Plantation Corp. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Plantation Corp.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - Plantation Corp.	f10q_311-plnt.htm
EX-32.2 - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO - Plantation Corp.	f10q_322-plnt.htm
EX-32.1 - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO - Plantation Corp.	f10q_321-plnt.htm
EX-31.2 - RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - Plantation Corp.	f10q_312-plnt.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______.

Commission file number 000-53625

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		16-1614060
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of icorporation or organization)

7325 Oswego Road
Liverpool, New York		13090
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number including area code (315) 451-4889

(Former Name or Former Address, if changed since last report)

Check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

	Large accelerated filer o			Accelerated filer o
	Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)			Smaller reporting company x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

35,300,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0004 per share, as of June 30, 2012, period covered in this report.

35,300,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0004 per share, as of August 22, 2012, date of filing this report.

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item #	Description	Page Numbers

	PART I

ITEM 1	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(Unaudited) Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3
	(Unaudited) Statements of Operations
	For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011
	For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011		4
	For the period from (inception) January 1, 2001 (Inception) to June 30, 2012
	(Unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows
	For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011		5
	For the cumulative period from January 1, 2001 (Inception) to June 30, 2012
	Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6-8

ITEM 2	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		9

ITEM 3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		18

ITEM 4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		18

	PART II

ITEM 1	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		20

ITEM 1A	RISK FACTORS		20

ITEM 2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		25

ITEM 3	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		25

ITEM 4	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		25

ITEM 5	OTHER INFORMATION		25

ITEM 6	EXHIBITS		26

	SIGNATURES		27

EXHIBIT 31.1	SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EXHIBIT 31.2	SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

EXHIBIT 32.1	SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EXHIBIT 32.2	SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page Numbers
(Unaudited) Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3
(Unaudited) Statements of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011
For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011		4
For the period from (inception) January 1, 2001 (Inception) to June 30, 2012
(Unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011		5
For the cumulative period from January 1, 2001 (Inception) to June 30, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6-8

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	254		$	80
Accounts Receivable		2,268			825
Total Current Assets		2,522			905

Property and Equipment:
Payphone equipment		20,000			20,000
Less accumulated depreciation		(7,333	)		(5,333	)
Net Property and Equipment		12,667			14,667

TOTAL ASSETS	$	15,189		$	15,572



LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable	$	1,581		$	315
Accounts Payable - Related Party		16,000			8,500
Accrued Liabilities		1,900			14,000
Related Party Notes Payable		55,025			45,085
Interest Payable- Related Party		19,045			14,796

Total Current Liabilities		93,551			82,696

Total Liabilities		93,551			82,696

Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred Stock, par value $.0004, 10,000,000 shares Authorized , 0 shares Issued and Outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		-			-
Common Stock, par value $.0004, 250,000,000 shares Authorized, 35,300,000 shares Issued and Outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		14,120			14,120
Additional Paid-In Capital		1,043,344			1,037,344
Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage		(1,135,826	)		(1,118,588	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(78,362	)		(67,124	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	15,189		$	15,572

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

													Cumulative
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Since
	June 30,						June 30,						January 1,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2001 (Unaudited)

Revenues:
Income	$	3,551		$	4,211		$	7,019		$	8,152		$	26,962
Cost of Services		(3,906	)		(4,822	)		(8,184	)		(9,260	)		(31,039	)
Gross Margin		(355	)		(611	)		(1,165	)		(1,108	)		(4,077	)

Expenses:
Accounting and bookkeeping		3,400			300			3,400			600			48,975
Amortization expense		-			-			-			-			3,000
Other General and administrative expense		3,103			3,000			6,108			6,044			22,908
Insurance		-			-			-			-			471,948
Legal fee - Merger		-			-			-			-			10,052
Offering cost		-			-			-			-			411,286
Outside services		1,576			200			1,616			520			11,381
Rent expense		-			-			-			-			1,260
Travel expense		-			-			-			-			2,641
Total Operating Expenses		8,079			3,500			11,124			7,164			983,451

Operating Loss		(8,434	)		(4,111	)		(12,289	)		(8,272	)		(987,528	)

Other Expense
Interest expense		(2,221	)		(2,020	)		(4,249	)		(4,007	)		(145,506	)

Loss Before Income Taxes		(10,655	)		(6,131	)		(16,538	)		(12,279	)		(1,133,034	)

Income Tax Provision		-			-			(700	)		(400	)		(2,792	)

Net Loss	$	(10,655	)	$	(6,131	)	$	(17,238	)	$	(12,679	)	$	(1,135,826	)

Basic & Diluted Loss per Common Share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding		35,300,000			35,300,000			35,300,000			35,300,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
							Cumulative
	Six Months Ended						Since
	June 30,						January 1,
	2012			2011			2001 (Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss	$	(17,238	)	$	(12,679	)	$	(1,135,826	)
Accrued Interest Satisfied through Contributed Capital								126,464
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		2,000			2,000			7,333
Fair value of services provided by related parties		6,000			6,000			18,000
Changes In:
Accounts Payable		1,266			(792	)		1,581
Accounts Payable - Related Party		7,500			600			16,000
Accounts Receivable		(1,443	)		(354	)		(2,268	)
Accrued Expenses		(12,100	)		-			1,900
Accrued Interest		4,249			4,007			19,045
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(9,766	)		(1,218	)		(947,771	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities		-			-			-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
Proceeds from Related Party Note Payable		9,940			800			35,025
Proceeds from Notes Payable		-			-			896,000
Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock		-			-			17,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		9,940			800			948,025

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash		174			(418	)		254
Cash at Beginning of Period		80			1,033			-

Cash at End of Period	$	254		$	615		$	254

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Franchise Taxes	$	700		$	400		$	2,792

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Notes Payable and Accrued Interest Satisfied through Contributed Capital	$	-		$	-		$	1,022,464
Related Party Note Payable for Contributed Payphone Equipment	$	-		$	-		$	20,000
Accrued Liabilities reclassified as Related Party Accounts Payable	$	7,500		$	-		$	7,500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Results for the six-month and period ending June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc.’s Form 10-12G filed with SEC on April 14, 2009 and December 31, 2011 annual filing Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on May 14, 2012. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure required in Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. fiscal 2011 financial statements have been omitted.

Emerging Growth Company Critical Accounting Policy Disclosure:

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the 2012 JOBS Act. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As an emerging growth company, we can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.

Nature of Business

The Company is primarily in the business of providing the use of outdoor payphones, and providing telecommunication services.

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenue from the sources described below, which includes dial-around revenues, coin collections, and local payphone customer revenue for telephone service.

Coin revenues are recorded in an equal amount to the coins collected. Local service revenue is realized on the date the payphone customer is invoiced for telecommunication services, these are monthly charges for payphone service for local customers. Dial Around revenues are earned when a customer uses the Company’s payphone to gain access to a different long distance carrier than is already programmed into the phone. The Dial Around revenue is recognized when the billing and collection agent of the Company, APCC, calculates and compensates the Company for the use of the payphone on a quarterly basis by billing the actual party’s long distance carrier that received the calls. The date of the Dial Around revenue recognition is determined when this compensation is collected and deposited into the Company’s bank account.

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) number 104, "Revenue Recognition." SAB 104 clarifies application of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles to revenue transactions. The Company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete. That is, when the arrangements of the goods are documented, the pricing becomes final and collectability is reasonably assured. An allowance for bad debt is provided based on estimated losses. For revenue received in advance for goods, the Company records a current liability classified as either deferred revenue or customer deposits. As of June 30, 2012, there was no deferred revenue.

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure accounts receivable are not overstated due to uncollectibility. Bad debt reserves are maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant one-time events and historical experience. An additional reserve for individual accounts is recorded when the Company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables would be further adjusted. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has determined an allowance for doubtful accounts is not necessary.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable will consist of Local Service revenue. The Accounts Receivable was $2,268 as of June 30, 2012.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost. On September 1, 2010, Joseph Passalaqua, President of the Company contributed payphone equipment valued at $20,000 in exchange for a promissory note. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $2,000. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Assets				Rate

Payphone Equipment	$	20,000.00		5 year
Accumulated Depreciation	$	(7,333.00	)
Net Value of Equipment	$	12,667.00

Upon sale or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the determination of income or loss. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major overhauls and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic useful lives.

Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations; betterments are capitalized. The cost of property sold or otherwise disposed of and the accumulated depreciation thereon are eliminated from the property and related accumulated depreciation accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. (hereto referred to as the “Company”) had negative working capital and an accumulated deficit incurred through June 30, 2012, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses for the period from (inception) January 1, 2001 to June 30, 2012, has limited revenues and requires additional financing in order to finance its business activities on an ongoing basis. The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. The Company is actively pursuing alternative financing and has had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained. In the interim, shareholders of the Company have committed to meeting its minimal operating expenses. Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a going concern.

PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During 2008-2012 a major shareholder and President of the Company, Joseph Passalaqua, has loaned the Company $24,735. On September 1, 2010, Joseph Passalaqua contributed payphone equipment in exchange for a $20,000 promissory note. All of these notes accrue simple interest at a rate of 18% annually and are payable on demand. As of June 30, 2012 the Company owed $44,735 related to these notes and has accrued $18,690 in simple interest.

During 2011 and 2012, Cobalt Blue LLC, of which Mary Passalaqua, the wife of Joseph Passalaqua is President has loaned the Company $10,290. All of these notes accrue simple interest at a rate of 18% annually and are payable on demand. As of June 30, 2012 the Company owed $10,290 related to these notes and has accrued $355 in simple interest.

As of June 30, 2012, Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. incurred a liability to Lyboldt-Daly, Inc. in the amount of $16,000 and has an additional accrued liability of $1,900. Lyboldt-Daly, Inc. completed the bookkeeping and internal accounting for Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. Joseph Passalaqua is President of Lyboldt-Daly, Inc. and a majority shareholder in Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc.

The principal stockholder provided, without cost to the Company, his services, valued at $800 per month which totaled $4,800 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The principal stockholder also provided, without cost to the Company, office space valued at $200 per month, which totaled $1,200 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The total of these expenses was reflected in the statement of operations as general and administrative expenses with a corresponding contribution of paid-in capital.

As of June 30, 2012, all activities of Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. have been conducted by corporate officers from either their homes or business offices. Currently, there are no outstanding debts owed by Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. for the use of these facilities and there are no commitments for future use of the facilities.

NOTE 4 – COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

As of June 30, 2012 Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc. has 250,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at $0.0004 par value per share and 35,300,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by the use of forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "continue," or other similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or financial condition or state other "forward-looking" information. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future that we are unable to accurately predict or control. Those events as well as any cautionary language in this Form 10-Q provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in this Form 10-Q could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited financial statements of Plantation Lifecare Developers Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PLD”, “the Company”, “our”, or “we”), should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principals, which require that management make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain statements contained below are forward-looking statements (rather than historical facts) that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We (or the “Company”) were incorporated as “Continental Exchange Corporation” in the State of Delaware on October 26, 1927.

Later that year, we changed our name to “Northern Exchange Corporation”. Our original purpose was to use our acquired capital to merge with or acquire any other lawful business or enterprise, the nature of which was left unstated. Being unable to achieve this intended purpose, we ceased operations and became dormant in 1943, having no assets or liabilities.

We remained in this condition until, December 30, 1980, when we were reinstated in the State of Delaware and our corporate name was changed to “Everest International Incorporated”. In 1988, our name was once again changed to “Comstock Resources Corporation” and then to “Comstock International, Inc.”. In 2000, our name was changed to “Copernicus International, Inc.”.

On October 29, 2001, pursuant to an Agreement of Merger we merged into Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc., a Delaware developing stage company, with the surviving corporation being Plantation Lifecare Developers, Inc.

November 8, 2001, a Certificate of Merger and Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation were filed with the State of Delaware. We intended to construct and operate life care communities which combine modern, specially designed resort villas, access to assisted-care living and modern skilled nursing hospitals in the Caribbean and South America. Since 2001, we had not cmenced planned principal operations.

On October 29, 2008 a Certificate of Revival and Renewal was filed with the State of Delaware.

On April 14, 2009 the Company filed a Registration Statement to become a reporting company. For the past 28 years, we have been dormant company, and accordingly, a development stage company, having not attained any significant revenue or operations.

On September 1, 2010 the Company’s President contributed payphones and payphone equipment. The company is now primarily in the business of providing the use of outdoor payphones, and providing telecommunication services.

We are presently seeking a merger, acquisition or other business combination transaction with a privately owned entity seeking to become a publicly owned entity. Our current principal business activity is to seek a suitable acquisition candidate through acquisition, merger, reverse merger or other suitable business combination method.

We have very limited capital, and it is unlikely that we will be able to take advantage of more than one such business opportunity. We intend to seek opportunities demonstrating the potential of long-term growth. Now, we have not yet identified any business opportunity that we plan to pursue, nor have we reached any agreement or definitive understanding with any person concerning an acquisition.

On April 14, 2009, we filed a Registration Statement on Form 10SB (File No.: 0-52269), or the Registration Statement, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, to register our common stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The Registration Statement went effective by operation of law in 60 days on June 13, 2009, or the Effective Date. Since the Effective Date of the Registration Statement, we have become a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act and are responsible for preparing and filing periodic and current reports under the Exchange Act with the SEC.

SERVICES AND PRODUCTS

We own, operate and manage privately owned public payphones in the State of New York. As of September 1, 2010, we own, operate, and manage 58 payphones. The Company does not have any long-term agreements with the customers of these payphones and they may terminate their contract at will. We may pay site owners a commission based on a flat monthly rate or on a percentage of sales. Some of the businesses include, but are not limited to, retail stores, convenience stores, bars, restaurants, gas stations, colleges and hospitals. In the alternative, our agreement with business owners may be to provide the telecommunications services without the payment of any commissions.

The local telephone switch controls the traditional payphone technology. The local switch does not provide any services in the payphone that can benefit the owner of the phone. When we purchase phones from other companies, they come with "smart card" payphone technology. These phones have a circuit board with improved technology. The “smart card” technology allows us to determine the operational status of the payphone. It also tells us when the coins in the phone have to be collected, the number and types of calls that have been made from each phone, as well as other helpful information that helps us provide better service to our payphone using public. This upgrade of the phones reduces the number and frequency of service visits due to outages and other payphone-related problems and, in turn, reduces the maintenance costs. Other companies manufacture the components of the payphones for the industry, including Universal Communications and TCI, which provides handsets, key pads, totalizers, and relays.

Payphone users can circumvent the usual payment method and avoid inserting a coin by using an access code or 800 number provided by a long distance carrier. These “dial-around” numbers, while convenient for users, leave payphone service providers uncompensated for the call made. The Federal Communications Commission, or the FCC, as instructed by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, created regulations to ensure that payphone service providers receive compensation for these “dial-around” calls.

Our installed payphone base generates revenue from two principal sources: coin-calls and non-coin calls.

Coin calls:

Coin calls represent calls paid for by customers who deposit coins into the payphones. Coin call revenue is recorded as the actual amount of coins collected from the payphones.

Non-Coin calls:

Non-coin revenue includes commissions from operator service telecommunications companies and a “dial-around” commission of $0.494 per call that the FCC requires sellers of long distance toll free services to pay payphone owners. The commissions for operator services are paid 45 days in arrears. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Seasonality

Our revenues from payphone operation are affected by seasonal variations, geographic distribution of payphones and type of location. Because we operate in the northeastern part of the country with many of the payphones located outdoor, weather patterns affect our revenue streams. Revenues drop off significantly during winter and conversely show an increase in the spring and summer. Revenues are generally lowest in the first quarter and highest in the third quarter.

Significant Customers

We do not rely on a major customer for our revenue. We have a variety of small single businesses as well as some small chain stores that we service. We do not believe that we would suffer dramatically if any one customer or small chain decided to stop using our phones.

Significant Vendors

We must buy dial tone for each payphone from the local exchange carrier. As long as we pay the carrier bill, it is required to provide a dial tone. As a regulated utility, the exchange carrier may not refuse to provide us service. Alternate service exists in certain areas where Verizon competitors are located. We use alternate local service providers when we can get a better price for the service. We use long distance providers on all the payphones.

Government Regulation:

We are subject to varying degrees of regulation by federal, state, local and foreign regulators. The implementation, modification, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations vary and can limit our ability to provide many of our services. Our ability to compete in our target markets depends, in part, upon favorable regulatory conditions and the favorable interpretations of existing laws and regulations.

FCC Regulation and Interstate Rates:

Our services are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with respect to interstate telecommunications services and other matters for which the FCC has jurisdiction under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Payphone users can circumvent the usual payment method and avoid inserting a coin by using an access code or 800 number provided by a long distance carrier. These “dial-around” numbers, while convenient for users, leave payphone service providers uncompensated for the call made. The Federal Communications Commission, as instructed by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, created regulations to ensure that payphone service providers receive compensation for these “dial-around” calls.

The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC). If the FCC regulation requiring sellers of long distance toll free services to pay payphone owners $0.494 per call is reduced or repealed, it could have a negative effect upon our revenue stream. We have no control over what rules and regulations the state and federal regulatory agencies require us to follow now or in the future. It is possible for future regulations to be so financially demanding that they cause us to go out of business. We are not aware of any proposed regulations or changes to any existing regulations.

Telecommunications Act of 1996

The Telecommunications Act of 1996, regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunication service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints. We are unable to predict definitively the impact that the ongoing changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. The financial impact will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regulatory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of our pursuit of new opportunities resulting from the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and technological advances.

Research and Development

We have not expended any money in the last two fiscal years on research and development activities.

Employees

The company does not have any employees. Joseph Passalaqua is our President and Chief Executive Officer and Ray Willenberg Jr. is our Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, neither of whom have employment agreements.

Any person or entity may read and copy our reports with the Commission at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Room by calling the Commission toll free at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov where reports, proxies and other disclosure statements on public companies may be viewed by the public.

GOING CONCERN QUALIFICATION

Several conditions and events cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $1,085,930 for the period from January 1, 2001 to June 30, 2012, has no revenues and requires additional financing in order to finance its business activities on an ongoing basis. The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. The Company is actively pursuing alternative financing and has had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained. In the interim, shareholders of the Company have committed to meeting its minimal operating expenses. Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2011, we had $80 cash on hand, and an accumulated deficit of $1,118,588. At June 30, 2012, we had $254 cash on hand, and an accumulated deficit of $1,135,826. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

COSTS RELATED TO OUR OPERATION

The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones include telecommunication costs, commissions and depreciation. Telecommunication expenses consist of payments made by us to local exchange carriers and long distance carriers for access to and use of their telecommunications networks and service and maintenance costs. Commission expense represents payments to owners or operators of the premises at which a payphone is located.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2012, we had $254 cash on hand and an accumulated deficit of $1,135,826. Our primary source of liquidity for the current quarter has been from borrowing from a Joseph C. Passalaqua, a principal stockholder. As of June 30, 2012 we have notes payable to Joseph C. Passalaqua in the amount $44,735 and notes payable to Cobalt Blue LLC in the amount of $10,290. These notes bear a simple interest rate of 18% per annum and are payable upon demand. As of June 30, 2012 the accrued interest on these notes was $19,045.

Net cash used in operating activities was $9,766 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $0 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012.

Net cash provided by financial activities was $9,940 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012.

Our expenses to date are largely due to professional fees that include accounting and legal fees.

To date, we have had minimal revenues; and we require additional financing in order to finance our business activities on an ongoing basis. Our future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. We are actively pursuing alternative financing and have had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained to date. In the interim, shareholders of the Company have committed to meet our minimal operating expenses. We believe that actions presently being taken to revise our operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a “going concern,” although no assurances can be given.

NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

The Company has a cumulative net loss of $1,135,826 as of June 30, 2012. The company had net loss of $17,238 for six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to a net loss of $12,679 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

CASH FLOW

Our primary source of liquidity has been cash from shareholder loans.

WORKING CAPTIAL

We had current assets of $905 and current liabilities of $82,696 resulting in a working capital deficit of $67,124 at December 31, 2011. We had current assets of $2,522 and current liabilities of $93,551, resulting in working capital deficit of $78,362 at June 30, 2012.

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

REVENUES

Our total revenue decreased by $660, from $4,211 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $3,551 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Our coin call revenue was $362 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Our non-coin call revenue, or commission income, which is comprised primarily of “dial around” revenue, star 88 commission revenue and operator service revenue, was $613 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $452 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per “dial-around” call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Our local service revenue which is comprised primarily of service for payphone customers was $3,236 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $3,099 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This is the revenue from monthly invoices billed to payphone customers in which the Company owns the payphone and provides service to operate the payphone on the premises. As of June 30, 2012 six customers made up the local service revenue:

Avotus Corporation (Hannaford Brothers) - New York

Berlin Central School - New York

Coxsackie Correctional Facility – New York

Grafton Lake State Park – New York

Greene Correctional Facility – New York

NYS Park Alleghany Region – New York

COST OF SALES

Our overall cost of services decreased by $916, from $4,822 in the three months ended June 30, 2011, to $3,906 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones will include telecommunication costs and depreciation.

Telecommunication costs consist of payments made by us to local exchange carriers and long distance carriers for access to, use of their telecommunications networks and service and maintenance costs. It also includes APCC commission fees related to “dial-around” processing, and payphone coin collection expenses or repair.

Depreciation expense is the quarterly depreciation of the payphone equipment, which is valued at $20,000. The company uses the straight line method, with a useful life of 5 years with $0 salvage value. The payphone equipment was acquired by the company on September 1, 2010.

Telecommunication costs were $3,822 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $2,906 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. Depreciation expense was $1,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $1,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012.

OPERATING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Operating expenses increased by $4,579, from $3,500 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $8,079 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. Operating expenses primarily consist of other general and administrative expenses (G&A), outside services, and professional fees. G&A expenses, made up primarily of office expense, postage and delivery expense and the fair value of services rendered by officers, increased by $103, from $3,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $3,103 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. Professional fees, made up of accounting and legal fees increased by $3,100, from $300 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $3,400 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. These are fees we pay to accountants and attorneys throughout the year for performing various tasks. Outside services, made up primarily of stock transfer company fees and incorporating services expenses, increased by $1,376, from $200 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $1,576 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. The bulk of the increase in expense was due to the Company’s accounting fees and outside services in 2012, when comparing the same three month period in 2011.

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

REVENUES

Our total revenue decreased by $1,133, from $8,152 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $7,019 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Our coin call revenue was $362 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Our non-coin call revenue, or commission income, which is comprised primarily of “dial around” revenue, star 88 commission revenue and operator service revenue, was $1,193 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $986 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per “dial-around” call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Our local service revenue which is comprised primarily of service for payphone customers was $6,597 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $6,033 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This is the revenue from monthly invoices billed to payphone customers in which the Company owns the payphone and provides service to operate the payphone on the premises. As of June 30, 2012 six customers made up the local service revenue:

Avotus Corporation (Hannaford Brothers) - New York

Berlin Central School - New York

Coxsackie Correctional Facility – New York

Grafton Lake State Park – New York

Greene Correctional Facility – New York

NYS Park Alegany Region – New York

COST OF SALES

Our overall cost of services decreased by $1,076, from $9,260 in the six months ended June 30, 2011, to $8,184 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones will include telecommunication costs and depreciation.

Telecommunication costs were $7,260 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $6,184 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Depreciation expense was $2,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $2,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

OPERATING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Operating expenses increased by $3,960, from $7,164 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $11,124 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Operating expenses primarily consist of other general and administrative expenses (G&A), outside services, and professional fees. G&A expenses, made up primarily of office expense, postage and delivery expense and the fair value of services rendered by officers, increased by $64, from $6,044 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $6,108 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Professional fees, made up of accounting and legal fees increased by $2,800, from $600 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $3,400 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. These are fees we pay to accountants and attorneys throughout the year for performing various tasks. Outside services, made up primarily of stock transfer company fees and incorporating services expenses, increased by $1,096, from $520 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $1,616 in the six months ended June 30, 2012. The bulk of the increase in expense was due to the Company’s accounting fees and outside services in 2012, when comparing the same six month period in 2011.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Emerging Growth Company. We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:

· have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

· comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);

· submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency;” and

· disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, defines a Smaller Reporting Company as an issuer that is not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer), or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent that is not a smaller reporting company and that:

· Had a public float of less than $ 75 million as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, computed by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of shares of its voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates by the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average of the bid and asked prices of common equity, in the principal market for the common equity; or

· In the case of an initial registration statement under the Securities Act or Exchange Act for shares of its common equity, had a public float of less than $75 million as of a date within 30 days of the date of the filing of the registration statement, computed by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of such shares held by non-affiliates before the registration plus, in the case of a Securities Act registration statement, the number of such shares included in the registration statement by the estimated public offering price of the shares; or

· In the case of an issuer whose public float as calculated under paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition was zero, had annual revenues of less than $50 million during the most recently completed fiscal year for which audited financial statements are available.

We qualify as a Smaller Reporting Company. Moreover, as a Smaller Reporting Company and so long as we remain a Smaller Reporting Company, we benefit from the same exemptions and exclusions as an Emerging Growth Company. In the event that we cease to be an Emerging Growth Company as a result of a lapse of the five year period, but continue to be a Smaller Reporting Company, we would continue to be subject to the exemptions available to Emerging Growth Companies until such time as we were no longer a Smaller Reporting Company

COMMON STOCK

Our board of directors is authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0004. There are an aggregate of 35,300,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, which are held by 274 stockholders as of the date of this Quarterly Report. All shares of our common stock have one vote per share on all matters, including election of directors, without provision for cumulative voting. The common stock is not redeemable and has no conversion or preemptive rights. The common stock currently outstanding is validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of common stock will share equally in any balance of the Company's assets available for distribution to them after satisfaction of creditors and preferred stockholders, if any. The holders of our common stock are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the Common Stock when, as and if, declared by the board of directors from funds legally available.

PREFERRED STOCK

Our Original Certificate of Incorporation did not provide for the issuance of Preferred Stock. On November 8, 2001, a Certificate of Amendment was filed with the State of Delaware that stated that the Corporation shall have the authority to issue 350,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 100,000,000 shares are authorized as Preferred Stock with the par value of $0.0004 per share. There are an aggregate of 0 shares of Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this Quarterly Filing.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Company’s market risk arises primarily from the fact that the area in which we do business is highly competitive and constantly evolving. We face competition from the larger and more established companies -- from companies that develop new technology, as well as the many smaller companies throughout the country.

We face competition from the larger and more established companies, from companies that develop new technology, as well as the many smaller companies throughout the country. For example, the last several years have shown an increase in the use of larger online sources such as Overstock.com and Ebay.com. These increases cut into our potential customer base. Companies who have a larger sales force, more money, larger manufacturing capabilities and greater ability to expand their markets also cut into our potential customers. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial strength, nationwide advertising coverage, brand identification and other resources that we do not have. Our competitors might introduce less expensive or more improved merchandise. These, as well as other factors, can negatively impact our business strategy. The competition from larger overstock companies is a very serious threat that can result in substantially less revenue.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's Chief Executive Officer, Joseph Passalaqua is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

For purposes of this Item 4, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of the Company (i) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. and hereinafter the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and (ii) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective and do not comply with the requirements in (i) and (ii) above.

Our Chief Executive Officer, Joseph Passalaqua, has reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the second quarter as covered by this report on June 30, 2012 and has concluded that and have concluded that (i) the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Commission due to a material weakness identified, and that (ii) the Company’s controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The material weakness identified relates to the lack of proper segregation of duties. The Company believes that the lack of proper segregation of duties is due to the Company’s limited resources.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation of these controls as of the end of our second fiscal quarter as covered by this report on June 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of Company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting does not provide assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

As of December 31, 2011, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and found it to be not effective subsequent to filing our last Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 on May 14, 2012 with the Commission. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management has concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are not effective because as noted in this Annual Report, we have limited resources available. As we obtain additional funding and employ additional personnel, we will implement programs recommended by the Treadway Commission to ensure the proper segregation of duties and reporting channels. Our independent public accountant, Michael F. Cronin, has not conducted an audit of our controls and procedures regarding internal control over financial reporting. Consequently, Michael F. Cronin expresses no opinion with regards to the effectiveness or implementation of our controls and procedures with regards to internal control over financial reporting.

INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS

The Company's management does not expect that its disclosure controls or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information in this report, the following risks should be considered carefully in evaluating our business and prospects as our Company is subject to numerous risk factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

Our limited operating history makes its potential difficult to assess.

We have limited assets and financial resources. We will, in all likelihood, continue to sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenue, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This will most likely result in the Company incurring a net operating loss, which will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a target company. There is no assurance that we can identify such a target company and consummate such a business combination.

We have no agreement for a business combination and no minimum requirements for a business combination.

We have no current arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect to engaging in a business combination with a specific entity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and evaluating suitable business opportunities or in concluding a business combination. No particular industry or specific business within an industry has been selected for a target company. We have not established a specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets, net worth or other criteria which we will require a target company to have achieved, or without which we would not consider a business combination with such business entity. Accordingly, we may enter into a business combination with a business entity having no significant operating history, losses, limited or no potential for immediate earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative characteristics. There is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on terms favorable to us.

There is no assurance of success or profitability of the Company.

There is no assurance that we will acquire a favorable business opportunity. Even if we should become involved in a business opportunity, there is no assurance that we will generate revenue or profits, or that the market price of our outstanding shares will be increased thereby. The type of business to be acquired may be one that desires to avoid effecting its own public offering and the accompanying expense, delays, uncertainties and federal and state requirements which purport to protect investors. Because of our limited capital, it is more likely than not that any acquisition by the Company will involve other parties whose primary interest is the acquisition of control of a publicly traded company. Moreover, any business opportunity acquired may be currently unprofitable or present other negative factors.

We may not be able to diversify its business.

Because we have limited financial resources, it is unlikely that we will be able to diversify our acquisitions or operations. Our probable inability to diversify our activities into more than one area will subject us to economic fluctuations within a particular business or industry and therefore increase the risks associated with our operations.

We have limited officers and directors.

Because management consists of only two persons, while seeking a business combination, Joseph Passalaqua, the President of the Company and Ray Willenberg Jr., the Secretary of the Company will be the only individuals responsible in conducting the day-to-day operations of the Company. We do not benefit from having access to multiple judgments that a greater number of directors or officers would provide, and we will rely completely on the judgment of our two officers and one director when selecting a target company. Mr. Passalaqua and Mr. Willenberg anticipate devoting only a limited amount of time per month to the business of the Company. Mr. Passalaqua and Mr. Willenberg have not entered into a written employment agreement with the Company and they are not expected to do so. We do not anticipate obtaining key man life insurance on Mr. Passalaqua or Mr. Willenberg. The loss of the services of Mr. Passalaqua or Mr. Willenberg would adversely affect development of our business and our likelihood of continuing operations.

Conflicts of interest exist between the Company and its management.

Certain conflicts of interest exist between the Company and its officers and directors. They have other business interests to which they currently devote attention, and are expected to continue to do so. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through their exercise of judgment in a manner that is consistent with their fiduciary duties to the Company.

It is anticipated that our principal stockholders may actively negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. In this process, our principal stockholders may consider their own personal pecuniary benefit rather than the best interest of other Company shareholders. Depending upon the nature of a proposed transaction, Company stockholders other than the principal stockholders may not be afforded the opportunity to approve or consent to a particular transaction.

We may need additional financing.

We have very limited funds, and such funds, may not be adequate to take advantage of any available business opportunities. Even if our currently available funds prove to be sufficient to pay for our operations until we are able to acquire an interest in, or complete a transaction with, a business opportunity, such funds will clearly not be sufficient to enable it to exploit the opportunity. Thus, the ultimate success of the Company will depend, in part, upon our availability to raise additional capital. In the event that we require modest amounts of additional capital to fund our operations until we are able to complete a business acquisition or transaction, such funds, are expected to be provided by the principal shareholders. However, we have not investigated the availability, source, or terms that might govern the acquisition of the additional capital, which is expected to be required in order to exploit a business opportunity, and will not do so until we have determined the level of need for such additional financing. There is no assurance that additional capital will be available from any source or, if available, that it can be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company. If not available, our operations will be limited to those that can be financed with our modest capital.

Our business is seasonal.

We do not have any long term contracts with our customers and the contracts that are in place may be terminated at will.

We do not have any long-term agreements with the customers of our payphones and they may terminate our contract to operate at will. Therefore, there is no continuity to our business. Although we are trying to expand our customer base, our efforts are still in the preliminary stages. If we lose our current customers and do not have any potential new customers at the time of such termination, our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Government regulations may change or be added that may adversely affect our ability to conduct, or how we conduct, our business.

In addition, while the FCC currently requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay us $0.494 cents per call, such regulations may be reduced in scope or effect or repealed, which would have a negative effect upon our revenue stream. We have no control over what rules and regulations the state and federal regulatory agencies require us to follow now or in the future. It is possible for future regulations to be so financially demanding that they cause us to go out of business.

Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunication service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints. We are unable to predict definitively the impact that the ongoing changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. The financial impact will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regulatory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of our pursuit of new opportunities resulting from the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and technological advances.

We may need to depend upon outside advisors.

To supplement the business experience of our officers and directors, we may be required to employ accountants, technical experts, appraisers, attorneys, or other consultants or advisors. The selection of any such advisors will be made by our officers, without any input by shareholders. Furthermore, it is anticipated that such persons may be engaged on an as needed basis without a continuing fiduciary or other obligation to the Company. In the event the officers and directors of the Company consider it necessary to hire outside advisors, they may elect to hire persons who are affiliates, if those affiliates are able to provide the required services.

We may have significant competition for business opportunities and combinations and may be at a competitive disadvantage in completing a business combination.

We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with and acquisitions of business entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than us and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with other public companies, some of which may also have funds available for use by an acquisition candidate.

The reporting requirements imposed upon us may delay or preclude our ability to enter into a business combination.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, we are required to provide certain information about significant acquisitions including audited financial statements of the acquired company. Obtaining audited financial statements are the economic responsibility of the target company. The additional time and costs that may be incurred by some potential target companies to prepare such financial statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by us. Acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may not be appropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable. Notwithstanding a target company’s agreement to obtain audited financial statements within the required time frame, such audited financials may not be available to us at the time of effecting a business combination. In cases where audited financials are unavailable, we will have to rely upon un-audited information that has not been verified by outside auditors in making our decision to engage in a transaction with the business entity. This risk increases the prospect that a business combination with such a business entity might prove to be an unfavorable one for us.

We lack market research and a marketing organization.

We have neither conducted, nor have others made available to it, market research indicating that demand exists for the transactions contemplated by the Company. In the event demand exists for a transaction of the type contemplated by the Company, there is no assurance the Company will be successful in completing any such business combination.

We do not own any intellectual property.

We do not own any patents or trademarks. Companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries in which we compete own large numbers of patents, copyrights and trademarks. Such companies are know to frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property claims against us grows. We might not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use.

It is probable that there will be a change in control of the Company and/or management.

In conjunction with completion of a business acquisition, it is anticipated that we will issue an amount of our authorized, but un-issued common stock that represents the greater majority of the voting power and equity of the Company, which will, in all likelihood, result in stockholders of a target company obtaining a controlling interest in the Company. As a condition of the business combination agreement, the current stockholder(s) of the Company may agree to sell or transfer all or a portion of our common stock he/they own(s) so to provide the target company with all or majority control. The resulting change in control of the Company will likely result in removal of the present officers and directors of the Company and a corresponding reduction in or elimination of his/their participation in the future affairs of the Company.

Stockholders will likely suffer a dilution of the value of their shares upon a business combination.

A business combination normally will involve the issuance of a significant number of additional shares. Depending upon the value of the assets acquired in such business combination, the per-share value of our common stock may increase or decrease, perhaps significantly.

No public market exists and no public market may develop for the Company’s common stock.

There is currently no public market for our common stock, and no assurance can be given that a market will develop or that a shareholder ever will be able to liquidate his investment without considerable delay, if at all. If a market should develop, the price may be highly volatile. Factors such as those discussed in this "Risk Factors” section may have a significant impact upon the market price of the securities offered hereby. Owing to the low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker willing to effect a transaction in these securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling costs may exceed the sales proceeds.

There may be restrictions imposed by states on the sale of common stock by investors.

Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the Blue Sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware, that there may be significant state Blue Sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one.

We may be subject to additional risks because of doing business in a foreign country.

We may effectuate a business combination with a merger target whose business operations or even headquarters, place of formation or primary place of business are located outside the United States of America. In such event, we may face the significant additional risks associated with doing business in that country. In addition to the language barriers, different presentations of financial information, different business practices, and other cultural differences and barriers that may make it difficult to evaluate such a merger target, ongoing business risks result from the international political situation, uncertain legal systems and applications of law, prejudice against foreigners, corrupt practices, uncertain economic policies and potential political and economic instability that may be exacerbated in various foreign countries.

The consummation of a business combination may subject us and our stockholders to federal and state taxes.

Federal and state tax consequences will, in all likelihood, be major considerations in any business combination that we may undertake. Currently, such transactions may be structured to result in tax-free treatment to both companies, pursuant to various federal and state tax provisions. We intend to structure any business combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both the Company and the target entity; however, there can be no assurance that such business combination will meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes, which may have an adverse effect on both parties to the transaction.

Regulation of Penny Stocks

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission") has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks." Such rules include Rule 3a51-1 and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because our securities may constitute “penny stocks" within the meaning of the rules (as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, largely traded in the National Association of Securities Dealers’ (NASD) OTC Bulletin Board or the "Pink Sheets", the rules may apply to us and to our securities.

The Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 that established sales practice requirements low price securities. Unless the transaction is, exempt, it shall be unlawful for a broker or dealer to sell a penny stock to, or to effect the purchase of a penny stock by, any person unless prior to the transaction: (i) the broker or dealer has approved the person’s account for transactions in penny stock pursuant to this rule and (ii) the broker or dealer has received from the person a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stock, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain from the person information concerning the person's financial situation, investment experience, and investment objectives; (b) reasonably determine that transactions in penny stock are suitable for that person, and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters that the person reasonably may be expected to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stock; (c) deliver to the person a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the determination (i) stating in a highlighted format that it is unlawful for the broker or dealer to affect a transaction in penny stock unless the broker or dealer has received, prior to the transaction, a written agreement to the transaction from the person; and (ii) stating in a highlighted format immediately preceding the customer signature line that (iii) the broker or dealer is required to provide the person with the written statement; and (iv) the person should not sign and return the written statement to the broker or dealer if it does not accurately reflect the person’s financial situation, investment experience, and investment objectives; and (d) receive from the person a manually signed and dated copy of the written statement.

It is also required that disclosure be made as to the risks of investing in penny stock and the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, as well as current price quotations and the remedies and rights available in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Statements, on a monthly basis, must be sent to the investor listing recent prices for the Penny Stock and information on the limited market. Shareholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) "boiler room" practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. We are aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, we will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012 there were no sales of securities.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFTEY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III EXHIBITS.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX




Exhibit
Number		Exhibit Description

3		Certificate of Incorporation*

3.1		Certificate of Merger and Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation*

3.2		Certificate of Renewal and Revival of Certificate of Incorporation*

3.3		By-laws*

4		Form of Common Stock Certificate*

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

		* Previously submitted and incorporated by reference herein.

Reports on Form 8-K

Description	Form	Filing Date

None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	PLANTATION LIFECARE DEVELOPERS, INC.
Date: August 22, 2012
	By:	/s/ JOSEPH C. PASSALAQUA
		Joseph C. Passalaqua
		President, Director, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 22, 2012	By:	/s/ RAY WILLENBERG JR.
		Ray Willenberg Jr.
		Secretary, Director, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Plantation Corp. - FORM 10-Q - August 22, 2012

Attached files

Plantation Corp. Reports