Fixed assets - Property, plant and equipment is valued at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. If the costs of certain components of an item of property, plant and equipment are significant in relation to the total cost of the item, they are accounted for and depreciated separately.   Depreciation expense is recognized using the straight-line method for the vehicle and the double declining method for all remaining assets and is amortized over the estimated useful life of the related asset. The following useful lives are assumed:

 Vehicle & Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 years

Furniture & Fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Years

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC (Accounting Standards Codification) 820-10 (SFAS No. 157), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" for financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820- 10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value:

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments as of February 28, 2015, reflect:

Federal income taxes -The Company utilizes FASB ACS 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded when, in the opinion

Page 12 of 27

of management, it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company generated a deferred tax credit through net operating loss carry-forward.  A valuation allowance of 100% has been established.

Interest and penalties on tax deficiencies recognized in accordance with ASC accounting standards are classified as income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10-50-19.

All taxes have been filed since inception and no taxes or penalties are assessed or owed.

Research and development costs - The Company expenses costs of research and development cost as incurred. Research and development costs for the sixmonths ended February 28, 2015, and February 28, 2014, was$133,695and $53,033 respectively.  

Advertising - Advertising and marketing expenses for the sixmonths ended February 28, 2015, and February 28, 2014,was $10,613and $2,776 respectively.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share - Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, for the period presented. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The Company has potentially dilutive securities outstanding consisting of warrants to purchase common stock, (see Note 9) and the conversion of convertible loans (see Note 6).  For the three months ended February 28, 2015, the warrants would not have been exercised since they are priced significantly higher than the market value of the Company’s trading common stock, while the convertible loans would likely be converted due to the discount that would be applied to the market price. As of February 28, 2015, 11,904,762possible shares under the convertible loan would be considered dilutive.  Alternatively, for the three months ended February 28, 2014,the exercise of warrants or conversions would be anti-dilutive since the Company was in a loss position, and they are not counted in the calculation of loss per share. The total common stock equivalents on a fully diluted basis if all outstanding agreements were exercised at February 28, 2015, and 2014 were 18,704,762and 7,175,879 shares, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements—Management has considered all recent accounting pronouncements.  The following pronouncement was deemed applicable to our financial statements.

In April of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property Plant, and Equipment Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update affect an entity that has a component that is disposed of or held for sale. We are evaluating the inclusion of this information should it apply in the future. This pronouncement will be adopted should it become relevant.

In June of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, “Development State Entities Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, the amendments in this Update affect entities that are development stage entities under U.S. GAAP. A development stage entity is defined in the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification as follows: An entity devoting substantially all of its efforts to establishing anew business and for which either of the following conditions exists:

a.Planned principal operations have not commenced.

b.Planned principal operations have commenced, but there has been no significant revenue therefrom.

This update applies to the Company as no significant revenue has been received, although there will be no significant impact on the financial statements since the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder

Page 13 of 27

equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. This amendment will become effective as of December 15, 2014 for the Company, after which the presentation of the financial statements will be revised as noted above.

In August of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,”Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities and will become effective as of the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will implement this Update if substantial doubt is ever raised about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued or at the date the financial statements are available to be issue when applicable.

Share based payments and awards

The company has adopted the use of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R) (now contained in FASB Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, orTopic 718), which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and its related implementation guidance and eliminates the alternative to use Opinion 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in Statement 123 as originally issued. This Statement requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instruments, which includes grants of stock options and stock warrants, based on the fair value of the award, measured at the grant date, (with limited exceptions). Under this standard, the fair value of each award is estimated on the grant date, using an option-pricing model that meets certain requirements. We use the Black- Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of our equity awards, including stock options and warrants. The Black-Scholes model meets the requirements of Topic 718; however the fair values generated may not reflect their actual fair values, as it does not consider certain factors, such as vesting requirements, employee attrition and transferability limitations. The Black-Scholes model valuation is affected by our stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. We estimate the expected volatility and estimated life of our stock options at grant date based on historical volatility; however, due to the thinly traded nature of our stock, we have chosen to use an average of the annual volatility of like companies in our industry. For the “risk-free interest rate”, we use the Constant Maturity Treasury rate on 90 day government securities. The term is equal to the time until the option expires. The dividend yield is not applicable, as the company has not paid any dividends, nor do we anticipate paying them in the foreseeable future. The fair value of our restricted stock is based on the market value of our free trading common stock, on the grant date calculated using a 20 trading day average. At the time of grant, the share based-compensation expense is recognized in our financial statements based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest using historical employee attrition rates and the expense is reduced accordingly. For the three months ended February 28, 2015, we recognized $0 in share based expense due to the issuance of common stock warrants.

Page 14 of 27

Note 2 – Going Concern

The Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has accumulated a deficit of $7,595,855as of February 28, 2015, and has no revenues.

In view of the matters described above, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance sheets is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and to succeed in its future operations. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available when needed or that such financing will be available on terms acceptable to the Company.  This would have a material adverse effect on the Company and raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Management plans to raise additional capital through the sale of stock to pursue business development activities.

Note 3 – Property and Equipment

Note 4 – Intangible Property

The Company has acquired intangible property in patents, patents pending and goodwill.  The patents are being amortized over their expected lives of not more than seventeen years.  The restrictive covenants were fully amortized as of August 31, 2013.  Those patent costs allocated to pending patents do not begin amortizing until the underlying patent is issued.  If for some reason a patent is not issued the costs associated with the acquisition and the continuation of the application are fully amortized in the year of the denial.  The balances as of  February 28, 2015, and  August 31, 2014 are as follows:

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

Rental Agreement:

On August 17, 2012, the Company leased a 10,410 square foot “industrial condominium” in Camarillo, California, for three years for monthly lease payments of $7,000 per month. There are no common area costs. All company operations are concentrated at the site.

Lease Commitments – as of February 28, 2015,remaining for the fiscal year:

Fiscal year endedAugust 31, 2015                             $  42,000

Note 8– Federal Income Taxes

No provision was made for federal income tax, since the Company has had significant net operating losses. Net operating loss carryforwards may be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2034. The availability of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more positive change in the ownership of the Company’s stock,unless the same or similar business is carried on. The net operating loss carryforward for federal and state income tax purposes was approximately $7,595,855, which will expire in 2028 through 2034 if not utilized.  The Company uses 35% for a composite tax rate to estimate the value of net operating losses for deferred taxes.

The Company incurred net income of $177,440 for the three months ended February 28, 2015. Although the company has no revenue, the net income was the result of the change in the derivative liability on convertible loans. The Company has net operating losses carried forward of approximately $7,595,855for tax purposes which will expire in 2028 through 2034, if not utilized.

No provision was made for federal income tax, since the Company had an overall net operating loss and has accumulated net operating loss carryforwards.

Although Management believes that its estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in our tax provisions. Ultimately, the actual tax

Page 17 of 27

benefits to be realized will be based upon future taxable earnings levels, which are very difficult to predict. The Company may be assessed penalties and interest related to the underpayment of income taxes.  Such assessments would be treated as a provision of income tax expense on the financial statements.  For the year ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, no income tax expense has been realized as a result of operations and no income tax penalties and interest have been accrued related to uncertain tax positions.  The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in the State of California.  These filings are subject to a three year statute of limitations.  The Company’s evaluation of income tax positions included the years ended August 31, 2014, and 2013, could be subject to agency examinations.  No filings are currently under examination.  No adjustments have been made to reduce the estimated income tax benefit at fiscal yearend or at the quarterly reporting dates.  Any valuations relating to these income tax provisions will comply with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Note 9 – Capital Stock

The Company engaged in the following stock transactions for the period beginning after August 31, 2013:

On August 16, 2013, the Company issued 151,515 shares of common stock for $19,956 at $0.132 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On September 16, 2013, the Company issued 110,375 shares of common stock for $10,000 at $0.0906 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On October 1, 2013, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock for $13,600 at $0.06800 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On October 9, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for $28,000 at $0.0560 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

Some of the following disclosures are net of wire fees and expenses.

On October 16, 2013, the Company issued 555,720 shares of common stock for $74,915 at $0.16870 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement to repay loan, interest and fees.

On November 6, 2013, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for $26,355 at $0.1056 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On November 11, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $30,819 at $0.10288 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On November 14, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $20,160 at $0.0672 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On November 18, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $32,091 at $0.1071 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On December 2, 2013, the Company issued 290,000 shares of common stock for $19,314 at $0.06660 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On December 2, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $29,619 at $0.09888 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On December 9, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $28,707 at $0.09584 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

Page 18 of 27

On January 6, 2014, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $18,180 at $0.06060 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On January 9, 2014, the Company issued 332,742 shares of common stock for $29,955 at $0.0902 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On January 21, 2014, the Company issued 349,097 shares of common stock for $29,955 at $0.0857 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On January 29, 2014, the Company issued 310,000 shares of common stock for $15,066 at $0.0486 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On February 14, 2014, the Company issued 500,741 shares of common stock for $24,336 at $0.0486 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On March 3, 2014, the Company issued 330,235 shares of common stock for $26,980 at $0.08176 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On March 28, 2014, the Company issued 577,741 shares of common stock for $49,980 at $0.0900 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On April 1, 2014, the Company issued 371,645 shares of common stock for $34,980 at $0.0942 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On April 9, 2014, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock for $37,996 at $0.0950 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On April 15, 2014, the Company issued 352,936 shares of common stock for $34,954 at $0.0992 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On April 24, 2014, the Company issued 320,000 shares of common stock for $32,277 at $0.1010 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On May 7, 2014, the Company issued 310,000 shares of common stock for $27,280 at $0.0880 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On May 23, 2014, the Company issued 310,000 shares of common stock for $25,567 at $0.0826 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On June 9, 2014, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for $20,229 at $0.06758 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On June 23, 2014, the Company issued 323,950 shares of common stock for $19,956 at $0.06174 per share pursuant to an Equity Purchase Agreement.

On May 30, 2014, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for $0.05 per share for consulting services of $25,000.

On July 7, 2014, the Company entered into a private placement agreement that involved issuing 5,000,000 units of securities at $0.05 per unit for a total amount of cash of $250,000. Each unit consisted of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and one (1) common stock purchase warrants for a total of 5,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.30 each expiring January 31, 2016.

On January 7, 2015, the Company issued 698,324 shares of common stock for $30,000 at $0.04296 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

Page 19 of 27

On January 29, 2015, the Company issued 476,190 shares of common stock for $20,000 at $0.042 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On February 11, 2015, the Company issued 714,286 shares of common stock for $30,000 at $0.042 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

On February 24, 2015, the Company issued 476,190 shares of common stock for $20,000 at $0.042 per share pursuant to a convertible note.

For the year ended August 31, 2014, the Company recognized two equity transactions in warrants which hada totalBlack-Scholes value of $27,449.

Note 10 – Warrants

A private placement of 400,000 units of securities consisted of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and two (2) common stock purchase warrants with an exercise price of $0.40 and expiring July 31, 2015.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014, the Company entered into four private placement agreements for total cash proceeds of $250,000.  The private placements of 5,000,000 units consist of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and one (1) common stock purchase warrant with an exercise price of $0.30 and expiring January 31, 2016.  The Company also issued 1,000,000 warrants to an investor in consideration of a loan for $50,000.  These warrants had an exercise price of $0.18 and expired on March 20, 2015.

During the three months ended February 28, 2015, the Company did not issue any additional warrants or other convertible securities.

The following table is a summary of information about the outstanding stock warrants as of February 28, 2015:

NOTE 11 - Contingencies, Litigation

There were no loss contingencies or legal proceedings against the Company with respect to matters arising in the ordinary course of business.

Page 20 of 27

St. George Investment Settlement:

On October 23, 2013, the Company filed a complaint against St George Investments, LLC (“St. George") in Superior Court, Ventura County California seeking declaratory relief as to contracts relating to the Company’s May, 2012 purchase of the assets of Helix Wind from St. George for treasury stock then valued in excess of $1.8 Million and a subsequent February 2013 promissory note for $275,000 executed under the terms of an amendment to the May, 2012 asset purchase agreement.  The Company alleged that the Helix Wind asset purchase price had been substantially paid and, in fact, may have been overpaid in light of St. George’s failure to deliver all of the intellectual property of Helix Wind.

On February 3, 2014, the parties participated in a mediation session at the Federal Court and executed an agreement reflecting a settlement in principal (the “Settlement”) which becomes binding only if the parties are unable to come to terms on more formal settlement agreements.  The parties have since executed more formal settlement agreements which are included as an exhibit hereto.  The basic terms of the Settlement required the issuance of an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock to St George under the Helix APA; required St. George to purchase additional shares of our common stock for $300,000 ($0.15 per share) which is a price above the market price at the time of the Settlement; fixed the amount due on the note issued to St George in connection with the Helix APA at $600,000 and granted the Company certain prepayment rights.  The Settlement provides for limitations on the amounts of our common stock that St. George may sell into the market.

As of February 28, 2015, the Company still owed St. George $500,000. See Note 14.

NOTE 12 – Correction of an Error

The Company had previously entered into debt agreements, which included original issue discounts, in delayed prepaid interest, which were not recognized as part of derivative financial instrument.  The Company also had previously acquired intangible property and had not assigned lives nor began amortization as appropriate.  

The difference in the income for the three months February 28, 2014, is an increase of $41,760, and for the six months a difference of $45,470 decrease of the net loss.  These changes represent the net corrections to derivative valuation expense and interest expense, and amortization of patent costs for these time periods.  For the six months ended, the increase of $45,470, decreased accumulated deficit and decreased current year loss by the same amount and had no effect on periods after August 31, 2014.  It had no effect upon the earnings per share for the period then ended.

NOTE 13 – Subsequent Events

Management has reviewed and evaluated subsequent events and transactions occurring after the balance sheet date, February 28, 2015, through the filing of this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q on April 14, 2015 and determined that only the following additional subsequent event has occurred:

Conversion of Settlement Debt— On March 5, 2015, the Company authorized 636,132 shares of common stock to be issued in exchange for cancellation of $25,000 of the convertible loan.  On March 19, 2015, the Company authorized 694,444 shares of common stock to be issued in exchange for cancellation of $25,000 of the convertible loan.

As of February 27, 2015, the Registrant entered into two agreements with Beaufort Capital Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability corporation (“BCPLLC”), an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “EPA”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the “RRA”).  The two agreements we filed as exhibits to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 17, 2015 and the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 Number 333-202819 and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibits.

Page 21 of 27

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

Overview

We caution you that reliance on any forward-looking statement involves risks and uncertainties, and that although we believe the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions could be incorrect.  In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not conclude that we will necessarily achieve any plans and objectives or projected financial results referred to in any of the forward-looking statements.  We do not undertake to release the results of any revisions of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.  Some of the factors that may cause actual results, developments and business decisions to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include the following:

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Six months ended February 28, 2015 v. six months ended February 28, 2014

We have not realized any revenue through February 28, 2015, however the net income reported for the six months ended February 28, 2015, includes $691,667 of Other Income and is the result of the change of Derivative Liabilities on Convertible Loan.  Our operating expenses increased to $471,121 for the six months endingFebruary 28, 2015,from $354,470for the six months endingFebruary 28, 2014, due to having proved our concept and devoting resources to calibrating our turbines to harmonize with peripheral components.Consulting expenses increasedto $73,814for the six months ended February 28, 2015,from $52,203for the six months ended February 28, 2014,.These overall increases in expenses were offset by decreases in financing costs and other non-operating expenses resulted in our net income of  $220,545 for the six months ended February 28, 2015,as compared to the net loss of $107,061for the six months ended February 28, 2014.We anticipate continued increased costs associated with increased levels of operation and our manufacturing and marketing processes which will begin in the current fiscal year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net cash flows used in operating activities for the six months ended February 28, 2015, was $420,613. There was $3,574 used in investing activities and no net cash flows used in financing activities for thesix months ended February 28, 2015. We had cash resources of $36,676 at February 28, 2015, and we intend to rely on the sale of stock in private placements to increase liquidity to enable us to execute on our plan to manufacture and market vertical axis wind turbines.  As reported on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2015, we have entered into an Equity PurchaseAgreement from which we anticipate raising substantial additional cash resources, but there can be no assurance that this will occur.

As of February 27, 2015, the Registrant entered into two agreements with Beaufort Capital Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability corporation (“BCPLLC”), an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “EPA”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the “RRA”).  The two agreements we filed as exhibits to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 17, 2015 and the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 Number 333-202819, filed on March 17, 2015, and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibits.

The agreements required the Registrant to file a registration statement for the common stock underlying the EPA. Subject to various limitations set forth in the EPA, BCPLLC, after effectiveness of such registration statement, was required to purchase up to $3,000,000 worth of the Registrant’s common stock at a price equal to 72% of the market price as determined under the EPA (prior ten trading days).  The EPA provides for volume limitations on the amount of shares that BVPLC must purchase at any time and provides that the Registrant will be paid for the common stock upon electronic delivery of the shares to BCPLLC.  BCPLLC bore the attorney fees relating to the Registration Statement and is not charging the Registrant any additional fees. The Registration Statement was filed by the Registrant on March 17, 2015.

Page 22 of 27

This is not sufficient to fund our operations and we intend to rely on the sale of stock in private placements to increase liquidity.  If we are unable to raise cash through the sale of our stock, we may be required to severely restrict our operations.  

Critical Accounting Policies

Financial Reporting Release No. 60 of the SEC encourages all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of the financial statements.There are no current revenue-generating activities that give rise to significant assumptions or estimates.  Our financial statements filed as part of our February 28, 2015, Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 3. - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is a smaller reporting company and is not required to provide this information.

Item 4T. - Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer who is also our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of February 28, 2015.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer has concluded that as of February 28, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.  Management has identified the following two material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of February 28, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1.           We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the year ending August 31, 2014, and the quarter ended February 28, 2015. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and

Page 23 of 27

procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2.           We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control.  Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible.  However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals.  Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external

purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

·

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

·

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

·

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process.  Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of the end of our most recent fiscal quarter, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments.  Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, as of February 28, 2015, such internal control over financial reporting was not effective.  This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal control over financial reporting that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on

Page 24 of 27

our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives of having segregation of the initiation of transactions, the recording of transactions and the custody of assets.  The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of February 28, 2015.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (1) and (2) above did not have an effect on our financial results.  However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only the management's report in this quarterly report.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:

We will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. First, we will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives of having separate individuals perform (i) the initiation of transactions, (ii) the recording of transactions and (iii) the custody of assets. Second, we will create a senior position to focus on financial reporting and standardizing and documenting our accounting procedures with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of the internal controls in preventing and detecting misstatements of accounting information. Third, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds areavailable to us. Although there is substantial uncertainty in any such estimate, we anticipate the costs of implementing these remediation initiatives will be approximately $50,000 to $100,000 a year in increased salaries, legal and accounting expenses.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.

We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully, implemented by August 31, 2015.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended February 28, 2015, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings

On October 23, 2013, the Company filed a complaint against St George Investments, LLC (“St. George") in Superior Court, Ventura County California seeking declaratory relief as to contracts relating to the Company’s May, 2012 purchase of the assets of Helix Wind from St. George for treasury stock then valued in excess of $1.8 Million and a subsequent February 2013 promissory note for $275,000 executed under the terms of an amendment to the May, 2012 asset purchase agreement.  The Company alleged that the Helix Wind asset purchase price had been substantially paid and, in fact, may have been overpaid in light of St. George’s failure to deliver all of the intellectual property of Helix Wind. St. George interpreted the contracts and promissory note as entitling it to a windfall recovery above and beyond the asset purchase price and promissory note amount. On November 21, 2013, St George exercised its right as a non-California based entity to remove the action from the Ventura state court to

Page 25 of 27

the federal court sitting in Los Angeles, the United States District Court for the Central District of California.  On November 26, 2013, St. George filed its answer and counterclaim seeking to enforce its interpretation of the contracts and to thereby collect approximately $440,000 above and beyond what is otherwise due, plus costs and attorney’s fees. On February 3, 2014, the parties participated in a mediation session at the Federal Court and executed an agreement reflecting a settlement in principal (the “Settlement”) which becomes binding only if the parties are unable to come to terms on more formal settlement agreements.  The parties have since executed more formal settlement agreements which are included as an exhibit hereto.  The basic terms of the Settlement required the issuance of an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock to St George under the Helix APA; required St. George to purchase an additional shares of our common stock for $300,000 ($0.15 per share) which is a price above the market price at the time of the Settlement; fixed the amount due on the note issued to St George in connection with the Helix APA at $600,000 and granted the Company certain prepayment rights.  The Settlement provides for limitations on the amounts of our common stock that St. George may sell into the market. The foregoing is a summary only and is qualified by reference to the settlement agreement included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2014.

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures  

Not applicable

Item 5 – Other Information

None.

Item 6 – Exhibits

The following documents are filed as part of this Report.

31.1*  Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

32.1*  Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS** XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

________________________

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

SIGNATURE

Page 26 of 27

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant caused this Report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SAUER ENERGY, INC.

By:    /s/Dieter R. Sauer, Jr.

Name: Dieter R. Sauer, Jr., CEO

(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)

Page 27 of 27