CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	ex32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	ex32-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP	ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES

securities and exchange commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

form 10-q

(Mark One)

[ X ]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended

March 31, 2015

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) of
	THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission file number

001-31830

Cathay General Bancorp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		95-4274680
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation		(I.R.S. Employer
or organization)		Identification No.)
777 North Broadway, Los Angeles, California		90012
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

(213) 625-4700

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☑	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock, $.01 par value, 79,912,799 shares outstanding as of April 30, 2015.

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARies

1^st quarter 2015 REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

table of contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		5

Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited).	5
	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited).	8
Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.	35
Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	58
Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.	59

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		60

Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.	60
Item 1A	RISK FACTORS.	60
Item 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.	60
Item 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.	60
Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.	61
Item 5.	OTHER INFORMATION.	61
Item 6.	EXHIBITS.	61




SIGNATURES		62

Forward-Looking Statements

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the term “Bancorp” refers to Cathay General Bancorp and the term “Bank” refers to Cathay Bank. The terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Bancorp and the Bank collectively.

The statements in this report include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the applicable provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding management’s beliefs, projections, and assumptions concerning future results and events. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements in these provisions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including statements about anticipated future operating and financial performance, financial position and liquidity, growth opportunities and growth rates, growth plans, acquisition and divestiture opportunities, business prospects, strategic alternatives, business strategies, financial expectations, regulatory and competitive outlook, investment and expenditure plans, financing needs and availability, and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation and statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Words such as “aims,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “optimistic,” “plans,” “potential,” “possible,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “shall,” “should,” “will,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements by us are based on estimates, beliefs, projections, and assumptions of management and are not guarantees of future performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. Such risks and uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, adverse developments or conditions related to or arising from:

●

U.S. and international business and economic conditions;

●

possible additional provisions for loan losses and charge-offs;

●

credit risks of lending activities and deterioration in asset or credit quality;

●

extensive laws and regulations and supervision that we are subject to, including potential supervisory action by bank supervisory authorities;

●

increased costs of compliance and other risks associated with changes in regulation, including the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”);

●

higher capital requirements from the implementation of the Basel III capital standards;

●

compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other money laundering statutes and regulations;

●

potential goodwill impairment;

●

liquidity risk;

●

fluctuations in interest rates;

●

risks associated with acquisitions and the expansion of our business into new markets;

●

inflation and deflation;

●

real estate market conditions and the value of real estate collateral;

●

environmental liabilities;

●

our ability to compete with larger competitors;

●

our ability to retain key personnel;

●

successful management of reputational risk;

●

natural disasters and geopolitical events;

●

general economic or business conditions in Asia, and other regions where the Bank has operations;

●

failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our information systems;

●

our ability to adapt our systems to technological changes;

●

risk management processes and strategies;

●

adverse results in legal proceedings;

●

certain provisions in our charter and bylaws that may affect acquisition of the Company;

●

changes in accounting standards or tax laws and regulations;

●

market disruption and volatility;

●

restrictions on dividends and other distributions by laws and regulations and by our regulators and our capital structure;

●

issuance of preferred stock;

●

successfully raising additional capital, if needed, and the resulting dilution of interests of holders of our common stock; and

●

the soundness of other financial institutions.

These and other factors are further described in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (Item 1A in particular), other reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and other filings it makes with the SEC from time to time. Actual results in any future period may also vary from the past results discussed in this report. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak to the date of this report. We have no intention and undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to publicly announce any revision of any forward-looking statement to reflect future developments or events, except as required by law.

Bancorp’s filings with the SEC are available at the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov, or by request directed to Cathay General Bancorp, 9650 Flair Drive, El Monte, California 91731, Attention: Investor Relations (626) 279-3286.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	182,159		$	176,830
Short-term investments and interest bearing deposits		618,726			489,614
Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,197,922 in 2015 and $1,324,408 in 2014)		1,203,682			1,318,935
Loans held for sale		-			973
Loans		9,224,797			8,914,080
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(156,089	)		(161,420	)
Unamortized deferred loan fees, net		(11,116	)		(12,392	)
Loans, net		9,057,592			8,740,268
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,000			30,785
Other real estate owned, net		30,799			31,477
Affordable housing investments, net		129,829			104,579
Premises and equipment, net		98,512			99,682
Customers’ liability on acceptances		17,956			35,656
Accrued interest receivable		26,584			25,364
Goodwill		316,340			316,340
Other intangible assets, net		3,084			3,237
Other assets		199,826			143,106
Total assets	$	11,910,089		$	11,516,846

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits	$	1,691,173		$	1,664,914
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW deposits		822,940			778,691
Money market deposits		1,551,453			1,538,187
Savings deposits		557,924			533,940
Time deposits under $100,000		1,241,529			1,162,547
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		3,248,231			3,105,181
Total deposits		9,113,250			8,783,460

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		400,000			450,000
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		485,000			425,000
Other borrowings for affordable housing investments		22,482			19,934
Long-term debt		119,136			119,136
Acceptances outstanding		17,956			35,656
Other liabilities		118,019			80,772
Total liabilities		10,275,843			9,913,958
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 84,108,607 issued and 79,901,042 outstanding at March 31, 2015, and 84,022,118 issued and 79,814,553 outstanding at December 31, 2014		841			840
Additional paid-in-capital		787,956			789,519
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(646	)		(5,569	)
Retained earnings		971,831			943,834
Treasury stock, at cost (4,207,565 shares at March 31, 2015, and at December 31, 2014)		(125,736	)		(125,736	)
Total equity		1,634,246			1,602,888
Total liabilities and equity	$	11,910,089		$	11,516,846

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans receivable, including loan fees	$	100,100		$	92,732
Investment securities		3,774			7,576
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		581			450
Deposits with banks		479			449
Total interest and dividend income		104,934			101,207

Interest Expense
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		6,773			6,664
Other deposits		4,793			4,028
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,925			6,930
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		93			199
Long-term debt		1,424			728
Total interest expense		17,008			18,549

Net interest income before provision for credit losses		87,926			82,658
Reversal of provision for loan losses		(5,000	)		-

Net interest income after credit for loan losses		92,926			82,658

Non-Interest Income
Securities (losses)/gains, net		(21	)		5,960
Letters of credit commissions		1,268			1,468
Depository service fees		1,301			1,363
Other operating income		6,001			5,768
Total non-interest income		8,549			14,559

Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		22,616			23,451
Occupancy expense		4,021			3,862
Computer and equipment expense		2,502			2,302
Professional services expense		5,352			5,156
FDIC and State assessments		2,260			2,154
Marketing expense		820			564
Other real estate owned expense		483			759
Operations of affordable housing investments, net		2,383			2,436
Amortization of core deposit intangibles		177			172
Costs associated with debt redemption		-			3,376
Other operating expense		3,517			3,836
Total non-interest expense		44,131			48,068

Income before income tax expense		57,344			49,149
Income tax expense		21,364			17,890
Net income		35,980			31,259

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized holding gain on securities available-for-sale		6,499			11,094
Less: reclassification adjustments included in net income		(12	)		3,455
Unrealized holding loss on cash flow hedge derivatives		(1,588	)		-
Total other comprehensive gain, net of tax		4,923			7,639
Total comprehensive income	$	40,903		$	38,898

Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.45		$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.45		$	0.39
Cash dividends paid per common share	$	0.10		$	0.05
Average common shares outstanding
Basic		79,835,628			79,595,757
Diluted		80,309,383			80,039,382

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	35,980		$	31,259
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Credit for loan losses		(5,000	)		-
Provision for losses on other real estate owned		181			617
Deferred tax liability		6,840			6,012
Depreciation		1,732			1,742
Net losses/(gains) on sale and transfer of other real estate owned		154			(559	)
Net gains on sale of loans		(596	)		(128	)
Proceeds from sales of loans		10,360			4,525
Originations of loans held-for-sale		(8,791	)		(4,397	)
Net change in trading securities		-			4,936
Write-downs on venture capital investments		224			75
Net losses/(gains) on sales and calls of securities		21			(5,960	)
Amortization/accretion of security premiums/discounts, net		502			867
Amortization of other intangible assets		197			196
Excess tax short-fall from share-based payment arrangements		4,395			1,227
Stock based compensation and stock issued to officers as compensation		1,570			1,353
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		6,631			3,285
Net change in other liabilities		1,379			1,374
Net cash provided by operating activities		55,779			46,424

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Increase in short-term investments		(129,112	)		(103,368	)
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale		(703,305	)		(246,498	)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale		741,992			139,671
Proceeds from repayments, maturities and calls of investment securities available-for-sale		12,102			133,369
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		-			(4,901	)
Redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		5,785			-
Net increase in loans		(305,651	)		(220,402	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(562	)		(2,081	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		1,043			6,379
Net increase in investment in affordable housing		(1,351	)		(1,894	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(379,059	)		(299,725	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net increase in deposits		329,724			251,032
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(50,000	)		(100,000	)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		2,242,000			5,127,400
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		(2,182,000	)		(5,012,400	)
Cash dividends paid		(7,983	)		(3,980	)
Proceeds from shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Plan		1,289			386
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		88			-
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of RSUs		(114	)		-
Excess tax short-fall from share-based payment arrangements		(4,395	)		(1,227	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		328,609			261,211

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,329			7,910
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period		176,830			153,747
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	182,159		$	161,657

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period:
Interest	$	17,370		$	19,533
Income taxes paid	$	11,884		$	12,444
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Net change in unrealized holding gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax	$	6,511		$	7,639
Net change in unrealized holding loss on interest rate swaps	$	(1,588	)	$	-
Transfers to other real estate owned from loans held for investment	$	701		$	-

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1. Business

Cathay General Bancorp (“Bancorp”) is the holding company for Cathay Bank (the “Bank” and, together, the “Company”), seven limited partnerships investing in affordable housing investments in which the Bank is the sole limited partner, and GBC Venture Capital, Inc. Bancorp also owns 100% of the common stock of five statutory business trusts created for the purpose of issuing capital securities. The Bank was founded in 1962 and offers a wide range of financial services. As of March 31, 2015, the Bank operated 21 branches in Southern California, 12 branches in Northern California, nine branches in New York State, three branches in Illinois, three branches in Washington State, two branches in Texas, one branch in Massachusetts, one branch in New Jersey, one branch in Nevada, one branch in Hong Kong, and a representative office in Shanghai and in Taipei. Deposit accounts at the Hong Kong branch are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”).

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates subject to change are the allowance for loan losses, goodwill impairment, and other-than-temporary impairment.

3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” ASU No. 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. An entity should recognize compensation cost in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. ASU 2014-12 becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. Adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”, issued by the FASB in August 2014, requires an entity’s management to evaluate and disclose conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. In addition, an entity’s management is to disclose management’s plans that alleviated or that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810).” This update requires that limited partnerships or similar legal entities must provide partners with either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the general partner to be qualified as voting interest entities (“VIE”). Limited partnerships that qualify as voting interest entities and with a controlling financial interest should consolidate a limited partnership. ASU 2015-02 eliminates the specialized consolidate model and guidance for limited partnerships. There is no longer a presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. This update specifies that fees paid to a decision maker are excluded from the evaluation of the economics criterion if the fees are both customary and commensurate with the level of effort required for the services provided. In instances in which no single party has a controlling financial interest in a VIE, related party relationships must be considered indirectly on a proportionate basis, rather than in their entirety. ASU 2015-02 becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. Adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest- Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30).” This update simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. ASU 2015-03 becomes effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. Adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

4. Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock and resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings.

Outstanding stock options with anti-dilutive effect were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The following table sets forth earnings per common share calculations:

	Three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)	2015		2014
Net income	$	35,980	$	31,259

Weighted-average shares:
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding		79,835,628		79,595,757
Dilutive effect of weighted-average outstanding common share equivalents
Warrants		344,919		298,535
Options		108,457		101,698
Restricted stock units		20,379		43,392
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding		80,309,383		80,039,382

Average stock options and warrants with anti-dilutive effect		1,670,231		1,985,848
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.45	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.45	$	0.39

5. Stock-Based Compensation

Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, directors and eligible employees may be granted incentive or non-statutory stock options and/or restricted stock units, or awarded non-vested stock. As of March 31, 2015, the only options granted by the Company were non-statutory stock options to selected Bank officers and non-employee directors at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Such options have a maximum ten-year term and vest in 20% annual increments (subject to early termination in certain events) except certain options granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2005 and 2008. If such options expire or terminate without having been exercised, any shares not purchased will again be available for future grants or awards. There were no options granted during the first quarter of 2015 or during 2014.

Option compensation expense was zero for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Stock-based compensation was fully recognized over the requisite service period for all awards. For the first quarter ended March 31, stock options covering 3,750 shares were exercised in 2015 compared to zero in the first quarter of 2014. Cash received totaled $88,000 and the aggregate intrinsic value totaled $10,000 from the exercise of stock options during the first quarter ended March 31, 2015. The table below summarizes stock option activity for the periods indicated:

						Weighted-average
				Weighted-average		Remaining Contractual		Aggregate Intrinsic
	Shares			Exercise Price		Life (in years)		Value (in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2014		2,332,904		$	32.34		1.2	$	1,388
Exercised		(3,750	)		23.37
Forfeited		(808,670	)		35.63
Balance, March 31, 2015		1,520,484		$	30.62		1.6	$	3,156

Exercisable, March 31, 2015		1,520,484		$	30.62		1.6	$	3,156

In addition to stock options, the Company also grants restricted stock units to eligible employees which vest subject to continued employment at the vesting dates.

The Company granted restricted stock units of 37,675 shares at an average closing price of $27.53 per share in the first quarter of 2015 compared to 17,601 shares at an average closing price of $24.66 per share in 2014. The restricted stock units granted are scheduled to vest two years from grant date for 2014 grants and to vest three years from grant date for 2015 grants.

The Company granted performance share unit awards in which the number of units earned is calculated based on the relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) of the Company’s common stock as compared to the TSR of the KBW Regional Banking Index. In addition, the Company granted performance share unit awards in which the number of units earned is determined by comparison to the targeted EPS as defined in the award for the next three years. In December 2014, the Company granted performance TSR restricted stock units for 60,456 shares and performance EPS restricted stock units for 57,642 shares to six executive officers. Both the performance TSR and performance EPS units awarded in 2014 are scheduled to vest at December 31, 2017.

The following table presents restricted stock unit activity from December 31, 2014, to March 31, 2015:

	Units
Balance at December 31, 2014		386,465
Granted		37,675
Vested		(16,709	)
Forfeited		(7,265	)
Balance at March 31, 2015		400,166

The compensation expense recorded for restricted stock units was $1.1 million for the first quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $1.0 million in the same period a year ago. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units was $6.5 million at March 31, 2015, and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.3 years.

At March 31, 2015, 3,562,168 shares were available under the Company’s 2005 Incentive Plan for future grants calculated based on maximum number of earned shares from TSR and EPS restricted stock units.

The following table summarizes the tax benefit (short-fall) from share-based payment arrangements:

	Three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2015			2014
Short-fall of tax deductions in excess of grant-date fair value	$	(4,395	)	$	(1,227	)
Benefit of tax deductions on grant-date fair value		4,442			1,227
Total benefit of tax deductions	$	47		$	-

6. Investment Securities

Investment securities were $1.20 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $1.32 billion at December 31, 2014. The following tables reflect the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of investment securities as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	349,830	$	353	$	-	$	350,183
Mortgage-backed securities		756,758		3,904		333		760,329
Collateralized mortgage obligations		74		-		32		42
Corporate debt securities		74,946		730		1,165		74,511
Mutual funds		6,000		-		79		5,921
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		6,686		844		3,584		3,946
Other equity securities		3,628		5,125		3		8,750
Total	$	1,197,922	$	10,956	$	5,196	$	1,203,682

	December 31, 2014
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	664,206	$	63	$	265	$	664,004
Mortgage-backed securities		549,296		1,393		6,386		544,303
Collateralized mortgage obligations		79		-		34		45
Corporate debt securities		94,943		776		1,247		94,472
Mutual funds		6,000		-		134		5,866
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		6,276		681		3,733		3,224
Other equity securities		3,608		3,413		-		7,021
Total	$	1,324,408	$	6,326	$	11,799	$	1,318,935

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at March 31, 2015, by contractual maturities, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or repayment penalties.

	Securities Available-For-Sale
	Amortized cost		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	174,987	$	175,062
Due after one year through five years		194,247		195,198
Due after five years through ten years		65,595		65,057
Due after ten years (1)		763,093		768,365
Total	$	1,197,922	$	1,203,682


(1) Equity securities are reported in this category

Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities were $406.9 million and from repayments, maturities and calls of mortgage-backed securities were $12.1 million during the first quarter of 2015 compared to proceeds from sales of $123.7 million and proceeds of $20.5 million from repayments, maturities, and calls during the same period a year ago. Proceeds from sales of other investment securities were $335.1 million during the first quarter of 2015 compared to $16.0 million during the same period a year ago. Proceeds from maturities and calls of other investment securities were zero during the first quarter of 2015 compared to $112.9 million during the same period a year ago. Gains of $1.7 million and losses of $1.7 million were realized on sales of investment securities during the first quarter of 2015 compared to gains of $6.0 million and losses of $67,000 realized during the same period a year ago.

The tables below show the fair value and unrealized losses of the temporarily impaired securities in our investment securities portfolio as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015
	Temporarily impaired securities
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale
Mortgage-backed securities	$	145,297	$	332	$	7	$	1	$	145,304	$	333
Collateralized mortgage obligations		-		-		41		32		41		32
Corporate debt securities		-		-		43,835		1,165		43,835		1,165
Mutual funds		-		-		5,921		79		5,921		79
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		2,597		3,584		-		-		2,597		3,584
Other equity securities		17		3		-		-		17		3
Total	$	147,911	$	3,919	$	49,804	$	1,277	$	197,715	$	5,196

	December 31, 2014
	Temporarily impaired securities
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
	(Dollars in thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	374,153	$	265	$	-	$	-	$	374,153	$	265
Mortgage-backed securities		-		-		425,090		6,386		425,090		6,386
Collateralized mortgage obligations		-		-		45		34		45		34
Corporate debt securities		-		-		63,753		1,247		63,753		1,247
Mutual funds		-		-		5,866		134		5,866		134
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		2,448		3,733		-		-		2,448		3,733
Total	$	376,601	$	3,998	$	494,754	$	7,801	$	871,355	$	11,799

At March 31, 2015, management believed the impairment was temporary and, accordingly, no impairment loss on debt securities has been recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company expects to recover the amortized cost basis of its debt securities, and has no intent to sell and will not be required to sell available-for-sale debt securities that have declined below their cost before their anticipated recovery.

Investment securities having a carrying value of $575.5 million at March 31, 2015, and $591.3 million at December 31, 2014, were pledged to secure public deposits, other borrowings, treasury tax and loan, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

7. Loans

Most of the Company’s business activity is with Asian customers located in Southern and Northern California; New York City, New York; Houston and Dallas, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Edison, New Jersey; Las Vegas, Nevada, and Hong Kong. The Company has no specific industry concentration, and generally its loans are secured by real property or other collateral of the borrowers. Loans are generally expected to be paid off from the operating profits of the borrowers, from refinancing by other lenders, or through sale by the borrowers of the secured collateral.

The components of loans in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, were as follows:

	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Type of Loans:
Commercial loans	$	2,434,550		$	2,382,493
Residential mortgage loans		1,600,269			1,570,059
Commercial mortgage loans		4,663,051			4,486,443
Equity lines		175,997			172,879
Real estate construction loans		345,560			298,654
Installment and other loans		5,370			3,552
Gross loans		9,224,797			8,914,080
Less:
Allowance for loan losses		(156,089	)		(161,420	)
Unamortized deferred loan fees		(11,116	)		(12,392	)
Total loans, net	$	9,057,592		$	8,740,268
Loans held for sale	$	-		$	973

At March 31, 2015, recorded investment in impaired loans totaled $180.7 million and was comprised of non-accrual loans of $80.3 million and accruing troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs) of $100.4 million. At December 31, 2014, recorded investment in impaired loans totaled $174.5 million and was comprised of non-accrual loans of $70.2 million and accruing TDRs of $104.3 million. For impaired loans, the amounts previously charged off represent 17.0% at March 31, 2015, and 17.1% at December 31, 2014, of the contractual balances for impaired loans. The following table presents the average balance and interest income recognized related to impaired loans for the periods indicated:

	Impaired Loans
	Average Recorded Investment				Interest Income Recognized
	Three months ended				Three months ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	25,426	$	30,844	$	229	$	226
Real estate construction loans		22,990		34,060		65		65
Commercial mortgage loans		110,293		111,305		917		1,134
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		17,280		19,156		124		95
Total impaired loans	$	175,989	$	195,365	$	1,335	$	1,520

The following tables present impaired loans and the related allowance for credit losses as of the dates indicated:

	Impaired Loans
	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance
	(In thousands)

With no allocated allowance
Commercial loans	$	14,176	$	13,148	$	-	$	19,479	$	18,452	$	-
Real estate construction loans		49,076		22,874		-		32,924		17,025		-
Commercial mortgage loans		93,468		85,142		-		77,474		75,172		-
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		2,496		2,496		-		2,518		2,518		-
Subtotal	$	159,216	$	123,660	$	-	$	132,395	$	113,167	$	-
With allocated allowance
Commercial loans	$	15,677	$	15,660	$	3,911	$	7,003	$	5,037	$	1,263
Real estate construction loans		-		-		-		19,006		8,703		1,077
Commercial mortgage loans		27,529		26,581		6,635		38,197		34,022		8,993
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		15,393		14,816		498		14,019		13,590		465
Subtotal	$	58,599	$	57,057	$	11,044	$	78,225	$	61,352	$	11,798
Total impaired loans	$	217,815	$	180,717	$	11,044	$	210,620	$	174,519	$	11,798

The following tables present the aging of the loan portfolio by type as of March 31, 2015, and as of December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Non-accrual Loans		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Type of Loans:	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	3,530	$	50	$	787	$	12,086	$	16,453	$	2,418,097	$	2,434,550
Real estate construction loans		-		-		-		17,126		17,126		328,434		345,560
Commercial mortgage loans		22,041		1,738		-		43,079		66,858		4,596,193		4,663,051
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		2,175		-		-		8,033		10,208		1,766,058		1,776,266
Installment and other loans		-		-		-		-		-		5,370		5,370
Total loans	$	27,746	$	1,788	$	787	$	80,324	$	110,645	$	9,114,152	$	9,224,797

	December 31, 2014
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Non-accrual Loans		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Type of Loans:	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	11,595	$	1,238	$	-	$	6,983	$	19,816	$	2,362,677	$	2,382,493
Real estate construction loans		1,416		-		-		19,963		21,379		277,275		298,654
Commercial mortgage loans		17,654		3,909		-		35,606		57,169		4,429,274		4,486,443
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		5,634		732		-		7,611		13,977		1,728,961		1,742,938
Installment and other loans		60		-		-		-		60		3,492		3,552
Total loans	$	36,359	$	5,879	$	-	$	70,163	$	112,401	$	8,801,679	$	8,914,080

The determination of the amount of the allowance for credit losses for impaired loans is based on management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into consideration known relevant internal and external factors that affect collectability when determining the appropriate level for the allowance for credit losses. The nature of the process by which the Bank determines the appropriate allowance for credit losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. This allowance evaluation process is also applied to troubled debt restructurings since they are considered to be impaired loans.

A troubled debt restructuring is a formal modification of the terms of a loan when the lender, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower. The concessions may be granted in various forms, including a change in the stated interest rate, a reduction in the loan balance or accrued interest, or an extension of the maturity date that causes significant delay in payment.

TDRs on accrual status are comprised of the loans that have, pursuant to the Bank’s policy, performed under the restructured terms and have demonstrated sustained performance under the modified terms for six months before being returned to accrual status. The sustained performance considered by management pursuant to its policy includes the periods prior to the modification if the prior performance met or exceeded the modified terms. This would include cash paid by the borrower prior to the restructure to set up interest reserves.

At March 31, 2015, accruing TDRs were $100.4 million and non-accrual TDRs were $44.5 million compared to accruing TDRs of $104.3 million and non-accrual TDRs of $41.6 million at December 31, 2014. The Company allocated specific reserves of $2.1 million to accruing TDRs and $6.9 million to non-accrual TDRs at March 31, 2015, and $6.5 million to accruing TDRs and $4.9 million to non-accrual TDRs at December 31, 2014. The following tables present TDRs that were modified during the first quarter of 2015 and of 2014, their specific reserves at March 31, 2015, and 2014, and charge-offs during the first quarter of 2015 and of 2014:

	Three months ended March 31, 2015								March 31, 2015
	No. of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Charge-offs		Specific Reserve
	(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial loans		1	$	850	$	850	$	-	$	-
Commercial mortgage loans		3		8,613		8,613		-		-
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		4		1,522		1,374		148		46
Total		8	$	10,985	$	10,837	$	148	$	46

	Three months ended March 31, 2014								March 31, 2014
	No. of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Charge-offs		Specific Reserve
	(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial loans		2		8,243		8,243	$	-	$	1,035
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		2		671		671		-		36
Total		4	$	8,914	$	8,914	$	-	$	1,071

Modifications of the loan terms during the first quarter of 2015 were in the form of changes in the stated interest rate, and/or extension of maturity dates, and/or reduction in monthly payment amount. The length of time for which modifications involving a reduction of the stated interest rate or changes in payment terms that were documented ranged from seven months to two years from the modification date.

We expect that the TDRs on accruing status as of March 31, 2015, which were all performing in accordance with their restructured terms, will continue to comply with the restructured terms because of the reduced principal or interest payments on these loans. A summary of TDRs by type of concession and by type of loan, as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, is shown below:

	March 31, 2015
Accruing TDRs	Payment Deferral		Rate Reduction		Rate Reduction and Payment Deferral		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	13,108	$	1,520	$	2,094	$	16,722
Commercial mortgage loans		17,430		6,101		50,861		74,392
Residential mortgage loans		5,233		1,008		3,038		9,279
Total accruing TDRs	$	35,771	$	8,629	$	55,993	$	100,393

	March 31, 2015
Non-accrual TDRs	Payment Deferral		Forgiveness of Principal		Rate Reduction and Payment Deferral		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	2,323	$	1,144	$	-	$	3,467
Commercial mortgage loans		12,344		-		26,834		39,178
Residential mortgage loans		622		-		1,274		1,896
Total non-accrual TDRs	$	15,289	$	1,144	$	28,108	$	44,541

	December 31, 2014
Accruing TDRs	Payment Deferral		Rate Reduction		Rate Reduction and Forgiveness of Principal		Rate Reduction and Payment Deferral		Total

Commercial loans	$	11,572	$	-	$	-	$	4,934	$	16,506
Real estate construction loans		5,765		-		-		-		5,765
Commercial mortgage loans		20,543		26,694		-		26,351		73,588
Residential mortgage loans		3,316		-		410		4,771		8,497
Total accruing TDRs	$	41,196	$	26,694	$	410	$	36,056	$	104,356

	December 31, 2014
Non-accrual TDRs	Payment Deferral		Rate Reduction		Rate Reduction and Payment Deferral		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans	$	1,423	$	860	$	1,269	$	3,552
Real estate construction loans		-		-		19,462		19,462
Commercial mortgage loans		15,917		-		973		16,890
Residential mortgage loans		1,026		-		688		1,714
Total non-accrual TDRs	$	18,366	$	860	$	22,392	$	41,618

The activity within our TDRs for the periods indicated are shown below:

	Three months ended March 31,
Accruing TDRs	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	104,356		$	117,597
New restructurings		10,628			7,375
Restructured loans restored to accrual status		-			962
Charge-offs		(148	)		-
Payments		(4,254	)		(7,012	)
Restructured loans placed on nonaccrual		(10,189	)		-
Ending balance	$	100,393		$	118,922

	Three months ended March 31,
Non-accrual TDRs	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance	$	41,618		$	38,769
New restructurings		209			1,539
Restructured loans placed on nonaccrual		10,189			-
Charge-offs		(2,754	)		(4	)
Payments		(4,721	)		(1,545	)
Restructured loans restored to accrual status		-			(962	)
Ending balance	$	44,541		$	37,797

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 60 to 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms. The Company did not have any loans that were modified as TDRs during the previous twelve months and which subsequently defaulted as of March 31, 2015. However, the Company took a charge off in the amount of $598,000 on a $10.2 million commercial mortgage loan, which was modified as a TDR during the previous twelve months. As a result, the Company placed that loan on non-accrual status and the charge off taken was due to a decrease in collateral value based on an updated appraisal report.

Under the Company’s internal underwriting policy, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification in order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty.

As of March 31, 2015, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose loans had been restructured, were considered impaired, or were on non-accrual status.

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of our loan portfolio, the Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each loan. The risk rating categories can be generally described by the following grouping for non-homogeneous loans:

●

Pass/Watch – These loans range from minimal credit risk to lower than average, but still acceptable, credit risk.

●

Special Mention – Borrower is fundamentally sound and loan is currently protected but adverse trends are apparent that, if not corrected, may affect ability to repay. Primary source of loan repayment remains viable but there is increasing reliance on collateral or guarantor support.

●

Substandard – These loans are inadequately protected by current sound net worth, paying capacity, or collateral. Well-defined weaknesses exist that could jeopardize repayment of debt. Loss may not be imminent, but if weaknesses are not corrected, there is a good possibility of some loss.

●

Doubtful – The possibility of loss is extremely high, but due to identifiable and important pending events (which may strengthen the loan), a loss classification is deferred until the situation is better defined.

●

Loss – These loans are considered uncollectible and of such little value that to continue to carry the loan as an active asset is no longer warranted.

The Company had no loans held for sale as of March 31, 2015. The following tables present the loan portfolio by risk rating as of March 31, 2015, and as of December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015
	Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total

Commercial loans	$	2,314,983	$	50,083	$	67,662	$	1,822	$	2,434,550
Real estate construction loans		328,434		-		16,626		500		345,560
Commercial mortgage loans		4,375,229		123,384		154,848		9,590		4,663,051
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		1,765,727		304		10,235		-		1,776,266
Installment and other loans		5,370		-		-		-		5,370
Total gross loans	$	8,789,743	$	173,771	$	249,371	$	11,912	$	9,224,797

	December 31, 2014
	Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total

Commercial loans	$	2,260,474	$	47,619	$	72,561	$	1,839	$	2,382,493
Real estate construction loans		272,927		-		25,227		500		298,654
Commercial mortgage loans		4,213,453		105,970		167,020		-		4,486,443
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		1,733,248		-		9,690		-		1,742,938
Installment and other loans		3,552		-		-		-		3,552
Total gross loans	$	8,483,654	$	153,589	$	274,498	$	2,339	$	8,914,080

Loans held for sale	$	-	$	-	$	973	$	-	$	973

The allowance for loan losses and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments are significant estimates that can and do change based on management’s process in analyzing the loan portfolio and on management’s assumptions about specific borrowers, underlying collateral, and applicable economic and environmental conditions, among other factors.

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of March 31, 2015, and as of December 31, 2014:

			Real Estate		Commercial		Residential
	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Mortgage Loans		Installment and
	Loans		Loans		Loans		and Equity Lines		Other Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
March 31, 2015
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
Allowance	$	3,911	$	-	$	6,635	$	498	$	-	$	11,044
Balance	$	28,808	$	22,873	$	111,724	$	17,312	$	-	$	180,717

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
Allowance	$	45,794	$	23,270	$	64,683	$	11,279	$	19	$	145,045
Balance	$	2,405,742	$	322,687	$	4,551,327	$	1,758,954	$	5,370	$	9,044,080

Total allowance	$	49,705	$	23,270	$	71,318	$	11,777	$	19	$	156,089
Total balance	$	2,434,550	$	345,560	$	4,663,051	$	1,776,266	$	5,370	$	9,224,797

December 31, 2014
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
Allowance	$	1,263	$	1,077	$	8,993	$	465	$	-	$	11,798
Balance	$	23,489	$	25,728	$	109,194	$	16,108	$	-	$	174,519

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
Allowance	$	46,238	$	26,575	$	65,680	$	11,113	$	16	$	149,622
Balance	$	2,359,004	$	272,926	$	4,377,249	$	1,726,830	$	3,552	$	8,739,561

Total allowance	$	47,501	$	27,652	$	74,673	$	11,578	$	16	$	161,420
Total balance	$	2,382,493	$	298,654	$	4,486,443	$	1,742,938	$	3,552	$	8,914,080

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and March 31, 2014. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

				Real Estate			Commercial			Residential			Installment
	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Mortgage Loans			and Other
	Loans			Loans			Loans			and Equity Lines			Loans			Total
	(In thousands)

2015 Beginning Balance	$	47,501		$	27,652		$	74,673		$	11,578		$	16		$	161,420

Provision/(credit) for possible credit losses		793			(4,427	)		(1,697	)		328			3			(5,000	)

Charge-offs		(864	)		-			(3,452	)		(148	)		-			(4,464	)
Recoveries		2,275			45			1,794			19			-			4,133
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries		1,411			45			(1,658	)		(129	)		-			(331	)
March 31, 2015 Ending Balance	$	49,705		$	23,270		$	71,318		$	11,777		$	19		$	156,089
Reserve for impaired loans	$	3,911		$	-		$	6,635		$	498		$	-		$	11,044
Reserve for non-impaired loans	$	45,794		$	23,270		$	64,683		$	11,279		$	19		$	145,045
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments	$	903		$	527		$	181		$	40		$	1		$	1,652

2014 Beginning Balance	$	65,103		$	11,999		$	84,753		$	12,005		$	29		$	173,889
Provision/(credit) for possible credit losses		4,888			(1,398	)		(4,306	)		447			(2	)		(371	)
Charge-offs		(7,226	)		-			(1,698	)		(78	)		-			(9,002	)
Recoveries		2,017			25			2,577			3			-			4,622
Net (charge-offs)/recoveries		(5,209	)		25			879			(75	)		-			(4,380	)

March 31, 2014 Ending Balance	$	64,782		$	10,626		$	81,326		$	12,377		$	27		$	169,138
Reserve for impaired loans	$	4,663		$	3,129		$	6,165		$	538		$	-		$	14,495
Reserve for non-impaired loans	$	60,119		$	7,497		$	75,161		$	11,839		$	27		$	154,643
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments	$	929		$	326		$	445		$	33		$	1		$	1,734

8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various litigation concerning transactions entered into in the normal course of business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not believe that the resolution of such litigation will have a material effect upon its consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity taken as a whole. Although the Company establishes accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company does not have accruals for all legal proceedings where there is a risk of loss. In addition, amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to the Company from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, ultimate losses may be higher or lower, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued for legal loss contingencies.

In the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of loans, or through commercial or standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. These instruments represent varying degrees of exposure to risk in excess of the amounts included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The contractual or notional amount of these instruments indicates a level of activity associated with a particular class of financial instrument and is not a reflection of the level of expected losses, if any.

9. Borrowed Funds

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $400.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.89% at March 31, 2015, compared to $450.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.85% at December 31, 2014. In the first quarter of 2014, the Company prepaid securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $100.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.50% and incurred prepayment penalties of $3.4 million. As of March 31, 2015, four floating-to-fixed rate agreements totaling $200.0 million with weighted average rate of 5.0% and final maturity in January 2017 have initial floating rates for one year, with floating rates of three-month LIBOR rate minus 340 basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.89% to 5.07%. As of March, 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, four fixed rate non-callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $200.0 million with a weighted average rate of $2.78%. Final maturity for the four fixed rate non-callable securities sold under agreements is $50.0 million in August 2016, $50.0 million in July 2017, $50.0 million in June 2018, and $50.0 million in July 2018.

These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were sold. The Company may have to provide additional collateral for the repurchase agreements, as necessary. The underlying collateral pledged for the repurchase agreements consists of U.S. Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $467.5 million as of March 31, 2015, and $516.3 million as of December 31, 2014.

Borrowing from the FHLB. As of March 31, 2015, over-night borrowings from the FHLB were $460.0 million at a rate of 0.24% compared to $400.0 million at a rate of 0.27% at December 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the long-term advance from the FHLB of $25.0 million was at a rate of 1.13% and will mature in March 2018.

10. Income Taxes

Income tax expense totaled $21.4 million, or an effective tax rate of 37.3%, for the first quarter of 2015, compared to an income tax expense of $17.9 million, or an effective tax rate of 36.4%, for the same period a year ago. The effective tax rate includes the impact of the utilization of low income housing tax credits for both periods.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had income tax refunds receivable of $18.1 million. These income tax receivables are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s tax returns are open for audits by the Internal Revenue Service back to 2011 and by the California Franchise Tax Board back to 2003. The Company is under audit by the California Franchise Tax Board for the years 2003 to 2007. As the Company is presently under audit by a number of tax authorities, it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly over the next twelve months. The Company does not expect that any such changes would have a material impact on its annual effective tax rate.

11. Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820 on January 1, 2008, and determined the fair values of our financial instruments based on the following:

●

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

●

Level 2 - Observable prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; directly observable market inputs for substantially the full term of the asset and liability; market inputs that are not directly observable but are derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

●

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own judgment about the assumptions that a market participant would use.

The Company uses the following methodologies to measure the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis:

Securities Available for Sale. For certain actively traded agency preferred stocks, mutual funds, and U.S. Treasury securities, the Company measures the fair value based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets at the reporting date, a Level 1 measurement. The Company also measures securities by using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement. This category generally includes U.S. Government agency securities, state and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), commercial MBS, collateralized mortgage obligations, asset-backed securities, corporate bonds and trust preferred securities.

Warrants. The Company measures the fair value of warrants based on unobservable inputs based on assumption and management judgment, a Level 3 measurement.

Foreign Exchange Contracts. The Company measures the fair value of foreign exchange contracts based on dealer quotes on a recurring basis, a Level 2 measurement.

Interest Rate Swaps. Fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from third party models with observable market data, a Level 2 measurement.

The valuation techniques for the assets and liabilities valued on a nonrecurring basis are as follows:

Impaired Loans. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent impaired loans are recorded based on either the current appraised value of the collateral, a Level 2 measurement, or management’s judgment and estimation of value reported on older appraisals that are then adjusted based on recent market trends, a Level 3 measurement.

Goodwill. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The two-step impairment testing process, if needed, begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to the two reporting units—Commercial Lending and Retail Banking. The Company then completes “step one” of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying amount”) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step two” of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming that all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. In connection with the determination of fair value, certain data and information is utilized, including earnings forecasts at the reporting unit level for the next four years. Other key assumptions include terminal values based on future growth rates and discount rates for valuing the cash flows, which have inputs for the risk-free rate, market risk premium, and adjustments to reflect inherent risk and required market returns. Because of the significance of unobservable inputs in the valuation of goodwill impairment, goodwill subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments is classified as a Level 3 measurement.

Core Deposit Intangibles. Core deposit intangibles is initially recorded at fair value based on a valuation of the core deposits acquired and is amortized over its estimated useful life to its residual value in proportion to the economic benefits consumed. The Company assesses the recoverability of this intangible asset on a nonrecurring basis using the core deposits remaining at the assessment date and the fair value of cash flows expected to be generated from the core deposits, a Level 3 measurement.

Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired in the settlement of loans is initially recorded at fair value based on the appraised value of the property on the date of transfer, less estimated costs to sell, a Level 2 measurement. From time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments are made to other real estate owned based on the current updated appraised value of the property, also a Level 2 measurement, or management’s judgment and estimation of value reported on older appraisals that are then adjusted based on recent market trends, a Level 3 measurement.

Investments in Venture Capital. The Company periodically reviews its investments in venture capital for other-than-temporary impairment on a nonrecurring basis. Investments in venture capital were written down to their fair value based on available financial reports from venture capital partnerships and management’s judgment and estimation, a Level 3 measurement.

Equity Investments. The Company records equity investments at fair value on a nonrecurring basis based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets at the reporting date, a Level 1 measurement.

The following tables present the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

March 31, 2015	Fair Value Measurements Using						Total at
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Assets	(In thousands)

Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury securities	$	350,183	$	-	$	-	$	350,183
Mortgage-backed securities		-		760,329		-		760,329
Collateralized mortgage obligations		-		42		-		42
Corporate debt securities		-		74,511		-		74,511
Mutual funds		5,921		-		-		5,921
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		-		3,946		-		3,946
Other equity securities		-		8,750		-		8,750
Total securities available-for-sale		356,104		847,578		-		1,203,682
Warrants		-		-		21		21
Foreign exchange contracts		-		1,615		-		1,615
Total assets	$	356,104	$	849,193	$	21	$	1,205,318

Liabilities

Interest rate swaps	$	-	$	8,610	$	-	$	8,610
Foreign exchange contracts		-		4,959		-		4,959
Total liabilities	$	-	$	13,569	$	-	$	13,569

December 31, 2014	Fair Value Measurements Using						Total at
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Assets	(In thousands)

Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury securities	$	664,004	$	-	$	-	$	664,004
Mortgage-backed securities		-		544,303		-		544,303
Collateralized mortgage obligations		-		45		-		45
Corporate debt securities		-		94,472		-		94,472
Mutual funds		5,866		-		-		5,866
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		-		3,224		-		3,224
Other equity securities		-		7,021		-		7,021
Total securities available-for-sale		669,870		649,065		-		1,318,935
Warrants		-		-		27		27
Foreign exchange contracts		-		1,876		-		1,876
Total assets	$	669,870	$	650,941	$	27	$	1,320,838

Liabilities

Interest rate swaps	$	-	$	4,626	$	-	$	4,626
Foreign exchange contracts		-		5,007		-		5,007
Total liabilities	$	-	$	9,633	$	-	$	9,633

The Company measured the fair value of its warrants on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs. The fair value of warrants was $21,000 at March 31, 2015, compared to $27,000 at December 31, 2014. The fair value adjustment of warrants was included in other operating income in the first quarter of 2015. The significant unobservable inputs in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the fair value of warrants are their expected life ranging from 1 to 5 years, risk-free interest rate from 0.57% to 1.40%, and stock volatility from 10.9% to 15.0%.

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015, the following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment, the carrying value of the related individual assets as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, and the total losses/(gains) for the periods indicated:

	March 31, 2015								Total Losses
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Total at		Three Months Ended
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Assets

Impaired loans by type:
Commercial loans	$	-	$	-	$	11,749	$	11,749	$	-	$	-
Commercial mortgage loans		-		-		19,947		19,947		56		-
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		-		-		14,318		14,318		148		-
Total impaired loans		-		-		46,014		46,014		204		-
Other real estate owned (1		-		10,868		4,110		14,978		181		183
Investments in venture capital		-		-		5,371		5,371		224		111
Total assets	$	-	$	10,868	$	55,495	$	66,363	$	609	$	294

(1) Other real estate owned balance of $30.8 million in the condensed consolidated balance sheet is net of estimated disposal costs.

	December 31, 2014								Total Losses / (Gains)
	Fair Value Measurements Using						Total at		Twelve Months Ended
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(In thousands)
Assets

Impaired loans by type:
Commercial loans	$	-	$	-	$	3,774	$	3,774	$	17	$	5,731
Commercial mortgage loans		-		-		25,029		25,029		3,914		125
Construction- other		-		-		7,625		7,625		-		-
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		-		-		13,126		13,126		27		213
Total impaired loans		-		-		49,554		49,554		3,958		6,069
Other real estate owned (1		-		16,458		4,110		20,568		202		(3,134	)
Investments in venture capital		-		-		5,495		5,495		436		409
Equity investments		-		-		617		617		-		-
Total assets	$	-	$	16,458	$	59,776	$	76,234	$	4,596	$	3,344

(1) Other real estate owned balance of $31.5 million in the consolidated balance sheet is net of estimated disposal costs.

The significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs used in the fair value measurement of collateral for collateral-dependent impaired loans was primarily based on the appraised value of collateral adjusted by estimated sales cost and commissions. The Company generally obtains new appraisal reports every nine months. As the Company’s primary objective in the event of default would be to monetize the collateral to settle the outstanding balance of the loan, less marketable collateral would receive a larger discount. During the reported periods, collateral discounts ranged from 55% in the case of accounts receivable collateral to 65% in the case of inventory collateral.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of loans held for sale was primarily based on the quoted price or sale price adjusted by estimated sales cost and commissions. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of other real estate owned (“OREO”) was primarily based on the appraised value of OREO adjusted by estimated sales cost and commissions.

The Company applies estimated sales cost and commissions ranging from 3% to 6% to collateral value of impaired loans, quoted price, or loan sale price of loans held for sale, and appraised value of OREO.

12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount was assumed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value, a Level 1 measurement.

Short-term Investments. For short-term investments, the carrying amount was assumed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value, a Level 1 measurement.

Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell. The fair value of securities purchased under agreements to resell is based on dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement.

Securities. For securities, including securities held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, and for trading, fair values were based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. If a quoted market price was not available, fair value was estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes. For certain actively traded agency preferred stocks and U.S. Treasury securities, the Company measures the fair value based on quoted market prices in active exchange markets at the reporting date, a Level 1 measurement. The Company also measures securities by using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement. This category generally includes U.S. Government agency securities, state and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), commercial MBS, collateralized mortgage obligations, asset-backed securities, and corporate bonds.

Loans held for sale. The Company records loans held for sale at fair value based on quoted price from third party sources, or appraisal reports adjusted by sales commission assumptions.

Loans. Fair values were estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Each loan category was further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.

The fair value of performing loans was calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan, a Level 3 measurement.

The fair value of impaired loans was calculated based on the net realizable fair value of the collateral or the observable market price of the most recent sale or quoted price from loans held for sale. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent impaired loans are recorded based on the current appraised value of the collateral, a Level 2 measurement.

Deposit Liabilities. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits was assumed to be the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit was estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities, a Level 3 measurement.

Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase. The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is based on dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). The fair value of the advances is based on quotes from the FHLB to settle the advances, a Level 2 measurement.

Other Borrowings. This category includes borrowings from other financial institutions. The fair value of other borrowings is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk, a Level 3 measurement.

Long-term Debt. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices or dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement.

Foreign Exchange Contracts. The Company measures the fair value of foreign exchange contracts based on dealer quotes, a Level 2 measurement.

Interest Rate Swaps. Fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from third party models with observable market data, a Level 2 measurement.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments. The fair value of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees written were estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit was based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair value of off-balance-sheet financial instruments was based on the assumptions that a market participant would use, a Level 3 measurement.

Fair value was estimated in accordance with ASC Topic 825. Fair value estimates were made at specific points in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Bank’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates were based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates were subjective in nature and involved uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

The following table presents the estimated fair value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2015, and as of December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying				Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	182,159	$	182,159	$	176,830	$	176,830
Short-term investments		618,726		618,726		489,614		489,614
Securities available-for-sale		1,203,682		1,203,682		1,318,935		1,318,935
Loans held for sale		-		-		973		1,225
Loans, net		9,057,592		9,001,232		8,740,268		8,688,072
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,000		25,000		30,785		30,785
Warrants		21		21		27		27

	Notional				Notional
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Foreign exchange contracts	$	127,172	$	1,615	$	167,005	$	1,876

Financial Liabilities	Carrying				Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value

Deposits	$	9,113,250	$	9,114,489	$	8,783,460	$	8,785,342
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		400,000		422,161		450,000		473,816
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		485,000		484,983		425,000		424,974
Other borrowings		22,482		19,396		19,934		17,978
Long-term debt		119,136		60,020		119,136		59,425

	Notional				Notional
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Foreign exchange contracts	$	158,331	$	4,959	$	178,868	$	5,007
Interest rate swaps		299,497		8,610		300,480		4,626

	Notional					Notional
	Amount		Fair Value			Amount		Fair Value
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Commitments to extend credit	$	2,027,773	$	(3,740	)	$	2,071,766	$	(3,442	)
Standby letters of credit		49,585		(238	)		53,910		(243	)
Other letters of credit		50,558		(34	)		48,142		(29	)
Bill of lading guarantees		159		-			108		-

The following tables present the level in the fair value hierarchy for the estimated fair values of only financial instruments that are not already included on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014.

	March 31, 2015
	Estimated
	Fair Value
	Measurements		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	182,159	$	182,159	$	-	$	-
Short-term investments		618,726		618,726		-		-
Securities available-for-sale		1,203,682		356,104		847,578		-
Loans, net		9,001,232		-		-		9,001,232
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,000		-		25,000		-
Warrants		21		-		-		21
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		9,114,489		-		-		9,114,489
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		422,161		-		422,161		-
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		484,983		-		484,983		-
Other borrowings		19,396		-		-		19,396
Long-term debt		60,020		-		60,020		-

	December 31, 2014
	Estimated
	Fair Value
	Measurements		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	176,830	$	176,830	$	-	$	-
Short-term investments		489,614		489,614		-		-
Securities available-for-sale		1,318,935		669,870		649,065		-
Loans held-for-sale		1,225		-		-		1,225
Loans, net		8,688,072		-		-		8,688,072
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		30,785		-		30,785		-
Warrants		27		-		-		27
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		8,785,342		-		-		8,785,342
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		473,816		-		473,816		-
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		424,974		-		424,974		-
Other borrowings		17,978		-		-		17,978
Long-term debt		59,425		-		59,425		-

13. Goodwill and Goodwill Impairment

The Company’s policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or between annual assessments if a triggering event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The two-step impairment testing process, if needed, begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to our two reporting units—Commercial Lending and Retail Banking. The Company then completes “step one” of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value (or “carrying amount”) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that reporting unit is not considered impaired, and “step two” of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the “implied fair value” of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming that all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill. This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

At March 31, 2015, the Company’s market capitalization was above book value and there was no triggering event that required the Company to assess goodwill for impairment as of an interim date.

14. Financial Derivatives

It is the policy of the Company not to speculate on the future direction of interest rates. However, the Company enters into financial derivatives in order to seek mitigation of exposure to interest rate risks related to our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We believe that these transactions, when properly structured and managed, may provide a hedge against inherent interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities and against risk in specific transactions. In such instances, the Company may enter into interest rate swap contracts or other types of financial derivatives. Prior to considering any hedging activities, we seek to analyze the costs and benefits of the hedge in comparison to other viable alternative strategies. All hedges must be approved by the Bank’s Investment Committee.

The Company follows ASC Topic 815 that establishes accounting and reporting standards for financial derivatives, including certain financial derivatives embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all financial derivatives as assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and measurement of those financial derivatives at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a financial derivative is designated as a hedge and, if so, the type of hedge. Fair value is determined using third-party models with observable market data. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income and are reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction is reflected in earnings. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reflected in current earnings, together with changes in the fair value of the related hedged item if there is a highly effective correlation between changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and changes in the fair value of the underlying asset or liability that is intended to be hedged. If there is not a highly effective correlation between changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap and changes in the fair value of the underlying asset or liability that is intended to be hedged, then only the changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, Bancorp entered into five interest rate swap contracts in the notional amount of $119.1 million for a period of ten years. The objective of these interest rate swap contracts, which were designated as hedging instruments in cash flow hedges, was to hedge the quarterly interest payments on Bancorp’s $119.1 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures that had been issued to five trusts throughout the ten-year period beginning in June 2014 and ending in June 2024, from the risk of variability of these payments resulting from changes in the three-month LIBOR interest rate. Bancorp pays a weighted average fixed interest rate of 2.61% and receives a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR at a weighted average rate of 0.27%. As of March 31, 2015, the notional amount of cash flow interest rate swaps was $119.1 million and their unrealized loss of $4.0 million, net of taxes, was included in other comprehensive income. The amount of periodic net settlement of interest rate swaps included in interest expense was $703,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to zero for the same quarter a year ago.

In June 2014, the Bank entered into ten interest rate swap contracts in the notional amount of $148.1 million for various terms from four to eight years. In October 2014, the Bank entered into four additional interest rate swap contracts in the notional amount of $34.9 million. These interest rate swap contracts that are matched to individual fixed-rate commercial real estate loans in the Bank’s loan portfolio. These contracts have been designated as hedging instruments to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the underlying commercial real estate loan due to changes in interest rates. The swap contracts are structured so that the notional amounts reduce over time to match the contractual amortization of the underlying loan and allow prepayments with the same pre-payment penalty amounts as the related loan. The Bank pays a weighted average fixed rate of 4.60% and receives a variable rate at one month LIBOR rate plus a weighted average spread of 292 basis points, or at a weighted average rate of 3.10%. As of March 31, 2015, the notional amount of fair value interest rate swaps was $180.4 million and their unrealized loss of $1.7 million was included in other non-interest income. The amount of periodic net settlement of interest rate swaps reducing interest income was $683,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, the ineffective portion of these interest rate swaps was not significant.

Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with institutional derivative counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. Institutional counterparties must have a strong credit profile and be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s credit exposure on interest rate swaps is limited to the net favorable value and interest payments of all swaps by each counterparty. Credit exposure may be reduced by the amount of collateral pledged by the counterparty. Bancorp’s interest rate swaps have been assigned by the counterparties to a derivatives clearing organization and daily margin is indirectly maintained with the derivatives clearing organization. Cash posted as collateral by Bancorp related to derivative contracts totaled $11.4 million as of March 31, 2015.

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts with various counterparties to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates for foreign exchange certificates of deposit or foreign exchange contracts entered into with our clients. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of these contracts as well as the related foreign exchange certificates of deposit and foreign exchange contracts are recognized immediately in net income as a component of non-interest income. Period end gross positive fair values are recorded in other assets and gross negative fair values are recorded in other liabilities. At March 31, 2015, spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $127.2 million had a positive fair value of $1.6 million. Spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $158.3 million had a negative fair value of $5.0 million at March 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014, spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $167.0 million had a positive fair value of $1.9 million at. Spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $178.9 million had a negative fair value of $5.0 million at December 31, 2014.

15. Balance Sheet Offsetting

Certain financial instruments, including resell and repurchase agreements, securities lending arrangements and derivatives, may be eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet and/or subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The Company’s securities sold with agreements to repurchase and derivative transactions with upstream financial institution counterparties are generally executed under International Swaps and Derivative Association master agreements which include “right of set-off” provisions. In such cases there is generally a legally enforceable right to offset recognized amounts and there may be an intention to settle such amounts on a net basis. Nonetheless, the Company does not generally offset such financial instruments for financial reporting purposes.

Financial instruments that are eligible for offset in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, are presented in the following table:

							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments		Collateral Posted			Net Amount
March 31, 2015	(In thousands)

Liabilities:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	400,000	$	-	$	400,000	$	-	$	(400,000	)	$	-
Derivatives	$	8,610	$	-	$	8,610	$	-	$	(8,610	)	$	-

December 31, 2014

Liabilities:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	450,000	$	-	$	450,000	$	-	$	(450,000	)	$	-
Derivatives	$	4,626	$	-	$	4,626	$	-	$	(4,626	)	$	-

16. Stockholders’ Equity

Total equity was $1.63 billion at March 31, 2015, an increase of $31.4 million, or 2.0%, from $1.60 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to increases in net income of $36.0 million and increases in other comprehensive income of $4.9 million offset by common stock cash dividends of $8.0 million.

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and March 31, 2014, was as follows:

	Three months ended March 31, 2015									Three months ended March 31, 2014
	Pre-tax			Tax expense/ (benefit)			Net-of-tax			Pre-tax			Tax expense/ (benefit)			Net-of-tax
Beginning balance, loss, net of tax	(In thousands)
Securities available-for sale							$	(3,172	)							$	(29,729	)
Cash flow hedge derivatives								(2,397	)								-
Total							$	(5,569	)							$	(29,729	)
Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period
Securities available-for sale	$	11,213		$	4,714		$	6,499		$	19,141		$	8,047		$	11,094
Cash flow hedge derivatives		(2,740	)		(1,152	)		(1,588	)		-			-			-
Total		8,473			3,562			4,911			19,141			8,047		$	11,094
Reclassification adjustment for net losses/(gains) in net income
Securities available-for sale		21			9			12			(5,961	)		(2,506	)		(3,455	)
Cash flow hedge derivatives		-			-			-			-			-			-
Total		21			9			12			(5,961	)		(2,506	)		(3,455	)
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)
Securities available-for sale		11,234			4,723			6,511			13,180			5,541			7,639
Cash flow hedge derivatives		(2,740	)		(1,152	)		(1,588	)		-			-			-
Total	$	8,494		$	3,571		$	4,923		$	13,180		$	5,541		$	7,639
Ending balance, income/(loss), net of tax
Securities available-for sale							$	3,339								$	(22,090	)
Cash flow hedge derivatives								(3,985	)								-
Total							$	(646	)							$	(22,090	)

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion is based on the assumption that the reader has access to and has read the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and results of operations are based upon its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management of the Company considers the following to be critical accounting policies:

Accounting for the allowance for credit losses involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of net loans. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances as described in “Allowance for Credit Losses” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Accounting for investment securities involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of securities and the recognition of any “other-than-temporary” impairment to our investment securities. The judgments and assumptions used by management are described in “Investment Securities” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Accounting for income taxes involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the amount of taxes currently payable and the income tax expense recorded in the financial statements. The judgments and assumptions used by management are described in “Income Taxes” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Accounting for goodwill and goodwill impairment involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the amount of goodwill and noninterest expense recorded in the financial statements. The judgments and assumptions used by management are described in “Goodwill and Goodwill Impairment” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Highlights

●

Diluted earnings per share increased 15.4% to $0.45 per share for the first quarter of 2015 compared to $0.39 per share for the same quarter a year ago.

●

Total loans increased $309.7 million, or 3.5%, in the first quarter of 2015, to $9.2 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $8.9 billion at December 31, 2014.

Quarterly Statement of Operations Review

Net Income

Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, was $36.0 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 15.1%, compared to net income of $31.3 million for the same quarter a year ago. Diluted earnings per share available to common stockholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, was $0.45 compared to $0.39 for the same quarter a year ago due primarily to an increase in net interest income and a negative provision for credit losses in 2015.

Return on average stockholders’ equity was 8.97% and return on average assets was 1.30% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to a return on average stockholders’ equity of 8.53% and a return on average assets of 1.19% for the same quarter a year ago.

Financial Performance

	Three months ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Net income (in millions)	$	36.0		$	31.3
Net income available to common stockholders (in millions)	$	36.0		$	31.3
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.45		$	0.39
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.45		$	0.39
Return on average assets		1.30	%		1.19	%
Return on average total stockholders' equity		8.97	%		8.53	%
Efficiency ratio		45.74	%		49.44	%

Net Interest Income Before Provision for Credit Losses

Net interest income before provision for credit losses increased $5.3 million, or 6.4%, to $87.9 million during the first quarter of 2015 compared to $82.7 million during the same quarter a year ago. The increase was due primarily to the increase in loan interest income and the decrease in interest expense from securities sold under agreements to repurchase, offset by the decrease in interest income from available-for-sale securities.

The net interest margin, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, was 3.41% for the first quarter of 2015, compared to 3.36% for the fourth quarter of 2014 and 3.38% for the first quarter of 2014. The increase in the net interest margin was due to the impact from the increase in loans and the decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, offset by decreases in investment securities.

For the first quarter of 2015, the yield on average interest-earning assets was 4.08%, the cost of funds on average interest-bearing liabilities was 0.88%, and the cost of interest bearing deposits was 0.65%. In comparison, for the first quarter of 2014, the yield on average interest-earning assets was 4.14%, the cost of funds on average interest-bearing liabilities was 0.99%, and the cost of interest bearing deposits was 0.65%. The net interest spread, defined as the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of funds on average interest-bearing liabilities, increased to 3.20% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, from 3.15% for the same quarter a year ago.

The following table sets forth information concerning average interest-earning assets, average interest-bearing liabilities, and the average yields and rates paid on those assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and March 31, 2014. Average outstanding amounts included in the table are daily averages.

Interest-Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
	Three months ended March 31,
	2015								2014
				Interest		Average						Interest		Average
	Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance			Expense		Rate (1)(2)			Balance			Expense		Rate (1)(2)
Interest earning assets:
Commercial loans	$	2,443,541		$	23,297		3.87	%	$	2,260,590		$	21,312		3.82	%
Residential mortgage loans		1,753,532			20,150		4.60			1,567,706			18,470		4.71
Commercial mortgage loans		4,563,911			51,980		4.62			4,075,694			49,614		4.94
Real estate construction loans		313,635			4,654		6.02			233,245			3,310		5.76
Other loans and leases		3,558			19		2.17			19,951			26		0.53
Total loans and leases (1)		9,078,177			100,100		4.47			8,157,186			92,732		4.61
Taxable securities		1,164,032			3,774		1.31			1,581,642			7,576		1.94
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		30,271			581		7.78			25,054			450		7.28
Interest bearing deposits		169,633			479		1.15			148,241			449		1.23
Total interest-earning assets		10,442,113			104,934		4.08			9,912,123			101,207		4.14
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		194,634								136,063
Other non-earning assets		741,288								786,069
Total non-interest earning assets		935,922								922,132
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(163,452	)							(174,934	)
Deferred loan fees		(11,722	)							(13,341	)
Total assets	$	11,202,861							$	10,645,980

Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand accounts	$	798,985		$	319		0.16		$	682,765		$	273		0.16
Money market accounts		1,538,722			2,264		0.60			1,275,726			1,927		0.61
Savings accounts		532,372			190		0.14			498,390			92		0.07
Time deposits		4,304,872			8,793		0.83			4,171,061			8,400		0.82
Total interest-bearing deposits		7,174,951			11,566		0.65			6,627,942			10,692		0.65

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		403,333			3,925		3.95			707,222			6,930		3.97
Other borrowings		100,072			93		0.38			175,252			199		0.46
Long-term debt		119,136			1,424		4.85			121,136			728		2.44
Total interest-bearing liabilities		7,797,492			17,008		0.88			7,631,552			18,549		0.99
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		1,665,791								1,445,269
Other liabilities		112,241								82,954
Total equity		1,627,337								1,486,205
Total liabilities and equity	$	11,202,861							$	10,645,980
Net interest spread							3.20	%							3.15	%
Net interest income				$	87,926							$	82,658
Net interest margin							3.41	%							3.38	%

(1) Yields and amounts of interest earned include loan fees. Non-accrual loans are included in the average balance.
(2) Calculated by dividing net interest income by average outstanding interest-earning assets.

The following table summarizes the changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume and changes in interest rates:

Taxable-Equivalent Net Interest Income — Changes Due to Rate and Volume(1)
	Three months ended March 31,
	2015-2014
	Increase (Decrease) in
	Net Interest Income Due to:
(Dollars in thousands)	Changes in Volume			Changes in Rate			Total Change

Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases		10,283			(2,915	)		7,368
Taxable securities		(1,710	)		(2,092	)		(3,802	)
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		98			33			131
Deposits with other banks		63			(33	)		30
Total changes in interest income		8,734			(5,007	)		3,727

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand accounts		46			-			46
Money market accounts		389			(52	)		337
Savings accounts		7			91			98
Time deposits		272			121			393
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(2,958	)		(47	)		(3,005	)
Other borrowed funds		(74	)		(32	)		(106	)
Long-term debt		(13	)		709			696
Total changes in interest expense		(2,331	)		790			(1,541	)
Changes in net interest income	$	11,065		$	(5,797	)	$	5,268

(1)

Changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to changes due to volume and changes due to rate.

Provision for Credit Losses

Provision for credit losses was a credit of $5.0 million for the first quarter of 2015 compared to zero for the first quarter of 2014. The provision for credit losses was based on the review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2015. The provision or reversal for credit losses represents the charge against or benefit toward current earnings that is determined by management, through a credit review process, as the amount needed to establish an allowance that management believes to be sufficient to absorb credit losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio, including unfunded commitments. The following table summarizes the charge-offs and recoveries for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Charge-offs:
Commercial loans	$	864	$	283	$	7,226
Construction loans		-		4,934		-
Real estate loans (1)		3,600		4,286		1,776
Total charge-offs		4,464		9,503		9,002
Recoveries:
Commercial loans		2,275		867		2,017
Construction loans		45		2,409		25
Real estate loans (1)		1,813		449		2,580
Total recoveries		4,133		3,725		4,622
Net charge-offs	$	331	$	5,778	$	4,380

(1) Real estate loans include commercial mortgage loans, residential mortgage loans, and equity lines.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income, which includes revenues from depository service fees, letters of credit commissions, securities gains (losses), gains (losses) on loan sales, wire transfer fees, and other sources of fee income, was $8.5 million for the first quarter of 2015, a decrease of $6.1 million, or 41.3%, compared to $14.6 million for the first quarter of 2014. The decrease in non-interest income in the first quarter of 2015 was primarily due to a decrease of $6.0 million in gains on sale of securities.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense decreased $4.0 million, or 8.2%, to $44.1 million in the first quarter of 2015 compared to $48.1 million in the same quarter a year ago. The decrease in non-interest expense in the first quarter of 2015 was primarily due to a decrease of $3.4 million in costs associated with debt redemptions and a decrease of $835,000 in salaries and employee benefits. The efficiency ratio was 45.74% in the first quarter of 2015 compared to 49.44% for the same quarter a year ago.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2015 was 37.3% compared to 36.4% for the first quarter of 2014. The effective tax rate includes the impact of the utilization of low income housing tax credits for both periods.

Balance Sheet Review

Assets

Total assets were $11.9 billion at March 31, 2015, an increase of $393.2 million, or 3.4%, from $11.5 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to a $309.7 million increase in loans and a $129.1 million increase in short-term investments offset by a $115.3 million decrease in securities available-for-sale.

Investment Securities

Investment securities represented 10.1% of total assets at March 31, 2015, compared with 11.5% of total assets at December 31, 2014. The carrying value of investment securities at March 31, 2015, was $1.20 billion compared with $1.32 billion at December 31, 2014. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value and had a net unrealized gain, net of tax, of $3.3 million at March 31, 2015, compared with a net unrealized loss, net of tax, of $5.6 million at December 31, 2014.

The following tables reflect the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of investment securities as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	March 31, 2015
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	349,830	$	353	$	-	$	350,183
Mortgage-backed securities		756,758		3,904		333		760,329
Collateralized mortgage obligations		74		-		32		42
Corporate debt securities		74,946		730		1,165		74,511
Mutual funds		6,000		-		79		5,921
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		6,686		844		3,584		3,946
Other equity securities		3,628		5,125		3		8,750
Total	$	1,197,922	$	10,956	$	5,196	$	1,203,682

	December 31, 2014
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
	(In thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale
U.S. treasury securities	$	664,206	$	63	$	265	$	664,004
Mortgage-backed securities		549,296		1,393		6,386		544,303
Collateralized mortgage obligations		79		-		34		45
Corporate debt securities		94,943		776		1,247		94,472
Mutual funds		6,000		-		134		5,866
Preferred stock of government sponsored entities		6,276		681		3,733		3,224
Other equity securities		3,608		3,413		-		7,021
Total	$	1,324,408	$	6,326	$	11,799	$	1,318,935

For additional information, see Note 6 to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this report.

Loans

Gross loans, excluding loans held for sale, were $9.22 billion at March 31, 2015, an increase of $310.7 million, or 3.5%, from $8.91 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to increases of $176.6 million, or 3.9%, in commercial mortgage loans, $52.1 million, or 2.2%, in commercial loans, $46.9 million, or 15.7%, in real estate construction loans, and $30.2 million, or 1.9%, in residential mortgage loans. The following table sets forth the classification of loans by type, mix, and percentage change as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2015			% of Gross Loans			December 31, 2014			% of Gross Loans			% Change
Type of Loans	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial loans	$	2,434,550			26.4	%	$	2,382,493			26.7	%		2.2	%
Residential mortgage loans		1,600,269			17.3			1,570,059			17.6			1.9
Commercial mortgage loans		4,663,051			50.6			4,486,443			50.3			3.9
Equity lines		175,997			1.9			172,879			2.0			1.8
Real estate construction loans		345,560			3.7			298,654			3.4			15.7
Installment and other loans		5,370			0.1			3,552			0.0			51.2
Gross loans	$	9,224,797			100	%	$	8,914,080			100	%		3.5	%

Allowance for loan losses		(156,089	)					(161,420	)					(3.3	)
Unamortized deferred loan fees		(11,116	)					(12,392	)					(10.3	)

Total loans, net	$	9,057,592					$	8,740,268						3.6	%

Loans held for sale	$	-					$	973						(100%	)

Non-performing Assets

Non-performing assets include loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, non-accrual loans, and other real estate owned. The Company’s policy is to place loans on non-accrual status if interest and/or principal is past due 90 days or more, or in cases where management deems the full collection of principal and interest unlikely. After a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed and charged against current income and subsequent payments received are generally first applied towards the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Depending on the circumstances, management may elect to continue the accrual of interest on certain past due loans if partial payment is received and/or the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. The loan is generally returned to accrual status when the borrower has brought the past due principal and interest payments current and, in the opinion of management, the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make future payments of principal and interest as scheduled.

Management reviews the loan portfolio regularly for problem loans. During the ordinary course of business, management becomes aware of borrowers that may not be able to meet the contractual requirements of the loan agreements. Such loans are placed under closer supervision with consideration given to placing the loans on non-accrual status, the need for an additional allowance for loan losses, and (if appropriate) partial or full charge-off.

The ratio of non-performing assets, excluding non-accrual loans held for sale, to total assets was 0.9% at March 31, 2015, compared to 0.9% at December 31, 2014. Total non-performing assets increased $10.3 million, or 10.1%, to $111.9 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $101.6 million at December 31, 2014, primarily due to a $10.2 million, or 14.5%, increase in non-accrual loans.

As a percentage of gross loans plus OREO, our non-performing assets increased to 1.21% at March 31, 2015, from 1.14% at December 31, 2014. The non-performing portfolio loan coverage ratio, defined as the allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans, decreased to 194.5% at March 31, 2015, from 232.8% at December 31, 2014.

The following table presents the changes in non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) at March 31, 2015, compared to December 31, 2014, and to March 31, 2014:

(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			% Change			March 31, 2014			% Change
Non-performing assets
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	787		$	-			100		$	974			(19	)
Non-accrual loans:
Construction loans		17,126			19,963			(14	)		28,042			(39	)
Commercial real estate loans		43,079			35,606			21			17,042			153
Commercial loans		12,086			6,983			73			13,806			(12	)
Residential mortgage loans		8,033			7,611			6			11,498			(30	)
Total non-accrual loans:	$	80,324		$	70,163			14		$	70,388			14
Total non-performing loans		81,111			70,163			16			71,362			14
Other real estate owned		30,799			31,477			(2	)		44,853			(31	)
Total non-performing assets	$	111,910		$	101,640			10		$	116,215			(4	)
Accruing troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)	$	100,393		$	104,356			(4	)	$	118,922			(16	)
Non-accrual loans held for sale	$	-		$	973			(100	)	$	-			-

Allowance for loan losses	$	156,089		$	161,420			(3	)	$	169,138			(8	)
Allowance for off-balance sheet credit commitments		1,652			1,949			(15	)		1,734			(5	)
Allowance for credit losses	$	157,741		$	163,369			(3	)	$	170,872			(8	)

Total gross loans outstanding, at period-end (1)	$	9,224,797		$	8,914,080			3		$	8,302,282			11

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, at period-end (2)		192.44	%		230.06	%					237.01	%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans, at period-end (1)		1.69	%		1.81	%					2.04	%
Allowance for credit losses to gross loans, at period-end (1)		1.71	%		1.83	%					2.06	%

(1) Excludes loans held for sale at period-end

(2) Excludes non-accrual loans held for sale at period-end

Non-accrual Loans

At March 31, 2015, total non-accrual loans were $80.3 million, an increase of $9.9 million, or 14.1%, from $70.4 million at March 31, 2014, and an increase of $10.2 million, or 14.5% from $70.2 million at December 31, 2014. The allowance for the collateral-dependent loans is calculated based on the difference between the outstanding loan balance and the value of the collateral as determined by recent appraisals, sales contracts, or other available market price information. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans varies from loan to loan based on the collateral coverage of the loan at the time of designation as non-performing. We continue to monitor the collateral coverage, based on recent appraisals, of these loans on a quarterly basis and adjust the allowance accordingly. Non-accrual loans also include those TDRs that do not qualify for accrual status.

The following tables present the type of properties securing the non-accrual portfolio loans and the type of businesses the borrowers engaged in as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Real				Real
	Estate (1)		Commercial		Estate (1)		Commercial
	(In thousands)
Type of Collateral
Single/multi-family residence	$	9,491	$	1,143	$	9,068	$	1,184
Commercial real estate		43,426		841		48,256		903
Land		15,321		-		5,856		-
Unsecured		-		10,102		-		4,896
Total	$	68,238	$	12,086	$	63,180	$	6,983

(1) Real estate includes commercial mortgage loans, real estate construction loans, residential mortgage loans and equity lines.

	Real				Real
	Estate (1)		Commercial		Estate (1)		Commercial
	(In thousands)
Type of Business
Real estate development	$	38,008	$	841	$	35,299	$	860
Wholesale/Retail		22,579		9,403		20,658		4,078
Food/Restaurant		933		144		650		144
Import/Export		-		1,698		-		1,901
Other		6,718		-		6,573		-
Total	$	68,238	$	12,086	$	63,180	$	6,983

(1) Real estate includes commercial mortgage loans, real estate construction loans, residential mortgage loans and equity lines.

Other Real Estate Owned

At March 31, 2015, OREO totaled $30.8 million, which decreased $678,000, or 2.2%, compared to $31.5 million at December 31, 2014, and decreased $14.1 million, or 31.3%, compared to $44.9 million at March 31, 2014.

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on current circumstances and events. The assessment for impairment occurs when and while such loans are on non-accrual as a result of delinquency status of over 90 days or receipt of information indicating that full collection of principal is doubtful, or when the loan has been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. Those loans with a balance less than our defined selection criteria, generally a loan amount less than $500,000 (less than $100,000 for quarters before June 30, 2012), are treated as a homogeneous portfolio. If loans meeting the defined criteria are not collateral dependent, we measure the impairment based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. If loans meeting the defined criteria are collateral dependent, we measure the impairment by using the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral. We obtain an appraisal to determine the amount of impairment at the date that the loan becomes impaired. The appraisals are based on “as is” or bulk sale valuations. To ensure that appraised values remain current, we generally obtain an updated appraisal every twelve months from qualified independent appraisers. If the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, is less than the recorded amount of the loan, we then recognize impairment by creating or adjusting an existing valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. If an impaired loan is expected to be collected through liquidation of the collateral, the amount of impairment, excluding disposal costs, which range between 3% to 6% of the fair value, depending on the size of the impaired loan, is charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Non-accrual impaired loans, including TDRs, are not returned to accrual status unless the unpaid interest has been brought current and full repayment of the recorded balance is expected or if the borrower has made six consecutive monthly payments of the scheduled amounts due, and TDRs are reviewed for continued impairment until they are no longer reported as TDRs.

At March 31, 2015, recorded investment in impaired loans totaled $180.7 million and was comprised of non-accrual loans of $80.3 million and accruing TDRs of $100.4 million. At December 31, 2014, recorded investment in impaired loans totaled $174.5 million and was comprised of non-accrual loans of $70.2 million and accruing TDRs of $104.3 million. For impaired loans, the amounts previously charged off represent 17.0% at March 31, 2015, and 17.1% at December 31, 2014, of the contractual balances for impaired loans. As of March 31, 2015, $68.2 million, or 85.0%, of the $80.3 million of non-accrual loans was secured by real estate compared to $63.2 million, or 90.1%, of the $70.2 million of non-accrual loans, excluding loans held for sale, that was secured by real estate at December 31, 2014. The Bank obtains current appraisals, sales contracts, or other available market price information which provide updated factors in evaluating potential loss.

At March 31, 2015, $11.0 million of the $156.1 million allowance for loan losses was allocated for impaired loans and $145.1 million was allocated to the general allowance. At December 31, 2014, $11.8 million of the $161.4 million allowance for loan losses was allocated for impaired loans and $149.6 million was allocated to the general allowance.

The allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans increased to 192.4% at March 31, 2015, from 230.1% at December 31, 2014, primarily due to decreases in non-accrual loans. Non-accrual loans also include those TDRs that do not qualify for accrual status.

The following table presents impaired loans and related allowance as of the dates indicated:

	Impaired Loans
	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance
	(In thousands)

With no allocated allowance
Commercial loans	$	14,176	$	13,148	$	-	$	19,479	$	18,452	$	-
Real estate construction loans		49,076		22,874		-		32,924		17,025		-
Commercial mortgage loans		93,468		85,142		-		77,474		75,172		-
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		2,496		2,496		-		2,518		2,518		-
Subtotal	$	159,216	$	123,660	$	-	$	132,395	$	113,167	$	-
With allocated allowance
Commercial loans	$	15,677	$	15,660	$	3,911	$	7,003	$	5,037	$	1,263
Real estate construction loans		-		-		-		19,006		8,703		1,077
Commercial mortgage loans		27,529		26,581		6,635		38,197		34,022		8,993
Residential mortgage loans and equity lines		15,393		14,816		498		14,019		13,590		465
Subtotal	$	58,599	$	57,057	$	11,044	$	78,225	$	61,352	$	11,798
Total impaired loans	$	217,815	$	180,717	$	11,044	$	210,620	$	174,519	$	11,798

Loan Interest Reserves

In accordance with customary banking practice, construction loans and land development loans are originated where interest on the loan is disbursed from pre-established interest reserves included in the total original loan commitment. Our construction and land development loans generally include optional renewal terms after the maturity of the initial loan term. New appraisals are obtained prior to extension or renewal of these loans in part to determine the appropriate interest reserve to be established for the new loan term. Loans with interest reserves are underwritten to the same criteria, including loan to value and, if applicable, pro forma debt service coverage ratios, as loans without interest reserves. Construction loans with interest reserves are monitored on a periodic basis to gauge progress towards completion. Interest reserves are frozen if it is determined that additional draws would result in a loan to value ratio that exceeds policy maximums based on collateral property type. Our policy limits in this regard are consistent with supervisory limits and range from 65% in the case of land to 85% in the case of one to four family residential construction projects.

As of March 31, 2015, construction loans of $276.9 million were disbursed with pre-established interest reserves of $39.2 million compared to $211.5 million of such loans disbursed with pre-established interest reserves of $35.6 million at December 31, 2014. The balance for construction loans with interest reserves which have been extended was $58.9 million with pre-established interest reserves of $1.6 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $55.2 million with pre-established interest reserves of $3.1 million at December 31, 2014. Land loans of $101.0 million were disbursed with pre-established interest reserves of $2.1 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $76.4 million land loans disbursed with pre-established interest reserves of $3.8 million at December 31, 2014. The balance for land loans with interest reserves which have been extended was $13.2 million with pre-established interest reserves of $170,000 at March 31, 2015, compared to $4.0 million land loans with pre-established interest reserves of $56,000 at December 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2015, the Bank had no loans on non-accrual status with available interest reserves. At March 31, 2015, $0.5 million of non-accrual residential construction loans, $31.9 million of non-accrual non-residential construction loans, and no non-accrual land loans had been originated with pre-established interest reserves. At December 31, 2014, the Bank had no loans on non-accrual status with available interest reserves. At December 31, 2014, $0.5 million of non-accrual residential construction loans, $19.5 million of non-accrual non-residential construction loans, and no non-accrual land loans had been originated with pre-established interest reserves. While loans with interest reserves are typically expected to be repaid in full according to the original contractual terms, some loans require one or more extensions beyond the original maturity. Typically, these extensions are required due to construction delays, delays in the sale or lease of property, or some combination of these two factors.

Loan Concentration

Most of the Company’s business activities are with customers located in the predominantly Asian areas of Southern and Northern California; New York City, New York; Dallas and Houston, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Edison, New Jersey; Las Vegas, Nevada, and Hong Kong. The Company has no specific industry concentration, and generally its loans are collateralized with real property or other pledged collateral of the borrowers. Loans are generally expected to be paid off from the operating profits of the borrowers, refinancing by another lender, or through sale by the borrowers of the collateral. There were no loan concentrations to multiple borrowers in similar activities which exceeded 10% of total loans as of March 31, 2015, or as of December 31, 2014.

The federal banking regulatory agencies issued final guidance on December 6, 2006, regarding risk management practices for financial institutions with high or increasing concentrations of commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans on their balance sheets. The regulatory guidance reiterates the need for sound internal risk management practices for those institutions that have experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, have notable exposure to specific types of CRE, or are approaching or exceeding the supervisory criteria used to evaluate the CRE concentration risk, but the guidance is not to be construed as a limit for CRE exposure. The supervisory criteria are: (1) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% of the institution’s total risk-based capital, and (2) both total CRE loans represent 300% or more of the institution’s total risk-based capital and the institution’s CRE loan portfolio has increased 50% or more within the last thirty-nine months. Total loans for construction, land development, and other land represented 32% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital as of March 31, 2015, and 30% as of December 31, 2014. Total CRE loans represented 263% of total risk-based capital as of March 31, 2015, and 256% as of December 31, 2014 and were below the Bank’s internal limit for CRE loans of 300% of total capital at both dates.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Bank maintains the allowance for credit losses at a level that is considered appropriate to absorb the estimated and known risks in the loan portfolio and off-balance sheet unfunded credit commitments. Allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for off-balance sheet unfunded credit commitments. With this risk management objective, the Bank’s management has an established monitoring system that is designed to identify impaired and potential problem loans, and to permit periodic evaluation of impairment and the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses in a timely manner.

In addition, the Bank’s Board of Directors has established a written credit policy that includes a credit review and control system which it believes should be effective in ensuring that the Bank maintains an appropriate allowance for credit losses. The Board of Directors provides oversight for the allowance evaluation process, including quarterly evaluations, and determines whether the allowance is appropriate to absorb losses in the credit portfolio. The determination of the amount of the allowance for credit losses and the provision for credit losses is based on management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into consideration known relevant internal and external factors that affect collectability when determining the appropriate level for the allowance for credit losses. The nature of the process by which the Bank determines the appropriate allowance for credit losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. Additions to the allowance for credit losses are made by charges to the provision for credit losses. While management utilizes its best judgment based on the information available, the ultimate appropriateness of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Bank’s control, including the performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates, and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications. Identified credit exposures that are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit losses. Recoveries of previously charged off amounts, if any, are credited to the allowance for credit losses. A weakening of the economy or other factors that adversely affect asset quality could result in an increase in the number of delinquencies, bankruptcies, or defaults, and a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and provision for credit losses in future periods.

The allowance for loan losses was $156.1 million and the allowance for off-balance sheet unfunded credit commitments was $1.7 million at March 31, 2015, which represented the amount believed by management to be appropriate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including unfunded commitments. The allowance for loan losses of $156.1 million at March 31, 2015, a decrease of $5.3 million, or 3.3%, from $161.4 million at December 31, 2014. The allowance for loan losses represented 1.69% of period-end gross loans, and 192.4% of non-performing loans at March 31, 2015. The comparable ratios were 1.81% of period-end gross loans, excluding loans held for sale, and 230.1% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2014. The following table sets forth information relating to the allowance for loan losses, charge-offs, recoveries, and the reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments for the periods indicated:

	For the three months ended
	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			December 31, 2014
Allowance for Loan Losses	(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at beginning of period	$	161,420		$	173,889		$	169,198
Reversal for credit losses		(5,000	)		-			(2,000	)
Transfers to reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments		-			(371	)		-
Charge-offs :
Commercial loans		(864	)		(7,226	)		(283	)
Construction loans		-			-			(4,934	)
Real estate loans		(3,600	)		(1,776	)		(4,286	)
Total charge-offs		(4,464	)		(9,002	)		(9,503	)
Recoveries:
Commercial loans		2,275			2,017			867
Construction loans		45			25			2,409
Real estate loans		1,813			2,580			449
Total recoveries		4,133			4,622			3,725

Balance at end of period	$	156,089		$	169,138		$	161,420
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit commitments
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,949		$	1,362		$	1,844
Provision/(reversal) for credit losses/transfers		(297	)		372			105
Balance at end of period	$	1,652		$	1,734		$	1,949

Average loans outstanding during period ended	$	9,078,177		$	8,157,186		$	8,846,861
Total gross loans outstanding, at period-end	$	9,224,797		$	8,302,282		$	8,914,080
Total non-performing loans, at period-end	$	81,111		$	71,362		$	70,163
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period		0.01	%		0.22	%		0.26	%
Provision for credit losses to average loans outstanding during the period		-0.24	%		0.02	%		-0.08	%
Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans at period-end		194.48	%		239.44	%		232.84	%
Allowance for credit losses to gross loans at period-end		1.71	%		2.06	%		1.83	%

Our allowance for loan losses consists of the following:

•

Specific allowance: For impaired loans, we provide specific allowances for loans that are not collateral dependent based on an evaluation of the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate and for loans that are collateral dependent based on the fair value of the underlying collateral determined by the most recent valuation information received, which may be adjusted based on factors such as changes in market conditions from the time of valuation. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan losses or, alternatively, a specific allocation will be established.

•

General allowance: The unclassified portfolio is segmented on a group basis. Segmentation is determined by loan type and common risk characteristics. The non-impaired loans are grouped into 19 segments: two commercial segments, ten commercial real estate segments, one residential construction segment, one non-residential construction segment, one SBA segment, one installment loans segment, one residential mortgage segment, one equity lines of credit segment, and one overdrafts segment. The allowance is provided for each segmented group based on the group’s historical loan loss experience aggregated based on loan risk classifications which take into account the current financial condition of the borrowers and guarantors, the prevailing value of the underlying collateral if collateral dependent, charge-off history, management’s knowledge of the portfolio, general economic conditions, environmental factors including the trends in delinquency and non-accrual, and other significant factors, such as the national and local economy, volume and composition of the portfolio, strength of management and loan staff, underwriting standards, and concentration of credit. In addition, management reviews reports on past-due loans to ensure appropriate classification. In the second quarter of 2010, management increased the weighting given to the most recent four quarters to 50%, and reduced the weighting of the earliest and second earliest four quarters to 10% and 15%, respectively, for pass rated loans, to place greater emphasis on losses taken by the Bank during the economic downturn. In the third quarter of 2014, management reevaluated the look-back period and restored the five year look-back period in order to capture a sufficient history of loss data. Additionally, risk factor calculations for pass rated loans included a specified loss emergence period and were determined based on the higher of the not-weighted five year average or weighted at 50.0 percent for the most recent four quarters, 25.0 percent for the next four quarters,12.5 percent for the next four quarters, 7.5% for the next four quarters and 5.0% for the next four quarters. In light of the changes above, the relevant environmental factors were reduced. These refinements maintained the Bank’s allowance at a level consistent with the prior quarter.

The table set forth below reflects management’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to the total average loans as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2015					December 31, 2014
			Percentage of					Percentage of
			Loans in Each					Loans in Each
			Category					Category
			to Average					to Average
Type of Loan:	Amount		Gross Loans			Amount		Gross Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial loans	$	49,705		26.9	%	$	47,501		27.2	%
Residential mortgage loans (1)		11,777		19.3			11,578		19.2
Commercial mortgage loans		71,318		50.3			74,673		50.2
Real estate construction loans		23,270		3.5			27,652		3.2
Installment and other loans		19		0.0			16		0.2
Total	$	156,089		100	%	$	161,420		100	%

(1) Residential mortgage loans includes equity lines.

The allowance allocated to commercial loans was $49.7 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $47.5 million at December 31, 2014. The increase is due primarily to increases during the first quarter of 2015 in specific reserves on two commercial loans.

The allowance allocated to commercial mortgage loans decreased from $74.7 million at December 31, 2014, to $71.3 million at March 31, 2015, which was due primarily to partial chargeoffs on two impaired loans against reserves established in prior quarters. The overall allowance for total commercial mortgage loans was 1.5% at March 31, 2015, and 1.7% at December 31, 2014.

The allowance allocated for construction loans decreased to $23.3 million, or 6.7%, of construction loans at March 31, 2015, compared to $27.7 million, or 9.3%, of construction loans at December 31, 2014, primarily due to the decrease in construction loans categorized as substandard.

Deposits

Total deposits were $9.11 billion at March 31, 2015, an increase of $329.8 million, or 3.8%, from $8.78 billion at December 31, 2014, primarily due to a $143.1 million, or 4.6%, increase in time deposits of $100,000 or more, a $79.0 million, or 6.8%, increase in time deposits under $100,000, and a $44.2 million, or 5.7%, increase in NOW deposits. The following table displays the deposit mix as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2015		% of Total			December 31, 2014		% of Total			% Change
Deposits	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits	$	1,691,173		18.6	%	$	1,664,914		19.0	%		1.6	%
NOW deposits		822,940		9.0			778,691		8.9			5.7
Money market deposits		1,551,453		17.0			1,538,187		17.5			0.9
Savings deposits		557,924		6.1			533,940		6.1			4.5
Time deposits under $100,000		1,241,529		13.6			1,162,547		13.2			6.8
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		3,248,231		35.7			3,105,181		35.3			4.6
Total deposits	$	9,113,250		100.0	%	$	8,783,460		100.0	%		3.8	%

Borrowings

Borrowings include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, funds obtained as advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of San Francisco, and borrowings from other financial institutions.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $400.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.89% at March 31, 2015, compared to $450.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.85% at December 31, 2014. In the first quarter of 2014, the Company prepaid securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $100.0 million with a weighted average rate of 3.50% and incurred prepayment penalties of $3.4 million. As of March 31, 2015, four floating-to-fixed rate agreements totaling $200.0 million with weighted average rate of 5.0% and final maturity in January 2017 have initial floating rates for one year, with floating rates of three-month LIBOR rate minus 340 basis points. Thereafter, the rates are fixed for the remainder of the term, with interest rates ranging from 4.89% to 5.07%. As of March, 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, four fixed rate non-callable securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $200.0 million with a weighted average rate of $2.78%. Final maturity for the four fixed rate non-callable securities sold under agreements is $50.0 million in August 2016, $50.0 million in July 2017, $50.0 million in June 2018, and $50.0 million in July 2018.

Borrowing from the FHLB. As of March 31, over-night borrowings from the FHLB were $460.0 million at a rate of 0.24% compared to $400.0 million at a rate of 0.27% at December 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the long-term advance from the FHLB of $25.0 million was at rate of 1.13% and will mature in March 2018.

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt was $119.1 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $119.1 million at December 31, 2014. Long-term debt is comprised of Junior Subordinated Notes, which qualify as Tier I capital for regulatory purposes, issued in connection with our various pooled trust preferred securities offerings.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations to make future payments as of March 31, 2015. Payments for deposits and borrowings do not include interest. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts.

	Payment Due by Period
			More than		3 years or
			1 year but		more but
	1 year		less than		less than		5 years
	or less		3 years		5 years		or more		Total
	(In thousands)

Contractual obligations:
Deposits with stated maturity dates	$	3,587,712	$	718,897	$	183,140	$	11	$	4,489,760
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1)		-		200,000		-		-		200,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (2)		-		100,000		100,000		-		200,000
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		460,000		25,000		-		-		485,000
Other borrowings		-		-		-		22,482		22,482
Long-term debt		-		-		-		119,136		119,136
Operating leases		6,827		10,359		6,203		5,556		28,945
Total contractual obligations and other commitments	$	4,054,539	$	1,054,256	$	289,343	$	147,185	$	5,545,323

(1)	These repurchase agreements have a final maturity of 10-years from origination date but are callable on a quarterly basis after one year.

(2)	These repurchase agreements are non-callable.

In the normal course of business, we enter into various transactions, which, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. We enter into these transactions to meet the financing needs of our customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Loan Commitments. We enter into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Substantially all of our commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. We minimize our exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for credit losses.

Standby Letters of Credit. Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by us to secure the obligations of a customer to a third party. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of an agreement with the third party, we would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment is funded, we would be entitled to seek reimbursement from the customer. Our policies generally require that standby letter of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.

Capital Resources

The following table summarizes changes in total equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

	Three months ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015
Net income	$	35,980
Stock issued to directors		495
Stock options exercised		88
Proceeds from shares issued through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan		1,289
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of RSUs		(114	)
Net tax short-fall from stock-based compensation expense		(4,395	)
Share-based compensation		1,075
Other comprehensive income		4,923
Cash dividends paid to common stockholders		(7,983	)
Net increase in total equity	$	31,358

Capital Adequacy Review

Management seeks to maintain the Company’s capital at a level sufficient to support future growth, protect depositors and stockholders, and comply with various regulatory requirements.

Both Bancorp’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital continued to exceed the regulatory minimum requirements under Basel III rules became effective January 1, 2015, with transitional provisions, as of March 31, 2015. In addition, the capital ratios of the Bank place it in the “well capitalized” category which is defined as institutions with a common equity tier 1 capital ratio equal to or greater than 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 8%, a total risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 10%, and a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio equal to or greater than 5%.

The following table presents Bancorp’s and the Bank’s capital and leverage ratios as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	Cathay General Bancorp								Cathay Bank
	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%

Common equtiy Tier 1 capital ( to risk-weighted assets)	$	1,317,239		13.35	n/a		n/a		$	1,392,191		14.14	n/a		n/a
Common equtiy Tier 1 capital minimum requirement		64,473		4.50	n/a		n/a			62,649		4.50	n/a		n/a
Excess	$	1,252,766		8.85	n/a		n/a		$	1,329,542		9.64	n/a		n/a

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	1,432,739		14.52	$	1,406,511		14.96	$	1,392,191		14.14	$	1,353,481		14.42
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement		85,964		6.00		56,260		4.00		83,531		6.00		54,139		4.00
Excess	$	1,346,775		8.52	$	1,350,251		10.96	$	1,308,660		8.14	$	1,299,342		10.42

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	1,557,515		15.79	$	1,524,702		16.22	$	1,515,648		15.40	$	1,471,337		15.68
Total capital minimum requirement		114,619		8.00		112,521		8.00		111,375		8.00		108,278		8.00
Excess	$	1,442,896		7.79	$	1,412,181		8.22	$	1,404,273		7.40	$	1,363,059		7.68

Tier 1 capital (to average assets) – Leverage ratio	$	1,432,739		13.16	$	1,406,511		12.99	$	1,392,191		12.83	$	1,353,481		12.52
Minimum leverage requirement		435,434		4.00		433,121		4.00		434,036		4.00		432,350		4.00
Excess	$	997,305		9.16	$	973,390		8.99	$	958,155		8.83	$	921,131		8.52

Risk-weighted assets	$	9,865,246			$	9,401,803			$	9,842,331			$	9,382,961
Total average assets (1)	$	10,885,854			$	10,828,015			$	10,850,908			$	10,808,747

(1)	The quarterly total average assets reflect all debt securities at amortized cost, equity security with readily determinable fair values at the lower of cost or fair value, and equity securities without readily determinable fair values at historical cost.

* Basel III rules became effective January 1, 2015, with transitional provisions. All prior period data is based on Basel I rules.

In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted final regulations which revised their risk-based and leverage capital requirements for banking organizations to meet requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act and to implement international agreements reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that were intended to improve both the quality and quantity of banking organizations’ capital (“Basel III”). Although many of the rules contained in these final regulations are applicable only to large, internationally active banks, some of them will apply on a phased-in basis to all banking organizations, including Bancorp and the Bank.

The following are among the new requirements that will be phased in beginning January 1, 2015:

•

An increase in the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio from 4.00%, to 6.00% of risk-weighted assets.

•

A new category and a required 4.50% of risk-weighted assets ratio is established for “common equity Tier 1” as a subset of Tier 1 capital limited to common equity.

•

A minimum non-risk-based leverage ratio is set at 4.00% eliminating a 3.00% exception for higher rated banks.

•

Changes in the permitted composition of Tier 1 capital to exclude trust preferred securities, mortgage servicing rights and certain deferred tax assets, and to include unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities.

•

A new additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk weighted assets over each of the required capital ratios that will be phased in from 2016 to 2019 must be met to avoid limitations in the ability of the Company to pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses.

•

The risk-weights of certain assets for purposes of calculating the risk-based capital ratios are changed for high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans, certain past due non-residential mortgage loans and certain mortgage-backed and other securities exposures.

•

An additional “countercyclical capital buffer” is required for larger and more complex institutions.

Dividend Policy

Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends as and when declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so. The amount of future dividends will depend on our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, and will be determined by our Board of Directors. We are subject to Federal Reserve supervisory policies, including informing and consulting with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco sufficiently in advance of any planned capital actions (i.e. increased dividend payments or stock redemptions). After prior notification to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, our Board of Directors increased the common stock dividend to $.07 per share in June 2014 and $0.10 per share in December 2014. There can be no assurance that our regulators will not object to any capital actions. The terms of our Junior Subordinated Notes also limit our ability to pay dividends.

The Company declared a cash dividend of $.10 per share on 79,823,624 shares outstanding on March 12, 2015, for distribution to holders of our common stock on March 2, 2015. Total cash dividends of $8.0 million were paid during the first quarter of 2015.

Country Risk Exposures

The Company’s total assets were $11.9 billion and total foreign country risk net exposures were $722.5 million at March 31, 2015. Total foreign country risk net exposures at March 31, 2015, were comprised primarily of $328.8 million from Hong Kong, $127.1 million from China, $65.3 million from England, $24.1 million from France, $44.3 million from Switzerland, $30.0 million from Australia, $20.0 million from the Philippines, $22.5 million from Taiwan, $26.8 million from Germany, $7.9 million from Singapore, $4.5 million from Canada, and $1.8 million from Macau. Risk is determined based on location of the borrowers, issuers, and counterparties.

All foreign country risk net exposures were to non-sovereign counterparties except $17.2 million due from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority at March 31, 2015.

Unfunded loans to foreign entities exposures were $40.5 million at March 31, 2015, and were comprised primarily of $39.8 million unfunded loans to three financial institution in China and a $720,000 unfunded loan to a borrower of Taiwan residence.

Financial Derivatives

In May 2014, the Bancorp entered into five interest rate swap contracts in the notional amount of $119.1 million for a period of ten years. The objective of these interest rate swap contracts, which were designated as hedging instruments in cash flow hedges, was to hedge the quarterly interest payments on Bancorp’s $119.1 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures that had been issued to five trusts throughout the ten-year period beginning in June 2014 and ending in June 2024, from the risk of variability of these payments resulting from changes in the three-month LIBOR interest rate. Bancorp pays a weighted average fixed interest rate of 2.61% and receives a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR at a weighted average rate of 0.27%. As of March 31, 2015, the notional amount of cash flow interest rate swaps was $119.1 million and their unrealized loss of $4.0 million, net of taxes, was included in other comprehensive income. The amount of periodic net settlement of interest rate swaps included in interest expense was $703,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to zero for the same quarter a year ago.

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts with various counterparties to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates for foreign exchange certificates of deposit or foreign exchange contracts entered into with our clients. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and are recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of these contracts as well as the related foreign exchange certificates of deposit and foreign exchange contracts are recognized immediately in net income as a component of non-interest income. Period end gross positive fair values are recorded in other assets and gross negative fair values are recorded in other liabilities. At March 31, 2015, spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $127.2 million had a positive fair value of $1.6 million. Spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $158.3 million had a negative fair value of $5.0 million at March 31, 2015. At December 31, 2014, spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $167.0 million had a positive fair value of $1.9 million. Spot, forward, and swap contracts in the total notional amount of $178.9 million had a negative fair value of $5.0 million at December 31, 2014.

Liquidity

Liquidity is our ability to maintain sufficient cash flow to meet maturing financial obligations and customer credit needs, and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they are presented in the marketplace. Our principal sources of liquidity are growth in deposits, proceeds from the maturity or sale of securities and other financial instruments, repayments from securities and loans, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and advances from the FHLB. At March 31, 2015, our liquidity ratio (defined as net cash plus short-term and marketable securities to net deposits and short-term liabilities) was 15.4% compared to 14.9% at December 31, 2014.

The Bank is a shareholder of the FHLB of San Francisco, enabling it to have access to lower cost FHLB financing when necessary. As of March 31, 2015, the Bank had an approved credit line with the FHLB totaling $3.9 billion. Advances from the FHLB were $485.0 million and standby letter of credits issued by FHLB on the Company’s behalf were $110.0 million at March 31, 2015. The Bank expects to be able to access this source of funding, if required, in the near term. The Bank has pledged a portion of its commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window under the Borrower-in-Custody program to secure these borrowings. At March 31, 2015, the borrowing capacity under the Borrower-in-Custody program was $109.8 million.

Liquidity can also be provided through the sale of liquid assets, which consist of federal funds sold, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and unpledged investment securities. At March 31, 2015, investment securities totaled $1.20 billion, with $575.5 million pledged as collateral for borrowings and other commitments. The remaining $628.2 million was available as additional liquidity or to be pledged as collateral for additional borrowings.

Approximately 79.9% of the Company’s time deposits mature within one year or less as of March 31, 2015. Management anticipates that there may be some outflow of these deposits upon maturity due to the keen competition in the Bank’s marketplace. However, based on our historical run-off experience, we expect that the outflow will be minimal and can be replenished through our normal growth in deposits. Management believes the above-mentioned sources will provide adequate liquidity to the Bank to meet its daily operating needs.

The business activities of Bancorp consist primarily of the operation of the Bank and limited activities in other investments. The Bank paid dividends to Bancorp totaling $30.0 million in 2014. The Bank did not pay dividends to Bancorp in the first quarter of 2015.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We use a net interest income simulation model to measure the extent of the differences in the behavior of the lending and funding rates to changing interest rates, so as to project future earnings or market values under alternative interest rate scenarios. Interest rate risk arises primarily through the Company’s traditional business activities of extending loans and accepting deposits. Many factors, including economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates, and consumer preferences affect the spread between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. The net interest income simulation model is designed to measure the volatility of net interest income and net portfolio value, defined as net present value of assets and liabilities, under immediate rising or falling interest rate scenarios in 100 basis point increments.

Although the modeling is very helpful in managing interest rate risk, it does require significant assumptions for the projection of loan prepayment rates on mortgage related assets, loan volumes and pricing, and deposit and borrowing volume and pricing, that might prove inaccurate. Because these assumptions are inherently uncertain, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income, or precisely predict the effect of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes, the differences between actual experience and the assumed volume, changes in market conditions, and management strategies, among other factors. The Company monitors its interest rate sensitivity and attempts to reduce the risk of a significant decrease in net interest income caused by a change in interest rates.

We have established a tolerance level in our policy to define and limit net interest income volatility to a change of plus or minus 5% when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points. When the net interest rate simulation projects that our tolerance level will be met or exceeded, we seek corrective action after considering, among other things, market conditions, customer reaction, and the estimated impact on profitability. The Company’s simulation model also projects the net economic value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities. We have established a tolerance level in our policy to limit the loss in the net economic value of our portfolio of assets and liabilities to zero when the hypothetical rate change is plus or minus 200 basis points.

The table below shows the estimated impact of changes in interest rate on net interest income and market value of equity as of March 31, 2015:

	Net Interest		Market Value
	Income		of Equity
Change in Interest Rate (Basis Points)	Volatility (1)		Volatility (2)
+200		11.4		2.0
+100		4.9		1.1
-100		-1.2		0.3
-200		-1.6		2.8

(1)	The percentage change in this column represents net interest income of the Company for 12 months in a stable interest rate environment versus the net interest income in the various rate scenarios.

(2)	The percentage change in this column represents net portfolio value of the Company in a stable interest rate environment versus the net portfolio value in the various rate scenarios.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first fiscal quarter of 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Bancorp’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cathay Bank, is a party to ordinary routine litigation from time to time incidental to various aspects of its operations. Management does not believe that any such litigation is expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There is no material change in the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, in response to Item 1A in Part I of Form 10-K.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (January 1, 2015 - January 31, 2015)		0	$	0		0		622,500
Month #2 (February 1, 2015 - February 28, 2015)		0	$	0		0		622,500
Month #3 (March 1, 2015 - March 31, 2015)		0	$	0		0		622,500
Total		0	$	0		0		622,500

For a discussion of limitations on the payment of dividends, see “Dividend Policy,” and “Liquidity” under Part I—Item 2—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

Not applicable.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

Item 6. EXHIBITS.

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 101.INS

XBRL Instance Document *

Exhibit 101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*

Exhibit 101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*

Exhibit 101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*

Exhibit 101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*

Exhibit 101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

____________________

XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information shall not be deemed to be filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise shall not be subject to liability under these sections, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Cathay General Bancorp

(Registrant)

Date: May 7, 2015

/s/ Dunson K. Cheng .

Dunson K. Cheng

Chairman, President, and

Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 7, 2015

/s/ Heng W. Chen .

Heng W. Chen

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP Reports

Also read