Item 1.  Financial Statements

OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 AND DECEMBER 31, 2012

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements

4

OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

*  Less than $1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements

5

OMAGE COMMERICAL FINANCE CORPORATION

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements

6

OMEGA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2013

NOTE 1.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management of Omega Commercial Finance Corp. (the Company), contain all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2013, the results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  The balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although management of the Company believes that the disclosures contained in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented therein not misleading. For further information, refer to the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expense during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

Business organization

Omega Commercial Finance Corporation (formerly known as DOL Resources, Inc.) (the “Company”) is a commercial real estate financing company that also provides asset backed lending services located in the Miami, Florida area. The Company was incorporated in the State of Wyoming on November 6, 1973. Since the Reorganization in September 2007, the Company’s business operations, through various subsidiaries, have been directed primarily on offering financing to the real estate markets in the United States.  The Company provides financial consulting services for short and medium term loans to borrowers primarily consisting of commercial real estate developers and speculators, business owners, landlords, and owners of core and non-core assets.  The Company focus on various alternative commercial real estate financings with an emphasis on loans secured by commercial real estate and also on financing non-core assets, including ground up developments, as well as core assets, including office buildings, multi-family residences, shopping centers, and luxury residential estates.  The loans consist of senior debt loans, mezzanine or subordinated loans, preferred equity, and other equity participation financing structures.  The Company’s operations are based primarily in Miami Beach, Florida.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries include the following:

CCRE (“CCRE”), a Florida limited liability company providing second- and third-tier real estate funding as well as partnering in development ventures.

Ωmega Capital Street LLC- a Nevada limited liability company which focuses on commercial mortgage-backed securities and by originating CMBS-style loans with proven and standard securitization underwriting criteria.

Ωmega CRE Group LLC – a Nevada limited liability company which focuses primarily on originating, investing in, acquiring and managing senior or mezzanine performing commercial real estate mortgage loans.

Ωmega Factoring LLC- an Ohio limited liability company focused on products to assist small to medium sized business owners with resolving their short-term working capital needs.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (“USGAAP”). The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the Company and its subsidiaries. Certain reclassifications to amounts reported in the June 30, 2012 consolidated financial statements have been made to conform to the June 30, 2013 presentation. All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

7

Management’s Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method following the guidance set forth in section 718-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosure about Stock-Based Compensation. This section requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. During the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded no compensation expense based on the fair value of services rendered in exchange for common shares issued to the Company’s officer.

The Company accounts for stock awards issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. The measurement date is the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. Stock awards granted to non-employees are valued at their respective measurement dates based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock and recognized as expense during the period in which services are provided.

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded $775,000 and $40,000 for outside services based on the fair value of services rendered in exchange for common shares, respectively. These approximated the fair value of the shares at the dates of issuances in the opinion of management.

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company issued to A.S. Austin Company, under their consulting agreements, warrants to purchase 85,713 and -0- shares of common stock at $.40 per share, respectively.

As of June 30, 2013, there are 25,641,000 options and 85,713 warrants outstanding.

Deferred Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when services are realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met:

(i)

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

(ii)

the services have been rendered and all required milestones achieved,

(iii)

 the sales price is fixed or determinable, and

(iv)

 collectability is reasonably assured.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports comprehensive income and its components following guidance set forth by section 220-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) items relate directly to investment securities (see Note 10).

8

Income (Loss) Per Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period.  Stock options and warrants associated with performance contracts totaling 25,641,000 shares are not considered in the calculation as the impact of the potential common shares would be to decrease loss per share. Therefore no diluted loss per share figures are presented.

Trading Securities

Trading securities was comprised of taxable corporate and government bonds which were purchased. The carrying value of the investment is the market price of the shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Any unrealized gain or loss are recorded under other income/(expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Risk and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the service industry, including, but not limited to, litigation, development of new technological innovations and dependence on key personnel.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Related Party Transactions

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include:

a. affiliates of the Company;

b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10-15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity;

c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profitsharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management;

d. principal owners of the Company;

e. management of the Company;

f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and

g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The consolidated financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include:

a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved;

b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements;

c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and

9

d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company had no fair value adjustments for liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2013. The Company did have losses reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date as of December 31, 2012.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 or for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Reclassifications

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 or for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated for subsequent events through the issuance date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements:

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on its financial condition or the results of its operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment”, which allows, but does not require, an entity when performing its annual goodwill impairment test the option to first do an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount for purposes of determining whether it is even necessary to perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. Accordingly, based on the option created in ASU 2011-08, the calculation of a reporting unit’s fair value is not required unless, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is less, the quantitative impairment test is then required. ASU 2011-08 also provides for new qualitative indicators to replace those currently used. Prior to ASU 2011-08, entities were required to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis, by first comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2011-08 during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

10

In December 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, “Balance Sheet - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” to enhance disclosure requirements relating to the offsetting of assets and liabilities on an entity's balance sheet. The update requires enhanced disclosures regarding assets and liabilities that are presented net or gross in the statement of financial position when the right of offset exists, or that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. The new disclosure requirements relating to this update are retrospective and effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The update only requires additional disclosures, as such, the Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”. The guidance allows companies to perform a “qualitative” assessment to determine whether further impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary, similar in approach to the goodwill impairment test.

ASU 2012-02 allows companies the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, before determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. Companies can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some, or all of its indefinite-lived intangible assets or choose to only perform the quantitative impairment test for any indefinite lived intangible in any period.

ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the guidance and the impact ASU 2012-02 will have on its

consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013 the FASB issued ASC Update No. 2013-02 “Comprehensive Income Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)”, which amends ASC Topic 220. The amendments require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) by component. In addition an entity is required to present either on the face of the Statement of Income on in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI and should be provided by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about these amounts. The changes to the ASC as a result of this updated guidance are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 will not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on its financial condition or the results of its operations.

NOTE 2.

INCOME TAXES

At June 30, 2013, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $7,633,663 that expire in various years through the year 2024.

Due to cumulative operating losses, there is no provision for current federal or state income taxes for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for federal and state income tax purposes.

The Company’s deferred tax asset at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consists of net operating loss carry forwards calculated using federal and state effective tax rates equating to approximately $2,595,446 less a valuation allowance in the amount of ($2,696,446). Because of the Company’s lack of earnings history, the deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance.

The Company’s total deferred tax asset as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:

11

The reconciliation of income taxes computed at the federal and state statutory income tax rate to total income taxes as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is as follows:

NOTE 3.

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE and ACCRUED LIABILITIES

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company has outstanding $22,537 and $29,483 in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities relating to operational expenses and legal fees, respectively.

NOTE 4.

CUSTOMER DEPOSITS

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had outstanding Customer deposit balances of $15,540 and $150,000, respectively. This remaining balance of $15,540 as of June 30, 2013 is being refunded to the customer at $1,000 per month, as agreed between the parties.

NOTE 5.

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Capital Stock

The Company is currently authorized to issue unlimited common shares at $.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 Series A preferred shares at $200 par value per share, and 5,000,000 preferred shares at $5.00 par value per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 15,000,000 common shares to an officer of the Company in exchange for $750,000 in services rendered, valued at the closing stock price at the date of issuance.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the officer returned 13,000,000 shares to be retired.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to an unrelated party for services rendered, valued at the closing stock price at the date of issuance.

Effective on January 8, 2013, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase to unlimited the number of authorized shares of its common stock.

On March 27, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the designations, terms, powers, preferences and rights of the Series A Redeemable Cumulative Preferred Stock as originally reported in its Form 8-K filed on October 15, 2012.  The amendment decreased the dividend rate to 4.50% and shortened the redemption obligation to 3 years.

In February, 2013, the Company issued 300,000 shares of its common stock as a deposit to secure the purchase of the building and property at 983 Washington, Miami, Florida. The Company recorded as an Other asset $30,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of the required deposit.

In March 2013, the Company issued 850,000 shares of common stock to A.S. Austin for marketing services and recorded an expense of $93,500 or $.11 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

In March 2013, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock to NewsUSA for marketing services and recorded an expense of $16,500 or $.11 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

In March, 2013, the Company issued 13,400,000 shares of common stock to Lambert as part of the Standby Purchase Agreement (See Note 14) and recorded the cost of $2,357,060 or $.1759 per share to Deferred equity offering costs, a contra equity account.

In March, 2013, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Stephen Hand as collateral for the TD bank loan repurchase and recorded an expense of $351,800 or $.1759 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.  These shares were voided in June, 2013. These shares were cancelled on ____, 2013.

In March, 2013, the Company issued 100,000,000 shares of restricted common stock as a reserve. As of the date of this filing, the shares have been cancelled and retired.

12

On April 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Research Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Grass Roots Research and Distribution, Inc. (“GRRD”) for a 30-day research project.  For these services, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted stock to GRRD with anti-dilution rights which expire at the conclusion of the contract. The Company recorded an expense of $62,500 or $.125 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On April 22, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted stock to La Postal for services rendered in furtherance of the agreements in process. The Company recorded an expense of $40,000 or $.08 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 1, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted stock to Grass Roots, as part of the contract executed in April, 2013.  The Company recorded an expense of $10,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 1, 2013, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares to A. Austin, in compliance with their consulting contract terms. The Company recorded an expense of $300,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 9, 2013, the Company issued T. Buxton 1,500,000 shares of restricted stock for services rendered.  The Company recorded an expense of $150,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 9, 2013, the Company issued Global Discovery 1,250,000 shares of restricted stock for services rendered.  The Company recorded an expense of $125,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 31, 2013, the Company issued 150,000,000 shares to its subsidiary, Omega Capital Street, in anticipation of share exchange agreements to be executed.  The Company recorded the transaction at par value with no expense associated.

On June 3, 2013, the Company issued Lambert 10,000,000 shares under the Standby Share Agreement.  The Company recorded $650,000 as Deferred equity offering costs.

On June 27, 2013, the Company issued its attorneys 500,000 shares of restricted stock in exchange for services.  The Company recorded the stock issuance at the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

In July 2013, the Company issued 13,000,000 shares of restricted stock in exchange for services to consultants, and 28,571 warrants in compliance with the A.S. Austin contract.

The Company had 240,536,150 and 58,768,150 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, including 150,000,000 shares issued to a subsidiary, Omega Capital Street, in anticipation of share exchange business combinations and mergers.

There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

OPTIONS

As part of the Standby Purchase Agreement with Lambert (See Note 14), the Company granted to Lambert a 5-year Option to Purchase Shares for 25,641,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of the lesser of (i) $0.40 per share or (ii) 110% of the lowest daily VWAP for our common stock as reported by Bloomberg during the thirty trading days prior to the date the option is exercised. The options expire March 7, 2018. The Company did not grant any registration rights with respect to any share of common stock issuable upon exercise of the options. The fair values of the options expense was calculated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model at issue date using the following assumptions:

No stock options were issued in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

WARRANTS

As part of the consulting agreement with A.S. Austin Company, Inc., the Company will grant warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock, to be granted ratably over the term of the agreement on the first day of each calendar month. The Warrants shall be exercisable at any time or from time to time commencing on the grant date at an exercise price of $.40 per share. The Warrants will expire two years from the date of issuance and will be subject to customary stock splits and payable in legal tender.

13

As of June 30, 2013, 85,713 warrants to purchase our common stock have been issued.  No warrants have been exercised.

Stock Warrants and Options

Stock warrants/options outstanding and exercisable on June 30, 2013 are as follows:

DEFERERED EQUITY OFFERING COSTS

In connection with the Standby Purchase Agreement with Lambert (See Note 14), the Company incurred the following costs through September 30, 2012: (1) stock issued to Lambert (See Note 14) as a commitment fee, fair value of $2,357; (2) options issued to Lambert as performance incentive, fair value of $4,500,950. These costs will be charged to additional paid-in-capital (“APIC”) as shares are sold to Lambert.

On June 3, 2013, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to Lambert under the Standby Purchase Agreement and a cost of $650,000 was charged to APIC, valued at the closing price of the stock on the day of stock issuance.

In the event it is determined no additional shares will be sold under the Standby Purchase Agreement, any deferred equity offering costs will be expensed at such time.

NOTE 6.

LEASE COMMITMENTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has a month to month lease at $563 per month with an unrelated landlord. The Company also has a month to month lease for an executive office at $95 per month with an unrelated landlord. Therefore, no future minimum lease commitment exists beyond one year.

NOTE 7.

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that would then share in the income of the Company, subject to anti-dilution limitations. Basic and diluted income (loss) per share was the same for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Stock options and warrants associated with performance contracts totaling 25,726,713 shares are not considered in the calculation as the impact of the potential common shares would be to decrease loss per share. Therefore no diluted loss per share figures are presented. The Company posted losses of ($.01) and ($.01) per basic and diluted share for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

NOTE 8.

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the periods ending June 30, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows:

Cash paid during the periods ending June 30, 2013 and 2012 for interest and income taxes:

NOTE 9.

SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company follows paragraph 280 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about segment reporting. This Statement requires companies to report information about operating segments in interim and annual financial statements. It also requires segment disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The Company determined that it did not have any separately reportable operating segments as of June 30, 2013 and 2012.

14

NOTE 10.

GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has negative working capital of ($2,199,093) and a retained deficit of ($7,633,664). There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the substantial additional capital resources necessary to implement its business plan or that any assumptions relating to its business plan will prove to be accurate. The Company is pursuing sources of additional financing and there can be no assurance that any such financing will be available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Any inability to obtain additional financing will have a material adverse effect on the Company, including possibly requiring the Company to cease operations.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

NOTE 11.

TRADING SECURITIES

As of June 30, 2013, the Company held no securities in its margin account and $818 in money market account, which is included in the cash balance of $9,932. This includes interest received of $3,765, interest expense of ($2,256), a loss from the sale of securities of ($24,352).

The Company held no investments or securities as of June 30, 2012.

NOTE 12.

JUDGMENTS PAYABLE

The Company currently has three judgments against it. Included in the accompanying balance sheets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is $2,300,948 stemming from the following lawsuits.

Sebaco Siete, S.A. v. Omega Realty Partners, LLC, et. al.  11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Case No.: 06-11204 CA 13 FJ. A default judgment against impleader defendants in the amount of $1,564,832 was filed in 2009.

Jorge Ramos v. Omega Capital Funding, LLC, et. al. in the circuit court of the 11^th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Case No.: 07-38288 CA 09. A final summary judgment was filed in 2009 in the amount of $85,000.

Luxury Home LLC v. Omega et. al. Case No.: CV2011-004554. A default judgment in the amount of $651,116 was filed in 2012 for a previous year’s claim.

NOTE 13

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company compensated its officer $53,307 and $20,934 in cash and equivalents, respectively.

NOTE 14.

MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

EQUITY RESTRUCTURING

Effective on January 8, 2013, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase to unlimited the number of authorized shares of our common stock.

On March 27, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the designations, terms, powers, preferences and rights of the Series A Redeemable Cumulative Preferred Stock as originally reported in its Form 8-K filed on October 15, 2012.  The amendment decreased the dividend rate to 4.50% and shortened the redemption obligation to 3 years.

15

TERMINATION OF DUTCHESS INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

On March 12, 2012, the Company entered into the Investment Agreement with Dutchess Opportunity Fund, II, LP (“Duchess”). Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, Dutchess committed to purchase up to $25 million of common stock over the course of 36 months. No sales of our common stock were made under this agreement, and the Company terminated this agreement on February 7, 2013.

ACQUISITION OF USA TAX & INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and AMERICAN INVESTMENT SERVICES LLC

On October 16, 2012, the Company entered into a Definitive Agreement for The Share Exchange & Acquisition of USA Tax & Insurance Services, Inc. (“USTIS”) and American Investment Services LLC (“AIS), (together the “Agreement”), whereby by agreed to purchase all of the outstanding equity and assets of both USTIS and AIS from Stephen Hand for $20 million. In accordance with the Agreement, the Company are required to create and authorize Series B Preferred Stock and conduct a registered offering of these shares to raise funds to pay the purchase price. The initial agreement expired December 15, 2012. The Company entered into amendments to the Agreement, on January 10, 2013 which extended the closing to January 30, 2013, and on January 23, 2013 extending the closing through April 30, 2013. These amendments removed the obligation for creating and selling Series B Preferred Stock in an offering, as well as reduced the purchase price from $20,000,000 to $10,400,000 plus payment of stock compensation as part of a roll-up acquisition strategy. Since the closing did not occur by April 30, 2013, USTIS and AIS can terminate the Agreement and it will become of no further force or effect. As of the date of this filing, the Agreement has not closed.

COMMERCIAL CONTRACT TO PURCHASE PROPERTY

On December 13, 2012, the Company entered into a Commercial Contract to purchase 0.15 acres of real estate including a 12,500 sq. ft. professional service building located at 983 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 from Club Investment Group, LLC for $11.5 million. In February, 2013, the Company deposited 300,000 shares of common stock valued at $.10 per share or $30,000, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services, into an escrow account. The closing is required to take place no later than February 11, 2013. The Company is currently negotiating with the seller of this property to extend the closing date and the payment terms under the agreement. As of June 30, 2013, the shares remain on deposit pending the contract closing.

JOINT VENTURE – GARDENS VE

On February 20, 2012, CCRE, a wholly owned subsidiary of Omega Commercial Finance Corp., entered into the Strategic Alliance Agreement (the “Strategic Alliance”) with Gardens VE Limited (Company No. 07071936), a British Company (“Gardens”), and its management, whereby the parties agreed to form a strategic alliance for the acquisition and refurbishment of the La Posta Golf Club & Luxury Hotel.  Under the Agreement, Gardens has free and clear, unencumbered title to the fixed assets and issues equal to forty-nine (49%) percent of their ownership interests in Gardens to CCRE in exchange for future fundraising for operating capital and related expenses. CCRE is responsible for the arrangement and contribution of up to but no more than fifty-eight million dollars ($58,000,000 US) over the course of the operation as needed per the budgeted projected cost for the Strategic Alliance but not to exceed 10 years. The principal is responsible for the day-to-day operation for the entire duration of the project as it pertains to the future refurbishment phase and he has currently placed the property under contract with a hard deposit.  In addition he is responsible for transferring free and clear with an unencumbered title of fixed assets in order to support future financing for all phases covering the acquisition on through the refurbishment of the property. The termination of the strategic alliance is at the discretion of both parties or upon the completion of the refurbishment and or disposition of the stabilized income-producing asset. Gardens has not completed the acquisition of La Posta and we will continue to work with the principal and general manager to continue our efforts under the Strategic Alliance to raise additional capital to meet our funding obligations to complete this transaction.

As of March 27, 2013, an operating agreement addendum (the “Addendum”) was issued by the Company and Gardens whereby CCRE will now own 95% of Gardens in exchange 1,000,000 shares of our unregistered common stock. The principal will retain a 75% profit participating interest pro rata for all mortgages, liens, operating expenses and or encumbrances on Garden’s development/projects. As of June 30, 2013, the details of the agreement have not been finalized.

JOINT VENTURE – TOWERS

On June 27, 2012, CCRE, a wholly owned subsidiary of Omega Commercial Finance Corp., entered into the Strategic Alliance Agreement (the “Strategic Alliance II”) with Towers Real Estate Limited, a British Company (“Towers”), and its management, whereby the parties agreed to form a strategic alliance for the acquisition and construction of the Le Principesse real estate located in Mestre-Venice, Italy.  Under the Agreement, Towers has free and clear, unencumbered title to the fixed assets and issues equal to forty-nine (49%) percent of their ownership interests in Towers to CCRE in exchange for future fundraising for operating capital and related expenses. CCRE is responsible for the arrangement and contribution of up to but no more than three hundred seventy five million dollars ($375,000,000 US) over the course of the operation as needed per the budgeted projected cost for the Strategic Alliance.

16

On March 27, 2013, an operating agreement addendum (the “Addendum”) was issued by the Company and Towers whereby the principal in the development agreed to transfer an additional 46% interest in Towers to CCRE, giving CCRE a 95% ownership interest in the capital of Towers in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s unregistered common stock. The principal of Towers will retain a 75% profit participating interest pro rata for all mortgages, liens, operating expenses and or encumbrances on Tower’s development/projects.

As of June 30, 2013, the details of the agreement have not been finalized.

ACQUISITION OF VFG SECURITIES INC.

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into a Purchase & Option to Purchase Agreement with VFG Securities Incorporated, a California corporation (“VFG Securities”) to acquire 100% of VFG Securities for $750,000 in cash and common stock. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company agreed to pay the shareholders of VFG Securities (1) $125,000 upon the first closing to acquire 17% of the issued and outstanding common stock of VFG (the “First Closing”) and (2) $525,000 in cash (the “Deferred Cash Payment”) plus 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to acquire the remaining 83% of VFG common stock (the “Second Closing:”). The First Closing and initial $125,000 was paid upon VFG’s filing of a Form BD with the Financial Industries Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and at such time the Company received a 17% non-controlling minority ownership stake in VFG Securities and VFG Advisors LLC, a subsidiary of VFG Securities. The Second Closing is contingent on obtaining FINRA approval within 90 days of First Closing. In addition, the Purchase Price is subject to VFG Securities achieving gross revenue of at least $3,300,000 during the 12 month period ending on December 31, 2013 (the “Revenue Target”). In the event VFG does not meet its Revenue Target, then the Purchase Price will be reduced pro rata based on a gross revenue target on $3,500,000. In addition, the Second Closing is subject to the Company obtaining errors and omissions insurance for VFG Securities’ operations and other customary conditions of closing. As of the date of this filing, the Company filed an Application for Approval of Change in Ownership with FINRA pursuant to NASD Rule 1017 and a Form BD. We are awaiting FINRA approval on these filings which are required prior to the Second Closing and the transfer of the 83% interest in VFG to the Company. FINRA review process for approval of the proposed sale of VFG Securities could take up to nine months. The Company plans to complete the Second Closing once FINRA has approved the transfer.

EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT - LAMBERT PRIVATE EQUITY LLC

On February 8, 2013, the Company entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Lambert Private Equity LLC (“Lambert”). The Agreement provides us with an equity line whereby the Company can sell to Lambert, from time to time, our shares of common stock up to an aggregate value of $100 million over a thirty-six month period. Under the terms of the Agreement, once a registration statement becomes effective, the Company will have the right to deliver to Lambert from time to time a “Draw Down Notice” stating the dollar amount of common shares we intend to sell to Lambert, up to a maximum of $100 million. The purchase price of the shares identified in the Draw Down Notice shall be equal to 90% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of our common stock during the fifteen (15) trading dates following the date of the Draw Down Notice. The Company has the option to specify a floor price for any Draw Down Notice. In the event the shares fall below the floor price, the put will be temporarily suspended. The put will resume if, during the pricing period for that put, the common stock trades above the floor price. The Company has agreed to pay to Lambert a commitment fee of 13,094,014 shares of common stock following execution of the Agreement.  In connection with the Agreement, the Company granted to Lambert a 5-year Option to Purchase Shares for 25,641,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of the lesser of (i) $0.40 per share or (ii) 110% of the lowest daily VWAP for our common stock as reported by Bloomberg during the thirty trading days prior to the date the option is exercised. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to the Agreement to develop and support operations for our commercial real estate financing subsidiaries, Omega Capital Street LLC and Omega CRE Group LLC as well as for general corporate and working capital purposes. The Agreement will not be effective until the date a registration statement is declared effective by the SEC.  On March 8, 2013, the Company issued to Lambert 13,400,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $2,357,060 or $.1759 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services. On June 3, 2013, the Company issued to Lambert 10,000,000 shares of restricted stock, under this agreement. The Company recorded the value of the stock at the valuation specified in the Standby Purchase Agreement or $650,000 to APIC.

LOAN RECEIVABLE PURCHASE AND PROMISSORY NOTE

On March 7, 2013, we borrowed $231,500 from Stephen Hand. The promissory note has a maturity date of April 1, 2014 and a stated interest rate of 3.5%. As collateral for the repayment of the loan and in the event of a default hereon, the Company issued to Mr. Hand 2,000,000 shares of common stock and recorded an expense of $351,800 or $.1759 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services. In addition, on March 7, 2013, the Company entered into a repurchase agreement with Mr. Hand whereby he shall purchase from the Company for $4,330,000 a loan receivable which we plan to purchase from TD Bank in the original principle amount of $4,460,000 (the “TD Bank Loan:”). Under the terms of the loan purchase agreement we entered into with TD Bank, we agreed to purchase from TD Bank for $4,330,000 the TD Bank Loan, which purchase required us to deposit $216,500 in an escrow account as a refundable earnest money deposit to be applied to the purchase price after the Company completes a 30-day due diligence review. In the event the Company elects not to close on the purchase after the expiration of the 30-day due diligence period, the above transactions shall be rescinded, ab initio.

17

On May 13, 2013, the Company terminated the contract with TD Bank and has been released from any performance obligation under said contract. The Company is also released from any and all obligations to repay the promissory note dated March 7, 2013, in the principal amount of $231,500. The repurchase agreement dated March 7, 2013 has been terminated and the Company has been released from any and all obligations to perform under said agreement.  On ___, 2013, the Company cancelled the 2,000,000 shares issued to Mr. Hand.

NOTE 15.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In July 2013, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its unregistered common stock for services rendered and recorded an expense of approximately $34,000.

Management has determined that there are no further events subsequent to the balance sheet date that should be disclosed in these financial statements.

18

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical combined financial statements and the related notes. The management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect” and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc)., or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Current Report. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Current Report. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these forward-looking statements.

Overview

We were incorporated in the state of Wyoming on November 6, 1973 under the name DOL Resources, Inc.  From inception until October 2002, our primary business activity was the acquisition, disposition, commercialization and/or exploration of interests in oil, gas and/or coal properties.  In October 2002, we sold all of our oil and gas properties to Glauber Management Company whereupon we ceased any business operations and became a development stage company, whose activities were limited to that of a shell company seeking to merge with or acquire an operating business.

On September 14, 2007, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement and Share Exchange with Omega Capital Funding LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Omega Capital”) pursuant to which we acquired 100% ownership of Omega Capital (the “Reorganization”).  After the Reorganization, our business operations consisted of those of Omega Capital.  Prior thereto since 2002, we were a non-operating shell company with no revenue and minimal assets.  As a result of the Reorganization, we were no longer considered a shell company.

Since the Reorganization in September 2007, our business operations, through various subsidiaries, have been directed primarily on offering financing to the real estate markets in the United States.  We provide short and medium term loans to borrowers primarily consisting of commercial real estate developers and speculators, business owners, landlords, and owners of core and non-core assets.  We focus on various alternative commercial real estate financings with an emphasis on loans secured by commercial real estate and also on financing non-core assets, including ground up developments, as well as core assets, including office buildings, multi-family residences, shopping centers, and luxury residential estates.  The loans consist of senior debt loans, mezzanine or subordinated loans, preferred equity, and other equity participation financing structures.  Our operations are based primarily in Miami Beach, Florida.

Going Concern

As of June 30, 2013, we have not yet achieved profitable operations.  We have accumulated losses since inception, a working capital deficiency and we expect to incur further losses in the development of our business, all of which, according to our accountants, casts substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.  We intend to seek additional funds by equity financing through an offering of our securities and/or related party advances, however there is no assurance of additional funding being available.

Results of Operations

The results discussed below are for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. For comparative purposes, we are comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. 

Revenues

19

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2013 decreased by $12,555 compared to the same period in 2012 even though our sales increased primarily as a result of a reduction in consulting services related to ongoing projects. Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $7,670  compared to the same period in  2012 primarily as a result of a reduction in consulting services related to ongoing projects. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was 14.0% compared to 122.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 cost of sales as a percentage of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 24.7% compared to 58.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. These reductions were primarily as a result of the increase in sales discussed above partially offset by a reduction in consulting services related to ongoing projects.

Operating Expenses

Total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased by $331,330 compared to the same period in 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 by $786,449 compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to stock issued for services provided for consulting and marketing services provided to the Company.

Other Income (Expense)

Total other income (expense) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $0 and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $(22,843) compared to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  This increase was primarily due to a $24,352 loss on sale of trading securities, $2,256 in interest expenses, partially offset by an increase of $3,765 in interest income.

Loss From Operations

Our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased by $98,315 compared to the same period in 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $626,207 compared to the same period in 2012 due to the circumstances set forth above.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements. On June 30, 2013 we had total assets of $170,524compared to $253,031 on December 31, 2012, a reduction of $82,507 (32.6%).  We had a deficit in total stockholders’ equity of $2,168,501 on June 30, 2013 compared to the deficit of stockholders’ equity of $2,255,663 on December 31, 2012, a reduction in the deficit of $87,162.

All assets are booked at historical cost.  Management reviews on an annual basis the book value, along with the prospective dismantlement, restoration, and abandonment costs and estimate residual value for the assets, in comparison to the carrying values on the financial statements.

Financing - The Equity Line of Credit.  On February 8, 2013 we entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Lambert Private Equity LLC (“Lambert”).  The Agreement provides us with an equity line whereby we can sell to Lambert, from time-to-time, our shares of common stock up to an aggregate value of $100 million over a thirty-six month period. Under the terms of the Agreement, once a registration statement becomes effective we will have the right to deliver to Lambert from time-to-time a “Draw Down Notice” stating the dollar amount of common shares we intend to sell to Lambert, up to a maximum of $100 million. Our board of directors will also have the discretion to use the funds for purposes it deems to be in our best interest. There can be no assurance that once we file a registration statement, it will become effective or that we will realize any proceeds from the Agreement.  The Agreement will not be effective until the date a registration statement is declared effective by the SEC. On June 3, 2013, the Company issued to Lambert 10,000,000 shares of its common stock under this agreement.

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $(142,115) as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $113,615 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Theses changes were primarily due to an increase in our net loss partially offset by non-cash expenses in connection with the issuance of common stock for services rendered.

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $130,000 as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $1,016 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The increase was primarily a result of a $130,000 investment deposit on the purchase of VFG Securities Incorporated.

20

Cash Requirements

We have not yet achieved profitable operations and expect to incur further losses in the development of our business, cash needs to complete various transactions we have entered into and repay certain indebtedness, the result of which casts substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from business operations when they come due.  We intend to meet our financial needs for operations by equity and/or debt financing and/or related party advances. In the event we are unable to borrow or raise funds needed for our business, or we are unable to repay our current obligations when due, we will have to seek additional financing, and no assurances can be given that such financing would be available on a timely basis, on terms that are acceptable or at all. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of our planned operations which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and threaten our financial viability.

Our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission which was declared effective on January 30, 2013, permits us to sell up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock at $.10 per share for a proposed maximum aggregate offer price of $10,000,000 along with certain selling shareholders who may sell up 31,075,350 shares of our common stock.  As of the date of this report, we sold 10,000,000 shares under this registration statement to Lambert as discussed above.

Any additional funds raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities will reduce the percentage ownership of our stockholders who may experience additional dilution and such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock.

In the next six months, the company's goal is to achieve profitable operations through implementation of our proposed financing products and services.

We do not currently have any contractual restrictions on our ability to incur debt and, accordingly we could incur significant amounts of indebtedness to finance operations. Any such indebtedness could contain covenants which would restrict our operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are choosing to take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause an effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

21

Revenue Recognition

We will be primarily engaged in the sourcing of and providing advice in connection with second- and third-tier financing for commercial development and construction.  Revenues are generated from fixed non-refundable processing fees associated with the contractual agreement.  Revenues are recorded at the time each contract is signed and fees remitted.

The fees are non-refundable and fixed, which is unconditionally earned and is not contingent on success factors. We recognize revenues as amounts become billable in accordance with contract terms.  These revenues based on contractual agreement with us are recognized as the contracts are signed and the fees are received, and amounts are earned in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB 101”), as amended by SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”). We consider amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, the contract signed, and the processing fees remitted.

In the past our fees have not been refundable, which resulted in unclear contracts and several lawsuits.  Our contracts have been rewritten to clearly state the processing fees as non-refundable, and customers are clearly informed of the fees and policies.  If the Company elects to refund any processing fees, determined on a case by case basis, a loss provision will be recorded in the period in which the loss first becomes probable and reasonably estimable. Contract losses are determined by the contractual agreement and the amount of processing fees associated with the customer. There were no refunds or anticipated contract refunds as of June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value because of their short maturities.

Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities

The trends, uncertainties or other factors that may negatively affected the Company’s business and the finance, construction and new development industries in general may also affect the unconsolidated entities in which the Company may have investments. The Company will review each of its investments in unconsolidated entities on a quarterly basis to determine the recoverability of its investment. The Company evaluates the recoverability of its investment in unconsolidated entities, which entails a detailed cash flow analysis using many estimates including but not limited to expected sales pace, expected sales prices, expected incentives, costs incurred and anticipated, sufficiency of financing and capital, competition, and market conditions. When markets deteriorate and it is no longer probable that the Company can recover its investment in a joint venture, the Company impairs its investment. If a joint venture has its own loans or is principally a joint venture to hold an option, such impairment may result in the majority or all of our investment being impaired.

Income Taxes — Valuation Allowance

Significant judgment is required in estimating valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740, a valuation allowance is established against a deferred tax asset if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that such asset will not be realized. The realization of a deferred tax asset ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or carry forward periods under tax law. We periodically assesses the need for valuation allowances for deferred tax assets based on ASC 740’s “more-likely-than-not” realization threshold criterion. In our assessment, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency, and severity of current and cumulative income and losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryback or carry forward periods, its experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards being used before expiration, and tax planning alternatives.

In accordance with ASC 740, we assesses whether a valuation allowance should be established based on its determination of whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our assessment of the need for a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets includes assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in its consolidated financial statements or tax returns. We base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates and, in certain cases, on business plans and other expectations about future outcomes. Changes in existing tax laws or rates could affect actual tax results and future business results may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time. Our accounting for deferred tax assets represents its best estimate of future events using the guidance provided by ASC 740.

Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, particularly with respect to changes in facts and circumstances in future reporting periods (carry forward period assumptions), it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from the estimates used in our historical analyses. Our assumptions require significant judgment because the residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. If our results of operations are less than projected and there is insufficient objectively verifiable evidence to support the likely realization of its deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance would be required to reduce or eliminate its deferred tax assets.

22

Stock Based Compensation

From time to time, we have compensated our officers and vendors with the issuance of stock.  The value of the transaction is determined by the trading price on the day of the transactions.  We anticipate that we will continue to compensate our officers with stock and traditional payments in the future.  Since the stock price is variable and there is no assurance the stock price will remain at any level, the amount of stock issued for services in kind or bonus awards will vary, and dilution may occur. We do not issue options or warrants.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, who is also our Chief Financial Officer, CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2013.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes identified in connection with our internal control over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Other than as set forth below, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject and to the best of our knowledge, no such actions against us are contemplated or threatened.

The following is summary information on the cases against us or our affiliates.

Jorge Ramos v. Omega Capital Funding, LLC, et. al.  In the 11^th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida. Case No.: 07-38288 CA 09.  This matter resulted in a summary judgment against the Defendants on September 25, 2009 for $85,000. The judgment accrues interest at 8% annually and has yet to be satisfied.

Sebaco Siete, S.A. v. Omega Realty Partners, L.L.C., et. al.  In the 11^th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida.  Case No.: 06-11204 CA 13.  This matter resulted in a default final judgment against the Defendants in March 2008 for $1,564,832 plus fees and costs.  The judgment accrues interest at 11% annually and has yet to be satisfied.

23

Luxury Home, LLC v. Omega Commercial Finance Corporation, et. al.  In the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, Arizona. Case No.: CV2011-004554.  This breach of contract matter resulted in a default judgment against the Defendants in 2012 for $651,113 plus fees and costs.  The judgment accrues interest at 4.25% annually and has yet to be satisfied.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds.

On April 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Research Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Grass Roots Research and Distribution, Inc. (“GRRD”) for a 30-day research project.  For these services, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its unregistered common stock to GRRD with anti-dilution rights which expire at the conclusion of the contract. The Company recorded an expense of $62,500 or $.125 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On April 22, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its unregistered common stock to La Postal for services rendered in furtherance of the agreements in process. The Company recorded an expense of $40,000 or $.08 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 1, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its unregistered common stock to Grass Roots, as part of the contract executed in April, 2013.  The Company recorded an expense of $10,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 9, 2013, the Company issued Global Discovery 1,250,000 shares of its unregistered common stock for services rendered.  The Company recorded an expense of $125,000 or $.10 per share, the value of the stock which approximated the value of services.

On May 31, 2013, the Company issued 150,000,000 shares of its common stock to its subsidiary, Omega Capital Street, in anticipation of share exchange agreements to be executed.  The Company recorded the transaction at par value with no expense associated.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company issued to A.S. Austin Company, under its consulting agreement, warrants to purchase 85,713 shares of our unregistered common stock at $.40 per share.

In July 2013, the Company issued 13,000,000 shares of its unregistered common stock in exchange for services to consultants, and 28,571 warrants to purchase our common stock in compliance with the A.S. Austin contract.

These shares of our common stock were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). In addition, the recipients of our shares were sophisticated investors and had access to information normally provided in a prospectus regarding us. In addition, the recipients of the shares had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to allow us to include a legend on the shares stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. These restrictions ensure that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a "public offering." Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for the above transactions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Item 5. Other Information

24

Item 6. Exhibits

*

Filed herewith

**

In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

25