Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPFinancial_Report.xls
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR8.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR6.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR5.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR1.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR2.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR9.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR4.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR3.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR7.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR16.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR13.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR12.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR14.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR10.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR11.htm
XML - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPR15.htm
EX-32.01 - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPmsccex3201.htm
EX-31.01 - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPmsccex3101.htm
EX-32.02 - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPmsccex3202.htm
EX-31.02 - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LPmsccex3102.htm

 
 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x           QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 or

o           TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________to__________________

Commission File Number: 0-50064

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
 
 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 

 
Delaware
 
01-0710311
 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
       
Ceres Managed Futures LLC
   
522 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor
   
New York, NY
 
10036
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
 
(212) 296-1999


(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x
Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes 0  No T


 
 

 




MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

March 31, 2012



 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
     
 
Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
2
     
 
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of March 31, 2012
3
     
 
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2011
4
     
 
Statements of Income and Expenses for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
5
     
 
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
6
     
 
Notes to Financial Statements
  7-23
     
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
24-31
     
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
31-38
     
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
38-39
     
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
40
     
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
40
     
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
40
     
Item 6.
Exhibits
40-41



 
 

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 
(Unaudited)
   
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
ASSETS
$
 
$
       
Trading Equity:
     
       
Unrestricted cash
50,920,096 
 
54,498,150 
Restricted cash
8,297,996 
 
6,938,556 
       
Total cash
59,218,092 
 
61,436,706 
       
Net unrealized gain on open contracts (MSIP)
65,688 
 
236,359   
Net unrealized loss on open contracts (MS&Co.)
(1,727,969) 
 
(146,410) 
       
Total net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts
(1,662,281) 
 
89,949 
       
Total Trading Equity
57,555,811 
 
61,526,655 
       
Interest receivable (MSSB)
4,006 
 
1,376 
       
Total Assets
57,559,817 
 
61,528,031 
       
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
     
       
Liabilities:
     
       
Redemptions payable
1,473,181      
 
2,022,443 
Accrued brokerage fees (MS&Co.)
294,670      
 
297,607 
Accrued management fees
98,223      
 
99,203 
       
Total Liabilities
1,866,074      
 
2,419,253 
       
Partners’ Capital:
     
       
Limited Partners (5,501,461.458 and 5,973,858.709 Units, respectively)
55,061,188     
 
58,393,243 
General Partner (63,202.055 and 73,202.055 Units, respectively)
632,555     
 
715,535 
       
Total Partners’ Capital
55,693,743     
 
59,108,778 
       
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
57,559,817     
 
61,528,031 
       
NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT
            10.01
 
             9.77 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

- 2 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2012 (Unaudited)




Futures and Forward Contracts Purchased
Net unrealized
gain/(loss) on
open contracts
% of
Partners’ Capital
 
$
 
Commodity
     (97,187)
 (0.17)
Equity
   176,247
 0.32          
Foreign currency
(282,534)
 (0.51)
Interest rate
      257,875    
  0.46
     
Total Futures and Forward Contracts Purchased
       54,401
   0.10
     
     
Futures and Forward Contracts Sold
   
     
Commodity
    752,099
 1.35          
Equity
    64,217
 0.12          
Foreign currency
123,912
 0.22          
Interest rate
      (259,581) 
    (0.47)         
     
Total Futures and Forward Contracts Sold
      680,647
     1.22
     
Unrealized Currency Loss
 (2,397,329)                  
        (4.30)              
     
Net fair value
          (1,662,281)
    (2.98)
     




















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

- 3 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2011



Futures and Forward Contracts Purchased
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on
open contracts
% of
Partners’ Capital
 
      $
 
Commodity
     (7,340)
 (0.01)
Equity
   151,394
 0.26         
Foreign currency
151,175
0.26
Interest rate
      945,072   
  1.59
     
Total Futures and Forward Contracts Purchased
   1,240,301
   2.10
     

Futures and Forward Contracts Sold
   
     
Commodity
    852
  – (1)                     
Equity
    70,025
 0.11         
Foreign currency
1,179,257
 2.00         
Interest rate
      (7,735)   
    (0.01)        
     
Total Futures and Forward Contracts Sold
   1,242,399
   2.10
     
Unrealized Currency Loss
 (2,392,751)                  
        (4.05)              
     
Net fair value
               89,949
     0.15
     
     




(1) Amounts less than 0.005%.













The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

- 4 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
(Unaudited)



 
For the Quarters Ended March 31,
       
 
2012
 
2011
 
$
 
$
INVESTMENT INCOME
     
Interest income (MSSB)
7,454 
 
20,722 
       
EXPENSES
     
Brokerage fees (MS&Co.)
888,345 
 
1,210,258 
Management fees
296,115 
 
403,419 
       
Total Expenses
1,184,460 
 
1,613,677 
       
NET INVESTMENT LOSS
(1,177,006) 
 
(1,592,955) 
       
TRADING RESULTS
     
Trading profit (loss):
     
Net realized
4,415,381 
 
(180,530) 
Net change in unrealized
(1,752,230) 
 
(2,754,203) 
       
Total Trading Results
2,663,151 
 
(2,934,733) 
       
NET INCOME (LOSS)
1,486,145 
 
(4,527,688) 
       
NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATION
     
       
Limited Partners
1,469,025 
 
(4,477,961) 
General Partner
17,120 
 
(49,727) 
       
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT *
     
       
Limited Partners
0.24 
 
(0.60) 
General Partner
0.24 
 
(0.60) 
       
 
Units
 
Units
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
     
OF UNITS OUTSTANDING
5,895,639.452 
 
7,629,167.454 



* Based on change in net asset value per Unit.



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

- 5 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
For the Quarters Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)



 
Units of
           
 
Partnership
 
Limited
 
General
   
 
Interest
 
Partners
 
Partner
 
Total
     
$
 
$
 
$
Partners’ Capital,
             
December 31, 2011
6,047,060.764 
 
58,393,243 
 
715,535 
 
59,108,778 
               
Net Income
 
1,469,025 
 
17,120 
 
1,486,145 
               
Redemptions
(482,397.251) 
 
(4,801,080) 
 
(100,100) 
 
(4,901,180) 
               
Partners’ Capital,
             
March 31, 2012
5,564,663.513 
 
55,061,188 
 
632,555 
 
55,693,743 
               
               
               
               
Partners’ Capital,
             
December 31, 2010
7,716,383.922 
 
80,808,446 
 
877,595 
 
81,686,041 
               
Net Loss
 
(4,477,961) 
 
(49,727) 
 
(4,527,688) 
               
Redemptions
(301,467.239) 
 
(3,111,327) 
 
 
(3,111,327) 
               
Partners’ Capital,
             
March 31, 2011
7,414,916.683 
 
73,219,158 
 
827,868 
 
74,047,026 





















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

- 6 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

(Unaudited)

The unaudited financial statements contained herein include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P. (the “Partnership”).  The financial statements and condensed notes herein should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

1.  Organization
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership organized in 2002 to engage primarily in the speculative trading of futures contracts, options on futures and forward contracts, and forward contracts on physical commodities and other commodity interests, including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, financial instruments, metals, energy, and agricultural products (collectively, “Futures Interests”) (refer to Note 4, Financial Instruments).  The Partnership is one of the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter series of funds, comprised of the Partnership, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Aspect L.P., and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter WNT L.P. (collectively, the “Charter Series”).

The Partnership’s general partner is Ceres Managed Futures LLC (“Ceres” or the “General Partner”).  The non-clearing commodity broker is Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (“MSSB”).  The clearing commodity brokers are Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”) and Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (“MSIP”).


- 7 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

MS&Co. also acts as the counterparty on all trading of foreign currency forward contracts.  MSIP serves as the commodity broker for trades on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”).  Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (“MSCG”) acts as the counterparty on all trading of options on foreign currency forward contracts. Ceres is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSBH”).  MSSBH is majority-owned indirectly by Morgan Stanley and minority-owned indirectly by Citigroup Inc.  MSSB is the principal subsidiary of MSSBH.  MS&Co., MSIP, and MSCG are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) is the trading advisor to the Partnership.













- 8 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)



2.  
Financial Highlights
Financial Highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and 2011 were as follows:
                                               For the Quarters Ended March 31,

 
2012
2011
         Per Unit operating performance:
   
         Net asset value, January 1:
$       9.77
$    10.59
     
                     Interest Income
         –     (3)
         –      (3)
                     Expenses
       (0.20)
       (0.21)
                     Realized/Unrealized Income (Loss) (1)
        0.44
       (0.39) (4)
                     Net Income (Loss)
        0.24
       (0.60)
     
         Net asset value, March 31:
$     10.01
$      9.99
     
         Ratios to average net assets:
   
                     Net Investment Loss (2)
      (8.1)%
      (8.3)%
                     Expenses before  Incentive Fees (2)
       8.2%
       8.4 %
                     Expenses after Incentive Fees (2)
       8.2%
       8.4 %
                     Net Income (Loss) (2)
     10.3%
    (23.5) %
         Total return before incentive fees
       2.5%
      (5.7)%
         Total return after incentive fees
       2.5%
      (5.7)%
     

   (1) Realized/Unrealized Income (Loss) is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Unit with the
      other per Unit information.
 
   (2) Annualized (except for incentive fees if applicable).
 
 
 (3) Amounts less than $0.005 per Unit.

   (4) These amounts have been reclassified from the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
      Specifically, realized and unrealized income (loss) per Unit amounts were combined in the 2011 Financial Highlights presentation.


3.  Related Party Transactions
The Partnership’s cash is on deposit with MSSB, MS&Co., and MSIP, in Futures Interests trading accounts to

- 9 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
 

 
meet margin requirements as needed.  Monthly, MSSB credits the Partnership with interest income received from MS&Co. and MSIP.  Such amount is based on 100% of its average daily funds held at MS&Co. and MSIP to meet margin requirements at a rate approximately equivalent to what the commodity brokers pay or charge other similar customers on margin deposits.  In addition, MSSB credits the Partnership at each month end with interest income on 100% of the Partnership’s assets not deposited as margin at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate during such month. MSSB retains any interest earned in excess of the interest paid by MSSB to the Partnership.  For purposes of such interest payments, net assets do not include monies owed to the Partnership on forward contracts and other Futures Interests.  The Partnership pays a flat rate brokerage fee to MSSB which then pays or reimburses the Partnership for all fees and costs charged or incurred by MS&Co., MSIP or any other entity acting as a commodity broker for the Partnership.

4.  Financial Instruments
The Partnership trades Futures Interests.  Futures and forwards represent contracts for delayed delivery of an instrument at a specified date and price.  Futures Interests are open commitments until settlement date, at which time they are realized.  They are valued at fair value, generally on a daily basis, and the unrealized gains and losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the Statements of Financial Condition as a net unrealized gain or loss on open contracts.  The resulting net change in unrealized gains and losses is reflected in the “Net change in unrealized” trading profit (loss) for open contracts from one period to the next on the Statements of Income and Expenses.  The fair value of exchange-traded futures, options and forward contracts is determined by the various futures exchanges, and

- 10 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
 

reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period.

The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) of the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges.  The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period.  Risk arises from changes in the value of these contracts and the potential inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts.  There are numerous factors which may significantly influence the fair value of these contracts, including interest rate volatility.

The Partnership may buy or write put and call options through listed exchanges and the over-the-counter market.  The buyer of an option has the right to purchase (in the case of a call option) or sell (in the case of a put option) a specified quantity of a specific Futures Interest on the underlying assets at a specified price prior to or on a specified expiration date.  The writer of an option is exposed to the risk of loss if the fair value of the Futures Interest on the underlying asset declines (in the case of a put option) or increases (in the case of a call option).  The writer of an option can never profit by more than the premium paid by the buyer but can potentially lose an unlimited amount.




- 11 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Premiums received/premiums paid from writing/purchasing options are recorded as liabilities/assets on the Statements of Financial Condition and are subsequently adjusted to fair values.  The difference between the fair value of the option and the premiums received/premiums paid is treated as an unrealized gain or loss within the Statements of Income and Expenses.

The fair value of exchange-traded contracts is based on the settlement price quoted by the exchange on the day with respect to which fair value is being determined.  If an exchange-traded contract could not have been liquidated on such day due to the operation of daily limits or other rules of the exchange, the settlement price will be equal to the settlement price on the first subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated.

The Partnership’s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to market on a daily basis.  The Partnership accounts for its derivative investments as described in Note 5, Derivatives and Hedging as required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or the “Codification”).  A derivative is defined as a financial instrument or other contract that has all three of the following characteristics:
1)  
a) One or more “underlyings” and b) one or more “notional amounts” or payment provisions or both;
2)  
Requires no initial net investment or a smaller initial net investment than would be required for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar response relative to changes in market factors; and
3)  
Terms that require or permit net settlement.


- 12 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Generally, derivatives include futures, forwards, swaps or options contracts, and other financial instruments with similar characteristics such as caps, floors, and collars.

The net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts, reported as a component of “Trading Equity” on the Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract maturities were as follows:
 
Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Open Contracts
Longest Maturities
Date
Exchange-Traded
 Off-Exchange-Traded
Total
Exchange-Traded
Off-Exchange-Traded
 
$
$
$
   
Mar. 31, 2012
(1,503,670)
(158,611)
(1,662,281)
Sep. 2014
Jun. 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
(1,240,461)
1,330,410
89,949
Sep. 2013
Mar. 2012

In general, the risks associated with off-exchange-traded contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded contracts because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an off-exchange-traded contract.  The Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance.  As of the date of the financial statements, the credit risk associated with the instruments in which the Partnership trades is limited to the unrealized gains (losses) amounts reflected in the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition.  The net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts is further disclosed gross by type of contract and corresponding fair value level in Note 6, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

The Partnership also has credit risk because MS&Co., MSIP, and/or MSCG act as the futures commission merchants or the counterparties, with respect to most of the Partnership’s assets. Exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts are fair valued on a daily basis,

- 13 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


with variations in value settled on a daily basis. MS&Co. and MSIP, each acting as a commodity futures broker for the Partnership’s exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, are required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), to segregate from their own assets, and for the sole benefit of their commodity customers, total cash held by them with respect to exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, including an amount equal to the net unrealized losses on all open exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, which funds, in the aggregate, totaled $57,714,422 and $60,196,245 at March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.  With respect to the Partnership’s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts and forward currency options contracts, there are no daily settlements of variation in value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on such contracts be segregated.  However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at MSSB for the benefit of MS&Co. With respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MS&Co., the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. With respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency options contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MSCG, the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform.  The Partnership has a netting agreement with each counterparty.  The primary terms are based on industry standard master agreements.  These agreements, which seek to reduce both the Partnership’s and the counterparties’ exposure on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, including options on such contracts, should materially decrease the Partnership’s credit risk in the event of MS&Co.’s or MSCG’s bankruptcy or insolvency.
- 14 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)



The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership may be subject.  These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics.  In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The futures, forwards and options traded by the Partnership involve varying degrees of related market risk.  Market risk is often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions, and consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash flow.  Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded  forward, and exchange--traded futures-styled options contracts are settled daily through variation margin.  Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts are settled upon termination of the contract.  Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency options contracts are settled on an agreed- upon settlement date.  However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership’s accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at MSSB for the benefit of MS&Co.



- 15 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

5.  Derivatives and Hedging
The Partnership’s objective is to profit from speculative trading in Futures Interests.  Therefore, the Trading Advisor for the Partnership will take speculative positions in Futures Interests where it feels the best profit opportunities exist for its trading strategy.  As such, the average number of contracts outstanding in absolute quantities (the total of the open long and open short positions) has been presented as a part of the volume disclosure, as position direction is not an indicative factor in such volume disclosures. With regard to foreign currency forward trades, each notional quantity amount has been converted to an equivalent contract based upon an industry convention.

The following tables summarize the valuation of the Partnership’s investments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2012:
Futures and Forward Contracts
Long Unrealized
Gain
Long Unrealized
Loss
 Short Unrealized
Gain
 
Short
  Unrealized
 Loss
Net   Unrealized
 Gain/(Loss)
Average number of contracts
outstanding
for the three months   (absolute quantity)
 
$
$
$
 
$
$
 
Commodity
178,295
(275,482)
917,796
 
(165,697)
654,912
616
Equity
482,342
(306,095)
64,217
 
240,464
509
Foreign currency
130,309
(412,843)
191,320
 
(67,408)
(158,622)
  3,367
Interest rate
     488,449
         (230,574)
        1,441
 
    (261,022)
     (1,706)
  2,391
Total
  1,279,395
   (1,224,994)
 1,174,774
 
  (494,127)
 735,048
 
               
Unrealized currency loss
         
  (2,397,329)
 
Total net unrealized loss on open contracts
         
 
  (1,662,281)
 
               

- 16 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)





The Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2011:
Futures and Forward Contracts
Long Unrealized
Gain
Long Unrealized
Loss
 Short Unrealized
Gain
 
Short
 Unrealized
Loss
Net   Unrealized
 Gain/(Loss)
Average number of contracts
outstanding
 for the year (absolute quantity)
 
$
$
$
 
$
$
 
               
Commodity
27,760
(35,100)
554,382
 
(553,530)
(6,488)
530
Equity
153,472
(2,078)
75,465
 
(5,440)
221,419
383
Foreign currency
183,838
(32,663)
1,202,671
 
(23,414)
1,330,432
  7,864
Interest rate
   1,031,489
      (86,417)
    13,978
 
    (21,713)
     937,337
  2,111
Total
  1,396,559
   (156,258)
 1,846,496
 
  (604,097)
 2,482,700
 
               
Unrealized currency loss
         
  (2,392,751)
 
Total net unrealized gain on open contracts
         
 
       89,949
 




   
Average number of
   
contracts outstanding
   
for the year
   
(absolute quantity)
Option Contracts at Fair Value
           $
 
Options purchased
2
Options written
1

The following tables summarize the net trading results of the Partnership for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Income and Expenses for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 included in Total Trading Results:


Type of Instrument
                      $
   
Commodity
2,010,118
Equity
2,131,999
Foreign currency
399,975
Interest rate
(1,874,364)
Unrealized currency loss
       (4,577)
Total
   2,663,151
   


- 17 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Line Items on the Statements of Income and Expenses for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012:
Trading Results
                      $
   
Net realized
4,415,381
Net change in unrealized
  (1,752,230)
Total Trading Results
     2,663,151

The Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Income and Expenses for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 included in Total Trading Results:
Type of Instrument
                      $
   
Commodity
1,340,935
Equity
(1,485,251)
Foreign currency
(1,457,071)
Interest rate
(1,329,399)
Unrealized currency loss
         (3,947)
   
Total
  (2,934,733)

Line Items on the Statements of Income and Expenses for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011:
Trading Results
                      $
   
Net realized
(180,530)
Net change in unrealized
   (2,754,203)
Total Trading Results
   (2,934,733)

6.  Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Effective January 1, 2012, the Partnership adopted ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.”  The amendments within this ASU change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.  However, some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and other amendments change a particular

- 18 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  This new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

Financial instruments are carried at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in the following three levels: Level 1 - unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 - inputs other than unadjusted quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (including unadjusted quoted market prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk); and Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability (including the Partnership’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments).

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.

The Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following tables by the type of inputs applicable to the fair value measurements.



- 19 -

 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


March 31, 2012
Unadjusted
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
$
$
$
 
$
Assets
         
Futures
2,132,540
n/a
 
2,132,540
    Forwards
             –     
           321,629
n/a
 
    321,629       
           
  Total Assets
   2,132,540
         321,629
n/a
 
2,454,169                  
           
  Liabilities
         
  Futures
1,238,881
n/a
 
 1,238,881    
  Forwards
             –     
           480,240
n/a
 
    480,240    
           
  Total Liabilities
1,238,881
         480,240
n/a
 
               1,719,121
           
Unrealized currency loss
       
               (2,397,329)
           
  *Net fair value
   893,659
      (158,611)
n/a
 
               (1,662,281)
           


December 31, 2011
Unadjusted
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
$
$
$
 
$
 Assets
         
 Futures
1,856,568
            –      
                                  n/a
 
    1,856,568
 Forwards
               –          
     1,386,487
                      n/a
 
1,386,487
           
  Total Assets
      1,856,568
           1,386,487      
n/a
 
          3,243,055
           
     Liabilities
         
 Futures
         704,278
            –      
                  n/a
 
       704,278   
     Forwards
             –      
   56,077
                       n/a
 
                       56,077
           
  Total Liabilities
       704,278
             56,077      
n/a
 
    760,355
           
Unrealized currency loss
       
    (2,392,751)
           
  *Net fair value
  1,152,290
     1,330,410
n/a
 
              89,949

* This amount comprises the “Total net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts” on the Statements of Financial Condition.

- 20 -
 
 
 

 

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

During the period January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012, there were no Level 3 assets and liabilities and there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

7.  Other Pronouncements
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”, which creates a new disclosure requirement about the nature of an entity’s rights of setoff and the related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Partnership should also provide the disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented.  The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact that the pronouncement would have on the financial statements. 




- 21 -
 

 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In October 2011, the FASB issued a proposed ASU intended to improve and converge financial reporting by setting forth consistent criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company.  Under longstanding U.S. GAAP, investment companies carry all of their investments at fair value, even if they hold a controlling interest in another company.  The primary changes being proposed by the FASB relate to which entities would be considered investment companies as well as certain disclosure and presentation requirements.  In addition to the changes to the criteria for determining whether an entity is an investment company, the FASB also proposes that an investment company be required to consolidate another investment company if it holds a controlling financial interest in the entity.  The Partnership will evaluate the impact that this proposed update would have on the financial statements once the pronouncement is issued.


8.  Restricted and Unrestricted Cash
As reflected on the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition, restricted cash equals the cash portion of assets on deposit to meet margin requirements plus the cash required to offset unrealized losses on foreign currency forwards and options contracts and offset unrealized losses on offset LME positions. All of these amounts are maintained separately.  Cash that is not classified as restricted cash is therefore classified as unrestricted cash.




- 22 -
 
 
 

 
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)

9.  Income Taxes
No provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements, as partners are individually responsible for reporting income or loss based upon their respective share of the Partnership’s revenues or expenses for income tax purposes. The Partnership files U.S. federal and state tax returns.

The guidance issued by the FASB on income taxes clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Partnership's financial statements, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken.  The Partnership has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  If applicable, the Partnership recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expenses in the Statements of Income and Expenses.  Generally, the 2008 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.  No income tax returns are currently under examination.

10.  Subsequent Events
Management of Ceres performed its evaluation of subsequent events through the date of filing, and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment of or disclosure in the financial statements.





- 23 -
 
 
 

 
Item 2.        MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
  OF OPERATIONS

As of March 31, 2012, the percentage of assets allocated to each market sector was approximately as follows: Interest Rate 23.34%; Currency 27.91%; Equity 21.77%; and Commodity 26.98%.

Liquidity.  The Partnership deposits its assets with MSSB as non-clearing commodity broker and MS&Co. and MSIP as clearing commodity brokers in separate futures, forward and options trading accounts established for the Trading Advisor.  Such assets are used as margin to engage in trading and may be used as margin solely for the Partnership’s trading. The assets are held in either non-interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and instruments permitted by the CFTC for investment of customer segregated or secured funds.  Since the Partnership’s sole purpose is to trade in futures, forwards and options, it is expected that the Partnership will continue to own such liquid assets for margin purposes.

The Partnership’s investment in futures, forwards and options may, from time to time, be illiquid.  Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or  “daily limits.”  Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit.  If the price for a particular futures or options contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or options contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading.  These market conditions could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating its futures or options contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions.



- 24 -

 
 

 

There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward contracts on foreign currencies.  The markets for some world currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from trading in potentially profitable markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to substantial losses.  Either of these market conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions.  For the periods covered by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership’s assets.

There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

As of March 31, 2012, approximately 72.09% of the Partnership’s total investments are futures contracts which are exchange-traded while approximately 27.91% are forward contracts which are off-exchange traded.

Capital Resources.  The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets.  Redemptions of units of limited partnership interest (“Unit(s)”) in the future will affect the amount of funds available for investments in futures, forwards and options in subsequent periods.  It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the impact, of future outflows of Units.

There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership’s capital resource arrangements at the present time.


- 25 -
 
 
 

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations.  The Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments that would affect its liquidity or capital resources.

Results of Operations
General.  The Partnership’s results depend on the Trading Advisor and the ability of the Trading Advisor’s trading program to take advantage of price movements in the futures, forward and options markets.

The Trading Advisor trades the Partnership’s assets in accordance with its Financial, Metal Energy Large Portfolio, a proprietary, systematic trading program.  The Trading Advisor’s trading models are designed to detect and exploit medium-term to long-term price changes, while also applying risk management and portfolio management principles.

The Trading Advisor believes that utilizing multiple trading models provides an important level of diversification, and is most beneficial when multiple contracts of each market are traded.  Every trading model may not trade every market.  It is possible that one trading model may signal a long position while another trading model signals a short position in the same market.  It is the Trading Advisor’s intention to offset those signals to reduce unnecessary trading, but if the signals are not simultaneous, both trades will be taken and since it is unlikely that both positions would prove profitable, in retrospect, one or both trades will appear to have been unnecessary.  It is the Trading Advisor’s policy to follow trades signaled by each trading model independently of the other models.


- 26 -
 
 
 

 
The following presents a summary of the Partnership’s operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and a general discussion of its trading activities during each period.  It is important to note, however, that the Trading Advisor trades in various markets at different times and that prior activity in a particular market does not mean that such market will be actively traded by the Trading Advisor or will be profitable in the future.

Consequently, the results of operations of the Partnership are difficult to discuss other than in the context of the Trading Advisor’s trading activities on behalf of the Partnership during the period in question.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Partnership’s results of operations set forth in the financial statements on pages 2 through 23 of this report are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements, including the following: the contracts the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to market on a daily basis.  The difference between their original contract value and market value is recorded on the Statements of Income and Expenses as “Net change in unrealized” trading profit (loss) for open (unrealized) contracts, and recorded as “Net realized” trading profit (loss) when open positions are closed out.  The sum of these amounts constitutes the Partnership’s trading results.  The market value of a futures contract is the settlement price on the exchange on which that futures contract is traded on a particular day.  The value of a foreign currency forward contract is based on the spot rate as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) the close of the business day.  Interest income, as well as management fees, incentive fees and brokerage fees of the Partnership are recorded on an accrual basis.


- 27 -
 
 
 

 
Ceres believes that, based on the nature of the operations of the Partnership, no assumptions relating to the applications of critical accounting policies other than those presently used could reasonably affect reported amounts.

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012
The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $2,670,605 and expenses totaling $1,184,460, resulting in net income of $1,486,145 for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.  The Partnership’s net asset value per Unit increased from $9.77 at December 31, 2011, to $10.01 at March 31, 2012.

During the first quarter, the Partnership posted a gain in net asset value per Unit as profits in energies, stock indices, agriculturals, and currencies more than offset losses within the global interest rate and metals markets.

The most significant gains were recorded within the energy markets during January and March from short positions in natural gas futures as prices dropped amid ample inventories and mild weather across the U.S. Additional gains were experienced during February from long futures positions in RBOB (unleaded) gasoline, Brent crude, and gas oil as prices increased on concerns over inventory levels and rising tensions in the Middle East. Within the global stock index sector, gains were achieved during January and February from long positions in U.S., European, and Pacific Rim equity index futures as prices were buoyed by better-than-expected economic reports in these regions. Prices also rose after China cut banks’ reserve requirements to fuel lending and the U.S. Federal Reserve Board raised its assessment of the U.S. economy. Further gains were recorded in this sector during March. Within the agricultural complex, gains were recorded during

- 28 -
 
 
 

 
February and March from short positions in coffee futures as prices declined on signs of abundant supplies from Brazil, the world’s biggest grower of coffee. Additional gains were achieved within the currency markets during January and February from long positions in the New Zealand dollar, Australian dollar, and Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar as the value of these commodity-linked currencies moved higher
against the U.S. dollar following positive economic news out of China and on optimism Greece will receive a second bailout package, which boosted demand for higher-yielding currencies.

A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the quarter was offset by losses incurred within the global interest rate sector in February and March from long positions in U.S., Australian, and Japanese fixed-income futures. During February, prices fell amid the aforementioned optimism that Greece would receive a second bailout, thereby diminishing demand for the relative “safety” of government bonds. Meanwhile, prices fell further during March after the U.S. Federal Reserve upwardly revised their U.S. economic outlook. Within the metals markets, losses were recorded primarily in January from short positions in zinc and aluminum futures as prices advanced on speculation metals demand will be supported by economic expansion in the U.S. and an easing credit policy in China. Smaller losses were experienced in this sector during February and March.

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(2,914,011) and expenses totaling $1,613,677, resulting in a net loss of $4,527,688 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.  The Partnership’s net asset value per Unit decreased from $10.59 at December 31, 2010, to $9.99 at March 31, 2011.


- 29 -
 
 
 

 
The most significant trading losses were incurred within the global stock index sector, primarily during March, due to long positions in European, Pacific Rim, and U.S. equity index futures as prices moved sharply lower following the worst earthquake and tsunami in Japanese history. Within the global interest rate sector, losses were recorded throughout the majority of the quarter. In January, long positions in short-term European fixed-income futures resulted in losses as prices declined after European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said inflationary pressures in the euro region may increase. During February, short positions in U.S. fixed-income futures resulted in losses as prices rose after concern over unrest in the Middle East spurred demand for the relative “safety” of government debt. Further losses were experienced in March from both long and short positions in fixed-income futures as prices moved without consistent direction throughout the month. Within the metals markets, losses were incurred primarily during January from long futures positions in gold and silver as prices fell amid a strengthening U.S. dollar, which reduced the “safe haven” appeal of precious metals. In March, additional losses were recorded in the metals sector from long futures positions in copper, nickel, and zinc as prices moved lower amid concern that rising energy costs associated with mounting unrest in the Middle East may slow the global economy. Lastly, losses were experienced within the currency markets, primarily during January, from long futures positions in the South African rand and Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar, as well as short positions in the euro versus the U.S. dollar. The value of the South African rand and Japanese yen declined against the U.S. dollar following the release of minutes from the latest U.S. Federal Reserve meeting that showed optimism about the U.S. economy and boosted demand for the U.S. currency, while the euro ended higher as European sovereign debt worries abated.



- 30 -
 
 
 

 
A portion of the Partnership’s losses for the quarter was offset by gains achieved within the energy markets throughout a majority of the quarter due to long futures positions in crude oil and its related products as prices rose amid an escalation in political instability in the Middle East and North Africa, prompting concerns that crude supplies may be disrupted. Within the agricultural complex, gains were recorded primarily during January and February from long positions in cotton futures as prices increased on signs
that global output may fail to keep pace with rising demand in China, the world’s biggest buyer of the fiber.

 
Item 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Introduction
The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the speculative trading of futures, forwards and options.  The market-sensitive instruments held by the Partnership are acquired for speculative trading purposes only and, as a result, all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are at risk of trading loss.  Unlike an operating company, the risk of market-sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business activity of the Partnership.

The futures, forwards and options on such contracts traded by the Partnership involve varying degrees of related market risk.  Market risk is often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions, and consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash flow.  Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts are settled daily through variation margin.

- 31 -
 
 
 

 
Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts and forward currency options contracts are settled upon termination of the contract.  Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency options contracts are settled upon an agreed upon settlement date.  However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at MSSB for the benefit of MS&Co.

The Partnership’s total market risk may increase or decrease as it is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the diversification among the Partnership’s open positions, the volatility present within the markets, and the liquidity of the markets.

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the applicable margin requirements.  Margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value.  Additionally, the use of leverage causes the face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership typically to be many times the total capitalization of the Partnership.

The Partnership’s past performance is no guarantee of its future results.  Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership’s market risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative trading.  The Partnership’s speculative trading and use of leverage may cause future losses and volatility (i.e., “risk of ruin”) that far exceed the Partnership’s experience to date as discussed under the “Partnership’s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors” section and significantly exceed the Value at Risk (“VaR”) tables disclosed.

Limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.
- 32 -
 
 
 

 
Quantifying the Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk
The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of fair value accounting principles.  Any loss in the market value of the Partnership’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership’s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Trading Advisor is estimated below in terms of VaR.  Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either Ceres or the Trading Advisor in their daily risk management activities.

VaR is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector.  However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated VaR or the Partnership’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”).  In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s losses in any market sector will be limited to VaR or by the Partnership’s attempts to manage its market risk.

- 33 -
 
 
 

 
Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its VaR.  Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95% - 99% of any one-day interval.  Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to VaR.

The Partnership’s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors
The following tables indicate the trading VaR associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of March 31, 2012 and the highest, lowest and average values during the three months ended March 31, 2012.  All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in
calculating the figures set forth below.  There has been no material change in the trading VaR information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  As of March 31, 2012, the Partnership’s total capitalization was approximately $56 million.

Primary Market
 
% of Total
Risk Category
VaR
Capitalization
     
Currency
$2,838,102
5.10%
     
Interest Rate
2,372,860
4.26%
     
Equity
2,213,239
3.97%
     
Commodity
2,743,519
4.93%
     
Total
$10,167,720
18.26%







- 34 -
 
 
 

 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Market Sector
High VaR
Low VaR
Average VaR*
Currency
$4,161,543
$2,052,174
$3,163,814
Interest Rate
$4,888,192
$2,080,828
$2,990,501
Equity
$2,590,049
$885,376
$1,795,035
Commodity
$2,917,108
$1,482,059
$2,125,957

* Average of month-end VaR

The following tables indicate the trading VaR associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2011 and the highest, lowest and average values during the twelve months ended December 31, 2011.  All open position trading risk exposure of the Partnership have been included in calculating the figures set forth below.  As of December 31, 2011, the Partnership’s total capitalization was approximately $59 million.
Primary Market
 
% of
Risk Category
VaR
Total Capitalization
     
Currency
$3,011,542
5.09%
     
Interest Rate
2,818,160
4.77%
     
Equity
1,204,846
2.04%
     
Commodity
2,915,553
4.93%
     
Total
$9,950,101
16.83%






- 35 -
 
 
 

 
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011
Market Sector
High VaR
Low VaR
Average VaR*
Currency
$5,001,944
$644,787
$1,820,543
Interest Rate
$4,143,512
$533,167
$1,884,857
Equity
$2,976,564
$354,019
$1,025,401
Commodity
$3,930,695
$465,517
$1,671,789
*Average of month-end VaR.
     

Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk
VaR models permit estimation of a portfolio’s aggregate market risk exposure, incorporating a range of varied
market risks, reflect risk reduction due to portfolio diversification or hedging activities, and can cover a wide
range of portfolio assets. However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of the methodology’s limitations, which include, but may not be limited to the following:
·  
past changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market movements;
·  
changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the VaR model;
·  
VaR results reflect past market fluctuations applied to current trading positions while future risk depends on future positions;
·  
VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and
·  
the historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements.

- 36 -
 
 
 

 
Non-Trading Risk
The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin.  These balances and any market risk they may represent are immaterial.

The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion of its available assets in unrestricted cash at MSSB; as of March 31, 2012, such amount was equal to approximately 89% of the Partnership’s net asset value.  A decline in short-term interest rates would result in a decline in the Partnership’s cash management income. This cash flow risk is not considered to be material.

Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and any associated potential losses, taking into account the leverage, optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership’s market-sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership’s net assets.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures
The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures - except for (A) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (B) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures - constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership’s primary market risk exposures, as well as the strategies used and to be used by Ceres and the Trading Advisor for managing such exposures, are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies.  Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant

- 37 -
 
 
 

 
fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation, and many other factors could result in material losses, as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership.  Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure
The Partnership and the Trading Advisor, separately, attempt to manage the risk of the Partnership’s open positions in essentially the same manner in all market categories traded. Ceres attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying the Partnership’s assets among different market sectors through the selection of a
commodity trading advisor and by daily monitoring of its performance.  In addition, the Trading Advisor establishes diversification guidelines, often set in terms of the maximum margin to be committed to positions in any one market sector or market-sensitive instrument.

Ceres monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership’s non-trading instrument, cash. Cash is the only Partnership investment directed by Ceres, rather than the Trading Advisor.


Item 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Ceres, at the time this quarterly report was filed, Ceres’ President (Ceres’ principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Ceres’ principal financial officer) have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of

- 38 -
 
 
 

 
March 31, 2012.  The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information the Partnership is required to disclose in the reports that the Partnership files or submits under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed and summarized and reported within the time period specified in the applicable rules and forms.  Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Ceres have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Partnership were effective at March 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes during the period covered by this quarterly report in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide reasonable (not absolute) assurance that its objectives will be met.  Furthermore, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.












- 39 -
 
 
 

 
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There were no additional information to supplement or amend the discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously referenced in the Partnership’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.


Item 6.
EXHIBITS

31.01
Certification of President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
31.02
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
32.01
Certification of President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
32.02
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 

 

 
 
- 40 -
 
 
 

 
101.INS*
XBRL Instance Document
 
101.SCH*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
101.CAL*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
101.LAB*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Document
 
101.PRE*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document
 
101.DEF*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
 

 
 
Notes to Exhibits List
 
 
* Submitted electronically herewith.
 
 
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Partnership is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in Exhibit 101 to this report and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Partnership has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fails to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
- 41 -
 

 

 
 

 






SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




 
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P.
 
(Registrant)
     
 
By:
Ceres Managed Futures LLC
   
(General Partner)
     
May 11, 2012
By:
/s/Brian Centner
   
Brian Centner
   
Chief Financial Officer




The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the registrant.  The registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors.





















- 42 -