U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

(   ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________to _______________

0-21777
(Commission File Number)

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
(Name of registrant in its charter)

Issuer’s telephone number: (604) 921-7570

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common shares without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes (   )      No (X)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes (   )      No (X)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes (X)      No (   )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes (X)      No (   )

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (   )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer (   )           Accelerated filer (X)           Non-accelerated filer (   )           Smaller reporting company (   )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes (   )        No (X)

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter:
$92,437,373 as at June 30, 2014.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:
99,778,683 common shares as at March 16, 2015.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2015, is being filed to include information for Part III, Items 10 through 14. This amendment is being filed as the Company did not file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, on or before April 30, 2015.

PART III

All references to “$” are references to United States dollars and all references to “C$” are references to Canadian dollars. As at April 28, 2015, one Canadian dollar was equal to approximately $0.8319 in United States dollars.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table contains information regarding the members and nominees of the Board of Directors and the Executive of Golden Queen as of the Record Date:

Members of the Board of Directors hold office until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor have been duly appointed or elected and qualified. Officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

The following table sets out the names of directors of the Company, their positions and offices in the Company, principal occupations, the period of time that they have been directors of the Company, whether or not they are considered independent or non-independent, the number of shares of the Company which each beneficially owns or over which control or direction is exercised, Board/Committee membership and attendance, and other public board of directorships information:

1

2

3

The Company believes that each of the persons standing for election to the Board at the Meeting has the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that, when taken as a whole, will enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively.

Andrée St-Germain - Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. Ms. St-Germain was previously an investment banker with Dundee Capital Markets where she worked exclusively with mining companies on a variety of financings and merger and acquisition advisory assignments. She holds an International Master of Business Administration degree (Honours) from Schulich School of Business (York University).

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

During the past ten years, none of the persons currently serving as executive officers and/or directors of the Company has been the subject matter of any of the following legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K including: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two (2) years prior to that time; (b) any criminal convictions; (c) any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (d) any finding by a court or the SEC to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud; or (e) any sanction or order of any self-regulatory organization or registered entity or equivalent exchange, association or entity. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer.

Other than as disclosed herein, the Company is not aware of any claims, actions, proceedings or investigations pending against the Company, any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent (5%) of the Common Stock, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or security holder that, individually or in the aggregate, are material to the Company. Neither the Company nor its assets and properties is subject to any outstanding judgment, order, writ, injunction or decree that has had or would be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, the Company is not aware of any threatened lawsuits.

On January 31, 2014, the Center for Biological Diversity (the “Center”) filed an emergency petition (the “Petition”) with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) asking the USFWS to list the Mojave Shoulderband snail as a threatened or endangered species. Citing a report published more than 80 years ago, the Petition claims that the snail exists in only three places, and that most of the snail habitat occurs on Soledad Mountain, where the Company is developing its fully permitted mining operation, known locally as the Soledad Mountain Project.

On April 22, 2014, the Company learned that the USFWS had determined that there is no emergency to justify listing the Mohave Shoulderband snail as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS has reviewed the Petition filed by the Center and has concluded that there is no imminent threat to the snail that would cause them to believe an emergency listing is required.

Even though an emergency listing was not warranted, the USFWS is required by the Endangered Species Act to continue processing the listing petition. On April 10, 2015, the USFWS announced the commencement of a 60-day public comment period as part of its decision to study the merits of the assertions made in the Petition. As USFWS states in its notice, taking this step does not mean that a listing will be warranted at the end of the 12-month study period.

4

The Company worked with its environmental and legal advisors to prepare a detailed response to the petition, which was filed with the USFWS on March 31, 2014. The Company’s response is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com.

The Project has received all necessary regulatory approvals. The decision by USFWS to engage in a study does not affect the Project’s regulatory approvals or prevent the Project from moving forward.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) against the Building and Construction Trades Council of Kern, Inyo, and Mono Counties (the “Union”). The complaint was in response to action taken by the Union related to a 1997 project labor agreement (the “PLA”) that the Company believes is not applicable to the current Project and, in any event, unenforceable under federal labor law.

The NLRB informed the Company that the NLRB’s General Counsel had found in favor of the Company in the above matter in early October 2014. The NLRB next informed the Company that the Union had decided not to sign the Settlement Agreement offered by the NLRB. The NLRB has issued a Complaint against the Union with the NLRB in the role of prosecutor. In the case the NLRB, Region 31, will be acting as a representative of the NLRB General Counsel and will be prosecuting this unfair labor practice charge against the Union.

A Field Attorney for the NLRB reported that he had his first substantive conversation with legal counsel for the Union on December 4, 2014. The Field Attorney explored the possibility of a settlement whereby the Union would agree not to enforce the 1997 PLA. Legal counsel for the Union indicated that they were not interested in a settlement because the Unions believed that the PLA was lawful and enforceable. The Field Attorney then asked the Company’s legal counsel about the possibility of a “non-Board” settlement, meaning a settlement between the Company and the Union. Our legal counsel’s response was that we had made several attempts to settle this issue and a likelihood of a settlement at this point was low. A hearing with the NLRB originally scheduled for February 2, 2015 has now been set for June 22, 2015.

We received notice that a complaint was filed on April 22, 2015, in United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, seeking recovery, pursuant Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act of alleged short-swing trading profits. The complaint was filed by Ryan T. Darby, as plaintiff, and named Landon T. Clay, a shareholder of the Company (“Clay”), and the Company as defendants, and alleges that Mr. Clay realized short-swing profits in connection with transactions in Company securities within six month periods. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive any funds as a result of this suit. Although the Company is only a nominal defendant in this action, time and money may be required to resolve it. The Company is unable to predict the timing or outcome of this litigation. Each of Mr. Clay and the Company believes that the allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against the claims.

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DIRECTORS OR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

There are no family relationships among any of the existing directors or executive officers of Golden Queen.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) requires Golden Queen's directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Golden Queen’s securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of Golden Queen. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish Golden Queen with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of Forms 3 and 4, as amended, furnished to it during its most recent fiscal year, and Form 5, as amended, furnished to it with respect to such year, the Company believes that during the year ended December 31, 2014, its directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

5

ETHICAL BUSINESS CONDUCT

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (the “Code”) as a guideline for the oversight of the ethical conduct of management. The Company’s audit committee monitors compliance with the Code, and the Board and audit committee are responsible for granting any waivers from the Code. During the recently completed fiscal year, there was no conduct by a director or executive officer that constituted a departure from the Code and no material change report in that respect has been filed. The Company Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee considers the selection and retention of independent auditors and reviews the scope and results of the audit. In addition, it reviews the adequacy of internal accounting, financial and operating controls and reviews Golden Queen’s financial reporting compliance procedures. As of the Record Date, the members of the Audit Committee are Bryan A. Coates, Bernard Guarnera and Guy Le Bel, all independent directors. Bryan A. Coates is the Chair and the “financial expert” of the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, the Audit Committee held four (4) meetings, during which all audit committee members were present.

As part of its oversight of our financial reporting process, the directors have: (1) reviewed and discussed with management our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014; (2) received a report from BDO Canada LLP our independent auditors, on the communications pursuant to the applicable standards and discussed the same with BDO Canada LLP; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the auditors required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence; and (4) considered whether or not the provision of non-audit services by the auditors is compatible with maintaining their independence and has concluded that it is compatible at this time.

Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements should be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2015.

Submitted by the Audit Committee.
Bryan A. Coates, Chair
Bernard Guarnera, Member
Guy Le Bel, Member

6

Item 11. Executive Compensation

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation of Golden Queen’s president and chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and the chief operating officer (the “Named Executive Officers”) during the last three completed fiscal years for services rendered to Golden Queen in all capacities.

OPTION GRANTS DURING THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR

The Board approves the issuance of stock options to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. Unless otherwise provided by the Board of Directors, all vested options are exercisable for a term of five (5) years from the date of grant. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, there were no options granted to the Named Executive Officers.

AGGREGATED STOCK OPTION EXERCISES DURING THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED FISCAL
YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

There were no stock options exercised by the Named Executive Officers during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

7

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT THE MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR

The following table sets forth the information concerning all option-based awards outstanding for each of Golden Queen’s Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2014:

DIRECTORS COMPENSATION

The following table sets out the compensation provided to the members of the Board during the Company’s year ended December 31, 2014:

It is currently the policy of the Company to grant options to purchase Common Shares to its directors under the Company’s 2013 Stock Option Plan.

Other than as disclosed, there are no other arrangements under which directors of the Company were compensated by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2014 for their services in their capacity as directors and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no additional amounts are payable under any standard arrangements for committee participation or special assignments, except that the Articles of the Company provide that the directors are entitled to be paid reasonable traveling, hotel and other expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties as directors. The Company’s Articles also provide that if a director is called upon to perform any professional or other services for the Company that, in the opinion of the directors, is outside of the ordinary duties of a director, such director may be paid a remuneration to be fixed by the directors and such remuneration may be either in addition to or in substitution for any other remuneration that such director may be entitled to receive.

8

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Composition of the Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee during the year ended December 31, 2014 were Bernard Guarnera who serves as the Committee’s Chairman, Bryan A. Coates, and Guy Le Bel. Each Compensation Committee member is an independent director.

Report on Executive Compensation and Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the remuneration of the senior management of the Company, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.

The guiding philosophy of the Compensation Committee in the determination of executive compensation is ensuring that the Company is able to attract the best possible candidates for management positions, given the high level of competition for competent management in the mining industry, and to align the interests of management with those of the Company’s shareholders.

The Company’s executive compensation policies are designed to recognize and reward individual contribution, performance and level of responsibility and ensure that the compensation levels remain competitive with other precious metals development and mining companies. The key components of total compensation are base salary and incentives.

The Compensation Committee has no formal process for determining appropriate base salary ranges. Currently the Company pays compensation in the form of a base salary to its President and its Chief Financial Officer. The base salary to the President was based on a proposal from the President, which was accepted by the Company after considering his experience and expected responsibility and contribution to the Company. The base salary of the Chief Financial Officer was negotiated based on industry comparables and the Chief Financial Officer’s experience.

Stock options are granted to senior management to align the financial interests of management with the interests of shareholders of the Company and to encourage senior management to focus on strategies and results that enhance shareholder value in the longer term. The number of options to purchase Common Shares granted to each individual will depend largely on his level of responsibility and contribution to the Company’s performance.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for considering the appropriateness and effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation policies, given prevailing circumstances. Although the shareholder vote on executive compensation, which is submitted to shareholders every three (3) years, is non-binding, the Compensation Committee will review the voting results in connection with the on-going evaluation of the Company’s compensation program.

The Compensation Committee may not delegate any of its authority to other persons.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee served as an officer or employee of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (or subsequently). No current member of the Compensation Committee formerly served as an officer of the Company, and none of the current members of the Compensation Committee have entered into a transaction with the Company in which they had a direct or indirect interest that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee hereby reports to the Board that, in connection with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we have:

Submitted by the Compensation Committee.
Bernard Guarnera, Chair
Bryan A. Coates, Member
Guy Le Bel, Member

9

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets out information as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance. Subsequent to the year-end, 50,000 options have expired:

10

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

To the knowledge of the directors and officers of the Company, no person or corporation beneficially owns directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, more than 5% of the outstanding Common Shares as of April 28, 2015, except as described below:

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of April 28, 2015 by:

Except as noted below, Golden Queen believes that the beneficial owners of the Common Stock listed below, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares, except as noted in the footnote below the table.

11

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Policy regarding transactions with management and others

Pursuant to its written charter, our Audit Committee has the responsibility to review all related party transactions on an ongoing basis.

Transactions with management and others

The following is in addition to disclosure contained elsewhere herein respecting transactions involving management.

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into agreements to issue convertible debentures for aggregate proceeds of C$10,000,000 ($9,710,603). The convertible notes are unsecured and bear interest at 2% per annum, calculated on the outstanding principal balance, payable annually. The principal amounts of the notes are convertible into shares of the Company at a price of C$1.03 per share for a period of two years. If the notes are not converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then the Company may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date. The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume-weighted average price of the shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five trading days preceding the maturity date. A total of C$7,500,000 of the offering was subscribed for by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company.

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to secure a $10,000,000 loan (the “January Loan”). The January Loan is provided by members of the Clay family including $7,500,000 to be provided by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The January Loan has a twelve-month term and bears an annual interest rate of 5%, payable on the maturity date. If the January Loan is repaid on a date that is less than 183 days before the maturity date, the Company will pay the Lenders an amount of 105% of the principal amount plus interest on the principal amount at the rate of 5% per annum accrued to the date the January Loan is repaid. The January Loan was repaid in full on the maturity date from the proceeds of new loan agreements with the lenders. For more detail, see the description of the December 31, 2014 transaction below.

12

On June 9, 2014, Golden Queen announced it had entered into an agreement with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) to form a joint venture to develop and operate the Project. At the Company’s special meeting of shareholders held on September 9, 2014, the Company’s shareholders voted overwhelmingly in support of the resolution approving the Joint Venture Transaction. The Joint Venture Transaction subsequently closed on September 15, 2014. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company converted its wholly-owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Co,, Inc. that was developing the Project, into a California limited liability company; Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”). On closing of the Joint Venture Transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC in exchange for a $110 million investment. Golden Queen Mining Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of Golden Queen holds the other 50% of GQM LLC. Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family (the “Clay Group”), a shareholder group, which, at the time of the Joint Venture Transaction, collectively owned approximately 27% of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen. Gauss is owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity).

In July 2014, Golden Queen Mining Co., Inc. (the predecessor of GQM LLC) entered into an agreement for a $10,000,000 short-term loan (the “Advance”) with Leucadia and Auvergne,with the Company as guarantor. Leucadia provided $6,500,000 and Auvergne provided $3,500,000 of the Advance respectively. The Advance had an interest rate of 10.0% per annum, compounded monthly. Auvergne is managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. On closing of the Joint Venture Transaction on September 15, 2014, GQM LLC applied part of the investment of $110,000,000 to repayment of principal and accrued interest on the Advance.

On December 31, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with members of the Clay family to secure a $12,500,000 loan (the “December Loan”) including approximately $9,375,000 provided by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay. Golden Queen issued two (2) promissory notes, each due July 1, 2015, with an annual interest rate of 10.0%, payable quarterly on the first business day of each quarter. A portion of the proceeds of the December Loan was used to retire the January Loan, including principal, accrued interest and an additional charge, for an aggregate payment of approximately $11,000,000. Golden Queen paid the lenders a closing fee of $1,000,000, and the balance of the proceeds of the December Loan will be used for expenses and general corporate purposes.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

BDO Canada LLP has served as the Company’s independent auditors since November 13, 1996, and has been appointed by the Board of Directors to continue as the Company’s independent auditor for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, and until the next annual general meeting of shareholders.

The fees for services provided by BDO Canada LLP to us in each of the fiscal years ended 2013 and 2014 were as follows:

⁽¹⁾ “Audit Fees” include fees necessary to perform the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Audit Fees include fees for review of tax provisions and for accounting consultations on matters reflected in the financial statements. Audit Fees also include audit or other attest services required by legislation or regulation, such as comfort letters, consents, reviews of securities filings and statutory audits. Audit fees also include services related to the review of the Company’s quarterly financial reports. The 2014 audit fees include C$76,916 in fees related to quarterly reviews of the Company's consolidated financial statements and C$60,745 in fees related to the audit of the Company's 50%-owned subsidiary, GQM LLC. The 2013 audit fees include C$50,397 in fees related to quarterly reviews of the Company's consolidated financial statements.

⁽²⁾ “Audit-Related Fees” include services that are traditionally performed by the auditor. These audit-related services include employee benefit audits, due diligence assistance, accounting consultations on proposed transactions, internal control reviews and audit or attest services not required by legislation or regulation.

⁽³⁾ “Tax Fees” include fees for all tax services other than those included in “Audit Fees” and “Audit-Related Fees”. This category includes fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Tax planning and tax advice includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities. Included in the 2013 tax fees is a credit memo of C$30,281 issued in 2014 for invoices issued in 2013.

⁽⁴⁾ “All Other Fees” include all other non-audit services.

13

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits

14

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 6, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.