Exhibit 10.1

THIRD AMENDMENT AND JOINDER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT AND TO SECURITY AGREEMENT

This Third Amendment and Joinder to Credit Agreement and to Security Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 15th day of September 2014, by and among SL INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and each of the entities listed as a Borrower on the signature pages hereto (collectively, “Existing Borrowers” and each is individually referred to as an “Existing Borrower”), each of the entities listed as a GUARANTOR on the signature pages hereto (collectively “Guarantors” and each is individually referred to as a “Guarantor”, and SLMTI DS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Joining Borrower” and collectively with the Existing Borrowers, the “Borrowers” and collectively with the Guarantors, the “Loan Parties”) the financial institutions which are now or which hereafter become a party hereto as lenders (collectively, the “Lenders” and each is individually referred to as a “Lender”), and PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders (hereinafter referred to in such capacity as the “Administrative Agent”) and in its capacity as a Lender.

BACKGROUND

A. On August 9, 2012, Existing Borrowers, Guarantors, Lenders and Administrative Agent entered into a Credit Agreement to reflect certain financing arrangements between the parties thereto (as amended, modified, renewed, extended, replaced or substituted from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) and executed a Security Agreement in connection therewith (as amended, modified, renewed, extended, replaced or substituted from time to time, the “Security Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, Security Agreement, and all other documents executed in connection therewith are collectively referred to herein as the “Existing Financing Agreements.” All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Credit Agreement.

B. The Existing Borrowers have informed Administrative Agent and Lenders that Joining Borrower has become affiliated with Existing Borrowers and has acquired the assets of Dynetic Systems, Inc. (“Asset Acquisition”). The Existing Borrowers have requested that Administrative Agent and Lenders consent to allowing Joining Borrower to become a “Borrower” under the Credit Agreement and a “Debtor” under the Security Agreement and amend certain terms and provisions contained in the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement, in each case subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.

NOW THEREFORE, with the foregoing background hereinafter deemed incorporated by reference herein and made part hereof, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, promise and agree as follows:

1. Joinder.

(a) Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, Joining Borrower joins in as, assumes the obligations and liabilities of, adopts the obligations, liabilities and role of, and becomes, a Borrower and a Debtor (as defined in the Security Agreement) under the Existing Financing Agreements. All references to Borrower or Borrowers and to Debtor or Debtors contained in the Existing Financing Documents are hereby deemed for all purposes to also refer to and include Joining Borrower as a Borrower or Debtor, as applicable, and Joining Borrower hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the Existing Financing Agreements (as may be modified in connection herewith) as if Joining Borrower were an original signatory thereto.

(b) Without limiting the generality of the provisions of paragraph (a) above, Joining Borrower hereby becomes liable on a joint and several basis, along with all other Borrowers, for all Loans made by Lenders under the Existing Financing Agreements and all Obligations under the Existing Financing Agreements.

2. Amendments to Credit Agreement. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows:

(a) Indebtedness. Clause (v) of Section 8.2.1 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(v) Any (i) Lender Provided Interest Rate Hedge, (ii) other Interest Rate Hedge approved by the Administrative Agent, (iii) Indebtedness under any Other Lender Provided Financial Services Product; provided however, the Loan Parties and their Subsidiaries shall enter into a Lender Provided Interest Rate Hedge or another Interest Rate Hedge only for hedging (rather than speculative) purposes, or (iv) other agreements or arrangements pursuant to which a financial institution provides foreign currency exchange services to the Loan Parties, provided, however that all obligations arising from such agreements or arrangements shall be on an unsecured basis and that the notional contract amount of such obligations shall not exceed at any time an aggregate amount equal to $15,500,000;

(b) Loans and Investments. Clause (v) of Section 8.2.4 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

(v) so long as no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing: (a) make investments in securities of trade creditors, customers or any debtor of any Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries received in compromise of obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business, including pursuant to any plan of reorganization or similar arrangement upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of such trade creditors, customers or debtors and any Investments received in satisfaction of judgments, and (b) other investments not otherwise referenced in this Section 8.2.4 in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000 at any one time during the term of this Agreement.

2

3. Schedules. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, the Schedules to the Credit Agreement shall be amended and supplemented as set forth on Exhibit A hereto and the Schedules to the Security Agreement shall be amended and supplemented as set forth on Exhibit B hereto.

4. Representations and Warranties. Each Loan Party hereby:

(a) reaffirms all representations and warranties made to Administrative Agent and Lenders under the Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and all of the other Existing Financing Agreements (as modified in connection herewith) and confirms that all are true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof, in each case other than representations and warranties that relate to a specific date;

(b) reaffirms all of the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement, and covenants to abide thereby until all Loans, Obligations and other liabilities of Loan Parties to Administrative Agent and Lenders, of whatever nature and whenever incurred, are satisfied and/or released by Administrative Agent and Lenders;

(c) represents and warrants that no Potential Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under any of the Existing Financing Agreements (including that the guaranty of SL Industries, Inc. and of SL Montevideo Technology, Inc. of certain of Joining Borrower’s obligations in conjunction with the Asset Acquisition, are permitted under Section 8.2.1 (vii) of the Credit Agreement);

(d) represents and warrants that since June 30, 2014, no event or development has occurred which has had or is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Change;

(e) represents and warrants that it has the authority and legal right to execute, deliver and carry out the terms of this Amendment and all related agreements, instruments, and documents to which such Loan Party is a party, that such actions were duly authorized by all necessary corporate or company action and that the officers executing this Amendment and any related agreements, instruments or documents on its behalf were similarly authorized and empowered, and that neither this Amendment or any related agreements, instruments, or documents contravenes any provisions of its Articles of Incorporation or Certificate of Formation, as applicable and Bylaws or Operating Agreement, as applicable, or of any contract or agreement to which it is a party or by which any of its properties are bound;

(f) represents and warrants that this Amendment and all assignments, instruments, documents, and agreements executed and delivered by such Loan Party in connection herewith, are valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with their respective terms; and

(g) represents and warrants that the Asset Acquisition constitutes a Permitted Acquisition under the Credit Agreement, and accordingly that the Borrowers’ Pro-Forma Leverage Ratio, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Asset Acquisition, is less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.0 as of the most recent fiscal quarter end for the trailing 12 month period then ending.

3

5. Security Interest. As security for the payment and performance of the Obligations, and satisfaction by the Loan Parties of all covenants and undertakings contained in the Credit Agreement, the Loan Documents and the Existing Financing Agreements (as modified in connection herewith), each of the Loan Parties reconfirms the prior grant of the security interest in and first priority, perfected lien in favor of Administrative Agent, for its benefit and the ratable benefit of each Lender, upon and to, all of its right, title and interest in and to the Collateral, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, created or arising and wherever located. Joining Borrower hereby agrees that the Administrative Agent and the Lenders and any IRH Provider shall have, and Joining Borrower hereby grants to and creates in favor of PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as Administrative Agent, for its benefit and the ratable benefit of each Lender and IRH Provider (as defined in the Security Agreement), a continuing first priority, perfected lien and security interest in and upon the Collateral (as defined in the Security Agreement) of Joining Borrower, whether now owned or hereafter acquired or arising and wherever located.

6. Confirmation of Indebtedness. Loan Parties confirm and acknowledge that as of the close of business on September 15, 2014, Borrowers were indebted to Administrative Agent and Lenders under the Credit Agreement in the aggregate principal amount of (i) $472,692.00, comprised of $0.00 of outstanding Revolving Credit Loans and $472,692.00 for issued and outstanding Letters of Credit and (ii) $6,422,749.00 under the DOJ/EPA Letter of Credit, in each case without any deduction, defense, setoff, claim or counterclaim, plus all fees, costs and expenses incurred to date in connection with the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents.

7. Acknowledgment of Guarantors. Each Guarantor hereby covenants and agrees that the Continuing Agreement of Guaranty and Suretyship dated August 9, 2012, as amended, restated, supplemented and otherwise modified from time to time, shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to cover the existing and future Obligations of Borrowers and each other Guarantor to Administrative Agent and Lenders under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents.

8. Conditions Precedent/Effectiveness Conditions. This Amendment shall be effective upon the satisfaction of each of the following conditions (all documents to be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Administrative Agent and Administrative Agent’s counsel):

(a) Administrative Agent shall have received this Amendment duly executed by Lenders and all Loan Parties;

(b) Loan Parties shall have paid or reimbursed Administrative Agent for its reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses as required under the Credit Agreement, including those in connection with the preparation, negotiation and execution of this Amendment and the documents provided for herein or related hereto;

4

(c) Administrative Agent shall have received each of the agreements, instruments, certificates and documents listed on Exhibit C attached hereto; and

(d) Execution and/or delivery of all other agreements, instruments and documents requested by Administrative Agent to effectuate and implement the terms hereof.

9. Reaffirmation of Existing Financing Agreements. Except as expressly modified by the terms hereof, all of the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Security Agreement, as amended, and all other of the Existing Financing Agreements (except as otherwise modified in connection herewith), are hereby reaffirmed and shall continue in full force and effect as therein written.

10. Release. As further consideration for Administrative Agent’s and Lenders’ agreement to grant the accommodations set forth herein, each Borrower and each Guarantor hereby waives and releases and forever discharges Administrative Agent and Lenders and their respective officers, directors, attorneys, agents and employees (the “Released Parties”) from any liability, damage, claim, loss or expense of any kind that Borrowers, Guarantors, or any of them, may have against Released Parties, or any of them, arising out of or relating to the Obligations, this Amendment or the Loan Documents.

11. Miscellaneous.

(a) No rights are intended to be created hereunder for the benefit of any third party donee, creditor, or incidental beneficiary.

(b) The headings of any paragraph of this Amendment are for convenience only and shall not be used to interpret any provision hereof.

(c) No modification hereof or any agreement referred to herein shall be binding or enforceable unless in writing and signed on behalf of the party against whom enforcement is sought.

(d) The terms and conditions of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York.

(e) This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by facsimile, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery by facsimile or electronic transmission shall bind the parties hereto.

[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

5

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO AND JOINDER TO CREDIT

AGREEMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT]

S-1

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO THIRD AMENDMENT TO AND JOINDER TO CREDIT

AGREEMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT]

S-2

Exhibit A

Amended and Supplemented Schedules to the Credit Agreement

SCHEDULE 1.1(B)

COMMITMENTS OF LENDERS AND ADDRESSES FOR NOTICES

Page 1 of 2

Part 1 - Commitments of Lenders and Addresses for Notices to Lenders

SCHEDULE 1.1(B) - 1

SCHEDULE 1.1(B)

COMMITMENTS OF LENDERS AND ADDRESSES FOR NOTICES

Page 2 of 2

Part 2 - Addresses for Notices to Borrower and Guarantors:

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

Name: PNC Bank, National Association

Address: 1600 Market Street, 22nd Floor, F2-F070-22-2

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attention: Kirk Mader, Senior Vice President

With a Copy To:

PNC Bank, National Association

Loan Administrator — Team Lead

Commercial Loan Administration

PNC Harborside

One East Pratt Street

4^th Floor W, Mail Stop C3-C411-04-1

Baltimore, Maryland 21202

BORROWER:

Name: SL Industries, Inc.

SL Delaware, Inc.

SL Delaware Holdings, Inc.

Teal Electronics Corporation

RFL Electronics, Inc.

SL Montevideo Technology, Inc.

SL Surface Technologies, Inc.

MTE Corporation

Cedar Corporation

MEX Holdings LLC

SL Power Electronics Corporation

SLGC Holdings, Inc.

SLMTI DS LLC

Address: 520 Fellowship Road, Suite A-114

SCHEDULE 1.1(B) - 2

Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

GUARANTORS:

Name: SL Power Electronics Ltd.

Industrias SL, S.A. de C.V.

Condor Power Supplies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

SL Xianghe Power Electronics Corp.

SL Shanghai Power Electronics Corp.

SL Shanghai International Trading Corp.

Cedro de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

TPE de Mexico, S. de R.L. De C.V.

Address: 520 Fellowship Road, Suite A-114

Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

SCHEDULE 1.1(B) - 2

SCHEDULE 1.1(P)

PERMITTED LIENS

SCHEDULE 6.1.1

QUALIFICATIONS TO DO BUSINESS

SCHEDULE 6.1.2

SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE 6.1.5

LITIGATION

China

During 2012, the Company conducted an investigation to determine whether certain employees of SL Xianghe Power Electronics Corporation, SL Shanghai Power Electronics Corporation and SL Shanghai International Trading Corporation, three of the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries incorporated and operating exclusively in China, may have improperly provided gifts and entertainment to government officials (the “China Investigation”). The Company had retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to assist in the China Investigation. Based upon the China Investigation, the estimated amounts of such gifts and entertainment were not material to the Company’s financial statements. Such estimates did not take into account the costs to the Company of the China Investigation itself, or any other additional costs.

The China Investigation included determining whether there were any violations of laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Company’s outside counsel contacted the DOJ and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voluntarily to disclose that the Company conducted an internal investigation, and agreed to cooperate fully. On September 26, 2013, the DOJ notified the Company that it had closed its inquiry into this matter without filing criminal charges. The Company has not received an update from the SEC regarding the status of its inquiry. The Company cannot predict at this time whether any action may be taken by the SEC.

Environmental

On December 3, 2012, the Company received a demand letter from the State of New Jersey. The demand is for $1,300,000 for past and future cleanup costs and $500,000 for natural resource damages (“NRD”) for a total of $1,800,000 (the “New Jersey Claim”). Although the Company and its counsel believe that it has meritorious defenses to any claim for reimbursement, on February 13, 2013 the Company offered to pay $250,000 to fully resolve the claim presented by the State of New Jersey for past costs, future costs and NRD at the Puchack Well Field Superfund site. The State of New Jersey has not responded to date.

The matters set forth on Schedule 6.1.14 are incorporated herein by reference.

SCHEDULE 6.1.14

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The disclosures set forth on this Schedule 6.1.14 updates and supplements the disclosures on Schedule 6.1.14 attached to the Second Amendment and Joinder to Credit Agreement and to Security Agreement, dated June 20, 2013, by and among Borrowers, Guarantors, Agent and the Lenders from time to time party thereto, which schedule is incorporated by reference.

The Company has been and is the subject of administrative actions that arise from its ownership of SL Surface Technologies, Inc. (“SurfTech”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, the assets of which were sold in November 2003. SurfTech formerly operated chrome-plating facilities in Pennsauken Township, New Jersey (the “Pennsauken Site”) and Camden, New Jersey (the “Camden Site”).

In 2006 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named the Company as a potential responsible party (a “PRP”) in connection with the remediation of the Puchack Well Field, which has been designated as a Superfund Site. The EPA is remediating the Puchack Well Field Superfund Site in two separate operable units. The first operable unit (“OU-1”) consists of an area of chromium groundwater contamination in three aquifers that exceeds the selected cleanup standard. The second operable unit (“OU-2”) pertains to sites that are allegedly the sources of contamination for the first operable unit.

The Company has reached an agreement with both the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and EPA effective April 30, 2013 related to its liability for both OU-1 and OU-2 pursuant to the terms of a Consent Decree which governs the agreement. Specifically, the Company has agreed to perform the remediation for OU-2 and pay a fixed sum for the EPA’s past cost for OU-2 and a portion of the EPA’s past cost for OU-1. The payments are to be made in five equal payments of $2,141,000, for a total $10,705,000, plus interest. The Company has also agreed to pay the EPA’s costs for oversight of the OU-2 remediation. The United States District Court judge signed the Consent Decree effective April 30, 2013, thereby triggering the Company’s obligation under the Consent Decree. On May 10, 2013, the Company made the first payment related to its obligation under the Consent Decree in the amount of $2,185,000, which included interest. On May 20, 2014, the Company made the second payment related to its obligation under the Consent Decree in the amount of $2,211,000, which included interest. The next three payments will be made on the anniversary of the prior year’s payment plus ten days in the same amount of $2,141,000, plus interest. In 2013, the Company had obtained financial assurances for the OU-2 remediation and the fixed payments as required by the terms of the Consent Decree. The financial instruments did not affect the Company’s availability under its Credit facility.

The Company is currently in the final stages of the design phase of the remediation activities for OU-2. The “90% Pre-Final Remediation Design” (the “Pre-Final Design”) is expected to be submitted during the first week of August as required by the Scope of Work to complete the Company’s obligation under the Consent Decree. The Company expects the EPA to respond to this submission by the end of August. The Pre-Final Design, once approved by the EPA, will essentially set the scope of work for the Company’s remediation responsibility related to OU-2 under the terms of the Consent Decree. The Company expects to incur significant remediation costs, which have been accrued, to commence in the fall of 2014 and continue into early 2016.

On December 3, 2012, the Company received a demand letter from the State of New Jersey. The demand is for $1,300,000 for past and future cleanup costs and $500,000 for natural resource damages (“NRD”) for a total of $1,800,000 (the “New Jersey Claim”). Although the Company and its counsel believe that it has meritorious defenses to any claim for reimbursement, on February 13, 2013 the Company offered to pay $250,000 to fully resolve the claim presented by the State of New Jersey for past costs, future costs and NRD at the Puchack Well Field Superfund site. The State of New Jersey has not responded to the Company’s counter-offer.

In the ordinary course of its business the Company is and may be subject to other loss contingencies pursuant to foreign and domestic federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations and may be party to certain legal actions, frequently involving complaints by terminated employees and disputes with customers, suppliers and others. In the opinion of management, any such other loss contingencies are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

Loss contingencies include potential obligations to investigate and eliminate or mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites, such as Superfund sites and other facilities, whether or not they are currently in operation. The Company is currently participating in environmental assessments and cleanups at a number of sites and in the future may be involved in additional environmental assessments and cleanups. Based upon investigations completed to date by the Company and its independent engineering-consulting firms, management has provided an estimated accrual for all known costs believed to be probable and costs that can be reasonably estimated in the amount of $19,413,000, of which $11,247,000 is included as other long-term liabilities, with the remainder recorded as other short-term accrued liabilities, as of June 30, 2014. However, it is the nature of environmental contingencies that other circumstances might arise, the costs of which are indeterminable at this time due to such factors as changing government regulations and stricter standards, the unknown magnitude of cleanup costs, and the unknown timing and extent of the remedial actions that may be required. These other circumstances could result in additional expenses or judgments, or offsets thereto. The adverse resolution of any one or more of these other circumstances could have a material adverse effect on the business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows of the Company. The Company’s environmental costs primarily relate to discontinued operations and such costs have been recorded in discontinued operations, net of tax.

There are three sites on which the Company may incur material environmental costs in the future as a result of past activities of its former subsidiary, SurfTech. There are two Company owned sites related to its former subsidiary, SurfTech. These sites are located in Pennsauken, New Jersey (the “Pennsauken Site”) and in Camden, New Jersey (the “Camden Site”). There is also a third site, which is not owned by the Company, referred to as the “Puchack Well Field Site.” The Puchack Well Field Site and the Pennsauken Site are part of the Puchack Well Field Superfund Site.

With respect to the Camden Site, the Company has reported soil contamination and a groundwater contamination plume emanating from the site. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) approved, and the Company implemented in 2010, an interim remedial action pilot study to inject neutralizing chemicals into the unsaturated soil. Based on an assessment of post-injection data, our consultants believe the pilot study can be implemented as a full scale soil remedy to treat unsaturated contaminated soil. A Remedial

Action Workplan for soils (“RAWP”) is being developed. The RAWP will select the injection remedy as the site wide remedy for unsaturated soils, along with demolition and proper disposal of the former concrete building slab and targeted excavation and disposal of impacted soil immediately underlying the slab. Additionally, the RAWP will address a small area of impacted soil off the property. The RAWP for soils will be submitted to the NJDEP in the third quarter of 2014, by the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (“LSRP”) for the site. The RAWP is scheduled to be implemented in the fourth quarter of 2014, so that the injections do not impact the bio-barrier pilot tests mentioned below. The Company’s environmental consultants finalized an interim remedial action pilot study to treat on-site contaminated groundwater, consisting of injecting food-grade product, into the groundwater at the down gradient property boundary, to create a “bio-barrier.” The pilot study includes post-injection monitoring to assess the bio-barrier’s ability to treat contaminated groundwater. Implementation of the groundwater pilot study is currently underway with post-injection effectiveness monitoring expected to continue through the third quarter of 2015.

As previously reported, the Company is currently participating in environmental assessments and cleanups at a number of sites. One of these sites is a commercial facility, located in Wayne, New Jersey. Contaminated soil and groundwater has undergone remediation with NJDEP and LSRP oversight, but contaminants of concern (“COCs”) in groundwater and surface water, which extend off-site, still remain above applicable NJDEP remediation standards. A soil remedial action plan has been developed to remove the new soil source contamination that continues to impact groundwater. Our LSRP filed a RAWP and permit application with the NJDEP to implement a supplemental groundwater remedial action that will likely consist of additional in-situ injections of food grade product into on-site groundwater. The NJDEP has issued a permit authorizing the remedial action to proceed which is scheduled to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014. Estimates have been developed by the Company’s consultants, which includes costs to enhance the existing vapor intrusion system, remedial injections, soil excavation and additional tests and remedial activities. Costs related to this site are recorded as part of discontinued operations, net of tax. The “Remedial Investigation” deadline for this site has been extended to May 7, 2016.

The Company has reported soil and groundwater contamination at the facility of SL-MTI located on its property in Montevideo, Minnesota. An analysis of the contamination has been completed and a remediation plan has been implemented at the site pursuant to the remedial action plan approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

A soil vapor extraction system has been operating at the site since October 2008. In 2013 the regulatory and screening levels for soil vapor and groundwater were lowered for some of the contaminants at the site. In response to this regulatory change, SL-MTI’s consultants are conducting additional testing to delineate site impacts and update the site conceptual model. Costs related to this site are recorded as a component of continuing operations.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, environmental accruals of $19,413,000 and $21,789,000, respectively, have been recorded by the Company in accrued liabilities – other and in other long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

Exhibit B

Amended and Supplemented Schedules to Security Agreement

SCHEDULE A

TO

SECURITY AGREEMENT

SECURITY INTEREST DATA SUMMARY

1. The chief executive office of the following companies (each a “Debtor”) is located at the address set forth opposite its name:

2. Each Debtor’s true and full name is as follows. Each Debtor uses the following trade names or fictitious names:

3. Each Debtor’s form of organization is as follows:

4. Each Debtor’s state of organization is as follows:

5. Each Debtor’s EIN # is as follows:

6. Each Debtor’s organization ID # is (if any exists) is as follows:

7. All of each Debtor’s personal property which has not been delivered to the Agent pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or the Credit Agreement is now, and will be at all future times, located at such Debtor’s chief executive office as described in Paragraph 1 above, except as specified below:

8. All of each Debtor’s books and records, including those relating to accounts payable and accounts receivable, are kept at such Debtor’s chief executive office as described in Paragraph 1 above, except as specified below:

None

Exhibit C

Effectiveness Conditions