UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported):  October 11, 2013

Health Discovery Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

4243 Dunwoody Club Drive, Suite 202, Atlanta GA  30350

(Address of principal executive offices / Zip Code)

(678) 336-5300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: 

On Friday, October 11, 2013, Health Discovery Corporation (the “Company”) held a duly called meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”).  In attendance were Kevin Kowbel, Chairman, Henry Kaplan, John Norris, William Quirk, and Eric Winger; absent were Sumio Takeichi and Norman Mineta.  The primary agenda item was to confirm who served on the Board, since Messrs. Takeichi and Mineta had presented obtuse statements or behavior, or failed to present clarifying statements or behavior, upon which the Company could rely with certainty.

Specifically, on August 2, 2013, Mr. Takeichi verbally indicated his disappointment with the termination of his friend Mr. Norris’ employment. Additionally, he gave a verbal indication that he may not want to serve as a Director, but his language was unclear. The Company immediately sought to confirm his resignation in writing.  After numerous attempts to contact Mr. Takeichi, who lives in Japan, the Company never received a response. Additionally, Mr. Norris indicated in several hostile emails following the August 2, 2013, Board meeting at which he was dismissed as CEO, that Mr. Mineta would “surely resign” from the Board.  Again, in an attempt to confirm Mr. Mineta’s intent and to ascertain whether Mr. Norris’ representations were correct, the Company tried to contact Mr. Mineta via numerous emails and phone calls. However, Mr. Mineta never responded and was utterly silent, as he has been since his appointment to the Board in May 2013.

At the October 11, 2013 Board meeting, Mr. Norris represented himself to be the legally authorized proxy for both Messrs. Takeichi and Mineta.  The Board delayed the start of the meeting so Mr. Norris could contact them and encourage them to dial in to the Board meeting.  Mr. Norris was unsuccessful.  He then stated that Mr. Takeichi “voted with his feet” by not attending the meeting, and therefore the Board should consider Mr. Takeichi's resignation effective as of August 2, 2013, which the Board then accepted.  

  Mr. Norris' friend Mr. Mineta accepted an appointment to the Board on May 10, 2013 and then was elected as a director at the Annual Shareholder Meeting on July 25, 2013, which Mr. Mineta did not attend. In fact, Mr. Mineta has never attended any Board meeting and has failed to respond to numerous attempts to communicate with him. 

At the Friday, October 11, 2013, Board meeting, Mr. Norris was invited to resign as a director. Mr. Norris equivocated and said he would respond by the end of business that day but he did not despite many attempts by Mr. Kowbel to reach him.  Then on Monday, October 14, 2013, Mr. Norris emailed to Mr. Kowbel what he called a “joint resignation letter” from himself and Messrs. Takeichi and Mineta. Mr. Mineta had only once communicated with the Company in any way, much less that he had resigned from the Board and so, based on Mr. Norris’ representations that he was Mr. Mineta's proxy, the Board accepted all the resignations.

  In this joint resignation letter, attached as Exhibit 99.1, Messrs. Norris, Mineta and Takeichi make factually incorrect statements and utterly unsubstantiated assertions about the Company and its current directors. However, while Mr. Norris’ attack on the current Board members is shocking since he personally recruited, interviewed, and voted to approve the nomination or appointment of each individual, it is not surprising since his condemnation of and accusations against those very same persons started the day he was terminated and has continued until now. 

The Company is also surprised by the assertion that Joseph McKenzie, D.V.M., the former Chairman of the Board, "is a signatory to the SEC Complaint, resigned from the Board earlier for other reasons, and strongly supports our decision to jointly resign in protest.”  The Company has no knowledge of any SEC complaint, or any basis for a complaint.  It should also be noted that Dr. McKenzie never resigned from the Board; in fact, he chose not to stand for election and therefore his term as a director simply expired on July 25, 2013, without any resignation. 

Ever since the Board terminated Mr. Norris as CEO, and allowed Mr. Robert Kelly’s consultant’s agreement to be non-renewed, the Company has been on the receiving end of several coordinated, hostile and threatening emails from each of these individuals.  See Section ITEM 8.01 below for more information on Mr. Kelly’s “claims” against the Company. 

To put things into some context, during Mr. Norris’ 8-month tenure as Chief Executive Officer from December 18, 2012 to August 2, 2013, he was paid over $200,000, granted 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock at no cost to Mr. Norris, and was awarded 16,500,000 options that potentially represented over 5% of the ownership of the Company's stock.  Furthermore, the day after the Shareholders Meeting, Mr. Norris demanded lucrative long-term employment contracts both for himself and for Mr. Kelly, which the Board declined to grant.

  Following his dismissal a week later, the Company had only approximately $871,000 in cash equivalents (based on the value of stock held in NeoGenomics, Inc.) and zero new prospects for near-term revenue from any of the extremely large companies he was pursuing.  Mr. Norris began with the Company in September 2009 with the specific task of generating revenue in the health field; however in the 40 months before Dr. McKenzie named him as CEO, Mr. Norris never produced any material revenue or new business relationships for the Company.  

The joint resignation letter claims that the current Board is wasting Company assets.  That is false. In fact, due to the efforts of current management, the Company’s monthly burn rate has been reduced more than 60% from the approximately $185,000 during Mr. Norris’ tenure. The Company has also identified our likeliest projects for near-term revenue and our current efforts are focused on these real-world opportunities.  This is in stark contrast to the financial and business management during Mr. Norris' tenure.

  The Company believes the hostility exhibited in the joint resignation letter is based solely upon Mr. Norris' (and Mr. Kelly’s) departure from the Company and that the allegations therein are nothing more than a pretext for criticizing a Board that fired them.

On September 10, 2013, the Company was informed by Mr. Kelly that he had filed a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) against the Company.  The substance and even the nature of Mr. Kelly’s complaint remains unclear, as well as what office at the SEC received the complaint. In fact, the Company has no copy of the alleged complaint and no evidence of any complaint actually being filed beyond Mr. Kelly’s assertions in his emails. In fact, soon after he was informed on July 31, 2013 that his consulting contract would not be renewed, he emailed the Company that he would communicate with a personal friend who headed a department at the SEC.

Mr. Kelly was a long time friend of Mr. Norris who hired him as a consultant soon after his appointment as CEO.  His consulting agreement began on February 1, 2013 and was not renewed when it expired on July 31, 2013 and for which he was fully compensated.  During this time, he was paid $128,000 for his work on a part-time basis. On September 11, 2013, Mr. Kelly informed the Company that he had filed a complaint with the State of Massachusetts Department of Labor for unpaid wages and expenses.  Mr. Kelly was never an employee of the Company and therefore is not owed any wages. Mr. Kelly submitted expense reports in late July 2013, which the Company is reviewing and will reimburse in the ordinary course of business if the supporting material is complete. In addition, the Company believes Mr. Kelly has violated several components of the consulting agreement including, but not limited to, non-disparagement and returning all Company property. 

The Company fully intends to aggressively defend itself from the claims made by Messrs. Norris, Takeichi, Mineta and Kelly.  In connection with these matters, the Company has concluded that it should review with fresh eyes the actions and decisions taken by officers and directors of the Company over the past few years. Based upon that review, the Company may call for an independent investigation by appropriate authorities if the findings reflect possibly improper dealings.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.