MCG CAPITAL CORP - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-321123114.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-322123114.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-231123114.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-312123114.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-311123114.htm
EX-21 - SUBSIDIARIES - MCG CAPITAL CORP	ex-21123114subsidiaries.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

___________________

Commission file number 0-33377

MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		54-1889518
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1001 19th Street North, 10th Floor, Arlington, VA		22209
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(703) 247-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2014, was $208,493,565, based on $3.92 per share, the last reported sale price of the shares of common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. For purposes of this computation, shares held by certain stockholders and by directors and executive officers of the Registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion of shares held by such persons is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, to be an admission that such persons are affiliates of the Registrant. There were 37,074,635 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 23, 2014.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as indicated herein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I		1
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	17
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	26
Item 2.	Properties	26
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	27
PART II		28
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	28
Item 6.	Selected Consolidated Financial Data	31
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	62
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	64
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	99
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	99
Item 9B.	Other Information	100
PART III		101
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	101
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	101
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	101
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	101
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	101
PART IV		102
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	102
SIGNATURES		107

PART I



ITEM 1.	BUSINESS

General

We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to lower middle-market companies throughout the United States. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investment to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations, buyouts, organic growth, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a BDC we must meet various regulatory tests, which include investing at least 70% of our total assets in private or thinly traded public U.S.-based companies and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt generally may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets).

In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes and obtain favorable RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain requirements, including certain minimum distribution requirements. If we satisfy these requirements, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, allowing us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. From time to time, our wholly owned subsidiaries may execute transactions that trigger corporate-level tax liabilities. In such cases, we recognize a tax provision in the period when it becomes more likely than not that the taxable event will occur.

Corporate Structure

We make certain of our investments through wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are structured as Delaware corporations and limited liability companies, to hold the assets of one or more of our portfolio companies. Some of these subsidiaries in turn have wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are Delaware corporations that hold the assets of certain of our portfolio companies.

Company Background

We were incorporated in Delaware in 1998. On March 18, 1998, we changed our name from MCG, Inc. to MCG Credit Corporation and, on June 14, 2001, to MCG Capital Corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 1001 19th Street North, 10th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209 and our telephone number is (703) 247-7500.

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “Company,” “MCG,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to MCG Capital Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires.

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and, accordingly, file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at the Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Our Internet address is www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge on our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

Our logo, trademarks and service marks are the property of MCG. Other trademarks or service marks appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective holders.

Significant Developments in 2014


•	Originations and Advances — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we made $0.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, in originations and advances to existing portfolio companies.


•	Loan Monetizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we received $15.6 million and $265.4 million, respectively, in loan payoffs and amortization payments.

•

Equity Monetizations and Realizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we received $5.7 million and $16.7 million, respectively, in proceeds from the sale of equity investments, principally the sale of securities in each of Accurate Group Holdings, Inc., C7 Data Centers, Inc., G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd. and IDOC, LLC. With the exception of the publicly listed minority equity investment in Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc., in which we have a built-in capital tax loss of approximately $93 million, and the pending sale of our last control equity investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC that we expect to close in March 2015, during the year ended December 31, 2014 we exited all of our equity positions.


•	Loans on Non-Accrual — As of December 31, 2014, we had no loans on non-accrual, at cost or fair value.

•

Reduced Leverage — As of December 31, 2014, we had no borrowings. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2014, we (i) terminated our MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust; (ii) terminated our unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver; (iii) prepaid in full the $150 million of small business investment company, or SBIC, debentures owed to the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, by Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital and (iv) sold the remaining participating interest in our secured financing.

•

Open-Market Purchases of Our Stock — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased 7,827,960 and 32,186,556 shares of our common stock at weighted average purchase prices of $3.74 and $3.73, respectively, including 4,859,744 shares purchased on December 10, 2014 in a modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer at $3.75 per share. In January 2015, we repurchased 1,061,075 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.93, which we believe will contribute two cents per share in accretion to our net asset value in the first quarter of 2015. We acquired these shares from sellers in open market transactions or the modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer. We retired these shares upon settlement, thereby reducing the number of shares issued and outstanding.


•	Dividends — For the year ended December 31, 2014, we declared and paid $0.25 per share in dividends.

•

Operating Costs — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, our total operating costs were $3.0 million and $23.7 million, respectively. During the three month period ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $0.6 million in severance costs and $0.7 million in professional fees associated with the lawsuit against various defendants involved in our subordinated loan transaction with Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc., or Color Star Litigation, all of which we included in general and administrative costs. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $1.3 million in salaries and benefits related to successful Solutions Capital investment exits and $1.1 million in amortization of employee restricted stock awards that accelerated upon termination of former employees, all of which we included in employee compensation. In addition, during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $3.4 million in severance payments, $2.3 million in Color Star Litigation costs and $0.3 million in contractual payments due our former CEO tied to successful Solutions Capital investment exits, all of which we included in general and administrative costs.

Outlook

We continue to believe that current market conditions in our primary lending markets are consistent with a peak of a credit cycle. We believe that we have successfully monetized investments, some of which were challenging, into a very liquid market, improving the quality of our assets and our cash position and resulting in a stronger balance sheet. We also elected to use excess cash to repay all of our outstanding debt and to repurchase our stock in the open market, including a modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer in December 2014. As a result of these capital allocation decisions, we have meaningfully reduced the size of our balance sheet and our net earning assets.

In January 2015, we entered into a merger agreement to sell our largest equity investment, Pharmalogic Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC. The merger agreement contains customary representations

and warranties of Pharmalogic Holdings Corp. and RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC as well as covenants of Pharmalogic Holdings Corp. to conduct its business in a commercially reasonable manner consistent with past practices. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions including receipt of certain regulatory approvals. In connection with the sale transaction, we committed to amend and restate our existing senior debt to provide $17.5 million of first lien financing at 8.5% to support the sale transaction. We expect this transaction to close by March 31, 2015. Upon consummation of the transaction, we will have exited all of our control investments. See Note 13—Significant Subsidiary in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Though we continue to take steps to rationalize our cost infrastructure and to strengthen our balance sheet, our primary asset is unencumbered cash and we do not have sufficient net earning assets to generate positive net operating income at this time.

Based on a thorough business review, on February 9, 2015, our board of directors announced its intention to explore strategic alternatives for the Company to maximize value for stockholders, including a possible sale of the Company. We may receive offers or engage in a transaction in the ordinary course which may ultimately result in a sale of any or all of our assets, above or below the fair value on our balance sheet at that time. We may also consider a variety of extraordinary transactions, such as a sale of the Company, a restructuring, a recapitalization, a merger, a consolidation, a business combination, a special dividend to stockholders, a liquidation or other transaction or series of transactions. No timetable has been set for the Company's process and we do not expect to comment further or update the market with any additional information on the process unless and until the board of directors approves a specific transaction or otherwise deems disclosure appropriate or necessary.

There can be no assurance that this strategic alternatives review will result in the Company changing its current business plan, pursuing a particular transaction, completing any such transaction, or that any transaction we might enter will prove to be beneficial to our stockholders. Further, it is not certain what impact any potential strategic alternatives, or a decision not to pursue any potential strategic alternatives, may have on the Company's stock price, operating results, business or financial condition, liquidity, or business prospects.

MCG’s Investment Portfolio

As of December 31, 2014, the majority of our investment portfolio consists of loans to lower middle-market companies that generate annual revenue of less than $200 million and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, in the range of $3-$15 million. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investments to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations and buyouts, as well as for organic growth and working capital. We identify and source new portfolio companies through multiple channels, including private equity sponsors, investment bankers, brokers, fund-less sponsors, institutional syndication partners, owner operators, and other club lenders that facilitate peer-to-peer loans. We generally invest in some combination of senior debt, second-lien debt, secured and unsecured subordinated debt and equity.

As of December 31, 2014, we had debt and equity investments in seven portfolio companies with a combined fair value of $75.3 million. The following table summarizes the fair value and revenue contributions of our current investments.



(dollars in thousands)			Interest Rate						As of December 31, 2014				Year ended December 31, 2014
Portfolio Company	Industry	Investment	Current		PIK		Total		Fair Value		% of Portfolio		Revenues		% of Total Revenues

RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	Healthcare	Senior Debt	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	$	17,192	22.8	%	$	2,100	7.8	%
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC		Preferred LLC Interest							12,044		16.0	%	—		—	%
									29,236		38.8	%	2,100		7.8	%
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	Business Services	Senior Debt	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	14,172		18.8	%	2,024		7.6	%
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC	Broadcasting	Senior Debt	4.3	%	—		4.3	%	9,198		12.2	%	574		2.1	%
South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt	12.0	%	2.5	%	14.5	%	8,926		11.8	%	1,643		6.1	%
Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC	Manufacturing	Subordinated Debt	9.5	%	2.0	%	11.5	%	7,130		9.5	%	1,164		4.3	%
Intrafusion Holding Corp.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt	13.6	%	—		13.6	%	6,404		8.5	%	1,401		5.2	%
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.	Communications	Common Stock							266		0.4	%	—		—	%
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.		Warrants							—		—	%	—		—	%
									266		0.4	%	—		—	%
Total									$	75,332	100.0	%	$	8,906	33.1	%

In addition to our portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $105.8 million, or 57.6% of our total assets.

The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 at fair value:



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio
Debt investments
Senior secured debt	$	40,562	53.8	%	$	185,524	50.3	%
Subordinated debt
Secured	22,460		29.8		108,338		29.4
Unsecured	—		—		42,452		11.5
Total debt investments	63,022		83.6		336,314		91.2
Equity investments
Preferred equity	12,044		16.0		28,390		7.7
Common/common equivalents equity	266		0.4		4,169		1.1
Total equity investments	12,310		16.4		32,559		8.8
Total investments	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 4.3% to 14.5%, a portion of which may be deferred. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 85.8% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 14.2% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 59.9% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had LIBOR floors between 1.5% and 2.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.75% and 4.50%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percent of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.

From time to time, we make equity investments in companies in which we have also made debt investments. Our equity investments include preferred stock, common stock and warrants and, in many cases, board observation rights. We may invest across the capital structure of our portfolio companies using a combination of debt and equity investments to meet our portfolio companies’ needs and achieve favorable risk-adjusted returns.

As of December 31, 2014, our control companies comprised 38.8% of the fair value of our portfolio and contributed 9.5% of our total revenues during 2014. In January 2015, we entered into a merger agreement to sell our largest equity investment, Pharmalogic Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC. We expect this

transaction to close by March 31, 2015. Upon consummation of this transaction, we will have exited all of our control investments.

Competition

We compete with many types of investors for the portfolio companies in which we invest, including public and private funds (including other BDCs), commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds or hedge funds. As a result of these entrants, competition for investment opportunities has intensified in recent years and may intensify further in the future. A majority of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some may also have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments that may lead to additional market share and a competitive advantage over us. Unlike many of our competitors, we are also subject to regulatory restrictions and valuation requirements the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC.

The myriad competitive pressures we face require our management team to develop and maintain strong relationships with intermediaries, financial institutions, investment bankers, commercial bankers, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, consultants and other individuals within our network in order to keep apprised of potential investment opportunities. We have experienced significant executive turnover and staff reductions while we monetized a majority our investments and repurchased our stock in the open market, which we believe has negatively impacted our ability to remain active investors with current or prospective clients. If our management team fails to maintain its existing relationships or develop new ones with important sources of investment opportunities, we may fail to remain competitive for new business or to generate positive net operating income and our investment portfolio may languish as a result. Regardless of the strength of relationships, no one is obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.

While we do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, we may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure. If we do match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure to win business, we may then experience a decrease in investment income resulting from lower net earning assets. We may be precluded from taking advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time as a result of an inability to meet market terms, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and successfully make investments that are consistent with our investment objective. Failure to compete effectively for, and establish strong relationships that could lead to, new business would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Life Cycle of Debt and Equity Originations

The key aspects of our portfolio origination, servicing and monitoring process are set forth below. For each investment, we continue to evaluate investment risks and exposure relative to the amount of our total assets and net asset value, or NAV, and make adjustments as we deem prudent. Generally, we intend to keep the amount of our investment in any one company at or below $15 million, which we may accomplish by selling a portion of our initial investment to another investor post-close. We generally make loans with four- to six-year stated maturities. We believe the market-average hold period of a loan is approximately three years, although that figure has declined. Our equity investments generally do not have maturity dates.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE AND STRATEGIES

Our investment objective is to achieve attractive returns by generating current income and capital gains on our investments. We seek to increase our earnings and NAV by investing principally in debt or equity securities of lower middle-market companies or syndicated loans. We intend to earn interest, dividends and fees on our investments and we may report unrealized appreciation and depreciation as the fair value of our investments periodically increases or decreases. We realize capital gains or losses when the investment is eventually monetized.

The cost basis of our investments include unamortized original issue discount, premiums and fees, as well as payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest and dividends that are generally due at maturity or upon our exit from the investment.

When we originate debt and equity investments, we strive to achieve favorable risk-adjusted rates of return in the form of current income and capital gains, while maintaining credit and investment quality in our portfolio. Before making investments, we apply well established credit processes to assess investment risk and we structure and price our investments accordingly. We have developed proprietary analytics, data and knowledge to support our business activities. We designed our investment process to achieve the following strategic objectives:


•	generate favorable risk-adjusted rates of return by delivering capital and strategic insight to increase our portfolio companies’ enterprise value;


•	maintain sound credit and investment discipline and pricing practices, regardless of market conditions, to avoid adverse investment selection; and


•	manage risk by utilizing an integrated team approach to business development, underwriting and investment management.

We maintain a flexible approach to funding that permits us to adjust price, maturity and other transaction terms to accommodate the needs of our portfolio companies.

ORGANIZATION OF MCG’S INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS

Our organization includes experienced professionals who originate, underwrite, finance, syndicate, monitor and monetize investments. Our professional staff also provides accounting, finance, human resources, investor relations, legal, compliance and corporate governance functions critical to our business. As of December 31, 2014, we have six full time employees serving cross-functional roles in support of our business. The following bullets describe the key functional teams that are responsible for our investment processes:

•

Investment Management—Our investment professionals are responsible for identifying and performing a financial and risk analysis of potential investment opportunities. They also underwrite and manage our investment portfolio and lead any work-out or restructuring that may occur from time to time. After an investment is approved and funded, a cross-functional team manages and monitors the performance of our investments.

•

Credit Committee—Prospective investments are presented to MCG's credit committee for review and approval prior to issuing a term sheet. Final approval by the credit committee generally occurs after the deal team has substantially completed the underwriting process. The credit committee includes our Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel. Our board of directors has delegated authority to the credit committee to (i) originate, underwrite and fund any non-control, non-distressed investment of $15 million or less provided that the equity component does not exceed $3 million, (ii) originate any distressed investment of $5 million or less and (iii) increase any existing investment previously approved by the Company's investment and valuation committee up to a certain over-line or established amount. As a matter of practice, our board of directors is invited to participate at every credit committee meeting and in the review and approval of all investments, irrespective of investment size.

•

Investment and Valuation Committee of the Board of Directors—The investment and valuation committee reviews and approves all investments over $15 million and has the discretion to review and approve other investments. Subsequent to the review and funding of an investment, the investment and valuation committee makes recommendations that are used by our board of directors for its quarterly determination of the fair value of our investment portfolio.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

MCG and its predecessors have been active investors in lower middle-market companies since 1990. We believe our experience in lower middle-market investing is a meaningful competitive advantage that we use to operate our business. Our senior investment professionals and members of our credit committee have extensive experience investing in lower middle-market companies and in industries that we target, such as healthcare, business services, technology, software, information services and consumer directed businesses.

Our investment professionals identify and source new investments through multiple channels, including private equity sponsors, investment bankers, brokers, fund-less sponsors, institutional syndication partners, other club lenders and owner-operators. Our investment professionals also market to prospective portfolio companies identified through past relationships with executives, information gathered through proprietary and public research and relationships with accountants, lawyers and other professionals.

Once we identify a prospective portfolio company, we review its financial reports, business plan, corporate activities and other relevant information gathered from third-party databases, industry reports and publications. We focus on a company’s fundamental performance against industry conditions and operational benchmarks, and evaluate acceptable risks and returns. We work with our current and prospective portfolio companies to understand their business, as well as the costs and benefits of their corporate development initiatives, opportunities and competition. Our detailed analysis allows us to support our portfolio companies’ corporate development decisions, even in some cases where short-term financial ratios or other metrics may decline temporarily.

RISK ANALYSIS

After identifying a prospective investment, we review the company’s operating history, executive leadership team, opportunities and the market for the company's products and services during the life of our investment, as well as the potential risks and threats to the business or the markets in which it competes. As early as possible in the process, we generally conduct on-site meetings with key executives to learn more about the investment directly from the company's leadership team and tour the company's key facilities or operating locations.

To assess the validity and stability of the company's historical and projected financial performance we often, either ourselves or through a third-party firm, perform a review of quality of earnings. For select transactions, we may engage or rely on the research of industry specific due diligence firms that provide market research or insights that we judge as prudent or helpful in in the underwriting process.

Based on our experience, we also look at the company's capitalization, proposed sources and uses of proceeds, structural considerations of various securities in the capital structure, leverage, expected cash generation, affirmative and negative covenants, methods for repayment or exit from the investment and other important considerations specific to the investment.

In particular, we analyze certain key risks in light of our underwriting criteria, including financial characteristics and portfolio-specific risk that might arise from the new investment, including, but not limited to, the following:


•	Industry Risks—maturity, cyclicality and seasonality associated with the industries in which we invest, as well as the proportion of our portfolio that is invested in specific industries and individual portfolio companies;


•	Competitive Risks—strengths and weaknesses of the prospective portfolio company relative to their competitors’ pricing, product quality, customer loyalty, substitution and switching costs, brand positioning and capitalization. We also assess the defensibility of a prospect’s market position and its opportunity for increasing market share;


•	Management Risks—track records, industry experience, turnover in leadership, concentration of knowledge, the prospective portfolio company’s business plan and management incentives;

•

Regulatory Risks—industry specific regulation and regulation reform (e.g., healthcare reform, increased regulatory oversight, government reimbursement of for-profit schools, etc.), and economic or macro issues that may affect an investment (e.g., cost of utilities or access to power at historical rates in certain regions, access to nuclear materials for medical imaging, etc.), as well as regulations that may change the incentives of partners or investors in the investment (e.g., tax reform that may impact private equity funds or hedge funds, regulations of commercial banks, and potential reforms of BDCs);


•	Customer Concentration and Market Risks—sustainability, stability and opportunities for the growth of the prospective portfolio company's customer base, including the number and size of its customers, attrition rates and dependence on one or a limited number of customers; and


•	Technology Risks—impact of technological advances in the industries and portfolio companies in which we may invest.

In addition, we evaluate industry-specific comparisons, such as cash flow margins, product and cash flow diversification, revenue growth rates, cost structure and other operating benchmarks that are derived from historical and projected financial statements. Qualitative attributes we evaluate may include management skill and depth, industry risk, substitution risk, sensitivity to economic cycles, cyclicality, geographic diversification, facilities infrastructure, administration requirements and product quality and ranking.

We have developed a series of valuation techniques to assist us in determining the risk of a potential investment and quantifying its underlying value. Analyses of comparative public and private market transactions and other data form the basis of our enterprise valuations, along with current and projected market conditions. We also look to comparable public companies to benchmark the value of the proposed investment using public market data. Using these methods

provides multiple views of the value of the enterprise allowing us to calculate certain metrics used in both risk assessment and product pricing, such as loan-to-value ratios for our debt investments.

UNDERWRITING AND RISK MANAGEMENT

We initiate our underwriting process in tandem with the business development process, focusing on investment risk analysis. We perform standard due diligence on a prospective portfolio company’s financial performance, as well as customized analyses of its operations, systems, accounting policies, human resources and competitive, legal and regulatory environments.

In addition to gaining an in-depth understanding of a prospective portfolio company, our research and due diligence process evaluates industry-wide operational, strategic and valuation issues. We also examine emerging trends and competitive threats to the portfolio company, as well as the industry in which it operates. Portfolio companies may later draw on our valuable knowledge and insight obtained through our research to refine their strategic plans, identify acquisition opportunities and set appropriate financial and operational goals.

When presenting a prospective investment to our credit committee for approval, our investment professionals deliver a detailed investment memorandum. Should the dollar amount of the proposed investment exceed certain pre-defined thresholds, or include a significant investment in equity, the investment memorandum is also submitted to the investment and valuation committee of our board of directors for review and approval. The investment memorandum generally consists of the following:


•	a transaction overview, including a description of the business and the investment opportunity;


•	transaction rationale, underwriting considerations and an assessment of risks and mitigants;


•	historical financial analyses, projections and scenario modeling;


•	a service or product overview, customer and industry analyses, operational and regulatory analyses;


•	an assessment of the company's enterprise valuation relative to comparable public and private companies;


•	a description of the capital structure and the investment risk and return characteristics; and


•	a review of insights or reports obtained from third-party experts or due diligence firms.

INVESTMENT STRUCTURE

We evaluate our portfolio companies’ needs to develop investment structures that meet their capital requirements and business plans while protecting our own capital, with an expectation toward generating risk-adjusted returns through current income on our loans and capital gains on our equity investments. We structure our debt investments to mitigate risk by requiring appropriate financial and collateral coverage thresholds. To create the most effective and responsive deal structures, we consider payment priority, collateral or asset value, and financial support from guarantors and other credit enhancements. Since our investments typically include cash-flow loans, rather than asset-backed loans, we factor the enterprise value of the prospective portfolio company’s assets into our credit decisions. For loans classified as senior secured, second-lien and subordinated secured, we receive a security interest in all or a portion of the portfolio companies’ tangible and intangible assets, entitling us to a preferred position relative to both unsecured creditors and more junior lenders on the proceeds of those assets in the event of liquidation. In addition, our loan documents generally include affirmative covenants that require our portfolio companies to provide periodic financial information, notification of material events and compliance with laws, as well as restrictive covenants that prevent the portfolio company from taking a range of significant actions, such as incurring additional indebtedness or making acquisitions. Financial covenants require the portfolio companies to maintain or achieve specified financial ratios, such as cash flow leverage, interest charge coverage, total charge coverage, and, in certain cases, meet specific operational benchmarks.

Our business strategy dictates that we generally invest in some combination of the following securities:

•

Senior Secured Debt—We provide cash flow based senior secured debt in the form of revolving credit facilities as well as amortizing term loans, bullet maturity term loans and uni-tranche loans that blend characteristics of both senior and subordinated financing. Senior secured debt ranks senior in priority of payment to other debt and equity, and benefits from a first priority security interest in the assets of the borrower that serve as collateral for the loan(s). As such, virtually all other creditors rank junior to senior secured debt in the event of insolvency. Some of our borrowers grant a first lien on working capital collateral (i.e., receivables) to asset-based lenders that is outside of our collateral pool. Assuming we have a first lien on all other collateral, in such cases we would still classify our security as senior secured. Due to its lower risk profile and often more restrictive covenants as compared to other debt, senior secured debt generally earns a lower return.

•

Second-Lien Debt—We provide second-lien term loans on a sole-source or participant basis where assets or enterprise-value based borrowing capacity is not readily available within typical senior debt leverage constraints. Second-lien debt ranks senior in priority of payment to subordinated debt, unsecured debt, select junior securities, and equity. While second lien debt benefits from a collateral interest in the assets of the borrower, its liens are subordinated to those of senior secured debt in a liquidation. As such, senior secured creditors rank ahead of second lien creditors in the event of insolvency with respect to pursuing remedies against the collateral of a portfolio company, and receiving the proceeds thereof. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants as compared to senior debt, second-lien debt generally earns a higher return than senior debt. We classify second-lien term loans as "Subordinated Secured" debt in our consolidated financial statements.

•

Secured and Unsecured Subordinated Debt—We invest in secured and unsecured subordinated debt, which may be structured with a combination of current interest, deferred interest and equity-linked components. Payment of all subordinated debt, whether secured or unsecured, ranks behind payment of senior secured and second-lien debt. While the security interest of subordinated secured debt ranks behind that of the senior secured and second-lien debt, subordinated unsecured debt enjoys no security interest in the borrower's assets. In the event of insolvency, senior secured and second-lien creditors will be paid in full before the subordinated secured and subordinated unsecured creditors. Due to its higher risk profile and often less restrictive covenants as compared to other types of loans, subordinated debt generally earns a higher return than other debt.

•

Equity—We principally invest in equity securities of private companies or collateralized loan structures. From time to time we may invest in equity securities of public companies. In addition, we may receive warrants to purchase preferred or common stock of a portfolio company that are related to our debt investments in such portfolio company. Preferred stock ranks senior to common stock, and often carries the right to receive a preferential return upon the sale of the company.

To protect our investments and maximize our returns, we negotiate carefully the structure of each debt and equity security in our investment portfolio, and may require board observation rights as part of our initial investment to keep abreast of company matters. Our loan and equity documentation generally includes terms governing interest rate, amortization, prepayment premiums, financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership and corporate governance parameters, dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and put or call rights. In some cases, our loan agreements also allow for interest rate increases and decreases to the extent the portfolio company's financial or operational performance varies materially from the portfolio company's business plan.

In addition to capital, we also offer managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. Typically, this assistance involves strategic advice, evaluation of business plans, financial modeling assistance and industry research and expertise. Providing assistance to our portfolio companies enables us to maximize our value proposition for our portfolio companies, which, in turn, helps maximize our investment returns.

INVESTMENT APPROVAL PROCESS

Our investment approval process begins with an initial screening of a business plan or financing solicitation by one of our investment professionals to assess eligibility, sector, risk profile, investment fit and expected returns. Our investment professionals meet regularly with the members of our credit committee to discuss new opportunities. Simultaneously, a non-binding indication of interest may also be executed in support of a private equity firm issuing a bid for the transaction. Deals are judged by, among other things, a prospect's revenue run rate, continuity of solid cash flow, percentage of recurring revenue, gross profit margin, bad debt as a percentage of revenue, customer renewal rate, the prospect's marketing niche, level of competition, customer base quality and concentration and strength of the management team.

The credit committee determines whether the investment should be pursued, giving consideration to the risk return profile, industry concentrations and general economic outlook for the sector in which the business operates. In these meetings the credit committee also offers insight into key issues that must be resolved before a potential investment is funded. If the credit committee agrees to move forward with an investment, the terms are documented initially by a signed term sheet or letter of intent, as applicable, consistent with the pipeline report and committee clearance, and the deal proceeds to the documentation stage. The term sheet establishes the terms and conditions under which we propose to enter into a credit or investment relationship.

Generally, our underwriting process begins after our investment professionals receive a signed term sheet or letter of intent. The assigned investment professional is responsible for oversight and completion of comprehensive due diligence, and is expected to investigate and report on all critical aspects of the proposed investment. Our due diligence

often includes review of financial statements, discussion with key members of management, review of material contracts, background checks, reviews of customer and vendor relationships, confirmation of historical results and assumptions underlying forecasted results. When necessary or advisable based on industry or the history of the prospect itself, third party diligence is conducted. The underwriting process includes legal and business due diligence and typically an on-site visit with the prospect company, including its management team and any other key employees.

Once the underwriting process is complete, the investment professional responsible for the deal presents a credit approval memorandum, including detailed findings of the foregoing underwriting process, to the credit committee and, if required, the investment and valuation committee. If approved, the deal proceeds to final documentation and closure. All of our investments are approved by our credit committee. In addition, investments of over $15 million must also be approved by the investment and valuation committee of our board of directors.

INVESTMENT FUNDING

We fund our investments using cash from our balance sheet. As a BDC, we are subject to certain restrictions on incurring debt. For example, we are not permitted to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities (which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we have then issued) of at least 200%.

INVESTMENT MONITORING AND RESTRUCTURING

We monitor the status and financial performance of each company in our portfolio in order to evaluate overall portfolio quality and to facilitate quarterly valuations, which are approved by our board of directors. We are proactive in advising and communicating with companies that are underperforming and, in many instances, have added stricter covenant protection and rights over time. During the process of monitoring a loan in default, if required or necessary to protect our security interest, we will send a notice of non-compliance outlining the specific defaults that have occurred and preserving our contractual rights and remedies, followed by a review of the collateral, if any.

When our attempts to collect past due principal and/or interest on a loan are unsuccessful, we analyze the appropriate course of action. In some cases, we may consider restructuring the investment to better reflect the current financial performance of the portfolio company. We may need to extend liquidity to companies from time to time as part of a restructuring. Such a restructuring may, among other things, involve deferring principal and interest payments, adjusting interest rates or warrant positions, imposing additional fees, amending financial or operating covenants or converting debt to equity. In connection with a restructuring, we generally receive compensation from the portfolio company. When a restructuring is not an appropriate course of additional action, we generally pursue remedies available to us to minimize potential losses, including initiating foreclosure, liquidation proceedings or selling the loan.

When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the portfolio company to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.

INVESTMENT POLICIES

Our investment policies provide that we will not:


•	act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers, except to the extent that we may be deemed an “underwriter” of securities (i) purchased by us that must be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, before they may be offered or sold to the public, or (ii) in connection with offerings of securities by our portfolio companies;


•	sell securities short in an uncovered position;


•	write or buy uncovered put or call options, except to the extent of options, warrants or conversion privileges in connection with our loans or other investments, and rights to require the issuers of such investments or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances;


•	engage in the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, including futures contracts, except for the purpose of hedging in the ordinary course of business or where necessary in working out distressed loan or investment situations; or


•	acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of, or invest more than 5% of our total assets in any securities issued by, any other investment company, except if we acquire them as part of a merger, consolidation or acquisition of assets or if they result from a sale of a portfolio company, or otherwise as permitted under the 1940 Act.

All of the above policies and the investment and lending guidelines set by our board of directors or any committees, including our investment objective to achieve current income and capital gains, are not “fundamental” as defined under the 1940 Act. Therefore, our board may change them without notice to, or approval by, our stockholders.

Other than the restrictions pertaining to the issuance of senior securities under the 1940 Act, the percentage restrictions on investments generally apply on the effective date of the transaction. A subsequent change in a percentage resulting from market fluctuations or any cause other than an action by us will not require us to dispose of portfolio securities or to take other action to satisfy the percentage restriction.

We intend to conduct our business so as to retain our status as a BDC. As such, we may not acquire any assets, other than non-investment assets necessary and appropriate to our operations as a BDC, if after giving effect to such acquisition the value of our “qualifying assets” is less than 70% of the value of our total assets.

Investment Adviser

We have no investment adviser and are internally managed by our executive officers under the supervision of the board of directors. Our investment decisions are made by our officers, directors and senior investment professionals who serve on our credit and investment and valuation committees. None of our executive officers or other employees has the unilateral authority to approve any investment.

Regulation

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

As a BDC, we are regulated under the 1940 Act. The BDC structure provides stockholders the ability to retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock, while sharing in the possible benefits, if any, of investing in primarily privately owned companies.

In part, the 1940 Act requires us to be organized in the United States for the purpose of investing in, or lending to, primarily private companies and making managerial assistance available to them. As a BDC we may use capital provided by public stockholders and from other sources to invest in long-term, private investments in businesses.

We may not, however, change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by vote of a majority of our outstanding voting securities. The 1940 Act defines a majority of the outstanding voting securities as the lesser of:


i.	67% or more of such company’s shares present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of such company are present or represented by proxy; or


ii.	more than 50% of the outstanding shares of such company.

We currently do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

Qualifying Assets

A BDC must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) below. Thus, under the 1940 Act, we may not acquire any asset other than those of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are the following:


1.	Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions):


a.	is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer that:


i.	is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;


ii.	is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by us) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and


iii.	does not have any class of securities listed on a national securities exchange;


b.	is a company that meets the requirements of (a)(i) and (ii) above, but is not an eligible portfolio company because it has issued a class of securities on a national securities exchange, if:


i.	at the time of the purchase, we own at least 50% of the (x) greatest number of equity securities of such issuer and securities convertible into or exchangeable for such securities; and (y) the greatest amount of debt securities of such issuer, held by us at any point in time during the period when such issuer was an eligible portfolio company; and


ii.	we are one of the 20 largest holders of record of such issuer’s outstanding voting securities; or


c.	is a company that meets the requirements of (a)(i) and (ii) above, but is not an eligible portfolio company because it has issued a class of securities on a national securities exchange, if the aggregate market value of such company’s outstanding voting and non-voting common equity is less than $250.0 million.


2.	Securities of any eligible portfolio company that we control.

Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.


4.	Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.


5.	Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.


6.	Cash, cash items, U.S. Government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a BDC beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company. For the foreseeable future, we do not expect to add new control positions to our portfolio.

Significant Managerial Assistance

In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test discussed above, we must either control the issuer of the securities or offer to make available significant managerial assistance; except that, where we act together to purchase such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance means, among other things, to offer to provide and, if accepted, provide significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company through monitoring of its operations, selective participation in board and management meetings, consulting with and advising its officers and directors or other organizational or financial guidance.

Warrants and Options

Under the 1940 Act, we are subject to restrictions on the amount of warrants, options, restricted stock or rights to purchase shares of capital stock that we may have outstanding at any time. In particular, the amount of capital stock that would result from the conversion or exercise of all outstanding warrants, options or rights to purchase capital stock cannot exceed 25% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock. This amount is reduced to 20% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock if the amount of warrants, options or rights issued pursuant to an executive compensation plan would exceed 15% of our total outstanding shares of capital stock. We have received exemptive relief from the SEC permitting us to issue restricted stock to our employees and directors subject to the above conditions, among others. See Regulation—Exemptive and Other Relief.

Indebtedness and Senior Securities

We will be permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, we may not be permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on our outstanding common shares, or purchase any such shares, unless, at the time of such declaration or purchase, we have asset coverage of at least 200% after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution, or purchase price. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes.

Capital Structure

As a BDC, we generally cannot issue and sell our common stock at a price below the current NAV per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current NAV of our common stock in a rights offering to our stockholders if: 1) our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders; 2) our stockholders approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less than the current NAV; and 3) the price at which our common stock is to be issued and sold is not less than a price that, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any sales load).

We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.

We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any registered investment company (as defined in the 1940 Act), invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one such investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of such investment companies in the aggregate.

1940 Act Code of Ethics

We have adopted and will maintain a code of ethics that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain personal securities transactions by our officers and directors. Personnel subject to the code may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the code’s requirements. Our Amended and Restated Code of Ethics, or 1940 Act Code of Ethics, will generally not permit investments by our employees in securities that may be purchased or held by us. We may be prohibited under the 1940 Act from conducting certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC.

A copy of our 1940 Act Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Form 10-K. In addition, you may read and copy the 1940 Act Code of Ethics at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090. In addition, the 1940 Act Code of Ethics attached as an exhibit to our registration statement and is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also obtain copies of the 1940 Act Code of Ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.

PRIVACY PRINCIPLES

We are committed to maintaining the privacy of our stockholders and safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.

Generally, we do not receive any non-public personal information relating to our stockholders, although certain non-public personal information of our stockholders may become available to us. We do not disclose any non-public personal information about our stockholders or former stockholders, except as permitted by law or as is necessary in order to service stockholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent).

We restrict access to non-public personal information about our stockholders to our employees with a legitimate business need for the information. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the security of the non-public personal information of our stockholders.

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interest of our stockholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there are compelling long-term reasons to do so.

Our proxy voting decisions are discussed with the committee that is responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision-making process disclose to our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision-making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

EXEMPTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF

We have received an exemptive order from the SEC to permit us to issue restricted shares of our common stock as part of the compensation packages for certain of our employees and directors. We believe that the particular characteristics of our business, the dependence we have on key personnel to conduct our business effectively and the highly competitive environment in which we operate require the use of equity-based compensation for our personnel in the form of restricted stock. The issuance of restricted shares of our common stock requires the approval of our stockholders. In June 2006, our stockholders approved our Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or the 2006 Plan, and our Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan.

Awards under the 2006 Plan must comply with all aspects of the SEC's order, including the following:


•	no one person may be granted awards totaling more than 25% of the shares available;


•	in any fiscal year, no person may be granted awards in excess of 500,000 shares of our common stock; and


•	the total number of shares that may be outstanding as restricted shares under all of our compensation plans may not exceed 10% of the total number of our shares of common stock authorized and outstanding at any time.

We requested the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engaged in a stock repurchase program and did not rescind awards of restricted stock previously awarded in compliance with the terms and conditions of the exemptive order of the SEC so long as we agreed not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. On September 27, 2013, the no-action letter was issued by the SEC.

OTHER

We will be examined periodically by the SEC for compliance with the Exchange Act and the 1940 Act.

As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, we must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. We must provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect us against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we cannot protect any director or officer against any liability to our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

We are required to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and to review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation. Mr. Tod K. Reichert, our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, is responsible for administering these policies and procedures.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND THE NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REGULATIONS

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on publicly held companies and their insiders. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with it and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

The NASDAQ Global Select Market has also adopted various corporate governance requirements as part of its listing standards. We believe we are in compliance with such corporate governance listing standards.

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Effective as of January 1, 2002, we elected to be treated as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as dividends, which allows us to reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as defined below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses, collectively referred to as the 90% Distribution Requirement.

TAXATION AS A REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANY

If we:


•	continue to qualify as a RIC, and


•	distribute each year to stockholders at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which is defined in the Internal Revenue Code generally as ordinary income plus realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses,

we will be entitled to deduct and, therefore, will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on, the portion of our income we distribute or are deemed to distribute to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate on any income not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders. We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax, or 4% excise tax, to the extent we do not make specified levels of distributions (actually or on a deemed basis) in a timely manner. We are subject as a RIC to the 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute (on either an actual or deemed basis): 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year; 98.2% of our capital gain net income for each calendar year; and any income realized, but not distributed, in prior calendar years.

To qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:


1.	continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;


2.	derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities, loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership;” and


3.	diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:


a.	at least 50% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and

no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of (i) one issuer, (ii) two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” known as the Diversification Tests.

We may be required to recognize taxable income even when we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount, we must include in taxable income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We also may have to include in taxable income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as PIK interest and deferred loan origination

fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a cash distribution to our stockholders in the amount of that non-cash income in order to satisfy the 90% Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any cash representing such income.

If we fail to satisfy the 90% Distribution Requirement or fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we would be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 15% or 20% maximum tax rate (depending on income thresholds) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.

EMPLOYEES

We believe our success will depend greatly on our ability to identify, attract and retain capable employees. As of December 31, 2014, we employed six full-time employees, including investment, portfolio and operations professionals, in-house counsel and administrative staff. All of these employees are located in our corporate headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit and we believe our relations with our employees are good.



ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS.

Investing in our common stock may be speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks described below and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the schedules and exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We are exploring and evaluating strategic alternatives for the Company and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying a strategic alternative, that such strategic alternative will yield additional value for our stockholders or that the process will not have an adverse impact on our business.

On February 9, 2015, we announced that we had retained a financial advisor to assist us in exploring a full range of strategic alternatives for the Company to enhance value for our stockholders. The process could result in, among other things, a sale of the Company, a restructuring, a recapitalization, merger, consolidation, business combination or returning capital to investors. We cannot provide any assurance that the exploration of strategic alternatives will result in the identification or consummation of any transaction. Similarly, any strategic decision will involve risks and uncertainties, and we cannot provide any assurance that any strategic alternative, if identified, evaluated and consummated, will provide the anticipated benefits or otherwise enhance stockholder value. The process is ongoing and our Board of Directors has not set a timetable for completion of the evaluation.

We expect to incur substantial costs associated with identifying and evaluating potential strategic alternatives. Any potential transaction would be dependent upon a number of factors that may be beyond our control, including, among other factors, market conditions, industry trends, the interest of third parties in our business, stockholder approval and the availability of financing to potential buyers or the Company on reasonable terms. The process of exploring strategic alternatives may be time consuming and disruptive to our business operations. We are also subject to other risks in connection with the uncertainty created by the strategic review process, including stock price volatility and the ability to retain qualified employees. We do not currently intend to disclose further developments with respect to this process, unless and until our Board of Directors approves a specific transaction or otherwise concludes the review of strategic alternatives.

If we are unable to effectively manage the strategic review process, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Investing in lower middle-market companies is inherently risky. Our financial results may be affected adversely if one or more of our portfolio investments defaults on its loans or fails to perform.

Our portfolio consists primarily of debt and equity investments in privately owned lower middle-market companies. Investing in lower middle-market companies involves a number of significant risks. The debt in which we invest is typically not rated. When rated by one or more rating agencies, a majority of our investments are rated below investment grade and have the highest risk of default among corporate bonds, typically referred to as junk bonds. Compared to larger publicly traded companies with greater financial, technical and marketing resources, lower middle-market companies typically have fewer resources and may experience wider variations in their operating results, making them more vulnerable to economic downturns. Lower middle-market companies experience limited access to capital and the cost of capital is usually higher than for their larger competitors. Many lower middle-market companies are unable to obtain financing from public capital markets or from traditional credit sources, such as commercial banks, often because they are perceived to pose a higher default risk. The success of lower middle-market companies often depends heavily on the managerial talents and efforts of an individual or a small group of persons. Therefore, the loss of any key employee could harm both its financial condition and its ability to compete effectively. Further, some lower middle-market companies conduct business in regulated industries. Changes in the regulatory environment impacting lower middle-market companies could result in significant expenditures and impair cash flow by making it difficult for them to conduct business in a cost effective manner, and have more dire effects, including bankruptcy. Even minor events may adversely affect the value of a loan's collateral and a company's ability to repay its obligations, which in turn may adversely affect the return on, or the recovery of, our investment in these businesses.

When evaluating a potential investment, we must rely on our employees' diligence to obtain information necessary to make well informed investment decisions. If we fail to uncover material information about our portfolio companies, either prior to or after our investment, we may lose money. A portfolio company's failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults under our loan documents and trigger cross-defaults

under other agreements. Should other lenders choose to accelerate their loans and/or foreclose on the company's secured assets, it could jeopardize our portfolio company's ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may also incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company.

Very few of our portfolio investments are publicly traded and, as a result, their value is uncertain. If our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments is higher than that which we ultimately realize upon disposition, our NAV could be affected adversely.

Typically, there is no public market for the securities of the privately held companies in which we have invested, and in which we generally expect to continue to invest. In accordance with the 1940 Act and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we carry substantially all of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors.

Whenever possible, our board of directors values our securities at market value; however, since very few of our investments are traded publicly the board considers various factors to assist it in determining fair value during the valuation process. For example, depending on the nature of the investment, the board may examine public and private mergers and acquisitions transactions, comparisons to publicly traded comparable companies, third-party assessments of valuation, discounted cash flow analyses, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's earnings and its ability to make payments, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market-based pricing, bond-yield analysis and other relevant factors. We also obtain financial and other information from portfolio companies, which may include unaudited, projected or pro forma financial information. Our board of directors also engages independent valuation firms to assist in determining the fair value of our investments. Because valuations, particularly those of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and are often based on estimates. Our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a readily available market for these investments existed and from the amounts we may realize on any disposition of such investments. If our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments are materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposition of such investments, our NAV could be affected adversely.

The general volatility of the financial markets and the economy could impair our portfolio companies' financial positions and operating results, which, in turn, could harm our operating results.

The future of the United States economy, sub-sectors of the broader economy and state and local economies in which we invest, is unclear. If economic performance in these markets declines in the future, the financial results of our lower middle-market portfolio companies may experience deterioration or limited growth. Prolonged, unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions may impact the ability of our portfolio companies to service their debt or engage in a liquidity event, such as a sale, merger, recapitalization or initial public offering.

Should this happen, we may experience a loss of value in our portfolio and decreases in our revenues, net income and net assets. Adverse economic conditions also may impair the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities, and the success of our business model necessitates that we develop and maintain strong referral relationships. Failure to do so, or to offer desirable investment terms, may preclude us from winning new business and adversely affect our financial conditions and results of operations.

accountants, consultants and other individuals within our network in order to keep apprised of potential investment opportunities. We have experienced significant executive turnover and staff reductions while we monetized a majority of our investments and repurchased our stock in the open market, which we believe has negatively impacted our ability to remain active investors with current or prospective clients. If our management team fails to maintain its existing relationships or develop new ones with important sources of investment opportunities, we may fail to remain competitive for new business or to generate positive net operating income and our investment portfolio may languish as a result. Regardless of the strength of relationships, no one is obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us.

Our portfolio is concentrated in certain industries, which increases our risk of significant loss if any one of these companies fails to service our debt because of industry downturns.

From time to time, we target specific industries in which to invest on a recurring basis, which may result in significant concentrations in our portfolio. As a consequence, the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of such investments or a substantial write-down of any one investment. Beyond regulatory and income tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration. In addition, while we generally decline to make investments in a particular industry or group of industries that would exceed 15.0% of our total assets at the time of closing, it is possible that as the values of our portfolio companies change, one industry or a group of industries may come to exceed such level. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have invested a significant portion of our total investments could have a materially adverse effect on us. As of December 31, 2014, due to the number of recent monetizations and loan repayments, 59.2%, 18.8% and 12.2% of our total investments at fair value were invested in healthcare, business services and broadcasting industries, respectively. Therefore, we are susceptible to the economic circumstances in these industries, and a downturn in any one of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes, enforcement or interpretation of healthcare or other laws and regulations applicable to some of our portfolio companies' businesses may constrain their ability to offer their products and services.

Changes, enforcement or interpretation of healthcare or other laws and regulations applicable to the businesses of some of our portfolio companies may increase their compliance and other costs of doing business, require significant systems enhancements, or render their products or services less profitable or obsolete, any of which could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations. There has also been an increased political and regulatory focus on healthcare laws in recent years, and new legislation, regulation, enforcement or interpretation may have a material effect on the business and operations of some of our portfolio companies.

We must effectively manage and deploy capital to ensure our financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to do so, we could experience a decline in our business prospects and the loss of key employees, both of which could negatively affect our operating results.

Equity capital is, and may continue to be, difficult to raise because we generally are not able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below NAV per share without stockholder approval. In addition, available debt capital may be costly and/or carry less favorable terms and conditions. Therefore, our ability to maximize our portfolio's total return depends on the ability to successfully manage and deploy capital effectively. Our debt investments generate capital from current income, and our equity and equity-related investments generally provide capital appreciation, enhancing our overall operating results. Our ability to identify and evaluate, and ultimately to finance and invest in, companies that will produce the desired financial gains rests squarely in the hands of our investment team. Accomplishing our investment objectives on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment team's handling of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services and our access to investments offering acceptable terms. In addition to monitoring the performance of our existing investments, members of our investment

team are also called upon, from time to time, to provide managerial assistance to some of our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow the rate of investment capital.

Our results of our operations will depend on many factors, including the availability of opportunities for investment, and economic conditions. Furthermore, if we cannot successfully operate our business or implement our investment policies and strategies it could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends. The prolonged inability to effectively deploy capital could negatively impact our business prospects, cause the departure of key employees and have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Our ability to raise additional capital is limited by the market price of our common stock and by regulations governing our operations as a BDC.

Although shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a market price that is less than the NAV attributable to those shares, this characteristic has no correlation with the risk of decline to our own NAV. It is not possible to predict whether our common stock will trade at, above, or below NAV. In the recent past, the stocks of BDCs as an industry, including shares of our common stock, have traded below NAV as a result of concerns over market conditions, credit concerns, liquidity, dividend coverage, leverage restrictions, distribution requirements and various other reasons. When our common stock trades below its NAV per share, the 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current NAV unless our stockholders approve such a sale and our board of directors makes certain determinations.

We have issued debt securities and may in the future incur additional debt, issue preferred stock, and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities”. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, as a BDC we are permitted to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our BDC asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines we may be unable to satisfy this test, precluding us from issuing senior securities and paying dividends. We may also be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.

Failure to maintain our qualification as a BDC would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.

If we were to continuously fail to qualify as a BDC, we might become subject to regulation as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition, failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us. For additional information on the qualification requirements of a BDC, see the disclosure under the caption Item 1. Business-Regulation.

If we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our BDC status.

As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Our failure to meet the 70% threshold could cause us to lose our status as a BDC, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the 70% requirement may preclude us from investing in potentially attractive investments, as well as prevent us from making additional investments in our existing portfolio companies, thus diluting our position, to the extent they do not meet the standard for qualifying assets under the 1940 Act. Finally, we may need to sell certain of our investments to comply with the 1940 Act, which could cause us to realize significantly less than the current value of such investments.

If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our income and our income available for distribution would be reduced significantly or eliminated.

We have elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code, we must meet certain source-of-income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements and maintain our status as a BDC, including:


•	Sources of Income. We must obtain at least 90% of our income each year from dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources.

•

Asset Diversification. At the end of each taxable year, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other acceptable securities. No more than 25% of the value of our assets may be invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer, or (ii) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as

determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships.”

•

Income Distribution. We must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, on an annual basis. Because we are subject to an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act, and may also be subject to certain financial covenants under any debt financings we may incur, we could, under certain circumstances, be restricted from making the distributions necessary to satisfy the IRS requirement.

As our total assets continue to decline associated with our stock repurchase program and tender offer, dividend distributions to stockholders and other transactions that reduce our total assets, there is an increased risk of non-qualification as a RIC due to the 50% or 25% asset diversification test as outlined in Internal Revenue Code Section 851(b)(3). The 50% diversification test requires at least 50% of the value of a RIC’s total assets be invested in cash, cash items (including receivables), government securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), securities of other RIC’s, or investments in other securities that, with respect to any one issuer, do not represent more than 5 percent of the RIC’s assets or more than 10 percent of the issuer’s voting securities.

The 25% diversification test requires that not more than 25% of the value of the company’s total assets are invested in the securities (other than government securities or the securities of other RIC’s) of any one issuer, or of two or more issuers which the taxpayer controls and which are determined to be engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses. The term “controls” means the ownership of 20% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of voting stock in a corporation.

The 50% and 25% diversification test must be satisfied at the end of each quarter of a RIC’s taxable year.

Failure to meet the foregoing requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and, therefore, will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason we would become subject to corporate-level income tax, substantially reducing our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution, if any, and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on our stockholders and us.

Our future success depends on our investment team. If we lose one or more of these or other key employees, our operating results may suffer from our inability to make future investments.

We depend on the members of our investment team for the identification, review, final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. Their significant investment expertise and relationships are vital to the implementation of our business plan and we have no guarantee that they or any other employees will remain with the company. If we lose the services of one or more of these individuals, our operating results could suffer if we are unable to make future investments as we expect.

If we fail to establish new credit facilities on favorable terms, our business could be harmed materially.

We cannot be certain that we will be able to establish new borrowing facilities to provide working and investment capital, including for new originations. If we are unable to establish new facilities of a reasonable size, our liquidity will be reduced significantly. Even if we are able to consummate new borrowing facilities, we may not be able to do so on favorable terms.

We may be unable to obtain debt capital on favorable terms or at all, in which case we would not be able to use leverage to increase the return on our investments.

If we are unable to obtain debt capital, then our equity investors will not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage to the extent that our investment strategy is successful and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or fundings to our portfolio companies.

Prepayments of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our results of operations and reduce our return on equity.

We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts. Any future investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally, prepayments could negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.

In situations where we hold junior priority liens, our ability to control decisions with respect to our portfolio companies may be limited by lenders holding superior liens. In a default scenario, the value of collateral may be insufficient to repay us after the senior priority lenders are paid in full.

We make certain loans to portfolio companies that are secured by a junior priority security interest in the same collateral pledged to secure debt owed to lenders with liens senior to ours. Often the senior lender has procured covenants from the portfolio company prohibiting the incurrence of additional secured debt without the senior lender's consent. As a condition of permitting the portfolio company to incur junior secured indebtedness, the senior lender will require that we as junior lender enter into an intercreditor agreement that, among other things, will establish the senior lender's right to control the disposition of any collateral in the event of an insolvency proceeding or other default situation. In addition, intercreditor agreements generally will expressly subordinate junior liens to senior liens as well as the repayment of junior debt to senior debt.

Because of the control we may cede to senior lenders under intercreditor agreements, we may be unable to control the manner or timing of collateral disposition. In addition, the value of collateral securing our debt investment will ultimately depend on market and economic conditions at the time of disposal, the availability of buyers and other factors. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by our liens. There is also a risk that such collateral securing our investments will be difficult to sell in a timely manner or to appraise. If the proceeds of the collateral are insufficient to repay our loans, then we will have an unsecured claim to the extent of the deficiency against any of the company's remaining assets, which claim will likely be shared with many other unsecured creditors.

As a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may have little direct influence over the entity. The stockholders and management of the portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.

We make both debt and minority equity investments. Should a portfolio company make business decisions with which we disagree, or the stockholders and management of that company take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests, the value of our portfolio holdings could decrease and have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

If we need to sell any of our investments, we may not be able to do so at a favorable price and, as a result, we may suffer losses.

Our investments usually are subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market. The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult for us to dispose of them at a favorable price. As a result, we may suffer losses. In addition, if we were forced to liquidate some or all of the investments in our portfolio on an expedited basis, the proceeds of such liquidation could be significantly less than the current fair value of such investments. We may be required to liquidate some or all of our portfolio to meet our debt service obligations or to maintain our qualification as a BDC and as a RIC to the extent we fail to satisfy the applicable regulatory criteria.

The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities.

Most of our investments involve private securities. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment with respect to certain potential liabilities or to the extent that any of our representations turn out to be inaccurate. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us.

Portfolio company litigation could result in additional costs, the diversion of management time and resources and have an adverse impact on the fair value of our investment.

In the course of providing significant managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies, we may serve as directors on the boards of such companies. In addition, in the course of making portfolio company investments, we may elect to take an equity position in any given company. To the extent that litigation arises out of our investments, we may be named as a defendant, which could result in additional costs and the diversion of management time and resources. In addition, litigation involving a portfolio company may be costly and affect the operations of the business, which could in turn have an adverse impact on the fair value of our investment.

There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.

If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court could elect to subordinate all or a portion of our claims to those of other creditors regardless of the seniority of our original investment. In such instances, the court may deem our actions to be more like that of an equityholder than a debt holder. Were that to occur, the claims we carried as senior in right of payment on our books might instead be recharacterized by the court as junior, and therefore come much lower in the priority of payments. To the extent that there are insufficient funds remaining to pay us once other debtholders are paid in full, we may lose all or a portion of our investment.

The actions we take with respect to a portfolio company's business, including providing managerial assistance, or the exercise of control over a portfolio company could also give rise to lender liability claims. Should our actions be viewed as more akin to those of an equityholder than a debtholder because of our involvement in the operations of the portfolio company, a presumption could arise that we have a fiduciary duty to the portfolio company. A third party could then sue us, for example, in an attempt to make us liable for any negative performance by such portfolio company.

We may choose to waive or defer enforcement of covenants in the debt securities held in our portfolio, which may cause us to lose all or part of our investment in these companies.

We structure the debt investments in our portfolio companies to include business and financial covenants placing affirmative and negative obligations on the operation of the company’s business and its financial condition. However, from time to time we may elect to waive breaches of these covenants, including our right to payment, or waive or defer enforcement of remedies, such as acceleration of obligations or foreclosure on collateral, depending upon the financial condition and prospects of the particular portfolio company. These actions may reduce the likelihood of our receiving the full amount of future payments of interest or principal and be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of the underlying collateral as many of these companies may have limited financial resources, may be unable to meet future obligations and may go bankrupt. This could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends, could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition and cause the loss of all or part of your investment.

Any unrealized losses we experience on our investment portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution and could impair our ability to service our borrowings, if any.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized depreciation in our investment portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected investments. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods and could materially adversely affect our ability to service our outstanding borrowings, if any.

Our stock price has been, and continues to be, volatile and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.

The stock market in general, and the market prices for securities of financial services companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. If current levels of market volatility continue or worsen, we may continue to experience an adverse effect, possibly material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market price and the liquidity of the market for our shares may from time to time be affected by a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, the following:


•	our quarterly results of operations;


•	our origination activity, including the pace of, and competition for, new investment opportunities;


•	price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;


•	investors' general perception of our company, the economy and general market conditions;


•	actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts;


•	the financial performance of the specific industries in which we invest on a recurring basis, including without limitation, our investments in the healthcare, business services and education industries;


•	significant transactions or capital commitments by us or our competitors;


•	significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of BDCs or other financial services companies;


•	volatility resulting from trading in derivative securities related to our common stock including puts, calls or short trading positions;


•	potential future sales of debt securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our common stock or the conversion of such securities;


•	the average trading volume and the ability of investors to obtain liquidity in our shares in the open market, which may be negatively impacted by the number of shares the Company repurchases in the open market;


•	changes in laws or regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to BDCs or RICs;


•	loss of RIC status;


•	the inability to secure additional debt or equity capital;


•	announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by us or our competitors;


•	litigation or regulatory actions affecting us or our portfolio companies; and


•	departures of key personnel.

If any of these factors causes an adverse effect on our business, our results of operations or our financial condition, the price of our common stock could fall and investors may not be able to sell their common stock at or above their respective purchase prices.

You may not receive future distributions.

In the event that the asset coverage ratio applicable to us as a BDC falls below 200%, we will be unable to make distributions until the ratio again meets or exceeds the threshold. If we do not distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including the possible loss of our status as a RIC for the applicable period. From December 2001 through December 31, 2014, we declared distributions totaling $14.13 per common share. Due to the market dislocation, we suspended our distributions from the third quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2010. We reinstated our distribution on April 29, 2010, and until the third quarter of 2014 continued to declare a quarterly dividend. There can be no assurance that distributions will resume in the future.

We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision. Regulatory constraints, our inability to achieve operating results or a decline in the performance of our business could restrict our ability to make any future distributions. In addition, we may not be able to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before, or without, receiving cash representing such income.

In accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations, we include in taxable income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash from our portfolio companies, such as contractual PIK interest, interest on loans that are on non-accrual status and original issue discount. PIK interest represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Loans that are on non-accrual status reflect an inability of a portfolio company to make payments to us when due. Original issue discount may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the issuance of a debt instrument or in other circumstances. We are required to include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Other situations may also arise where we are required to include amounts in taxable income for which we have not yet received payment in cash.

We must distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to maintain the tax benefits we enjoy as a RIC. This obligation applies whether or not that income was actually received in cash. Since we may recognize income before, or without, receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement. To raise funds to make the required distributions, we may have to raise additional debt or equity capital at unattractive rates or on unfavorable conditions. We might also need to sell some of our investments at unfavorable prices, or repurpose the cash we had reserved for new investment originations. If we cannot obtain cash from these or other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and, thus, be subject to corporate-level income tax.

Any change in the regulation of our business could have a significant adverse effect on the profitability of our operations and our cost of doing business.

Changes in the laws, regulations or interpretations of the laws and regulations that govern BDCs, RICs or non-depository commercial lenders could have a significant adverse effect on our operations and our cost of doing business. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations and also to judicial and administrative decisions that affect our operations. If these laws, regulations or decisions change, or if we expand our business into jurisdictions that have adopted requirements that are more stringent than those in which we currently conduct business, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply or we may have to restrict our operations.

We may in the future decide to issue preferred stock, which would magnify the risks of investing in us, as well as the potential for loss.

Because preferred stock is another form of borrowing and the dividends on any preferred stock we might issue would be cumulative, preferred stock has the same risks to our common stockholders as debt. We are obligated to pay the cumulative dividends and any liquidation preference attached to such preferred stock before we make any payments to our common stockholders. While the value of preferred stock is unaffected by our expenses or losses, preferred stockholders do not participate in any income or appreciation in excess of their stated preference. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue would have the right to elect members of the board of directors as well as class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status. Accordingly, preferred stockholders could veto changes to the detriment of the company and its common stockholders. We currently have no plans to issue preferred stock.

Investments in equity securities involve a substantial degree of risk.

We have purchased, and may purchase in the future, common stock and other equity securities, including warrants, in various portfolio companies. Although equity securities historically have generated higher average total returns than debt securities over the long term, equity securities may experience more volatility in those returns than debt securities. The equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate, decline in value or lose all value, and our ability to recover our investment will depend on our portfolio company's success. Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including the risk of further dilution in the event the portfolio company issues additional securities. Investments in preferred securities involve special risks, such as the risk of deferred distributions, illiquidity and limited voting rights.

Fluctuations in interest rates could affect our income adversely.

Because we sometimes borrow to make investments, our net income depends, in part, on the difference between the interest rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate at which we invest these funds. Because a significant portion of our assets and liabilities may be priced using various short-term rate indices, including one-month to six-month LIBOR, commercial paper rates and the prime rate, the timing of changes in market interest rates or in the relationship between interest rate indices could affect the interest rates earned on our interest-earning assets differently than the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. As a result, significant changes in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our net income.

A significant portion of our variable rate loans have interest rate floors based on the LIBOR or prime rate. These floors minimize our exposure to significant decreases in interest rates. A significant increase in market interest rates could harm our ability to attract new portfolio companies and originate new loans and investments. In addition, our non-performing assets could increase and the value of our portfolio decrease because our floating-rate loan portfolio companies may be unable to meet higher payment obligations.

Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.

Concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association, or BBA, in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivatives positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.

Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.

Our business is subject to increasingly complex corporate governance, public disclosure and accounting requirements that could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We are subject to changing rules and regulations of federal and state government as well as the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market have issued a significant number of new and increasingly complex requirements and regulations over the course of the last several years and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to laws enacted by Congress. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation-related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, and the SEC has adopted, and will continue to adopt, additional rules and regulations that may impact us. Our efforts to comply with these requirements have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, an increase in expenses and a diversion of management’s time from other business activities.

Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

The Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage a third party from making a proposal to acquire us. We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of our board or our company, including provisions in our certificate of incorporation dividing our board of directors into three classes with the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting of stockholders. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price of our common stock.

The failure in cyber security systems, as well as the occurrence of events unanticipated in our disaster recovery systems and management continuity planning could impair our ability to conduct business effectively.

The occurrence of a disaster such as a cyber attack, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, a terrorist attack or war, events unanticipated in our disaster recovery systems, or a support failure from external providers, could have an adverse effect on our ability to conduct business and on our results of operations and financial condition, particularly if those events affect our computer-based data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems or destroy data. If a significant number of our managers were unavailable in the event of a disaster, our ability to effectively conduct our business could be severely compromised.

We depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures, our computer systems could be subject to cyber attacks and unauthorized access, such as physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized tampering. Like other companies, we may experience threats to our data and systems, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, system failures and disruptions. If one or more of these events occurs, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations, which could result in damage to our reputation, financial losses, litigation, increased costs, regulatory penalties and/or customer dissatisfaction or loss.



ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.



ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES.

Neither we nor any of our consolidated subsidiaries own any facilities or real estate. However, during 2014 we leased 13,684 square feet of office space for our corporate headquarters located at 1001 19th Street North, Arlington, VA 22209. Our lease expires December 31, 2015.



ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.



ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

PART II



ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “MCGC.” The following table sets forth the high and low last sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:



	Years ended December 31,
	2014				2013
Quarter Ended	High		Low		High		Low
March 31	$	4.75	$	3.59	$	5.00	$	4.47
June 30	$	3.92	$	3.24	$	5.32	$	4.57
September 30	$	4.08	$	3.52	$	5.49	$	4.89
December 31	$	3.95	$	3.03	$	5.32	$	4.40

Holders

On February 23, 2015 we had approximately 91 holders of record and approximately 13,119 beneficial holders of our common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Purchases of Equity Securities

STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a second stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the second stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. On April 25, 2014, our board of directors terminated the second stock repurchase program effective as of May 2, 2014 and authorized a third stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of May 5, 2014. On August 5, 2014, our board of directors terminated the third stock repurchase program and authorized a fourth stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014. On October 17, 2014, our board of directors suspended the fourth stock repurchase program. On December 18, 2014, the fourth stock repurchase program, which had been suspended during our modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer, was reinstated. In January 2015, the fourth stock repurchase program was discontinued. We have provided our stockholders with notice of our intention to repurchase shares of our common stock in accordance with 1940 Act requirements. We retired all shares of common stock that we purchased in connection with the stock repurchase program.

TENDER OFFER

On November 3, 2014, we commenced a modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer pursuant to an offer to purchase dated November 3, 2014 and a related letter of transmittal, under which we offered to purchase up to $75.0 million of our common stock at a price per share not less than $3.25 and not greater than $3.75. The tender offer expired on December 3, 2014, and we accepted for payment an aggregate of 4,859,744 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $3.75 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $18.2 million. These shares represented approximately 11.2% of our shares issued and outstanding as of the date of commencement of the tender offer. We incurred costs of $0.4 million associated with the tender offer resulting in a total cost of $18.6 million, or $3.83 per share, for the shares repurchased.

NET ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK

For certain employees, we may be deemed to have purchased through the net issuance of shares, a portion of the shares of restricted stock previously issued under the 2006 Plan for which the forfeiture provisions have lapsed to satisfy the applicable employee’s income tax withholding obligations. We retire immediately all such shares of common stock that we purchase in connection with such net issuance to employees.

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN

As part of our dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders, we may direct the plan administrator to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestment requests related to dividends that we pay on outstanding shares of our common stock.

The following table summarizes the shares of our common stock that we have purchased during the three months ended December 31, 2014:



Period/Purpose	Total number of shares	Average Price Paid per Share			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 – 31, 2014
Stock repurchase program^(a)	2,458,300	$	3.52		2,458,300	$	28,842,975
November 1 – 30, 2014
Restricted stock vesting^(b)	220	$	3.65	^(c)	n/a	n/a
December 1 – 31, 2014
Tender Offer^(d)	4,859,744	$	3.83	^(e)	4,859,744	$	—
Stock repurchase program^(a)	509,916	$	3.93		509,916	$	26,837,074
Restricted stock vesting^(b)	1,031	$	3.82	^(c)	n/a	n/a
Total December 1 – 31, 2014	5,370,691	$	3.84		5,369,660	$	26,837,074
Total	7,829,211	$	3.74		7,827,960	$	26,837,074


^(a)	On August 5, 2014, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014.


^(b)	Represents shares repurchased from our employees in connection with the net issuance of shares to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock.


^(c)	Based on the weighted-average closing share prices of our common stock on the dates that the forfeiture restrictions lapsed.

^(d)

On November 3, 2014, we commenced a modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer pursuant to an offer to purchase dated November 3, 2014 and a related letter of transmittal, by which we offered to purchase up to $75.0 million of our common stock at a price per share not less than $3.25 and not greater than $3.75. The tender offer expired on December 3, 2014, and we accepted for payment an aggregate of 4,859,744 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $3.75 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $18.2 million.


^(e)	Represents the cost per share of the tender offer including the purchase price and direct costs associated with the offer.

Distribution Policy

We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient distributions to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income which amounts would be considered a return of capital. As a RIC, we are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the BDC asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable RIC tax treatment. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level. We may make distributions to our stockholders of certain net capital gains.

The following table summarizes our distributions declared since January 1, 2013:



Date Declared	Record Date	Payable Date	Dividends per Share
August 5, 2014	August 20, 2014	August 29, 2014	$	0.050
April 25, 2014	May 9, 2014	May 30, 2014	$	0.070
February 28, 2014	March 14, 2014	March 28, 2014	$	0.125
October 25, 2013	November 8, 2013	November 22, 2013	$	0.125
July 26, 2013	August 9, 2013	August 30, 2013	$	0.125
April 26, 2013	May 10, 2013	May 31, 2013	$	0.125
March 1, 2013	March 15, 2013	March 29, 2013	$	0.125

We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision. For additional information about our distributions, see the Liquidity and Capital Resources and Distributions sections of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in our definitive proxy statement for our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Stock Performance Graph

The following comparative stock performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends, if any) from investing $100 on December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2014, in each of: i) our common stock; ii) the Russell 2000 Index; and iii) the NASDAQ Financial 100 Index (capitalization weighted).

The information included under the heading Stock Performance Graph in Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is “furnished” and not “filed,” and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or subject to Regulation 14A, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act.



ITEM 6.	SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data set forth in the following table with respect to our statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are derived from our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are derived from our audited financial statements, which are not included herein. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. See the notes below and to the consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the method used to determine the number of shares used in computing NOI and net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto found at Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.



(in thousands, except per share and other period-end data)	Years ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Income statement data
Revenue	$	26,813		$	50,485		$	60,993		$	85,696		$	89,569
Net operating income before net investment loss, (loss) gain on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision	3,143			29,896			18,806			37,658			40,565
Net investment loss	(24,179		)	(28,594		)	(13,299		)	(129,873		)	(54,819		)
Net (loss) income	(20,843		)	1,176			4,998			(93,115		)	(13,072		)
Per common share data
Net operating income before net investment loss, (loss) gain on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision per weighted-average common share—basic and diluted	$	0.06		$	0.42		$	0.25		$	0.49		$	0.54
Income (loss) per weighted-average common share—basic and diluted	$	(0.38	)	$	0.02		$	0.07		$	(1.22	)	$	(0.17	)
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.25		$	0.50		$	0.58		$	0.66		$	0.37
Selected period-end balances
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,826		$	91,598		$	73,588		$	58,563		$	44,970
Investment portfolio balance
Fair value	75,332			368,873			477,724			741,166			1,009,705
Cost	234,640			566,438			668,787			1,017,218			1,245,673
Total assets	183,797			513,993			630,776			890,538			1,145,277
Borrowings	—			175,172			248,053			430,219			546,882
Total stockholders’ equity	178,901			333,954			371,728			434,952			578,016
Net asset value per common share outstanding^(a)	$	4.69		$	4.74		$	5.18		$	5.65		$	7.54
Other period-end data
Average size of investment
Fair value	$	10,762		$	10,849		$	10,857		$	12,353		$	14,221
Cost	$	33,520		$	16,660		$	15,200		$	16,954		$	17,545
Number of portfolio companies	7			34			44			60			71
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted	55,504			71,232			74,859			76,259			75,422
Shares outstanding at end of year	38,136			70,510			71,721			76,997			76,662


(a)	Based on common shares outstanding at period-end.



ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and Other Data, and our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, projections, intentions, goals, strategies, plans, prospects and the beliefs and assumptions of our management including, without limitation: our expectations regarding our results of operations, including revenues, net operating income, net investment losses and general and administrative expenses and the factors that may affect such results; our expectations regarding the exploration of strategic alternatives when we cannot provide any assurance that the exploration of strategic alternatives will result in the identification or consummation of any transaction, or whether any strategic alternative, if identified, evaluated and consummated, will provide the anticipated benefits or otherwise enhance stockholder value; our expectation regarding the closing of our sale transaction involving Pharmalogic Holdings Corp.; our decisions to make dividend distributions after taking into account our distribution requirements as a RIC, together with an assessment of our current and forecasted gains and losses recognized or to be recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, liquidity, cash earnings and our asset coverage ratio; expected accretion to net asset value from our stock repurchase program; the sufficiency of liquidity to meet 2015 operating requirements, new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions; our expectations regarding the full use of, and our belief that our operations, monetizations and unrestricted cash will provide sufficient liquidity to fund, as necessary, requests to draw on unused portions of commitments that obligate us to extend credit in the form of loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments; our use of independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses; our expectations regarding the outcome of legal proceedings incidental to our business; market conditions generally and specifically regarding the leveraged loan market; the state of the economy and other factors. Forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “could increase the likelihood,” “hope,” “target,” “project,” “goals,” “potential,” “predict,” “might,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is planned,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “will enable,” “would be expected,” “look forward,” “may provide,” “would” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of those terms. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated or implied by forward-looking statements. Such factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those risk factors discussed in Item IA of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be incorrect. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Significant Developments in 2014


•	Originations and Advances — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we made $0.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, in originations and advances to existing portfolio companies.


•	Loan Monetizations — For the three and twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014, we received $15.6 million and $265.4 million, respectively, in loan payoffs and amortization payments.

•


•	Loans on Non-Accrual — As of December 31, 2014, we had no loans on non-accrual, at cost or fair value.

•


•	Dividends — For the year ended December 31, 2014, we declared and paid $0.25 per share in dividends.

•

Outlook

Based on a thorough business review, on February 9, 2015, our Board of Directors announced its intention to explore strategic alternatives for the Company to maximize value for stockholders, including a possible sale of the Company. We may receive offers or engage in a transaction in the ordinary course which may ultimately result in a sale of any or all of our assets, above or below the fair value on our balance sheet at that time. We may also consider a variety of extraordinary transactions, such as a sale of the Company, a restructuring, a recapitalization, a merger, a consolidation, a business combination, a special dividend to stockholders, a liquidation or other transaction or series of transactions. No timetable has been set for the Company's process and we do not expect to comment further or update the market with any additional information on the process unless and until the Board of Directors approves a specific transaction or otherwise deems disclosure appropriate or necessary.

Access to Capital and Liquidity

At December 31, 2014, we had $105.8 million of cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes and $1.4 million of restricted cash held in escrow.

On January 21, 2014, we repaid and terminated our 2006-1 Trust. As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. Upon termination, the assets of the 2006-1 Trust were transferred to MCG, the parent.

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of our investment portfolio was $75.3 million, which represents a $293.6 million, or 79.6%, decrease from the $368.9 million fair value as of December 31, 2013. The following sections describe the composition of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2014 and key changes in our portfolio during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

Portfolio Composition

The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at fair value:



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio
Debt investments
Senior secured debt	$	40,562	53.8	%	$	185,524	50.3	%
Subordinated debt
Secured	22,460		29.8		108,338		29.4
Unsecured	—		—		42,452		11.5
Total debt investments	63,022		83.6		336,314		91.2
Equity investments
Preferred equity	12,044		16.0		28,390		7.7
Common/common equivalents equity	266		0.4		4,169		1.1
Total equity investments	12,310		16.4		32,559		8.8
Total investments	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

Our debt investments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 4.3% to 14.5%, a portion of which may be in the form of payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 85.8% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 14.2% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 59.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.5% and 2.0% on a LIBOR based index or prime floors between 2.75% and 4.50%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percentage of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.

The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio
Healthcare	$	44,566	59.2	%	$	84,922	23.0	%
Business services	14,172		18.8		64,108		17.4
Broadcasting	9,198		12.2		12,252		3.3
Manufacturing	7,130		9.5		51,735		14.0
Diversified financial services	—		—		3,298		0.9
Education	—		—		57,905		15.7
Publishing	—		—		25,312		6.9
Insurance	—		—		23,620		6.4
Restaurants	—		—		23,010		6.2
Information services	—		—		12,552		3.4
Home furnishings	—		—		4,730		1.3
Consumer products	—		—		4,657		1.3
Other	266		0.3		772		0.2
Total	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we had concentrations in certain industries, including the healthcare, business services and broadcasting industries. The following table summarizes our fair value and revenue concentrations in each of those industries:



	Investments at fair value								Revenue for the year ended
	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total Portfolio		Amount		% of Total Portfolio		Amount		% of Total Revenue		Amount		% of Total Revenue
Industry
Healthcare	$	44,566	59.2	%	$	84,922	23.0	%	$	7,552	28.2	%	$	12,650	25.1	%
Business services	14,173		18.8		64,108		17.4		6,871		25.6		8,265		16.4
Broadcasting	9,198		12.2		12,252		3.3		574		2.1		1,616		3.2
Total	$	67,937	90.2	%	$	161,282	43.7	%	$	14,997	55.9	%	$	22,531	44.7	%

Changes in Investment Portfolio

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we made $10.0 million of originations and advances compared to $128.1 million of originations and advances during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes our total portfolio investment activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Year ended
(in thousands)	December 31
	2014			2013
Beginning investment portfolio	$	368,873		$	477,724
Originations and advances	10,025			128,089
Gross payments, reductions and sales of securities	(282,073		)	(210,124		)
Net realized loss^(a)	(62,332		)	(21,686		)
Unrealized depreciation	(21,723		)	(14,443		)
Reversals of unrealized depreciation	59,979			7,940
Origination fees and amortization of unearned income	2,583			1,373
Ending investment portfolio	$	75,332		$	368,873

___________________________


^(a)	Net realized loss for each of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 excludes $0.2 million of net realized loss related to other assets.

Originations and Advances

The following table shows our originations and advances during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by security type:



	Year ended December 31,
	2014				2013
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount			% of Total
Debt investments
Senior secured debt	$	6,451	64.3	%	$	73,683		57.5	%
Subordinated debt
Secured	2,178		21.7		15,011			11.7
Unsecured	551		5.5		36,541			28.5
Total debt investments	9,180		91.5		125,235			97.7
Equity investments
Preferred equity	845		8.5		2,884			2.3
Common/common equivalents equity	—		—		(30		)	—
Total equity investments	845		8.5		2,854			2.3
Total originations and advances	$	10,025	100.0	%	$	128,089		100.0	%

The following table shows our significant originations and advances:



(in thousands)	Year ended
	December 31, 2014
Company	Originations		Draws/ Advances		PIK Advances/ Dividends		Total
Debt
Oceans Acquisition, Inc.	$	—	$	3,250	$	—	$	3,250
Community Investors, Inc.	—		1,667		—		1,667
Other (< $1 million)	—		1,400		2,863		4,263
Total debt	—		6,317		2,863		9,180
Equity (< $1 million)	—		298		547		845
Total originations and advances	$	—	$	6,615	$	3,410	$	10,025

Repayments, Sales and Other Reductions of Investment Portfolio

The following table shows our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by security type:



	Year ended December 31,
	2014				2013
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
Debt investments

Senior secured debt	$	147,318	52.2	%	$	159,065	75.7	%
Subordinated debt
Secured	74,347		26.4		20,243		9.6
Unsecured	43,688		15.5		20,144		9.6
Total debt investments	265,353		94.1		199,452		94.9
Equity investments
Preferred equity	14,060		5.0		7,669		3.7
Common/common equivalents equity	2,660		0.9		3,003		1.4
Total equity investments	16,720		5.9		10,672		5.1
Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities	$	282,073	100.0	%	$	210,124	100.0	%

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities by transaction type included:



	Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2014		2013
Principal repayments, reductions and loan sales	$	223,941	$	164,292
Sale of equity investments	16,001		9,803
Scheduled principal amortization	29,250		31,779
Collection of accrued paid-in-kind interest and dividends	12,881		4,250
Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities	$	282,073	$	210,124

As shown in the following table, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we monetized all, or part of, 28 portfolio investments with proceeds totaling $250.5 million:



	Year ended
	December 31, 2014
(in thousands)	Principal Repayments and Proceeds from Loan Sales		Sale or Settlement of Equity Investments		PIK Interest and Dividend Prepayments		Total
Monetizations
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC	$	17,500	$	4,196	$	2,060	$	23,756
Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.	16,857		—		5,345		22,202
TCFI CP LLC	20,000		—		282		20,282
Miles Media Group, LLC	18,463		—		—		18,463
IDOC, LLC	13,832		1,500		—		15,332
Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc.	14,306		—		—		14,306
Oceans Acquisition, Inc.	14,251		—		—		14,251
Huron Inc.	12,868		—		200		13,068
Midwest Technical Institute, Inc.	12,251		—		—		12,251
West World Media LLC	10,576		446		919		11,941
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.	10,072		1,245		—		11,317
SC Academy Holdings, Inc.	9,534		—		1,530		11,064
Dorsey's School of Business Holdings, Inc.	9,653		—		—		9,653
Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC	9,000		—		508		9,508
Rita's Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC	9,282		—		—		9,282
Community Investors, Inc.	8,292		572		—		8,864
Visant Corporation	4,670		—		—		4,670
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.	4,518		—		—		4,518
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	—		4,000		—		4,000
Education Management, Inc.	3,962		—		—		3,962
Mailsouth, Inc.	3,529		—		—		3,529
Golden Knight	—		1,600		—		1,600
Other < $1 Million	525		2,099		56		2,680
Total monetizations	223,941		15,658		10,900		250,499
Other scheduled payments	29,250		343		1,981		31,574
Total gross payments, sales and other reductions of investment portfolio	$	253,191	$	16,001	$	12,881	$	282,073

The proceeds from these monetizations correlated closely with the most recently reported fair value of the associated investments.

ASSET QUALITY

Asset quality is generally a function of portfolio company performance and economic conditions, as well as our underwriting and ongoing management of our investment portfolio. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, we use the following investment rating system to characterize and monitor our expected level of returns on each investment in our portfolio:



Investment Rating	Summary Description
1	Capital gain expected or realized
2	Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected with customer performing in accordance with plan
3	Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected, but customer requires closer monitoring
4	Some loss of interest or dividend expected, but still expect an overall positive internal rate of return on the investment
5	Loss of interest or dividend and some loss of principal investment expected, which would result in an overall negative internal rate of return on the investment

The following table shows the distribution of our investments on our 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:



(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Investment Rating	Investments at Fair Value		% of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Total Portfolio
1^(a)	$	—	—	%	$	104,657	28.4	%
2	22,460		29.8		137,586		37.3
3	40,562		53.8		94,102		25.5
4	12,044		16.0		25,976		7.0
5	266		0.4		6,552		1.8
Total	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

_________________________


^(a)	As of December 31, 2013, Investment Rating “1” included $83.4 million of loans to companies in which we also held equity securities.

When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest have been brought current through payment or a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status:



	COST BASIS								FAIR VALUE BASIS
	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Cost		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Cost		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Loan Portfolio
Loans greater than 90 days past due
On non-accrual status	$	—	—	%	$	3,897	1.11	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%
Total loans greater than 90 days past due	$	—	—	%	$	3,897	1.11	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%
Loans on non-accrual status
0 to 90 days past due	$	—	—	%	$	17,531	4.98	%	$	—	—	%	$	4,493	1.34	%
Greater than 90 days past due	—		—		3,897		1.11		—		—		—		—
Total loans on non-accrual status	$	—	—	%	$	21,428	6.09	%	$	—	—	%	$	4,493	1.34	%

The following table summarizes the changes in the cost and fair value of the loans on non-accrual status from December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2014:



	Year ended
	December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Cost			Fair Value
Non-accrual loan balance as of December 31, 2013	$	21,428		$	4,493
Additional loan on non-accrual status	19,856			4,879
Payments received on loans on non-accrual status	(9,469		)	(9,469		)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on non-accrual loans	—			(515		)
Reversal of previously recognized unrealized loss on non-accrual loans	—			32,427
Realized loss on non-accrual loans	(31,815		)	(31,815		)
Total change in non-accrual loans	(21,428		)	(4,493		)
Non-accrual loan balance as of December 31, 2014	$	—		$	—

COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013

The following table summarizes the components of our net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Years ended
	December 31,						Variance
(dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			$			Percentage
Revenue
Interest and dividend income
Interest income	$	22,294		$	43,106		$	(20,812	)	(48.3	)%
Dividend income	547			2,554			(2,007		)	(78.6	)
Loan fees	2,675			3,165			(490		)	(15.5	)
Total interest and dividend income	25,516			48,825			(23,309		)	(47.7	)
Advisory fees and other income	1,297			1,660			(363		)	(21.9	)
Total revenue	26,813			50,485			(23,672		)	(46.9	)
Operating expenses
Interest expense	7,339			9,087			(1,748		)	(19.2	)
Employee compensation
Salaries and benefits	4,516			4,928			(412		)	(8.4	)
Amortization of employee restricted stock	1,804			1,179			625			53.0
Total employee compensation	6,320			6,107			213			3.5
General and administrative expense	10,011			5,381			4,630			86.0
Restructuring expense	—			14			(14		)	(100.0	)
Total operating expense	23,670			20,589			3,081			15.0
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision	3,143			29,896			(26,753		)	(89.5	)
Net investment loss before income tax (benefit) provision	(24,179		)	(28,594		)	4,415			(15.4	)
Income tax (benefit) provision	(193		)	126			(319		)	NM
Net income	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176		$	(22,019	)	NM
NM=Not Meaningful

TOTAL REVENUE

Total revenue includes interest and dividend income, loan fees, advisory fees and other income. The following sections describe the reasons for the variances in each major component of our revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 from the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

INTEREST INCOME

The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 12.2%. The weighted-average yield may vary each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.

The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:



	Year ended
	December 31
	2014		2013
Average 90-day LIBOR	0.2	%	0.3	%
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio	11.3		11.9
Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans	0.7		0.3
Impact of non-accrual loans	—		(0.3	)
Total yield on average loan portfolio	12.2	%	12.2	%

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, interest income was $22.3 million, compared to $43.1 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, which represented a $20.8 million, or 48.3%, decrease. This decrease reflected (i) an $18.7 million decrease resulting from a 45.7% decrease in our average loan balance, (ii) a $1.9 million decrease resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 but that had been accruing interest during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 (iii) a $0.2 million decrease due to interest rate floors and (iv) a $0.1 million decrease related to the decrease in LIBOR. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in interest income attributable to our net spread to LIBOR.

PIK Income

Interest income includes certain amounts that we have not received in cash, such as PIK interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance of the loan and compounded if not paid on a current basis. Borrowers may in some instances be required to prepay PIK because of certain contractual provisions or they may choose to prepay; however, more typically, PIK is paid at the end of the loan term. The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, at cost:



	Year ended
	December 31
(in thousands)	2014			2013
Beginning PIK loan balance	$	12,132		$	9,043
PIK interest earned during the period	2,863			6,480
Interest receivable converted to PIK	—			605
Payments received from PIK loans	(12,135		)	(3,381		)
Realized loss	(1,153		)	(615		)
Ending PIK loan balance	$	1,707		$	12,132

As of each of December 31, 2014 and 2013, all of our PIK loans were accruing interest. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the payments received from PIK loans included $5.3 million collected in connection with the repayment of our loan to Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc., $2.1 million related to the repayment in full of our loan to G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, $1.5 million collected in connection with the sale of our loan to SC Academy Holdings, Inc., $0.9 million collected in connection with the repayment of our loan to West World Media, LLC, $0.9 million in payments on our loan to RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC and $0.5 million collected in connection with the repayment of our loan to Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC. The payments received from PIK loans during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, included $1.0 million collected in conjunction with the partial repayment of our investment in Education Management, Inc., as well as $0.8 million and $0.5 million collected in conjunction with the repayments in full of our investments in NDSSI Holdings, LLC and Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc., respectively.

DIVIDEND INCOME

We accrete dividends on equity investments with stated dividend rates as they are earned, to the extent that we believe the dividends will be paid ultimately and the associated portfolio company has sufficient value to support the accretion. Dividend accretion is included in the cost basis of the related equity instrument on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Schedule of Investments. We record dividend income on common equity investments when the dividend has been declared and is required to be paid. Our dividend income varies from period to period because of changes in the size and composition of our equity investments, the yield from the investments in our equity portfolio and the ability of the portfolio companies to declare and pay dividends. During the twelve months ended December 31,

2014 and 2013, we recognized dividend income of $0.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively. In addition, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we received payments on accrued dividends of $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the balance of accrued dividends was $6.4 million, which was related to our equity investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC.

ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME

Advisory fees and other income primarily include fees related to prepayment, advisory and management services, equity structuring, syndication, bank interest and other income. Generally, advisory fees and other income relate to specific transactions or services and, therefore, may vary from period to period depending on the level and types of services provided. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we earned $1.3 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $0.4 million, or 21.9%, decrease from the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. This decrease resulted from a decrease in amendment and management fees of $0.3 million and a decrease in interest on cash of $0.1 million.

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.

INTEREST EXPENSE

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $7.3 million of interest expense, which represented a $1.7 million, or 19.2%, decrease from the same period in 2013. On September 2, 2014, we prepaid in full the $150.0 million of SBIC debentures owed to the SBA by Solutions Capital, which had a cost of funds, including the amortization of deferred financing costs, of 4.6%. In connection with the repayment of the SBIC debentures, we recorded $2.3 million of accelerated deferred financing costs in interest expense. In addition, interest expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 includes $0.2 million of interest and deferred financing costs associated with our 2006-1 Trust, which we terminated in January 2014. As of December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings or borrowing facilities.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, our average borrowings declined to approximately $108 million from an average of approximately $201 million for the same period in 2013, which accounted for a $3.8 million reduction in our interest expense. In addition, interest expense decreased by $0.1 million due to a decrease in the average LIBOR rate from 0.27% to 0.23%. These decreases were offset by $1.7 million related to increased amortization of debt issuance costs and $0.4 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 3.63% to 3.83%.

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

Employee compensation expense includes base salaries and benefits, variable annual incentive compensation and amortization of employee stock awards. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, our employee compensation expense was $6.3 million, which represented a $0.2 million, or 3.5%, increase from the same period in 2013. Our salaries and benefits decreased by $0.4 million, or 8.4%, due to a $1.3 million decrease in base salaries and benefits, offset by a $0.9 million increase in incentive compensation. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $1.3 million in incentive compensation tied to successful Solutions Capital investment exits. As of December 31, 2014, we had six employees compared to 17 employees as of December 31, 2013. Amortization of employee stock awards for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $1.1 million of accelerated amortization related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, general and administrative expense was $10.0 million, which represented a $4.6 million, or 86.0%, increase compared to the same period in 2013.


•	General and administrative expense increased $2.6 million due to an increase in severance costs. General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $2.2 million in severance related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and $1.2 million in severance related to other employee terminations.


•	General and administrative expense increased $2.0 million due to an increase in legal fees. Legal fees expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 included $2.3 million related to our lawsuit against various defendants involved in our subordinated loan transaction with Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc., Vast, Inc. and Color Star LLC.


•	General and administrative expense increased $0.3 million due to an increase in professional services fees. Professional services fees expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 included $0.3 million in contractual payments due our former chief executive officer tied to successful Solutions Capital investment exits.


•	General and administrative expense decreased $0.3 million due to a reduction in audit and accounting fees, third party valuation fees, dues and subscriptions and other expense items of the business.

NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) GAIN BEFORE INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we incurred $24.2 million of net investment losses before income tax (benefit) provision, compared to $28.6 million during the same period in 2013. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and (losses), net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or (loss). The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and (loss) on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014:



			Year ended December 31, 2014
(in thousands)		Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Portfolio Company	Note	Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Education Management, Inc.	1	Education	Affiliate	$	(20,727	)	$	(15,984	)	$	20,810		$	(15,901	)
SC Academy Holdings, Inc.	2	Education	Non-Affiliate	(4,037		)	—			—			(4,037		)
Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.	3	Diversified Financial Services	Non-Affiliate	(429		)	(1,236		)	429			(1,236		)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	4	Healthcare	Control	—			(1,131		)	—			(1,131		)
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC	5	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	(1,177		)	(591		)	1,138			(630		)
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC	6	Plastic Products	Control	(3,371		)	—			3,897			526
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	7	Business Services	Affiliate	2,000			(207		)	(1,275		)	518
Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC	8	Information Services	Non-Affiliate	(5,717		)	(27		)	5,305			(439		)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.	9	Home Furnishings	Non-Affiliate	(5,741		)	317			5,746			322
Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc.	10	Home Furnishings	Non-Affiliate	(1,665		)	283			1,665			283
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC	11	Insurance	Non-Affiliate	(4,416		)	—			4,523			107
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC	12	Broadcasting	Control	(16,046		)	35			16,046			35
Other (< $1.0 million net gain (loss))				(1,311		)	(3,285		)	2,000			(2,596		)
Total				$	(62,637	)	$	(21,826	)	$	60,284		$	(24,179	)

____________________________


1.	We sold our senior debt and preferred stock investment in Education Management, Inc. for net proceeds of $3.5 million resulting in a realized loss of $20.7 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $20.8 million.


2.	We sold our subordinated debt investment in SC Academy Holdings, Inc. for net proceeds of $11.1 million resulting in a realized loss of $4.0 million.


3.	We sold our investment in Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd. for proceeds of $1.6 million resulting in a realized loss of $0.4 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $0.4 million.

In January 2015, we entered into a merger agreement to sell our largest equity investment, Pharmalogic Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC. The sale transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of certain regulatory approvals, and is anticipated to close by March 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value estimate of our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC reflects the net sales proceeds from this transaction.


5.	We sold our equity investment in Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC for net proceeds of $0.8 million resulting in a realized loss of $1.2 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $1.1 million.


6.	We received the final proceeds for the sale of the assets of Jet Plastica Investors, LLC of $0.5 million resulting in a realized loss of $3.4 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $3.9 million.


7.	We sold our equity investment in C7 Data Centers, Inc. for net proceeds of $4.0 million resulting in a realized gain of $2.0 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation of $1.3 million.


8.	We sold our equity investment in Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC for net proceeds of $0.2 million resulting in a realized loss of $5.7 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $5.3 million.


9.	We sold our senior and subordinated debt investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. for net proceeds of $4.5 million resulting in a realized loss of $5.7 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $5.7 million.


10.	We sold our equity investment in Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc. for net proceeds of $0.5 million resulting in a realized loss of $1.7 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $1.7 million.


11.	We sold our preferred and common equity investments in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC resulting in a realized loss of $4.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $4.5 million.


12.	In addition, in December 2014, we wrote off our subordinated debt and equity investments in GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC resulting in a realized loss of $16.0 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $16.0 million.

The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from the change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.

The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for 2013:



			Year ended December 31, 2013
(in thousands)		Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Portfolio Company	Note	Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc.	1	Agriculture	Non-Affiliate	$	(13,522	)	$	(327	)	$	327		$	(13,522	)
Virtual Radiologic Corporation	2	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	(6,298		)	(3,341		)	4,841			(4,798		)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	3	Healthcare	Control	—			(4,655		)	—			(4,655		)
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC	4	Insurance	Non-Affiliate	—			(3,870		)	—			(3,870		)
Education Management, Inc.	5	Education	Affiliate	—			(3,627		)	—			(3,627		)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.	6	Home Furnishings	Non-Affiliate	(3,424		)	(2,381		)	3,249			(2,556		)
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC	7	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	—			(1,144		)	—			(1,144		)
Miles Media Group, LLC	8	Business Services	Affiliate	2,877			1,192			(1,170		)	2,899
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	9	Business Services	Affiliate	—			1,114			—			1,114
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))				(1,523		)	2,395			693			1,565
Total				$	(21,890	)	$	(14,644	)	$	7,940		$	(28,594	)

____________________________


1.	In December 2013, Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan to sell substantially all of its assets, which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in January 2014. The proceeds from the sale were less than the claims senior to our subordinate debt investment, resulting in a realized loss of $13.5 million.


2.	We received $7.2 million from the sale of our debt investment in Virtual Radiologic Corporation, which resulted in a $6.3 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.


3.	We recorded $4.7 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC due to an increased cost basis related to preferred dividends and to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


4.	During 2013, we recorded $3.9 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, to reflect proceeds from the January 2014 sale of our preferred and common stock investment.


5.	We recorded $3.6 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Education Management, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company and the exchange, in the fourth quarter of 2013, of $5.0 million of principal of our senior debt investment for a new class of preferred stock of Education Management, Inc.


6.	During 2013, we wrote off our preferred and common equity investments in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. resulting in a realized loss of $3.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of

$3.2 million. In addition, we recorded $2.4 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


7.	We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


8.	We received $3.0 million for the sale of our equity investment in Miles Media Group, LLC, which resulted in a $2.9 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million.


9.	We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized appreciation on our investment in C7 Data Centers, Inc. to reflect improvement in the company's performance and the value indicated by the sale of new preferred stock of C7 Data Centers, Inc. to third parties.

The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from a change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.2 million, which was primarily attributable to a net operating loss carryback and lower than expected flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.1 million, which was primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.

SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA

The following tables summarize key unaudited financial information for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2014. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.



	2014 Quarters												2013 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Fourth			Third			Second			First			Fourth			Third			Second		First
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Revenue	$	2,278		$	5,664		$	9,525		$	9,346		$	11,179		$	13,170		$	12,890	$	13,246
Net operating (loss) income before net investment gain (loss) and income tax (benefit) provision	(755		)	(976		)	551			4,323			6,333			7,964			7,556		8,043
Net investment gain (loss) before income tax provision	2,786			2,109			(5,819		)	(23,255		)	(24,757		)	(4,616		)	1,012		(233		)
Net income (loss)	2,076			1,285			(5,268		)	(18,936		)	(18,439		)	3,289			8,574		7,752
PER COMMON SHARE DATA
Net operating (loss) income before net investment gain (loss) and income tax (benefit) provision per common share—basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.01		$	0.06		$	0.09		$	0.11		$	0.11	$	0.11
Income (loss) per common share—basic and diluted	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.05		$	0.12	$	0.11
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	—		$	0.050		$	0.070		$	0.125		$	0.125		$	0.125		$	0.125	$	0.125
SELECTED PERIOD-END BALANCES
Investment portfolio balances
Fair value	$	75,332		$	93,570		$	196,075		$	326,298		$	368,873		$	395,532		$	456,027	$	409,022
Cost	234,640			273,475			413,892			542,513			566,438			589,270			645,048		596,287
Total assets	183,797			211,212			401,073			448,561			513,993			546,018			580,311		606,993
Borrowings	—			—			150,000			150,000			175,172			179,173			204,927		233,015
Total stockholders’ equity	178,901			205,968			239,789			296,047			333,954			363,501			368,709		368,672
Net asset value per common share outstanding^(a)	$	4.69		$	4.48		$	4.42		$	4.37		$	4.74		$	5.10		$	5.18	$	5.18
OTHER PERIOD-END DATA
Average size of investment
Fair value	$	10,762		$	7,797		$	8,912		$	9,888		$	10,849		$	10,987		$	11,123	$	10,226
Cost	33,520			22,790			18,813			16,440			16,660			16,369			15,733		14,907
Number of portfolio companies	7			12			22			33			34			36			41		40
Number of employees	6			11			13			15			17			17			21		20
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING—BASIC AND DILUTED	42,706			49,805			61,221			69,395			69,924			71,218			71,217		71,507
NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING AT PERIOD-END	38,136			45,965			54,252			67,745			70,510			71,212			71,222		71,212

^(a) Based on common shares outstanding at period-end.

The following tables summarize key unaudited information about our investment portfolio for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2014. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or for any future quarter.



	2014 Quarters												2013 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Fourth			Third			Second			First			Fourth			Third			Second			First
PORTFOLIO COMPANY DATA (FAIR VALUE)
Portfolio by type
Debt investments
Senior secured debt	$	40,562		$	41,029		$	100,068		$	173,251		$	185,524		$	218,937		$	261,904		$	214,907
Subordinated debt
Secured	22,460			27,283			53,389			90,127			108,338			114,173			113,019			111,801
Unsecured	—			9,848			22,821			42,761			42,452			22,771			39,245			39,085
Total debt investments	63,022			78,160			176,278			306,139			336,314			355,881			414,168			365,793
Equity investments
Preferred equity	12,044			13,632			16,441			16,375			28,390			37,284			39,384			39,264
Common equity/equivalents	266			1,778			3,356			3,784			4,169			2,367			2,475			3,965
Total equity investments	12,310			15,410			19,797			20,159			32,559			39,651			41,859			43,229
Total portfolio	$	75,332		$	93,570		$	196,075		$	326,298		$	368,873		$	395,532		$	456,027		$	409,022
Percentage of total portfolio
Debt investments
Senior secured debt	53.8		%	43.8		%	51.1		%	53.1		%	50.3		%	55.4		%	57.4		%	52.5		%
Subordinated debt
Secured	29.8			29.2			27.2			27.6			29.4			28.8			24.8			27.3
Unsecured	—			10.5			11.6			13.1			11.5			5.8			8.6			9.6
Total debt investments	83.6			83.5			89.9			93.8			91.2			90.0			90.8			89.4
Equity investments
Preferred equity	16.0			14.6			8.4			5.0			7.7			9.4			8.6			9.6
Common equity/equivalents	0.4			1.9			1.7			1.2			1.1			0.6			0.6			1.0
Total equity investments	16.4			16.5			10.1			6.2			8.8			10.0			9.2			10.6
Total portfolio	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%
YIELD ON AVERAGE LOAN PORTFOLIO AT FAIR VALUE
Average 90-Day LIBOR	0.2		%	0.2		%	0.2		%	0.2		%	0.2		%	0.3		%	0.3		%	0.3		%
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio	10.9			12.4			11.6			12.1			12.1			12.0			12.1			11.7
Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans	1.0			1.4			1.0			—			0.5			0.6			0.1			0.1
Impact of non-accrual loans	—			(0.7		)	(0.4		)	(0.9		)	(0.7		)	(0.5		)	—			—
Total yield on average loan portfolio	12.1		%	13.3		%	12.4		%	11.4		%	12.1		%	12.4		%	12.5		%	12.1		%
COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO BY INTEREST TYPE (FAIR VALUE)
Percentage of loans with fixed interest rates	14.2		%	36.6		%	36.9		%	32.5		%	26.7		%	27.2		%	27.2		%	30.6		%
Percentage of loans with floating interest rates	85.8		%	63.4		%	63.1		%	67.5		%	73.3		%	72.8		%	72.8		%	69.4		%
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEBT INVESTMENTS (FAIR VALUE)
Loans on non-accrual status	—		%	—		%	4.4		%	3.1		%	1.3		%	3.7		%	0.1		%	0.2		%
Loans greater than 90 days past due	—		%	—		%	2.5		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL DEBT INVESTMENTS (COST)
Loans on non-accrual status	—		%	8.3		%	19.3		%	12.2		%	6.1		%	7.4		%	3.4		%	3.9		%
Loans greater than 90 days past due	—		%	—		%	6.8		%	1.2		%	1.1		%	1.0		%	0.9		%	1.0		%

COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

The following table summarizes the components of our net income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:



	Years ended
	December 31,						Variance
(dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			$			Percentage
Revenue
Interest and dividend income
Interest income	$	43,106		$	50,775		$	(7,669	)	(15.1	)%
Dividend income	2,554			3,688			(1,134		)	(30.7	)
Loan fees	3,165			3,236			(71		)	(2.2	)
Total interest and dividend income	48,825			57,699			(8,874		)	(15.4	)
Advisory fees and other income	1,660			3,294			(1,634		)	(49.6	)
Total revenue	50,485			60,993			(10,508		)	(17.2	)
Operating expenses
Interest expense	9,087			15,103			(6,016		)	(39.8	)
Employee compensation
Salaries and benefits	4,928			10,956			(6,028		)	(55.0	)
Amortization of employee restricted stock	1,179			2,076			(897		)	(43.2	)
Total employee compensation	6,107			13,032			(6,925		)	(53.1	)
General and administrative expense	5,381			13,983			(8,602		)	(61.5	)
Restructuring expense	14			69			(55		)	(79.7	)
Total operating expense	20,589			42,187			(21,598		)	(51.2	)
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax provision	29,896			18,806			11,090			59.0
Net investment loss before income tax provision	(28,594		)	(13,299		)	(15,295		)	115.0
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision	—			(174		)	174			(100.0	)
Income tax provision	126			335			(209		)	(62.4	)
Net income	$	1,176		$	4,998		$	(3,822	)	(76.5	)

TOTAL REVENUE

INTEREST INCOME

The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 12.2% compared to 11.3% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The weighted-average yield varies each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.

The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:



	Year ended
	December 31
	2013		2012
Average 90-day LIBOR	0.3	%	0.4	%
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio	11.9		10.9
Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans	0.3		0.4
Impact of non-accrual loans	(0.3	)	(0.4	)
Total yield on average loan portfolio	12.2	%	11.3	%

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, interest income was $43.1 million, compared to $50.8 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, which represented a $7.7 million, or 15.1%, decrease. This decrease reflected (i) a $11.5 million decrease resulting from a 21.0% decrease in our average loan balance, (ii) a $1.8 million decrease due to interest rate floors, (iii) a $0.8 million decrease related to the decrease in LIBOR and (iv) a $0.7 million decrease resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 but that had been accruing interest during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. These decreases were partially offset by a $7.1 million increase in interest income resulting from a 1.3% increase in our net spread to LIBOR.

PIK Income

The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, at cost:



	Year ended
	December 31
(in thousands)	2013			2012
Beginning PIK loan balance	$	9,043		$	15,653
PIK interest earned during the period	6,480			5,253
Interest receivable converted to PIK	605			—
Payments received from PIK loans	(3,381		)	(8,996		)
PIK converted from (to) other securities	—			3,143
Realized loss	(615		)	(6,010		)
Ending PIK loan balance	$	12,132		$	9,043

As of December 31, 2013, all of our PIK loans were accruing interest and, as of December 31, 2012, we were not accruing interest on $0.4 million of the ending PIK loan balance, at cost. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the payments received on PIK loans, included $1.0 million collected in conjunction with the partial repayment of our investment in Education Management, Inc., as well as $0.8 million and $0.5 million collected in conjunction with the repayments in full of our investments in NDSSI Holdings, LLC and Contract Datascan Holdings, Inc., respectively. The payments received from PIK loans during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, included $2.9 million from Jet Plastica Investors, LLC, $1.8 million from GSDM Holdings Corp. and $1.3 million from Coastal Sunbelt Holding, Inc.

DIVIDEND INCOME

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recognized dividend income of $2.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively. In addition, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we received payments on accrued dividends of $0.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the balance of accrued dividends was $10.9 million.

ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we earned $1.7 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $1.6 million, or 49.6%, decrease from the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. This decrease resulted from a decrease in prepayment premiums of $1.6 million during 2013.

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.

INTEREST EXPENSE

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $9.1 million of interest expense, which represented a $6.0 million, or 39.8%, decrease from the same period in 2012. Our average cost to borrow decreased from 4.60% during the year ended December 31, 2012 to 4.46% during the year ended December 31, 2013, principally due to a decrease in the amortization of deferred financing costs (from $5.6 million to $1.2 million), offset by the repayment of securitized debt in our 2006-1 Trust, which carried interest rates ranging from L+0.33% to L+2.25%.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, our average borrowings declined to approximately $201 million from an average of approximately $324 million for the same period in 2012, which accounted for a $4.9 million reduction in our interest expense. In addition, interest expense decreased by $4.4 million related to decreased amortization of debt issuance costs and $0.5 million due to a decrease in the average LIBOR rate from 0.43% to 0.27%. These decreases were offset by $3.8 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 2.46% to 3.63%.

We recognized $1.2 million in deferred financing costs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, down $4.4 million from 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to $2.9 million in deferred financing fees related to our SunTrust Warehouse financing facility which terminated in 2012.

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $1.2 million of compensation expense related to employee restricted stock awards, a decrease of $0.9 million from the same period in 2012. The decrease in amortization of restricted stock awards resulted from a decrease of $0.3 million due to forfeitures of restricted stock awards, a decrease of $0.3 million due to accelerated amortization of awards related to employees whose employment was terminated, and a decrease of $0.3 million due to the expiration of the requisite service period for stock awards net of the amortization of new awards.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, general and administrative expense was $5.4 million, which represented an $8.6 million, or 61.5%, decrease compared to the same period in 2012. General and administrative expense for 2012 included $4.8 million in transition costs, including $3.3 million in severance related expenses and $1.5 million in costs to move our corporate headquarters and improve our information technology systems. In addition, the decrease in general and administrative expense reflected (i) a $2.2 million decrease due to reduced occupancy and other costs for our new corporate office space, (ii) a $0.6 million decrease due to reduced directors and officers insurance costs, (iii) a $0.4 million decrease in board of directors fees, (iv) a $0.4 million decrease in legal fees related to portfolio litigation, (v) a $0.3 million decrease in data processing costs related to our loan servicing system, (vi) a $0.3 million decrease in professional consulting services for corporate and investment related services, (vii) a $0.1 million decrease in professional consulting services for information technology related matters, and (viii) a $0.1 million decrease in telecommunications costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in severance costs related to employee terminations in the third quarter of 2013.

NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) GAIN BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred $28.6 million of net investment losses before income tax provision, compared to $13.3 million during the same period in 2012. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and losses, net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation, and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or loss. The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013:



		Year ended December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Portfolio Company	Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc.	Agriculture	Non-Affiliate	$	(13,522	)	$	(327	)	$	327		$	(13,522	)
Virtual Radiologic Corporation	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	(6,298		)	(3,341		)	4,841			(4,798		)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	Healthcare	Control	—			(4,655		)	—			(4,655		)
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC	Insurance	Non-Affiliate	—			(3,870		)	—			(3,870		)
Education Management, Inc.	Education	Affiliate	—			(3,627		)	—			(3,627		)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.	Home Furnishings	Non-Affiliate	(3,424		)	(2,381		)	3,249			(2,556		)
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	—			(1,144		)	—			(1,144		)
Miles Media Group, LLC	Business Services	Affiliate	2,877			1,192			(1,170		)	2,899
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	Business Services	Affiliate	—			1,114			—			1,114
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))			(1,523		)	2,395			693			1,565
Total			$	(21,890	)	$	(14,644	)	$	7,940		$	(28,594	)

____________________________


•	In December 2013, Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan to sell substantially all of its assets, which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in January 2014. The proceeds from the sale were less than the claims senior to our subordinate debt investment, resulting in a realized loss of $13.5 million.


•	We received $7.2 million from the sale of our debt investment in Virtual Radiologic Corporation, which resulted in a $6.3 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.


•	We recorded $4.7 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC due to an increased cost basis related to preferred dividends and to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


•	During 2013, we recorded $3.9 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, to reflect proceeds from the January 2014 sale of our preferred and common stock investment.


•	We recorded $3.6 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Education Management, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company and the exchange, in the fourth quarter of 2013, of $5.0 million of principal of our senior debt investment for a new class of preferred stock of Education Management, Inc.

•

During 2013, we wrote off our preferred and common equity investments in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. resulting in a realized loss of $3.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $3.2 million. In addition, we recorded $2.4 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


•	We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.


•	We received $3.0 million for the sale of our equity investment in Miles Media Group, LLC, which resulted in a $2.9 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million.


•	We recorded $1.1 million of unrealized appreciation on our investment in C7 Data Centers, Inc. to reflect improvement in the company's performance and the value indicated by the sale of new preferred stock of C7 Data Centers, Inc. to third parties.

The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for 2012:



		Year ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Industry	Type	Realized Gain/(Loss)			Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation)			Net (Loss)/ Gain
Portfolio Company
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.	Communications	Control	$	—		$	(9,789	)	$	—		$	(9,789	)
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.	Home Furnishings	Affiliate	—			(6,046		)	—			(6,046		)
Orbitel Holdings, LLC	Cable	Control	(2,171		)	(1,966		)	805			(3,332		)
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	Healthcare	Control	—			(1,734		)	—			(1,734		)
Education Management, Inc.	Education	Non-Affiliate	—			(1,387		)	—			(1,387		)
GSDM Holdings, LLC	Healthcare	Non-Affiliate	1,463			(849		)	(1,976		)	(1,362		)
Stratford School Holdings, Inc.	Education	Affiliate	16,370			(99		)	(13,056		)	3,215
NPS Holding Group, LLC	Business Services	Control	(12,930		)	2,414			12,715			2,199
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC	Plastic Products	Control	(90,802		)	1,385			91,288			1,871
Intran Media, LLC	Other Media	Control	(12,785		)	—			12,945			160
PremierGarage Holdings, LLC	Home Furnishings	Control	(5,371		)	—			5,371			—
Philadelphia Media Network, Inc.	Newspaper	Non-Affiliate	(5,027		)	(1		)	5,064			36
Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.	Publishing	Non-Affiliate	(3,000		)	(1,366		)	4,821			455
Jenzabar, Inc.	Technology	Non-Affiliate	16,370			—			(16,436		)	(66		)
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss))			(698		)	4,182			(1,003		)	2,481
Total			$	(98,581	)	$	(15,256	)	$	100,538		$	(13,299	)

____________________________


•	In August 2012, Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc., or Broadview, filed a voluntary pre-packaged chapter 11 plan of reorganization which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and became effective in November 2012. As of December 31, 2012, our fair value estimate of our investment in Broadview reflected our reduced ownership resulting from this restructuring and the performance of the company.


•	In April 2012, Jet Plastica Investors, LLC liquidated substantially all of its assets. Including the proceeds from the liquidation, we received $11.0 million in payments on our senior debt resulting in a $90.8 million realized loss and a $91.3 million reversal of unrealized depreciation in the second quarter of 2012.


•	In the second quarter of 2012, we received $34.0 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Stratford School Holdings, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $13.1 million.


•	We received $35.2 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in Orbitel Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $2.2 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $0.8 million.


•	We received $34.7 million for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investment in GSDM Holdings, LLC, which resulted in a $1.5 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $2.0 million.


•	We received $12.1 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of NPS Holding Group, LLC for the repayment of our debt and the sale of our equity investments, which resulted in a $12.9 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.7 million.


•	We received $0.4 million in proceeds from the sale of all the assets of Intran Media, LLC which resulted in a realized loss on our equity investments of $12.7 million and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $12.9 million.


•	We restructured our subordinated debt investment in Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. and canceled a portion of our outstanding subordinated loan balance, resulting in a $3.0 million realized loss and a reversal of previously unrealized depreciation of $4.8 million.


•	We received $44,000 in the sale of our equity investment in Philadelphia Media Network, Inc. and wrote off our equity investment in PremierGarage Holdings, LLC, resulting in realized losses and reversals of previously unrealized depreciation on those investments.


•	In February 2012, we accepted $23.7 million for our senior preferred stock and warrant position in Jenzabar, Inc., which resulted in a $16.4 million reversal of previously unrealized appreciation and the realization of a $16.4 million gain


•	We recorded $6.0 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to reflect a decrease in the performance of that company.in.

INCOME TAX PROVISION

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred a $0.1 million income tax provision compared to a $0.3 million income tax provision during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. The income tax provision for both periods was primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our financial liquidity principally comes from our cash on hand, portfolio monetizations and net operating income. In addition to making investments in portfolio companies, we may use our available liquidity to pay dividends to our stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased 32,186,556 shares of our common stock for $120.0 million at a weighted average price of $3.73 per share, representing a 16.1% discount from our quarterly weighted average net asset value per share. We also declared 24.5 cents per share in dividends and paid $15.4 million in total dividends.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we earned 12.2% on our average loan portfolio at fair value of $205.3 million and our weighted average cost to borrow was 6.7% (4.06% excluding the impact of amortization of deferred debt issuance costs) on average borrowings of $108.2 million. Including dividend income and fee income, we earned $3.1 million of net operating income.

At December 31, 2014, we had $105.8 million in cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes and $1.4 million of restricted cash held in escrow.

As of December 31, 2014, we had no borrowings. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2014, we (i) terminated our 2006-1 Trust; (ii) terminated the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver; (iii) prepaid in full the $150 million of SBIC debentures owed to the SBA by Solutions Capital and (iv) sold the remaining participating interest in our secured financing.

Although there can be no assurance, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating requirements for fiscal year 2015, as well as liquidity for new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH, SECURITIZATION ACCOUNTS, AND CASH, RESTRICTED

Our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect three categories of cash: cash and cash equivalents; cash, securitization accounts; and cash, restricted. Each of these categories is described more fully below:

•

Cash and cash equivalents represents unrestricted cash, including checking accounts, interest bearing deposits collateralized by marketable debt securities and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had $105.8 million and $91.6 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents included $77.4 million that was held in interest-bearing accounts.


•	Cash, restricted includes cash held in escrow and, previously, cash held for regulatory purposes. As of December 31, 2014, cash held in escrow comprises the entire balance of restricted cash. Prior to the repayment in full of our SBIC debentures in September 2014, restricted cash predominately consisted of cash

held by our SBIC. When we repaid the debentures and surrendered our SBIC license to the SBA in September, 2014, cash restrictions lapsed and we reclassifed the remaining cash held by Solutions Capital to Cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2014, we had $1.4 million of restricted cash.

•

Cash, securitization accounts previously included principal and interest payments received on securitized loans, which, were held in designated bank accounts until monthly or quarterly disbursements were made from the securitization trusts. We were generally required to use a portion of these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings or pay other amounts in accordance with the related securitization agreements. Cash in securitization accounts had a negative impact on our earnings since the interest we paid on borrowings typically exceeded the rate of return that we were able to earn on temporary cash investments. As of December 31, 2013, we had $13.9 million in cash, securitization accounts. On January 21, 2014, we terminated our 2006-1 Trust and the securitized cash was used to repay principal and interest due on the notes including the notes owned by MCG Capital, the parent.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, our operating activities provided $280.0 million of cash and cash equivalents, and our financing activities used $265.8 million of cash and cash equivalents.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—BORROWINGS

As of December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings or borrowing facilities. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and the amounts outstanding.



		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Maturity Date	Total Facility/ Program		Amount Outstanding		Total Facility/ Program		Amount Outstanding
SBIC^(a)
2008-10B	September 2018	$	—	$	—	$	2,600	$	2,600
2009-10A	March 2019	—		—		12,000		12,000
2009-10B	September 2019	—		—		13,000		13,000
2010-10B	September 2020	—		—		27,500		27,500
2011-10A	March 2021	—		—		53,500		53,500
2012-10A	March 2022	—		—		41,400		41,400
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1^(b)
Series 2006-1 Class D Notes	April 2018	—		—		40,016		25,172
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver^(c)
Unsecured Revolving Note	November 2014	—		—		20,000		—
Total borrowings		$	—	$	—	$	210,016	$	175,172

^__________


^(a)	In September 2014, we repaid in full the SBIC Debentures.


^(b)	In January 2014, we repaid in full the Class D Notes.


^(c)	In April 2014, we terminated the undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.

SBIC DEBENTURES

In September 2014, we prepaid in full the $150 million of SBIC debentures owed to the SBA by Solutions Capital using excess restricted cash. After repayment, Solutions Capital surrendered its SBIC license to the SBA’s Office of SBIC Operations. In connection with the repayment of the SBIC debentures, we recorded $2.3 million of accelerated deferred financing costs in interest expense. From 2005-2014, Solutions Capital invested $468 million in 36 U.S. small businesses generating an approximate 12% IRR on its portfolio investments based on the total amounts invested and amounts received through the exit of the investments.

BANK OF AMERICA UNSECURED REVOLVER

In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million. On April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.

MCG COMMERCIAL LOAN TRUST 2006-1

As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE BORROWINGS AND COST OF FUNDS

The following table shows our weighted-average borrowings, the weighted-average interest rate on all of our borrowings, including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and commitment fees, the average LIBOR, and the average spread to LIBOR for 2014 and 2013:



	Year ended
(dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Weighted-average borrowings	$	108,234		$	200,918
Average LIBOR	0.23		%	0.27		%
Average spread to LIBOR, excluding amortization of deferred debt issuance costs	3.83			3.63
Impact of amortization of deferred debt issuance costs	2.63			0.56
Total cost of funds	6.69		%	4.46		%

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—COMMON STOCK

We are a closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current net asset value of such stock, except in limited circumstances, including approval by our stockholders of such a sale and certain determinations by our board of directors.

STOCK REPURCHASES

Stock Repurchase Programs

Tender Offer

The following table summarizes our stock repurchases under the stock repurchase programs and the tender offer for the year ended December 31, 2014.



	Year ended December 31, 2014
Dollar amount repurchased (in thousands)	$	119,993
Shares repurchased	32,186,556
Average price per share	$	3.73
Discount to quarterly weighted average net asset value per share	16.1		%

We requested and received the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engage in a stock repurchase program and agree not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. Although as of December 31, 2014, there were 1,426,811 shares of our common stock available for issuance under our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Plan, no shares of restricted stock could be issued under our 2006 Plan or our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Non-Employee Plan, because the 10% threshold set forth in the SEC's order had been reached due to shares we repurchased under our stock repurchase program.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our customers. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. We attempt to limit our credit risk by conducting extensive due diligence and obtaining collateral where appropriate.

Commitments to extend credit include the unused portions of commitments that obligate us to extend credit in the form of loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. Commitments to extend credit would also include loan proceeds we are obligated to advance, such as loan draws, rotating or revolving credit arrangements, or similar transactions. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014, we had $2.0 million of outstanding unused loan commitments. We believe that our operations, monetizations and unrestricted cash will provide sufficient liquidity to fund, as necessary, requests to draw on these unfunded commitments. We estimate that the fair value of these commitments was less than $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. From time to time, we provide guarantees or standby letters of credit on behalf of our portfolio companies. As of December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table shows our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014:



(in thousands)	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations^(a)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		After 5 years
Operating leases	575		575		—		—		—
Severance obligations^(b)	1,621		1,271		350		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	2,196	$	1,846	$	350	$	—	$	—

_______________


^(a)	Excludes the unused commitments to extend credit to our customers of $2.0 million as discussed above.


^(b)	Represents remaining severance payments, employer taxes and incentive payments that we are obligated to pay stemming from the resignation of our former chief executive officer, which have been accrued in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

DISTRIBUTIONS

We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amount would be considered a return of capital. As a RIC, we are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.

We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the BDC asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable RIC tax treatment. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions, or distributions at a particular level. We may make distributions to our stockholders of certain net capital gains. Since December 2001, we have declared aggregate per share distributions of $14.13 per share. Due to the market dislocation, we suspended our distributions from the third quarter of 2008 through the first quarter of 2010. We reinstated our distribution on April 29, 2010, and until the third quarter of 2014 continued to declare a quarterly dividend.

The following table summarizes the distributions that we declared since January 1, 2012:



Date Declared	Record Date	Payable Date	Dividends per Share
August 5, 2014	August 20, 2014	August 29, 2014	$	0.050
April 25, 2014	May 9, 2014	May 30, 2014	$	0.070
February 28, 2014	March 14, 2014	March 28, 2014	$	0.125
October 25, 2013	November 8, 2013	November 22, 2013	$	0.125
July 26, 2013	August 9, 2013	August 30, 2013	$	0.125
April 26, 2013	May 10, 2013	May 31, 2013	$	0.125
March 1, 2013	March 15, 2013	March 29, 2013	$	0.125
October 26, 2012	November 16, 2012	November 30, 2012	$	0.125
July 27, 2012	August 17, 2012	August 31, 2012	$	0.140
April 27, 2012	June 13, 2012	July 13, 2012	$	0.140
February 24, 2012	April 13, 2012	May 15, 2012	$	0.170

As of the end of each fiscal year, we determine the tax attributes of our distributions, including return of capital, based upon our taxable income and distributions paid for the full year, which we report to each stockholder on a Form 1099. Based on the tax attributes of the distributions that we declared for 2014, 3.9% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 96.1% of our distributions were a return of capital. We will make future decisions with respect to the actual level of distributions after taking into account the minimum statutorily required level of distributions, gains and losses

recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, our liquidity, cash earnings and our BDC asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision.

Each year, we mail statements on Form 1099-DIV to our stockholders that identify whether we made distributions from ordinary income, net capital gains on the sale of securities, which are each taxable distributions, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus, which is a nontaxable distribution. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders for tax purposes. All or a portion of the distributions that we paid to stockholders during fiscal years 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 represented a return of capital. During the fiscal year 2009, we did not declare or pay any dividends to stockholders. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we declared and paid distributions from ordinary income that were sufficient to meet our distribution requirements as a RIC. We will monitor 2015 taxable income in order to ensure compliance with the distribution requirements as a RIC. We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid during the full year.

On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, or the Modernization Act, was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of RICs. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. One of the more prominent changes addresses capital loss carryforwards. Under the Modernization Act, each RIC will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those subsequent taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation. For the tax years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we have total net capital losses of $181.1 million which have no expiration and will be carried forward indefinitely to offset future net capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards from tax years 2009 of $54.2 million and 2010 of $5.2 million will expire December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unless utilized to offset future net capital gains prior to those expiration dates to the extent permitted by federal tax law.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The following are some of the more critical judgment areas that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.

INCOME RECOGNITION

We follow the policies described below to recognize income on our Consolidated Statement of Operations:

•

Interest Income—We accrue interest income if we expect that ultimately we will be able to collect it. Generally, when a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise believe the customer is unable to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we remain contractually entitled to this interest. We may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. We generally accrue PIK interest when collection is expected and cease accruing PIK if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we expect the customer is unable to pay all principal and interest due.

•

Dividend Income—We accrete dividends on equity investments, generally preferred equity, with stated dividend rates as they are earned, to the extent that we believe the dividends will be paid ultimately and the associated portfolio company has sufficient value to support the accretion. Dividend accretion is included in the cost basis of the related equity instrument on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Schedule of Investments. We record dividend income on common equity investments, and gains from realized distributions, when the dividend has been declared and is required to be paid.


•	Loan Origination Fees—We capitalize loan origination fees, then amortize these fees into interest income over the term of the loan using the effective interest rate method or on a straight-line basis when the loan has a revolving credit feature. In certain loan arrangements, we receive warrants or other equity interests from the

borrower as additional origination fees. Typically, borrowers granting these interests are not traded publicly. We record the financial instruments received at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. In certain cases, when we record a warrant or other equity instrument that results in a loan discount, we accrete the discount into income over the term of the loan.

•

Advisory Fees and Other Income—We charge our portfolio companies fees for services that we provide, including advisory and management services, prepayments, research, structuring, and other fees. We generally recognize these fees when earned. We recognize prepayment fees upon receipt. Finally, certain of the bank accounts in which we maintain cash balances pay interest, which we recognize when the interest is earned.

VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

We account for our investments at fair value in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.

ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:



ASC 820 Fair Value Hierarchy	Inputs to Fair Value Methodology
Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2	Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information
Level 3	Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment

We categorize a financial instrument in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to its fair value measurement. In the event that transfers between these levels were to occur in the future, we would recognize those transfers as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period.

DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUE IN GOOD FAITH

As a BDC, we invest primarily in illiquid securities, including debt and equity securities of private companies. To protect our investments and maximize our returns, we negotiate the structure of each equity security and the majority of the debt securities in our investment portfolio. Our contracts with our portfolio companies generally include many terms governing interest rate, repayment terms, prepayment premiums, financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership and corporate governance rights, dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and put or call rights. In some cases, our loan agreements also allow for increases in the spread to the base index rate, if the portfolio company’s financial or operational performance deteriorates or shows negative variances from its business plan and, in some cases, allow for decreases in the spread if financial or operational performance improves or exceeds the portfolio company’s plan. Generally, our investments are subject to some restrictions on resale and have no established trading market. Because of the type of investments that we make and the nature of our business, our valuation processes require analyses of numerous market, industry and company-specific factors, including: the performance of the underlying investment; the financial condition of the portfolio company; changing market events; market prices, when available; estimates of market interest rates that would otherwise be made available to our portfolio companies; and other factors relevant to the individual security.

There is no single approach for determining fair value in good faith. Unlike banks, we are not permitted to provide a general reserve for anticipated loan losses. As a result, for portfolio investments that do not have an active market, we must apply business judgment to the specific facts and circumstances associated with each security to determine fair value.

Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. When such market prices are not available, we use several valuation methodologies to estimate the fair value of our investment portfolio, which generally results in a range of fair values from which we derive a single estimate of fair value. To determine a portfolio company’s fair value, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as key market value factors. In determining a security's fair value, we assume we would exchange it in an orderly transaction at the measurement date. We use the following methods to determine the fair value of investments in our portfolio that are not traded actively:

•

Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprised 38.8% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine the fair value of these securities, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches also consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit.

•

Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprised 61.2% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Quoted prices were not available for 99.4% of our non-control investments at fair value. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach.

•

Thinly-Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of December 31, 2014, these securities represented 0.4% of our investment portfolio at fair value. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence.

Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of December 31, 2014, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made, considered pending sales of the investments or used market quotes in the preceding twelve month period to calculate 100.0% of the fair value of our investment portfolio.

The majority of the valuations performed by the independent valuation firms utilize proprietary models and inputs. We have used, and intend to continue to use, independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses.

Our board of directors sets our valuation policies and procedures and determines the fair value of our investments. The investment and valuation committee of our board of directors meets at least quarterly with our executive management to review management’s recommendations of fair value of our investments. Our board of directors considers our valuations, as well as the independent valuations and reviews, in its determination of the fair value of our investments.

Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such fair value estimates may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses that we ultimately realize on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.

Significant Unobservable Inputs

Our investment portfolio is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including the historical and forecasted financial and operational performance of the portfolio company, projected cash flows, market multiples, comparable market transactions, the priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and other inputs too numerous to list quantitatively herein.

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of December 31, 2014.




($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Range				Weighted Average
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Minimum		Maximum		Weighted Average
Senior debt	$	40,562	Discounted Cash Flow	Market Interest Rate	7.8	%	7.8	%	7.8	%
			Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
Subordinated debt	22,460		Discounted Cash Flow	Market Interest Rate	7.8	%	14.5	%	11.6	%
			Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
Preferred equity	12,044		Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
	$	75,066

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

In accordance with ASC Topic 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, we recognize compensation cost related to share-based awards for which forfeiture provisions are expected to lapse over the requisite service period. Share-based awards are entitled to receive dividends which are not forfeitable in the event the share-based awards forfeiture provisions are not achieved. If actual forfeitures differ from our expectations, dividends previously paid on the forfeited shares are reclassified between retained earnings and compensation expense.

INCOME TAXES

We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amounts would be considered a return of capital. We are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.

We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, each of which holds or has held one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments. The purpose of these taxable subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as LLCs or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement

that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the taxable subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us for the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by taxable subsidiaries is taxed to the taxable subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the taxable subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the taxable subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09. This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-230: Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. The core principal of the update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity should identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this update will have on our consolidated financial statements.



ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. In the event of financial downturns affecting the banking system and financial markets, the financial position and results of operations of certain of the middle-market companies in our portfolio could be affected adversely, which ultimately could lead to difficulty in their meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults.

Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. Our net interest income is affected by changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR, prime rates and commercial paper rates. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 85.8% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, bore interest at a spread to either the LIBOR or the prime rate, and 14.2% at a fixed interest rate. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 59.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.5% and 2.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.75% and 4.50%. The three-month weighted-average LIBOR interest rate was 0.24% as of December 31, 2014. Thus, the LIBOR floors in these loan investments lessen the impact of such historically low LIBOR rates.

We regularly measure exposure to interest rate risk. We assess interest rate risk and we manage our interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis by comparing our interest rate-sensitive assets to our interest rate-sensitive liabilities. Based on this review, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates.

The following table shows a comparison of the interest rate base for our interest-bearing cash, outstanding commercial loans, at cost, and our outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans		Borrowings		Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans		Borrowings
Money market rate	$	77,392	$	—	$	56,685	$	—
Prime rate	—		—		—		—
LIBOR
30-day	—		—		57,725		—
60-day	—		—		—		—
90-day	52,771		—		194,133		25,172
180-day	—		—		—		—
Fixed rate	8,926		—		100,009		150,000
Total	$	139,089	$	—	$	408,552	$	175,172

In addition, as of December 31, 2014, we had $29.8 million of non-interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents.

Based on our December 31, 2014 balance sheet, the following table shows the impact to net income of hypothetical base rate increases in interest rates, assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure. The impact to net income of hypothetical base rate decreases in interest rates is not shown in the following table because as of December 31, 2014, the quarterly average LIBOR was 0.24% and a 100-basis point decrease could not occur:



(dollars in thousands) Basis Point Change	Interest Income		Interest Expense		Net Income
100	$	937	$	—	$	937
200	1,996		—		1,996
300	3,311		—		3,311

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



	Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	65
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013	67
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	68
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	69
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	70
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2014	71
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013	72
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	75

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

MCG Capital Corporation

We have audited MCG Capital Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). MCG Capital Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, MCG Capital Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and our report dated March 2, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 2, 2015

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

MCG Capital Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2014, by correspondence with the custodian, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MCG Capital Corporation at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the consolidated results of its operations, changes in its net assets, and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), MCG Capital Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 2, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 2, 2015

MCG Capital Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets



(in thousands, except per share amounts)	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,826		$	91,598
Cash, restricted	1,408			33,895
Cash, securitization accounts	—			13,906
Investments at fair value
Non-affiliate investments (cost of $204,084 and $444,217, respectively)	46,096			268,173
Affiliate investments (cost of $0 and $69,470, respectively)	—			56,792
Control investments (cost of $30,556 and $62,751, respectively)	29,236			43,908
Total investments (cost of $234,640 and $566,438, respectively)	75,332			368,873
Interest receivable	396			2,087
Other assets	835			3,634
Total assets	$	183,797		$	513,993
Liabilities
Borrowings (maturing within one year of $0 and $25,172, respectively)	$	—		$	175,172
Interest payable	—			2,345
Other liabilities	4,896			2,522
Total liabilities	4,896			180,039
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized 1 share, none issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized 200,000 shares on December 31, 2014 and 2013, 38,136 issued and outstanding on December 31, 2014 and 70,510 issued and outstanding on December 31, 2013	381			705
Paid-in capital	862,472			980,930
Distributions in excess of earnings	(524,644		)	(449,915		)
Net unrealized depreciation on investments	(159,308		)	(197,766		)
Total stockholders’ equity	178,901			333,954
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	183,797		$	513,993
Net asset value per common share at end of period	$	4.69		$	4.74

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MCG Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations



	Year ended
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	December 31
	2014			2013			2012
Revenue
Interest and dividend income
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)	$	20,192		$	37,307		$	45,004
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)	2,815			6,345			6,761
Control investments (more than 25% owned)	2,509			5,173			5,934
Total interest and dividend income	25,516			48,825			57,699
Advisory fees and other income
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)	1,259			1,622			1,858
Control investments (more than 25% owned)	38			38			1,436
Total advisory fees and other income	1,297			1,660			3,294
Total revenue	26,813			50,485			60,993
Operating expense
Interest expense	7,339			9,087			15,103
Employee compensation
Salaries and benefits	4,516			4,928			10,956
Amortization of employee restricted stock awards	1,804			1,179			2,076
Total employee compensation	6,320			6,107			13,032
General and administrative expense	10,011			5,381			13,983
Restructuring expense	—			14			69
Total operating expense	23,670			20,589			42,187
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision	3,143			29,896			18,806
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)	(25,004		)	(20,460		)	8,907
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)	(18,326		)	(1,485		)	16,370
Control investments (more than 25% owned)	(19,307		)	55			(123,858		)
Total net realized loss on investments	(62,637		)	(21,890		)	(98,581		)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned)	18,056			(7,294		)	(168,409		)
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned)	2,678			4,743			(18,598		)
Control investments (more than 25% owned)	17,523			(3,951		)	271,996
Other fair value adjustments	201			(202		)	293
Total net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	38,458			(6,704		)	85,282
Net investment loss before income tax (benefit) provision	(24,179		)	(28,594		)	(13,299		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision	—			—			(174		)
Income tax (benefit) provision	(193		)	126			335
Net (loss) income	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176		$	4,998
Income (loss) per basic and diluted common share	$	(0.38	)	$	0.02		$	0.07
Cash distributions declared per common share	$	0.245		$	0.500		$	0.575
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted	55,504			71,232			74,859

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MCG Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets



(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Year ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision	$	3,143		$	29,896		$	18,806
Net realized loss on investments	(62,637		)	(21,890		)	(98,581		)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	38,458			(6,704		)	85,282
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision	—			—			(174		)
Income tax benefit (provision)	193			(126		)	(335		)
Net (loss) income	(20,843		)	1,176			4,998
Distributions to stockholders
Distributions declared from net operating income	(602		)	(26,423		)	—
Distributions declared in excess of net operating income	(14,826		)	(8,977		)	(42,889		)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions	(15,428		)	(35,400		)	(42,889		)
Capital share transactions
Repurchase of common stock	(119,993		)	(4,693		)	(27,172		)
Amortization of restricted stock awards
Employee awards accounted for as employee compensation	1,804			1,179			2,076
Non-employee director awards accounted for as general and administrative expense	52			60			120
Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock	(645		)	(96		)	(357		)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions	(118,782		)	(3,550		)	(25,333		)
Total decrease in net assets	(155,053		)	(37,774		)	(63,224		)
Net assets
Beginning of period	333,954			371,728			434,952
End of period	$	178,901		$	333,954		$	371,728
Net asset value per common share at end of period	$	4.69		$	4.74		$	5.18
Common shares outstanding at end of period	38,136			70,510			71,721

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MCG Capital Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows



	Year ended
	December 31
(in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) income	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176		$	4,998
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities
Investments in portfolio companies	(9,198		)	(119,803		)	(153,005		)
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales	269,192			205,874			394,725
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable, accrued payment-in-kind interest and dividends	11,059			(5,146		)	9,842
Amortization of restricted stock awards
Employee	1,804			1,179			2,076
Non-employee director	52			60			120
Decrease in cash—securitization accounts from interest collections	1,399			2,486			4,415
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash—escrow accounts	(430		)	5,842			(485		)
Depreciation and amortization	2,916			1,225			6,532
Decrease (increase) in other assets	(117		)	83			958
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	30			(6,179		)	(894		)
Realized loss on investments	62,637			21,890			98,581
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments	(38,458		)	6,704			(85,282		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			174
Net cash provided by operating activities	280,043			115,391			282,755
Cash flows from financing activities
Repurchase of common stock	(119,993		)	(4,693		)	(27,172		)
Payments on borrowings	(179,685		)	(72,881		)	(203,740		)
Proceeds from borrowings	4,513			—			21,400
Decrease (increase) in cash in restricted and securitization accounts
Securitization accounts for repayment of principal on debt	12,479			587			18,911
Restricted cash	32,944			15,102			(19,389		)
Payment of financing costs	—			—			(1,402		)
Distributions paid	(15,428		)	(35,400		)	(55,981		)
Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock	(645		)	(96		)	(357		)
Net cash used in by financing activities	(265,815		)	(97,381		)	(267,730		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	14,228			18,010			15,025
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning balance	91,598			73,588			58,563
Ending balance	$	105,826		$	91,598		$	73,588
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest paid	$	6,804		$	8,071		$	9,727
Income taxes paid	33			138			277
Paid-in-kind interest accrued	2,863			6,480			5,253
Paid-in-kind interest collected	12,135			3,381			8,996
Dividend income collected	746			869			8,474

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands)

			Interest Rate⁽⁷⁾										Fair Value
Portfolio Company	Industry	Investment	Current		PIK		Total		Principal		Cost		Fair Value

Control Investments⁽⁴⁾:
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC^(2)(10)	Healthcare	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	$	17,195	$	17,192	$	17,192
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC^(2)(10)		Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)⁽⁵⁾									13,364		12,044
Total control investments (represents 38.8% of total investments at fair value)											30,556		29,236
Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned):
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.⁽⁹⁾	Communications	Common Stock (132,779 shares)⁽⁵⁾									159,579		266
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.⁽⁹⁾		Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)⁽⁵⁾									—		—
		Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)⁽⁵⁾									—		—
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	Business Services	Senior Debt (Due 9/19)	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	14,341		14,172		14,172
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC⁽²⁾	Broadcasting	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)	4.3	%	—		4.3	%	10,203		7,873		9,198
Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC⁽¹¹⁾	Manufacturing	Subordinated Debt (Due 6/19)	9.5	%	2.0	%	11.5	%	7,219		7,130		7,130
Intrafusion Holding Corp.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt (Due 6/18)	13.6	%	—		13.6	%	6,500		6,404		6,404
South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)	12.0	%	2.5	%	14.5	%	9,031		8,926		8,926
Total non-affiliate investments (represents 61.2% of total investments at fair value)											204,084		46,096
Total Investments											$	234,640	$	75,332

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)

			Interest Rate⁽⁷⁾										Fair Value
Portfolio Company	Industry	Investment	Current		PIK		Total		Principal		Cost

Control Investments⁽⁴⁾:
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC⁽²⁾	Broadcasting	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)⁽¹⁾	4.3	%	—		4.3	%	$	13,329	$	10,963	$	12,252
		Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)⁽⁶⁾	2.5	%	—		2.5	%	11,593		6,975		—
		Class B Voting Units (8.0%, 86,700 units)⁽⁵⁾									9,071		—
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC⁽²⁾	Plastic Products	Senior Debt A (Due 3/15)⁽¹⁾⁽⁶⁾	2.4	%	7.5	%	9.9	%	5,326		3,897		—
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC⁽²⁾	Healthcare	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)⁽¹⁾	7.5	%	—		7.5	%	7,640		7,640		7,640
		Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)⁽¹⁾	12.0	%	3.0	%	15.0	%	10,845		10,841		10,841
		Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)⁽⁵⁾									13,364		13,175
Total control investments (represents 11.9% of total investments at fair value)											62,751		43,908
Affiliate Investments⁽³⁾:
C7 Data Centers, Inc.	Business Services	Senior Debt (Due 9/17)⁽¹⁾	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	17,350		17,092		17,092
		Series B Preferred Stock (7,142,857 shares)⁽⁵⁾									2,000		3,482
Education Management, Inc.	Education	Senior Debt (Due 12/15)⁽¹⁾	3.0	%	8.7	%	11.7	%	19,723		19,617		19,617
		Series C Preferred Stock (9.0%, 16,910 shares)⁽⁵⁾									5,000		174
IDOC, LLC	Healthcare	Senior Debt (Due 8/17)⁽¹⁾	9.8	%	—		9.8	%	15,000		14,762		14,762
		Limited Partner Interests^(1)(2)(5)									999		1,665
Total affiliate investments (represents 15.4% of total investments at fair value)											59,470		56,792
Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned):
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.⁽²⁾	Business Services	Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)⁽¹⁾	12.5	%	—		12.5	%	10,000		9,827		9,827
		Series A Preferred Stock (974,805 shares)⁽⁵⁾									2,000		1,731
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.⁽²⁾	Home Furnishings	Senior Debt (Due 1/14 to 8/14)⁽¹⁾⁽⁶⁾	10.3	%	—		10.3	%	7,409		7,204		4,493
		Subordinated Debt (Due 1/14)⁽⁶⁾	—		10.0	%	10.0	%	3,771		3,352		—
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.⁽⁹⁾	Communications	Common Stock (132,779 shares)⁽⁵⁾									159,579		761
		Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)⁽⁵⁾									—		—
		Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)⁽⁵⁾									—		—
Community Investors, Inc.	Business Services	Senior Debt (Due 5/18)⁽¹⁾	9.8	%	—		9.8	%	12,300		12,079		12,079
		Preferred Stock (10.0%, 297,436 shares)⁽¹⁾									317		317
		Common Stock (2,564 shares)⁽¹⁾⁽⁵⁾									3		124
Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc.	Publishing	Subordinated Debt (Due 3/15)⁽¹⁾	5.0	%	7.3	%	12.3	%	21,521		21,483		21,483
Dorsey School of Business Holdings, Inc.	Education	Senior Debt (Due 6/18)⁽¹⁾	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	10,000		9,867		9,867
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC⁽²⁾	Insurance	Subordinated Debt (Due 5/14)⁽¹⁾	11.2	%	4.3	%	15.5	%	19,484		19,423		19,423
		Series A Preferred Shares (14.0%, 5,000,000 shares)⁽⁵⁾									8,191		4,196
		Class C Shares (621,907 shares)⁽⁵⁾									529		—
Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.⁽⁸⁾	Diversified Financial Services	Income Notes (Due 4/19)									2,491		3,298
Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC	Manufacturing	Subordinated Debt (Due 9/18)⁽¹⁾	10.0	%	4.0	%	14.0	%	9,379		9,221		9,221
Huron Inc.	Manufacturing	Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)⁽¹⁾	10.0	%	4.0	%	14.0	%	13,187		12,958		12,958
Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC	Manufacturing	Subordinated Debt (Due 6/19)	9.7	%	2.0	%	11.7	%	10,035		9,888		9,888
Intrafusion Holding Corp.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt (Due 6/18)⁽¹⁾	11.9	%	—		11.9	%	11,500		11,290		11,290
Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc.	Home Furnishings	Class B-1 Common Stock (2,000 shares)⁽⁵⁾									2,185		237

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements



MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)

			Interest Rate⁽⁷⁾									Fair Value
Portfolio Company	Industry	Investment	Current		PIK		Total		Principal	Cost

Mailsouth, Inc.	Publishing	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)⁽¹⁾	6.8	%	—		6.8	%	3,921	3,888		3,830
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC	Healthcare	Preferred Units (10.0%, 1,250,000 units)⁽⁵⁾								2,021		1,474
		Class A Common Units (1,250,000 units)⁽⁵⁾								—		—
Midwest Technical Institute, Inc.	Education	Senior Debt (Due 10/17)⁽¹⁾	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	13,813	13,575		13,670
Miles Media Group, LLC	Business Services	Senior Debt (Due 6/16)⁽¹⁾	12.5	%	—		12.5	%	19,063	18,913		18,913
Oceans Acquisition, Inc.	Healthcare	Senior Debt (Due 12/17)⁽¹⁾	10.8	%	—		10.8	%	12,710	12,460		12,460
Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC	Restaurants	Senior Debt (Due 11/16)⁽¹⁾	14.0	%	—		14.0	%	9,375	9,320		9,320
SC Academy Holdings, Inc.	Education	Subordinated Debt (Due 7/16)⁽¹⁾	—		14.0	%	14.0	%	14,641	14,577		14,577
South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.	Healthcare	Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)⁽¹⁾	12.0	%	2.5	%	14.5	%	11,761	11,581		11,614
Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC	Information Services	Class E Series I Units (636 units)⁽¹⁾⁽⁵⁾								4,120		563
		Class E Series II Units (276 units)⁽¹⁾⁽⁵⁾								1,788		67
TCFI CP LLC	Manufacturing	Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 4/19)⁽¹⁾	10.0	%	3.0	%	13.0	%	20,010	19,667		19,667
Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc.	Restaurants	Senior Debt (Due 12/18)⁽¹⁾	9.5	%	—		9.5	%	14,000	13,691		13,691
The e-Media Club I, LLC	Investment Fund	LLC Interest (74 units)⁽⁵⁾								88		11
Visant Corporation	Consumer Products	Senior Debt (Due 12/16)⁽¹⁾	5.3	%	—		5.3	%	4,711	4,711		4,657
West World Media, LLC	Information Services	Senior Debt (Due 9/15)⁽¹⁾	11.0	%	3.0	%	14.0	%	11,467	11,105		11,182
		Class A Membership Units (25,000 units)⁽¹⁾⁽⁵⁾								1		362
		Warrant to purchase Class A Membership Units (expire 9/15)⁽¹⁾⁽⁵⁾								324		379
Xpressdocs Holdings, Inc.	Business Services	Series A Preferred Stock (161,870 shares)⁽⁵⁾								500		543
Total non-affiliate investments (represents 72.7% of total investments at fair value)										444,217		268,173
Total Investments										$	566,438	$	368,873

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MCG Capital Corporation

Consolidated Schedule of Investments


⁽¹⁾	Some or all of this security was held by our SBIC subsidiary or one of our other financing subsidiaries and may have been pledged as collateral in connection therewith. See Note 6—Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


⁽²⁾	Includes securities issued by one or more of the portfolio company’s affiliates.


⁽³⁾	Affiliate investments represent companies in which we own at least 5%, but not more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities.


⁽⁴⁾	Control investments represent companies in which we own more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities.


⁽⁵⁾	Equity security is non-income producing at period-end.


⁽⁶⁾	Loan or debt security is on non-accrual status.

⁽⁷⁾

Interest rates represent the weighted-average annual stated interest rate on debt securities, presented by nature of indebtedness for a single issuer. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is generally added to the principal balance of the debt security and compounded if contractually required and not paid on a current basis. PIK may be prepaid by either contract or the portfolio company's choice, but generally is paid at the end of the loan term. Rates on preferred stock and preferred LLC interests, where applicable, represent the contractual rate.


⁽⁸⁾	Investment is not a qualifying asset under section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets.


⁽⁹⁾	Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.’s financial statements are currently publicly available and may be accessed on-line using either the Company’s website (www.broadviewnet.com) or using the EDGAR System available on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov)

⁽¹⁰⁾

In January 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our equity investment in Pharmalogic Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC. The sale transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of certain regulatory approvals, and is anticipated to close by March 31, 2015. In connection with the sale transaction, we committed to amend and restate our existing senior debt to provide $17.5 million of first lien financing at 8.5% to support the sale transaction.


⁽¹¹⁾	In February 2015, Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC repaid in full our subordinated debt investment.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MCG Capital Corporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These Financial Statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “MCG” refer to MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to middle-market companies throughout the United States. We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. Our organization includes the following categories of subsidiaries:

Taxable Subsidiaries—We currently qualify as a regulated investment company, or RIC, for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, are not required to pay corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, or Taxable Subsidiaries, each of which hold or has held one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedules of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs, or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us, and be included in the calculation of the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Small Business Investment Subsidiary—We own Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, a wholly owned subsidiary that, until September 19, 2014, had been licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, and operated as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or SBIC Act. In connection with the formation of Solutions Capital, MCG also established another wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital G.P., LLC, to act as the general partner of Solutions Capital, while MCG is the sole limited partner.

Wholly Owned Special-Purpose Financing Subsidiary—This subsidiary was a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose entity to which we transferred certain loans. The financing subsidiary, in turn, transferred the loans to a Delaware statutory trust. For accounting purposes, the transfers of the loans to the Delaware statutory trust were structured as an on-balance sheet securitization.

The accompanying financial statements reflect the consolidated accounts of MCG and the following subsidiaries: Solutions Capital; Solutions Capital G.P., LLC; and MCG’s former special-purpose financing subsidiary, MCG Finance VII, LLC.

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

These consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and conform to Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We believe we have made all necessary adjustments so that the financial statements are presented fairly and that all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. We eliminated all significant intercompany balances. In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we do not consolidate portfolio company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest. Further, in connection with the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements, we have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date as of December 31, 2014 through the date these financial statements were issued.

Preparing financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported on our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although we believe the estimates and assumptions used in preparing these Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes are reasonable, actual results could differ materially.

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Significant Accounting Policies

INCOME RECOGNITION

We follow the policies described below to recognize income on our Consolidated Statements of Operations:

•

Interest Income—We accrue interest income if we expect that ultimately we will be able to collect it. Generally, when a loan becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise believe the customer is unable to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we remain contractually entitled to this interest. We may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. Paid-in-kind interest, or PIK, represents contractually deferred interest that typically is added to the loan balance. Generally, PIK interest is due at the end of the loan term. We generally accrue PIK interest when collection is expected and cease accruing PIK if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we expect the customer is unable to pay all principal and interest due.

•

Loan Origination Fees—We capitalize loan origination fees, then amortize these fees into interest income over the term of the loan using the effective interest rate method or on a straight-line basis when the loan has a revolving credit feature. In certain loan arrangements, we receive warrants or other equity interests from the borrower as additional origination fees. Typically, borrowers granting these interests are not traded publicly. We record the financial instruments received at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. In certain cases, when we record a warrant or other equity instrument that results in a loan discount, we accrete the discount into income over the term of the loan.

•

PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS

In accordance with the 1940 Act, we classify portfolio investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Schedules of Investments into the following categories:


•	Control Investments—Investments in which we control more than 25% of the voting securities or have greater than 50% representation on the board of directors;


•	Affiliate Investments—Investments in which we own between 5% and 25% of the voting securities and have less than 50% representation on the board of directors; and


•	Non-Affiliate Investments—Investments in which we own less than 5% of the voting securities.

We carry our investments at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. We base the fair value of portfolio investments on market prices when market quotations are readily available. As required by the 1940 Act, the fair value of all other investments is determined in good faith by our board of directors. Typically, there are no readily available market values for the majority of investments in our portfolio. As a result, the fair value of our entire investment portfolio was determined in good faith by our board of directors. We determine fair values using various valuation models that estimate the underlying value of the associated entity, taking into consideration our ownership share, as well as any discounts for transfer restrictions or other terms that impact the value. No single standard exists for determining fair value in good faith. Therefore, our board of directors applies business judgment to specific facts and circumstances about each investment in our portfolio pursuant to our valuation policy and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820’s definition of fair value focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs within a measurement of fair value.

Each quarter, we record the difference between the carrying value of our investments and the fair values determined by the board of directors as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Upon the ultimate disposition of an asset in our portfolio, we reverse any previously recorded unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and realize a gain (loss) on investment that reflects the difference between the carrying cost of the investment and the net proceeds from the sale, including proceeds held in escrow that we record as restricted cash on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 4—Fair Value Measurement for additional information about the methodologies that the board of directors uses to determine the fair value of our investments, as well as our application of ASC 820.

CASH

Our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect the following categories of cash:


•	Cash and cash equivalents—Represents unrestricted cash, including checking accounts, interest bearing deposits collateralized by marketable debt securities and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less;


•	Cash, restricted—Includes cash held in escrow that we received as part of an asset sale, and previously included cash held for regulatory purposes and cash that we had received that was earmarked for transfer into our cash, securitization accounts; and

•

Cash, securitization accounts—Previously represented principal and interest held in designated bank accounts that we received on securitized loans or other reserved amounts associated with our securitization facility. We were generally required to use the funds deposited in these accounts to pay interest, reduce borrowings or pay other specified obligations in accordance with associated securitization agreements. Interest collections in excess of the interest payments and other specified obligations were distributed back to us.

BORROWING FACILITIES

As described more fully in Note 6—Borrowings, we had borrowed funds from various sources including debentures guaranteed by the SBA and an unsecured credit facility. In addition, we had a bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entity that issued debt collateralized by pools of loans that we have transferred to the entity. We had recorded our obligation to repay all our borrowings at cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We accounted for loans transferred to our bankruptcy remote, special-purpose entity for use in securitization transactions in accordance with ASC Topic 860—Transfers and Servicing, or ASC 860.

Debt issuance costs included fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with our borrowings. We amortized these costs ratably over the contractual term of the borrowing facility using the effective interest method and included this amortization in interest expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. For facilities with a revolving credit feature, we amortized these costs on a straight-line basis.

We repurchased certain debt instruments issued by our bankruptcy-remote special-purpose entities from third parties at a negotiated price that was different than the principal amount of the debt. In accordance with ASC 470—Debt, we treated these repurchases as if the debt were extinguished and reported the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt as a loss on extinguishment of debt on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

INCOME TAXES

We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amounts would be considered a return of capital. We are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or on deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.

We have certain wholly owned Taxable Subsidiaries, each of which hold or has held one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedule of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as LLCs or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us for the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations. For additional information about our Taxable Subsidiaries and the determination of our income taxes, see Note 10—Income Taxes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value:



	COST BASIS								FAIR VALUE BASIS
	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Cost		% of Total Portfolio		Investments at Cost		% of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Total Portfolio
Debt Investments
Senior secured debt	$	39,237	16.7	%	$	190,783	33.7	%	$	40,562	53.8	%	$	185,524	50.3	%
Subordinated debt
Secured	22,460		9.6		118,632		20.9		22,460		29.8		108,338		29.4
Unsecured	—		—		42,452		7.5		—		—		42,452		11.5
Total debt investments	61,697		26.3		351,867		62.1		63,022		83.6		336,314		91.2
Equity investments
Preferred	13,364		5.7		44,956		8.0		12,044		16.0		28,390		7.7
Common/common equivalents	159,579		68.0		169,615		29.9		266		0.4		4,169		1.1
Total equity investments	172,943		73.7		214,571		37.9		12,310		16.4		32,559		8.8
Total investments	$	234,640	100.0	%	$	566,438	100.0	%	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 4.3% to 14.5%, a portion of which may be in the form of PIK. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 85.8% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 14.2% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 59.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.5% and 2.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.75% and 4.5%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percent of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.

When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place the loan on non-accrual status and generally will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status:



	COST BASIS								FAIR VALUE BASIS
	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Cost		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Cost		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Loan Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		% of Loan Portfolio
Loans greater than 90 days past due
On non-accrual status	$	—	—	%	$	3,897	1.11	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%
Total loans greater than 90 days past due	$	—	—	%	$	3,897	1.11	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%
Loans on non-accrual status
0 to 90 days past due	$	—	—	%	$	17,531	4.98	%	$	—	—	%	$	4,493	1.34	%
Greater than 90 days past due	—		—		3,897		1.11		—		—		—		—
Total loans on non-accrual status	$	—	—	%	$	21,428	6.09	%	$	—	—	%	$	4,493	1.34	%

The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio
Healthcare	$	44,566	59.2	%	$	84,922	23.0	%
Business services	14,172		18.8		64,108		17.4
Broadcasting	9,198		12.2		12,252		3.3
Manufacturing	7,130		9.5		51,735		14.0
Diversified financial services	—		—		3,298		0.9
Education	—		—		57,905		15.7
Publishing	—		—		25,312		6.9
Insurance	—		—		23,620		6.4
Restaurants	—		—		23,010		6.2
Information services	—		—		12,552		3.4
Home furnishings	—		—		4,730		1.3
Consumer products	—		—		4,657		1.3
Other	266		0.3		772		0.2
Total	$	75,332	100.0	%	$	368,873	100.0	%

We provide financial support to our portfolio companies for investment purposes in the form of originations or draws and advances. Originations represent financial support for which we have not been previously contractually required to provide and draws and advances represent financial support for which we have been previously contractually required to provide. The following table shows our significant originations and advances:



(in thousands)	Year ended
	December 31, 2014
Company	Originations		Draws/ Advances		PIK Advances/ Dividends		Total
Debt
Oceans Acquisition, Inc.	$	—	$	3,250	$	—	$	3,250
Community Investors, Inc.	—		1,667		—		1,667
Other (< $1 million)	—		1,400		2,863		4,263
Total debt	—		6,317		2,863		9,180
Equity (< $1 million)	—		298		547		845
Total originations and advances	$	—	$	6,615	$	3,410	$	10,025

As of December 31, 2014, we have commitments to invest an additional $2.0 million to our portfolio companies. See Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies.

NOTE 4—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

We account for our investments in portfolio companies under ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.

Fair Value Hierarchy

ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:



ASC 820 Fair Value Hierarchy	Inputs to Fair Value Methodology
Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2	Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information
Level 3	Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents the assets that we report at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets by fair value hierarchy:



	December 31, 2014
(in thousands)	Internal Models with Significant				Total Fair Value Reported in Consolidated Balance Sheet
	Observable Market Parameters (Level 2)		Unobservable Market Parameters (Level 3)
Non-affiliate investments
Senior secured debt	$	—	$	23,370	$	23,370
Subordinated secured debt	—		22,460		22,460
Common/common equivalents	266		—		266
Total non-affiliate investments	266		45,830		46,096
Control investments
Senior secured debt	—		17,192		17,192
Preferred equity	—		12,044		12,044
Total control investments	—		29,236		29,236
Total assets at fair value	$	266	$	75,066	$	75,332

As of December 31, 2014, we had no investments that had quoted market prices in active markets, which we would categorize as Level 1 investments under ASC 820. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value and are Level 1 assets. Interest receivable is carried at cost which approximates fair value.

Valuation Methodologies and Procedures

As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by level of control. Control investments include both majority-owned control investments and non-majority owned control investments. A majority-owned control investment represents a security in which we own more than 50% of the voting interest of the portfolio company and generally control its board of directors. A non-majority owned control investment represents a security in which we own 25% to 50% of the portfolio company’s voting equity. As of December 31, 2014, our portfolio contained no non-majority control investments. Non-control investments represent both affiliate and non-affiliate securities for which we do not have a controlling interest. Affiliate investments represent securities in which we own 5% to 25% of the portfolio company’s equity. Non-affiliate investments represent securities in which we own less than 5% of the portfolio company’s equity.

•

Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprise 38.8% of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2014. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or

EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine fair value, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit.

•

Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprise 61.2% of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2014. Quoted prices are not available for 99.4% of our non-control investments as of December 31, 2014. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach.

•

Thinly-Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of December 31, 2014, these securities represented 0.4% of our investment portfolio. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. The majority of our level 2 investments are senior debt investments that are secured and collateralized. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence.

Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of December 31, 2014, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made, considered pending sales of the investments or used market quotes in the preceding twelve-month period to calculate 100.0% of our investment portfolio, calculated on a fair value basis.

Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and such differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.

Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

We classify securities in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. Our fair value approach for Level 3 securities primarily uses unobservable inputs, but may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include fair value changes due, in part, to observable factors. Additionally, we transfer investments in and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 securities as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 and 2. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, common equity investments with a fair value of $0.5 million were listed on and began trading in a market that is not active. As of the ending balance sheet date of the quarter in which the common equity began to trade, the investment was transferred from Level 3 to level 2. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, there were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2 or 3.

The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.



(in thousands)	Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	Non-affiliate Investments			Affiliate Investments			Control Investments			Total
Fair value as of December 31, 2013
Senior secured debt	$	105,674		$	51,471		$	19,892		$	177,037
Subordinated secured debt	97,497			—			10,841			108,338
Unsecured subordinated debt	42,452			—			—			42,452
Preferred equity	8,261			3,656			13,175			25,092
Common/common equivalents equity	2,504			1,665			—			4,169
Total fair value as of December 31, 2013	256,388			56,792			43,908			357,088
Realized/unrealized gain (loss)
Senior secured debt	(261		)	(15,727		)	532			(15,456		)
Subordinated secured debt	(4,025		)	—			—			(4,025		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	72			—			—			72
Preferred equity	(1,109		)	344			(1,131		)	(1,896		)
Common/common equivalents equity	(868		)	(165		)	—			(1,033		)
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss)	(6,191		)	(15,548		)	(599		)	(22,338		)
Issuances
Senior secured debt	30,911			(13,869		)	1,059			18,101
Subordinated secured debt	2,439			—			(9,944		)	(7,505		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	1,163			—			—			1,163
Preferred equity	643			—			—			643
Total issuances	35,156			(13,869		)	(8,885		)	12,402
Settlements
Senior secured debt	(62,949		)	(18,413		)	(4,291		)	(85,653		)
Subordinated secured debt	(52,873		)	—			(897		)	(53,770		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	(33,615		)	—			—			(33,615		)
Preferred equity	(396		)	—			—			(396		)
Common/common equivalents equity	(41		)	—			—			(41		)
Total settlements	(149,874		)	(18,413		)	(5,188		)	(173,475		)
Sales
Senior secured debt	(50,005		)	(3,462		)	—			(53,467		)
Subordinated secured debt	(20,578		)	—			—			(20,578		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	(10,072		)	—			—			(10,072		)
Preferred equity	(7,399		)	(4,000		)	—			(11,399		)
Common/common equivalents equity	(1,120		)	(1,500		)	—			(2,620		)
Total sales	(89,174		)	(8,962		)	—			(98,136		)
Transfers
Common/common equivalents equity	(475		)	—			—			(475		)
Total transfers	(475		)	—			—			(475		)
Fair value as of December 31, 2014
Senior secured debt	23,370			—			17,192			40,562
Subordinated secured debt	22,460			—			—			22,460
Unsecured subordinated debt	—			—			—			—
Preferred equity	—			—			12,044			12,044
Common/common equivalents equity	—			—			—			—
Total fair value as of December 31, 2014	$	45,830		$	—		$	29,236		$	75,066

There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors.



(in thousands)	Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	Non-affiliate Investments			Affiliate Investments			Control Investments			Total
Fair value December 31, 2012
Senior secured debt	$	163,125		$	48,060		$	23,376		$	234,561
Subordinated secured debt	96,585			7,880			10,518			114,983
Unsecured subordinated debt	26,274			—			—			26,274
Preferred equity	16,561			6,038			16,112			38,711
Common/common equivalents equity	3,048			101			—			3,149
Total fair value December 31, 2012	305,593			62,079			50,006			417,678
Realized/unrealized gain (loss)
Senior secured debt	(2,064		)	921			702			(441		)
Subordinated secured debt	(13,735		)	190			—			(13,545		)
Preferred equity	(4,635		)	(3,540		)	(4,667		)	(12,842		)
Common/common equivalents equity	(544		)	3,107			—			2,563
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss)	(20,978		)	678			(3,965		)	(24,265		)
Issuances
Senior secured debt	53,910			10,708			55			64,673
Subordinated secured debt	31,057			683			323			32,063
Unsecured subordinated debt	36,322			—			—			36,322
Preferred equity	413			3,458			1,718			5,589
Common/common equivalents equity	3			1,457			—			1,460
Total issuances	121,705			16,306			2,096			140,107
Settlements
Senior secured debt	(92,067		)	(8,218		)	(4,241		)	(104,526		)
Subordinated secured debt	(16,410		)	(8,753		)	—			(25,163		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	(17,144		)	—			—			(17,144		)
Preferred equity	20			—			12			32
Total settlements	(125,601		)	(16,971		)	(4,229		)	(146,801		)
Sales
Senior secured debt	(17,230		)	—			—			(17,230		)
Unsecured subordinated debt	(3,000		)	—			—			(3,000		)
Preferred equity	(4,098		)	(2,300		)	—			(6,398		)
Common/common equivalents equity	(3		)	(3,000		)	—			(3,003		)
Total sales	(24,331		)	(5,300		)	—			(29,631		)
Fair value as of December 31, 2013
Senior secured debt	105,674			51,471			19,892			177,037
Subordinated secured debt	97,497			—			10,841			108,338
Unsecured subordinated debt	42,452			—			—			42,452
Preferred equity	8,261			3,656			13,175			25,092
Common/common equivalents equity	2,504			1,665			—			4,169
Total fair value as of December 31, 2013	$	256,388		$	56,792		$	43,908		$	357,088

There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation of Level 3 Investments

The following table summarizes the unrealized (depreciation) appreciation that we recognized on those investments for which we determined fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.



	Year ended December 31, 2014										Year ended December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Non-affiliate Investments		Affiliate Investments			Control Investments			Total		Non-affiliate Investments			Affiliate Investments			Control Investments			Total
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Senior secured debt	$	2,567	$	—		$	3,903		$	6,470	$	(2,235	)	$	928		$	703		$	(604	)
Subordinated secured debt	10,294		—			—			10,294		1,820			190			—			2,010
Unsecured subordinated debt	—		—			—			—		—			—			—			—
Preferred equity	13,840		3,344			(1,131		)	16,053		(4,412		)	(3,146		)	(4,655		)	(12,213		)
Common/common equivalents equity	7,011		(666		)	—			6,345		1,158			770			—			1,928
Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 investments	$	33,712	$	2,678		$	2,772		$	39,162	$	(3,669	)	$	(1,258	)	$	(3,952	)	$	(8,879	)

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of December 31, 2014.




($ in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Range				Weighted Average
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Minimum		Maximum		Weighted Average
Senior debt	$	40,562	Discounted Cash Flow	Market Interest Rate	7.8	%	7.8	%	7.8	%
			Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
Subordinated debt	22,460		Discounted Cash Flow	Market Interest Rate	7.8	%	14.5	%	11.6	%
			Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
Preferred equity	12,044		Pending Transactions	Pending Transactions	N/A		N/A		N/A
	$	75,066

NOTE 5—CONCENTRATIONS OF INVESTMENT RISK



	Investments at fair value								Revenue for the year ended
	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013				December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Total Portfolio		Amount		% of Total Portfolio		Amount		% of Total Revenue		Amount		% of Total Revenue
Industry
Healthcare	$	44,566	59.2	%	$	84,922	23.0	%	$	7,552	28.2	%	$	12,650	25.1	%
Business services	14,173		18.8		64,108		17.4		6,871		25.6		8,265		16.4
Broadcasting	9,198		12.2		12,252		3.3		574		2.1		1,616		3.2
Total	$	67,937	90.2	%	$	161,282	43.7	%	$	14,997	55.9	%	$	22,531	44.7	%

NOTE 6—BORROWINGS

As of December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings or borrowing facilities. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and amounts outstanding.



		December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands)	Maturity Date	Total Facility/ Program		Amount Outstanding		Total Facility/ Program		Amount Outstanding
SBIC^(a)
2008-10B	September 2018	$	—	$	—	$	2,600	$	2,600
2009-10A	March 2019	—		—		12,000		12,000
2009-10B	September 2019	—		—		13,000		13,000
2010-10B	September 2020	—		—		27,500		27,500
2011-10A	March 2021	—		—		53,500		53,500
2012-10A	March 2022	—		—		41,400		41,400
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1^(b)
Series 2006-1 Class D Notes	April 2018	—		—		40,016		25,172
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver^(c)
Unsecured Revolving Note	November 2014	—		—		20,000		—
Total borrowings		$	—	$	—	$	210,016	$	175,172

^__________


^(a)	In September 2014, we repaid in full the SBIC Debentures.


^(b)	In January 2014, we repaid in full the Class D Notes.


^(c)	In April 2014, we terminated the undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.

On September 2, 2014, we prepaid in full the $150.0 million of SBIC debentures owed to the SBA by Solutions Capital. In connection with the repayment of the SBIC debentures, we recorded $2.3 million of accelerated deferred financing costs in interest expense. In addition, on April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our undrawn unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.

As a BDC, we are not permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities, including preferred stock, unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings (which excluded our SBIC debentures) of at least 200%. In addition, we may not be permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on our outstanding common shares, or purchase any such shares, unless, at the time of such declaration or purchase, we have an asset coverage ratio of at least 200% after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price. If we are unable to meet this asset coverage requirement, we may not be able to incur additional debt. In October 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC which allowed us to exclude debt issued by Solutions Capital from the calculation of our consolidated BDC asset coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2014, there were no senior securities outstanding.

Each of our borrowing facilities had certain financial covenants and non-financial covenants. We were in compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2013.

We had funded our secured borrowing debt facility through a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose, wholly owned subsidiary. Therefore, this subsidiary’s assets were not available to our creditors. While the secured borrowing was in place, we continued to service those portfolio investments that we used as collateral in our secured borrowing facility.

SBIC Debentures

In September 2014, we prepaid in full the $150 million of SBIC debentures owed to the SBA by Solutions Capital, using excess restricted cash. After repayment, Solutions Capital surrendered its SBIC license to the SBA’s Office of SBIC Operations. As of December 31, 2013, Solutions Capital had borrowed $150.0 million from the SBA. We were permitted to use these funds to provide debt and equity capital to qualifying small businesses. However, we were not permitted to use these funds to provide working capital to MCG, Solutions Capital's parent company.

As of December 31, 2013, we had $207.0 million of investments in Solutions Capital and we had $32.5 million, of restricted cash which could be used for additional investments by Solutions Capital.

Bank of America Unsecured Revolver

In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million. On April 21, 2014, we terminated our Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.

MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1

In April 2006, we completed a $500.0 million debt securitization through the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust, a wholly owned subsidiary. The 2006-1 Trust issued six classes of notes with interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 0.33% to LIBOR plus 2.25%. The reinvestment period for the 2006-1 Trust ended on July 20, 2011 and all subsequent principal collections or monetization proceeds that we received from collateral used to securitize this 2006-1 Trust were applied to the outstanding balance of that facility. As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.

NOTE 7—CAPITAL STOCK

We have one class of common stock and one class of preferred stock authorized. Our board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in one or more series, establish the number of shares to be included in each such series and establish the designations, voting powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, subject to the 1940 Act.

Stock Repurchases

The following table summarizes our stock repurchases under the stock repurchase programs and the tender offer for the year ended December 31, 2014.



	Year ended December 31, 2014
Dollar amount repurchased (in thousands)	$	119,993
Shares repurchased	32,186,556
Average price per share	$	3.73
Discount to quarterly weighted average net asset value per share	16.1		%

Stock Repurchase Programs

On December 18, 2014, the fourth stock repurchase program, which had been suspended during our modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer, was reinstated. In January 2015, the fourth stock repurchase program was discontinued. We have provided our stockholders with notice of our intention to repurchase shares of our common stock in accordance with 1940 Act requirements. We retired all shares of common stock that we purchased in connection with the stock repurchase program.

Tender Offer

Distributions

The following table summarizes our distributions per share declared since January 1, 2012:



Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Amount
August 5, 2014	August 20, 2014	August 29, 2014	$	0.050
April 25, 2014	May 9, 2014	May 30, 2014	$	0.070
February 28, 2014	March 14, 2014	March 28, 2014	$	0.125
October 25, 2013	November 8, 2013	November 22, 2013	$	0.125
July 26, 2013	August 9, 2013	August 30, 2013	$	0.125
April 26, 2013	May 10, 2013	May 31, 2013	$	0.125
March 1, 2013	March 15, 2013	March 29, 2013	$	0.125
October 26, 2012	November 16, 2012	November 30, 2012	$	0.125
July 27, 2012	August 17, 2012	August 31, 2012	$	0.140
April 27, 2012	June 13, 2012	July 13, 2012	$	0.140
February 24, 2012	April 13, 2012	May 15, 2012	$	0.170

NOTE 8—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

All full-time employees, and those part-time employees who work at least 1,000 hours per year, are eligible to participate in a contributory employee savings plan that we sponsor under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, or 401(k) Plan. We match a portion of the contribution made by employees to the 401(k) Plan, based upon a percentage of defined compensation. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we incurred $70,000, $68,000 and $152,000, respectively, in expenses related to the 401(k) Plan.

NOTE 9—SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

EMPLOYEE SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan

From time to time, we award shares of restricted common stock to employees under our 2006 Plan which our stockholders initially approved in June 2006. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan increasing the number of shares we may award from 3,500,000 to 6,050,000 shares. Shares of restricted common stock awarded under the 2006 Plan may be subject to the employees' meeting service or performance conditions specified at the time of award. The award date is the date on which the shares are awarded by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors, while the fair value of the respective stock award is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the award date. We amortize restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and report this expense as amortization of employee restricted stock awards on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, no shares of restricted stock were issued under the 2006 Plan.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recognized $1.8 million of compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards including $1.1 million of compensation costs associated with the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $1.2 million of compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards. As of December 31, 2014, all the restricted share awards for which forfeiture provisions had not lapsed carried non-forfeitable dividend rights to the holder of the restricted shares. As of December 31, 2014, we had $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to employees. We expect to recognize these costs over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 1.2 years.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

During June 2006, our stockholders initially approved the 2006 Non-Employee Plan, which was subsequently amended and restated. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Non-Employee Plan that increased the number of shares we may award to non-employee members of our board of directors from 100,000 to 150,000 shares. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, no shares of restricted stock were issued to non-employee directors. Our board of directors has waived the right to an automatic award of 7,500 shares of restricted stock, previously awarded to non-employee directors upon the commencement of each three-year term of board service. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we awarded 15,000 shares of restricted common stock to non-employee directors. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we recognized $52,000 and $60,000, respectively, of compensation costs related to share-based awards to non-employee directors. We include this compensation cost in general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2014, we had less than $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to non-employee directors, which we expect to recognize over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 1.1 years.

SUMMARY OF EMPLOYEE AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes our restricted stock award activity since December 31, 2011:



	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2011	430,510		$6.14
Awarded	1,022,500		$4.43
Forfeiture provision satisfied	(275,265	)	$5.25
Forfeited	(35,725	)	$6.87
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2012	1,142,020		$4.69
Awarded	15,000		$5.01
Forfeiture provision satisfied	(71,730	)	$6.58
Forfeited	(189,550	)	$4.63
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2013	895,740		$4.55
Awarded	—		$—
Forfeiture provision satisfied	(525,815	)	$4.61
Forfeited	(1,805	)	$6.97
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2014	368,120		$4.45

NOTE 10—INCOME TAXES

As a RIC, we are taxed under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, our income generally is not taxable to the extent we distribute it to stockholders and we meet certain qualification tests as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code. However, income from certain investments owned by our wholly owned subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. During 2014 and 2013, we declared and paid distributions from ordinary income that were sufficient to meet our distribution requirements as a RIC. To qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:


1.	continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;


2.	derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities, loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership;” and


3.	diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:


a.	at least 50% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and

If we fail to satisfy the distribution requirement or fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we would be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014 would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 15% or 20% maximum tax rate (depending on income thresholds) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.

We use the asset and liability method to account for our Taxable Subsidiaries' income taxes. Using this method, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. In addition, we recognize deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carryforwards that we may use to offset future tax obligations. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which we

expect to recover or settle those temporary differences. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.2 million. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded income tax provisions of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which were primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.

From December 2001 through December 31, 2014, we declared distributions per share of $14.13. We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid during the full year. Each year, we mail statements on Form 1099-DIV to our stockholders that identify whether we made distributions from ordinary income, net capital gains on the sale of securities, which are each taxable distributions, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus, which is a nontaxable distribution. A portion of our distributions may represent a return of capital to our stockholders, to the extent that the total distributions paid in a given year exceed current and accumulated taxable earnings and profits. All or a portion of the distributions that we paid to stockholders during fiscal years 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 represented a return of capital.

For income tax purposes, we report distributions paid to stockholders as ordinary income, return of capital, capital gains or a combination thereof. For the tax year ended December 31, 2014, 3.9% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 96.1% of our distributions were a return of capital. For the tax year ended December 31, 2013, 75.0% of our distributions were from ordinary income and 25.0% of our distributions were a return of capital. For the tax year ended December 31, 2012, 100% of our distributions were a return of capital. Distributions per common share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2011 were taxable as follows:



	Years ended December 31,
	2014				2013				2012
	$/Share		% of Total		$/Share		% of Total		$/Share		% of Total
Dividends declared during the year	$	0.245			$	0.500			$	0.575
Dividends declared in 2011 but paid in 2012	—				—				0.170
Dividends paid in calendar year	0.245				0.500				0.745
Dividends declared on tax Form 1099-DIV(unaudited)
Ordinary income^(a)	$	0.010	3.9	%	$	0.375	75.0	%	$	—	—	%
Return of capital^(b)	0.235		96.1		0.125		25.0		0.745		100.0
Total reported on tax Form 1099-DIV	$	0.245	100.0	%	$	0.500	100.0	%	$	0.745	100.0	%

__________________


(a)	Ordinary income was reported on Form 1099-DIV as either qualified or non-qualified.


(b)	Return of capital refers to those amounts reported as nontaxable distributions on Form 1099-DIV.

On a tax basis, distributions allocable to 2014 were composed of $0.4 million of ordinary income and $14.8 million of return of capital, distributions allocable to 2013 were composed of $26.0 million of ordinary income and $9.0 million of return of capital and distributions in 2012 were composed of $55.2 million of return of capital. The following table summarizes changes in our cumulative distributions in excess of earnings for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:



(in thousands)	December 31,
	2014			2013
Beginning Balance	$	260,476		$	251,165
Current year return of capital	14,826			9,029
Current year tax permanent differences	(175		)	282
Tax distributions in excess of earnings	$	275,127		$	260,476

Taxable income differs from net income recognized in accordance with GAAP because of temporary and permanent differences in income and expense recognition.

Taxable income generally excludes unrealized gains and losses from appreciation or depreciation of our investments, which are included in GAAP net income. Further, amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes may differ from amounts included in taxable income due to the accrued dividends on preferred stock, which increases the book basis but not the tax basis of our investments, and non-accrual interest on loans, which increases tax basis but not book basis.

The following table summarizes the cost, as well as the unrealized appreciation and depreciation for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:



(in thousands)	December 31,
	2014			2013
Total investments at fair value (GAAP)	$	75,332		$	368,873
Gross unrealized appreciation
Unrealized appreciation of fair value of portfolio investments (GAAP)	(1,325		)	(5,231		)
Book to tax differences	(72,246		)	(76,810		)
Gross unrealized appreciation (GAAP)	(73,571		)	(82,041		)
Gross unrealized depreciation
Unrealized depreciation of fair value of portfolio investments (GAAP)	160,634			202,596
Book to tax differences	—			—
Gross unrealized depreciation (GAAP)	160,634			202,596
Net unrealized depreciation (GAAP)	87,063			120,555
Plus: Unrealized depreciation of fair value of other assets and liabilities (GAAP)	—			201
Cost for federal income tax purposes	$	162,395		$	489,629

The following table reconciles GAAP net (loss) income to taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:



(in thousands)	Years ended December 31,
	2014			2013
Net (loss) income	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176
Difference between book and tax losses on investments	2,486			(1,894		)
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments not taxable until realized	(38,458		)	6,704
Capital losses in excess of capital gains	60,593			23,985
Timing difference related to deductibility of long-term incentive compensation	859			(2,120		)
Taxable interest income on non-accrual loans^(a)	(7,652		)	63
Dividend income accrued for GAAP purposes that is not yet taxable	(547		)	(2,554		)
Distributions from taxable subsidiaries and portfolio investment companies	747			3,104
Federal tax provision	(188		)	125
Other, net	3,453			(2,557		)
Taxable income before deductions for distributions	$	450		$	26,032

___________________________

(a)

Results for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 reflect the reversal of interest we previously recognized on non-accrual loans of portfolio investments that we monetized. In accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, we are required to recognize as taxable interest income all interest that is owed to us by portfolio companies, including interest on those debt investments that are on non-accrual status for GAAP reporting purposes.

As of December 31, 2014, based on our analysis of our tax position, we concluded that we did not have any uncertain tax positions that met the recognition or measurement criteria of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.

NOTE 11—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:



	Years ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2014			2013			2012
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) per share
Net (loss) income	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176		$	4,998
Less: Dividends declared—common and restricted shares	(15,428		)	(35,400		)	(42,889		)
Undistributed earnings	(36,271		)	(34,224		)	(37,891		)
Percentage allocated to common shares^(a)	100.0		%	98.4		%	98.6		%
Undistributed earnings—common shares	(36,271		)	(33,676		)	(37,361		)
Add: Dividends declared—common shares	15,428			34,834			42,289
Numerator for common shares outstanding excluding participating shares	(20,843		)	1,158			4,928
Numerator for participating unvested shares only	—			18			70
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) per share—total	$	(20,843	)	$	1,176		$	4,998
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
Common shares outstanding	55,504			70,122			73,793
Participating unvested shares^(b)	—			1,110			1,066
Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding—total^(b)	55,504			71,232			74,859
Income (loss) per share—basic and diluted
Excluding participating unvested shares	$	(0.38	)	$	0.02		$	0.07
Including participating unvested shares	$	(0.38	)	$	0.02		$	0.07
_______________________________
^(a) Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	55,504			70,122			73,793
Weighted-average restricted shares	—			1,110			1,066
Total basic and diluted^(b) weighted-average common shares	55,504			71,232			74,859
Percentage allocated to common shares	100.0		%	98.4		%	98.6		%


^(b)	For the year ended December 31, 2014, we excluded 537 weighted-average shares of restricted common stock from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the inclusion of these shares would have had an anti-dilutive impact on the calculation of loss per share.

Holders of unvested shares of our issued and outstanding restricted common stock are eligible to receive non-forfeitable dividends. As such, these unvested shares are participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share in periods with net income. Pursuant to the two-class method, we report basic and diluted earnings per share both inclusive and exclusive of the participating securities.

NOTE 12—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business, including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

During the normal course of business, we are party to certain financial instruments, including loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. We conduct extensive due diligence and, when appropriate, obtain collateral to limit our credit risk. Generally, these commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, which may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. We expect many of these commitments will not be fully used before they expire; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had $2.0 million and $18.1 million, respectively, of outstanding unused loan commitments. We estimate that as of each of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the fair value of these commitments was less than $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.

LEASE OBLIGATIONS

The lease on our headquarters in Arlington, Virginia has a term from December 2014 through December 2015. The base rent for the lease is $0.7 million per year with a $0.2 million rent credit. The base rent will not increase during the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2014, our obligations for the remaining term of the lease is $0.6 million, all of which will be payable during the next twelve months. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, our rent expense totaled $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

NOTE 13—SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARY

We have determined that for the year ended December 31, 2014, RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC, or RadioPharmacy, is an unconsolidated portfolio company that meets the conditions of a significant subsidiary and therefore, we are presenting summarized financial information of RadioPharmacy as of December 31, 2014. RadioPharmacy, a private company, is a nuclear compounding pharmacy for regional hospitals and imaging centers. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized $2.1 million of total revenue from our investment in RadioPharmacy.

The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet information for RadioPharmacy as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



(in thousands)	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)
Assets:
Total current assets	$	6,595	$	6,573
Total non-current assets	19,311		19,409
Total assets	$	25,906	$	25,982

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Current liabilities	$	4,708	$	3,351
Long-term liabilities	18,374		20,411
Preferred stock	1		1
Other stockholders' equity	2,823		2,219
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	25,906	$	25,982

The following table sets forth summarized income statement information for RadioPharmacy for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.



	Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2014		2013
	(unaudited)
Sales	$	26,953	$	26,863
Gross margin	$	16,125	$	15,304
Net income	$	605	$	156

NOTE 14—FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Following schedule summarizes financial highlights for the five years ended December 31, 2014:



	Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
PER SHARE DATA
Net asset value at beginning of year^(a)	$	4.74		$	5.18		$	5.65		$	7.54		$	8.06
Net (loss) income^(b)
Net operating income before net investment loss, loss on extinguishment of debt and income tax (benefit) provision	0.06			0.42			0.25			0.49			0.54
Net realized (loss) gain on investments	(1.13		)	(0.31		)	(1.32		)	(1.19		)	0.15
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	0.69			(0.09		)	1.14			(0.51		)	(0.88		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt before income tax provision	—			—			—			(0.01		)	0.04
Income tax (benefit) provision	—			—			—			—			(0.02		)
Net (loss) income	(0.38		)	0.02			0.07			(1.22		)	(0.17		)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from distributions
Distributions declared from net operating income	(0.01		)	(0.37		)	—			(0.28		)	(0.37		)
Distributions declared in excess of net operating income	(0.24		)	(0.13		)	(0.58		)	(0.38		)	—
Net decrease in net assets resulting from distributions	(0.25		)	(0.50		)	(0.58		)	(0.66		)	(0.37		)
Net (decrease) increase in net assets relating to stock-based transactions
Forfeiture (issuance) of shares of restricted common stock^(c)	—			0.01			(0.07		)	(0.04		)	(0.04		)
Repurchase of common stock	0.56			—			0.06			—			—
Net increase in stockholders’ equity from restricted stock amortization	0.03			0.02			0.03			0.03			0.06
Net (decrease) increase in stockholders’ equity from other stock transactions^(b)	(0.01		)	0.01			0.02			—			—
Net increase (decrease) in net assets relating to share issuances	0.58			0.04			0.04			(0.01		)	0.02
Net asset value at end of year^(a)	$	4.69		$	4.74		$	5.18		$	5.65		$	7.54
MARKET PRICE PER SHARE AT END OF YEAR	$	3.83		$	4.40		$	4.60		$	3.99		$	6.97
TOTAL RETURN^(d)	(7.39		)%	6.52		%	33.96		%	(33.72		)%	66.67		%
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING
Weighted-average (diluted)	55,504			71,232			74,859			76,259			75,422
End of year	38,136			70,510			71,721			76,997			76,662
NET ASSETS
Average	$	251,571		$	364,188		$	397,741		$	534,240		$	611,084
End of year	$	178,901		$	333,954		$	371,728		$	434,952		$	578,016
RATIO
Operating expenses to average net assets	9.41		%	5.65		%	10.61		%	8.99		%	8.02		%
Net operating income to average net assets	1.25		%	8.21		%	4.73		%	7.05		%	6.64		%
General and administrative expense to average net assets	3.98		%	1.48		%	3.52		%	2.63		%	1.88		%
Return on average equity	(8.29		)%	0.32		%	1.26		%	(17.43		)%	(2.14		)%

_____________________________


(a)	Based on total number shares outstanding.


(b)	Based on weighted-average number shares outstanding.


(c)	Represents the effects of shares issued during the period and the lapsing of forfeiture provisions on restricted stock on earnings per share.


(d)	Total return = [(ending market price per share – beginning market price per share + dividends paid per share) / beginning market price per share].

NOTE 15—SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)



	2014 Quarters												2013 Quarters
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Fourth			Third			Second			First			Fourth			Third		Second		First
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Revenue	$	2,278		$	5,664		$	9,525		$	9,346		$	11,179		$	13,170	$	12,890	$	13,246
Net operating (loss) income before net investment gain (loss) and income tax (benefit) provision	(755		)	(976		)	551			4,323			6,333			7,964		7,556		8,043
Net income (loss)	$	2,076		$	1,285		$	(5,268	)	$	(18,936	)	$	(18,439	)	$	3,289	$	8,574	$	7,752
Income (loss) per basic and diluted common share	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.26	)	$	0.05	$	0.12	$	0.11
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted	42,706			49,805			61,221			69,395			69,924			71,218		71,217		71,507

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.



ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.



1.	Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.



2.	Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

(a) MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:


•	pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;


•	provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and


•	provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including the supervision and participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” published in 2013.

Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report with regard to our internal control over financial reporting.

(b) ATTESTATION REPORT OF THE REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding our internal control over financial reporting appears on page 65.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act), occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.

100

PART III



ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The information relating to our directors, nominees for election as directors, executive officers and audit committee under the headings Election of Directors, Corporate Governance—Our Executive Officers, Corporate Governance—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Corporate Governance—Board Committees in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We make available our code of business conduct and ethics free of charge through our website which is located at www.mcgcapital.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ Global Select Market by filing such amendment or waiver with the Securities and Exchange Commission and by posting it on our website.

We made no material change to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors, as described in our 2014 proxy statement.



ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The discussion under the headings Executive Compensation, Compensation of Directors, Compensation Committee Report, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation, and Narrative Disclosure of Our Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.



ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The discussion under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.



ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The discussion under the headings Certain Relationships and Related Transactions; Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions and Corporate Governance—Board Determination of Independence in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.



ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The discussion under the heading Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Auditors’ Fees and—Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.

101

PART IV



ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



		Page
1	The following financial statements are filed herewith:
	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	65
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013	67
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	68
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	69
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	70
	Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2014	71
	Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2013	72
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	75
2	The following financial statement schedules are filed herewith:
	Schedule 12-14 Investments in and Advances to Affiliates	104
3	Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K	105

102

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

MCG Capital Corporation

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of MCG Capital Corporation (the Company), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and have issued our report thereon dated March 2, 2015 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K). Our audits also included the Schedule 12-14 listed in Item 15 of this Form 10-K. The Schedule 12-14 is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, the Schedule 12-14 referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 2, 2015

103

Schedule 12-14

MCG Capital Corporation

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES



(in thousands)		Year Ended December 31, 2014		As of December 31, 2013 Fair Value							As of December 31, 2014 Fair Value
Portfolio Company	Investment^(a)	Amount of Interest or Dividends Credited to Income^(d)				Gross Additions^(b)		Gross Reductions^(c)
Control Investments
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC^(e)	Senior Debt	409		12,252		32		(12,284		)	—
	Subordinated Debt	—		—		—		—			—
	Class B Voting Units	—		—		—		—			—
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC	Senior Debt	—		—		—		—			—
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC	Senior Debt	909		7,640		9,555		(3		)	17,192
	Subordinated Debt	1,191		10,841		324		(11,165		)	—
	Preferred LLC Interest	—		13,175		1,719		(2,850		)	12,044
Total Control Investments		2,509		43,908		11,630		(26,302		)	29,236

Affiliate Investments
C7 Data Centers, Inc.^(f)	Senior Debt	1,660		17,092		80		(17,172		)	—
	Series B Preferred Units	—		3,482		—		(3,482		)	—
Education Management, Inc.	Senior Debt	—		19,617		485		(20,102		)	—
	Series C Preferred Debt	—		174		—		(174		)	—
IDOC, LLC	Senior Debt	1,155		14,762		46		(14,808		)	—
	Limited Partner Interests	—		1,665		—		(1,665		)	—
Total Affiliate Investments		$	2,815	$	56,792	$	611	$	(57,403	)	$	—

This schedule should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, including our Consolidated Schedule of Investments and Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


(a)	Common stock, warrants, options and, in some cases, preferred stock generally are non-income producing and restricted. The principal amount of the debt and the number of shares of common stock and preferred stock are shown in the Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2014.


(b)	Gross additions include increases in investments resulting from new portfolio company investments, paid-in-kind interest or dividends, amortization of discounts and fees, and exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross additions also include net increases in unrealized appreciation or net decreases in unrealized depreciation.


(c)	Gross reductions include decreases in investments resulting from principal collections related to investment repayments or sales and the exchange of one or more existing securities for one or more new securities. Gross reductions also include net increases in unrealized depreciation or net decreases in unrealized appreciation.


(d)	Represents the total amount of interest or dividends credited to income for the portion of the year an investment was a control investment (more than 25% owned) or an affiliate investment (5% to 25% owned), respectively. All dividend income is non-cash unless otherwise noted.


(e)	In October 2014, we sold our equity investment in HITV Operating Co., Inc. a subsidiary of GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC. With the completion of this transaction, GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC became a non-affiliate. The transfers of our senior debt investment from control to non-affiliate are included in gross reductions.


(f)	In September 2014, we sold our equity investment in C7 Data Centers, Inc. With the completion of this transaction, C7 Data Centers, Inc. became a non-affiliate. The transfers of our senior debt investment from affiliate to non-affiliate are included in gross reductions.

Information related to the amount of equity in the net profit and loss for the period for the investments listed has not been included in this schedule. This information is not considered to be meaningful due to the complex capital structures of the portfolio companies, with different classes of equity securities outstanding with different preferences in liquidation. These investments are neither consolidated nor accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

104

Exhibits

The following table lists exhibits filed as part of this report, according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K. All exhibits listed in the following table are incorporated by reference except for those exhibits denoted in the last column. Please note that the agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-K are included to provide information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement that have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.



		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Description	Form and SEC File No.	Filing Date with SEC	Exhibit No.	Filed with this 10-K
	Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MCG Capital Corporation	8-K (0-33377)	May 31, 2005	3.1
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of MCG Capital Corporation	8-K (0-33377)	April 11, 2012	3.1
	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders
4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate	N-2 (333-64596)	November 1, 2001	99.d.1
4.2	Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and among MCG Capital Corporation and certain stockholders	10-K (0-33377)	April 1, 2002	10.1
	Material Contracts—Custody Agreements
10.1	Amended and Restated Custody Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated December 11, 2008	10-K (0-33377)	March 9, 2009	10.2
	Material Contracts—Leases
10.2	Deed of Lease by and between BFP Potomac Tower Co. LLC, as landlord, and MCG Capital Corporation, as tenant, dated as of February 28, 2014	10-K (0-33377)	March 5, 2014	10.5
	Material Contracts—Management Contracts and Compensation Plans
10.3#	MCG Capital Corporation 401(k) Plan	10-K (0-33377)	March 5, 2013	10.12
10.4#	MCG Capital Corporation Dividend Reinvestment Plan	N-2 (333-64596)	November 1, 2001	99.e
10.5#	MCG Capital Corporation Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan	8-K(0-33377) 8-K/A(0-33377)	June 1, 2010 June 2, 2010	10.2 10.2
10.6#	MCG Capital Corporation Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan	8-K(0-33377) 8-K/A(0-33377)	June 1, 2010 June 2, 2010	10.1 10.1
10.7#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Members of the Board of Directors (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan)	10-Q (0-33377)	August 5, 2010	10.4
10.8#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan)	10-Q (0-33377)	August 5, 2010	10.3
10.9#	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for MCG Executive Employee (pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan).	8-K (0-33377)	March 15, 2012	10.3
10.10#	Letter Agreement between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville dated April 21, 2014.	8-K (0-33377)	April 21, 2014	10.2
10.11#	Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Tod K. Reichert, dated August 2, 2011	10-Q (0-33377)	August 4, 2011	10.6
10.12#	Amendment No. 1 to Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Tod K. Reichert, dated as of March 5, 2014	10-K (0-33377)	March 5, 2014	10.19
10.13#	Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Keith Kennedy, dated as of March 5, 2014	10-K (0-33377)	March 5, 2014	10.20
10.14#	Amendment No. 1 to Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Keith Kennedy dated April 21, 2014.	8-K (0-33377)	April 21, 2014	10.3
10.15#	MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan, dated August 3, 2011	10-Q (0-33377)	August 4, 2011	10.4

105



		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Description	Form and SEC File No.	Filing Date with SEC	Exhibit No.	Filed with this 10-K
10.16#	Amendment No. 1 to MCG Capital Corporation 2011 Severance Pay Plan.	8-K (0-33377)	March 15, 2012	10.1
10.17#	Amendment No. 2 to MCG Capital Corporation Severance Pay Plan	10-Q (0-33377)	July 31, 2012	10.1
	Code of Ethics
14.1	Amended and Restated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, effective as of March 15, 2012	8-K (0-33377)	March 15, 2012	14.1
	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21	Subsidiaries of MCG Capital Corporation and Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization				*
	Consents of Experts
23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm				*
	Certifications
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				*
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				*
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				†
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				†


*	Filed herewith.


†	Furnished herewith.


#	Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit herein pursuant to Item 15(a) of Form 10-K.

106

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 2, 2015.




MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION

By:	/s/ KEITH KENNEDY
	Keith Kennedy President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.




Signature	Title	Date

/s/ KEITH KENNEDY	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	March 2, 2015
Keith Kennedy
/s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEY	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 2, 2015
Beverly Jane Alley
/s/ RICHARD W. NEU	Chairman of the Board and Director	March 2, 2015
Richard W. Neu
/s/ KIM D. KELLY	Director	March 2, 2015
Kim D. Kelly
/s/ KENNETH J. O’KEEFE	Director	March 2, 2015
Kenneth J. O’Keefe
/s/ GAVIN SAITOWITZ	Director	March 2, 2015
Gavin Saitowitz

107

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

MCG CAPITAL CORP Reports

Also read