UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 333-136110

 

GTJ REIT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(516) 693-5500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No   x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked priced of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: N/A

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date: As of March 17, 2015, there were 13,729,228 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

1

---

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative of future operations. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “prospects,” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to:

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Although we believe the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements, and the forward-looking statements themselves, are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans, which we consider to be reasonable, will be achieved. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

GTJ REIT, Inc. (the “Company” or “GTJ REIT”) is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) which, as of the date of this report, owns and operates a total of 45 commercial properties in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. We focus primarily on the acquisition, ownership, management and operation of commercial real estate. We previously provided, through our taxable REIT subsidiaries, outdoor maintenance and shelter cleaning services, as well as electrical construction services. These operations have all been disposed.

We were incorporated on June 23, 2006 in Maryland. On March 29, 2007, the Company completed a merger transaction with Triboro Coach Corp., Jamaica Central Railways, Inc., and Green Bus Lines, Inc., (together collectively referred to as the “Bus Companies”). The effect of the merger transaction was to complete a reorganization (the “Reorganization”) of the ownership of the Bus Companies into GTJ REIT, with the former shareholders of the Bus Companies becoming stockholders in GTJ REIT. The Company then commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company, and elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, effective July 1, 2007.

On January 17, 2013, the Company closed on a transaction with Wu/Lighthouse Portfolio, LLC, in which a limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) owned and controlled by the Company, acquired all outstanding ownership interests of a portfolio consisting of 25 commercial properties (the “Acquired Properties”) located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, in exchange for 33.29% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership; the owner of all 45 properties. The acquisition was recorded as a business combination and accordingly the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value. As a result of this acquisition and the acquisition of six properties in 2014 and seven in 2015, the

2

---

 

Company currently beneficially owns a 66.71% interest in a total of 45 properties consisting of approximately 4.1 million square feet of primarily industrial properties on approximately 333 acres of land in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.

Our 2015 contractual rental income includes, after giving effect to any abatements, concessions or adjustments, rental income that is payable in 2015 under leases existing at December 31, 2014. Contractual rental income excludes straight-line rent and amortization of intangibles.

2014 Highlights and 2015 Developments

Description of Business

We intend to further expand our real estate portfolio beyond our current portfolio of 45 properties. We seek to acquire commercial real estate at favorable prices; focusing on the industrial product sector. We believe that quality tenants seek well-managed properties that offer superior and dependable services, particularly in competitive markets. We believe that a critical success factor in property acquisition lies in possessing the ability and flexibility to move quickly when an opportunity presents itself.

3

---

 

We intend to acquire fee ownership, but may also enter into joint venture arrangements. We seek to maximize current cash flows and seek long term increases in the value of our assets. Our policy is to acquire assets where we believe opportunities exist for appropriate risk adjusted investment returns. We seek to accomplish this by investing in quality properties in geographic markets that we believe to be attractive and offer the potential of current and future demand, renovating acquired properties as appropriate, maintaining and efficiently operating our properties, and establishing good relationships with our tenants and the local communities.

We intend to invest primarily in quality commercial real estate, specifically targeting industrial properties since they:

To the extent it is in the interest of our stockholders, we will seek to invest in a diversified portfolio of properties that will satisfy our primary investment objectives of providing our stockholders with stable cash flow, preservation of capital, and growth of income and principal, without taking undue risk. We anticipate that the majority of properties we acquire will have both the potential for growth in value and the ability to provide current cash distributions to stockholders.

We intend to acquire properties with financing from mortgage or other debt or may acquire properties subject to existing indebtedness. We may also acquire properties, including a portfolio of properties, in exchange for an interest in our Operating Partnership (GTJ Realty, LP). We do not intend to incur aggregate indebtedness in excess of 75% of the gross fair value of our properties. Fair value, defined as the amount at which an investment could be exchanged in a current transaction with market participants, will be determined by management, using analytical data and other available information, including independent appraisals.

Decisions relating to the purchase or sale of properties are approved by our Board of Directors (the “Board”). Our Board is responsible for monitoring the administrative procedures, investment operations, and performance of our Company to ensure our policies are carried out. Our Board oversees our investment policies to determine that our policies are in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our Business Objective

Our business objective is to maintain and increase, over time, the cash available for distribution to our stockholders and enhance stockholder value by:

Typical Property Attributes

The properties in our portfolio typically have the following attributes:

4

---

 

Considerations Related to Potential Acquisitions

The following are some of the material considerations which we evaluate in relation to potential acquisitions:

We will not acquire any property until we obtain an environmental assessment for each property and are satisfied with the environmental status of the property.

We anticipate that the purchase price of properties we acquire will vary depending on the general interest rate environment and availability of credit in addition to tenant profile, value of leases in place, property condition, size and location. We are not specifically limited in the number or size of properties we may acquire. The number and mix of properties we may acquire will depend upon existing real estate and market conditions and other relevant circumstances. Our operating costs will vary based on the amount of debt we incur in connection with financing the acquisition. It is difficult to predict the actual number or timing of properties that we will acquire because the purchase prices of properties vary widely and our investment in each will vary based on the amount and cost of debt financing we use.

Acquisition Strategies

We seek to acquire properties that have locations, demographics and other investment attributes that we believe to be attractive. We believe that long-term leases provide a predictable income stream over the term of the lease, making fluctuations in market rental rates and in real estate values less significant to achieving our overall investment objectives. Our preference is to acquire single-tenant properties that are subject to long-term net or ground leases that include periodic contractual rental increases or rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index. Periodic contractual rental increases provide reliable increases in future rent payments and rent increases based on the consumer price index provide protection against inflation. Historically, long-term leases have made it easier for us to obtain longer-term, fixed-rate mortgage financing, thereby moderating the interest rate risk. We may, however, acquire a property that is subject to a short-term lease when we believe the property represents a good opportunity for recurring income, potential repositioning and residual value. Although the acquisition of single-tenant properties subject to net and ground leases is the focus of our investment strategy, we will also consider investments in, among other things, properties that can be repositioned or redeveloped and multi-tenant properties.

Generally, we hold the properties we acquire for an extended period of time. Our investment criteria are intended to identify properties from which increased asset value and overall return can be realized from an extended period of ownership. Although our investment criteria favor an extended period of ownership, we will dispose of a property if we regard the disposition of the property as an opportunity to realize the overall value of the property sooner or to avoid future risks by achieving a determinable return from the property.

5

---

 

Our charter documents do not limit the number of properties in which we may invest, the amount or percentage of our assets that may be invested in any specific property or property type. We will continue to form entities to acquire interests in real properties, either alone or with other investors, and we may acquire interests in joint ventures or other entities that own real property.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that our investment strategy and operating model distinguish us from other owners, operators and acquirers of industrial real estate in a number of ways, including:

Our Policies With Respect to Borrowing

We presently anticipate that we will borrow funds, secured by the acquired property, as we purchase new properties. We may later refinance or increase mortgage indebtedness by obtaining additional loans secured by selected properties. Our Board reviews our aggregate borrowings to ensure that such borrowings are reasonable in relation to our assets.

We may also seek an acquisition facility to finance the purchase of additional properties, finance improvements, finance capital improvements or major repairs and maintenance and, if necessary, for working capital needs, or to meet our distribution requirements. We anticipate that aggregate borrowings, both secured and unsecured, will not exceed 75% of the gross fair value of our properties.

When incurring secured debt, we will seek to incur nonrecourse indebtedness, which means that the lenders’ rights in the event of our default generally will be limited to foreclosure on the property(ies) that secured the obligation, however, we may have to accept limited recourse financing, where we remain liable for any shortfall between the debt and the proceeds of sale of the mortgaged property. If we incur mortgage indebtedness, we will endeavor to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year, however, we acknowledge that some mortgages are likely to provide for one large payment, and therefore, we may incur floating or adjustable rate financing depending on market conditions.

Sale or Other Disposition of Our Properties

Management, with approval from our Board, determines whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of after consideration of the relevant factors, including performance or projected performance of the property and market conditions, with a view toward achieving our principal investment objectives including maximizing capital appreciation and the effect on our obligations under existing agreements.

The determination of whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic, market, property and tenant conditions, with a view to achieving maximum capital appreciation. We cannot assure you that this objective will always be realized.

Presently, we do not intend to sell any of the real estate we acquired from the Bus Companies for a period of ten years after we made our REIT election, which ends, July 2017. Under the Code, if real estate acquired from the Bus Companies is sold within such ten year period, we may be taxed on the gain from the sale, and a subsequent distribution of any of the profits would be taxed to the stockholder as a dividend. This may result in the proceeds of such sale to double taxation meaning taxation both at the corporate and stockholder level. In addition, if we sell any of the 25 properties we acquired in the January 2013 transaction described above during the next seven years, we may be required to pay the former Wu/Lighthouse partners certain monies as set forth in the Tax Protection Agreement.

6

---

 

Changes in Our Investment Objectives

Subject to the limitations in our charter, our bylaws, and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our business and policies will be controlled by our Board. Our Board has the right to establish policies concerning investments and the right, power, and obligation to monitor our procedures, investment operations, and performance of our company. Thus, stockholders must be aware that the Board, acting consistently with our organizational documents, applicable law, and their fiduciary obligations, may elect to modify our objectives and policies from time to time.

Discontinued Outdoor Maintenance Operations

We, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Shelter Express Corp., operated a group of outdoor maintenance, shelter cleaning, and electrical contracting businesses, as well as a parking garage facility. During 2011, our Board voted to divest these operations. Those operations are described below.

MetroClean

MetroClean was comprised of two major divisions, the outdoor advertising service division and the traffic control services division. On January 12, 2012, the business was sold to an unrelated third party.

Shelter Electric

On May 2, 2013, Shelter Express completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Shelter Electric to an unrelated third party. This business provided support services for MetroClean Express and electrical contracting services to other customers.

Shelter Parking

Shelter Parking formerly operated and managed parking facilities in the New York tri-state area. On February 1, 2012, we exited the parking business.

Employees

As of December 31, 2014, we had 13 employees who were employed at GTJ REIT, Inc. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Our Compliance with Governmental Regulations

Many laws and government regulations are applicable to our Company and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and the courts, occur frequently.

Costs of Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe that we are in substantial compliance with present requirements of the ADA, none of our properties have been audited, nor have investigations of our properties been conducted to determine compliance. Therefore, we may incur additional costs in connection with the ADA. There are also federal, state, and local laws which also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other legislation, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay dividends and distributions could be adversely affected.

Costs of Government Environmental Regulation and Private Litigation

Environmental laws and regulations hold us liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances which may be on our properties. These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we are responsible for the presence or release of the hazardous materials. Government investigations and remediation actions may have substantial costs and the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in personal injury or similar claims by private plaintiffs. Various laws also impose liability on persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person

7

---

 

arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. If we incur substantial costs to comply with any governmental environmental laws and regulations or the results of private litigation, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our debt obligations and pay dividends and distributions could be adversely affected.

Use of Hazardous Substances by Some of Our Tenants

Some of our tenants may handle hazardous or toxic substances and wastes on our properties as part of their routine operations. Environmental laws and regulations subject these tenants, and potentially us, to liability resulting from such activities. We require the tenants, in their respective leases, to comply with these environmental laws and regulations and to indemnify us for any related liabilities. We are unaware of any material noncompliance, liability, or claim relating to hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products in connection with any of our properties. If we incur substantial costs in order to comply with any environmental laws and regulations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our debt obligations and pay dividends and distributions could be adversely affected.  

Other Federal, State, and Local Regulations

Our properties are subject to various federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we may incur governmental fines or private damage awards. Although we believe that our properties are currently in material compliance with all of these regulatory requirements, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely affect our ability to make liquidating distributions to our stockholders. We believe, based in part on engineering reports which we generally obtain at the time we acquire the properties, that all of our properties comply in all material respects with current regulations. However, if we were required to make significant expenditures under applicable regulations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions could be adversely affected.

Our Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 60 Hempstead Avenue, Suite 718, West Hempstead, New York 11552. Our telephone number is (516) 693-5500. Our website is www.gtjreit.com. The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this report or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

How to Obtain Our SEC Filings

All reports we file with the SEC are available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the public reference room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to any of those reports that we file with the SEC are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable through our website at www.gtjreit.com. The information found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this report or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

 

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the specific factors listed below, together with the cautionary statement under the caption “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements” and the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the following significant risk factors set forth below actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results of operation could be materially adversely affected and the value of our common stock could decline and potentially affect our ability to pay dividends and distributions.

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to corporate level income tax, which would materially impact funds available for distribution.

We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT. Qualifying as a REIT requires us to meet several tests regarding the nature of our assets and income on an ongoing basis. A number of the tests established to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes are fact specific. Therefore, while we intend to qualify as a REIT, it may not be possible at this time to assess our ability to

8

---

 

satisfy these various tests on a continuing basis. Additionally, we cannot guarantee that we will in fact qualify as a REIT or remain qualified as a REIT in the future.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any year, we would be required to pay federal income tax on our net income. Our payment of income tax would substantially decrease the amount of cash available to be distributed to our stockholders. In addition, we would no longer be required to distribute substantially all of our taxable income to our stockholders. Unless our failure to qualify as a REIT is excused under relief provisions of the federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify.

We depend on key personnel and the loss of their full service could adversely affect us.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain key personnel including, but not limited to, our management team, whose continued service is not guaranteed, and each of whom would be difficult to replace. If any of our key personnel were to cease employment with us, our operating results could suffer. Our ability to retain our management group or to attract suitable replacements should any members of the management group leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key members of the management group or a limitation in their availability could adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the marketplace.

Our growth depends on external sources of capital which are outside of our control, which may affect our ability to seize strategic opportunities, satisfy debt obligations and make distributions to our stockholders.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are generally required under the Code to distribute annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any necessary acquisition financing, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may rely on third‑party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all. Any additional debt we incur will increase our leverage. Our access to third‑party sources of capital depends, in part, on general market conditions, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current debt levels, our current and expected future earnings, our cash flow and cash dividends, among other factors. If we cannot obtain capital from third‑party sources, we may not be able to acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist, meet the capital and operating needs of our existing properties or satisfy our debt service obligations. Further, in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements and maintain our REIT status and to avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short‑term basis even if the then prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These short‑term borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes or the effect of non‑deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, certain restrictions on distributions under loan documents or required debt or amortization payments. To the extent that capital is not available to acquire properties, profits may not be realized or their realization may be delayed, which could result in an earnings stream that is less predictable than some of our competitors and result in us not meeting our projected earnings and distributable cash flow levels in a particular reporting period. Failure to meet our projected earnings and distributable cash flow levels in a particular reporting period could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to forego otherwise attractive opportunities, which may delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders’ overall return.

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain tests on an ongoing basis concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, nature of our assets and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits and the value of our stockholders’ investment.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes affecting REITs that could have a negative effect on us.

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could adversely affect our stockholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. New legislation, Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

9

---

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Properties

We depend upon our tenants to pay rent in a timely manner, and their inability or unwillingness to pay rent could impact our ability to pay our indebtedness, leading to possible defaults, and reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our real property, particularly those we may purchase in the future, will be subject to varying degrees of risk that generally arise from such ownership. The underlying value of our properties and the ability to make distributions to you depend upon the ability of the tenants of our properties to generate enough income to pay their rents in a timely manner. Their inability or unwillingness to do so may be impacted by the profitability of our tenants’ businesses or other constraints on their finances. Changes beyond our control may adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make lease payments and consequently would substantially reduce our income from operations and our ability to meet our debt service requirements and make distributions to our stockholders.

A default by a tenant, the failure of a tenant’s guarantor to fulfill its obligations, or other premature termination of a lease could, depending upon the size of the leased premises and our ability to successfully find a substitute tenant, have a materially adverse effect on our revenues, the value of our common stock or our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

If we are unable to find tenants for our properties, particularly those we may purchase in the future, or find replacement tenants when leases expire and are not renewed by the tenants, our revenues, cash available for distribution to our stockholders and our ability to serve our debt obligations will be reduced.

Approximately 38% of our 2014 revenues and 41% of our 2015 contractual rental income is derived from leases with the City of New York for four locations used as bus depots, three leases with Federal Express, and one lease with Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. A tenant default or financial distress could significantly reduce our revenues.

The leases with the City of New York, Federal Express and Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. are triple net leases and provide for escalations. Any disruption or delay in these tenants’ ability to perform under the leases could cause interruptions in the receipt of, or loss of, a significant amount of rental revenues and could result in requiring us to pay operating expenses currently paid by the tenants which could substantially reduce our income from operations and our ability to meet our debt service requirements and make distributions to our stockholders.

We may not be able to diversify our real property portfolio due to the number and size of our competitors.

Competition may adversely affect acquisition of properties and leasing operations. We compete for the purchase of commercial property with a variety of investors, including domestic and foreign entities, other REITs, insurance companies and pension funds, as well as corporate and individual developers and owners of real estate, some of which are publicly traded. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial recourses than ours. In addition, our competitors may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. If our competitors prevent us from buying the properties that we have targeted for acquisition, we may not be able to meet our property acquisition goals. We may also incur costs on unsuccessful acquisitions that we will not be able to recover.

All of our properties are located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut making us vulnerable to changes in economic, regulatory or other conditions in the Northeast that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

All of our properties are located in the three states in the Northeast, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. This geographic concentration exposes us to greater risks than if we owned properties in multiple geographic regions. General economic conditions in the Northeast may significantly affect the occupancy and rental rates of our properties. Further, the economic condition of the region may also depend on a few industries and, therefore, an economic downturn in one of these industry sectors may adversely affect our performance. In addition to economic conditions, we may also be subject to changes in the region’s regulatory environment (such as increases in real estate and other taxes, costs of complying with government regulations or increased regulation and other factors) or other adverse conditions or events (such as natural disasters). Thus, adverse developments and/or conditions in the Northeast region could reduce demand for space, impact the credit-worthiness of our tenants or force our tenants to curtail operations, which could impair their ability to meet their rent obligations to us and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, and our ability to meet our debt service requirements and make distributions to our stockholders.

Lack of liquidity of real estate could make it difficult for us to sell properties within our desired time frame.

Our business is subject to risks normally associated with investment primarily in real estate. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions will be limited. We cannot

10

---

 

assure you that we will be able to dispose of a property when we want or need to. Consequently, the sale price for any property we may purchase in the future may not recoup or exceed the amount of our investment.

Our revenues and the value of our portfolio are affected by a number of factors that affect investments in leased real estate generally.

We are subject to the general risks of investing in leased real estate. These include the non-performance of lease obligations by tenants, leasehold improvements that will be costly or difficult to remove or certain upgrades that may be needed should it become necessary to re-rent the leased space for other uses, rights of termination of leases due to events of casualty or condemnation affecting the leased space or the property or due to interruption of the tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the leased premises, and obligations of a landlord to restore the leased premises or the property following events of casualty or condemnation. The occurrence of any of these events could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

In addition, if our competitors offer space at rental rates below our current rates or the market rates, we may lose current or potential tenants to other properties in our markets. Additionally, we may need to reduce rental rates below our current rates in order to retain tenants upon expiration of their leases or to attract new tenants. As a result, our results of operations, cash flow and distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected.

A number of risks to which our properties may be exposed may not be covered by insurance, which could result in losses which are uninsured.

We could suffer a loss due to the cost to repair any damage to properties that are not insured or are underinsured. There are types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses due to terrorism, wars, earthquakes, or acts of God that are either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Generally, we will not obtain insurance for hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other acts of God unless required by a lender or we determine that such insurance is necessary and may be obtained on a cost-effective basis. If such a catastrophic event were to occur, or cause the destruction of one or more of our properties, we could lose both our invested capital and anticipated profits from such property.

We may be unable to renew our current leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as our current leases expire.

We cannot assure you that leases at our properties will be renewed or that such properties will be re-leased at favorable rental rates. If the rental rates for our properties decrease, our tenants do not renew their leases or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, and space for which leases are scheduled to expire, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution to stockholders and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to renew leases or re-lease a property, the resale value of that property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend in part upon the value of the leases of such property.

Declining real estate valuations and impairment charges could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.

We review the carrying value of our properties when circumstances, such as adverse market conditions indicate potential impairment may exist. We base our review on an estimate of the future cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition. We consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If our evaluation indicates that we may be unable to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss will be recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. These losses would have a direct impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. A worsening real estate market may cause us to reevaluate the assumptions used in our impairment analysis. Impairment charges could adversely affect our financial condition.

Stockholders may not receive any distributions from the sale of one of our properties, or not receive such distributions in a timely manner, because we may have to provide financing to the purchaser of such property, resulting in an inability or delay of distributions to stockholders.

When appropriate, we may structure the sale of a real property as a “like-kind exchange” under the federal income tax laws so that we may acquire qualifying like-kind replacement property meeting our investment objectives without recognizing taxable

11

---

 

gain on the sale. Furthermore, we may reinvest in additional properties proceeds from the sale, financing, refinancing, or other disposition or, secondarily, to use such proceeds for capital improvements or maintenance and repair of existing properties or to increase our reserves for such purposes. The objective of reinvesting such portion of the sale, financing, and refinancing proceeds is to increase the total value of real estate assets that we own, and the future cash flow derived from such assets to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Despite this policy, our Board of Directors may distribute to our stockholders all or a portion of the proceeds from the sale, financing, refinancing, or other disposition of a property. In determining whether any of such proceeds should be distributed to our stockholders, our Board of Directors considers, among other factors, the desirability of properties available for purchase, real estate market conditions, and compliance with the REIT distribution requirements.

In connection with a sale of a property, our preference will be to obtain an all-cash sale price. However, we may accept a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage on the property as partial payment. The terms of payment upon sale will be affected by the salient economic and market conditions. To the extent we receive notes, securities, or other property instead of cash from sales, such proceeds, other than any interest payable on such proceeds, will not be included in net sale proceeds available for distribution until and to the extent the notes or other property are actually paid, sold, refinanced, or otherwise disposed of. Thus, the distribution of the proceeds of a sale to stockholders may need to be paid from other sources.

Our performance and value are subject to general economic conditions and risks associated with our real estate assets.

The investment returns available from equity investments in real estate depend on the amount of income earned and capital appreciation generated by the properties, as well as the expenses incurred in connection with the properties. If our properties do not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, then our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected. In addition, there are significant expenditures associated with an investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs) that generally do not decline when circumstances reduce the income from the property. Income from and the value of our properties may be adversely affected by:

In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or public perception that any of these events may occur, would result in a general decrease in rents or an increased occurrence of defaults under existing leases, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Future terrorist attacks may result in declining economic activity, which could reduce the demand for, and the value of, our properties. To the extent that future attacks impact our tenants, their businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to honor their existing leases.

12

---

 

For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties.

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.

We compete with other owners, operators and developers of real estate, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same markets and submarkets in which our properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, cash flows, cash available for distribution, trading price of our securities and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected.

A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or re‑lease, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities.

A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. In addition, certain of the properties we acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of closing. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant. We may have difficulty obtaining a new tenant for any vacant space we have in our properties. If the vacancy continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenue resulting in less cash available to be distributed to stockholders. In addition, the resale value of a property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

We may not have funding for future tenant improvements, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, and the value of our securities.

When a tenant at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend funds to construct new tenant improvements in the vacated space. Except with respect to our current reserves for capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, we cannot assure you that we will have adequate sources of funding available to us for such purposes in the future.

Bankruptcy laws will limit our remedies if a tenant becomes bankrupt and rejects the lease and we may be unable to collect balances due on our leases.

If a tenant becomes bankrupt or insolvent, that could diminish the income we receive from that tenant’s leases. Our tenants may experience downturns in their operating results due to adverse changes to their business or economic conditions, and those tenants that are highly leveraged may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency. We may not be able to evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. On the other hand, a bankruptcy court might authorize the tenant to terminate its leases with us. If that happens, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid future rent would be an unsecured prepetition claim subject to statutory limitations, and therefore such amounts received in bankruptcy are likely to be substantially less than the remaining rent we otherwise were owed under the leases. In addition, any claim we have for unpaid past rent could be substantially less than the amount owed. If the lease for such a property is rejected in bankruptcy, our revenue would be reduced and could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

Environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean‑up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, natural resources or property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean‑up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or borrow using the property as collateral. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated. A property owner who violates environmental laws may be subject to sanctions which may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be exposed to such costs. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of

13

---

 

remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms depends on factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.

Our officers and directors may have other interests which may conflict with their duties to us and our stockholders, and which may have adverse effects on the interests of us and our stockholders.

Our officers and directors may have other interests which could conflict with their duties to us and our stockholders, and which may have adverse effects on the interests of us and our stockholders. For example, certain of such persons may have interests in other real estate related ventures and may have to determine how to allocate an opportunity between us and such other ventures. Also, such persons may have to decide on whether we should purchase or dispose of real property from or to an entity with which they are related, or conduct other transactions, and if so, the terms thereof. Our officers and directors are expected to disclose, in a timely and fair manner, such instances, and we require that potential conflicts be brought to the attention of our Board of Directors and that determinations will be made by a majority of directors who have no interest in the transaction. As of this time, only three officers and directors conduct a real property business apart from his activities with us. These individuals are Paul Cooper, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Louis Sheinker, our President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary, and Director, and Jeffrey Wu, who is a member of our Board of Directors.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

The absence of a public market for our common stock will make it difficult for a stockholder to sell shares, which may have to be held for an indefinite period.

Current and prospective stockholders should understand that our common stock is illiquid, as there is currently no public market, and they must be prepared to hold their shares of common stock for an indefinite length of time. We have no current plans to cause our common stock to be listed on any securities exchange or quoted on any market system or in any established market either immediately or at any definite time in the future. While our Board of Directors may attempt to cause our common stock to be listed or quoted in the future, there can be no assurance that this event will occur. Accordingly, stockholders will find it difficult to resell their shares of common stock. Thus, our common stock should be considered a long-term investment. In addition, there are restrictions on the transfer of our common stock. In order to qualify as a REIT, our shares must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons at all times and no more than 50% of the value of our issued and outstanding shares may be owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer individuals and certain entities at all times. Our charter provides that no person may own more than 9.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Any attempted ownership of our shares that would result in a violation of one or more of these limits will result in such shares being transferred to an “excess share trust” so that such shares will be disposed of in a manner consistent with the REIT ownership requirements. In addition, any attempted transfer of our shares that would cause us to be beneficially owned by less than 100 persons will be disallowed.

Our stockholders’ interests may be diluted by issuances under our 2007 Incentive Award Plan and other common stock or preferred stock issuances, which could result in lower returns to our stockholders.

We have adopted the 2007 Incentive Award Plan, under which 1,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance, and under which we may grant stock options, restricted stock, and other performance awards to our officers, employees, consultants, and independent directors. The effect of these grants, including the subsequent exercise of stock options, could be to dilute the value of the stockholders’ investments.

In addition, our Board of Directors is authorized, without stockholder approval, to cause us to issue additional shares of our common stock, or shares of preferred stock on which it can set the terms, and to raise capital through the issuance of options,

14

---

 

warrants and other rights, on terms and for consideration as the Board of Directors in its sole discretion may determine, subject to certain restrictions in our charter in the instance of options and warrants. Any such issuance could result in dilution to stockholders. The Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, authorize us to issue common stock or other interests or our securities to persons from whom we purchase real property or other assets, as part or all of the purchase price. The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may determine the value of any common stock or other equity or debt securities issued in consideration of property or services provided, or to be provided, to us.

Real estate investments are not as liquid as other types of assets, which may reduce the economic returns we are able to provide to our stockholders.

Real estate investments are not as liquid as other types of investments, and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic, financial, investment or other conditions. In addition, significant expenditures associated with real estate investments, such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investments. In addition, we intend to comply with the safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties that can be disposed of in a year, the tax bases and the costs of improvements made to these properties, and meet other tests which enable a REIT to avoid punitive taxation on the sale of assets. Thus, our ability at any time to sell assets may be restricted. This lack of liquidity may limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic, financial, investment or other conditions and, as a result, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and our ability to pay distributions on our common stock.

Tax Risks Related to our Business and Structure

The requirement to distribute at least 90% of our taxable REIT income may require us to incur debt, sell assets, or issue additional securities for cash, which would increase the risks associated with your investment.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable REIT income, other than any capital gains. To the extent that we distribute at least 90% but less than 100% of our taxable income in a calendar year, we will incur no federal corporate income tax on our distributed net income, but will incur a federal corporate income tax on any undistributed amounts. In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount required. We intend to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders each year so that we will satisfy the distribution requirement and avoid the 4% excise tax. However, we could be required to include earnings in our taxable income before we actually receive the related cash. In the event that we don’t distribute 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to taxation at the REIT level on the amount of undistributed taxable income and to the extent we distribute such amount, you will be subject to taxation on it at the stockholder level.

We cannot assure you that we will make distributions. Our policy is to make such distributions on a quarterly basis. We will seek to minimize, to the extent possible, the fluctuations in distributions that might result if distribution payments were based solely on actual cash received during the distribution period. To implement this policy, we may use cash received during prior periods or cash received subsequent to the distribution period and prior to the payment date for such distribution payment, to pay annualized distributions consistent with the distribution level established from time to time by our Board of Directors. Our ability to maintain this policy will depend upon, among other things, the availability of cash and applicable requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that there will be cash available to pay distributions or that distributions will not fluctuate. If cash available for distribution is insufficient to pay distributions to our stockholders, we may distribute payment in the form of shares of our common stock or obtain the necessary funds by borrowing, issuing new securities, or selling assets. These methods of obtaining funds could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs.

To the extent that distributions to our stockholders are made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions would be taxable as ordinary income. To the extent that our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such amounts will constitute a return of capital to our stockholders for federal income tax purposes, to the extent of their basis in their stock, and any amount in excess of their stock basis would constitute capital gains.

If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will not be able to deduct our distributions, and our income will be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

The requirements for qualification as a REIT are complex and interpretations of the federal income tax laws governing REITs are limited. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our ability to meet various requirements concerning, among other things, the ownership of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amount of our distributions to our shareholders. If we fail to meet these requirements and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, our distributions to our shareholders will not be deductible by us and we will be subject to a corporate level tax (including

15

---

 

any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, substantially reducing our cash available to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, if we failed to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we would no longer be required to make distributions for federal income tax purposes. Incurring corporate income tax liability might cause us to borrow funds, liquidate some of our investments or take other steps that could negatively affect our operating results. Moreover, if our REIT status is terminated because of our failure to meet a REIT qualification requirement or if we voluntarily revoke our election, unless relief provisions applicable to certain REIT qualification failures apply, we would be disqualified from electing treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which REIT status is lost. We may not qualify for relief provisions for REIT qualification failures and even if we can qualify for such relief, we may be required to make penalty payments, which could be significant in amount.

We are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and furnish a report on our internal control over financial reporting.

We are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 which requires us to assess and attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Since we are defined as a smaller reporting company pursuant to Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to opine as to the adequacy of our assessment and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If any deficiencies or material weaknesses exist as a result of our assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting, our financial statements may be materially adversely affected.

Acquisition Risks

Our inability to identify or find funding for acquisitions could prevent us from diversification or growth and could adversely impact the value of an investment in us.

We may not be able to identify or obtain financing to acquire additional real properties. We are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders each year, and thus our ability to retain internally generated cash is very limited. Accordingly, our ability to acquire properties or to make capital improvements or renovate properties will depend on our available cash flow and our ability to obtain financing from third parties or the sellers of properties.

Investing in properties through joint ventures creates a risk of loss to us as a result of the possible inaction or misconduct of a joint venture partner.

We may decide to acquire certain properties using a joint venture structure. Joint venture investments may involve risks not present in a direct acquisition, including, for example:

Actions by such a co-venturer or partner might have the result of subjecting the applicable property to liabilities in excess of those otherwise contemplated and may have the effect of reducing our cash available for distribution. It also may be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership in such property.

Risks Related to Our Use of Borrowed Funds

We have incurred and plan to incur mortgage and other indebtedness, which could result in material risk to our business if there is a default, including the loss of the real property.

Borrowings by us may increase the risks of owning shares of our company. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow generated by our properties and the cash flow needed to service our indebtedness, then the amount available for distributions to our stockholders will be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in

16

---

 

default, thus reducing the value of your investment. If any mortgages or other indebtedness contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single loan could affect multiple properties.

Additionally, when providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may also contain covenants that limit our ability to further leverage the property. These or other limitations may limit our flexibility and our ability to achieve our operating plans. Our failure to meet such restrictions and covenants could result in an event of default under our line of credit and result in the foreclosure of some or all of our properties.

As we incur indebtedness which may be needed for operations, we increase expenses which could result in a decrease in cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Debt service payments decreases cash available for distribution. In the event the fair market value of our properties was to increase, we could incur more debt without a commensurate increase in cash flow to service the debt.

Prolonged disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our common stock.

Global stock and credit markets experience price volatility, dislocations, and liquidity disruptions, which cause market prices of many stocks to fluctuate, availability of debt to be curtailed and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances materially impact liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive, and, in certain cases, result in the unavailability of certain types of financing. Our profitability will be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain cost-effective financing for our investments. A prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. These events in the stock and credit markets may also make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

We have incurred and will incur indebtedness secured by our properties, which may subject our properties to foreclosure in the event of a default.

Incurring mortgage indebtedness increases the risk of possible loss. Most of our borrowings to acquire properties would be secured by mortgages on our properties. In February 2015, we refinanced a substantial portion of our real estate portfolio in the amount of approximately $233.1 million. If we default on our secured indebtedness, the lender may foreclose and we could lose our entire investment in the properties securing such loan, which would adversely affect distributions to stockholders. For federal tax purposes, any such foreclosure would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage and, if the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds the basis of the property to our company, there could be taxable income upon a foreclosure. To the extent lenders require our company to cross-collateralize our properties, or our loan agreements contain cross-default provisions, a default under a single loan agreement could subject multiple properties to foreclosure. In addition, the foreclosure of certain of our properties may trigger additional liabilities for us, such as payments which may be required pursuant to the Tax Protection Agreement.

Possible Adverse Consequences of Limits on Ownership and Transfer of our Shares

The limitation on ownership of our stock in our charter will prevent you from acquiring more than 9.9% of our common stock and may force you to sell common stock back to us.

Our charter limits the beneficial and constructive ownership of our capital stock by any single stockholder to 9.9% of the number of outstanding shares of each class or series of our stock including our common stock. We refer to these limitations as the ownership limits. Our charter also prohibits the beneficial or constructive ownership of our capital stock by any stockholder that would result in (1) our capital stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, (2) five or fewer individuals, including natural persons, private foundations, specified employee benefit plans and trusts, and charitable trusts, owning more than 50% of our capital stock, applying broad attribution rules imposed by the federal tax laws, (3) our company otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT for federal tax purposes. In addition, any attempted transfer of our capital stock that would result in the Company being beneficially owned by less than 100 persons will be disallowed.

17

---

 

Anti-takeover Provisions Related to Us

Our Stockholder Rights Agreement is designed to discourage takeover attempts without approval of our Board of Directors, which could discourage a potential takeover bid and the related payment to our stockholders.

The Stockholder Rights Agreement provides that a right is deemed to be issued and outstanding in conjunction with each outstanding share of our common stock. If any person or group, as defined in the agreement, acquires more than 15% of our outstanding common stock without the approval of our Board of Directors, each holder of a right, other than such 15% or more holder(s), will be entitled to purchase 1000^th of a share of our Series A preferred stock for $50.00 which is convertible into our common stock at one-half of the market value of our common stock, or to purchase, for each right, $50.00 of our common stock at one-half of the market value. The effect of this provision is to materially dilute the holdings of such 15% or more holders and substantially increase the cost of acquiring a controlling interest in us. These types of provisions generally inhibit tender offers or other purchases of a controlling interest in a company such as ours.

Limitations on share ownership and transfer may deter a sale of our company in which you could profit.

The limits on ownership and transfer of our equity securities in our charter may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company that might involve a premium price for your common stock. The ownership limits and restrictions on transferability will continue to apply until our Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT.

Our ability to issue preferred stock with terms fixed by the Board of Directors may include a preference in distributions superior to our common stock and also may deter or prevent a sale of our company in which a stockholder could otherwise profit.

Our ability to issue preferred stock and other securities without your approval also could deter or prevent someone from acquiring our company. Our Board of Directors may establish the preferences and rights, including a preference in distributions superior to our common stockholders, of any issued preferred stock designed to prevent, or with the effect of preventing, someone from acquiring control of our company.

Maryland anti-takeover statute restrictions may deter others from seeking to acquire our company in a transaction in which a stockholder could profit.

Maryland law contains many provisions, such as the business combination statute and the control share acquisition statute, that are designed to prevent, or have the effect of preventing, someone from acquiring control of our company without approval of our Board of Directors. Our bylaws exempt our company from the control share acquisition statute (which eliminates voting rights for certain levels of shares that could exercise control over us) and our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution opting out of the business combination statute (which prohibits a merger or consolidation of us and a 10% stockholder for a period of time) with respect to affiliates of our company. However, if the bylaw provisions exempting our company from the control share acquisition statute or the board resolution opting out of the business combination statute were repealed by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, these provisions of Maryland Law could delay or prevent offers to acquire our company and increase the difficulty of consummating any such offers.

Because of our staggered Board of Directors, opposition candidates would have to be elected in two separate years to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors, which may deter a change of control from which a stockholder could profit.

We presently have ten members of our Board of Directors. Each director has or will have a three year term, and only approximately one-third of the directors will stand for election each year. Accordingly, in order to change a majority of our Board of Directors, a third party would have to wage a successful proxy contest in two successive years, which is a situation that may deter proxy contests.

Certain provisions of our charter make stockholder action more difficult, which could deter changes beneficial to our stockholders.

We have certain provisions in our charter and bylaws that require super-majority voting and regulate the opportunity to nominate directors and to bring proposals to a vote by the stockholders.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

 

18

---

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s 38 properties as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 

Our Leases

Substantially all of our leases are net or ground leases under which the tenant, in addition to its rental obligation, typically is responsible for expenses attributable to the operation of the property, such as real estate taxes and operating costs. The tenant is also generally responsible for maintaining the property and for restoration following a casualty or partial condemnation. The tenant is typically obligated to indemnify us for claims arising from the property and is responsible for maintaining insurance coverage for the property it leases and naming us an additional insured. The Company typically evaluates a tenant’s credit quality by reviewing tenant’s financial information, rating agency reports and credit reports, when available, and other sources of information that can be

19

---

 

useful in determining a tenant’s credit worthiness and financial condition. The Company monitors the tenants’ credit worthiness and financial condition throughout the term of their leases by requiring them to provide financial and other information necessary as per the terms of their respective leases, by reviewing rating agency reports and credit reports, when available and reviewing other available sources of information.

Our typical lease provides for contractual rent increases periodically throughout the term of the lease or for rent increases pursuant to a formula based on the consumer price index. Our policy has been to acquire properties that are subject to existing long-term leases or to enter into long-term leases with our tenants. Our leases generally provide the tenant with one or more renewal options.

The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations of leases for our properties as of December 31, 2014:

 

Portfolio of Real Estate Investments

The following represents information about our portfolio as of December 31, 2014:

 

Financing, Re-Renting and Disposition of Our Properties

Our charter documents do not limit the level of debt we may incur. We may borrow funds on a secured and unsecured basis and intend to do so in the future. We also mortgage specific properties on a non-recourse basis subject to industry standard carve-outs, to enhance the return on our investment. The proceeds of mortgage loans may be used for property acquisitions, investments in joint ventures or other entities that own real property, to reduce bank debt and for working capital purposes. Net proceeds received from the sale of a property are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under debt secured by the property sold.

With respect to properties we acquire on a free and clear basis, we usually seek to obtain long-term fixed-rate mortgage financing, when available at acceptable terms, shortly after the acquisition of such property to avoid the risk of movement of interest rates and fluctuating supply and demand in the mortgage markets. We also will acquire a property that is subject to (and will assume) a fixed-rate mortgage. Some of our properties may be financed on a cross-defaulted or cross-collateralized basis.

20

---

 

After termination or expiration of any lease relating to any of our properties, we will seek to re-rent or sell such property in a manner that will maximize the return to us, considering, among other factors, the income potential and market value of such property. We acquire properties for long-term investment for income purposes and do not typically engage in the turnover of investments. We will consider the sale of a property if a sale appears advantageous in view of our investment objectives. We may take back a purchase money mortgage as partial payment in lieu of cash in connection with any sale and may consider local custom and prevailing market conditions in negotiating the terms of repayment. If there is a substantial tax gain, we may seek to enter into a tax deferred transaction and reinvest the proceeds in another property. It is our policy to use any cash realized from the sale of properties, net of any distributions to stockholders, to pay down amounts due under our credit facility, if any, and for the acquisition of additional properties.

Real Property Used By Us in Our Businesses

The real properties used by us as of December 31, 2014, for the day to day conduct of our businesses are as follows (all of which are leased):

 

 

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in lawsuits and other disputes which, from time to time, arise in the ordinary course of business; however, management believes that these matters will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

 

 

 

21

---

 

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market for Common Equity

Currently, there is no public market for our common stock, and we do not expect a market to develop in the near future. We have no current plans to list our common stock on any securities exchange or quoted on any market system.

Outstanding Common Stock and Holders

As of March 17, 2015, we had 13,729,228 shares issued and outstanding, held by approximately 511 shareholders of record. There is no trading market for our common stock and none is expected to develop in the foreseeable future.

Distributions

Our Board of Directors has declared and paid cash dividends on a quarterly basis. On March 26, 2015, our Board of Directors declared a supplemental distribution of $.09 per share of common stock, payable with respect to the year ended December 31, 2014, to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2015; payable on or about April 15, 2015. On March 26, 2015, our Board of Directors also declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share of common stock, payable with respect to the first quarter ended March 31, 2015 to common stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 31, 2015; payable on or about April 15, 2015. The following table shows the declaration dates and the amounts distributed per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

We have determined for income tax purposes that 100% of the total dividends distributed to shareholders during 2014 represented ordinary income. The total distributions paid in 2014 were the result of cash flow from operations with any shortfalls made up from cash flow from other sources or cash on hand.

Although we intend to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends, no assurances can be made as to the amounts of any future payments. The declaration of any future dividends is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as any other factors deemed relevant by the Board. Two principal factors in determining the amounts of distributions are (i) the requirement Code that a REIT distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, and (ii) the amount of available cash.

22

---

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

On June 11, 2007, the Board approved the Company’s 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) with the effective date of the Plan was June 11, 2007, which was then approved by our stockholders on February 7, 2008. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be awarded under the Plan is 1,000,000 shares. These shares were registered on the Registration Statement on Form S-8 on September 23, 2010. See Item 11 and Footnote 7 of this Report Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Plan.

The following information is provided as of December 31, 2014 with respect to compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements, under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

 

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not have a plan for the purchase of shares of our common stock, and did not purchase any of the same during the year ended December 31, 2014 except for the purchase of 3,000 shares at the rate of $6.80 per share from a former employee pursuant to a severance agreement.

 

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussions contain forward-looking statements that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and uncertainties, including those set forth in this report under “Forward-Looking Statements” and under “Risk Factors.” You should read the following discussion in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this filing. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Executive Summary

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, engaged in the acquisition, ownership, and management of commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2014, we owned 38 properties, predominately all industrial/warehouse locations leased on a net lease basis.  The Company typically evaluates a tenant’s credit quality by reviewing their financial information, rating agency reports and credit reports, when available, and other sources of information that can be useful in determining a tenant’s creditworthiness and financial condition.

We formerly owned a group of outdoor maintenance businesses, an electrical contracting business, and a parking garage business, which are presented as part of discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations. These businesses have all been disposed as of December 31, 2014.

On January 17, 2013, we acquired all outstanding ownership interests of a portfolio consisting of 25 commercial properties located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut in exchange for 33.29% of the outstanding limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, the owner of all 32 properties. As a result of the transaction, as well as the six properties acquired in 2014 and seven in 2015, we currently beneficially own a 66.71% interest in the 45 property portfolio, consisting of approximately 4.1 million square feet of industrial, warehouse, office, retail and other properties on 333 acres of land in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

23

---

 

We continue to seek opportunities to acquire properties. We will seek to acquire properties within geographic areas that will satisfy our primary investment objectives of providing our stockholders with stable cash flow, preservation of capital and growth of income and principal without taking undue risk. Because a significant factor in the valuation of income-producing property is the potential for future income, we anticipate that the majority of properties that we will acquire will have both the potential for growth in value and provide for cash distributions to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in Note 1 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” set forth in Item 8 hereof. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.

Revenue Recognition:

We recognize our rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the leased property. In those instances in which we fund tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be owned by us, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant. When we determine that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, we commence revenue recognition when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. The properties are being leased to tenants under operating leases.  

Property operating expense recoveries from tenants of common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance, and other recoverable costs are recognized in the period the related expenses are incurred.

Real Estate:

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. All costs related to the improvement or replacements of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs and improvements that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred.

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (generally consisting of land, buildings and building improvements, and tenant improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (generally consisting of above-market and below-market leases and the origination value of in-place leases) in accordance with GAAP. We utilize methods similar to those used by independent appraisers in estimating the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property “as-if-vacant.” In allocating purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the differences between contractual rentals and the estimated market rents over the applicable lease term discounted back to the date of acquisition utilizing a discount rate adjusted for the credit risk associated with the respective tenants. Fixed-rate renewal options have been included in the calculation of the fair value of acquired leases where applicable. The aggregate value of in-place leases is measured based on the avoided costs associated with lack of revenue over a market oriented lease-up period, the avoided leasing commissions, and other avoided costs common in similar leasing transactions.

Mortgage notes payable assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the time of acquisitions. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred.

The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during expected lease-up periods, current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. The value of in-place leases are amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases. If a tenant vacates

24

---

 

its space prior to its contractual expiration date, any unamortized balance of the related intangible assets or liabilities is recorded as income or expense in the period.

Asset Impairment:

Management reviews each real estate investment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition. Such cash flow analyses consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If an impairment event exists due to the projected inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. Management is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties. These assessments could have a direct impact on net income, because an impairment loss is recognized in the period that the assessment is made. Management has determined that there were no indicators of impairment relating to our long lived assets at December 31, 2014.

Income Taxes:

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we will generally not be subject to Federal income taxation on that portion of our distributable income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and comply with certain other requirements as defined under the Code.

We also participate in certain activities conducted by entities which elected to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code. As such we are subject to Federal, state and local taxes on the income from these activities.

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, as required by the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740-10-30. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which we do not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

Stock-Based Compensation:

We account for stock based compensation in accordance with GAAP, which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and the expense is recognized in earnings at the grant date (for the portion that vests immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods.

25

---

 

Summary of Operations

Results of Operations:

Year Ended December 31, 2014 as compared with Year Ended December 31, 2013

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the years indicated (in thousands):

 

 

 

nm—not meaningful

Property Rental Revenues

Property rentals revenue increased $4.1 million, or 14%, to $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of four income producing properties during 2014 and the rents derived from 235,000 square feet of new leases and renewals of existing tenancies.  

Tenant Reimbursements

Tenant reimbursements increased $0.7 million, or 13%, to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of four income producing properties during 2014 as well as an increase in recoverable operating expenses.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased $5.4 million, or 18%, to $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $29.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease is primarily attributable to 2013 transaction costs related to the acquisition of 25 properties in January 2013. Property operating expenses increased $0.8 million or 11% mainly due to the acquisition of six properties during 2014, owning the 25 properties acquired in January 2013 for the full year in 2014 and an increase in weather related property operating expenses in 2014.

26

---

 

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $1.5 million, or 18%, to $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase is primarily attributable to the additional interest on debt relating to the acquisition of six properties during 2014.

Insurance Recovery

Insurance recovery of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 was the result of the settlement of an insurance claim.

Acquisition Costs

Acquisition costs decreased $4.5 million, or 82%, to $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was due to costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of 25 properties in January 2013 whereas six properties were acquired during 2014.

Discontinued Operations

The loss from discontinued operations of $0.3 million for the year ended from December 31, 2014 represents expenses incurred in connection with the continued wind down of former operating companies.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. These revenues include fixed base rents and recoveries of certain property operating expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the individual tenants.

Our primary cash expenses consist of our property operating expenses, which include: real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance, utilities, general and administrative expenses, which include compensation costs, office expenses, professional fees and other administrative expenses, leasing and acquisition costs, which include third-party costs paid to brokers and consultants, and interest expense on our mortgage loans.

Our sources of liquidity and capital include cash flow from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, refinancing existing mortgage loans, obtaining loans secured by our unencumbered properties, and property sales. Our available liquidity at December 31, 2014 was approximately $8.3 million, consisting of cash and cash equivalents and $16.2 million from our revolving credit facility with Capital One, N.A. As of December 31, 2014 the outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving credit facility was $43.8 million. On February 20, 2015, the Company secured a $233.1 million loan facility.  Available proceeds under the facility repaid approximately $56 million outstanding on the Capital One N.A. revolving credit facility, thereby paying off and terminating the revolving credit facility.

We expect to meet substantially all of our operating cash requirements (including dividend payments required to maintain our REIT status and estimated $0.9 million of 2015 principal mortgage debt amortization) from cash flow from operations. To the extent that cash flow from operations is not adequate to cover all of our operating needs, we will be required to use our available cash and cash equivalents to satisfy operating requirements. Additionally, in the normal course of our business, we may sell properties when we determine that it is in our best interests, which also generates additional liquidity.

Net Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2014 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2013

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.5 million for 2014 compared to $5.7 million in 2013. The increase is mainly attributable to the net increased cash flows resulting from the acquisition of six properties in 2014 and the transaction costs in 2013 associated with acquiring 25 properties. 2014 cash flow from operations of $10.5 million included (i) net income from continuing operations of $5.2 million, (ii) depreciation and amortization of $9.4 million, and (iii) stock based compensation of $0.3 million partially offset by (iv) an increase in other assets of $2.1 million, (v) an increase in rental income in excess of amounts billed of $1.9 million and (vi) a decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $0.4 million. 2013 cash flow provided by operating activities of $5.7 million included (i) a net loss from continuing operations of $2.5 million, (ii) depreciation and

27

---

 

amortization of $10.4 million, (iii) an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $3.0 million and (iv) stock based compensation of $0.4 million offset by (v) an increase in rental income in excess of amounts billed of $3.3 million and (vi) an increase in other assets of $2.3 million.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the 2014 period, cash used in investing activities was primarily related to (i) the net cash paid for the acquisition of six properties totaling approximately $49.6 million, (ii) contract deposits of $2.5 million for acquisitions that closed in 2015, (iii) a limited partnership investment of $1.8 million and (iv) property improvements of $1.6 million. For the 2013 period, cash used in investing activities primarily related to property improvements of $1.9 million and the net cash paid for acquisitions of $0.9 million offset by proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $0.5 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $47.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. For the 2014 period, cash provided by financing activities was attributable to (i) proceeds from our revolving credit facility of $56.9 million, and (ii) proceeds from mortgage note payable $15.5 million partially offset by (iii) the pay down of a $13.1 million bridge loan used to acquire a property in Long Island City, New York, (iv) the payment of the Company’s dividends totaling $4.7 million, (v) a $3.3 million good faith deposit for a loan facility that closed in February 2015, (vi) distributions to partners of $2.3 million and (vii) payments of mortgage principal of $1.7 million.  Net cash provided by financing activities in 2013 was approximately $1.9 million and was related to proceeds from mortgage note payable of $16.8 million partially offset by payments of the Company’s dividends offset of $5.7 million, repayments to our revolving credit facility of $5 million, distributions to partners of $3.1 million, payments of mortgage principal of $1.0 million and repurchases of the Company’s common stock of $0.1 million.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA computation may not be comparable to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA reported by other companies that interpret the definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do. Management believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to be meaningful measures of a REIT’s performance because they are widely followed by industry analysts, lenders and investors and are used by management as measures of performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income as measures of our operating performance.

Adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure our operating performance independent of our capital structure and indebtedness. Additionally, as we are currently in a growth phase, exclusively focused on real estate, acquisition related costs and discontinued operations expenses have been excluded from Adjusted EBITDA in order to assist with measuring core real estate operating performance.

Reconciliation of Net (Loss) Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):

 

Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations

We consider Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”), each of which are non-GAAP measures, to be additional measures of an equity REIT’s operating performance. We report FFO in addition to our net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities. Management has adopted the definition suggested by the National Association of

28

---

 

Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and defines FFO to equal net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP; excluding gains or losses from sales of property, excluding asset impairments, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and loss from discontinued operations. We believe these measurements provide a more complete understanding of our performance when compared year over year and better reflect the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and general and administrative expenses which may not be immediately apparent from net income.

Management considers FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of our real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and industry analysts have accepted it as a performance measure. FFO is presented to assist investors in analyzing our performance. It is helpful because it excludes various items included in net income that are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains or losses from sales of property and depreciation and amortization. Management believes Core FFO to be a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance because it provides information consistent with the Company’s analysis of the operating performance of its portfolio by excluding items such as acquisition costs which affect the comparability of the Company’s period over period performance and are not indicative of the results provided by our operating portfolio. Management believes AFFO to be a meaningful, additional   measure of operating performance because it provides information consistent with the Company’s analysis of its operating performance by excluding non-cash income and expense items such as straight lined rent, amortization of lease intangibles, mark to market debt adjustments and financing costs which are not indicative of the results of our operating portfolio.

However, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO:

FFO, Core FFO and AFFO as defined by us may not be comparable to similarly titled items reported by other real estate investment trusts due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs. The following table provides a reconciliation of net loss in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except for per share data):

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to FFO and AFFO (in thousands, except share and per share data):

 

29

---

 

Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Investments

Wu/Lighthouse Acquisition

As previously disclosed, the Company closed on a transaction with Wu/Lighthouse Portfolio, LLC effective as of January 17, 2013, in which an Operating Partnership owned and controlled by the Company, acquired all outstanding ownership interests of a portfolio consisting of 25 commercial properties located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, in exchange for 33.29% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership.

Shelter Electric Disposition

On May 2, 2013, Shelter Express Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding stock of Shelter Electric Maintenance Corp. (“SEM”). As a result of the sale, the Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are included as part of discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Windsor Locks, CT

On April 9, 2014, the Company acquired a 226,000 square foot building located on 15.1 acres in Windsor Locks, CT for $14.2 million, subject to the assumption of a $9.0 million mortgage that bears interest at 6.07%. A principal payment of $3.0 million is due in March 2017, with the balance of the loan maturing in March 2020. The equity was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One. The distribution facility is triple net leased to Ford Motor Company. The acquisition included an adjacent vacant land parcel.

Parsippany, NJ

On April 23, 2014, the Company acquired a 75,000 square foot industrial building located on 7.8 acres of land in Parsippany, NJ for $3.3 million.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One.

Long Island City, Queens, NY

On July 2, 2014, the Company acquired an 84,000 square foot parking lot that is leased to FedEx Ground in Long Island City, Queens, NY for $28.5 million. The acquisition was financed, in part, by a $13 million bridge loan with Capital One and the equity financed from the Company’s revolving credit facility. Permanent financing of $15.5 million closed in October 2014 with People’s United Bank and replaced the bridge loan.  The permanent financing is for 10 years at an interest rate of 4.18%.  Payments for the first seven years are interest only. Payments over the remaining three years of the term are based on a 25 year amortization schedule with a balloon payment of $14.4 million due at maturity.

Norwalk, CT

On August 22, 2014, the Company acquired a 50,000 square foot distribution center in Norwalk, CT for $4.2 million that is leased to FedEx Corporation. The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving line of credit facility with Capital One.

Shelton, CT

On October 15, 2014, the Company acquired a 125,000 square foot industrial building in Shelton, CT for $9.5 million that is leased to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One.

Garden City, NY

On November 4, 2014, the Company invested $1.8 million in exchange for a limited partnership interest in Garden 1101 Stewart, L.P. (“Garden 1101”).  Garden 1101 was formed for the purpose of acquiring a 90,000 square foot office building in Garden City, NY that will be converted to a medical office building. The general partners of Garden 1101 include the members of Green Holland Ventures; Paul Cooper, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company and Louis Sheinker, the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The investment in Garden 1101 was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One. The investment is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

30

---

 

Rocky Hill, CT

On January 20, 2015 the Company acquired a 92,500 square foot specialty office/flex/warehouse building located on 12 acres of land in Rocky Hill, CT for $12.4 million.  The facility is leased to the Connecticut Lottery Corporation.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One.

Piscataway, NJ

On March 13, 2015 the Company acquired six industrial properties totaling approximately 681,754 square feet located on 52 acres of land in Piscataway, NJ for an aggregate net purchase price including closing costs of $64.6 million. The purchase price was funded by a combination of net proceeds from the Company’s refinancing of $25.5 million and a $39.1 million mortgage loan with Allstate Life Insurance Company, Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York and American Heritage Life Insurance Company. The loan is for a 10-year term with interest only payments for the first three years at a rate of 4.05% per annum.  Following this period until the loan matures in March, 2025, payments will be based on a 30 year amortization schedule.

Cash Payments for Financing

Payment of interest under our mortgage notes payable will consume a portion of our cash flow, reducing taxable income and consequently, the resulting distributions to be made to our stockholders.

Trend in Financial Resources

We expect to receive additional rent payments over time due to scheduled increases in rent set forth in the leases on our real properties. It should be noted, however, that the additional rent payments are expected to result in an approximately equal obligation to make additional distributions to stockholders, and will therefore not result in a material increase in working capital.

Environmental Matters

During 2014, our six current and former bus depot sites had continued activity associated with on-going environmental cleanup efforts to remedy legacy site contamination issues. One of the sites received final regulatory closure in 2013, satisfying regulatory obligations and the remaining five continued on-going monitoring and remediation activities. Each of the six sites maintained compliance with existing local, state and federal regulatory obligations.

Insurance Subsidiary

On December 26, 2013, the Company’s captive insurance entity entered into a commutation agreement with National Union Fire Insurance Company (the “reinsurer”) of Pittsburgh, PA transferring all obligations and liabilities to the reinsurer in exchange for a payment of $670,000.

 

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and other market changes affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we are exposed to is interest rate risk. At December 31, 2013, we did not have any variable interest rate liabilities. As of December 31, 2014 the Company has a variable rate line of credit facility with Capital One that bears interest at (i) LIBOR plus a margin of 200 basis points to 335 basis points depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio as defined, or (ii) base rate plus an applicable margin, depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio. Interest expense on our variable rate line of credit facility would increase by as much as $600,000 annually if LIBOR increased 100 basis points.  On February 20, 2015 the Company closed on a $233.1 million loan facility.  Available proceeds from the facility were used to repay the outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility thereby paying off and terminating such facility.

Low to moderate levels of inflation during the past several years have favorably impacted our operations by stabilizing operating expenses. At the same time, low inflation has had the indirect effect of reducing our ability to increase tenant rents. However, our properties have tenants whose leases include expense reimbursements and other provisions to minimize the effect of inflation.

 

 

 

31

---

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

32

---

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

GTJ REIT, Inc. and Subsidiaries

West Hempstead, New York

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GTJ REIT, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GTJ REIT, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, New York

March 27, 2015

 

 

 

33

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

34

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

35

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

36

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

37

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

38

---

 

GTJ REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2014

1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:

GTJ REIT, Inc. (the “Company” or “GTJ REIT”) was incorporated on June 23, 2006, under Maryland General Corporation Law. The Company is focused primarily on the acquisition, ownership, management, and operation of commercial real estate located in the New York tri-state area.

The Company has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and elected December 31 as its fiscal year end. Under the REIT operating structure, the Company is permitted to deduct the dividends paid to its stockholders when determining its taxable income. Assuming dividends equal or exceed the Company’s taxable income, the Company generally will not be required to pay Federal corporate income taxes on such income.

On January 17, 2013, the Company closed on a transaction with Wu/Lighthouse Portfolio, LLC, in which a limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) owned and controlled by the Company, acquired all outstanding ownership interests of a portfolio consisting of 25 commercial properties (the “Acquired Properties”) located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, in exchange for 33.29% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership; the owner of all 32 properties as of December 31, 2013. The acquisition was recorded as a business combination and accordingly the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value. As a result of this acquisition and the six properties acquired in 2014, the Company currently beneficially owns a 66.71% interest in a total of 38 properties (including the seven previously-owned properties) consisting of approximately 3.4 million square feet of office and industrial properties on 269 acres of land in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. At December 31, 2014, subject to certain anti-dilutive and other provisions contained in the governing agreements, the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership may be convertible in the aggregate, into approximately 1.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock and approximately 5.0 million shares of Series B preferred stock.

Prior to 2013, the Company had operated a group of outdoor maintenance, shelter cleaning, and electrical contracting businesses, as well as a parking garage facility. During 2011, the Board voted to divest these operations which were sold in 2012 and 2013. Accordingly, the operations of these entities are reported as discontinued operations in the statements of operations.

 

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and include the financial statements of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and the Operating Partnership, as the Company makes all operating and financial decisions for (i.e., exercises control over) the Operating Partnership. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 financial statement presentation. The ownership interests of the other investors in the Operating Partnership are recorded as noncontrolling interests. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. All of these estimates reflect management’s best judgment about current economic and market conditions and their effects based on information available as of the date of these consolidated financial statements. If such conditions persist longer or deteriorate further than expected, it is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates could change, which may result in impairments of certain assets. Significant estimates include the useful lives of long- lived assets including property, equipment and intangible assets, impairment of assets, collectability of receivables, contingencies, and stock-based compensation.

39

---

 

Real Estate:

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations, and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs, and improvements that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset, are charged to operations as incurred.

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (generally consisting of land, buildings and building improvements, and tenant improvements) and identified intangible assets and liabilities (generally consisting of above-market and below-market leases and the origination value of in-place leases) in accordance with GAAP. We utilize methods similar to those used by independent appraisers in estimating the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property “as-if-vacant.” In allocating purchase price to identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, the value of above-market and below-market leases is estimated based on the differences between contractual rentals and the estimated market rents over the applicable lease term discounted back to the date of acquisition utilizing a discount rate adjusted for the credit risk associated with the respective tenants. Fixed-rate renewal options have been included in the calculation of the fair value of acquired leases where applicable. The aggregate value of in-place leases is measured based on the avoided costs associated with lack of revenue over a market oriented lease-up period, the avoided leasing commissions, and other avoided costs common in similar leasing transactions.

Mortgage notes payable assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the time of acquisitions. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during expected lease-up periods, current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. The values of in-place leases are amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases. If a tenant vacates its space prior to its contractual expiration date, any unamortized balance of the related intangible assets or liabilities is recorded as income or expense in the period. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below-market leases was a net increase in rental revenue of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2014, approximately $2.5 million and $13.1 million (net of accumulated amortization) relating to above-market and in-place leases, respectively, are included in acquired lease intangible assets, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Approximately $7.8 million (net of accumulated amortization) relating to below-market leases is included in acquired lease intangible liabilities, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The following table presents the projected increase to rental revenue from the amortization of the acquired above-market and below-market lease intangibles and the increase to amortization expense of the in place lease intangibles for properties owned at December 31, 2014 , over the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization:

The Company uses the straight-line method for depreciation and amortization. Properties and property improvements are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which range from 5 to 40 years. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated over estimated useful lives that range from 5 to 10 years. Tenant improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining non-cancellable term of the related leases or their useful lives.

40

---

 

Deferred Charges:

Deferred charges consist principally of leasing commissions, which are amortized ratably over the life of the related tenant leases, and financing costs, which are amortized over the terms of the respective debt agreements. These deferred charges are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

Asset Impairment:

Management reviews each real estate investment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition. Such cash flow analyses consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If an impairment event exists due to the projected inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. Management is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate holdings. These assessments could have a direct impact on net income, because an impairment loss is recognized in the period that the assessment is made. Management has determined that there were no indicators of impairment relating to its long-lived assets at December 31, 2014.

Reportable Segments:

As of December 31, 2014, the Company primarily operated in one reportable segment, commercial real estate.

Revenue Recognition:

Rental income includes the base rent that each tenant is required to pay in accordance with the terms of their respective leases reported on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. In order for management to determine, in its judgment, that the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific property is collectible, management reviews billed and unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history and financial condition. Some of the leases provide for additional contingent rental revenue in the form of percentage rents and increases based on the consumer price index, subject to certain maximums and minimums.

Substantially all of the Company’s properties are subject to long-term net leases under which the tenant is typically responsible to pay for their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and ordinary maintenance and repairs for the property.

Property operating expense recoveries from tenants of common area maintenance, real estate, and other recoverable costs are recognized as revenues in the period that the related expenses are incurred.

Earnings Per Share Information:

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower per share amount. Restricted stock was included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share and stock option awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the option awards would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash:

Restricted cash represents reserves used to pay real estate taxes, insurance, and tenant improvements. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had restricted cash of $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, which was included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

41

---

 

Fair Value Measurement:

The Company determines fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10-05 for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.

Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair values are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, which are defined by ASC 820-10-35, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities. Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment and the Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

Income Taxes:

The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company is generally not subject to Federal income taxation on the portion of its distributable income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and complies with certain other requirements as defined.

The Company also participates in certain activities conducted by entities which elected to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code. As such, the Company is subject to federal, state, and local taxes on the income from these activities.

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method as required by the provisions of ASC 740-10-30. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

ASC 740-10-65 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740-10-65, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740-10-65 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. As of December 2014 and 2013, the Company had determined that no liabilities are required in connection with unrecognized tax positions. As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s tax returns for the prior three years are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service.

Concentrations of Credit Risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, which from time-to-time exceed the federal depository insurance coverage. Beginning January 1, 2013, all noninterest bearing transaction accounts deposited at an insured depository institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to the standard maximum deposit insurance amount of $250,000. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk due to the credit worthiness of the financial institutions.

42

---

 

Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described below in Note 7. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718-30-30, which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of ASC 718-10-35, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is expensed at the grant date (for the portion that vests immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods.

New Accounting Pronouncements:

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810) – Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-02 amends the consolidation requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810 “Consolidation” and changes the required consolidation analysis.  The amendments in ASU No. 2015-02 affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. The amendments impact limited partnerships and legal entities, the evaluation of fees paid to a decision maker or service provider of a variable interest, the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination, and certain investment funds.  ASU No. 2015-02 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2015-02 on its consolidated financial statements.  

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, “Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items.” ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of extraordinary items.  However, the presentation and disclosure requirements for items that are either unusual in nature of infrequent in occurrence remain and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. ASU 2015-01 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.”  The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamentals of measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations in financial statement footnotes. This accounting standard is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2014-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

During June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments when the Terms of an Award Profile That a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” ASU 2014-12 provides explicit guidance on how to account for share-based payments that require a specific performance target to be achieved which may be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period. ASU 2014-12 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

During May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transaction methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the standard will be adopted in 2017.

In April 2014, the FASB issued 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” The

43

---

 

amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation and require new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. Only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. This accounting standards update is effective for annual filings beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted.  The impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-08 on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures will be based on the Company’s future disposal activity.

 

 

3. REAL ESTATE:

The changes in real estate for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

The changes in accumulated depreciation, exclusive of amounts relating to equipment, transportation equipment, and furniture and fixtures, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Windsor Locks, CT

On April 9, 2014, the Company acquired a 226,000 square foot building located on 15.1 acres in Windsor Locks, CT for $14.2 million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed a $9.0 million mortgage that bears interest at 6.07%. A principal payment of $3.0 million is due in March 2017, with the balance of the loan maturing in March 2020. The equity was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One. The distribution facility is triple net leased to Ford Motor Company.  The acquisition included an adjacent vacant land parcel.

Parsippany, NJ

On April 23, 2014, the Company acquired a 75,000 square foot industrial building located on 7.8 acres of land in Parsippany, NJ for $3.3 million.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One.

Long Island City, Queens, NY

On July 2, 2014, the Company acquired an 84,000 square foot parking lot that is leased to FedEx Ground in Long Island City, Queens, NY for $28.5 million. The acquisition was financed, in part, by a $13.0 million bridge loan with Capital One and the equity financed from the Company’s revolving credit facility. Permanent financing of $15.5 million closed in October 2014 with People’s United Bank and replaced the bridge loan.  The permanent financing is for 10 years at an interest rate of 4.18%.  Payments for the first seven years are interest only. Payments over the remaining three years of the term are based on a 25 year amortization schedule with a balloon payment of $14.4 million due upon maturity.

Norwalk, CT

On August 22, 2014, the Company acquired a 50,000 square foot distribution center in Norwalk, CT for $4.2 million that is leased to FedEx Corporation. The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving line of credit facility with Capital One.

44

---

 

Shelton, CT

On October 15, 2014, the Company acquired a 125,000 square foot industrial building in Shelton, CT for $9.5 million that is leased to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One.

Purchase Price Allocations

The purchase prices of the above acquisitions were allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The preliminary measurements of fair value reflected below are subject to change. The Company expects to finalize the valuations and complete the purchase price allocations with one year from the dates of acquisition.

The following table summarizes the Company’s preliminary allocations of the purchase prices of assets acquired and liabilities assumed during 2014 (in thousands):

 

Garden City, NY

On November 4, 2014, the Company invested $1.8 million in exchange for a limited partnership interest in Garden 1101 Stewart, L.P. (“Garden 1101”).  Garden 1101 was formed for the purpose of acquiring a 90,000 square foot office building in Garden City, NY that will be converted to a medical office building. The general partners of Garden 1101 include the members of Green Holland Ventures; Paul Cooper, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Louis Sheinker, the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The investment in Garden 1101 was financed from the Company’s revolving credit line facility with Capital One and is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.  As the Company does not exercise control over Garden 1101, it is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

 

 

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

On May 2, 2013, Shelter Express Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Shelter Electric Maintenance Corp. (“SEM”). The operations of SEM are included as part of discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the detail of the Company’s loss from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

 

45

---

 

The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the Company’s discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE:

The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s mortgage notes payable (in thousands):

 

Hartford Loan Agreement:

On July 1, 2010, two wholly-owned of subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership (collectively, the “Hartford Borrowers”) entered into a non-recourse fixed rate mortgage loan agreement with Hartford Life Insurance Company, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company (collectively, the “Hartford Lenders”) pursuant to which the Hartford Lenders made a term loan to the Hartford Borrowers in the aggregate principal amount of $45.5 million. The loan was evidenced by promissory notes in the principal amounts of $25.0 million, $10.5 million, and $10.0 million.

The obligations are secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage lien on two properties. The outstanding principal balance of the loan bears interest at the fixed rate of 5.05% per annum. The Hartford Borrowers are required to make monthly payments of interest only in the amount of $191,479. The principal is payable on the maturity date, July 1, 2017.

Athene (formerly Aviva) Loan Agreement

On February 22, 2013, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, entered into a $15.0 million mortgage note with Aviva Life and Annuity Company. The loan bears interest at a rate of 3% per annum and requires monthly payments of interest. The principal is payable when the loan matures on March 1, 2018. Approximately $10.1 million from the proceeds was used to satisfy in full the obligations under the Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company’s secured revolving credit facility discussed in Note 6 below. The remaining proceeds were used for general working capital and other corporate purposes and partner distributions.

46

---

 

The loan is secured by a mortgage on a property. The obligations under this loan agreement are also guaranteed by the Operating Partnership.

Genworth Loan Agreement

On April 3, 2013, four wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership (collectively, the “Genworth Borrower”) entered into mortgage loan agreements with Genworth Life Insurance Company (the “Genworth Lender”), in the aggregate principal amount of $29.5 million. The loan bears interest at a rate of 3.20% and matures on April 30, 2018. The loan was evidenced by promissory notes of $14.4 million (the “New York Note”) and $15.1 million (the “New Jersey Note”), hereinafter referred to as the (“Notes”).

The New York Note requires 12 monthly payments of interest only starting June 1, 2013. Beginning June 1, 2014, monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of approximately $70,000 are required until the note becomes due and payable.

The New Jersey Note requires 12 monthly payments of interest starting June 1, 2013. Beginning June 1, 2014, monthly payments of principal and interest in the amount of approximately $73,000 are required until such New Jersey Note becomes due and payable.

The Notes are secured by, among other things, property owned by the Genworth Borrower. The proceeds from the Loans were used to satisfy in full obligations to John Hancock Life Insurance Company under a prior mortgage agreement (discussed further below).

The Borrower and the Operating Partnership agreed to indemnify the Genworth Lender against certain claims and guaranty certain obligations of the Borrower pursuant to certain Environmental Indemnity Agreements. Certain obligations under the loan agreements are also guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. In connection with the loan agreements, the Genworth Borrower is required to comply with certain covenants. As of December 31, 2014, the Genworth Borrower was in compliance with all covenants.

People’s United Bank Loan Agreement

In connection with the acquisition of an 84,000 square foot parking lot in Long Island City, Queens, NY, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a mortgage loan agreement with People’s United Bank in the aggregate amount of $15.5 million.  The loan has a ten year term and bears interest at 4.18%. Payments for the first seven years are interest only. Payments over the remaining three years of the term are based on a 25 year amortization schedule, with a balloon payment of $14.4 million due at maturity.

Loan Assumptions:

Certain of the Acquired Properties discussed above were and continue to be encumbered by certain mortgage indebtedness. Concurrent with the acquisition of these properties, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the entity owners of the Acquired Properties entered into certain loan assumption and modification documents to facilitate the acquisition of the Acquired Properties. Below is a summary of the material terms of the arrangement with each lender.

United States Life Insurance Company Loan:

Six wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, (collectively, the “USLIC Borrowers”) previously entered into mortgage loans with The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York (“USLIC”), in the aggregate original principal amount of $23.5 million (the “USLIC Mortgage Loan”).

The USLIC Mortgage Loan is secured by the properties owned by the USLIC Borrowers and bears interest at a rate of 5.76%. The Company is required to make payments of principal and interest until the loan matures on April 1, 2018. An option is available to extend the loan for an additional five (5) years based on a new market interest rate and a new amortization period. After September 8, 2014, the USLIC Mortgage Loan may be prepaid subject to a prepayment fee. The obligations under this loan agreement are also guaranteed by GTJ REIT.

47

---

 

John Hancock Loan:

Certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, (collectively, the “John Hancock Borrowers”), entered into a mortgage loan agreement with John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). The John Hancock Loan is secured by mortgages covering the properties owned by the John Hancock Borrowers. The obligations under this loan agreement are also guaranteed by GTJ REIT.

A portion of the John Hancock Loan matured on March 1, 2013 (the “5 Year Notes”) and was refinanced as part of the Genworth Loan Agreement discussed above. The $61.0 million remaining portion of the John Hancock Loan matures on March 1, 2018 (the “10 Year Notes”). The 5 Year Notes bore interest at a rate of 5.44%. The 10 Year Notes bear interest at 6.17%. The 10 Year Notes are interest only for the first five years; for years 6 through 10, payments of principal and interest are required. The John Hancock Mortgage Loan may be prepaid subject to a prepayment fee.

People’s United Bank Loan:

Wu/LH 15 Progress Drive L.L.C. (the “PUB Borrower”) entered into a $2.7 million mortgage loan with the bank, on September 30, 2010. The loan is secured by the properties located at 15 Progress Road and 30 Commerce Drive, Shelton, Connecticut and bears interest at a rate of 5.23%. The Company is required to make monthly payments of principal and interest until the loan matures on October 1, 2020. The obligations under this loan agreement are also guaranteed by GTJ REIT.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Loan:

In connection with the April 2014 acquisition of a property in Windsor Locks, CT, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership assumed a $9.0 million mortgage that bears interest at 6.07%.  The payments are interest only.  A principal payment of $3.0 million is due in March 2017 with the balance of the loan maturing in March 2020.

Principal Repayments:

Scheduled principal repayments during the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

 

Please see subsequent event footnote for information regarding our financing transaction on February 20, 2015.

 

6. SECURED REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY:

M&T Financing Agreement:

On August 26, 2011, the Company and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M&T”) entered into a certain credit agreement which provided for, among other things, a $10.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”). The Revolver was available to the Company for acquisitions and for general working capital and other corporate purposes. The Company’s obligations under this credit agreement were satisfied in full on February 22, 2013 and the Revolver was cancelled.

Capital One Loan Agreement:

On April 8, 2014, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Capital One, N.A. (the “Lender”). The Loan Agreement is for a $45.0 million senior revolving credit facility, secured by certain properties located in NYC (the “NYC Borrowers”) by means of, among other things, negative pledges relating to such properties. The intended uses of the proceeds of this facility include funding of the acquisitions of additional properties as well as working capital expenditures.

The facility is a full obligation of the NYC Borrowers, together with GTJ REIT, Inc. and GTJ Realty, LP (the “Guarantors”). Subject to certain conditions, the facility is available at any time prior to the April 2016 maturity of this facility, in

48

---

 

minimum principal amounts of $1.0 million. Due to the revolving nature of the facility, amounts prepaid under the facility may be borrowed again. The line of credit facility has an initial term of two years, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain other customary conditions. The NYC Borrowers may prepay the facility, in whole or in part, at any time without fees or penalty, subject to reimbursement of the Lender’s breakage costs associated with the prepayment of LIBOR rate loans. The interest-only facility includes a floating rate using (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin (200 basis points (bps) to 335 bps), or (ii) base rate plus an applicable margin, depending upon the overall leverage of the properties. A commitment fee of 35 bps (if less than 50% of the facility is used), and 25 bps (if 50% or more is being used) will accrue on unused portions of the commitments under the facility.

The principal amount of the line of credit facility and all interest, fees, and other amounts owing under the line of credit are guaranteed by the Guarantors under the terms and provisions of the Guaranty Agreement (the “Guaranty”). The continuing ability to borrow under the line of credit facility will be subject to the ongoing compliance of the Guarantors and the NYC Borrowers with various affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, with respect to liens, indebtedness, investments, and distributions. The Loan Agreement contains events of default and remedies customary for loan transactions of this sort including, among others, those related to a default in the payment of principal or interest, a material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty, and a default with regard to performance of certain covenants. The Loan Agreement includes customary representations and warranties of the Guarantors and the NYC Borrowers, which must continue to be true and correct in all material respects as a condition to future draws. In addition, the Loan Agreement also includes customary events of default, in certain cases subject to customary cure, following which, amounts outstanding under the facility may be accelerated.

On November 20, 2014, the above-referenced parties executed an amendment to the Loan Agreement to increase the credit facility from $45.0 million to $60.0 million. The additional credit facility extension was underwritten by People's United Bank. The terms and provisions of the extension are substantially the same as the one under the original credit facility. The parties also entered into several side agreements and instruments to facilitate the transactions contemplated under the foregoing amendment.

As of December 31, 2014 the outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving credit facility was $43.8 million.

On February 20, 2015, the Company secured a loan facility in the principal amount of $233.1 million. Using proceeds available under the loan facility, the Company repaid the outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility of approximately $56.0 million, thereby paying off and terminating the revolving credit facility.

Please see subsequent event footnote regarding our financing transaction on February 20, 2015.  

 

 

7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Common Stock:

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has a total of 13,729,228 shares issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock:

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share. Voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Company is authorized to issue 6,500,000 shares of Series B preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share. There are no voting rights associated with the Series B preferred stock.

49

---

 

Dividend Distributions:

The following table presents dividends declared by the Company on its common stock during 2014 and 2013:

 

 

 

In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its taxable income and must distribute 100% of its taxable income in order not to be subject to corporate federal income taxes on retained income. The Company anticipates it will distribute all of its taxable income to its stockholders. Because taxable income differs from cash flow from operations due to non-cash revenues or expenses (such as depreciation), in certain circumstances, the Company may generate operating cash flow in excess of its distributions or, alternatively, may be required to borrow to make sufficient distribution payments.

Stock Based Compensation:

On June 11, 2007, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan covers directors, officers, key employees and consultants of the Company. The purposes of the Plan are to further the growth, development, and financial success of the Company and to obtain and retain the services of the individuals considered essential to the long-term success of the Company. The Plan may provide for awards in the form of restricted shares, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation rights. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be awarded under the Plan is 1,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had 446,296 shares available for future issuance of awards under the Plan. Dividends paid on restricted shares are recorded as dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock whether or not they are vested. In accordance the ASC 718-10-35, the Company measures the compensation costs for these shares as of the date of the grant and the expense is recognized in earnings, at the grant date (for the portion that vest immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods.

On February 7, 2008, 55,000 options were granted to non-employee directors and vested immediately and 200,000 options were granted to key officers of the Company and had a three year vesting period. On June 9, 2011, the Company granted 10,000 options to a non-employee director and vested immediately. No options were exercised during 2013 or 2014. All options expire ten years from the date of grant. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no stock compensation expense relating to these stock option grants.

On April 30, 2012, and June 7, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 55,149 and 5,884 restricted shares of common stock, respectively, under the Plan. The shares issued on June 7, 2012 have a value of approximately $40,000 ($6.80 per share), were granted to non-management members of the Board of Directors, and vested immediately. The shares issued on April 30, 2012 have a value of approximately $375,000 ($6.80 per share), were granted to certain executives of the Company, and vest ratably over a four year period. One fourth of the shares granted to the executives vested on the grant date and one fourth will vest each year on the following dates: April 30, 2013, April 30, 2014, and April 30, 2015.

On March 21, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 50,002 restricted shares of common stock, with a value of approximately $320,000, under the Plan. A total of 3,126 of these shares, with a value of approximately $20,000 ($6.40 per share), were granted to non-management members of the Board of Directors, and vested immediately. The remaining 46,876 shares, with a value of approximately $300,000 ($6.40 per share), were granted to certain executives of the Company, and vest ratably over a four year period. One fourth of the shares granted to the executives vested on the grant date and one fourth will vest each year on the following dates: March 21, 2014, March 21, 2015, and March 21, 2016.

50

---

 

On June 6, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,378 restricted shares of common stock, with a value of approximately $60,000 ($6.40 per share), under the Plan. These shares were granted to non-management members of the Board of Directors and vested immediately.

On June 4, 2014, 44,704 restricted shares of common stock, with a value of approximately $304,000 (based upon an estimated value of $6.80) were granted to certain executives of the Company. One sixth of the shares vest immediately upon issuance and the remaining shares vest in equal installments on the next five anniversary dates of the grant.

On June 19, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,820 restricted shares of common stock with a value of approximately $60,000 (based upon an estimated value of $6.80 per share) under the Plan to non-managing members of the Board of Directors. The shares vested immediately upon issuance.

Management has determined the value of a share of common stock to be $9.30 based on a valuation completed July 29, 2014, with the assistance of an independent third-party for the purpose of valuing shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Plan. This value is not necessarily indicative of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock.

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s total stock compensation expense was approximately $361,000 and $413,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, there was approximately $298,000 of unamortized stock compensation related to restricted stock.

At December 31, 2014, 265,000 stock options were outstanding, all of which were exercisable, and 263,947 shares of restricted stock were outstanding, 229,857 of which were vested.

 

 

8. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:

In accordance with ASC 260-10-45, basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing the net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents and convertible securities then outstanding. There were no common share equivalents for any of the periods presented in dilutive earnings per share.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share information for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except share and per share data):

 

 

 

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

Douglas Cooper, a director of the Company, is a partner of Ruskin, Moscou, Faltischek, P.C. (“RMF”), and RMF has acted as counsel to the Company. Fees paid to RMF for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $31,704 and $483,767 respectively, representing fees and expenses for various divestitures, preparation of all documentation related to the Wu/Lighthouse transaction, and general corporate matters.

Paul Cooper, our Chairman and CEO, and Louis Sheinker, our President and COO, each hold passive, minority ownership interests in a real estate brokerage firm, The Rochlin Organization (“TRO”). The firm acted as the exclusive broker for one of the

51

---

 

Company’s properties. In 2013, the firm introduced a new tenant to the property, resulting in the execution of a lease agreement and a subsequent lease modification. The firm earned aggregate brokerage cash commissions of approximately $60,000 based on a total lease value of $1,015,000. In January 2014, the new tenant expanded further which resulted in approximately $95,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $2,100,000.

The Company formerly was subject to a lease agreement with Lighthouse 444 Limited Partnership (“Lighthouse”), the owner of the building at 444 Merrick Road, Lynbrook, NY in which Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker were managing members of the general partner. The lease was terminated on January 16, 2014. Additionally, Lighthouse Sixty, LP, owner of the building at 60 Hempstead Avenue, West Hempstead, NY, and of which Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker are managing members of the general partner, have a lease agreement with the Company expiring in 2020 for office and storage space at a current annual base rent of approximately $234,000 with aggregate lease payments totaling $1.8 million.

On December 11, 2013, the Company and Jerome Cooper, Chairman Emeritus, entered into a separation agreement. The agreement provides for the payment to Mr. Cooper of an aggregate of $360,000; payable in three equal annual installments of $120,000, commencing January 1, 2014.

On November 4, 2014 the Company invested $1.8 million for a limited partnership interest in Garden 1101 Stewart, L.P. (“Garden 1101”). Garden 1101 was formed for the purposes of acquiring a 90,000 square foot office building in Garden City, NY that will be converted to a medical office building. The general partners of Garden 1101 include the members of Green Holland Ventures; Paul Cooper, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company and Louis Sheinker, the President, Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The investment is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Legal Matters:

The Company is involved in lawsuits and other disputes which arise in the ordinary course of business; however, management believes that these matters will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Insurance:

On December 26, 2013, the Company’s captive insurance entity entered into a commutation agreement with National Union Fire Insurance Company (the “reinsurer”) of Pittsburgh, PA transferring all obligations and liabilities to the reinsurer in exchange for a payment of $670,000.

In June 2013, the Company received a $1.2 million insurance settlement relating to a fire that had occurred at one of its properties in 2006. The gain is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Divestiture:

On February 16, 2012, the Company received a notice from the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry claiming a pension withdrawal liability in the amount of $1.5 million in connection with the divestiture of Shelter Electric. The Company determined the liability was probable and the Company agreed to pay the obligation in monthly installments of approximately $8,000 over a twenty-year term. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the present value of this obligation was approximately $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and is included in liabilities of discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Environmental Matters:

During 2014, five of the Company’s six current and former bus depot sites had continued monitoring and remediation activities associated with on-going environmental cleanup efforts to remedy legacy site contamination issues. One of the sites received final regulatory closure in 2013, satisfying regulatory obligations. Each of the six sites maintained compliance with existing local, state and federal regulatory obligations.

 

 

52

---

 

11. FAIR VALUE:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are determined based upon applicable accounting guidance. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted process in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted process for similar instruments in active markets or quoted process for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, available-for-sale securities and secured revolving credit facility approximated their carrying value because of the short-term nature based on Level 1 inputs. The fair values of mortgage notes payable and pension withdrawal liability are based on borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs. The following table summarizes the carrying values and the estimated fair values of the financial instruments (in thousands):

 

 

 

12. OTHER RETIREMENT BENEFITS:

Other Retirement Benefits:

The Company sponsors retirement benefits under a defined contribution 401(k) plan which covers all employees who have completed one year of service and are at least 21 years of age. Contributions to this plan and charged to benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $30,000 and $70,000, respectively.

 

 

13. INCOME TAXES:

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. A REIT will generally not be subject to federal income taxation on that portion of its income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders and complies with certain other requirements. It is management’s intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s REIT status. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable minimum tax and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for subsequent taxable years). Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.

53

---

 

Reconciliation between GAAP Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations and Federal Taxable Income:

The following table reconciles GAAP income (loss) from continuing operations to taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

 

 

Dividend distributions for the year ended December 31, 2014 were characterized for federal income tax purposes as 100% ordinary income.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries

The Company is subject to federal, state, and local income taxes on the income from its Taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) activities, which include all the discontinued operations of Shelter Express, Inc. and subsidiaries. There were no provisions for (benefit from) income taxes from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The TRS entities have approximately $20.0 million of net operating loss carry-forwards and $9.0 million of capital loss carryforwards at December 31, 2014. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowable against the deferred income tax assets as it does not consider realization of such assets to be likely.

 

 

14. FUTURE MINIMUM RENT SCHEDULE:

Future minimum contractual lease payments to be received by the Company (without taking into account straight-line rent or amortization of intangibles) as of December 31, 2014 under operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

The lease agreements generally contain provisions for reimbursement of real estate taxes and operating expenses over base year amounts, as well as fixed increases in rent.

 

 

54

---

 

15. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (Unaudited):

The summarized selected quarterly data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands except per share data).

 

 

 

 

 

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Loan Agreement

On February 20, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company refinanced the current outstanding debt on certain properties and placed new financing on others by entering into a Loan Agreement (“the Loan Agreement”) with American General Life Insurance Company, The Variable Life Insurance Company, The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, American Home Assurance Company and Commerce and Industry Insurance Company.

The Loan Agreement provides a secured loan in the principal amount of $233.1 million (the “AIG Loan”). The AIG Loan is a 10-year term loan that requires interest only payments at the rate of 4.05% per annum. Interest was paid at closing through February 28, 2015.  During the period from April 1, 2015, to February 1, 2025, payments of interest only will be payable in the arrears with the entire principal balance plus any accrued and unpaid interest due and payable on March 1, 2025.  The Company’s obligation to pay the interest, principal and other amounts under the Loan Agreement are evidenced by the secured promissory notes executed on the Closing Date (the “Notes”).  The Notes are secured by certain mortgages encumbering 28 properties in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.  Using the proceeds available under the AIG Loan, the Company repaid approximately $199.9 million of its outstanding indebtedness including (i) $68.6 million to John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (ii) $56.0 million to Capital One, N.A., (iii) $50.2 million to Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and (iv) $25.1 million to United States Life Insurance Company thereby paying off and terminating those obligations. The repayments included approximately $15.7 million in prepayment premiums and other fees.

Acquisitions

Rocky Hill, CT

On January 20, 2015, the Company acquired a 92,500 square foot single story office/flex/warehouse building located on 12 acres of land in Rocky Hill, CT for $12.4 million.  The purchase was financed from the Company’s revolving credit facility with Capital One, N.A.

Piscataway, NJ

On March 13, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of six properties totaling approximately 681,754 square feet in Piscataway, NJ.  The aggregate net purchase price including closing costs was $64.6 million in cash. The purchase price was funded from a combination of $25.5 million from  the net proceeds of the Company’s February 20, 2015 financing and the remaining $39.1 million from a cross-collateralized mortgage (the “Allstate Loan”) from Allstate Life Insurance Company, Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York and American Heritage Life Insurance Company (together, the “Mortgages”).  The Allstate Loan Agreement provided a secured facility with a 10-year term loan. During the first three years of the term of the loan, it requires interest only payments at the rate of 4% per annum.  Following this period until the loan matures on March 1, 2025, payments will be based on a 30 year amortization schedule.

 

 

55

---

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, management, under the direction of our Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. During our review we determined that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal controls may vary over time.

We have assessed the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in the 1992 Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that require the Company to include only management’s report in this annual report.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

 

 

56

---

 

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our directors and executive officers and the positions they held with us as of March 17, 2015:

 

The principal occupation and business experience of each of the directors and executive officers are as follows:

Paul Cooper has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since June 2012 and Chairman of the Board of Directors since January 1, 2014. Mr. Cooper has been a director of the Company since June 2006 and previously served as Executive Vice President. Prior to joining the Company, for more than 12 years, Mr. Cooper was a principal of Lighthouse Real Estate Ventures and its affiliates (collectively “Lighthouse”). Lighthouse owned, managed, and leased its own portfolio of more than 2 million square feet of commercial buildings in the Greater New York metropolitan area. Mr. Cooper is qualified to serve on our Board due to his extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Cooper holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a Juris Doctor degree from Fordham University. Paul Cooper is the son of Jerome Cooper and the cousin of Douglas Cooper.

Jerome Cooper has been a director of the Company since June 2006 and was Chairman of the Board of Directors from June 2006 through December 31, 2013. Mr. Cooper had previously served as Chief Executive Officer from March 2007 through June 2012. Prior to that Mr. Cooper was principally employed as Chief Executive Officer of the Bus Companies and their subsidiaries for ten years. He is uniquely qualified to serve on our Board based on his extensive experience with our Company. Jerome Cooper received a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Ohio State University and a Bachelor of Laws degree from Fordham School of Law. Jerome Cooper is Paul Cooper’s father and Douglas Cooper’s uncle.

Louis Sheinker has been President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of the Company since January 2013. Louis Sheinker brings nearly 27 years of real estate experience to the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Louis Sheinker was a co-founding partner in Lighthouse Real Estate Ventures. He has participated in restructuring and repositioning of over 4 million square feet of office space and industrial properties. Prior to founding Lighthouse, he was the President of Sheinker Wasserstein Realty Services, Inc., which performed management and asset management services on behalf of financial institutions throughout the New York Metropolitan Area. Mr. Sheinker is qualified to serve on the Board due to his extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Ithaca College, and is currently a licensed Real Estate Broker in New York State. Effective as of January 15, 2015, Mr. Sheinker was appointed Secretary of the Company.

Ben Zimmerman has been Chief Financial Officer of the Company since June 2014 and brings nearly 25 years of accounting and real estate experience. Mr. Zimmerman leads the Company’s accounting, reporting and cash management functions and manages acquisition and financing initiatives. He is a graduate of Amherst College (1989) and received his MBA from NYU Stern School of Business (1992). He is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in New York State. Effective as of January 15, 2015, Mr. Zimmerman was appointed Treasurer of the Company.

Douglas Cooper has been a director since June 2006. Mr. Cooper has been practicing law for over 40 years and is one of the partners of Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. Mr. Cooper is qualified to serve on our Board due to his long history with our Company and industry. Mr. Cooper graduated from Hamilton College, and received his Juris Doctor degree from Fordham Law School. Mr. Cooper also earned a Master’s degree in Corporate Law from NYU Law School. Douglas A. Cooper is the nephew of Jerome Cooper and the cousin of Paul Cooper. Mr. Cooper resigned as the Company’s Treasurer and Secretary effective as of January 15, 2015.

57

---

 

Joseph Barone has been a director of the Company since February 2009. Mr. Barone has been President of Insurance Financial Services, Inc., a provider of a wide variety of services to the insurance industry, including expert testimony as well as capital raising efforts such as initial public offerings, private placements, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Barone was formerly a member of the Board of Directors of the Bus Companies. In addition, Mr. Barone has been Senior Vice President of Swiss ReServices Corporation, Managing Director of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and Vice President of Salomon Brothers Inc. Mr. Barone is qualified to serve on our Board as one of our independent directors based on his prior service as a Board member, knowledge of our Company and his financial industry experience. Mr. Barone graduated from Brandeis University with a Bachelors’ degree in economics in 1956 and received a Master’s degree in Business Administration from New York University in 1961. He is a chartered financial analyst.

John Leahy has been a director of the Company since June 2006. Mr. Leahy is presently President of JJL Consulting. From 1998 to 2006, Mr. Leahy was Managing Director of Citibank Private Bank operations in Long Island. Prior to that, Mr. Leahy was a Senior Vice President of Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. Mr. Leahy is qualified to serve on our Board as one of our independent directors based on his long history as a private and commercial banker, giving him financial industry experience. Mr. Leahy holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Dayton, and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Long Island University. Mr. Leahy is deemed an independent director.

Stanley Perla has been a director of the Company since January, 2013. Mr. Perla was a partner with Ernst & Young LLP, a public accounting firm, from September, 1978 to June, 2003, and Managing Partner of Cornerstone Accounting Group LLP, from June, 2008 to May, 2011. He served as Ernst & Young’s National Director of Real Estate Accounting, as well as Ernst & Young’s National Accounting and Auditing Committee. He is an active member of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and the National Association of Real Estate Companies. He is currently chair and/or a member of the Madison Harbor Balanced Strategies, American Real Estate Income Fund, American Realty Capital Fund V, and the American Realty Capital Hospitality Trust audit committees. He has also served as a director and/or member of the audit committees of American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Fund, American Mortgage Acceptance Company and Lexington Realty Trust, and Vice President/Director of Internal Audit for Vornado Realty Trust (July 2003 to May 2008). Mr. Perla is qualified to serve on our Board as one of our independent directors based on his accounting experience within our industry as well as his real estate and financial industry experience. He graduated from Baruch College, where he obtained his BBA in accounting in 1965, and his MBA in taxation in 1970. He is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of New Jersey and New York. Mr. Perla is deemed an independent director.

Donald Schaeffer has been a director of the Company since June 2006. Mr. Schaeffer has extensive accounting and legal experience in real estate and tax. In 1982, he joined the accounting firm, Kandel Schaeffer, in which he eventually became an officer and owner. Through successor accounting firms, he became co-owner and President of Schaeffer & Sam, P.C., which he has practiced with for the past twelve years. Mr. Schaeffer is qualified to serve on our Board as one of our independent directors based on his experience as both an attorney and accountant within our industry as well as his financial industry experience. He graduated from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, in 1972 and Columbia University School of Law in 1975. He is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of New York. Mr. Schaeffer is deemed an independent director.

Harvey Schneider has been a director of the Company since June 2007. Mr. Schneider is currently a partner at the law firm of Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson LLP. Mr. Schneider is admitted to practice law in New York and Florida. For approximately fifty years he has practiced in the field of trusts and estates for individuals, and employee benefits and succession planning for business entities. Mr. Schneider is qualified to serve on our board as one of our independent directors through his experience as an attorney in the fields of employee benefits and business succession planning. Mr. Schneider is a 1955 graduate of Pennsylvania State University with a Bachelors’ degree in Business Administration and a 1958 graduate of the New York University School of Law. Mr. Schneider is deemed an independent director.

Jeffrey Wu has been a director of the Company since January 2013. Mr. Wu is an active and accomplished investor in commercial real estate and many other businesses. Since the mid-1980’s, he has transacted over sixty properties totaling more than four million square feet. He is also the principal shareholder, a founder and director of United International Bank. In addition, he is the sole owner of Hong Kong Supermarket Chain, one of the largest Asian supermarket chains with stores in multi-states. Jeffrey is a major contributor to many charities and non-profit organizations, and serves as a director of the New York Law Enforcement Foundation. Mr. Wu is qualified to serve on our Board due to his extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Wu is deemed an independent director.

Except as noted above and elsewhere in this filing, there are no family relationships between any of the Company’s executive officers or directors and there are no arrangements or understandings between a director and any other person pursuant to which such person was elected as director.

Except as set forth below, no director or officer of the Company has, during the last 10 years, been subject to or involved in any legal proceedings described under Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, been convicted of any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic

58

---

 

violations or similar misdemeanors), or been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to, United States federal or state securities laws or finding any violations with respect to such laws.

On December 17, 2014, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) approved and adopted the Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Order of Further Prohibition from Further Participation, Order to Pay a Civil Money Penalty and Order for Restitution (the “Stipulation and Consent”) entered into by Jeffrey Wu in November 2014, a Company Board member (the “Respondent”), individually and as an institution-related party of United International Bank, Flushing, NY (the “Bank”) and also issued an Order of Further Prohibition from Further Participation, Order to Pay a Civil Money Penalty and Order for Restitution (the “Order”) against the Respondent.  The Order was issued pursuant to Sections 8(e), 8(b)(6) and 8(i)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (the “Act”). The FDIC alleged that the Respondent, in his capacity as an institution-related party to the Bank, engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practices, and/or breaches of fiduciary duties in connection with certain nominee loan arrangement. Without admitting or denying any grounds for the foregoing allegations, the Respondent consented to the issuance of the Order and to paying (i) $500,000 to the U.S. Treasury as a civil money penalty paid in full on December 17, 2014, (ii) $285,286 as restitution to the Bank (to be paid in monthly installments commencing in April 2015), and (iii) approximately $2.8 million in toto also as restitution to the Bank in full satisfaction of certain loans extended to the Respondent through nominee borrowers, on the earlier of any date the Bank is merged, sold or acquired, or June 30, 2016. In addition, the Respondent is also prohibited from (i) participating in the conduct of the affairs of any financial institution as set forth in Section 8(e)(7)(a) of the Act, (ii) soliciting, voting or transferring any voting rights in any such financial institution, (iii) violating any previously approved (by any federal banking agency) voting agreements, and (iv) voting for a director or serving as an institution-affiliated party. The Respondent is prohibited from seeking any indemnification from any financial institutions for the civil money penalties referenced above. The Order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC. The foregoing description of the Stipulation and Consent and the Order is qualified in its entirety by reference to the texts of such documents.

Board Membership, Meetings and Attendance

The Board oversees the business affairs of our Company and monitors the performance of management. Each director holds office for the term for which he or she is elected or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, his resignation, or he is removed in the manner provided by our Bylaws. All of our officers devote their full-time attention to our business.

Directors are reelected at the Annual Meetings of stockholders. We have a staggered Board of Directors. Class I directors have a term expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2016 and until their successors are elected and qualified. Class II directors have a term expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2017 and until their successors are elected and qualified. Class III directors have a term expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2015 and until their successors are elected and qualified. Directors reelected at such time shall be reelected to three year terms. Officers are appointed by the Board and serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Our Board held 5 meetings during 2014 which were attended by all directors. We encourage all members of the Board to attend annual meetings of stockholders, but there is no formal policy as to their attendance. At the 2014 Annual Meeting of stockholders, all members of the Board attended. The independent directors of our Board regularly meet in executive session without management present. Generally, the meetings follow after each quarterly meeting of the Board and each committee.

The membership and responsibilities of these current committees are summarized below. Additional information regarding the responsibilities of each committee is found in, and is governed by, our Bylaws, each committee’s Charter, where applicable, specific directions of the Board, and certain mandated regulatory requirements. The Charters of the Audit and Compensation Committees, as well as the Code of Conduct and Ethics are available at the Company’s website at http://www.gtjreit.com. The information on the Company’s website is not a part of this Annual Report. The information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it.

Board Committees

Audit Committee

We have an Audit Committee comprised of four directors, Messrs. Perla, Leahy, Schaeffer, and Barone, all of whom are independent directors. Mr. Perla is designated as Chairman; he also serves as the Audit Committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of our financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. In general, the Audit Committee selects and appoints the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing:

59

---

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Audit Committee held 4 meetings and all of the members attended all of the meetings.

Compensation Committee

We have a Compensation Committee comprised of Messrs. Barone, Leahy, Schneider, and Wu all of whom are deemed independent directors. Mr. Barone is designated as Chairman. The Compensation Committee establishes compensation policies and programs for our directors and executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board will use data, showing current and historic elements of compensation, when reviewing executive compensation. The Committee is empowered to review all components of executive officer and director compensation for consistency with the overall policies and philosophies of the Company relating to compensation issues. The Committee may from time to time delegate duties and responsibilities to subcommittees or a Committee member. The Committee may retain and receive advice, in its sole discretion, from compensation consultants. None of the members of our Compensation Committee is one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Pursuant to its Charter, the Compensation Committee is authorized to retain and terminate, without Board or management approval, the services of an independent compensation consultant to provide advice and assistance. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms, and reviews the independence of the consultant and any other services that the consultant or the consultant’s firm may provide to the company. The Chair of the Compensation Committee reviews, negotiates and executes an engagement letter with the compensation consultants. The compensation consultant must directly report to the Compensation Committee.  In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged FTI Consulting (“FTI”) to review the Company’s executive management and Board member compensation policies and levels. FTI completed its review and delivered its recommendations to the Committee on April 17, 2014. The FTI engagement did not exceed $16,000. Except as set forth above, FTI provided no other services to the Company in 2014.  In December 2013, the Company’s executive management engaged Gressle & McGinley (“G&M”) to provide its review and recommendations of the named executive officer compensation (CEO, President/COO, CFO and Executive VP) levels in connection with 2013 fiscal year bonuses, including, without limitations, providing compensation analysis and peer group review as well as salary and performance target analysis. G&M completed its review and delivered its recommendations to the management.  Subsequently, the Company’s executive management engaged the services of G&M to review and provide its recommendations pertaining to (i) the named executive officer compensation levels for the 2014 fiscal year bonuses and (ii) the non-management Board member compensation levels. G&M completed its review and delivered its recommendations in February 2015. The G&M engagements, in the aggregate, did not exceed $43,000. Except as set forth above, G&M provides no other services to the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Compensation Committee held 10 meetings. With the exception of Jeffrey Wu, all of our directors attended at least 75% of all committee meetings.

The Board of Directors does not have a stand-alone Nominating Committee. Instead, the full Board carries out duties of a nominating committee. The Board has not adopted written guidelines regarding nominees for director.

Corporate Governance Matters; Risk Oversight and Management

When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board focused primarily on each person’s background and experience as reflected in the information discussed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above  Our directors possess relevant and industry-specific experience and knowledge relevant to the size and nature of our business, which we believe enhances the Board’s ability to oversee, evaluate and direct our overall corporate strategy. The Board annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding the composition and size of the Board so that the Board consists of members with the proper expertise, skills, attributes, and personal and professional backgrounds needed by the Board, consistent with applicable regulatory requirements.

60

---

 

Our Board believes that all of its members (including director nominees) should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. In considering a director nominee, the Board will consider criteria including the nominee’s current or recent experience as a senior executive officer, whether the nominee is independent, as that term is defined under the independence requirements applicable to the Company, the business, scientific or engineering experience currently desired on the Board, geography, the nominee’s industry experience, and the nominee’s general ability to enhance the overall composition of the Board. The Board does not have a formal policy on diversity; however, in recommending directors, the Board considers the specific background and experience of the Board members and other personal attributes in an effort to provide a diverse mix of capabilities, contributions, and viewpoints to facilitate the Board’s discharge of its responsibilities.

The Board has no formal policy with respect to separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) or with respect to whether the Chairman should be a member of management or an independent director, and believes that these are matters that should be discussed and determined by the Board from time to time. Currently, Paul Cooper serves as our Chairman and CEO. We believe he is well suited to manage the responsibility of implementing our corporate strategy and leading discussions, at the Board level, regarding performance relative to our corporate strategy, which accounts for a significant portion of the time devoted at our Board meetings. We believe this arrangement serves the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The Board believes that risk management is an important component of the Company’s corporate strategy. While we assess specific risks at our committee levels, the Board, as a whole, oversees our risk management process and discusses and reviews with management major policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Board is regularly informed through its interactions with management and committee reports about risks we face in the course of our business.

Director Independence

As of December 31, 2014, our Board of Directors consisted of ten members, six of whom were deemed independent. The Board elects to apply the NASDAQ Stock Market corporate governance requirements and standards in its determination of the independence status of each Board and Board committee member. The members of the Audit Committee are also “independent” as defined under the Exchange Act and applicable rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Board based its independence determinations primarily on a review of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment and transaction history, affiliations and family and other relationships and on discussions with the directors. Except as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report, none of our directors engages in any transaction, relationship, or arrangement contemplated under section 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. A copy of the Code will be provided to any person without charge upon written request to our corporate address to the attention of the Secretary.

 

 

61

---

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation of each executive officer of the Company and/or their subsidiaries for the two years ended December 31, 2014 (“Named executive officers”):

 

 

 

Grants of Plan Based Awards and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End:

All options granted to our named executive officers in 2008 are non-qualified stock options. The exercise price per share of each option granted to our named executive officers was determined by our Board of Directors on the date of the grant. All of the stock options granted to our named executive officers in 2008 were granted under our 2007 Plan. No grants plan-based awards were made to the named executive officers in 2014.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:

 

62

---

 

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to restricted stock awards held by each named executive officer as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding stock option awards granted to our named executive officers outstanding as of December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested:

No options were exercised by our named executive officers in 2014.

Pension Benefits:

We do not currently maintain qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation:

We do not currently maintain non-qualified defined contribution plans or other deferred compensation plans.

Employee Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control:

Except as set forth below, there are no employment agreements or agreements providing for potential payments upon termination or a change in controls at December 31, 2014.

Paul Cooper Employment Agreement

Paul Cooper’s employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2013, provides for an initial term of three years and two successive automatic one year renewal terms, unless either party gives written notice to the other party of its desire to terminate the agreement. The agreement provides for the payment of a base salary at the annual rate of $550,000, subject to annual increases at the

63

---

 

discretion of the Company. Additionally, Mr. Cooper may earn a cash bonus of $250,000 per year and an equity bonus payable in shares of the Company’s restricted common stock valued at $150,000 per year, upon the achievement of certain benchmarks set forth in an annual budget approved by the Board, which amounts are subject to adjustments in the Board’s review and discretion, as set forth in the agreement. In addition, the agreement provides that the Company will provide Mr. Cooper with certain usual and customary benefits commensurate with his position including without limitation, medical insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, and participation in 401(k) plan. In the event that (a) the Company terminates the agreement without cause, (b) Mr. Cooper terminates the agreement for good reason, (c) the Company does not renew the employment agreement after expiration of the initial term or any renewal term, as the case may be, or (d) following a change in control and (i) the Company, or any successor entity terminates Mr. Cooper without cause, or (ii) Mr. Cooper terminates his employment for good reason, then the Company will have severance obligations to Mr. Cooper, including severance payments, accelerated vesting of unvested equity bonus and COBRA payments for the greater of the remainder of the initial term or one year.  The severance payments will be calculated as follows: (a) if Mr. Cooper’s employment is terminated following a change in control, or for good reason, the Company will pay him base salary and bonus that he would have earned for the remainder of the initial term or one year, whichever is greater. If the Company does not extend the agreement following expiration of the initial term and provided that the Company achieved the bonus criteria for each of the three years of the initial term, the Company will pay Mr. Cooper one times his base salary and one times his bonus amount.  If such termination occurs during a renewal term, the Company will pay Mr. Cooper the base salary and bonus (assuming achievement of the bonus criteria for such renewal term) he could have earned during the remainder of such renewal term.

Louis Sheinker Employment Agreement

Louis Sheinker’s employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2013, provides for an initial term of three years and two successive automatic one year renewal terms, unless either party gives written notice to the other party of its desire to terminate the agreement.  The agreement provides for the payment of a base salary at the annual rate of $500,000, subject to annual increases at the discretion of the Company. Additionally, Mr. Sheinker may earn a cash bonus of $200,000 per year and an equity bonus payable in shares of the Company’s restricted common stock valued at $50,000 per year, upon the achievement of certain benchmarks set forth in an annual budget approved by the Board, which amounts are subject to adjustments in the Board’s review and discretion, as set forth in the agreement.  In addition, the agreement provides that the Company will provide Mr. Sheinker with certain usual and customary benefits commensurate with his position including without limitation, medical insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, and participation in 401(k) plan. In the event that (a) the Company terminates the agreement without cause, (b) Mr. Sheinker terminates the agreement for good reason, (c) the Company does not renew the employment agreement after expiration of the initial term or any renewal term, as the case may be, or (d) following a change in control and (i) the Company, or any successor entity terminates Mr. Sheinker without cause, or (ii) Mr. Sheinker terminates his employment for good reason, then the Company will have severance obligations to Mr. Sheinker, including severance payments, accelerated vesting of unvested equity bonus and COBRA payments for the greater of the remainder of the initial term or one year.  The severance payments shall be calculated as follows: (a) if Mr. Sheinker’s employment is terminated following a change in control as provided for in the agreement, or for good reason, the Company will pay him base salary and bonus (assuming achievement of the bonus criteria) that he would have earned for the remainder of the initial term or one year, whichever is greater.  If the Company does not extend the agreement following expiration of the initial term and provided that the Company achieved the bonus criteria for each of the three years of the initial term, the Company will pay Mr. Sheinker one times his base salary and one times his bonus amount.  If such termination occurs during a renewal term, the Company will pay Mr. Sheinker the base salary and bonus (assuming achievement of the bonus criteria for such renewal term) he could have earned during the remainder of such renewal term.

Ben Zimmerman Employment Letter

On June 4, 2014, the Board approved appointment of Ben Zimmerman as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, to commence his employment with the Company on June 16, 2014. The Board also approved the terms and provisions of Mr. Zimmerman’s employment with the Company as set forth in certain Employment Letter, to include, among others: (i) base salary of $225,000 per annum, subject to review by the Board on an annual basis; (ii) an opportunity to earn an annual bonus in the discretion of and subject to the Board’s review, and (iii) eligibility to participate in the Company’s health, long-term care and other benefit programs. In addition, the Employment Letter also contains confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants customary for agreements of this nature.

Jerome Cooper Separation Agreement

On December 11, 2013, the Company and Jerome Cooper, the Company’s Chairman of the Board entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release (the “Agreement”).  The Agreement provides for the payment to Mr. Cooper of an aggregate of $360,000, payable in three equal annual installments of $120,000 each, commencing January 1, 2014 and continuing on the next two anniversaries thereof.  The Agreement contains, among other things, a general release in favor of the Company of all claims by Mr. Cooper which he may have against the Company which arose or accrued prior to the effective date of the Agreement.

64

---

 

Douglas Cooper Separation Agreement

Effective as of January 15, 2015, following his resignation from the offices of the Company’s Secretary and Treasurer, Douglas Cooper and the Company executed a certain Separation Agreement and General Release (the “Agreement”). The Agreement provides for a severance payment to Mr. Cooper in the aggregate amount of approximately $77,800 (less payroll and other customary deductions) and contains a mutual release of claims by the parties to the agreement. The Severance Agreement also contains certain other provisions that are customary in agreements of this nature.

Independent Director Compensation:

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation to our independent directors for 2014 services:

 

Our non-officer Directors receive the following forms of compensation:

 

 

65

---

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 2015, information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by (1) each person who is known to the Company to be the owner of more than five (5%) percent of the Company’s common stock (2) each of the Company’s directors and executive officers and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have beneficial ownership of any shares that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of December 31, 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Directors and executive officers and their affiliates and associates have engaged in the following transactions with the Company, (excluding customary salary payments as employees).

Paul Cooper, our Chairman and CEO, and Louis Sheinker, our President, COO and Secretary, each hold passive, minority ownership interests in a real estate brokerage firm, The Rochlin Organization. The firm acted as the exclusive broker for one of the Company’s properties. In 2013, the firm introduced a new tenant to the property, resulting in the execution of a lease agreement and a subsequent lease modification. The firm earned aggregate brokerage cash commissions of approximately $60,000 based on a total lease value of $1,015,000. In January 2014, the new tenant expanded further which resulted in approximately $95,000 of brokerage commissions on the additional lease modification value of $2,100,000.

The Company formerly had a lease agreement with Lighthouse 444 Limited Partnership (“Lighthouse”), the owner of the building at 444 Merrick Road, Lynbrook, NY in which Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker were managing members of the general partner. The lease was terminated on January 16, 2014. Additionally, Lighthouse Sixty, LP, owner of the building at 60 Hempstead Avenue, West Hempstead, NY, and of which Paul Cooper and Louis Sheinker are managing members of the general partner, have a lease agreement with the Company expiring in 2020 for office and storage space at an initial base rent of approximately $234,000 with aggregate lease payments totaling approximately $1.8 million.

Douglas Cooper, a director of the Company, is a partner of Ruskin, Moscou, Faltischek, P.C. (“RMF”), and RMF has acted as counsel to the Company. Fees paid to RMF for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $31,704 and $483,767,

66

---

 

respectively, representing fees and expenses for various divestitures, preparation of all documentation related to the Wu/Lighthouse transaction, and general corporate matters.

On November 4, 2014, the Company invested approximately $1.8 million for a limited partnership interest in Garden 1101 Stewart L.P. (“Garden 1101”). Garden 1101 was formed for the purpose of acquiring a 90,000 square foot office building in Garden City, NY that will be converted to a medical office building. The general partners of Garden 1101 include the members of Green Holland Ventures; Paul Cooper, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company and Louis Sheinker, the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.  There are several limited partners, including a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTJ Realty LP.

Policy Concerning Related Party Transactions:

In February 2009, our Board adopted a formal written policy (the “Policy”) concerning the identification, review and approval of Related Party Transactions (as such term is defined in the Policy).

Identification of Potential Related Party Transactions:

Related Party Transactions will be brought to management’s and the Board’s attention in a number of ways. Each of our directors and executive officers is instructed and periodically reminded to promptly inform the Secretary of any potential Related Party Transactions. In addition, each director and executive officer completes a questionnaire on an annual basis designed to elicit information about any potential Related Party Transactions.

Any potential Related Party Transactions that are brought to our attention are analyzed by our outside counsel in consultation with management, as appropriate, to determine whether the transaction or relationship does, in fact, constitute a Related Party Transaction requiring compliance with the Policy.

Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions:

At each of its meetings, the Board will be provided with the details of each new, existing, or proposed Related Party Transaction, including the terms of the transaction, the business purpose of the transaction, and the effects on the Company and the relevant Related Party. In determining whether to approve a Related Party Transaction, the Board will consider, among other factors, the following factors to the extent relevant to the Related Party Transaction:

Any member of the Board who has an interest in the transaction under discussion will abstain from voting on the approval of the Related Party Transaction, but may, if so requested by the Chairperson of the Board, participate in some or all of the Board’s discussions of the Related Party Transaction. Upon completion of its review of the transaction, the Board may determine to permit or to prohibit the Related Party Transaction.

 

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

On April 8, 2009, the Audit Committee appointed BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and have reported on the financial statements in this 2014 Annual Report.

67

---

 

The following table presents aggregate fees billed for each of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP in the following categories:

 

Audit fees. These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and the required review of quarterly financial statements, audit of the Company’s 401(k) plan and other procedures performed by BDO USA, LLP in order for them to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. These fees also cover services that are normally provided by independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit related fees. These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, internal control reviews, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax fees. These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in BDO USA, LLP’s tax division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax planning and tax advice.

All other fees. These are fees for any services not included in the above-described categories, including assistance with internal audit plans, risk assessments, and other regulatory filings.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all anticipated annual audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm prior to the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm with respect to such permissible services. With respect to audit services and permissible non-audit services not previously approved, the Audit Committee has authorized the Chairman of the Audit Committee to approve such audit services and permissible non-audit services, provided the Chairman informs the Audit Committee of such approval at its next regularly scheduled meeting. All “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” and “Tax Fees” set forth above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. In accordance with Section 10A(i) of the Exchange Act, before BDO USA, LLP was engaged by us to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement was approved by our Audit Committee.

 

 

 

68

---

 

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

 

69

---

 

70

---

 

71

---

 

72

---

 

73

---

 

74

---

 

75

---

 

 

 

 

76

---

 

GTJ REIT, Inc

Schedule III- Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (in thousands)

 

77

---

 

 

 

 

78

---

 

 

 

 

 

79

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

80