Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

OR

 

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                      .

Commission file number: 001-36878

 

 

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware		20-8627710
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
813 Shades Creek Parkway, Suite 100 Birmingham, Alabama		35209
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(205) 313-8100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer		¨		Accelerated filer		¨
Non-accelerated filer		¨		Smaller reporting company		x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class of Common Stock		Outstanding at August 12, 2015
Common stock, $0.01 par value		9,438,541 shares

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

 

PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		Financial Statements (Unaudited):			1
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014			1
		Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014			2
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014			3
		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015			4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014			5
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			7
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			17
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			38
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures			38
PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			38
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			38
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			38
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities			38
Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosure			38
Item 5.		Other Information			38
Item 6.		Exhibits			39
		Signatures			40

 

i

---

Table of Contents

GENERAL

Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “National Commerce Corporation,” “NCC,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to National Commerce Corporation and its consolidated affiliates as of June 30, 2015.

On October 28, 2014, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-198219) became effective, and the Company became subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance, which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include any statement that, without limitation, may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements instead of historical or current facts and may contain words like “anticipates,” “approximately,” “believes,” “budget,” “can,” “could,” “continues,” “contemplates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecast,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “objective,” “outlook,” “predicts,” “probably,” “plans,” “potential,” “project,” “seeks,” “shall,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or the negative of these terms and other words, phrases, or expressions with similar meaning.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based upon our historical performance and on our current plans, estimates and expectations in light of information currently available to us. The inclusion of forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us that the future plans, estimates or expectations will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, and the Company cannot give assurances that such statements will prove to be correct. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information or otherwise. Given these uncertainties, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or estimated by us include those that are discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 under Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

 

ii

---

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

Assets
		June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
Cash and due from banks		$	17,677				14,236
Interest-bearing deposits with banks			124,716				109,199
Cash and cash equivalents			142,393				123,435
Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $12,122 at June 30, 2015)			12,609				—
Investment securities available-for-sale			29,977				34,932
Other investments			5,844				5,421
Mortgage loans held-for-sale			13,750				9,329
Loans, net of unearned income			970,653				888,721
Less: allowance for loan losses			9,274				9,802
Loans, net			961,379				878,919
Premises and equipment, net			27,554				27,560
Accrued interest receivable			2,217				2,193
Bank owned life insurance			11,848				10,641
Other real estate			1,494				1,008
Deferred tax assets, net			12,149				11,444
Goodwill			29,775				28,834
Core deposit intangible, net			1,535				1,757
Other assets			4,090				2,953
Total assets		$	1,256,614				1,138,426
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand		$	246,804				217,643
Interest-bearing demand			162,087				154,816
Savings and money market			414,720				392,394
Time			227,872				206,207
Total deposits			1,051,483				971,060
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			22,000				22,000
Accrued interest payable			453				431
Other liabilities			8,049				8,774
Total liabilities			1,081,985				1,002,265
Commitments
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 250,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding			—				—
Common stock, at June 30, 2015, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized and 9,438,541 shares issued and outstanding; at December 31, 2014, $0.01 par value, 12,500,000 shares authorized and 7,541,541 shares issued and outstanding			94				75
Additional paid-in capital			165,674				131,455
Retained earnings (deficit)			724				(3,453	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			610				845
Total shareholders’ equity attributable to National Commerce Corporation			167,102				128,922
Noncontrolling interest			7,527				7,239
Total shareholders’ equity			174,629				136,161
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	1,256,614				1,138,426

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

1

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

		For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2015				2014				2015				2014
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans		$	12,226				6,053			$	24,018				11,839
Interest and dividends on taxable investment securities			269				310				525				627
Interest on non-taxable investment securities			114				42				156				84
Interest on interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold			105				44				208				107
Total interest income			12,714				6,449				24,907				12,657
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits			961				524				1,879				1,074
Interest on borrowings			110				110				219				219
Total interest expense			1,071				634				2,098				1,293
Net interest income			11,643				5,815				22,809				11,364
Provision for loan losses			120				—				281				—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses			11,523				5,815				22,528				11,364
Other income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts			308				172				575				338
Mortgage origination and fee income			1,505				1,048				2,776				1,753
Merchant sponsorship revenue			191				—				191				—
Income from bank owned life insurance			86				60				165				120
Wealth management fees			13				15				32				29
(Loss) gain on other real estate			(11	)			—				(24	)			5
(Loss) gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale			—				—				—				—
Other			114				31				255				48
Total other income			2,206				1,326				3,970				2,293
Other expense:
Salaries and employee benefits			5,114				3,119				10,101				6,115
Commission-based compensation			1,056				471				1,852				777
Occupancy and equipment			829				459				1,665				895
Core deposit intangible amortization			111				—				222				—
Other			2,506				1,386				5,066				2,529
Total other expense			9,616				5,435				18,906				10,316
Earnings before income taxes			4,113				1,706				7,592				3,341
Income tax expense			1,264				568				2,356				1,160
Net earnings			2,849				1,138				5,236				2,181
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest			593				—				1,059				—
Net earnings attributable to National Commerce Corporation		$	2,256				1,138			$	4,177				2,181
Basic earnings per common share		$	0.24				0.20			$	0.49				0.38
Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.24				0.20			$	0.48				0.38

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

 

		For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2015				2014				2015				2014
Net earnings		$	2,256				1,138			$	4,177				2,181
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrealized (losses) gains on investment securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period, net of tax of ($147), $121, ($127) and $221, respectively			(273	)			225				(235	)			409
Other comprehensive (loss) income			(273	)			225				(235	)			409
Comprehensive income		$	1,983			$	1,363			$	3,942			$	2,590

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands)

 

														Accumulated
						Additional								Other
		Common				Paid-in				Accumulated				Comprehensive				Noncontrolling
		Stock				Capital				Deficit				Income				Interest				Total
Balance, December 31, 2014		$	75				131,455				(3,453	)			845				7,239				136,161
Share-based compensation expense							471																471
Net earnings attributable to National Commerce Corporation											4,177												4,177
Sale of common stock, net of offering expenses of $728			19				33,748																33,767
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest																			1,059				1,059
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest																			(771	)			(771	)
Change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax			—				—				—				(235	)			—				(235	)
Balance, June 30, 2015		$	94				165,674				724				610				7,527				174,629

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Uaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

		For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2015				2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings		$	4,177				2,181
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses			281				—
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest			1,059				—
Depreciation, amortization and accretion			1,086				436
Loss on ineffective portion of fair value hedge derivative			2				72
Change in mortgage loan derivative			(118	)			(18	)
Loss on trade or sale of premises and equipment			5				—
Share-based compensation expense			471				215
Income from bank owned life insurance			(165	)			(120	)
Loss (gain) on other real estate			24				(5	)
Change in:
Mortgage loans held-for-sale			(4,421	)			(4,763	)
Other assets and accrued interest receivable			(1,186	)			(126	)
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable			(739	)			(754	)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities			476				(2,882	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of securities available-for-sale			7,081				2,608
Purchases of securities available-for-sale			(2,500	)			—
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity			(12,611	)			—
Proceeds from sale of other investments			703				118
Purchases of other investments			(1,126	)			(73	)
Net change in loans			(83,845	)			(5,932	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate			169				50
Investment in bank owned life insurance			(1,042	)			—
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment			49				—
Purchases of premises and equipment			(1,815	)			(1,455	)
Net cash used by investing activities			(94,937	)			(4,684	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in deposits			80,423				(11,296	)
Cash distribution paid to noncontrolling interests			(771	)			—
Proceeds from stock offering			34,495				—
Stock offering expenses			(728	)			—
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants			—				615
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities			113,419				(10,681	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents			18,958				(18,247	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period			123,435				124,136
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period		$	142,393				105,889

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued

(In thousands)

 

		For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2015				2014
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		$	2,076				1,375
Income taxes		$	2,538				1,500
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Change in unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax		$	235				409
Transfer of loans to other real estate		$	694				—

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

6

---

Table of Contents

NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts in tables in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

General

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of National Commerce Corporation (including its subsidiaries, the “Company”), its wholly owned subsidiary, National Bank of Commerce (the “Bank”), and its majority-owned subsidiary, CBI Holding Company, LLC (“CBI”). The Bank provides a full range of commercial and consumer banking services throughout Alabama, including metropolitan Birmingham, Huntsville, Lee County and Baldwin County. In addition to its Alabama locations, the Bank operates full-service banking offices in the greater Orlando area and in Vero Beach, Florida. The Bank is primarily regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and undergoes periodic examinations by the OCC. The Company is regulated by and subject to periodic examinations by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). CBI is the holding company for Corporate Billing, LLC, a transaction-based finance company headquartered in Decatur, Alabama that provides factoring, invoicing, collection and accounts receivable management services to transportation companies and automotive parts and service providers nationwide.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted or abbreviated. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes as of December 31, 2014, which are contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s knowledge and best estimates of the impact of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, the allowance for loan losses, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, fair value of financial instruments, deferred taxes and contingencies. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change and therefore are critical accounting estimates for the Company include the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the

 

7

---

Table of Contents

assessment of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Management does not anticipate any material changes to its estimates in the near term. Factors that may affect such estimates include, but are not limited to, external market factors, such as market interest rates and employment rates; changes to operating policies and procedures; economic conditions in the Company’s markets; and changes in applicable banking regulations. Actual results may ultimately differ from estimates, although management does not generally believe that such differences would materially affect the consolidated financial statements in any individual reporting period presented.

Note 2 – Reclassifications and Reincorporation

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in 2015. These reclassifications had no material effect on the operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company.

Note 3 – Net Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the effect of the issuance of potential common shares that are dilutive and by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Anti-dilutive potential common shares (options and warrants) are excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation. There were no antidilutive securities for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Antidilutive securities totaled 102,397 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. There were no antidilutive securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

The reconciliation of the components of the basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows.

 

		For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2015				2014				2015				2014
Net earnings available to common shareholders		$	2,256				1,138			$	4,177				2,181
Weighted average common shares outstanding			9,438,541				5,739,173				8,574,900				5,748,154
Dilutive effect of stock options			54,014				11,938				44,096				10,908
Dilutive effect of directors’ shares			5,353				—				5,305				—
Dilutive effect of performance share awards			71,787				42,333				63,685				42,172
Diluted common shares			9,569,695				5,793,444				8,687,986				5,801,234
Basic earnings per common share		$	0.24				0.20			$	0.49				0.38
Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.24				0.20			$	0.48				0.38

Note 4 – Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows.

 

		Held-to-Maturity Securities
						Gross				Gross				Estimated
		Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Fair
June 30, 2015		Cost				Gains				Losses				Value
Municipal securities		$	12,609				—				487				12,122
		$	12,609				—				487				12,122
		Available-for-Sale Securities
						Gross				Gross				Estimated
		Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Fair
June 30, 2015		Cost				Gains				Losses				Value
Mortgage-backed securities		$	24,631				925				151				25,405
Municipal securities			4,408				206				42				4,572
		$	29,039				1,131				193				29,977

 

						Gross				Gross				Estimated
		Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Fair
December 31, 2014		Cost				Gains				Losses				Value
U.S. Treasury securities		$	1,501				—				—				1,501
Mortgage-backed securities			27,723				1,138				111				28,750
Municipal securities			4,408				279 6								4,681
		$	33,632				1,417				117				34,932

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Details concerning the Company’s debt securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows.

 

		Held-to-Maturity Securities
		Less than 12 Months								12 Months or More								Total
		Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized
June 30, 2015		Value				Losses				Value				Losses				Value				Losses
Municipal securities		$	12,122				487				—				—				12,122				487
		$	12,122				487				—				—				12,122				487
		Available-for-Sale Securities
		Less than 12 Months								12 Months or More								Total
		Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized
June 30, 2015		Value				Losses				Value				Losses				Value				Losses
Mortgage-backed securities		$	844				19				5,946				132				6,790				151
Municipal securities			940				42				—				—				940				42
		$	1,784				61				5,946				132				7,730				193
		Less than 12 Months								12 Months or More								Total
		Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized				Fair				Unrealized
December 31, 2014		Value				Losses				Value				Losses				Value				Losses
U.S. Treasury securities		$	—				—				—				—				—				—
Mortgage-backed securities			—				—				7,705				111				7,705				111
Municipal securities			—				—				494				6				494				6
		$	—				—				8,199				117				8,199				117

 

8

---

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2015, the Company did not consider securities with unrealized losses to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses in each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates, market spreads and market conditions subsequent to purchase. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value. There were no other-than-temporary impairments charged to earnings during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not sell any debt securities.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2015, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

		Available-for-Sale Securities								Held-to-Maturity Securities
		Amortized				Fair				Amortized				Fair
		Cost				Value				Cost				Value
Municipal securities:
0 to 5 years		$	—				—			$	—				—
5 to 10 years			1,047				1,095				—				—
Over 10 years			3,361				3,477				12,609				12,122
Mortgage-backed securities			24,631				25,405				—				—
		$	29,039				29,977			$	12,609				12,122

Note 5 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

Major classifications of loans at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows.

 

		June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	141,932				131,657
Factored commercial receivables			75,000				82,600
Real estate - mortgage			636,600				577,268
Real estate - construction			100,928				83,663
Consumer			16,798				13,962
			971,258				889,150
Less: Unearned fees			605				429
Total loans and leases			970,653				888,721
Allowance for loan losses			(9,274	)			(9,802	)
Total net loans and leases		$	961,379				878,919

The Company grants loans and extensions of credit to individuals and a variety of businesses and corporations located in its general market areas throughout Alabama and Florida, including metropolitan Birmingham, Huntsville, Lee County and Baldwin County in Alabama and metropolitan Orlando and Vero Beach in Florida. Through CBI, the Company also purchases receivables from transportation companies and automotive parts and service providers nationwide. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio is collateralized by improved and unimproved real estate and is dependent upon prevailing conditions in the real estate market. Portfolio segments utilized by the Company are identified below. Relevant risk characteristics for these portfolio segments generally include debt service coverage, loan-to-value ratios and financial performance on non-consumer loans, and credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, collateral type and loan-to-value ratios for consumer loans.

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method for the periods indicated. Acquired loans are not included in the allowance for loan losses calculation, as these loans are recorded at fair value, and there has been no further indication of credit deterioration that would require an additional provision.

 

		Commercial,				Factored
		financial and				commercial				Real estate -				Real estate -
Balance, June 30, 2015		agricultural				receivables				mortgage				construction				Consumer				Unallocated				Total
Balance, December 31, 2014		$	1,523				955				5,047				647				562				1,068				9,802
Provisions charged to operating expense			25				(148	)			1,022				196				(226	)			(588	)			281
Loans charged off			(1	)			(1,095	)			(764	)			—				(87	)			—				(1,947	)
Recoveries			36				1,003				49				45				5				—				1,138
Balance, June 30, 2015		$	1,583				715				5,354				888				254				480				9,274
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment		$	—				540				—				—				—				—				540
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment		$	1,583				175				5,354				888				254				480				8,734
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	—				840				2,849				181				30				—				3,900
Collectively evaluated for impairment		$	141,720				74,160				628,820				100,413				16,521				—				961,634
Acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality		$	212				—				4,931				334				247				—				5,724
		Commercial,				Factored
		financial and				commercial				Real estate -				Real estate -
Balance, June 30, 2014		agricultural				receivables				mortgage				construction				Consumer				Unallocated				Total
Balance, December 31, 2013		$	1,398				—				4,449				964				243				2,065				9,119
Provisions charged to operating expense			(263	)			—				101				(396	)			(169	)			727				—
Loans charged off			(3	)			—				(227	)			—				—				—				(230	)
Recoveries			32				—				23				18				12				—				85
Balance, June 30, 2014		$	1,164				—				4,346				586				86				2,792				8,974
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment		$	—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment		$	1,164				—				4,346				586				86				2,792				8,974
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	—				—				1,195				—				—				—				1,195
Collectively evaluated for impairment		$	88,566				—				428,302				64,014				6,513				—				587,395

 

9

---

Table of Contents

The Company individually evaluates for impairment all loans that are on nonaccrual status. Additionally, all troubled debt restructurings are individually evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current events and circumstances, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan will not be collected. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, at the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Management may also elect to apply an additional collective reserve to groups of impaired loans based on current economic or market factors. Interest payments received on impaired loans are generally applied as a reduction of the outstanding principal balance. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not modify any loans that would be considered a troubled debt restructuring.

The following tables present impaired loans by class of loans as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The purchased credit-impaired loans are not included in these tables because they are carried at fair value and accordingly have no related associated allowance.

 

						Unpaid								Average
		Recorded				Principal				Related				Recorded
June 30, 2015		Investment				Balance				Allowance				Investment
Impaired loans without related allowance:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—
Factored commercial receivables			—				—				—				—
Real estate - mortgage			2,849				5,837				—				2,274
Real estate - construction			181				188				—				60
Consumer			30				31				—				39
Total		$	3,060				6,056				—				2,373
Impaired loans with related allowance:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—
Factored commercial receivables			840				840				540				1,088
Real estate - mortgage			—				—				—				—
Real estate - construction			—				—				—				—
Consumer			—				—				—				—
Total		$	840				840				540				1,088
Total impaired loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—
Factored commercial receivables			840				840				540				1,088
Real estate - mortgage			2,849				5,837				—				2,274
Real estate - construction			181				188				—				60
Consumer			30				31				—				39
Total		$	3,900				6,896				540				3,461
						Unpaid								Average
		Recorded				Principal				Related				Recorded
December 31, 2014		Investment				Balance				Allowance				Investment
Impaired loans without related allowance:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				24
Factored commercial receivables			—				—				—				—
Real estate - mortgage			1,052				2,030				—				1,770
Real estate - construction			—				—				—				—
Consumer			—				—				—				—
Total		$	1,052				2,030				—				1,794
Impaired loans with related allowance:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—
Factored commercial receivables			1,605				1,605				473				321
Real estate - mortgage			1,026				1,026				350				205
Real estate - construction			198				198				50				40
Consumer			—				—				—				—
Total		$	2,829				2,829				873				566
Total impaired loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				24
Factored commercial receivables			1,605				1,605				473				321
Real estate - mortgage			2,078				3,056				350				1,975
Real estate - construction			198				198				50				40
Consumer			—				—				—				—
Total		$	3,881				4,859				873				2,360

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not recognize a material amount of interest income on impaired loans.

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans and non-accrual loan balances as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, by class of loans. All loans greater than 90 days past due are placed on non-accrual status, excluding factored receivables. For CBI’s factored receivables, which are commercial trade credits rather than promissory notes, the Company’s practice is to charge off unpaid recourse receivables when they become 90 days past due from the invoice due date and the non-recourse receivables when they become 120 days past due from the statement billing date. For the recourse receivables, the invoice is charged against the client reserve account established for such purposes, unless the client reserve is insufficient, at which point it is charged against the allowance for loan losses.

 

		30-59 Days				60-89 Days				> 90 Days				Total
June 30, 2015		Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Current				Total				Non-accrual
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—				141,932				141,932				—
Factored commercial receivables			5,697				1,034				145				6,876				68,124				75,000				—
Real estate - mortgage			547				2,427				693				3,667				632,933				636,600				5,216
Real estate - construction			—				—				—				—				100,928				100,928				181
Consumer			48				64				22				134				16,664				16,798				86
Total		$	6,292				3,525				860				10,677				960,581				971,258				5,483
		30-59 Days				60-89 Days				> 90 Days				Total
December 31, 2014		Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Current				Total				Non-accrual
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	—				—				—				—				131,657				131,657				—
Factored commercial receivables			6,327				1,013				217				7,557				75,043				82,600				—
Real estate - mortgage			191				1,963				1,572				3,726				573,542				577,268				4,133
Real estate - construction			198				—				—				198				83,465				83,663				676
Consumer			188				—				132				320				13,642				13,962				56
Total		$	6,904				2,976				1,921				11,801				877,349				889,150				4,865

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans with respect to their credit risk. This analysis is performed on a continuous basis. The Bank uses the following definitions for its risk ratings:

Other Assets Especially Mentioned (“OAEM”). Weakness exists that could cause future impairment, including the deterioration of financial ratios, past due status and questionable management capabilities. Collateral values generally afford adequate coverage but may not be immediately marketable.

Substandard. Specific and well-defined weaknesses exist that may include poor liquidity and deterioration of financial ratios. The loan may be past due and related deposit accounts experiencing overdrafts. Immediate corrective action is necessary.

 

10

---

Table of Contents

Doubtful. Specific weaknesses characterized as Substandard that are severe enough to make collection in full unlikely. There is no reliable secondary source of full repayment. Loans classified as Doubtful will be placed on non-accrual, analyzed and fully or partially charged-off based on a review of the related collateral and other relevant factors.

Loss. Specific weaknesses characterized as Doubtful that are severe enough to be considered uncollectible and of such minimal value that its continuance as an asset is not warranted.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above-described process are considered to be Pass rated loans. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans was as follows.

 

June 30, 2015		Pass				OAEM				Substandard				Doubtful				Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	140,040				212				1,680				—				141,932
Factored commercial receivables			74,160				840				—				—				75,000
Real estate - mortgage			625,335				2,837				3,212				5,216				636,600
Real estate - construction			100,413				—				334				181				100,928
Consumer			16,099				—				613				86				16,798
Total		$	956,047				3,889				5,839				5,483				971,258
December 31, 2014		Pass				OAEM				Substandard				Doubtful				Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	129,314				1,159				1,184				—				131,657
Factored commercial receivables			80,995				—				—				1,605				82,600
Real estate - mortgage			565,992				4,057				2,803				4,416				577,268
Real estate - construction			82,552				94				254				763				83,663
Consumer			13,192				201				477				92				13,962
Total		$	872,045				5,511				4,718				6,876				889,150

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans and other real estate and repossessed assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of the lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded or disclosed at fair value.

 

11

---

Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For disclosure purposes, the carrying amount for cash, due from banks, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities Available-for-Sale

Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, and U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises and municipal bonds. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Securities Held-to-Maturity

The fair value of securities held-to-maturity is estimated using the same measurement techniques as securities available-for-sale.

Other Investments

For disclosure purposes, the carrying amount of other investments approximates their fair value.

Loans and Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment using one of three methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans for which an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral, or loans that are charged down according to the fair value of collateral, require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When the fair value is based on an appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

For disclosure purposes, the fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. For variable rate loans, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at cost, which is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

 

12

---

Table of Contents

Bank Owned Life Insurance

For disclosure purposes, the fair value of the cash surrender value of life insurance policies is equivalent to the carrying value.

Other Real Estate

Other real estate properties are adjusted to fair value upon the transfer of the loans to other real estate. Subsequently, other real estate assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based on independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price, the Company records the other real estate as nonrecurring Level 2. When fair value is based on an appraised value or management’s estimate of value, the Company records the other real estate or repossessed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

Deposits

For disclosure purposes, the fair value of demand deposits, NOW and money market accounts and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed rate maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

For disclosure purposes, the fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is based on the quoted value for similar remaining maturities provided by the FHLB.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The valuation of the Company’s derivative financial instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined by using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves derived from observable market interest rate curves).

The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company or the counterparty. However, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

13

---

Table of Contents

Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit

Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally short-term and made using variable rates, the carrying value and estimated fair value associated with these instruments are immaterial.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

June 30, 2015		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Mortgage-backed securities		$	—				25,405				—				25,405
Municipal securities			—				4,572				—				4,572
Total investment securities available-for-sale		$	—				29,977				—				29,977
Derivative assets		$	—				239				—				239
Derivative liabilities		$	—				379				—				379
December 31, 2014		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
U.S. Treasury securities		$	1,501				—				—				1,501
Mortgage-backed securities			—				28,750				—				28,750
Municipal securities			—				4,681				—				4,681
Investment in mutual fund			—				—				—				—
Total investment securities available-for-sale		$	1,501				33,431				—				34,932
Derivative assets		$	—				105				—				105
Derivative liabilities		$	—				425				—				425

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

June 30, 2015		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Other real estate and repossessed assets		$	—				—				1,636				1,636
Impaired loans			—				—				5,483				5,483
December 31, 2014		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Other real estate and repossessed assets		$	—				—				1,380				1,380
Impaired loans			—				—				4,865				4,865

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

		Carrying				Estimated Fair Value
June 30, 2015		Amount				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	142,393				142,393				—				—
Investment securities held-to-maturity			12,609				—				12,122				—
Investment securities available-for-sale			29,977				—				29,977				—
Other investments			5,844				—				5,844				—
Loans, net			961,379				—				955,947				5,483
Mortgage loans held-for-sale			13,750				—				13,750				—
Bank owned life insurance			11,848				—				11,848				—
Derivative assets			239				—				239				—
Liabilities:
Deposits			1,051,483				—				1,022,470				—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			22,000				—				22,601				—
Derivative liabilities			379				—				379				—
		Carrying				Estimated Fair Value
December 31, 2014		Amount				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	123,435				123,435				—				—
Investment securities available-for-sale			34,932				1,501				33,431				—
Other investments			5,421				—				5,421				—
Loans, net			878,919				—				873,125				4,865
Mortgage loans held-for-sale			9,329				—				9,329				—
Bank owned life insurance			10,641				—				10,641				—
Derivative assets			105				—				105				—
Liabilities:
Deposits			971,060				—				949,621				—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			22,000				—				22,677				—
Derivative liabilities			425				—				425				—

Limitations

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on many judgments. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include mortgage banking operations, deferred income taxes, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

 

14

---

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Sale of Common Stock and Initial Public Offering

On March 18, 2015, the Company sold 1,642,000 shares of common stock at $19.50 in its initial public offering. The underwriters had an option to purchase an additional 255,000 shares, which they exercised on March 27, 2015. In total, the Company sold 1,897,000 shares and raised approximately $33.8 million, net of offering expenses. The Company’s stock is now traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “NCOM.”

In February 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal to increase the Company’s total number of authorized common shares from 12,500,000 to 30,000,000.

Note 8 – Segment Reporting

The Company’s three reportable segments represent distinct product lines and are viewed separately for strategic planning purposes and internal reporting. There are no amounts to report for the Receivables Factoring segment for the 2014 periods, as this business was not acquired until August 29, 2014. The following table is a reconciliation of the reportable segment revenues, expenses and profit to the Company’s consolidated totals.

 

		Retail and
		Commercial				Mortgage				Receivables				Elimination
		Banking				Division (1)				Factoring				Entries (2)				Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015:
Interest income		$	10,051				113				3,048				(498	)			12,714
Interest expense			1,034				37				498				(498	)			1,071
Net interest income			9,017				76				2,550				—				11,643
Provision for loan and lease losses			428				—				(308	)			—				120
Noninterest income			377				1,829				—				—				2,206
Noninterest expense			6,873				1,453				1,290				—				9,616
Net earnings before tax and noncontrolling interest			2,093				452				1,568				—				4,113
Income tax expense			721				172				371				—				1,264
Noncontrolling interest			—				—				(593	)			—				(593	)
Net earnings atributable to National Commerce Corporation		$	1,372				280				604				—				2,256
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015:
Interest income		$	19,566				197				6,161				(1,017	)			24,907
Interest expense			2,032				66				1,017				(1,017	)			2,098
Net interest income			17,534				131				5,144				—				22,809
Provision for loan and lease losses			429				—				(148	)			—				281
Noninterest income			924				3,017				29				—				3,970
Noninterest expense			13,789				2,493				2,624				—				18,906
Net earnings before tax and noncontrolling interest			4,240				655				2,697				—				7,592
Income tax expense			1,485				249				622				—				2,356
Noncontrolling interest			—				—				(1,059	)			—				(1,059	)
Net earnings atributable to National Commerce Corporation		$	2,755				406				1,016				—				4,177
Total assets as of June 30, 2015		$	1,213,137				13,750				97,687				(67,960	)			1,256,614
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014:
Interest income		$	6,328				121				—				—				6,449
Interest expense			599				35				—				—				634
Net interest income			5,729				86				—				—				5,815
Provision for loan and lease losses			—				—				—				—				—
Noninterest income			166				1,160				—				—				1,326
Noninterest expense			4,471				964				—				—				5,435
Net earnings before tax and noncontrolling interest			1,424				282				—				—				1,706
Income tax expense			461				107				—				—				568
Noncontrolling interest			—				—				—				—				—
Net earnings atributable to National Commerce Corporation		$	963				175				—				—				1,138
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014:
Interest income		$	12,466				191				—				—				12,657
Interest expense			1,238				55				—				—				1,293
Net interest income			11,228				136				—				—				11,364
Provision for loan and lease losses			—				—				—				—				—
Noninterest income			324				1,969				—				—				2,293
Noninterest expense			8,583				1,733				—				—				10,316
Net earnings before tax and noncontrolling interest			2,969				372				—				—				3,341
Income tax expense			1,019				141				—				—				1,160
Noncontrolling interest			—				—				—				—				—
Net earnings atributable to National Commerce Corporation		$	1,950				231				—				—				2,181
Total assets as of June 30, 2014		$	771,275				11,922				—				—				783,197

 

(1)	Noninterest income for the Mortgage Division segment includes intercompany income allocation.

(2)	Entry to remove intercompany interest allocated to the Receivables Factoring segment. For segment reporting purposes, we allocate funding costs to the Receivables Factoring segment at the Fed Funds rate plus 2.5%.

Note 9 – Goodwill and Intangibles

Changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are provided in the following table.

 

Balance, December 31, 2014		$	28,834
Adjustments to goodwill			941
Balance, June 30, 2015		$	29,775

The adjustments to goodwill made during the six months ended June 30, 2015 resulted from the write-down of fixed assets, prepaid assets and land acquired through the acquisition of United Group Banking Company of Florida, Inc. (“United”). The adjustments were made as additional information that existed at the time of acquisition was reviewed and affected the recorded fair value of certain fixed assets and prepaid assets. Net of deferred taxes, these adjustments resulted in a $941,000 increase to goodwill recorded in the United acquisition. The adjustment to goodwill had no impact on net income or shareholders’ equity of the Company for the first six months of 2015.

A summary of core deposit intangible assets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is set forth below.

 

		June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
Gross carrying amount		$	1,776			$	1,776
Less: accumulated amortization			(241	)			(19	)
Net carrying amount		$	1,535			$	1,757

 

15

---

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (“FRB”), the FHLB and correspondent banks, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods. The Company is required to maintain average reserve balances with the FRB or in cash. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company’s reserve requirements were approximately $3,036,000 and $2,436,000, respectively.

Note 11 – Acquisition

On July 7, 2015, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement providing for the merger of Reunion Bank of Florida (“Reunion”), headquartered in Tavares, Florida, with and into NBC. Subsequent to the merger, Reunion will become a part of NBC, but will continue to operate under the “Reunion Bank of Florida” name and its existing management team.

Under the terms of the definitive agreement, each share of common stock of Reunion issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be converted into the right to receive either 0.7273 shares of NCC common stock or cash in the amount of $16.00. However, the total amount of cash payable in the merger will be equal to, as nearly as practicable, but in no event will exceed, $7,365,680, which represents approximately 20% of the currently issued and outstanding shares of Reunion common stock. Based on the 2,301,773 shares of common stock of Reunion currently issued and outstanding, the Company will issue approximately 1,339,264 shares of the Company’s common stock to Reunion shareholders in the merger, excluding any shares that may be issued in connection with future option exercises, and the currently outstanding options to purchase 286,343 shares of Reunion common stock will be converted into options to purchase approximately 208,257 shares of the Company’s common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $14.11 per share. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals and approval by Reunion’s shareholders. The Company expects the merger to close during the fourth quarter of 2015.

Note 12 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The amendment substantially changes the way that reporting entities are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the new amendment. Specifically, the amendments modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities, eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs. The amendments in this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The adoption of this ASU will not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

16

---

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Part I, Item 1A. – Risk Factors,” as well as other unknown risks and uncertainties.

All dollar amounts in the tables in this section are in thousands of dollars, except per share data, yields, percentages and rates, or when specifically identified. The words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “NCC” and similar terms when used in this section refer to National Commerce Corporation and its consolidated affiliates, unless the context indicates otherwise.

Our Business

NCC is a bank holding company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. We engage in the business of banking through our wholly owned banking subsidiary, National Bank of Commerce, which we may refer to as the “Bank” or “NBC.” On February 28, 2015, we merged United Legacy Bank (“ULB”), another of our banking subsidiaries, with and into NBC, and each of the former ULB banking offices now operates as “United Legacy Bank, a division of National Bank of Commerce.”

Through the Bank, we provide a broad array of financial services to businesses, business owners and professionals through eight full-service banking offices in Alabama (in Birmingham, Huntsville, Auburn-Opelika and Baldwin County) and seven full-service banking offices in Central Florida (in Longwood, Winter Park, Orlando, Oviedo, Kissimmee and Vero Beach). We also own a 70% equity interest in CBI Holding Company, LLC (“CBI”), which owns Corporate Billing, LLC (“Corporate Billing”), a transaction-based finance company headquartered in Decatur, Alabama that provides factoring, invoicing, collection and accounts receivable management services to transportation companies and automotive parts and service providers throughout the United States and parts of Canada.

Overview of Second Quarter 2015 Results

Net income was $2.3 million in the second quarter ended June 30, 2015, compared with $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2014. Highlights from the 2015 second quarter include:

 

•

Net interest margin (tax-effected) of 4.22%, compared with 3.29% for the second quarter of 2014.

 

•

Return on average assets of 0.75%, compared with 0.61% for the second quarter of 2014.

 

•

Loan growth (excluding mortgage loans held for sale) of $49.9 million for the second quarter of 2015, representing a 21.7% annualized growth rate. Excluding factoring receivables, loans grew by $44.5 million during the quarter, representing a 20.9% annualized growth rate.

 

17

---

Table of Contents

•

Deposit growth of $51.3 million for the second quarter of 2015, representing a 20.9% annualized growth rate.

 

•

$84.8 million in mortgage production, compared with $56.5 million for the second quarter of 2014.

 

•

$189 million in purchased volume in the Receivables Factoring segment. Because the Company entered the factoring business in the third quarter of 2014, no comparable figure is available for the second quarter of 2014.

 

•

Increase in non-acquired non-performing assets to $4.2 million, from $3.3 million at December 31, 2014 and $2.3 million at March 31, 2015.

 

•

Annualized net charge-offs of 0.16%, compared with 0.13% for the second quarter of 2014.

 

•

Ending book value per share of $18.50.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies, the most significant of which are described in the notes to NCC’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or subject to variation and may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for the current period or future periods. The use of estimates, assumptions and judgments is necessary when financial assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at, or adjusted to reflect, fair value. Assets carried at fair value inherently result in more financial statement volatility. Fair values and information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by other independent third-party sources, when available. When such information is not available, management estimates valuation adjustments. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on our future financial condition and results of operations.

The following briefly describes the more complex policies involving a significant degree of judgment about valuation and the application of complex accounting standards and interpretations.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We record estimated probable inherent credit losses in the loan portfolio as an allowance for loan losses. The methodologies and assumptions for determining the adequacy of the overall allowance for loan losses involve significant judgments to be made by management. Some of the more critical judgments supporting our allowance for loan losses include judgments about the creditworthiness of borrowers, the estimated value of underlying collateral, assumptions about cash flow, determination of loss factors for estimating credit losses, and the impact of current events, conditions and other factors affecting the level of inherent losses. Under different conditions or using different assumptions, the actual or estimated credit losses that we may ultimately realize may be different than our estimates. In determining the allowance, we estimate losses on individual impaired loans, or groups of loans that are not impaired, where the probable loss can be identified and reasonably estimated. On a quarterly basis, we assess the risk inherent in our loan portfolio based on qualitative and quantitative trends in the

 

18

---

Table of Contents

portfolio, including the internal risk classification of loans, historical loss rates, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, industry or borrower concentrations, delinquency trends, detailed reviews of significant loans with identified weaknesses and the impacts of local, regional and national economic factors on the quality of the loan portfolio. Based on this analysis, we may record a provision for loan losses in order to maintain the allowance at appropriate levels. For a more complete discussion of the methodology employed to calculate the allowance for loan losses, see note 1 to NCC’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Investment Securities Impairment

We assess on a quarterly basis whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security with respect to which there is an unrealized loss is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. We consider many factors in this assessment, including the severity and duration of the impairment, our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, and, for debt securities, external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Securities with respect to which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than-temporary are written down to fair value. The credit portion of the impairment, if any, is recognized as a realized loss in current earnings.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed using the asset and liability method, which recognizes an asset or liability representing the tax effects, based on current tax law, of future deductible or taxable amounts attributable to events recognized in the financial statements. A valuation allowance may be established to the extent necessary to reduce the deferred tax asset to a level at which it is “more likely than not” that the tax asset or benefit will be realized. The ultimate realization of tax benefits depends on many factors, including the sufficiency of taxable income, the availability of tax loss carrybacks or credits, the reversal of taxable temporary differences and tax planning strategies within the reversal period, as well as the state of applicable tax laws with respect to the realization of recorded tax benefits.

Business Combinations

Assets purchased and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at their respective fair values. The fair value of a loan portfolio acquired in a business combination requires greater levels of management estimates and judgment than the remainder of the purchased assets or assumed liabilities. On the date of acquisition, when the loans exhibit evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that we will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments, the difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected is referred to as non-accretable difference. We must estimate expected cash flows at each reporting date. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows will generally result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and adjusted accretable yield, which will have a positive impact on interest income. Purchased loans without evidence of credit deterioration are recorded in the same manner.

 

19

---

Table of Contents

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014

The following is a narrative discussion and analysis of significant changes in our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net Income

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, our net income was $2.3 million, compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of 98.2%. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, our net income was $4.2 million, compared to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of 91.5%. Our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 include the results of CBI and ULB. These companies were acquired during the third and fourth quarters, respectively, of 2014 and, therefore, were not included in our results of operations for the three or six months ended June 30, 2014.

The primary reason for the increase in net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same period of 2014 was an increase in net interest income. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, net interest income was $11.6 million, an increase of $5.8 million, or 100.2%, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, net interest income was $22.8 million, an increase of $11.4 million, or 100.7%, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was a result of higher levels of loan volume and other earning assets from organic growth and the acquisitions of CBI and ULB. Total noninterest income during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $2.2 million, an increase of $880 thousand compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The largest increase in noninterest income during the second quarter of 2015 was in revenue from the mortgage division. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, mortgage origination and fee income totaled $1.5 million, compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of 43.6%. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, revenue from the mortgage division also contributed the largest increase in noninterest income. Mortgage origination and fee income totaled $2.8 million, compared to $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of 58.4%.

The increases in net interest income and noninterest income were partially offset by an increase in other noninterest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Total noninterest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $9.6 million, an increase of $4.2 million, or 76.9%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. Total noninterest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $18.9 million, an increase of $8.6 million, or 83.3%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase during each period of 2015 was primarily a result of the addition of the operating expenses of CBI and ULB and costs associated with our initial public offering completed during the first quarter of 2015. These companies were not included in our results of operations for the three or six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

20

---

Table of Contents

A majority of the changes in our net interest income, noninterest income and noninterest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same periods of 2014 resulted from the additional revenues and expenses of CBI and ULB, which we acquired during the second half of 2014. The following table details the amounts that CBI and ULB contributed to selected consolidated totals for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015								For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
		ULB				CBI				ULB				CBI
Net interest income		$	2,072			$	2,958			$	3,908			$	5,976
Noninterest income			125				—				260				29
Noninterest expense			1,568				1,290				3,365				2,624

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin Analysis

Comparison of net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

The largest component of our net income is net interest income – the difference between the income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds used to support our assets. Net interest income divided by average earning assets represents our net interest margin. The major factors that affect net interest income and net interest margin are changes in volume, the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest margin can also be affected by economic conditions, the competitive environment, loan demand and deposit flow. Our ability to respond to changes in these factors by using effective asset-liability management techniques is critical to maintaining the stability of the net interest margin and our primary source of earnings.

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the average balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity and the average yields on assets and average costs of liabilities. Such yields and costs are calculated by dividing annualized income or expense by the average daily balances of the associated assets or liabilities.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST ANALYSIS

 

		For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except yields and rates)		June 30, 2015												June 30, 2014
Assets		Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense				Average Yield/ Rate				Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense				Average Yield/ Rate
Loans		$	944,373			$	12,116				5.15	%		$	570,896			$	5,935				4.17	%
Mortgage loans held for sale			11,180				112				4.02				12,145				121				4.00
Securities:
Taxable securities			32,402				269				3.33				46,525				310				2.67
Tax-exempt securities			14,297				181				5.08				4,496				66				5.89
Cash balances in other banks			112,081				105				0.38				77,607				44				0.23
Funds sold			—				—				0.00				—				—				0.00
Total interest-earning assets			1,114,333			$	12,783				4.60				711,669			$	6,476				3.65
Noninterest-earning assets			95,949												31,040
Total assets		$	1,210,282											$	742,709
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing transactions accounts		$	157,261			$	97				0.25	%		$	112,371			$	73				0.26	%
Savings and money market deposits			408,117				417				0.41				276,062				253				0.37
Time deposits			208,388				447				0.86				97,303				198				0.82
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowed money			22,000				110				2.01				22,000				110				2.01
Total interest-bearing liabilities			795,766			$	1,071				0.54				507,736			$	634				0.50
Noninterest-bearing deposits			233,136												141,623
Total funding sources			1,028,902												649,359
Noninterest-bearing liabilities			8,026												2,025
Shareholders’ equity			173,354												91,325
		$	1,210,282											$	742,709
Net interest rate spread											4.06	%											3.15	%
Net interest income/margin (Taxable equivalent)							11,712				4.22	%							5,842				3.29	%
Tax equivalent adjustment							69												27
Net interest income/margin						$	11,643				4.19	%						$	5,815				3.28	%

Net interest income increased $5.8 million, or 100.2%, to $11.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $5.8 million for the same period of 2014. The increase was due to an increase in interest income of $6.3 million, resulting from higher levels of loan volume from organic growth and the acquisitions of CBI and ULB. This increase in interest income was partially offset by a $437 thousand increase in interest expense. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a 65.4% increase in average loans outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The resulting net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2015 rose to 4.19%, from 3.28% during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

 

21

---

Table of Contents

Interest-earning assets averaged $1.1 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $711.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $402.6 million, or 56.6%. Additional information on growth in our loan portfolio for these periods is presented below. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased 95 basis points to 4.60% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 3.65% for the three months ended June 30, 2014. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the loan yield was 5.15%, compared to 4.17% during the three months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in loan yield was primarily due to the addition of the factored receivables originated by CBI. These factored receivables are generally much higher-yielding assets than our traditional loans. The yield on the factored receivables varies but is approximately 15%. CBI contributed average loan balances of $74.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $795.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $507.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $288.0 million, or 56.7%. The rate on total interest-bearing liabilities was 54 basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 50 basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing average deposits was due to organic deposit production and the inclusion of ULB’s deposits in our results for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $233.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to $91.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014. This increase in average noninterest-bearing deposits, together with the increased volume of interest-earning assets and higher yields on interest-earning assets, led to the higher net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

The following table reflects, for the periods indicated, the changes in our net interest income due to changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the associated rates paid or earned on these assets and liabilities.

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME

 

		For the Three Months Ended
		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015 vs. 2014
		Variance due to
Interest-earning assets		Volume				Yield/Rate				Total
Loans		$	4,552			$	1,629			$	6,181
Mortgage loans held for sale			(10	)			1				(9	)
Securities:
Taxable securities			(107	)			66				(41	)
Tax-exempt securities			125				(10	)			115
Cash balances in other banks			24				37				61
Funds sold			—				—				—
Total interest-earning assets		$	4,584			$	1,723			$	6,307
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transactions accounts		$	28			$	(4	)		$	24
Savings and money market deposits			132				32				164
Time deposits			237				12				249
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowed money			—				—				—
Total interest-bearing liabilities		$	397			$	40			$	437
Net interest income
Net interest income (Taxable equivalent)			4,187				1,683				5,870
Taxable equivalent adjustment			23				19				42
Net interest income		$	4,164			$	1,664			$	5,828

Comparison of net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the average balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity and the average yields on assets and average costs of liabilities. Such yields and costs are calculated by dividing annualized income or expense by the average daily balances of the associated assets or liabilities.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST ANALYSIS

 

		For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except yields and rates)		June 30, 2015												June 30, 2014
Assets		Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense				Average Yield/ Rate				Average Balance				Interest Income/ Expense				Average Yield/ Rate
Loans		$	924,081			$	23,826				5.20	%		$	562,404			$	11,654				4.18	%
Mortgage loans held for sale			10,338				197				3.84				9,255				191				4.16
Securities:
Taxable securities			33,963				525				3.12				47,132				627				2.68
Tax-exempt securities			9,550				248				5.24				4,422				133				6.07
Cash balances in other banks			113,323				208				0.37				92,565				107				0.23
Funds sold			—				—				0.00				—				—				0.00
Total interest-earning assets			1,091,255			$	25,004				4.62				715,778			$	12,712				3.58
Noninterest-earning assets			94,920												29,791
Total assets		$	1,186,175											$	745,569
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing transactions accounts		$	158,477			$	196				0.25	%		$	113,177			$	146				0.26	%
Savings and money market deposits			399,765				794				0.40				279,064				507				0.37
Time deposits			208,700				889				0.86				100,272				421				0.85
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowed money			22,000				219				2.01				22,000				219				2.01
Total interest-bearing liabilities			788,942			$	2,098				0.54				514,513			$	1,293				0.51
Noninterest-bearing deposits			232,818												138,451
Total funding sources			1,021,760												652,964
Noninterest-bearing liabilities			7,836												2,130
Shareholders’ equity			156,579												90,475
		$	1,186,175											$	745,569
Net interest rate spread											4.08	%											3.07	%
Net interest income/margin (Taxable equivalent)							22,906				4.23	%							11,419				3.22	%
Tax equivalent adjustment							97												55
Net interest income/margin						$	22,809				4.21	%						$	11,364				3.20	%

Net interest income increased $11.4 million, or 100.7%, to $22.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $11.4 million for the same period of 2014. The increase was due to an increase in interest income of $12.3 million, resulting from higher levels of loan volume from organic growth and the acquisitions of CBI and ULB. This increase in interest income was partially offset by a $805 thousand increase in interest expense. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a

 

22

---

Table of Contents

64.3% increase in average loans outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. The resulting net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2015 rose to 4.21%, from 3.20% during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Interest-earning assets averaged $1.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $715.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $375.5 million, or 52.5%. Additional information on growth in our loan portfolio for these periods is presented below. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased by 104 basis points to 4.62% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 3.58% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the loan yield was 5.20%, compared to 4.18% during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in loan yields was primarily due to the addition of the factored receivables originated by CBI. These factored receivables are generally much higher-yielding assets than our traditional loans. The yield on the factored receivables varies but is approximately 15%. CBI contributed average loan balances of $75.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $788.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $514.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, an increase of $274.4 million, or 53.3%. The rate on total interest-bearing liabilities was 54 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 51 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing average deposits was due to organic deposit production and the inclusion of ULB’s deposits in our results for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $232.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to $94.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase in average noninterest-bearing deposits, together with the increased volume of interest-earning assets and higher yields on interest-earning assets, led to the higher net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The following table reflects, for the periods indicated, the changes in our net interest income due to changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the associated rates paid or earned on these assets and liabilities.

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME

 

		For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015 vs. 2014
		Variance due to
Interest-earning assets		Volume				Yield/Rate				Total
Loans		$	8,821			$	3,351			$	12,172
Mortgage loans held for sale			22				(16	)			6
Securities:
Taxable securities			(193	)			91				(102	)
Tax-exempt securities			135				(20	)			115
Cash balances in other banks			28				73				101
Funds sold			—				—				—
Total interest-earning assets		$	8,813			$	3,479			$	12,292
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transactions accounts		$	56			$	(6	)		$	50
Savings and money market deposits			236				51				287
Time deposits			462				6				468
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowed money			—				—				—
Total interest-bearing liabilities		$	754			$	51			$	805
Net interest income
Net interest income (Taxable equivalent)			8,059				3,428				11,487
Taxable equivalent adjustment			27				15				42
Net interest income		$	8,032			$	3,413			$	11,445

Provision for Loan Losses

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a provision for loan losses of $120 thousand and $281 thousand, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we did not record a provision for loan losses. Our policy is to maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is a charge to earnings, and is decreased by charge-offs and increased by loan recoveries. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we

 

23

---

Table of Contents

consider our historical loan loss experience, the general economic environment, the overall portfolio composition and other relevant information. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision changes. When individual loans are evaluated for impairment and an impairment is deemed necessary, the impaired portion of the loan amount is charged off. Currently, no portion of our allowance is related to impaired loans.

Noninterest Income

In addition to net interest margin, we generate other types of recurring noninterest income from our operations. Our banking operations generate revenue from service charges and fees on deposit accounts. Our mortgage division generates revenue from originating and selling mortgages, and we have a revenue sharing relationship with a registered broker-dealer. In addition to these types of recurring noninterest income, NBC owns life insurance on several key employees and records income on the increase in the cash surrender value of these policies.

Additionally, during the 2015 second quarter, we began earning revenue as a sponsor bank for a provider of electronic transaction processing services for retail merchants and the consumer finance industry. This sponsorship into the VISA and MasterCard networks allows the processor to accept debit and credit card transactions, and we earn a fee on each such transactions.

The following table sets forth the principal components of noninterest income for the periods indicated.

NONINTEREST INCOME

 

		For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015				2014				2015				2014
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts		$	308			$	172			$	575			$	338
Mortgage origination and fee income			1,505				1,048				2,776				1,753
Merchant sponsorship revenue			191				—				191				—
Income from bank owned life insurance			86				60				165				120
Wealth management fees			13				15				32				29
(Loss) gain on sale of other real estate			(11	)			—				(24	)			5
Other noninterest income			114				31				255				48
Total noninterest income		$	2,206			$	1,326			$	3,970			$	2,293

Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $4.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The inclusion of ULB and CBI in our results of operations accounted for approximately $125 thousand of the $880 thousand increase in noninterest income recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and approximately $289 thousand of the $1.7 million increase recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The most significant increase in noninterest income for both periods of 2015 was from the mortgage division. Mortgage division income increased $457 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and totaled $1.5 million for this period, as compared to $1.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Mortgage division income increased $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and totaled $2.8 million for this period, as compared to $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Increased production led to higher mortgage division income during each of the 2015 periods. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, total production was $84.8 million, compared to $56.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Total production for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $140.5 million, compared to $97.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, refinance activity accounted for 18.6% of production volume, compared to 11.8% during the same period in 2014. The addition of ULB had a minimal impact on the higher mortgage division income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. We intend to grow this business line in the greater Orlando market, but the increased mortgage division income during the first six months of 2015 came predominately from our other markets.

 

24

---

Table of Contents

Service charges and fees on deposit accounts increased by $136 thousand to $308 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased $237 thousand to $575 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same periods in 2014. The addition of ULB contributed $89 thousand and $152 thousand of the increases for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The remaining portion of this increase was a result of an increase in the number of deposit accounts as we continue to gain momentum and market share in our markets.

Noninterest expense

The increase in our total noninterest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 reflects the continued growth of the Company (organic growth and growth via acquisition), as well as the expansion of our operational framework, employee base and facilities infrastructure as we build the foundation to support our growth strategies. We believe that some of our overhead costs will decrease as a percentage of our revenue as we grow and gain operating leverage by spreading these costs over a larger revenue base.

The following table presents the primary components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

 

		For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015				2014				2015				2014
Salaries and employee benefits		$	5,114			$	3,119			$	10,101			$	6,115
Commission-based compensation			1,056				471				1,852				777
Occupancy and equipment expense			829				459				1,665				895
Data processing expenses			487				294				912				583
Advertising and marketing expenses			125				63				298				139
Legal fees			135				134				302				196
FDIC insurance assessments			152				105				357				212
Accounting and audit expenses			212				103				435				198
Consulting and other professional expenses			164				72				269				107
Telecommunications expenses			135				67				263				129
Other real estate owned, repossessed asset and other collection expenses			71				20				193				20
Core deposit intangible amortization			111				—				222				—
Other noninterest expense			1,025				528				2,037				945
Total noninterest expense		$	9,616			$	5,435			$	18,906			$	10,316

Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $9.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $18.9 million and $10.3 million, respectively. The inclusion of ULB and CBI in our results of operations accounted for approximately $2.9 million of the $4.2 million increase in noninterest expense recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015. The inclusion of ULB and CBI accounted for approximately $6.0 million of the $8.6 million increase in noninterest expense recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The largest components of noninterest expense are related to employee costs shown in the table above as salaries and employee benefits expense and commission-based compensation expense. Salaries continue to increase as we expand our presence in the markets in which we operate. In April 2014, we opened a loan production office (which we converted to a full-service branch in November 2014) in Vero Beach, Florida, which contributed to the increase in salaries and employee benefits expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Commission-based compensation expense is directly related to mortgage loan origination activity and certain production activity at CBI. The higher levels of revenue for the mortgage division contributed to the increased commission-based compensation expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, salaries and benefits expense for CBI’s and ULB’s employees contributed approximately $1.9 million of the $2.6 million increase in salaries and employee benefits expense and commission-based compensation

 

25

---

Table of Contents

expense recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and contributed approximately $3.7 million of the $5.1 million increase in salaries and employee benefits and commission-based compensation expense recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared with the same periods in 2014.

Each category of noninterest expense increased during the three months ended June 30, 2015. This was largely a result of the additional expenses associated with the operations of CBI and ULB. Also, legal, accounting and other professional services expenses increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 in connection with merger-related activities and costs associated with becoming a public company and our initial public offering during March 2015.

Income Tax Provision

Income tax expense of $1.3 million was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to income tax expense of $568 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Income tax expense of $2.4 million was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to income tax expense of $1.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in income tax expense during the each of the 2015 periods was due to an increase in pre-tax income. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was 30.7% (35.9% including the minority interest in CBI), compared to 33.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was 31.0% (36.1% including the minority interest in CBI), compared to 34.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The effective tax rate is affected by items of income and expense that are not subject to federal and state taxation.

Comparison of Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014

Overview

Our total assets increased $118.2 million, or 10.4%, from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2014, to $1.3 billion at June 30, 2015. Loans increased by $81.9 million, or 9.2%, during the first six months of 2015, and cash and cash equivalents increased by $19.0 million.

Deposits at June 30, 2015 totaled $1.1 billion, an increase of $80.4 million as compared to December 31, 2014. Our deposits increased during the first six months of 2015 due to the successful business development efforts of our employees, as we continue to move banking relationships from other financial institutions. Additionally, the Bank has benefited from excess liquidity in the financial markets, as investors are unwilling to make long-term investments due to the low interest rate environment and elect to maintain cash in interest-bearing transaction and money market accounts.

Investment Securities

We use our securities portfolio primarily to enhance our overall yield on interest-earning assets and as a source of liquidity, as a tool to manage our balance sheet sensitivity and regulatory capital ratios, and as a base from which to pledge assets for public deposits. When our liquidity position exceeds current needs and our expected loan demand, other investments are considered as a secondary

 

26

---

Table of Contents

earnings alternative. As investments mature, they are used to meet current cash needs, or they are reinvested to maintain our desired liquidity position. We have designated a majority of our securities as available-for-sale to provide flexibility in case an immediate need for liquidity arises, and we believe that the composition of the portfolio offers needed flexibility in managing our liquidity position and interest rate sensitivity without adversely impacting our regulatory capital levels. Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income, net of related deferred taxes. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost on our balance sheet.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we elected to use a portion of our balance sheet liquidity to invest in securities issued by states and political subdivisions (“municipal securities”). During the first six months of 2015, we invested $12.6 million in municipal securities. Additionally, we have elected to classify these municipal securities as held-to-maturity, as we currently have the ability and intent to hold these securities until maturity.

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

 

		As of
		June 30,								December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015								2014
		Cost				Market				Cost				Market
U.S. Treasury securities		$	—			$	—			$	1,501			$	1,501
Securities issued by states and political subdivisions			4,408				4,572				4,408				4,681
Residential mortgage pass-through securities			24,631				25,405				27,723				28,750
Total investment securities		$	29,039			$	29,977			$	33,632			$	34,932

INVESTMENT SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY

 

		As of
		June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2015
		Cost				Market
U.S. Treasury securities		$	—			$	—
Securities issued by states and political subdivisions			12,609				12,122
Residential mortgage pass-through securities			—				—
Other debit securities			—				—
Total investment securities		$	12,609			$	12,122

We invest primarily in mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and obligations of government-sponsored entities and agencies of the United States, though we may in some situations also invest in direct obligations of the United States or obligations guaranteed as to the principal and interest by the United States. All of our mortgage-backed securities are residential securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).

Loans

Loans are our largest category of earning assets and typically provide higher yields than other types of earning assets. Associated with the higher loan yields are the inherent credit and liquidity risks that management attempts to control and counterbalance. Total loans averaged $924.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015, or 84.7% of average earning assets, as compared to $562.4 million, or 78.6% of average earning assets, for the six months ended June 30, 2014. At June 30, 2015, total loans, net of unearned income, were $970.7 million, compared to $888.7 million at December 31, 2014, an increase of $81.9 million, or 9.2%.

The organic, or non-acquired, growth in the Bank’s loan portfolio is attributable to the Bank’s ability to attract new customers to the Company from other financial institutions. We have also been successful in building banking relationships with new customers in all of the markets that we serve. We have hired several new bankers in our markets, and these employees have been successful in transitioning their former clients and new clients to the Bank. Our bankers are expected to be involved in their communities and to maintain business development efforts to develop relationships with clients, and our

 

27

---

Table of Contents

philosophy is to be responsive to customer needs by providing decisions in a timely manner. In addition to our business development efforts, many of the markets in which we operate have shown signs of economic recovery over the last few years, which has increased demand for the services that we provide.

The table below provides a summary of the loan portfolio composition as of the dates indicated.

COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO

 

		As of
		June 30,								December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		2015								2014
		Amount				Percent of Total				Amount				Percent of Total
Construction, land development, and other land loans		$	100,928				10.39	%		$	83,663				9.41	%
Secured by farmland			1,988				0.20				1,842				0.21
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties			246,690				25.40				221,222				24.88
Secured by multifamily (5 or more) residential properties			24,103				2.48				23,420				2.63
Secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties			363,819				37.47				330,784				37.20
Loans secured by real estate			737,528				75.94				660,931				74.33
Commercial and industrial loans			123,478				12.71				113,788				12.80
Factored commercial receivables			75,000				7.72				82,600				9.29
Consumer loans			16,798				1.73				13,962				1.57
Other loans			18,454				1.90				17,869				2.01
Total gross loans			971,258				100.00	%			889,150				100.00	%
Unearned income			(605	)							(429	)
Total loans, net of unearned income			970,653								888,721
Allowance for loan losses			(9,274	)							(9,802	)
Total net loans		$	961,379							$	878,919

In the context of this discussion, a “real estate mortgage loan” is defined as any loan secured by real estate, other than a loan for construction purposes, regardless of the purpose of the loan. It is common practice for financial institutions in our market areas, and for us in particular, to obtain a security interest in or lien on real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to increase the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan. This practice tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan portfolio. In many cases, we prefer real estate collateral to many other potential collateral sources, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment.

The principal component of our loan portfolio is loans secured by real estate. At June 30, 2015, this category totaled $737.5 million and represented 75.9% of our total loan portfolio, compared to $660.9 million, or 74.3% of the total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2014. Each category of real estate mortgage loans and real estate construction loans increased during the first six months of 2015.

Loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties (“commercial mortgage loans”) increased by $33.0 million, or 10.0%, to $363.8 million at June 30, 2015, compared to $330.8 million at December 31, 2014. Commercial mortgage loans comprise the single largest category of our loans, and, at June 30, 2015, accounted for 37.5% of our total loan portfolio. Our management team has a great deal of experience and expertise in commercial mortgages, and this loan type has traditionally comprised a large portion of our loan portfolio. Of the $363.8 million in total commercial mortgage loans at June 30, 2015, approximately $139.8 million were loans secured by owner-occupied properties.

Residential mortgage loans increased by $25.5 million, or 11.5%, to $246.7 million at June 30, 2015, compared to $221.2 million at December 31, 2014. At June 30, 2015, residential mortgages accounted for 25.4% of our total loan portfolio.

Real estate construction loans totaled $100.9 million at June 30, 2015, an increase of 20.6% from $83.7 million at December 31, 2014. At June 30, 2015, this loan type accounted for 10.4% of our total loan portfolio.

Commercial and industrial loans totaled $123.5 million at June 30, 2015, compared to $113.8 million at December 31, 2014. The Bank has hired several experienced commercial lenders, and the increases described above are largely a result of the successful efforts of these employees. We expect this trend to continue with respect to commercial and industrial loans as economic conditions continue to improve.

 

28

---

Table of Contents

Factored commercial receivables totaled $75.0 million at June 30, 2015, compared to $82.6 million at December 31, 2014. This balance will fluctuate depending on several variables, such as when receivables are purchased and when and how quickly payments are received. A lower balance at the end of a period does not necessarily mean less purchase activity during the period.

Allowance for Loan Losses, Provision for Loan Losses and Asset Quality

Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable inherent credit losses in the loan portfolio. We determine the allowance based on an ongoing evaluation of risk as it correlates to potential losses within the portfolio. Increases to the allowance are made by charges to the provision for loan losses. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

In determining the amount of the allowance, we utilize the risk department’s independent analysis of the minimum required loan loss reserve for the Bank. In this analysis, problem loans are reviewed for impairment or for loss exposure based on their payment performance, probability of default and value of the collateral. These totals are specifically allocated to the reserve. The loan portfolio is then divided into various homogeneous risk pools utilizing a combination of collateral codes, loan purpose codes and internal risk ratings. Historical losses are used to estimate the probable loss in the current portfolio based on both an average loss methodology and a migration loss methodology. The methodologies and the time periods considered are subjective and vary for each risk pool based on systematic risk relative to our ability to estimate losses for that risk pool. Because every loan has a risk of loss, the calculation begins with a minimum loss allocation for each loan pool. The minimum loss is estimated based on long-term trends for the Bank, the banking industry and the economy. A minimum loss allocation is similarly applied to letters of credit and unused lines of credit. Loss allocations are adjusted for changes in the economy, problem loans, payment performance, loan policy, management, credit administration systems, credit concentrations, loan growth and other elements over the time periods utilized in the methodology. The adjusted loss allocations are then applied to the current balances in their respective loan pools. Loss allocations are totaled, yielding the required allowance for loan losses.

We incorporate the data from the allowance calculation with interim changes to that data in our ongoing determination of the allowance for loan losses. We then take into consideration other factors that may support an allowance in excess of required minimums. These factors include systems changes, historically high loan growth, changes in the economy and company management and lending practices at the time at which the loans were made. We believe that the data that we use in determining the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to estimate the potential losses in the loan portfolio; however, actual results could differ from management’s estimates.

The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

		As of and for the Three Months Ended								As of and for the Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		2015				2014				2015				2014
Total loans outstanding, net of unearned income		$	970,653			$	588,065			$	970,653			$	588,065
Average loans outstanding, net of unearned income		$	944,373			$	570,896			$	924,081			$	562,404
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period		$	9,522			$	9,162			$	9,802			$	9,119
Charge-offs:
Loans secured by real estate			432				227				764				227
Commercial and industrial loans			—				—				—				—
Factored receivables			529				—				1,095				—
Consumer loans			87				—				87				—
All other loans			—				2				1				3
Total charge-offs			1,048				229				1,947				230
Recoveries:
Loans secured by real estate			63				15				95				41
Commercial and industrial loans			193				4				9				7
Factored receivables			406				—				1,003				—
Consumer loans			5				10				5				12
All other loans			13				12				26				25
Total recoveries			680				41				1,138				85
Net charge-offs			368				188				809				145
Provision for loan losses			120				—				281				—
Allowance for loan losses at period end		$	9,274			$	8,974			$	9,274			$	8,974
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans			0.96	%			1.53	%			0.96	%			1.53	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans			0.16	%			0.13	%			0.18	%			0.05	%

 

29

---

Table of Contents

The table above does not include the allowance for loan losses related to loans acquired from ULB. In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, ULB’s allowance for loan losses was not brought forward as of the date of acquisition; rather, the acquired loans were recorded at fair value, and any discount to fair value was recorded against the loans rather than as an allowance for loan losses. The portion of the discount deemed related to credit quality was recorded as a non-accretable difference, and the remaining discount was recorded as an accretable discount and accreted into interest income over the estimated average life of the loans using the level yield method. At June 30, 2015, ULB’s acquired loan portfolio totaled $137.7 million and had a related non-accretable difference of $2.1 million and an accretable discount of $1.7 million.

Overall, asset quality indicators have remained steady, and, as a result, provision expense has been minimal. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, one large credit was partially charged off and placed on nonaccrual. This event, along with continued strong loan growth, required the recording of a provision expense during the three months ended June 30, 2015. While nonperforming assets increased during the three months ended June 30, 2015, our nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets remains low.

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

While no portion of the allowance is in any way restricted to any individual loan or group of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb losses from any and all loans, the following table represents management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses to specific loan categories as of the dates indicated.

ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

		As of
		June 30,								December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		2015								2014
		Amount				Percent of Loans in each Category to Total Loans				Amount				Percent of Loans in each Category to Total Loans
Commercial, financial and agricultural		$	1,583				14.61	%		$	1,523				14.81	%
Factored receivables			715				7.72				955				9.29
Real estate - mortgage			5,354				65.55				5,047				64.92
Real estate - construction			888				10.39				647				9.41
Consumer			254				1.73				562				1.57
Unallocated			480				—				1,068				—
		$	9,274				100.00	%		$	9,802				100.00	%

Our allowance for loan losses is composed of general reserves and specific reserves. General reserves are determined by applying to each segment of our portfolio loss percentages based on that segment’s historical loss experience and adjustment factors derived from internal and external environmental conditions. All loans considered to be impaired are evaluated on an individual basis to determine specific reserve allocations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Loans for which specific reserves are provided are excluded from the calculation of general reserves.

A portion of the allowance is deemed to be a general reserve and remains unallocated to any particular loan category to reflect our estimate of probable inherent but not yet specifically identified losses within the portfolio due to the nature of the portfolio and uncertainties in underwriting standards of certain loans. For example, the portfolio includes exposures to various businesses with different organizational structures that may implicate multiple segments within the allocation framework, which will inherently lead to imperfections in the loss percentages applied to the portfolio segments. These inherent risks are amplified by the fact that we remain at risk for unidentified problems in the loan

 

30

---

Table of Contents

portfolio that we inherited upon bank acquisitions, as many of the loans underwritten by prior management were made using different credit policies and procedures than those that we currently use. Problems with respect to credit quality or the collectibility of these loans often are not apparent from the documentation in the file and frequently do not arise until the loan matures. For example, in some instances, sizable loans with satisfactory payment history and apparently complete documentation have led to write-offs upon maturity of the loan or a subsequent discovery of adverse information. Allocating this risk from the inherited loans to the segment portfolios is not deemed advisable by management due to the breadth of exposure of these loans over the portfolio segments.

We evaluate the adequacy and allocation of the allowance on a quarterly basis. Recent variations in the unallocated portion of the allowance have been driven by our estimate of probable inherent losses within the portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified due in large part to the factors discussed above and consideration of such additional factors as changes in the nature and volume of our loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect borrowers’ ability to pay, overall portfolio quality and our review of specific problem loans. In general, we expect that the portion of the unallocated allowance attributable to inherited loans will decrease over time as new loans are made and additional information becomes available with respect to currently unidentified problems and expected losses for the inherited loans. However, because our allocation of the allowance among the various loan types is driven by several factors, this decrease may not be linear with the volume of acquired loans outstanding during certain time frames.

Our procedures for allocating the allowance support an incurred, rather than expected, loss model through utilization of both specific and general reserves (including the unallocated amount). Although leaving a portion of the allowance unallocated may appear to indicate the expectation of future events, it in fact addresses the potential for additional losses on the current portfolio. We deem it prudent to include this component of measurement in our allowance for loan losses and believe that it is appropriate to apply it as an unallocated amount based on the current information available in the loan files and our exposure to incurred losses over the various segments. In effect, the unallocated portion represents a component that explicitly accounts for the inherent imprecision in the loan loss analysis based on our specific current circumstances.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table presents our nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

 

		As of
		June 30,								December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		2015				2014				2014
Nonaccrual loans		$	5,483			$	1,195			$	4,865
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing			145				—				297
Total nonperforming loans			5,628				1,195				5,162
Other real estate and repossesed assets			1,636				800				1,380
Total nonperforming assets		$	7,264			$	1,995			$	6,542
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans			0.96	%			1.53	%			1.10	%
Allowance for loan losses to period end non-performing loans			164.78				750.96				189.89
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans			0.16				0.13				0.05
Nonperforming assets to period end loans and foreclosed property and repossessed assets			0.75				0.34				0.73
Nonperforming loans to period end loans			0.58				0.20				0.58

Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when we believe, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest is doubtful. In addition to a consideration of these factors, we have a consistent and continuing policy of placing all loans on nonaccrual status if they become 90 days or more past due, excluding factored receivables. For CBI’s factored receivables, which are trade credits rather than promissory notes, our practice is to charge off unpaid recourse receivables when they become 90 days

 

31

---

Table of Contents

past due from the invoice due date and unpaid non-recourse receivables when they become 120 days past due from the statement billing date. For the recourse receivables, the amount of the invoice is charged against the client reserve account established for such purposes, unless the client reserve is insufficient, in which case either the amount of the invoice is charged against loans or the balance is considered impaired and the client is responsible for repaying the unpaid obligation of the account debtor. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all accrued interest on the loan is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain. Payments received while a loan is on nonaccrual status will be applied to the loan’s outstanding principal balance. When a problem loan is resolved, there may ultimately be an actual write-down or charge-off of the principal balance of the loan that would necessitate additional charges to the allowance for loan losses.

Total nonperforming assets increased by $621 thousand to $7.2 million at June 30, 2015, from $6.5 million at December 31, 2014. Asset quality has been and will continue to be a primary focus of management.

Deposits

Deposits, which include noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, money market accounts and savings and time deposits, are the primary funding source for the Bank. We offer a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with a primary focus on building and expanding client relationships. We continually focus on establishing a comprehensive relationship with consumer and business borrowers, seeking deposits as well as lending relationships.

The following table details the composition of our deposit portfolio as of the dates indicated.

COMPOSITION OF DEPOSITS

 

		As of
		June 30,								December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		2015								2014
		Amount				Percent of Total				Amount				Percent of Total
Noninterest-bearing demand		$	246,804				23.47	%		$	217,643				22.41	%
Interest-bearing demand			162,087				15.42				154,816				15.94
Savings and money market			414,720				39.44				392,394				40.41
Time less than $100k			67,156				6.39				74,367				7.66
Time equal to or greater than $100k and less than $250k			47,351				4.50				46,538				4.79
Time equal to or greater than $250k			113,365				10.78				85,302				8.79
Total deposits		$	1,051,483				100.00	%		$	971,060				100.00	%

Total deposits were $1.1 billion at June 30, 2015, an increase of $80.4 million from December 31, 2014. Deposit growth has been a point of emphasis, and additionally, we have benefited to a large extent from uncertainty in the financial markets, which has increased the liquidity of many banks as consumers and businesses look for safe places for liquidity, thereby increasing bank deposits. All deposit categories increased during the first six months of 2015, with the exception of time deposits. Customers continue to be reluctant to invest in time deposits due to the low interest rate environment and have instead chosen money market accounts and other interest-bearing accounts.

Other Funding Sources

We supplement our deposit funding with wholesale funding when needed for balance sheet planning or when the terms are attractive and will not disrupt our offering rates in our markets. One of our primary sources of wholesale funding is the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB). We had FHLB borrowings of $22.0 million at each of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. We have not initiated any additional borrowings from the FHLB since 2012. Additionally, we have access to brokered deposits and issued $48.9 million of brokered certificates during 2014 to fund a portion of the assets

 

32

---

Table of Contents

acquired in the CBI transaction. Another funding source that we have used to supplement our local funding is internet certificates of deposit. We have used this source to book certificates of deposit that mature in three to five years at rates that are lower than we would offer in our local markets, typically below the rates indicated on the LIBOR swap curve for similar maturities. We had internet certificates of deposit balances of $12.2 million and $14.0 million at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Liquidity

Market and public confidence in our financial strength and in financial institutions in general will have a significant role in our access to appropriate levels of liquidity. This confidence is significantly dependent on our ability to maintain sound asset quality and appropriate levels of capital reserves.

Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet anticipated customer demands for funds under credit commitments and deposit withdrawals at a reasonable cost and on a timely basis. We measure our liquidity position by giving consideration to both on- and off-balance sheet sources of and demands for funds on a daily, weekly and monthly basis.

Liquidity risk involves the risk of being unable to fund assets with the appropriate duration and rate-based liabilities, as well as the risk of not being able to meet our cash needs as they arise. Liquidity planning and management are necessary to ensure the ability to fund operations in a cost-effective manner and to meet current and future potential obligations, such as loan commitments, lease obligations and deposit outflows. In this process, we focus on both assets and liabilities and on the manner in which they collectively contribute to provide adequate liquidity to meet our needs.

Funds are available from a number of basic banking activity sources, including the core deposit base, the repayment and maturity of loans and investment security cash flows. Other funding sources include federal funds purchased, brokered certificates of deposit and borrowings from the FHLB.

Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $142.4 million and $123.4 million, respectively. Based on the recorded cash and cash equivalents, we believe that our liquidity resources were sufficient at June 30, 2015 to fund loans and meet our other cash needs as necessary.

Contractual Obligations

While our liquidity monitoring and management considers both present and future demands for and sources of liquidity, the following table of contractual commitments focuses only on future obligations.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of June 30, 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)		Due in 1 year or less				Due after 1 through 3 years				Due after 3 through 5 years				Due after 5 years				Total
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		$	15,000			$	—			$	7,000			$	—			$	22,000
Certificates of deposit of less than $100k			24,736				37,567				4,853				—				67,156
Certificates of deposit of $100k or more			108,409				39,216				13,091				—				160,716
Operating leases			582				763				148				79				1,572
Total contractual obligations		$	148,727			$	77,546			$	25,092			$	79			$	251,444

 

33

---

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of amounts recorded on our balance sheet. Our exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amounts of these commitments. We follow the same credit policies in making these types of commitments as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements are summarized in the following table as of the dates indicated.

CREDIT EXTENSION COMMITMENTS

 

		As of
		June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
		Amount				Amount
Unfunded lines		$	219,912			$	182,820
Letters of credit			8,583				8,085
Total credit extension commitments		$	228,495				190,905

Interest Sensitivity and Market Risk

Interest Sensitivity

We monitor and manage the pricing and maturity of our assets and liabilities in order to diminish the potential adverse impact that changes in interest rates could have on our net interest income. The principal monitoring technique that we employ is simulation analysis, as augmented by a “gap” analysis.

In simulation analysis, we review each individual asset and liability category and its projected behavior in various interest rate environments. These projected behaviors are based on our past experiences and on current competitive environments, including the various environments in the different markets in which we compete. Using this projected behavior and differing rate scenarios as inputs, the simulation analysis generates projections of net interest income. We also periodically verify the validity of this approach by comparing actual results with those that were projected in previous models.

Another technique used in interest rate management, but to a lesser degree than simulation analysis, is the measurement of the interest sensitivity “gap,” which is the positive or negative dollar difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest rate repricing within a given period of time. Interest rate sensitivity can be managed by repricing assets and liabilities, selling securities available for sale or trading securities, replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability.

We evaluate interest rate sensitivity risk and then formulate guidelines regarding asset generation and repricing and sources and prices of off-balance sheet commitments in order to decrease interest sensitivity risk. We use computer simulations to measure the net income effect of various interest rate scenarios. The modeling reflects interest rate changes and the related impact on net income over specified periods of time.

 

34

---

Table of Contents

The following table illustrates our interest rate sensitivity at June 30, 2015, assuming that the relevant assets and liabilities are collected and paid, respectively, based upon historical experience rather than their stated maturities.

INTEREST SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

As of June 30, 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets		0-1 Mos				1-3 Mos				3-12 Mos				1-3 Yrs				3-5 Yrs				> 5 Yrs				Total
Loans (1)		$	485,562				28,678				81,758				175,136				151,192				62,077				984,403
Securities			331				2,611				2,592				8,717				5,511				22,824				42,586
Cash balances in other banks			124,716				—				—				—				—				—				124,716
Funds sold			—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Total interest-earning assets			610,609				31,289				84,350				183,853				156,703				84,901				1,151,705
Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transactions accounts			58,413				3,332				14,991				28,504				17,030				39,817				162,087
Savings and money market deposits			259,025				5,396				24,279				60,613				1,568				63,839				414,720
Time deposits			10,803				17,916				104,426				70,296				—				24,431				227,872
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowed money			—				—				15,000				—				7,000				—				22,000
Total interest-bearing liabilities		$	328,241				26,644				158,696				159,413				25,598				128,087				826,679
Interest sensitivity gap
Period gap		$	282,368				4,645				(74,346	)			24,440				131,105				(43,186	)			325,026
Cumulative gap			282,368				287,013				212,667				237,107				368,212				325,026
Cumulative gap - Rate Sensitive Assets/Rate Sensitive Liabilities			24.52	%			24.92				18.47				20.59				31.97				28.22

 

(1)	Includes mortgage loans held-for-sale

We generally benefit from an increase in market rates of interest when we have an asset-sensitive gap (a positive number) and generally benefit from a decrease in market interest rates when we have a liability-sensitive gap (a negative number). As shown in the table above, we are asset-sensitive on a cumulative basis throughout all timeframes presented. The interest sensitivity analysis presents only a static view of the timing and repricing opportunities, without taking into consideration the fact that changes in interest rates do not affect all assets and liabilities equally. For example, rates paid on a substantial portion of core deposits may change contractually within a relatively short timeframe, but those are viewed by management as significantly less interest-sensitive than market-based rates, such as those paid on non-core deposits. For this and other reasons, we rely more on the simulation analysis (as described above) in managing interest rate risk. Net interest income may be impacted by other significant factors in a given interest rate environment, including changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Market Risk

Our earnings are dependent, to a large degree, on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on all earning assets, primarily consisting of loans and securities, and interest paid on all interest-bearing liabilities, primarily consisting of deposits. Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from inherent interest rate risk in our lending, investing and deposit gathering activities. We seek to reduce our exposure to market risk through actively monitoring and managing interest rate risk. Management relies on static “gap” analysis to determine the degree of mismatch in the maturity and repricing distribution of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which quantifies, to a large extent, the degree of market risk inherent in our balance sheet. Gap analysis is further augmented by simulation analysis to evaluate the impact of varying levels of prevailing interest rates and the sensitivity of specific earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to changes in those prevailing rates. Simulation analysis consists of evaluating the impact on net interest income given changes from 400 basis points below the current prevailing rates to 400 basis points above the current prevailing rates. We make certain assumptions regarding the effect that varying levels of interest rates have on certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which incorporate both historical experience and consensus estimates of outside sources.

The following table illustrates the results of our simulation analysis to determine the extent to which market risk would affect net interest margin for the next twelve months if prevailing interest rates increased or decreased by the specified amounts from current rates. As described above, this model uses estimates and assumptions regarding the manner in which asset and liability accounts will react to changes in prevailing interest rates. However, to isolate the market risk inherent in the balance sheet,

 

35

---

Table of Contents

the model assumes that no growth in the balance sheet occurs during the projection period. The model also assumes an immediate and parallel shift in interest rates, which would result in no change in the shape or slope of the interest rate yield curve. Because of the inherent use of these estimates and assumptions in the simulation model to derive this market risk information, the actual results of the future impact of market risk on our net interest margin may (and likely will) differ from those set forth in the table.

MARKET RISK

 

		Impact on Net Interest Income
		As of June 30,				As of December 31,
Change in prevailing interest rates		2015				2014
+400 basis points			23.88	%			20.42	%
+300 basis points			17.67				15.10
+200 basis points			11.36				9.54
+100 basis points			5.13				4.21
0 basis points			—				—
-100 basis points			(2.02	)			(1.23	)
-200 basis points			(6.04	)			(4.58	)
-300 basis points			(9.02	)			(6.83	)
-400 basis points			(10.17	)			(7.61	)

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity attributable to NCC at June 30, 2015 was $167.1 million, or 13.3% of total assets. At December 31, 2014, total shareholders’ equity attributable to us was $128.9 million, or 11.3% of total assets. The increase in shareholders’ equity during the first six months of 2015 was attributable to our initial public offering that priced on March 18, 2015. We sold 1,642,000 shares of our common stock at $19.50 per share in our initial public offering. The underwriters had an option to purchase an additional 255,000 shares, which they exercised on March 27, 2015. In total, we sold 1,897,000 newly issued shares of common stock and raised approximately $33.8 million, net of offering expenses. Our common stock is now traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “NCOM.”

In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC issued final rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital framework, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rules took effect for the Company and Bank on January 1, 2015, subject to a transition period for certain parts of the rules. The rules revise the minimum capital requirements and adjust the prompt corrective action thresholds applicable to financial institutions under the agencies’ jurisdiction. The rules revise the regulatory capital elements, add a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, increase the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirements and implement a new capital conservation buffer. The rules also permit certain banking organizations to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company and Bank have made the election to retain the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income.

The rules are intended to provide an additional measure of a bank’s capital adequacy by assigning weighted levels of risk to asset categories. Banks are also required to systematically maintain capital against such “off-balance sheet” activities as loans sold with recourse, loan commitments, guarantees and standby letters of credit. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of capital by increasing the emphasis on common equity and restricting the amount of loan loss reserves and other forms of equity, such as preferred stock, that may be included in capital. Certain items, such as goodwill and other intangible assets, are deducted from total capital in arriving at the various regulatory capital measures such as common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total risk-based capital. Our objective is to maintain our current status as a “well-capitalized institution,” as that term is defined by the Bank’s regulators. As of June 30, 2015, the Bank was “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

 

36

---

Table of Contents

Under the current regulatory guidelines, banks must meet minimum capital adequacy levels based on both total assets and risk-adjusted assets. All banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6%, a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio) of 4%. Adherence to these guidelines has not had an adverse impact on us.

The table below calculates and presents regulatory capital based on the new regulatory capital ratio requirements under Basel III that became effective on January 1, 2015, as well as the regulatory capital ratios in effect on December 31, 2014. Beginning in 2016, an additional capital conservation buffer will be added to the minimum requirements for capital adequacy purposes, subject to a three-year phase-in period. The capital conservation buffer will be fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5 percent. A banking organization with a conservation buffer of less than 2.5 percent (or the required phase-in amount in years prior to 2019) will be subject to limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The ratios for the Company and Bank are currently sufficient to satisfy the fully phased-in conservation buffer.

The following table sets forth selected consolidated capital ratios at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 for both NBC and NCC. ULB is not included separately at June 30, 2015, as ULB was merged into NBC on February 28, 2015.

CAPITAL ADEQUACY ANALYSIS

 

(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)		Actual								For Capital Adequacy Purposes								To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
As of June 30, 2015		Amount				Ratio				Amount				Ratio				Amount				Ratio
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
NCC		$	139,268				13.78	%		$	80,863				8.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	112,273				11.13	%			80,685				8.00	%		$	100,856				10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
NCC		$	129,994				12.86	%		$	60,648				6.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	102,999				10.21	%		$	60,513				6.00	%		$	80,685				8.00	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
NCC		$	129,994				12.86	%		$	45,486				4.50	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	102,999				10.21	%		$	45,385				4.50	%		$	65,556				6.50	%
Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets)
NCC		$	129,994				11.09	%		$	46,901				4.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	102,999				8.80	%		$	46,825				4.00	%		$	58,531				5.00	%
As of December 31, 2014
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
NCC		$	106,289				11.75	%		$	72,367				8.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	84,148				11.42	%		$	58,948				8.00	%		$	73,685				10.00	%
ULB		$	18,731				11.31	%		$	13,249				8.00	%		$	16,561				10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets)
NCC		$	96,487				10.66	%		$	36,205				4.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	74,927				10.16	%		$	29,499				4.00	%		$	44,248				6.00	%
ULB		$	18,731				11.31	%		$	6,625				4.00	%		$	9,937				6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets)
NCC		$	96,487				10.68	%		$	36,137				4.00	%			N/A				N/A
NBC		$	74,927				8.57	%		$	34,972				4.00	%		$	43,715				5.00	%
ULB		$	18,731				8.60	%		$	8,712				4.00	%		$	10,890				5.00	%

Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that a bank can pay without the prior approval of its regulatory authorities. These restrictions are based on levels of regulatory classified assets, prior years’ net earnings and the ratio of equity capital to assets. As of June 30, 2015, the Bank’s retained earnings deficit was eliminated and, subject to regulatory approval, the Bank is now permitted to pay dividends to NCC.

 

37

---

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The information required by this item is contained in Part I, Item 2 herein under the heading “Interest Sensitivity and Market Risk.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company has carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2015, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in various routine legal proceedings incidental to our respective businesses. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 that could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

 

38

---

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 7, 2015, by and among National Commerce Corporation, National Bank of Commerce and Reunion Bank of Florida (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 8, 2015)
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of National Commerce Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-198219), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2014)
3.1A		Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of National Commerce Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1A to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55336), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2015)
3.2		Bylaws of National Commerce Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-198219), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2014)
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101		Interactive Data Files for National Commerce Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015

 

39

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

				NATIONAL COMMERCE CORPORATION (Registrant)
Date: August 13, 2015				/s/ John H. Holcomb, III
				John H. Holcomb, III
				Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Date: August 13, 2015				/s/ William E. Matthews, V
				William E. Matthews, V
				Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board

 

40