Attached files

file filename
8-K - FORM 8-K - BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.d448068d8k.htm
Wells Fargo Securities
11 
Annual
Pipeline,
MLP
and
Energy
Symposium
December 4, 2012
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
Exhibit 99.1
th


LEGAL NOTICE/FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
2
This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” that we believe to be reasonable as of the date of this presentation.  These statements,
which include any statement that does not relate strictly to historical facts, use terms such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “plan,” “position,” “predict,” “project,” or “strategy” or the negative connotation or other variations of such terms
or other similar terminology.  In particular, statements, express or implied, regarding future results of operations or ability to generate sales,
income or cash flow, to make acquisitions, or to make distributions to unitholders are forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking
statements are based on management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “BPL”) and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond
management’s control.  Although the Partnership believes that its expectations stated in this presentation are based on reasonable assumptions,
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.  The factors listed in the “Risk Factors”
sections of, as well as any other cautionary language in, the Partnership’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, provide
examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause the Partnership’s actual results to differ materially from the expectations it describes
in its forward-looking statements.  Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, and the Partnership
undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.
 


INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS
Over 125 years of continuous operations, with a 26-year track record as a publicly traded MLP on the
NYSE
Market capitalization near $5.0 billion
Lower cost of capital realized from elimination of GP IDRs
Investment grade credit rating with a conservative approach toward financing growth 
Increased
geographic
and
product
diversity
resulting
from
recent
acquisitions
Growth opportunities to unlock significant value from acquisition of assets from
major
petroleum
companies
-
“Terminal
Franchise”
Opportunities
for
significant
internal
growth
projects
on
legacy
and
recently
acquired
assets
Paid cash distributions each quarter since formation in 1986
Petroleum storage tanks at our Macungie terminal in Pennsylvania
Aerial view of BORCO’s six offshore jetties with tank farm in the distance
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
3


MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
Achieving Financial and Operational Excellence
The current management team has consistently executed on each element of our strategy to
transform Buckeye into a best-in-class asset manager by:
Implementing best practices across our business, including acquired assets
Improving our cost structure through an organizational restructuring in 2009
Expanding our asset portfolio through conservatively financed, accretive acquisitions, and organic
growth projects
Diversifying
our
legacy
business
into
new
geographies,
products,
and
asset
classes
Reducing cost of capital through the buy-in of our general partner
We continue to be committed to our mission of delivering superior returns through our
talented, valued employees and our core strengths of:
Best-in-class customer service
Operational excellence that provides consistent, reliable performance to optimize the assets we own
and operate
An unwavering commitment to safety, environmental responsibility, regulatory compliance, and
personal integrity
An entrepreneurial approach toward asset acquisition and development
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
4


CEO SUCCESSION AND STRATEGIC ORGANIZATIONAL REALIGNMENT
CEO succession effective 1Q 2012:
Clark C. Smith, Buckeye’s President and Chief Operating Officer,
succeeded Forrest E. Wylie as Chief Executive Officer, and joined the
Board of Directors of Buckeye’s general partner.
Forrest E. Wylie continues to serve as Non-Executive Chairman of the
Board, where he remains active in developing our strategic vision.
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
5
Board of Directors
Forrest E. Wylie
Chairman
Clark C. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Robert A. Malecky
President, Domestic
Pipelines and Terminals
Domestic
Pipelines
BORCO
Terminal
Yabucoa
Terminal
Natural Gas
Storage
Mark S. Esselman
Global
Human Resources
Keith E. St.Clair
Chief Financial
Officer
Khalid A. Muslih
Corp. Development &
Strategic Planning
Development
& Logistics
Mary F. Morgan
President, International
Pipelines and Terminals
Energy
Services
Jeremiah J. Ashcroft, III
President,
Buckeye Services
Domestic
Terminals
Strategic Organizational Realignment, effective 1Q 2012; Buckeye
operations organized into three business units, each headed by a
President.
Domestic Pipelines & Terminals
International Pipelines & Terminals
Buckeye Services
Management Structure after Reorganization
      Strategic Organizational Realignment rationale:
Previous structure organized around functions (e.g., commercial, operations, etc.).
Growth has resulted in increased complexities in each of Buckeye’s business areas, requiring focus and ownership of skilled executives
on a daily basis.
Allows business unit Presidents to focus on all aspects of performance–including commercial, operational, and financial performance–of
their respective business unit.
Presidents of business units accountable for overall performance of those units.
William  H. Schmidt, Jr.
General Counsel


ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW
Three Business Operating Units
Domestic Pipelines & Terminals
Over 6,000 miles of pipeline with ~100 delivery locations
Approximately 100 liquid petroleum product terminals
Approximately 41 million barrels of liquid petroleum product storage
capacity 
International
Pipelines
&
Terminals
Over 28 million barrels of storage capacity at 2 terminal facilities
in The Bahamas (~23 million) and Puerto Rico (~5 million)
Deep water berthing capability to handle ULCCs and VLCCs
in The Bahamas
Announced expansion underway to add approximately 4.7 million
barrels
at
Bahamian
facility;
1.9
million
barrels
placed
in
service
half
2012
Buckeye Services
Natural Gas Storage
~30 Bcf of working natural gas storage capacity in Northern California
Energy Services
Markets refined petroleum products in areas served by Domestic
Pipelines &
Terminals
5 terminals with ~1 million barrels of storage capacity
Development & Logistics
Operates and/or maintains third-party pipelines under agreements with major
oil and chemical companies
(1) See Appendix for Non-GAAP Reconciliations
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
6
74.0%
23.1%
0.9%
0.4%
1.6%
2011 ADJUSTED EBITDA
(1)
nd


BUCKEYE SYSTEM MAP
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
7


VALUE CREATION/GROWTH DRIVERS
$4 Billion Invested Since 2008
Recent Transactions
(1)
2012
Perth Amboy, New Jersey Marine Terminal,
$260.0 million
2011
BORCO Marine Terminal, $1.7 billion
BP Pipeline & Terminal Assets, $165.0 million
Maine Terminals and Pipeline, $23.5 million
2010
Buy-in of BPL’s general partner, 20 million units issued
Yabucoa, Puerto Rico Terminal, $32.6 million
Opelousas, Louisiana Terminal, $13.0 million
Additional Equity Interest in West Shore Pipe Line Company, 
$13.5 million
2009
Blue/Gold Pipeline and Terminal Assets, $54.4 million
2008
Lodi Natural Gas Storage, $442.4 million
Farm & Home Oil Company
(2)
, $146.2 million
(3)
Niles and Ferrysburg, Michigan Terminals, $13.9 million
Albany, New York Terminal, $46.9 million
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
8
(1)
Excludes acquisitions with a value of $10 million or lower
(2)
Now Buckeye Energy Services
(3)
Buckeye sold the retail division of Farm & Home Oil Company in 2008 for $52.6 million
(4)
Estimate provided is mid-point of expected organic growth capital spend range
Organic Growth Capital Spending
$0
$80
$160
$240
$320
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012P
Perth Amboy
BORCO
Natural Gas
Storage
Legacy Assets (excl.
NGS)
$91.5
$261.9
$63.8
$46.5
$270.0
Major Capital Projects in Current Year
Transformation of Perth Amboy terminal into highly efficient, multi-
product storage, blending, and throughput facility
Significant expansion and product diversity plans at BORCO facility
Transformation of our Albany marine terminal to handle crude via
rail and ship; represents another connection for us to crude-rich
Bakken shale play
Propylene rail loading and storage project and storage expansion
and unit train rack construction at two terminals within our
Chicago complex
Pipeline expansion between our Linden, NJ and Macungie, PA
terminals to increase capacity to Western PA
Butane blending and vapor recovery installations planned for
numerous terminal facilities across our system


Domestic Pipelines & Terminals
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
9


DOMESTIC PIPELINES & TERMINALS OVERVIEW
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
10
Petroleum storage tanks at our Macungie terminal in Pennsylvania
Pipelines & Terminals segment represents Buckeye’s
largest segment contribution to Adjusted EBITDA
Over 6,000 miles of pipeline located primarily in the
Northeast and Midwest United States moving over 1.3
million barrels of liquid petroleum products per day
with more than 100 delivery points
Approximately 100 liquid petroleum product storage
terminals located throughout the United States
Approximately 41 million barrels of storage capacity
(1)
YTD as of September 30, 2012
(2)
Terminal Throughput Volumes
(1)
Pipeline Throughput Volumes
(1)(2)
1,483.4
1,395.4
1,323.1
1,316.3
1,358.1
1,386.7
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
482.3
464.4
471.9
562.5
742.8
888.3
0
250
500
750
1000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Pipeline volumes exclude contribution from the Buckeye NGL Pipeline 
sold in January of 2010


BP PIPELINES & TERMINALS ACQUISITION
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
11
Transaction closed in June 2011
Total transaction purchase price of $165 million
33 liquid products terminals expanding Buckeye’s
footprint in the Midwest as well as providing
geographic diversity with terminals in the Southeast
and on the West Coast
643 miles of refined product pipeline in Iowa and
Northern Ohio
590-mile “Lower V”
pipeline system that originates
in Dubuque, Iowa and runs southwest into Missouri
and then northwest back into Iowa
53 miles of pipelines in Northern Ohio
Transaction Overview
Benefits to Buckeye
Represents a key step in Buckeye’s continued expansion
and geographic diversification efforts
Facilitates participation in several growth markets
outside Buckeye’s previous system footprint
Provides stable tariff and fee-based revenue streams,
supported by multi-year throughput commitments by BP
Acquisition was accretive to distributable cash flow
Commercial development of these assets has exceeded
plan
Execution of our Best Practices Initiative strategies:
Rapid realization of operating synergies with
Buckeye’s existing assets
Headcount reduction pursuant to synergy realization
Process improvement resulting in efficient, cost-
effective operations
Operation of integrated assets under Buckeye
business strategy, which includes utilization of assets
at the lowest costs per unit


BP ACQUISITION—STRONG RESULTS
Successful Execution of Terminal Growth Franchise
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
12
Pipeline and terminal volumes have exceeded plan since
inception
Continued growth expected with several additional new
contracts still to be signed in the short term
Belton, SC and Fairfax, VA are select examples that
highlight significant growth through incremental third-
party business, and new products and service offerings
Terminal Growth
Franchise
Ability
to
quickly
integrate
these spun-
off assets while unlocking significant value through
commercialization and application of our best practices formula
32
34
13.1
Belton, SC
Fairfax, VA
Number of new third-party terminal customers
Percentage increase in Adj. EBITDA contribution
from these assets for June 2012 vs. June 2011
Percentage of volume growth across all 33 acquired
terminals since inception


PERTH AMBOY ACQUISITION OVERVIEW
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
13
Note: Facility
located in Perth
Amboy, NJ. 
Green line
indicates
approximate
property
boundaries
(1)
Includes acquisition purchase price and capital spent on tanks, terminal piping, dock and truck rack improvements, and ~6 miles of new pipeline to be constructed from Perth Amboy to Buckeye’s Linden, NJ complex.
(2)
One of the barge docks is currently out of service.
Facility Overview
Acquisition of a New York Harbor marine terminal for
liquid petroleum products from Chevron for $260
million in cash
Unique opportunity to acquire key link in the product
logistics chain to unlock significant long-term value
across the Buckeye enterprise
Near-term plans to transform existing terminal into a
highly efficient, multi-product storage, blending, and
throughput facility
Anticipated growth capital investment in the facility of
~$200-250 million over the next three years at
attractive annual Adjusted EBITDA investment multiple
of  4 –
5x, resulting in all-in Adjusted EBITDA
investment multiple of 7 –
8x
(1)
Transaction supported by multi-year storage, blending,
and throughput commitments from Chevron
Closed on July 26, 2012
Expected to be accretive to distributable cash flow per
unit in 2013
Portion of purchase price funded indirectly by
February 2012 registered direct offering of LP units
Located in New York Harbor as a NYMEX delivery point
Approximately 4.0 MMBbls total storage capacity
~2.7 MMBbls of active refined product storage
~1.3 MMBbls of refurbishable storage
4 docks (1 ship, 3 barge
(2)
) with water draft up to 37'
Pipeline, water, rail, and truck access
~250 acre site with significant undeveloped acreage for expansion
potential
Close proximity for integration with Buckeye’s Linden complex
Assessing opportunities for handling Bakken-sourced crude at this   
facility via rail and ship
Transaction Overview


PERTH AMBOY COMMERCIAL STRATEGY
PADD
(1)
1 Market Opportunity
The PADD 1 region has ~36% of the U.S.
population and relies on PADD 3 and international
imports and transfers of refined products to meet
market demand
All U.S. Northeast product not produced by local
refineries must be supplied either through import
or inter-PADD transfers, increasing storage
capacity demand in the New York Harbor
New York Harbor NYMEX delivery point:  nexus of
U.S. Northeast petroleum flows
Significantly more trading liquidity than
Philadelphia market
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
14
(1)
Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts
Buckeye Business Strategy
Pipeline constraints and poor facility configurations
(tank-to-tank communication) at some existing
terminals in New York Harbor result in inefficiencies
Ability to complement storage with local product
distribution via truck rack
Strong interest expressed for a Bakken/Utica crude
solution, bunker fuel growth, and asphalt
terminalling/supply
Facilitates U.S. Northeast product flow and logistics
Secures and diversifies access to product supply
Extension of the product value chain with BORCO
Opportunity to tie-in imports and exports to/from the
U.S.
We believe optimal facility configuration with simultaneous operations and high-speed
takeaway capacity will give Perth Amboy competitive advantages in the marketplace
Multi-mode takeaway capacity (pipe, water,
rail, truck) connected to the Buckeye system
and inland distribution network
Balanced focus on imports/exports for clean
products (gasoline, distillates, jet) and dirtier fuels
(crude, fuel oil, asphalt)
Perth Amboy is in a highly attractive location
in the New York Harbor with access to the
large local PADD 1 market


LONG-TERM VISION –
“Connecting the Dots…”
Global supply and demand imbalances expected to persist, but
they will likely continue to shift as the rate of change accelerates
Anticipate new sources of product supply in the future
New global refining capacity coming online will seek deficit markets
Northeast U.S. refineries face long-term challenges from high cost and
low investment
We believe New York Harbor and Buckeye’s pipeline system are
critical components to facilitate Northeast product flow logistics
Perth Amboy is expected to function as a premier access point for
refined petroleum products moving into PADD 1
A component of our strategy in acquiring BORCO was to help facilitate
product flow into the Buckeye system in PADD 1
BORCO, Perth Amboy, and Yabucoa are key components of a
long-term marine terminal strategy
Create
a
more
fully
integrated
and
flexible
system
with
superior
trade
flow connectivity, service capabilities, and tankage versatility
Execution on this strategy will continue to differentiate
Buckeye’s service offerings and provide sustainability and
optionality for further growth in our core businesses
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
15
BORCO
Yabucoa


DOMESTIC PIPELINES & TERMINALS GROWTH POTENTIAL
NY Harbor to PA Expansion
(completed 4/1/12):
Increased Buckeye’s ability to handle NY Harbor
barrels destined for the Pennsylvania market
Incremental 30,000 bpd of pipeline capacity
Bakken Crude: 
Multi-year agreement to support transformation
of the Albany marine terminal to handle crude
via rail and ship for major oil refiner
Contracted to offload approximately 8,600 bpd
of Bakken crude for refinery customer at
Woodhaven, MI facility
Perth Amboy well-suited for handling via rail
Butane Blending:
Significant growth driven by strong blending
margins
Improved blending efficiencies and oversight
Opportunities for further locational deployment
of blending capabilities
Propylene Rail Facility
(in progress):
Construction of new propylene storage at East
Chicago facility
Add rail loading capability at that facility
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
16
Utica Shale
Opportunity:
Development is
in early stages,
but industry
consensus is that
crude logistics
solutions will be
needed
Buckeye has
presence in area
and has
opportunity to
utilize existing
infrastructure,
including ROW
and underutilized
lines, to be key
logistics provider
Miami and JFK Airports Pipeline Expansions (potential):
Reviewing expansion options as a result of jet fuel volume growth
Chicago Complex Crude Oil Storage Opportunity (potential):
Opportunity to leverage asset footprint in Chicago to take
advantage of changing crude oil slates in the market
PROJECTS
Primary
Utica Shale


FERC ORDER DEVELOPMENTS
Buckeye Pipe Line’s Market-Rate Program
Program
Background
and
“Show
Cause”
Proceeding
In 1991, FERC approved Buckeye Pipe Line Company, L.P.’s (“BPL Co.”) use of an innovative rate-setting system.
In its 15 competitive markets, BPL Co. sets tariff rates in response to competitive forces, subject to a cap
Rates in the other five markets, including NYC, are tied to changes in rates in the competitive markets
On March 1, 2012, BPL Co. filed for routine, system-wide rate increases; a single airline shipper in the NYC area protested.
On March 30, 2012, FERC issued an order rejecting the rate increases and initiated a review of the program. 
BPL Co.’s response, which was filed May 15, affirmed that the program has functioned reasonably, has adjusted rates in line with the
pipeline industry, and has not caused undue discrimination among its shippers.
On June 29, 2012, the initial protesting party filed comments contending that BPL Co.’s program has not been reasonable and should be
discontinued; three companies intervened without taking a position, and three companies and a committee representing jet fuel consumers
at
an
airport
supported
the
position
of
the
protesting
party.
Additional
filings
were
made
by
the
parties
in
July
and
August.
One
of
the
intervenors withdrew from the proceeding in October.
In
2011,
BPL
Co.
generated
approximately
$295
million
of
the
revenue
in
Buckeye’s
Pipelines
&
Terminals
operating
segment
and
deliveries
of
jet
fuel
to
the
NYC
airports
generated
approximately
$30
million
of
BPL
Co.’s
revenues.
FERC’s
order
does
not
affect
any
pipelines
or terminals owned by Buckeye’s other operating subsidiaries. 
Although Buckeye believes the program should be preserved, FERC may discontinue or modify it to conform to its generic rate-setting
methodology of indexing or one of the alternative methodologies (market-based, cost-based, or settlement-based rates).
Airlines’
Complaint
On September 20, 2012, four airlines filed a complaint at FERC challenging BPL Co.’s tariff rates for transporting jet fuel to three NYC airports
the
same
movements
that
were
the
subject
of
the
March
protest
that
led
to
the
“show
cause”
proceeding.
The complaint is not directed at BPL Co.’s rates for service to other destinations, and it has no impact on the pipeline systems and terminals
owned by Buckeye’s other operating subsidiaries. 
On October 10, 2012, BPL Co. filed its answer to the complaint, and additional filings were made by the parties in October and November. 
No third parties have filed to intervene in the complaint proceeding.
While
we
cannot
predict
when
FERC
will
act
on
the
airlines’
complaint
or
what
FERC
may
do,
all
parties
have
expressed
a
willingness
to explore settlement by participating in FERC’s standard settlement processes.  We believe it is likely that FERC will initiate a settlement
process, though we cannot predict whether the process will be successful. 
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
17


FERC ORDER DEVELOPMENTS (Continued)
Buckeye Pipe Line’s Market-Rate Program
Market-Based Rates Application for New York City Market
On October 15, 2012, BPL Co. filed an application with FERC seeking authority to charge market-based rates for deliveries of refined
petroleum products to the NYC market.
If
FERC
grants
the
application,
BPL
Co.
would
be
permitted
prospectively
to
set
its
rates
in
response
to
competitive
forces,
and
the
airlines’
cost-based
challenges
to
BPL
Co.’s
jet
fuel
delivery
rates
to
the
NYC
airports
would
be
moot
with
respect
to
future
rates.
Buckeye believes that the New York City-area market is robust and highly competitive.  The New York Harbor is one of the world’s most
active refined petroleum products markets.  Within this market, BPL Co.’s customers have access to numerous existing alternatives, via
pipeline,
barge,
and
truck,
to
transport
refined
products.
The
three
airports
are
located
near
other
active
products
pipelines
or
barge
docks and, with reasonable investment, should be able to access alternative jet fuel supplies efficiently and economically.
Any protests or comments on BPL Co.’s market-based rates application are due by December 14th.  Buckeye cannot predict when FERC
will  act on the application or what it will do.
Depending
on
the
outcome
of
these
proceedings,
the
level
of
some
or
all
of
BPL
Co.’s
rates
could
be
subject
to
change,
which
could
have
a material impact on our revenues.
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
18


International Pipelines & Terminals
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
19


BORCO
World-class marine storage terminal for crude oil, fuel oil, and
refined petroleum products
23.3 MMBbls capacity
Located in Freeport, Bahamas, 80 miles from Southern Florida and
920 miles from New York Harbor
Deep-water access (up to 91 feet) and the ability to berth VLCCs
and ULCCs
Significant amount of capacity under long-term (3-5 year) take or
pay contracts
World-class customer base
Variable revenue generation from ancillary services such as
berthing, blending, bunkering, and transshipping
Hub for international logistics
Expansion project approved for 4.7 million barrels with 1.9 million
barrels delivered to date; room to double storage capacity
if
market conditions permit
International Pipelines & Terminals Yabucoa, Puerto Rico
Well maintained facility with superior blending/manufacturing
facilities
4.6 million barrels of refined petroleum product, fuel oil, and crude
oil storage capacity
Strategic location supports a strong local market and also provides
regional growth opportunities
Long-term fee-based revenues supported by multi-year volume
commitments from Shell
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
20
INTERNATIONAL PIPELINES AND TERMINALS
(1)
Excludes non-cash amortization of unfavorable storage contracts.
83%
11%
6%
BORCO 2011 REVENUE
(1)
Storage (take or pay)
Berthing (variable)
Other Ancillary (variable)
66%
20%
14%
BORCO 2011 LEASED CAPACITY
Fuel Oil
Crude Oil
Refined Products


BORCO BERTHING CAPABILITIES
SIX OFFSHORE JETTIES AND INLAND DOCK
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
21
BERTH 5
Fuel Oil
Clean Products
BERTH 6
Crude Oil
Fuel Oil
Clean Products
BERTH 7
Fuel Oil
Clean Products
BERTH 8
Crude Oil
Fuel Oil
Clean Products
BERTH 10
Crude Oil
Fuel Oil
Berth 12
(Inland Dock)
Fuel Oil
Clean Products
BERTH 9
Crude Oil
Fuel Oil


BORCO INTERNAL GROWTH PROJECTS
EXPANSION AND OTHER GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES
Significant Land Available for Expansion
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
22
Expansion project at BORCO well underway
Phase 1 to add approximately 3.5 million barrels of storage
capacity
1.1 million barrels of fuel oil storage in operation as of July
2012
~0.8
million
barrels
of
refined
products
storage
in
operation
as
of October 2012
~1.6 million barrels of refined products storage to be in-
service in first quarter of 2013
Initiation of Phase 2 expansion of 1.2 million barrels of crude oil
storage expected to be in service in the third quarter of 2013
Longer-term opportunity to double storage capacity in Greenfield
Offshore
jetty
(2
berths)
and
inland
dock
construction
completed
and operations initiated in the fourth quarter of 2011
Other Internal Growth Opportunities
Crude Unit
Strong interest in setting up crude topping unit at BORCO
Driver: need for low sulfur fuel oil
Strategic alliance could also support GC exports as
shale/Canadian crude floods into GC (export after “minor
processing”)
Bunkering
Opportunities 
Blended
Fuel
Oil
BORCO is the logical, geographical, optimum spot for a new
“Bunker filling station”
2014 Panama Canal expansion to allow passage of Suezmax
vessels expected to lead to 20-30% increase in traffic, BORCO
location ideal to service the incremental vessels
BORCO
Expansion
Capacity
(1)
–millions
of
barrels
(1)
Graph reflects expected midpoint of capital spend range. Dates represent expected date that capacity is placed in service.
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
0
1
2
3
4
5
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2012
2013
Yellowfield 2
Bluefield 2
Bluefield 1
Yellowfield 1
Approximately 75% of total expansion capacity is already leased
Capex


Buckeye Services
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
23


BUCKEYE SERVICES OVERVIEW
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
24
Contract operations
Project origination
Asset development
Engineering design
Project management
Natural Gas Storage
Buckeye’s Lodi Gas Storage facility is a high performance natural gas storage facility with approximately 30 Bcf of
working gas capacity in Northern California serving the greater San Francisco Bay Area
Revenue is generated through firm storage services and hub services
The
facilities
collectively
have
a
maximum
injection
and
withdrawal
capability
of
approximately
550
million
cubic
feet
per
day
(MMcf/day)
and
750
MMcf/day,
respectively
Energy Services
Development & Logistics
Buckeye Development & Logistics (“BDL”) operates               
and/or maintains third-party pipelines under
agreements with major oil and chemical companies
BDL is also responsible for identifying and
completing potential acquisitions and organic
growth projects for Buckeye
BDL services offered to customers
Lodi’s
facilities
are
designed
to
provide
high
deliverability
natural
gas
storage
service
and
have
a
proven
track
record of safe and reliable operations
Energy Services
Buckeye Energy Services (“BES”) markets a wide
range of refined petroleum products and other
ancillary products in areas served by Buckeye’s
pipelines and terminals
Strategy for mitigating basis risk included a
reduction of refined product inventories in the
Midwest and focusing on fewer, more strategic
locations for transacting business
Recently reduced costs by right-sizing the
infrastructure for reduced geographic focus
Contributed almost $32 million in revenues to
Domestic Pipelines & Terminals over last 12
months while also providing valuable insight on
demand and pricing support for our terminalling
and storage business


Financial Overview
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
25


FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
26
Adjusted
EBITDA
($MM)
(1)(2)
Cash Distributions per Unit
Cash
Distribution
Coverage
(2)(3)
(1)
LTM as of September 30, 2012
(2)
See Appendix for Non-GAAP Reconciliations
(3)
Distributable cash flow divided by cash distributions declared for the respective periods
(4)
Long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by Adjusted EBITDA
Net LT
Debt/Adjusted
EBITDA
(1)(4)(6)
(5)  Pro forma distribution coverage excludes $17.1 million of acquisition and integration expenses incurred 
       in 2011 and $15.3 million during the LTM period ended September 30, 2012
(6)  For purposes of calculating the leverage, Adjusted EBITDA is adjusted for pro forma impacts of acquisitions


INVESTMENT SUMMARY
Stability and Growth
Proven 26-year track record as a publicly traded partnership through varying economic and commodity price
cycles
Management
continues
to
drive
operational
excellence
through
its
best
practices
initiative
Recent acquisitions provide Buckeye with increased geographic and product diversity, including access to
international logistics opportunities, and provide significant near-term growth projects
July 2012 acquisition of marine terminal facility in Perth Amboy, NJ from Chevron furthers Buckeye’s strategy to
create a fully integrated and flexible system that offers unparalleled connectivity and service capabilities;
provides significant near-term growth opportunities at attractive multiple
World-class
BORCO
marine
storage
terminal
with
23.3
million
barrels
of
storage
capacity
for
crude
oil
and
liquid
petroleum products in Freeport, Bahamas with approved expansion project of 4.7 million barrels, including 1.9
million barrels operational in the second half of 2012; serves as important logistics hub for international
petroleum product flows
Diversified portfolio of assets provides balanced mix of stability and growth and is well positioned to take
advantage of changing supply and demand fundamentals for crude and refined petroleum products to drive
improved returns to unitholders
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
27


Non-GAAP Reconciliations
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
28


BASIS OF REPRESENTATION; EXPLANATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
29
Buckeye’s equity-funded merger with Buckeye GP Holdings, L.P. (“BGH”) in the fourth quarter of 2010 has been treated as a reverse merger for accounting
purposes. As a result, the historical results presented herein for periods prior to the completion of the merger are those of BGH, and the diluted weighted average
number of LP units outstanding increase from 20.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 44.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. Additionally, Buckeye incurred
a non-cash charge to compensation expense of $21.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2010 as a result of a distribution of LP units owned by BGH GP Holdings, LLC to
certain officers of Buckeye, which triggered a revaluation  of an equity incentive plan that had been instituted in 2007.
Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are measures not defined by GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is the primary measure used by our senior management,
including our Chief Executive Officer, to (i) evaluate our consolidated operating performance and the operating performance of our business segments, (ii) allocate
resources and capital to business segments, (iii) evaluate the viability of proposed projects, and (iv) determine overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities. Distributable cash flow is another measure used by our senior management to provide a clearer picture of Buckeye’s cash available for distribution
to its unitholders. Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow eliminate (i) non-cash expenses, including, but not limited to, depreciation and amortization
expense resulting from the significant capital investments we make in our businesses and from intangible assets recognized in business combinations, (ii) charges
for obligations expected to be settled with the issuance of equity instruments, and (iii) items that are not indicative of our core operating performance results and
business outlook.
Buckeye believes that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures used by senior management and that these measures are useful to
investors because they aid in comparing Buckeye’s operating performance with that of other companies with similar operations. The Adjusted EBITDA and
distributable cash flow data presented by Buckeye may not be comparable to similarly titled measures at other companies because these items may be defined
differently by other companies.  Please see the attached reconciliations of each of Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow to net income.
This presentation references forward-looking estimates of Adjusted EBITDA and investment multiples projected to be generated by the Perth Amboy terminal. A
reconciliation of estimated Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income is not provided because GAAP net income generated by the Perth Amboy terminal for the
applicable periods is not accessible.  Buckeye has not yet completed the necessary valuation of the various assets to be acquired, a determination of the useful lives
of these assets for accounting purposes, or an allocation of the purchase price among the various types of assets.  In addition, interest and debt expense is a
corporate-level expense that is not allocated among Buckeye’s segments and could not be allocated to the Perth Amboy terminal operations without unreasonable
effort. Accordingly, the amount of depreciation and amortization and interest and debt expense that will be included in the additional net income generated as a
result of the acquisition of the Perth Amboy terminal is not accessible or estimable at this time. The amount of such additional resulting depreciation and
amortization and applicable interest and debt expense could be significant, such that the amount of additional net income would vary substantially from the
amount of projected Adjusted EBITDA.


NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
30
Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA ($M)
(1)
LTM as of September 30, 2012.
(2)
On November 19, 2010, Buckeye merged with Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(3)
In
2010,
Buckeye
revised
its
definition
of
Adjusted
EBITDA
to
exclude
non-cash
unit-based
compensation
expense,
the
2010
non-cash
equity
plan
modification
expense
and
income
attributable
to
noncontrolling
interests
affected
by
the
merger
for
periods
prior
to
our
buy-in
of
our
general
partner.
These
amounts
were
excluded
from
Adjusted
EBITDA
presented
for
2008,
2009
and
2010
in
our
Annual
Report
on
Form
10-K
for
the
year
ended
December
31,
2010,
as
amended.
Adjusted
EBITDA
for
2007
has
been
restated
in
this
presentation
to
exclude
these
amounts
for
comparison
purposes.
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
LTM
(1)
Net income attributable to BPL
22,921
26,477
49,594
43,080
108,501
251,141
Interest and debt expense
51,721
75,410
75,147
89,169
119,561
114,428
Income tax expense (benefit)
760
801
(343)
(919)
(192)
1,177
Depreciation and amortization
40,236
50,834
54,699
59,590
119,534
136,793
EBITDA
115,638
153,522
179,097
190,920
347,404
503,539
Net
income
attributable
to
noncontrolling
interests
affected
by
merger
(2)
131,941
153,546
90,381
157,467
-
-
Amortization of unfavorable storage contracts
-
-
-
-
(7,562)
(10,994)
Gain on sale of equity investment
-
-
-
-
(34,727)
(615)
Non-cash deferred lease expense
-
4,598
4,500
4,235
4,122
3,956
Non-cash unit-based compensation expense
968
1,909
4,408
8,960
9,150
13,152
Equity plan modification expense
-
-
-
21,058
-
-
Asset impairment expense
-
-
59,724
-
-
-
Goodwill impairment expense
-
-
-
-
169,560
-
Reorganization expense
-
-
32,057
-
-
-
Adjusted EBITDA
(3)
248,547
313,575
370,167
382,640
487,947
509,038
Adjusted Segment EBITDA
Pipelines & Terminals
238,830
253,790
302,164
346,447
361,018
390,983
International Operations
-
-
-
(4,655)
112,996
122,553
Natural Gas Storage
-
41,814
41,950
29,794
4,204
3,639
Energy Services
-
9,443
19,335
5,861
1,797
(19,540)
Development & Logistics
9,717
8,528
6,718
5,193
7,932
11,403
Total Adjusted EBITDA
(3)
248,547
313,575
370,167
382,640
487,947
509,038


NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS
©
Copyright 2012 Buckeye Partners, L.P.
31
Net Income to Distributable Cash Flow ($M)
(1)
LTM as of September 30, 2012.
(2)
On November, 19, 2010, Buckeye merged with Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(3)
In 2011, Buckeye revised its definition of Distributable Cash Flow to exclude amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts. Distributable Cash Flow for 2007-2010 have been restated to exclude those amounts for
comparison purposes.
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
LTM
(1)
Net income attributable to BPL
22,921
26,477
49,594
43,080
108,501
251,141
Depreciation and amortization
40,236
50,834
54,699
59,590
119,534
136,793
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests affected by merger
(2)
131,941
153,546
90,381
157,467
-
-
Gain on sale of equity investment
-
-
-
-
(34,727)
(615)
Non-cash deferred lease expense
-
4,598
4,500
4,235
4,122
3,956
Non-cash unit-based compensation expense
968
1,909
4,408
8,960
9,150
13,152
Equity plan modification expense
-
-
-
21,058
-
-
Asset impairment expense
-
-
59,724
-
-
-
Reorganization expense
-
-
32,057
-
-
-
Non-cash senior administrative charge
950
1,900
475
-
-
-
Amortization of unfavorable storage contracts
-
-
-
-
(7,562)
(10,994)
Write-off of deferred financing costs
-
-
-
-
3,331
-
Amortization
of
deferred
financing
costs
and
debt
discounts
(3)
1,448
1,737
3,134
4,411
4,289
3,476
Goodwill impairment expense
-
-
-
-
169,560
-
Maintenance capital expenditures
(33,803)
(28,936)
(23,496)
(31,244)
(57,467)
(56,662)
Distributable Cash Flow
164,661
212,065
275,476
267,557
318,731
340,247
Distributions for Coverage ratio
(4)
173,689
209,412
237,687
259,315
351,245
376,177
Coverage Ratio
0.95x
1.01x
1.16x
1.03x
0.91x
0.90x
Represents cash distributions declared for limited partner units (LP units) outstanding as of each respective period. 2012 amounts reflect actual cash distributions paid on LP units for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 
June 30, 2012 and estimated cash distributions paid on LP units for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Distributions with respect to the  Class B units outstanding on the record date for each  quarter ended during 2011 and
2012 were paid in additional Class B units rather than in cash.
(4)