PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex311.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex312.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex321.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	biei_ex322.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC	Financial_Report.xls

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.

Commission file number: 000-54563

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		27-2635666
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

970 Lake Carillon Drive, Suite 300 St. Petersburg, FL		33716
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (814) 786-8849

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No x .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x.

Applicable only to issuers involved in bankruptcy proceedings during the preceding five years:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o No o

Applicable only to corporate issuers:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 1, 2012, there were 12,364,479 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value, issued and outstanding.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

ITEM 1	Financial Statements	4

ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25

ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29

ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures	29

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		31

ITEM 1	Legal Proceedings	31

ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	31

ITEM 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	31

ITEM 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32

ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	32

ITEM 5	Other Information	32

ITEM 6	Exhibits	32

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1

Financial Statements

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDNESED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash	$	73,445		$	26,264
Prepaid expenses		187			-
Total current assets		73,632			26,264

Property and equipment, net		2,346			-
Patent rights and applications		28,755			7,058

Total assets	$	104,733		$	33,322


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	30,429		$	2,295
Accounts payable, related parties		17,871			803
Notes payable, related parties		12,000			-
Total current liabilities		60,300			3,098

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized,
12,324,479 and 11,451,200 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		123			115
Additional Paid in Capital		267,382			144,127
Subscriptions receivable, 1,429 shares and -0- shares
at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		(500	)		-
Subscriptions payable, 40,000 shares and -0- shares
at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		4,000			-
(Deficit) accumulated during development stage		(226,572	)		(114,018	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		44,433			30,224

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	104,733		$	33,322

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						May 10, 2010(inception) to September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		17,265			2,991			30,342			10,323			50,562
Professional fees		41,041			10,677			81,827			62,447			160,619
Total operating expenses		58,306			13,668			112,169			72,770			211,181

Net operating loss		(58,306	)		(13,668	)		(112,169	)		(72,770	)		(211,181	)

Other expense:
Loss on disposal of patents		-			-			-			-			(14,817	)
Interest expense		(239	)		-			(385	)		(113	)		(574	)
Total other expenses		(239	)		-			(385	)		(113	)		(15,391	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(58,545	)		(13,668	)		(112,554	)		(72,883	)		(226,572	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-			-

Net loss	$	(58,545	)	$	(13,668	)	$	(112,554	)	$	(72,883	)	$	(226,572	)

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic and fully diluted		11,922,156			11,451,200			11,609,331			11,163,410

Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

																	(Deficit)
																	Accumulated			Total
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-In			Subscriptions			Subscriptions		During Development			Stockholders' Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Receivable			Payable		Stage			(Deficit)

Patent rights and applications contributed by director		-	$	-		-	$	-	$	14,817		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	14,817

Units of common stock and warrants sold to founders at $0.00001 per share		-		-		10,000,000		100		-			-			-		-			100

Net loss from May 10, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010		-		-		-		-		-			-			-		(2,156	)		(2,156	)

Balance, December 31, 2010		-	$	-		10,000,000	$	100	$	14,817		$	-		$	-	$	(2,156	)	$	12,761

Common stock sold to founders at $0.00001 per share		-		-		500,000		5		-			-			-		-			5

Units of common stock and warrants sold at $0.10 per share		-		-		723,200		7		72,313			-			-		-			72,320

Common stock sold at $0.25 per share		-		-		228,000		3		56,997			-			-		-			57,000

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011		-		-		-		-		-			-			-		(111,862	)		(111,862	)

Balance, December 31, 2011		-	$	-		11,451,200	$	115	$	144,127		$	-		$	-	$	(114,018	)	$	30,224

Units of common stock and warrants sold at $0.35 per share		-		-		203,289		2		71,148			(500	)		-		-			70,650

Common stock sold at $0.10 per share pursuant to warrant exercises		-		-		420,000		4		41,996			-			4,000		-			46,000

Exercise of cashless warrants at $0.00001		-		-		249,990		2		(2	)		-			-		-			-

Amortization of stock based compensation		-		-		-		-		9,728			-			-		-			9,728

Imputed interest on non-interest bearing related party debts		-		-		-		-		385			-			-		-			385

Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012		-		-		-		-		-			-			-		(112,554	)		(112,554	)

Balance, September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)		-	$	-		12,324,479	$	123	$	267,382		$	(500	)	$	4,000	$	(226,572	)	$	44,433

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	For the Nine			For the Nine			May 10, 2010
	Months Ended			Months Ended			(inception) to
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)	$	(112,554	)	$	(72,883	)	$	(226,572	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities:
Loss on disposal of patents		-			-			14,817
Depreciation		60			-			60
Imputed interest on non-interest bearing related party debts		385			-			385
Amortization of stock based compensation		9,728			-			9,728
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Prepaid expenses		(187	)		(1,500	)		(187	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		28,134			5,450			31,232
Accounts payable, related parties		1,664			40			1,664
Accrued interest, related parties		-			(74	)		-
Net cash used in operating activities		(72,770	)		(68,967	)		(168,873	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment		(2,406	)		-			(2,406	)
Payments on patent rights and applications		(6,293	)		(4,796	)		(13,351	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,699	)		(4,796	)		(15,757	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from notes payable, related parties		12,000			1,000			15,355
Repayments on notes payable, related parties		-			(3,355	)		(3,355	)
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		116,650			129,325			246,075
Net cash provided by financing activities		128,650			126,970			258,075

NET CHANGE IN CASH		47,181			53,207			73,445
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		26,264			373			-

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	73,445		$	53,580		$	73,445

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	187
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of patent rights and applications paid subsequent to period end	$	15,404		$	-
Cashless exercise of common stock warrants, 250,000 warrants exercised	$	3		$	-

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

Premier Biomedical, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on May 10, 2010 (“Inception”). The Company was formed to develop and market medications and procedures that address a significant number of the most highly visible health issues currently affecting mankind. The Company will market these medications and procedures to leading worldwide pharmaceutical firms via publication in medical journals and by direct contact.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein.

Development Stage Company

The Company is currently considered a development stage company as defined by FASB ASC 915-10-05. As a development stage enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the development stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception to the current balance sheet date. An entity remains in the development stage until such time as, among other factors, revenues have been realized. To date, the development stage of the Company’s operations consists of developing the business model and marketing concepts.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We maintain cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts, which do not currently exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Patent rights and applications

Patent rights and applications costs include the acquisition costs and costs incurred for the filing of patents. Patent rights and applications are amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life of the patent rights beginning at the time the patents are approved.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, the Financial Accounting Standards Board establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement reaffirms that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements as reflected herein. The carrying amounts of cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheet are estimated by management to approximate fair value primarily due to the short term nature of the instruments.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. There was no material effect to the financial statements as result of these reclassifications.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the periods presented, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company adopted FASB guidance on stock based compensation upon inception at May 10, 2010. Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The Company recognized $9,728 and $-0- of compensation expense related to common stock warrants issued for services for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Revenue Recognition

Sales on fixed price contracts are recorded when services are earned, the earnings process is complete or substantially complete, and the revenue is measurable and collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue from sales in which payment has been received, but the earnings process has not occurred. No sales have yet commenced.

Advertising and Promotion

All costs associated with advertising and promoting products are expensed as incurred. These expenses were $1,795 and $-0- for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such asset will not be recovered through future operations.

Uncertain Tax Positions

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be capable of withstanding examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. These standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. The Company has not yet undergone an examination by any taxing authorities.

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.

Note 2 – Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no revenues, incurred net losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $226,572 and working capital of $13,332 as of September 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is actively pursuing new ventures to increase revenues. In addition, the Company is currently seeking additional sources of capital to fund short term operations. The Company, however, is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful, therefore, without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Related Parties

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s CEO pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as an Officer. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as the Chairman of the Board. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 50,000 common stock warrants to each of nine Directors to purchase a total of 450,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share over a seven year period from the grant date for their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The total fair value of the 450,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $320,564, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 70,000 common stock warrants to each of three Directors to purchase a total of 210,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The total fair value of the 210,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $153,615, or $0.7315 per share as of September 30, 2012, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years. The Company recognized

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to one of the Directors to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The total fair value of the 70,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $49,865, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants.

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from the Company’s CEO.

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors.

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from one of the Company’s Directors.

On May 7, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from one of the Company’s Directors.

Interest has been imputed using an estimated borrowing rate of 8% per annum. Interest expense of $385 and $-0- has been recognized as contributed capital during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company owed $15,404 and $2,295 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 to an entity owned by the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The amounts are related to patent costs.

The Company owed $2,467 and $-0- as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 to the Company’s CEO for reimbursable expenses.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 4 – Patent Rights and Applications

	September 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011

Patent rights and applications	$	28,755	$	7,058
Less: accumulated amortization		-		-

	$	28,755	$	7,058

The Company amortizes its patent rights and applications on a straight line basis over the expected useful technological or economic life of the patents, which is typically 17 years from the legal approval of the patent applications. All patent applications are currently pending and the Company has no patents that have yet been approved. It is the Company’s policy that it performs reviews of the carrying value of its patent rights and applications on an annual basis. At December 31, 2011, the Company performed a review of the carrying value of its patent rights and applications and, as a result, the Company wrote off a total book value of $14,817 in patent rights and applications related to discontinued pursuit of international patents for the year ended December 31, 2011. No impairment was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. We have not yet begun to amortize these patent application costs, as they are still pending.

Note 5 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 upon inception at May 10, 2010. Under FASB ASC 820-10-5, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

The Company has certain financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Assets
None	$	-	$	-		$	-
Total assets		-		-			-
Liabilities
Notes payable, related parties		-		12,000			-
Total liabilities		-		12,000			-
	$	-	$	(12,000	)	$	-

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

None

Total assets

Liabilities

None

Total liabilities

The fair values of our related party debts are deemed to approximate book value, and are considered Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or the year ended December 31, 2011.

No fair value adjustment was necessary during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or the year ended December 31, 2011.

Note 6 – Notes Payable, Related Parties

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from the Company’s CEO.

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors.

On May 4, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from one of the Company’s Directors.

On May 7, 2012, the Company received an unsecured, non-interest bearing loan in the amount of $3,000, due on demand from one of the Company’s Directors.

The Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $385 and $-0- for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively related to notes payable, related parties.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity

The Company has authorized 300,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock.

Common Stock

On September 21, 2012, four warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 40,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011 in exchange for total proceeds of $4,000. The shares were subsequently issued on October 16, 2012, as such, the proceeds are presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2012.

On various dates from August 9, 2012 through September 18, 2012, the Company issued a total of 420,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share amongst a total of forty four warrant holders, in exchange for total proceeds of $42,000 pursuant to warrant exercise notices from unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold 10,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $3,500, of which $500 wasn’t received until November 15, 2012, and was, accordingly presented as a subscription receivable as of September 30, 2012. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On July 23, 2012, the Company sold 3,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $1,050. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 16, 2012, the Company sold 14,285 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 9, 2012, a warrant holder elected to exercise 250,000 cashless warrants of a total of 2,500,000 held, exercisable at $0.00001 per share. As a result, the Company issued an aggregate of 249,990 shares of common stock. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and the investor was accredited, had the opportunity to meet with and ask questions of management, and there was no solicitation in connection with the offering.

On June 11, 2012, the Company sold a total of 160,004 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for total proceeds of $56,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 8, 2012, the Company sold 6,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $2,100. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On various dates from April 1, 2011 through June 3, 2011, the Company sold a total of 228,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, in exchange for total proceeds of $57,000 to a total of eighteen independent investors. The Company was able to increase its offering price from its February 28, 2011 offerings due to developments with regard to an anticipated Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, or CRADA, involving clinical tests on patients which it anticipates will be conducted in conjunction with the Department of Defense, along with the increased enterprise value generated from the capital previously received.

On February 28, 2011, the Company sold a total of 723,200 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, along with warrants to purchase a total of 723,200 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share over a two year period beginning one year from the date the Company begins trading on a public stock exchange, in exchange for total proceeds of $72,320 to a total of eighty five independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the 723,200 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,121, or $0.00155 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.27% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $506. The Company was able to increase its offering price as it advanced in the development of its business, along with the progression of events that will enable it to bring the Company to a public trading platform and increase the implied value attributed to the potential liquidity to third party investors.

On January 20, 2011, the Company sold 500,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for proceeds of $5 to a newly appointed director. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, 5/10/10 through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $160, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

-	500,000 shares of common stock valued at a total of $160, or $0.00032 per share, based on a 115% expected price volatility, estimated term of 12 months, risk-free interest rate of 0.29% and a dividends rate of 0%.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, at a fair value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s CEO. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, 5/10/10 through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

-	3,000,000 shares of common stock valued at a total of $960, or $0.00032 per share, based on a 115% expected price volatility, estimated term of 12 months, risk-free interest rate of 0.29% and a dividends rate of 0%.

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

-	Warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock valued at a total of $890, or $0.00089 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

-	Warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock valued at a total of $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, and an intrinsic value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

-	3,000,000 shares of common stock valued at a total of $960, or $0.00032 per share, based on a 115% expected price volatility, estimated term of 12 months, risk-free interest rate of 0.29% and a dividends rate of 0%.

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

-	Warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock valued at a total of $890, or $0.00089 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

-	Warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock valued at a total of $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold a total of 4,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for total proceeds of $40 to four of the Company’s directors. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $1,280, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, 5/10/10 through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The fair value of the common stock issuances to the founders using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

-	1,000,000 shares of common stock issued to each of four Directors valued at $320 each, or $0.00032 per share, based on a 115% expected price volatility, estimated term of 12 months, risk-free interest rate of 0.29% and a dividends rate of 0%.

Note 8 – Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants Granted

On June 21, 2010 the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 shares of founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s CEO. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $890, or $0.00089 per share, using the stated term, or ten years, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

On June 21, 2010 the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 shares of founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $890, or $0.00089 per share, using the stated term, or ten years, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Cancelled

No series A preferred stock warrants were cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Expired

No series A preferred stock warrants were expired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Exercised

No series A preferred stock warrants were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of information about the Series A Preferred Stock Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2012.

Shares Underlying Warrants Outstanding

Shares Underlying Warrants Exercisable

Range of

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Warrants

Contractual

Exercise

Warrants

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.001

2,000,000

7.71 years

0.001

2,000,000

0.001

The following is a summary of information about the Series A Preferred Stock Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011.

Shares Underlying Warrants Outstanding

Shares Underlying Warrants Exercisable

Range of

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Warrants

Contractual

Exercise

Warrants

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.001

2,000,000

8.5 years

0.001

2,000,000

0.001

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011

Average risk-free interest rates		3.27	%		3.27	%
Average expected life (in years)		5.0			5.0

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s series A preferred stock warrants have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its series A preferred stock warrants. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no warrants granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

The weighted average fair value of warrants granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during the period from May 10, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 was approximately $0.001 per warrant, and there were no series A preferred stock warrants granted during the year ended December 31, 2011, or the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding series A preferred stock warrants:

			Weighted
			Average
	Number of		Exercise
	Shares		Price

Balance, May 10, 2010 (inception)		-	$	-
Warrants cancelled		-		-
Warrants granted		2,000,000		0.001
Warrants exercised		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2010		2,000,000	$	0.001
Warrants cancelled		-		-
Warrants granted		-		-
Warrants exercised		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,000,000	$	0.001
Warrants cancelled		-		-
Warrants granted		-		-
Warrants exercised		-		-
Balance, September 30, 2012		2,000,000	$	0.001

Exercisable, September 30, 2012		2,000,000	$	0.001

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2012)

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500 in conjunction with the sale of 10,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase another 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500 in conjunction with the sale of 10,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 23, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $1,050 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 16, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 14,285 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $5,000 in conjunction with the sale of 14,285 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 11, 2012 the Company sold warrants to purchase a total of 160,004 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $56,000 in conjunction with the sale of 160,004 shares of common stock to a total of seven independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 8, 2012 the Company sold warrants to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for proceeds of $2,100 in conjunction with the sale of 6,000 shares of common stock to an independent investor. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2011)

On February 28, 2011, the Company granted warrants to purchase a total of 723,200 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share over a two year period from the date the Company begins trading on a public stock exchange, which occurred on August 1, 2012, in exchange for total proceeds of $72,320 in conjunction with the sale of 723,200 shares of common stock to a total of eighty five independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the 723,200 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,121, or $0.00155 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.27% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $506.

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2010)

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s CEO. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance to the Company’s securities attorney, as an offering cost for the sale of a total of 10,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Officers and Directors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $575, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $225. These warrants were subsequently amended on June 30, 2012 to be exercisable on a cashless basis. All other terms remain unchanged.

The Company recognized a total of $7,232, and $-0- of compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, on common stock warrants issued to Employees and Directors that are being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The remaining unamortized balance of these warrants is $512,793 as of September 30, 2012.

In addition, the Company recognized a total of $2,496, and $-0- of compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, on common stock warrants issued to Directors acting in their capacity as Non-Employees or Directors. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured each period, accordingly there is no unamortized balance of these warrants.

Common Stock Warrants Cancelled

No warrants were cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Common Stock Warrants Expired

No warrants expired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Common Stock Warrants Exercised

A total of 710,000 and -0- common stock warrants were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The exercises resulted in the issuance of a total of 709,990 shares of common stock, including 40,000 shares that were subsequently issued on October 16, 2012 and total proceeds of $46,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of information about the Common Stock Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2012.

Shares Underlying Warrants Outstanding

Shares Underlying Warrants Exercisable

Range of

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Warrants

Contractual

Exercise

Warrants

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.00001 – $1.45

37,656,489

7.61 years

0.0396

36,716,489

0.00350

The following is a summary of information about the Common Stock Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011.

Shares Underlying Warrants Outstanding

Shares Underlying Warrants Exercisable

Range of

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Underlying

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Warrants

Contractual

Exercise

Warrants

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.00001 – $0.10

37,223,200

8.3 years

0.00195

36,500,000

0.00001

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011

Average risk-free interest rates		0.43	%		3.27	%
Average expected life (in years)		2.5			5.0

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s common stock warrants have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its common stock warrants. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no warrants granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

The weighted average fair value of warrants granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during the period from May 10, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 was approximately $0.00001 per warrant, and approximately $0.10 per warrant granted during the year ended December 31, 2011, and the weighted average fair value of warrants granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.50 per warrant.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding common stock warrants:

				Weighted
				Average
	Number of			Exercise
	Shares			Price

Balance, May 10, 2010 (inception)		-		$	-
Warrants cancelled		-			-
Warrants granted		36,500,000			0.00001
Warrants exercised		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2010		36,500,000		$	0.00001
Warrants cancelled		-			-
Warrants granted		723,200			0.10
Warrants exercised		-			-
Balance, December 31, 2011		37,223,200		$	0.00195
Warrants cancelled		-			-
Warrants granted		1,143,289			1.28108
Warrants exercised		(710,000	)		(0.06479	)
Balance, September 30, 2012		37,656,489		$	0.03960

Exercisable, September 30, 2012		36,716,489		$	0.00350

Note 10 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred a net operating loss and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $248,125 and $135,820 of federal net operating losses, respectively. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2031.

The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:

	September 30			December 31,
	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	86,850		$	47,500

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance	$	86,850		$	47,500
Less: Valuation allowance		(86,850	)		(47,500	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of its loss, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011

Federal and state statutory rate		35	%		35	%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(35	%)		(35	%)

In accordance with FASB ASC 740, the Company has evaluated its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

Change in Directors

On November 8, 2012, one of our Directors tendered his resignation. No replacement has yet been appointed.

Common Stock

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued a total of forty thousand shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants on September 21, 2012, which were presented as subscriptions payable as of September 30, 2012.

Common Stock Warrants

On October 1, 2012, the Company granted 1,000,000 common stock warrants to each of two Directors to purchase a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants are fully vested, and are exercisable over seven (7) years from the date of grant.

ITEM 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Statement reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company is based upon, and should be read in conjunction with, its unaudited financial statements and related notes elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Summary Overview

We are a research-based company that intends to discover and develop medical treatments for humans, specifically targeting the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS/Lou Gehrig’s Disease), Blood Sepsis and Viremia, and Cancer.

We have not generated any revenue to date, and we do not currently have a product ready for market.

Going Concern

As a result of our financial condition, we have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm for our financial statements for the period from May 10, 2010 (Inception) to December 31, 2011 that includes an explanatory paragraph describing the uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern. In order to continue as a going concern we must effectively balance many factors and begin to generate revenue so that we can fund our operations from our sales and revenues. If we are not able to do this we may not be able to continue as an operating company. At our current revenue and burn rate, our cash on hand will last approximately eight months. However, there is no assurance that our existing cash flow will be adequate to satisfy our existing operating expenses and capital requirements.

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Introduction

We had no revenues for either the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012, or the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011. Our operating expenses were $58,306 and $112,169 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $13,668 and $72,770 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 consisted entirely of professional fees and general and administrative expenses as completed a small secondary capital raise and incurred legal and accounting costs associated with being a public reporting company.

Revenues and Income (Loss) from Operations

Our revenues, operating expenses, and net operating loss, total other expenses, and net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, are as follows:

	Three Months			Nine Months			Three Months			Nine Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 30, 2011

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Costs and Expenses:
General & Administrative		17,265			30,342			2,991			10,323
Professional fees		41,041			81,827			10,677			62,447
Total operating expenses		58,306			112,169			13,668			72,770

Net operating loss		(58,306	)		(112,169	)		(13,668	)		(72,770	)

Total other expenses		(239	)		(385	)		-			(113	)

Net loss	$	(58,545	)	$	(112,554	)	$	(13,668	)	$	(72,883	)

Revenues:

We were established on May 10, 2010 and are in the development stage and had no revenue during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

General and Administrative:

General and administrative expenses were $17,265 and $30,342 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $2,991 and $10,323 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The increase for the comparative nine month periods of $20,019, or 194%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to the costs associated with increased filing fees related to the publishing of our quarterly reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), advertising and public relation costs, and research and development expenses.

Professional Fees:

Professional fees expense was $41,041 and $81,827 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $10,677 and $62,447 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The increase for the comparative nine month periods of $19,380, or 31%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to increased legal fees and stock based compensation related to common stock warrants granted to Officers and Directors not incurred in the comparative nine month period ended September 30, 2011.

Net Operating Loss:

Net operating loss was $58,306 and $112,169 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $13,668 and $72,770 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. As outlined above regarding general and administrative expenses and professional fees, the increase of $39,399, or 54%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to increased filing fees related to the publishing of our quarterly reports with the SEC, advertising and public relation costs, and research and development expenses, along with increased legal fees and stock based compensation related to common stock warrants granted to Officers and Directors not incurred in the comparative nine month period ended September 30, 2011.

Other Expense:

Other expense was $239 and $385 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $-0- and $113 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. In all periods, other expense consisted of imputed interest expenses on non-interest bearing related party loans and finance charges.

Net Loss:

Net loss was $58,545 and $112,554 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $13,668 and $72,883 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. As outlined above regarding net operating loss, the increase of $39,671, or 65%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to increased filing fees related to the publishing of our quarterly reports with the SEC, advertising and public relation costs, and research and development expenses, along with increased legal fees and stock based compensation related to common stock warrants granted to Officers and Directors not incurred in the comparative nine month period ended September 30, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash, current assets, total assets, current liabilities, and total liabilities as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		Change

Cash	$	73,445	$	26,264	$	47,181
Total Current Assets		73,632		26,264		47,368
Total Assets		104,733		33,322		71,411
Total Current Liabilities		60,300		3,098		57,202
Total Liabilities	$	60,300	$	3,098	$	57,202

Our cash and total current assets increased because we were able to raise capital from the sale of our stock and cash advances from affiliates. Correspondingly, our total current liabilities increased because of the cash advances from affiliates and increased accounts payable. Our working capital was $13,332 at September 30, 2012.

Cash Requirements

Although we had $73,445 in cash as of September 30, 2012, based on our lack of revenues, cash on hand and current monthly burn rate, around $9,000 per month, we will need to continue to raise capital from the sale of our stock and to borrow from our shareholders and other related parties to fund operations.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operations

We had net cash used in operating activities of $(72,770) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $(68,967) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the net cash used in operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of $(112,554), and increase in prepaid expenses of $(187), offset by non-cash adjustments to our net loss, including $60 of depreciation expense, $385 of imputed interest on related party loans, and $9,728 of amortization of stock based compensation related to warrants granted to related parties, and an increase in accounts payable of $29,798. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the net cash used in operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of $(72,883), plus prepaid expenses of $(1,500) and accrued interest of $(74), offset by an increase in accounts payable of $5,490.

Investments

Our cash flows from investing activity for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $(8,699) and $(4,796), respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the net cash used in investing activities consisted of purchases of equipment of $(2,406) and payments on patent rights and applications of $(6,293). For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the net cash used in investing activities consisted of payments on patent rights and applications of $(4,796).

Financing

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $128,650, compared to $126,970 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our financing activities consisted of proceeds from notes payable to related parties of $12,000 and proceeds from the sale of common stock, including the exercise of warrants, of $116,650. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our financing activities consisted of proceeds from notes payable to related parties of $1,000, offset by repayments on notes payable to related parties of $($3,355), and proceeds from the sale of common stock of $129,325.

Debt Instruments, Guarantees, and Related Covenants

We have no disclosure required by this Item.

ITEM 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 4

Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of September 30, 2012, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission's rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of September 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses identified and described in Item 4(b).

Our principal executive officers do not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Although our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our principal executive officers have determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at doing so, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented if there exists in an individual a desire to do so. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

(b) Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:

·	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and any disposition of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

·	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, Management identified the following two material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of September 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting, were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

To remediate the material weakness in our documentation, evaluation and testing of internal controls we plan to engage a third-party firm to assist us in remedying this material weakness once resources become available.

We also intend to remedy our material weakness with regard to insufficient segregation of duties by hiring additional employees in order to segregate duties in a manner that establishes effective internal controls once resources become available.

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report, the quarter ended September 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1

Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to or otherwise involved in any legal proceedings.

In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and it is possible that the resolution of such matters might have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition and/or results of operations. However, in the opinion of our management, other than as set forth herein, matters currently pending or threatened against us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A

Risk Factors

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In July and August of 2012, we issued an aggregate of 37,285 shares of our common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and 37,285 warrants, exercisable for a period of one (1) year at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, to a total of four (4) investors. The total amount received in exchange for the shares was $13,050. Three of these issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 promulgated under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, and the investors were accredited and there was no solicitation in connection with the offering. The issuance to the non-accredited investor was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

In August and September of 2012, we issued an aggregate of 420,000 shares of our common stock to a total of forty four (44) individuals pursuant to the exercise of common stock purchase warrants at $0.10 per share.

ITEM 3

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this Item.

ITEM 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5

Other Information

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this Item.

ITEM 6

Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

3.1 (1)		Articles of Incorporation of Premier Biomedical, Inc.
3.2 (1)		Bylaws of Premier Biomedical, Inc.
3.3 (1)		Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)	Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated June 13, 2011, filed with the Commission on June 14, 2011.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Premier Biomedical, Inc.

Dated: November 16, 2012		/s/ William A. Hartman
	By:	William A. Hartman
	Its:	Chief Executive Officer

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC - FORM 10-Q - November 19, 2012

Attached files

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC Reports