Attached files

file filename
8-K - FORM 8-K - DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC.d436317d8k.htm
Investor Presentation
(NASDAQ: DCTH)
November 2012
Exhibit 99.1


2
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Forward-looking Statements
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by the Company or on
its behalf. This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that can cause
actual results to differ materially from those described. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to,
uncertainties relating to: our ability to address the contents of the 74 Day letter, timing of completion of the FDA’s review of our NDA,
the extent to which the FDA may request additional information or data and our ability to provide the same in a timely manner,
acceptability of the Phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trial data by the FDA, FDA approval of the Company's NDA for the treatment of
metastatic melanoma to the liver, adoption, use and resulting sales, if any, for the chemosaturation system in the United States,
adoption, use and resulting sales, if any, for the Hepatic CHEMOSAT delivery system in the EEA, our ability to successfully
commercialize the chemosaturation system in various markets and the potential of the chemosaturation system as a treatment for
patients with cancers in the liver, the timing and our ability to successfully enter into strategic partnership and distribution
arrangements in foreign markets including Australia and key Asian markets and resulting sales, if any, from the same, patient
outcomes using the Generation 2 system, approval of the current or future chemosaturation system for other indications and/or for
use with various chemotherapeutic agents, actions by the FDA or other foreign regulatory agencies, our ability to obtain
reimbursement for the CHEMOSAT system in various markets, submission and  publication of the Phase II and III clinical trial data,
the timing and results of research and development projects, the timing and results of future clinical trials including the initiation of
clinical trials in key Asian markets with the Hepatic CHEMOSAT Delivery System device for intra-hepatic arterial delivery and
extracorporeal filtration of doxorubicin, approval of the Hepatic CHEMOSAT Delivery System device for intra-hepatic arterial delivery
and extracorporeal filtration of doxorubicin in key Asian markets and adoption and patient outcomes using the same, the timing and
use, if any, of the line of credit from SVB and our ability to access this facility and uncertainties regarding our ability to obtain
financial and other resources for any research, development and commercialization activities. These factors, and others, are
discussed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they are made.


3
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Our Mission
Concentrating the Power of Chemotherapy for Disease Control in the Liver
We are a cancer therapy company
Our technology offers the opportunity to gain control of tumors
in the liver
The liver is a site where uncontrolled disease is often life-limiting
or leads to withdrawal of systemic treatments in favor of palliative
care
We plan on being a fully-integrated company and are building the
infrastructure to develop and commercialize our products in
Europe and North America, while pursuing opportunities in other
regions
o
In Europe, CHEMOSAT with Melphalan is approved and is currently being sold
We believe that our first product, CHEMOSAT, may extend the
lives of a large number of cancer patients


4
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Existing Liver Cancer Treatments Have Significant Limitations
The Problem
Metastatic disease to the liver, brain or lungs is often the life-
limiting location of solid tumors
o
In contrast to the brain and lungs, where systemic chemotherapy
and radiation can exert some degree of local control, tumors in the
liver are not particularly responsive to chemotherapy and radiation
therapy
Existing treatments to control tumors in the liver include:
Surgical resection
Radioembolization (SIRT)
Chemoembolization (TACE)
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Microwave, Cryoablation
Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI)
Systemic chemotherapy


5
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Existing Liver Cancer Treatments Have Limitations
Unmet Medical Need Exists for More Effective Liver Cancer Treatments
Treatment
Advantages
Disadvantages
Systemic
Non-invasive
Repeatable
Systemic toxicities
Limited efficacy in liver
Regional
(e.g., Isolated Hepatic Perfusion)
Therapeutic effect
Targeted
Invasive/limited repeatability
Multiple treatments are
required but not possible
Focal
(e.g. surgery, radioembolization,
chemoembolization, radio
frequency ablation)
Partial removal or
treatment of tumors
Only 10% to 20% resectable
Invasive and/or limited
repeatability
Treatment is limited by tumor
size, number of lesions and
location
Tumor revascularization
Cannot treat diffuse disease


6
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Diffuse Hepatic
Metastases
from
Ocular
and
Cutaneous
Melanoma
Diffuse disease in the liver is prevalent
Effective treatment for patients with liver-limited or dominant cancers
remains a clinical challenge
Whole organ therapy creates a new option for patients in the management
of liver dominant disease


7
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Concentrating the Power of Chemotherapy for Disease Control in the Liver
Our Solution –
Whole Organ-Focus Disease Control
Our proprietary CHEMOSAT system isolates the liver
circulation, delivers an ultra-high concentration of
chemotherapy (melphalan) to the liver and filters most of the
chemotherapy out of the blood prior to returning it to the patient
The procedure typically takes approximately two hours to
complete and involves a team including the interventional
radiologist and perfusionist
CHEMOSAT (Gen 2) has demonstrated minimal systemic
toxicities and impact to blood components in initial commercial
use and may complement systemic therapy
CHEMOSAT
has
been
used
on
approximately
200
patients
to
date through clinical development and early commercial launch


8
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
The Delcath CHEMOSAT System
Minimally Invasive, Repeatable Liver Procedure That Could Complement Systemic Therapy
Chemosaturation
Improves disease
control in the liver
Treats entire liver
(macro and micro)
Controls systemic
toxicities
Allows for over 100x
effective dose
escalation at tumor
site
1.
ISOLATE
2.
SATURATE
3.
FILTRATE


9
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Concentrating the Power of Chemotherapy for Disease Control in the Liver
The Data
We conducted a randomized Phase 3 study under a Special
Protocol Assessment (“SPA”) using Generation 1 of our
chemosaturation system with melphalan in patients with
melanoma (ocular and cutaneous) metastatic to the liver
Melanoma liver metastases are relatively homogeneous
regardless of origin
Liver metastases are typically the life-limiting aspect of the
disease
Melanoma is notoriously insensitive to systemic chemotherapy
and our study was a great demonstration of our technology’s
potential in a challenging histology


10
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Phase III Clinical Trial Design
Randomized to CS
93 patients: ocular
or cutaneous melanoma
Best Alternative Care (BAC)
Investigator and patient decision
(any and all treatments)
CS/Melphalan
Treat every 4 weeks x 4 rounds
(responders
can receive up to 6 rounds)
Cross-over
Modeled hPFS for Trial Success:
7.73 months (CS) 
vs.
4 months (BAC)
Secondary Trial Endpoints
Investigator hPFS
Hepatic objective response rate
Overall objective response rate
Overall
Survival
Diluted
by
Cross
Over
SAP calls for analysis of various patient subsets
Pre-CS (Baseline)
Post-CS (22+ Months)
Hepatic
Response
Metastatic
Melanoma
Fully Powered, 93 Patient, Randomized, Multi-Center NCI Led Study
CS = ChemoSaturation (CHEMOSAT)
Primary Trial Endpoint
Statistically
significant
difference
in
Hepatic
Progression
Free Survival (“hPFS”): p < 0.05 (IRC)
Over 80% of Oncologic drugs approved by FDA between
2005 –
2007 on endpoints other than overall survival


11
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Hepatic progression-free survival (IRC)
Positive Phase III Results –
Primary Endpoint hPFS
CS-PHP Demonstrated 4x or 5.3 months Improvement in Primary Endpoint of hPFS
Hazard ratio = 0.50
(95%
CI
0.31–0.80)
P=0.0029
0               
5                       10                     15
20
25                      30              
Months
7.0
1.7
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Proportion of patients surviving
5.3 mo
Intent-to-treat population
Chemosaturation (CS-PHP)
Best alternative care (BAC)
INDEPENDENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (IRC) ASSESSMENT
-
UPDATED ANALYSIS (4 June 2012)


12
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Overall progression-free survival (investigator)
Months
5.4
1.6
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Proportion of patients surviving
Hazard ratio = 0.42
(95% CI 0.27–0.64)
P<0.0001
0             5            10            15
20
25           30            35           40         
45           50           55
3.8 mo
Intent-to-treat population
Chemosaturation (CS-PHP)
Best alternative care (BAC)
Positive Phase III Results –
Overall PFS
CS-PHP also Demonstrated a Highly Statistically Significant Improvement in Overall PFS
INVESTIGATOR ASSESSMENT
-
UPDATED ANALYSIS (4 June 2012)


13
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
TOTOL CS-PHP vs BAC ONLY
Proportion of subjects surviving
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
12
36
0
24
48
60
11.4
Total
CS-PHP
incl.
crossover
BAC only
Months
4.1
Intent-to-treat population
7.3 mo
Overall Survival –
Exploratory Subset Analysis
Overall
Survival
Tail
For
CS-PHP
Treated
Patients


14
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Positive Phase III Results
Primary endpoint (hPFS by IRC) exceeded, p value = 0.0029, hazard ratio of 0.50
as of June, 2012
o
CS/PHP
median
hepatic
progression
free
survival
(hPFS)
was
4-fold
of
control,
or
5.3
months
improvement
o
CS/PHP
achieved
a
median
hPFS
of
7.0
months
vs
1.7
months
for
BAC
control
o
75% overall clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD)
Secondary endpoints consistent with primary endpoints
o
CS/PHP achieved a median overall PFS of 5.4 months vs. 1.6 months for BAC
o
OS –
No difference demonstrated due to heavy crossover from BAC to CS/PHP
o
Median OS 10.6 months vs. 10.0 months for CS/PHP and BAC respectively
OS exploratory analyses supportive of key observations
o
Median overall survival of 11.4 months for all patients treated with melphalan, including crossover
o
BAC patients did not cross-over to CS/PHP had a median survival of 4.1 months
o
7 CS/PHP-treated and 3 BAC-only patients still alive as of 6/2012
Gen 1 Safety profile –
consistent with currently approved labeling for melphalan
o
30-day deaths on PHP: 3/44 patients (6.8%)
1 Neutropenic Sepsis (2.3%); 1 Hepatic Failure 2.5% (95% tumor burden); 1 gastric perforation
o
30-day deaths on BAC: 3/49 patients (6.1%)
Trial Outcomes Favorable and Consistent with Special Protocol Assessment


15
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
The Evidence for Melphalan
Melphalan, an established chemotherapy agent, is proven active at
high doses with broad antitumor activity
1. Grover AC, et al. Surgery 2004;136:1176-82
4. Alexander HR Jr, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:6343-9
7. Van Iersel LB, et al. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1662-7
2. Noter SL, et al. Melanoma Res 2004;14:67-72
5. Alexander HR Jr, et al. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1852-9
8. Verhoef C, et al. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1367-74
3. Alexander HR Jr, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:3062-70
6. Van Iersel LB, et al. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1127-34


16
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Melphalan Sensitivity: In Vitro Tumor Cell Lines Study
We Believe CHEMOSAT Will Be Effective On a Wide Range of Solid Tumors
192 uM


17
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Our Opportunity
At the concentrations of melphalan we are achieving in the
liver, we believe CHEMOSAT will be effective on a wide variety
of histologies
We believe that physicians are recognizing the broad
applicability of CHEMOSAT, based on early experience and
their interest in testing our technology with melphalan in a
variety of tumor histologies
CE Mark approved broad indication
Large global market opportunity with pharmaceutical-like gross
margin ~ 80%
Concentrating the Power of Chemotherapy for Disease Control in the Liver


18
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
CHEMOSAT -
Potential Multi-Billion Dollar Market
$7 Billion Annual Global Opportunity with Pharmaceutical-Like Gross Margins
Sources: LEK Consulting, GLOBOCAN, Company estimates.
*TPM for initial U.S. labeled indication only.
EU: Initial target countries of Germany, UK, Italy, France, Spain, Netherlands, Ireland.
APAC: Initial target countries of China, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan, Australia.
Assumes 2.5 treatments per patient.
Assumes EU ASP of $15K; US ASP of $25K; APAC ASP of $5K.
55,389
$2.2 B
8,708*
$2.6 B
189,943
$2.2 B
HCC
CRC
Melanoma
NET
8,708
6,563
4,085
8,212
7,202
33,966
19,861
33,953
52,143
5,585
7,671
99,749
0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
USA
EU
APAC


19
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Approved  (CE Mark Device)
NDA Filing Accepted by the FDA with PDUFA goal date of June 15, 2013
Application Submitted/ Planned –
Mutual Recognition of European CE Mark
Global Commercialization Status
Addressing A Multi-Billion Dollar Global Market


20
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
European Commercialization Strategy
Strategy:
Focus efforts in 7 Target Countries (EU 5 + Netherlands & Ireland)
8-10 leading EU cancer centers as initial training centers
Validate business model and demonstrate scalability
Push and Pull marketing and selling strategy
Tactics & Execution:
Educate medical and surgical oncologists via contract organization
Sell to hospital-based oncologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and C-suite decision makers
with combination of direct sales and distributors
Focus on medical and surgical oncologists at referral centers
Hospitals procure melphalan from third parties and physicians use at their discretion
Establish
European
patient
education
and
awareness
programs
(PR,
website)
Leverage interim reimbursement channels, while pursuing permanent procedure reimbursement
Focused clinical trial program to generate additional data and build clinical experience across multiple
centers for various tumor types (e.g. HCC, NET and CRC)
Currently In Initial Training and Marketing Phase


21
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Patient Referral Path
Interventional
Radiologist
Offers chemosaturation
procedure
Patient
Primary
Care
Medical
Oncologist
Offers systemic therapy
Surgical
Oncologist
Offers resection or
other focal therapy
Chemosaturation
Diagnosis
of Cancer
Identification
of
liver
involvement
with no
improvement from systemic
therapy
When liver disease is
Oncologist for additional systemic therapy
patients
return
to
the
Medical
controlled,


22
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
CHEMOSAT Training and Marketing Commenced in Europe
Continue Training and Marketing Centers Roll-Out
Entered training and marketing agreements with leading cancer centers in Europe
o
Milan, Italy –
European Institute of Oncology (IEO)
o
Frankfurt, Germany –
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität (JWG)
o
Kiel, Germany –
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
o
Villejuif, France –
Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy (IGR)
o
Barcelona, Spain –
El Hospital Quiron
o
Naples, Italy –
Instituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale"
o
Amsterdam, The Netherlands –
Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
o
Erlangen, Germany –
University Hospital of Erlangen
o
Pamplona, Spain –
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
o
Bordeaux, France –
Hôpital Saint-André
o
Galway, Ireland –
University Hospital Galway
o
Leiden, The Netherlands –
Leiden University Medical Center
o
Southampton, United Kingdom –
Southampton University Hospital
Training completed and patients treated at IEO, Italy; JWG University Hospital, Frankfurt,
Germany; IGR, France; UHG, Ireland; Southampton, UK, St Andre, France
o
Liver metastases from cutaneous melanoma, ocular melanoma, gastric cancer, breast cancer,
neuroendocrine tumor (NET), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma
Selected Quintiles to support EU launch with medical science liaisons (MSL)


23
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
European Reimbursement Considerations
No centralized
pan-European
medical
device
reimbursement
body
reimbursement
mechanisms vary greatly at national and regional levels across our target markets
Working with reimbursement specialists to execute plan in each of our key markets
for both interim and long term reimbursement
Interim reimbursement plans expected to begin coming online during fourth quarter
Italy –
Secured
a
pathway
for
reimbursement
using
an
existing
Diagnosis
Related
Group
code (DRG)
for
use
with
CHEMOSAT.
We
will
continue
to
seek
additional
supplemental
new technology payments, and potentially pursue a new higher reimbursing DRG for
CHEMOSAT
o
A limited number of procedures are currently being covered by private payment and research funding
o
Apply for funding under existing New Technology Payment programs
o
Italy –
First Regional Application submitted for supplemental (in addition to DRG) new technology
payments.
o
Germany -
Interim reimbursement process is being actively sponsored and driven by the German
Radiology
Society
12
NUB
applications
filed
o
United
Kingdom
Our
lead
centers
are
seeking
to
gain
PCT
(Primary
Care
Trust)
approval.
This
would
allow
us
to
perform
CHEMOSAT
procedures
in
3
to
4
key
centers
in
the
UK
Reimbursement Program Now In Execution Phase


24
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
International Strategy beyond EU and US
Leverage CE Mark to obtain reciprocal regulatory approvals for CHEMOSAT
System in other international markets
o
Obtained approval for Gen 2 CHEMOSAT System with melphalan in Austrailia
International regulatory submissions status:
Application
submitted
and
expected
approvals
in
Hong Kong
-
2012 (Gen 2 expected in Dec.)
Canada
-
2012 (Gen 2 expected in Dec.)
Singapore
-
2013
Argentina
-
2013
Brazil
-
2014
Intend
to
submit
applications
S. Korea
(CHEMOSAT Doxorubicin)
Mexico
China
(CHEMOSAT Doxorubicin)
Taiwan
Russia
India
Japan
Israel
Utilize 3   party melphalan and doxorubicin available to physicians
Combination of Strategic Partnerships and Specialty Distributors
rd


25
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
U.S. FDA Regulatory Status
NDA accepted and under active FDA review since submission in mid
August, 2012
We are working closely with the FDA during the review process
PDUFA goal date of June 15, 2013 assigned by the FDA
FDA advised Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) panel to be
expected
NDA filing included:
o
Comprehensive set of additional data in a new FDA compliant
CDISC database
o
Gen 2 filter as part of the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control
(CMC) module
We have also amended IND and Expanded Access Program (EAP)
and Gen 2 has been accepted by the FDA for use in EAP,
compassionate use and prospective clinical trials in the US


26
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
U.S. Commercialization Strategy
Initial focus on centers that participated in the phase III clinical trial
Educate Medical Oncologists via Medical Science Liaison (MSL)
Direct strategy to sell to Interventional Radiologists and Oncologists
o
Approximately 12 sales territories ultimately expanding to as many as 60
territories as revenues ramp
Utilize top centers from Phase III trial as Centers of Excellence for
training and support
Intend to seek chemosaturation specific CPT reimbursement code,
based upon value proposition relative to other cancer therapies
Direct Sales Channels with MSL Clinical Support


27
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Clinical Development Program
Establish CHEMOSAT as the Standard of Care (SOC) for Disease Control in the Liver
Goal:
o
Expand US (CS-PHP: MEL) label indications to include HCC and mCRC
o
Generate robust clinical data to support commercialization
FDA has accepted IND Amendment to include Gen 2 device in Expanded Access Program
(EAP), compassionate use (CU), and all future clinical trials
o
Intend to initiate EAP for metastatic melanoma by Q412
Initiate EU Registry to systematically collect relevant data from commercial experience
New Clinical Trials (first patient enrolled in 2013)
o
mCRC
Global
Phase
3
Randomized
2L
CHEMOSAT
Melphalan
vs.
Approved
Alternatives
o
HCC
Global Phase
3
Randomized
2L
CHEMOSAT
Melphalan
vs.
BSC
for
Sorafenib
Failure
Asia Regional
Phase
3
Randomized
2L
CHEMOSAT
Doxorubicin
vs.
BSC
for
Sorafenib
Failure
Multiple Phase 2 studies under evaluation: HCC, NET, mBreast, Pancreatic
Support investigator-initiated trials (IITs)


28
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
CHEMOSAT System for Doxorubicin –
CE Mark
Satisfied all of the requirements to affix the CE Mark to Hepatic
CHEMOSAT Delivery System device for intra-hepatic arterial delivery
and extracorporeal filtration of doxorubicin in October, 2012
Provides a pathway for regulatory approval in China and S. Korea
Provides basis for partnership opportunities in China and S. Korea
where doxorubicin has a broad label
Multiple published Phase I/II studies from MD Anderson Cancer Center
and Yale with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) and Kobe
University using doxorubicin show promising response rates for HCC*
Plan
to
use
CHEMOSAT
Doxorubicin
in
Asia
Phase
III
2L
HCC trials
Addressing the Large HCC Market Opportunity in China


29
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
2012 Milestones
First patients have been treated with CHEMOSAT Melphalan in Europe -
Done
Execute contract for MSL services in EU in 1Q 2012 (Quintiles was selected to
support EU launch of CHEMOSAT) -
Done
Secure agreements with 8-10 leading cancer centers in EU -
Done
Obtain CE Mark for Gen 2 CHEMOSAT Melphalan -
Done
US NDA submission in August 2012 -
Done
US NDA acceptance with standard review in October 2012 -
Done
Obtain CE Mark for CHEMOSAT Doxorubicin in 2H 2012 -
Done
Submission for publications of Phase III data and mNET arm of Phase II data in
Q4 2012
First patients enrolled in EAP in Q4 2012
Initiate EU Registry in Q4 2012
Potential Asia strategic partnership –
dedicated BD with China a top priority


30
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Financial Update
Cash & Cash Equivalents:
$28.3 million at September 30, 2012
Financing:
$21.1 million (net) raised in a follow-on equity
offering in May 2012
ATM Program
$24.5 million remaining as of September 30,
2012
Working Capital Line of Credit:
$20.0 million credit facility
Debt:
None
Cash Spend:
$14.6 million in 3Q2012
Shares Outstanding:
73.4
million
(83.8
million
fully
diluted
¹
)
Institutional Ownership:
13%
Market Capitalization:
$120 million as of September 30, 2012
Avg. Daily Volume (3 mo.):
1,000,000
1) Fully diluted includes an additional 4.8 million options and 5.6 million warrants


31
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Team
Executive
Title
Prior Affiliation(s)
Years of
Experience
Eamonn Hobbs
President and CEO
AngioDynamics, E-Z-EM
31
Graham Miao, Ph.D.
EVP & CFO
D&B, Pagoda Pharma, Schering-Plough,
Pharmacia, JP Morgan
22
Krishna Kandarpa, M.D.,
Ph.D.
CSO and EVP, R&D
Harvard, MIT(HST), Cornell, UMass
32
Agustin Gago
EVP, Global Sales
AngioDynamics, E-Z-EM
30
Jennifer Simpson, Ph.D.
EVP, Global Marketing
Eli Lilly (ImClone), Johnson & Johnson
(Ortho Biotech)
22
Peter Graham, J.D.
EVP, General Counsel &
Global Human Resources
Bracco, E-Z-EM
17
David McDonald
EVP, Business Development
AngioDynamics, RBC Capital Markets
29
John Purpura
EVP, Regulatory Affairs & Quality
Assurance
E-Z-EM, Sanofi-Aventis
28
Harold Mapes
EVP, Global Operations
AngioDynamics, Mallinkrodt
26
J. Chris Houchins
SVP, Clinical Affairs
Arno, Schering-Plough, Pfizer,
Pharmacia, GD Searle
21
Gloria Lee, M.D., PH.D.
SVP, Global Clinical Development
Hoffmann-La Roche, Syndax
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
20
Bill Appling
SVP Medical Device R&D
AngioDynamics
26
Dan Johnston, Ph.D.
VP, Pharmaceutical R&D
Pfizer, Wyeth
11


32
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendices


33
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix I
Intellectual Property


34
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Intellectual Property
Patent Protection
o
5 U.S. patents in force and 6 U.S. patent applications pending
o
6 foreign patents in force (with patent validity in 22 countries) and 15 foreign patent
applications pending
o
Primary device patent set to expire August 2016
o
Up to 5 years of patent extension post FDA approval
Trade Secret Protection
o
Developed improved filter media via new manufacturing processes
FDA Protection
o
Orphan Drug Designation granted for melphalan in the treatment of ocular
melanoma, cutaneous melanoma and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as
for doxorubicin in the treatment of HCC
Provides 7 years of marketing exclusivity post FDA approval
o
Additional Orphan Drug applications to be filed for other drugs and indications,
including melphalan for HCC and CRC
Multiple Levels of Protection


35
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix II
CHEMOSAT Market Opportunity
by Disease and Target Counties


36
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Market Opportunity by Disease (patients)
Market
Opportunity
defined
as
Total
Potential
Market
(TPM)
for
CHEMOSAT
®
1.Primary cancer incidence
2.Adjusted for predominant disease in the liver (primary or      
metastatic cancer)
3.Adjusted
for
addressable
patients
via
Delcath
CHEMOSAT
®
Europe
Largest
near-term
opportunity
CRC
Largest
opportunity
worldwide
Melanoma
Largest
opportunity
is
in
US
China -
Largest
opportunity
for
HCC


37
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Europe Market by Disease –
Device Only
Germany
(Direct)
UK
(Direct)
France
(Indirect)
Italy
(Indirect)
Spain
(Indirect)
Netherlands
(Direct)
Ireland
(Direct)
Total 
Potential
(patients)
Potential
Market
($ MM)
1,2,3
Total Potential Market #Patients
Ocular
Melanoma
404
297
295
285
197
79
19
1,576
$ 62
Cutaneous
Melanoma
1,625
994
753
801
360
379
73
4,987
$ 206
CRC
9,902
5,300
5,475
7,281
4,016
1,644
335
33,953
$1,339
HCC
(Primary)
1,637
720
1,514
2,597
1,087
82
35
7,671
$277
NET
1,783
1,336
1,353
1,299
974
360
98
7,202
$ 281
TOTAL
15,351
8,647
9,389
12,263
6,634
2,545
560
55,389
$ 2,166
Europe Presents Significant Potential Market Opportunity
Sources: LEK Consulting, GLOBOCAN, Company estimates.
1) Assumes 2.5 treatments per patient.
2) Assumes ASP of  ~$15K USD.
3) Assumes mix of direct sales and distributors.


38
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
US Market by Disease –
Device and Drug Combination
Liver Metastasis
Potential Market
# Patients
Potential Market
# Procedures
Potential Market
($MM)
1,2
Ocular
Melanoma
1,685
4,213
$ 105
Cutaneous
Melanoma
7,023
17,557
$ 439
TOTAL MELANOMA
(Initial Expected Label)
8,708
21,770
$ 544
CRC
19,861
49,653
$ 1,241
HCC (Primary)
5,586
13,964
$ 349
NET
8,212
20,530
$ 513
OTHER TOTAL
(Potential Label Expansion)
33,659
84,147
$ 2,104
TOTAL
42,367
105,917
$ 2,648
Sources: LEK Consulting, GLOBOCAN, Company estimates.
1) Assume 2.5 treatments per patient.
2) Estimated ASP of $25K.


39
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
APAC Market by Disease
China
(Device)
S. Korea
(Device)
Japan
(Device)
Taiwan
(Device)
Australia
(Device)
Total 
Potential
(patients)
Potential
Market
($MM)
1,2
Total Potential Market  #Patients
HCC
(Primary)
85,780
3,258
8,296
2,152
263
99,749
$ 1,156
Other
CRC
31,127
3,245
14,298
1,441
2,031
52,143
$ 642
NET
29,197
1,048
2,759
500
462
33,966
$ 393
Ocular 
Melanoma
1,765
66
175
31
96
2,134
$ 25
Cutaneous
Melanoma
382
43
136
246
1,144
1,951
$ 23
OTHER
TOTAL
62,472
4,403
17,368
2,218
3,733
90,194
$ 1,083
TOTAL
148,104
7,661
25,665
4,370
3,996
189,943
$ 2,239
APAC Target Markets Represent Over $2 Billion Potential Market Opportunity 
Sources: LEK Consulting, GLOBOCAN, Company estimates.
1) Assume 2.5 treatments per patient.
2) Estimated ASP of ~$5K.


40
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix III
CHEMOSAT Melphalan Phase I and II


41
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Melphalan Dosing & Background
Well understood, dose dependant, tumor preferential, alkylating cytotoxic agent
that demonstrates little to no hepatic toxicity
Manageable systemic toxicities associated with Neutropenia and
Thrombocytopenia
Drug dosing 12x higher than FDA-approved dose via systemic IV chemotherapy
Dose delivered to tumor is over 100x higher than that of systemic IV
chemotherapy
An Established Drug for Liver Cancer Therapy
Type
Dosing (mg/kg)
Multiple Myeloma (label)
0.25
Chemoembolization
0.62
Surgical Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP)
1.50
Myeloablation
2.50-3.50
Chemosaturation (PHP)
3.00


42
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Phase II NCI Trial –
Metastatic Neuroendocrine Cohort
Pre-CS
(Baseline)
Post-CS #2
(+4 Months)
Post-CS #1
(+6 Weeks)
Compelling Clinical Data in Attractive mNET Market
Phase II mNET Tumor Cohort  (n=24)*
Number (n)
Primary Tumor Histology
Carcinoid
4
Pancreatic Islet Cell
20
Response
Not Evaluable (Toxicity, Incomplete Treatment, Orthotopic Liver
Transplantation)
4
Progressive Disease
2
Minor Response / Stable Disease
4
Partial
Response
(30.0%
-
99.0%
Tumor
Reduction)
13
Complete Response (No Evidence of Disease)
1
Objective Tumor Response
14
Objective Tumor Response Rate
58%
Duration (months)
Median Hepatic PFS
15.5
Overall Survival After CS
30.4
*Presentation at ECCO/ESMO 2011 annual meeting.


43
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Phase II NCI Trial –
Hepatobilliary carcinoma
11 patients with tumors of hepatobiliary origin: 5 HCC, 2 intrahepatic and
3 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,1 mixed histology
CHEMOSAT treatment showed encouraging anti-tumor activities in
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
o
1 Confirmed partial response lasting 7 months
o
2 stable disease lasting 8 months, 6 months respectively
Safety profile –
consistent with pivotal US Phase III melanoma trial
HCC is the most common primary cancer of the liver, with approximately
750,000* new cases diagnosed worldwide annually
Intend to invest in new HCC trials with CHEMOSAT
Encouraging Initial Positive Signal for Primary Liver Cancer
*Source: GLOBOCAN


44
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Substantial clinical evidence of benefit of using melphalan to treat
mCRC via isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) procedure
o
Over 800 patients treated in 15 studies since 1998
o
Patients treated only once
o
Median response rate of 47% (range
29%-76%)
Delcath
Phase
II
NCI
Chemosaturation
Trial
mCRC
Cohort
o
Challenges enrolling at NCI
o
16 patients treated since 2004
o
Inconclusive
efficacy
due
to
advanced
disease
status
(generally
or
6
line)
o
Safety profile –
expected and consistent with pivotal FDA Phase III
melanoma trial
Intend to invest in new mCRC trials with CHEMOSAT Melphalan
Strong Rationale for Using CHEMOSAT with Melphalan to Treat mCRC
1) van Iersel LB, Koopman M, Van D, V, et al. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1662-7.
Phase II NCI Trial –
mCRC Cohort
th
th
1


45
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix IV
Published Phase I/II Studies of
Doxorubicin with PHP (percutaneous hepatic
perfusion) for HCC


46
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Phase I/II Studies of PHP-Doxorubicin For HCC
Delivered Safely in Multiple Studies with Promising Response Rates 
1) Ku Y et al. Chir Gastroenterol 2003;19:370–376.
2) Curley SA et al. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1:389–99.
3) Ravikumar TS et al. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2723–36.
4) Hwu WJ et al. Oncol Res 1999;11:529–37.
No. of
pts
No. of
PHP/
pt
Disease stage
(tumor diameter)
Treatment
Median  survival
(mo)
Response
Rates
Reference
HCC
(n=79)
CHM
(n=23)
1–4
1–2
IV A: n=66
IV B: n=13
All multiple
bilobar
Extrahepatic disease in 52%
Doxorubicin 60
–150 mg/m
Cisplatin
50–150 mg/m
2
Mitomycin C 50–200 mg/m
16
13
HCC pts
RR 64.5%
5-year
survival 20.3%
Kobe
Phase I/II
HCC
(n=11)
1–3
Mean
9.5 cm
Doxorubicin 60
–120 mg/m
6.5
13 (responders)
2 (non-responders)
RR 20%
MDACC
Phase I
HCC
(n=5)
CHM
(n=8)
Other
(n=8)
2–4
Extrahepatic disease in 17%
Doxorubicin 50–120 mg/m
5-FU 1000–5000 mg/m
2
NR
RR 22%
Yale
Phase I
HCC
(n=7)
Other
(n=11)
1–10
NR
Doxorubicin
90–120
mg/m
2
23 (responders)
8 (non-responders)
RR 58%
Yale
4
Phase I
2
3
1
2
2
2
2


47
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix V
Product Development Pipeline


48
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Product Development Pipeline
Melanoma liver mets
Proprietary drug-melphalan &
CHEMOSAT
All liver
cancers
melphalan
Classified as Medical Device
3   party melphalan
Gen 2 melphalan CE Mark
CHEMOSAT for additional drugs
CHEMOSAT for other organs (lung
and brain)
mCRC and HCC indications
Initial Opportunity
Near Term (< 5 years)
Intermediate Term (> 5 years)
Doxorubicin system CE Mark
mCRC and HCC clinical trials
CHEMOSAT for additional drugs
CHEMOSAT for other organs (lung
and brain)
CHEMOSAT Melphalan in
Taiwan and Japan 
CHEMOSAT Doxorubicin in
China and South Korea
3    party doxorubicin
CHEMOSAT for additional drugs
CHEMOSAT for other organs (lung
and brain)
CHEMOSAT Melphalan in
Australia and Hong Kong
3   party melphalan
Development Aligned to Address Significant Market Opportunity
E
U
A
S
I
A
U
S
rd
rd
rd


49
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
Appendix VI
European Regulatory Update


50
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
European Regulatory Update
Retained new Notified Body
Device reclassified from class III to class IIB, permitting self-certification in
accordance with the same established quality management system
o
The primary difference between Class III and Class IIb is that for Class IIb medical
devices the Notified Body is not required to carry out an examination of the product’s
design dossier as part of its conformity assessment
o
The Company must continue to comply with the essential requirements of the EU
Medical
Devices
Directive
(Directive
93/42
EC)
and
is
subject
to
a
conformity
assessment procedure requiring the intervention of a Notified Body
o
The conformity assessment procedure for Class IIb medical devices requires the
manufacturer to lodge an application for the assessment of its quality system for the
design, manufacture and inspection of its medical devices by a Notified Body
o
The Notified Body will audit the system to determine whether it conforms to the
provisions of the Medical Devices Directive. If the Notified Body’s assessment is
favorable it will issue a Full Quality Assurance Certificate, which enables the
manufacturer to draw a Declaration of Conformity and affix the CE mark to the medical
devices covered by the assessment
o
Thereafter, the Notified Body will carry out periodic audits to ensure that the approved
quality system is applied by the manufacturer.


51
DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC
©
2011 DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Concentrating the Power of Chemotherapy