Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - Aevi Genomic Medicine, Inc.v332330_8k.htm
EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - Aevi Genomic Medicine, Inc.v332330_ex99-1.htm

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Business-Related Risks

 

We are a clinical stage medical technology company and have a history of significant and continued operating losses and a substantial accumulated earnings deficit and we may continue to incur significant losses.

 

We are a clinical stage medical technology company and since our inception have been focused on research and development and have not generated any substantial revenues. We have incurred net losses of approximately $3.03 million, $8.10 million and $4.15 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012 and the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately $62.61 million for the period from inception through September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $62.19 million. We expect to incur additional operating losses, as well as negative cash flow from operations, for the foreseeable future, as we continue to expand our research and development and commence commercialization of our potential product candidates. Our ability to generate revenues from sales of our potential products will depend on:

 

·successful completion of necessary medical trials which have not advanced beyond phase I/II stage;

 

·regulatory approval;

 

·commercialization (through partnership or licensing deals or through internal development) and market acceptance of new technologies and product candidates under development;

 

·medical community awareness; and

 

·changes in regulation or regulatory policy.

 

We believe that initial commercialization of any of our product candidates by us or any future strategic partners is not likely before 2017 and could easily take five years or more.

 

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Our auditors, Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, have indicated in their report on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 that there exist conditions that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses and the lack of working capital. We also expect to receive such a report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Early-stage biotechnical companies often receive such a report, as our continued operations are dependent on our ability to raise additional capital until revenues are available and received. A “going concern” opinion could impair our ability to finance our operations through the sale of debt or equity securities. Our ability to continue as a going concern will depend on our ability to obtain additional financing when necessary, which is not certain. If we are unable to achieve these goals, our business would be jeopardized and we may not be able to continue. If we ceased operations, it is likely that all of our investors would lose their investment.

 

We will need substantial additional capital for the continued development of our product candidates and for our long-term operations.

 

As of December 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents were approximately $6.4 million. Our present and future capital requirements depend on many factors, including:

 

·the level of patient recruitment in the phase IIa study of EPODURE in Israel, which will be commencing in the near term, as well as the anticipated clinical trials of INFRADURE in Israel, and the continuing results of such trials;

 

·the level of preparations for our anticipated phase IIb study of EPODURE in the United States;

 

 
 

 

·the level of research and development investment required to develop our first product candidates, and maintain and improve the Biopump Platform Technology;

 

·changes in product development plans needed to address any difficulties that may arise in manufacturing, preclinical activities, clinical studies or commercialization;

 

·our ability and willingness to enter into new agreements with strategic partners, and the terms of these agreements;

 

·our success rate in preclinical and clinical efforts associated with milestones and royalties;

 

·the costs of recruiting and retaining qualified personnel;

 

·the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals; and

 

·the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending, and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights.

 

We will require significant amounts of additional capital in the future, and such capital may not be available when we need it on terms that we find favorable, if at all. We may seek to raise these funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, credit facilities, or partnering or other corporate collaborations and licensing arrangements. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to fund our operations, take advantage of opportunities, develop products and technologies, and otherwise respond to competitive pressures could be significantly delayed or limited, and we may need to downsize or halt our operations.

 

We have significant severance liabilities and may not be able to satisfy such obligations.

 

Our balance sheet as of September 30, 2012 includes a net liability of approximately $1.31 million representing severance payments required under Israeli law and contractual obligations in excess of severance covered by our current insurance policies that would be due if our employees left under circumstances that triggered payment of severance. Of such amount, approximately $0.59 million represents amounts that would be payable to our President and Chief Executive Officer if his employment with us terminated.

 

Our liability for severance pay is calculated pursuant to the Israeli severance pay law based on the most recent salary for the employees multiplied by the number of years of employment, as of the balance sheet date. Under law, employees are entitled to one month salary (based on the average of the employee’s last three months’ salary) for each year of employment or a portion thereof. Accordingly, our unfunded severance liability increases upon any increase in an employee’s salary. In addition, several employees are entitled to additional severance compensation in accordance with the terms of their respective employment agreements. Our liability for all of our employees is fully provided by an accrual and is mainly funded by monthly deposits with insurance policies. The value of these policies is recorded as an asset in our balance sheet. Our net liability for severance payments is due to additional months of severance provided under our agreements with certain employees and to any shortfall in our deposited amounts caused by increases in salary.

 

The deposited funds may be withdrawn only upon the fulfillment of the obligation pursuant to Israeli severance pay law or labor agreements. The value of the deposited funds is based on the cash surrender value of these policies and includes profits or losses as appropriate.

 

We are still in the process of clinical trials and do not have a commercialized product and may never be able to commercialize our product candidates.

 

We have completed a phase I/II clinical trial with respect to our EPODURE Biopump in pre-dialysis patients and are conducting a phase IIa study in dialysis patients in Israel and preparing for a phase II study in dialysis patients in the United States. We have not commenced clinical trials for our INFRADURE Biopump or any other Biopump application. Only a small number of research and development programs ultimately result in commercially successful drugs and drug delivery systems. Potential products that appear to be promising at early stages of development may not reach the market for a number of reasons, including:

 

 
 

 

·failure to obtain approvals for large-scale clinical trials;

 

·difficulties related to large-scale manufacturing;

 

·lack of familiarity of health care providers and patients;

 

·low market acceptance as a result of lower demonstrated clinical safety or efficacy compared to other products or other potential disadvantages relative to alternative treatment methods;

 

·inability to obtain favorable coverage determinations from health plans and third-party payers;

 

·insufficient or unfavorable levels of reimbursement from government or third-party payers;

 

·infringement on proprietary rights of others for which we (or our licensees, if any) have not received licenses;

 

·incompatibility with other therapeutic products;

 

·potential advantages of alternative treatment methods;

 

·ineffective marketing and distribution support;

 

·lack of cost-effectiveness; or

 

·timing of market introduction of competitive products.

 

If any of these potential problems occurs, we may never successfully commercialize our Biopump Platform Technology. If we are unable to develop commercially viable products, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.

 

Our Biopump Platform Technology is still being developed and has not been tested on a large scale, and, therefore, we do not know all of the possible side effects and may not be able to commercialize our technology as planned.

 

The Biopump Platform Technology has not been tested on a large scale, and is still in an early stage of development. Although we and our advisors believe that the results in patients treated to date have demonstrated proof of concept and shown safety and efficacy of our technology so far in its first application, and although we are encouraged by the FDA clearance to proceed with a Phase IIb anemia study with EPODURE in dialysis patients, this does not constitute confirmation or approval of the safety and efficacy of our technology, nor have we received such from any regulatory authority. To date, although we have produced thousands of Biopumps in the laboratory, we have administered Biopumps to only a relatively small number of patients. We are in the early stages of developing the most efficient and effective methods to implant Biopumps so as to attain sustained performance once in the patient and thereby produce the desired therapeutic effect for extended periods of time. While we have attained a number of positive results in our first clinical application, there is significant variability between patients. These and other aspects of the implementation and use of the Biopump Platform Technology are not yet fully developed or proven, and disappointing results and problems could delay or prevent their completion. Even if the Biopump Platform Technology works well in one indication, it could have disappointing results in others. If so, the development could be stalled or even blocked in one or more indications. Potential risks associated with the use of the Biopump Platform Technology are the development of an immune response to the vector or the encoded protein product, local inflammatory response to the implanted tissue or associated with the insertion of the Biopump in the surrounding tissue, autoimmunity to the endogenous protein product or potential overdose of protein due to difficulties in managing the continuous supply in the patient in accordance with patient need. Risk for immunogenic reaction to the vector is based on clinical studies using first general adenoviral vectors that contain a full complement of viral proteins. We currently use a gutless adenoviral vector in all our development activities and our current trial to eliminate the risk of immune rejection of the Biopumps prepared with viral vector particles. While these gutless adenoviral vectors do not include genes for viral proteins, the risk for somehow re-establishing expression of viral proteins cannot be ruled out.

 

 
 

 

The basis for the risks described above is currently only theoretical since these effects have not been seen in the small number of patients that have received a Biopump in our EPODURE clinical trials or in preclinical safety studies performed in mice. However, the possible side effects and full efficacy and safety of the technology need to be tested in a substantial number of patients to verify this. Our previous safety tests were only carried out on a small number of patients and therefore any conclusions may not be representative of either a larger multi-centric test or the commercial version of the technology in the general population. In addition, the full impact of the technology, and its many possible variations, on the body is, as yet, unknown. Although no side effects attributed to the Biopump Platform Technology were found to date in our EPODURE clinical trials, other than minor bruising at the implantation site, the possibility cannot be ruled out that serious side effects might be borne out by further trials, and if so, this could have serious implications on the viability of the technology and our business.

 

Although the Biopump Platform Technology aims to minimize the residual number of viral vector particles and their proteins introduced into a body, there is a chance that the cumulative effect of Biopump reimplantation could result in an eventual buildup of viral proteins and an immunogenic reaction against the Biopumps preventing further implantations, which could question the viability of the technology.

 

Severe side effects or complications in trials, or post-approval, could result in financial claims and losses against us, damage our reputation, and increase our expenses and reduce our assets. In addition, our product candidates may not gain commercial acceptance or ever be commercialized.

 

We are completely dependent upon the successful development of our Biopump Platform Technology. If we fail to successfully complete its development and commercialization or enter into licensing or partnership agreements, we will not generate operating revenues.

 

All of our efforts are focused on the development of our Biopump Platform Technology. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in developing products based on our Biopump Platform Technology. If we or any partner(s) or collaborator(s) that we may enter into a relationship with are unable to consummate the production of Biopumps to provide the sustained protein therapy to treat various chronic diseases in a safe, stable, commercial end-product form, we will be unable to generate any revenues. There is no certainty as to our success, whether within a given time frame or at all. Any delays in our schedule for clinical trials, regulatory approvals or other stages in the development of our product are likely to cause us additional expense, and may even prevent the successful finalization of any or all of our product candidates. Delays in the timing for development of our technology may also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations due to the possible absence of financing sources for our operations during such additional periods of time.

 

Clinical trials involve lengthy and expensive processes with uncertain outcomes, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results.

 

We cannot predict whether we will encounter problems with any of our completed, ongoing or planned clinical trials, which would cause us or regulatory authorities to delay or suspend clinical trials, or delay the analysis of data from completed or ongoing clinical trials. We estimate that clinical trials involving various applications of our Biopump Platform Technology will continue for several years; however, such trials may also take significantly longer to complete and may cost more money that we expect. Failure can occur at any stage of testing, and we may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the clinical trial process that could delay or prevent commercialization of the current, or a future, more advanced, version of our Biopump Platform Technology, including but not limited to:

 

·delays in obtaining regulatory approvals to commence a clinical trial;

 

·failure or inability to recruit qualified investigators;

 

·slower than anticipated patient recruitment and enrollment;

 

·negative or inconclusive results from clinical trials;

 

·unforeseen safety issues;

 

·an inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment; and

 

 
 

 

·problems with investigator or patient compliance with the trial protocols.

 

A number of companies in the medical device, biotechnology, and biopharmaceutical industries, including those with greater resources and experience than us, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier clinical trials. Despite the successful results reported in early clinical trials regarding our EPODURE Biopump, we do not know whether any clinical trials we or our clinical partners may conduct will demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety to result in regulatory approval to market our product candidate for the treatment of chronic kidney disease or other indications. If later-stage clinical trials involving EPODURE Biopump do not produce favorable results, our ability to obtain regulatory approval may be adversely impacted, which will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Potential difficulty with, and delays in, recruiting additional patients for phase I/II, phase IIa and IIb, and phase III clinical trials may adversely affect the timing of our clinical trials and our working capital requirements.

 

Our research and development is highly dependent on timely recruitment of the requisite number and type of patients for our clinical trials. We have previously found it very difficult to recruit such patients and the increased volume and ethnic backgrounds required for future testing may render such testing even more difficult. Such larger studies will likely be based on the use of multicenter, multinational design, which can prove difficult to manage and could result in delays in patient recruitment. Delays in the recruitment of such patients could delay our trials and negatively impact our working capital requirements.

 

Potential difficulty with, and delays in, obtaining vectors necessary for conducting phase I/II, phase IIa and IIb, and phase III clinical trials and additional research and development of the Biopump Platform Technology may adversely affect the timing of our clinical trials, the further development of our technology and our working capital requirements.

 

We need specific vectors in order to conduct our research and development of our Biopump Platform Technology and to create Biopumps to conduct our clinical trials. We currently use only one source for the production and delivery of research grade versions of new vectors for developing new products. Such source is highly dependent on the work of a particular individual. Although we have a contract with such source, there is a possibility that the source could discontinue its business or the contract could be terminated, that the particular individual could become unable to work on the production of vectors or that other problems could occur with the timely production and delivery of vectors. We are in the process of seeking additional sources, including considering our internal ability to produce the necessary vectors. Vectors intended for use in clinical trials must be produced by other vector suppliers who manufacture according to strict requirements of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). We have worked with one such GMP vector manufacturer who has supplied the GMP vectors used in our EPODURE phase I/II clinical studies and for the planned INFRADURE phase I/II clinical studies, and we intend to continue to order new GMP vectors when needed from such supplier. There is a possibility that the source would discontinue its business or that other problems could occur with the timely production and delivery of GMP vectors. If this were to occur, we would need to establish GMP vector production at one or more alternative GMP vector manufacturers. Delays in obtaining the vectors could delay any new trials. Without the necessary vectors, we would be unable to continue the research and development of our technology, which would negatively impact our working capital requirements.

 

We may not successfully establish and maintain relationships with third-party service providers and collaborators, which could adversely affect our ability to develop our product candidates.

 

Our ability to commercialize our technology is dependent on our ability to reach strategic licensing and other development agreements with appropriate partners, including pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms and medical device companies. If we are unable to successfully negotiate such agreements, we may not be able to continue to develop the Biopump Platform Technology without raising significant additional capital for commercialization.

 

 
 

 

The successful adoption of Biopump Platform Technology also relies on our ability to bring about practical, reliable and cost-effective production of Biopumps on a commercial scale and its use in patients in widespread locations. This requires the design, development and commercial scale-up of Biopump manufacturing capability, intended for implementation in regional Biopump processing centers, together with appropriate logistical capabilities to enable local treatment of patients in their communities, in a cost effective and reliable manner. Biopump processing is intended to be effected using semi-automated processing stations employing sealed cassettes and other single use items for each patient. Although we have experienced initial positive results in processing MOs in individual closed processing chambers that were shipped from Israel at our contract manufacturing organization (CMO) in a GMP-certified facility in California, we or our CMO may not be able to replicate the results or be able to accommodate greater amounts. Treatment of patients in various locations is dependent upon reliable acquisition of MOs and implantation or ablation of Biopumps by trained local physicians, using appropriate proprietary and nonproprietary devices and products, and upon the transport of micro-organs and Biopumps between the Biopump processing centers and local treatment clinics via reliable and cost effective logistical arrangements. It may also be important that the processing center not require highly skilled operators, specialist laboratories or clean rooms. The inability to adequately scale and rollout such technology could damage the cost-effectiveness and therefore one of the anticipated competitive advantages of the Biopump Platform Technology.

 

Our core business strategy is to enter into collaborative relationships or strategic partnerships and/or license appropriate parts or uses of our technology in order to establish, develop and expand the distribution and international sale of our product candidates. We may not be able to identify such collaborators and partners on a timely basis and we may not be able to enter into relationships with any future collaborator(s) or partner(s) on terms that are commercially beneficial to us or at all. In addition, such relationships and partnerships may not come to fruition or may not be successful. Our agreements with these third parties may also contain provisions that restrict our ability to develop and test our product candidates or that give third parties rights to control aspects of our product development and clinical programs.

 

The third-party contractors may not assign as great of a priority to our clinical development programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs directly and, accordingly, may not complete activities on schedule, or may not conduct the studies or our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or with our trial design. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, or if their performance is substandard, we may be required to replace them.

 

In addition, conflicts may arise with our collaborators, such as conflicts concerning the interpretation of clinical data, the achievement of milestones, the interpretation of financial provisions or the ownership of intellectual property developed during the collaboration. If any conflicts arise with our existing or future collaborators, they may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interests. The third-party contractors may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of whom may compete with us. If the third-party contractors work with our competitors, our competitive position may be harmed.

 

In addition, although we attempt to audit and control the quality of third-party data, we cannot guarantee the authenticity or accuracy of such data, nor can we be certain that such data has not been fraudulently generated. The failure of third parties to carry out their obligations towards us would materially adversely affect our ability to develop and market our Biopump Platform Technology. To date, we have only entered into one collaboration agreement which addressed the feasibility and laboratory development of the HEMODURE Biopump. That agreement expired in September 2011.

 

We have no marketing experience, sales force or distribution capabilities. If our product candidates are approved, and we are unable to recruit key personnel to perform these functions, we may not be able to successfully commercialize the products.

 

Although we do not currently have any marketable products, our ability to produce revenues ultimately depends on our ability to sell our product candidates if and when they are approved by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. We currently have no experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products, and we do not have a marketing and sales staff or distribution capabilities. Developing a marketing and sales force is also time-consuming and could delay the launch of new products or expansion of existing product sales. In addition, we will compete with many companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations. If we fail to establish successful marketing and sales capabilities or fail to enter into successful marketing arrangements with third parties, our ability to generate revenues will suffer.

 

 
 

 

Furthermore, even if we enter into marketing and distributing arrangements with third parties, these third parties may not be successful or effective in selling and marketing our Biopump Platform Technology. If we fail to create successful and effective marketing and distribution channels, our ability to generate revenue and achieve our anticipated growth could be adversely affected. If these distributors experience financial or other difficulties, sales of our products could be reduced, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

 

We are subject to intense government regulation and we may not be able to successfully complete the necessary clinical trials.

 

Approval for clinical trials depends, among other things, on data obtained from our pre-clinical and clinical activities, including completion of preclinical animal and in vitro studies in a timely manner. These pre-clinical and clinical activities must meet stringent quality assurance and compliance requirements. Data obtained from such activities are susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approvals. Approval also depends on our obtaining certain key materials such as the GMP produced gutless adenoviral vector, which is prepared through a contract with a GMP vector manufacturer. Being a new version of an adenoviral vector, production of gutless adenoviral vector involves the use of certain special techniques for its preparation, which are somewhat different from those normally used by GMP vector manufacturers of first generation adenoviral vectors and such manufacturer may not be able to meet our requirements on a timely basis, or at all. Delays in obtaining a GMP vector needed for a specific clinical trial could delay the start of the trial. In addition, we cannot guarantee approval of our clinical trial protocols under the human subject protection laws and regulations of the countries where such trials are planned.

 

We currently have limited experience in and resources for conducting the large-scale clinical trials which may hamper our ability to obtain or comply with regulatory approval. The failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements may result in criminal prosecution, civil penalties, product recalls, withdrawal of product approval, mandatory restrictions and other actions, which could impair our ability to conduct business.

 

The FDA and other health authorities will regulate our product candidates and we may never receive regulatory approval to market and sell our product candidates.

 

Our product candidates will require regulatory approvals prior to sale. In particular, our product candidates are subject to stringent approval processes, prior to commercial marketing, by the FDA and by comparable agencies in all countries where we operate and desire to introduce our product candidates, whether sold via a strategic partner or directly by us. These requirements range from vector and Biopump efficacy and safety assessment in phase III clinical trials to long-term follow-up assessments on treated patients in clinical trials for product approval for sale. The process of obtaining FDA and corresponding foreign approvals is costly and time-consuming, and we cannot assure that such approvals will be granted. Also, the regulations we are subject to change frequently and such changes could cause delays in the development of our product candidates.

 

It typically takes a company several years or longer to satisfy the substantial requirements imposed by the FDA and comparable agencies in other countries for the introduction of therapeutic pharmaceutical and biological products. Pharmaceutical or biological products must be registered in accordance with applicable law before they can be manufactured, marketed and distributed. This registration must include medical data proving the product’s safety, efficacy and clinical testing. Also included in product registration should be references to medical publications and information about the production methods and quality control.

 

To obtain regulatory approvals in the United States, we or a collaborator must ultimately demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA that our product candidates are sufficiently safe and effective for their proposed administration to humans. Many factors, known and unknown, can adversely impact clinical trials and the ability to evaluate a product candidate’s safety and efficacy, including:

 

·the FDA or other health regulatory authorities, or instructional review boards (IRB), do not approve a clinical trial protocol or place a clinical trial on hold;

 

·suitable patients do not enroll in a clinical trial in sufficient numbers or at the expected rate, for reasons such as the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the perceptions of investigators and patients regarding safety, and the availability of other treatment options;

 

 
 

 

·clinical trial data are adversely affected by trial conduct or patient withdrawal prior to completion of the trial;

 

·there is competition with ongoing clinical trials and scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians;

 

·patients experience serious adverse events, including adverse side effects of our drug candidates, for a variety of reasons that may or may not be related to our product candidates, including the advanced stage of their disease and other medical problems;

 

·patients in the placebo or untreated control group exhibit greater than expected improvements or fewer than expected adverse events;

 

·third-party clinical investigators do not perform the clinical trials on the anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol and good clinical practices, or other third-party organizations do not perform data collection and analysis in a timely or accurate manner;

 

·service providers, collaborators or co-sponsors do not adequately perform their obligations in relation to the clinical trial or cause the trial to be delayed or terminated;

 

·we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of manufactured clinical trial materials;

 

·regulatory inspections of manufacturing facilities require us or a co-sponsor to undertake corrective action or suspend the clinical trials;

 

·the interim results of the clinical trial are inconclusive or negative;

 

·the clinical trial, although approved and completed, generates data that are not considered by the FDA or others to be sufficient to demonstrate safety and efficacy; and

 

·changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions affect the conduct of the clinical trial or the interpretation of its results.

 

There can be no assurance that our clinical trials will in fact demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the FDA and others, that our product candidates are sufficiently safe or effective. The FDA or we may also restrict or suspend our clinical trials at any time if either believes that we are exposing the subjects participating in the trials to unacceptable health risks.

 

Delays in obtaining such clearances and/or changes in existing requirements could have a material adverse effect on our company by making it difficult to advance product candidates or by reducing or eliminating their potential or perceived value and, therefore, our ability to conduct our business as currently planned could materially suffer. Failure to obtain required regulatory approvals could require us to delay, curtail or cease our operations. Even if we invest the necessary time, money and resources required to advance through the FDA approval process, there is no guarantee that we will receive FDA approval of our product candidates.

 

Our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA or state agencies, which may include any of the following sanctions:

 

·warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

 

·repair, replacement, refunds, recall or seizure of our products;

 

·operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

 

·refusing our requests for regulatory clearance or premarket approval of new products, new intended uses, or modifications to existing products;

 

·withdrawing regulatory clearance or premarket approvals that have already been granted; and

 

 
 

 

·criminal prosecution.

 

If any of these events were to occur, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Even if we obtain regulatory approvals, our products will be subject to ongoing regulatory review and if we fail to comply with continuing regulations, we could lose those approvals and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be seriously harmed.

 

Even if our Biopump Technology Platform receives initial regulatory approval or clearance for specific therapeutic applications, we will still be subject to ongoing reporting obligations, and such product and the related manufacturing operations will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including FDA inspections. This ongoing review may result in the withdrawal of our product from the market, the interruption of manufacturing operations and/or the imposition of labeling and/or marketing limitations related to specific applications of our product. Since many more patients will be exposed to our Biopump Technology Platform following its marketing approval, serious but infrequent adverse reactions that were not observed in clinical trials may be observed during the commercial marketing of such product. In addition, the manufacturer(s) and the manufacturing facilities that we will use to produce our Biopumps will be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other similar foreign regulators. Late discovery of previously unknown problems with any product, manufacturer or manufacturing process, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in actions, such as:

 

·restrictions on such product, manufacturer or manufacturing process;

 

·warning letters from the FDA or other regulatory authorities;

 

·the withdrawal of the product from the market;

 

·the suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals;

 

·a refusal by such regulator to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we or our licensees (if any) submit;

 

·a voluntary or mandatory recall;

 

·fines;

 

·a refusal to permit the import or export of our product;

 

·product seizures or detentions;

 

·injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; and

 

·adverse publicity.

 

In addition, from time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in the United States that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing any regulatory clearance or approval that we receive from the U.S. regulatory authorities. FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our product. We cannot predict what these changes will be, how or when they will occur or what effect they will have on the regulation of our product. If we, or our licensees, suppliers, collaborative research partners or clinical investigators are slow to adapt, or are unable to adapt, to changes in existing regulatory requirements or the adoption of new regulatory requirements or policies, we may lose marketing approval for any of the therapeutic applications of our product (to the extent that such applications are initially approved), resulting in decreased or lost revenue from milestones, product rental or usage fees, or royalties.

 

 
 

 

Even if approved by the necessary regulatory authorities, our product candidates may not gain market acceptance.

 

The development of a market for new technology is affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance the Biopump Platform Technology will gain acceptance within the markets at which it is targeted. Further, the internal structure for medical service provision varies considerably from territory to territory throughout the world and may be, in some cases, subject to public sector procurement processes, which could delay penetration of this market by our product candidates. If the market does not accept our product candidates, when and if we are able to commercialize them, then we may never become profitable. Factors that could delay, inhibit or prevent market acceptance of our product candidates may include:

 

·the timing and receipt of marketing approvals;

 

·the safety and efficacy of the products;

 

·the emergence of equivalent or superior products;

 

·the cost-effectiveness of the products;

 

·findings by health plans or third-party payers that the product candidates are not reasonable and necessary, or are subject to additional prerequisites for coverage;

 

·decisions by health plans not to cover the Biopump Platform Technology if they conclude that it is experimental or investigational; and

 

·ineffective marketing.

 

Our success is first and foremost reliant upon there being a demand for our technology by potential strategic partners. Together with such partners, we intend to establish and manage reliable and cost effective Biopump production capabilities on a large scale. There is risk that such facilities may not be successfully established, may not meet their performance requirements or cost targets, or in other ways fail to deliver the requisite level of reliable and cost-effective Biopumps for clinical use. In addition, sales will rely upon demand for Biopump products, which in turn is dependent upon patient and doctor and other medical practitioner perceptions as to safety, reliability and efficacy of our product candidates. Although our product candidates will be subject to extensive testing, there can be no assurance that consumers will ultimately accept them relating to safety.

 

Our efforts to comply with federal and state fraud and abuse laws could be costly, and, if we are unable to fully comply with such laws, we could face substantial penalties.

 

We are subject to extensive federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

·the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid;

 

·the federal False Claims Act, which prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;

 

·the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), which creates federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program and which also imposes certain obligations on entities with respect to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

 

·the federal False Statements Statute, which prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services;

 

 
 

  

·the federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits, among other things, making payments to foreign officials of any country outside of the United States for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business; and

 

·state laws that are analogous to each of the above federal laws, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws (some of which may apply to healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including commercial insurers), as well as certain state laws that require pharmaceutical and medical device companies to comply with industry voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal

 

If our past or present operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from third-party payer programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and/or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we may do business are found to be non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions including exclusions from government-funded health care programs, which could also negatively impact our operations. Our ongoing efforts to comply with these laws may be costly, and our failure to comply with these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been definitively interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of subjective interpretations. In addition, these laws and their interpretations are subject to change. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses, divert our management's attention from the operation of our business and damage our reputation.

 

If any of our key employees discontinue his or her services with us, our efforts to develop our business may be delayed.

 

Our success will depend on the retention of our Directors, Strategic Advisory Board and other current and future members of our management and technical team, including Dr. Andrew Pearlman, our founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, Clarence “Butch” Dellio, our Chief Operating Officer, and Dr. Marvin Garovoy, our Chief Medical Officer, and on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will retain the services of any of our Directors, Strategic Advisory Board members, officers or employees, or attract or retain additional senior managers or skilled employees. Furthermore, we do not carry key man insurance with respect to any of such individuals.

 

The Biopump Platform Technology is still in development and is dependent on further development and testing to reach commercial production. We currently employ a small number of key personnel including top managers, scientists, engineers and clinical experts who are important to developing the Biopump Platform Technology and have a high level of accumulated knowledge which would be lost if they left our company. If these employees leave our company or otherwise are unable to provide services, there could be significant implications on the timing and cost of future development of the technology. Because competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense, we may be unable to timely find suitable replacements with the necessary scientific expertise. We cannot assure you that our efforts to attract or retain such personnel will be successful.

 

If we are not able to obtain and maintain adequate patent protection for our product candidates, we may be unable to prevent our competitors from using our technology.

 

Our ability to commercialize the Biopump Platform Technology, or our product candidates, will depend, in part, on our ability, both in the United States and in other countries, to obtain patents, enforce those patents, preserve trade secrets and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. Our owned and licensed patent portfolio directed to the Biopump Platform Technology contains 40 issued patents and 81 pending U.S. and international patent applications. We may not successfully obtain patents in the other countries in which patent applications have been or will be filed, and we may not develop other patentable products or processes. In addition, any future patents may not prevent other persons or companies from developing similar or medically equivalent products and other persons or companies may be issued patents that may prevent the sale of our products or that will require us to license or pay significant fees or royalties. Furthermore, issued patents may not be valid or enforceable, or be able to provide our company with meaningful protection. Patent litigation is costly and time-consuming and there can be no assurance that we will have, or will be able to devote, sufficient resources to pursue such litigation. In addition, potentially unfavorable outcomes in such proceedings could limit our intellectual property rights and activities.

 

 
 

 

The patent positions of the products being developed by us and our collaborators involve complex legal and factual uncertainties. As a result, we cannot assure that any patent applications filed by us, or by others under which we have rights, will result in patents being issued in the United States or foreign countries. In addition, there can be no assurance that the scope of any patent protection will be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages, that any patents obtained by us or our collaborators will be held valid if subsequently challenged or that others will not claim rights in or ownership of the patents and other proprietary rights we or our collaborators may hold.

 

Unauthorized parties may try to copy aspects of our product candidates and technologies or obtain and use information we consider proprietary. Policing the unauthorized use of our proprietary rights is difficult. We cannot guarantee that no harm or threat will be made to our or our collaborators’ intellectual property. In addition, changes in, or different interpretations of, patent laws in the United States and other countries may also adversely affect the scope of our patent protection and our competitive situation.

 

There is certain subject matter that is patentable in the United States but not generally patentable outside of the United States. Differences in what constitutes patentable subject matter in various countries may limit the protection we can obtain outside of the United States. For example, methods of treating humans are not patentable in many countries outside of the United States. These and other issues may prevent us from obtaining patent protection outside of the United States, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

As we develop the Biopump Platform Technology, we may need to obtain licenses to use certain patents depending on the specific gene products, proteins, vectors and promoters used in conjunction with the Biopump Platform Technology. These licenses include, for example, one or more specific proteins and promoters used in conjunction with certain genes to control their expression. There is no assurance that we will obtain licenses for such technology or would be able to obtain licenses to any third party intellectual property on commercially reasonable terms.

 

Additionally, there can be no assurance that we can successfully develop non-infringing alternatives on a timely basis, or license non-infringing alternatives, if any exist, on commercially reasonable terms. A significant intellectual property impediment to our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates could adversely affect our business prospects.

 

We cannot be certain that any of our patent applications, or those of our licensors, will result in issued patents. In addition, because patents are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions, the patents and patent applications we own and license, or any further patents or patent applications we may own or license, may not prevent other companies from developing similar products. We cannot assure you that our patents will not be challenged by third parties or that we will be successful in any defense we undertake. Failure to successfully defend a patent challenge could materially and adversely affect our business.

 

We cannot assure you that third parties cannot and will not design around our patents and develop similar products  or that we will be successful in enforcing our patents on such design around products. Additionally, the biosimilars pathway created under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) may allow for another manufacturer to develop a non-patent infringing product using data from our own clinical trials. Prior to the enactment of BPCIA, information in approved Biologic License Applications (BLAs) could not be relied upon by other manufacturers to to establish the safety and efficacy of their products for which they were seeking FDA approval. Accordingly, if the Biopump Platform Technology were approved under a BLA, other manufacturers potentially could develop and seek FDA approval of “biosimilar” products at some point in the future.

 

In addition, changes in either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may materially diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection.  For example, on September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent enforcement and defense.  It is too early to determine what the effect or impact the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act will have on the operation of our business and the protection and enforcement of our intellectual property. However, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

 

 
 

 

We are heavily reliant on licenses from third parties and any loss of these rights would adversely affect our business.

 

We do not own some of the patents upon which the Biopump Platform Technology is based. We license such patents exclusively from Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Yissum), subject to certain specific reservations and restrictions. We have certain monetary and operational obligations under the license agreement with Yissum. If we fail to perform any of our obligations under the Yissum license agreement, Yissum may have the right to declare a breach of the Yissum license agreement. Upon such a breach, the Yissum license agreement could be terminated and the intellectual property could revert to Yissum and we may be unable to use or further develop the Biopump Platform Technology in those circumstances.

 

We have also obtained a non-exclusive license to technology from Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), Houston, Texas. The license is subject to certain specific reservations and restrictions including BCM’s required approval for the sale, market, transfer, sublicense, use and filing of patent applications for the BCM technology. BCM’s technology is also subject to U.S. governmental rights to call for a license to exploit the technology. If we fail to get such approvals or rights, our ability to use and/or profit from products that incorporate the BCM technology may be inhibited or prevented. If we fail to perform any of our obligations under the BCM license agreement, the BCM license agreement may be terminated. If the BCM license agreement is terminated, the licensed technology could revert to BCM, which may impair our ability to use or further develop our products candidates.

 

We have obtained a worldwide license to patents for variants of Factor VIII from the Regents of the University of Michigan (University of Michigan). We intend to use such variants to further our research and development with respect to our HEMODURE Biopump. If we breach our payment or development obligations under such license agreement, University of Michigan would have the right to terminate the license and we would be unable to use such licensed patents. As a result, development of our HEMODURE Biopump may be adversely impacted or delayed.

 

Our business is dependent on proprietary rights that may be difficult to protect and such dependence could affect our ability to effectively compete.

 

In addition to our patents, we also rely on trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. However, others, including our competitors, may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology. We take precautionary measures to protect our proprietary rights and information, including the use of confidentiality agreements with employees and consultants, and those with whom we have academic and commercial relationships. However, we may not have such agreements in place with all such parties and, in spite of the measures, there can still be no guarantee that agreements will not be violated or that there will be an adequate remedy available for a violation of an agreement. Any of these events could prevent us from developing or commercializing our product candidates.

 

In addition, we have no trademark or applications pending; and third parties may have trademarks or have pending applications on our contemplated marks or similar marks or in similar fields of use that are confusingly similar; or may be using our contemplated marks or similar marks. We may have to change our use of certain marks currently in use or contemplated which could have an adverse impact on our business and may require us to spend additional funds to develop new marks. We anticipate that we will spend both time and management resources to develop and file trademark applications in the future.

 

 
 

 

 

We are subject to intense competition in the therapeutic protein market from companies with greater resources and more mature products, which may result in our competitors developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than us.

 

While we believe our Biopump Platform Technology has significant advantages, there are a number of well-established and substantial companies engaged in the development, production, marketing, sale and distribution of products that are potentially competitive with our product candidates or the Biopump Platform Technology in general. Many of these companies are more experienced than our company is and represent significant competition. It is also possible that other parties have in development products substantially similar to or with properties that are more efficacious, less invasive and more cost effectively delivered than our product candidates or the Biopump Platform Technology in general. The success of our competitors in developing, bringing to market, distributing and selling their products could negatively affect our result of operations and/or general acceptance of our product candidates.

 

We face risks related to the current economic conditions that may adversely affect our business.

 

In general, our operating results can be significantly and adversely affected by negative economic conditions, high labor, material and commodity costs and unforeseen changes in demand for our products and services. These conditions have resulted and could continue to result in slower adoption of new technologies and cost containment efforts by governments and other payers for healthcare research and development, products and services. The current economic conditions could also have a potentially significant negative impact on our ability to generate sufficient internal cash flows or access credit at reasonable rates to meet future operating expenses, service debt and fund capital expenditure. The continued weakness in world economies makes the strength and timing of any economic recovery uncertain, and there can be no assurance that global economic conditions will not deteriorate further.

 

The grants we received from the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist place certain restrictions on us.

 

Through our wholly owned Israeli subsidiary, we have received, and anticipate continuing to receive, grants from the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist (OCS) totaling $7,062,000. The grant agreements require repayment of the grants provided to us through the payment of royalties out of income received from commercializing the developed technology. Pursuant to the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, certain limitations will apply to the change of control of the grant recipient and the financing, mortgaging, production, exportation, licensing or transfer or sale outside of Israel of its technology and intellectual property, which will require the Chief Scientist’s prior consent and, in some cases, extended royalties or other fees. This could have a material adverse effect on and significant cash flow consequences to our company if, and when, any technologies, intellectual property or manufacturing rights are exported, transferred or licensed to third parties outside Israel. If the OCS does not wish to give its consent in any required situation or transaction, we would need to negotiate a resolution with OCS which would involve monetary payments, such as royalties or fees, in aggregate up to three times the applicable funding received from OCS.

 

Health care policy changes, including U.S. health care reform legislation signed in 2010, may have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Health care reform is often a subject of attention in governments that are trying to control health care expenditures. Health care reform proposals have been the subject of much debate in the U.S. Congress and some state legislatures, as well as in other countries. There is no assurance that legislation resulting in adverse effects on our company or our product candidates will not be adopted in a country in which we intend to operate and/or upon the distribution of our product candidates in the United States.

 

In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. The legislation imposes significant new taxes on medical device makers in the form of a 2.3% excise tax on all U.S. medical device sales that began January 1, 2013. Under the law, the total cost to the medical device industry from the tax is expected to be approximately $29 billion over ten years. This significant increase in the tax burden on our industry could have a material, negative impact on our results of operations and our cash flows, especially if the Biopump was determined to be a medical device. Other elements of this legislation, such as comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system reforms, including shared savings pilots, and other provisions, could meaningfully change the way health care is developed and delivered, and may materially impact numerous aspects of our business.

 

 
 

 

Reimbursement policies of third-party payers may negatively affect the acceptance of our product candidates by subjecting the product candidates to sales and pharmaceutical pricing controls.

 

Third-party payers (Medicare, Medicaid, private health insurance companies and other organizations) may affect the pricing or relative attractiveness of our product candidates by regulating the level of reimbursement provided to the physicians and clinics utilizing our product candidates or by refusing reimbursement. If reimbursement under these programs, or if the amount of time to secure reimbursement is too long, our ability to market our technology and product candidates may be adversely and materially affected. In international markets, reimbursement by private third-party medical insurance providers, including government insurers and independent providers, varies from country to country. In certain countries, our ability to achieve significant market penetration may depend upon the availability of third-party government reimbursement. Pharmaceutical pricing is also subject to regulation in Israel as well as other countries within which we may wish to distribute our product candidates.

 

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in March 2010 reduces Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals, clinical laboratories and pharmaceutical companies, and could otherwise reduce the volume of medical procedures. Although we cannot predict the full effect on our business of the implementation of existing legislation such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the enactment of additional legislation, we believe that legislation or regulation that reduces reimbursement for our products could adversely affect how much or under what circumstances health care providers will prescribe or administer our products. This could materially and adversely impact our business by reducing our ability to generate revenue, raise capital, obtain additional collaborators and market our products. In addition, we believe the increasing emphasis on managed care in the United States has and will continue to put pressure on the price and usage of pharmaceutical products, which may adversely impact product sales.

 

We may experience product liability claims, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

 

We may become subject to product liability claims. We have not experienced any product liability claims to date; however, the production at commercial scale, distribution, sale and support of our product candidates may entail the risk of such claims, which is likely to be substantial in light of the use of our product candidates in the treatment of medical conditions. We carry product liability insurance coverage in connection with our phase I/II trial of the EPODURE Biopump currently being conducted in Israel. Our insurance provides $3 million in coverage, subject to a $5,000 deductible. Our insurance must be renewed annually at a current cost of $17,000 per year to cover current and planned trials in Israel. If we are unable to obtain a renewal or if we suffer a successful product liability claim in excess of our insurance coverage, such claim could result in significant monetary liability and could have a material adverse impact on our business, operations, financial position and/or reputation.

 

Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In addition, current and potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

 

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our results of operation could be harmed.

 

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. We continuously monitor our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems to confirm that they are compliant with Section 404, and we may identify deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadlines imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This process may divert internal resources and will take a significant amount of time and effort to complete.

 

If, at any time, it is determined that we are not in compliance with Section 404, we may be required to implement new internal control procedures and reevaluate our financial reporting. We may experience higher than anticipated operating expenses as well as increased independent auditor fees during the implementation of these changes and thereafter. Further, we may need to hire additional qualified personnel. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which could result in our being unable to obtain an unqualified report on internal controls from our independent auditors. Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

 

 
 

 

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses, divert management’s attention from operating our business which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

There have been changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, as well as new regulations promulgated by the SEC and rules promulgated by the national securities exchanges, including the NYSE MKT. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Our board members, principal executive officer and principal financial officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive officers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, we may incur additional expenses to comply with standards set by regulatory authorities or governing bodies which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risk Related to our Securities

 

Our common stock is thinly traded, resulting in relative illiquidity and price volatility, and there may not ever be an active market for our common stock in the United States.

 

Although our common stock has been admitted for trading on the AIM Market since December 2007 and has been traded on the NYSE MKT (formerly the NYSE Amex) since April 2011, the volumes and trading in our common stock have been extremely sporadic. As a result, the ability of holders to purchase or sell our common stock is limited, with low-volume trading creating wide shifts in price. For our common stock to continue to be listed on the NYSE MKT, we must meet the current listing requirements of that exchange. If we were unable to meet these requirements, our common stock could be delisted from the NYSE MKT. Any such delisting of our common stock could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but also through delays in the timing of transactions and less coverage of us by securities analysts, if any. Also, if in the future we were to determine that we need to seek additional equity capital, it could have an adverse effect on our ability to raise capital in the public or private equity markets.

 

Further, the share prices of public companies, particularly those operating in high growth sectors, are often subject to significant fluctuations. The market price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT has been volatile, ranging from $2.96 per share to $16.43 per share during the 52-week trading period ending January 15, 2013. We expect that the market price of our common stock will continue to fluctuate significantly due to factors including, but not limited to, the following:

 

·actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;

 

·announcements of developments by us or our competitors;

 

·announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

 

·adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;

 

·additions or departures of key personnel;

 

·introduction of new products by us or our competitors;

 

 
 

 

·changes in market valuations of companies in our industry;

 

·general market conditions;

 

·future issuances of our common stock or other securities; and

 

·other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

 

Our common stock is traded on more than one market and this may result in price variations.

 

Our common stock is traded on both the NYSE MKT and the AIM Market. Trading in our shares on these markets takes place in different currencies (U.S. dollars on the NYSE MKT and British Pounds sterling on the AIM Market) and at different times (resulting from different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the United States and the United Kingdom). The trading prices of our shares of common stock on these two markets may differ due to these and other factors. Any decrease in the price of our shares of common stock on one of these markets could cause a decrease in the trading price of our shares on the other market. We cannot predict what the effect of trading of our common stock on the AIM Market will be on the trading of our common stock on the NYSE MKT, and vice versa.

 

Securities analysts may not initiate coverage or continue to cover our common stock, and this may have a negative impact on its market price.

 

The trading market for our securities could depend in part on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about our business and us. We do not have any control over these analysts. There is no guarantee that securities analysts will cover our securities. If securities analysts do not cover our securities, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect their market prices. If we are covered by securities analysts, and our securities are the subject of an unfavorable report, the prices for our securities would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price and/or trading volume to decline.

 

The exercise of options and warrants and other issuances of shares of common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock will dilute the ownership interests of our current stockholders and may adversely affect the future market price of our common stock.

 

Sales of our common stock in the public market, either by us or by our current stockholders, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause a decline in the market price of our securities. Nearly all of the shares of our common stock held by those of our current stockholders who are not affiliates may be immediately eligible for resale in the open market either in compliance with an exemption under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or pursuant to an effective resale registration statement that we have previously filed with the SEC. Such sales, along with any other market transactions, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

In addition, as of December 31, 2012, there were outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 1,059,542 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $2.49 per share to $14.50 per share, of which options to purchase 914,219 shares were exercisable as of such date. As of December 31, 2012, there were warrants outstanding to purchase 5,969,891 shares of our common stock, at exercise prices ranging from $0.0002 per share to $11.16 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.93 per share, all of which were exercisable as of December 31, 2012. The exercise of options and warrants at prices below the market price of our common stock could adversely affect the price of shares of our common stock. In addition, some of the warrants have anti-dilution protection which will require us to lower the exercise price in the event we sell securities in the future at a price lower than the exercise price. Additional dilution may result from the issuance of shares of our common stock in connection with collaborations or manufacturing arrangements or in connection with other financing efforts.

 

Any issuance of our common stock that is not made solely to then-existing stockholders proportionate to their interests, such as in the case of a stock dividend or stock split, will result in dilution to each stockholder by reducing his, her or its percentage ownership of the total outstanding shares. Moreover, if we issue options or warrants to purchase our common stock in the future and those options or warrants are exercised, stockholders may experience further dilution. Holders of shares of our common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle them to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series.

 

 
 

 

Our principal stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

 

As of December 31, 2012, our officers and directors together controlled approximately 23.0% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, our four largest stockholders other than management and the directors controlled approximately 10.3% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and therefore may not be in the best interest of our other stockholders.

 

We have never declared or paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

We have never declared or paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, applicable contractual restrictions and other such factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

 

Provisions of Delaware law may delay or prevent efforts to acquire a controlling interest in us, even if such acquisition were in the best interests of our stockholders.

 

We are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which regulates corporate acquisitions. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management.

 

There may be future sales or other dilution of our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

We are not restricted from issuing additional shares of our common stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, our common stock. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of shares of our common stock or sales of such other securities or the perception that such sales could occur.

 

Israel-Related Risks

 

Our business occurs primarily in Israel, and our company and our business could be adversely affected by the economic, political and military conditions in that region.

 

Our principal activities are based in Israel, which may be adversely affected by acts of terrorism, major hostilities, adverse legislation or litigation. If major hostilities should occur in the Middle East, including as a result of acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere, any such effects may not be covered by insurance. Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with the security situation in the Middle East, such as damages to our facilities and the resulting disruption to our ability to continue our product development. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot be certain that this government coverage will be maintained or will be adequate in the event we submit a claim. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

 
 

 

Israel withdrew unilaterally from the Gaza Strip and certain areas in northern Samaria in 2005. Thereafter Hamas, an Islamist terrorist group responsible for many attacks, including missile strikes against Israeli civilian targets, won the majority of the seats in the Parliament of the Palestinian Authority in January 2006 and took control of the entire Gaza Strip, by force, in June 2007. Since then, Hamas and other Palestinian movements have launched thousands of missiles from the Gaza strip into civilian targets in southern Israel. In late 2008, a sharp increase in rocket fire from Gaza on Israel’s western Negev region, extending as far as 25 miles into Israeli territory and disrupting most day-to-day civilian activity in the proximity of the border with the Gaza Strip, prompted the Israeli government to launch military operations against Hamas that lasted approximately three weeks. Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire in January 2009, which substantially diminished the frequency of, but did not eliminate, Hamas rocket attacks against Israeli cities. In November 2012, following an increase in rocket attacks and hostile activity originating from the Gaza Strip, the Israeli government launched an air attack on Hamas. Rockets were fired into Israel extending as far as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. After seven days, a ceasefire was agreed to by Israel and Hamas. Since then, rocket attacks have been significantly reduced, but not totally stopped. There can be no assurance that this period of relative calm will continue, especially in light of continuing rhetoric between Iran and Israel.

 

We are directly affected by economic, political and military conditions in that country. Our Israeli production facilities are located in Misgav which is located approximately 150 miles from the nearest point of the border with the Gaza Strip. There can be no assurance that Hamas will not obtain and use longer-range missiles capable of reaching our facilities, which could result in a significant disruption of the Israel-based portion of our business. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations and may make it more difficult for us to raise necessary capital. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors and a state of hostility, varying in degree and intensity, has led to security and economic problems for Israel. For example, any major escalation in hostilities in the region could result in a portion of our employees, including executive officers, directors, and key personnel and consultants, being called up to perform military duty for an extended period of time. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in the agreements.

 

In addition to the foregoing, since the end of 2010, numerous acts of protest and civil unrest have taken place in several countries in the Middle East and North Africa, many of which involved significant violence. The civil unrest in Egypt, which borders Israel, resulted in significant changes to the country’s government. In Syria, also bordering Israel, large and violent protests against the government are taking place. The ultimate effect of these developments on the political and security situation in the Middle East and on Israel’s position within the region is not clear at this time.

 

Our operations may be disrupted by the obligations of our personnel to perform military service which could have a material adverse effect of our business.

 

Many of our male employees in Israel are obligated to perform up to one month (in some cases more) of annual military reserve duty until they reach the age of 45 and, in the event of a military conflict, could be called to active duty. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of our employees related to military service or the absence for extended periods of military service of one or more of our key employees. A disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Under current U.S. and Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce employees’ covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees.

 

We have entered in non-competition agreements with our key employees. These agreements prohibit our key employees, if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors for a limited period. Under applicable U.S. and Israeli law, we may be unable to enforce these agreements. If we cannot enforce our non-competition agreements with our employees, then we may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of our former employees, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and ability to capitalize on our proprietary information.

 

 
 

 

Service of process and enforcement of civil liabilities on our company and our officers may be difficult.

 

We are organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and are subject to service of process in the United States. However, approximately half of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, most of our executive officers are residents of Israel and the bulk of the assets of such executive officers are located outside the United States.

 

There is doubt as to the enforceability of civil liabilities under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, in original actions instituted in Israel. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to enforce or effect service of process upon these executive officers or to judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. laws against our assets, as well as the assets of these executive officers. In addition, awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be unenforceable in Israel.

 

We may experience foreign currency exchange risks, which may increase the dollar costs of our operations in Israel.

 

A substantial portion of our expenses, including those related to our clinical trial, our research and development, personnel and facilities-related expenses is incurred in New Israeli Shekels (NIS). Inflation in Israel will have the effect of increasing the dollar cost of our operations in Israel, unless it is offset on a timely basis by a devaluation of the NIS relative to the U.S. dollar. This may give rise to an exchange rate risk against NIS. We do not currently engage in hedging or use any other financial instruments or arrangements to manage this risk.