BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC	Financial_Report.xls
EX-12.1 - COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC	ratioofearningstofixedchar.htm
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION - BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC	certificationsexhibit321llc.htm
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC	certificationsexhibit311llc.htm
EX-31.2 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC	certificationsexhibit312llc.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-11535

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		27-1754839
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2650 Lou Menk Drive

Fort Worth, Texas

(Address of principal executive offices)

76131-2830

(Zip Code)

(800) 795-2673

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
		Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
		Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [x] Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
		Yes [ ] No [x]
Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H (2).

Table of Contents



PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	PAGE

Item 1.	Financial Statements.	3

Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations.	20

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	23


PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.	Exhibits.	24

Signatures		S-1

Exhibits		E-1

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Financial Statements.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Revenues	$	5,002	$	4,533

Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits	1,117		1,075
Fuel	1,095		939
Purchased services	569		547
Depreciation and amortization	463		446
Equipment rents	202		192
Materials and other	291		230
Total operating expenses	3,737		3,429
Operating income	1,265		1,104
Interest expense	148		136
Other expense, net	2		3

Income before income taxes	1,115		965
Income tax expense	414		358
Net income	$	701	$	607

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Net income	$	701		$	607

Other comprehensive income:
Change in amortization of accumulated actuarial losses, net of tax expense of $2 million and $0, respectively	2			—
Change in fuel hedge mark-to-market, net of tax benefit of $4 million and tax expense of $25 million	(8		)	40
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income of equity method investees	(2		)	1
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	(8		)	41
Total comprehensive income	$	693		$	648

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,276		$	1,960
Accounts receivable, net	1,103			1,150
Materials and supplies	836			739
Current portion of deferred income taxes	205			295
Other current assets	178			121
Total current assets	4,598			4,265

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,235 and $1,056, respectively	48,498			48,047
Goodwill	14,803			14,803
Intangible assets, net	1,343			1,420
Other assets	1,876			1,845
Total assets	$	71,118		$	70,380

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities	$	3,082		$	3,143
Long-term debt due within one year	530			526
Total current liabilities	3,612			3,669

Deferred income taxes	15,682			15,637
Long-term debt	13,295			12,139
Intangible liabilities, net	1,426			1,496
Casualty and environmental liabilities	869			905
Pension and retiree health and welfare liability	733			769
Other liabilities	1,059			1,016
Total liabilities	36,676			35,631
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 2, 6 and 7)
Equity:
Member’s equity	34,653			34,952
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(211		)	(203		)
Total equity	34,442			34,749
Total liabilities and equity	$	71,118		$	70,380

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	701		$	607
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	463			446
Deferred income taxes	137			196
Long-term casualty and environmental liabilities, net	(46		)	(19		)
Contribution to defined benefit pension plan	(36		)	—
Other, net	(29		)	(64		)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	47			(132		)
Materials and supplies	(97		)	(74		)
Other current assets	(76		)	(126		)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities	15			(9		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,079			825

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures excluding equipment	(489		)	(444		)
Acquisition of equipment	(298		)	(63		)
Other, net	(169		)	(95		)
Net cash used for investing activities	(956		)	(602		)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	1,250			—
Payments on long-term debt	(46		)	(52		)
Cash distributions	(1,000		)	(1,000		)
Other, net	(11		)	—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	193			(1,052		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	316			(829		)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period	1,960			2,087
End of period	$	2,276		$	1,258

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	189		$	187
Capital investments accrued but not yet paid	$	118		$	100
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	28		$	1
Non-cash asset financing	$	—		$	1

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(In millions)

(Unaudited)



	Member’s Equity			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	34,952		$	(203	)	$	34,749
Cash distributions to Parent	(1,000		)	—			(1,000		)
Comprehensive income, net of tax	701			(8		)	693
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	34,653		$	(211	)	$	34,442

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)


1.	Accounting Policies and Interim Results

The Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, including the financial statements and notes thereto. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (BNSF) is a holding company that conducts no operating activities and owns no significant assets other than through its interests in its subsidiaries. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of BNSF and its majority-owned subsidiaries, all of which are separate legal entities (collectively, the Company). BNSF’s principal operating subsidiary is BNSF Railway Company (BNSF Railway). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 16, 1994. On February 12, 2010, Berkshire Hathaway Inc., a Delaware corporation (Berkshire), acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation common stock that it did not already own. The acquisition was completed through the merger (the Merger) of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation with and into R Acquisition Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire (Merger Sub), with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving entity. In connection with the Merger, Merger Sub changed its name to “Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC” and remains an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire. Berkshire's cost of acquiring BNSF was pushed-down to establish a new accounting basis for BNSF beginning as of February 13, 2010. Earnings per share data has not been presented because BNSF has not issued stock or membership interests to the public.

The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed) necessary for a fair statement of BNSF’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2012, and the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Certain prior year amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been adjusted to correctly reflect the presentation of changes in accrued but unpaid capital items. The correction did not affect the Company's previously reported results of operations or financial position.

Subsequent Events

Related Party Transactions

In April 2012, BNSF declared a distribution of $750 million to its parent company, which will be paid in May 2012.

In April 2012, the Company made tax payments of $271 million to Berkshire.


2.	Fuel

Fuel costs represented 29 percent and 27 percent of total operating expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Due to the significance of diesel fuel expenses to the operations of BNSF and the historical volatility of fuel prices, in the past the Company had entered into derivatives to partially mitigate the risk of fluctuations in the price of its diesel fuel purchases. Previously, the Company entered into fuel-derivative instruments based on management’s evaluation of current and expected diesel fuel price trends with the intent of protecting operating margins and overall profitability from adverse fuel price changes. However, to the extent the Company hedged portions of its fuel purchases, it may not realize the impact of decreases in fuel prices. Conversely, to the extent the Company did not hedge portions of its fuel purchases, it may be adversely affected by increases in fuel prices.

The Company has not entered into any new derivative contracts subsequent to the Merger and all open derivatives at March 31, 2012, are expected to expire during the second quarter of 2012.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

As of March 31, 2012, BNSF’s total fuel-derivative positions, of which the majority are designated as cash flow hedges, covered approximately 1 percent of the average annual locomotive fuel consumption over the past three years. Derivative positions are closely monitored to ensure that they will not exceed actual fuel requirements in any period. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, BNSF has existing fuel-derivative agreements covering approximately 10 million gallons and 36 million gallons, respectively.

Derivative Activities

The Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet, commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by authoritative accounting guidance related to derivatives and hedging, is recognized in current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) as a separate component of equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Cash flows related to fuel derivatives are classified as operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

BNSF monitors its derivative instrument positions and credit ratings of its counterparties and does not anticipate any losses due to counterparty nonperformance. All counterparties were financial institutions with credit ratings of A2/A- or higher as of March 31, 2012. Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments are covered by master netting arrangements whereby, in the event of a default, the non-defaulting party has the right to setoff any amounts payable against any obligation of the defaulting party under the same counterparty agreement. The maximum amount of loss the Company could incur from credit risk based on the gross fair value of derivative instruments in asset positions and the Company’s net asset exposure to counterparty credit risk was $7 million and $24 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for derivative transactions were as follows, presented net of any master netting arrangements (in millions):



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Short-term derivative asset	$	7	$	24
Total derivatives	$	7	$	24

The table below contain summaries of all derivative positions reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements, presented gross of any master netting arrangements (in millions):



Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
Asset Derivatives
	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		Balance Sheet Location
Asset derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Fuel contracts	$	7	$	24	Other current assets
Total asset derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20	$	7	$	24

Total asset derivatives	$	7	$	24

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)



The Effects of Derivative Instruments Gains and Losses for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
Derivatives in ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
	2012		2011
Fuel Contracts	$	9	$	90
Total derivatives	$	9	$	90



		Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized from AOCL into Income (Effective Portion)
	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized	2012		2011
	from AOCL into Income	2012		2011
Fuel Contracts	Fuel expense	$	21	$	25
Total derivatives		$	21	$	25



		Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)^a
	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized	2012			2011
	in Income on Derivatives	2012			2011
Fuel Contracts	Fuel expense	$	(2	)	$	(6	)
Total derivatives		$	(2	)	$	(6	)


^a	No portion of the gain or (loss) was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness for the periods then ended.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company estimates that within the next twelve months approximately $6 million in pre-tax hedge instrument gains will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings.

The Company utilizes a market approach using the forward commodity price for the periods hedged to value its fuel-derivative swaps and costless collars. As such, the fair values of these instruments are classified as Level 2 valuations under authoritative accounting guidance related to fair value measurements.

Additional disclosure related to derivative instruments is included in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


3.	Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable, net consists of freight and other receivables, reduced by an allowance for bill adjustments and uncollectible accounts, based upon expected collectibility. At March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, $49 million and $39 million, respectively, of such allowances had been recorded.

At March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, $40 million and $31 million, respectively, of accounts receivable were greater than 90 days old.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)


4.	Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Amortized intangible assets and liabilities were as follows (in millions):



	As of March 31, 2012				As of December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets	$	2,013	$	670	$	2,013	$	593
Amortized intangible liabilities	$	2,056	$	630	$	2,056	$	560

Amortized intangible assets primarily consisted of internally developed software and franchise & customer assets. Amortized intangible liabilities primarily consisted of customer and shortline contracts which were in an unfavorable position at the date of Merger.

Amortized intangible assets and liabilities are amortized based on the estimated pattern in which the economic benefits are expected to be consumed or on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives.

Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities was as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Amortization of intangible assets	$	77	$	78
Amortization of intangible liabilities	$	70	$	74

Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities for the next five years is expected to approximate the following (in millions):



	Amortization of intangible assets		Amortization of intangible liabilities
Remainder of 2012	$	229	$	212
2013	$	306	$	252
2014	$	306	$	179
2015	$	54	$	115
2016	$	31	$	101


5.	Other Assets

In July 2010, the Company entered into a low-income housing partnership (the Partnership) as the limited partner, holding a 99.9% interest in the Partnership. The Partnership is a variable interest entity (VIE), with the purpose of developing and operating low-income housing rental properties. Recovery of the Company’s investment is accomplished through the utilization of low-income housing tax credits and the tax benefits of Partnership losses. The general partner, who holds a 0.1% interest in the Partnership, is an unrelated third party and is responsible for controlling and managing the business and financial operation of the Partnership. As the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Partnership’s economic performance, the Company is not the primary beneficiary and therefore, does not consolidate the Partnership. As of March 31, 2012, the assets of the unconsolidated Partnership totaled approximately $510 million. The Company does not provide financial support to the Partnership that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

The Company has accounted for its investment in the Partnership using the effective yield method. The risk of loss of the Company's investment in the Partnership is considered low as an affiliate of the general partner has provided certain guarantees of tax credits and minimum annual returns. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to the Partnership is the unamortized investment balance. The following table provides information as of March 31, 2012 (in millions):



Unamortized investment balance classified as Other Assets		Remaining commitments classified as Other Liabilities		Maximum exposure to loss
$	485	$	148	$	485

Of the remaining commitments, $130 million is due at the end of 2012 and $18 million is due at the end of 2013.


6.	Debt

Notes and Debentures

In March 2012, BNSF issued $625 million of 3.05 percent debentures due March 15, 2022 and $625 million of 4.40 percent debentures due March 15, 2042. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include but are not limited to working capital, capital expenditures, repayment of outstanding indebtedness and distributions.

In January 2012, the Board of Managers (the Board) of the Company authorized an additional $1.5 billion of debt securities that may be issued pursuant to the debt shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). At March 31, 2012, $1 billion remained authorized by the Board to be issued through the SEC debt shelf registration process.

The Company is required to maintain certain financial covenants in conjunction with $500 million of certain issued and outstanding junior subordinated notes. As of March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. In the event of non-compliance, the Company would be required to pay any accrued and unpaid interest.

Fair Value of Debt Instruments

At March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the fair value of BNSF's debt, excluding capital leases and unamortized gains on interest rate swaps, was $13,713 million and $12,947 million, respectively, while the book value, which also excludes capital leases and the associated unamortized fair value adjustment under acquisition method accounting related to capital leases and unamortized gains on interest rate swaps, was $12,607 million and $11,395 million, respectively. The fair value of BNSF's debt is primarily based on market value price models using observable market-based data for the same or similar issues, or on the estimated rates that would be offered to BNSF for debt of the same remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value of the Company's cash equivalents approximates their carrying value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

Guarantees

As of March 31, 2012, BNSF Railway has not been called upon to perform under the guarantees specifically disclosed in this footnote and does not anticipate a significant performance risk in the foreseeable future.

Debt and other obligations of non-consolidated entities guaranteed by the Company as of March 31, 2012, were as follows (dollars in millions):



	Guarantees
	BNSF Ownership Percentage		Principal Amount Guaranteed		Maximum Future Payments		Maximum Recourse Amount^a		Remaining Term (in years)	Capitalized Obligations
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.	0.5	%	$	190	$	190	$	—	Termination of Ownership	$	2	^b
Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP	—	%	N/A^d		N/A^d		N/A^d		5	$	9	^c
All other	—	%	$	10	$	16	$	—	Various	$	—


^a	Reflects the maximum amount the Company could recover from a third party other than the counterparty.


^b	Reflects capitalized obligations that are recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.


^c	Reflects the asset and corresponding liability for the fair value of these guarantees required by authoritative accounting guidance related to guarantees.


^d	There is no cap to the liability that can be sought from BNSF for BNSF’s negligence or the negligence of the indemnified party. However, BNSF could receive reimbursement from certain insurance policies if the liability exceeds a certain amount.

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.

Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc., an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of BNSF Railway, has a guarantee in connection with its remaining special limited partnership interest in Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners, L.P. (SFPP), a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., to be paid only upon default by the partnership. All obligations with respect to the guarantee will cease upon termination of ownership rights, which would occur upon a put notice issued by BNSF or the exercise of the call rights by the general partners of SFPP.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP

In the third quarter of 2007, BNSF Railway entered into an indemnity agreement with Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP (Chevron Phillips), granting certain rights of indemnity from BNSF Railway, in order to facilitate access to a new storage facility. Under certain circumstances, payment under this obligation may be required in the event Chevron Phillips were to incur certain liabilities or other incremental costs resulting from trackage access.

All Other

As of March 31, 2012, BNSF guaranteed $10 million of debt. These guarantees expire between 2012 and 2026.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

Indemnities

In the ordinary course of business, BNSF enters into agreements with third parties that include indemnification clauses. The Company believes that these clauses are generally customary for the types of agreements in which they are included. At times, these clauses may involve indemnification for the acts of the Company, its employees and agents, indemnification for another party’s acts, indemnification for future events, indemnification based upon a certain standard of performance, indemnification for liabilities arising out of the Company’s use of leased equipment or other property, or other types of indemnification. Despite the uncertainty whether events which would trigger the indemnification obligations would ever occur, the Company does not believe that these indemnity agreements will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Additionally, the Company believes that, due to lack of historical payment experience, the fair value of indemnities cannot be estimated with any amount of certainty. However, the fair value of any such amount would be immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Agreements that contain unique circumstances, particularly agreements that contain guarantees that indemnify for another party’s acts, are disclosed separately if appropriate. Unless separately disclosed above, no fair value liability related to indemnities has been recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Variable Interest Entities - Leases

BNSF Railway has entered into various equipment lease transactions in which the structure of the lease contains VIEs. These VIEs were created solely for the lease transactions and have no other activities, assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions. In some of the arrangements, BNSF Railway has the option to purchase some or all of the equipment at a fixed-price, thereby creating variable interests for BNSF Railway in the VIEs. The future minimum lease payments associated with the VIE leases were approximately $4 billion as of March 31, 2012.

In the event the leased equipment is destroyed, BNSF Railway is obligated to either replace the equipment or pay a fixed loss amount. The inclusion of the fixed loss amount is a standard clause within equipment lease arrangements. Historically, BNSF Railway has not incurred significant losses related to this clause. As such, it is not anticipated that the maximum exposure to loss would materially differ from the future minimum lease payments.

BNSF Railway does not provide financial support to the VIEs that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide.

BNSF Railway maintains and operates the equipment based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements, which set specific guidelines consistent within the industry. As such, BNSF Railway has no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased equipment. BNSF Railway does not hold the power to direct the activities of the VIEs and therefore does not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the VIEs. Additionally, BNSF Railway does not have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIEs or the right to receive benefits of the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Depending on market conditions, the fixed-price purchase options could potentially provide benefit to the Company; however, any benefits potentially received from a fixed-price purchase option are expected to be minimal. Based on these factors, BNSF Railway is not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. As BNSF Railway is not the primary beneficiary and the VIE leases are classified as operating leases, there are no assets or liabilities related to the VIEs recorded in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.


7.	Commitments and Contingencies

Personal Injury

Personal injury claims, including asbestos claims and employee work-related injuries and third-party injuries (collectively, other personal injury), are a significant expense for the railroad industry. Personal injury claims by BNSF Railway employees are subject to the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) rather than state workers’ compensation laws. FELA’s system of requiring the finding of fault, coupled with unscheduled awards and reliance on the jury system, contributed to increased expenses in past years. Other proceedings include claims by non-employees for punitive as well as compensatory damages. A few proceedings purport to be class actions. The variability present in settling these claims, including non-employee personal injury and matters in which punitive damages are alleged, could result in increased expenses in future years. BNSF has implemented a number of safety programs designed to reduce the number of personal injuries as well as the associated claims and personal injury expense.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

Other than the fair value adjustments recorded in the application of acquisition method accounting related to the Merger, as discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, BNSF records an undiscounted liability for personal injury claims when the expected loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. The liability and ultimate expense projections are estimated using standard actuarial methodologies. Liabilities recorded for unasserted personal injury claims are based on information currently available. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in projecting future events such as the number of claims filed each year, developments in judicial and legislative standards and the average costs to settle projected claims, actual costs may differ from amounts recorded. Expense accruals and any required adjustments are classified as materials and other in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Asbestos

The Company is party to a number of personal injury claims by employees and non-employees who may have been exposed to asbestos. The heaviest exposure for BNSF employees was due to work conducted in and around the use of steam locomotive engines that were phased out between the years of 1950 and 1967. However, other types of exposures, including exposure from locomotive component parts and building materials, continued after 1967 until they were substantially eliminated at BNSF by 1985.

BNSF assesses its unasserted asbestos liability exposure on an annual basis during the third quarter. BNSF determines its asbestos liability by estimating its exposed population, the number of claims likely to be filed, the number of claims that will likely require payment and the estimated cost per claim. Estimated filing and dismissal rates and average cost per claim are determined utilizing recent claim data and trends.

Throughout the year, BNSF monitors actual experience against the number of forecasted claims and expected claim payments and will record adjustments to the Company’s estimates as necessary.

Based on BNSF’s estimate of the potentially exposed employees and related mortality assumptions, it is anticipated that unasserted asbestos claims will continue to be filed through the year 2050. The Company recorded an amount for the full estimated filing period through 2050 because it had a relatively finite exposed population (former and current employees hired prior to 1985), which it was able to identify and reasonably estimate and about which it had obtained reliable demographic data (including age, hire date and occupation) derived from industry or BNSF specific data that was the basis for the study. BNSF projects that approximately 60, 80 and 95 percent of the future unasserted asbestos claims will be filed within the next 10, 15 and 25 years, respectively.

Other Personal Injury

BNSF estimates its other personal injury liability claims and expense quarterly based on the covered population, activity levels and trends in frequency and the costs of covered injuries. Estimates include unasserted claims except for certain repetitive stress and other occupational trauma claims that allegedly result from prolonged repeated events or exposure. Such claims are estimated on an as-reported basis because the Company cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible loss due to other non-work related contributing causes of such injuries and the fact that continued exposure is required for the potential injury to manifest itself as a claim. BNSF has not experienced any significant adverse trends related to these types of claims in recent years.

BNSF monitors quarterly actual experience against the number of forecasted claims to be received, the forecasted number of claims closing with payment and expected claim payments. Adjustments to the Company’s estimates are recorded quarterly as necessary or more frequently as new events or revised estimates develop.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s accrued obligations for asbestos and other personal injury matters (in millions):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	540		$	575
Accruals	23			7
Payments	(57		)	(19		)
Ending balance	$	506		$	563

At March 31, 2012, $115 million was included in current liabilities. In addition, defense and processing costs, which are recorded on an as-reported basis, were not included in the recorded liability. The Company is primarily self-insured for personal injury claims.

Because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle personal injury claims may range from approximately $450 million to $590 million. However, BNSF believes that the $506 million recorded at March 31, 2012, is the best estimate of the Company’s future obligation for the settlement of personal injury claims.

The amounts recorded by BNSF for personal injury liabilities were based upon currently known facts. Future events, such as the number of new claims to be filed each year, the average cost of disposing of claims, as well as the numerous uncertainties surrounding personal injury litigation in the United States, could cause the actual costs to be higher or lower than projected.

Although the final outcome of personal injury matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering among other things the meritorious legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded, it is the opinion of BNSF that none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, the occurrence of a number of these items in the same period could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.

BNSF Insurance Company

The Company has a consolidated, wholly-owned subsidiary, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Insurance Company, Ltd. (BNSF IC) that provides insurance coverage for certain risks, FELA claims, railroad protective and force account insurance claims and certain excess general liability and property coverage, and certain other claims which are subject to reinsurance. BNSF IC has entered into annual reinsurance treaty agreements with several other companies. The treaty agreements insure workers compensation, general liability, auto liability and FELA risk. In accordance with the agreements, BNSF IC cedes a portion of its FELA exposure through the treaty and assumes a proportionate share of the entire risk. Each year BNSF IC reviews the objectives and performance of the treaty to determine its continued participation in the treaty. The treaty agreements provide for certain protections against the risk of treaty participants’ non-performance. On an on-going basis, BNSF and/or the treaty manager reviews the credit-worthiness of each of the participants. BNSF does not believe its exposure to treaty participants’ non-performance is material at this time. BNSF IC typically invests in commercial paper, time deposits and money market accounts. At March 31, 2012, there was $465 million related to these third-party investments, which were classified as cash and cash equivalents on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, as compared with $500 million at December 31, 2011.

Environmental

The Company’s operations, as well as those of its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulation. BNSF’s operating procedures include practices to protect the environment from the risks inherent in railroad operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials. Additionally, many of BNSF’s land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. As a result, BNSF is subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. In particular, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, as well as similar state laws, generally impose joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and former owners and operators of a site without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. BNSF has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party (PRP) for study and cleanup costs at Superfund

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

sites for which investigation and remediation payments are or will be made or are yet to be determined (the Superfund sites) and, in many instances, is one of several PRPs. In addition, BNSF may be considered a PRP under certain other laws. Accordingly, under CERCLA and other federal and state statutes, BNSF may be held jointly and severally liable for all environmental costs associated with a particular site. If there are other PRPs, BNSF generally participates in the cleanup of these sites through cost-sharing agreements with terms that vary from site to site. Costs are typically allocated based on such factors as relative volumetric contribution of material, the amount of time the site was owned or operated and/or the portion of the total site owned or operated by each PRP.

BNSF is involved in a number of administrative and judicial proceedings and other mandatory cleanup efforts for 261 sites, including 19 Superfund sites, at which it is participating in the study or cleanup, or both, of alleged environmental contamination.

Liabilities for environmental cleanup costs are recorded when BNSF’s liability for environmental cleanup is probable and reasonably estimable. Subsequent adjustments to initial estimates are recorded as necessary based upon additional information developed in subsequent periods. Environmental costs include initial site surveys and environmental studies as well as costs for remediation of sites determined to be contaminated.

BNSF estimates the ultimate cost of cleanup efforts at its known environmental sites on an annual basis during the third quarter. Ultimate cost estimates for environmental sites are based on current estimated percentage to closure ratios, possible remediation workplans and estimates of the costs and likelihood of each possible outcome, historical payment patterns, and benchmark patterns developed from data accumulated from industry and public sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency and other governmental agencies. These factors incorporate into the estimates experience gained from cleanup efforts at other similar sites.

Annual studies do not include: (i) contaminated sites of which the Company is not aware; (ii) additional amounts for third-party tort claims, which arise out of contaminants allegedly migrating from BNSF property, due to a limited number of sites; or (iii) natural resource damage claims. BNSF continues to estimate third-party tort claims on a site by site basis when the liability for such claims is probable and reasonably estimable. BNSF’s recorded liability for third-party tort claims as of March 31, 2012, was $11 million.

On a quarterly basis, BNSF monitors actual experience against the forecasted remediation and related payments made on existing sites and conducts ongoing environmental contingency analyses, which consider a combination of factors including independent consulting reports, site visits, legal reviews and analysis of the likelihood of other PRP's participation in, and their ability to pay for, cleanup. Adjustments to the Company’s estimates will continue to be recorded as necessary based on developments in subsequent periods. Additionally, environmental accruals, which are classified as materials and other in the Consolidated Statements of Income, include amounts for newly identified sites or contaminants, third-party claims and legal fees incurred for defense of third-party claims and recovery efforts.

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s accrued obligations for environmental matters (in millions):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	570		$	578
Accruals	3			5
Payments	(15		)	(12		)
Ending balance	$	558		$	571

At March 31, 2012, $80 million was included in current liabilities.

BNSF’s environmental liabilities are not discounted. BNSF anticipates that the majority of the accrued costs at March 31, 2012, will be paid over the next ten years, and no individual site is considered to be material.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)

Liabilities recorded for environmental costs represent BNSF’s best estimate of its probable future obligation for the remediation and settlement of these sites and include both asserted and unasserted claims. Although recorded liabilities include BNSF’s best estimate of all probable costs, without reduction for anticipated recoveries from third parties, BNSF’s total cleanup costs at these sites cannot be predicted with certainty due to various factors such as the extent of corrective actions that may be required, evolving environmental laws and regulations, advances in environmental technology, the extent of other parties’ participation in cleanup efforts, developments in ongoing environmental analyses related to sites determined to be contaminated and developments in environmental surveys and studies of contaminated sites.

Because of the uncertainty surrounding these factors, it is reasonably possible that future costs for environmental liabilities may range from approximately $420 million to $790 million. However, BNSF believes that the $558 million recorded at March 31, 2012, is the best estimate of the Company’s future obligation for environmental costs.

Although the final outcome of these environmental matters cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of BNSF that none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, the occurrence of a number of these items in the same period could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.

Other Claims and Litigation

In addition to asbestos, other personal injury and environmental matters discussed above, BNSF and its subsidiaries are also parties to a number of other legal actions and claims, governmental proceedings and private civil suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including those related to disputes and complaints involving certain transportation rates and charges. Some of the legal proceedings include claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages, and a few proceedings purport to be class actions. Although the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering among other things the meritorious legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded along with applicable insurance, BNSF currently believes that none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, an unexpected adverse resolution of one or more of these items could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.


8.	Employment Benefit Plans

Components of the net cost for the periods presented below for certain employee benefit plans were as follows (in millions):



	Pension Benefits
	Three Months Ended March 31,
Net Cost	2012			2011
Service cost	$	10		$	8
Interest cost	25			26
Expected return on plan assets	(30		)	(30		)
Amortization of net loss	3			—
Net cost recognized	$	8		$	4



	Retiree Health and Welfare Benefits
	Three Months Ended March 31,
Net Cost	2012		2011
Interest cost	$	3	$	4
Amortization of net loss	1		—
Net cost recognized	$	4	$	4

The Company is not required to make contributions to the BNSF Retirement Plan in 2012; however, the Company made a discretionary contribution of $36 million in January 2012.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) - (Continued)


9.	Related Party Transactions

The companies identified as affiliates of BNSF include Berkshire and its subsidiaries. During both the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company declared and paid cash distributions of $1 billion to its parent company.


10.	Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income, a component of equity within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, rather than net income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Under existing accounting standards, other comprehensive income may include, among other things, unrecognized gains and losses and prior service credit related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans and accounting for derivative financial instruments, which qualify for cash flow hedge accounting.

The following table provides the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (in millions):



	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Unrecognized prior service credit and actuarial losses, net of tax (see Note 8)	$	(211	)	$	(213	)
Fuel hedge mark-to-market, net of tax (see Note 2)	3			11
Accumulated other comprehensive loss of equity method investees	(3		)	(1		)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(211	)	$	(203	)


11.	Accounting Pronouncements

No pronouncements materially affecting the Company's financial statements have been issued since the filing of the Company's 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents


Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations.

Management’s narrative analysis relates to the results of operations of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively BNSF, Registrant or Company). The principal operating subsidiary of BNSF is BNSF Railway Company (BNSF Railway) through which BNSF derives substantially all of its revenues. The following narrative analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes.

The following narrative analysis of results of operations includes a comparative analysis of the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Results of Operations

Revenues Summary

The following tables present BNSF’s revenue information by business group:



	Revenues (in millions)				Cars / Units (in thousands)
	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		2012	2011
Consumer Products	$	1,533	$	1,328	1,132	1,066
Coal	1,240		1,214		561	583
Industrial Products	1,133		914		392	352
Agricultural Products	953		949		263	276
Total Freight Revenues	4,859		4,405		2,348	2,277
Other Revenues	143		128
Total Operating Revenues	$	5,002	$	4,533



	Average Revenue Per Car / Unit
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Consumer Products	$	1,354	$	1,246
Coal	2,210		2,082
Industrial Products	2,890		2,597
Agricultural Products	3,624		3,438
Total Freight Revenues	$	2,069	$	1,935

Fuel Surcharges

Freight revenues include both revenue for transportation services and fuel surcharges. BNSF’s fuel surcharge program is intended to recover its incremental fuel costs when fuel prices exceed a threshold fuel price. Fuel surcharges are calculated differently depending on the type of commodity transported. BNSF has two standard fuel surcharge programs – Percent of Revenue and Mileage-Based. In addition, in certain commodities, fuel surcharge is calculated using a fuel price from a time period that can be up to 60 days earlier. In a period of volatile fuel prices or changing customer business mix, changes in fuel expense and fuel surcharge may significantly differ.

The following table presents fuel surcharge and fuel expense information (in millions):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Total fuel expense ^a	$	1,095	$	939
BNSF fuel surcharges	$	672	$	582

^a Total fuel expense includes locomotive and non-locomotive fuel as well as gains and losses from fuel derivatives, which do not impact the fuel surcharge program.

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012, vs the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012, were $5,002 million, up 10 percent as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase in revenues is due to the following changes in underlying trends in revenues:


▪	Average revenue per car / unit increased for all business units as a result of increased rate per car / unit and higher fuel surcharges, which was driven by increased fuel prices.

In addition to an increase in average revenue per car / unit, the following changes in underlying trends in volumes also impacted the change in revenues:


▪	Consumer Products unit volumes increased primarily due to higher domestic intermodal volumes as a result of highway conversion to rail and higher automotive volumes due to increased North American auto sales and automakers rebuilding inventory levels.


▪	Coal unit volumes decreased primarily due to a decrease in coal demand as a result of low natural gas prices, a mild winter and rising utility stockpiles.


▪	Industrial Products unit volumes increased primarily due to increased shipments of petroleum products and of construction products, principally sand and steel.


▪	Agricultural Products unit volumes decreased primarily due to a decrease in wheat exports, partially offset by higher U.S. corn shipments.

Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012, were $3,737 million, an increase of $308 million, or 9 percent, as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2011. A significant portion of this increase is due to the following changes in underlying trends in expenses:


▪	Increased unit volume and inflation contributed to the increase in compensation and benefits expense.


▪	Higher fuel prices and volume increases, partially offset by improved fuel efficiency, accounted for the majority of the increase in fuel expenses.


▪	Purchased services expenses increased due to higher volume-related costs, including purchased transportation for BNSF Logistics, a wholly-owned third-party logistics company, and increased locomotive maintenance costs.


▪	Depreciation expense increased as a result of increased capital expenditures, net of retirements, partially offset by a slight reduction in depreciation rates for certain asset classes.


▪	There were no significant changes in underlying trends for equipment rents expense.


▪	An unfavorable arbitration ruling in 2012 increased materials and other expenses.


▪	Interest expense increased due to a higher average debt balance.


▪	The effective tax rate was 37.1 percent for both the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Information

To the extent that statements made by the Company relate to the Company’s future economic performance or business outlook, projections or expectations of financial or operational results, or refer to matters that are not historical facts, such statements are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual performance or results may differ materially. For a discussion of material risks and uncertainties that the Company faces, see the discussion in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Economic and industry conditions: material adverse changes in economic or industry conditions, both in the United States and globally; volatility in the capital or credit markets including changes affecting the timely availability of and cost of capital; changes in customer demand, effects of adverse economic conditions affecting shippers or BNSF’s supplier base, and effects due to more stringent regulatory policies such as the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions that could reduce the demand for coal or governmental tariffs or subsidies that could affect the demand for grain, the continuing impact of low natural gas prices on coal demand for electric power plants, changes in fuel prices and other key materials and disruptions in supply chains for these materials; competition and consolidation within the transportation industry; and changes in crew availability, labor and benefits costs and labor difficulties, including stoppages affecting either BNSF’s operations or customers’ abilities to deliver goods to BNSF for shipment;

• Legal, legislative and regulatory factors: developments and changes in laws and regulations, including those affecting train operations or the marketing of services; the ultimate outcome of shipper and rate claims subject to adjudication; or claims, investigations or litigation alleging violations of the antitrust laws; increased economic regulation of the rail industry through legislative action and revised rules and standards applied by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board in various areas including rates and services; developments in environmental investigations or proceedings with respect to rail operations or current or past ownership or control of real property or properties owned by others impacted by BNSF operations; losses resulting from claims and litigation relating to personal injuries, asbestos and other occupational diseases; the release of hazardous materials, environmental contamination and damage to property; regulation, restrictions or caps, or other controls of diesel emissions that could affect operations or increase costs; the availability of adequate insurance to cover the risks associated with operations; and

• Operating factors: changes in operating conditions and costs; operational and other difficulties in implementing positive train control technology, including increased compliance or operational costs or penalties; restrictions on development and expansion plans due to environmental concerns; constraints due to the nation’s aging infrastructure; disruptions to BNSF’s technology network including computer systems and software, including cybersecurity intrusions, misappropriation of assets or sensitive information, corruption of data or operations disruptions; as well as natural events such as severe weather, fires, floods and earthquakes or man-made or other disruptions of BNSF Railway’s or other railroads’ operating systems, structures, or equipment including the effects of acts of terrorism on the Company’s system or other railroads’ systems or other links in the transportation chain.

The Company cautions against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect its current beliefs and are based on information currently available to it as of the date a forward-looking statement is made. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs. In the event the Company does update any forward-looking statement, no inference should be made that the Company will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, BNSF’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that BNSF’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by BNSF in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to BNSF’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Additionally, as of the end of the period covered by this report, BNSF's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that there have been no changes in BNSF's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during BNSF’s first fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, BNSF's internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

PART II OTHER INFORMATION


Item 6.	Exhibits.

See Index to Exhibits on page E-1 for a description of the exhibits filed as part of this report.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC (Registrant)

	By:	/s/ Thomas N. Hund
		Thomas N. Hund Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (On behalf of the Registrant and as principal financial officer)

Date: May 4, 2012

S-1

Table of Contents

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC and SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit Index



		Incorporated by Reference (if applicable)
	Exhibit Number and Description	Form	File Date	File No.	Exhibit

3.1	Certificate of Formation dated November 2, 2009.	8-K	2/16/2010	001-11535	3.1

3.2	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, dated as of February 12, 2010.	8-K	2/16/2010	001-11535	3.2

3.3	Written Consent of sole member of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, dated April 8, 2010, amending and restating certain sections of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC dated as of February 12, 2010.	8-K	4/14/2010	001-11535	3.2

4.1	Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 2, 2012, to Indenture dated as of December 1, 1995, between Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee.	8-K	3/2/2012	001-11535	4.1

4.2	Certificate of Determination as to the terms of BNSF’s 3.05% Debentures due March 15, 2022 and 4.40% Debentures due March 15, 2042.	8-K	3/2/2012	001-11535	4.2

12.1	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.*

31.1	Principal Executive Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

31.2	Principal Financial Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).*

E-1

Table of Contents



		Incorporated by Reference(if applicable)
	Exhibit Number and Description	Form	File Date	File No.	Exhibit
101	eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) documents submitted electronically: 101.INS - XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL - XBRL Extension Calculation Linkable Document 101.DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkable Document 101.LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase 101.PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document The following unaudited information from Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL includes: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as of March 31, 2012, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. *

Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and of its subsidiaries, involving a total

amount of indebtedness not in excess of 10 percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis,

have not been filed as exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.

__________________

* Filed herewith

E-2

Attached files

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC Reports

Also read