Attached files

file filename
10-Q - FORM 10-Q - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.v326124_10q.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R46.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R33.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R42.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R39.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R25.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.v326124_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.v326124_ex31-1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.Financial_Report.xls
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R12.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R3.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R1.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R4.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R7.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R2.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R5.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R8.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R9.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R6.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R21.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R11.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R19.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R13.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R32.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R37.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R23.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R35.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R31.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R22.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R26.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R20.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R43.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R18.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R29.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R17.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R36.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R44.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R40.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R34.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R41.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R27.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R45.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R10.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R24.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R38.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R15.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R30.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R28.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Xstelos Holdings, Inc.R14.htm
v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

10. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Litigation Matters

 

The Company is involved in various and routine litigation matters, which arise through the normal course of business. Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of the Company. While it firmly maintains that all pending claims are meritless, the Company will, however, continue to expend costs as it vigorously defends against these claims.

 

Thom McAn: In connection with the Company’s discontinued operations in 1995, the Company entered into a sublease formerly occupied by its Thom McAn stores. The lease expires effective February 1, 2014. The obligation under the sublease is $1.0 million as of the date of this filing, although the Company believes that there has been a novation of its obligations under such lease and may bring litigation to have a court finally determine such issue. At this time, the Company has not recorded a liability relating to this commitment as the probability of an unfavorable outcome is remote.

 

Upsher-Smith Litigation: In October 2008, CPEX and Auxilium received notice that Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (“Upsher-Smith”) had filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA containing a paragraph IV certification in which Upsher-Smith certified that it believes its proposed generic version of Testim® does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,320,968 (the “968 Patent”). The ‘968 Patent claims a method for maintaining effective blood serum testosterone levels for treating a hypogonadal male, and will expire in January 2025. The ‘968 Patent is listed for Testim® in Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (commonly known as the Orange Book), published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Upsher-Smith’s paragraph IV certification sets forth allegations that the ‘968 Patent will not be infringed by the manufacture, use, or sale of its proposed generic product as set forth in its ANDA No. 79-178. On December 4, 2008, CPEX and Auxilium filed a Hatch-Waxman infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (“the Court”) against Upsher-Smith seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. The Court docketed this case as Civil Action No. 08-908-SLR. In June 2009, Upsher-Smith amended its answer to the complaint to include a defense and counterclaim of invalidity of the ‘968 Patent, which CPEX and Auxilium have denied in a reply to the counterclaim filed in July 2009. A patent issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), such as the ‘968 Patent, is presumed valid. As of the date of this filing, the lawsuit remains pending; however, the case was administratively closed in December of 2011 and will remain closed until further order of the Court.

  

CPEX has filed continuation and divisional applications with the USPTO relating to the ‘968 Patent. Nine patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,608,605; 7,608,606; 7,608,607; 7,608,608; 7,608,609; 7,608,610; 7,935,690; 8,063,029; and 8,178,518 were issued from these applications, which may provide further market protection. Each of these nine patents has been listed in the Orange Book with respect to Testim®. In April 2012, Auxilium and CPEX received a paragraph IV notice letter for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,320,968; 7,608,605; 7,608,606; 7,608,607; 7,608,608; 7,608,609; 7,608,610; 7,935,690; and 8,063,029 in whicjh USL certified that it believes that its proposed generic product does not infringe these patents.  At this time, only the ’968 Patent is in the Delaware lawsuit discussed above.

 

On September 10, 2012, Upsher-Smith filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Auxilium and FCB, seeking declaratory judgment that its ANDA No. 79-178 does not infringe eight of the ten patents listed in the Orange Book as covering Testim® as well as a declaration of invalidity as to these patents U.S. Patent Nos. 7,608,605; 7,608,606; 7,608,607; 7,608,608; 7,608,609; 7,608,610; 7,935,690; and 8,063,029. On October 12, 2012, Auxilium and FCB filed a motion to dismiss Upsher-Smith's declaratory judgment complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or alternately, to transfer that case to the District of Delaware. Upsher-Smith's Opposition to this motion was received on November 7, 2012. Auxilium’s and FCB's Reply to Upsher-Smith’s Opposition is due on November 16, 2012.

 

CPEX and its affiliates will vigorously pursue the Hatch-Waxman patent infringement lawsuit. However, if CPEX is unsuccessful in obtaining an injunction to keep Upsher-Smith’s proposed version of Testim® off the market until the patent protection expires, or in defending the ‘968 Patent covering Testim®, sales of Testim®, and royalties relating to Testim® sales could be materially reduced.

 

Watson Litigation: On May 23, 2012, Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Auxilium") and FCB I LLC ("FCB") filed a lawsuit against Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Watson Pharma, Inc. (collectively, "Watson") for infringement of FCB's ten patents listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA's") Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (commonly known as the "Orange Book") as covering Testim® 1% testosterone gel.  The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

 

Auxilium and FCB filed this lawsuit in response to a notice letter, dated April 12, 2012, sent by Watson Laboratories, Inc. regarding its filing with the FDA of ANDA No. 09-1073 for a generic 1% testosterone gel product.  This letter also stated that ANDA No. 09-1073 contained Paragraph IV certifications, under 21 U.S.C. Section 355(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, with respect to the nine patents listed in the Orange Book on that date as covering Testim®: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,320,968; 7,608,605; 7,608,606; 7,608,607; 7,608,608; 7,608,609; 7,608,610; 7,935,690; and 8,063,029.  On May 15, 2012, a new composition patent covering Testim® issued.  This patent is now also listed in the Orange Book and was included in the patent infringement lawsuit filed against Watson.  In total, ten Testim® patents are now listed in the Orange Book and will expire at various dates ranging from July 21, 2023 through January 18, 2025.

  

On July 6, 2012, Watson filed its answer to the patent infringement complaint filed by Auxilium and FCB.  Watson also asserted counterclaims against Auxilium and FCB, which seek declaratory judgments that each of the ten patents-in-suit are invalid or are not infringed by Watson's proposed generic 1% testosterone gel product.  Auxilium and FCB's reply to Watson's counterclaims was filed on July 30, 2012.  On July 30, 2012, the parties entered into a stipulation wherein Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Watson Pharma, Inc. were dismissed without prejudice from this lawsuit and agreed to be bound by any stipulation, judgment, order, or decision rendered as to Watson Laboratories, Inc., including any appeals and any order granting preliminary or permanent injunctive relief against Watson Laboratories, Inc.

 

The case is presently in the early stages of fact discovery, and a trial date has not yet been set. On October 22, 2012, Auxilium and FCB disclosed to Watson the claims from the ten patents-in-suit that they assert are infringed. On October 29, 2012, Watson served its invalidity and noninfringement contentions on Auxilium and FCB. Auxilium and FCB will serve their responsive infringement and validity contentions on December 13, 2012. The parties' initial case scheduling conference with the court occurred on November 9, 2012.

 

Auxilium and FCB remain committed to protecting their intellectual property rights, including their patent protection for Testim®. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, as a result of the patent infringement lawsuit filed against Watson, final FDA approval of Watson's ANDA for its proposed generic version of Testim® will be stayed until at least the earlier of 30 months from the date Watson's notice letter was received (i.e., October 14, 2014) or final resolution of the pending patent infringement lawsuit.