Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCFinancial_Report.xls
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR2.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR5.htm
10-Q - QUARTERLY REPORT - ESCALADE INCv325530_10q.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR7.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR4.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR3.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR1.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR6.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR8.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR9.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR33.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR16.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR19.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR10.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR32.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR36.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR18.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR41.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR40.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR39.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR30.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR23.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR35.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR17.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR25.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR13.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR26.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR29.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR27.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR22.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR24.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR34.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR42.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR46.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR14.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR20.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR44.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR12.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR45.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR11.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR43.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR31.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR28.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR37.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR21.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ESCALADE INCR38.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - ESCALADE INCv325530_ex32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - ESCALADE INCv325530_ex31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - ESCALADE INCv325530_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - ESCALADE INCv325530_ex31-1.htm
v2.4.0.6
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Oct. 06, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note I – Fair Values of Financial Instruments

 

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments recognized in the accompanying balance sheets at amounts other than fair values.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Time Deposits

 

Fair values of cash and cash equivalents and time deposits approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.

 

Notes Payable and Long-term Debt

 

Fair values of notes payable and long-term debt is estimated based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities and determined through the use of a discounted cash flow model.

 

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall in accordance with FASB ASC 825 at October 6, 2012 and October 1, 2011.

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

October 6, 2012
In thousands
Fair Value Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,255 $ 3,255 $ $
Time deposits $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ $
Financial liabilities
Note payable and Short-term debt $ 14,033 $ $ 14,033 $
Current portion of Long-term debt $ 2,000 $ $ 2,000 $
Long-term debt $ 3,500 $ $ 3,500 $

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

October 1, 2011
In thousands
Fair Value Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,433 $ 4,433 $ $
Time deposits $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ $
Financial liabilities
Note payable and Short-term debt $ 18,129 $ $ 18,129 $
Current portion of Long-term debt $ 2,000 $ $ 2,000 $
Long-term debt $ 5,500 $ $ 5,500 $

 

The outstanding balance of the euro overdraft facility is included in Notes payable and Short-term debt. For the periods ended October 6, 2012, December 31, 2011, and October 1, 2011, the balance of the euro overdraft facility was $2.4 million, $2.2 million, and $2.3 million, respectively.

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

For purposes of the interim impairment test, the fair value of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit was determined using a combination of two methods; one based on market earnings multiples of peer companies identified for the business unit (the market approach), and a discounted cash flow model with estimates of cash flows based on internal forecasts of revenues and expenses over a five year period plus a terminal value period (the income approach). The market approach estimates fair value by applying earnings and revenue market multiples to the reporting unit’s operating performance for the trailing twelve-month period. The market multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with operating and investment characteristics similar to those of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit. The income approach estimates fair value by discounting the reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows using a weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current market conditions and the risk profile of the business unit.

 

To arrive at the Martin Yale Group reporting unit’s future cash flows, the Company uses estimates of economic and market information, including growth rates in revenues, costs, and estimates of future expected changes in operating margins, tax rates, and cash expenditures. Other significant estimates and assumptions include terminal value growth rates, future estimates of capital expenditures, and changes in future working capital requirements. Under the income approach, the Company applied a risk-adjusted discount rate of 11.2% to the future cash flows from the Martin Yale Group reporting unit. In addition to the earnings multiples and the discount rates disclosed above, certain other judgments and estimates are used to prepare the goodwill impairment test.

The fair values of the intangible assets for the Martin Yale Group reporting unit were estimated considering estimated royalty savings, discounted cash flows and average attrition rates associated with these assets.

 

As a result of the impairment tests performed, the goodwill of the Martin Yale Group reporting unit was written down to the implied fair value of zero from its carrying value of $13.2 million as of October 6, 2012. The intangible assets of this reporting unit were written down to their estimated fair value of $1.7 million from their carrying value of $1.9 million as of October 6, 2012.

 

Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs and management judgment used in the goodwill and intangible asset impairment analyses, these measurements were classified in level three of the valuation hierarchy.

 

Equity Method Investments

 

For purposes of the impairment analysis of the equity method investment in Escalade International, Ltd, the Company considered the impact of attrition of certain significant customers on future cash flows of this entity as well as expectations regarding future divestiture of the investment. The Company is negotiating to sell its investment to the remaining shareholders of Escalade International, Ltd. Based on consideration of cash flows related to the potential divestiture, the Company has determined that other than temporary impairment in the amount of $0.4 million ($0.2 million, net of tax) is appropriate. Consequently, the investment was written down to its estimated fair value of $0.5 million from its carrying value of $0.9 million as of October 6, 2012. Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs and management judgment used in the equity method impairment analysis, this measurement was classified in level three of the valuation hierarchy.