Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP LTDFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP LTDaegg_ex321.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP LTDaegg_ex311.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _____________ to _______________

Commission file number:  0-26402

THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
 (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
Nevada     87-0448843
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
1 Gorham Island Suite 303 Westport, Connecticut    06880
(Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip code)
 
203-222-7315
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
____________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $.001 Per Share

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes x  No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of November 19, 2012, the number of Common shares outstanding was 41,279,429

Transitional Small Business Issuer Format (Check one) Yes o  No x
 


 
 

 

THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
 
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION     PAGE  
         
Item 1.
Financial Statements    3  
         
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations   8  
           
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    11  
           
Items 4 and 4T.
Controls and Procedures
    11  
           
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
       
           
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
    12  
           
Item 1A
Risk Factors
    12  
           
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
    13  
           
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
    13  
           
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
    13  
           
Item 5.
Other Information
    13  
           
Item 6.
Exhibits
    13  
 
 
2

 

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION

THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
Balance Sheets
 
Assets
   
September 30,
2012
   
June 30,
2012
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
Current Assets
           
Cash
  $ 50,197     $ 82,433  
Oil and gas sales receivable
    1,126,750       819,590  
Prepaid expenses
    21,383       30,750  
Total Current Assets
    1,198,330       932,773  
Property and Equipment
               
Office equipment
    30,417       30,417  
Leasehold improvements
    26,458       26,458  
Accumulated depreciation
    (38,915 )     (37,732 )
Net Property and Equipment
    17,960       19,143  
Other Assets
               
Investment in oil and gas working interest – related party
    1,583,914       1,583,914  
Security deposit
    16,312       16,312  
Total Other Assets
    1,600,226       1,600,226  
Total Assets
  $ 2,816,516     $ 2,552,142  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 51,849     $ 58,190  
Security deposits
    13,200       13,200  
Note payable
    12,581       24,854  
Accrued liabilities
    241,099       232,216  
Total Current Liabilities
    318,729       328,460  
Total Liabilities
    318,729       328,460  
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share;
               
authorized 80,000,000 shares; 40,679,429 and
               
39,432,761 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    40,679       39,433  
Capital in excess of par value
    12,522,139       12,336,385  
Accumulated deficit
    (10,065,031 )     (10,152,136 )
Total Stockholders’ Equity
    2,497,787       2,223,682  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 2,816,516     $ 2,552,142  
 
See accompanying unaudited notes to the financial statements.
 
 
3

 
 
THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
             
Revenue – Oil and gas royalties
  $ 307,160     $ 67,579  
General and Administrative Expenses
               
Administrative salaries
    104,994       104,420  
Legal and professional
    53,618       34,152  
General and administrative
    42,465       50,311  
Office overhead expenses
    15,487       18,509  
Depreciation
    1,183       1,253  
Total Expenses
    217,747       208,645  
Net Operating Income (Loss)
    89,413       (141,066 )
Other Income and (Expense)
               
Interest expense
    (2,308 )     (1,804 )
Total Other Income and (Expense)
    (2,308 )     (1,804 )
Net Income (Loss) Before Tax
    87,105       (142,870 )
Income Tax
    -       -  
Net Income (Loss)
  $ 87,105     $ (142,870 )
Earnings (Loss) per Share
               
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ (0.00 )
Fully Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ N/A  
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
               
Basic
    39,994,066       34,385,333  
Fully Diluted
    42,354,066       36,745,333  
 
See accompanying unaudited notes to the financial statements.
 
 
4

 
 
THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
           
Net income (loss)
  $ 87,105     $ (142,870 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
               
(used in) operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    1,183       1,253  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
(Increase) decrease in oil and gas sales receivable
    (307,160 )     (57,869 )
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses
    (2,906 )     8,516  
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
    (6,341 )     (9,388 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses
               
and other current liabilities
    8,883       20,144  
Net Cash (Used In) Operating Activities
    (219,236 )     (180,214 )
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
               
Funds reserved for acquisitions
    -       -  
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities
    -       -  
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
               
Cash received from stock issuances
    187,000       -  
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
    187,000       -  
Net (Decrease) in Cash
    (32,236 )     (180,214 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
    82,433       246,061  
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
  $ 50,197     $ 65,847  
Cash Paid For:
               
Interest
  $ 2,308     $ 1,804  
Taxes
  $ -     $ -  

See accompanying unaudited notes to the financial statement
 
 
5

 

THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
September 30, 2012

Note 1 - General

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The information furnished in the interim condensed financial statements include normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Although management believes the disclosures and information presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these interim condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements and notes thereto included in its June 30, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2013.


Note 2 – Basic Loss Per Share of Common Stock
 
 
   
For the three
months ended,
Sept 30, 2012
   
For the three
months ended,
Sept 30, 2011
 
             
Income (Loss) (numerator)
  $ 87,105     $ (142,870 )
                 
Basic Shares (denominator)
    39,994,066       34,385,333  
                 
Fully Diluted Shares (denominator)
    42,354,066       36,745,333  
                 
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share
  $ 0.00     $ (0.00 )
                 
Fully Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
  $ 0.00     $ N/A  
 
The basic loss per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares issued and outstanding during the period of the financial statements.  Stock warrants convertible into 2,360,000 shares of common stock are not included in the basic calculation because their inclusion would be antidilutive, thereby reducing the net loss per common share.

Note 3 – Revenue Recognition

Revenue from oil and gas royalties consists solely of override royalty interests and is recognized after production has occurred on the oil and gas concession in which the Company has an interest. Royalty income is reported on a net revenue basis.

Note 4 - Common Stock

During August, 2012, the Company issued 1,046,668 shares of common stock for cash at $0.15 per share.

During September, 2012, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.15 per share.
 
 
6

 

THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.
Notes to the Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
 
Note 5 – Investment in Oil and Gas Working Interest – Related Party

During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company executed an agreement to acquire from Hycarbex – American Energy, Inc. (Hycarbex), a related party, a two and one half percent (2-1/2%) working interest in each of the 2,258 square kilometer Sanjawi Block No. 3068-2, Zone II, Baluchistan Province, Pakistan, and 1,229 square kilometer Zamzama North Block No. 2667-8, Zone III, Sindh Province, Pakistan. In exchange for the working interest, the Company issued (1) 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Hycarbex, (2) 100,000 warrants with a three year duration to purchase an additional 100,000 shares at $1.75 per share and (3) $100,000 in cash.

The Company has the option to convert the two and one half percent working interests described above to a one and one half percent gross royalty working interest at any time.

Note 6 – Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC 855-10, management of the Company has reviewed all material events from September 30, 2012 through the date the financial statements were issued.  Subsequent to September 30, 2012, the Company issued 600,000 shares of Common Stock for cash at $0.15 per share.   There were no other material events that warrant any additional disclosure.

Note 7 – Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  Accordingly, the financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of assets or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  At September 30, 2012, while the Company’s current assets exceeded its current liabilities, it has recorded negative cash flows from operations and net losses in this period and prior fiscal periods.   The preceding circumstances combine to raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company has received its initial two royalty payments from the operator of the Pakistan petroleum concession and based upon management’s expectation of continuous production in future periods, management expects that a regular royalty revenue stream will be forthcoming.

 
7

 

ITEM 2- MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains statements about the future, sometimes referred to as “forward-looking” statements.  Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of the words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “propose,” “plan,” “intend” and similar words and expressions.  We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.  Statements that describe our future strategic plans, goals or objectives are also forward-looking statements.

Readers of this report are cautioned that any forward-looking statements, including those regarding the Company or its management’s current beliefs, expectations, anticipations, estimations, projections, proposals, plans or intentions, are not guarantees of future performance or results of events and involve risks and uncertainties, such as:

.  The future results of drilling individual wells and other exploration and development activities;
.  Future variations in well performance as compared to initial test data;
.  Future events that may result in the need for additional capital;
.  Fluctuations in prices for oil and gas;
.  Future drilling and other exploration schedules and sequences for various wells and other activities;
.  Uncertainties regarding future political, economic, regulatory, fiscal, taxation and other policies in Pakistan;
.  Our future ability to raise necessary operating capital.

The forward-looking information is based on present circumstances and on our predictions respecting events that have not occurred, which may not occur or which may occur with different consequences from those now assumed or anticipated.  Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risk factors detailed in this report.  The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date of this report.  We are not obligated to update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

Overview

In November, 2003, we sold our Hycarbex-American Energy, Inc. (“Hycarbex”) subsidiary, which was the owner and operator of the Yasin 2768-7 Petroleum Concession Block in the Republic of Pakistan, to a foreign corporation.  We retained in the sale an 18% overriding royalty interest in the Yasin Block.  Drilling of the first well in Pakistan as to which our overriding royalty pertains, named the Haseeb No. 1 Well, was successfully completed by Hycarbex-American Energy, Inc. (“Hycarbex”), in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005.  A state-of-the-art, third party owned, surface facility for the well was constructed for Hycarbex after well completion.  During September 2010, Hycarbex connected the well to the Sui Southern Gas Company pine line, and commenced gas sales under an Extended Well Test but the production quickly ceased due to mechanical difficulties encountered in the commissioning of the surface facility owned by the third party.  The production re-commenced into the pipe line in July, 2011, at the initial rate of 3.5 million cubic feet of gas per day (MMCFD).  Hycarbex has advised that this rate is expected to be gradually increased to 15 MMCFD during the Extended Well Test.  Such production can likewise experience temporary interruptions to permit testing, calibration and other activities common with an extended well test.

In the fall of 2011, we received the initial two production revenue payments for Yasin production, but in November, 2011, Hycarbex, the operator of the Yasin concession, suspended the monthly revenue payments due to Hycarbex’s financial difficulties and advised that it would continue to accrue the revenues to the Company until it resolved its financial difficulties.  Although the daily production rate has increased to over 10 million cubic feet per day under the Extended Well Test, the accrued production revenues due to the Company from August, 2011 through the date of this report have not been distributed to the Company.   In December, 2011, we initiated legal proceedings against Hycarbex and others in the High Court of Islamabad, Pakistan to enforce the revenue payment obligations.  During 2012, we sold shares of Common Stock to certain private investors to provide working capital to the Company and anticipate making future sales as needed for working capital requirements should the pending litigation not result in the near term resumption of production revenue payments to the Company.

 
8

 

Results of Operations

Our operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 reflected a net operating income of  $89,413, as compared to a net operating loss of $141,066 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The net income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 is predominantly a direct result of oil and gas revenue earned during the current quarter in the amount of $307,160.  Prior to September, 2011, we had no recurring income stream and relied upon the proceeds of securities sales and loans. In the fall of 2011, Hycarbex, the operator of the Yasin concession, commenced revenue payments to the Company but then abruptly suspended the monthly revenue payments due to Hycarbex’s financial difficulties after only two  revenue payments totaling $30,425 covering Hycarbex’s April 2011 and July 2011 production.  Hycarbex advised us in its notice of suspension that it would continue to accrue the revenues to the Company until it resolved its financial difficulties. As a result, the accrued production revenues due to the Company from August 2011 through the date of this report have not been distributed to the Company.

The production rate volumes reported by Hycarbex to the Pakistan Oil Ministry indicate that the average daily production for the quarter exceeded 10.3 million cubic feet per day based upon a monthly total of 309.60 million cubic feet for July, 2012, 317.91 million cubic feet for August, 2012 and 320.52 million cubic feet for September, 2012. We have had to base our production and revenue accrual estimates and assumptions based upon these reported estimated figures due to Hycarbex’s failure to directly provide us with updated, accurate production and sale information which is a direct breach of Hycarbex’s contractual obligations. Given the early information received from Hycarbex as to the BTU content of the gas sold, management believes that the appropriate estimated gas price applicable to these reported sale volumes is $1.80 per million cubic feet of gas sold.  Using this price and using the actual production reported by Hycarbex to the Pakistan Oil Ministry for the period, would result in an estimated accrual to the Company for the quarter of $307,160.  Actual monthly accruals for the period could be higher or lower depending upon the actual BTU content.

In December, 2011, we initiated legal proceedings against Hycarbex and others in the High Court of Islamabad, Pakistan to enforce the revenue payment obligations. Management is optimistic that such proceedings will be successful in causing the resumption of payments to the Company. In order to provide necessary working capital for the Company while these revenue payments are being wrongfully withheld, we sold to private investors during the current quarter 1,246,668 shares for $187,000.  Subsequent to the end of the quarter we sold 600,000 shares for $90,000.  The funds will be utilized for general and administrative expenses incurred by the Company, including the non-recurring legal costs associated with the pending litigation in Pakistan. We will make additional sales of securities in the future to fund the Company’s working capital needs as they arise in the event that the pending litigation in Pakistan does not result in a near term resumption of monthly revenue payments from Hycarbex.   Despite management’s expectations, there can be no assurance of litigation success in the short term or upon final resolution on the merits, and there can be no assurance of management’s ability to consummate securities sales to meet working capital requirements. (See Note 7 – Going Concern footnote to Financial Statements above).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Prior to the connection of the Haseeb No. 1 to the gas marketing pipe line, we funded our operations through private loans, all of which have been repaid, and through the private sale of securities. The re-connection to the marketing pipe line and resulting gas sales under the Extended Well Test were expected to provide future cash flow sufficient to meet the Company’s ongoing expenses because the level of production was sufficiently high to cause production revenues to exceed the Company’s monthly operating capital requirements. The suspension of revenue payments by Hycarbex due to its financial difficulties after just two (2) monthly revenue payments caused management to develop a different short term approach to funding its operations.  In order to provide necessary working capital for the Company while these revenue payments are being wrongfully withheld, we sold Common Stock to private investors, including 1,246,668 shares during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 for $187,000.  An additional 600,000 shares were sold subsequent to the end of the quarter for $90,000. The funds have been and will continue to be utilized for general and administrative expenses incurred by the Company, including the non-recurring legal costs associated with the pending litigation in Pakistan which was initiated in December, 2011 against Hycarbex and others in the High Court of Islamabad, Pakistan to enforce the revenue payment obligations. Management is optimistic that such proceedings will be successful in causing the resumption of payments to the Company. However, we will make additional sales of securities in the future to fund the Company’s working capital needs as they arise in the event that the pending litigation in Pakistan does not result in a near term resumption of monthly revenue payments from Hycarbex.   Despite management’s expectations, there can be no assurance of litigation success in the short term or upon final resolution on the merits, and there can be no assurance of management’s ability to consummate securities sales to meet working capital requirements. (See Note 7 – Going Concern footnote to Financial Statements above).
 
 
9

 

Business Strategy and Prospects

In July, 2011, the Haseeb #1 Well began producing into the Sui Southern Gas Company line under the Extended Well Test Gas Sales and Purchase Agreement covering the sale of gas from the Haseeb Gas Field on Yasin Block (2768-7) signed by the parties in December, 2009.  While the Company received only the initial two production payments from Hycarbex before the wrongful suspension and accrual of payments, we are optimistic and pending litigation in Pakistan will be successful in causing a resumption of monthly payments. We are further optimistic that the Company will continue to be successful in making sales of securities to private investors to fund the Company’s working capital requirements. We further expect that the monthly production currently being accrued by Hycarbex to the Company’s interest will increase as the sale volume under the Extended Well Test is gradually increased to the target daily production level of 15 million cubic feet per day. Our business strategy is to use these sales of securities to meet our administrative expenditure requirements until the monthly payments derived from production are resumed. Further, since the accrual rate exceeds the Company’s actual and historical monthly cash requirements for operations, management expects to seek similar non-cost bearing production purchase opportunities in Pakistan and other petroleum producing regions.

The Yasin Block, to date, has no reported Proved Reserves as that term and the calculation for discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes is mandated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, titled “Disclosures About Oil and Natural Gas Producing Activities”.  However, based upon test results upon the Haseeb No. 1 and other data collected by Hycarbex from its drilling and seismic activities, we strongly believe that the Yasin Block acreage contains oil and gas producing physical structures which are worthy of further exploration.  If successfully developed, our reserved 18% production interest will likely be a good source of cash revenues because the royalty, by its nature, entitles us to share in gross, rather than net, production.  We expect to use these anticipated revenues for further investment in other revenue generating assets or business activities.

On October 29, 2009, the Company executed an agreement to acquire from Hycarbex a two and one half percent (2-1/2%) working interest in each of the 2,258 square kilometer Sanjawi Block No. 3068-2, Zone II, Baluchistan Province, Pakistan, and 1,229 square kilometer Zamzama North Block No. 2667-8, Zone III, Sindh Province, Pakistan, concessions, each of which is operated by Heritage Oil and Gas Limited. Heritage is an affiliate of Heritage Oil, PLC, an independent oil and gas company which focuses its oil and gas operations in Africa, the Middle East, and Russia. Heritage’s shares trade on the London Stock Exchange under the symbol HOIL with a secondary listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol HOC. Heritage owns a 54% interest in the Zamzama North Block and a 48% interest in the Sanjawi Block.  Other working interest participants in the two Blocks are Sprint Energy (Private) Limited, an affiliate of Pakistan-based JS Group, and Tracker Energy (Private) Limited, an affiliate of Pakistan-based TPL Holdings, Ltd.  Under the terms of the agreement with Hycarbex, the American Energy Group, Ltd’s 2-1/2% working interests are “carried” by Hycarbes for the initial two (2) wells on the Sanjawi Block and the initial three (3) wells on the Zamzama North Block. The term “carried” means that the costs associated with work programs, seismic, road preparation, drillsite preparation, rig and equipment mobilization, drilling, reworking, testing, logging completion and governmental fees (except taxes and production) shall be borne by Hycarbex. Infrastructure costs such as pipelines and surface facilities constructed after the first discovery well on each Block are not carried. After the initial carried wells have been drilled, American Energy Group, Ltd. shall bear its proportionate share of drilling and exploration costs. The agreement provides and option to American Energy group, Ltd. to convert its working interest in any well at any time to a 1.5% gross royalty interest free of any exploration costs or operating costs.
 
 
10

 
 
According to information set forth on Heritage’s website [www.heritageoilplc.com], the Sanjawi Block is considered a very viable prospect due to the recent oil discovery to the West, a number of gas fields to the Southeast and the presence of oil seeps. The Sanjawi Block is dominated by a series of broad East-West trending surface features including the Dabbar and Warkan Shah anticlines. These are large structures, with the Dabbar anticline being some 300 square kilometers in area.  The Zamzama North Block is immediately to the North of the Zamzama Gas Field, a major Upper Cretaceous gas accumulation.  Heritage has acquired approximately 750 kilometers of fair to good quality, 2D seismic and has mapped a number of structural leads. According to Heritage, further seismic is being acquired and a new well on the Zamzama North Block is planned in the near future. If such development activities occur and are successful, then our Zamzama North interest would also be a source of revenue in the future.
 
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

ITEM 3- QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is not a party to nor does it engage in any activities associated with derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and/or derivative commodity instruments.

ITEMS 4 AND 4T - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2012, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that all information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rule and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
There have been no material changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
Our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting includes using the COSO framework, an integrated framework for the evaluation of internal controls issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, to identify the risks and control objectives related to the evaluation of our control environment.
 
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.  Based on our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2012.
 
Inherent Limitations Over Internal Controls
 
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an effective internal control system may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
 
11

 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1-LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In December, 2011, we initiated civil legal proceedings against Hycarbex and others in the High Court of Islamabad, Pakistan. Our pleadings with respect to the 2.5% carried working interest positions in the Sanjawi and Zamzama North concessions sought a registration of those interests with the Government of Pakistan and  simultaneously sought the imposition of an injunction preventing the transfer of the working interest in those concessions until the registration can be effected, thereby protecting our interests.  Our pleadings with respect to the Yasin concession and the right to receive 18% of the gross production revenues, our pleadings sought a referral to arbitration based upon ownership of, in effect, a 25% carried working interest to which is attributed 18% of gross production revenues and the right to receive pertinent records and data, the appointment of a receiver to both protect and cause disbursement of the 18% of gross revenues since the inception of production in April, 2011, and the imposition of an injunction against the transfer of the working interest in the Yasin concession. The Court immediately issued two injunction orders preserving the status quo as to the Company’s interests in each of the Yasin, Sanjawi and Zamzama North petroleum concessions.

On March 27, 2012, the Islamabad High Court issued its final order (later clarified as to certain arbitration procedures by a clarification Order dated April 4, 2012). The Court directed the parties to proceed to arbitration in London, UK under the ICC Rules of Arbitration and further reaffirmed the continuation of the pending temporary injunctions against Hycarbex’s potential transfer of interests in the concessions prior to final resolution in the arbitration forum.  Our application for the appointment of a receiver was neither granted or denied, but was instead deferred by the Court to the arbitration forum.  Hycarbex appealed the March 27, 2012 Order asserting that litigation should not have been initiated by American Energy without first going to arbitration, asserting that our claims to 18% of gross production revenues were premature (despite already having made some payments toward that production interest) because a “commercial discovery” had not yet been declared, and asserting that the injunctions had the effect of enjoining all of the working interest, not just a portion.  American Energy countered with an appeal that the Court should reconsider the application for a receiver due to an existing arbitration rule which would prevent the arbitration forum from granting interim relief of that type, irrespective of the merits of such an application.  These appeals are expected to be heard prior to the end of December, 2012.

On April 10, 2012, pursuant to the terms of the March 27, 2012, Islamabad High Court Order, we filed our claim with the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) International Court of Arbitration.  In this claim, we are seeking an order which voids, ab initio, the original 2003 Stock Purchase Agreement under which Hycarbex’s parent company acquired the stock of Hycarbex (and thus the underlying Yasin concession owned by Hycarbex) and in conjunction therewith, seeks the recovery of any financial dividends or advances which may have been made by Hycarbex to its shareholders. Alternatively, our claim requests the declaration of a 25% carried working interest (and the in-country registration of same) to which is attributed 18% of gross production free of taxes and costs, plus the recovery from the respondents of all accrued, unpaid production revenues. The request in our arbitration claim for a voiding of the original Stock Purchase Agreement is based upon our assertions in the claim that Hydro Tur, Ltd., the original purchaser of the Hycarbex stock under the 2003 Stock Purchase Agreement, fraudulently misrepresented to American Energy that “no current or past shareholders, officers and/or directors of [American Energy] or Hycarbex have any interest, direct or indirect, in the ownership of [Hydro Tur, Ltd.].” The respondents have not filed their response to the arbitration claim, which is due to proceed further in late calendar  2012 and if necessary, early 2013.

ITEM 1A-RISK FACTORS

Not applicable.

 
12

 

ITEM 2-UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we sold to private investors 1,046,668 shares for $157,000 and 200,000 shares for $30,000. The funds raised were applied to salaries, office rent, legal and accounting expenses and other general and administrative expenses incurred, including the costs associated with our pending litigation with Hycarbex.  Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we sold another 600,000 shares of Common Stock to private investors for $90,000.  These funds also will be utilized for general, administrative and litigation expenses which are expected to be incurred.

ITEM 3-DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4- MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.

ITEM 5-OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6-EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:
 
Exhibit 31.1   Certification by R. Pierce Onthank, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a);
     
Exhibit 32.1   Certification by R. Pierce Onthank, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 1350(a) and (b).
     
101.INS **
 
XBRL Instance Document
     
101.SCH **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
     
101.CAL **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
     
101.DEF **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
     
101.LAB **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
     
101.PRE **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
 
 
13

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
  THE AMERICAN ENERGY GROUP, LTD.  
       
DATED:  November 19, 2012
By:
/s/ R. Pierce Onthank  
    R. Pierce Onthank, President, Chief Executive  
    Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director  
 
 
14