Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.Financial_Report.xls
10-K - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.greenhygienics10k073112.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R7.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R9.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R4.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R3.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R8.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R2.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R5.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R1.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R6.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R15.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R19.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R21.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R26.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R20.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R27.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R12.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R17.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R23.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R22.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R10.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R25.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R18.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R14.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R13.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R11.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.R24.htm
EX-32.2 - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - GREEN HYGIENICS HOLDINGS INC.ex31-1.htm
v2.4.0.6
Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2012
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  In the opinion of management all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein.
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]
REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company will recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification No. 605, REVENUE RECOGNITION ("ASC-605"), ASC-605 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company will defer any revenue for which the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.

Revenue was earned for the placement of product endorsements in the filming of a promotion that was carried on to the pre-production stage by the Company.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates.

To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of July 31, 2012 the Company had $0 in cash or cash equivalents (July 31, 2011, cash of $111,799).
Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block]
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company is considered a development stage company, having limited operating revenues during the period presented, as defined by Accounting Standards Codification ASC 915-205 “Development-Stage Entities”.  ASC 915-205 requires companies to report their operations, shareholders equity and cash flows since inception through the date that revenues are generated from management’s intended operations, among other things.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]
INCOME TAXES

The Company provides for income taxes under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. ASC 740 requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. 

ASC 740 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. 

The Company has $2,239,123 of net operating losses carried forward to offset taxable income in future years which expire commencing in fiscal 2030. The income tax benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the US federal income tax rate of 34% to net loss before income taxes for the year ended July 31, 2012 and had no uncertain tax positions as at July 31, 2012:

Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of:

   
July 31,
   
July 31,
 
            
 
2012
   
2011
 
NOL Carryover
 
$
761,302
   
$
  340,363
 
Valuation allowance
   
(761,302)
     
(340,363)
 
Net deferred tax asset
 
$
0
   
$
0
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As at July 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no potentially dilutive shares.
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 718 which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of its employee stock option awards. This eliminates accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value and requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The guidance in ASU 2011-08 is intended to reduce complexity and costs by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. The amendments also improve previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Also, the amendments improve the examples of events and circumstances that an entity having a reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount should consider in determining whether to measure an impairment loss, if any, under the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, items of other comprehensive income that are reclassified to profit or loss are required to be presented separately on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (2) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2011-04 will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect that the guidance effective in future periods will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”. This amendment explains which modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). Under the new guidance, the definition of a troubled debt restructuring remains essentially unchanged, and for a loan modification to be considered a TDR, certain basic criteria must still be met. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructuring occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not expect that the guidance effective in future periods will have a material impact on its financial statements.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.