Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC | Financial_Report.xls |
8-K/A - FORM 8-K/A - TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC | tti8k-20121011.htm |
EX-99 - EXHIBIT 99.3 - TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC | tti8k-ex99_3.htm |
EX-23 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC | tti8k-ex23_1.htm |
EX-99 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC | tti8k-ex99_2.htm |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Directors of Greywolf Production Systems Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Greywolf Production Systems Inc. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at September 30, 2011, and the consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Greywolf Production Systems Inc. and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/BDO Canada LLP
Chartered Accountants
Red Deer, Alberta
July 25, 2012
GREYWOLF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
September 30, 2011
(Denominated in Canadian Dollars)
See notes to consolidated financial statements
GREYWOLF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INC.
Consolidated Statement of Income
Year Ended September 30, 2011
(Denominated in Canadian Dollars)
See notes to consolidated financial statements
GREYWOLF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INC.
Consolidated Statement of Retained Earnings
Year Ended September 30, 2011
(Denominated in Canadian Dollars)
See notes to consolidated financial statements
GREYWOLF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INC.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended September 30, 2011
(Denominated in Canadian Dollars)
See notes to consolidated financial statements
GREYWOLF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year Ended September 30, 2011
(Denominated in Canadian Dollars)
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Greywolf Production Systems Inc. (the
"Company") is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act of
Alberta. Greywolf Production Systems Ltd. is incorporated under the Colorado
Business Corporations Act. The companies provide well production services to
the Canadian and American oil and gas industry.
2. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Equipment
Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated
amortization. Equipment is amortized over their estimated useful lives at the
following rates and methods:
Computer equipment |
55% |
declining balance method |
Computer software |
100% |
declining balance method |
Furniture and fixtures |
20% |
declining balance method |
Office trailers |
20% |
declining balance method |
Other equipment |
15‑20% |
declining balance method |
Production equipment |
20% |
declining balance method |
Vehicles |
30% |
declining balance method |
Amortization is recorded at half the stipulated rate in
the year of acquisition.
Future
income taxes
The liability method of tax allocation is used in
accounting for income taxes. Under this method, future tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting
and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and measured using the substantially
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are
expected to reverse.
Revenue
recognition
Test revenue is recognized as service contracts are
completed and all the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, performance of the service has occurred, price to the
customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Basis
of consolidation
These financial statements include the accounts of
Greywolf Production Systems Inc. and its variable interest entity
"VIE" Greywolf Productions Systems Ltd. and its subsidiary 1554531
Alberta Ltd. Greywolf Productions Systems Ltd. is considered a VIE as Greywolf
Production Systems Inc. holds a variable interest in Greywolf Production Ltd.
through a large intercompany debt owed to Greywolf Productions Inc. and
Greywolf Productions Systems Ltd. does not have sufficient equity to support
its operations without additional financial support. All intercompany
balances, transactions, income and expenses, profits or losses have been
eliminated on consolidation. Profit for the period that is attributable to non‑controlling
interests is calculated based on the ownership of the non‑controlling
interests.
Foreign
currency translation
Accounts in foreign currencies have been translated into Canadian dollars using the current method. Under this method, monetary assets and liabilities and non‑monetary assets and liabilities have been translated at the year-end exchange rate. Revenues and expenses have been translated at the average rates of exchange during the year.
Measurement
uncertainty
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the period. Such estimates include providing for amortization of equipment,
and allowances for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
3. FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
Credit
Risk
Credit risk arises from the potential that a counter
party will fail to perform its obligations. The Company is exposed to credit
risk from customers. Six customers account for 63% of accounts receivable.
Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Company is not
exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these
financial instruments.
Fair
Value
The Company as part of its operations carries a number of
financial instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that
the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk
arising from these financial instruments. Except for the fair value of the
amounts due to or from related parties, the fair values of these financial
instruments approximate their carrying values unless otherwise noted. It is
not practical to determine the fair value of amounts due to related parties as
there is no comparable market value.
Interest
Rate Risk
The Company is subject to risk related to its operating
line and some of its long term debt as the interest charged on these amounts
fluctuates with the prime lending rate of the lending institution. Interest
rate risk also exists in that some of the Company's long term debt as it is a
fixed rate. Should market interest rates vary significantly, the Company could
be paying interest at a rate either higher or lower than the market rate.
Currency
Risk
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company has operations in the United States and therefore is exposed to the financial impact arising from changes in the U.S. dollar. Additionally, because the presentation currency of the Company is Canadian dollars, differences arise when its U.S. operations are translated into the presentation currency. These differences are recorded in the Cumulative Translation Adjustment account in equity.
4. EQUIPMENT
During the 2011 year, equipment was acquired at an aggregate cost of $4,222,258 of which $359,635 was acquired by means of finance contracts and loans and the remaining balance was paid in cash.
5. LOANS
RECEIVABLE
6. DUE FROM RELATED PARTIES
Amounts due from related parties are non‑interest bearing and have no set terms of repayment.
7. BANK
INDEBTEDNESS
The Company has an approved line of credit for $3,500,000 which bears interest at prime plus 2.25%. Prime rate as at September 30, 2011 was 3.00%. At year end the Company had a temporary bulge in the line of credit to a maximum of $4,500,000.
The credit facility agreement contains a certain covenant regarding a minimum tangible net worth that must be respected at all times. Capital expenditures for the year must also not exceed $1,000,000 per annum without the bank's prior approval. At September 30, 2011 the Company was in breach of the covenants.
The above bank indebtedness is secured by a general security agreement over all assets of the Company and postponements and guarantees by the shareholders.
8. LONG TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 0% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $990. The contract matures on May 21, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
7,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $1,084. The contract matures on February 23, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
40,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $922. The contract matures on February 23, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
34,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $943. The contract matures on February 23, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
34,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $1,300. The loan matures on February 23, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
35,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $930. The contract matures on May 20, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
36,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $682. The contract matures on June 30, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
27,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $790. The contract matures on October 30, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
34,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.99% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $744. The loan matures on November 10, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
32,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 6.59% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $913. The loan matures on December 6, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
31,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan bearing interest at 0% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $13,333. The loan matures on December 1, 2013 and is secured by assets of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan bearing interest at 0% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $30,000. The loan matures on September 1, 2012 and is secured by assets of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 8.3% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $933. The loan matures on May 26, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 8.3% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $933. The loan matures on May 26, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract payable bearing interest at 6.59% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $1,351. The loan matures on October 21, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
45,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract payable bearing interest at 6.49% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $810. The loan matures on July 8, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
32,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 6.91% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $970. The loan matures on May 25, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 7% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $634. The loan matures on May 25, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
18,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 9.05% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $2,779. The loan matures on April 8, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
49,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 6.74% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $1,315. The loan matures on September 9, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
15,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 7.57% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $1,124. The loan matures on May 29, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
32,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 6.5% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $679. The loan matures on June 30, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
27,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 6.5% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $679. The loan matures on June 30, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
27,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance contract loan bearing interest at 5.58% per annum, repayable in monthly blended payments of $734. The loan matures on October 26, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
31,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091,432 |
|
Amounts payable within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,620,714) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
470,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayment terms are approximately:
2012 |
$ |
2,620,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
236,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
153,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
77,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,091,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credit facility agreement for certain loans contain a covenant regarding a minimum tangible net worth that must be respected at all times. Capital expenditures for the year must also not exceed $1,000,000 per annum without the bank's prior approval. At September 30, 2011 the Company was in breach of the covenants.
The above loans and finance contracts are secured by production equipment with a net book value of $9,631,499, vehicles with a net book value of $299,065 a general security agreement over all assets and postponements and guarantees by the shareholders.
9. DUE TO SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
2011 |
||||
Non‑interest bearing loans |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,818,593 |
|
Interest bearing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
1,258,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,077,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial amounts due to shareholders are non‑interest bearing and have no set repayment terms. There are two loans advanced for a total of $1,258,436 which bear interest compounded annually at prime plus 2%.
10. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company and its legal counsel evaluate the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.
If the assessment of a contingency suggests that a loss is probable, and the amount can be reliably estimated, then a loss is recorded. When a contingent loss is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but the amount of loss cannot be reliably estimated, then details of the contingent loss are disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case we disclose the nature of the guarantee. Legal fees incurred in connection with pending legal proceedings are expensed as incurred.
The Company is the co‑defendant named in litigation regarding an accident involving a motor vehicle owned by the Company. At this time we are unable to estimate the amount of any possible claims. Management feels that insurance will cover any possible claims and any possible amounts in excess of insurance coverage will be recorded as incurred.
The Company is the co‑defendant named in litigation regarding an incident at a well site. At this time we are unable to estimate the amount of any possible claims. Management feels that insurance will cover any possible claims and any possible amounts in excess of insurance coverage will be recorded as incurred.
The Company has guaranteed the indebtedness of Valhalla Industries Ltd, a company in which two shareholders of the Company have a controlling interest. The loans are secured by mortgages and second charges on several pieces of property. The balance of the loans at September 30, 2011 is $3,080,591.
11. LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company has long term leases with respect to its vehicles and its US premises. The leases for the premises contain renewal options. Under the leases the Company is required to pay a base rent of $9,558 per month plus provide for payment of utilities and maintenance costs. Future minimum lease payments as at September 30, 2011, are as follows:
2012 |
$ |
136,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
103,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
58,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
297,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "A" voting common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "B" voting common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "C" voting common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "D" non‑voting common sharess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "E" preferred shares, entitled to 6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative dividend, with the right to vote and convert into Class "A" common shares should the dividends become in arrears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "F" preferred shares, entitled to 6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative dividend, with the right to vote and convert into Class "A" common shares should the dividends become in arrears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited |
Class "G" non‑voting preferred shares, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entitled to dividends when declared before Classes A to D, but not before Classes E and F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
||
Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
Class "A" common shares |
|
|
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
164 |
Class "D" common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
1,262,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,262,899 |
|
13. PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENT
Prior period decreases of $144,247 have been made to opening retained earnings. The adjustment is the result of liabilities that existed as of the balance sheet but were not recorded in the correct period.
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following is a summary of the Company's related party transactions:
These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties. Management has concluded that it is not practical to determine the fair value of related party loans as there is no comparable market data.
Included in accounts receivable at year end is $18,400 for goods and services provided to Valhalla Industries Ltd. Included in accounts payable at year end is $7,350 for goods and services received from Valhalla Industries Ltd.
In February 2010 Greywolf Production Systems Inc purchased the shares of Greywolf Production Systems Ltd for cash consideration of $732,650. During the year Greywolf Production Systems Inc. transferred ownership of Greywolf Production Systems Ltd. to related individuals for proceeds of $732,650 in exchange for a loan receivable (Note 5). The difference between these proceeds and the carrying amount of the net assets associated with that company resulted in an $814,499 credit to retained earnings.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to the year end the shareholders of the Company were in negotiations to sell substantially all of the operating equipment of the Company to an unrelated arms‑length party. As part of the transaction all the operating equipment is being sold and all of the bank indebtedness and the long term debt is being paid out.
16. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CANADIAN GAAP AND US GAAP)
1) Significant accounting policies
a) Recent US accounting pronouncements
i) Fair Value Measurements
In May 2011, the FASB provided amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments provide clarification and / or additional requirements relating to the following:
a) application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts,
b) measurement of the fair value of instruments classified in an entity’s shareholders’ equity,
c) measurement of the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio,
d) application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement, and
e) disclosures about fair value measurements.
These amendments will be effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the amendments to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ii) Comprehensive Income
In June and December 2011, the FASB provided amendments requiring an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, eliminating the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. We do not expect the adoption of the amendments to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
2) Differences in Accounting Principles
There are no differences in accounting principles that affect the balance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flows.
Consolidated Expenses
(Schedule 1)
Year Ended September 30, 2011
See notes to consolidated financial statements