Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - APPLE REIT SIX INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - APPLE REIT SIX INCex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - APPLE REIT SIX INCex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - APPLE REIT SIX INCex31-1.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 



x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______

Commission File Number 000-51270

APPLE REIT SIX, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
VIRGINIA
 
20-0620523
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS. Employer
Identification No.)
     
814 EAST MAIN STREET
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
 
 
23219
(Address of principal executive offices)   
 
  (Zip Code)
 
(804) 344-8121
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer   ¨
 
Accelerated filer   ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer x  
 
Smaller reporting company   ¨
       
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of registrant’s common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2012: 91,007,018
 
 
 

 
APPLE REIT SIX, INC.
FORM 10-Q
 
   
Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
     
Item 1.
 
     
  Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 3
 
   
 
   4
     
 
5
     
 
6
     
Item 2.
 12
     
Item 3.
 21
     
 Item 4.
21
     
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION  
     
Item 1.
 22
     
Item 2.
 23
     
Item 6.
 24
     
25
 
This Form 10-Q includes references to certain trademarks or service marks. The SpringHill Suites® by Marriott, TownePlace Suites® by Marriott, Fairfield Inn® by Marriott, Courtyard® by Marriott, Residence Inn® by Marriott and Marriott Suites® trademarks are the property of Marriott International, Inc. or one of its affiliates. The Homewood Suites® by Hilton, Hilton Garden Inn®, Hampton Inn® and Hampton Inn & Suites® trademarks are the property of Hilton Worldwide or one or more of its affiliates. For convenience, the applicable trademark or service mark symbol has been omitted but will be deemed to be included wherever the above referenced terms are used.
 
 
 

 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements

Apple REIT Six, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)

   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
   
(unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
of $201,724 and $185,860, respectively
  $ 735,536     $ 746,354  
Cash and cash equivalents
    0       32  
Restricted cash-furniture, fixtures and other escrows
    3,352       3,570  
Due from third party manager, net
    13,596       6,598  
Other assets, net
    3,110       2,811  
                 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 755,594     $ 759,365  
                 
LIABILITIES
               
Credit facility
  $ 55,045     $ 43,690  
Mortgage debt
    14,194       19,377  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    6,311       5,670  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
    75,550       68,737  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Preferred stock, authorized 15,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding
    0       0  
Series A preferred stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 91,219,408 and 91,181,198 shares, respectively
    0       0  
Series B convertible preferred stock, no par value, authorized 240,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 240,000 shares
    24       24  
Common stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 91,219,408 and 91,181,198 shares, respectively
    899,869       899,345  
Distributions greater than net income
    (219,849 )     (208,741 )
                 
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
    680,044       690,628  
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
  $ 755,594     $ 759,365  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
3

 
Apple REIT Six, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
   
Three months ended
   
Six months ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
                         
Revenues:
                       
Room revenue
  $ 62,189     $ 57,820     $ 116,107     $ 108,589  
Other revenue
    4,148       4,140       8,220       7,898  
Reimbursed expenses
    1,886       1,824       3,799       3,648  
Total revenue
    68,223       63,784       128,126       120,135  
                                 
Expenses:
                               
Operating expense
    16,195       15,521       31,478       29,889  
Hotel administrative expense
    5,047       4,831       9,974       9,530  
Sales and marketing
    5,345       4,959       10,075       9,376  
Utilities
    2,255       2,241       4,516       4,612  
Repair and maintenance
    2,812       2,745       5,603       5,367  
Franchise fees
    2,805       2,606       5,218       4,892  
Management fees
    2,288       2,109       4,232       3,933  
Taxes, insurance and other
    3,364       3,087       6,499       6,095  
General and administrative
    1,849       1,455       4,246       2,700  
Reimbursed expenses
    1,886       1,824       3,799       3,648  
Depreciation expense
    7,862       8,600       15,869       16,457  
Total expenses
    51,708       49,978       101,509       96,499  
                                 
Operating income
    16,515       13,806       26,617       23,636  
                                 
Interest expense, net
    (846 )     (1,068 )     (1,668 )     (1,957 )
                                 
Income from continuing operations
    15,669       12,738       24,949       21,679  
                                 
Income from discontinued operations
    0       156       0       671  
                                 
Net income
  $ 15,669     $ 12,894     $ 24,949     $ 22,350  
                                 
Basic and diluted net income per common share
                               
From continuing operations
  $ 0.17     $ 0.14     $ 0.27     $ 0.23  
From discontinued operations
    0       0       0       0.01  
Total basic and diluted net income per common share
  $ 0.17     $ 0.14     $ 0.27     $ 0.24  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding -
basic and diluted
    91,100       91,338       91,091       91,347  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
4

 
Apple REIT Six, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
 
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income
  $ 24,949     $ 22,350  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    15,869       16,457  
Amortization of deferred financing costs, fair value
   adjustments and other non-cash expenses, net
    169       309  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Increase in due from third party managers, net
    (6,998 )     (6,730 )
Increase in other assets
    (561 )     (888 )
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    1,027       26  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    34,455       31,524  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Capital improvements, net
    (5,371 )     (7,516 )
Proceeds from sale of assets, net
    0       10,755  
Net decrease in cash restricted for property improvements
    303       349  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (5,068 )     3,588  
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net proceeds from credit facility
    11,355       4,141  
Payments of mortgage debt
    (5,150 )     (4,333 )
Payments of financing costs related to borrowings
    0       (300 )
Net proceeds related to issuance of Units
    10,484       14,691  
Redemptions of Units
    (10,051 )     (14,161 )
Distributions paid to common shareholders
    (36,057 )     (35,150 )
Net cash used in financing activities
    (29,419 )     (35,112 )
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    (32 )     0  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    32       0  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 0     $ 0  
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
5

 
Apple REIT Six, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Apple REIT Six, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.  The Company was formed to invest in income-producing real estate in the United States.  Initial capitalization occurred on January 20, 2004 and operations began on May 28, 2004 when the Company acquired its first hotel. The Company concluded its best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) in March 2006. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.  The Company has no foreign operations or assets and its operating structure includes only one segment.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 66 hotels located in 18 states with an aggregate of 7,658 rooms.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Earnings per Common Share 

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 or 2011. As a result, basic and dilutive outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.
 
 
6

 
2.  Credit Facility

The Company has a $60 million unsecured credit facility with a commercial bank that is utilized for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. The Company refinanced the credit facility in September 2011 with its existing lender. The outstanding principal is required to be paid by the maturity date of September 8, 2013 and may be prepaid without penalty. Interest payments are due monthly and the interest rate is equal to the applicable LIBOR (the London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 3.5%. The credit facility also has an unused fee of 0.35% if the average outstanding quarterly balance is greater than $30 million and 0.5% if the average outstanding quarterly balance is less than $30 million. The outstanding balance on the credit facility as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $55.0 million and $43.7 million and its interest rate was 3.75% and 3.82%, respectively. The credit facility has two primary financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at June 30, 2012.

3.  Notes Payable

In June 2012, the Company retired the note payable secured by its Hampton Inn & Suites hotel in Glendale, Colorado which had an outstanding balance of $4.8 million when retired.

4.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of its debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit terms and credit characteristics which are Level 3 inputs. Market rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was approximately $69.2 million and $70.0 million. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $63.1 million and $64.0 million. The carrying value of the Company’s other financial instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

5.  Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties.  These transactions cannot be construed to be at arms length, and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties.  The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.
 
The Company is party to an advisory agreement with Apple Six Advisors, Inc. (“A6A”), pursuant to which A6A provides management services to the Company. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses, are payable for these services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled $1.3 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The increase is due to the Company reaching the top tier of the fee range under the advisory agreement. At June 30, 2012, $0.5 million of the 2012 advisory fee had not been paid and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
 
 
7

 
Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Apple Fund Management, LLC (“AFM”), the Company provides support services to Apple Six Realty Group (“A6RG”), Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), A6A, Apple Seven Advisors, Inc. (“A7A”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc. (“A8A”), Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple REIT Nine, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.  A7A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Seven, Inc. A8A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Eight, Inc. A9A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Nine, Inc. A10A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Ten, Inc. ASRG provides real estate brokerage services to Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse the Company for its costs in providing these services. A6RG, ASRG, A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A, and A10A are 100% owned by Glade Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company received reimbursement of its costs totaling $3.8 million and $3.6 million from the participating entities.  The Company’s net allocated cost for these support services was approximately $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.   As part of this arrangement, the day to day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the noted related parties.  To effectively manage cash disbursements, the individual companies may make payments for any or all of the related companies.  The amounts due to or from the related companies are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.
 
Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of personnel due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Amounts reimbursed to the Company include both compensation for personnel and “overhead” (office rent, utilities, benefits, office supplies, etc.) utilized by the companies. AFM receives its direction for staffing and compensation from the advisory companies (A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A, A10A, ASRG, and A6RG) each of which is wholly owned by Glade M Knight.  Since the employees of AFM may also perform services for the advisors, individuals, including executive officers, have received and may receive consideration directly from the advisors.  The allocation of costs is made by the management of the REITs and is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the REITs. In making the allocation, management and the Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to the Company’s level of business activity and the extent to which the Company requires the services of particular personnel. The costs allocated are actual costs and do not include any profit/markup for the Company. Such payments are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to each Company.
 
Including A6RG, A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A and A10A discussed above, Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.  Members of the Company’s Board of Directors are also on the boards of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.
 
Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is a 26% equity investment in Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”).  The other members of Apple Air are Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Through its equity investment the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for asset management and renovation purposes. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.6 million and $1.7 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $103,000 and $98,000 as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein.  The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting.  These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.  To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Companies (Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc., and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.).  The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services.
 
 
8

 
6.  Shareholders’ Equity

Unit Redemption Program

In July 2005, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to the lesser of: (1) the purchase price per Unit that the shareholder actually paid for the Unit; or (2) $11.00 per Unit. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since inception of the program through June 30, 2012, the Company has redeemed approximately 17.5 million Units representing $192.5 million, including 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.1 million and 1.3 million Units in the amount of $14.2 million redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the July 2011 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2011, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis.  Prior to July 2011, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests.  The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2011 and the first six months of 2012:

 
Redemption
Date
 
Requested Unit Redemptions
   
Units
Redeemed
   
Redemption Requests not
Redeemed
 
January 2011
    606,064       606,064       0  
April 2011
    683,427       683,427       0  
July 2011
    4,412,066       737,284       3,674,782  
October 2011
    9,878,351       726,613       9,151,738  
January 2012
    11,591,274       459,736       11,131,538  
April 2012
    11,168,887       455,124       10,713,763  

As noted in the table above, beginning with the July 2011 redemption, the total redemption requests exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and, as a result, the Board of Directors has and will continue to limit the amount of redemptions as it deems prudent.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

In February 2006, the Company instituted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan for its shareholders. The plan provides a way to increase shareholder investment in the Company by reinvesting dividends to purchase additional Units of the Company. The uses of the proceeds from this plan may include purchasing Units under the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, enhancing properties, satisfying financing obligations and other expenses, increasing working capital, funding various corporate operations, and acquiring hotels. The Company has registered 20 million Units for potential issuance under the plan.  During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, approximately 1.0 million Units, representing $10.5 million and 1.3 million Units, representing $14.7 million in proceeds to the Company, were issued under the plan. Since the inception of the plan through June 30, 2012, approximately 17.6 million Units, representing $194.0 million in proceeds to the Company, were issued under the plan.

Distributions

The Company’s annual distribution rate as of June 30, 2012 was $0.792 per common share, payable monthly. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company made distributions of $0.198 and $0.193 per common share for a total of $18.0 million and $17.6 million.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company made distributions of $0.396 and $0.385 per common share for a total of $36.1 million and $35.2 million.
 
 
9

 
7.  Legal Proceedings

The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (the “Company”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
 
On February 16, 2012, one shareholder of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., filed a putative class action lawsuit captioned Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-782-ERK-RER, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Glade M. Knight, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., David Lerner Associates, Inc., and certain executives of David Lerner Associates, Inc.  The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., or those who otherwise acquired these Units, asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, negligence, breach of written or implied contract (against the David Lerner Associates, Inc. defendants only), and for violation of New Jersey’s state securities laws.  On March 13, 2012, by order of the court, Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al. was consolidated into the In re Apple REITs Litigation.

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other Apple REIT Companies, served a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The Company and the other Apple REIT Companies accompanied their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint with a memorandum of law in support of their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. The briefing period for any motion to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple entities are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

8.  Discontinued Operations

The Company completed the sale of two hotels on June 6, 2011; therefore these properties had no results of operations in 2012. The results of operations for these properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 have been classified in the consolidated statements of operations in the line item income from discontinued operations.
 
 
10

 
The following table sets forth the components of income from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

   
Three months
   
Six months
 
   
ended
   
ended
 
   
June 30, 2011
   
June 30, 2011
 
             
Total revenue
  $ 563     $ 1,915  
Hotel operating expenses
    350       1,110  
Taxes, insurance and other
    57       134  
Depreciation expense
    0       0  
Income from discontinued operations
  $ 156     $ 671  

9.  Subsequent Events

In July 2012, the Company declared and paid approximately $6.0 million, or $0.066 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders, of which approximately $1.6 million or 149,000 Units were reinvested under the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
 
In July 2012, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 361,000 Units in the amount of $4.0 million.  As contemplated in the program, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis, whereby a percentage of each requested redemption was fulfilled at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. This redemption was approximately 3% of the total 12.5 million requested Units to be redeemed, with approximately 12.2 million requested Units not redeemed.

 
11


Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “goal,” “plan,” “should,” “will,” “predict,” “potential,” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to implement its acquisition strategy and operating strategy; the Company’s ability to manage planned growth; changes in economic cycles; the outcome of current and future litigation, regulatory proceedings, or inquiries; and competition within the real estate industry. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements included in the quarterly report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved. In addition, the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Readers should carefully review the Company’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
 
Overview

Apple REIT Six, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), was formed to invest in income-producing real estate in the United States. The Company was initially capitalized on January 20, 2004, with its first investor closing on April 23, 2004. The Company completed its best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) in March 2006. The Company has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 66 hotels within different markets in the United States. The Company’s first hotel was acquired on May 28, 2004.

Hotel Operations

Although hotel performance can be influenced by many factors including local competition, local and general economic conditions in the United States and the performance of individual managers assigned to each hotel, performance of the hotels as compared to other hotels within their respective local markets, in general, has met the Company’s expectations for the period owned. Beginning in 2011 and continuing through the first half of 2012, the hotel industry and Company’s revenues and operating income have shown improvement from the significant decline in the industry during 2008 through 2010. Although there is no way to predict future general economic conditions, the Company anticipates mid single digit revenue percentage increases for 2012 as compared to 2011. In evaluating financial condition and operating performance, the most important indicators on which the Company focuses are revenue measurements, such as average occupancy, average daily rate (“ADR”), revenue per available room (“RevPAR”), and market yield which compares an individual hotel’s results to others in its local market, and expenses, such as hotel operating expenses, general and administrative and other expenses described below.
 
 
12

 
The Company continually monitors the profitability of its properties and attempts to maximize shareholder value by timely disposal of properties. During the third quarter of 2010 the Company committed to sell two underperforming assets, the Tempe, Arizona TownePlace Suites and SpringHill Suites. The Company completed the sale of these two hotels in June 2011. The results of these properties have been included in discontinued operations for the period owned and are not included in the summary below. The following is a summary of the Company’s results from continuing operations:
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 (in thousands except statistical data)
 
2012
   
Percent of Revenue
   
2011
   
Percent of Revenue
   
Percent Change
   
2012
   
Percent of Revenue
   
2011
   
Percent of Revenue
   
Percent Change
 
                                                             
Total hotel revenue
  $ 66,337       100 %   $ 61,960       100 %     7 %   $ 124,327       100 %   $ 116,487       100 %     7 %
Hotel operating expenses
    36,747       55 %     35,012       57 %     5 %     71,096       57 %     67,599       58 %     5 %
Taxes, insurance and other expense
    3,364       5 %     3,087       5 %     9 %     6,499       5 %     6,095       5 %     7 %
General and administrative expense
    1,849       3 %     1,455       2 %     27 %     4,246       3 %     2,700       2 %     57 %
                                                                                 
Depreciation
    7,862               8,600               -9 %     15,869               16,457               -4 %
Interest expense, net
    846               1,068               -21 %     1,668               1,957               -15 %
                                                                                 
Number of hotels
    66               66               0 %     66               66               0 %
Average Market Yield (1)
    119               118               1 %     122               121               1 %
ADR
  $ 115             $ 111               4 %   $ 113             $ 109               4 %
Occupancy
    78 %             75 %             4 %     74 %             72 %             3 %
RevPAR
  $ 89             $ 83               7 %   $ 83             $ 78               6 %
Total rooms sold (2)
    538,575               518,954               4 %     1,021,754               989,550               3 %
Total rooms available (3)
    692,447               692,447               0 %     1,384,894               1,377,767               1 %
 
(1) Calculated from data provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®  Excludes hotels under renovation during the applicable periods.
(2) Represents the number of room nights sold during the period.
(3) Represents the number of rooms owned by the Company multiplied by the number of nights in the period.
 
Legal Proceedings

The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (the “Company”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.
 
 
13

 
On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

On February 16, 2012, one shareholder of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., filed a putative class action lawsuit captioned Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-782-ERK-RER, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Glade M. Knight, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., David Lerner Associates, Inc., and certain executives of David Lerner Associates, Inc.  The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., or those who otherwise acquired these Units, asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, negligence, breach of written or implied contract (against the David Lerner Associates, Inc. defendants only), and for violation of New Jersey’s state securities laws.  On March 13, 2012, by order of the court, Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al. was consolidated into the In re Apple REITs Litigation.

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other Apple REIT Companies, served a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The Company and the other Apple REIT Companies accompanied their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint with a memorandum of law in support of their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. The briefing period for any motion to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple entities are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

Hotels Owned
 
The following table summarizes the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each of the 66 hotels the Company owned at June 30, 2012.  All dollar amounts are in thousands.
 
City
 
State
 
Brand
 
Manager
 
Date Acquired
 
Rooms
   
Gross
Purchase
Price
 
Birmingham
 
Alabama
 
Fairfield Inn
 
LBA
 
8/25/05
  63     $ 2,176  
Dothan
 
Alabama
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
8/11/05
  78       8,016  
Dothan
 
Alabama
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
LBA
 
6/24/05
  85       8,673  
Huntsville
 
Alabama
 
Fairfield Inn
 
LBA
 
9/30/05
  79       4,954  
Huntsville
 
Alabama
 
Residence Inn
 
LBA
 
6/24/05
  78       8,288  
Montgomery
 
Alabama
 
SpringHill Suites
 
LBA
 
9/30/05
  79       6,835  
Tuscaloosa
 
Alabama
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
8/25/05
  78       7,551  
Tuscaloosa
 
Alabama
 
Fairfield Inn
 
LBA
 
8/25/05
  63       3,982  
Anchorage
 
Alaska
 
Hampton Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
3/14/05
  101       11,500  
Anchorage
 
Alaska
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  125       18,900  
Anchorage
 
Alaska
 
Homewood Suites
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  122       13,200  
Phoenix
 
Arizona
 
Hampton Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  99       6,700  
 
 
14

 
Arcadia
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  124       12,000  
Arcadia
 
California
 
SpringHill Suites
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  86       8,100  
Bakersfield
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Hilton
 
3/18/05
  120       11,500  
Folsom
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
11/30/05
  100       18,028  
Foothill Ranch
 
California
 
Hampton Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
4/21/05
  84       7,400  
Lake Forest
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  103       11,400  
Milpitas
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
11/30/05
  161       18,600  
Roseville
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
11/30/05
  131       20,759  
San Francisco
 
California
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
White
 
1/30/06
  169       12,266  
Boulder
 
Colorado
 
Marriott
 
White
 
5/9/05
  157       30,000  
Glendale
 
Colorado
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  133       14,700  
Lakewood
 
Colorado
 
Hampton Inn
 
Stonebridge
 
10/12/04
  170       10,600  
Farmington
 
Connecticut
 
Courtyard
 
White
 
10/20/05
  119       16,330  
Rocky Hill
 
Connecticut
 
Residence Inn
 
White
 
8/1/05
  96       12,070  
Wallingford
 
Connecticut
 
Homewood Suites
 
White
 
7/8/05
  104       12,780  
Clearwater
 
Florida
 
SpringHill Suites
 
LBA
 
2/17/06
  79       6,923  
Lake Mary
 
Florida
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
3/18/05
  86       6,000  
Lakeland
 
Florida
 
Residence Inn
 
LBA
 
6/24/05
  78       9,886  
Orange Park
 
Florida
 
Fairfield Inn
 
LBA
 
11/8/05
  83       7,221  
Panama City
 
Florida
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
4/26/06
  84       9,245  
Pensacola
 
Florida
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
8/25/05
  90       11,369  
Pensacola
 
Florida
 
Fairfield Inn
 
LBA
 
8/25/05
  63       4,858  
Pensacola
 
Florida
 
Hampton Inn & Suites
 
LBA
 
7/21/05
  85       9,279  
Tallahassee
 
Florida
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Hilton
 
3/18/05
  99       10,850  
Albany
 
Georgia
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
6/24/05
  84       8,597  
Columbus
 
Georgia
 
Residence Inn
 
LBA
 
6/24/05
  78       7,888  
Savannah
 
Georgia
 
SpringHill Suites
 
LBA
 
9/30/05
  79       5,407  
Valdosta
 
Georgia
 
Courtyard
 
LBA
 
10/3/05
  84       8,284  
Mt. Olive
 
New Jersey
 
Residence Inn
 
White
 
9/15/05
  123       12,070  
Somerset
 
New Jersey
 
Homewood Suites
 
White
 
8/17/05
  123       17,750  
Saratoga Springs
 
New York
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
White
 
9/29/05
  112       17,750  
Roanoke Rapids
 
North Carolina
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Newport
 
3/10/08
  147       17,764  
Hillsboro
 
Oregon
 
Courtyard
 
Inn Ventures
 
3/9/06
  155       11,000  
Hillsboro
 
Oregon
 
Residence Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
3/9/06
  122       15,500  
Hillsboro
 
Oregon
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Inn Ventures
 
12/19/05
  136       11,500  
Portland
 
Oregon
 
Residence Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
12/19/05
  258       42,000  
Pittsburgh
 
Pennsylvania
 
Residence Inn
 
White
 
9/2/05
  156       11,000  
Myrtle Beach
 
South Carolina
 
Courtyard
 
Marriott
 
6/8/04
  135       9,200  
Nashville
 
Tennessee
 
Homewood Suites
 
Hilton
 
5/24/05
  121       8,103  
Arlington
 
Texas
 
SpringHill Suites
 
Western
 
6/30/05
  122       7,486  
Arlington
 
Texas
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Western
 
6/30/05
  95       7,148  
Dallas
 
Texas
 
SpringHill Suites
 
Western
 
12/9/05
  148       19,500  
Ft. Worth
 
Texas
 
Homewood Suites
 
Hilton
 
5/24/05
  137       9,097  
Ft. Worth
 
Texas
 
Residence Inn
 
Western
 
5/6/05
  149       17,000  
Ft. Worth
 
Texas
 
SpringHill Suites
 
Marriott
 
5/28/04
  145       13,340  
Laredo
 
Texas
 
Homewood Suites
 
Western
 
11/30/05
  106       10,500  
Laredo
 
Texas
 
Residence Inn
 
Western
 
9/12/05
  109       11,445  
Las Colinas
 
Texas
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Western
 
6/30/05
  136       7,178  
McAllen
 
Texas
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Western
 
7/19/05
  104       9,000  
Fredericksburg
 
Virginia
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Hilton
 
12/20/05
  148       16,600  
Kent
 
Washington
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Inn Ventures
 
12/19/05
  152       12,000  
Mukilteo
 
Washington
 
TownePlace Suites
 
Inn Ventures
 
12/19/05
  128       12,000  
Redmond
 
Washington
 
Marriott
 
Marriott
 
7/7/04
  262       64,000  
Renton
 
Washington
 
Hilton Garden Inn
 
Inn Ventures
 
11/30/05
  150       16,096  
                               
               
Total    
  7,658     $ 829,142  
 
 
15

 
Results of Operations

As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 66 hotels with 7,658 rooms. The Company’s portfolio reflects the sale of two Tempe, Arizona properties in June 2011. Hotel performance is impacted by many factors, including the economic conditions in the United States, as well as each locality. During the period from the second half of 2008 through 2010, the overall weakness in the U.S. economy had a considerable negative impact on both consumer and business travel. As a result, hotel revenue in most markets in the United States declined from levels of 2007 and the first half of 2008. However, economic conditions have shown evidence of improvement in 2011 and the first half of 2012. Although the Company expects continued improvements in 2012, it is not anticipated that revenue and operating income will completely return to pre-recession levels in 2012. The Company’s hotels in general have shown results consistent with industry and brand averages for the period of ownership.

     Revenues

The Company’s principal source of revenue is hotel revenue, consisting of room and other related revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had total hotel revenue from continuing operations of $66.3 million and $62.0 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had total hotel revenue from continuing operations of $124.3 million and $116.5 million.  For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the hotels achieved average occupancy of 78% and 75%, ADR of $115 and $111 and RevPAR of $89 and $83.   For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the hotels achieved average occupancy of 74% and 72%, ADR of $113 and $109 and RevPAR of $83 and $78.  ADR is calculated as room revenue divided by the number of rooms sold, and RevPAR is calculated as occupancy multiplied by ADR.
 
 Since the beginning of 2010 and continuing into 2012, the Company has experienced an increase in demand, as demonstrated by the improvement in average occupancy. In addition, also signifying a stabilizing economy, the Company experienced an increase in ADR of 4% during both the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the second quarter of 2011 and for the first half of 2012 as compared to the first half of 2011. With continued demand and room rate improvement, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid single digit percentage increase in revenue for 2012 as compared to 2011. While reflecting the impact of post-recessionary levels of single-digit growth in national economic activity, the Company’s hotels also continue to be leaders in their respective markets. The Company’s average Market Yield for the first six months of 2012 and 2011 was 122 and 121, respectively. The Market Yield is a measure of each hotel’s RevPAR compared to the average in the market; with 100 being the average (the index excludes hotels under renovation) and is provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc. ®, an independent company that tracks historical hotel performance in most markets throughout the world. The Company will continue to pursue market opportunities to improve revenue.

     Expenses

Hotel operating expenses consist of direct room expense, hotel administrative expense, sales and marketing expense, utilities expense, repair and maintenance expense, franchise fees and management fees.  For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, hotel operating expenses from continuing operations totaled $36.7 million and $35.0 million, respectively, representing 55% and 57% of total hotel revenue.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, hotel operating expenses from continuing operations totaled $71.1 million and $67.6 million, respectively, representing 57% and 58% of total hotel revenue.  Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 reflect the impact of modest increases in revenues and occupancy at most of the Company’s hotels, and the Company’s efforts to control costs. Certain operating costs such as management costs, certain utility costs and minimum supply and maintenance costs are relatively fixed in nature. The Company has been successful in reducing, relative to revenue increases, certain labor costs, hotel supply costs, maintenance costs and utilities by continually monitoring and sharing utilization data across its hotels and management companies. Although operating expenses will increase as occupancy and revenue increases, the Company has and will continue to work with its management companies to reduce costs as a percentage of revenue where possible while maintaining quality and service levels at each property.
 
 
16

 
Taxes, insurance, and other expenses from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $3.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively, or 5% of total hotel revenue.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, taxes, insurance, and other expenses from continuing operations totaled $6.5 million and $6.1 million, respectively, or 5% of total hotel revenue. Although the first half of 2012 included the benefit of successful appeals, property taxes will likely increase for the full year of 2012 if the economy continues to improve and localities reassess property values accordingly. Also, 2012 insurance rates have increased due to property and casualty carriers’ losses world-wide in the past year.
 
General and administrative expense from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1.8 million and $1.5 million, or 3% and 2% of total hotel revenue.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, general and administrative expense from continuing operations was $4.2 million and $2.7 million, or 3% and 2% of total hotel revenue. The principal components of general and administrative expense are advisory fees and reimbursable expenses, legal fees, accounting fees, the Company’s share of the loss in its investment in Apple Air Holding, LLC, and reporting expenses. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred approximately $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in legal costs, an increase over prior year due to the legal matters discussed herein and continued costs related to responding to staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures in the Company’s filings with the SEC beginning in 2008, as well as the Company’s review of certain transactions involving the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies. We intend to continue to cooperate with the SEC staff, and are engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning these issues and the roles of certain officers. We do not believe the issues raised by the SEC staff affect the material accuracy of the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this investigation as to the Company or any of its officers, nor can we predict the timing associated with any such conclusion or resolution. The Company anticipates it will continue to incur significant legal costs for at least the remainder of 2012 related to these matters. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company began to incur costs associated with its evaluation of a potential consolidation transaction with Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.  Total costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2012 were approximately $0.8 million.  In May 2012, it was determined by the Board of Directors of the Company and each of the other Apple REIT’s Board of Directors not to move forward with the potential consolidation transaction at that time.
 
Depreciation expense from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $7.9 million and $8.6 million, and $15.9 million and $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Depreciation expense represents the expense of the 66 hotels included in the Company’s continuing operations and related personal property for the respective periods owned. The decrease in depreciation expense is due to an increase in the number of hotels whose personal property has become fully depreciated over the second half of 2011 and first half of 2012.

Interest expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $0.8 million and $1.1 million.  Interest expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, was $1.7 million and $2.0 million. Interest expense primarily arose from mortgage debt outstanding on certain properties acquired, in addition to interest on borrowings under the Company’s credit facility. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had debt outstanding of $69.2 million compared to $63.5 million at June 30, 2011. Interest expense decreased from 2011 due to a reduction in mortgage debt and a reduction in the effective interest rate under the Company’s credit facility. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in the Company’s outstanding balance under its credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company capitalized interest of approximately $45,000 and $164,000 in conjunction with hotel renovations.

Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties.  These transactions cannot be construed to be at arms length, and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties.  The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.
 
 
17

 
The Company is party to an advisory agreement with Apple Six Advisors, Inc. (“A6A”), pursuant to which A6A provides management services to the Company. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses, are payable for these services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled $1.3 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The increase is due to the Company reaching the top tier of the fee range under the advisory agreement. At June 30, 2012, $0.5 million of the 2012 advisory fee had not been paid and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
 
Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Apple Fund Management, LLC (“AFM”), the Company provides support services to Apple Six Realty Group (“A6RG”), Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), A6A, Apple Seven Advisors, Inc. (“A7A”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc. (“A8A”), Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple REIT Nine, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.  A7A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Seven, Inc. A8A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Eight, Inc. A9A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Nine, Inc. A10A provides day to day advisory and administrative functions for Apple REIT Ten, Inc. ASRG provides real estate brokerage services to Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse the Company for its costs in providing these services. A6RG, ASRG, A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A, and A10A are 100% owned by Glade Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company received reimbursement of its costs totaling $3.8 million and $3.6 million from the participating entities.  The Company’s net allocated cost for these support services was approximately $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.   As part of this arrangement, the day to day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the noted related parties.  To effectively manage cash disbursements, the individual companies may make payments for any or all of the related companies.  The amounts due to or from the related companies are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.
 
Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of personnel due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Amounts reimbursed to the Company include both compensation for personnel and “overhead” (office rent, utilities, benefits, office supplies, etc.) utilized by the companies. AFM receives its direction for staffing and compensation from the advisory companies (A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A, A10A, ASRG, and A6RG) each of which is wholly owned by Glade M Knight.  Since the employees of AFM may also perform services for the advisors, individuals, including executive officers, have received and may receive consideration directly from the advisors.  The allocation of costs is made by the management of the REITs and is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the REITs. In making the allocation, management and the Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to the Company’s level of business activity and the extent to which the Company requires the services of particular personnel. The costs allocated are actual costs and do not include any profit/markup for the Company. Such payments are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to each Company.
 
Including A6RG, A6A, A7A, A8A, A9A and A10A discussed above, Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.  Members of the Company’s Board of Directors are also on the boards of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.
 
 
18

 
Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is a 26% equity investment in Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”).  The other members of Apple Air are Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Through its equity investment the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for asset management and renovation purposes. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.6 million and $1.7 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $103,000 and $98,000 as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein.  The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting.  These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.  To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Companies (Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc., and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.).  The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The Company has a $60 million unsecured credit facility with a commercial bank, that is utilized for working capital, hotel renovations, and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. The Company refinanced the credit facility in September 2011 with its existing lender. The outstanding principal is required to be paid by the maturity date of September 8, 2013 and may be prepaid without penalty. Interest payments are due monthly and the applicable interest rate is equal to the applicable LIBOR (the London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 3.5%. With the availability of this credit facility, the Company maintains little cash on hand, accessing the facility as necessary. As a result, cash on hand was $0 at June 30, 2012. The outstanding balance on the credit facility as of June 30, 2012 was $55.0 million and its interest rate was 3.75%. The credit facility has two primary financial covenants, which are: a) at the end of each calendar quarter, the shareholder payout ratio, as defined in the loan documents, cannot exceed the Company’s funds from operations for the immediately preceding twelve month period, which is 105% through December 31, 2012 and 100% thereafter, and b) the Company must maintain a minimum net worth, as defined in the loan documents, greater than $500 million at all times. The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at June 30, 2012.
 
Operating cash flow from the properties owned and the $60 million credit facility are the Company’s principal sources of liquidity. The Company anticipates that cash flow from operations and the credit facility will be adequate to meet its anticipated liquidity requirements, including debt service, capital improvements, required distributions to shareholders (the Company is not required to make distributions at its current rate for REIT purposes), and planned Unit redemptions. The Company intends to maintain a relatively stable distribution rate with varying economic cycles. If cash flow from operations and the credit facility are not adequate to meet liquidity requirements, the Company will attempt if necessary to utilize additional financing to achieve this objective. Although the Company has relatively low levels of debt, there can be no assurances it will be successful with this strategy and may need to reduce its distributions to required levels. If the Company were unable to refinance its maturing debt in future periods or if it were to default on its debt, it may be unable to make distributions or redemptions. The Company’s bylaws require board approval and review of any debt financing obtained by the Company.
 
To maintain its REIT status the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary income. The Company’s objective in setting a distribution rate is to project a rate that will provide consistency over the life of the Company, taking into account acquisitions and capital improvements, ramp up of new properties and varying economic cycles. Distributions in the first six months of 2012 totaled $36.1 million and were paid monthly at a rate of $0.066 per common share. For the same period the Company’s cash generated from operations was $34.5 million. The shortfall includes a return of capital and was funded primarily by borrowings on the credit facility. The Company intends to continue paying distributions on a monthly basis. However, since there can be no assurance of the ability of the Company’s properties to provide income at this level, there can be no assurance as to the classification or duration of distributions at the current rate.  The Board of Directors monitors the Company’s distribution rate relative to the performance of the hotels on an ongoing basis and may make adjustments to the distribution rate as determined to be prudent in relation to other cash requirements of the Company.
 
 
19

 
The Company has on-going capital commitments to fund its capital improvements. The Company is required, under all of the hotel management agreements and under certain loan agreements, to make available, for the repair, replacement and refurbishing of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, a percentage of gross revenues provided that such amount may be used for the Company’s capital expenditures with respect to the hotels. The Company expects that this amount will be adequate to fund required repair, replacement, and refurbishments and to maintain the Company’s hotels in a competitive condition. The Company invested approximately $5.4 million in capital expenditures during the first six months of 2012. The Company anticipates total capital expenditures of approximately $16 million to $20 million for the full year of 2012 in connection with renovations and brand initiatives. The Company currently does not have any existing or planned projects for new development.

In July 2005, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to the lesser of: (1) the purchase price per Unit that the shareholder actually paid for the Unit; or (2) $11.00 per Unit. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since inception of the program through June 30, 2012, the Company has redeemed approximately 17.5 million Units representing $192.5 million, including 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.1 million and 1.3 million Units in the amount of $14.2 million redeemed during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the July 2011 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2011, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis.  Prior to July 2011, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests.  The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2011 and the first half of 2012:
 
 
Redemption
Date
 
Requested Unit Redemptions
   
Units
Redeemed
   
Redemption Requests not
Redeemed
 
January 2011
    606,064       606,064       0  
April 2011
    683,427       683,427       0  
July 2011
    4,412,066       737,284       3,674,782  
October 2011
    9,878,351       726,613       9,151,738  
January 2012
    11,591,274       459,736       11,131,538  
April 2012
    11,168,887       455,124       10,713,763  

As noted in the table above, beginning with the July 2011 redemption, the total redemption requests exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and, as a result, the Board of Directors has and will continue to limit the amount of redemptions as it deems prudent. Currently, the Company plans to redeem under its Unit Redemption Program approximately 2% of weighted average Units during 2012.

In February 2006, the Company instituted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan for its shareholders. The plan provides a way to increase shareholder investment in the Company by reinvesting dividends to purchase additional Units of the Company. The uses of the proceeds from this plan may include purchasing Units under the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, enhancing properties, satisfying financing obligations and other expenses, increasing working capital, funding various corporate operations, and acquiring hotels. The Company has registered 20 million Units for potential issuance under the plan.  As of June 30, 2012, approximately 17.6 million Units, representing $194.0 million in proceeds to the Company, have been issued under the plan, including 1.0 million Units and 1.3 million Units, representing $10.5 million and $14.7 million in proceeds to the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
 
20

 
Impact of Inflation

Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. Competitive pressures may, however, limit the operators’ ability to raise room rates. Currently the Company is not experiencing any material impact from inflation.

Business Interruption

Being in the real estate industry, the Company is exposed to natural disasters on both a local and national scale. Although management believes there is adequate insurance to cover this exposure, there can be no assurance that such events will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Seasonality
 
The hotel industry historically has been seasonal in nature. Seasonal variations in occupancy at the Company’s hotels may cause quarterly fluctuations in its revenues. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenue, the Company expects to utilize cash on hand or, if necessary, any available other financing sources to make distributions.

Subsequent Events

In July 2012, the Company declared and paid approximately $6.0 million, or $0.066 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders, of which approximately $1.6 million or 149,000 Units were reinvested under the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
 
In July 2012, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 361,000 Units in the amount of $4.0 million.  As contemplated in the program, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis, whereby a percentage of each requested redemption was fulfilled at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. This redemption was approximately 3% of the total 12.5 million requested Units to be redeemed, with approximately 12.2 million requested Units not redeemed.
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The Company does not engage in transactions in derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk. The Company will be exposed to interest rate risk due to possible changes in short term interest rates as it invests its cash, or borrows on its credit facility. Based on the balance of the Company’s credit facility at June 30, 2012 of $55.0 million, every 100 basis points change in interest rates could impact the Company’s annual net income by $550,000, all other factors remaining the same. The Company’s cash balance at June 30, 2012 was $0.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012.  There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
21

 
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 The term the “Apple REIT Companies” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (the “Company”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., Apple REIT Nine, Inc. and Apple REIT Ten, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Companies, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The consolidated complaint also asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.
 
On February 16, 2012, one shareholder of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., filed a putative class action lawsuit captioned Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:12-cv-782-ERK-RER, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Glade M. Knight, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., David Lerner Associates, Inc., and certain executives of David Lerner Associates, Inc.  The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units of the Company and Apple REIT Seven, Inc., or those who otherwise acquired these Units, asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, negligence, breach of written or implied contract (against the David Lerner Associates, Inc. defendants only), and for violation of New Jersey’s state securities laws.  On March 13, 2012, by order of the court, Laurie Brody v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al. was consolidated into the In re Apple REITs Litigation.

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other Apple REIT Companies, served a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. The Company and the other Apple REIT Companies accompanied their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint with a memorandum of law in support of their motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. The briefing period for any motion to dismiss was completed on July 13, 2012.

The Company believes that any claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple entities are without merit, and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

 
22

 
Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Unit Redemption Program

In July 2005, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to the lesser of: (1) the purchase price per Unit that the shareholder actually paid for the Unit; or (2) $11.00 per Unit.  The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. As noted below, during 2011 and the first half of 2012, the total redemption requests exceeded the authorized amount of redemptions and the Board of Directors has and will continue to limit the amount of redemptions as it deems prudent.

Since inception of the program through June 30, 2012, the Company has redeemed approximately 17.5 million Units representing $192.5 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 the Company redeemed approximately 0.9 million Units in the amount of $10.1 million. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the July 2011 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis with approximately 17% of the amount requested redeemed in the third quarter of 2011, approximately 7% of the amount requested redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2011, approximately 4% of the amount requested redeemed in January 2012, and approximately 4% of the amount requested redeemed in April 2012 (the last scheduled redemption date during the three months ended June 30, 2012), leaving approximately 10.7 million Units requested but not redeemed. Prior to July 2011, the Company had redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The Company has a number of cash sources including cash from operations, dividend reinvestment plan proceeds, borrowings under its credit facilities and asset sales from which it can make redemptions. See the Company’s complete consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 in the Company’s interim financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further description of the sources and uses of the Company’s cash flows. The following is a summary of redemptions during the second quarter of 2012 (no redemptions occurred in May and June 2012):
 
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
   
(a)
   
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
 
Period
 
Total Number of Units Purchased
   
Average Price Paid per Unit
   
Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
   
Maximum Number of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
April 2012
    455,124     $ 10.98       455,124         (1)

(1) The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any 12 month period is limited to up to five percent (5.0%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding from the beginning of the 12 month period, subject to the Company’s right to change the number of Units to be redeemed.


 
23

 
Item 6.   Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Documents
   
   
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-112169) effective April 23, 2004)
   
3.2
Bylaws of the Registrant.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-112169) effective June 14, 2005)
   
31.1
   
31.2
   
32.1
 
101
The following materials from Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail (FURNISHED HEREWITH)
   
   
   


 
24

 


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
         
APPLE REIT SIX, INC.
   
         
By:
/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT
   
Date: August 13, 2012
 
Glade M. Knight,
     
 
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
         
By:
/s/    BRYAN PEERY
   
Date: August 13, 2012
 
Bryan Peery,
     
 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
     
 
 
 
25