Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PARALLAX HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - PARALLAX HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - PARALLAX HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.ex31-2.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - PARALLAX HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - PARALLAX HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.ex32-1.htm



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

S     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

 

or

 

£     TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from__________ to _________

 

Commission File Number 000-52534

 

ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada 72-1619357  
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

84 Winnismmet Drive, Chelsea, MA  02150
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(617) 372-3293

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

S YES   £ NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

S YES   £ NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer £   Accelerated filer £
Non-accelerated filer £   Smaller reporting company S
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)      

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

£ YES    S NO

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

 

Check whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

£ YES    £ NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

S YES    £ NO

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


151,063,898 common shares issued and outstanding as of October 25, 2012

 



 

 

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 form part of this quarterly report. They are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

 

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, on Form 10K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2
 

 

ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

   June 30, 2012   December 31, 2011 
ASSETS          
           
Current assets  $   $ 
           
Property and equipment, net   6,097    8,347 
           
TOTAL ASSETS  $6,097   $8,347 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)          
LIABILITIES:          
Current Liabilities          
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  $147,620   $115,154 
Notes and loans payable   84,075    84,075 
Due to related parties   137,849    108,349 
Total Current Liabilities   369,544    307,578 
           
Related party loans   417,438    417,438 
           
Total Liabilities   786,982    725,016 
           
STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)          
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding        
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 151,063,898 and 151,063,898 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively   151,064    151,064 
Additional paid in capital   17,529,437    17,529,437 
(Deficit) accumulated during the development stage   (18,461,386)   (18,397,170)
           
Total Stockholders' (Deficit)   (780,885)   (716,670)
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)  $6,097   $8,347 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

3
 

  

ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

           Cumulative from 
   For the three months ended   For the six months ended   July 6, 2005 (inception) To  
   June 30, 2012   June 30, 2011   June 30, 2012   June 30, 2011   June 30, 2012 
Revenue  $   $49,385   $   $192,246   $212,643 
                          
Cost of sales        5,336        90,091    126,137 
                          
Gross profit       44,049        102,155    86,506 
                          
General and administrative expenses   16,202    41,904    40,216    1,996,964    7,665,677 
                          
Operating (loss)   (16,202)   2,145    (40,216)   (1,894,809)   (7,579,171)
                          
Other income (expenses)                         
Loss on settlement of debt                   (3,292,149)
Interest expense   (12,227)   (12,407)   (24,000)   (24,590)   (999,794)
Interest income                   1,823 
Total other income (expenses)   (12,227)   (12,407)   (24,000)   (24,590)   (4,290,120)
                          
Net (loss) – continuing operations  $(28,429)  $(10,262)  $(64,216)  $(1,919,399)  $(11,869,291)
                          
Discontinued operations                       (6,592,095)
                          
Net (loss)                      $(18,461,386)
                          
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted   151,063,898    153,958,513    151,063,898    151,580,473      
                          
Net (loss) per common share - basic and diluted  $(0.00)  $(0.00)  $(0.00)  $(0.01)     

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

4
 

 

ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

       Cumulative From 
       July 6, 2005 
   Six Months Ended   (Inception) to 
   June 30, 2012   June 30, 2011   June 30, 2012 
             
Cash Flow from operations:               
Net loss  $(64,216)  $(1,919,399)  $(11,869,291)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities:               
Accretion expense           826,541 
Depreciation expense   2,250    2,250    7,403 
Common shares issued for services       1,800,000    6,880,452 
Common shares issued for incentives           110,250 
Loss on settlement of debt           3,292,149 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:               
Increase in accounts and accrued expenses   34,855    38,804    207,260 
Increase in related party payables   27,100    3,000    61,255 
Net cash (used in) operating activities       (75,345)   (483,981)
                
Cash Flow from investing activities:               
Cash (used in) purchase of property and equipment           (13,500)
Net cash provided by investing activities           (13,500)
                
Cash Flow from financing activities:               
Net proceeds from related party loans           1,061,561 
Proceeds from notes payable       65,000    84,075 
Proceeds from shareholders           264,949 
Proceeds from Issuance of common shares           83,991 
Repayment on cancellation of common shares           (5,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities       65,000    1,489,576 
                
Cash flows from discontinued operations:               
Net cash (used in) operating activities           (382,377)
Net cash (used in) investing activities           (609,718)
Net cash (used in) discontinued operations           (992,095)
                
Increase (decrease) in cash       (10,345)    
                
Cash - beginning of period       27,802     
                
Cash - end of period  $   $17,457   $ 
                
NONCASH ACTIVITIES              
Common shares issued to acquire mineral properties  $   $   $5,600,000 
Common shares issued to settle note payable  $   $   $500,000 
                
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION               
Interest paid  $   $   $ 
Income taxes paid  $   $   $ 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

5
 

  

ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION

(A DVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2012

 

NOTE 1. OVERVIEW AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

 

Endeavor Power Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 6, 2005 under the name VB Biotech Laboratories, Inc.  On September 21, 2007, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada to change its operating name to VB Trade, Inc., with principal business operations to develop an online website that allowed web designers to sell their website designs in exchange for a commission on all products that were sold through the website.   On September 21, 2007, the Company entered into a Plan of Merger (the “Merger”) with Endeavor Uranium, Inc., a mineral exploration company with mineral properties in the northwestern United States.  Effectively, the Company changed its name to Endeavor Uranium, Inc. as part of the Merger transaction.  On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Federated Energy Corporation, a Tennessee corporation, for working interests in prospective oil and gas wells located in Nowata County, Oklahoma.  Effectively on December 23, 2008, the Company changed its operating name to Endeavor Power Corporation.

 

In November, 2010, Management assessed a potential business opportunity and determined that in an effort to create value for its Shareholders, the Company should change its business direction. On November 8, 2010, the Company discontinued its operations in its working interests in oil and gas exploration and changed its operating focus to the development of E-Waste processing services aimed at industrial and government clients.  The Company’s new direction sought to limit the impact of discarded “E-Waste” on the environment. Discarded computers and electronic equipment pose environmental hazards.

 

On May 26, 2011, Mr. Alfonso Knoll resigned from all positions with the Company, including but not limited to, that of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary.  The resignation did not involve any disagreement with the Company. On June 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Mutual Release (“Settlement Agreement”) to terminate Mr. Knoll’s Employment Agreement dated November 8, 2010, and to accept his resignation.  Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Knoll immediately ceased all services to the Company and, on June 11, 2011, returned to the Company any and all shares of its common stock currently held by him.

 

On June 2, 2011, Mr. Matthew Carley was appointed as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director. Mr. Carley accepted the appointment, but effectively resigned his positions on September 27, 2011. The Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Carley, as well as the resignation of Mr. Keith Kress as a member of the Board of Directors. Simultaneously, the Board of Directors appointed Tom Mackay as the President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and the sole member of the Board of Directors.

 

In accordance with a change in management effective September 27, 2011, the Company’s business operations changed. The Company intended to provide managerial services, and pursue potential funding opportunities for the Company. It retained consultants to perform the necessary due diligence on certain mining properties located in Venezuela, Brazil, Bolivia, Guyana and several other South American countries. Management, however, determined that the outcome of such due diligence did not provide the Company a viable opportunity, nor did it provide sufficient economic benefit for the Company. Management has therefore ceased its due diligence and exploration of mining property opportunities, and is pursuing other viable business opportunities to increase shareholder market value.

 

6
 

  

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not generated significant revenues to date and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future.  As at June 30, 2012, the Company had a working capital deficit of $369,544, and an accumulated deficit of $18,461,386. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability to raise equity or debt financing, and the attainment of profitable operations from the Company's future business. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 

 

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at June 30, 2012, the Company had no cash equivalents.

 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the valuation of its mineral properties, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

 

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share.  ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

 

Comprehensive Loss

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at June 30, 2012, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with ASC 830 Foreign Currency Translation Matters, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

 

7
 

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is reasonably assured.  

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of vehicles and general equipment and are recorded at cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of three years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.

 

Financial Instruments

Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
   
Level 2 Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
   
Level 3 Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company. The Company has adopted the following new accounting standards during 2012:

 

8
 

 

Trouble Debt Restructuring: Issued in April, 2011, ASU 2011-02 clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled debt restructurings. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted.

 

Comprehensive Income: Issued in June, 2011, ASU 2011-05 eliminates the current option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. It will require companies to report the total of comprehensive income including the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in the ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

 

Intangibles: Issued in September, 2011, ASU 2011-08 permits entities to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would then perform the first step of the goodwill impairment test; otherwise, no further impairment test would be required. The amendments will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

 

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities: Issued in December, 2011, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to provide information to help reconcile differences in the offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The differences in the offsetting requirements account for a significant difference in the amounts presented in statements of financial position prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS for certain entities. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Updates:

There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

NOTE 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and Equipment consists of the following:

 

   June 30, 2012   December 31, 2011 
General  Equipment  $2,500   $2,500 
Automobiles   11,000    11,000 
Sub-Total   13,500    13,500 
           
Accumulated Deprecation   (7.403)   (5,153)
           
Property and Equipment, Net  $6,097   $8,347 

 

Depreciation expense totaled $2,250 and $4,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

9
 

 

NOTE 4. NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

 

In June, 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the principal amount of $9,075 to a non-related party.  Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due upon demand.

 

In June, 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the principal amount of $10,000 to a non-related party. Under the terms of the note, the amount is unsecured, accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum, and is due upon demand.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $1,809 in interest as an accrued expense.

 

On April 21, 2011, the Company issued a note payable in the principal amount of $65,000 to a non-related party. The note is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum, and is due upon demand. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $9,083 in interest as an accrued expense.

 

NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY PAYABLE

 

As at June 30, 2012, related party payable consists of $137,849 representing miscellaneous operating expenses accrued and/or paid on behalf of the Company by certain related parties.  The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due upon demand.

 

NOTE 6. NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

 

On August 25, 2009, the Company issued a convertible promissory note (the “Note”) of $826,541 to a related party to settle outstanding debt obligations owing as of the issuance date.  Under the terms of the Note, the amount owing accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum, was due August 25, 2011, and contained certain provisions to convert the debt into common shares of the Company.

 

On June 17, 2010, the Company issued the related party 375,000 common shares to settle $75,000 of the outstanding Note, reducing the principal balance to $751,541.

 

In September, 2010, the Company issued the related party 140,000,000 common shares to settle $500,000 of the Note, reducing the principal balance to $251,541.

 

On September 17, 2010, the Company amended the Note with the related party to combine the remaining principal of $251,541 with the accrued interest to date of $65,897, for a revised principal balance of $317,438. The new principal balance continues to accrue interest at a rate of 10% per annum, but no longer contains a provision for conversion.

 

In November, 2010, the Company received an additional $100,000 from the related party, increasing the principal balance to $417,438.

 

As at June 30, 2012, the principal balance of the Note is $417,438. The Company has recorded $94,976 in interest as an accrued expense.  

 

NOTE 7. COMMON STOCK

 

All common shares issued for services or settlements of debt are valued based on the end-of-day market prices on the date of issuance, unless otherwise specified.  

 

The Company and its Board of Directors authorized a 1:100 reverse common stock split on August 16, 2010, The effects of the reverse stock split resulted in the number of issued and outstanding common stock to decrease from 106,388,200 common shares to 1,063,898 common shares, have been applied on a retroactive basis, and are reflected below where applicable.

 

10
 

 

The total number of authorized shares of common stock that may be issued by the Company is 250,000,000 with a par value of $0.001 per share.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 325,000,000 founder shares for cash proceeds of $5,000.  These shares were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 513,448 (post-split adjusted) common shares for cash proceeds of $78,991.

 

In October 2007, the Company issued 140,000 (post-split adjusted) common shares at $0.40 per common share, with a fair value of $5,600,000, to acquire mineral properties.

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 460 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company with a fair value of $67,376 to settle debt obligations of $27,500, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $39,876.

On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 460 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company with a fair value of $67,376 to settle debt obligations of $27,500, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $39,876.

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 1,667 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company with a fair value of $245,000 to settle debt obligations of $100,000, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $145,000.

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 100 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company with a fair value of $14,700 to settle debt obligations of $12,000, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $2,700.

 

On July 22, 2009, the Company issued 750 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company with a fair value of $110,250 to a related party as incentive bonus shares for the conversion of amounts owing into a long-term convertible note payable.

 

On August 25, 2009, the Company issued 32,000 (post-split adjusted) common shares of the Company for consulting services with a fair value of $3,776,000.

 

On June 17, 2010, the Company issued 375,000 (post-split adjusted) common shares to a related party for the repayment of payable note payable of $75,000, resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $180,000.  Per the convertible note agreement the Company was to convert the debt at $0.006 per share (post split) for a total issuance of 12,500,000 shares. The additional 25,000,000 shares were issued at the closing price of the stock on the day of issuance resulting in the $180,000 loss.

.

On September 20, 2010, the Company issued 140,000,000 common shares to settle outstanding notes payable of $500,000 resulting in a loss on settlement of debt of $3,116,667.  Per the convertible note agreement the Company was to convert the debt at $0.006 per share (post split) for a total issuance of 83,333,333 shares. The additional 56,666,667 shares were issued at the closing price of the stock on the day of issuance resulting in the $3,166,667 loss.

 

On November 8, 2010, the Company issued 3,500,000 common shares to the CEO of the Company for management services with a fair value of $910,000. As a result, $906,500 was recorded as paid in capital.

 

On February 23, 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for services rendered to the Company, valued at $1,800,000. As a result, $1,790,000 was recorded as paid in capital.

 

On June 14, 2011, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement related to the resignation of the Company’s former CEO/President, the 3,500,000 shares of common stock previously issued on November 8, 2010, were returned to treasury. As a result, paid in capital was reduced by $3,500.

 

11
 

 

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had 151,063,898 common shares issued and outstanding.

 

NOTE 8. WARRANTS

 

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had the following share purchase warrants outstanding:

 

Outstanding and Exercisable Warrants
  Number of Remaining Contractual Life Exercise Price times Number Weighted Average
Exercise Price Shares (in years) of Shares Exercise Price
$0.900 500,000 0.15 $ 450,000 $ 0.900

 

Warrants   Weighted
Number Average
of Shares Exercise
  Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 500,000   $ 0.900
Issued    
Exercised    
Expired / Cancelled    
Outstanding at June 30, 2012 500,000   $ 0.900

 

The outstanding share purchase warrants expire on August 25, 2012.

 

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES

 

The components of the net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the statutory tax rate, the effective tax rate and the amount of the valuation allowance are indicated below:

 

   June 30, 2012   December 31, 2011 
           
Income (Loss) Before Taxes  $(64,216)  $(1,967,287)
Statutory rate   34%   34%
           
Computed expected tax payable (recovery)  $21,833   $668,878 
Non-deductible expenses       (1,530)
Change in valuation allowance   (21,833)   (667,348)
           
Reported income taxes  $   $ 

 

12
 

 

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

   June 30, 2012   December 31, 2011 
           
Net operating loss carried forward  $5,954,508   $5,890,292 
           
Valuation allowance   (5,954,508)   (5,890,292)
           
Net deferred income tax asset  $   $ 

 

As at June 30, 2012, the Company had $5,954,508 of net operating losses which expire commencing in the year 2026.

 

NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has evaluated events and transactions that occurred between June 30, 2012 and the date the consolidated financial statements were available for issue, for possible disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has determined that there were no such events or transactions that warrant disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

 

13
 

  

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors” that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

 

Our unaudited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.

 

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this quarterly report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors".

 

In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to "common shares" refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

 

As used in this quarterly report and unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, “our company” and “Endeavor” refer to Endeavor Power Corporation.

 

Corporate History

 

Endeavor Power Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 6, 2005 under the name VB Biotech Laboratories, Inc.  On September 21, 2007, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada to change its operating name to VB Trade, Inc., with principal business operations to develop an online website that allowed web designers to sell their website designs in exchange for a commission on all products that were sold through the website.   On September 21, 2007, the Company entered into a Plan of Merger (the “Merger”) with Endeavor Uranium, Inc., a mineral exploration company with mineral properties in the northwestern United States.  Effectively, the Company changed its name to Endeavor Uranium, Inc. as part of the Merger transaction.  On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Federated Energy Corporation, a Tennessee corporation, for working interests in prospective oil and gas wells located in Nowata County, Oklahoma.  Effectively on December 23, 2008, the Company changed its operating name to Endeavor Power Corporation.

 

In November, 2010, Management assessed a potential business opportunity and determined that in an effort to create value for its Shareholders, the Company should change its business direction. On November 8, 2010, the Company discontinued its operations in its working interests in oil and gas exploration and changed its operating focus to the development of E-Waste processing services aimed at industrial and government clients.  The Company’s new direction sought to limit the impact of discarded “E-Waste” on the environment. Discarded computers and electronic equipment pose environmental hazards.

 

14
 

 

On May 26, 2011, Mr. Alfonso Knoll resigned from all positions with the Company, including but not limited to, that of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary.  The resignation did not involve any disagreement with the Company. On June 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and General Mutual Release (“Settlement Agreement”) to terminate Mr. Knoll’s Employment Agreement dated November 8, 2010, and to accept his resignation.  Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Knoll immediately ceased all services to the Company and, on June 11, 2011, returned to the Company any and all shares of its common stock currently held by him.

 

On June 2, 2011, Mr. Matthew Carley was appointed as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director. Mr. Carley accepted the appointment, but effectively resigned his positions on September 27, 2011. The Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Carley, as well as the resignation of Mr. Keith Kress as a member of the Board of Directors. Simultaneously, the Board of Directors appointed Tom Mackay as the President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and the sole member of the Board of Directors.

 

Overview

In accordance with a change in management effective September 27, 2011, the Company’s business operations changed. The Company intended to provide managerial services, and pursue potential funding opportunities for the Company. It retained consultants to perform the necessary due diligence on certain mining properties located in Venezuela, Brazil, Bolivia, Guyana and several other South American countries. Management, however, determined that the outcome of such due diligence did not provide the Company a viable opportunity, nor did it provide sufficient economic benefit for the Company. Management has therefore ceased its due diligence and exploration of mining property opportunities, and is pursuing other viable business opportunities to increase shareholder market value.

 

Balance Sheet

 

As at June 30, 2012, the Company had total assets of $6,097, compared with total assets of $8,347 as at December 31, 2011. The decrease in total assets of $2,250 is attributable to $2,250 of depreciation expense related to the Company’s property and equipment.  

 

As at June 30, 2012, the Company had total liabilities of $786,982, compared with $725,016 as at December 31, 2011. The increase in total liabilities of $61,966 is attributable to an increase of $32,466 of accounts payable and accrued expenses, and an increase of $29,500 in related party payables.

 

Results of Operations

 

Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months and six months ended June 30, 2011

 

The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, which are included herein.

 

Results of Operations  Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
   Cumulative
From July 6, 2005
(inception) to
June 30,
 
   2012   2011   2012   2011   2012 
                     
Revenue  $   $49,385   $   $192,246   $212,643 
Cost of Sales       5,336        90,091    126,137 
Gross profit (loss)       44,049        102,155    86,506 
General and administrative expenses   16,202    41,904    40,216    1,996,964    7,665,677 
Operating (loss)   (16,202)   2,145    (40,216)   (1,894,809)   (7,579,171)
Loss on settlement of debt                    (3,292,149)
Interest expense   (12,227)   (12,407)   (24,000)   (24,590)   (999,794)
Interest income                    1,823 
Net (loss) – continuing operations  $(28,429)  $(10,262)  $(64,216)  $(1,919,399)  $(11,869,291)

 

Revenue

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, no revenue was generated. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, revenue in the amount of $49,385 and $192,246 was generated from limited levels of E-Waste processing services.

 

Operations in the E-Waste business ceased in September, 2011.

 

Cost of sales

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, no costs of sales were incurred. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, costs of sales in the amount of $5,336 and $90,091 consisted of limited purchases of discarded computers and electronic equipment.

 

Operations in the E-Waste business ceased in September, 2011.

 

Operating Expenses

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred operating expenses totaling $16,202, compared with $41,904 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in operating expenses of $25,702 is attributable to the discontinuation of the Company’s E-Waste activities:

 

a decrease in legal, accounting and management services of $13,500 due to no legal costs incurred during the current period, compared to legal costs incurred for the same period last year of $13,500;
a decrease in rent expense of $1,800 resulting from a reduction in office space leased in the current period, compared to office space leased for the same period of 2011; and
a decrease in payroll and other outside services of $5,247, and a decrease in other miscellaneous expenses of $5,155, all due to the discontinuation of E-Waste operations in 2011, resulting in no payroll and other outside services incurred in the current period, versus $5,247 in expense for the same period last year; and $3,077 of other general and administrative expenses incurred in the current period, compared to $8,232 in expense for the same period last year.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred operating expenses totaling $40,216, compared with $1,996,964 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in operating expenses of $1,956,748 is attributable to the discontinuation of the Company’s E-Waste activities:

 

a decrease of $1,800,000 in stock based compensation resulting from none recognized in the current period versus $1,800,000 recognized in the same period of 2011;
a decrease in legal, accounting and management services of $25,072 due to no legal costs incurred during the current period, compared to legal costs incurred for the same period last year of $25,072;

  

15
 

 

a decrease in rent expense of $5,400 resulting from a reduction in office space leased in the current period, compared to office space leased for the same period of 2011; and
a decrease in payroll and other outside services of $81,148, and a decrease in other miscellaneous expenses of $45,128, all due to the discontinuation of E-Waste operations in 2011, resulting in no payroll and other outside services incurred in the current period, versus $81,148 in expense for the same period last year; and $9,516 of other general and administrative expenses incurred in the current period, compared to $54,644 in expense for the same period last year.

 

General and Administrative Expenses  Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
   Variances 
   2012   2011   2012   2011   3-month   6-month 
                         
Stock-based compensation  $   $   $   $1,800,000   $   $(1,800,000)
Depreciation expense   1,125    1,125    2,250    2,250         
Legal, accounting, and management   9,000    22,500    22,450    47,522    (13,500)   (25,072)
Rent expense   3,000    4,800    6,000    11,400    (1,800)   (5,400)
Payroll and outside services       5,247        81,148    (5,247)   (81,148)
Office supplies and miscellaneous   3,077    8,232    9,516    54,644    (5,155)   (45,128)
                               
Total General & Administrative Expenses  $16,202   $41,904   $40,216   $1,996,964   $(25,702)   (1,956,748)

 

Net Loss

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred a net loss of $28,429 compared with a net loss of $10,262 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in net loss of $18,167 is primarily attributable to the discontinuation of the Company’s E-waste activities in November, 2011, as well as the change in management, resulting in a decrease in gross profit of $44,049, a decrease in other general and administrative expenses of $25,702 resulting from limited development activities during the current period, versus 3 months of E-Waste operations for the same period in 2011, and a decrease in interest expense of $180.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred a net loss of $64,216 compared with a net loss of $1,919,399 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in net loss of $1,855,183 is primarily attributable to the discontinuation of the Company’s E-waste activities in November, 2011, as well as the change in management, resulting in a decrease in gross profit of $102,155, a decrease in other general and administrative expenses of $1,956,748 resulting from limited development activities during the current period, versus 6 months of E-Waste operations for the same period in 2011, and a decrease in interest expense of $590.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As at June 30, 2012, the Company had a cash balance of $0 and a working capital deficit of $369,544 compared with a cash balance of $0 and a working capital deficit of $307,758 at December 31, 2011. The increase in working capital deficit of $61,966 is attributable to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $32,466, and an increase in related party payable of $29,500.

 

16
 

 

Working Capital            
   At June 30,   At December, 31   Increase 
   2012   2011   (Decrease) 
Current Assets  $   $   $ 
Current Liabilities   369,544    307,578    61,966 
Working Capital (Deficit)  $(369,544)  $(307,578)  $(61,966)

 

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive acquisitions and activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company did not receive any proceeds from the issuance of common shares or other equity instruments.  

 

Cash Flows  For the six months ended 
   June 30, 
   2012   2011 
         
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities  $   $(75,345)
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Investing Activities        
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities       65,000 
Increase (Decrease) in Cash  $   $(10,345)

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company used $0 of cash flow for operating activities compared with $75,345 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in cash used for operating activities of $75,345 is attributable to the discontinuation of the Company’s E-Waste activities; resulting in a decrease in net (loss) of $1,855,183, a decrease in stock compensation of $1,800,000, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3,938, and an increase in related party payables of $24,100.

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company used $0 of cash flow for investing activities, compared with $0 for the same period in 2011.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company was provided with $0 of cash flow from financing activities, compared with $65,000 during the same period last year. The decrease in cash flows provided from financing activities is attributable to no financing received in the current period, versus $65,000 in financing received during the same period last year, from the issuance of a new note payable.

 

Future Financings

 

The Company will continue to rely on equity sales of its common shares in order to continue to fund its business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that the Company will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund planned acquisitions and exploration activities.

 

17
 

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not required to provide the information under this item.

 

Going Concern

 

The unaudited financial statements included with this quarterly report have been prepared on the going concern basis which assumes that adequate sources of financing will be obtained as required and that our assets will be realized and liabilities settled in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the unaudited financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

 

The Company regularly evaluates the accounting policies and estimates that the Company use to prepare its financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company. The Company has adopted the following new accounting standards during 2012:

 

Trouble Debt Restructuring: Issued in April, 2011, ASU 2011-02 clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled debt restructurings. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted.

 

Comprehensive Income: Issued in June, 2011, ASU 2011-05 eliminates the current option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. It will require companies to report the total of comprehensive income including the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in the ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

 

18
 

 

Intangibles: Issued in September, 2011, ASU 2011-08 permits entities to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would then perform the first step of the goodwill impairment test; otherwise, no further impairment test would be required. The amendments will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

 

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities: Issued in December, 2011, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to provide information to help reconcile differences in the offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The differences in the offsetting requirements account for a significant difference in the amounts presented in statements of financial position prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS for certain entities. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Updates: 

 

There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the end of our period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

19
 

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the six month period ended June 30, 2012 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Audit Committee

 

Our Board of Directors has not established an audit committee. The respective role of an audit committee has been conducted by our Board of Directors. We intend to establish an audit committee during the fiscal year 2012. When established, the audit committee's primary function will be to provide advice with respect to our financial matters and to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding finance, accounting, and legal compliance. The audit committee's primary duties and responsibilities will be to: (i) serve as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system; (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent accountants; (iii) evaluate our quarterly financial performance as well as its compliance with laws and regulations; (iv) oversee management's establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices; and (v) provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, management and our Board of Directors.

 

20
 

 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

We know of no material existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

No report required

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Standards

 

Not Applicable

 

21
 

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B

 

Exhibit

Number

  Description of Exhibit   Filing Reference
(3)   Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws    
         
3.1   Articles of Incorporation   Filed with the SEC on March 5, 2007 as part of our Registration Statement on Form SB-2.
3.1(a)   Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation   Filed with the SEC on May 17, 2010 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3.2   Bylaws   Filed with the SEC on March 5, 2007 as part of our Registration Statement on Form SB-2.
3.2(a)   Amended Bylaws   Filed with the SEC on May 17, 2010 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)   Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders    
         
4.1   2011 Equity Incentive Plan dated March 26, 2011   Filed with the SEC on March 31, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
4.2   Sample Stock Option Agreement   Filed with the SEC on March 31, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
4.3   Sample Stock Award Agreement for Stock Units   Filed with the SEC on March 31, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
4.4   Sample Stock Award Agreement for Restricted Stock   Filed with the SEC on March 31, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
(10)   Material Contracts    
         
10.1   Second Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement between the Company and Federated Energy Corporation dated September 15, 2009   Filed with the SEC on September 19, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.2   Farmount Agreement between the Company and Togs Energy, Inc. and M-C Production & Drilling Co, Inc. dated July 21, 2009   Filed with the SEC on July 23, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.3   Convertible Promissory Note to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated August 25, 2009   Filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.

 

22
 

 

10.4   Common Stock Purchase Warrant to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated August 25, 2009   Filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.5   Settlement Agreement between the Company and Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated September 11, 2010   Filed with the SEC on July 12, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.6   Promissory Note to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated September 11, 2010   Filed with the SEC on July 12, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.7   Amended Promissory Note to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated September 11, 2010   Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2011 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
10.8   Settlement Agreement between the Company and Andrew I. Telsey, P.C., dated August 3, 2010.   Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.9   Settlement Agreement between the Company and Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated September 17, 2010   Filed with the SEC on October 21, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.10   Promissory Note to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated September 17, 2010   Filed with the SEC on October 21, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.11   Employment Agreement between the Company and Alfonso Knoll dated November 8, 2010.   Filed with the SEC on November 12, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.12   Promissory Note to Regal Capital Development, Inc. dated November 23, 2010.   Filed with the SEC on November 30, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.13   Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Alfonso Knoll dated November 17, 2010   Filed with the SEC on November 30, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.14   Consulting Agreement between the Company and The Musser Group, LLC dated February 21, 2011   Filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.15   Promissory Note to Marans Invest & Finance S.A. dated April 8, 2011   Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.16   Promissory Note to Rast Trade Corp. dated April 21, 2011   Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
10.17   Settlement Agreement between the Company and Mr. Alfonso Knoll dated June 8, 2011   Filed with the SEC on June 16, 2011 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
10.18   Settlement Agreement between the Company and The Musser Group, LLC dated July 19, 2011   Filed with the SEC on August 22, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(14)   Code of Ethics    
         
14.1   Code of Ethics   Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2011 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

23
 

 

(16)   Letter Re Change in Certifying Accountant    
         
16.1   Letter from Moore and Associates, Chartered dated August 13, 2009   Filed with the SEC on August 13, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
16.2   Letter from Seale & Beers, CPAs dated August 26, 2009   Filed with the SEC on August 27, 2009 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
16.3   Letter from M&K CPAs, PLLC dated March 12, 2010   Filed with the SEC on March 12, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
16.4   Letter from Ron Chadwick, P.C. dated August 3, 2010   Filed with the SEC on August 4, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
16.5   Letter from Davis Accounting Group, P.C. dated November 29, 2010   Filed with the SEC on November 30, 2010 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.
(31)   Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications    
         
31.1*   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14   Filed herewith.
31.2*   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14   Filed herewith.
(32)   Section 1350 Certifications    
         
32.1*   CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.   Filed herewith.
32.2*   CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.   Filed herewith.
(100)   XBRL Related Documents    
         
101.INS**   XBRL Instance Document   Filed herewith.
101.SCH**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document   Filed herewith.
101.CAL**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document   Filed herewith.
101.LAB**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document   Filed herewith.
101.PRE**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document   Filed herewith.
101.DEF**   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document   Filed herewith.

 

* Filed herewith.
** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

24
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  ENDEAVOR POWER CORPORATION
   
 Dated: November 5 , 2012 /s/ Gardner Williams
  Gardner Williams
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer)
   
 Dated: November 5, 2012 /s/ Gardner Williams
  Gardner Williams
  Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer and
  Principal Accounting Officer)

 

25