Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - CHAUS BERNARD INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - CHAUS BERNARD INCd353017dex322.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) - CHAUS BERNARD INCd353017dex311.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE13A-14(A) - CHAUS BERNARD INCd353017dex312.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 - CHAUS BERNARD INCd353017dex321.htm
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

x     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012.

OR

¨     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO  SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission file number 1-9169

BERNARD CHAUS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

New York   13-2807386
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. employer identification number)
530 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York   10018
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(212) 354-1280

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes x  No¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any , every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

¨

 

Large accelerated filer

 

¨

  

Accelerated filer

¨

 

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

x

  

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨  No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Date

  

Class

  

Shares Outstanding

May 15, 2012    Common Stock, $0.01 par value    37,481,373


Table of Contents

INDEX

 

PART I        

  FINANCIAL INFORMATION   

Item 1.

  Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)      PAGE   
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012,

July 2, 2011 and April 2, 2011

     3   
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the

Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011

     4   
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011

     5   
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements      6   

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial

Condition and Results of Operations

     13   

Item 4.

  Controls and Procedures      19   

PART II

  OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1.

  Legal Proceedings      20   

Item 2.

  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds      20   

Item 3.

  Defaults Upon Senior Securities      20   

Item 4.

  [Removed and Reserved]      20   

Item 5.

  Other Information      20   

Item 6.

  Exhibits      21   

SIGNATURES

     22   

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)

xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx
     March 31,
2012
     July 2,
2011
     April 2,
2011
 
     (Unaudited)      ( * )      (Unaudited)  

Assets

        

Current Assets

        

Cash

     $ 3            $ 3            $ 3      

Accounts receivable – factored

     17,923            6,466            14,467      

Accounts receivable – net

     1,375            1,004            1,648      

Inventories – net

     7,100            5,077            5,235      

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     243            1,476            1,356      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total current assets

     26,644            14,026            22,709      

Fixed assets – net

     1,714            1,159            936      

Other assets

     -              -              3      

Trademarks

     1,000            1,000            1,000      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

     $ 29,358            $ 16,185            $ 24,648      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency

        

Current Liabilities

        

Revolving credit borrowings

     $ 7,517            $ 2,577            $ 9,966      

Accounts payable

     20,191            20,605            19,067      

Accrued expenses

     3,694            1,473            1,158      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     31,402            24,655            30,191      

Notes payable – related party

     12,000            -              -        

Deferred income

     2,534            2,834            2,934      

Other long term liabilities

     1,986            1,927            1,851      

Deferred income taxes

     220            200            193      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     48,142            29,616            35,169      

Commitments and Contingencies

        

Stockholders’ Deficiency

        

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized shares – 1,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – none

     —              —              —        

Common stock, $.01 par value,

authorized shares – 50,000,000; issued shares – 37,543,643 at March 31, 2012, July 2, 2011 and April 2, 2011

     375            375            375      

Additional paid-in capital

     133,443            133,443            133,440      

Deficit

     (150,037)           (144,684)           (141,516)     

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (1,085)           (1,085)           (1,040)     

Less: Treasury stock at cost –

62,270 shares at March 31, 2012 and July 2, 2011 and 3,062,270 at April 2, 2011

     (1,480)           (1,480)           (1,780)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ deficiency

     (18,784)           (13,431)           (10,521)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency

     $ 29,358            $ 16,185            $ 24,648      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(*) Derived from audited financial statements at July 2, 2011.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

     For the Three Months Ended     For the Nine Months Ended  
     March
31, 2012
    April
2, 2011
    March
31, 2012
    April
2, 2011
 
     (Unaudited)  

Net revenue

   $ 27,467      $ 23,260      $ 65,540      $ 67,885   

Cost of goods sold

     20,528        18,812        48,917        54,790   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     6,939        4,448        16,623        13,095   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     8,166        6,956        20,750        21,262   

Merger related costs

     415        -          782        -     

Accrued gain on early termination of license agreement

     -          (1,165     -          (4,055
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from operations

     (1,642     (1,343     (4,909     (4,112

Interest expense

     223        163        418        541   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income tax provision

     (1,865     (1,506     (5,327     (4,653

Income tax provision

     8        12        26        36   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (1,873   $ (1,518   $ (5,353   $ (4,689
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic loss per share

   $ (0.05   $ (0.04   $ (0.14   $ (0.13
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted loss per share

   $ (0.05   $ (0.04   $ (0.14   $ (0.13
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding- basic

     37,481,000        34,514,000        37,481,000        36,492,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding- diluted

     37,481,000        34,514,000        37,481,000        36,492,000   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx
     For the Nine Months Ended  
     March 31,
2012
     April 2,
2011
 
     (Unaudited)  

Operating Activities

     

Net loss

     $ (5,353)           $ (4,689)     

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

     

Depreciation and amortization

     299            275      

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

     37            -        

Amortization of deferred income

     (300)           (300)     

Deferred rent expense

     44            78      

Deferred income taxes

     20            20      

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

     

Accounts receivable–factored

     (11,457)           4,937      

Accounts receivable

     (371)           141      

Inventories

     (2,023)           3,611      

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     1,233            (820)     

Accounts payable

     11,586            (332)     

Accrued expenses and other long term liabilities

     2,236            (1,109)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     (4,049)           1,812      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Investing Activities

     

Purchases of fixed assets

     (891)           (304)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash used in investing activities

     (891)           (304)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Financing Activities

     

Net proceeds from (repayments of) revolving credit borrowings

     4,940            (1,209)     

Purchase of treasury stock

     —              (600)     

Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock

     —              300      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     4,940            (1,509)     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Decrease in cash

     —              (1)     

Cash, beginning of year

     3            4      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash, end of period

     $ 3            $ 3      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

     

Cash paid for:

     

Taxes

     $ 4            $ 13      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest

     $ 335            $ 499      
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

In January 2012, the Company converted $12 million of accounts payable into two notes payable (see Note 4).

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011

1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business:

Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the “Company” or “Chaus”) designs, arranges for the manufacture of and markets an extensive range of women’s career and casual sportswear principally under the VINCE CAMUTO®, JOSEPHINE CHAUS®, JOSEPHINE®, JOSEPHINE STUDIO®, CHAUS®, CHAUS SPORT®, CYNTHIA STEFFE®, SEAMLINE CYNTHIA STEFFE® and CYNTHIA CYNTHIA STEFFE® trademarks and under private label brand names. The Company’s products are sold nationwide through department store chains, specialty retailers, discount stores, wholesale clubs and other retail outlets. The Company’s CHAUS product lines sold through the department store channels are in the opening price points of the “better” category. The Company’s CYNTHIA STEFFE product lines are upscale contemporary women’s apparel lines sold through department stores and specialty stores. The Company’s private label product lines are designed and sold to various customers. On November 18, 2010, the Company entered into a trademark license agreement (“Camuto License Agreement”) with Camuto Consulting, Inc. d/b/a Camuto Group (“Camuto”). This agreement grants the Company an exclusive license to design, manufacture, sell and distribute women’s sportswear and ready-to-wear apparel under the trademark VINCE CAMUTO® in approved department stores, specialty retailers and off-price channels in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The Company began shipping Camuto licensed products in June 2011.

The Company had a license agreement (the “KCP License Agreement”) with Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (“KCP”) to manufacture and sell women’s sportswear under various labels. On October 19, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with KCP (the “KCP Termination Agreement”) pursuant to which the KCP License Agreement terminated on June 1, 2011.

Recent Developments:

On April 3, 2012, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Camuto, Camuto Merger Sub, Inc., a New York corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Camuto (“Investor Newco”), Josephine Chaus, the Company’s chief executive officer and chairwoman, and certain family members and entities associated with Mrs. Chaus (collectively, the “Family Shareholders”), and BC Family Merger Corp., a New York corporation beneficially owned by the Family Shareholders (“Family Newco”), providing for the merger (the “Merger”) of Investor Newco and Family Newco with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger. The Merger Agreement was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), acting upon the unanimous recommendation of the special committee composed of independent directors of the Board.

Prior to the Merger, the Family Shareholders will contribute all of their shares of Company common stock to Family Newco in exchange for shares of Family Newco, and Camuto will contribute all of its shares of Company common stock to Investor Newco in exchange for shares of Investor Newco. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of Company common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares owned by (i) Family Newco and Investor Newco or (ii) shareholders who have properly exercised and perfected appraisal rights under New York law) will be converted automatically into the right to receive $0.21 in cash (the “Per Share Merger Consideration”), without interest. Each share of Family Newco and Investor Newco will be converted into one share of Company common stock. As a result of the Merger, all of the shares of the common stock of the Company will be owned by the Family Shareholders and Camuto, and the other shareholders of the Company immediately prior to the Merger will be entitled to receive the Per Share Merger Consideration. More information can be found in the Form 8-K filed by the Company on April 5, 2012.

 

6


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

The Merger must be approved by 2/3 of the Company’s shareholders. The Company plans to call a special meeting of the shareholders to vote on the proposed Merger, and has filed the preliminary proxy statement on April 13, 2012.

On September 29, 2011, the Company was served with a summons and complaint in connection with a purported shareholder class action lawsuit relating to Camuto’s merger proposal. The lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties by certain current and prior directors of the Company. On April 3, 2012, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with Kenneth Braun, the Plaintiff in the putative class action, and with Dr. Barry Berkowitz, the owner of 4,688,591 shares of Company common stock, providing for the litigation to be settled with prejudice and for Dr. Berkowitz to support the Merger, so long as it has the approval of the Board. The memorandum of understanding is, among other things, subject to court approval and is attached as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on April 5, 2012.

In January 2012, the Company negotiated and signed a Debt Restructuring Agreement with an affiliate of China Ting Group Holdings Limited (“CTG”), a supplier and stockholder of the Company, to convert approximately $12 million of debt owed by the Company to CTG from accounts payable into a new interest-bearing debt obligation memorialized by two notes payable (see Note 4).

The Merger has not yet been approved by the shareholders of the Company. There is no assurance that any transactions or agreements contemplated by the Merger Agreement will take place or be entered into by the Company. In addition, the memorandum of understanding with Kenneth Braun and Barry Berkowitz has not yet been approved by the court, and therefore the Company cannot ensure settlement of the pending litigation or the terms of any such settlement.

Liquidity:

For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company realized losses from operations of $5.4 million and as of March 31, 2012 had a working capital deficit of $4.8 million and stockholders’ deficiency of $18.8 million. The Company’s business plan requires the availability of sufficient cash flow and borrowing capacity to finance its product lines and to meet its cash needs. The Company expects to satisfy such requirements through cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings from its lender. The Company’s fiscal 2012 business plan anticipates improvement from fiscal 2011, primarily by achieving increased revenues and improved gross margin percentages. The Company’s ability to achieve its fiscal 2012 business plan is critical to maintaining adequate liquidity. The Company relies on CIT, the sole source of its external financing, to borrow money in order to fund its operations. Should CIT cease funding its operations, the Company may not have sufficient cash flow from operations to meet its liquidity needs. In addition, CTG manufactures the majority of the Company’s product on favorable payment terms. In the event CTG terminates the supply agreement with the Company or requires a change in the favorable payment terms, the Company may be unable to locate alternative suppliers in a timely manner or obtain similarly favorable payment terms. For the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011, the KCP License Agreement accounted for approximately 54% of the Company’s revenues, and this agreement terminated on June 1, 2011. While the Company entered into the Camuto License Agreement, there can be no assurance that it will be able to derive revenue from this agreement sufficient to offset the loss in revenue resulting from the termination of the KCP License Agreement. There could be a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, liquidity and financial condition should any of the following occur: a) CIT ceases its funding of the Company’s operations, b) CTG terminates its supply agreement with the Company or requires a change in the favorable payment terms, or c) the Company fails to offset the revenue lost as a result of the termination of the KCP License Agreement.

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that

 

7


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2012 or any other period. The balance sheet as of July 2, 2011 is based on the audited financial statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011.

Fiscal Year:

The Company reports on a fifty-two/fifty-three week fiscal year-end. The three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011 each contained 13 and 39 weeks respectively.

Principles of Consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition:

Sales are recognized upon shipment of products to customers since title and risk of loss pass upon shipment. Revenue relating to goods sold on a consignment basis is recognized when the Company has been notified that the buyer has resold the product. Provisions for estimated uncollectible accounts, discounts and returns and allowances are provided when sales are recorded based upon historical experience and current trends. While such amounts have been within expectations and the provisions established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same rates as in the past.

Historically, the Company’s sales and operating results fluctuate by quarter, with the greatest sales typically occurring in the Company’s first and third fiscal quarters. It is in these quarters that the Company’s Fall and Spring product lines, which traditionally have had the highest volume of net sales, are shipped to customers, with revenues recognized at the time of shipment. As a result, the Company experiences significant variability in its quarterly results and working capital requirements. Moreover, delays in shipping can cause revenues to be recognized in a later quarter, resulting in further variability in such quarterly results.

Factoring Agreement and Accounts Receivable:

The Company has a financing agreement with CIT that includes a non-recourse factoring arrangement that provides notification factoring on substantially all of the Company’s sales. CIT, based on credit approved orders, assumes the accounts receivable risk of the Company’s customers in the event of insolvency or non-payment. The Company assumes the accounts receivable risk on sales factored to CIT but not approved by CIT as non-recourse factored receivables, which approximated $0.2 million as of March 31, 2012, $0.2 million as of July 2, 2011, and $0.4 million as of April 2, 2011. The Company receives payment on non-recourse factored receivables from CIT as of the earliest of: a) the date that CIT has been paid by the Company’s customers; b) the date of the customer’s longest maturity if the customer is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings; or c) the last day of the third month following the customer’s longest maturity date if the receivable remains unpaid. All other receivable risks for customer deductions that reduce the customer receivable balances are retained by the Company, including, but not limited to, allowable customer markdowns, operational chargebacks, disputes, discounts, and returns. These deductions, totaling $3.3 million as of March 31, 2012, $2.3 million as of July 2, 2011 and $2.0 million as of April 2, 2011, have been recorded as a reduction of either accounts receivable – factored or accounts receivable – net based upon the classification of the respective customer balance to which they pertain. The Company also assumes the risk on accounts receivable not factored to CIT, which is shown as accounts receivable-net on the accompanying balance sheets.

 

8


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on the first-in, first-out method. The majority of the Company’s inventory purchases are shipped FOB shipping point from the Company’s suppliers. The Company takes title, assumes the risk of loss and records inventory when the merchandise is received at the boat or airplane overseas. Reserves for slow moving and aged merchandise are provided to write down inventory costs to net realizable value based on historical experience and current product demand. Inventory reserves were approximately $0.5 million as of March 31, 2012, $0.4 million as of July 2, 2011 and $0.4 million as of April 2, 2011. Inventory reserves are based upon the level of excess and aged inventory and the Company’s estimated recoveries on the sale of the inventory. While markdowns have been within expectations and the provisions established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same level of markdowns as in the past.

Long-Lived Assets and Trademarks:

Trademarks relate to the Cynthia Steffe trademarks and were determined to have an indefinite life. The Company does not amortize assets with indefinite lives and conducts impairment testing annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or sooner if events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows including market participant assumptions, when available. The review of trademarks and long lived assets is based upon projections of anticipated future undiscounted cash flows. While the Company believes that its estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect evaluations. To the extent these future projections or the Company’s strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may differ from the current estimates. There were no impairment charges for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011.

Income Taxes:

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740. Deferred income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at year-end. The Company periodically reviews its historical and projected taxable income and considers available information and evidence to determine if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is established to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. As of March 31, 2012, July 2, 2011 and April 2, 2011, based upon its evaluation of the Company’s historical and projected results of operations, the current business environment and the magnitude of the net operating loss, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future, that portion of the valuation allowance will be reduced and the Company will provide for an income tax benefit in its Statement of Operations at its estimated effective tax rate.

The Company’s trademarks are not amortized for book purposes, however, they continue to be amortized for tax purposes and therefore the Company records a deferred tax liability on the temporary difference. The temporary difference will not reverse until such time as the assets are impaired or sold, therefore the likelihood of being offset by the Company’s net operating loss carryforward is uncertain.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

Basic earnings (loss) per share have been computed by dividing the applicable net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share have been computed by dividing the applicable net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common share equivalents. Options to purchase approximately 125,000 and 689,000 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011, respectively, because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price.

 

9


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

    

For the Three Months Ended

    

For the Nine Months Ended

 
     March 31,      April 2,      March 31,      April 2,  
Denominator for loss per share (in millions):    2012      2011      2012      2011  

Denominator for basic loss per share weighted-average shares outstanding

     37.5           34.5           37.5           36.5     

Assumed exercise of potential common shares

     -             -             -             -       
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted loss per share

     37.5           34.5           37.5           36.5     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable and revolving credit borrowings, approximated fair value due to their short-term maturity or variable interest rates. The notes payable – related party were entered into in January 2012. Going forward it will not be practicable to estimate the fair value of these notes, as they are owed to a stockholder and are of a related-party nature.

New Accounting Pronouncements:

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be classified to net income. ASU 2011-05 should be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-05 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU 2011-05, which defers only those changes in ASU 2011-05 related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments in order to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. ASU 2011-12 is effective at the same time as ASU 2011-05 and until determined, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

10


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

2. Inventories - net

 

     March 31,
2012
     July 2,
2011
     April 2,
2012
 
            (in thousands)         
     (unaudited)      (*)      (unaudited)  

Raw materials        

   $ 89       $ 184       $ 288   

Work-in-process        

     -           7         104   

Finished goods        

     7,011         4,886         4,843   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 7,100       $ 5,077       $ 5,235   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

  *

Derived from the audited financial statements as of July 2, 2011.

Included in finished goods inventories is merchandise in transit of approximately $3.5 million as of March 31, 2012, $2.8 million as of July 2, 2011 and $1.7 million as of April 2, 2011.

3. Financing Agreements

The Company has a financing agreement with CIT (the “CIT Financing Agreement”) that permits CIT to make loans and advances on a revolving basis at CIT’s “Sole Discretion,” which is defined as “the sole and absolute discretion exercised in good faith in accordance with customary business practices for similarly situated asset-based lenders in comparable asset-based lending transactions.” Borrowings are based on a borrowing base formula, as defined, and include a sublimit in the amount of $2 million for the issuance of letters of credit. The Company’s obligations under the agreement are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets, including the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory, intangibles, equipment, and trademarks, and a pledge of the Company’s interest in its subsidiaries. The agreement had an original maturity of September 30, 2011 with automatic annual extensions to September 30th (“Anniversary Date”) unless terminated by CIT with written notice at least sixty days in advance of the Anniversary Date. No such termination notice has been received by the Company from CIT.

The borrowings under the agreement accrue interest at a rate of 3.00% above prime; however, the applicable margin shall revert to the original 2.00% interest rate in the event that the Company achieves two successive quarters of profitable business. The interest rate as of March 31, 2012 was 6.25%. The Company has the option to terminate the agreement with CIT. If the Company terminates the agreement with CIT due to non-performance by CIT of certain of its obligations for a specified period of time, the Company will not be liable for any termination fees. Otherwise, in the event of an early termination by the Company, the Company will be liable for minimum factoring fees.

On March 31, 2012, the Company had $1.2 million of outstanding letters of credit, total availability of approximately $8.4 million and revolving credit borrowings of $7.5 million under the agreement. On April 2, 2011, the Company had $1.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, total availability of approximately $1.1 million, and $10.0 million of revolving credit borrowings, including a short-term extension of $0.3 million.

Factoring Agreement

The agreement with CIT also provides for a non-recourse factoring arrangement which provides notification factoring on substantially all of the Company’s sales. The proceeds of this agreement are assigned to CIT as collateral for all indebtedness, liabilities and obligations due to CIT. A factoring commission based on various rates is charged on the gross face amount of all accounts with minimum fees as defined in the agreement.

 

11


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

4. Notes Payable – Related Party

On January 20, 2012, the Company entered into a Debt Restructuring Agreement with an affiliate of CTG to convert $12 million of accounts payable into two interest-bearing senior unsecured notes payable. One note is in the principal amount of $2 million, matures on September 1, 2013 and is payable in two installments of $250,000 on April 1, 2013 and July 1, 2013 with the remaining balance of $1.5 million due at maturity. The other note is in the principal amount of $10 million (“$10 million Note”), matures on September 1, 2016 and is payable in four quarterly installments of $250,000 beginning July 1, 2014, five quarterly installments of $800,000 beginning July 1, 2015 with the remaining balance of $5 million due at maturity. If no event of default exists under the notes and the principal balance on the $10 million Note is $5,000,000 or less as of September 1, 2016, the $10 million Note can be extended by CTG for an additional two years. Both notes accrue interest at 5.25% per annum compounded quarterly beginning January 31, 2012. At March 31, 2012, there was approximately $53,000 of accrued interest related to the notes included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The notes contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default.

5. Deferred Income

The Company has an exclusive supply agreement with CTG. Under this agreement, CTG will act as the exclusive supplier of substantially all merchandise purchased by the Company, in addition to providing sample making and production supervision services. In consideration for the Company appointing CTG as the sole supplier of its merchandise in Asia/China for a term of 10 years, CTG paid the Company an exclusive supply premium of $4.0 million. The Company recorded this premium as deferred income and as of March 31, 2012, $0.4 million of the premium is included in accrued expenses and approximately $2.5 million is considered long-term. The Company will recognize the premium as income on a straight line basis over the 10-year term of the agreement. For each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million respectively of income as a reduction to cost of goods sold. As of March 31, 2012, July 2, 2011 and April 2, 2011, amounts owed to CTG for merchandise approximated $15.5 million, $17.4 million and $13.2 million, respectively, and are included in accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

6. Pension Plan

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

 

     For the Three Months Ended      For the Nine Months Ended  
     March 31,
2012
     April 2,
2011
     March 31,
2012
     April 2,
2011
 
            (Unaudited)         
            (In Thousands)         

Service cost

   $ 3       $ 2       $ 9       $   

Interest cost

     31         28         93         84    

Expected return on plan assets

     (28)         (26)         (84)         (78)   

Amortization of net loss

     10         9         30         27    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 16       $ 13       $ 48       $ 39    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Employer Contributions

The Company has contributed approximately $32,000 to the plan during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and will be required to contribute an additional $30,000 during the remainder of fiscal 2012.

 

12


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that have been made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “intend” and similar words or phrases. Such statements are based on current expectations and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the overall level of consumer spending on apparel; the financial strength of the retail industry generally and our customers in particular; changes in trends in the market segments in which we compete and our ability to gauge and respond to changing consumer demands and fashion trends; the level of demand for our products; our dependence on our major department store customers; the success of the Camuto License Agreement; the highly competitive nature of the fashion industry; our ability to satisfy our cash flow needs, including the cash requirements under the Camuto License Agreement; our ability to achieve our business plan and have adequate access to capital; our ability to operate within production and delivery constraints, including the risk of failure of manufacturers and our exclusive supplier to deliver products in a timely manner or to quality standards; the ability and willingness of our exclusive supplier to continue to supply product to us on favorable payment terms; our ability to meet the requirements of the Camuto License Agreement; our ability to source product in an environment of high volatility and inflationary pressures on prices of labor and raw materials; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and changes in economic or political conditions in the markets where we sell or source our products, including war and terrorist activities and their effects on shopping patterns, as well as other risks and uncertainties set forth in the Company’s publicly-filed documents, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected.

There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For a detailed discussion of some of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011, as well as the other reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We undertake no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), all of which are available in the SEC EDGAR database at www.sec.gov and from us.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Bernard Chaus, Inc.

Overview

The Company designs, arranges for the manufacture of and markets an extensive range of women’s career and casual sportswear principally under the VINCE CAMUTO®, JOSEPHINE CHAUS®, JOSEPHINE®, JOSEPHINE STUDIO®, CHAUS®, CHAUS SPORT®, CYNTHIA STEFFE®, SEAMLINE CYNTHIA STEFFE® and CYNTHIA CYNTHIA STEFFE® trademarks and under private label brand names. Our products are sold nationwide through department store chains, specialty retailers, discount stores, wholesale clubs and other retail outlets. On November 18, 2010, the Company entered into the Camuto License Agreement, which grants us an exclusive license to design, manufacture, sell and distribute women’s sportswear and ready-to-wear apparel under the trademark “VINCE CAMUTO®” in approved department stores, specialty retailers and off-price channels in the United States, Canada and Mexico. We began shipping Camuto licensed products in June 2011.

On April 3, 2012, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Camuto, Camuto Merger Sub, Inc., a New York corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Camuto (“Investor Newco”), Josephine Chaus, the Company’s chief executive officer and chairwoman, and certain family members and

 

13


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

entities associated with Mrs. Chaus (collectively, the “Family Shareholders”), and BC Family Merger Corp., a New York corporation beneficially owned by the Family Shareholders (“Family Newco”), providing for the merger (the “Merger”) of Investor Newco and Family Newco with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger. The Merger Agreement was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), acting upon the unanimous recommendation of the special committee composed of independent directors of the Board. The Merger must be approved by 2/3 of the Company’s shareholders. The Company plans to call a special meeting of the shareholders to vote on the proposed Merger, and has filed the preliminary proxy statement on April 13, 2012. Please see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

In January 2012, the Company negotiated and signed a Debt Restructuring Agreement with an affiliate of China Ting Group Holdings Limited (“CTG”), a supplier and stockholder of the Company, to convert approximately $12 million of debt owed by the Company to CTG from accounts payable into a new interest-bearing debt obligation memorialized by two notes payable. Please see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for more information.

Under the terms of the KCP License Agreement, we manufactured and sold women’s sportswear under various labels. The KCP License Agreement terminated on June 1, 2011. KCP agreed to pay the Company a termination fee upon termination of the agreement based on sales to certain customers through June 1, 2011, as specified in the agreement. Accordingly, we recorded a $4.4 million gain on early termination of the license agreement for the year ended July 2, 2011.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items expressed as a percentage of net revenue.

 

     For the Three Months Ended      For the Nine Months Ended  
     March 31,      April 2,      March 31,      April 2,  
     2012      2011      2012      2011  

Net Revenue

     100.0 %         100.0 %         100.0 %         100.0 %   

Gross Profit

     25.3 %         19.1 %         25.4 %         19.3 %   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     29.7 %         29.9 %         31.7 %         31.3 %   

Merger related costs

     1.5 %         -%         -%         -%   

Accrued gain on early termination of license agreement

     -%         (5.0) %         -%         (6.0) %   

Interest expense

     0.8 %         0.7 %         0.6 %         0.8 %   

Net loss

     (6.8 )%         (6.5 )%         (8.2 )%         (6.9 )%   

Net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased by 18.1%, or $4.2 million, to $27.5 million from $23.3 million for the three months ended April 2, 2011. Units sold decreased by approximately 9.2% and the overall price per unit increased by approximately 28.2%. Our net revenues increased in our Chaus product lines by $4.6 million and in our Cynthia Steffe product lines by $2.2 million, partially offset by decreases in our licensed product line by $1.9 million, and in our private label product lines by $0.7 million. The increase in the Chaus product line revenue was largely reflected in the special make and club channels. The increase in the Cynthia Steffe product line was primarily reflected in the special make and discount channel. The decrease in licensed product revenues reflects the net impact of Vince Camuto licensed product line sales in this year’s quarter versus the terminated Kenneth Cole licensed product sales in last year’s quarter. The decrease in overall licensed product sales in the quarter, year on year, results from eliminated shipments to Kenneth Cole retail and outlets as well as to the club channel, which were partially offset by higher department store sales. The private label revenue decrease was largely a result of the loss of business with two customers during the latter part of fiscal 2011. The overall increase in the average price per unit was primarily a result of product mix, particularly associated with a higher proportion of overall revenues to the department store channel and to a lesser extent selective increases in wholesale prices.

 

14


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Net revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 decreased by 3.5%, or $2.3 million, to $65.5 million from $67.9 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. Units sold decreased by approximately 23.3% and the overall price per unit increased by approximately 24.5%. Our net revenues decreased in our licensed product line by $8.0 million and in our private label product lines by $4.0 million, which were partially offset by increases in our Chaus product lines of $8.3 million, and in our Cynthia Steffe product lines by $1.4 million. The decrease in licensed product revenues reflects the net impact of the launch of the Vince Camuto licensed product line versus the terminated Kenneth Cole licensed product line. The decrease in overall licensed product sales for the nine months, year on year, results from eliminated shipments to Kenneth Cole retail and outlets as well as to the club channel, which were partially offset by higher department store sales. The private label revenue decrease was largely a result of the loss of business with two customers during the latter part of fiscal 2011. The increase in the Chaus product line revenue was reflected across all channels. The increase in the Cynthia Steffe product line was primarily reflected in the special make channel. The overall increase in the average price per unit was primarily a result of product mix, particularly associated with a higher proportion of overall revenues to the department store channel and to a lesser extent selective increases in wholesale prices.

Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased by $2.5 million to $6.9 million as compared to $4.4 million for the three months ended April 2, 2011 as a result of an increase in gross profit percentage and an increase in revenues. The increase in gross profit dollars was primarily reflected in our Chaus product lines of $1.9 million and licensed product lines of $0.6 million. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased to 25.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 19.1% for the three months ended April 2, 2011. The increase in gross profit percentage reflected a strategic focus on key volume programs to achieve negotiated lower material and production costs, higher wholesale prices, product mix particularly associated with a higher proportion of overall revenues to the department store channel, and selective increases in wholesale prices.

Gross profit for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 increased by $3.5 million to $16.6 million as compared to $13.1 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011 as a result of an increase in gross profit percentage offset partially by a decrease in revenues. The increase in gross profit dollars was primarily reflected in our Chaus product lines of $3.7 million and licensed product lines of $0.9 million, which were partially offset by decreases in our private label product lines of $0.6 million and our Cynthia Steffe product lines of $0.5 million. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased to 25.4% for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 from 19.3% for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. The increase in gross profit percentage reflected a strategic focus on key volume programs to achieve negotiated lower material and production costs, product mix particularly associated with a higher proportion of overall revenues to the department store channel, and selective increases in wholesale prices.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased by $1.2 million to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $7.0 million for the three months ended April 2, 2011. As a percentage of net revenue, SG&A expenses decreased to 29.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to 29.9% for the three months ended April 2, 2011. The increase in SG&A expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was the result of increases in marketing and advertising costs of $0.7 million and restructuring costs due to the closing of a location related to the Cynthia Steffe line of $0.5 million. Increases in marketing and advertising costs reflect the combined effects of increased spending this year for the Vince Camuto licensed brand and decreased spending last year related to the terminated Kenneth Cole licensed brand.

SG&A expenses decreased by $0.5 million to $20.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 from $21.3 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. As a percentage of net revenue, SG&A expenses increased to 31.7% for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 compared to 31.3% for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. The decrease in SG&A expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 was largely the result of payroll and payroll related expenses of $1.2 million, partially offset by restructuring costs due to the closing of a location related to the Cynthia Steffe line of $0.5 million and increases in marketing and advertising costs of $0.4 million. The decreases in payroll and payroll related expenses were due to staff reductions. Increases in marketing and advertising costs reflect the combined effects of increased spending this year to launch the Vince Camuto licensed brand and decreased spending last year related to the terminated Kenneth Cole licensed brand.

 

15


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Merger related costs of $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, respectively, were due to the Camuto merger proposal and primarily related to legal and professional fees.

Accrued gain on early termination of the KCP License Agreement last year was $1.2 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. This gain was based on sales to certain customers as defined in the KCP Termination Agreement.

Interest expense for both the three months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011 was $0.2 million. Interest expense decreased for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 to $0.4 million as compared to $0.5 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower bank borrowings partially offset by interest due to CTG under the new notes.

Our income tax provision for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011 includes provisions for state and local taxes and a deferred provision for the temporary difference associated with the Company’s trademarks.

We periodically review our historical and projected taxable income and consider available information and evidence to determine if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is established to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. As of March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011, based upon its evaluation of taxable income and the current business environment, we recorded a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets including net operating losses (“NOL”). If we determine that a portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized in the future, that portion of the valuation allowance will be reduced and we will provide for an income tax benefit in our Statement of Operations at our estimated effective tax rate. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” below for more information regarding income taxes and our federal NOL carry-forward.

Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Net cash used in operating activities was $4.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $1.8 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 resulted primarily from an increase in accounts receivable- factored of $11.5 million and a net loss of $5.4 million, which was partially offset by an decrease in accounts payable of $11.6 million. The increase in accounts receivable-factored of $11.5 million was due to the increase of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the three months ended July 2, 2011. Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.8 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011which resulted primarily from a decrease in accounts receivable-factored of $4.9 million and inventories of $3.6 million, which was partially offset by a net loss of $4.7 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and long term liabilities of $1.1 million, and an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.8 million. The decrease in accounts receivable-factored of $4.9 million was due to the reduction of sales for the three months ended April 2, 2011 as compared to the three months ended July 3, 2010.

Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.9 million compared to $0.3 million in the previous year. The purchases of fixed assets for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 consisted primarily of store fixtures for the new Camuto licensed products.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $4.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 resulted from revolving credit borrowings. Net cash used in financing activities of $1.5 million for the nine months ended April 2, 2011 resulted primarily from repayments of revolving credit borrowings.

 

16


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Financing Agreement

We have a financing agreement with CIT that permits CIT to make loans and advances on a revolving basis at CIT’s “Sole Discretion,” which is defined as “the sole and absolute discretion exercised in good faith in accordance with customary business practices for similarly situated asset-based lenders in comparable asset-based lending transactions.” Borrowings are based on a borrowing base formula, as defined, and include a sublimit in the amount of $2 million for the issuance of letters of credit. Our obligations under the agreement are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets, including our accounts receivable, inventory, intangibles, equipment, and trademarks, and a pledge of our interest in our subsidiaries. The agreement had an original maturity of September 30, 2011 with automatic annual extensions to September 30th (“Anniversary Date”) unless terminated by CIT by written notice at least sixty days before the Anniversary Date. No such termination notice has been received by the Company from CIT.

The borrowings under the agreement accrue interest at a rate of 3.00% above prime; however, the applicable rate shall revert to the original 2.00% interest rate in the event that we achieve two successive quarters of profitable business. The interest rate as of March 31, 2012 was 6.25%. We have the option to terminate the agreement with CIT. If we terminate the agreement with CIT due to non-performance by CIT of certain of its obligations for a specified period of time, we will not be liable for any termination fees. Otherwise, in the event of an early termination by us, we will be liable for minimum factoring fees.

On March 31, 2012, the Company had $1.2 million of outstanding letters of credit, total availability of approximately $8.4 million and revolving credit borrowings of $7.5 million under the agreement. On April 2, 2011, the Company had $1.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, total availability of approximately $1.1 million, and $10.0 million of revolving credit borrowings, including a short-term extension of $0.3 million.

Factoring Agreement

The agreement with CIT also provides for a non-recourse factoring arrangement which provides notification factoring on substantially all of our sales. The proceeds of this agreement are assigned to CIT as collateral for all indebtedness, liabilities and obligations due to CIT. A factoring commission based on various rates is charged on the gross face amount of all accounts with minimum fees as defined in the agreement.

Notes Payable – Related Party

On January 20, 2012, we entered into a Debt Restructuring Agreement with an affiliate of CTG to convert $12 million of accounts payable into two interest-bearing senior unsecured notes payable. One note is in the principal amount of $2 million and matures on September 1, 2013. The other note is in the principal amount of $10 million (“$10 million Note”) and matures on September 1, 2016. If no event of default exists under the notes and the principal balance on the $10 million Note is $5,000,000 or less as of September 1, 2016, the $10 million Note can be extended by CTG for an additional two years. Both notes accrue interest at 5.25% per annum compounded quarterly beginning January 31, 2012. Please see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for more information regarding the Debt Restructuring Agreement and related notes.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2012, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements except for letters of credit under the agreement with CIT. The borrowings under the letters of credit finance the Company’s operating expenses and are a significant source of liquidity for the Company. For more information about borrowing terms, see “Financing Agreement” discussion above.

 

17


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Future Financing Requirements

For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, we realized losses from operations of $5.4 million, and as of March 31, 2012 we had a working capital deficit of $4.8 million and stockholders’ deficiency of $18.8 million. Our business plan requires the availability of sufficient cash flow and borrowing capacity to finance our product lines and to meet our cash needs. We expect to satisfy such requirements through cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings from our lender. Our fiscal 2012 business plan anticipates improvement from fiscal 2011, primarily by achieving increased revenues and improved gross margin percentages. Our ability to achieve our fiscal 2012 business plan is critical to maintaining adequate liquidity. We rely on CIT, the sole source of our external financing, to borrow money in order to fund our operations. Should CIT cease funding our operations, we may not have sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our liquidity needs. In addition, CTG manufactures the majority of our product on favorable payment terms. In the event CTG terminates the supply agreement or requires a change in the favorable payment terms, we may be unable to locate alternative suppliers in a timely manner or obtain similarly favorable payment terms. For the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011, the KCP License Agreement accounted for approximately 54% of our revenues, and this agreement terminated on June 1, 2011. While we entered into the Camuto License Agreement, there can be no assurance that we will be able to derive revenue from this agreement sufficient to offset the loss in revenue resulting from the termination of the KCP License Agreement. There could be a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity and financial condition should any of the following occur: a) CIT ceases its funding of our operations, b) CTG terminates its supply agreement with us or requires a change in the favorable payment terms, or c) we fail to offset the revenue lost as a result of the termination of the KCP License Agreement.

The foregoing discussion contains forward-looking statements which are based upon current expectations and involve a number of uncertainties, including our ability to maintain our borrowing capabilities, maintain our current arrangement with CTG and replace the revenues which will be lost as a result of the termination of the KCP License Agreement. Should any of these events fail to occur, this could result in a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity and financial condition.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on historical experience, observation of trends in the industry, information provided by customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Significant accounting policies include:

Revenue Recognition — Sales are recognized upon shipment of products to customers since title and risk of loss pass upon shipment. Revenue relating to goods sold on a consignment basis is recognized when we have been notified that the buyer has resold the product. Provisions for estimated uncollectible accounts, discounts and returns and allowances are provided when sales are recorded based upon historical experience and current trends. While such amounts have been within expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same rates as in the past.

Factoring Agreement and Accounts Receivable — We have a factoring agreement with CIT whereby substantially all of our receivables are factored. The factoring agreement is a non-recourse factoring agreement whereby CIT, based on credit approved orders, assumes the accounts receivable risk of our customers in the event of insolvency or nonpayment. We assume the accounts receivable risk on sales factored to CIT but not approved by CIT as non-recourse, which approximated $0.2 million as of March 31, 2012, $0.2 million as of July 2, 2011 and $0.4 million as of April 2, 2011. We receive payment on non-recourse factored receivables from CIT as of the earlier of: a) the date that CIT has been paid by our customers; b) the date of the customer’s longest maturity if the customer is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings; or c) the last day of the third month following the customer’s longest maturity date if the receivable remains unpaid. All receivable risks for customer deductions that reduce the customer receivable balances are retained by us, including, but not limited to, allowable customer markdowns, operational chargebacks, disputes, discounts and returns. These deductions totaling approximately $3.3 million as of March 31, 2012, $2.3

 

18


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

million as of July 2, 2011 and $2.0 million as of April 2, 2011, have been recorded as a reduction of either accounts receivable-factored or accounts receivable-net based on the classification of the respective customer balance to which they pertain. We also assume the risk on accounts receivable not factored to CIT, which are shown as Accounts Receivable-net on the accompanying balance sheets.

Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on the first-in, first-out method. The majority of our inventory purchases are shipped FOB shipping point from our suppliers. We take title and assume the risk of loss when merchandise is received at the boat or airplane overseas. Reserves for slow moving and aged merchandise are provided to adjust inventory costs based on historical experience and current product demand. Inventory reserves were $0.5 million as of March 31, 2012, $0.4 million as of July 2, 2011 and $0.4 million as of April 2, 2011. Inventory reserves are based upon the level of excess and aged inventory and estimated recoveries on the sale of the inventory. While markdowns have been within expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same level of markdowns as in the past.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Trademarks — Trademarks relate to the Cynthia Steffe trademarks and were determined to have an indefinite life. We conduct impairment testing annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or sooner if events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows including market participant assumptions, when available. The review of trademarks and long lived assets is based upon projections of anticipated future undiscounted cash flows. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect evaluations. To the extent these future projections or our strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may differ from the current estimates. There were no impairment charges for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011.

Income Taxes — Results of operations have generated a federal tax NOL carryforward of approximately $59.5 million as of July 2, 2011. Approximately 15% of the Company’s NOL carryforward expires in 2012. Generally accepted accounting principles require that we record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with this NOL if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxable income. As of March 31, 2012, based upon its evaluation of our historical and projected results of operations, the current business environment and the magnitude of the NOL, we recorded a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets including NOLs. The provision for income taxes primarily relates to provisions for state and local taxes and a deferred provision for temporary differences associated with indefinite lived intangibles. It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which cause us to conclude that it is more likely than not we will realize all or a portion of the NOL carryforward. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of the NOL is utilized.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairwoman and the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Each fiscal quarter the Company carries out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the

 

19


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Company’s CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, our management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of March 31, 2012, our internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are involved in legal proceedings from time to time arising out of the ordinary course of business. We believe that the outcome of these proceedings in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On September 29, 2011, the Company was served with a summons and complaint in connection with a purported shareholder class action lawsuit relating to Camuto’s merger proposal. The lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties by certain current and prior directors of the Company. On April 3, 2012, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with Kenneth Braun, the Plaintiff in the putative class action, and with Dr. Barry Berkowitz, the owner of 4,688,591 shares of Company common stock, providing for the litigation to be settled with prejudice and for Dr. Berkowitz to support the Merger, so long as it has the approval of the Board. The memorandum of understanding is, among other things, subject to court approval and is attached as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed by the Company on April 5, 2012. The memorandum of understanding has not yet been approved by the court, and therefore the Company cannot ensure settlement of the pending litigation or the terms of any such settlement.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

 

20


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Item 6. Exhibits (filed herewith)

 

31.1   

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2   

Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1   

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by Josephine Chaus, Chairwoman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Bernard Chaus, Inc.

32.2   

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, executed by William P. Runge, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Bernard Chaus, Inc.

101   

The following materials from the quarterly report on this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) include: (i) Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

 

21


Table of Contents

BERNARD CHAUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    BERNARD CHAUS, INC.  
Date: May 15, 2012     By:   /s/ Josephine Chaus  
    Josephine Chaus  
    Chairwoman of the Board, and  
    Chief Executive Officer  
       
Date: May 15, 2012     By:   /s/ William P. Runge  
    William P. Runge  
    Interim Chief Financial Officer  

 

22