Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC /CAFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC /CAex31_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC /CAex31_1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC /CAex32_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC /CAex32_1.htm
UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ending November 30, 2014
 
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to __________________

Commission File No. 0-29373
 
Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc.
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
 
33-0836954
(State or other jurisdiction Of incorporation)
 
(IRS Employer File Number)
     
32963 Calle Perfecto
   
San Juan Capistrano, California
 
92675
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(zip code)
     
(949) 234-1999
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
  
Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ  No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes o  No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
       
Non-accelerated filer 
o
Smaller reporting company
þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
     
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)  Yes o   No þ
 
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock, as of  January 14, 2015 was 25,913,646.
.
References in this document to "us," "we," “Seychelle,” “SYEV,” or "the Company" refer to Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., its predecessor and its subsidiaries.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

FORM 10-Q
 
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
Page
 
PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
       
           
Item 1.
Financial Statements
   
3
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets 
   
3
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
   
4
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
   
6
 
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
   
7
 
           
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
   
11
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
   
17
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
   
17
 
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
   
17
 
           
PART II  OTHER INFORMATION
       
           
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
   
18
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
   
18
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
   
18
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
   
18
 
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
   
18
 
Item 5.
Other Information
   
18
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
   
19
 
           
Signatures
   
20
 
 

 
 
 
- 2 -

 
 

 
PART I
 
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
November 30,
2014
 
February 28,
2014
 
ASSETS
 
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
2,010,609
   
$
2,971,825
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns
               
   of $13,300 and $3,400, respectively
   
319,150
     
316,358
 
Related party receivable
   
8,726
     
14,323
 
Inventory, net
   
1,050,442
     
990,253
 
Deferred tax assets
   
463,205
     
61,359
 
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets
   
173,526
     
101,231
 
      Total current assets
   
4,025,658
     
4,455,349
 
                 
Property and equipment, net
   
169,799
     
171,013
 
Intangible assets, net
   
153,076
     
3,943
 
Deferred tax assets
   
433,874
     
433,874
 
Other assets
   
24,481
     
13,514
 
                 
      Total assets 
 
$
4,806,888
   
$
5,077,693
 
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
               
   Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
$
246,771
   
$
171,643
 
   Customer deposits
   
242,485
     
199,572
 
   Capital lease obligation, current portion
   
5,633
     
5,030
 
       Total current liabilities
   
494,889
     
376,245
 
                 
Long-term liabilities:
               
 Capital lease obligation, net of current
   
5,474
     
8,894
 
    Total liabilities
   
500,363
     
385,139
 
                 
Stockholders' equity:
               
Preferred stock, 6,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
    Common stock $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 25,913,646 and
    25,853,646 issued and outstanding at November 30, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively
   
25,914
     
25,854
 
                 
Additional paid-in capital
   
8,369,428
     
8,067,163
 
Accumulated deficit
   
(4,088,817
)
   
(3,400,463
)
          Total stockholders' equity
   
4,306,525
     
4,692,554
 
                 
 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
4,806,888
   
$
5,077,693
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 
 
- 3 -

 
 
 

SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
For the Three Months Ended
November 30,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
Sales
 
$
1,287,814
   
$
1,197,653
 
Cost of sales
   
724,997
     
620,324
 
               Gross profit
   
562,817
     
577,329
 
Operating Expenses
               
    Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
   
995,161
     
393,278
 
    Depreciation and Amortization
   
16,827
     
13,893
 
                 Total  operating  expenses
   
1,011,988
     
407,171
 
 Income (Loss)  from Operations
   
(449,171
)
   
170,158
 
Other Income (Expense)
               
     Interest income
   
947
     
1,089
 
     Interest expense
   
(401
)
   
(242
)
     Other income (expense)
   
7,201
     
(1
)
                    Total other income
   
7,747
     
846
 
 Income (loss)  before income tax benefit
   
(441,424
)
   
171,004
 
 Income tax benefit
   
158,386
     
26,411
 
Net  Income (Loss)
 
$
(283,038
)
 
$
197,415
 
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01
 
DILUTED  INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01
 
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
               
SHARES OUTSTANDING
   
25,913,206
     
25,853,646
 
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
               
SHARES OUTSTANDING
   
25,913,206
     
29,661,931
 
 
 See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 
 
- 4 -

 
 
 
 
SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
For the Nine Months
Ended
November 30,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
Sales
 
$
3,162,328
   
$
3,860,657
 
Cost of sales
   
1,730,478
     
1,986,150
 
               Gross profit
   
1,431,850
     
1,874,507
 
Operating Expenses
               
    Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
   
2,488,457
     
1,242,895
 
    Depreciation and Amortization
   
46,402
     
40,823
 
                 Total  operating  expenses
   
2,534,859
     
1,283,718
 
 Income (Loss)  from Operations
   
(1,103,009
)
   
590,789
 
Other Income (Expense)
               
     Interest income
   
3,718
     
1,603
 
     Interest expense
   
(849
)
   
(1,108
)
     Other income
   
9,740
     
53,680
 
                    Total other income
   
12,609
     
54,175
 
 Income (loss)  before income tax benefit (expense)
   
(1,090,400
)
   
644,964
 
 Income tax benefit (expense)
   
402,046
     
(164,461
)
Net  Income (Loss)
 
$
(688,354
)
 
$
480,503
 
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
0.02
 
DILUTED  INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
0.02
 
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
               
SHARES OUTSTANDING
   
25,898,446
     
25,848,628
 
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
               
SHARES OUTSTANDING
   
25,898,446
     
27,533,658
 
 
 See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
- 5 -

 
 
 
  SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
For The Nine Months Ended
November 30,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
             
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income (loss)
 
$
(688,354
)
 
$
480,503
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)  to net cash provided by (used in)  operating activities:
               
                 
    Depreciation and amortization
   
46,402
     
40,823
 
    Stock-based compensation
   
302,325
     
267,290
 
    Gain from sale of property and equipment
   
-
     
(124
)
    Provision for doubtful accounts
   
9,900
     
(114,591
)
    Decrease in inventory reserve
   
-
     
(48,509
)
    Deferred tax benefit
   
(401,846
)
   
(100,000 
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
   (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
   
(12,692
)
   
226,416
 
   Decrease in related party receivable
   
5,597
     
-
 
   Increase in inventory
   
(60,189
)
   
(359,093
)
   Increase in prepaid expenses, deposits  and other assets
   
(83,262
)
   
(58,821
 )
   Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
75,128
     
63,245
 
   Increase in income taxes payable
   
-
     
235,771
 
   Increase (decrease) in customer deposits
   
42,913
     
(85,305
)
 
               
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
   
(764,078
)
   
547,605
 
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
   Purchase of property and equipment
   
(43,887
)
   
(29,359
)
   Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
   
-
     
1,250
 
   Purchase of intangible assets
   
(150,434
)
   
(1,424
)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
   
(194,321
)
   
(29,533
)
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
   Repayment of  capital lease obligation
   
(2,817
)
   
(3,073
)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
   
(2,817
)
   
(3,073
)
                 
       NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
(961,216
)
   
514,999
 
                 
       CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   
2,971,825
     
2,234,545
 
                 
       CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
 
$
2,010,609
   
$
2,749,544
 
                 
                 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
    Cash paid for:
               
 Interest
 
$
849
   
$
1,108
 
 Income taxes
 
$
-
   
$
-
 
 
 See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
- 6 -

 

SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED (UNAUDITED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
NOTE 1:    CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., and subsidiaries (the “Company”) without audit.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at November 30, 2014, and for all periods presented herein, have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.  It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014.  The results of operations for the periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal years.

The summary of significant accounting policies of the Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements and the February 28, 2014 consolidated financials included in the 10-K filed on May 23, 2014.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
   
NOTE 2:    BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period presented.  Diluted income (loss) per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.  In periods when losses are reported, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.
 
The denominator for diluted income (loss) per share for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2014 did not include warrants as they would have been anti-dilutive.  During the three and nine months ended November 30, 2014, 4,677,123 and  6,305,415  warrants, respectively, were excluded from diluted income (loss) per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The denominator for diluted income per share for the three and  nine month periods ended November 30, 2013 is adjusted to include the effect of warrants totaling  3,808,285 and 1,685,030, respectively.  
 
   
For the nine months ended
 
   
November 30,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
Numerator:
           
Net Income (Loss) available to common shareholders
 
$
(688,354
)
 
$
480,503
 
Weighted average shares – basic
   
25,898,446
     
25,848,628
 
Net income (loss) per share – basic
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
0.02
 
                 
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
               
Warrants
   
-
     
1,685,030
 
Weighted average shares – diluted
   
25,898,446
     
27,533,658
 
Net income (loss) per share – diluted
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
0.02
 
 
 
 
 
- 7 -

 
 

SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED (UNAUDITED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 

 
NOTE 2:    BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (continued)

   
For the three months ended
 
   
November 30,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
Numerator:
           
Net Income (Loss) available to common shareholders
 
$
(283,038
)
 
$
197,415
 
Weighted average shares – basic
   
25,913,206
     
25,853,646
 
Net income per share – basic
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01
 
                 
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
               
Warrants
   
-
     
3,808,285
 
Weighted average shares – diluted
   
25,913,206
     
29,661,931
 
Net income  per share – diluted
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.01
 

  
NOTE 3:   COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS
 
Common Stock
During the nine month period ended November 30, 2014, 60,000 shares of restricted stock were issued by the Company to employees. 50,000 shares vest over a two year period, with 17,000 shares vested upon issue, with 17,000 and 16,000 after one and two years, respectively. The other 10,000 shares were fully vested upon issuance. The value recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements was based on the estimated fair value of the stock on the date of the grant and aggregated $3,800.

During the nine months ended November 30, 2013, the Company issued 20,000 shares of restricted common stock for services rendered valued at $4,600. All shares of restricted stock were fully vested upon issuance, but not able to be traded on the open market upon issuance. The values recorded were based on the estimated fair value of the stock on the date of grant.   

Warrants
The Company has determined the estimated value of warrants granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The amount of the expense charged to operations for warrants was $88,175 and $264,525 for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2014, respectively, and $88,490 and $262,690 for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2013, respectively.  All outstanding warrants are expected to be vested in December 2015.

A summary of warrant activity for the nine months ended November 30, 2014 is as follows:
 
       
Weighted-
 
       
Average
 
   
Warrants
 
Exercise
 
   
Outstanding
 
Price
 
Outstanding at February 28, 2014
   
8,407,221
   
0.21
 
Granted
   
-
   
-
 
Exercised
   
-
   
-
 
Forfeited
   
-
   
0.21
 
Outstanding at November 30, 2014
   
8,407,221
   
0.21
 
Vested at November 30, 2014
   
6,305,415
   
0.21
 
Exercisable at November 30, 2014
   
6,305,415
   
0.21
 
 
 
 
 
- 8 -

 
 
 
SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED (UNAUDITED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
NOTE 3:   COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS (continued)
 
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding warrants as of November 30, 2014:
 
     
Warrants Outstanding
   
Warrants Exercisable
 
           
Weighted
   
Weighted
         
Weighted
 
           
Average
   
Average
         
Average
 
Exercise Price
   
Number
   
Remaining
   
Exercise
   
Number
   
Exercise
 
     
Outstanding
   
Life (Years)
   
Price
   
Outstanding
   
Price
 
$
0.21
   
8,407,221
   
6.04
   
$
0.21
   
6,305,415
   
$
0.21
 
 
 
NOTE 4:    INVENTORY
 
The Company’s inventory consisted of the following at November 30, 2014 and February 28, 2014:
 
   
November 30,
2014
   
February 28,
2014
 
Raw materials
 
$
629,408
   
$
559,946
 
Finished goods
   
456,034
     
465,307
 
     
1,085,442
     
1,025,253
 
Reserve for obsolete and slow moving inventory
   
(35,000
)
   
(35,000
)
   
$
1,050,442
   
$
990,253
 
 
 
NOTE 5:    LINE OF CREDIT

As of November 30, 2014, the Company had a line of credit agreement totaling $500,000, with no outstanding borrowings as of November 30, 2014.  The line expires on September 1, 2015. (See Note 9).
 
 
NOTE 6:    CONCENTRATIONS

Sales to three customers accounted for 63% and 61% of sales for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2014, respectively. Accounts receivable from these three customers amounted to $233,000 or 70% of accounts receivable as of November 30, 2014.  

Sales to two customers accounted for 55% and 47% of the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2013, respectively.  Accounts receivable from three customers amounted to approximately 80% of accounts receivable at November 30, 2013.  
 
 
NOTE 7:    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three month periods ended November, 2014 and 2013, payments totaling $103,250 and $20,000, respectively, and during the nine month periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, payments totaling $177,250 and $100,200, respectively, were made to TAM Irrevocable Trust (“TAM”) for consulting services, in which Cari Beck, is a trustee as well as the daughter of the Company’s President.  

During the nine month period ending November 30, 2014, the Company paid $150,000 to TAM for purchase of intellectual property retained by TAM when the Company was organized in 1998. 
 
 
 
 
- 9 -

 
 
 
SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED (UNAUDITED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 

NOTE 8:  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company previously reported that it was involved in a case titled Letty Garcia v. Carl Palmer, Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., et. al. brought in the Superior Court for the State of California, San Diego County District. This case has been transferred to the Orange County Superior Court for the State of California with additional hearings scheduled during the fourth quarter. We anticipate that it will be resolved this fiscal year and believe that Seychelle will prevail.

In January 2012, the Company entered into a contract with a distributor in which it granted exclusive distribution rights for certain new product lines. Subsequently, there was a contract dispute that has resulted in a lawsuit titled Archette Wellness Group, dba Functional Water Technologies v. Seychelle Environmental Technologies , brought in the U.S. District Court, for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The Company believes it will prevail in this matter.
 
Otherwise, as of November 30, 2014, we know of no other legal proceedings pending or threatened, or judgments entered against the Company or any of its directors or officers in their capacity as such.
 
 
NOTE 9: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On December 2, 2014, a prepayment totaling $50,000 was made to TAM for consulting services to be provided during the three months ending February 28, 2015.
 
On December 10, 2014, our bank notified us that our line of credit discussed in Note 5 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statement would no longer be accessible by us.  This situation is not material to our operations.  However, we plan to request that our bank restore out line of credit as soon as we return to a net profit position for at least one fiscal quarter.
 
 
- 10 -

 
 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the operating results, financial condition and liquidity and cash flows of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of and for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013. The discussion and analysis that follows should be read together with the consolidated financial statements of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.  Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this section are forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and are based upon judgments concerning various factors that are beyond the Company’s control.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements contained herein are “forward-looking” statements.  Forward-looking statements include statements which are predictive in nature; which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions; or which include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, or variations or negatives thereof or by similar or comparable words or phrases. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance, ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible future Company actions that may be provided by management are also forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about the Company; and economic and market factors in the countries in which the Company does business, among other things. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and the Company has no specific intentions to update these statements. Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors including, among others:
 
 
(1)
the portable water filtration industry is in a state of rapid technological change, which can render the Company’s products obsolete or unmarketable;
 
 
(2)
any failure by the Company to anticipate or respond to technological developments or changes in industry standards or customer requirements, or any significant delays in product development or introduction, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition;
 
 
(3)
the Company’s sales are concentrated to a few large customers, and loss of business from one or more could impact the Company’s revenues, gross profit and operating results;
 
 
(4)
the Company’s cost of sales may be materially affected by increases in the market prices of the raw materials used in the Company’s assembly processes;
 
 
(5)
the Company’s water related product sales could be materially affected by weather conditions and government regulations;
 
 (6)
the Company is subject to the risks of conducting business internationally; and
 
 
 
(7)
the industries in which the Company operates are highly competitive. Additional risks and uncertainties are outlined in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Description of the Business
 
We were incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on January 23, 1998 as a change of domicile to Royal Net, Inc., a Utah corporation that was originally incorporated on January 24, 1986. Royal Net, Inc. changed its state of domicile to Nevada and its name to Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. effective in January 1998.
 
On January 30, 1998, we entered into an Exchange Agreement with Seychelle Water Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (SWT), whereby we exchanged our issued and outstanding capital shares with the shareholders of SWT on a one share for one share basis. We became the parent company and SWT became a wholly owned subsidiary. SWT had been formed in 1997 to market water filtration systems of Aqua Vision International.
 
Our Company is presently comprised of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, with two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Seychelle Water Technologies, Inc. and Fill 2 Pure International, Inc., also Nevada corporations (collectively, the Company or Seychelle). We use the trade name "Seychelle Water Filtration Products, Inc." in our commercial operations.
 
 
- 11 -

 
 
Seychelle designs, assembles and distributes unique, state-of-the-art ionic absorption micron filters for portable filter devices that remove up to 99.99% of all pollutants and contaminants found in any fresh water source.  Patents or trade secrets cover all proprietary products.

Our principal business address is 32963 Calle Perfecto, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. Our telephone number at this address is 949-234-1999.
 
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Results of Operations
 
Our summarized historical financial data is presented in the following table to aid in your analysis. You should read this data in conjunction with this section entitled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The selected condensed consolidated statements of operations data for the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013 are derived from our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
   
Three month period ended November 30, 2014 compared to the corresponding period in 2013
       
                   
               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
                         
Sales
 
$
1,287,814
   
$
1,197,653
     
90,161
     
8
%
Cost of sales
   
724,997
     
620,324
     
104,673
     
17
%
Gross profit
   
562,817
     
577,329
     
(14,512
)
   
(3)
%
Gross profit %
   
44
%
   
48
%
               
Selling general and administrative expenses
   
995,161
     
393,278
     
601,883
     
153
%
Depreciation and amortization expense
   
16,827
     
13,893
     
2,934
     
21
%
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense)
   
(441,424
)
   
171,004
     
(612,428
)
   
(358
%)
  Income tax benefit
   
158,386
     
26,411
     
131,975
     
500
%
                                 
Net income (loss)
   
(283,038
)
   
197,415
     
(480,453
)
   
(243
%)
                                 
 
Sales. Our customer concentration is constantly changing, which contributes toward much of the fluctuation in sales. The current period increase in sales is primarily due to higher sales from our largest customers. Our largest customer accounted for $568,000 or 44% of sales during the three months ended November 30, 2014, compared to $471,000 or 39% of our sales during the three months ended November 30, 2013. During the three months ended November 30, 2014, we shifted our focus toward building a broader customer base through the work of a national sales manager to develop stronger sales relationships with our current and potential customers (this role did not exist during the three months ended November 30, 2013). Management believes this action will continue to positively impact our sales going forward.
 
 
- 12 -

 
 
Cost of sales and gross profit percentage. A portion of the increase in cost of sales is a direct result of sales increasing during the three month period ended November 30, 2014.  As a percentage of sales, the gross profit margin during the three months ended November 30, 2014 decreased from 48% to 44%.  During the three months ended November 30, 2014, we sold certain products to our largest customer at a lower price than the three months ended November 30, 2013, as a result of the higher quantities that were  purchased.  During the three months ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, three specific products had combined sales of $274,000 and $228,000, respectively, with corresponding gross margins of 36% and 52%, respectively.  The decrease in gross margins was   a direct result of the lower sales prices.    The Company expects gross margins to return to fiscal 2014 levels as a result of efforts to diversify our customer base, which will result in a wider product mix that includes higher-margin product sales.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. These expenses increased by approximately $602,000, or 153%, during the period ended November 30, 2014 compared to the same period ended in the prior year.  The increase was largely a result of the increase in legal costs incurred related to issues described in Note 8 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. During the three months ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses net of approximately $468,000 in legal costs incurred related to the Archette case would have been:

               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
 
                         
Selling general and administrative expenses
 
527,320
   
393,278
   
134,042
   
34%
 

The $134,042 or 34% increase for the three months ended November 30, 2014 (net of legal costs incurred related to Archette) was a result of additional personnel costs, including hiring a full time corporate controller and national sales manager (neither position was in place during the three months ended November 30, 2013) and stock grants to employees discussed in Note 3 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, we incurred approximately $25,000 on other litigation (see Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) during the three months ended November 30, 2014 compared to nothing during the three months ended November 30, 2013.  We have also experienced rising health care costs, which accounted for approximately $17,000 of the increase to selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended November 30, 2014.  We anticipate incurring additional legal costs through the end of our current fiscal year, but do not expect these costs to carry over into future years and we are currently re-evaluating our health insurance programs and obtaining proposals on both health and workers’ compensation insurance policies in order to negate this increase in future periods.

During the three month periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, payments totaling $103,000 and $20,000, respectively, were made to TAM Irrevocable Trust (“TAM”) for consulting services, in which Cari Beck, is a trustee as well as the daughter of the Company’s President.  

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense was relatively flat from period to period, but the slight increase is due to additional tooling and a Company vehicle that was purchased during the period.

Income tax benefit.  The Company recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $158,000 due to the pretax loss of approximately $441,000 during the three month period ended November 30, 2014, compared to a benefit of approximately $26,000 during the three month period ended November 30, 2013.
 
Net income (loss). Net loss for the three month period ended November 30, 2014 was $283,038, down 243% compared to net income of $197,415 for the three month period ended November 30, 2013. During the three months ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, net income, exclusive of approximately $468,000 in legal costs incurred related to the Archette case (offset by a reduction in income tax benefit of approximately $168,000) would have been:

               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense)
 
26,576
   
171,004
   
(144,428
)
  (84 %)
  Income tax benefit (expense)
 
(9,614
 
26,411
   
(36,025
  (136 %)
                       
Net income (loss)
 
16,962
   
197,415
   
(180,453
)
  (91 %)

Excluding the legal costs related to the Archette case, the decrease in net income during the three months ended November 30, 2014 of approximately $180,000 was due to the aforementioned reduction in gross margin as well as the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses discussed above. We remain focused on the primary factors affecting our bottom line and look to improve the Company’s profitability in the upcoming periods during future fiscal years.
 
 
- 13 -

 
 
 
 
Nine month period ended November 30, 2014 compared to the corresponding period in 2013
       
                   
               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
 
                         
                         
Sales
 
$
3,162,328
   
$
3,860,657
     
(698,329
)
   
(18
%)
Cost of sales
   
1,730,478
     
1,986,150
     
(255,672
)
   
(13
%)
Gross profit
   
1,431,850
     
1,874,507
     
(442,657
)
   
(24
%)
Gross profit %
   
45
%
   
49
%
               
Selling general and administrative expenses
   
2,488,457
     
1,242,895
     
1,245,562
     
100
%
Depreciation and amortization expense
   
46,402
     
40,823
     
5,579
     
14
%
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense)
   
(1,090,400
)
   
644,964
     
(1,735,364
)
   
(269
%)
 Income tax benefit (expense)
   
402,046
     
(164,461
   
566,507
     
344
%
                                 
Net income (loss)
   
(688,354
)
   
480,503
     
(1,168,857
)
   
(243
%)
                                 
 
Sales. Our customer concentration is constantly changing, which contributes toward much of the fluctuation in sales. The current period decrease in sales is primarily due to lower sales from a large customer, who accounted for approximately $747,000 or 19% of sales during the nine months ended November 30, 2013 compared to approximately $114,000 or 4% of our sales during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 (a decrease of $633,000 or 85%). This customer has historically placed large orders irregularly, and we expect to continue to sell to this customer in future periods.

Cost of sales and gross profit percentage. A portion of the decrease in cost of sales is a direct result of sales decreasing during the nine month period ended November 30, 2014. As a percentage of sales, the gross profit margin during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 decreased from 49% to 45%.    During the nine months ended November 30, 2013 the largest sale at the product line level was the Mission Packs, which produced sales of approximately $682,000 and carried a gross margin of approximately 50.3%. During the nine months ended November 30, 2014, there were no sales of Mission Packs due to the ordering trends of one of our largest customers. However, during the nine months ended November 30, 2014, sales of new bottle lines (our 20-ounce RAD Advanced bottle and 28-ounce Extreme flip-top bottle) increased to approximately $627,000 (from nothing during the nine months ended November 30, 2013). These bottles carried a gross margin of approximately 46.4%, which is 3.9% lower than our top-selling product’s gross margin for the nine months ended November 30, 2013.

Additionally, our largest customer, which had sales of approximately $1,324,000 and $1,098,000, or 42% and 28% of total sales during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, purchased larger quantities of specific products during the nine months ended November 30, 2014. These higher-quantity orders resulted in a sales price favorable to the customer, which also had a negative impact on our overall gross margins.  The fluctuation in our gross margins are often the result of product mix.  Based on current sales trends, we expect our gross margins to remain near 45% going forward.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. These expenses increased by approximately $1,246,000, or 100%, during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 compared to the same period of  the prior year. The increase was largely a result of the increase in legal costs incurred related to issues described in Note 8 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. During the nine months ended November 30, 2014, selling, general and administrative expenses net of approximately $730,000 in legal costs incurred related to the Archette case would have been:

               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
 
                         
Selling general and administrative expenses
 
1,758,457
   
1,242,895
   
515,562
   
41%
 
 
 
- 14 -

 
 
The $515,562 or 41% increase for the nine months ended November 30, 2014 (net of legal costs incurred related to Archette) was a result of additional personnel costs, including hiring a full time corporate controller and national sales manager (neither position was in place during the nine months ended November 30, 2013) and stock grants to employees discussed in Note 3 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.   Additionally, as part of a strategic move to pursue a retail market for our products, we also incurred incremental costs to develop product branding and packaging specific to the retail market. We also incurred moving costs during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 relocating our production and customer service departments. Lastly, we have also experienced rising health care and workers’ compensation insurance costs due to the Company's personnel growth and secondary production and office space.  The retail packaging and moving costs are not expected to be  incurred in future periods. As we defend our position in the litigation described in Note 8 of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, we anticipate incurring additional legal costs  into our subsequent fiscal year. We are currently re-evaluating our health insurance programs and obtaining proposals on both health and workers’ compensation insurance policies in order to negate this increase in future periods.

During the nine month periods ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, payments totaling $177,000 and $100,000, respectively, were made to TAM for consulting services.    These consulting services are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. The increase in the consulting fees during the nine month period ended November 30, 2014 was a direct result of services provided related to the litigation described in Note 8 of the accompanying condensed financial statements. We anticipate continuing to incur higher consulting costs into our subsequent fiscal year as we defend our position.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense was relatively flat from period to period, but the slight increase is due to additional tooling and a Company vehicle purchased during the period.

Income tax expense (benefit).  The Company recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $402,000 due to the pretax loss of approximately $1,090,000 during the nine month period ended November 30, 2014, compared to a provision of approximately $164,000 due to the pretax income of approximately $645,000 during the nine month period ended November 30, 2013.
 
Net income (loss). Net loss for the nine month period ended November 30, 2014 was $688,354, down 243% compared to net income of $480,503 for the nine month period ended November 30, 2013.  During the nine months ended November 30, 2014, net income, exclusive of approximately $730,000 in legal costs incurred related to the Archette case (offset by a reduction in income tax benefit of approximately $281,000) would have been:
 
               
Period over
       
   
2014
   
2013
   
Period change
   
%
 
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense)
   
(360,400
)
   
644,964
     
(1,005,364
)
   
(156
%)
  Income tax benefit (expense)
   
121,046
     
(164,461
   
285,507
     
(174
%)
                         
Net income (loss)
   
(239,354
)
   
480,503
     
(719,857
)
   
(150
%)

Excluding the legal costs related to the Archette case, the decrease in net income during the nine months ended November 30, 2014 of approximately $720,000 was due to the $698,000 or 18% decrease in sales, the aforementioned reduction in gross margin, as well as, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses discussed above. We remain focused on the primary factors affecting our bottom line and look to improve the Company’s profitability in the upcoming periods during future fiscal years.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. During the nine month period ended November 30, 2014, cash used in operating activities was approximately $764,000, primarily as the result of the net loss reported for the period of approximately $688,000, compared to cash provided by operating activities of approximately $548,000 during the nine month period ended November 30, 2013. Additionally, we made prepayments of approximately $83,000 on future expenses and increased our accounts receivable by approximately $13,000 and inventory by approximately $60,000 and  recorded a non-cash tax benefit of approximately $402,000. This was offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $75,000, an increase in customer deposits of approximately $43,000  and adding back non-cash expenses for stock based compensation and depreciation and amortization, the net of which was approximately $349,000.
 
Net cash used in investing activities. During the nine month period ended November 30, 2014, the Company spent approximately $44,000 on capital expenditures and $150,000 for intangible assets. In the comparable period of the prior year, the Company spent approximately $21,000 on capital expenditures, net of $1,000 in proceeds from the sale of equipment, and approximately $1,000 for intangible assets.
 
Net cash used in financing activities. Cash used in financing activities during the nine month period ended November 30, 2014 was relatively consistent with the comparable period in the prior year and related to schedule payments on our capital lease obligation.
 
 
- 15 -

 
 
As of November 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $2.0 million in cash and cash equivalents. The Company believes it has liquidity to meet its operating needs through the next 12 months.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
 
The Company believes that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of its most recent fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K have the greatest potential impact on its consolidated financial statements, so it considers these to be its critical accounting policies. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results could differ from the estimates the Company uses in applying the critical accounting policies. Certain of these critical accounting policies affect working capital account balances, including the policies for inventory reserves and stock-based compensation. These policies require that the Company make estimates in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements as of a given date.
 
Within the context of these critical accounting policies, the Company is not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different amounts being reported. There were no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies or estimates during the nine and three month periods ended November 30, 2014.
 
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. This new standard requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carryforward that would apply in settlement of the uncertain tax positions. UTBs will be netted against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carryforwards that would be utilized, rather than only against carryforwards that are created by the UTBs.  The Company adopted ASU-2013-11 on March 1, 2014, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires entities to recognize revenue in the way it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  The ASU will replace most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective.  This pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the effect that this pronouncement will have on our  consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  
 
In August 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Preparation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Under U.S. GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity's liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity's liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements—Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity's liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this Update should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this Accounting Standards Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at the current period, management does not believe that it has met conditions which would subject these condensed consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure.
 
Management does not believe any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
 
 
- 16 -

 
 

 
ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
None.
 
 
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Not applicable.
 
 
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
As of the end of the period covered by this report, based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a -15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act), our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer each have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the applicable time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 240.13a-15 or Rule 240.15d-15 of this chapter that occurred during our most recent fiscal three months that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
This report does not include an attestation report by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting as we are not subject to this requirement.
 
 
 
- 17 -

 
 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
The Company previously reported that it was involved in a case titled Letty Garcia v. Carl Palmer, Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., et. al. brought in the Superior Court for the State of California, San Diego County District. This case has been transferred to the Orange County Superior Court for the State of California with additional hearings scheduled during the fourth quarter. We anticipate that it will be resolved this fiscal year and believe that Seychelle will prevail.

In January 2012, the Company entered into a contract with a distributor in which it granted exclusive distribution rights for certain new product lines. Subsequently, there was a contract dispute that has resulted in a lawsuit titled Archette Wellness Group, dba Functional Water Technologies v. Seychelle Environmental Technologies, brought in the U.S. District Court, for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The Company believes it will prevail in this matter.
 
Otherwise, as of November 30, 2014, we know of no other legal proceedings pending or threatened, or judgments entered against the Company or any of its directors or officers in their capacity as such.
 
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no changes to our Risk Factors included in our fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2014.
 
 
ITEM 2.   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
During the nine month period ended November 30, 2014, 60,000 shares of restricted stock were issued by the Company to employees. 50,000 shares vest over a two year period, with 17,000 shares vested upon issue, with 17,000 and 16,000 after one and two years, respectively. The other 10,000 shares were fully vested upon issuance. The value recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements was based on the estimated fair value of the stock on the date of the grant.

During the nine months ended November 31, 2013, the Company issued 20,000 shares of restricted common stock for services rendered valued at $4,600. All shares of restricted stock were fully vested upon issuance, but not able to be traded on the open market upon issuance. The values recorded were based on the estimated fair value of the stock on the date of grant.   
 
  
ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
None.
 
 
ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
None.
 

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.
 
 
- 18 -

 
 

 ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
31.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     
31.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     
32.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     
32.2   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
     
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
     
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
     
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
     
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
     
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
     
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
 
- 19 -

 


 
SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

 
Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc.
 
  
  
  
 
Date: January 14, 2015
By:  
/s/ Dick Parsons
 
 
Dick Parsons
Director, Chief Executive Officer
 
 
Date: January 14, 2015
By:  
/s/ Jim Place
 
 
Jim Place
Director and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 20 -