PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on June 29, 1994 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2015. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”). Prior to converting to a limited liability company structure, AFS was formerly known as ATEL Financial Corporation.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 12,500,000 Limited Partnership units, at a price of $10 per Unit. Upon the sale of the minimum amount of Units of Limited Partnership interest Units of $1.2 million and the receipt of the proceeds thereof on January 3, 1995, the Partnership commenced operations in its primary business (acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities). On November 23, 1996, subscriptions for 12,500,000 ($125 million) Limited Partnership Units had been received, in addition to the initial Limited Partners’ Units, and the offering terminated. As of December 31, 2012, 12,478,676 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Partnership’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Partnership’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the partners of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), which ended December 31, 2002 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Partnership is governed by its Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AFS receives compensation and reimbursements for services rendered on behalf of the Partnership (see Note 5 to the financial statements included in Item 8 of this report). AFS is required to maintain in the Partnership reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

As of December 31, 2012, the Partnership remains in the liquidation phase of its life cycle as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

Narrative Description of Business

The Partnership has acquired various types of equipment, and leased such equipment pursuant to Operating Leases and Full Payout leases, whereby Operating Leases are defined as being leases in which the minimum lease payments during the initial lease term do not recover the full cost of the equipment and Full Payout leases recover such cost. Guidelines provided by the offering indicated that no more than 50% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment would represent equipment leased as operating leases upon final investment of the net proceeds of the offering and that no more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment would be invested in equipment acquired from a single manufacturer.

The Partnership only purchased equipment under pre-existing leases or for which a lease would be concurrently entered into at the time of the purchase. From inception through December 31, 2012, the Partnership had purchased equipment with a total acquisition price of $208.3 million.

The Partnership’s objective was to lease a minimum of 75% of the equipment acquired with the net proceeds of the offering to lessees that (i) had an average credit rating by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. of Baa or better, or the credit equivalent as determined by AFS, with the average rating weighted to account for the original equipment cost for each item leased or (ii) were established hospitals with histories of profitability or municipalities. The balance of the original equipment portfolio could include equipment leased to lessees which, although deemed creditworthy by AFS, would not satisfy the general credit rating criteria for the portfolio. In excess of 75% of the equipment acquired with the net proceeds of the offering (based on original purchase cost) was originally leased to lessees with an average credit rating of Baa or better or to such hospitals or municipalities as described in (ii) above.

1

During 2012 and 2011, certain lessees generated significant portions (defined as 10% or more) of the Partnership’s total lease revenues as follows:

						Percentage of Total Lease Revenues
Lessee		Type of Equipment				2012				2011
Interstate Commodities			Railcars				40	%			24	%
Central States Enterprises			Railcars				32	%			38	%
Transamerica Leasing			Containers				11	%			14	%
Bunge Corporation			Railcars				10	%			13	%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable between periods.

The equipment leasing industry is highly competitive. Equipment manufacturers, corporations, partnerships and others offer users an alternative to the purchase of most types of equipment with payment terms that vary widely depending on the lease term, type of equipment and creditworthiness of the lessee. The ability of the Partnership to keep the equipment leased and/or operating and the terms of the acquisitions, leases and dispositions of equipment depends on various factors (many of which are not in the control of AFS or the Partnership), such as raw material costs to manufacture equipment as well as general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation or recession, and fluctuations in supply and demand for various types of equipment resulting from, among other things, technological and economic obsolescence.

The business of the Partnership is not seasonal.

The Partnership has no full time employees. AFS’ employees and affiliates provide the services the Partnership requires to effectively operate. The cost of these services is reimbursed by the Partnership to AFS and affiliates per the Partnership Agreement.

Equipment Leasing Activities

The Partnership had acquired a diversified portfolio of equipment. The equipment had been leased to lessees in various industries. The following tables set forth the types of equipment acquired by the Partnership through December 31, 2012 and the industries to which the assets were leased (dollars in thousands):

Asset Types		Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees				Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Railcars and locomotives		$	60,101				28.85	%
Manufacturing			36,342				17.45	%
Transportation			27,465				13.18	%
Construction			24,507				11.76	%
Materials handling			16,237				7.80	%
Office automation			16,048				7.70	%
Containers			15,379				7.38	%
Mining			7,919				3.80	%
Other*			4,322				2.08	%
		$	208,320				100.00	%

2

Industry of Lessee		Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees				Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Transportation, rail		$	53,140				25.51	%
Electronics and manufacturing			29,031				13.94	%
Business services			28,361				13.61	%
Mining			24,793				11.90	%
Transportation, other			23,217				11.14	%
Manufacturing, other			18,922				9.08	%
Oil and gas			16,536				7.94	%
Communications			5,282				2.54	%
Food products			2,856				1.37	%
Other*			6,182				2.97	%
		$	208,320				100.00	%

Through December 31, 2012, the Partnership had disposed of certain leased assets as set forth below (in thousands):

Asset Types		Original Equipment Cost, Excluding Acquisition Fees				Sale Price				Gross Rents
Railcars and locomotives		$	39,534			$	25,581			$	34,582
Manufacturing			36,342				8,151				32,015
Transportation			25,191				5,921				24,769
Construction			24,507				4,355				27,631
Containers			16,374				2,365				17,681
Office automation			16,048				1,786				15,559
Materials handling			16,037				3,994				19,238
Mining			7,919				2,064				7,866
Other			3,238				494				2,665
		$	185,190			$	54,711			$	182,006

For further information regarding the Partnership’s equipment lease portfolio as of December 31, 2012, see Note 4 to the financial statements, Investments in equipment and leases, net, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Certain of the Partnership’s lessee customers have international operations. In these instances, the Partnership is aware that certain equipment, primarily rail and transportation, may periodically exit the country. However, these lessee customers are US-based, and it is impractical for the Partnership to track, on an asset-by-asset day-by-day basis, where these assets are deployed. For further information regarding the Partnership’s geographic revenues and assets, and major customers, see Notes 2 and 3 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Partnership does not own or lease any real property, plant or material physical properties other than the equipment held for lease as set forth in Item 1, Business.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Partnership. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations. No material legal proceedings are currently pending against the Partnership or against any of its assets.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

3

PART II

Market Information

There are certain material conditions and restrictions on the transfer of Units imposed by the terms of the Partnership Agreement. Consequently, there is no public market for Units and it is not anticipated that a public market for Units will develop. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

Holders

As of December 31, 2012, a total of 5,812 investors were Unitholders of record in the Partnership.

ERISA Valuation

In order to permit ERISA fiduciaries who hold Units to satisfy their annual reporting requirements, AFS estimated the value per Unit of the Partnership’s assets as of December 31, 2012. AFS calculated the estimated liquidation proceeds that would be realized by the Partnership, assuming an orderly disposition of all of the Partnership’s assets as of December 31, 2012. The estimates were based on the amount of remaining lease payments on existing Partnership leases, and the estimated residual values of the equipment held by the Partnership upon the termination of those leases. This valuation was based solely on AFS’s perception of market conditions and the types and amounts of the Partnership’s assets. No independent valuation was sought.

After calculating the aggregate estimated disposition proceeds, AFS then calculated the portion of the aggregate estimated value of the Partnership assets that would be distributed to Unitholders on liquidation of the Partnership, and divided the total so distributable by the number of outstanding Units. As of December 31, 2012, the value of the Partnership’s assets, calculated on this basis, was approximately $0.67 per Unit. The foregoing valuation was performed solely for the ERISA purposes described above. There is no market for the Units, and, accordingly, this value does not represent an estimate of the amount a Unitholder would receive if he were to seek to sell his Units. Furthermore, there can be no assurance as to the amount the Partnership may actually receive if and when it seeks to liquidate its assets or the amount of lease payments and equipment disposition proceeds it will actually receive over the remaining term of the Partnership.

Distributions

The Partnership does not make dividend distributions. However, the Limited Partners of the Partnership are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Partnership Agreement.

AFS has sole discretion in determining the amount of distributions; provided, however, that AFS will not reinvest in equipment, but will distribute, subject to payment of any obligations of the Partnership.

Distributions were paid in December 2012 and 2011. The annualized rates for distributions from 2012 and 2011 operations were $0.08 and $0.13 per Unit, respectively. The rates and frequency of periodic distributions paid by the Fund during its liquidation phase are solely at the discretion of the General Partner.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

A smaller reporting company is not required to present selected financial data in accordance with item 301(c) of Regulation S-K.

4

Statements contained in this Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Partnership’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Partnership’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a California partnership that was formed in June 1994 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to generate revenues from equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 12,500,000 Limited Partnership units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. The offering was terminated in November 1996. During early 1997, the Partnership completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, throughout the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Partnership reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the Limited Partners and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment.

The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2015. Pursuant to the guidelines of the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership began to liquidate its assets and distribute the proceeds thereof after the end of the Reinvestment Period which ended in December 2002. As of December 31, 2012, the Partnership remains in its liquidation phase. Accordingly, assets that mature will be returned to inventory and most likely will be subsequently sold, which will result in decreasing revenue as earning assets decrease. The Partnership continues to generally make distributions on an annual basis or at the discretion of the General Partner.

Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were concentrations (defined as greater than 10%) of equipment leased to lessees in certain industries (as a percentage of total equipment cost) as follows:

		2012				2011
Transportation, rail			81	%			72	%
Transportation, containers			13	%			14	%
Food products			*				12	%

As previously indicated, certain lessees generated significant portions (defined as 10% or more) of the Partnership’s total lease revenues during 2012 and 2011 as follows:

						Percentage of Total Lease Revenues
Lessee		Type of Equipment				2012				2011
Interstate Commodities			Railcars				40	%			24	%
Central States Enterprises			Railcars				32	%			38	%
Transamerica Leasing			Containers				11	%			14	%
Bunge Corporation			Railcars				10	%			13	%

5

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods due to the expiration of lessee contracts during the Fund’s liquidation period.

It has been the Partnership’s objective to maintain a 100% utilization rate for all equipment purchased in any given year. All equipment transactions were acquired subject to binding lease commitments, so equipment utilization remained high throughout the reinvestment stage. Initial lease terms of these leases were generally from 36 to 120 months, and as they expired, the Partnership attempted to re-lease or sell the equipment; as such, utilization rates may tend to decrease during the liquidation stage of the Partnership. All of the Partnership’s remaining equipment on lease was acquired in the years 1995 through 1996. The utilization percentage of existing assets under lease was 97% and 100% as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Cost reimbursements to the General Partner are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Partnership. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

2012 versus 2011

The Partnership had net income of $1.2 million and $717 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The 2012 results reflect an increase in total revenues and a decline in operating expenses when compared to prior year.

Revenues

Total revenues for 2012 increased by $333 thousand, or 13%, as compared to prior year primarily due to increases in operating lease revenues and gain on sales of assets.

The increase in operating lease revenues totaled $309 thousand and was largely due to higher negotiated rates on certain re-marketed leases partially offset by a reduction in usage-based rental revenues and continued run-off and sales of lease assets. Gain on sales of lease assets increased by $22 thousand primarily due to the change in the mix of assets sold.

Expenses

Total expenses for 2012 decreased by $107 thousand, or 6%, as compared to prior year. The net reduction in expenses was primarily due to a decline in depreciation expense partially offset by an increase in railcar maintenance costs.

The decrease in depreciation expense totaled $365 thousand and was largely due to continued run-off and disposition of lease assets, consistent with a fund in liquidation. Railcar maintenance costs were higher by $248 thousand due to an increase in the base rate for maintenance by the Partnership’s third party railcar manager.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $542 thousand and $205 thousand, respectively. The liquidity of the Partnership varies, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds from lease asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as distributions are made to the partners and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The primary source of liquidity for the Partnership has been its cash flow from leasing activities. As the initial lease terms have expired, the Partnership ventured to re-lease or sell the equipment. Future liquidity will depend on the Partnership’s success in remarketing or selling the equipment as it comes off-rental.

If inflation in the general economy becomes significant, it may affect the Partnership in as much as the residual (resale) values of the Partnership’s leased assets may increase as the costs of similar assets increase. However, the Partnership’s revenues from existing leases would not increase as such rates are generally fixed for the terms of the leases without adjustment for inflation. In addition, if interest rates increase significantly under such circumstances, the lease rates that the Partnership can obtain on future leases will be expected to increase as the cost of capital is a significant factor in the pricing of lease financing. Leases already in place, for the most part, would not be affected by changes in interest rates.

The Partnership currently believes it has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Partnership would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. AFS envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

6

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):

		2012				2011
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		$	1,133			$	1,253
Investing activities			212				207
Financing activities			(1,008	)			(1,701	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		$	337			$	(241	)

2012 versus 2011

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership’s primary source of liquidity has been cash flows from its portfolio of operating lease contracts. Moreover, the Partnership realized $212 thousand and $207 thousand of proceeds from sales of lease assets during 2012 and 2011, respectively.

During the same comparative years, cash was mainly used to pay periodic distributions to both the Limited Partners and the General Partner totaling $1.0 million and $1.7 million. Cash was also used to pay trade payables and other expenses. As the Fund is in its liquidation phase, any future financing activity is anticipated to only include distributions to Partners.

Distributions

The Partnership commenced periodic distributions, based on cash flows from operations, beginning with the month of January 1995. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, for additional information regarding the distributions.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2012, the Partnership had no commitments to purchase lease assets and pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership will no longer purchase any new lease assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting standards updates as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) were evaluated and determined to be not applicable to the Partnership.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The policies discussed below are considered by management of the Partnership to be critical to an understanding of the Partnership’s financial statements because their application requires significant complex or subjective judgments, decisions, or assessments, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. The Partnership also states these accounting policies in the notes to the financial statements and in relevant sections in this discussion and analysis. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events may not develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported

7

amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term, expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms negotiated, but initial leases were generally from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

The Partnership earns revenues from certain lease assets based on utilization of such assets. Such contingent rentals and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Partnership’s asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the assets and its carrying value on the measurement date.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements attached hereto at pages 9 through 20.

8

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners
ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (“Partnership”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Management of the Partnership’s General Partner. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

		/s/ Moss Adams LLP
San Francisco, California March 12, 2013

9

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
BALANCE SHEETS
  
DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
(In Thousands)

		2012				2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	542			$	205
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1 as of December 31, 2012 and $0 as of December 31, 2011			478				204
Prepaid expenses and other assets			8				3
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $20,936 at December 31, 2012 and $21,017 at December 31, 2011			3,182				3,605
Total assets		$	4,210			$	4,017
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
General Partner		$	68			$	78
Lessees and other			145				87
Unearned operating lease income			3				7
Total liabilities			216				172
Commitments and contingencies
Partners’ capital:
General Partner			—				—
Limited Partners			3,994				3,845
Total Partners’ capital			3,994				3,845
Total liabilities and Partners’ capital		$	4,210			$	4,017

See accompanying notes.

10

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

		2012				2011
Revenues:
Leasing activities:
Operating leases		$	2,835			$	2,526
Gain on sales of assets			117				95
Other revenue			2				—
Total revenues			2,954				2,621
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets			328				693
Cost reimbursements to General Partner			254				253
Railcar maintenance			776				528
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner			93				112
Taxes on income and franchise fees			1				3
Other management fees			121				113
Professional fees			25				30
Outside services			84				63
Provision for doubtful accounts			1				—
Postage			20				29
Printing and photocopying			38				19
Other			56				61
Total operating expenses			1,797				1,904
Net income		$	1,157			$	717
Net income:
General Partner		$	10			$	17
Limited Partners			1,147				700
		$	1,157			$	717
Net income per Limited Liability Partnership Unit		$	0.09			$	0.06
Weighted average number of Units outstanding			12,478,676				12,478,676

See accompanying notes.

11

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

		Limited Partners								General Partner				Total
		Units				Amount
Balance December 31, 2010			12,478,676			$	4,829			$	—			$	4,829
Distributions to Limited Partners ($0.13 per Unit)			—				(1,684	)			—				(1,684	)
Distributions to General Partner			—				—				(17	)			(17	)
Net income			—				700				17				717
Balance December 31, 2011			12,478,676				3,845				—				3,845
Distributions to Limited Partners ($0.08 per Unit)			—				(998	)			—				(998	)
Distributions to General Partner			—				—				(10	)			(10	)
Net income			—				1,147				10				1,157
Balance December 31, 2012			12,478,676			$	3,994			$	—			$	3,994

See accompanying notes.

12

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
  
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011
(In Thousands)

		2012				2011
Operating activities:
Net income		$	1,157			$	717
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of operating lease assets			328				693
Provision for doubtful accounts			1				—
Gain on sales of assets			(117	)			(95	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(275	)			(21	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(5	)			1
Accounts payable, General Partner			(10	)			29
Accounts payable, other			58				(45	)
Unearned operating lease income			(4	)			(26	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			1,133				1,253
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of assets			212				207
Net cash provided by investing activities			212				207
Financing activities:
Distributions to Limited Partners			(998	)			(1,684	)
Distributions to General Partner			(10	)			(17	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(1,008	)			(1,701	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			337				(241	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year			205				446
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year		$	542			$	205
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for taxes		$	3			$	6

See accompanying notes.

13

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Partnership matters:

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on June 29, 1994 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2015. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group. Prior to converting to a limited liability company structure, AFS was formerly known as ATEL Financial Corporation.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 12,500,000 Limited Partnership units, at a price of $10 per Unit. Upon the sale of the minimum amount of Units of Limited Partnership interest Units of $1.2 million and the receipt of the proceeds thereof on January 3, 1995, the Partnership commenced operations in its primary business (acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities). On November 23, 1996, subscriptions for 12,500,000 ($125 million) Limited Partnership Units had been received, in addition to the initial Limited Partners’ Units, and the offering terminated. As of December 31, 2012, 12,478,676 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Partnership’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Partnership’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the partners of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), which ended December 31, 2002 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Partnership is governed by its Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AFS receives compensation and reimbursements for services rendered on behalf of the Partnership (see Note 5). The Partnership is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

As of December 31, 2012, the Partnership remains in the liquidation phase of its life cycle, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, and is generally making distributions on an annual basis or at the discretion of the General Partner.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results from operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Partnership has reviewed, as determined necessary by the General Partner, events that have occurred after December 31, 2012, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

14

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasury instruments with original and/or purchased maturities of ninety days or less.

Credit risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Partnership to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating lease receivables and accounts receivable. The Partnership places the majority of its cash deposits in noninterest-bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250 thousand. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Partnership. Accounts receivable represent amounts due from lessees in various industries, related to equipment on operating leases.

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating lease contracts which are currently due to the Partnership. Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based on historical charge-off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are charged-off on a specific identification basis by AFS. Amounts recovered that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms negotiated, but initial leases were generally from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

The Partnership earns revenues from certain lease assets based on utilization of such assets. Such contingent rentals and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Partnership’s asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of

15

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the assets and its carrying value on the measurement date.

Segment reporting:

The Partnership is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Partnership operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The Partnership’s principal decision makers are the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Partnership believes that its equipment leasing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Partnership measures profit and loss at the equipment portfolio level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment leasing transaction portfolio; c) the Partnership does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Partnership has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment lease financing; and e) the Partnership has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.

However, certain of the Partnership’s lessee customers may have international operations. In these instances, the Partnership is aware that certain equipment, primarily rail and transportation, may periodically exit the country. However, these lessee customers are US-based, and it is impractical for the Partnership to track, on an asset-by-asset, day-by-day basis, where these assets are deployed.

The primary geographic regions in which the Partnership sought leasing opportunities were North America and Europe. Currently, 100% of the Partnership’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America.

Unearned operating lease income:

The Partnership records prepayments on operating leases as a liability under the caption of unearned operating lease income. The liability is recorded when prepayments are received and recognized as operating lease revenue over the period to which the prepayments relate using a straight-line method.

Income taxes:

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 of the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership is not subject to federal income taxes. All income and losses of the Partnership are the liability of the individual partners and are allocated to the partners for inclusion in their individual tax returns. Accordingly, the Partnership has provided current income and franchise taxes for only those states which levy taxes on partnerships. Interest and penalties on such taxes are considered to be insignificant. The net tax expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1 thousand and $3 thousand, respectively. The Partnership does not have any entity level uncertain tax positions. The Partnership files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and is generally subject to examination by U.S. federal (or state and local) income tax authorities for three years from the filing of a tax return.

The tax bases of the Partnership’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts presented in these financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 as follows (in thousands):

		2012				2011
Financial statement basis of net assets		$	3,994			$	3,845
Tax basis of net assets (unaudited)			13,931				13,369
Difference (unaudited)		$	(9,937	)		$	(9,524	)

16

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

The primary differences between the tax bases of net assets and the amounts recorded in the financial statements are the result of differences in accounting for syndication costs and differences between the depreciation methods used in the financial statements and the Partnership’s tax returns.

The following reconciles the net income reported in these financial statements to the income reported on the Partnership’s federal tax return (unaudited) for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

		2012				2011
Net income per financial statements		$	1,157			$	717
Tax adjustments (unaudited):
Adjustment to depreciation expense			321				682
Provision for doubtful accounts			1				—
Adjustments to gain on sales of assets			95				113
Adjustments to revenues and other items			(4	)			(27	)
Income per federal tax return (unaudited)		$	1,570			$	1,485

Per unit data:

Net income and distributions per unit are based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding during the year.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

Recent accounting standards updates as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) were evaluated and determined to be not applicable to the Partnership.

3. Concentration of credit risk and major customers:

At its current stage of liquidation, the Partnership’s remaining assets under lease are concentrated in three major industries for 2012 and 2011 spread across seven and eight lessees, respectively. The leases provide for the return of the equipment upon default.

The Partnership is no longer acquiring equipment. As assets have been sold upon maturity of the related leases, concentrations have arisen in certain industries due to the decreasing number of remaining leases and assets.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were concentrations (defined as greater than 10%) of equipment leased to lessees in certain industries (as a percentage of total equipment cost) as follows:

		2012				2011
Transportation, rail			81	%			72	%
Transportation, containers			13	%			14	%
Food products			*				12	%

During 2012 and 2011, certain lessees generated significant portions (defined as 10% or more) of the Partnership’s total lease revenues as follows:

						Percentage of Total Lease Revenues
Lessee		Type of Equipment				2012				2011
Interstate Commodities			Railcars				40	%			24	%
Central States Enterprises			Railcars				32	%			38	%
Transamerica Leasing			Containers				11	%			14	%
Bunge Corporation			Railcars				10	%			13	%

17

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Investments in equipment and leases, net:

The Partnership’s investments in equipment and leases consist of the following (in thousands):

		Balance December 31, 2011				Reclassifications & Additions/ Dispositions				Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases				Balance December 31, 2012
Net investment in operating leases		$	3,600			$	(157	)		$	(328	)		$	3,115
Assets held for sale or lease, net			5				62				—				67
Total		$	3,605			$	(95	)		$	(328	)		$	3,182

Impairment of investments in leases and assets held for sale or lease:

Management periodically reviews the carrying values of its assets on leases and assets held for lease or sale. As a result of these reviews, management determined that no impairment losses existed for the respective years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

The Partnership utilizes a straight-line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Partnership’s equipment was $328 thousand and $693 thousand for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

All of the remaining property on leases was acquired from 1995 through 1996.

Net investment in operating leases:

Equipment on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

		Balance December 31, 2011				Additions				Reclassifications or Dispositions				Balance December 31, 2012
Transportation, rail		$	24,117			$	—			$	(1,596	)		$	22,521
Transportation, other			295				—				—				295
Materials handling			199				—				—				199
			24,611				—				(1,596	)			23,015
Less accumulated depreciation			(21,011	)			(328	)			1,439				(19,900	)
Total		$	3,600			$	(328	)		$	(157	)		$	3,115

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 12% and 13% of the assets’ original cost at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Partnership earns revenues from certain lease assets based on utilization of such assets. Such contingent rentals and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred. The revenues associated with these rentals are included as a component of Operating Lease Revenues, and totaled $334 thousand and $459 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

There were no operating leases in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

At December 31, 2012, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments under operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

		Operating Leases
Year ending December 31, 2013		$	1,554
2014			1,143
2015			88
		$	2,785

18

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Partnership Agreement provide that AFS and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment acquisition, management and resale and for management of the Partnership.

The Partnership Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by AFS in providing administrative services to the Partnership. Administrative services provided include Partnership accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. AFS is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of equipment. The Partnership will be liable for certain future costs to be incurred by AFS to manage the administrative services provided to the Partnership.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Partnership. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications services and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the General Partner are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Partnership. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

Incentive management fees are computed as 4% of distributions of cash from operations, as defined in the Partnership Agreement. Equipment management fees are computed as 3.5% of gross revenues from operating leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement plus 2% of gross revenues from full payout leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees, commissions and reimbursements, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement as follows (in thousands):

		2012				2011
Cost reimbursements to General Partner and/or affiliates		$	254			$	253
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner			93				112
		$	347			$	365

6. Guarantees:

The Partnership enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Partnership has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The General Partner knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Partnership’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Partnership believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Partnership’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Partnership would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

7. Partners’ capital:

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, 12,478,676 Units were issued and outstanding, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Limited Partners, as defined. The Partnership was authorized to issue up to 12,500,000 Units, in addition to the 50 Units issued to the initial Limited Partners.

The Partnership has the right, exercisable at the General Partner’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Partnership is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the General Partner on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the General Partner deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Partnership;

19

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. Partners’ capital: - (continued)

provided, the Partnership is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s Net Profits, Net Losses, and Tax Credits are to be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to AFS. The Partnership Agreement allows the Partnership to make an allocation of income to AFS in order to maintain the capital account of AFS at zero. In accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement, additional allocations of income were made to AFS in 2012 and 2011. The amounts allocated were determined so as to bring AFS’s ending capital account balance to zero at the end of each year.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, Available Cash from Operations and Cash from Sales and Refinancing are to be distributed as follows:

Cash from Operations

Cash from Operations is distributed 95% to the Limited Partners, 1% to AFS and 4% to an affiliate of AFS as an Incentive Management Fee.

Cash from Sales and Refinancing

First, 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to AFS until each Limited Partner has received Aggregate Distributions in an amount equal to their Original Invested Capital, as defined, plus a 10% per annum cumulative (compounded daily) return on their Adjusted Invested Capital; and

Thereafter, 95% to the Limited Partners, 1% to AFS and 4% to an affiliate of AFS as an Incentive Management Fee.

Distributions to the Limited Partners for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands except Units and per Unit data):

		2012				2011
Distributions		$	998			$	1,684
Weighted average number of Units outstanding			12,478,676				12,478,676
Weighted average distributions per Unit		$	0.08			$	0.13

20

None.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Partnership’s General Partner’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures, Management concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the General Partner, who is responsible for providing the Partnership with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The General Partner’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Partnership, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Management of the General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) for the Partnership, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. The internal control process of the General Partner, as it is applicable to the Partnership, was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, and includes those policies and procedures that:

All internal control processes, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management of the General Partner assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, Management of the General Partner concluded that the General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, was effective as of December 31, 2012.

21

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts non-accelerated filers from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership, during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Partnership.

22

PART III

The registrant is a Limited Partnership and, therefore, has no officers or directors.

All of the outstanding capital stock of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”) (the General Partner) is held by ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”), a holding company formed to control AFS and affiliated companies. The outstanding voting capital stock of ACG is owned 100% by Dean L. Cash.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a subsidiary under the control of ACG and performs services for the Partnership. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications services and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

The officers and directors of ATEL and its affiliates are as follows:

Dean L. Cash		President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
Paritosh K. Choksi		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
Vasco H. Morais		Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

Dean L. Cash, age 62, became chairman, president and chief executive officer of ATEL in April 2001. Mr. Cash joined ATEL as director of marketing in 1980 and served as a vice president since 1981, executive vice president since 1983 and a director since 1984. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Cash was a senior marketing representative for Martin Marietta Corporation, data systems division, from 1979 to 1980. From 1977 to 1979, he was employed by General Electric Corporation, where he was an applications specialist in the medical systems division and a marketing representative in the information services division. Mr. Cash was a systems engineer with Electronic Data Systems from 1975 to 1977, and was involved in maintaining and developing software for commercial applications. Mr. Cash received a B.S. degree in psychology and mathematics in 1972 and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in finance in 1975 from Florida State University. Mr. Cash is an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and is qualified as a registered principal with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Paritosh K. Choksi, age 59, joined ATEL in 1999 as a director, senior vice president and its chief financial officer. He became its executive vice president and CFO/COO in April 2001. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Choksi was chief financial officer at Wink Communications, Inc. from 1997 to 1999. From 1977 to 1997, Mr. Choksi was with Phoenix American Incorporated, a financial services and management company, where he held various positions during his tenure, and was senior vice president, chief financial officer and director when he left the company. Mr. Choksi was involved in all corporate matters at Phoenix and was responsible for Phoenix’s capital market needs. He also served on the credit committee overseeing all corporate investments, including its venture lease portfolio. Mr. Choksi was a part of the executive management team which caused Phoenix’s portfolio to increase from $50 million in assets to over $2 billion. Mr. Choksi is a member of the board of directors of Syntel, Inc. Mr. Choksi received a bachelor of technology degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay; and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Vasco H. Morais, age 54, joined ATEL in 1989 as general counsel. Mr. Morais manages ATEL’s legal department, which provides legal and contractual support in the negotiating, documenting, drafting, reviewing and funding of lease transactions. In addition, Mr. Morais advises on general corporate law matters, and assists on securities law issues. From 1986 to 1989, Mr. Morais was employed by the BankAmeriLease Companies, Bank of America’s equipment leasing subsidiaries, providing in-house legal support on the documentation of tax-oriented and non-tax oriented direct and leveraged lease transactions, vendor leasing programs and general corporate matters. Prior to the BankAmeriLease Companies, Mr. Morais was with the Consolidated Capital Companies in the Corporate and Securities Legal Department involved in drafting and reviewing contracts, advising on corporate law matters and securities law issues. Mr. Morais received a B.A. degree in 1982 from the University of California in Berkeley, a J.D. degree in 1986 from Golden Gate University Law School; and an M.B.A. (Finance) degree from Golden Gate University in 1997. Mr. Morais, an active member of the State Bar of California since 1986, served as co-chair of the Uniform Business Law Section of the State Bar of California and was inducted as a fellow of the American College of Commercial Finance Lawyers in 2010.

23

Audit Committee

The board of directors of the General Partner acts as the audit committee of the Partnership. Dean L. Cash and Paritosh K. Choksi are members of the board of directors of the General Partner and are deemed to be financial experts. They are not independent of the Partnership.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, the Partnership is not aware of any failures to file reports of beneficial ownership required to be filed during or for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Code of Ethics

A Code of Ethics that is applicable to the Partnership, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of its General Partner, AFS, or persons acting in such capacity on behalf of the Partnership, is included as Exhibit 14.1 to this report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The registrant is a Limited Partnership and, therefore, has no officers or directors.

Set forth hereinafter is a description of the nature of remuneration paid and to be paid to AFS and its Affiliates. The amount of such remuneration paid for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is set forth in Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions,” at Note 5 thereof, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Through December 31, 1996, $11.9 million of commissions (the maximum allowable) had been paid to AFS or its affiliates. Of that amount, $10.2 million was re-allowed to other broker/dealers. None have been paid since 1996, nor will any additional amounts be paid in future periods.

Acquisition Fees

Acquisition fees were paid to AFS for services rendered in finding, reviewing and evaluating equipment to be purchased by the Partnership and rejecting equipment not to be purchased by the Partnership. The total amount of acquisition fees paid to AFS or their affiliates was not to exceed 3% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment acquired with the net proceeds of the offering and was not to exceed 4.5% of the Gross Proceeds of the Offering.

Through December 31, 1996, $5.6 million of such fees (the maximum allowable amount) had been paid to AFS or its affiliates. No such fees have been paid subsequent to that date.

Equipment Management Fees

As compensation for its services rendered generally in managing or supervising the management of the Partnership’s equipment and in supervising other ongoing services and activities including, among others, arranging for necessary maintenance and repair of equipment, collecting revenue, paying operating expenses, determining the equipment is being used in accordance with all operative contractual arrangements, property and sales tax monitoring and preparation of financial data, AFS or its affiliates are entitled to receive management fees which are payable for each fiscal quarter and are to be in an amount equal to (i) 3.5% of the gross lease revenues from “operating” leases, as defined, and (ii) 2% of gross lease revenues from “full payout” leases, as defined, which contain net lease provisions. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements included at Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this report for amounts paid.

Incentive Management Fees

As compensation for its services rendered in establishing and maintaining the composition of the Partnership’s equipment portfolio and its acquisition and debt strategies and supervising fund administration including supervising the preparation of reports and maintenance of financial and operating data of the Partnership, Securities and Exchange Commission and Internal Revenue Service filings, returns and reports, AFS is entitled to receive the Incentive management fee which shall be payable for each fiscal quarter and shall be an amount equal to 1% of cash distributions from operations, sales or refinancing and 3.25% (4% prior to July 1, 1995) of cash distributions from operations to an affiliate of AFS until such time as the Limited Partners have received aggregate distributions of cash

24

from operations in an amount equal to their original invested capital plus a 10% per annum return on their average adjusted invested capital (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). Thereafter, the incentive management fee paid to the affiliate of AFS shall be 4% of all distributions of cash from operations, sales or refinancing. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements included at Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this report for amounts paid.

Equipment Resale Fees

As compensation for services rendered in connection with the sale of equipment, AFS is entitled to receive an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 3% of the sales price of the equipment, or (ii) one-half the normal competitive equipment sales commission charged by unaffiliated parties for such services. Such fee is payable only after the Limited Partners have received a return of their adjusted invested capital (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) plus 10% of their adjusted invested capital per annum calculated on a cumulative basis, compounded daily, commencing the last day of the quarter in which the limited partner was admitted to the Partnership. To date, none have been accrued or paid.

Equipment Re-lease Fee

As compensation for providing re-leasing services, AFS is entitled to receive fees equal to 2% of the gross rentals or the comparable competitive rate for such services relating to comparable equipment, whichever is less, derived from the re-lease provided that (i) AFS or their affiliates have and will maintain adequate staff to render such services to the Partnership, (ii) no such re-lease fee is payable in connection with the re-lease of equipment to a previous lessee or its affiliates, (iii) AFS or its affiliates have rendered substantial re-leasing services in connection with such re-lease and (iv) AFS or its affiliates are compensated for rendering equipment management services. To date, none have been accrued or paid.

General Partner’s Interest in Operating Proceeds

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s Net income, Net losses, Distributions and investment tax credits are allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to AFS. See the statements of income included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this report for the amounts allocated to the General and Limited Partners in 2012 and 2011.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

At December 31, 2012, no investor is known to hold beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Units.

Security Ownership of Management

The parent of AFS is the beneficial owner of Limited Partnership Units as follows:

(1) Title of Class		(2) Name and Address of Beneficial Owner		(3) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		(4) Percent of Class
Limited Partnership Units		Dean Cash The Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111		Initial Limited Partner Units 25 Units ($250) (owned by wife)		0.0002%

Changes in Control

The Limited Partners have the right, by vote of the Limited Partners owning more than 50% of the outstanding limited Partnership units, to remove a General Partner.

AFS may at any time call a meeting of the Limited Partners or a vote of the Limited Partners without a meeting, on matters on which they are entitled to vote, and shall call such meeting or for vote without a meeting following receipt of a written request therefore of Limited Partners holding 10% or more of the total outstanding Limited Partnership units.

25

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The responses to Item 1 of this report under the caption “Equipment Leasing Activities,” Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions” at Note 5 thereof, and Item 11 of this report under the caption “Executive Compensation,” are hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The Partnership incurred audit fees with its principal auditors totaling $18 thousand and $21 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed in connection with the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in the Partnership’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

The board of directors of the General Partner acts as the audit committee of the Partnership. Engagements for audit services, audit related services and tax services are approved in advance by the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner acting on behalf of the board of directors of the General Partner in its role as the audit committee of the Partnership.

26

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Included in Part II of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			9
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011			10
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011			11
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011			12
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011			13
Notes to Financial Statements			14

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(3) and (4) Agreement of Limited Partnership, included as exhibit B to the Prospectus filed as exhibit 28.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 33-81952), is hereby incorporated herein by reference

(14.1)  Code of Ethics

(31.1)  Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

(31.2)  Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

(32.1)  Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(32.2)  Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(101.INS)*  XBRL Instance Document

(101.SCH)*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

(101.CAL)*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

(101.LAB)*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

(101.PRE)*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(101.DEF)*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 14, 2013

ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P.
(Registrant)

By: ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of Registrant

		By: /s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
By: /s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
		By: /s/ Samuel Schussler Samuel Schussler, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE		CAPACITIES		DATE
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash		President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)		March 14, 2013
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)		March 14, 2013
/s/ Samuel Schussler Samuel Schussler		Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)		March 14, 2013

No proxy materials have been or will be sent to security holders. An annual report will be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this report on Form 10-K, and copies thereof will be furnished supplementally to the Commission when forwarded to the security holders.

28

Exhibit 14.1

ATEL CASH DISTRIBUTION FUND VI, L.P.
  
CODE OF ETHICS FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL AND OPERATING OFFICER

A. SCOPE

This Code of Ethics is applicable to ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (“Fund VI”), including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of its General Partner, ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), or persons acting in such capacity (collectively the “Covered Officers”) on behalf of Fund VI, referred to herein as the “Company.”

Accordingly, under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s interpretation of its disclosure rules, the Board of Directors of AFS functions as the de facto audit committee for the Company with respect to all procedural and disclosure requirements applicable to audit committees under Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Board of Directors shall have oversight responsibility over the activities of the Company for purposes of this Code of Ethics.

B. PURPOSE

The Company is proud of the values with which it conducts business. It has and will continue to uphold the highest levels of business ethics and personal integrity in all types of transactions and interactions. To this end, this Code of Ethics serves to (1) emphasize the Company’s commitment to ethics and compliance with the law; (2) set forth basic standards of ethical and legal behavior; (3) provide reporting mechanisms for known or suspected ethical or legal violations; and (4) help prevent and detect wrongdoing. This Code of Ethics is intended to augment and supplement the standard of ethics and business conduct expected of all Company employees, and its limitation to Covered Officers is not intended to limit the obligation of all Company employees to adhere to the highest standards of business ethics and integrity in all transactions and interactions conducted while in the Company’s employ.

Given the variety and complexity of ethical questions that may arise in the course of business of the Company, this Code of Ethics serves only as a rough guide. Confronted with ethically ambiguous situations, the Covered Officers should remember the Company’s commitment to the highest ethical standards and seek independent advice, where necessary, to ensure that all actions they take on behalf of the Company honor this commitment.

C. ETHICS STANDARDS

1. Honest and Ethical Conduct

The Covered Officers shall behave honestly and ethically at all times and with all people. They shall act in good faith, with due care, and shall engage only in fair and open competition, by treating ethically competitors, suppliers, customers, and colleagues. They shall not misrepresent facts or engage in illegal, unethical, or anti-competitive practices for personal or professional gain.

2. Conflicts of Interest

This fundamental standard of honest and ethical conduct extends to the handling of conflicts of interest. The Covered Officers shall avoid any actual, potential, or apparent conflicts of interest with the Company and any personal activities, investments, or associations that might give rise to such conflicts. They shall not compete with or use the Company, for personal gain, self-deal, or take advantage of any Company opportunities. They shall act on behalf of the Company free from improper influence or the appearance of improper influence on their judgment or performance of duties. A Covered Officer shall disclose any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a conflict to the Company’s General Counsel or a member of AFS’s Board of Directors. No action may be taken with respect to such transaction or party unless and until AFS’s Board of Directors has approved such action.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood, as fully disclosed in the offering documents for the Company, that AFS as General Partner of the Company has certain inherent conflicts of interest. The provisions of the Company’s Partnership Agreement have been drafted to address the obligations, restrictions and limitations on the power and authority of AFS to manage the Company’s affairs, including restrictions prohibiting or limiting the terms of any transactions in which conflicts of interest may arise. Furthermore, AFS has a fiduciary duty to the Company as its General Partner. It is therefore expressly understood by the Company and the Covered Officers that any and all actions by AFS and its personnel that comply with the provisions of the Company’s Partnership Agreement, and which are consistent with AFS’s fiduciary duty to the Company, will not be considered material transactions or relationships which require disclosure or reporting under this Code of Ethics.

3. Timely and Truthful Disclosure

In reports and documents filed with or submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators by the Company and in other public communications made by the Company, the Covered Officers shall make disclosures that are full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable. The Covered Officers shall provide thorough and accurate financial and accounting data for inclusion in such disclosures. The Covered Officers shall not knowingly conceal or falsify information, misrepresent material facts, or omit material facts necessary to avoid misleading the Company’s independent public auditors or investors.

4. Legal Compliance

In conducting the business of the Company, the Covered Officers shall comply with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations at all levels of government in the United States and in any non-U.S. jurisdiction in which the Company does business, as well as applicable rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations of which the Company is a member. If the Covered Officer is unsure whether a particular action would violate an applicable law, rule, or regulation, he or she should seek the advice of inside counsel (if available), and, where necessary, outside counsel before undertaking it.

D. VIOLATIONS OF ETHICAL STANDARDS

1. Reporting Known or Suspected Violations

The Covered Officers will promptly bring to the attention of the Company’s General Counsel or AFS’s Board of Directors any information concerning a material violation of any of the laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Company and the operation of its businesses, by the Company or any agent thereof, or of violation of this Code of Ethics. The Company’s General Counsel will investigate reports of violations and the findings communicated to AFS’s Board of Directors.

2. Accountability for Violations

If the Company determines that this Code of Ethics has been violated, either directly, by failure to report a violation, or by withholding information related to a violation, it may discipline the offending Covered Officer for non-compliance with penalties up to and including termination of employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of law and may result in criminal penalties and civil liabilities for the offending Covered Officer and the Company.

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

Date: March 14, 2013

/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

Date: March 14, 2013

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: March 14, 2013

/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: March 14, 2013

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.