BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

Attached files

BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC Reports

Also read

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC	d335300dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC	d335300dex311.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA INC	d335300dex321.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-22955

BAY BANKS OF VIRGINIA, INC.

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

VIRGINIA

54-1838100

(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF

INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

(I.R.S. EMPLOYER

IDENTIFICATION NO.)

100 SOUTH MAIN STREET, KILMARNOCK, VA 22482

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

(804) 435-1171

(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x yes ¨ no

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x yes ¨ no

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ yes x no

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

2,610,856 shares of common stock on May 10, 2012

FORM 10-Q

For the interim period ending March 31, 2012.

INDEX


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS MARCH 31, 2012 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2011			3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)			4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)			5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)			6

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)			7

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			21

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			29

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			29

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			29

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS			29

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS			29

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES			29

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES			29

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION			30

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS			30

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	4,910,717	$	4,728,895
Interest-bearing deposits		16,654,967		10,369,075
Federal funds sold		2,245,145		2,136,375
Securities available for sale, at fair value		39,871,116		41,799,121
Restricted securities		1,991,200		1,991,200
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,308,257 and $3,188,541		238,680,643		233,501,281
Premises and equipment, net		12,164,976		12,300,274
Accrued interest receivable		1,147,306		1,161,191
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance		2,260,653		2,279,935
Goodwill		2,807,842		2,807,842
Other assets		2,136,898		2,136,907

*Total assets*	$	324,871,463	$	315,212,096


LIABILITIES
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	48,244,970	$	43,803,349
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		110,230,025		105,269,889
Time deposits		115,635,176		116,444,867

*Total deposits*	$	274,110,171	$	265,518,105

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		6,259,247		5,277,158
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		15,000,000		15,000,000
Other liabilities		1,456,892		1,402,049
Commitments and contingencies		—		—

*Total liabilities*	$	296,826,310	$	287,197,312


SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock ($5 par value; authorized - 5,000,000 shares; outstanding - 2,610,856 shares)	$	13,054,280	$	13,054,280
Additional paid-in capital		4,973,724		4,971,531
Retained earnings		9,649,261		9,543,634
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		367,888		445,339

*Total shareholders’ equity*	$	28,045,153	$	28,014,784

*Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity*	$	324,871,463	$	315,212,096

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME


	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	3,224,780		$	3,438,163
Securities:
Taxable		200,933			205,134
Tax-exempt		70,594			64,450
Federal funds sold		1,366			2,972
Interest -bearing deposit accounts		7,062			9,060

Total interest income		3,504,735			3,719,779


INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		749,154			820,681

Securities sold under repurchase agreements		2,921			3,398
FHLB advances		140,924			342,188

Total interest expense		892,999			1,166,267


Net interest income		2,611,736			2,553,512
Provision for loan losses		96,024			55,000


Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,515,712			2,498,512


NON-INTEREST INCOME
Income from fiduciary activities		160,154			154,433
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts		166,863			166,256
VISA-related fees		159,469			162,958
Other service charges and fees		189,110			165,595
Secondary market lending fees		77,208			37,888
Gains (Losses) on sale of securities available for sale		8,861			(1,676	)
Other real estate (losses)		(68,053	)		(117,776	)
Net (losses) gains on other assets		(4,906	)		4,082

Other income		28,324			3,118

Total non-interest income		717,030			574,878


NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		1,562,169			1,532,176
Occupancy expense		504,331			465,114
Bank franchise tax		42,990			36,780
VISA expense		131,160			127,137
Telephone expense		41,324			43,053
FDIC assessments		103,851			147,098
Debit card expense		55,404			47,444
Foreclosure property expense		43,254			42,566
Other expense		629,675			497,068

Total non-interest expenses		3,114,158			2,938,436


Net income before income taxes		118,584			134,954
Income tax		12,957			6,218

Net income	$	105,627		$	128,736


*Basic Earnings Per Share*
Average basic shares outstanding		2,610,856			2,605,856
Earnings per share, basic	$	0.04		$	0.05

*Diluted Earnings Per Share*
Average diluted shares outstanding		2,612,206			2,605,856
Earnings per share, diluted	$	0.04		$	0.05

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


Three months ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited)

Net income			$	105,627
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax;
Unrealized (losses) on securities;				—
Unrealized holding (losses) arising during the period (net of tax benefit, $36,885)	(71,603	)		—
Less reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in income (net of tax, $3,013)	(5,848	)

Other comprehensive loss	(77,451	)		(77,451	)

Comprehensive income			$	28,176


Three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited)

Net income			$	128,736
Other comprehensive income, net of tax;
Unrealized gains on securities;				—
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period (net of tax, $25,589)	49,673
Less reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in income (net of tax, $570)	1,106			50,779

Other comprehensive income	50,779			50,779

Comprehensive income			$	179,515

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


	Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
(unaudited)

Balance at beginning of period		2,610,856	$	13,054,280	$	4,971,531	$	9,543,634	$	445,339		$	28,014,784
Net income		—		—		—		105,627		—			105,627
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		—		(77,451	)		(77,451	)
Stock compensation expense		—		—		2,193		—		—			2,193


Balance at end of period		2,610,856	$	13,054,280	$	4,973,724	$	9,649,261	$	367,888		$	28,045,153


THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
(unaudited)

Balance at beginning of period		2,605,856	$	13,029,280	$	4,965,460	$	9,193,492	$	154,078		$	27,342,310
Net income		—		—		—		128,736		—			128,736
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		—		50,779			50,779
Stock compensation expense		—		—		2,376		—		—			2,376


Balance at end of period		2,605,856	$	13,029,280	$	4,967,836	$	9,322,228	$	204,857		$	27,524,201

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)


Three months ended March 31,	2012			2011
*Cash Flows From Operating Activities*
Net income	$	105,627		$	128,736
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		194,031			206,034
Net amortization and accretion of securities		62,859			17,209
Provision for loan losses		96,024			55,000
Stock-based compensation		2,193			2,376

(Gain) loss on securities available-for-sale		(8,861	)		1,676
Increase in OREO valuation allowance		14,100			104,436
Loss on sale of other real estate		53,953			13,341
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets		4,906			(4,082	)
Decrease in accrued income and other assets		13,894			256,856
Increase in other liabilities		94,742			185,861

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	633,468		$	967,443


*Cash Flows From Investing Activities*
Proceeds from maturities and principal paydowns of available-for-sale securities	$	1,364,846		$	2,647,524
Proceeds from sales and calls of available-for-sale securities		2,326,850			1,170,000
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(1,935,039	)		—

(Increase) in interest bearing deposits in other banks		(6,285,892	)		(5,735,760	)
(Increase) in federal funds sold		(108,770	)		(107,133	)
Loan (originations) and principal collections, net		(5,585,242	)		1,222,302
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		261,086			45,936

(Purchases) of premises and equipment		(63,640	)		(55,743	)

Net cash (used in) investing activities	$	(10,025,801	)	$	(812,874	)


*Cash Flows From Financing Activities*
Increase in demand, savings, and other interest-bearing deposits	$	9,401,757		$	1,349,769
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits		(809,691	)		533,573
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		982,089			(1,050,325	)

Net cash provided by financing activities	$	9,574,155		$	833,017


Net increase in cash and due from banks		181,822			987,586

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		4,728,895			3,275,584

Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	4,910,717		$	4,263,170


*Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information*
Interest paid	$	888,164		$	1,166,369

Income taxes paid		—			10,111

Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities		(117,350	)		76,938

Loans transferred to other real estate owned		309,857			772,632

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1:

General

Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”) owns 100% of the Bank of Lancaster (the “Bank”), 100% of Bay Trust Company, Inc. (the “Trust Company”) and 100% of Steptoes Holdings, LLC (“Steptoes Holdings”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Bank, the Trust Company, Steptoes Holdings and Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc.

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to the general practices within the banking industry. In management’s opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current year presentations.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Note 2:

Securities

The aggregate amortized costs and fair values of the available-for-sale securities portfolio are as follows:


Available-for-sale securities March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value

U.S. Government agencies	$	8,694,442	$	88,948	$	(13,398	)	$	8,769,992
State and municipal obligations		30,141,402		1,036,480		(76,758	)		31,101,124

	$	38,835,844	$	1,125,428	$	(90,156	)	$	39,871,116


Available-for-sale securities December 31, 2011	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value

U.S. Government agencies	$	8,698,771	$	100,951	$	(4,656	)	$	8,795,066
State and municipal obligations		31,947,729		1,066,585		(10,259	)		33,004,055

	$	40,646,500	$	1,167,536	$	(14,915	)	$	41,799,121

Securities with a market value of $7.7 million were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and for other purposes as required by law as of March 31, 2012. The market value of pledged securities at December 31, 2011 was $9.3 million.

Securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by duration of the unrealized loss, are shown below. The unrealized loss positions were directly related to interest rate movements as there is minimal credit risk exposure in these investments. All securities are investment grade or better and all losses are considered temporary. Management does not intend to sell the securities and does not expect to be required to sell the securities. Furthermore, we do expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis. Bonds with unrealized loss positions at March 31, 2012 included one mortgage backed security, ten municipals and three federal agencies. Bonds with unrealized loss positions at December 31, 2011 included two municipal and one federal agency. The tables are shown below.


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. Government agencies	$	1,609,540	$	13,398	$	—	$	—	$	1,609,540	$	13,398
States and municipal obligations		4,817,400		76,758		—		—		4,817,400		76,758

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	6,426,940	$	90,156	$	—	$	—	$	6,426,940	$	90,156


	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
December 31, 2011	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. Government agencies	$	311,122	$	4,656	$	—	$	—	$	311,122	$	4,656
States and municipal obligations		819,809		10,259		—		—		819,809		10,259

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	1,130,931	$	14,915	$	—	$	—	$	1,130,931	$	14,915

The Company’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) stock totaled $1.6 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. FHLB stock is generally viewed as a long-term investment and as a restricted investment security, which is carried at cost, because there is no market for the stock, other than the FHLBs or its member institutions. Therefore, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Despite the FHLB’s temporary suspension of repurchases of excess capital stock in 2010, the Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2012 and no impairment has been recognized. FHLB stock is shown in the restricted securities line item on the consolidated balance sheets and is not a part of the available-for-sale securities portfolio.

Note 3:

Loans

The following is a summary of the balances of loans:


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Construction, Land and Land Development	$	29,057,945		$	27,642,280
Farmland		1,505,710			1,526,050
Commercial Mortgages (Non-Owner Occupied)		18,165,867			16,198,584
Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)		28,354,611			27,845,596
Residential First Mortgages		109,368,242			107,638,735
Residential Junior Mortgages		28,962,792			28,526,008
Commercial and Industrial loans		18,916,498			18,983,332
Consumer Loans		7,657,235			8,329,237

Total loans	$	241,988,900		$	236,689,822
Allowance for loan losses		(3,308,257	)		(3,188,541	)


Loans, net	$	238,680,643		$	233,501,281

The recorded investment in past due and nonaccruing loans is shown in the following table. A loan past due by more than 90 days is generally placed on nonaccrual unless it is both well secured and in the process of collection.

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000
Loans Past Due and Nonaccruals March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing		Nonaccruals		Total Past Due and Nonaccruals		Current		Total Loans
Construction, Land and Land Development	$	426,549	$	476,076	$	—	$	500,800	$	1,403,425	$	27,654,520	$	29,057,945
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		1,505,710		1,505,710
Commercial Mortgages (Non-Owner Occupied)		—		—		—		384,006		384,006		17,781,861		18,165,867
Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)		627,410		196,706		109,387		651,306		1,584,809		26,769,802		28,354,611
Residential First Mortgages		706,201		870,074		—		2,017,575		3,593,850		105,774,392		109,368,242
Residential Junior Mortgages		145,935		—		—		1,762,227		1,908,162		27,054,630		28,962,792
Commercial and Industrial		265,940		—		—		742,720		1,008,660		17,907,838		18,916,498

Consumer Loans		95,395		6,077		7,329		492,285		601,086		7,056,149		7,657,235

Total	$	2,267,430	$	1,548,933	$	116,716	$	6,550,919	$	10,483,998	$	231,504,902	$	241,988,900

		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000		0000000
Loans Past Due and Nonaccruals December 31, 2011	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing		Nonaccruals		Total Past Due and Nonaccruals		Current		Total Loans
Construction, Land and Land Development	$	—	$	93,287	$	—	$	534,037	$	627,324	$	27,014,956	$	27,642,280
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		1,526,050		1,526,050
Commercial Mortgages (Non-Owner Occupied)		—				—		384,168		384,168		15,814,416		16,198,584
Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)		—		—		—		256,749		256,749		27,588,847		27,845,596
Residential First Mortgages		128,632		92,503		—		1,666,779		1,887,914		105,750,821		107,638,735
Residential Junior Mortgages		29,712		—		—		1,741,286		1,770,998		26,755,010		28,526,008
Commercial and Industrial		43,364		—		—		742,720		786,084		18,197,248		18,983,332

Consumer Loans		56,272		466,560		60,090		90,933		673,855		7,655,382		8,329,237

Total	$	257,980	$	652,350	$	60,090	$	5,416,672	$	6,387,092	$	230,302,730	$	236,689,822

Note 4:

Allowance for Loan Losses

A disaggregation of and an analysis of the change in the allowance for loan losses by segment is shown below.

Allowance for Loan Losses by Portfolio Segment

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited)


	Construction, Land and Land Development			Farmland		Commercial Mortgages (Non Owner Occupied)			Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)			Residential First Mortgages			Residential Junior Mortgages			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer Loans			Unallocated			Total

Beginning Balance	$	190,500		$	—	$	88,000		$	554,318		$	1,161,551		$	719,121		$	281,650		$	185,000		$	8,401		$	3,188,541
(Charge-offs)		(57,660	)	$	—	$	—		$	—			(15,422	)		(32,674	)		(7,500	)		(36,085	)				$	(149,341	)
Recoveries		—		$	—		162,226		$	—			—			—			—			10,807					$	173,033
Provision		18,137			—		(153,226	)		(219,828	)		130,677			(15,032	)		260,209			83,488			(8,401	)	$	96,024

Ending Balance	$	150,977		$	—	$	97,000		$	334,490		$	1,276,806		$	671,415		$	534,359		$	243,210		$	—		$	3,308,257


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	116,977		$	—	$	—		$	272,490		$	901,806		$	448,415		$	463,359		$	94,210		$	—		$	2,297,257
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	34,000		$	—	$	97,000		$	62,000		$	375,000		$	223,000		$	71,000		$	149,000		$	—		$	1,011,000

LOAN RECEIVABLES:
Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	407,513		$	—	$	—		$	1,841,609		$	4,283,018		$	1,774,975		$	954,451		$	94,210					$	9,355,776
Collectively evaluated for impairment		28,650,432			1,505,710		18,165,867			26,513,002			105,085,224			27,187,817			17,962,047			7,563,025						232,633,124


Total Gross Loans	$	29,057,945		$	1,505,710	$	18,165,867		$	28,354,611		$	109,368,242		$	28,962,792		$	18,916,498		$	7,657,235					$	241,988,900

The decline in the ALL balance required for the Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied) segment was due to improvement in the stress test results portion of the ALL calculation for that segment. As a result, the provision required for that segment was negative. The Commercial Mortgages (Non Owner Occupied) segment also had a large negative provision as a result of a large recovery corresponding to a successful legal judgment on a piece of real estate.

Allowance for Loan Losses by Portfolio Segment

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011


	Construction, Land and Land Development			Farmland			Commercial Mortgages (Non Owner Occupied)			Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)			Residential First Mortgages			Residential Junior Mortgages			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer Loans			Unallocated			Total

Beginning Balance	$	192,518		$	3,000		$	108,000		$	1,270,451		$	206,171		$	460,648		$	69,869		$	210,662		$	709,358		$	3,230,677
(Charge-offs)		(35,428	)		—			(52,117	)		—			(232,904	)		(29,162	)		(16,553	)		(211,117	)		—			(577,281	)
Recoveries		175			—						—			1,393			—			—			38,577			—			40,145
Provision		33,235			(3,000	)		32,117			(716,133	)		1,186,891			287,635			228,334			146,878			(700,957	)		495,000

Ending Balance	$	190,500		$	—		$	88,000		$	554,318		$	1,161,551		$	719,121		$	281,650		$	185,000		$	8,401		$	3,188,541


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	119,500		$	—		$	—		$	244,318		$	726,552		$	465,121		$	236,650		$	—		$	—		$	1,792,141
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	71,000		$	—		$	88,000		$	310,000		$	435,000		$	254,000		$	45,000		$	185,000		$	8,401		$	1,396,401

LOAN RECEIVABLES:
Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	408,640		$	—		$	—		$	1,447,278		$	3,187,147		$	1,790,858		$	560,197		$	—					$	7,394,120
Collectively evaluated for impairment		27,233,640			1,526,050			16,198,584			26,398,318			104,451,588			26,735,150			18,423,135			8,329,237						229,295,702


Total Gross Loans	$	27,642,280		$	1,526,050		$	16,198,584		$	27,845,596		$	107,638,735		$	28,526,008		$	18,983,332		$	8,329,237					$	236,689,822

Provision is negative for the Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied) segment due mainly to a reduction in the level of impaired loans in this segment, between September 30, 2011 and December 31,2011, with a corresponding reduction in the required allowance as of December 31,2011.

Internal risk rating grades are assigned to commercial loans not secured by real estate, commercial mortgages, residential mortgages greater than $1 million, loans to real estate developers and contractors, and consumer loans greater than $250,000 with chronic delinquency, as shown in the following table. The grading analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations of the loan agreements as scheduled. Risk grades are evaluated as new information becomes available for each borrowing relationship or at least quarterly.


As of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Construction, Land and Land Development		Farmland		Commercial Mortgages (Non-Owner Occupied)		Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)		Commercial and Industrial		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	21,746,113	$	1,505,710	$	12,240,033	$	18,292,738	$	13,749,223	$	67,533,817
Watch		2,809,364		—		2,567,875		7,109,368		3,910,256		16,791,420
Special mention		2,179,954		—		2,537,662		—		—		4,717,616
Substandard		1,979,896		—		754,709		2,695,756		485,090		5,520,894
Doubtful		342,618		—		65,588		256,749		771,929		1,436,884

Total	$	29,057,945	$	1,505,710	$	18,165,867	$	28,354,611	$	18,916,498	$	96,000,631


As of December 31, 2011 INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Construction, Land and Land Development		Farmland		Commercial Mortgages (Non-Owner Occupied)		Commercial Mortgages (Owner Occupied)		Commercial and Industrial		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	20,365,500	$	1,526,050	$	11,209,765	$	17,875,112	$	13,790,715	$	64,767,142
Watch		2,807,742		—		1,847,911		7,079,654		3,952,068		15,687,375
Special mention		2,186,094		—		2,393,755		310,959		—		4,890,808
Substandard		1,940,326		—		681,403		2,323,122		457,698		5,402,549
Doubtful		342,618		—		65,750		256,749		782,851		1,447,968

Total	$	27,642,280	$	1,526,050	$	16,198,584	$	27,845,596	$	18,983,332	$	92,195,842

Loans not assigned internal risk rating grades are comprised of residential mortgages and smaller consumer loans. Payment activity of these loans is reviewed monthly by management. Loans are considered to be nonperforming when they are delinquent by 90 days or more or on nonaccrual, as shown in the table below.


As of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) PAYMENT ACTIVITY STATUS	Residential First Mortgages		Residential Junior Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Total
Performing	$	107,350,667	$	27,200,565	$	7,157,621	$	141,708,853
Nonperforming		2,017,575		1,762,227		499,614		4,279,416

Total	$	109,368,242	$	28,962,792	$	7,657,235	$	145,988,269


As of December 31, 2011 PAYMENT ACTIVITY STATUS	Residential First Mortgages		Residential Junior Mortgages		Consumer Loans		Total
Performing	$	105,971,956	$	26,784,722	$	8,178,214	$	140,934,892
Nonperforming		1,666,779		1,741,286		151,023		3,559,088

Total	$	107,638,735	$	28,526,008	$	8,329,237	$	144,493,980

The following table shows the Company’s recorded investment and the customers’ unpaid principal balances for impaired loans, with the associated allowance amount, if applicable. Also shown are the average recorded investments in impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized and collected during the time the loans were impaired.

IMPAIRED LOANS


As of March 31, 2012	Recorded Investment		Customers’ Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Collected
With no related allowance:
Construction, land & land development	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		1,734,409		1,734,409		—		1,455,368		24,459		15,851
Residential Junior Mortgages (1)		129,025		129,025		—		130,126		1,875		1,875
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		258,875		258,875		—		258,875		3,549		3,549
Commercial & industrial		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer (2)		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	2,122,309	$	2,122,309	$	—	$	1,844,368	$	29,883	$	21,275


With an allowance recorded:
Construction, land & land development	$	407,513	$	408,540	$	116,977	$	408,077	$	—	$	—
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		2,548,609		2,579,221		901,806		2,279,715		18,700		12,500
Residential Junior Mortgages (1)		1,645,950		1,959,957		448,415		1,652,791		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		1,582,734		1,585,794		272,490		1,385,569		14,680		6,924
Commercial & industrial		954,451		983,399		463,359		757,324		3,712		3,095
Consumer (2)		94,210		94,210		94,210		47,105		1,620		1,620

	$	7,233,467	$	7,611,121	$	2,297,257	$	6,530,580	$	38,712	$	24,139


Total Impaired Loans:
Construction, land & land development	$	407,513	$	408,540	$	116,977	$	408,077	$	—	$	—
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		4,283,018		4,313,630		901,806		3,735,083		43,159		28,351
Residential Junior Mortgages (1)		1,774,975		2,088,982		448,415		1,782,917		1,875		1,875
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		1,841,609		1,844,669		272,490		1,644,444		18,229		10,473
Commercial & industrial		954,451		983,399		463,359		757,324		3,712		3,095
Consumer (2)		94,210		94,210		94,210		47,105		1,620		1,620

	$	9,355,776	$	9,733,430	$	2,297,257	$	8,374,948	$	68,595	$	45,414

IMPAIRED LOANS


As of December 31, 2011	Recorded Investment		Customers’ Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Collected
With no related allowance:
Construction, land & land development	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		901,132		901,132		—		726,266		52,293		52,378
Residential Junior Mortgages		131,226		131,226		—		66,245		7,325		6,208
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		258,875		258,875		—		208,153		14,311		14,309
Commercial & industrial		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	1,291,233	$	1,291,233	$	—	$	1,000,665	$	73,929	$	72,895


With an allowance recorded:
Construction, land & land development	$	408,640	$	408,640	$	119,500	$	355,822	$	3,865	$	3,260
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		2,286,015		2,303,167		726,552		1,254,593		100,550		95,208
Residential Junior Mortgages		1,659,632		1,961,728		465,121		1,451,332		14,483		9,846
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		1,188,403		1,191,301		244,318		891,128		48,600		44,593
Commercial & industrial		560,197		610,822		236,650		356,905		15,982		14,548
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	6,102,887	$	6,475,658	$	1,792,141	$	4,309,779	$	183,480	$	167,455


Total Impaired Loans:
Construction, land & land development	$	408,640	$	408,640	$	119,500	$	355,822	$	3,865	$	3,260
Farmland		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential First Mortgages		3,187,147		3,204,299		726,552		1,980,859		152,843		147,586
Residential Junior Mortgages		1,790,858		2,092,954		465,121		1,517,577		21,808		16,054
Commercial Mortgages (Non-owner occupied)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial Mortgages (Owner occupied)		1,447,278		1,450,176		244,318		1,099,281		62,911		58,902
Commercial & industrial		560,197		610,822		236,650		356,905		15,982		14,548
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	7,394,120	$	7,766,891	$	1,792,141	$	5,310,444	$	257,409	$	240,350

At March 31, 2012, the Bank had five relationships that constitute troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”), totaling $3.9 million. One relationship involves seven loans totaling $1.8 million, which is included above in the commercial and industrial segment; the construction, land and land development segment; and the residential junior mortgages segment. These loans had defaulted and have been nonaccruing since October of 2010, and were modified during the second quarter of 2011 to provide cross-collateralization between loans and reduced payments. Three relationships each involved residential first mortgages for a total of $2.0 million in principal balances. Two of these three with balances of $899,222 as of March 31, 2012, were restructured during 2011. One of these two defaulted during 2011. Another TDR, which was restructured in 2010, defaulted in 2011. The two which have defaulted are on nonaccrual where the borrowers have filed for bankruptcy. In 2012, one relationship was added that involved a residential first mortgage totaling $650,113 and a consumer loan totaling $94,210.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, nonaccruing loans excluded from impaired loan disclosure totaled $467,790 and $681,592, respectively. If interest on these nonaccruing loans had been accrued, such income would have approximated $20,576 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $32,560 during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Note 5:

Earnings per share

The following table shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock.


Three Months Ended (unaudited)	March 31, 2012				March 31, 2011
	Average Shares		Per share Amount		Average Shares		Per share Amount
Basic earnings per share		2,610,856	$	0.04		2,605,856	$	0.05

Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		1,350				—

Diluted earnings per share		2,612,206	$	0.04		2,605,856	$	0.05

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, options on 158,861 and 217,025 shares, respectively, were not included in computing diluted earnings per share, because their effects were anti-dilutive.

Note 6:

Stock-Based Compensation

Incremental stock-based compensation expense recognized was $2,193 during the first three months of 2012 and $2,376 for the same period in 2011. As of March 31, 2012, there was unrecognized compensation expense of $731 related to stock options.

Stock option compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes Model amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award. There were no options granted and no options exercised during the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

Stock option plan activity for the three months ended March 31, 2012, is summarized below:


	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)

Options outstanding, January 1		197,423		$	10.00		5.8

Granted		—			—
Forfeited		(33,562	)		8.92
Exercised		—			—
Expired		—			—

Options outstanding, March 31		163,861			10.22		5.4	$	18,932


Options exercisable, March 31		163,861			10.22		5.4	$	18,932

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2012. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Company’s stock.

Note 7:

Goodwill

The Company has goodwill recorded on the consolidated financial statements relating to the purchase of five branches during the years 1994 through 2000. The balance of the goodwill at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, as reflected on the consolidated balance sheets was $2,807,842. Management determined that these purchases qualified as acquisitions of businesses and that the related unidentifiable intangibles were goodwill. Therefore, amortization was discontinued effective January 1, 2002. The goodwill balance was tested for impairment in the third quarter of 2011, and no impairment was determined to exist.

Note 8:

Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time employees over 21 years of age. Under this cash balance plan, the account balance for each participant will grow each year with annual pay credits based on age and years of service and monthly interest credits based on an amount established each year by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company funds pension costs in accordance with the funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

The Company sponsors a postretirement benefit plan covering current and future retirees who acquire age 55 and 10 years of service or age 65 and 5 years of service. The post-retirement benefit plan provides coverage toward a retiree’s eligible medical and life insurance benefits expenses.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

(Unaudited)


	Pension Benefits						Post Retirement Benefits
	2012			2011			2012		2011
Three months ended March 31,
Service cost	$	63,571		$	68,737		$	6,501	$	5,570
Interest cost		44,575			51,994			7,489		7,943
Expected return on plan assets		(80,466	)		(88,287	)		—		—
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost		(13,491	)		(13,491	)		—		—
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		17,860			10,605			735		42
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			728		728

Net periodic benefit cost	$	32,049		$	29,558		$	15,453	$	14,283

The Company expects to make no contribution to its pension plan and $22,061 to its post-retirement benefit plan in 2012. The Company has contributed $3,827 toward the post-retirement plan during the first three months of 2012.

Note 9:

Long Term Debt

On March 31, 2012, the Bank had FHLB debt consisting of two advances. The FHLB holds an option to terminate the $10 million advance on any quarterly payment date. The $10 million advance has an early conversion option which gives the FHLB the option to convert, in whole only, into a one-month LIBOR-based floating rate advance, effective on any quarterly payment date. If the FHLB elects to convert, the Bank may elect to terminate, in whole or in part, without a prepayment fee.

Advances on the FHLB lines are secured by a blanket lien on qualified 1 to 4 family residential real estate loans with a lendable collateral value of $52.0 million. Immediate available credit, as of March 31, 2012, was $35.0 million. With additional collateral, the total line of credit is worth $62.9 million, with $45.9 million available.

The two advances are shown in the following table.


Description	Balance		Acquired		Current Interest Rate			Maturity Date

Convertible	$	10,000,000		9/12/2006		4.23	%		9/12/2016
Fixed Rate Hybrid		5,000,000		5/20/2011		2.69	%		5/20/2014

	$	15,000,000

Note 10:

Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value to record certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Authoritative accounting guidance clarifies that fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.

Authoritative accounting guidance specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on these two types of inputs are as follows:


Level 1	–	Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2	–	Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.
Level 3	–	Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available-for-sale: Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that considers observable market data (Level 2).

The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

		$8,795,006		$8,795,006		$8,795,006		$8,795,006
			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using
Description	Balance as of March 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(unaudited)
U. S. Government agencies	$	8,769,992	$	—	$	8,769,992	$	—
State and municipal obligations		31,101,124		—		31,101,124		—

		$8,795,006		$8,795,006		$8,795,006		$8,795,006
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

U. S. Government agencies	$	8,795,006	$	—	$	8,795,006	$	—
State and municipal obligations		33,004,055		—		33,004,055		—

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Impaired Loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’s financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise,

values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other Real Estate Owned: Certain assets such as other real estate owned are measured at the lower of their carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. At or near the time of foreclosure, the Bank obtains real estate appraisals on the properties acquired through foreclosure. The real estate is then valued at the lesser of the loan balance, including interest receivable, or the appraised value at the time of foreclosure less an estimate of costs to sell the property. Management believes that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 820 and that current real estate appraisals support a Level 2 valuation.

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period.

		$2,279,935		$2,279,935		$2,279,935		$2,279,935
			Fair value measurements at March 31, 2012 using
Description	Balance as of March 31, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(unaudited)
Impaired Loans, net of valuation allowance	$	4,936,210	$	—	$	2,265,117	$	2,671,093
Other real estate owned	$	2,260,653	$	—	$	2,260,653	$	—

		$2,279,935		$2,279,935		$2,279,935		$2,279,935
			Fair value measurements at December 31, 2011 using
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired Loans, net of valuation allowance	$	4,310,746	$	—	$	2,057,314	$	2,253,432
Other real estate owned	$	2,279,935	$	—	$	2,279,935	$	—

The estimated fair values of financial instruments are shown in the following table. The carrying amounts in the table are included in the balance sheet under the applicable captions.


			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using
March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	4,910,717	$	4,910,717	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits		16,654,967		—		16,654,967		—
Federal funds sold		2,245,145		—		2,245,145		—
Securities available-for-sale		39,871,116		—		39,871,116		—
Restricted securities		1,991,200		—		1,991,200		—
Loans, net		238,680,643		—		236,310,779		2,671,093
Accrued interest receivable		1,147,306		—		1,147,306		—

Liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	48,244,970	$	—	$	48,244,970	$	—
Savings and other interest-bearing deposits		110,230,025		—		110,230,025		—
Time deposits		115,635,176		—		117,618,120		—
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		6,259,247		—		6,259,247		—
FHLB advances		15,000,000		—		16,586,477		—
Accrued interest payable		173,463		—		173,463		—


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
December 31, 2011	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	4,728,895	$	4,728,895	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits		10,369,075		—		10,369,075		—
Federal funds sold		2,136,375		—		2,136,375		—
Securities available-for-sale		41,799,121		—		41,799,121		—
Restricted securities		1,991,200		—		1,991,200		—
Loans, net		233,501,821		—		231,681,647		2,253,432
Accrued interest receivable		1,161,191		—		1,161,191		—

Liabilities:
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	43,803,349	$	—	$	43,803,349	$	—
Savings and other interest-bearing deposits		105,269,889		—		105,269,889		—
Time deposits		116,444,867		—		118,668,679		—
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		5,277,158		—		5,277,158		—
FHLB advances		15,000,000		—		16,651,084		—
Accrued interest payable		168,628		—		168,628		—

The fair values shown do not necessarily represent the amounts which would be received on immediate settlement of the instruments. Authoritative accounting guidance excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold or purchased, accrued interest, non-interest-bearing deposits, savings, and securities sold under repurchase agreements, represent items which do not present significant market risks, are payable on demand, or are of such short duration that carrying value approximates market value.

Available-for-sale securities are carried at the fair values measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Therefore carrying value equals market value. The carrying value of restricted securities approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions.

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers.

Time deposits are presented at estimated fair value using interest rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

The fair value of the FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the interest rate offered for similar advances.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit worthiness of the counter parties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The fair value of standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counter parties at the reporting date.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit was immaterial. Therefore, they are not included in the table above.

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding the results of operations and the financial condition of the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the above consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company remains energized under its new leadership and management is coordinating the implementation of numerous plans and projects which are beginning to show results. A reduction in work force of 15% of total full-time employees was completed in January of 2012. Several initiatives are in process to grow non-interest income, which will start showing results during the second quarter. A new Investment Advantage representative and a new residential lending manager joined us in April of 2012. A new overdraft privilege service is going live in May 2012, and other new products and services are in development. Finally, we remain committed to the reduction of some major expenses. For example, on May 11, 2012, we filed for deregistration from the SEC. This is expected to save us as much as $100 thousand annually in related expense. We are continuing our traditional conservative philosophy and service to our community. The Bank does not invest in non-traditional debt securities, nor does it have programs that originate Sub-Prime, Alt-A, or other types of mortgages that have a high risk profile.

We are especially pleased to report that the loan portfolio grew by more than $5 million during the first quarter of 2012. This reverses the negative trend that began during the first quarter of 2011, as we are now originating more loans than those lost to pay downs, prepayments and foreclosures.

The level of non-performing assets and impaired loans remain a primary concern. Although significant efforts are made to prevent foreclosures, some are unavoidable, and as some Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) properties have been sold, others have been added, leaving the balance of OREO at around $2.3 million from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012. Non-accruing loans, which no longer provide interest income, grew by nearly $1 million during the first quarter 2012. Balances on loans considered impaired that are not already non-accruing grew to $3.5 million as of March 31, 2012 compared to $2.6 million on December 31, 2011.

Loan recoveries actually exceeded loan charge-offs during the first quarter. This is unusual, but reflects our success in obtaining a favorable judgment on a residential real estate property. Our net loan charge-off ratio is negative 0.4% for the first quarter of 2012, compared to 0.12% for the first quarter of 2011. Most charge-offs in the first quarter of 2012 were included in the Allowance for Loan Losses (“ALL”) as specific reserves on impaired loans at December 31, 2011. In consideration of continued economic uncertainty, management believes the conservative level of ALL at a relatively high level of $3.3 million, or 1.37% of loans is prudent. We remain cautiously optimistic that the worst levels of foreclosures and charge-offs are behind us.

Like all financial institutions holding insured domestic deposits, one of the major challenges to earnings is Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance premiums for those deposits. This insurance remains historically high as the FDIC rebuilds the Deposit Insurance Fund. As a result, the Bank continues to experience elevated levels of FDIC assessment expense.

Foreclosed properties continue to stress earnings. The Bank experienced $68 thousand in losses and write-downs on existing OREO, and $43 thousand in sundry maintenance and repairs on these properties, for a total expense of $111 thousand during the first quarter of 2012. The good news is that this is down from the $160 thousand during the first quarter of 2011.

Interest margins are improving. Although interest rates remain at historic lows, management continues to mitigate declines in interest income with greater reductions in interest expense, resulting in an increase in net interest income of $58 thousand for the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. Loan yields continue to decline, contributing to the reduced interest income, which is also negatively impacted to a lesser degree by nonaccruing loans. However, management has systematically reduced deposit rates to reflect the current rate environment, creating compensating reductions in costs of funds and interest expense, and therefore minimizing declines in net interest income as noted previously. The $15 million paydown in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) advances contributed a material reduction in interest expense and cost of funds. Looking forward, as time deposits continue to mature and new ones are issued at lower rates, reductions in interest expense are expected to continue.

The Company’s liquidity, core capital levels and regulatory ratios remain good. According to the Bank’s regulators, the Bank remains “well capitalized” under supervisory guidelines. Given the challenging economic environment, management is closely guarding the Company’s liquidity and capital.

We remain grateful for the support of our shareholders, community, customers and employees and anticipate a bright future for our Company.

For more information, visit the Company’s website at www.baybanks.com. Information contained on the Company’s website is not a part of this report.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

GENERAL. The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. For example, historical loss factors are one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors used. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact those transactions could change.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES. The ALL is an estimate which reflects management’s judgment of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on two basic principles of accounting: (1) that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable and (2) that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. The ALL is increased by charges to income, through the provision for loan losses expense, and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries).

Management calculates the ALL and evaluates it for adequacy every quarter. This process is lengthy and thorough. The calculation is based on information such as past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions. The quarterly process includes consideration of certain borrowers’ payment histories compared to the terms of each loan agreement and other adverse factors such as divorce, loss of employment income, and bankruptcy. Each loan is then given a risk grade which represents the extent (or lack) of weakness. This grading process occurs dynamically throughout each quarter as new information is learned about each borrowing relationship.

The ALL calculation has three main elements. First, large commercial and construction loan relationships with adverse risk rating grades, in bankruptcy, nonaccruing, or more than 30 days past due are evaluated for impairment. For loans determined to be impaired, a specific allowance is provided when the loan balance exceeds its discounted collateral value. Real estate collateral value is determined based on appraisals done by third parties. At such time as a loan is assigned to a ‘watch’ grade, if the most recent appraisal is more than two years old, a new appraisal will generally be ordered. Discounts applied to collateral include estimated realtor commissions on real estate (in consideration of selling costs should the Bank end up owning the property), and industry-standard reductions in values for accounts receivable, inventory and other varying forms of collateral.

Second, loans not deemed impaired under the first element plus smaller commercial loans, residential mortgages and consumer loans are collectively evaluated in groups of homogenous pools called segments, then a historical loss factor is applied to each segment of loans. The historical loss factor for each segment is calculated by averaging the losses over the prior six quarters.

Finally, a set of qualitative factors, such as changes in credit quality, changes in loan staff experience, changes in loan policies and underwriting guidelines, and changes in national and local economic conditions, is used to estimate the value of intrinsic risk in each of the segments.

The summation of these three elements results in the total estimated ALL. Management may also include an unallocated component to cover uncertainties in the level of probable losses. This estimate is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. For a more detailed description of the ALL, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of the previously filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

EARNINGS SUMMATION

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, net income was $106 thousand, a decrease of 18.0% compared to the $129 thousand for the similar period in 2011. Diluted earnings per average share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $0.04, down one cent from the same period in 2011; annualized return on average assets was 0.13% and 0.16% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011; and annualized return on average equity was 1.51% and 1.91%, respectively.

The principal source of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense. The net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of interest-earning assets. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the associated yields and rates, and the volume of non-performing assets have an effect on net interest income, the net interest margin, and net income. Although interest income is down by $195 thousand in the first three months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, interest expense is down more, by $273 thousand, thereby increasing the level of net interest income by $78 thousand, or 3.1%. The $195 thousand decrease in interest income was driven by both lower average loan balances and reduced loan yields. The $273 thousand decrease in interest expense was primarily due to reduced rates on savings accounts and time deposits and reduced FHLB borrowings.

Net Interest Income Analysis (unaudited)


	Average Balances, Income and Expense, Yields and Rates
	Three months ended 3/31/2012							Three months ended 3/31/2011
(Fully taxable equivalent basis)	Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Cost
(Dollars in Thousands)
Taxable investments	$	30,056	$	201		2.68	%	$	26,748	$	205		3.07	%
Tax-exempt investments (1)		11,821		108		3.64	%		6,852		97		5.66	%

Total investments		41,877		309		2.95	%		33,600		302		3.59	%

Gross loans (2)		239,316		3,224		5.38	%		246,717		3,438		5.59	%

Interest-bearing deposits		12,126		7		0.23	%		14,227		9		0.26	%
Federal funds sold		2,424		1		0.23	%		6,330		3		0.19	%

Total Interest Earning Assets	$	95,743	$	3,541		4.79	%	$	300,874	$	3,752		4.99	%


INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES:
Savings deposits	$	47,736	$	62		0.52	%	$	48,324	$	99		0.83	%
NOW deposits		38,263		20		0.21	%		37,767		24		0.26	%
Time deposits => $100,000		51,848		332		2.57	%		47,307		289		2.48	%
Time deposits < $100,000		64,208		298		1.86	%		64,480		372		2.33	%
Money market deposit accounts		22,744		37		0.65	%		19,451		37		0.77	%

Total Deposits	$	24,799	$	749		1.34	%	$	217,329	$	821		1.53	%

Securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	5,143	$	3		0.23	%	$	6,706	$	3		0.21	%
FHLB advances		15,000		141		3.77	%		30,000		342		4.62	%

Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	$	244,942	$	893		1.46	%	$	254,035	$	1,166		1.86	%


Net interest income and net interest margin			$	2,648		3.58	%			$	2,587		3.44	%
Net interest rate spread						3.33	%						3.13	%

Notes:

(1)	Income and yield assumes a federal tax rate of 34%

(2)	Includes Visa program and nonaccrual loans.

The annualized net interest margin was 3.58% for the three months ended March 31, 2012, up from 3.44% for the same period in 2011. The main reason for this improvement is reductions in FHLB advances. Unfortunately, because interest rates remain at historic lows, new loans are generally added to the loan portfolio at lower yields than the average yield of the portfolio as a whole. Combined with paydowns and payoffs of generally higher yielding loans, and shrinkage of the loan portfolio, interest income has continued to decline. However, deposit rates have declined to reduce the cost of funding and interest expense. One FHLB advance matured during the second quarter of 2011, allowing management to reduce the level of FHLB borrowings at materially lower interest rates. Two more FHLB advances were prepaid in August of 2011. These reductions in rates and balances of interest bearing liabilities have more than mitigated the declines in interest income, thus improving net interest income and the net interest margin. Further reductions in the cost of funds are anticipated as time deposits mature and are replaced at lower rates. As long as market rates remain low, this trend is expected to continue, but at a slower pace, and to have positive effects on the net interest margin.

Average interest-earning assets decreased 1.7% to $295.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to $300.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Average interest-earning assets as a percent of total average assets was 93.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to 91.6% for the comparable period of 2011. As shown in the table above, for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the loan portfolio, with $239.3 million, is the largest category of interest-earning assets.

Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 3.5% to $244.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to $254.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The largest category of interest-bearing liabilities is time deposits, with combined average balances of $116.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, up from $111.8 million for the similar period in 2011.

The net interest spread, which is the difference between the annualized yield on earning assets and the annualized cost of interest-bearing liabilities, increased to 3.33% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to 3.13% for the same period in 2011.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity represents an institution’s ability to meet present and future financial obligations (such as commitments to fund loans) through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, federal funds sold and investments and loans maturing within one year. The Company’s ability to obtain deposits and purchase funds at favorable rates are major factors for liquidity. Management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and to meet its customers’ credit needs.

At March 31, 2012, federal funds sold totaled $2.2 million, interest-bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond totaled $16.7 million, and securities and loans maturing in one year or less totaled $29.0 million. The liquidity ratio as of March 31, 2012 was 16.3% as compared to 14.2% as of December 31, 2011. The Company determines this ratio by dividing the sum of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities maturing in one year or less, loans maturing in one year or less and federal funds sold, by total assets. The Bank has a formal liquidity management policy and contingency plan. Given current economic uncertainty, management is maintaining a historically high level of liquidity.

In addition, as noted earlier, the Company has a line of credit with the FHLB worth $52.0 million, plus federal funds lines of credit with correspondent banks totaling $20.3 million.

OFF BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS

In the normal course of business, the Company offers various financial products to its customers to meet their credit and liquidity needs. These instruments may involve elements of liquidity, credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby-letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. Subject to its normal credit standards and risk monitoring procedures, the Company makes contractual commitments to extend credit. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Conditional commitments are issued by the Company in the form of performance stand-by letters of credit, which guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The credit risk of issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements


	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Total Loan Commitments Outstanding	$	29,778	$	31,170
Standby-by Letters of Credit		378		378

The Company maintains liquidity and credit facilities with non-affiliated banks in excess of the total loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit. As these commitments are earning assets only upon takedown of the instrument by the customer, thereby increasing loan balances, management expects the revenue of the Company to be enhanced as these credit facilities are utilized.

There have been no material changes to the off balance sheet items disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the contractual obligations disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital resources represent funds, earned or obtained, over which a financial institution can exercise greater long-term control in comparison with deposits and borrowed funds. The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis with reference to size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and consistency with regulatory requirements and industry standards. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential losses, yet allow management to effectively leverage its capital to maximize return to shareholders. The Company’s capital, also known as equity, is comprised mainly of outstanding stock and retained earnings. Capital can be increased with securities offerings or through earnings. The Company has a formal capital policy and plan and management believes that the capital level at March 31, 2012, supports current economic uncertainty.

From December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012, total shareholders’ equity increased by $30 thousand to $28.0 million. Several factors impact shareholder’s equity, including net income, earnings returned to shareholders through cash dividends and regulatory capital requirements.

The Company’s capital resources are also impacted by net unrealized gains or losses on securities. The available-for-sale securities portfolio is marked to market monthly and unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, are recognized as accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheets and statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. Another factor effecting accumulated other comprehensive income is changes in the fair value of the Company’s pension and post-retirement benefit plans. Shareholders’ equity before accumulated other comprehensive income was $27.7 million on March 31, 2012 compared to $27.6 million on December 31, 2011. Accumulated other comprehensive income decreased $77.5 thousand between December 31, 2011 and March 30, 2012, a result of reductions in unrealized gains in the investment portfolio.

Book value per share, basic, increased by 0.1% to $10.74 on March 31, 2012 from $10.73 on December 31, 2011. Book value per share, basic, before accumulated other comprehensive income on March 31, 2012, compared to December 31, 2011, increased by 0.4% to $10.60 from $10.56. No cash dividends were paid for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, nor for the comparable period ended March 31, 2011. Of the 5,000,000 common shares authorized, 2,610,856 were outstanding on March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Company began a share repurchase program in August of 1999 and has continued the program into 2012. No repurchases were made during the first three months of 2012 or during the comparable period in 2011.

The Bank is subject to minimum regulatory capital ratios as defined by Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council guidelines. These ratios continue to be well in excess of regulatory minimums. As of March 31, 2012, the Bank maintained Tier 1 capital of $24.6 million, net risk weighted assets of $225.0 million, and Tier 2 capital of $2.8 million. On March 31, 2012, the Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets ratio was 10.92%, the total capital ratio was 12.18%, and the Tier 1 leverage ratio was 7.79%.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets increased by 3.1% to $324.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Cash and due from banks, which produce no income, increased to $4.9 million on March 31, 2012 from $4.7 million at year-end 2011.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, gross loans increased by $5.3 million or 2.2%, to $242.0 million from $236.7 million at year-end 2011. The largest component of this increase was in Commercial mortgages, non-owner occupied with a 12.1% increase of $2.0 million to $18.2 million. Noticeable growth occurred in Construction, land and land development with a 5.1% increase of $1.4 million to $29.1 million.

Consumer loans, including residential real estate loans, are generally underwritten based on the borrower’s debt-to-income ratio, credit score or payment history and the ratio of the requested loan amount to the value of any collateral. There are established underwriting criteria for these parameters to determine if a loan will be considered an acceptable credit risk. For commercial borrowers, factors we assess include the legal entity of the borrower, the capacity of the borrower to cover its debt service obligations, the strength and creditworthiness of any guarantor support, the value of any collateral relative to the loan amount, stability and predictability of the borrower’s cash flow, and the borrower’s standing with the Virginia State Corporation Commission.

As of March 31, 2012, loans valued at $9.4 million were considered impaired, whereas $7.4 million were considered impaired as of December 31, 2011. Between December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, new impaired loans totaled $2.0 million, whereas none were dispensed. Management has reviewed these impaired credits and the underlying collateral and expects no additional losses above those which are specifically reserved in the ALL.

Risk rating grades are assigned conservatively, causing some homogenous loans, like residential mortgages, to fall into the pool of adversely risk rated loans and thereby evaluated for impairment, even though they may be performing as agreed and therefore not impaired.

Non-Performing Assets


(Dollars in Thousands)	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
(percentages are as a percent of total loans)	$			%			$			%
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing	$	117			0.0	%	$	60			0.0	%
Non-accruing loans		6,551			2.7	%		5,417			2.3	%

Total non-performing loans	$	6,668			2.8	%	$	5,477			2.3	%

Allowance for loan losses	$	3,308			1.37	%	$	3,189			1.35	%
Allowance to non-performing loans		49.6	%					58.2	%

(percentages are as a percent of total loans plus OREO)
Other real estate owned		2,261			0.9	%		2,280			1.0	%

Total non-performing assets	$	8,929			3.7	%	$	7,757			3.2	%

Non-performing loans, which include loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing plus non-accruing loans, as a percentage of total loans, increased to 2.8% as of March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011, a result of two large loans each past due between 91 and 103 days, plus two additional large nonaccruing loans, which are in the process of foreclosure. One of the two past due loans is in the process of workout and the other is well collateralized with a paydown expected within 30 days. Non-accruing loans totaled $6.6 million as of March 31, 2012, up from $5.4 million at year-end 2011. Loans still accruing interest but delinquent for 90 days or more totaled $117 thousand on March 31, 2012, up from $60 thousand on December 31, 2011. Non-performing assets, which include OREO in addition to non-performing loans, increased to 3.7% at March 31, 2012 from 3.2% at December 31, 2011. The Bank has twelve TDRs which are comprised by five borrowers, one more at March 31, 2012 than at December 31, 2011, for a total of $3.9 million. The most recent TDR involves two loans totaling $744 thousand.

Loans charged off during the first three months of 2012 were less than recoveries, resulting in net recoveries of $23 thousand. This represents a reduction in the annualized net charge-off ratio from 0.12% for the first three months of 2011 to negative 0.04% for the same period of 2012. The majority of the charge-offs were anticipated and specific reserves had been provided for them in the ALL. The large amount of recoveries was driven by a successful legal judgment on a piece of residential real estate related to a prior foreclosure. Management is maintaining a conservative level of the ALL at 1.37% of total loans, up from 1.35% on December 31, 2011.

The Company had $2.3 million of OREO at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. OREO consists of eight residences, 11 lots, one former lodging property with a restaurant, two former convenience stores, a seafood house and one piece of farmland. In 2012, six OREO properties with a book value of $395 thousand were sold for a loss of $54 thousand, and four properties with a total value of $310 thousand from four borrowers were added through foreclosures and a deed in lieu of foreclosure. All properties maintained as OREO are valued at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are actively marketed.

As of March 31, 2012, securities available-for-sale at fair value totaled $39.9 million as compared to $41.8 million on December 31, 2011. This represents a net decrease of $1.9 million or 4.6% for the three months. As of March 31, 2012, these securities represented 12.3% of total assets and 13.2% of earning assets. All securities in the Company’s investment portfolio are classified as available-for-sale and marked to market on a monthly basis. These gains or losses, net of tax, are booked as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity based upon market conditions, and are not realized as an adjustment to earnings until the securities are actually sold or an other than temporary impairment occurs. Management does not consider any of the securities to be other than temporarily impaired.

As of March 31, 2012, total deposits were $274.1 million compared to $265.5 million at year-end 2011. This represents an increase in balances of $8.6 million or 3.2% during the three months. This increase was due materially to savings and interest bearing demand deposits with a 4.7% increase of $5.0 million.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012, was up by $142 thousand, or 24.7%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011. The main driver of this increase is the reduction in losses on OREO properties, which were down to $68 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to $118 thousand for the same period in 2011. Fees from sales of mortgages into the secondary market more than doubled from $38 thousand to $77 thousand. Income from Investment Advantage was up to $63 thousand from $42 thousand for the same period of 2011, an increase of $21 thousand. Investment Advantage contributes the majority of income to other service charges and fees, and since income from Investment Advantage is commission-based, increases in investment activity will cause increases in the Company’s income. VISA^® related fees declined by $3 thousand to $159 thousand in the first three months of 2012 compared to the similar period in 2011.

Income from fiduciary activities was up by $6 thousand to $160 thousand for the first three months of 2012 compared to the similar period in 2011. The Company’s fiduciary income is derived from the operations of its subsidiary, Bay Trust Company, which offers a broad range of trust and related fiduciary services. Among these are estate settlement and testamentary trusts, revocable and irrevocable personal trusts, managed agency, custodial accounts, and rollover IRAs, both self-directed and managed. Fiduciary income is largely affected by changes in the performance of the stock and bond market, which directly impacts the market value of the accounts upon which fees are earned and therefore the levels of this fee income.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

For the three ended March 31, 2012, non-interest expenses totaled $3.1 million, an increase of $176 thousand, or 6.0%, compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 2011, due mainly to a $133 thousand increase in other expenses, which is related primarily to strategic planning consulting expense. Non-interest expense is comprised of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense, bank franchise tax, Visa^® program expense, telephone expense, FDIC assessments and other expense. The largest portion of non-interest expense is salary and benefits, which increased by $30 thousand in the first three months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Without the $93 thousand paid in severance expense related to the reduction in force, salaries and benefits expense would be down by $63 thousand. Expenses related to the VISA^® program increased by 3.2% to $131 thousand in the first three months of 2012 as compared to $127 thousand for the same period in 2011. However, when also considering the interest and non-interest income generated by the VISA^® program prior to taxes, it provided a net positive contribution to the Company of $39 thousand in the first three months of 2012, down from $41 thousand for the same period in 2011.

Bank franchise taxes increased to $43 thousand for the first three months of 2012 compared to $37 thousand for the same period in 2011 and telephone expenses declined to $41 thousand for the current period compared to $43 thousand for the same period in 2011. Telephone expenses include the cost of the Company’s Customer Care Center and data network communications. Also, FDIC insurance assessments are down by $43 thousand for the same period comparison.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and IFRSs.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic 820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective application. Early application is not permitted. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require transition disclosures. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” The amendments in this ASU permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors related to goodwill to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.” The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by ASU 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period to which this report relates, the Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating its disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential conditions. Based upon their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings as of March 31, 2012.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There was no change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Not required.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The Company began a share repurchase program in August of 1999 and has continued the program into 2011. There are a total of 280,000 shares authorized for repurchase under the program. No shares were repurchased during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None to report.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None to report.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

31.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.*

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data File attached as Exhibit 101 hereto is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under such sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc.
	(Registrant)

May 14, 2012	By:	/s/ Randal R. Greene
		Randal R. Greene
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ Deborah M. Evans
		Deborah M. Evans
		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company