Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex31-2.htm
EX-10.8 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex10-8.htm
EX-10.11 - Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.	ex10-11.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [ ] to [ ]

Commission file number 000-54253

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		20-0266164
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

17-120 West Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada		L4B 1L2
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (905) 771-6551

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
N/A		N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on August 31, 2013 was $Nil based on a $Nil average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date. 53,998,116 common shares as of June 8, 2015.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.	Business	3

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	16

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	23

Item 2.	Properties	23

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	23

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	25

Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	34

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	58

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	58

Item 9B.	Other Information	59

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	60

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	64

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	68

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	69

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	70

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	71

Item 1. Business

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenues, or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operation; any statements concerning proposed new products, services, or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; statements of belief; and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the following: competition, promotional costs and the risk of declining revenues. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this filing, and we assume no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. The following discusses our financial condition and results of operations based upon our audited financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. It should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our consolidated financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars (US$) and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this quarterly report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “our company” mean Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., and our wholly owned subsidiary, Falconridge Oil Ltd. an Ontario, Canada corporation, unless otherwise indicated.

Corporate Background

We were incorporated on May 30, 2007 under the name Ameriwest Minerals Corp. On December 23, 2010, we changed our name to Ameriwest Petroleum Corp. by way of a merger with our wholly-owned subsidiary Ameriwest Petroleum, which was formed solely for the change of name. We were an exploration stage corporation. Our company carried out the first phase of exploration on the Key 1-4 Mineral Claims, SW Goldfield Hills Area, Esmeralda County, Nevada, USA. The results of Phase I were not promising and management determined it was in the best interests of the shareholders to abandon the property and we allowed the claim to lapse in September 2009.

On November 4, 2009, our company signed a letter of intent with Suntech Energy of British Columbia to establish the basic terms to be used in a future asset purchase between our company and Suntech Energy. The Agreement was to become effective on or before March 31, 2010. The letter of intent expired without having concluded the Agreement.

On November 13, 2009, our company purchased a bioreactor pod to use in a test process. As of November 30, 2010, our company had not been able to take possession and implement the testing of the bioreactor pod due to legal problems the manufacturer was experiencing. Our company therefore felt it was appropriate to write off the asset during the period ended November 30, 2010.

On June 20, 2013, we entered into letter of intent for a share exchange transaction and acquisition with Falconridge Ontario and its shareholders. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we have agreed to acquire all 100 issued and outstanding shares of Falconridge Ontario’s common stock in exchange for the issuance by our company of 29,250,000 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Falconridge Ontario.

Effective July 2, 2013, in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), our company changed our name from “Ameriwest Petroleum Corp.” to “Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.” by way of a merger with our wholly-owned subsidiary Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., which was formed solely for the change of name.

The name change became effective with the OTCQB at the opening of trading on July 2, 2013 under the symbol “FROT”. On July 2, 2013, our stock symbol changed from “AWSS” to “FROT” to better reflect the new name of our company.

On August 2, 2013, we entered into a share exchange agreement with Falconridge Ontario and its shareholders. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, we agreed to acquire all 100 issued and outstanding shares of Falconridge Ontario’s common stock in exchange for the issuance by our company of 29,250,000 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Falconridge Ontario.

Further, pursuant to the share exchange agreement, we are required to:

(a)

provide to Falconridge Ontario a financing of debt or equity for $1,100,000, which is to close no later than 150 days from the closing of the share exchange and on mutually agreeable terms;

(b)

complete a private placement of an aggregate of $400,000 at $1.50 per share (for the purposes of furthering the business of Falconridge Ontario); and

(c)

complete an equity financing, using our commercially best efforts, of up to $6,000,000 for 4,000,000 units at a price of no less than $1.50 per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share in our capital stock and one-half of one whole warrant (each one whole warrant, a “Financing Warrant”). Each Financing Warrant shall be exercisable into one share of our common stock at a price of no less than $3.00 per share for a period of 24 months from the date of issuance of the Financing Warrants. As a term to the equity financing, any party, who is successful in raising funds, with respect to the equity financing, from a private investor shall earn a cash commission of 7% and a commission of 5% payable in warrants (each, a “Commission Warrant”). Each Commission Warrant shall have the same terms as the Financing Warrants. If we are unable to complete the equity financing, then we may offer to Falconridge Ontario to complete a financing of up to $6,000,000 that may include debt, preferred shares of our company or a combination of the foregoing.

We may be unable to secure any debt or equity financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, at the time when we need such funding. Additionally, although we agreed to complete the above financings, where we are unable to complete any of the financings in the agreement, there will not be any real consequences on the parties of the agreement. The value of the agreement to provide such financings is the use commercially best efforts to fulfill the financings and demonstrating the need for financings to occur for our business to be successful.

On August 2, 2013, we closed the share exchange by issuing the required 29,250,000 common shares to the shareholders of Falconridge Ontario. As a result of the share exchange, Falconridge Ontario is now the wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. Concurrently, and as a condition to closing the share exchange agreement, Mr. Muran cancelled 18,000,000 shares of our common stock. He received no consideration for the cancellation of his stock.

In connection with the share exchange agreement, we adopted a stock option plan on August 2, 2013 to issue options to purchase up to 10% of the issued and outstanding of our capital stock when the share exchange closed, being 4,875,000 shares, to our board members and management, at an exercise price of $1.50 per share or higher. When the options are granted, they vest quarterly over two years from the date of grant and shall expire 24 months from vesting. There have been no options granted pursuant to the plan as of the date of this Annual Report.

Additionally, effective August 2, 2013, we changed our fiscal year end to February 28 and William J. Muran resigned as president, treasurer, principal financial officer, principal executive officer, and principal accounting officer of our company. Concurrently, Mark Pellicane was appointed as a director, president and chief financial officer and Alfred Vincent Morra was appointed as a director, treasurer and chief financial officer of our company.

As a result of the closing of the share exchange agreement with Falconridge Ontario, Falconridge Ontario has become our wholly-owned subsidiary and we now carry on business in the Province of Ontario, Canada. Our company has generated only some revenue.

Effective January 22, 2014, we entered into a private placement agreement with one person, pursuant to which we issued 266,667 common shares in our capital stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share, for total proceeds of $400,000, pursuant to the share exchange agreement.

On February 7, 2014, our company removed William Muran as our corporate secretary. As a result of his removal, Mr. Muran will no longer be an agent (or have signing authority on behalf) of our company. Concurrently, our company appointed Alfred V. Morra as corporate secretary. Mr. Morra has served as our chief financial officer and a director of our company since August 2, 2013.

On March 12, 2014, we appointed Carl Meaney as a member of our company’s board of directors.

On October 15, 2014, we entered into an agreement with LiveCall Investor Relations Company. Pursuant to this agreement, LiveCall is to provide us with investor relation services for a term of three months. In exchange for these services provided by LiveCall, we are to compensate LiveCall with an initial non-refundable fee of $7,500 and $2,500 per month. The term of this agreement will be automatically extended on a monthly basis after the term of three months unless 30 days of written notice is given by either party. As of the date of this Annual report, the LiveCall continues to provide services to our company.

Effective January 23, 2015, Mr. William Muran resigned as a Director of our company. Mr. Muran’s resignation was not the result of any disagreements with our company regarding our operations, policies, practices or otherwise. Our board of directors now consists of Mark Pellicane, Al Morra and Carl Meaney.

On February 20, 2015, we filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State to create 450,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The Certificate of Amendment will be effective with the Nevada Secretary of State on February 23, 2015.

On February 20, 2015, we filed a Certificate of Designation with the Nevada Secretary of State designating 10,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock, which series shall have certain designations and number thereof, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, in particular, it shall have the following voting rights:

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder to one (1) votes for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. In any vote or action of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock voting together as a separate class, each share of issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote per share. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote together with the shares of Common Stock as one class. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall share ratably, with the holders of common stock, in any dividends that may, from time to time may be declared by the board of directors. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall rank pari passu with the holders of common stock in respect of all rights in liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all of said assets being distributed among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and other classes of stock ranking pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert at any time all or any portion of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by such person into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock equal to 1,000 (one thousand) shares of Common Stock for each 1 (one) share of Series A Preferred Stock being converted (the “Conversion Ratio”), provided that the Company has a sufficient number of authorized shares of Common Stock for such conversion

On April 1, 2015, our directors approved the adoption of the 2015 Stock Plan which permits our company to issue up to 4,900,000 shares of our common stock to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company under the 2015 Stock Plan. We have issued 4,840,000 shares pursuant to this plan.

Our administrative office is located at 17-120 West Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada L4B 1L2. Our fiscal year end is February 28.

Business Overview

We are an oil and gas technology company that specializes in identifying and accessing additional petroleum reserves that are usually left in the ground. Our value proposition is extracting new resources from wells that have been assessed as uneconomic. Most of our projects will involve depleted or low producing assets. Assets are stimulated utilizing Terra Slicing Technology (“TST”) for maximum effectiveness and productivity, essentially revitalizing the pre-existing well and establishing a flow rate with a significant percentage of its initial production. Alternatively, TST may be utilized as part of a workover project or procedure.

Using the TST, our company offers operators a lower-cost alternative to drilling a new well, by accessing hydrocarbons currently in the ground within existing low or non-producing wells.

Our goal is to shift the industry and social paradigm away from new drilling and towards increasing efficiency of current extraction in existing well-bores to increase recovery of oil and gas. Thus, when widely applied, TST can add significant reserves to the energy resources of the world.

To date we have performed our TST services on only two wells.

We will finance projects involving the enhancement and stimulation of pre-existing oil and gas assets such as:

·	Producing well assets;

·	Dead wells;

·	Non-performing well assets; and

·	Low yield assets.

Most projects involve depleted or low producing assets. Assets are stimulated utilizing TST technology for maximum effectiveness and productivity, essentially revitalizing the per-existing well and establishing a flow rate with a significant percentage of its initial production. Alternatively, TST may be utilized as part of a workover project or procedure. We are the exclusive agents of TST in the United Arab Emirates and the exclusive marketing principal of TST globally, with non-exclusive rights to TST in any geographical region, country, or territory that does not infringe on the territorial rights of any other exclusive arrangement for TST that does not involve us. Further, we may only implement TST in certain areas around the world where we have a revenue interest in a property for which TST is applied (e.g. a gross over-riding royalty, override, working interest, revenue share, or share in some form of the hydrocarbon extraction from the property, contract, lease, or client).

Capital outlay and availability will be variable per project. Our intended business plan is to operate as an enhancement company and take a revenue interest in properties for which TST is applied as repayment as well as an interest in the form of a gross over-riding royalty on the producing asset. By applying TST, an operator will retrieve a significant portion of the well reserves still locked in the ground.

Our company assumes a financial risk in the process, with no capital outlay required by the asset holder or lease owner. Hence if there is no productivity, we bear the cost. To the well owner, this is a strong value proposition as we are taking an existing non-performing asset, and converting it to a cash flowing asset.

The financial risk we assume is part of our capital program to oil and gas well owner/operators. We understand that many operators cannot afford EORT (enhanced oil recovery techniques) despite the fact that they have assets that could perform at higher levels. Our program is made available to selected clients only after a detailed engineering and geological review of their asset. If we are confirmed that there will be a significant increase in production, then we enter into an agreement with the operator where in return for a GORR (gross overriding royalty) we will provide all the capital necessary to apply the TST technology to their asset. We assume all the financial risk. There will be significant covenants in our agreement with our client, such as the right to audit and the right to replace the operator should we ascertain a default in the agreement. Our program is designed to ensure capital repayment from the GORR within 12 months and then a cashflow uninhibited by operational costs of the well operator for the life of the well.

TST has been designed for deployment in virtually all environments and applications in the oil and gas industry. TST is designed to be applicable on land, or marine environments, and for both oil and gas well applications, in vertical or horizontal formats.

In October 2011, Falconridge Ontario contracted with a third party to perform a workover of a well using TST. As payment, we received a royalty interest upon completion in February 2012. The value of the royalty interest obtained was fair valued based on our reserve report, which is deemed to be $128,990. We accounted for this royalty interest received as service revenues and capitalized the amount as oil and gas property. Falconridge performed its services on a second well in December of 2013. Our technology again proved its ability to slice into the formation with significant success. However, despite the successful demonstration of the TST’s ability the well has to date only produced a significant amount of water.

Technologies and Products Overview

We are the exclusive agents of TST in the United Arab Emirates and the exclusive marketing principal of TST globally, with non-exclusive rights to TST in any geographical region, country, or territory that does not infringe on the territorial rights of any other exclusive arrangement for TST that does not involve us. Further, we may only implement TST in certain areas of the world where we have a revenue interest in a property for which TST is applied (e.g. a gross over-riding royalty, override, working interest, revenue share, or share in some form of the hydrocarbon extraction from the property, contract, lease, or client).

Terra Slicing:

TST is the most advanced completion water jetting technology today. TST uses high pressure (5000 psi) abrasive slurry to cut two perpendicular slices, through casing and cement, and deep into the formation. Two vertical windows, each going out 6 to 15 feet, about 1 to 3 inches wide, and as vertically tall as necessary. Optionally, Terra Slicing can orient the down hole machine, inject chemical reagents, and create fractures. Terra Slicing eliminates near-well bore compaction, cleans formation and increases permeability, creates pressure drop in near-well bore zone and vertical permeability that does not exist naturally. TST is very different from shaped charge perforation because it is a cutting procedure. No explosion, or burning, or scarring, or lamination.

TST is a patented oil and gas completion technology that increases production of under-performing oil and gas assets by excavation, cutting through damaged zones, increasing permeability, creating non-existent vertical permeability, avoiding damage caused by perforation, increases the drainage area, and is safer than a frac.

As TST does not pressurize the formation but only uses water pressure to create a hydro slice into the formation there is no risk of a fracture or disruption to the natural water table of increase in tectonic stresses. Further, hydraulic fracturing is a contentious environmental and health issue globally resulting moratoriums and bans of the practice. In comparison, TST has not been banned in any country or criticized due to concerns over environmental or health safety concerns.

TST can be used in almost any situation with high risk wells and is the only tool that can work in less than 5% porosity/permeability. Additionally,

TST may be utilized when there is poor pressure regime around the well bore. Conventional drilling and completion technologies cause high pressure, low permeable area to form around the well bore. Often conventional drilling and completion technologies also damage the near-well bore zone.

Further, TST re-distributes stress. Conventional drilling and completion technologies cause high pressure, low permeable area to form around the well bore. Often conventional drilling and completion technologies also damage the near-well bore zone.

Data Analysis:

Data analysis is the first stage in applying the TST process. By examining the well data and historical performance, our engineers are able to approximate the yield and net result of the technology application. This analysis phase of the project is what our staff will use to determine the financial feasibility of the project.

Safe and Proven Technology:

TST is now in its GEN-3 phase utilizing advancements in metallurgy and engineering technologies to make the application that much more efficient than previous generations of TST. The technology is safe with predictable and measurable results. TST may be used predictably and safely in many oil or gas wells.

Well Requirements:

Most important for the applicability of TST to a well are the well logs, any data files, and production history, formation, reserve, and reservoir details. As with any project, the more knowledge the TST engineers can study, the more accurate the results. Virtually any well can be enhanced, and the TST engineers can determine if a project is viable by examining the well data and past production. The following is a comprehensive “wish list” of useful data which can be provided to enhance application of TST to a given asset. We recognize that often much of the data is unavailable, however what can be provided will assist the engineers in evaluating a target property.

A.	Geological / Geophysical:

1.	Rock type, rock analysis, sample of rock for destructive testing is desirable.

2.	Hydrocarbon analysis, including viscosity, sour chemicals, scale, asphaltenes, paraffins.

3.	Water analysis, including specific conductivity and mineral, salt and trace metals content.

4.	Every and all logs run on well, at any point in time in history of well, including electric / resistivity (DIL), neutron porosity/density (CDNL), mud, oxygen, sonic, computer log, etc.

5.	Temperature of target interval(s), but a temperature log is helpful.

6.	Isopach map or other contour map or other seismic data interpretation (top and bottom).

7.	Porosity stress matrix or tectonic stress data.

8.	Initial and current reservoir pressure.

B.	Engineering:

Drilling:

1.	Drilling / daily reports or drilling summary.

2.	Bit type(s), size, speed, bore hole characteristics.

3.	Composition, pressure balance, pH, weight, working muds / fluids / chemicals used, etc.

4.	MWD data if available.

5.	LWD data if available.

6.	Deviation – slope and orientation of target interval.

Cased Hole:

1.	Casing type, size, grade, centralizers, etc.

2.	CCL (we do not like to slot through joints and this will tell us where they are).

3.	Cement type, amount, mix, cement bond log if available.

Open Hole:

1.	Rock stability analysis if any.

2.	Casing liner, gravel pack type, size, grade, centralizers, if any.

Completion:

1.	Treatment reports – type of treatment – perforation, stimulation details – shot, acid, frac etc.

2.	Frac report details – quantities and compositions of materials, rates, pressures, times, etc.

3.	Flow testing or other testing – all results, methods of testing, esp. testing by stages, if any.

4.	Reports for 1 – 3 (Completion) for all subsequent re-works or re-stimulation efforts.

5.	Down-hole Logistics.

6.	Down-hole production equipment and surface production equipment.

7.	Well-bore diagram.

C.	Production Drilling:

1.	All records for rates, pressures – all fluids (including gases), on daily or weekly basis, if possible.

2.	Balancing and/or overproduction status that occurred at any time.

D.	Independent Analysis

1.	Any independent calculations – drainage radius, gross/net pay thickness, pay/acre.

2.	Independent reservoir analysis or model if available, including initial reservoir pressure, skin factor, permeability, in-place hydrocarbons, drainage area, etc.

3.	Any other notable geological / geophysical, engineering, or operational details.

4.	Any decline rate analysis, by stage if possible, and not by commingled production.

5.	Any previous life projections or analysis, by material balance or decline curve.

6.	Reserve to production ratio or analysis.

7.	All analysis to include calculations, please.

Centrator

We use a device called a centrator to orient the tool according to any depth, vector, or angle. TST is very accurate and reliable. The centrator ensures the cut is perpendicular to the maximum stresses of the porosity matrix.

Chemical Slot Expansion

At this point in the procedure, permeability is already 15 to 20 times higher than before. Now, we can insert chemistry directly into the window cavities if necessary, to further increase permeability. Note – we only use slurry and chemicals that are absolutely safe for the wells geology.

Risks and Costs

Risks of failing to cut are minimal, even for multiple casings and cement, as the equipment is designed for deep cuts. Cutting and orientation ability can be demonstrated on the surface prior to starting the job. Depending on size, depth, number of terra-slices, and complexity of the job, costs are variable. However, we provide an economic model outlining the cost benefits analysis. Risk and cost can be reduced further by consulting with our experienced engineering and geological team.

What we do:

1.	We start with an existing oil and gas asset.
2.	TST cuts away several tons of rock in two directions in the wells performance or “pay” zone(s). When we do this, we remove the compression around the well-bore, and move it to the tips of the slots.
3.	We can then insert chemistry to clean the near-well-bore zone to ensure maximum productivity (optional).
4.	Permeability at the lateral sides of these windows increases to 15 times what exists in nature. Permeability at the tips goes to zero.
5.	What the well becomes is a new structure that is not a 5½ inch radius any more, but a radius between 10 and 20 feet wide in the target interval.
6.	Manage and refinance assets.
7.	Purchase additional assets and repeat the process.
8.	Capital at risk secured by assets and production.

This allows the well to access reserves far beyond what was previously accessible. An oil and gas project’s low production goes way up. A dead well becomes revived. We can enhance productivity, increase revenue, and extend the life of current oil and gas assets.

Terra-Seal:

The Terra-Seal machine is the only down-hole tool that can be per-programmed to control itself at down-hole point of engagement and not at surface, including azimuth orientation. This is a big advantage over competing technologies. Terra-Seal is a patented abrasive jet cutting completion process to cut smoothly through casing with high-pressure slurry (up to four or more casings).

Terra-Seal is designed to excavate vertical windows in the cement and deep into near well-bore rock in two 180o-phased directions (up to four sets).

The application of Terra-Seal is ideal in any cement squeeze repair of bad casing; new well completion; secondary recovery of oil or gas production from depleted zones; or where previous completion or fracturing was unstable or ineffective; any open-hole or cased wells that have low permeability, low porosity, high pressure, near-well-bore damage, or other production problems; can be run in vertical or horizontal wells; also to improve water-cut and increase production.

Benchmarking:

·	Reservoir engineering, numerical modeling, completion engineering design, economic evaluation, casing/rock analysis.

·	Cut dimensions are calibrated beforehand.

·	Real-time digital monitoring provided.

·	Orientation tool field-tested, high accuracy.

·	Confirm final measurements with cutting returns and DHV or well test logging.

Markets and Market Penetration

Market Size

Currently there are numerous assets available for acquisition in the North American market. These are represented by oil and gas brokers, agents, and regional land men. Assets are opportunistic and constantly coming on and off the market. Many acquisitions are by closed bid through agents and brokers of the property / leases. There are an abundance of properties available through local oil and gas brokers, land men. General information may be reviewed for many of the assets for a preliminary evaluation of TST feasibility and implementation. Detailed analysis and in-house engineering due diligence may only be accomplished once proof of funds is provided. For the purposes of our business, asset availability is plentiful and we are able to evaluate the assets prior to any financial commitment.

Market Segments and Competitive Landscape

Our business is directed at formerly producing oil and gas projects that have potential for sole or joint venture enhancement using TST. Financial feasibility is key. We will not work in a completely depleted reservoir or one with a 95% water cut as the financial viability would make the project unfeasible. TST performance is exceptionally significant in assets with tight formations, high pressure, and low permeability, where standard stimulation and enhancement procedures would show minimal results.

Given the current state of the market, we will give preference to oil assets over gas assets. However we will review all types of assets on a case by case basis.

There currently are several different methods of enhanced oil recovery including steam flood and water flood injection and hydraulic fracturing.

The total undeveloped US domestic oil resources still in the ground total more than 1 trillion barrels (160 km3), most of it remaining unrecoverable. The Department of Energy estimates that if the enhanced oil recovery potential were to be fully realized, state and local treasuries would gain $280 billion in revenues from future royalties, severance taxes, and state income taxes on oil production, aside from other economic benefits.

Product Marketing and Communications

Our company has developed contractual relationships globally in the course of our usual business for deployment of its technology, specifically in UAE, and Egypt, and is exploring further relationships in Oman and Brazil, and is further open to deployment globally.

Our company’s marketing strategy is focused on identifying market opportunities and customer needs and marketing communications to build awareness within market segments. We expect that marketing communications will encompass trade shows addressing oil and gas extraction.

Material Contracts

On February 17, 2011, Falconridge Ontario entered into an agreement with Meadowbank Asset Management Inc. Pursuant to this agreement, Meadowbank will attempt to source properties for the implementation of our technology. As a term to the agreement, Falconridge Ontario agreed to remunerate Meadowbank where:

Falconridge Ontario is required to finance the technology implementation, then Meadowbank will be entitled to 10% of total gross revenue earned by Falconridge from the establishment of relationships and target from Meadowbank after initial expenses of enhancement or implementation are recovered from the property; or

Falconridge Ontario is not required to finance the technology implementation, then Meadowbank will be entitled to:

20% of total gross revenue earned by Falconridge from the establishment of relationships and target from Meadowbank; and

10% of any up-front fees charged for the implementation of the technology.

In October 2011, we contracted with a third party to perform a workover of a well using TST. As payment, we received a royalty interest upon completion in February 2012. The value of the royalty interest obtained was fair valued based on our reserve report, which is deemed to be $128,990. We accounted for this royalty interest received as service revenues and capitalized the amount as oil and gas property.

On October 1, 2012, we entered into a licensing agreement with HydroSlotter Corporation of Canada (“HSC”). Pursuant to this agreement, we became the exclusive marketing agent for TST from HSC in the United Arb Emirates. Additionally, we are the exclusive marketing principal throughout the world of TST in any region that HSC does not already have exclusive arrangements for. In consideration of these rights, we paid a fee to HSC.

After a term of 14 months, this agreement was to terminate with 30 days of advance notice. As of December 1, 2013, this agreement was renewed by mutual consent and signature by both parties and continues on a year to year basis as neither party received notice of termination of this agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, this agreement was renewed for another year until December 31, 2015.

Placement Agent

On December 10, 2014, we entered into a placement agent agreement with Empire State Financial, Inc. (“Empire”), whereupon Empire will be our non-exclusive agent in equity financings on a best efforts basis in exchange we will be compensating Empire with:

8% of any related aggregate financing closing payable in cash; and

4% of any related aggregate financing closing payable in common shares of our company.

On January 14, 2015, we entered into a placement agent agreement with Almorli Advisors Inc., whereupon Almorli Advisors will be our non-exclusive agent in equity financings on a best efforts basis in exchange we will be compensating Almorli Advisors with a cash fee of 8% of the total capital provided to our company.

Loan Agreement with Quezon Group, LLC

On December 29, 2014, we issued a convertible note to Quezon Group LLC. Pursuant to the note issuance, Quezon Group loaned our company an aggregate of $25,000. In exchange, we issued a promissory note in an aggregate of $25,000 plus 10% interest per annum due on December 28, 2015. The promissory note issued by us is convertible into common shares of our company at a deemed conversion price of the closing price per share of our common shares on the OTCQB on the day notice is given by Quezon Group.

Loan Agreement with Dutchess Capital Management, II, LLC

On January 25, 2015, we entered into a letter of intent with Dutchess Capital Management, II, LLC. Pursuant to the letter of intent, Dutchess Capital would enter into an agreement on completion of due diligence to provide an equity line of $25,000,000 over 36 months after a registration statement of our company is effective to register our common shares to be purchased by Dutchess at a price of 95% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price the five consecutive trading days immediately before the drawdown by us that is to be drawn down at our option at either a maximum of either:

$250,000; or

200% of the average daily dollar volume using the three trading days prior to the drawdown date.

We compensated Dutchess for entering into the letter of intent and for completing due diligence with $15,000 to be paid in restricted common shares of our company priced at 33% of the lowest volume weight average price with the last 10 days upon execution of the letter of intent. As of January 27, 2015, we issued 113,949 of our common shares to Dutchess at a fair value price of $0.44 per common share pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that they represented to our company that they were an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D.

On completion of due diligence by Dutchess, our company exercised its discretion to not enter into a definitive agreement with Dutchess at this time.

Loan Agreement with Union Capital, LLC

On February 3, 2015, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with Union Capital, LLC, pursuant to which Union Capital agreed to provide our company with an aggregate investment of $52,500 in consideration of our issuance of a convertible promissory note. On February 17, 2015, Union Capital funded an aggregate investment of $52,500 to us pursuant to our agreement. Therefore, we issued Union Capital a convertible promissory note with 8% interest commencing February 3, 2015 and due February 3, 2016 and convertible into common shares on a cashless basis at a price equal to 65% of the average of the two lowest bids on the 20 trading days before a notice to convert.

Loan Agreement with LG Capital Funding, LLC

We entered into a securities purchase agreement dated as of February 11, 2015 with LG Capital Funding, LLC, pursuant to which LG Capital agreed to provide our company with an aggregate investment of $78,750 in consideration of our issuance of convertible promissory notes.

On February 17, 2015, LG Capital funded an aggregate investment of $78,750 to us. Therefore, we issued LG Capital a convertible promissory note with 8% interest commencing February 11, 2015 and due February 11, 2016 and convertible into common shares on a cashless basis at a price equal to 65% of the average of the two lowest bids on the 20 trading days before a notice to convert.

Loan Agreement with Adar Bays, LLC

We entered into a securities purchase agreement dated as of February 3, 2015 with Adar Bays, LLC, pursuant to which Adar Bays agreed to provide our company with an aggregate investment of $52,500 in consideration of our issuance of convertible promissory notes.

On February 19, 2015, Adar Bays funded an aggregate investment of $52,500 to us. Therefore, we issued Adar Bays a convertible promissory note with 8% interest commencing February 3, 2015 and due February 3, 2016 and convertible into common shares on a cashless basis at a price equal to 65% of the average of the two lowest bids on the 20 trading days before a notice to convert.

Loan Agreement with Iconic Holdings, LLC

We entered into a securities purchase agreement dated February 17, 2015 with Iconic Holdings, LLC, pursuant to which Iconic Holdings agreed to provide our company with an aggregate investment of $165,000 and up to $550,000 in consideration of our issuance of convertible promissory notes and common share purchase warrants.

On February 20, 2015, Iconic Holdings funded an aggregate investment of $100,000 to us. Therefore, we issued Iconic Holdings a convertible promissory note with 10% interest due February 17, 2016 and convertible into common shares on a cashless basis at a price of the lower of 60% of the average of the lowest bids on the 20 trading days before a notice to convert.

Amended Agreement with Empire

On March 15, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Empire, we agreed that pursuant the above agreement dated December 10, 2014, that our company would compensation Empire, for the financing between us and Iconic on for an aggregate of $165,000, with 27,500 common shares of the Company (the “Commission Shares”) at a fair value price of $0.40 being 4% of the financing.

As of March 22, 2015, we issued 27,500 common shares of our company to Empire pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on the basis that they represented to our company that they were an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D.

Loan Agreement with EMA Financial, LLC

On April 16, 2015, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with EMA Financial, LLC, pursuant to which EMA Financial agreed to provide our company with an aggregate of $100,000 in consideration of our issuance of a convertible promissory note.

Concurrently, EMA Financial funded an aggregate investment of $100,000 to us pursuant to our agreement. Therefore, we issued EMA Financial a convertible promissory note with 12% interest commencing April 16, 2015 and due April 16, 2016 and convertible into common shares on a cashless basis at a price equal to 60% of the lowest bid on the 20 trading days before a notice to convert by EMA Financial.

Intellectual Property

We assert common law trademark rights for the names “Terra-Seal” and “TerraSlicing” in the field of oil and gas production. Common law trademark rights are enforceable in provincial courts in Canada, and may be asserted against those who appropriate, dilute or damage the goodwill of our business by using the same or similar trade-names or trademarks. Unlike statutory trademark rights, which are acquired by registration and provide nation-wide protection, common law trademark rights are acquired automatically and provide protection only in the jurisdiction where a business uses a name or logo in commerce. We intend to rely on common law trademark protection until such time as we deem it economical for our business to register our trade-names or trademarks.

Further, the terms “TerraSlicing”, “TerraSeal”, “TST” and “TSS” are deemed to be our intellectual property.

We have not registered for the protection of any rights under trademark, patent, or copyright in any jurisdiction.

Our logos:

Our internet site is located at www.falconridgeoil.com.

Government Regulation

Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and Canada in areas such as oil and gas regulation, consumer protection, government contracts, trade, environmental protection, labor and employment, tax, licensing and others. For example, in the U.S., most states have oil and gas laws and regulations directed specifically toward our industry, including environmental laws. In certain jurisdictions, we will have to obtain licenses or permits in order to comply with standards governing environmental regulations and oil and gas extraction.

The oil and gas industry is also subject to requirements, codes and standards imposed by various insurance, approval and listing and standards organizations. Depending upon the type of oil and gas asset and requirements of the applicable local governmental jurisdiction, adherence to the requirements, codes and standards of such organizations is mandatory in some instances and voluntary in others.

Amount Spent on Research and Development the Last Two Fiscal Years

We have not spent any money during each of the last two fiscal years on research and development activities.

Employees and Employment Agreements

Each of our directors and officers is a full-time employee and currently devotes about 100% of their time to our operation.

Agreement with Mark Pellicane:

On February 7, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Mark Pellicane, the president, chief executive officer and a director of our company, for a term of at least one year. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Pellicane is to serve as our president and chief executive officer and to be in charge of the day-to-day administration of our company including corporate structuring, overseeing the formation of contracts and agreements between operating entities and potential partners, oversight of senior management personnel, and assist in capital raises for projects where necessary. As compensation for his services to us, Mr. Pellicane will be paid $7,500 per month by our company. At Mr. Pellicane’s discretion, this compensation may be deferred until a later time and accrue as such. Furthermore, at the sole discretion of Mr. Pellicane, any compensation owing to Mr. Pellicane may be satisfied by the issuance of our common stock. The value of such common stock will be the lesser of:

(a)

stock trading value on the day the compensation becomes due;

(b)

stock trading value on the day the request is made for accrued payment; or

(c)

independent valuation of the outstanding corporate shares independent of current trade value.

Additionally, if Mr. Pellicane’s agreement is terminated by us, he will be entitled to 14 months of severance for each year served under this agreement. Pursuant to a directors’ resolution of our company, this agreement is deemed to have been effective as of August 14, 2013.

Agreement with Alfred V. Morra:

On February 7, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Alfred V. Morra, the corporate secretary, treasurer, chief financial officer and a director of our company, for a term of at least one year. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Morra is to serve as our corporate secretary, treasurer and chief financial officer and to assist at an executive level in the day-to-day administration, operations, of our company including corporate structuring, overseeing the formation of contracts and agreements between operating entities and potential partners, oversight of projects and implementation of TST, and the operating agreements between our company and service suppliers. As compensation for his services to us, Mr. Morra will be paid $7,500 per month by our company. At Mr. Morra’s discretion, this compensation may be deferred until a later time and accrue as such. Furthermore, at the sole discretion of Mr. Morra, any compensation owing to Mr. Morra may be satisfied by the issuance of our common stock. The value of such common stock will be the lesser of:

(a)

stock trading value on the day the compensation becomes due;

(b)

stock trading value on the day the request is made for accrued payment; or

(c)

independent valuation of the outstanding corporate shares independent of current trade value.

Additionally, if Mr. Morra’s agreement is terminated by us, he will be entitled to 14 months of severance for each year served under this agreement. Pursuant to a directors’ resolution of our company, this agreement is deemed to have been effective as of August 14, 2013.

Except as disclosed below, we presently do not have pension, health, annuity, insurance, profit sharing or similar benefit plans; however, we may adopt plans in the future. Except for our stock option plan, which no options have been issued, there are presently no personal benefits available to our officers and directors.

We had one other employee, Mark Nowak, who was compensated $60,000 per annum in 2013. We did not have a written employment agreement with this employee and his employment with us ended in October 2013.

Mr. Morra receives benefits through a third party for which the company pays approximately $238 in addition to his salary (as a salary or business expense). Mark Pellicane receives spousal employment / family benefits and does not book the expense to our company.

Enforceability of Civil Liabilities Against Foreign Persons

It may be difficult to bring and enforce suits against our management in the United States as they are citizens of Canada. Our company, however, is incorporated in the State of Nevada. Cash and our material contracts are our only assets.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The statements contained in or incorporated into this annual report that are not historic facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We have a limited operating history with significant losses and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.

We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations and, as at February 28, 2015, have incurred a net loss of $2,145,294 since our inception on May 7, 2010. Our business operations began in 2010 and have resulted in net losses in each year. We have generated only nominal revenues since our inception and do not anticipate that we will generate revenues which will be sufficient to sustain our operations in the near future. Our profitability will require the successful commercialization and sales of our planned products. We may not be able to successfully achieve any of these requirements or ever become profitable.

There is doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses from operations, accumulated deficit and insufficient cash resources to meet our business objectives, all of which means that we may not be able to continue operations.

Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion issued in connection with the financial statements for the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 with respect to their doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to our financial statements for the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, we have generated operating losses since inception, and our cash resources are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives, which together raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We could face intense competition, which could result in lower revenues and higher expenditures and could adversely affect our results of operations.

Unless we keep pace with changing technologies, we could lose existing customers and fail to win new customers. In order to compete effectively in the enhanced oil and gas recovery industry, we must continually design, develop implement and market new and enhanced technologies and strategies. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the changing and sophisticated needs of the marketplace. Enhanced oil and gas recovery technologies have not achieved widespread commercial acceptance in Canada and our strategy of expanding our enhanced oil and gas recovery business could adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.

Further, we expect to derive over a significant amount of revenue from oil and gas assets, which are often non-standard, involve competitive bidding, and may produce volatility in earnings and revenue.

Our plan to pursue oil and gas assets in international markets may be limited by risks related to conditions in such markets.

We are governed by only three persons serving as directors and officers which may lead to faulty corporate governance.

We have not implemented various corporate governance measures nor have we adopted any independent committees as we presently do not have any independent directors.

We must attract and maintain key personnel or our business will fail.

Success depends on the acquisition of key personnel. We will have to compete with other companies both within and outside the oil and gas industry to recruit and retain competent employees. If we cannot maintain qualified employees to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We may not be able to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs due to changes in general economic conditions.

We anticipate requiring significant capital to fulfill our contractual obligations (as noted in our audited financial statements), continue development of our planned products to meet market evolution, and execute our business plan, generally. We may use capital more rapidly than currently anticipated and incur higher operating expenses than currently expected, and we may be required to depend on external financing to satisfy our operating and capital needs. We may need new or additional financing in the future to conduct our operations or expand our business. Any sustained weakness in the general economic conditions and/or

financial markets in the United States or globally could adversely affect our ability to raise capital on favorable terms or at all. From time to time we have relied, and may also rely in the future, on access to financial markets as a source of liquidity to satisfy working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes. We may be unable to secure debt or equity financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, at the time when we need such funding. If we do raise funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of existing stockholders would be reduced, and the securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock or may be issued at a discount to the market price of our common stock which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may be subject to debt covenants, which could place limitations on our operations including our ability to declare and pay dividends. Our inability to raise additional funds on a timely basis would make it difficult for us to achieve our business objectives and would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business and operating results could be harmed if we fail to manage our growth or change.

Our business may experience periods of rapid change and/or growth that could place significant demands on our personnel and financial resources. To manage possible growth and change, we must continue to try to locate skilled professionals in the oil and gas industry and adequate funds in a timely manner.

We have a limited operating history and if we are not successful in continuing to grow our business, then we may have to scale back or even cease our ongoing business operations.

We have achieved some revenues and have limited significant tangible assets. There can be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. We have a limited operating history. Our success is significantly dependent on the successful marketing and implementation of our Terra Slicing Technology (“TST”) service, which cannot be guaranteed. Our operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to complete the marketing and implementation of our TST service and operate on a profitable basis. Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by enterprises in the early stages. If our business plan is not successful, and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in our company.

We are affected by certain law and governmental regulations which could affect international operations of our oil and gas assets.

While our TST service has been approved in certain countries, failure to gain compliance would limit international operations. In addition, future government regulations concerning environmental issues could have an adverse effect on market acceptance or cause time delays or additional costs to meet requirements.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no laws or governmental regulations which would prohibit the use of TST in our target countries (i.e. United Arab Emirates, Oman, Egypt, or Brazil). Use of our technology is only subject to local operator/owner approval. Where we may be restricted as to the introduction of our technology in foreign countries relates only to local governmental regulations which may require the establishment of a corporate entity in the subject country, of which we may decide against due to costs and lack of corporate control of that new entity.

If our intellectual property is not adequately protected, then we may not be able to compete effectively and we may not be profitable.

Our commercial success may depend, in part, on obtaining and maintaining patent protection, trade secret protection and regulatory protection of our technologies and product candidates as well as successfully defending third-party challenges to such technologies and candidates. We will be able to protect our technologies and product candidates from use by third parties only to the extent that valid and enforceable patents, trade secrets or regulatory protection cover them and we have exclusive rights to use them. The ability of our licensors, collaborators and suppliers to maintain their patent rights against third-party challenges to their validity, scope or enforceability will also play an important role in determining our future.

The patent positions of technology related companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions that include unresolved principles and issues. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed regarding such companies’ patents has emerged to date in the United States, and the patent situation outside the United States is even more uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States or other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we cannot predict with any certainty the range of claims that may be allowed or enforced concerning our patents.

We may also rely on trade secrets to protect our technologies, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. While we seek to protect confidential information, in part, through confidentiality agreements with our consultants and scientific and other advisors, they may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim against a third party related to the illegal acquisition and use of trade secrets can be expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is often unpredictable. If we are not able to maintain patent or trade secret protection on our technologies and product candidates, then we may not be able to exclude competitors from developing or marketing competing products, and we may not be able to operate profitability.

If we are the subject of an intellectual property infringement claim, the cost of participating in any litigation could cause us to go out of business.

There has been, and we believe that there will continue to be, significant litigation and demands for licenses in our industry regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Although we anticipate having a valid defense to any allegation that our current products, production methods and other activities infringe the valid and enforceable intellectual property rights of any third parties, we cannot be certain that a third party will not challenge our position in the future. Other parties may own patent rights that we might infringe with our products or other activities, and our competitors or other patent holders may assert that our products and the methods we employ are covered by their patents. These parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur substantial litigation expenses and, if successful, may require us to pay substantial damages. Some of our potential competitors may be better able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation, and depending on the circumstances, we could be forced to stop or delay our research, development, manufacturing or sales activities. Any of these costs could cause us to go out of business.

We could lose our competitive advantages if we are not able to protect any TST and intellectual property rights against infringement, and any related litigation could be time-consuming and costly.

Our success and ability to compete depends to a significant degree on our license to use TST which is renewed every year unless there is thirty days of notice by either party. If any of our competitor’s copies or otherwise gains access to TST or develops similar technologies independently, we would not be able to compete as effectively.

We also consider our trademarks invaluable to our ability to continue to develop and maintain the goodwill and recognition associated with our brand. These and any other measures that we may take to protect our intellectual property rights, which presently are based upon a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, may not be adequate to prevent their unauthorized use.

Further, the laws of foreign countries may provide inadequate protection of such intellectual property rights. We may need to bring legal claims to enforce or protect such intellectual property rights. Any litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and diversions of resources. In addition, notwithstanding any rights we have secured in our intellectual property, other persons may bring claims against us that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights, including claims based upon the content we license from third parties or claims that our intellectual property right interests are not valid. Any claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our attention and resources, result in the loss of goodwill associated with our service marks or require us to make changes to our website or other of our technologies.

If we fail to effectively manage our growth our future business results could be harmed and our managerial and operational resources may be strained.

As we proceed with the commercialization of our technology, we expect to experience significant and rapid growth in the scope and complexity of our business. We will need to add staff to market our services, manage operations, handle sales and marketing efforts and perform finance and accounting functions. We will be required to hire a broad range of additional personnel in order to successfully advance our operations. This growth is likely to place a strain on our management and operational resources. The failure to develop and implement effective systems, or to hire and retain sufficient personnel for the performance of all of the functions necessary to effectively service and manage our potential business, or the failure to manage growth effectively, could have a materially adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Our services may become obsolete and unmarketable if we are unable to respond adequately to rapidly changing technology and customer demands.

Our industry is characterized by rapid changes in technology and market demands. As a result, our service and technology may quickly become obsolete and unmarketable. Our future success will depend on our ability to adapt to technological advances, anticipate market demands, develop new products and enhance our current products on a timely and cost-effective basis. Further, our products must remain competitive with those of other companies with substantially greater resources. We may experience technical or other difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or marketing of new products or enhanced versions of existing products. Also, we may not be able to adapt new or enhanced services to emerging industry or governmental standards.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Securities

Our stock price may be volatile, which may result in losses to our shareholders.

The stock markets have experienced significant price and trading volume fluctuations, and the market prices of companies listed on the OTCQB quotation system in which shares of our common stock are listed, have been volatile in the past and have experienced sharp share price and trading volume changes. The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to many factors, including the following, some of which are beyond our control:

·	variations in our operating results;

·	changes in expectations of our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;

·	changes in operating and stock price performance of other companies in our industry;

·	additions or departures of key personnel; and

·	future sales of our common stock.

Domestic and international stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations, as well as general economic and political conditions unrelated to our performance, may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Our common shares may become thinly traded and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices, or at all.

We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for trading our common stock will be sustained. The trading volume of our common shares has historically been sporadically or “thinly-traded” meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at certain given time may be relatively small or non-existent.

This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community who generate or influence sales volume. Even if we came to the attention of such persons, those persons tend to be risk-averse and may be reluctant to follow, purchase, or recommend the purchase of shares of an unproven company such as ours until such time as we become more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained.

The market price for our common stock is particularly volatile given our status as a relatively small company, which could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price. You may be unable to sell your common stock at or above your purchase price if at all, which may result in substantial losses to you.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to our common shareholders.

We presently do not anticipate that we will pay dividends on any of our common stock in the foreseeable future. If payment of dividends does occur at some point in the future, it would be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements, and general financial condition. The payment of any common stock dividends will be within the discretion of our board of directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings to implement our business plan; accordingly, we do not anticipate the declaration of any dividends for common stock in the foreseeable future.

As we are listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board quotation system, our common stock is subject to “penny stock” rules which could negatively impact our liquidity and our shareholders’ ability to sell their shares.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB. We must comply with numerous NASDAQ MarketPlace rules in order to maintain the listing of our common stock on the OTCQB. There can be no assurance that we can continue to meet the requirements to maintain the quotation on the OTCQB listing of our common stock. If we are unable to maintain our listing on the OTCQB, the market liquidity of our common stock may be severely limited.

Volatility in our common share price may subject us to securities litigation.

The market for our common stock is characterized by significant price volatility as compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may, in the future, be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under Nevada law and the existence of indemnification rights of our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.

Our Articles of Incorporation contains a specific provision that eliminates the liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages to our company and shareholders. Further, we are prepared to give such indemnification to our directors and officers to the extent provided for by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our company and shareholders.

Our business is subject to changing regulations related to corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of noncompliance.

Because our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to certain rules and regulations of federal, state and financial market exchange entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), have issued requirements and regulations and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our efforts to comply with these regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue resulting in, increased general and administrative expenses and diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Because new and modified laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices.

We will incur increased costs and compliance risks as a public company.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that Falconridge Ontario did not incur as a private company prior to the private placement financing and share exchange.

Our business will incur costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We also anticipate that we will incur costs associated with recently adopted corporate governance requirements, including certain requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules implemented by the SEC and FINRA. We expect these rules and regulations, in particular Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to significantly increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. Like many smaller public companies, we face a significant impact from required compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires management of public companies to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The SEC has adopted rules implementing Section 404 for public companies as well as disclosure requirements. We are currently preparing for compliance with Section 404; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively meet all of the requirements of Section 404 as currently known to us in the currently mandated timeframe. Any failure to implement effectively new or improved internal controls, or to resolve difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations or result in management being required to give a qualified assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting. Any such result could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

We also expect these new rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these new rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal executive offices are located at 17-120 West Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada L4B 1L2. Our telephone number is (905) 771-6551. We pay rent of approximately $4,250 per month for the use of this space.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is not traded on any exchange. Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the trading symbol “FROT”. OTCQB securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTCQB securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers. OTCQB issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a national or regional stock exchange.

The following quotations, obtained from Stockwatch, reflect the high and low bids for our common shares based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The first trade of our shares was on September 9, 2013.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

Quarter Ended	High1(1)		Low(1)

May 31, 2015	$	0.16	$	0.014
February 28, 2015	$	1.21	$	0.12
November 30, 2014	$	1.32	$	0.40
August 31, 2014	$	1.11	$	0.36
May 31, 2014	$	1.15	$	0.99
February 28, 2014	$	1.85	$	1.05
November 30, 2013	$	2.61	$	0.30
August 31, 2014(2)		n/a		n/a

(1)

Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

(2)

There were no trades prior this period. The first trade of our shares was on September 9, 2013.

As of June 8, 2015, we have 16 shareholders of record. As of such date, 53,998,116 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

Our transfer agent is Action Stock Transfer. Their mailing address is 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd, Suite 214, Salt Lake City, UT 84121.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds From Registered Securities

$250,000; or

200% of the average daily dollar volume using the three trading days prior to the drawdown date.

We compensated Dutchess for entering into the letter of intent and for completing due diligence with $15,000 to be paid in restricted common shares of our company priced at 33% of the lowest volume weight average price with the last 10 days upon execution of the Term Sheet. As of January 27, 2015, we issued 113,949 of our common shares to Dutchess at a fair value of $0.44 per common share pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 on the basis that they represented to our company that they were an “accredited investor” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D.

On completion of due diligence by Dutchess, our company exercised its discretion to not enter into a definitive agreement with Dutchess at this time.

Equity Compensation Plans

In connection with the share exchange agreement, we adopted a stock option plan on August 2, 2013 to issue options to purchase up to 10% of the issued and outstanding of our capital stock when the share exchange closed, being 4,875,000 shares, to our board members and management, at an exercise price of $1.50 per share or higher. When the options are granted, they will vest quarterly over two years from the date of grant and shall expire 24 months from vesting.

On April 1, 2015, our directors approved the adoption of our 2015 Stock Option Plan which permits our company to grant up to 4,900,000 options to acquire shares of common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company. We do not have in effect any other compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Awards under our 2015 Stock Option Plan will vest as determined by our board of directors and as established in stock option agreements to be entered into between our company and each participant receiving an award.

Convertible Securities

As of February 28, 2015, we do not have any outstanding stock options.

Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our shares of common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

There were no shares of common stock or other securities issued to the issuer or affiliated purchasers during the year ended February 28, 2015.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014.

Our operating results for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 are summarized as follows:

	Year Ended
	February 28,
	2015			2014

Revenues	$	11,733		$	19,029
Operating expenses	$	521,661		$	474,608
Interest expense (income)	$	18,324		$	1,897
Net loss	$	(562,520	)	$	(457,476	)

Revenues for the year ended February 28, 2015 were $11,733 as compared to $19,029 for the comparative period in 2014. The $7,296 decrease in our revenues is primarily due to a decrease in our oil and gas revenue.

Expenses

Our operating expenses for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 are outlined in the table below:

	Year Ended
	February 28,
	2015			2014

Oil and gas revenue	$	11,733		$	19,029

General and administrative	$	265,284		$	461,558
Depreciation, amortization and depletion	$	11,570		$	16,478
Impairment of oil and gas property	$	244,807			Nil
Gain on disposal of capital assets	$	Nil		$	(3,428	)
Interest expense (income)	$	18,324		$	1,897
Loss on derivative liability	$	34,268		$	Nil
Net loss	$	(562,520	)	$	(457,476	)

Our net loss for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $562,520 compared to a net loss of $457,476 during the year ended February 28, 2014.

During the year ended February 28, 2015, we incurred operating expenses of $521,661 compared to operating expenses of $474,608 during the year ended February 28, 2014. The increase in operating expenses were generally related to impairment of our oil and gas property.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

	At			At
	February 28,			February 28,
	2015			2014

Current Assets	$	344,047		$	38,677
Current Liabilities	$	1, 982,051		$	1,563,091
Working Capital (Deficit)	$	(1,638,004	)	$	(1,524,414	)

Our current assets as of February 28, 2015 were $344,047 as compared to current assets of $38,677 as of February 28, 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash. As of February 28, 2015, we had a working capital deficit of $1,638,004 compared to a working capital deficit of $1,524,414 as of February 28, 2014.

Cash Flows

	Year Ended
	February 28,
	2015			2014

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	$	(170,917	)	$	(390,739	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities	$	Nil		$(192,505		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities	$	352,850		$	584,613
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents During the Period	$	206,754		$	23,422

Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities was $170,917 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 compared to cash used in operating activities of $390,739 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The decrease in cash used in operating activities was primarily due to an increase in our net loss offset by decreases in depreciation, amortization and depletion, impairment of oil and gas property, and increases in accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

Investing Activities

We used cash of $Nil in investing activities during the year ended February 28, 2015 compared to $192,505 in February 28, 2014.

Financing Activities

Cash provided from financing activities was $352,850 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 compared to cash provided from activities of $584,613 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The decrease in cash from financing activities was primarily due to a decrease in advances from related parties and financing of our common shares issued.

Our cash balance at February 28, 2015 was $233,551 with $1,982,051 in outstanding liabilities. The outstanding liabilities consist of $258,810 in accounts payable, $52,948 in accrued liabilities, $1,192,275 in a loan payable to a related party, convertible note payable of $38,674 (net of a discount of $335,076), derivative liabilities of $369,344 and $70,000 in a loan payable to an unrelated party. Management believes our current cash balance may not be sufficient to fund our operating activities over the next 12 months.

Going Concern

The financial statements accompanying this report have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that our company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Our company has not generated revenues since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from our shareholders, the ability of our company to obtain necessary equity financing to achieve our operating objectives, and the attainment of profitable operations. As at February 28, 2015, our company has an accumulated deficit of $2,166,283 since inception. We do not have sufficient working capital to enable us to carry out our plan of operation for the next twelve months.

Due to the uncertainty of our ability to meet our current operating expenses and the capital expenses noted above in their report on the financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2015, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

The continuation of our business is dependent upon us raising additional financial support. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

Plan of Operation

We are now investigating other properties on which exploration could be conducted and other business opportunities to enhance shareholder value. If we are unable to find another property or business opportunity, our shareholders will lose some or all of their investment and our business will likely fail.

Cash Requirements

Over the next 12 months we intend to carry on business as an enhanced oil and gas technology company. We anticipate that we will incur the following operating expenses during this period:

Estimated Funding Required During the Next 12 Months

Expense	Amount ($)

Consulting Fees for Research and Development		Nil
Engineering		2,000,000
Fixed asset purchases		15,000
Management Consulting Fees		300,000
Professional fees		180,000
Rent		55,000
Sales, Travel and Marketing		120,000
Other general administrative expenses		74,000
Total		2,744,000

We will require funds of approximately $2,744,000 over the next twelve months to operate our business. These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in further dilution in the equity ownership of our shares. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on their investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Purchase of Significant Equipment

We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment during the next 12 months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies

The financial statements and the related notes of our company are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and are expressed in US dollars.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), and include the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of all subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances, transactions and cash flows are eliminated on consolidation.

Mergers and acquisitions

In a business combination, the acquisition method of accounting requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded as of the date of the merger or acquisition at their respective fair values with limited exceptions. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Any excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred) over the estimated fair values of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The operating results of the acquired business are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements after the date of the merger or acquisition. If the Company determines the assets acquired do not meet the definition of a business under the acquisition method of accounting, the transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than a business combination and, therefore, no goodwill will be recorded.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash equivalents

Our company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

Our company evaluates its accounts receivables for collectability and establishes an allowance for bad debts through a review of several factors including historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts, and financial condition of our customers. As of February 28, 2015 and 2014, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded.

Oil and gas operations

Our company applies the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under the successful efforts method exploration costs such as exploratory geological and geophysical costs, delay rentals and exploration overhead are charged against earnings as incurred. Acquisition costs and costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether proved reserves can be attributed to the area as a result of drilling the well. If management determines that commercial quantities of hydrocarbons have not been discovered, capitalized costs associated with exploratory wells are charged to exploration expense. An acquisition costs of unproved leaseholds are assessed for impairment during the holding period and transferred to proved oil and gas properties to the extent associated with successful exploration activities. Significant undeveloped leases are assessed individually for impairment based on our company’s current exploration plans and a valuation allowance is provided if impairment is indicated. During the year our company determined that the Sabanero well was impaired due to a lack of production and no plans to invest further in the well and therefore wrote off $244,807, being the costs expended on the well.

Proved oil & gas property impairment

When circumstances that an asset may be impaired, our company compares expected undiscounted future cash flows at the field level to the unamoritzed capitalized cost of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flows, based on our company’s estimate of future natural gas and oil prices and anticipated production from proved reserves and other relevant data, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, the capitalized cost is reduced to fair value. Fair value is calculated by discounting the future cash flows at an appropriate risk- adjusted discount rate. During the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, our company did not have any impairment on its proved properties.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life. Upon sale or retirement of equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations. Depreciation expense for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 was $189 and $6,321 respectively.

Depletion and amortization

Leasehold costs of producing properties are depleted using the unit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Amortization of intangible development costs is based on the unit-of-production method using estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves. Depletion expense for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 was $11,381 and $10,157 respectively.

Asset retirement obligations

Our company follows ASC 410 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with the retirement obligations of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred. This standard requires our company to record a liability for the fair value of the dismantlement and plugging and abandonment costs excluding salvage values. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, accretion of the liability is recognized each period and the capitalized cost is amortized over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. During 2015 and 2014, our company has not recorded any asset retirement obligations.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Our company follows paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Our company’s long-lived assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Our company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. As of February, 2015 and 2014, no impairment was recorded.

Derivative financial instruments

Our company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. Our company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that our company record the conversion option at its fair value as of the inception date of the agreements, and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date.

Fair value of financial instruments

Our company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and estimated volatility factors based on historical quoted market prices for the Company's common stock, and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2015.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains/(Losses)

Derivative liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	369,344	$	(34,268	)

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2014.

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Gains/(Losses)

Derivatives liabilities

As of February 28, 2015 the Company had a derivative liability amount of $369,344 (2014 - $Nil) which was classified as a Level 3 financial instrument, and a loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $34,268 (2014 - $Nil).

Revenue recognition

Our company follows the guidance of paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. Our company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Our company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Under the royalty agreements obtained as part of the Service and Gross Overriding Royalty Agreements, our company recognizes revenue when production occurs. The royalty income is calculated monthly and our company recognizes royalty income as production is reported by well.

Under the Success Fees obtained as part of the Service and Gross Overriding Royalty Agreements, our company recognizes revenue when the success fees are earned as defined by the agreements

Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services

Our company accounted for its stock based compensation under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of paragraph 718-10-30-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification using the modified prospective method for transactions in which our company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of options, if any, is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

Our company uses historical data to estimate employee termination behaviour. The expected life of options granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding.

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the options.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option.

The expected dividend yield is based on our company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the option.

Our company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award, if any. Additionally, our company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services.

Our company accounted for instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of the warrants is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

The expected life of warrants granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding.

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the warrants.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.

The expected dividend yield is based on our company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.

Income taxes

Our company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Net loss per common share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock warrants.

Commitments and contingencies

Our company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

We do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

FALCONRIDGE OIL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Consolidated Financial Statements

February 28, 2015 and 2014

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Index

	Page

Auditors' report on consolidated financial statements	30

Consolidated balance sheet	31

Consolidated Statement of stockholders' deficit	32

Consolidated statements of operations	33

Consolidated statements of cash flows	34

Notes to consolidated financial statements	35

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively, "the Company") as of February 28, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income,, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. and its subsidiaries as of February 28, 2015 and 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements of the Company has not generated significant revenue and has a working capital deficit. These conditions raise significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in this regard are described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Malone Bailey LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

June 15, 2015

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As at February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014

	2015			2014
ASSETS

Current
Cash	$	233,551		$	26,797
Accounts receivable		2,714			11,880
Prepaid and other current assets		107,782			-
Total current assets		344,047			38,677

Property & equipment net of accumulated depreciation of $3,436 (2014 - $2,630)		2,809			5,080
Oil and gas properties net of accumulated depletion of $30,712 (2014 - $24,464)		72,322			91,896
Unproved oil and gas properties		-			260,353

Total assets	$	419,178		$	396,006

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current
Accounts payable	$	125,389		$	124,519
Accounts payable related parties		133,421			-
Accrued liabilities		52,948			47,482
Loans payable - related parties		1,192,275			1,321,090
Derivative liability		369,344			-
Loan payable		70,000			70,000
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $335,076		38,674			-
Total current liabilities		1,982,051			1,563,091

Total liabilities		1,982,051			1,563,091

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized
Nil shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized;
49,130,616 and 49,016,667shares issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014		49,131			49,017
Additional paid in capital		320,969			270,661
Deficit		(2,166,283	)		(1,603,763	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		233,310			117,000

Total stockholders' deficit		(1,562,873	)		(1,167,085	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	419,178		$	396,006

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

	2015			2014

Oil & gas revenue	$	11,733		$	19,029

Expenses
General and administrative		265,284			461,558
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		11,570			16,478
Impairment of oil and gas property		244,807			-
Gain on disposal of capital assets		-			(3,428	)

Total operating expense		521,661			474,608

Other income (expense)		(509,928	)		(455,579	)

Interest expense		(18,324	)		(1,897	)
Loss on derivative liability		(34,268	)		-

		(52,592	)		(1,897	)

Net Loss	$	(562,520	)	$	(457,476	)

Loss per common share - Basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		49,016,667			48,772,222

Comprehensive income (loss)
Net Loss	$	(562,520	)	$	(457,476	)
Currency translation adjustment		116,310			117,000

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(446,210	)	$	(340,476	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

											Total
					Additional						Comprehensive		Accumulated
	Common Stock				Paid in			Accumulated			Income		Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			(loss)		Deficit

Balances, February 28, 2013		29,250,000	$	29,250	$	(29,150	)	$	(1,146,287	)	$	-	$	(1,146,187	)

Shares issued to acquire

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.		19,500,000		19,500		(99,922	)		-			-		(80,422	)

Common stock issued		266,667		267		399,733			-			-		400,000

Currency translation adjustment		-		-		-			-			117,000		117,000

Net loss		-		-		-			(457,476	)		-		(457,476	)

Balances, February 28, 2014		49,016,667		49,017		270,661			(1,603,763	)		117,000		(1,167,085	)

Common stock issued		113,949		114		50,308			-			-		50,422

Currency translation adjustment		-		-		-			-			116,310		116,310

Net loss		-		-		-			(562,520	)		-		(562,520	)

Balances, February 28, 2015		49,130,616	$	49,131	$	320,969		$	(2,166,283	)	$	233,310	$	(1,562,873	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net Loss	$	(562,520	)	$	(457,476	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Amortization debt discount		16,226			-
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		11,570			16,478
Impairment of oil and gas property		244,807			(3,428	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		34,268			-
Changes in working capital
Accounts receivable		9,166			20,637
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(46,964	)		33,050
Prepaid and other current assets		(10,891	)		-
Accounts payable - related parties		133,421			-

Net cash used in operating activities		(170,917	)		(390,739	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Investment in oil and gas property		-			(208,960	)
Cash received on acquisition		-			16,455

Net cash used in investing activities		-			(192,505	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Convertible notes payable		358,750			-
Advances from related party		22,000			184,613
Financing fees paid		(27,900	)		-
Common stock issued		-			400,000

Net cash from financing activities		352,850			584,613

Effect of foreign currency		24,821			22,053

Net change in cash		206,754			23,422

Cash, beginning of period		26,797			3,375

Cash, end of period	$	233,551		$	26,797

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	-		$	-
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	-		$	-

Non-cash investing and financing disclosures:
Acquisition of Falconridge Oil Technologies	$	-		$	116,378
Capital lease obligation payments made by related party	$	-		$	4,800
Capital lease obligation released by shareholders	$	-		$	41,684
Oil and Gas additions in accounts payable	$	17,039		$	80,393
Deferred financing costs via shares of common stock	$	61,422		$	-
Deferred financing cost via share liability	$	11,000		$	-
Addition of derivative liability/debt discount	$	336,302		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

1. Incorporation and nature of operations

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. (“the Company”) was incorporated on May 30, 2007 under the name Ameriwest Minerals Corp. on December 23, 2010, the Company changed its name to Ameriwest Petroleum Corp. by way of a merger with its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ameriwest Petroleum Corp., which was formed solely for the change of name.

Effective July 2, 2013, in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), the Company changed its name from "Ameriwest Petroleum Corp." to "Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp." by way of a merger with its wholly-owned subsidiary Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., which was formed solely for the change of name.

The name change became effective with the OTCBB at the opening of trading on July 2, 2013 under the symbol "FROT". On July 2, 2103, the Company's stock symbol changed from "AWSS" to "FROT" to better reflect the new name of the Company.

The Company is an oil and gas technology company that specializes in identifying and accessing additional petroleum reserves that are usually left in the ground. The Company's value proposition is extracting new resources from wells that have been assessed as uneconomic. Most of the Company's projects will evolve depleted or low producing assets. Assets are stimulated utilizing Terra Slicing Technology ("TST") for maximum effectiveness and productivity, essentially revitalizing the pre-existing well and establishing a flow rate with a significant percentage of its initial production. Alternatively, TST may be utilized as part of a workover project or procedure.

Financial organization

On August, 2, 2013, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Falconridge Oil Ltd. (hereby referred to as “Falconridge Ontario”) whereby the Company consummated its acquisition of Falconridge Ontario by issuance of 29,250,000 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Falconridge Ontario in exchange for 100 Falconridge Ontario shares.

Assets acquired, liabilities assumed and purchase consideration are as follows:

Cash	$	16,455
Other assets		-
Liabilities assumed		(96,877	)

Net liability charged to stockholders' deficit	$	(80,422	)

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Further, pursuant to our share exchange agreement with Falconridge Ontario we are to provide:

a) a financing of debt or equity for $1,100,000, which is to close no later than 150 days from the closing of the share exchange and on mutually agreeable terms;

b) complete a private placement in the aggregate of $400,000 at $1.50 per share (for the purposes of furthering the business of Falconridge Ontario); and

c) complete an equity financing (the “EQUITY FINANCING”), using our commercially best efforts, of up to $6,000,000 for 4,000,000 units (each, a “UNIT”) at a price of no less than $1.50 per Unit. Each unit will consist of one common share in our capital stock and one-half of one whole warrant (each one whole warrant, a “FINANCING WARRANT”). Each Financing Warrant shall be exercisable into one share of our common stock at a price of no less than $3.00 per share for a period of 24 months from the date of issuance of the Financing Warrants. As a term to the Equity Financing, any party, who is successful in raising funds, with respect to the Equity Financing, from a private investor shall earn a cash commission of 7% and a commission of 5% payable in warrants (each, a “Commission Warrant”). Each Commission Warrant shall have the same terms as the Financing Warrants. If we are unable to complete the Equity Financing, then we may offer to Falconridge Ontario to complete a financing of up to $6,000,000 that may include debt, preferred shares of our company or a combination of the foregoing

Additionally, although we agreed to complete the above financings, we were only able to complete a private placement in the aggregate of $400,000 at $1.50 per share. There will not be any real consequences on the parties of the agreement. The value of the agreement to provide such financings is the use commercially best efforts to fulfill the financings and demonstrating the need for financings to occur for our business to be successful.

The share exchange transaction is sometimes referred to hereafter as the “reverse-merger acquisition”. The share exchange transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of the Company, where the Company (the legal acquirer) is considered the accounting acquiree and Falconridge Ontario (the acquiree) is considered the accounting acquirer. As a result of this transaction, the Company is deemed to be a continuation of the business of Falconridge Ontario.

Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are those of the accounting acquirer, Falconridge Ontario. The historical stockholders’ equity of the accounting acquirer prior to the share exchange has been retroactively restated as if the share exchange transaction occurred as of the beginning of the first period presented. See also Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for the Company’s policy on capitalisation of long-lived assets.

In connection with the share exchange agreement, we adopted a stock option plan on August 2, 2013 to issue options to purchase up to 10% of the issued and outstanding of our capital stock when the share exchange closed, being 4,875,000 shares (the "Option"), to our board members and management , at an exercise price of $1.50 per share or higher. When the Options are granted, they vest quarterly over two years from the date of grant and shall expire 24 months from vesting. No options have been issued under the plan to date.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Principles of consolidation

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Mergers and acquisitions

Use of estimates

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company evaluates its accounts receivables for collectability and establishes an allowance for bad debts through a review of several factors including historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts, and financial condition of our customers. As of February 28, 2015 and 2014, no allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded.

Oil and gas operations

The Company applies the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under the successful efforts method exploration costs such as exploratory geological and geophysical costs, delay rentals and exploration overhead are charged against earnings as incurred. Acquisition costs and costs of drilling exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether proved reserves can be attributed to the area as a result of drilling the well. If management determines that commercial quantities of hydrocarbons have not been discovered, capitalized costs associated with exploratory wells are charged to exploration expense. A acquisition costs of unproved leaseholds are assessed for impairment during the holding period and transferred to proved oil and gas properties to the extent associated with successful exploration activities. Significant undeveloped leases are assessed individually for impairment based on the Company's current exploration plans and a valuation allowance is provided if impairment is indicated. During the year the Company determined that the attempt to revive the Sabanero well was not successful and the well was impaired. During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company wrote off $244,807 being the costs expended on the well as the well was only pumping water and neither the operator nor the Company were prepared to invest any further into the well.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Proved oil & gas property impairment

When circumstances that an asset may be impaired, the Company compares expected undiscounted future cash flows at the field level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset. If the future undiscounted cash flows, based on the Company's estimate of future natural gas and oil prices and anticipated production from proved reserves and other relevant data, are lower than the unamortized capitalized cost, the capitalized cost is reduced to fair value. Fair value is calculated by discounting the future cash flows at an appropriate risk- adjusted discount rate. During the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the Company did not have any impairment on its proved properties.

Property and equipment

Depletion and amortization

Asset retirement obligations

The Company follows ASC 410 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with the retirement obligations of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred. This standard requires the Company to record a liability for the fair value of the dismantlement and plugging and abandonment costs excluding salvage values. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity increases the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, accretion of the liability is recognized each period and the capitalized cost is amortized over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. During 2015 and 2014, the Company has not recorded any asset retirement obligations.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company follows paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. As of February 28, 2015 and 2014, no impairment was recorded.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2015.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains/(Losses)

Derivative liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	369,344	$	(34,268	)

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2014.

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Gains/(Losses)

Derivatives liabilities

Revenue recognition

The Company follows the guidance of paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Under the royalty agreements obtained as part of the Service and Gross Overriding Royalty Agreements, the Company recognizes revenue when production occurs. The royalty income is calculated monthly and the Company recognizes royalty income as production is reported by well.

Under the Success Fees obtained as part of the Service and Gross Overriding Royalty Agreements, the Company recognizes revenue when the success fees are earned as defined by the agreements

Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services

The Company accounted for its stock based compensation under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of paragraph 718-10-30-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification using the modified prospective method for transactions in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of options, if any, is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

The Company uses historical data to estimate employee termination behaviour. The expected life of options granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the options.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option.

The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the option.

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award, if any. Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services

The Company accounted for instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of the warrants is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the warrants.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.

The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Net loss per common share

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

We do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

3. Going concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we have incurred net losses of $562,520 and $457,476 for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition, we have an accumulated deficit of $2,166,283 and a working capital deficit of $1,638,004 as of February 28, 2015. These conditions arise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. In response to these conditions, we may raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities, through an offering of debt securities or through borrowings from financial institutions or individuals. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

4. Loans Payable - related parties

First World Trade Corporation (“FWT”) is a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company. As at February 28, 2015, FWT has advanced the Company $1,160,000 (2014 - $1,310,816) to fund operating costs and shared expenses, the loan is non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment. During 2015, Jeremy Yaseniuk, a shareholder of the company, advanced the company $22,000. The loan is non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment. William Muran, a shareholder of the Company, advanced the Company $10,274 (2014 - $10,274). The loan is non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment.

As of February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Company owed accounts payables to related parties of $133,421 and $0, respectively.

5. Loan payable

	2015		2014

Loans payable bears interest at 6% per annum and was due December 31, 2013	$	70,000	$	70,000

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

6. Convertible notes payable

During 2015, the Company issued the following convertible notes payable.

The Company has determined that it needs to account for each of the Convertible Notes Payable issued as derivative liabilities and apply the provisions of ASC 815.

Quezon Group LLC $25,000 bearing interest at 10% per annum and matures December 28, 2015. The note may be prepaid in whole or in part without penalty and is convertible into common shares at 100% of the closing price on the date of notice of conversion. The Company received $25,000 on issuance. The Company recorded a debt discount related to the day 1 fair value of the derivative liability of $2,552.

Union Capital LLC $52,500 bearing interest at 8% per annum and matures February 3, 2016. The note may be prepaid up to 180 days from the date of issue with a prepayment penalty from 118% to 148% depending on date of prepayment and is Convertible into common shares at 65% of the average of the two lowest trading prices for the 20 days prior to giving notice of conversion. The Company received $50,000 on issuance net of issuance fee of $2,500. The Company recorded a debt discount related to the day 1 fair value of the derivative liability of $52,500

LG Capital Funding LLC $78,750 bearing interest at 8% per annum and matures February 11, 2016. The note may be prepaid up to 180 days from the date of issue with a prepayment penalty from 118% to 148% depending on date of prepayment and is Convertible into common shares at 65% of the average of the two lowest trading prices for the 20 days prior to giving notice of conversion. The Company received $75,000 on issuance net of issuance fee of $3,750. The Company recorded a debt discount related to the day 1 fair value of the derivative liability of $78,750.

Adar Bays LLC $52,500 bearing interest at 8% per annum and matures February 3, 2016. The note may be prepaid up to 180 days from the date of issue with a prepayment penalty from 118% to 148% depending on date of prepayment and is Convertible into common shares at 65% of the average of the two lowest trading prices for the 20 days prior to giving notice of conversion. The Company received $50,000 on issuance net of issuance fee of $2,500. The Company recorded a debt discount related to the day 1 fair value of the derivative liability of $52,500.

Iconic Holdings LLC $165,000 bearing interest at 8% per annum and matures February 17, 2016. The note may be prepaid up to 180 days from the date of issue with a prepayment of 135% depending on date of prepayment and is Convertible into common shares at 60% of the average of the two lowest trading prices for the 20 days prior to giving notice of conversion. The Company received $150,000 on issuance net of original issue discount of $15,000. The Company recorded a debt discount related to the day 1 fair value of the derivative liability and the original issue discount of of $165,000.

The Company recorded amortization of debt discount expense of $16,226 during the year for these notes.

A summary of the activity of Convertible Notes payable is shown below.

Total convertible notes	$	373,750
Discount on notes from derivative liability		(336,302	)
Original issue discount		(15,000	)
Amortization of discount		16,226

Net convertible notes	$	38,674

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

7. Derivative liabilities

The Company has determined that it needs to account for the Convertible Notes Payable issued as derivative liabilities and apply the provisions of ASC 815.

The Company records the fair value of the of the conversion price of the convertible notes disclosed in Note 6 in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair value of the derivative was calculated using a multi-nominal lattice model performed by an independent qualified business valuator. The fair value of the derivative liability is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company recorded a loss on the change in fair value of derivative liability of $34,268 (2014 - $Nil). At February 28, 2015 the Company recorded a derivative liability of $369,344 (2014 - $Nil).

For the lattice options pricing model that values the compound embedded derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. The Convertible Note derivatives were valued as of inception and as of February 28, 2015. The following assumptions were used for the valuation of the derivative liability related to the Notes:

The stock price (decreasing from $1.11 to $0.15 in this period which significantly increased the liability) would fluctuate with the Company’s projected volatility;

An event of default for the Convertible Note would occur 0% of the time, increasing 1.00% per month to a maximum of 10%;

Alternative financing for the Convertible Notes would be initially available to redeem the note 0% of the time and increase monthly by 2% to a maximum of 10%;

The monthly trading volume would average $7,257,163 to $5,399,150 and increase at 1% per month;

The variable conversion prices ranging from 60% to 65% of the trading prices over 20 trading days (Quezon note converts at 100% of the trading price) have effective discount rates of 52.35% to 47.44% and 1.22%;

The Note Holders would automatically convert the notes with variable conversion prices if the registration was effective and the company not in default;

A summary of the activity of loss on derivative liability for the year ended February 28, 2015 is shown below:

Day 1 loss on derivative liability	$	61,749
Unrealized gain on mark-to-market of derivate liability		(27,481	)

Loss on derivate liability	$	34,268

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

The projected annual volatility for each valuation period was based on the historical volatility of the company;

	1 year

12/29/14		149	%
2/3/15		144	%
2/11/15		136	%
2/17/15		136	%
2/28/15		136	%

A summary of the activity of the derivative liability is shown below:

	2015			2014

Beginning balance	$	-		$	-
Derivative liabilities recorded		396,825			-

Unrealized gain attributable to the change in liabilities
still held		(27,481	)		-

Ending balance	$	369,344		$	-

8. Stockholders' equity

Preferred stock

On January 23, 2015, the Company amended its authorized capital to include 450,000,000 preferred stock with par value of $0.001. On February 20, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the Nevada Secretary of State designating 10,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock, which series shall have certain designations and number thereof, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, in particular, it shall have the following voting rights:

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder to one (1) vote for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. In any vote or action of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock voting together as a separate class, each share of issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote per share.

The holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote together with the shares of Common Stock as one class. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall share ratably, with the holders of common stock, in any dividends that may, from time to time may be declared by the board of directors. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall rank pari passu with the holders of common stock in respect of all rights in liquidation, dissolution or winding up with all of said assets being distributed among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and other classes of stock ranking pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert at any time all or any portion of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by such person into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock equal to 1,000 (one thousand) shares of Common Stock for each 1 (one) share of Series A Preferred Stock being converted (the “Conversion Ratio”), provided that the Company has a sufficient number of authorized shares of Common Stock for such conversion. The Company has not issued any preferred stock.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Common stock

During the year the Company issued 113,949 shares of common stock for deferred financing costs with a fair value of $50,422.

As of February 28, 2015, the Company has entered into an agreement with Empire State Financial Inc. (“Empire”) whereupon the Company would compensate Empire for arranging financing for the Company with 27,500 common shares. The fair value of the common shares of $11,000 has been recorded as a stock payable liability as of February 28, 2015. The common shares were issued on March 22, 2015.

During fiscal 2014, the Company issued 266,667 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share for total proceeds of $400,000.

9. Commitments and contingencies

The Company has entered into a licensing agreement with HydroSlotter Corporation of Canada (“HSC”) for the non-exclusive right to market, represent and use HSC technology in order explore and develop utilization of the HSC technology in any geographical region, country, or territory. The term of the agreement is from January 1, 2014 to December 1, 2015 and may be renewed annually by mutual consent. Revenue and expenses are shared in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

On January 25, 2015, The Company entered into an equity line term sheet dated January 23, 2015 (“the Term Sheet”) with Dutchess Capital Management 11, LLC (“Dutchess”), whereupon Dutchess will provide an equity line of $25,000,000 over 36 months after a registration statement of the Company is effective to register the common shares of the Company to be purchased by Dutchess at a price of 95% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price the five consecutive trading days immediately before the drawdown by the Company that is to be drawn in the Company’s option at either a maximum of either:

$250,000; or

200% of the average daily dollar volume using the three trading days prior to the drawdown date

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company compensated Dutchess for providing the equity line with 113,949 restricted common shares of the Company for due diligence and document preparation.

The Company entered into a placement agency agreement with Empire State Financial Inc. (“Empire”) whereupon Empire would be compensated for arranging financing on a best efforts basis with 8% of any aggregate financing payable in cash and 4% of any aggregate financing payable in Common Shares of the Company. The consultant was paid fees of $13,200 during 2015

The Company entered into a placement agency agreement with Almori Advisors Inc. (“Almori”) whereupon Almori would be compensated for arranging financing on a best efforts basis with 8% of any aggregate financing payable in cash. The consultant was paid fees of $14,700 during 2015

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

10. Income taxes

The Company uses the liability method, where deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. During 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred net losses and, therefore, has no tax liability. The net deferred tax asset generated by the loss carryforward has been fully reserved. The cumulative net operating loss carryforward is approximately $1,719,000 at February 28, 2015, and will begin to expire in the year 2031.

At February 28, 2015 and 2014, deferred tax assets consisted of the following:

	2015			2014

Net operating losses	$	483,000		$	488,000
Valuation allowance		(483,000	)		(488,000	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	-		$	-

11. Subsequent events

On April 1, 2015, the Company adopted a 2015 Stock Plan that will provide for the granting of stock, for the issuance of up to 4,900,000 shares of common stock to eligible employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company

On March 16, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dominic Johnny Calabrigo (“Calabrigo”). Calabrigo is to be compensated with 4,840,000 Common Shares of the Company. The agreement expires on December 25, 2015. On April 10, 2015, the Company issued 2,440,000 common shares, with a fair value of $73,200 and on May 6, 2015 the Company issued 2,400,000 common shares, with a fair value of 55,200, to Domenic Calabrigo pursuant to the consulting agreement.

On April 16, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with EMA Financial LLC (“EMA”) for funds to be provided to the Company in the aggregate amount of $100,000 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum for a period of 12 months. The Company agreed to issue to EMA a convertible promissory note for the aggregate principal sum of $100,000 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum for 12 months (“the “Note”). The Note is convertible at 60% of the lowest reported sale price of common stock of the Company in the last 20 trading days prior to notice of conversion.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

12. Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements

In connection with our review of our financial statements for prior periods and to correct the February 28, 2015 beginning balance for accumulated other comprehensive income, we identified the following item which we have revised in our 2014 financial statements: Certain assets and liabilities at February 28, 2014 should have been translated to US funds.

The Company has evaluated the effect of the revisions on all relevant periods in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 99 and SAB 108 and determined that the impact of the revisions on its previously filed annual financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2014 was not material.

The following balances have been revised

	Amount
	Originally			Revised
	Reported			Change			Amount
Balance sheet

Oil and gas properties	$	101,896		$	(10,000	)	$	91,896
Unproved oil and gas properties		289,353			(29,000	)		260,353
Total assets		435,006			(39,000	)		396,006


Accounts payable		139,519			(15,000	)		124,519
Loans payable - related parties		1,462,090			(141,000	)		1,321,090
Total current liabilities		1,719,091			(156,000	)		1,563,091


Accumulated other comprehensive income		-			117,000			117,000
Total equity		(1,284,085	)		117,000			(1,167,085	)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Accounts payable		55,103			(22,053	)		33,050
Net cash used in operating activities		(368,686	)		(22,053	)		(390,739	)
Effect on foreign currency		-			22,053			22,053

13. Supplemental information on oil and gas operations

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities

Revenue	$	11,733	$	19,029
Production costs		-		-
Depletion, depreciation and amortization		11,381		10,239
Impairment of oil and gas properties		-		-

Income from oil and gas operations	$	352	$	8,790

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

The supplemental unaudited oil and gas reserve information that follow is presented in accordance with FASB ASC 932-235. The process of estimating quantities of proved natural gas and crude oil reserve is very complex, requiring significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir. The data for a given reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions. Consequently, material revisions to existing reserve estimates occur from time to time. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that reported reserve estimates represent the most accurate assessment possible, the significance of the subjective decisions required and variances in available data for various reservoirs make these estimates generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

The recording and reporting of proved reserve are governed by criteria established by regulations of the SEC. Those regulations define proved reserves as those estimated quantities of hydrocarbons that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved reserves are further classified as either developed or undeveloped. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods, while proved undeveloped reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from an existing well where relatively major expenditures are required for recompletion.

Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil and condensate that geological and engineering data demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in future years from know reservoirs under economic and operating conditions existing at the time the estimates were made.

Estimates of proved reserves, future net revenue and present values of oil and gas reserves at February 28, 2015 were based on studies performed by Chapman Petroleum Engineering Ltd. and independent reservoir engineering firm. Oil and gas prices received by the Company on February 28, 2015 were used in pricing the reserves. Development and production costs were based on respective year-end costs. Future income taxes were not considered. Present value amounts were determined by applying a 10% discount factor. All of the Company's reserves are located in the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada.

No major discovery or other favourable or adverse event subsequent to February 28, 2015 is believed to have caused a material change in the estimates of proved reserves as of that date. Substantially all of the Company's proved reserves related to one property.

The following supplemental unaudited information regarding the Company's oil and gas activities is presented pursuant to the disclosure requirement of FASB ASC 932-235.

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Estimated net proved reserves at February 28, 2015:

	2015			2014
Proved developed & undeveloped reserves:
Beginning of year		1,967			-
Acquisition		-			2,183
Discoveries and extensions		-			-
Improved recovery		-			-
Revisions of previous estimates		(491	)		-
Production		(151	)		(216	)

End of year		1,325			1,967

Developed reserves, included above:		-			-
Beginning of year		1,967			2,183
End of year		1,325			1,967

Costs incurred in oil and gas producing activities for the year ended February 28, 2015 and 2014:

(in thousands)

	2015		2014
Property acquisition costs:
Proved	$	-	$	-
Unproved		17,039		260,353

Net capitalized cost	$	17,039	$	260,353

Costs incurred include capitalized and expensed items. Acquisition costs include the costs of acquiring proved and unproved oil and gas properties. Exploration costs include geological and geophysical expenses, the cost of drilling and equipping development wells and building related production facilities for extracting treating, gathering and storing petroleum liquids and natural gas.

Summary of the changes in the standardized measures of future net cash flows are as follows:

Beginning of year	$	84,171		$	103,661
Sale of oil and gas produced		(11,733	)		(18,180	)
Acquisition of oil and gas property		-			-
Changes in timing and other		(12,676	)		(1,310	)

	$	59,762		$	84,171

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Amounts are computed using year-end prices and costs (adjusted only for existing contractual changes), appropriate statutory tax rates and a prescribed 10 percent discount factor. Continuation of year-end economic conditions also is assumed. The calculation is based on estimates of proved reserves, which are revised over time as new data become available. Probable or possible reserves, which may become proved in the future are not considered. The calculation also requires assumptions as to the timing of future production of proved reserves, and the timing and amount of future development, including dismantlement, and production costs.

While due care was taken in its preparation, we do not represent that this data is the fair value of our oil and gas properties, or a fair estimate of the present value of cash flows to be obtained from their development and production.

	2015			2014

Future cash flows	$	97,814		$	152,864
Future development costs		-			-
Future production costs		-			-
Future income tax expense		-			-
Future net cash flows		-			-

Less: 10% annual discount of estimated timing of cash flows		(38,052	)		(68,693	)

Discounted future net cash flows	$	59,762		$	84,171

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no disagreements with our accountants related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and subsequent interim periods.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the material information required to be included in our SEC reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for the company.

Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of its management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, and accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect material misstatements. In addition, effective internal control at a point in time may become ineffective in future periods because of changes in conditions or due to deterioration in the degree of compliance with our established policies and procedures.

A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of February 28, 2015, based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under this framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of the evaluation date due to the factors stated below.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our company’s internal control over financial reporting as of evaluation date and identified the following material weaknesses:

Lack of proper segregation of duties due to limited personnel;

Lack of a formal review process that includes multiple levels of review from adequate personnel with requisite expertise.

We do not have a functioning audit committee or outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.

Management is committed to improving its internal controls and will (1) continue to use third party specialists to address shortfalls in staffing and to assist our company with accounting and finance responsibilities, (2) increase the frequency of independent reconciliations of significant accounts which will mitigate the lack of segregation of duties until there are sufficient personnel and (3) may consider appointing outside directors and audit committee members in the future.

Management, including our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), has discussed the material weakness noted above with our independent registered public accounting firm. Due to the nature of this material weakness, there is a more than remote likelihood that misstatements which could be material to the annual or interim financial statements could occur that would not be prevented or detected.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended February 28, 2015 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

On March 12, 2014, we appointed Carl Meaney as a member of our board of directors.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following individuals serve as the directors and executive officers of our company as of the date of this annual report. All directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The executive officers of our company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office.

Name	Position Held with our Company	Age	Date First Elected or Appointed

Mark Pellicane	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	44	August 2, 2013

Alfred V. Morra	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director	65	August 2, 2013

Carl Meaney	Director	74	March 12, 2014

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of our company, indicating the person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

Mark Pellicane – President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mark Pellicane has acted as our president, chief executive officer and director since August 2, 2013. Specializing in the areas of product development and implementation, Mr. Pellicane has had a distinctive career in the development of numerous technology, marketing, and financial companies. Mark has always attributed his strength and success to working with industry leaders and pioneers in the field and integrating strong team leadership values to the project at hand.

At the age of 15, Mr. Pellicane was the youngest student accepted to a Canadian University and was educated at the University of Toronto in the field of sciences. Mr. Pellicane furthered his study in Business, and holds an Oxford Masters in Business Administration from Hamilton College, Oxford, England.

Mr. Pellicane is an accomplished public speaker and lecturer having been invited as guest speaker, and conducting seminars in the areas of technology and business across North America and Great Britain.

Mr. Pellicane’s career as a senior executive and industry leader may be highlighted as follows:

From June 2007 until March 2010, Mark shifted towards financial and tax related products. Mr. Pellicane was President of the Universal Barter Group (“UBG”), where he was an integral part of a team delivering national seminars on tax strategies resulting in cash and product donations to charities in Canada. The initiative resulting in $20 million in cash raised by UBG to facilitate the donations and provide charitable goods and services. During the time, Mr. Pellicane served in various executive and consulting roles while marketing charitable services and tax products within the Canadian market, with a primary focus on seminar marketing speaking events.

Beginning in May 2010 , Mr. Pellicane became the co-founder, a Director, and President of Falconridge Ontario, and worked with HydroSlotter Corporation of Canada (“HSC”) in developing the marketing and branding of HSC. Over his four years of working with HSC, he was trained by HSC on the capabilities of the abrasive hydrojetting technology deployed by the company. During this time, Mr. Pellicane utilized his expertise in marketing to implement a rebranding strategy creating and implementing the TST marketing infrastructure and strategy allowing for brand awareness on a global scale. Mr. Pellicane played a critical role with the marketing and contract negotiations with key oil and gas companies including ADNOC, the fifth largest oil company globally resulting in a letter of intent for the potential deployment of TST services within the UAE.

During Mr. Pellicane’s working relationship with HSC, he worked closely with technology providers and more specifically with abrasive hydro-jetting enhancement services. Mr. Pellicane participated and managed a team developing a marketing infrastructure to promote enhancement services on a global basis. He has gained extensive knowledge in working with global partners for the implementation of abrasive hydro-jetting technologies on a global scale. Mr. Pellicane, along with his partner, Alfred V. Morra, is currently spearheading the implementation of TST services in Canada, USA, UAE, and numerous Middle Eastern and Indo Asian countries.

Alfred Vincent Morra – Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

Alfred V. Morra has acted as our chief financial officer, treasurer and director since August 2, 2013 and was appointed as secretary on February 7, 2014. Alfred V. Morra enjoyed a career in international and corporate banking spanning some 25 years and retiring from the finance sector in 1998. Throughout his career he was involved in numerous turnaround financing, international leases, international loan syndications, leveraged buyouts, real estate financing and resource capital finance.

Further, Mr. Morra has acted as a President, CEO, General Manager, Vice President Finance for various companies that were in various stages of growth and in some cases in need of operational and financial structuring. His experience in industry includes: injection and blow moulding, plastic extrusion, magnesium production, retail operations, commercial lighting manufacturing, digital imaging for medical record conversion, toy and game manufacturing, packaging and leasing operations.

Most recently, Mr. Morra has served as Managing Director of Falconridge Ontario from April 2009 to present developing international territories for the technology of Falconridge Ontario. From March 2008 to February 2010, Mr. Morra served as President of BioWorld Technology Ltd.

Mr. Morra’s educational background includes having studied English and economics at the University of Toronto - University of St. Michael’s College from 1968 to 1971. Prior to having attended the University of Toronto - University of St. Michael’s College, he attended Brebeuf College School from 1963 to 1968 to study general arts.

Carl Meaney – Director

Carl Meaney has acted as a director of our company since March 12, 2014. Mr. Meaney resides in Oxford England where he is a Teacher, Lecturer, and tutor for the Carfax Tutorial Establishment Oxford Branch, in the areas of Economics and Business since September 2004. Mr. Meaney graduated with a BA in Economics and Socioeconomic History from McMaster University in 1979. Pursuing his Academic standing, Mr. Meaney then completed a Master’s Degree in Economics from the University of Oxford in 1988. During and post completion his Oxford MA, Mr. Meaney occupied the position of Lecturer in the academic area of economics and business at Oxford University. Mr. Meaney has not been employed or working in any other capacities in the last five years.

Our company believes that Mr. Meaney’s educational and professional background experience give him the qualifications and skills necessary to serve as a director of our company.

Our company believes that all of our directors’ respective educational background, operational and business experience give them the qualifications and skills necessary to serve as directors and officers, respectively, of our company.

Identification of Significant Employees

We have no significant employees, other than Mark Pellicane, our president, chief executive officer and director and Alfred V. Morra our chief financial officer, treasurer, secretary and director.

Conflicts of Interest

We believe that our directors who are also officers may be subject to conflicts of interest. The conflicts of interest arise from a conflict of duties and also being unable to devote full time to our operations. No policy has been implemented or will be implemented to address conflicts of interest.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26)), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29)), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, members of our board of directors, our company’s officers including our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, employees, consultants and advisors. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;

compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our company’s senior officers commit to timely, accurate and consistent disclosure of information; that they maintain confidential information; and that they act with honesty and integrity.

In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly senior officers, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal and state securities laws. Any senior officer, who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to our company. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is attached hereto as Exhibit 14. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., 17-120 West Beaver Creek Rd., Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, L4B 1L2.

Committees of the Board

All proceedings of our board of directors were conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by all the directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the directors. Such resolutions consented to in writing by the directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the directors are, according to the corporate laws of the state of Nevada and the bylaws of our company, as valid and effective as if they had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held.

Our audit committee consists of our entire board of directors.

Our company currently does not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions nor does our company have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes that the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our directors.

Our company does not have any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. The directors believe that, given the early stage of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations develop to a more advanced level. Our company does not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to the board of directors and we do not have any specific process or procedure for evaluating such nominees. Our directors assess all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and make recommendations for election or appointment.

A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request addressed to our president, at the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of our audit committee that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is “independent” as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors, who act as our audit committee in fulfilling that function, are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

(a)

our principal executive officer;

(b)

our principal financial officer;

(c)

each of our three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014; and

(d)

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended February 28, 2015and 2014,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and

Principal Position

Year

Salary

Bonus

Stock

Awards

Option

Awards

Non-

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

Change in

Pension

Value

and

Non-qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

All Other

Compensation

Total

William J. Muran(1),

2015

Nil

Director and Former President,

Secretary and Treasurer,

2014

Nil

Mark Pellicane(2)

2015

$90,000

Nil

$90,000

President, Chief Executive Officer

and Director

2014

$65,000

Nil

$65,000

Alfred V. Morra(3)

2015

$90,000

Nil

$90,000

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,

Secretary and Director

2014

$65,000

Nil

$65,000

(1)

William J. Muran has been a director of our company since January 24, 2008. Mr. Muran resigned as President, Treasurer, on August 2, 2013 and was removed as secretary on February 7, 2014.

(2)

Mark Pellicane has been president, chief executive officer and a director of our company since August 2, 2013.

(3)

Alfred V. Morra has been chief financial officer, treasurer and a director of our company since August 2, 2013 and was appointed as our secretary on February 7, 2014.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Agreement with Mark Pellicane:

On February 7, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Mark Pellicane, the president, chief executive officer and a director of our company, for a term of at least one year. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Pellicane is to serve as our president and chief executive officer and to be in charge of the day-to-day administration of the company including corporate structuring, overseeing the formation of contracts and agreements between operating entities and potential partners, oversight of senior management personnel, and assist in capital raises for projects where necessary. As compensation for his services to us, Mr. Pellicane will be paid $7,500 Canadian dollars per month by our company. At Mr. Pellicane’s discretion, this compensation may be deferred until a later time and accrue as such. Furthermore, at the sole discretion of Mr. Pellicane, any compensation owing to Mr. Pellicane may be satisfied by the issuance of our common stock. The value of such common stock will be the lesser of:

stock trading value on the day the compensation becomes due;

stock trading value on the day the request is made for accrued payment; or

independent valuation of the outstanding corporate shares independent of current trade value.

Agreement with Alfred V. Morra:

On February 7, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Alfred V. Morra, the corporate secretary, treasurer, chief financial officer and a director of our company, for a term of at least one year. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Morra is to serve as our corporate secretary, treasurer and chief financial officer and to assist at an executive level in the day-to-day administration, operations, of the Company including corporate structuring, overseeing the formation of contracts and agreements between operating entities and potential partners, oversight of projects and implementation of TST, and the operating agreements between our company and service suppliers. As compensation for his services to us, Mr. Morra will be paid $7,500 Canadian dollars per month by our company. At Mr. Morra’s discretion, this compensation may be deferred until a later time and accrue as such. Furthermore, at the sole discretion of Mr. Morra, any compensation owing to Mr. Morra may be satisfied by the issuance of our common stock. The value of such common stock will be the lesser of:

stock trading value on the day the compensation becomes due;

stock trading value on the day the request is made for accrued payment; or

independent valuation of the outstanding corporate shares independent of current trade value.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards

We do not have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors do not receive any compensation for serving on the board of directors.

We have determined that none of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv)(B) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

Stock Option Plans

In connection with the share exchange agreement, we adopted a stock option plan on August 2, 2013 to issue options to purchase up to 10% of the issued and outstanding of our capital stock when the share exchange closed, being 4,875,000 shares, to our board members and management, at an exercise price of $1.50 per share or higher. When the options are granted, they will vest quarterly over two years from the date of grant and shall expire 24 months from vesting.

Stock Options/SAR Grants

During our fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 there were no options granted to our named officers or directors.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

No equity awards were outstanding as of the year ended February 28, 2015.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years, is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.

Indemnification

Under our Bylaws, we may indemnify our officers or directors who are made a party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of their position, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that our officers or directors are successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which they are to be indemnified, we must indemnify them against all expenses incurred, including attorney’s fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officers or directors are judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of June 8, 2015, the total number of shares owned beneficially by each of our directors, named executive officers, individually and as a group, and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares. The stockholder listed below has direct ownership of his shares and possesses sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)	Percentage of Class

Mark Pellicane (2) 51 Macarther Drive Thornhill, Ontario L4J 7T5 Canada	17,550,000 Common Shares	32.5%

Alfred V. Morra (3) 18 Queen Street Schomberg, Ontario L0G 1T0 Canada	11,700,000 Common Shares	21.7%

Carl Meaney (4) 37 Trinity St. Oxford, England 0X1 1TN	Nil Common Shares	0%

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group	29,250,000 Common Shares	54.2%

5%+ Shareholders
None.	Nil Common Shares	0%

(1)

Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on June 8, 2015. As of June 8, 2015, there were 53,998,116 shares of our company’s common stock issued and outstanding.

(2)	Mark Pellicane is our company’s president, chief executive officer and director.

(3)	Alfred V. Morra is our company’s chief financial officer, treasurer, secretary and director

(4)	Carl Meaney is a director of our company.

Changes in Control

We do not currently have any arrangements which if consummated may result in a change of control of our company.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Transactions with Related Persons of Falconridge Nevada

The following includes a summary of transactions since the beginning of the May 31, 2012 fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which Falconridge Nevada was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation”). We believe the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions.

On August 2, 2013, in conjunction with the closing of our share exchange with Falconridge Ontario, we issued an aggregate of 29,250,000 shares of our common stock to two of our directors and officers, Mark Pellicane and Al Morra.

Falconridge Nevada has not had any other transaction since the last two fiscal years ended May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, or any currently proposed transaction, in which Falconridge Nevada was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation”).

Transactions with Related Persons of Falconridge Ontario

The following includes a summary of transactions since the beginning of the February 28, 2014 fiscal year through the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, or any currently proposed transaction, in which Falconridge Ontario was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation”). We believe the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions.

As at February 28, 2015, First World Trade Corporation (“FWT”) has advanced Falconridge Ontario $1,160,000 (2014 - $1,439,862) to fund operating costs and shared expenses, the loan is non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment.

Falconridge Ontario incurs shared expenses with FWT. The costs include administrative, office lease expenses, and other costs which are allocated based on managements’ determination of the proportionate expenses incurred. Mark Pellicane, who is a director and officer, and was a shareholder of Falconridge Ontario, is the 100% shareholder of FWT.

Falconridge Ontario has not had any other transaction since our last two fiscal years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than compensation described under “Executive Compensation”).

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

Other than the directors and officers of our company, we have no promoters.

Corporate Governance

We currently act with four directors, consisting of Mark Pellicane, Alfred Vincent Morra, and Carl Meaney.

We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors acts in such capacities. We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee because we believe that the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the board of directors. Additionally, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Director Independence

We currently do not have any independent directors, as the term “independent” is defined by the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

	Year Ended
	February 28, 2015		February 28, 2013
	$		$

Audit Fees		34,500		34,500
Audit Related Fees		Nil		Nil
Tax Fees		Nil		Nil
All Other Fees		Nil		Nil
Total		34,500		34,500

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements

(1) Financial statements for our company are listed in the index under Item 8 of this document

(2) All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description

(3)		Articles of Incorporation; Bylaws

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 14, 2008)

3.2		Bylaws of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 14, 2008)

3.3		Certificate of Change (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2010)

3.4		Articles of Merger (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2010)

3.5		Articles of Merger (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 28, 2013)

(4)		Instrument Defining the Right of Holders, Including Indentures

4.1		Form of Share Certificate (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2013)

(10)		Material Contracts

10.1		License Agreement with HydroSlotter Corporation of Canada dated October 1, 2012***

10.2		Share Exchange Agreement among Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp., Falconridge Oil Ltd. and the Shareholders of Falconridge Oil Ltd. dated August 2, 2013 (incorporated by reference to our Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on October 23, 2013)

10.3		2013 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2013)

10.4		Services and Gross Overriding Royalty Agreement dated October 7, 2011 (incorporated by reference to our Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1\A filed on October 21, 2013)***

10.5		Agreement between Falconridge Ontario and Meadowbank Asset Management Inc. dated February 17, 2011 (incorporated by reference to our Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A #2 filed on December 16, 2014)

10.6		Management Agreement dated February 7, 2014 between our company and Mark Pellicane (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2014)

10.7		Management Agreement dated February 7, 2014 between our company and Alfred Morra (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2014)

10.8		Term Sheet dated January 23, 2015 between our company and Dutchess Capital Management, II, LLC.

10.9		Agent Agreement between our company and Empire Statement Financial, Inc. dated December 10, 2014 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1).

10.10		Promissory Note dated December 29, 2014 between our company and Quezon Group LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 12, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1).

10.11		Placement Agent Agreement dated January 14, 2015 between our company and Almorli Advisors Inc.

10.12		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 23, 2015 between our company and Union Capital, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1).

10.13		Form of Convertible Promissory Note between our company and Union Capital, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.2).

10.14		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 27, 2015 between our company and LG Capital Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.3).

10.15		Form of Convertible Promissory Note between our company and LG Capital Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.4).

10.16		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 27, 2015 between our company and Adar Bays, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.5).

10.17		Form of Convertible Promissory Note between our company and Adar Bays, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.6).

10.18		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 27, 2015 between our company and Iconic Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.7).

10.19		Form of Convertible Promissory Note between our company and Iconic Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2015 as Exhibit 10.8).

10.20		Price Agreement between our company and Empire Statement Financial, Inc. dated March 15, 2015(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2015 as Exhibit 10.2).

10.21		Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 16, 2015 between our company and EMA Financial, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1).

10.22		Convertible Promissory Note between our company and EMA Financial, LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2015 as Exhibit 10.2).

(14)		Code of Ethics

14.1		Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

(31)		Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer

31.2*		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

(32)		Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer

32.1*		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

101**		Interactive Data File (Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2015 furnished in XBRL).
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Filed herewith.

Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

***	Certain parts of this document have not been disclosed and have been filed separately with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, and are subject to a confidential treatment request pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	FALCONRIDGE OIL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
	(Registrant)


Dated: June 15, 2015	/s/ Mark Pellicane
	Mark Pellicane
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: June 15, 2015	/s/ Alfred V. Morra
	Alfred V. Morra
	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: June 15, 2015	/s/ Mark Pellicane
	Mark Pellicane
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated June 15, 2015	/s/ Alfred V. Morra
	Alfred V. Morra
	Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)


Dated: June 15, 2015	/s/ Carl Meaney
	Carl Meaney
	Director

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. - FORM 10-K - June 15, 2015

Attached files

Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. Reports