
The Company has entered into a marketing agreement to sell all distiller grains produced at the plant to CHS, an unrelated party, at a mutually agreed on price, less commission and transportation charges. The agreement was renewed for another one year term on April 1, 2015. The agreement calls for automatic renewal for successive one-year terms unless 120-day prior written notice is given before the current term expires. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had approximately 60,000 tons of distiller grains commitments for delivery through December 2015 at various fixed prices.
Sales and marketing fees related to the agreements in place for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were approximately as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Sales ethanol | $ | 53,236,000 | $ | 97,532,000 | $ | 67,670,000 | $ | 130,866,000 | |||||||
Sales distiller grains | 17,176,000 | 32,515,000 | 17,656,000 | 34,609,000 | |||||||||||
Sales corn oil | 2,338,000 | 4,373,000 | 2,498,000 | 4,385,000 | |||||||||||
Marketing fees ethanol | $ | 42,000 | $ | 84,000 | $ | 33,000 | $ | 66,000 | |||||||
Marketing fees distiller grains | 205,000 | 366,000 | 168,000 | 334,000 | |||||||||||
Marketing fees corn oil | 25,000 | 46,000 | 18,000 | 34,000 | |||||||||||
As of June 30, 2015 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||
Amount due from/(to) RPMG | $ | 1,751,000 | $ | (1,495,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Amount due from CHS | 2,528,000 | 595,000 | |||||||||||||
At June 30, 2015, the Company had approximately $20,479,000 in outstanding priced corn purchase commitments for bushels at various prices and approximately 1,117,000 bushels of unpriced corn through June 2016 accounted for under the normal purchase exclusion.
The Company has commitments for minimum purchases of various utilities such as electricity over the next 4 years, accounted for under the normal purchase exclusion, which are anticipated to approximate the following for the twelve month periods ending June 30:
2016 | $ | 3,787,000 | ||
2017 | 3,787,000 | |||
2018 | 3,787,000 | |||
2019 | 2,841,000 | |||
Total anticipated commitments | $ | 14,202,000 | ||
6. LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company leases rail cars and rail moving equipment with original terms up to 5 years. The Company is obligated to pay costs of insurance, taxes, repairs and maintenance pursuant to the terms of the leases. Rent expense incurred for the operating leases during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately $402,000 and $818,000 and for the same periods in 2014 was approximately $416,000 and $832,000, respectively.
11
At June 30, 2015, the Company had the following approximate minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases for the twelve month periods ended June 30:
2016 | $ | 1,663,000 | ||
2017 | 1,435,000 | |||
2018 | 413,000 | |||
Total lease commitments | $ | 3,511,000 | ||
7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company's activities expose it to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in commodity prices. These financial exposures are monitored and managed by the Company as an integral part of its overall risk-management program. The Company's risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial and commodities markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that the volatility of these markets may have on its operating results.
To reduce price risk caused by market fluctuations, the Company generally follows a policy of using exchange traded futures and options contracts to reduce its net position of merchandisable agricultural commodity inventories and forward cash purchase and sales contracts and uses exchange traded futures and options contracts to reduce price risk. Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at market price. Changes in market price of exchange traded futures and options contracts related to corn and natural gas are recorded in costs of goods sold and changes in market prices of contracts related to the sale of ethanol, if applicable, are recorded in revenues.
The Company uses futures or options contracts to fix the purchase price of anticipated volumes of corn to be purchased and processed in a future month. The Company's plant will grind approximately 45 million bushels of corn per year. During the previous period and over the next 12 months, the Company has hedged and anticipates hedging between 5% and 60% of its anticipated monthly grind. At June 30, 2015, the Company has hedged portions of its anticipated monthly purchases for corn averaging approximately 14% of its anticipated monthly grind over the next twelve months.
The following table represents the approximate amount of realized/unrealized gains (losses) and changes in fair value recognized in earnings on commodity contracts for the three and six months ending June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the fair value of derivatives as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Income Statement Classification | Realized Gain (Loss) | Change In Unrealized Gain (Loss) | Total Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||||
Commodity contracts for the | Cost of Goods Sold | $ | 1,048,000 | $ | (3,090,000 | ) | $ | (2,042,000 | ) | ||||
three months ended June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||
Commodity contracts for the | Cost of Goods Sold | $ | 695,000 | $ | 3,226,000 | $ | 3,921,000 | ||||||
three months ended June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Commodity contracts for the | |||||||||||||
six months ended June 30, 2015 | Cost of Goods Sold | $ | 1,536,000 | $ | (2,624,000 | ) | $ | (1,088,000 | ) | ||||
Commodity contracts for the | Cost of Goods Sold | $ | 116,000 | $ | 1,363,000 | $ | 1,479,000 | ||||||
six months ended June 30, 2014 | Revenue | $ | (283,000 | ) | $ | 283,000 | $ | — | |||||
Total | $ | (167,000 | ) | $ | 1,646,000 | $ | 1,479,000 | ||||||
12
Balance Sheet Classification | June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Futures and option contracts through March 2016 | |||||||||
In gain position | $ | 1,000 | $ | 292,000 | |||||
In loss position | (2,557,000 | ) | (224,000 | ) | |||||
Cash held by (owed to) broker | 1,921,000 | 1,237,000 | |||||||
Current Asset (Liability) | $ | (635,000 | ) | $ | 1,305,000 | ||||
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below:
Trading securities: Trading securities consisting of short term bond mutual funds are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. Trading securities are measured at fair value using prices obtained from pricing services.
Derivative financial instruments: Commodity futures and exchange-traded commodity options contracts are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. For these contracts, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes and live trading levels from the CBOT and NYMEX markets.
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
13
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 40,734,000 | $ | 40,734,000 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Liabilities | $ | (2,557,000 | ) | $ | (2,557,000 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 32,221,000 | $ | 32,221,000 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 292,000 | $ | 292,000 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Liabilities | $ | (224,000 | ) | $ | (224,000 | ) | — | — | |||||||
9. LITIGATION MATTERS
Retterath
In relation to the repurchase agreement discussed in Note 4, on August 1, 2013 Mr. Retterath filed a lawsuit against the Company along with several directors, the Company's CEO, CFO, Plant Manager, a former director and the Company's outside legal counsel in Florida state court. Mr. Retterath is claiming that certain actions taken by the Company violated fiduciary duties owed to him as a member or fraudulently induced him to take certain actions. Mr. Retterath is also claiming violations of state and federal securities laws and violations of Florida's deceptive and unfair trade practices statutes. On August 14, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit in Iowa state court to enforce the repurchase agreement the Company entered into with Mr. Retterath.
GS Cleantech Corporation
On August 9, 2013, GS Cleantech Corporation (GS Cleantech), a subsidiary of Greenshift Corporation, filed a complaint against the Company alleging that the Company's operation of a corn oil extraction process licensed by the Company infringes patent rights claimed by GS Cleantech. GS Cleantech seeks royalties, damages and potentially triple damages associated with the alleged infringement, as well as attorney's fees from the Company. The Company has filed an answer and counterclaims claiming invalidity of the patents, noninfringement, and inequitable conduct. On October 23, 2014, the Court hearing similar cases found GS Cleantech's patents invalid which ruling benefits the Company.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve future events, our future performance and our expected future operations and actions. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as "may," "will," "should," "anticipate," "believe," "expect," "plan," "future," "intend," "could," "estimate," "predict," "hope," "potential," "continue," or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only our predictions and involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results or actions may differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in this report or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may
14
be materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
Overview
Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC (referred to herein as "we," "us," the "Company," or "Homeland") is an Iowa limited liability company. Homeland was formed on December 7, 2005 for the purpose of pooling investors for the development, construction and operation of a 100 million gallon per year ethanol plant located near Lawler, Iowa. We began producing ethanol and distiller grains at the plant in April 2009. We completed installation of corn oil extraction equipment and commenced selling corn oil during our fourth quarter of 2011. The ethanol plant is capable of operating at a rate in excess of 135 million gallons of ethanol per year.
On June 13, 2013, we entered into an agreement with Steve Retterath, our largest member, to repurchase and retire all of the units owned by Mr. Retterath. We agreed to repurchase and retire 25,860 membership units owned by Mr. Retterath in exchange for $30 million, to be paid in two equal installments payable at closing and on July 1, 2014. The transaction failed to close by August 1, 2013 due to objections by Mr. Retterath. The Company believes that it has a binding agreement with Mr. Retterath. On August 14, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Mr. Retterath in Iowa state court to enforce the terms of the repurchase agreement. The Company is asking the Iowa state court to require Mr. Retterath to complete the repurchase agreement pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Retterath contends he is not bound by the agreement. The Company's position is as of the closing date, Mr. Retterath is no longer the equitable owner of any membership units in the Company. As a result, we have recorded a $30 million short-term liability related to the amount we agreed to pay Mr. Retterath to repurchase his membership units and have correspondingly reduced members' equity on our balance sheet. If we are ultimately unsuccessful in our lawsuit against Mr. Retterath, the Company will reevaluate the accounting considerations made during the period of time that the lawsuit is pending.
On the scheduled closing date for the repurchase agreement, Mr. Retterath sued the Company along with several directors, our CEO, CFO, Plant Manager, a former director and our outside legal counsel in Florida state court. This lawsuit was subsequently removed to federal court in the State of Florida and ultimately to federal court in the State of Iowa. The federal court in the State of Iowa recently dismissed the only federal claim in Mr. Retterath's lawsuit against the Company and remanded the case to Florida state court. Details of both the Company's lawsuit against Mr. Retterath and Mr. Retterath's lawsuit are provided below in the section entitled "PART II - Item 1. Legal Proceedings."
On May 29, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its proposed final rule setting the renewable volume obligations pursuant to the Federal Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) for 2014, 2015 and 2016. The renewable volume obligations are the amount of renewable fuels which must be used each year in the United States pursuant to the RFS. The EPA has authority in certain situations to adjust the statutory obligations under the RFS, which authority the EPA proposes to use pursuant to its May 29, 2015 release. The renewable volume obligations for corn-based ethanol are lower than the statutory requirements in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Management believes that this decrease in the renewable volume obligations for corn-based ethanol will negatively impact operating margins in the ethanol industry. Management expects that there will be lawsuits filed against the EPA challenging its authority to reduce the renewable volume obligations below the statutory requirements.
15
Results of Operations
Comparison of Fiscal Quarters Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Income Statement Data | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 72,749,789 | 100.0 | $ | 87,823,949 | 100.0 | ||||||||
Costs of goods sold | 63,524,613 | 87.3 | 64,787,918 | 73.8 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 9,225,176 | 12.7 | 23,036,031 | 26.2 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 925,185 | 1.3 | 991,541 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 8,299,991 | 11.4 | 22,044,490 | 25.1 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) | 45,310 | 0.1 | 101,012 | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 8,345,301 | 11.5 | $ | 22,145,502 | 25.2 | ||||||||
Revenue
Our total revenue for our second quarter of 2015 was approximately 17% less than our total revenue for our second quarter of 2014. Management attributes this decrease in revenue with a decrease in the average price we received for our products during the 2015 period, partially offset by increased sales of our products during the 2015 period.
For our second quarter of 2015, our total ethanol revenue decreased by approximately 21% compared to our second quarter of 2014 due to decreased average ethanol prices during the 2015 period partially offset by increased ethanol sales. The average price we received for our ethanol during our second quarter of 2015 was approximately 30% lower than during our second quarter of 2014. We experienced unusually high ethanol prices during our first two quarters of 2014 due to rail logistics issues which restricted the supply of ethanol in the market and resulted in ethanol price increases. These higher ethanol prices led to very favorable operating margins during our first six months of 2014, despite the fact that we had to reduce production during that time due to our inability to efficiently transport our ethanol to the market. Rail shipping times started to normalize during our second quarter of 2014. The ethanol industry did not experience the same level of rail shipping delays during 2015 which contributed to lower market ethanol prices. In addition, lower corn and gasoline prices during our second quarter of 2015 resulted in lower ethanol prices. Further, management believes that ethanol prices were negatively impacted by the EPA's release of the renewable volume obligations for 2014, 2015 and 2016 which reduced the amount of corn-based ethanol which must be used in the United States during those years. Management believes that this reduction has had a negative impact on ethanol demand and prices which may continue through the next two years. This negative impact is especially pronounced due to current low gasoline prices. In the past, many fuel blenders used ethanol because of the difference in price between gasoline and ethanol. This voluntary use of ethanol in excess of the requirements in the RFS has been lowered due to the fact that the spread between the price of ethanol and gasoline is smaller. Management believes that ethanol prices will remain at their current levels unless gasoline prices increase or we experience an increase in ethanol demand. Ethanol exports have provided some support for ethanol prices. However, the recent increase in ethanol exports is mainly driven by lower domestic ethanol prices and these exports may not continue at their current levels, especially if ethanol prices increase.
We sold approximately 13% more gallons of ethanol during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Ethanol production during our second quarter of 2014 was lower due to the rail shipping delays we experienced during that time which required us to reduce production of ethanol. This reduction in ethanol production had a corresponding impact on ethanol sales. Our ethanol production returned to more normal levels during our 2015 fiscal year which resulted in increased ethanol sales during that time.
Our total distiller grains revenue was approximately 3% lower during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014, due primarily to decreased distiller grains prices partially offset by increased distiller grains sales. The average price we received for our dried distiller grains was approximately 19% less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Further, the average price we received for our modified/wet distiller grains was approximately 10% less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Management attributes these lower distiller grains prices to decreasing corn prices and increasing corn availability. Management anticipates that going forward, distiller grains prices will
16
remain lower and will continue to track corn prices. Further, if we experience any distiller grains demand decreases, such as we experienced when China ceased importing distiller grains from the United States in 2014, we could experience even lower market distiller grains prices. We sold approximately 20% more total tons of distiller grains during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. This increase in our distiller grains production is related to our increased ethanol production.
Our total corn oil revenue was approximately 6% less for our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to the net effect of increased corn oil production at the ethanol plant and lower corn oil prices during the 2015 period. We sold approximately 20% more pounds of corn oil during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 because of an increase in the amount of corn oil we produced per bushel of corn used along with increased ethanol production which increases our corn oil production. The corn that we are using during our 2015 fiscal year contains more corn oil compared to the corn we were using during our 2014 fiscal year which has increased our corn oil yield. The average price we received for our corn oil was approximately 22% less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. The biodiesel industry has been impacted by recent legislative changes, including the expiration of the biodiesel blenders' tax credit. While the EPA's renewable volume obligation for biodiesel was more favorable than some expected, the lack of the blenders' tax credit has continued to negatively impact biodiesel production. Since biodiesel production is a major source of corn oil demand, lower biodiesel demand has impacted corn oil prices. In addition, corn oil prices have been impacted by lower soybean oil prices as soybean oil is a product that typically competes with corn oil, particularly for biodiesel production. Management anticipates continued lower corn oil prices as additional corn oil supply enters the market with relatively stagnant corn oil demand.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our two primary costs of production are corn costs and natural gas costs. Our total cost of goods sold was approximately 2% less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Our cost of goods sold related to corn, without taking into account derivative instruments, was approximately 16% lower during our second quarter of 2015 compared to our second quarter of 2014 due to decreased market prices for corn. The average price we paid per bushel of corn was approximately 24% less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to our second quarter of 2014. We processed approximately 11% more bushels of corn during our second quarter of 2015 compared to our second quarter of 2014 due to increased production at the ethanol plant. Management anticipates these lower corn prices will continue due to an improved balance between corn supply and demand as a result of the larger corn crops harvested in 2013 and 2014 along with a strong anticipated corn crop in 2015 and relatively stable corn demand.
We experienced significantly lower natural gas prices during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to a milder winter and more stable market natural gas prices during the 2015 period. During our first quarter of 2014, there were several spikes in the price we paid for natural gas which management attributes to the longer and colder winter during 2014 which depleted natural gas supplies. In addition, due to increased natural gas demand, natural gas delivery costs increased. These higher natural gas costs continued into our second quarter of 2014. During our second quarter of 2015, the average delivered price we paid per MMBtu of natural gas was approximately 40% less compared to the same period of 2014. Due to our increased production, our natural gas consumption during our second quarter of 2015 was approximately 5% greater compared to the same period of 2014. Management anticipates relatively stable natural gas prices during our 2015 fiscal year unless there are disruptions in natural gas production which impact natural gas supplies. If a shortage of natural gas were to occur in the future, it could result in significantly higher natural gas prices which could negatively impact our profitability.
We engage in risk management activities that are intended to fix the purchase price of the corn we require to produce ethanol, distiller grains and corn oil. During our second quarter of 2015, we had a realized gain of approximately $1,048,000 and an unrealized loss of approximately $3,090,000 related to our corn derivative instruments. During our second quarter of 2014, we had a realized gain of approximately $695,000 and an unrealized gain of approximately $3,226,000 related to our corn derivative instruments. We recognize the gains or losses that result from changes in the value of our corn and natural gas derivative instruments in cost of goods sold as the changes occur. Our plant is expected to use approximately 47 million bushels of corn per year. As of June 30, 2015, the Company has hedged portions of its anticipated monthly purchases for corn averaging approximately 14% of its anticipated monthly grind for the next twelve months.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to our second quarter of 2014 primarily due to decreased legal fees related to our pending lawsuits.
17
Other Income (Expense)
Our interest expense was lower during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 because we had no amounts outstanding on our loans during the 2015 period. We had more interest income during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to having more cash on hand during the 2015 period. Our other income was less during our second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to decreased investment income from our marketer, RPMG, and less patronage dividends we received from CHS, our distiller grains marketer.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
Income Statement Data | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 134,419,822 | 100.0 | $ | 169,576,255 | 100.0 | ||||||||
Costs of goods sold | 122,288,399 | 95.3 | 131,100,373 | 81.1 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 12,131,423 | 4.7 | 38,475,882 | 18.9 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 1,869,458 | 1.5 | 1,994,300 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 10,261,965 | 3.2 | 36,481,582 | 17.7 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) | 675,493 | 1.0 | 359,283 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,937,458 | 4.2 | $ | 36,840,865 | 18.0 | ||||||||
Revenue
Our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately 21% less than our total revenue for the same period of 2014. Management attributes this decrease in revenue with a decrease in the average price we received for our products during the 2015 period, partially offset by increased sales of our products during the 2015 period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, our total ethanol revenue decreased by approximately 25% compared to the same period of 2014 due to decreased average ethanol prices during the 2015 period partially offset by increased ethanol sales. The average price we received for our ethanol during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately 34% lower than during the same period of 2014. We experienced unusually high ethanol prices during the first six months of 2014 due to rail logistics issues which restricted the supply of ethanol in the market and resulted in ethanol price increases. These higher ethanol prices led to very favorable operating margins during the 2014 period. We sold approximately 14% more gallons of ethanol during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Ethanol production during the first six months of 2014 was lower due to the rail shipping delays we experienced during that time which required us to reduce production of ethanol. This reduction in ethanol production had a corresponding impact on ethanol sales.
Our total distiller grains revenue was approximately 6% lower during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014, due primarily to decreased distiller grains prices partially offset by increased distiller grains sales. The average price we received for our dried distiller grains was approximately 19% less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Further, the average price we received for our modified/wet distiller grains was approximately 8% less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Management attributes these lower distiller grains prices to decreasing corn prices and increasing corn availability. We sold approximately 15% more total tons of distiller grains during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. This increase in our distiller grains production is related to our increased ethanol production.
Our total corn oil revenue was comparable for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to the net effect of increased corn oil production and lower corn oil prices during the 2015 period. We sold approximately 20% more pounds of corn oil during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 because of an increase in the amount of corn oil we produced per bushel of corn used along with increased ethanol production. The average price we received for our corn oil was approximately 17% less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014.
18
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had no gain or loss on ethanol related derivative instruments. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had a realized loss of approximately $283,000 and an unrealized gain of approximately $283,000 related to our ethanol derivative instruments.
Cost of Goods Sold
Our two primary costs of production are corn costs and natural gas costs. Our total cost of goods sold was approximately 7% less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. Our cost of goods sold related to corn, without taking into account derivative instruments, was approximately 9% lower during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to same period of 2014 due to decreased market prices for corn. The average price we paid per bushel of corn was approximately 18% less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014. We processed approximately 11% more bushels of corn during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to increased production at the ethanol plant.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the average delivered price we paid per MMBtu of natural gas was approximately 50% less compared to the same period of 2014. Due to our increased production, our natural gas consumption during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately 7% greater compared to the same period of 2014.
We engage in risk management activities that are intended to fix the purchase price of the corn we require to produce ethanol, distiller grains and corn oil. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had a realized gain of approximately $1,536,000 and an unrealized loss of approximately $2,624,000 related to our corn derivative instruments. We had no gain or loss on natural gas related derivative instruments. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had a realized gain of approximately $116,000 and an unrealized gain of approximately $1,363,000 related to our corn derivative instruments.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were less during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 primarily due to decreased legal fees related to our pending lawsuits.
Other Income (Expense)
Our interest expense was lower during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 because we had no amounts outstanding on our loans during the 2015 period. We had more interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014, primarily due to having more cash on hand during the 2015 period. Our other income was greater during the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to increased investment income from our marketer, RPMG, and patronage dividends we received from CHS, our distiller grains marketer.
Changes in Financial Condition for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015.
Balance Sheet Data | June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Total current assets | $ | 75,956,222 | $ | 78,792,392 | ||||
Total property and equipment | 104,694,463 | 105,218,605 | ||||||
Total other assets | 4,603,930 | 4,496,076 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 185,254,615 | $ | 188,507,073 | ||||
Total current liabilities | $ | 36,043,897 | $ | 40,237,858 | ||||
Total long-term liabilities | 240,869 | 419,904 | ||||||
Total members' equity | 148,969,849 | 147,849,311 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Members' Equity | $ | 185,254,615 | $ | 188,507,073 | ||||
We had less cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 due to deferred corn payments we made in January 2015 along with a distribution we paid during our first quarter of 2015. As of June 30, 2015, we purchased an additional approximately $8.5 million in trading securities compared to the trading securities we had at December 31, 2014. In order to fund our purchase obligation related to the Retterath repurchase agreement, we have allocated $30 million of our trading securities to the Retterath repurchase. Our accounts receivable was higher at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 due
19
to the timing of our quarter end with respect to shipments of our ethanol. We had more inventory on hand at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 due to having additional finished goods on hand at June 30, 2015. We had less prepaid and other assets at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 due primarily to the amortization of prepaid insurance premiums.
Our net property and equipment was lower at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 due to depreciation, partially offset by capital expenses related to our plant storage capacity and process improvement projects which were in process as of June 30, 2015.
Our other assets were comparable at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Our current liabilities were lower at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014, primarily due to a reduction in our accounts payable. We typically experience an increase in our accounts payable at the end of our fiscal year as our corn suppliers seek to defer income into a later tax year by deferring corn payments. We typically make these deferred corn payments early in January of each year. Our payroll payable was lower at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 because we paid our employee bonuses during our first quarter of 2015. Our derivative instruments were a liability at June 30, 2015 because of unrealized losses we experienced on our corn futures position.
Our long-term liabilities were lower at June 30, 2015 compared to December 31, 2014 primarily due to payments of vested bonus dollars to employees.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity during our quarter ended June 30, 2015 were cash from our operations and our $20 million long-term revolving loan. Our credit facilities are described in greater detail below under "Short-Term and Long-Term Debt Sources." As of June 30, 2015, we had $20.0 million available pursuant to our revolving loan and approximately $18.4 million in cash. We also had approximately $30 million at June 30, 2015 of trading securities for the Retterath repurchase agreement along with an additional approximately $11 million in trading securities which are not set aside for the Retterath repurchase. Based on financial forecasts performed by our management, we anticipate that we will have sufficient cash from our revolving loan and cash from our operations to continue to operate the ethanol plant at capacity for the next 12 months and beyond. We do not anticipate seeking additional equity or debt financing in the next 12 months. However, should we experience unfavorable operating conditions in the future, we may have to secure additional debt or equity financing for working capital or other purposes.
The following table shows cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 8,833,286 | $ | 33,628,228 | ||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities | (13,100,827 | ) | (951,862 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (9,816,920 | ) | (58,122,851 | ) | ||||
Cash at beginning of period | 32,522,840 | 38,490,952 | ||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 18,438,379 | $ | 13,044,467 | ||||
Cash Flow From Operations
Our operations generated less cash during our first six months of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 primarily due to having significantly less net income during the 2015 period.
Cash Flow From Investing Activities
We used more cash for investing activities during our first six months of 2015 compared to the first six months of 2014. The major contributing factor causing this increase was the purchase of approximately $8.5 million of trading securities and having significantly more payments for equipment and construction in progress during the 2015 period.
Cash Flow From Financing Activities
We used less cash for financing activities during our first six months of 2015 compared to the same period of 2014 due to the net effect of paying nearly $10 million in distributions during the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period when we primarily
20
used cash to fund $15 million of the amount owed for the Retterath repurchase agreement and we made a distribution to our members of approximately $13 million.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt Sources
Master Loan Agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank
On November 30, 2007, we entered into a Master Loan Agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank (Home Federal) establishing a senior credit facility with Home Federal. In return, we executed a mortgage and a security agreement in favor of Home Federal creating a senior lien on substantially all of our assets. We currently have a $20 million term revolving loan with Home Federal.
Term Revolving Loan
We have a $20 million term revolving loan which has a maturity date of August 1, 2018. Interest on the term revolving loan accrues at a rate equal to the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 310 basis points. We are required to make monthly payments of interest until the maturity date of the term revolving loan on August 1, 2018, on which date the unpaid principal balance of the term revolving loan becomes due. As of June 30, 2015, we had $0 outstanding on our term revolving loan and $20,000,000 available to be drawn. Interest accrued on our term revolving loan as of June 30, 2015 at a rate of 3.2917% per year.
If we fail to make a payment of principal or interest on our loan within 10 days of the due date, there will be a late charge equal to 5% of the amount of the payment.
Covenants
In connection with the Master Loan Agreement, we are required to comply with certain debt covenants and financial ratios. As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants and financial ratios. During the term of this Agreement, we are required to achieve and maintain a tangible net worth of not less than $105 million as measured at the end of each fiscal year. Tangible net worth is calculated as our total assets less intangible assets and total liabilities. As of June 30, 2015, we had tangible net worth of approximately $149.0 million. In addition, we are required to maintain tangible owner's equity of at least 65% which is tangible net worth over total assets. As of June 30, 2015, we had tangible owner's equity of approximately 81%. We are required to have working capital of at least $12 million. As of June 30, 2015, we had working capital of approximately $63.4 million. Management anticipates that we will be in compliance with all of our debt covenants and financial ratios for at least the next 12 months.
Failure to comply with the loan covenants or to maintain the required financial ratios may cause acceleration of any future outstanding principal balances on the loans and/or the imposition of fees, charges or penalties. Any acceleration of the debt financing or imposition of the fees, charges or penalties may restrict or limit our access to the capital resources necessary to continue plant operations.
Should we default on any of our obligations pursuant to the Home Federal loans, Home Federal may terminate its commitment to provide us funds and declare any future unpaid principal balance of the loans, plus accrued interest, immediately due and payable. Events of default include the failure to make payments when due, our insolvency, any material adverse change in our financial condition or the breach of any of the covenants, representations or warranties we have made in the loan agreements.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Of the significant accounting policies described in the notes to our financial statements, we believe that the following are the most critical:
Derivative Instruments
The Company enters into derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to price risk related to forecasted corn and forward corn purchase contracts through our commodities accounts with ADM Investor Services, Inc. (ADMIS). We may also occasionally enter into derivative contracts to hedge our exposure to price risk as it relates to ethanol sales. We do not plan to enter into derivative instruments other than for hedging purposes. Changes in the fair value of our derivatives are recorded in current period earnings.
21
Although certain derivative instruments are not designated as, and accounted for, as a cash flow hedge, we believe our derivative instruments will be effective economic hedges of specified risks.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from the sale of the Company's products is recognized at the time title to the goods and all risks of ownership transfer to the customers. This generally occurs upon shipment, loading of the goods or when the customer picks up the goods. Interest income is recognized as earned. Shipping costs incurred by the Company in the sale of ethanol and distiller grains are not specifically identifiable and as a result, revenue from the sale of ethanol and distiller grains is recorded based on the net selling price reported to the Company from the marketer.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews its property and equipment for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group to the carrying value of the asset group. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are generally valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In the valuation of inventories and purchase and sale commitments, market is based on current replacement values except that it does not exceed net realizable values and is not less than net realizable values reduced by allowances for approximate normal profit margin.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with commodity prices as discussed below. We have no exposure to foreign currency risk as all of our business is conducted in U.S. Dollars and we have no amounts outstanding on variable interest rate debt. We use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk. We use cash, futures and option contracts to hedge changes to the commodity prices of corn, natural gas and ethanol. We do not enter into these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes.
Commodity Price Risk
We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of raw material inputs, such as corn and natural gas, and finished products, such as ethanol and distiller grains, through the use of hedging instruments. In practice, as markets move, we actively manage our risk and adjust hedging strategies as appropriate. Although we believe our hedge positions accomplish an economic hedge against our future purchases and sales, management has chosen not to use hedge accounting, which would match the gain or loss on our hedge positions to the specific commodity purchase being hedged. We are using fair value accounting for our hedge positions, which means as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of goods sold or as an offset to revenues. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses under fair value accounting can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.
As of June 30, 2015, we had price protection in place for approximately 5% of our anticipated corn needs, 4% of our natural gas needs and approximately 2% of our ethanol sales for the next 12 months. A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate our exposure to ethanol, corn and natural gas price risk. Market risk related to these factors is estimated as the potential change in income resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the average cost of our corn and natural gas prices and average ethanol price as of June 30, 2015, net of the forward and future contracts used to hedge our market risk for corn and natural gas usage requirements. The volumes are based on our expected use and sale of these commodities for a one year period from June 30, 2015. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:
22
Estimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts) | Unit of Measure | Hypothetical Adverse Change in Price | Approximate Adverse Change to income | ||||||||
Natural Gas | 3,600,000 | MMBTU | 10% | $ | 869,508 | ||||||
Ethanol | 135,000,000 | Gallons | 10% | 19,712,700 | |||||||
Corn | 47,000,000 | Bushels | 10% | 15,440,440 | |||||||
For comparison purposes, our sensitivity analysis for our second quarter of 2014 is set forth below.
Estimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts) | Unit of Measure | Hypothetical Adverse Change in Price | Approximate Adverse Change to income | ||||||||
Natural Gas | 3,200,000 | MMBTU | 10% | $ | 1,590,400 | ||||||
Ethanol | 128,500,000 | Gallons | 10% | 24,415,000 | |||||||
Corn | 45,000,000 | Bushels | 10% | 15,867,000 | |||||||
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Steven Core, along with our Chief Financial Officer, (the principal financial officer), David Finke, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015. Based on this review and evaluation, these officers believe that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information related to us is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the forms and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Retterath Florida Lawsuit
On August 1, 2013, Steve Retterath, the Company's largest investor and a former member of the Company's board of directors filed a lawsuit in the Florida Circuit Court located in Palm Beach County, Florida. The lawsuit was subsequently removed to federal court in Florida. In the lawsuit, Mr. Retterath sued the Company, Pat Boyle, Maurice Hyde, Christine Marchand, Mathew Driscoll, Leslie Hansen, and Chad Kuhlers, each members of the Company's board of directors, Walter Wendland, the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, David Finke, the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Kevin Howes, the Company's Plant Manager. Mr. Retterath also sued James Boeding, a former director and the Company's outside legal counsel, Joseph Leo and the BrownWinick Law Firm. Mr. Retterath is claiming that certain actions taken by the Company violated fiduciary duties owed to him as a member or fraudulently induced him to take certain actions. Mr. Retterath is also claiming violations of state and federal securities laws and violations of Florida's deceptive and unfair trade practices statutes. Mr. Retterath claims an unspecified damage in excess of $30 million in monetary damages. The Florida court ruled in favor of the Company's motion to transfer the case to Iowa. Each of the defendants filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit and Mr. Retterath filed a motion for partial summary judgment in the case. The Federal Court in Iowa ruled in favor of the defendants and dismissed the federal claims in this lawsuit. Further, the Federal Court declined jurisdiction to hear the other state law matters in the case and remanded those claims back to Florida state court.
On August 21, 2014, Jason Retterath and Annie Retterath, the son and daughter-in-law of Steve Retterath, filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit to protect their interests as members of the Company. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the
23
intervenor petition. The Federal Court in Iowa declined to consider the Company's motion to dismiss the intervention and instead remanded the intervenors’ case back to Florida state court.
Retterath Iowa Lawsuit
On August 14, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Steve Retterath in the Iowa state court located in Polk County, Iowa. The purpose of the lawsuit is to enforce the terms of the repurchase agreement the Company executed with Mr. Retterath on June 13, 2013. The Company is asking the Iowa state court to require Mr. Retterath to perform his obligations under the repurchase agreement pursuant to its terms. Mr. Retterath removed the case to federal court in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Iowa in December 2013. The Company believed that this removal was improper and as a result the Company moved to remand the case back to the Iowa state court in Polk County which was granted. Mr. Retterath answered the lawsuit in August 2014, denying the validity of the repurchase agreement. The Company has filed a motion for summary judgment asking the Iowa state court to enforce the repurchase agreement. The Iowa state court has ruled in favor of Jason Retterath and Annie Retterath who sought to be added as parties to the Iowa state lawsuit. The Company and Mr. Retterath both recently filed motions for summary judgment which are being considered by the Iowa state court. Trial has been scheduled for March 2016.
GS Cleantech Patent Litigation
On August 9, 2013, GS Cleantech Corporation ("GS Cleantech"), a subsidiary of Greenshift Corporation, filed a complaint in the United States District for the Northern District of Iowa against the Company. The Company is one of more than twenty ethanol manufacturers that were sued by GS Cleantech. The complaint alleges that the Company's operation of a corn oil extraction process infringes patent rights claimed by GS Cleantech. GS Cleantech seeks royalties, damages and potentially triple damages associated with the alleged infringement, as well as attorney's fees. The complaint was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana due to a finding that the action involves questions of fact common to several other lawsuits which were joined in a multi-district litigation ("MDL"). The MDL Court developed two tracks of defendants in this litigation. The first track includes defendants which were originally sued by GS Cleantech in 2010 and a second track of defendants sued in 2013 which includes the Company. On October 23, 2014, the MDL Court granted summary judgment in favor of the first track defendants and found that the GS Cleantech patents which the Company is alleged to have infringed are invalid. Further, in a January 16, 2015 decision, the MDL ruled in favor of a stipulated motion for partial summary judgment finding that all of the GS Cleantech patents in the suit were invalid and, therefore, not infringed. GS Cleantech has said it will appeal this decision when the remaining claim in the suit has been decided. If GS Cleantech successfully appeals the District Court’s findings of invalidity, damages awarded GS Cleantech may be $1 million or more.
The only remaining claim in the lawsuit alleges that GS Cleantech inequitably conducted itself before the United States Patent Office when obtaining the patents at issue. A trial in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on the single issue of inequitable conduct was recently rescheduled until October 2015. If the defendants, including the Company, succeed in proving inequitable conduct, the patents at issue will be rendered unenforceable as will certain additional patents. No damages for infringement of an unenforceable patent can be awarded. Further, if the defendants successfully prove inequitable conduct, they will ask the Court to find the case exceptional and award the defendants their attorneys' fees. It is unknown whether GS Cleantech would appeal such a ruling.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
The following risk factor is provided due to material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K. The risk factor set forth below should be read in conjunction with the risk factors section and the Management's Discussion and Analysis section for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.
On May 29, 2015 the EPA released its proposed renewable volume obligations for corn-based ethanol under the RFS which is lower than the statutory requirements which has negatively impacted the market price of ethanol.
On May 29, 2015, the EPA released its proposed renewable volume obligations under the RFS for 2014, 2015 and 2016. The renewable volume obligations for conventional biofuels, including the corn-based ethanol we produce, is significantly lower than the statutory standard set in the RFS. The RFS requires the use of 14.40 billion gallons of conventional biofuels in 2014, 15 billion gallons in 2015 and 15 billion gallons in 2016. Pursuant to the EPA proposal, the requirement for conventional biofuels in 2014 is 13.25 billion gallons, 13.40 billion gallons in 2015 and 14 billion gallons in 2016. This is a one billion gallon or more reduction in each of these years compared to the requirements in the RFS. Further, due to the lower price of gasoline, we do not anticipate that renewable fuels blenders will use additional gallons of ethanol than what is required by the RFS which may result in a significant decrease in ethanol demand. This departure by the EPA from the statutory requirements in the RFS is expected to have a negative impact on ethanol prices and demand in 2015 and 2016 and potentially beyond and is expected to result in reduced
24
operating margins in the future. This reduction in ethanol demand is expected to have a material negative impact on our operating performance and financial condition.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
25
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this report.
Exhibit No. | Exhibit |
31.1 | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)* |
31.2 | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)* |
32.1 | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350* |
32.2 | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350* |
101 | The following financial information from Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, (ii) Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (iii) Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, and (iv) the Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.** |
________________________________
(*) Filed herewith.
(**) Furnished herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC | |||
Date: | August 14, 2015 | /s/ Steven Core | |
Steven Core | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
Date: | August 14, 2015 | /s/ David A. Finke | |
David A. Finke | |||
Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | |||
26